The new automatic control system united the air defense of the Urals and the Volga regions

The newest integrated automated control system for air defense forces and means (ACS) took up combat duty in the Central Military District. Reported by "News" with reference to the Russian Ministry of Defense.

According to the newspaper, the new ACS unites the air defense of the entire Urals and the Volga region, including the largest base of strategic bombers in Engels. The single control loop includes S-400 long-range anti-aircraft systems, cover systems - missile-gun "Pantsiri" and various radars.

The new system allows real-time detection, distribution and destruction of targets, taking into account the location of anti-aircraft systems. In addition, the ACS can control diverse forces and assets, including Aviation, ground forces, etc.

It is noted that the deployment of the system was completed last year, after which it was tested during exercises and has already taken up combat duty. The Ministry of Defense explained that earlier such automated control systems were deployed in the western, north-western and eastern directions, there was not enough manpower and resources for the central military district.

The foundations of this system were laid thirty years ago. Now its implementation is just being completed using the technologies that are available today.

- said the former head of the anti-aircraft missile forces of the Russian Air Force, Alexander Gorkov.

Comments

[tralflot1832]

As I understand it, Sverdlovsk is under the "umbrella"? Murmansk too!

[mitroha]

the new ACS integrates the air defense of the entire Urals and the Volga region, including the largest base of strategic bombers in Engels. The single control loop includes S-400 long-range anti-aircraft systems, cover systems - missile and cannon "Pantsiri" and various radars.

Great news. And then some comrades are sure that we have only Moscow covered by air defense and missile defense.

[Kart]

These "comrades" live in a virtual country. In which everything is already bad, there is no army or navy and the population died of hunger.

[Tochilka]

Uh-huh. And the Internet for coupons.

[venik]

Quote: Carte

These "comrades" live in a virtual country. In which everything is already bad, there is no army or navy and the population died of hunger.

========
Most likely, these "comrades" live "for a hedgehog"!

[tralflot1832]

About 6 years ago, the Americans carried out a command-and-control command to break through the air defense of Russia, they counted 60% losses, our responded tactfully, well, we can somehow master 30%!

[Disant]

About 6 years ago, the Americans conducted a CSU

they do not stand still and are ready to pay ten times more for an air defense breakthrough.
And they are going to pay with iron without people

[Disant]

some comrades are sure that only Moscow is covered by air defense and missile defense.

and what else is covered by missile defense, besides Moscow?

[YOUR]

According to the SALT treaty, we and the Americans have one missile defense area each. So only Moscow and Valdai are properly covered.

[mitroha]

Quote: Disant

some comrades are sure that only Moscow is covered by air defense and missile defense.

and what else is covered by missile defense, besides Moscow?

Do you think that S300-400-500, electronic warfare systems, will passively observe a missile attack?
Or air defense systems capable of working on missiles, is that so, the fish was wrapped?

[Romario_Argo]

and what else is covered by missile defense, besides Moscow?

functional missile defense have: MiG-31 shoot down decelerating BB at altitudes of 30 km. up to 3 km / sec.
S-300V4 up to heights of 30 km; S-400 are still waiting for mass deliveries of 40N6 missiles
It's a lot (!)
The United States will never shoot a full BC SNW only half, and China also needs to grab
from 1200 BB / 2 = 600 BB
150 MiG-31 x 4 = 600 warheads
4 Brigades S-300V4 x 64 long-range missiles = 256 BB
S-400 is already under 60 zard but there is no open data on 40N6 yet
minimum of 8 launchers for 4 launchers for 4 zur x 60 zrd = 960 BB
total: intercept 1816 BB throughout the country
since 2020, all state defense orders have been classified

[Disant]

MiG-31s ​​are shot down by decelerating BB at altitudes of 30 km. up to 3 km / sec.

waiting for mass deliveries of 40N6 missiles

I think neither one nor the other is intended for nuclear warheads of intercontinental missiles going downhill (at the final stage) - there are different speeds. Otherwise, there would have been a howl.

[Romario_Argo]

I think

- there are other speeds. Otherwise, there would have been a howl.

ABOUT
BB in orbit has a speed of 8 km / s
deorbiting 110 km. - 7,8 km / s (niche S-500)
height 90 km. - 6,4 km / s
height 70-60 km. slows down to 5 km / s (niche S-300V4 and S-400)
height 40 km. already 3,5 km / s
height 30 km. already 3 km / s (the niche is already for the MiG-31)
height 10 km. already 1,5-2 km / sec and starts to accelerate (!)
near the ground can already grow up to 2,5-3 km / sec.
it has only now begun to be publicly advertised, but this is an old topic
The United States even abandoned the air defense system in the 80s in favor of fighters on this topic

[Disant]

if not difficult - where can I find information on speed?
on s-400, -500, instant-31 - you are confusing something. They have Nothing to knock down the intercontinental blocks.

[Romario_Argo]

here in your picture in lower left corner speed of BR and MRBM 4800 m / s.
just an altitude of 50-60 km.
BR - means Intercontinental Missile (!)
MRBM enters its peak at 75 degrees. a BB ICBM at an angle of 45 degrees. - it's even easier to intercept

[Disant]

you are an outrageous optimist.
you need to be burned at the stake.

[Romario_Argo]

see bottom left corner

[Disant]

I meant the speed of the warhead in altitude. and the angle of incidence - is there a place to read and look?
.
I counted - 44 seconds from deorbiting at altitude 110 and before hitting the ground when changing the speed at the indicated altitudes. But the warhead can also fall from 300 hundred kilometers of altitude - then the angle and speed can be different, it can improve up to 30 seconds.
.
and than,

S-400 is already under 60 zard but there is no open data on 40N6 yet
minimum of 8 PUs, 4 PUs each 4 zur x 60 SD = 960 BB
total: we will intercept 1816 BB throughout the country

two per car.

[Romario_Argo]

and here we smoothly approached the hardware acceleration of the KP computer and / or the ACS of the air defense missile system
2,5 sec. for processing and issuing the control center + 1,5 sec. to launch missiles + error 1 sec.
= 5 seconds
And preemptive. The detection range of the attached radars coupled through the automated control system with the air defense missile system is 1500 km. Not to be confused with export versions 120 km away.
You can continue for a long time.
And you can read in the format of lectures - go to the appropriate university

[Disant]

BR - means Intercontinental Missile (!)

x / f features of national fishing:
- Well, this is ravioli ?!
- Mikhalych, well, read - first, dumplings, and only then - ravioli!))
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mrvv4BA2Ta0
.
the first word in the picture is tactical and operational-tactical.
your confidence has gone wild - that's why burn

[antivirus]

it's good that there is no AB. how to cover them in Hawaii ?.

control of Eurasia is a goal for decades of work.

[Cananecat]

All

Quote: tralflot1832

As I understand it, Sverdlovsk is under the "umbrella"? Murmansk too!

All industrial centers were originally under the umbrella, now it has been turned into one big canopy.

[YOUR]

Initially, under the USSR, yes, they were all under one big umbrella, but then Yeltsin came and there was MO Pasha Mercedes and the reduction began, a little time passed and they pushed Taburetkin to the position of MO. They slashed aviation, destroyed military schools, destroyed airfields, and left little pieces of air defense.
Yes, we have wonderful air defense systems, the main one is the S-300, little by little they are installing the S-400. For those who do not know the S-400, this is a modernized S-300, originally designated as S-300PM3.
But they are few, catastrophically few. There is not a single regiment with a full complement (6 divisions), only one regiment of 4 divisional personnel, the rest are mainly 2 armored personnel carriers.
Do you even know that the interval from Chita to Khabarovsk is not covered at all as air defense?
And in the Amur Region, a couple of hydroelectric power plants, bridges across the Zeya, the world's largest gas processing plant is being built, and finally the Ukrainka airbase, on which one of the 2 TBAD is based.
And you are an umbrella, a canopy ...

[venik]

Quote: YOUR

They slashed aviation, destroyed military schools, destroyed airfields, and left little pieces of air defense.

=======
Chef! Everything is lost! All! The plaster is removed, the wedge is leaving! Everything ... everything ...

--------

Quote: YOUR

For those who do not know the S-400, this is a modernized S-300, originally designated as S-300PM3.

=======
Yes, we know, we know!
---------

Quote: YOUR

But they are few, catastrophically few. There is not a single regiment with a full complement (6 divisions), only one regiment of 4 divisional personnel, the rest are mainly 2 armored personnel carriers.

========
Well, yes ... CATASTROPHICALLY little ... So far, only 33 regiments, 69 divisions with 552 PU ...
By the way, from what "hangover" did you decide that the S-400 regiment must have a 6 divisional composition? Just the staff of the S-400 regiment has just 2 divisional personnel! At the same time, it can cover an area even larger than 6 S-300 PS divisions! And as for the only regiment of 4 divisional composition (it is located somewhere in the North, or in the Far East) - this is reinforced composition, which is due to the organizational and staff structure of the air defense in this district! And nothing more.
----------

Quote: YOUR

Do you even know that the interval from Chita to Khabarovsk is not covered at all as air defense?

========
Nothing at all? And what about the military air defense? What about fighter aircraft?
---------

Quote: YOUR

Yes, we have wonderful air defense systems, the main one is the S-300, little by little they are putting the S-400

========
Are you aware that the number of S-400 divisions has ALREADY exceeded the number of S-300P divisions ... of all modifications (not counting the military S-300V (also of all modifications)?
PS "Don't panic, Major Kardash!". Don't scare us! Already" scared "......

[YOUR]

From what hangover did you decide that the staff of the S-400 air defense station of 2 divisions?

The basic structure of the system 40P6 (S-400)
30K6E controls including:
The combat control point (PBU) 55K6E based on the Ural-5323 01.
Radar complex (RLK) 91Н6E. Anti-jamming panoramic radar. Installed on MZKT-7930. Works in the decimeter range.
Up to 6 anti-aircraft missile systems 98ZH6E. Maximum 10 targets with 20 missiles pointing at them, each consisting of:
Multifunction radar (MRLS) 92N6E with a range of 400 km. 100 targets.
Up to 12 transport launchers (TPU) of type 5P85TE2 and / or 5P85SE2 on a trailer.
Anti-aircraft missiles 48N6E, 48N6E2, 48N6E3 of the existing S-300PMU1, −2 air defense systems, as well as 9M96E and 9M96E2 missiles and an ultra-long-range missile 40N6E
A complex of technical support systems 30TS6E.
-------------------------------------------------- ------
From what hangover did you decide that the number of S-400 exceeds the number of S-300.
Just the numbers of the S-300 total number of all modifications - 345 air defense systems. These are deployed, and how much is still on conservation, which are periodically removed and supplied to the troops after modernization. An example of a recently deployed regiment near Arkhangelsk. How many S-400s you yourself wrote. True, you lied a little here too - 66 air defense systems, 2 of them have not yet been deployed, tk. were delivered at the end of 2020. We just didn't have time.
But this is not just a little, it is minuscule for the whole country. Idiocy. First, destroy, then think about how to restore.
---------------------------------------------------------
Question????????
Why do you think launchers. For such complexes as Buk, Thor, Kub, Osa, this is justified. There, each launcher is a separate complex with a detection and guidance system. But the S-300, 400 do not have this, and what's the difference how many launchers are one or 100, there is still one on-load tap-changer. All PUs are just vehicles for transporting missiles.
---------------------------------------------------------
One more question???????
That is to say, a test of competence. Do you know something or so ...........
What is the affected area of ​​the S-300, 400 air defense system

[venik]

Quote: YOUR

The basic structure of the system 40P6 (S-400)

=========
Ah, so here it is, what's the problem! You, my friend Stirlitz, are confused by the concepts: "battery-division-regiment"
So the "system" of the S-400 air defense missile system is precisely the DIVISION: This is a completely autonomous unit, which includes a 91N6E early warning radar and a 55K6E combat control point, as well as 4-6 complexes (batteries), usually - 4, each of which consists of 2 PU 5P85TE2 or 5P85SE2 and guidance station 92N2E. An optional 96L6E all-altitude detector and a tower for the antenna post (included in the regimental kit) can be attached to the battalion.
Two more: 2 divisions are reduced to a regiment. That. in the regiment nominally: 2 divisions, 8 complexes and 16 launchers.
------------

Quote: YOUR

From what hangover did you decide that the number of S-400 exceeds the number of S-300.

========
Information slipped through the media when they received the extreme regimental kit.
-------------

Quote: YOUR

Why do you think launchers. For such complexes as Buk, Tor, Kub, Osa, this is justified. There, each launcher is a separate complex with a detection and guidance system.

=========
Do "Cuba" - too? (in the sense - each BM is a separate complex? That's really news, so news! " Second: the number of PUs is a multiple of the number combat-ready missiles (if you didn't know). And even if the number of combat-ready missiles exceeds the capabilities of the guidance radar for target processing, then for long-range complexes the possibility of re-firing at targets remains.
----------

Quote: YOUR

what's the difference how many launchers are one or 100, all the same there is one tap changer. All PUs are just vehicles for transporting missiles.

=========
Or "connect" to another RLSPN.
-----------

Quote: YOUR

That is to say, a test of competence. Do you know something or so ...........
What is the affected area of ​​the S-300, 400 air defense system

=========
"Check for lice" well, well! The question is certainly not correct: this depends on many factors: target parameters (altitude, speed, RCS), geography of the area, weather conditions, air situation, the type of missiles used, etc.
The S-400's maximum interception range, with the advent of the 40N6E missile, increased from 250 km (48N6E) to 380 km. Although "maximum range" is a calculated concept, practically no one ever shoots at such distances - the probability of defeat is significantly reduced ... Although at one time the valiant Ukrainian anti-aircraft gunners contrived to overwhelm the Tu-154 over the Black Sea at the limit of range ...

[YOUR]

Quote: venik

Ah, so here it is, what's the problem! You, my friend Stirlitz, are confused by the concepts: "battery-division-regiment"

I am an air defense officer, my friend, who served 27 calendars in these troops. You are studying this on the Internet, but I got it all in my life.

Quote: venik

Although at one time the valiant Ukrainian anti-aircraft gunners contrived to overwhelm the Tu-154 over the Black Sea at the limit of range ...

Again, write what you heard the ringing about. They shot down at a range of 250-260 km, the maximum range for a rocket is 280 km, taking into account the passive guidance section, i.e. when all the fuel is used up and the rocket is flying by inertia, up to 360 km.

Quote: venik

The question is certainly not correct: this depends on many factors: target parameters (altitude, speed, RCS), geography of the area, weather conditions, air situation, the type of missiles used, etc.

Get away from the answer. ZP characteristics - in the horizontal plane, the far, near boundaries of the ZP
in the vertical lower and upper boundaries of the RFP
And there is also a limiting heading angle. So what is it like for the S-300/400?

[venik]

Quote: YOUR

I am a friend of an air defense officer who served in these troops for 27 calendars

========
For some reason I thought so. It was embarrassing that you did not hesitate to place the "Cube" in a row with "Thor", "Wasp" and "Buk".
------------

Quote: YOUR

This is what you study on the Internet

========
Not only, my friend, not only!
-------------

Quote: YOUR

maximum range for a rocket 280 km

=========
It depends on what modification! S-200V "Vega" with 5V21P has a maximum range of 180 km (taking into account the passive section - about 250 km ). Namely, with this complex and at such a distance, then the "carcass" and filled up! By the way, as far as I remember, it was precisely this circumstance (that the range to the plane was supposedly greater, the flight range of the Ukrainian military tried to justify themselves (they say, "they could not shoot down by definition").
-------------

Quote: YOUR

Get away from the answer. ZP characteristics - in the horizontal plane, the far, near boundaries of the ZP
in the vertical lower and upper boundaries of the RFP

=========
Thank you for reminding me! The truth about this as something "heard" .....
--------------

Quote: YOUR

And there is also a limiting heading angle. So what is it like for the S-300/400?

=========
I don't know exactly, but according to my estimates, it should be close to 90 degrees.

[YOUR]

Quote: venik

I don't know exactly, but according to my estimates, it should be close to 90 degrees.

Where do these estimates come from?

Quote: venik

It depends on what modification! S-200V "Vega" with 5V21P has a maximum range of 180 km

These missiles were not in service in the mid-80s, but were B-880M. Somehow little is written about them in the wiki, but if you try, you will find.
They cited the destruction of the Tu-154 by the Ukrainians as an incomprehensible example.
Question? Why did this happen? And is this possible on modern S-300/400 complexes?

[venik]

Quote: YOUR

Where do these estimates come from?

=======
This - bursting - indicated the maximum angle when shooting towards .... Where did the estimates come from - "from the woods" ..... I just used some knowledge and formulas.

Quote: YOUR

They cited the destruction of the Tu-154 by the Ukrainians as an incomprehensible example.

=========
Why is it not clear? It is clear - simply, as an example, that at the most extreme range, you can overwhelm the target with the first missile!
----------

Quote: YOUR

These missiles were not in service in the mid-80s, but there were V-880M

========
I don’t know, I don’t know .... They could have survived in Ukraine ....
----------

Quote: YOUR

Question? Why did this happen?

========
This is not a question for me, but for the valiant Ukrainian anti-aircraft gunners! How they "missed" the target re-acquisition - For me - this mystery is great esmb!
------------

Quote: YOUR

And is this possible on modern S-300/400 complexes?

========
Considering the guidance method ("through the rocket") and the level of automation - it is not possible at all! Although ..... If the pens playful "from the wrong place" grow and instead of the brain - the sciatic nerve, then you can certainly EVERYTHING! You should know that!

[YOUR]

So how did it happen that the Ukrainians shot down this plane?
Well, at least some assumptions, I don't ask about knowledge

[venik]

Quote: YOUR

So how did it happen that the Ukrainians shot down this plane?
Well, at least some assumptions, I don't ask about knowledge

=========
А Knowledge - neither me nor you - NO! Because all the information is closed! (Well, unless you were there, at this ill-fated complex yourself then personally attended ...).
Well, if you are such a cool specialist in air defense issues, then try to explain why the "Thor" has a zone of destruction in terms of the exchange rate parameter, more than 2 times larger than that of "Pvntsir", although there seems to be no special reason for that?

[YOUR]

The S-200 air defense missile system implements the principle of the priority of goals. If there are several targets in the beam, the missile will be guided to the most dangerous one. The most dangerous is the naturally bomber. Those. target with a larger image intensifier.
The rocket began to aim at another target. There is an element of unprofessional calculation here. The training target was at a distance of 26 km, a civil aircraft at a distance of 260 km, at least according to the flight time they had to orient themselves. The flight time is 10 times longer. But ......

Quote: venik

Why does "Thor" have a hit zone in terms of the course parameter more than 2 times larger than that of "Pvntsir", although no special reasons for this seem to be visible?

I have no idea. Not exploited.
By the way, there is in the combat work of the calculation of the air defense missile system and the AKP such a report, the target parameter .... well, and the figure. You used it, and what does this parameter mean

[venik]

Quote: YOUR

The S-200 air defense missile system implements the principle of the priority of goals. If there are several targets in the beam, the missile will be guided to the most dangerous one. The most dangerous is the naturally bomber. Those. target with a larger image intensifier.

==========
Isn't the selection of targets there based on speed?
------------

Quote: YOUR

The rocket began to aim at another target.

=========
And the option that the operator, in a hurry (the target was at a short range), simply did not turn on the phase-code keying mode, which allows you to determine the range and stupidly "highlighted" the target with the highest RCS, you don't consider?
Anyway, anyway, no later than one and a half minutes after the launch, the operator had to figure out that the rocket went beyond the range and give the command to self-destruct!
-----------

Quote: YOUR

target parameter .... well, figure. You used it, and what does this parameter mean

========
You what? Are you kidding me? Or don't know what it is exchange rate parameter goals?

[YOUR]

I'm not kidding. I know. I wanted to hear from you.

Quote: venik

You what? Are you kidding me? Or don’t know what the target exchange rate parameter is?

Quote: venik

Isn't the selection of targets there based on speed?

What does speed have to do with it?
The bomber gives a large exposure, and the rocket will aim at it. S-200 semi-active homing, the missile will automatically switch to a "thicker" target.

[venik]

Quote: YOUR

S-200 semi-active homing, the missile will automatically switch to a "thicker" target.

========
That is, you completely exclude the option when the operator mistakenly "highlighted" a "thicker" target (when the SPN is operating in two-coordinate mode)?
There, after all, the boundaries of the range were small, somewhere around 50 kilometers. There was very little time for firing at the target, but it was rumored that it took about half a minute to switch to the three-coordinate mode ... How do you like this option?

[YOUR]

In the S-200, not SPN but ROC (target illumination radar).

Quote: venik

That is, you completely exclude the option when the operator mistakenly "highlighted" a "thicker" target (when the SPN is operating in two-coordinate mode)?

What does it mean mistakenly highlighted. The detection range is 400 km. The width of the radiation pattern is 2 degrees in the narrow beam mode and 4.5 in the wide beam mode. Any target caught in the beam reflects a signal that hits the seeker (seeker) at which the missile is guided. The operator participates in the guidance process at the initial stage, when the missile is still at the launch site. As soon as the seeker has captured the target and the launch is made, nothing depends on the calculation.
In this case, the calculation was required to turn off the ROC. The target illumination stops, the rocket goes in the same direction for some time, aiming at the place where the target was, if, for a short period of time, there is no reflected signal from the target, the rocket goes up and self-destructs.

[venik]

Quote: YOUR

The width of the radiation pattern is 2 degrees in the narrow beam mode and 4.5 in the wide beam mode.

=========
I meant the situation when the angular distance between the aircraft and the target exceeds 4.5 degrees, then one of the targets does not hit the beam and, accordingly, the seeker is not captured and the choice of the target remains with the operator:

The scheme is, of course, primitively rough (the directional diagram of the ROC 5N62V, alas, is unknown to me).
Could this option take place?

[YOUR]

I didn’t finish it. There is also such a button K3. (Ka three). This is the only thing that connects the calculation and the rocket. Detonation button.
Why it was not used is of course a question.
An even bigger question is why they began to conduct live-fire exercises in alignment with the international air corridor, and even when the plane was walking along it.

[venik]

Quote: YOUR

There is also such a button K3. (Ka three). This is the only thing that connects the calculation and the rocket. Detonation button.
Why it was not used is of course a question.
An even bigger question is why they began to conduct live-fire exercises in alignment with the international air corridor, and even when the plane was walking along it.

========
A related question: why, one and a half minutes after the launch, when it became clear that the rocket was leaving or had already gone beyond the boundaries of the range (50-60 km), did they not take action - turned off the backlight or did not activate the self-liquidator?
And finally, why, having discovered, instead of one target, two, did they not rush to transfer the station to three-coordinate mode, in order to figure out if one of them was outside the range?
Well, as a summary: WHAT really happened:
a) "spontaneous re-targeting of a missile from a small target to a" fat "target - a civilian liner (if both" targets "were in line with the beam (this version is more convenient for the Ukrainian side, since it allows to write off part of the blame on" outdated "equipment ), or:
b) or still erroneous selection by the operator of the "highlighted" target (if the angular distance between 2 objects exceeds the width of the radiation pattern)? This is a more "scandalous" version.

PS Alas! The truth only know immediate participants in the incident ..... Only one thing is clear - the main reason - low qualifications personnel and disgusting training!

[YOUR]

I do not comment on the rest for nonsense.

[venik]

Quote: YOUR

I do not comment on the rest for nonsense.

======

[Romario_Argo]

For those who do not know the S-400, this is the modernized S-300.

yeah, for the S-300PMU-1 on the zrd 6 channels
at the S-400 36 channels for zd
interesting comparison you have

[YOUR]

FAQ ???????????????????????????????????????

[Vadim Ananyin]

It would be interesting to take a look, but it won't work.

[kaban7]

We have such devices
But we won't tell you about them.

[mojohed2012]

Back in 2003, Zhirinovsky traveled to Iraq to see Saddam and shouted there on the video: You are Bush, ... a cowboy. Do you want ... our scientists ... at night ... will slightly change the axis of the earth and your country will be under water! ... Your whole country will be under water. What are you thinking? Come to your senses !!!
Speaking at length, so far there have not been any incidents since the late Soviet Union that made it possible to test the effectiveness of the anti-missile defense system of the USSR or the Russian Federation. Therefore, at the expert level, it is believed that the Russian Federation has the most effective air defense system.
And yes, only Moscow is covered by missile defense, the rest of Russia is only air defense, which, I think, will also be able to intercept some missiles.

[Romario_Argo]

It would be interesting to see

everything is simple - this is the ACS Foundation
ACS Polyana is resting with its 225 control units and 500 accompanied by

[rocket757]

The new automatic control system united the air defense of the Urals and the Volga regions

Mark a hundred times, cut once !!!
What would have been good! Otherwise, it's better not at all ...

[Captain45]

According to the newspaper, the new ACS unites the air defense of the entire Urals and the Volga region, including the largest base of strategic bombers in Engels. The single control loop includes S-400 long-range anti-aircraft systems, cover systems - missile-gun "Pantsiri" and various radars.(C)
Well, now, as it was sung in the song from the movie "Fighters":
Favorite city can sleep peacefully
And to dream, and turn green in the middle of spring!

[YOUR]

Before that eh this was not?
ACS Vector, Senezh, Baikal .... these are all ACS of air defense with the same tasks. So the Senezh M ACS made it possible to control the S-125, 75 air defense system with two groups of C-200 air defense systems, a group of C-300 air defense systems and 6 groups of fighters -
Baikal was created on the same computing base as the S-300, increased performance, mainly sharpened for the S-300.