Commercial successes of the Ataka rocket

42

Rocket 9M120 "Attack" and transport and launch container. Photo Vitalykuzmin.net

In 1996, the Russian army adopted the latest 9M120 Attack anti-tank guided missile, intended for use in the Shturm family of complexes. Shortly thereafter, the new ATGM was introduced to the international market, followed by the first foreign orders. By now, "Attack" has shown its commercial potential, having entered service with a number of foreign armies.

Technical features


The 9M120 rocket was developed on the basis of the 9M114 "Cocon" product from the "Shturm" complex and differed from it in a number of technical innovations, as well as improved performance. "Attack" is a solid-propellant rocket 2,1 m long and 42,5 kg in weight with radio command control and a tandem cumulative warhead. With the further development of the design, other control devices, warheads, etc. were introduced.



ATGM 9M120 develops a speed of up to 550 m / s and is capable of hitting targets at ranges of up to 6 km. A cumulative warhead of the basic version provides penetration of at least 800 mm of armor behind ERA. In the 9M120M project, the range was increased to 8 km, and penetration - to 950 mm. The most advanced version of the rocket, the 9M120D, flies 10 km. Variants of missiles with fragmentation, space-detonating and rod warheads are proposed.


The crew of the Shturm-S complex is preparing to use the Attack. Photo of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

"Attack" is intended for use in the ATGM "Shturm" of various modifications and in other similar complexes. Together with the Shturm-V equipment, it should be used by helicopters. The use of ATGMs by the self-propelled ground complex "Shturm-S" is allowed. There are also projects for installing a complex with "Attack" on other samples of ground armored vehicles, incl. robotic systems, and on boats.

For the Russian army


The first and largest customer of the Attack was the Russian Armed Forces. Supply of such weapons began in the mid-nineties and continue to this day. Our army makes extensive use of the potential of this ATGM in terms of the choice of carriers and modifications with different capabilities.

9M120 products are implemented in aviation ATGM "Shturm-V", together with which they are used on combat helicopters of various types. "Attack" can be carried by the main modifications of the Mi-24/35 helicopter, all versions of the Mi-28 and Ka-52. Also, such a weapon is included in the ammunition of the transport-combat Mi-8AMTSh and Ka-29.


"Shturm-V" of the army of Kazakhstan. Photo Wikimedia Commons

Self-propelled "Shturm-S" of various modifications are capable of using 9M120. In addition, the Ataka-T complex has been developed, which is used on support combat vehicles. tanks... Other anti-tank systems using missiles of the 9M120 line are proposed and, possibly, will be adopted.

For obvious reasons, the total number of ordered and delivered Ataka missiles has not been published and remains unknown. At the same time, it is known from open sources that potential carriers of such missiles can be 500-600 helicopters of various types. The ground forces have 850 Shturm-S complexes, including those upgraded according to new designs. The number of combatant BMPT "Terminator" so far does not exceed several dozen.

Foreign customers


According to various sources, 9M120 missiles have been adopted by up to 10-12 foreign armies. The first contracts for such ATGMs appeared in the late nineties and were implemented at the beginning of the next decade. At the same time, there is no exact information on some deliveries. For example, it is known about the Iranian order in 1999 for the supply of 500 missiles for the ATGM "Shturm". According to some reports, both older "Cocoons" and new "Attacks" were supplied under this contract.


9M120 missiles as part of BMPT armament. Photo Vitalykuzmin.net

According to SIPRI, Slovenia ordered a small number of Attacks in 2009; deliveries took place already in 2010. In the same period, Russia received an order from Kazakhstan for a small number of BMPTs and ammunition for them. ATGM 9M120 were delivered in 2011-13. In 2013, Algeria ordered a variety of weapons, including Attack missiles for its Mi-28 helicopters and ground Terminators. Another confirmed customer of such ATGMs is Egypt. In 2015, he wished to receive Ka-52K helicopters and guided weapons for them.

In November 2019, a Russian-Belarusian agreement appeared on the supply of various weapons and equipment. In accordance with this document, the transfer of the first batch of 9M120 missiles took place recently. Most likely, the Belarusian army will use such weapons with Mi helicopters.

There is also information about possible deliveries of "Attacks" to other foreign armies. Such missiles, alone or together with 9M114, could be transferred to Brazil, India, Indonesia, Serbia and Venezuela. However, there are no detailed data on such deliveries. Some foreign sources mention the sale of the 9M120 ATGM to North Korea, but no official confirmation has been received.

Factors of success


As you can see, the 9M120 Attack anti-tank guided missile and its modifications show certain commercial successes. In terms of sales volume, this product cannot be compared with the market leaders, however, in this case, it provides the Russian industry with a good income. Despite their considerable age, Attack continues to be ordered, and new contracts of this kind may appear in the very near future.


Mi-28N with the "Shturm" / "Attack" launcher under the right wing. Photo "Russian Helicopters"

One of the reasons for such success should be considered the high performance of the rocket. "Attack" was developed back in the mid-nineties, but its key parameters still remain at the modern level. In addition, upgraded options with increased performance are offered. The proposed flight range and powerful warhead make it possible to effectively solve urgent problems of fighting enemy armored vehicles.

The second reason for its popularity is compatibility with a wide range of platforms, air and land. This potential is most fully realized in the case of helicopters of the Mi-24/35 family, equipped with the Shturm-V complex. Such equipment is in service with many countries, and 9M120 missiles can increase its combat potential without cardinal modernization.

The list of "Attack" carriers is expanding. The latter included the Terminator, several options for upgrading existing infantry fighting vehicles, as well as modern Mi-28 and Ka-52 helicopters. All these samples attract the attention of the customer, and contracts for their supply are accompanied by the purchase of compatible ATGMs of the latest models.


Mi-8AMTSh-VN with guided missile weapons. Photo "Russian Helicopters"

It should be noted that not all foreign customers use all the technical and operational capabilities provided by the Ataka family. So far, only Russia is in service with all compatible carriers, and advanced missiles are not yet in demand on the international market. This does not allow to fully realize the commercial potential of the rocket.

Past and Future


At the moment, the Ataka anti-tank guided missile for the Shturm family of complexes and other systems is not the market leader and cannot even claim this honorary title. However, it enjoys a certain popularity and occupies its own niche, where it has virtually no direct competitors. There are several factors driving the demand for such weapons, which leads to the regular appearance of new orders from different countries.

There is every reason to believe that the current situation will persist in the future or change for the better. Existing customers, having evaluated the Russian missiles, may order additional batches in the future. In addition, the positive experience will contribute to the emergence of contracts for the supply of new models of equipment-carriers "Attack".

It should be borne in mind that not all potential customers in the person of the armies operating the Mi-24/35 or other equipment of Soviet and Russian design have updated their missile arsenals. And if they are going to save the available helicopters and improve their combat qualities, the Russian 9M120 missiles of all modifications will become the most successful choice.
42 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    15 March 2021 05: 26
    Cost / efficiency as it is! GOS is certainly better than command control, but much more expensive.
  2. +10
    15 March 2021 05: 29
    I often come across in publications the opinion that the assault family complexes are shamelessly outdated, and in some ways we can agree with this. Of course, the optical sighting devices on the mi-24, mi-24p and assault-s / cm already look antique (if my memory serves me, then the backup optical channel is also used on mi-28n / nm). but at the same time, I cannot fail to note and even admire how the KBM, the Ministry of Defense and manufacturers carried out the development of this means of destruction, and took into account the real situation with guided weapon systems in the country.
    firstly, they gave a unified anti-tank guided missile with a dual-range gsn (radio channel / laser-beam) and put its production on stream. secondly, it was the variant of the assault complex for the ka-52 that initially gave the latter the opportunity to use controlled asp after being put into service (a "full-blooded" vortex with established production is suitable only now). thirdly, despite the fact that the assault options do not fully implement the "let and forget" principle, the joint work of KBM (rocket) and Milevites (guidance system on board the Mi-28NM) made it possible to dismantle the rainbow guidance antenna and, most likely , to provide guidance due to the nadvtulochny radar, significantly expanding the maneuverable range of the carrier after launch.
    in my opinion, these examples illustrate the fact that the article considers, albeit a modernized old rocket, but a rocket that provides widespread use in the troops, and taking into account the technical modifications of the carriers and tactical techniques, the complexes with the attack missile, although they do not become the 3rd generation complexes, but approaching them. in our situation, when there is always not enough funding, this is a compromise solution to the problem of providing the Armed Forces with new weapons
    1. 0
      15 March 2021 08: 29
      For some purposes, 2nd generation ATGMs will never become obsolete, I would also add a reket with an OF part to the GOS with coordinate guidance (with GLONASS) for the Cornet and others. This makes a good addition to artillery. But AGSN should be "cut" as well as infrared sights for 2nd generation ATGMs.
    2. +1
      19 March 2021 00: 59
      Quote: Nikolay R-PM
      the joint work of KBM (rocket) and Milevites (guidance system on board the Mi-28NM) made it possible to dismantle the rainbow guidance antenna and, most likely, provide guidance due to the nadzulok radar, significantly expanding the maneuverable range of the carrier after launch.

      Correction: the guidance system is also a KBM. Just another department. The overhead radar station is Ryazan. The maneuverability of the helicopter after launch is not associated with it, for this there is a target tracking machine. It works great on the Mi-28N too. The nadulok radar will increase the range of weapon use by about 2,5 times and will allow the use of new missiles, including those with a seeker.
      1. 0
        19 March 2021 05: 25
        thank you for the clarification and new data. at one time I tried to figure out the current state and the prospect of the assault family complexes, apparently you need to figure it out more)
  3. +5
    15 March 2021 08: 11
    About "Attack" is said well! "All sorts of rockets are important, all sorts of rockets are needed!" Here are just a few "confused" by the presence of several "branches" of helicopter missile armament 2/2 + generation! There are 3 (!) Of them in the Russian Federation: 1. "Attacks" ("Cocoon") in the "Shturm-V" complex; 2. "Whirlwinds" with the "Whirlwind-V" complex; 3. "Chrysanthemum-B" ... Where are so many?
    1. +1
      15 March 2021 08: 32
      They have just begun to lump together. Previously, something was used only by Kamov, and something by Miles. And the Chrysanthemum came from the land. In versions M and NM, it seems, should unify both complexes on both machines. There they still want to "Hermes" and to shove some kind of "Miracle Rocket". In total, the 4th complex will be.
      1. -2
        15 March 2021 20: 18
        Hermes has a small caliber - 130mm, will always be inferior to 152mm Cornet.
        1. +1
          15 March 2021 20: 40
          There's a difference in range
          1. -2
            15 March 2021 20: 42
            But there is also a big difference in mass (Hermes - two-stage). Question: what prevented the use of a 152mm second stage, preferably based on the same Cornet? request
            1. +1
              15 March 2021 23: 22
              There the speeds are different and the range ... as the caliber of the second stage increases, the speed and range decrease ...
              1. 0
                15 March 2021 23: 32
                Excuses .. Well, the weight would have grown by another 10kg. After all, in reality, we have only one type of ATGM with a caliber of 152mm.
                For comparison: the latest TOW is 152mm, Hellfire / Brimstone is 178mm.
                (Maverick is 305mm, but there is also a weight of 300kg).
                1. +1
                  16 March 2021 07: 07
                  What about air resistance? Thaw and Kornet - subsonic .... attack - supersonic
                  1. 0
                    16 March 2021 10: 27
                    With the Mega-booster on Hermes is not so relevant, I think.
                    (TOU - transonic, Max speed 320m / s.)
                    Perhaps not the way it should be, supersonic? Better to modify the ARL of the GOS or thermal imaging, to reduce the time spent under fire.
                    1. 0
                      16 March 2021 10: 51
                      Above the sound is important for Attack and Whirlwind ... because. they are helicopter-based and you need to lean out less time
                      1. 0
                        16 March 2021 11: 22
                        they are helicopter

                        And the second generation, which is important.
                        To make a telecontrolled (easier) and thermal imaging seeker (more difficult), then an increase in average speed by 100-150m / s will not be particularly important.
                        Again, the 9M133FM-2 Cornet has a long range (8 km), and of course the caliber (armor penetration).
                      2. 0
                        16 March 2021 11: 43
                        Quite right ..... that's why they bother with speed ...... the Americans still had a GP ATGM project. BOPS was accelerated and broke through the tank.
                      3. 0
                        19 March 2021 01: 26
                        Quote: Zaurbek
                        Above the sound is important for Attack and Whirlwind ... because. they are helicopter-based and you need to lean out less time

                        Supersonic is important for any large ammunition. On the other side, there are no pieces of wood, where people also think with their heads and will intercept the ATGM whenever possible.
                      4. +1
                        19 March 2021 08: 59
                        1. 150 mm - not a large ammunition ..... but a carrier that hangs twice longer on a "straight line" to the target can be destroyed. As well as the calculation of the ATGM. But air defense systems are sharpened for this and will make ATGMs fly faster than a tank.
                        2. And do not forget + supersonic, - the weight of the warhead .....
    2. 0
      15 March 2021 20: 17
      Each department has ordered rockets from different design bureaus (since Soviet times). The military had priority in finance, why not run for it?
      As a result, we have a team hodgepodge.
      1. 0
        19 March 2021 01: 26
        Quote: 3danimal
        Each department has ordered rockets from different design bureaus (since Soviet times). The military had priority in finance, why not run for it?
        As a result, we have a team hodgepodge.


        Yes? And who ordered the Attack, and who ordered the Whirlwind?
        1. +1
          19 March 2021 12: 04
          Different design bureaus ordered two missiles for each helicopter: for the Mi-28 - an ATGM based on Shturm in Kolomna (more reasonable), for the Ka-52 a new one - Vortex in the Tula KBP.
          Wasteful, but with priority in funding, you can get ahead. Citizens will be patient.
          Interestingly, the RC Guided Attack provides more stealth for the carrier.
    3. 0
      19 March 2021 01: 23
      Quote: Nikolaevich I
      About "Attack" is said well! "All sorts of rockets are important, all sorts of rockets are needed!" Here are just a few "confused" by the presence of several "branches" of helicopter missile armament 2/2 + generation! There are 3 (!) Of them in the Russian Federation: 1. "Attacks" ("Cocoon") in the "Shturm-V" complex; 2. "Whirlwinds" with the "Whirlwind-V" complex; 3. "Chrysanthemum-B" ... Where are so many?


      Here "legs grow" from the very competition for an attack helicopter. Kamov needed a "wow effect" which Kolomna was not going to do. There was a huge amount of experience in arming helicopters and people knew exactly what kind of weapon to install on the helicopter. And Tula needed an outlet on the "rocket theme". As a result, Kamov and KBP gave birth to "Whirlwind". But the Tula did not have experience in creating industrial cooperation to launch their complex into series. As a result, "Whirlwind" is still running in projects.

      "Cocoon" is the predecessor of "Attack" and is no longer in production. Sturm-B is now all on "Attack".

      So, as far as I know, today there is only one helicopter missile launcher system - Sturm-Attack.
      Whirlwind is still a project. Even for the "native" carrier - the Ka-52, it essentially does not exist.

      Chrysanthemum-B? And what's that? As far as I know, Chrysanthemum is an ATGM based on the BMP-3. Using the 9M123 rocket. How to stick this into a helicopter?

      Yes, there is a project to use the 9M123 rocket on the Mi-28NM, but this is not Chrysanthemum. The use of this missile was closely related to the presence of a full-fledged radar station on the helicopter. And since the MI-28N PNK was also developed with the participation of KBM, it seems that the expansion of the Mi-28NM armament with the 9M123 missile will look exactly as an extension, and not as a replacement.
  4. mvg
    0
    15 March 2021 10: 28
    If the article is not readable, I know the author. How many times does the article contain the phrase: Attack rocket for the Shturm complex? 15 times or 20? This is so that the readers do not forget what the speech is about?
  5. +1
    15 March 2021 15: 33
    But Attack never appeared on the boats.
  6. 0
    15 March 2021 18: 14
    The problem is the overly inflated ATGM nomenclature.
    Of the modern ones, at least 4: Whirlwind, Attack, Chrysanthemum, Cornet. Which are not compatible with each other.
    With, say, not the largest military budget.
    Where is the logic?
    IMHO, only one ATGM is needed, which is used both on helicopters, and on attack aircraft, and from ground vehicles.
    The cornet looks more preferable due to its larger caliber (152mm) and the potential for modernization. Perhaps, over time, it will become possible to create a version of the 3rd generation with thermal imaging / radar seeker.
    1. 0
      15 March 2021 18: 41
      One cannot work out in any way, since they have different masses. The Kornet rocket, which hypothetically weighs 26 kg, the air attack mentioned in the article is almost 2 times heavier than the aforementioned Hermes, in general, in my opinion, in the region of a hundred, it should have weighed. But in general, yes, the diversity is excessive.
      1. -2
        15 March 2021 19: 52
        Kornet's rocket, which hypothetically weighs 26 kg, the air attack mentioned in the article is almost 2 times heavier than the one mentioned

        26kg - version with a range of 5,5 km.
        9M133M-2, 31kg - range 8km, with 1300mm armor penetration (152mm caliber), which is noticeably more Attack with its 800-950mm (130mm caliber limits).
        The Israelis use Spike on all media, a good example.
        Hermes "in general, in my opinion, in the region of a hundred should weigh

        He seems to be undergoing tests. Ok, make it a separate class of heavy missiles.
        And still, you get only 2 types, instead of the existing vinaigrette.
        And you still need to train operators for different complexes.
        It's bad that Hermes' warheads are of the same caliber (as Attack) 130mm, he will always lose to 152mm Kornet in terms of armor penetration.
        IMHO, you just had to add a second stage to the Cornet.
        1. 0
          15 March 2021 20: 42
          Israelis use Spike on all media, good example

          So this, the spike is also 3 modifications different in range and mass dimensions.
          And you still need to train operators for different complexes.

          As I understand it, the only thing that saves the situation is that none of these complexes were massively purchased, well, except perhaps for the Cornet. All helicopters are still mainly working with NARs.
          It's bad that Hermes' warheads are of the same caliber (as Attack) 130mm, he will always lose to 152mm Kornet in terms of armor penetration.

          But to win in range, and for a multipurpose missile, sky-high armor penetration may not be needed.
          1. 0
            15 March 2021 20: 52
            for a multipurpose rocket, sky-high armor penetration may not be needed

            Strange argument .. For the same Cornet there are HE and thermobaric warheads than not a multipurpose one, just a shorter range. In a larger caliber, all warheads are more powerful.
            All helicopters are still mainly working with NARs.

            And someone is already switching to NAR with semi-active laser guidance ...
            So this, the spike is also 3 modifications different in range and mass dimensions.

            I'm talking about Spike LR and ER, with ranges of 5,5 and 8-10 km, the closest analogue of the Cornet (except for guidance systems). What is important, different versions are unified as much as possible, which cannot be said about our varied arsenal of ATGMs.
            1. 0
              16 March 2021 09: 41
              I'm talking about Spike LR and ER, with ranges of 5,5 and 8-10 km, the closest analogue of the Cornet (except for guidance systems). What is important, different versions are unified as much as possible, which cannot be said about our varied arsenal of ATGMs.

              Yes, they are unified, but firstly, you mentioned 2 out of 3 models, and secondly, as far as I understand, even in unified spikes at different ranges, they use different guidance modes.
              1. 0
                16 March 2021 10: 32
                Spike LR - similar to Cornet 9M133-1, 5,5 km range.
                The ER spike is already similar to the 9M133M-2 Cornet, with a range of 8 km.
                And our ATGM missiles are somewhat different (in the amount of fuel, a little in length and weight).
                The GOS is installed either Tele- or thermal imaging, everything is unified.
                1. 0
                  16 March 2021 10: 58
                  GOS is put or Tele-, or thermal imaging, all unified.

                  Well, if there are 2 options for the GOS, then, as it were, not all. I do not in any way justify the existing zoo, I just draw your attention to the fact that there are certain prerequisites for having several different systems.

                  Of course, in Spike it is noticeably more rational from the point of view of unification.
                  1. +1
                    16 March 2021 11: 25
                    Well, if there are 2 options for the GOS, then, as it were, not all.

                    They are arbitrarily installed, full compatibility.
                    I am not making excuses for the existing zoo, I just draw your attention to the fact that there are certain prerequisites for having several different systems.

                    I wrote above about the reasons for the "heterogeneity":
                    Each department has ordered rockets from different design bureaus (since Soviet times). The military had priority in finance.

                    Another example is the adoption of 2 attack helicopters (Mi-28N and Ka-52) at once, when it was possible to order the loser (in the competition) Mile to create an absent analogue of the UH-60 Blackhawk. Lobby, personal connections ..
                    1. 0
                      19 March 2021 02: 00
                      Quote: 3danimal
                      Another example is the adoption of 2 attack helicopters (Mi-28N and Ka-52) at once, when it was possible to order the loser (in the competition) Mile to create an absent analogue

                      And Mil did not lose the competition. He won it. The Ka-50 concept turned out to be unsuitable for combat operations, as field tests showed. And no matter how much the Kamov lobby in uniform tried to suppress the customer, but until the Mi-50 with a coaxial scheme was made from the Ka-28, the car was not accepted.
                      That is why Milya was not ordered anything. Because only he had a real combat vehicle, and not a Kamov "wow-effector". It was possible to blow cheeks even to the point of blue in the face, but nothing but the Mi-28 was in readiness stage.