Chinese imitation of the T-90 VISMOD tank repelled the attack of the attack helicopter?

The armed forces of several countries of the world have been using impressive stocks of military equipment for a long time to replenish the fleet of visually modified vehicles designed to imitate the forces of a potential enemy. This technique is designated VISMOD (visually modified) and is used during maneuvers and exercises. It is widely known about the use of imitations in the US Army, while similar information regarding the Chinese troops is rather scarce.

New Delhi is traditionally viewed as a possible enemy in Beijing. In this regard, the PLA was in demand for an American approach in training personnel. The Chinese resource China Defense Blog drew attention to the maneuvers in the PRC of imitation of Indian tanks T-90, one of which was hit by a rotorcraft.

Another "fake" example. Pay attention to the angle of attack of the ATGM

- noted on the portal after viewing the trajectory of the anti-tank guided missile.

Apparently, the resource considers “fake” footage, which captures the reflection of an ATGM attack launched from an attack helicopter, elements of dynamic protection of the Chinese T-90 VISMOD tank.

Example T-90 VISMOD PLA:

Comments

[Graz]

looked at the lowest playback speed, it seemed to me that the rocket bounced off the ground near the tank, it looks like it was without a warhead

[NDR-791]

I see it too, it even looks like a flight from the stern.

[Free wind]

First, who will shoot a combatant during exercises? To spoil even the model, but still costs money, getting under the hodovka, right between the wheels. Even if it was an accidental hit, the tank would be immobilized. If they were aiming there in order to save the layout, then beyond praise. I looked frame by frame.

[Pastor]

China has a really strong and well-equipped army. But only with real experience of war, you can achieve something. China has no such experience. Studying a stranger. But this is not enough.

[Insurgent]

Quote: Pastor

China has a really strong and well-equipped army. But only with real experience of war, you can achieve something. China has no such experience. Studying a stranger. But this is not enough.

And in this example, the enemy - who? India... whose army also has no experience of more or less large wars ...

[Pereira]

Our last major war was with Japan 1945.
India - 1971.
China - 1979.

[Insurgent]

Quote: Pereira

Our last major war was with Japan 1945.

Quote: Pereira

India - 1971.
China - 1979.

Do you consider these local conflicts a WAR comparable to the war with Japan?

Tell me, where is the Afghan war, the 1st and 2nd "Chechens"?

[Simargl]

Quote: Insurgent

and where is the Afghan war, the 1st and 2nd "Chechens"?

And 080808 ?!

[Pereira]

Is this a war? Didn't notice.

[Simargl]

From the point of view of the Georgian government, this is a punitive operation.
If you look at it from the side of the world community, it is a war. The fact that it was so fleeting does not make this event something else.

[Pereira]

The problem is that in terms of the transience and nature of hostilities, this is more like a special operation than a combined arms battle.

[Simargl]

Quote: Pereira

it looks more like a special operation

A special operation to liberate the territory captured by the regular army units of the neighboring state ...
... now that's what it's called ...
It is necessary to write down.

[Pereira]

Well, like, yes. Are there any valid objections?

[dauria]

China has no such experience.

They have this experience, like a fool of a makhorka. No less than others. 120 thousand dead in Korea alone, when it was the PRC army that threw the Americans and the UN rabble to the 38th parallel. In fact, it was the Chinese who saved North Korea. Stubborn soldiers, persistent. And now also trained and equipped.
Who, besides them, after the Second World War, was really cut on the ground? Vietnam, perhaps, and even then, conventionally, the United States leaves this dirt to the aborigines, the British are a bit with Argentina, and the Jews and Arabs are at the level of a fight in a tavern.

[Sands Careers General]

Unfortunately (or fortunately?) Chinese warriors are so-so. Only with their own kind of Asians know how to fight.

[Lara Croft]

Quote: dauria

They have this experience, like a fool of a makhorka. Not less than others.

The latest land conflicts, these are conflicts with India, it is difficult to say that they were successful for the PLA, air incidents with the Taiwan Air Force and an amphibious operation for the Paracel Islands from Vietnam ...
But all this was a very long time ago ..., "contact wars" of the mid-late 20th century in the APR ...

120 thousand dead in Korea alone, when it was the PRC army that threw the Americans and the UN rabble to the 38th parallel. In fact, it was the Chinese who saved North Korea. Stubborn soldiers, persistent. And now also trained and equipped.

Yes, you are right, the DPRK did not disappear from the face of the earth in that war, only thanks to Chinese volunteer formations and the Soviet 64th Air Corps ...
The Chinese defeated the UN forces with the help of "living waves", the same thing was then repeated by Iran in the Iran-Iraq war, throwing numerous volunteer Basij units into the minefields of Iraq ....

Who, besides them, after the Second World War, was really cut on the ground? Vietnam, perhaps, and even then conventionally, the United States leaves this dirt to the aborigines, the British are a bit with Argentina

Not at all. The Anglo-Saxons and the USSR / RF do not climb out of the trenches.
Of course, the First "contactless" Gulf War at the end of the 20th century means nothing to you, and meanwhile the Iraqi army was at that time one of the strongest in the BV ....

yes Jews with Arabs at the level of a fight in a tavern.

I do not want to protect Israeli Jews, but in fairness, the IDF conducted one of the major wars in the BV, they can be safely called regional, by the number of participants ... and the forces involved, which the PRC never dreamed of ...

[Free wind]

Korea, Vietnam, I hope you don't think Vietnam won? their losses are more significant than those of the Chinese. It is hard to learn, easy to fight. A.V. Suvorov.

[Nikolaevich I]

Quote: Pastor

But only with real experience of war, you can achieve something. China has no such experience. ...

Alas! As the historical reality has shown, experience can be lost! Recent events include the war in Karabakh. But there are sad examples in Russia too! 1.Afgan: from the beginning of large-scale battles, the inability of the Soviet troops to fight in the mountains was revealed due to the lack of mountain (mountaineering) training and mountain equipment ... And this despite the significant experience of mountain warfare gained in the Second World War! I read the story of one helicopter pilot - "Afghan" ... During the hostilities in Afghanistan, the inefficiency of some tactical techniques in the use of combat helicopters was revealed ... The pilot was wounded, was recovering for a long time, then wound leave ... when the Afghan war ended, and then to his surprise, it was discovered that those ineffective tactics were still practiced in helicopter training! Nobody in the unit knew about the tactical innovations "discovered" by helicopter pilots in Afghanistan!
2. Chechen "events": Inability to fight in the city ... and this, despite the rich experience of the Second World War!
Both in Afghanistan and in Chechnya I had to "learn" anew! How many losses were there that could have been avoided! Who will say now?

[Jager]

The Chechen war is another story altogether ...

[mvg]

China has no such experience. Studying a stranger.

Hasn't it at all? Can I read something besides Murzilka?

[The leader of the Redskins]

Funny layout. Very reminiscent of the German crafts of the thirties, when recruits were accustomed to tanks (which are forbidden to build)))

[Insurgent]

Quote: Leader of the Redskins

Funny layout. Very reminiscent of the German crafts of the thirties, when recruits were accustomed to tanks (which are forbidden to build)))

Perhaps there is something similar, but only this is not a purely useless imitation model, but a functional element of the target complex.

[The leader of the Redskins]

Just to write something? On "useless" mock-ups, German tank units worked out actions in battle and on the march. Drivers and commanders moved from these models to panzers. And the infantry learned to repel groups of "tanks" advancing on their positions.

[Insurgent]

Quote: Leader of the Redskins

Just to write something? On "useless" mock-ups, German tank units worked out their actions in battle and on the march.

I wrote somewhere about the uselessness of German ersatz tanks, often "motorized"?

De vie take pummeled , a pan-speculator who wrote about "fun crafts"?

Would you pay attention to the Outskirts panzerwaffe and see how they on foot crews practice actions in battle and on the march.

No layouts at all ...

[The leader of the Redskins]

but only this is not a purely useless mock imitation
Now, I understand this is about German layouts?
And again you will see the subject of conversation aside from the main topic. Here they dragged the ukroinu again ...
Are you aware that you have a complex? Self-righteousness complex. Sometimes observing your comments, I have never read that you would apologize or admit a mistake.
Is it congenital or acquired by specific working conditions? Most likely from childhood ...

[Insurgent]

Quote: Leader of the Redskins

but only this is not a purely useless mock imitation
Now, I understand this is about German layouts?

NO, this is purely about YOUR COMMENT.

Quote: Leader of the Redskins

Funny layout... Very reminiscent of German crafts of the thirties

Quote: Leader of the Redskins

Are you aware that you have a complex? Self-righteousness complex. Sometimes observing your comments, I have never read that you would apologize or admit a mistake.

He who does not want to see does not see.

Quote: Leader of the Redskins

Here they dragged the ukroinu again ...

And you Germans ...

[Avior]

Manufacturing "tanks"

This is at the Kama school in Kazan

[The leader of the Redskins]

Why are you doing this? The karma was torn to the insurgent in the morning .... He considers it useless crafts. Moreover, Nazi, and you poked him that we did this too .... Have pity on the forum member. He firmly believes in his innocence ...

[K150]

Quote: Leader of the Redskins

Why are you doing this? The karma was torn to the insurgent in the morning .... He considers it useless crafts. Moreover, Nazi, and you poked him that we did this too .... Have pity on the forum member. He firmly believes in his innocence ...

And what have we to do with it, do you even know that these are German photos of German cadets?

[Insurgent]

Quote: K150

And what have we to do with it, do you even know that these are German photos of German cadets?

To the Indian - on tam-tam (in the photo the Papuans of New Guinea, but the skakuas also did not go far )

[loki565]

It looks like training helicopter pilots to hit a moving target, so as not to spoil the target, they shoot without warheads, or without a knock sensor

[Insurgent]

Quote: loki565

or without knock sensor

Something you are completely different, and from another opera ...

Knock sensor VAZ-2112, ZMZ-406,40524 (manufactured by BOSCH)

[Timofey Cherepov]

Kills distance and open terrain))) Ka-52 shoots from behind the "mountains" so to speak

[Nikolaevich I]

Quote: Timofey Cherepov

Ka-52 shoots from behind the "mountains" so to speak

How's that?

[Insurgent]

Quote: Nikolaevich I

Quote: Timofey Cherepov

Ka-52 shoots from behind the "mountains" so to speak

How's that?

And so - " From behind the forest, from behind the mountains, the man showed an ax "...

[donavi49]

I wonder if it was the Indian media that threw the news?

Just an amazing sketch. All normal people (including the exercises of the Russian army aviation) - work with inert ammunition, especially for relatively expensive models. And on the cardboard shield too. It is more convenient, practical, cheaper and safer (even at a landfill).

The video shows a classic work with an inert rocket.

[rocket757]

They thought it was necessary ... quite an adequate solution.

[Pavel57]

Quote: Free Wind

It is hard to learn, easy to fight. A.V. Suvorov.

Original: hard to learn, easy to hike.

[Usher]

So where is the fake? Understood nothing? What's wrong with the trajectory? Like a rocket, a rocket, well, it flies, well, it was shot down. What is the problem?