Military Review

Deadlines for the completion of the construction of a series of "Varshavyank" for the Pacific Fleet have been announced

32
Deadlines for the completion of the construction of a series of "Varshavyank" for the Pacific Fleet have been announced

Construction of a series of diesel-electric submarines of project 636.3 "Varshavyanka" for the Pacific fleet will be completed in 2024. This was announced by Alexander Buzakov, General Director of the Admiralteyskie Verf shipyard.


According to Buzakov, the sixth submarine for the Pacific Fleet will be handed over to the customer in 2024, at which the construction of the Varshavyanka series for the Pacific Fleet will be completed. The laying of the fifth and sixth submarines is planned for this year and will take place either by Victory Day or by the Day of the Navy.

The sixth boat will be handed over to the fleet in 2024, the construction of the series will be completed

- leads RIA News words of the CEO.

At present, Admiralty Shipyards have already handed over to the Navy the lead submarine of the Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky series and the first serial Volkhov. Both submarines are to make an inter-fleet passage from the Baltic to the Far East, presumably in May along the "southern route": Mediterranean Sea - Suez Canal - Indian Ocean.

The third and fourth submarines of the Magadan and Ufa series were laid down on the same day - November 1, 2019. "Magadan" is being prepared for launching at the end of March this year, its readiness is already more than 80%, there is no information about the timing of a similar procedure with regard to "Ufa".

Earlier, "Admiralty Shipyards" built a series of six "Varshavyanka" for the Black Sea Fleet. Last summer, the general director of the enterprise said that Admiralty Shipyards are awaiting the signing of a contract for a series of diesel-electric submarines for the Baltic Fleet, since in 2021 some of the plant's capacities will be free. At the moment, the Ministry of Defense has not made a decision on the construction.
32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. moreman78
    moreman78 18 March 2021 13: 45
    +1
    And what is considered sufficient for the current MO optimizers 6 diesel submarines for the Pacific Fleet? With this approach, it was possible to limit the series to about 3 units, so that 1 boat could constantly demonstrate all the "power" of our Pacific Fleet! am Yes, it's all sad ...
    1. Krasnoyarsk
      Krasnoyarsk 18 March 2021 13: 58
      0
      Quote: moreman78
      And what is considered sufficient for the current MO optimizers 6 diesel submarines for the Pacific Fleet? With this approach, it was possible to limit the series to about 3 units, so that 1 boat could constantly demonstrate all the "power" of our Pacific Fleet! am Yes, it's all sad ...

      The "power" of the Pacific Fleet is not ensured by the "Varshavyanka" alone.
      Maybe something more advanced will be done for the Pacific Fleet.
      1. moreman78
        moreman78 18 March 2021 14: 08
        +8
        Quote: Krasnoyarsk
        Quote: moreman78
        And what is considered sufficient for the current MO optimizers 6 diesel submarines for the Pacific Fleet? With this approach, it was possible to limit the series to about 3 units, so that 1 boat could constantly demonstrate all the "power" of our Pacific Fleet! am Yes, it's all sad ...

        The "power" of the Pacific Fleet is not ensured by the "Varshavyanka" alone.
        Maybe something more advanced will be done for the Pacific Fleet.

        And how is the "power" of the Pacific Fleet provided? Everything there is very, very deplorable with the operating crew ... On the fingers of one hand you can count the operating units both among nuclear-powered ships and among large surface ships!
        1. bayard
          bayard 18 March 2021 20: 06
          +6
          Quote: moreman78
          And how is the "power" of the Pacific Fleet provided? Everything there is very, very deplorable with the operating crew ... On the fingers of one hand you can count the operating units both among nuclear-powered ships and among large surface ships!

          Do not forget that in addition to the expected 636.3 at the Pacific Fleet, there are six more diesel-electric submarines pr. 877 "Halibut", so along with the new ones there will already be 12 (now 8). And corvettes for the Pacific Fleet are being built, in total, it is expected from 12 to 16 pieces. The larger ones - frigates 22350 are already under construction and by the middle of the decade everyone will be there. The modernization of the BOD 1155 to the level of a frigate was continued.
          For the Pacific Fleet, the revival of Naval Aviation is now critically important, and in all forms - from fighter to special and transport. In such a huge theater of operations, only aviation can promptly respond to threats.
          1. Alien From
            Alien From 20 March 2021 12: 46
            +2
            I agree with you!
    2. Kalmar
      Kalmar 18 March 2021 14: 25
      +1
      Quote: moreman78
      And what is considered sufficient for the current MO optimizers 6 diesel submarines for the Pacific Fleet?

      In the current realities, 6 diesel-electric submarines are already not bad. At the very least, this is much more than nothing at all, although, of course, even more is needed.
      1. Escobar
        Escobar 21 March 2021 19: 54
        +1
        In contrast to tiny Japan, this is not a fleet, but a flotilla, which, in which case, dozens of destroyers and MODERN non-nuclear submarines of the enemy will be sent to the bottom in the first days of a probable conflict
        1. Kalmar
          Kalmar 21 March 2021 23: 11
          0
          Quote: Eskobar
          Opposite tiny Japan, this is not a navy, but a flotilla

          At the moment, alas, yes. But, as the saying goes, "the path of a thousand steps begins with the first step": you see, little by little something decent will come together over time.
          1. Escobar
            Escobar 22 March 2021 09: 24
            0
            Yes, but it is worth taking into account the mutual rates of fleet renewal; in this state of affairs, over time, we will lag more and more behind the fleets of a potential enemy without new technologies and updating the shipbuilding base.
            1. Kalmar
              Kalmar 22 March 2021 09: 38
              0
              It remains to be hoped that the growth of the Japanese fleet of the same at some stage will slow down for natural reasons (budgets are not rubber, bases are not endless, etc.), which will give a chance, if not to catch up, then at least to reach a comparable level. But yes, the situation is very bleak.
  2. Sergej1972
    Sergej1972 18 March 2021 13: 54
    +6
    Does the Baltic Fleet need the Varshavyanka? It seems that they have repeatedly written that he needs boats with a smaller displacement and dimensions.
    1. Doccor18
      Doccor18 18 March 2021 14: 00
      +5
      In my opinion, it would be better if 12 boats were transferred to the Pacific Fleet. There may be a hotter situation.
      1. Escobar
        Escobar 22 March 2021 09: 27
        0
        In my opinion, non-nuclear weapons are better in the "puddles" of the Baltic and the Black Sea, where there can be almost no nuclear competitors
        1. Doccor18
          Doccor18 22 March 2021 11: 46
          0
          It is better.
          But they are so lacking everywhere that it is more necessary for the Pacific Fleet. There are a dime a dozen "partners" ... And the Black Sea Fleet and the Baltic Sea Fleet, in my opinion, could wait a little ...
          1. Escobar
            Escobar 22 March 2021 12: 33
            0
            You can simply spray them across all fleets, and still not achieve parity, and so 6 + 6 submarines on the Black Sea Fleet could almost equal the Turks or 6 VVrshavyanka blocking the Baltic, than to drive them in the Pacific Fleet's zone of responsibility
            1. Doccor18
              Doccor18 22 March 2021 12: 53
              0
              And leave the Pacific Fleet with 1,5 diesel-electric submarines and 3,5 nuclear submarines (figurative numbers).
              Parity with Turkey and even superiority can be ensured by 2-3 SU-30 regiments in the composition of the Black Sea Fleet.
              1. Escobar
                Escobar 22 March 2021 15: 46
                0
                How will the Su 30 hinder Turkish submarines?
                1. Doccor18
                  Doccor18 22 March 2021 16: 01
                  0
                  Quote: Eskobar
                  How will the Su 30 hinder Turkish submarines?

                  You do not.
                  So after all, not a single submarine. Well, Turkey has a two-fold advantage in submarine, so what? Will the Turkish Navy have a lot from this? And they don't have a fighter like the Su-30 and won't have it for a long time. Still, the anti-ship missile system would have been fitted under its wings with a modern one ...
    2. moreman78
      moreman78 18 March 2021 14: 10
      +1
      So the project 677 "Lada" is tortured and tortured - but the stone flower does not come out.
    3. Vladimir1155
      Vladimir1155 18 March 2021 23: 24
      +1
      Of course, sending submarines to the Baltic is stupid, they can be sent to the Pacific Fleet, to the Northern Fleet or the Black Sea Fleet, but definitely not to the shallow and narrow Baltic
  3. Jacket in stock
    Jacket in stock 18 March 2021 14: 00
    +1
    Boats of the last century level.
    Now even Africans do not take this, but for our sailors it will do.
    1. Ru_Na
      Ru_Na 18 March 2021 14: 06
      +2
      In our situation and without fish, cancer is a fish! Those submarines that are at the disposal of the Pacific Fleet will soon run out of service, the construction of the MAPL is delayed, when the submarine with the VNEU is ready, it is also unknown, so the construction of Varshavyanka and their transfer to the fleet is at least something!
      1. Escobar
        Escobar 22 March 2021 09: 29
        0
        "at least something" is like the position of an infantryman with a bunch of hand grenades - yes, no artillery, but at least something. Yes, women from Warsaw are not ersatz, but a necessary measure
    2. Uncle lee
      Uncle lee 18 March 2021 14: 18
      +1
      Quote: Jacket in stock
      Boats of the last century level.

      Underwater Trilinear ....
    3. maratkoRuEkb
      maratkoRuEkb 22 March 2021 12: 56
      0
      https://topwar.ru/181056-podtverdilis-dannye-o-tom-chto-protivolodochnye-sily-nato-uzhe-nedelju-ne-mogut-obnaruzhit-pl-rostov-na-donu-v-sredizemnom-more.html

      Here you are, get acquainted ... Like a boat of the last century, all such high-tech NATO forces cannot find it. Right here our boats are backward? aha aha rzhu nimagu.
  4. Ros 56
    Ros 56 18 March 2021 14: 46
    +1
    So it’s great, they’ll probably be followed by something else.
  5. mvg
    mvg 18 March 2021 15: 03
    +3
    Very dubious combat value at the Pacific Fleet. Where it will compete with Japanese Kawasaki P-1 and American Boeing P-8 Poseidon. Also with frigates and destroyers URO Japan Self-Defense Forces, the Navy of the Republic of Kazakhstan, where diesel-electric submarines Soryu and 214. Very hard.
    1. Kalmar
      Kalmar 18 March 2021 15: 17
      +1
      Useful for protecting the naval base from enemy submarines, for example. Near our naval base, destroyers, frigates and anti-submarine aircraft are unlikely to ply freely due to the threat from coastal missile systems and aviation, but submarines must be driven by something else.
      1. mvg
        mvg 18 March 2021 15: 26
        0
        Useful for protecting the naval base from enemy submarines, for example

        In your understanding, how much is it in km? The real range of the torpedo launch is 10-12 km, and the Caliber-M needs a control center, lying on the bottom you will not get it.
        For the protection of naval base more effective DBK, as less vulnerable. Diesel-electric submarines are needed to disrupt sea communications, and 636.6 will not cope with this.
        1. Kalmar
          Kalmar 18 March 2021 15: 30
          0
          Quote: mvg
          For the protection of the naval base, the DBK is more effective, as it is less vulnerable.

          DBKs work on surface ships, and I'm more about anti-submarine warfare. The "Varshavyanka" has a good SAC, and the problem with torpedoes will probably be somehow solved in the foreseeable future (they say there are positive changes). Apparently, we still do not have more effective means of PLO now.
  6. Igor Tikhomirov
    Igor Tikhomirov 18 March 2021 15: 08
    -4
    Why, for the sake of fun, the boats "Bars" would be built according to the project of the tsarist admiral Bubnov.
  7. maratkoRuEkb
    maratkoRuEkb 19 March 2021 13: 25
    -2
    I read the comments and immediately it became so clear ... great experts sit here and put their valuable opinions on public display. One is not enough, to another they seem old ... They would not be disgraced to carry nonsense. Probably without you, the MO will figure out how much of what and where to put it.