FSMTC denied reports on the supply of Su-34 to the Algerian Air Force

20

Russia does not plan to supply Algeria with front-line bombers Su-32 (export version of the Su-34), and the production of aircraft for the Algerian Air Force is not being conducted. This was reported by the Federal Service for Military-Technical Cooperation (FSMTC).

The FSMTC of the Russian Federation does not confirm the information that appeared on the Internet that Russia allegedly plans to transfer a batch of Su-32 aircraft to the Algerian People's Democratic Republic. There is no production of aircraft in the interests of Algeria.

- leads "Interfax" statement by the press secretary of the FSMTC of the Russian Federation Valery Reshetnikov.



Earlier in Russian and foreign media (for example, in Dutch media) there was information about the alleged plans of Russia to supply Algeria with a batch of Russian front-line bombers Su-34 in the export version. It was reported that the first batch of six aircraft was allegedly already in the manufacturing process and will be delivered to Algeria by the end of this year. In total, according to media reports, the Algerian Air Force "ordered 20 Su-34 bombers."

It was also reported that the Algerian version of the Su-34 will have the designation Su-34ME and differ from the one used in the Russian Aerospace Forces only by the "friend or foe" system and communications. Everything else, including avionics and weapons, will be standard.

Note that Algeria is indeed showing great interest in Russian Su-34 bombers, negotiations on their delivery are underway in the early 2010s. But to date, bombers are supplied only by the Russian Aerospace Forces.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    20 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +3
      March 16 2021
      Yesterday someone jinxed me.
      It is necessary to carefully re-read yesterday's comments, to figure out the wretch and obstruct.
      1. +3
        March 16 2021
        Quote: Flood
        Yesterday someone jinxed me.
        It is necessary to carefully re-read yesterday's comments, to figure out the wretch and obstruct.

        But what about pluralism of opinions then? wink
        1. +17
          March 16 2021
          Pluralism pluralism, but something is often published unverified information, here all the spears are broken and the faces of the faces are smashed in blood, and then it turns out that, as it were, they quarreled in the comments.
          1. +7
            March 16 2021
            Quote: WHAT IS
            Pluralism pluralism, but something is often published unverified information, here all the spears are broken and the faces of the faces are smashed in blood, and then it turns out that, as it were, they quarreled in the comments.

            this is the same "social network" ... the norm. some "throw in" others fight ... ratings. lol don't need to be taken seriously.
          2. +6
            March 16 2021
            Attendance, readability, and commentability are what matters.
            And you mean reliability.
          3. +2
            March 16 2021
            I agree. Now in Odessa "Iroquois" build, then in Algeria they sell Su 34 ...
            Back in the 90s, when there was a heyday of the "yellow" press and rags vied with each other to report "sensations"?
        2. +3
          March 16 2021
          Quote: Aerodrome
          But what about pluralism of opinions then?

          ========
          lol What is pluralism opinions? It is when: "me on your opinion to spit!" laughing drinks
          1. +2
            March 16 2021
            Quote: venik
            Quote: Aerodrome
            But what about pluralism of opinions then?

            ========
            lol What is pluralism opinions? It is when: "me on your opinion to spit!" laughing drinks

            well ... in our aviation they said: I gave your opinion a spin ...
            1. 0
              March 16 2021
              Quote: Andrey Yurievich
              well ... in our aviation they said: I gave your opinion a spin ...

              =========
              In! good drinks
      2. 0
        March 16 2021
        Su-35 for Egypt did not do the same, but they are already there.
    2. +4
      March 16 2021
      Earlier in the Russian and foreign media there was information about Russia's plans to supply Algeria with a batch of Russian front-line bombers Su-34 in the export version. It was reported that the first batch of six aircraft is already under construction and will be delivered to Algeria by the end of this year. In total, according to media reports, the Algerian Air Force ordered 20 Su-34 bombers.

      That is why it is necessary to believe only official information, and not all rumors. And not explain the secrecy by American sanctions. This also applies to some Su-35 for Egypt, which, allegedly, have already been seen in the appropriate color. You can't sell combat aircraft from under the floor wink
      1. +2
        March 16 2021
        Quote: Stirbjorn
        one must believe only official information, and not all rumors

        Yes, here, even if a dubious source of information is clearly indicated, such as "unnamed, close to ..., who wished to remain anonymous", many do not pay attention to this, and immediately begin to pull each other's hair out.
        1. -3
          March 16 2021
          So try to point out the dubiousness of the source "close to ..." They are immediately enrolled in agents, and if they also find that they had previously written something positive about the technique of a potential enemy, then they will mold the stigma forever!
    3. 0
      March 16 2021
      It would be better if the Algerians really bought our planes - this is both money for the country, and a good advertisement for our weapons!
      1. +2
        March 16 2021
        Quote: Thrifty
        It would be better if the Algerians really bought our planes

        Now opponents of any export of weapons will explain to you that it is not enough for us ourselves, that it is not enough to arm everyone with our modern weapons ... laughing
      2. 0
        March 16 2021
        Quote: Thrifty
        It would be better if the Algerians really bought our planes

        So they bought it.
        Including the Su-32 (export name Su-34), and for a long time.
        And the Chkalovsky plant annually reported how many aircraft were delivered to the Aerospace Forces, and how many under the Algerian contract.
        14 pcs. Su-32, if memory has not changed.
        Moreover, the planes have been delivered long ago.
        1. -1
          March 16 2021
          Quote: bayard
          if memory has not changed

          Has changed. There were conversations, there were no sales of the Su-32. About 14 units were confused with the Su-30MKA hi
          1. -1
            March 16 2021
            No, I perfectly remember the annual reports of the plant. Chkalov on the supply of (annual) Su-32 to Algeria. With division - how much in the videoconferencing, and how much under the "Algerian contract". And there were a lot of articles on this topic. Including VO.
            ... Stop, I looked at the composition of the Algerian Air Force ... there is no Su-32 \ 34 ... How so?
            The Mandela Effect?
            There were so many publications and discussions - about the first contract for the Su-34 ... strange ...
    4. +3
      March 16 2021
      Circus tent, yesterday we write one thing, today another. Lavrov you will forget, with such specialists.
    5. +1
      March 16 2021
      Russia does not plan to supply Algeria with front-line bombers Su-32 (export version of the Su-34), and the production of aircraft for the Algerian Air Force is not being conducted. This was reported by the Federal Service for Military-Technical Cooperation (FSMTC).

      Cool! Magazine l sheets again put the cars in front of the locomotive?

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"