Syomin: If Zhirinovsky is right, then the conflicts in Syria and Ukraine are only poorly concealed preparations for war

111

Vladimir Zhirinovsky believes that the state of international relations is now approaching war. According to the leader of the Liberal Democratic Party, "without a war, it will not be possible to get out of the deadlock into which the world was brought by the financial crisis, the pandemic and the ecological crisis."

These statements by Vladimir Zhirinovsky are used by Konstantin Semin as a kind of means for analyzing the international situation in the plot of his author's program "Agitprop".



The journalist points out what rhetoric has recently become defining in the communication of the leaders of nuclear states, recalling how Joe Biden allowed himself to call Russian President Vladimir Putin the "killer".
Semin, using the title of a famous film in Soviet cinema, defines the 78-year-old Biden's statements as "The old robbers."

Konstantin Semin notes:

If Zhirinovsky is right, then the conflicts in Syria, Ukraine and elsewhere are only poorly concealed preparations for war.

The plot provides data on the growing number of military maneuvers, on the transfer of heavy equipment of the Armed Forces of Ukraine to the Donbass, on the activation of American troops in Eastern Europe.

Reasoning and conclusions of Konstantin Semin about the situation in the world today:

  • Facebook / US Army
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

111 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    22 March 2021 11: 12
    I agree, I once wrote here that the Yankees are eager to push the non-brothers on us and weaken any sanctions, SP2 will definitely not be allowed to complete the construction, although they understand that events may develop and not according to their scenario, but the situation is dangerous.
    1. +29
      22 March 2021 11: 31
      Syomin: If Zhirinovsky is right, then the conflicts in Syria and Ukraine are only poorly concealed preparations for war

      Unfortunately, Vladimir Volfovich, in his analysis of current events and conclusions from them, often turned out to be right, correctly placing accents.
      1. +35
        22 March 2021 12: 11
        Only the blind and naive does not see and does not understand that now the whole world is preparing TMV with Russia.
        USA, as during the preparation and conduct of WWII, going to fight again in Europe and the Pacific by someone else's hands and on someone else's territory - and exclusively in their favor!
        Simply put, the United States again wants to enter paradise as a result of a new war on someone else's hump!
        1. -2
          22 March 2021 12: 53
          Quote: Tatiana
          Only the blind and naive does not see and does not understand that now the whole world is preparing TMV with Russia.

          It seems that the expectation of a war with America has turned into a modern version of an apocalyptic destructive sect, others are waiting for the second coming. People stubbornly ignore the elephant in the room - that it is impossible to win a nuclear war, and no one doubts it - but they see signs in anything and as long as they want.
          1. +9
            22 March 2021 13: 05
            Quote: military_cat
            It seems that the expectation of a war with America has turned into a modern version of an apocalyptic destructive sect, others are waiting for the second coming. People stubbornly ignore the elephant in the room - that it is impossible to win a nuclear war, and no one doubts it - but they see signs in anything and as long as they want.
            Unfortunately, this is what you think of yesterday! Namely.

            Check out the new US, Pentagon and NATO strategy in a new war!
            They do not share your REALITIES at all!

            Moreover. To start a war, it is enough to have one crazy US president in the person of, for example, the same Joe Biden!
            Or, for example, it is enough for some ordinary idiot in a state of drug intoxication to make a technical mistake when launching an appropriate rocket.
            And that's it! What is there not to understand?
            There is an arms race all over the world, and diplomatic relations with the Russian Federation between the US and NATO countries are torn! It is ridiculous to count on some kind of local war when the question is about US hegemony.
            1. -4
              22 March 2021 15: 08
              Quote: Tatiana
              Quote: military_cat
              It seems that the expectation of a war with America has turned into a modern version of an apocalyptic destructive sect, others are waiting for the second coming. People stubbornly ignore the elephant in the room - that it is impossible to win a nuclear war, and no one doubts it - but they see signs in anything and as long as they want.
              Unfortunately, this is what you think of yesterday! Namely.

              Check out the new US, Pentagon and NATO strategy in a new war!
              They do not share your REALITIES at all!

              Moreover. To start a war, it is enough to have one crazy US president in the person of, for example, the same Joe Biden!
              Or, for example, it is enough for some ordinary idiot in a state of drug intoxication to make a technical mistake when launching an appropriate rocket.
              And that's it! What is there not to understand?
              There is an arms race all over the world, and diplomatic relations with the Russian Federation between the US and NATO countries are torn! It is ridiculous to count on some kind of local war when the question is about US hegemony.

              You won't let a fool of a rocket from the ship ....... Through the GKP-he and the Americans have
            2. +2
              23 March 2021 12: 34
              Check out the new US, Pentagon and NATO strategy in a new war!
              They do not share your REALITIES at all!
              they constantly rewrite it, paper will endure, and it’s their job to invent such a thing.
              There is an arms race around the world

              this is not a race, planned modernization, and even the big powers do not allow "with a scratch" finances. The world rested on the laurels of the winner of communism for too long and relaxed, and behind the noise of fun they did not notice how degradation and decline came.
            3. +1
              26 March 2021 11: 09
              The missiles will immediately fly to the FSA and you won't be able to get rid of someone else's hump! am stop
          2. 0
            22 March 2021 20: 39
            We do not have enough nuclear warheads to incinerate the United States and its allies. And in the case of the first strike, there will be even less of them.
            1. +3
              23 March 2021 06: 25
              Enough for everyone, don't worry. In Europe, you don't need much.
              1. 0
                23 March 2021 07: 08
                So the United States spat on Europe and it is not so small, it is four million square kilometers, for the complete destruction of Europe, our nuclear weapons are not enough.
                1. 0
                  25 March 2021 06: 52
                  For most, it will be enough just one gift at a time, for full awareness of the situation and bringing to life. For the dull - with repetition. The same Germany, - less in territory than our Komi. A small area is more of a problem.
                  1. 0
                    25 March 2021 10: 58
                    Germany's problems are not US problems. Even if that is completely lowered into the Stone Age. They have been under occupation since 1945. And one should not confuse the awareness of ordinary people and those in power. The latter will survive all the consequences without problems.
                  2. 0
                    April 30 2021 07: 30
                    The real preparation will begin when the children of officials from London are urgently drawn to Australia. But most likely they will not be allowed to leave. They will freeze crossings under the pretext of quarantine, for example.
                    Oh. Oyoyoy
                2. 0
                  25 March 2021 09: 48
                  Why incinerate? It is enough to destroy the production infrastructure. Further, the inevitable degradation to some level there. Certainly there will be some kind of high-tech enclaves with preserved production. They will serve as centers of crystallization of new slave owners.
                  1. 0
                    25 March 2021 11: 08
                    Will not work. Only part of the production and military potential may be affected. To do what you say, several thousand nuclear warheads need to be dropped on the US territory alone, we have only 1400 of them. And not all will be intact for a retaliatory strike if the first strike is struck at us.
                    1. +1
                      25 March 2021 12: 26
                      You are a little off topic, sorry for being straightforward. It is not required to drop "products" directly on industrial facilities and cities. For example, if you drop a couple of "products" in the middle reaches of the Mississippi, then the wave will wash away all dams and all towns with cities and come to the Bay and New Orleans, too. Most of the US industry is located on the coast (climate, logistics, etc.). Further more. The product will arrive, explode a kilometer from the coast, at an altitude of 50-100 meters. And the wave and all the delights of a shock wave, a light wave, radioactive contamination.
                      1. +1
                        25 March 2021 17: 24
                        In Cheroshima, the river wave washed away nothing.
                      2. KLV
                        0
                        28 March 2021 09: 30
                        What is "Heroshima"?
                      3. 0
                        25 March 2021 17: 34
                        Many are too convinced that a major war over the presence of nuclear weapons is impossible. Theoretically, yes, but this weapon must have a certain supply of stock that guarantees the impossibility of the further existence of a potential enemy, otherwise it is not a guarantee. Now our stock is sufficient for a maximum of several European countries.
                3. 0
                  26 March 2021 11: 22
                  One nuclear charge of 3 megatons will cover the whole of Europe with radiation, 100 charges will be enough to forget it for a long time 300 charges nuclear winter for three years approximately on the entire planet, come back to earth !!!
                  1. +1
                    26 March 2021 12: 24
                    But no. And yes I have always been on earth.
            2. 0
              24 March 2021 06: 03
              They don't have either
              1. 0
                24 March 2021 07: 28
                They dont have. But there are 320 million people in the United States itself, half a billion in allies in Europe. Developed high-tech industry and a bunch of different puppets or countries who want to chop off a piece of our territory, which are also under their influence. There is the possibility of delivering a first strike from their territory so that the response also flew there in the first place. There has never been such a balance of forces not in our favor in history!
                1. 0
                  24 March 2021 08: 52
                  So you are sure that Asia and Africa will stand aside? Will NATO move eastward in unison?
                  1. +1
                    24 March 2021 12: 28
                    I have no idea what Africa and Asia will be doing at this moment. And that's not the point.
          3. 0
            25 March 2021 09: 45
            It seems that the expectation of a war with America has turned into a modern version of an apocalyptic destructive sect, others are waiting for the second coming. People stubbornly ignore the elephant in the room - that it is impossible to win a nuclear war, and no one doubts it - but they see signs in anything and as long as they want.
            And you compare the intensity of hysteria in Europe in the 30s of the 20th century with the present. And a lot will become clear to you. Of course the chimney is lower and the smoke is thinner. In a nuclear war, you can win: 1. Preventive destruction of the enemy's nuclear forces (carriers, mines). No one canceled sabotage and betrayal, takeover of control. 2. The oligarchs will surrender the Russian Federation by organizing a military coup. Is it unrealistic? Look at 1991 in the USSR. The army was ordered, it did not defend the USSR. All. EVERYONE broke the oath. Unrealistic? Now it's even easier to buy the military. I am sure the work has been going on for a long time and persistently.
        2. +1
          23 March 2021 15: 53
          Quote: Tatiana
          enter paradise for someone else's hump

          What, what, let alone heaven we will not give them laughing We have already been promised it, but "they will just die." It remains to believe in consistency, and therefore in "a blow to the centers of decision-making."
      2. +4
        23 March 2021 09: 33
        Unfortunately, Vladimir Volfovich ... often turned out to be right.

        Unfortunately, this is true and very big truth ... The Anglo-Saxons are preparing for a war with Russia. And the reason for the war is China, which the Anglo-Saxons cannot cope with without destroying, without defeating Russia, which is covering China from the north.
        China has always perfectly defended itself from the south and east and was vulnerable from the north, so it built the Great Wall of China. Now Russia is playing the role of this wall. Having destroyed Russia, the Anglo-Saxons, the Yankees will cope with China without any problems from the north.
        How I would like Zhirinovsky to be mistaken. But, unfortunately, as a rule, he is not mistaken ..
        1. +3
          23 March 2021 09: 37
          Quote: The Truth
          Unfortunately, Vladimir Volfovich ... often turned out to be right.

          Unfortunately, this is true and very big truth ... The Anglo-Saxons are preparing for a war with Russia. And the reason for the war is China, which the Anglo-Saxons cannot cope with without destroying, without defeating Russia, which is covering China from the north.
          China has always perfectly defended itself from the south and east and was vulnerable from the north, so it built the Great Wall of China. Now Russia is playing the role of this wall. Having destroyed Russia, the Anglo-Saxons, the Yankees will cope with China without any problems from the north.
          How I would like Zhirinovsky to be mistaken. But, unfortunately, as a rule, he is not mistaken ..


          Well ... Then - "back to back", the RF Armed Forces and the PLA ...

    2. 0
      23 March 2021 01: 36
      But I'm wondering how the faithful communist Semin's family lives in full force in the United States, which he hates? Kik tick then? And what shishi? This alone raises questions about the nonsense of this character, for who is this pots Gaponenko working for?
      1. +1
        23 March 2021 07: 05
        He himself studied in the United States under the journalism program. So believe it is not worth supporting.
      2. +1
        23 March 2021 15: 59
        HZ. He's dim, like all media characters. Anyone who speaks on more or less serious topics is admitted one way or another. At one time he was good friends with the authorities, by the way, his film "Anatomy of Betrayal" is very good. I recognized him from this film. And only then his ambiguous past. I wonder how he and the authorities parted ways? While he was "in the cage" - nothing surprising, there all have plus or minus the same thing: who is the thread and what is the thread in the West.
      3. 0
        27 March 2021 13: 25
        Let me explain. Semin is not a communist - he is a Marxist internationalist! He believes that in all countries of the world there should be a more equitable distribution of the final product corresponding to the real contribution of each person to social production. And it doesn't matter in what family, in what clan you were born and to what people, nation you belong, in what country of the world you live ... You, a WORKER, should have equal access to the property, educational, and spiritual benefits of society. And BEZDELNIK (even if it is the son of Rockefeller or Putin) cannot have HIS car if he did not earn it by OWN labor! Since the situation for workers everywhere is a shitty difference where to live - no ...
    3. -3
      23 March 2021 09: 09
      , SP2 will definitely not be allowed to complete the construction, although they understand that the events
      From the joint venture, even if 2 (two) your erection will not increase ... but the food in the refrigerator will not increase, will you take the machine in your hands, if that ... soldier
      1. +1
        23 March 2021 20: 36
        Do not worry about completing it! So far, the GDP has nothing to say with words, and the Europian, headed by Germashka, oh, how interested in SP-2 .. We invested 5 billion, they 16 billion and the lost profit will still be counted .. But then the Arctic fox will come without gas to the Ukrainushka, then the reverse is immediately copper the basin will cover ..
  2. +2
    22 March 2021 11: 15
    It's been 2 years since the end of WW75.
    Yes, today a new world war is rapidly brewing. The United States is losing world domination, the PRC is becoming the most powerful force in the world, Europe is revolting, Russia is trying to regain its positions lost after the collapse of the USSR.
    Interestingly, the state. rearmament programs in many countries around the world end in 2027. Is this the year of the beginning of the war?
    1. -6
      22 March 2021 11: 37
      Quote: El Dorado
      Russia is trying to regain positions lost after the collapse of the USSR

      ambition is worthless in an archaic industry and inefficient economy.
      we have fallen so deeply in terms of production that we are approaching the level of RI, which placed half of the orders abroad. In comparison with the USSR, the economic strength of the Russian Federation barely pulls by 1/4, and then only due to the trade in resources, and in comparison with production, the difference is already 8-10 times.
      1. +4
        22 March 2021 11: 43
        Have you invented the numbers now? Do you want to compare the population and territories of the Russian Federation and the USSR?
        1. +7
          22 March 2021 12: 10
          Quote: Mitroha
          Have you invented the numbers now? Do you want to compare the population and territories of the Russian Federation and the USSR?

          And who cares about other people's problems? If you want a place, if you please match, everything else is an excuse. Something the same Germany with a smaller population gives better performance, why would it?
        2. +1
          22 March 2021 12: 46
          no, I didn’t make it up, I have been working in manufacturing plants all my life.
          Yes, the territories and population are different, but if you look closely at what contribution they made to the USSR, then it is quite possible to compare. Let us recall the subsidized republics (Tribaltika, Ukraine, Georgia) and simply exclude them from consideration. Apart from the diversification of production, they did not give anything, rather they took it away. Some of the republics were almost entirely agricultural or resource-based. They can also be ignored. And it turns out that in fact, Kazakhstan and Belarus just split off, this affected the volumes. And the rest is practically nonexistent. Diversification suffered much more seriously, but not so much in terms of GDP as in the adaptability of production.
          and the last thing. According to recent statistics, about 80 thousand large enterprises have been closed in the RSFSR.
          New ones appear, but smaller and often just as cheerfully close.
          one can hint at automation and technological progress, but these are just words. Even this does not correct the situation in any way. Automation often comes down to a couple of machines and office accounting.
          1. +3
            22 March 2021 15: 46
            Quote: yehat2
            Let us recall the subsidized republics (Tribaltika, Ukraine, Georgia) and simply exclude them from consideration.

            Yes you are a genius of statistics negative Is Ukraine subsidized? You are healthy?
            Quote: yehat2
            And it turns out that in fact, Kazakhstan and Belarus only split off, this affected the volumes.

            And the granary of the USSR, Ukraine, with its production and agricultural capacities, where did they go? You wrapped herring there or what?
            1. +6
              22 March 2021 16: 40
              Quote: Mitroha
              Are you a genius of statistics Ukraine subsidized? You are healthy?

              well, read the reports of the USSR, you will find out
              For many years, Ukraine's GDP was less than transfers from the union budget to support it.
              this means that it was subsidized.
              For example

              when analyzing the Ukrainian economy, they like to "forget" about investments, reducing everything to GDP. For many years, simply hellish sums were invested in this republic. Is that Georgia can boast of great attention - they invested in it in proportions generally 1 to 3 or even 5.
              Apart from the RSFSR, donors were often also Kazakhstan and Belarus.
              1. +1
                23 March 2021 03: 34
                At the expense of Ukraine, you got excited, take at least the Dnepropetrovsk region, there are military-industrial complex plants like fleas on a dog, mines, the Novomoskovsk pipe plant, which cost, Zaporozhye, Nikolaev, Kharkov. Are you out of your mind when you say that Ukraine is a subsidized republic? Every 5-10 km, there are collective farms, cowsheds, pigsties, agricultural fields.
                1. +5
                  23 March 2021 07: 49
                  Quote: Sirocco
                  Are you out of your mind when you say that Ukraine is a subsidized republic? Every 5-10 km, there are collective farms, cowsheds, pigsties, agricultural fields.

                  here again the same song. "we produced a lot"
                  yes, Ukraine produced a lot. And she consumed almost everything herself. And what went into the general trade turnover was much inferior to the investments that the union invested in Ukraine every year, just trying to form a powerful production.
                  1. -1
                    24 March 2021 08: 59
                    Food products from Ukraine went all over the Union. Cooperation existed in the USSR and Ukraine was built into the production chain. Interestingly, an aircraft carrier or a frigate made by Nikolaev was consumed by Ukraine or the Soviet fleet?))
                    1. +2
                      24 March 2021 09: 21
                      Quote: Kiev
                      Food products from Ukraine went all over the Union.

                      how is it? here they rightly ask, if they walked everywhere, then why did no one see them anywhere, except perhaps the MSC?
                      1. 0
                        24 March 2021 13: 17
                        The funny thing is that in Ukraine itself, these products were not seen by everyone. Because the nomenklatura and the party, the military, various scientific cities, generously poured themselves on special rations. The union had a state reserve, assistance to fraternal countries and starving people. They saw it all there.
                2. 0
                  26 March 2021 11: 04
                  Ukraine is large and heterogeneous. Most of the industry is the most Russian regions: Kharkov, Donetsk-Kryvyi Rih basin and the Black Sea region. Well, Kiev, but it is more of an administrative center.
                  But Western Ukraine was clearly devouring subsidies. Even for food - in the west there is little land and a lot of population (in Galicia).
                  In addition, this region, like the Baltic states, was disloyal, so they tried to "placate" it with the best supplies. It turned out badly. Perhaps it would be better to return this region to the Poles after the war - let them figure it out.
              2. +4
                23 March 2021 15: 48
                Once they threw this sign in the newspaper and, according to the principle, "if a person is told 1000 times that he is a pig, he grunts at 1001," she began to surf the Internet. Do you have any questions for her? I'm having this.
                1) In the USSR, the GDP indicator was not used.
                2) The currency of the USSR is not the dollar.
          2. -1
            23 March 2021 16: 05
            I agree absolutely. I won't say about the big economy, but about automation and progress - to the point. Something serious can be afforded by the giants. Everyone who works in production can see it. Everything is lame. A lot of factories are just called that, in fact they assemble kits from China, finish something of their own and sell them.
          3. +1
            23 March 2021 20: 40
            According to recent statistics, about 80 thousand large enterprises have been closed in the RSFSR.


            In the best years there were no more than 25 tons of them, you at least look at the reference books lol
          4. 0
            24 March 2021 06: 12
            The fact of the matter is that the enterprise is mainly economists and managers. A lot of managers and at best 1/4 are workers, moreover, qualified
      2. -2
        22 March 2021 16: 12
        Quote: yehat2
        In comparison with the USSR, the economic strength of the Russian Federation barely pulls by 1/4, and then only due to the trade in resources, and in comparison with production, the difference is already 8-10 times.

        What does the USSR have to do with it, if we compare the Russian Federation with the RSFSR .....
    2. +10
      22 March 2021 11: 37
      Quote: El Dorado
      Interestingly, the state. rearmament programs in many countries around the world end in 2027. Is this the year of the beginning of the war?

      request Who will pull to the final?
      The USSR before the Second World War, planned to complete the program of rearmament and reform of the army by 1943, but was not given.
      The war was started by the one who was the most aggressive and ready.
      1. 0
        22 March 2021 11: 58
        When did Japan end its program of creating an ocean-going battleship fleet? In 1904.
        And in what year did she attack Port Arthur, huh?
        1. +4
          22 March 2021 12: 01
          Quote: El Dorado
          When did Japan end its program of creating an ocean-going battleship fleet? In 1904.
          And in what year did she attack Port Arthur, huh?

          With the same success it could have attacked in 1905-06-07 ... After all, tsarist Russia would still be inferior in the power and capabilities of the fleet.
          1. +1
            22 March 2021 12: 07
            But not earlier than this date.
            1. +1
              22 March 2021 12: 10
              Quote: El Dorado
              But not earlier than this date.


              Ну recourse ... you are just Captain Obvious Yes I am amazed at your sagacity Yes

              Quote: Insurgent
              The war was started by the one who was the most aggressive and ready.
      2. 0
        22 March 2021 12: 50
        Quote: Insurgent
        USSR before the Second World War, the program of rearmament and reform of the army was planned to be completed by 1943

        for the first time I hear about such plans.
        most of the immediate plans for rearmament and reorganization were drawn up by 42, by 43, they basically planned to solve organizational issues and training of the army (reorganization of mechanized units and aviation).
        1. +4
          22 March 2021 12: 54
          Quote: yehat2
          Quote: Insurgent
          USSR before the Second World War, the program of rearmament and reform of the army was planned to be completed by 1943

          for the first time I hear about such plans.
          most of the immediate plans for rearmament and reorganization were drawn up by 42, by 43, they mainly planned to solve organizational issues and training of the army (reorganization of mechanized units and aviation).


          "Reorganization of mechanized units and aviation"Is this not an element of military reform?
          1. 0
            22 March 2021 12: 54
            yes, but this is no longer rearmament
            1. 0
              22 March 2021 12: 57
              Quote: yehat2
              yes, but this is no longer rearmament


              Don't take it out of context, I wrote about:

              Quote: Insurgent
              USSR before the Second World War, rearmament program и reforming the army planned to be completed by 1943, but was not given.
              1. 0
                22 March 2021 13: 04
                I just do not understand how it was possible to draw up such plans, if already in 39 it was obvious that the war would begin in 41-42. What was the point in that? There are also speeches by Stalin, who says there that you need to hurry. Probably, some plans existed by 43, but already in 40 the country was clearly oriented towards preparations for the summer of 42.
                That is why, for example, they rushed to release the raw T-34, which was brought to mind (conditional) only by the year 43, so fighters were massively delivered to the border aviation units, on which they were just beginning to learn to fly.
                As for the mechanized corps, the reorganization by 43 was planned because they made very wrong conclusions from the events of 39-40, and by the end of the summer of 40 it became obvious that the structure was clearly unbalanced. Those. this date is forced on a residual basis, and not planned.
                1. +3
                  22 March 2021 13: 16
                  Quote: yehat2
                  I just do not understand how it was possible to draw up such plans, if already in 39 it was obvious that the war would begin in 41-42. What was the point in that?

                  To understand, you need to imagine the Stalinist pace of development of the USSR in all spheres, in order to realize that the program calculated before 1943 could have been completed earlier.
                  And so, in 1941, we were "knocked out" practically "on takeoff" at the most, as they say, inopportune moment.
                  1. +2
                    22 March 2021 13: 22
                    Quote: Insurgent
                    And so, in 1941, we were "knocked out" practically "on takeoff" at the most, as they say, inopportune moment.

                    well, not quite. the army in 1936 was 1.6-1.8 million, in 1940 it was already almost 4.
                    managed to do something.
                    1. +2
                      22 March 2021 13: 31
                      Quote: yehat2
                      managed to do something


                      Well you are stubborn Yes ... "Something", is that all?

                      I am writing about the fact that the Red Army began the DB during the period of incomplete rearmament and reforms, but you are inserting the same facts, but it is not clear why request

                      In the end, what did you want to say at all?
                      1. +2
                        22 March 2021 13: 39
                        Quote: Insurgent
                        the start of the database during the period of incomplete rearmament

                        Can you name at least one period of "completed rearmament" ???
                      2. +3
                        22 March 2021 13: 41
                        Quote: yehat2
                        Can you name at least one period of "completed rearmament" ???

                        Please - Germany in both WW ... In addition, we are talking not only about weapons, but also technological and industrial power.
                      3. +1
                        22 March 2021 13: 51
                        Quote: Insurgent
                        Please - Germany in both MVs ...


                        oh, okay! let's look at June 22, 41.
                        they attacked the USSR, for example, with only about 400 new T4s.
                        m3h new, and the scandal over the lengthening of the gun
                        stugIII - new
                        The Czech-38t is also actually new.
                        bf-109f is also new.
                        u-88 with a new wing
                        me-110e - new
                        At the same time, some of the German pilots continue to fly on whatnots like the He-51
                        and the Italian units are also partially armed with biplanes.
                        in 41, the Germans had 37mm - the main anti-tank gun
                        at 42 there is already a very significant support for 50-76 mm barrels.
                        transport - all trophy trucks.
                        you can go on and on.

                        Is this called a complete rearmament?
  3. +4
    22 March 2021 11: 16
    Yesterday I watched this issue. They threw it off for me on vatsap ... In the program, the main message is not that there will be a war or not. The main thing is that the communists and the USSR are again to blame for everything in power, as well as the fact that the authorities are trying to distract the people from internal problems.
    1. +1
      22 March 2021 11: 58
      Quote: Arlen
      in power again the communists and the USSR are to blame,

      The old whining is nothing! hi
      The Pechenegs and the Polovtsians are far away, we need to invent myths. There were 2 countries in the world that had a full cycle of swarming aircraft - the USA and the USSR. Where is the role of the Russian Federation in this now! Jet is a national pride laughing 80% imported
      1. +1
        22 March 2021 21: 09
        Quote: Silvestr
        There were 2 countries in the world that had a full cycle of swarming aircraft - the USA and the USSR

        The United States, it seems, also collects components from all over the world for aircraft.
  4. 0
    22 March 2021 11: 17
    Fat.Oracle ... s
  5. +5
    22 March 2021 11: 20
    Syomin: If Zhirinovsky is right, then the conflicts in Syria and Ukraine are only poorly concealed preparations for war

    VVZH often hits the spot.
    1. -5
      22 March 2021 11: 25
      Quote: rocket757
      VVZH often hits the spot.

      What they say to him .. that is broadcasting.
      1. +4
        22 March 2021 11: 33
        So it gets to the point, the one who says ... is not one fig.
  6. 0
    22 March 2021 11: 24
    Yes, the video was fire. I watched and sweat with a hat. Kostya burns with napalm at the ulcers of capitalism.
    Those in power are not preparing anything else for us, only blood and poverty.
  7. 0
    22 March 2021 11: 53
    And without Zhirinovsky, it is clear that an agreement on Donbass will not work. But the outcome of this war is not clear.
  8. -1
    22 March 2021 11: 55
    Quote: Mitroha
    Do you want to compare the population and territories of the Russian Federation and the USSR?

    You compare the economy, not the number of mouths and kilometers! ECONOMY! - It determines the outcome of any war
  9. +5
    22 March 2021 11: 57
    I agree with those who argued the following, if the USSR had not been sold, then in five years the West would have collapsed.
    Now the situation is similar. As J. Kedmi said, the United States has three years left. Either they break Russia or the United States, at least, will cease to be a "hegemon."
    More and more people are getting involved in conflicts. The decision-makers, alas, do not understand what the growing tension can lead to and correctly calculate the consequences.
  10. 0
    22 March 2021 12: 55
    Do not understand why "hidden", and even "bad"? If only Zhirinovsky is right, then it should have been said "well hidden." The Skabeevs do not say anything about this, which means it does not exist.
  11. -2
    22 March 2021 20: 00
    Yes, there will be no war between the United States and Russia, there will be no hot war, cold, economic - yes, hot - no. And it will not be due to the fact that Russia is guaranteed to arrive both in the United States and in Europe. And the Americans and Europeans will have to fight directly. All the hysteria and the escalation of troops only so that Russia does not interfere in another war. But another war is planned and the United States actually has no choice - either the war or the fate of the USSR. This is a US / China war. And here the United States has many advantages. The entire infrastructure of China is off the coast - you can freely strike from the sea. The missiles will fly from China to the United States across the Pacific Ocean, and the main missile defense system of the Americans on destroyers can repel, especially since China does not have such an impressive and high-quality arsenal as that of Russia. The United States will not be alone at sea, the allies are Japan, Taiwan and Australia. And there is no need to land troops - they will just bomb until China surrenders. And when China is bombed, Russia itself will fall - there will be no more impressive support. Therefore, there is only one hope - that China, with the support of Russia, will withstand or inflict such damage on the United States that there will be no winners in this war.
    1. +1
      22 March 2021 21: 13
      Quote: HBG_Belarus
      But another war is planned and the United States actually has no choice - either the war or the fate of the USSR. This is a US / China war.

      what kind of game? For China, the United States is the main trading partner.
      1. 0
        22 March 2021 21: 25
        England and Germany also traded well before the 1st World War - so what?
        1. 0
          23 March 2021 08: 18
          The USSR traded well with the fascist Gkrmania, even after the attack, trains went for a week, and, surprisingly, after 3 days after the attack, the Germans were paying for the supplies.
          1. -1
            23 March 2021 10: 23
            Quote: nznz
            The USSR traded well with the fascist Gkrmania, even after the attack, trains went for a week, and, surprisingly, after 3 days after the attack, the Germans were paying for the supplies.

            What kind of game? Forgive me, what should I be to say something like that?
            Echelons are not cars; they cannot turn around halfway before reaching the station. And as I remember (very vaguely), the deliveries were made to repay the loan issued by Germany to the USSR.
            1. 0
              24 March 2021 12: 55
              boorishly write. But I will forgive you. Just that I read a huge work by William Shearer, he was often quoted in a film that was banned on YouTube, so this is where I can name a page. Moreover, the sanctity of deliveries to Germany was noted by the Germans themselves, who literally received grain to the last and the contracts were carried out to the end. This was a consequence of Stalin's fears - he did not want to give the slightest reason for war. in other words, I just stress that the USSR fulfilled its obligations literally to the last. This is also noted in Shirerea (p. 900, it seems) and even described as a passenger train on the night of June 21-22 Moscow-Berlin, when the troops had already moved to the USSR border passed through the border without problems. As for the payment by the Germans for supplies, 3 days after the outbreak of hostilities, I met this and how I will find, I will give a source. I admit that the banking systems are not as operative as today and payments took place with some period when they were already sent, but had not yet arrived and it is no longer possible to stop them. Moreover, they probably went through intermediaries. I think no one knew about the beginning of the war except a narrow circle of the military. Perhaps these insignificant amounts simply did not stop. So as not to warn the enemy about aggression. I’ll give you, but I definitely did. And you don’t have to shout like that and be indignant. I am a patriot and I love my Motherland.
            2. 0
              24 March 2021 13: 09
              found interesting data. They indirectly confirm the inertia of the system, well, for example, the processes of customs clearance of goods that went through other countries led to this, and after the start of the war they took place. https://historicalmemory.ru/2017/07/03/Soviet-German-trade-in-pervo/
      2. 0
        23 March 2021 08: 16
        in the light of the recent disaster in the negotiations in Alaska, it is obvious that partnership in trade is already acquiring the character of a thief, irreconcilable. I am delighted with China - to respond with real EU sanctions and amer - well, well done. Such are afraid. And we all call them partners, while they officially call us enemies number 1 and number 2. If the Americans are afraid (Kissinger) of the alliance of the Russian Federation and China against them - this means that on this segment you need to connect efforts. It sounded from Lavrov - the rejection of SWIFT is ripe, there is a MIR system, ATMs in the EU accept a card, it's time to give up dollars. The fact that he will soon and truly collapse is not a fantasy of Khazin ... a guessing man. We must be prepared.
    2. 0
      23 March 2021 14: 51
      China is the economic symbiont of the United States. Total war between them is out of the question. Trillions of dollars of American TNCs are invested in China, and, accordingly, on the contrary, from Chinese investors in the United States, when assets are requisitioned, everyone will lose, and no one will acquire. It makes sense for the American kaganate to put pressure on the Chinese partner, but there is no point in destroying him - this is a shot not even in the leg, but in the stomach. The only thing that is theoretically possible for the US / FRS is to carry out a classical bourgeois revolution in Beijing by the forces of "communist" businessmen-shape-shifters, according to the guidelines for the collapse of the USSR, but at the pace of China's economic development, this will not work, the Chinese value the restored ZhongGuo Empire too much, just now restored to full growth. Therefore, the United States needs to weaken the economic power of China, first of all, by cutting it off from 3 markets by military means, and then tightly tie it to a market where the rules are set by American TNCs, exclusively as a service partner who is not allowed to have "more than". Peripheral wars with China on the territory of 3 countries, proxy wars - yes, they are possible. The bombing of Chinese ports / factories in Mainland China is out of the question.
      1. 0
        23 March 2021 15: 08
        However, there is one caveat. Degenerative inadequacies like Harris, Pelosi and the like are capable of anything. These do not really know how to do anything, but they can break everything - in hysterics - including their own neck.
    3. 0
      24 March 2021 06: 25
      That is why there is a clear, indicative rapprochement between China and Russia, plus Iran and the Indians want to pull up.
  12. +3
    22 March 2021 20: 12
    Yok makaryok! .. what
    And I so hoped to live to see a stroke! ...
    Here is on you! Get a tractor village.
    Maybe something else will cost? Well, please ... feel
  13. 0
    22 March 2021 21: 01
    Zhirinovsky is right! Russia has been living without war for 75 years (on its territory), this is too much ...
    There were no such peaceful periods in Russian history ...
    1. +4
      22 March 2021 22: 01
      So let's drink to the fact that for another 350 years the war bypasses this God-pleasing state! ..
    2. 0
      23 March 2021 15: 01
      A good reason to erect a collective monument in the style of the "1000th anniversary of Russia" with the figures of Stalin, Beria, Kurchatov, Soviet scientists and German specialists, as well as the executed Rosenberg couple. "For the first time in history, Russia was able to ensure its security for decades to come" ("The USSR is under siege", ed. 2010)
  14. +3
    22 March 2021 22: 18
    Milosevic, Hussein, Gaddafi, Assad were named the "killer" ... as a pretext for the invasion.
    1. 0
      23 March 2021 08: 12
      it is a black mark for an unwanted leader. The question is about the destruction of Putin, yet they understand that all foreign policy and defense are based on him. I think Putin has foreseen this too. There is a replacement who will ask from America. therefore, the words of the canned star must be taken as a threat. Russia pay, Putin will pay. He does not think that they will ask him. And they will ask America.
  15. 0
    23 March 2021 08: 09
    I think this is unlikely. Against the background of NATO's obvious failures in the above regions, what can they hope for in a serious war? By vopuzhny the same thing, until they have something that will definitely cause them big trouble. What did the European and American aggressors always count on? For surprise and impunity.
    Neither one nor the other will work. And the point is not even that the Russian Federation has a means of detection allowing to track launches, etc. The very area of ​​the Russian Federation protects against defeat. No one knows how many Russian Railways trains are already surfing the country from Kushka to Vladik, no one knows how many tractors daily ICBMs are dragging along the roads .. well, at least 10 will remain and will not reach the Malr aggressor. And the boats? But you never know what else, up to the Sakharov charges, no one knows about it. the fanatic will press. And this is probably all that he will have time. Then he will watch from the bunker as his country disappears. And the Russian Federation will not be flooded, not burned. Who will remain and take revenge.
  16. 0
    23 March 2021 12: 26
    Zhirinovsky is disingenuous, the West has always tried to bring Russia to its knees, even during the time of the tsars, even during the times of the USSR. And the "guarantor" .... "I should drink honey with your lips"
  17. +1
    23 March 2021 12: 29
    Quote: Tatiana
    Only the blind and naive does not see and does not understand that now the whole world is preparing TMV with Russia.

    It never stopped.
    Another thing is that the West has no strength yet.
    Thank God in due time not all missiles were cut and not all plutonium was distributed.
  18. +2
    24 March 2021 13: 57
    Zhirinovsky is the captain Obvious ... Here only the blind will not see where the Yankees are leading. However, what is surprising? The United States has already twice found itself in such a situation, in both cases it unleashed a world massacre. In both cases, they came out with a big plus.
  19. +17
    25 March 2021 15: 08
    the conflicts in Syria and Ukraine are only poorly concealed preparations for war

    In the West, no one is hiding their preparations for a war with Russia. All their aspirations are directed against Russia.
  20. 0
    25 March 2021 19: 34
    Nothing will happen. Old people won't understand. The topic is in the youth of any of the top ten countries.
  21. 0
    27 March 2021 10: 52
    It turns out that when Britain was transporting rifles and pounds to Central Asia to the Basmachs, she was preparing for war with the USSR? No, I just crap ...
  22. 0
    27 March 2021 19: 37
    If war is not avoided, then it is necessary to fight with fury, the scary thing is that from the first minute of the war there will be traitors who will sell Russia with all the secrets with patrons and these people are shouting about patriotism today and their families have long been in America and England and they themselves are in good positions here Unfortunately
  23. 0
    28 March 2021 08: 31
    We need to answer one question: does the tightrope walker want to, balancing on a rope suspended high above the ground, to fall down and crash to death? Or will he still want to walk the tightrope to the opposite side, fighting against the gusts of wind, fearing to lose his balance, and at the same time getting thunderous applause? In my opinion, the modern world can be compared with this tightrope walker.
  24. 0
    29 March 2021 09: 45
    Trotskyist Semin having a wife in the USA ...
  25. 0
    April 14 2021 03: 41
    It was predicted for the date of May 3, the defectors confirm ... So, if possible, we go to the bomb shelters, or to the basements ..
  26. 0
    18 May 2021 09: 38
    Well, the fact that the war, sooner or later will be, is clear to any slightest thinking person. You don't have to be Vanga.
    The story is cyclical.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"