Military Review

Another scandal in the "noble family"

121
Another scandal in the "noble family"
Meghan Markle and Harry interview Oprah Winfrey

In May 2018, the wedding of the grandson of British Queen Elizabeth II Harry and Rachel Markle, better known under the pseudonym Megan, took place.


The marriage initially looked very scandalous. The bride was an American actress whose fame was brought about by the Canadian television series. Stepbrother Megan in his letter to Harry, a copy of which he was not too lazy to send to the editorial office of one of the British newspapers, tried to warn the prince, calling his marriage to her

"The biggest mistake in stories royal weddings ".

In addition, Megan was three years older than the groom (she was already over 36 years old) and had previously been married.

Prince Harry's reputation is also not brilliant. In his youth, he was truly the Enfant terrible of the royal family. Even his mother, the famous Princess Diana, called him

"Spoiled boy."

And his uncle, Prince Andrew, once said that Harry

"Will never be normal."

The elder brother of this prince, William, in his youth, was also not a good boy and did not deny himself entertainment.

Some journalists even said that Harry plays the role of a "lightning rod", diverting attention from the future king. But William, of course, was smarter and more responsible than his brother. He got into an unpleasant story only once, having contrived in October 2006, during a shooting practice in Wales, to lose the L86 LSW (Light Support Weapon) machine gun. This situation was resolved quite well: the machine gun was found two hours later.

But Harry found himself in some kind of unpleasant situations with unenviable regularity. At the age of 17, he was convicted of smoking marijuana and sent on an "excursion" to a rehabilitation center for drug addicts. The prince had to admit this, after in one of the bars he, demanding alcohol, called the French waiter "frog" (according to another version - "frog").

Then Eaton College teacher Sara Forsyth provided journalists with an audio recording, from which it followed that it was she who wrote a job for 20-year-old Harry that allowed him to enter the Sandhurst Military Academy.

Prince Harry has always had problems with his studies.

Colin Campbell, in Meghan and Harry: The Real Story, quotes his classmates from Eton College:

"He just lacked the intelligence to adequately cope with the workload in such an academic institution."

"There are still stories of how the school made exams simpler so that Harry could pass them, but he still failed."

At 20, the prince smashed the lip of a London Evening Standard reporter who tried to photograph him as he left a nightclub.

At the time, he had a reputation

"Sexually disinhibited"

young man. Journalists talked about

Harry's Secret Girlfriends Club

which supposedly included girls from the most aristocratic English families. And in the royal palace, he received a rather indecent nickname from the staff, which I probably will not quote.

At the age of 21, Harry showed up for a costume party in the form of the Wehrmacht Afrika Korps (older brother William preferred a lion costume).


At the age of 28, Harry decided to play strip billiards in Las Vegas. And his photographs in the style of "nude", if desired, anyone can find on the Internet. It was alleged that the porn studio Vivid Entertainment even offered him a $ 10 million contract for the film at the time. It seems that its owners simply decided to make an advertisement in the name of the prince: it is unlikely that they seriously counted on his consent.

Finally, one day Harry swallowed a live goldfish on a bet.

But Meghan Markle quickly took control of the infantile prince. To call a spade a spade, she made him the most pitiful henpecked, and then forced him to betray her family.

The future duchess could not boast of a good education. And once on television, out of 15 questions asked to her about the history of England, she correctly answered only four. It turned out, for example, that she does not know what is depicted on the coat of arms of Great Britain.

The daughter of a white-skinned light specialist and African-American who worked in Hollywood, she began her career in a television show, where she played the role of a girl carrying a suitcase full of money.

In her portfolio, among other things, Markle pointed out the ability to perform striptease as an acting skill.

In the television series CSI: Crime Scene Investigation, she played the role of the maid Veronica, dressed in a uniform very similar to underwear.

Fame brought Markle filming in the Canadian TV series - Suits (in Russian translation - "Force Majeure"). All her other roles can be called episodic.

She also took part in a charity project in support of professional prostitutes. Megan expressed her support for them with the help of inscriptions on ... bananas.

One of the staff at Windsor Palace, who took part in the preparation of the wedding of Harry and Markle, told the already mentioned Colin Campbell:

"We were overwhelmed when we found this second-rate TV actress from California to be so demanding."

Markle's arrogance and arrogance is remembered by all the servants who encountered her.

But the scandals began even before the wedding.

At the first dinner with the royal family, Markle was outraged that one of the women (the princess of Kent) came with a brooch with a picture of a man in a turban whom she mistook for a negro. Here she got into a mess, because the picture was a Venetian Moor, but who in the tolerant United States of America is interested in such trifles?

Then she made a scandal due to the fact that Elizabeth II did not allow her to wear the tiara she liked to the wedding: the fact is that it was decorated with colored stones, and the ancient tradition requires that the bride's tiara of a member of the royal family should have colorless stones.

Harry, who perfectly knows the order of his family, sided with the bride, saying:

"What Megan wants, Megan gets."

But he failed to convince his grandmother.

Markle invited David and Victoria Beckham, Serena Williams, Oprah Winfrey, George Clooney, Tom Hardy to her wedding ceremony. But his own father, half-brother and sister Markle did not wait for the invitation: the future Duchess of Sussex quarreled with them. Her half-brother, as we remember, even tried to warn Harry.

Before the wedding ceremony, Markle demanded that Kate Middleton ... remove tights from her daughter, little Princess Charlotte. Meanwhile, according to the protocol, women of the royal family, regardless of age, are not allowed to appear in society with bare legs. But during a recent interview, which will be discussed a little later, Megan said that it was Kate Middleton who brought her to tears then.

While taking the oath during the wedding, Megan left out the word "obey." However, her husband's mother Diana and her brother's wife Kate Middleton did the same.

I must say that initially the wife of Prince William, Kate Middleton, was very coldly received in the royal palace. And the journalists, too, at first often mocked her. However, Kate, as they say, endured and is now the favorite of British citizens. Megan literally declared war on the royal family and forced her husband to participate in it.

After the wedding, Megan fired all of her assigned servants, and her firstborn's two nannies fled from her themselves.

She threw a tantrum after learning that her children, unlike Kate Middleton's children, would not be princes and princesses: boys would receive the title of count, girls would become ladies. Although it was clear to everyone that neither her origin nor her skin color had anything to do with this - these are the rules.

On September 20, 2019, already being the Duchess of Sussex, Megan came to the wedding of her friend, designer Misha Non, in a black dress for 11 thousand dollars, through the fabric of which underwear was visible. However, Harry also distinguished himself then, putting on holey shoes.

After the birth of Arthur's son, Megan at first categorically refused to show the first-born to British journalists, but allowed him to be photographed by the correspondents of American publications.

Finally, on January 8, 2020, Markle decided to abandon her duties as a member of the royal family and forced her husband to join her.

In March, Elizabeth II, reluctantly, agreed to give them a year of "leave", retaining both the ducal title, albeit removing the appeal from it

"Royal highness".

Thus, from April 1, 2020, "Sussex" became free from all obligations.

To many, this decision of Megan and Harry seems bold and admirable: they say, they gave up lifelong maintenance, privileges and decided to live by their own labor.

However, Harry at that time had in his accounts, according to various estimates, from 25 to 40 million pounds sterling. And Markle has from 5 to 7 million dollars "lying around". Taking advantage of the increased interest in her person and the title, she hoped to earn much more.

The Prime Minister of Canada, where Meghan and Harry first went, greeted them very warmly, but changed his attitude after voters were outraged to learn that the country's budget would have to pay $ 10 million a year to protect the intruders.

After that, Markle and Harry moved to Los Angeles. If they put on a different attitude here, then they miscalculated: US President Donald Trump immediately announced that he would not spend a cent on their protection.

On February 15, 2021, it became known that the notorious daughter-in-law of the ruling Queen of Great Britain, Meghan Markle, agreed to give a long interview to Oprah Winfrey.

The Royal Court made one last attempt to prevent a complete rupture of relations with her, and especially with Harry.

When Prince Philip of Edinburgh, the husband of Elizabeth II, was admitted to the hospital on February 17, it was stated that the royal family is now paramount to concern for his health. Harry and Meghan made clear hints that their interviews were untimely and undesirable.

In essence, it was a proposal for peace and a call to refrain from "burning bridges." The runaway couple paid no attention to the warning. And on February 19, Markle confirmed her desire to tell the whole world about her "suffering".

After that, it was announced that Harry and Meghan are no longer eligible to cooperate with charities as members of the royal family. And Harry was stripped of his military ranks and titles.

On March 3, the royal court's human resources department announced an investigation into allegations of bullying that Kensington Palace officials had leveled against Meghan Markle.

One of the women, whose name was not named, stated in this regard:

"We can finally tell the truth."

Royal expert Richard Fitz-Williams commented on these messages in an interview with Mail Online:

"Undoubtedly, the palace should have investigated the initial complaints back in the fall of 2018."

The Daily Mail reported that news about the investigations worried many of the palace staff, both former and current, and

"A lot of unpleasant memories."

On March 4, Prince Philip of Edinburgh underwent heart surgery.

On March 7, the long-awaited interview was released on CBS in the United States, which was watched live by 17 million TV viewers. And which Oprah declared her best work.

On the morning of March 8, the TV show was also seen by residents of the UK (audience - 12 million people).

Meghan Markle accused the British royal family of racism, cruelty to herself, refusing to provide security, and also stated that she was forced to do what she did not want. And they almost drove to suicide. “With a blue eye,” she announced that when she got married, she did not understand that the wife of a member of the royal family had some responsibilities that turned out to be extremely difficult for her.

This revelation also caused great bewilderment: the wedding ceremony, which cost the British taxpayers £ 30 million, turned out to be a staging. The real wedding took place three days before her. And Megan modestly compared herself to the Little Mermaid: they say, she fell in love with the prince and lost her voice, and now she brought it back.

Harry wasn't silent during this interview either.

Father and brother he announced

"Trapped in the existing system."

He complained that after moving to the United States, he lost financial support from the royal family. (Many commentators later wrote: what salary can an employee rely on when he refuses to fulfill his duties?)

Harry also said that as if the reason for his family's move to Los Angeles was the fear that Megan would repeat the story of his mother, Princess Diana.

The Daily Mail noted on this occasion that Megan and Harry

“Introduced the queen as a mafia boss like Don Corleone from The Godfather.

Robert Johnson, biographer of Prince Charles and Duke of Edinburgh stated:

“The Queen and the Royal Family are not the Corleone clan of Windsor.

They don't have hired assassins and gangsters who shut up people.

Megan, as an active member of the royal family, has always been under the protection of Scotland Yard employees. Thank God she was never in physical danger, and Harry knows it.

Talking that she was forced to remain silent is absurd. "

But what is the first reaction of society to this

"Awkward airing of clothes"

(expression of a New York Times journalist) from Meghan Markle's side?

In the US, the attitude towards the "Sussex" is still rather sympathetic.

And, of course, they were in the forefront

“Fighters against racial discrimination”.

For example, Martin Luther King's daughter Bernice thanked Markle and stated that

"Even being royalty does not protect against racism"
... Serena Williams, Meghan's friend, said that

“Knows firsthand how the media can participate in the vilification of women and non-white people.”

Hillary Clinton named interview

"Heartbreaking".

And the notorious Jen Psaki, spokesman for the current president, commented on this interview as follows:

“Meghan Markle is a private person, just like Harry is now.

It takes courage for everyone to tell about their problems, including psychological ones, to tell their own story, and this is what the president believes in ”.

Unexpectedly, the official representative of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation M. Zakharova, who called the interview with Megan and Harry

"Collapse of scenery"

and stated that

"Even the most protected members of the British elite do not feel safe if they are not pleasing to the royal family."

However, perhaps this is a kind of "response" to the British for the notorious highly likely?

But many conservative Britons are outraged.

Harry, who is called

"Poodle Markle",

her henpecked and a traitor to her family, they call on the queen to deprive this couple of all titles, to stop communicating with them.

Pierce Morgan, host of Good Morning Britain, talks about this interview as

"The queen's utterly shameful betrayal."

He also stated that he would not have believed Markle, even if she was only talking about the weather.

Sandy Times journalist Camilla Long named Harry

"The so-called prince."

The Sun came up with a word

"Megsit",

hinting that Markle will now never be able to return to Britain.

Tom Bauer writes:

“Harry rebelled against his family.

Appearing on US television, he sold his soul. "

Royal family biographer Robert Hardman:

"If the goal (of the interview) was not to undermine the monarchy and settle scores, I cannot understand what the point is."

A similar opinion was expressed by the correspondent of the BBC Johnny Diamond, who called this interview

"Stabbing the monarchy."

As for Meghan Markle, when speaking about her, journalists and commentators do not hesitate in expressions. Even the dress in which she was interviewed is called

"Dressed up with birds."

Meghan Markle. and Oprah Winfrey

Commenting on her accusations of the royal family of racism, the British ask the question: why did she leave for

"The most racist country in the world"

(in Britain, it turns out, the United States considers such) and why did it lighten its skin so much that it ceased to look like a mulatto?

So, dreamed of the laurels of Princess Diana, Meghan Markle may have been wrong with this interview. And ruined her reputation in Britain.

Harry definitely did the most stupid thing in his life.

The British company YouGov, specializing in sociological and marketing research, promptly conducted a survey of citizens of the United Kingdom, which showed that 47% of correspondents consider Meghan and Harry's statements unacceptable, and 31% have no sympathy for them.

However, there were also those in Great Britain who began to curse and stigmatize the royal family, accusing it of

"Callousness".

Some, hinting at the difficult relationship between Elizabeth II and Princess Diana, recall Talleyrand's words about the Bourbons, who

“They didn’t understand anything and didn’t learn anything”.

And they consider Markle the second Diana.

This comparison is not new.

Back in 2018, on the eve of Meghan and Harry's wedding, the Daily Mail could read the following:

“If Princess Diana were alive, she would be delighted with such a daughter-in-law.

Because Megan is the woman that Diana always wanted to be: independent and accomplished everything herself. "

Let's remember Diana, who was affectionately called "the people's princess" and "Cinderella".

She even ranked third on the list of the 2002 Greatest Britons in history, according to a XNUMX BBC poll.

Her paternal ancestors were descended from the illegitimate sons of King Charles II and the illegitimate daughter of his brother and successor, King James II.

Diana's father became the eighth Earl Spencer. And she received the title of "lady" for the daughters of the highest peers.

Not a very typical Cinderella, is it?

Now about the "nationality" of this princess.

It

"She was superbly able to sneak up to the door and eavesdrop on what the servants were gossiping about."

By the way, she did not speak with these servants for weeks, leaving orders in the form of notes.

Personally, I have a question: if Diana is a "people's princess", then what kind of "anti-people" do they have there in the UK?

Unhappy Diana is very

"I suffered from loneliness and misunderstanding."

And here she proved her

"Love for common people":

I was looking for “consolation” in a society far from aristocratic.

Over the years, she was the mistress of her riding instructor Captain James Hewitt, antiquarian Oliver Hoare, rugby player Will Carling, Dr. Hasnat Khan.

And Diana's youngest son Harry turned out to be very unlike her lawful husband Charles. Even a genetic examination was carried out, the results of which were never reported to British citizens.

Charles, William and Harry, not too much like them

It has been suggested that Harry's father is the gallant cavalryman Hewitt.

James Hewitt, photo 1995

In an affair with him (which lasted 5 years), Diana herself confessed.

However, the most likely candidate is the officer of the Welsh Guards regiment, Mark Dyer, who took an active part in the upbringing of Prince Harry. And unlike many official relatives, he was invited to his wedding with Meghan Markle.

Mark Dyer at Harry and Meghan's wedding

In general, quite a few Britons question Harry's royal lineage.

Well, what can I say?

Actually, this is not so rare in royal families.

Having a crown on his head does not make a monarch a model male. And the heir to the throne, unlike breeding bulls and stallions, often does not show outstanding results in intercourse. But, if you are not yet Louis XV (with his "Deer Park") and not Catherine II, who has established an almost official position of her favorite, then you are still engaged in such matters

"Quietly and under the covers."

This is exactly what Prince Philip of Edinburgh, the husband of Elizabeth II, who had numerous connections "on the side" did (his sisters, by the way, were the wives of Wehrmacht officers, and therefore they were not invited to the royal wedding).

And in the modern world, where the expediency of keeping at the state expense of the Swedish king or queen of Denmark is quite difficult to explain from a logical point of view, members of the royal houses need to be doubly careful - in all respects.

But under Diana, the British royal family was rocked by constant scandals in which her husband and the reigning queen looked like real despots and moral freaks.

They, it turns out, did nothing but tyrannize the unfortunate Diana with all their might, who declared:

“I want to travel, do what I like, and not what others expect of me.

I am willing to do what I want. "

I wonder if she understood that the wife of the heir to the throne is

"Public office",

which is hard to get a job. But is it even harder to quit?

And that any woman in this "position" will have not only rights, but also responsibilities?

It looks like she just didn't want to understand this.

And therefore, she sincerely despised her well-mannered boring husband, who, during the drought of 1976, following a government order, took a shower instead of a bath, and not every day. And, having urinated, did not flush the water in the toilet. Diana considered herself above this. And she was not going to get up on the same level with the commoners. However, she also did not want to observe the traditions of the British royal court.

Diana wanted to use her position and only take, without giving anything in return.

She performed her duties as the wife of the heir to the throne extremely reluctantly. And under any pretext she tried to evade them. And at the same time she was called

"People's Princess"

and Prince Charles -

"Mister Tampon"

(he received this nickname after using this word in a telephone conversation with his girlfriend Camilla, recorded by one of the journalists).

In the end, Diana gave a damn about all decency. She left her husband-prince. She left her children and went to live with a wealthy Alexandria-born playboy named Dodi Al-Fayed (Imad ad-Din Muhammad Abd al-Mun'im al-Fayed).

Diana and Dodi Al-Fayed

Since he was a Muslim, Diana was also going to convert to Islam - in order to officially marry him.

After that, she planned to take her sons from England. Recall that William is the second in line to the royal throne of Great Britain, and Harry was then still the third.

In general, I would not be surprised if the British special services were really involved in the accident in which this couple died on August 31, 1997.
Author:
121 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Prisoner
    Prisoner 11 March 2021 10: 05
    +10
    Well, the princes went. Dry out a whole machine gun on shooting practice! By the way, if they knew in advance what the youngest prYnts was going to tryndet about, they could have turned him down like a mother.
    1. Bashkirkhan
      Bashkirkhan 11 March 2021 10: 09
      +7
      Granny had to flog her granddaughter as a child.
      1. Ilya-spb
        Ilya-spb 11 March 2021 10: 16
        +12
        It's useless. Complete degradation.

        The British, by the way, owe us a favor. They did not accept the Romanov family. Which ultimately led to their death.

        And the reason is trivial. The Romanovs had large sums in their accounts in England. Now this money is working for the Anglo-Saxons.
        1. Insurgent
          Insurgent 11 March 2021 10: 57
          +14
          Quote: Ilya-spb
          Complete degradation.

          There is View (since the article was published in this section of the VO), create a special, separate sector - "Secular herald"in order to publish materials on the life, antics and adventures of the" beau monde ".
          After all, it is just as interesting (to eerie) how it is there, among the young people and the process ... And most importantly - without this, well, you can not do yes
          1. mole
            mole 11 March 2021 11: 57
            +4
            I don't care much about the adventures of princes and their princesses.
            The British faced a "close US friendship." When the prince's leashes are examined inside and out, the "princess" is picked up and slipped on. Next, clean up the problems in the kingdom ...
            The most interesting thing is that in the Kingdom everyone understands this fact. But as a serpentarium ... let them rejoice.
            1. Insurgent
              Insurgent 11 March 2021 12: 11
              +3
              Quote: Mole
              I don't care much about the adventures of princes and their princesses.
              The British faced a "close US friendship." When the prince's leashes are examined inside and out, the "princess" is picked up and slipped on. Next, clean up the problems in the kingdom ...


              Sure, not a problem ! Collided and collided yes Let them do it.
              But is it worth it to publish it here in the form of an expanded "footcloth" (I mean a detailed presentation of the life of the whole family with illustrations)?
              1. mole
                mole 11 March 2021 12: 29
                +1
                Quote: Insurgent


                Sure, not a problem ! Collided and collided yes Let them do it.
                But is it worth it to publish it here in the form of an expanded "footcloth" (I mean a detailed presentation of the life of the whole family with illustrations)?

                I agree completely, but they publish it.
              2. AUL
                AUL 12 March 2021 13: 40
                0
                Quote: Insurgent
                But is it worth it to publish it here in the form of an expanded "footcloth" (I mean a detailed presentation of the life of the whole family with illustrations)?

                I would have their worries!
            2. Nosgoth
              Nosgoth 14 March 2021 14: 10
              +1
              If adventures did not bother you a little, you would not read this article, and even more so, you would not have scribbled a commentary on it.
          2. Fitter65
            Fitter65 11 March 2021 12: 29
            +4
            Quote: Insurgent
            There is an Opinion (since the article was published in this section of the VO), to create a special, separate sector - "Secular Bulletin"

            Well, "news from the madhouse", that is, from Ukraine, there was also an opinion to create such a section so that they would not get confused with serious articles. Although ... If the opuses of such authors as Irina Frolova go to the "history" section, instead of section "alternative reality", then most likely it will be all together - beer, honey, manure and a tractor ...
          3. Hagen
            Hagen 11 March 2021 13: 19
            +1
            Quote: Insurgent
            After all, it is just as interesting (to eerie) how it is there, among the young people and the process ... And most importantly - without this, well, you can not do

            I would be more interested in the "deep state" and its connections with the main active players in global politics. And this "house-xxx" from Buckingham Palace doesn't get much attention.
        2. alexey alexeyev_2
          alexey alexeyev_2 12 March 2021 16: 58
          +1
          Well, not only money. The last tsarina gave them her jewelry to keep them. Now the Queen wears them. Pay attention to the tiara she wears on special occasions. It belonged to the last Russian tsarina. No other family of European monarchs had such jewelry. The so-called family The Windsor jewelry is 90 percent of Russian origin. By the way, this tiara was sometimes worn by Princess Diana. I have a strong suspicion that it was because of these bruliks that they brought the Romanovs under the bullets.
      2. Reviews
        Reviews 11 March 2021 10: 53
        +5
        Quote: Bashkirkhan
        Granny had to flog her granddaughter as a child.

        I had to start with my son. So that after the wedding he does not walk to the left with his Kamilsha, if he is already married.
    2. Civil
      Civil 11 March 2021 10: 11
      .
      This family of kings in England is purely decorative dogs for home decoration. Whether our autocracy is real, evil, merciless, it crushes the people to the point of eversion of their guts. There is something to be proud of.
      1. zloybond
        zloybond 11 March 2021 10: 37
        +1
        They don't want to work, but they need money for a good life, so he tries. Who would have listened to her now, if not for the crown))))
      2. EvilLion
        EvilLion 11 March 2021 10: 57
        0
        The people are crushing in traffic jams, so many impoverished people have cars.
        1. Lannan Shi
          Lannan Shi 11 March 2021 13: 04
          +8
          Quote: EvilLion
          The people are crushing in traffic jams, so many impoverished people have cars.

          No was, still there is. The fact is that the car does not fall apart 5 minutes after purchase. Sometimes he walks for more than a quarter of a century. Especially if a rider is driving, not a rider. And what you see in traffic jams is a legacy of the "fat" years. And so ... Sales fell. And not weak. From a peak of 2935 thousand in 2012, to 1599 thousand in the past. Which is much closer to the "dashing 90m", with, say, 1.084 million in 1997, than to the prosperous 2010-2013. yes
          In general .... Ave, Caesar, morituri te salutant. Well, or in our reality - be glorious vova, going in the 90s, greet you yes
          1. EvilLion
            EvilLion 11 March 2021 13: 09
            -2
            That is, when "Crimea is ours!" - this is shouting all a lot, and when sanctions and other aggressive actions against the Russian Federation, and countermeasures, like, lowering the rate of the national. currency, it is "Putin crushes the people."
            1. Lannan Shi
              Lannan Shi 11 March 2021 13: 19
              +8
              Quote: EvilLion
              then it is "Putin crushes the people."

              Laponka, when in Russia the number of billionaires and millionaires, in dollars, will be cut in half, and the incomes of the population will increase, then no one will wake up to say that Russians are being pressed by their own power. But when people's incomes fall, just by half, and there are more and more Rotenbergs and Alekperovs ...
              Have you looked at the latest statistics from Rosstat? Demographics? Which reacts faster than buckets of nuts? Well, you can rejoice. Judging by January 2021, we have already returned to those same 90s. Yeah.
              1. EvilLion
                EvilLion 11 March 2021 13: 27
                -7
                If you have such negative knowledge of demography, then start your study with demographically successful countries, such as Nigeria or Afghanistan. Then make suggestions based on experience. In general, the demographic lag is equal to one generation, that is, 25 years. And if in the 90s there were no children, then where do a large number of people aged 20-30 come from now, who basically give birth.

                Well, in terms of the number of billionaires, last year's records were specifically updated by "communist" China. You love to refer to it, how good it is.
                1. Lannan Shi
                  Lannan Shi 11 March 2021 13: 46
                  +4
                  Quote: EvilLion
                  If you have such negative knowledge of demography, then start your study with demographically successful countries, such as Nigeria or Afghanistan.

                  Ugums. And you can also compare the length of the Moscow Ring Road and the color of a sunflower. Et pourquoi pas? The general is about the same in both cases. yes
                  Quote: EvilLion
                  And if in the 90s there were no children, then where can a large number of people aged 20-30 come from now, who basically give birth.

                  So we have already broken through the bottom. Last year. Showing a result that is worse than the average for 1992-1999. And now we are going to an absolute anti-record. There is every chance to show the worst birth rate in the entire post-war period. There is someone to give birth, there is no desire. This is exactly what the 90s generation tells you. Yeah. I am. Have a family. But I will not give birth any more. Thanks to our government in general, and Putin and Mishustin in particular. Those who decided at my expense to sponsor different Potanin. Yeah.
                  Quote: EvilLion
                  renewed "communist" China. You love to refer to it, how good it is.

                  There are 800 billionaires in China. We have 100. We have 1 billionaire for 1.4 million, and in China for 1.8 million. To at least catch up with us, China lacks about 200 billionaires. So ... Let's not talk about China? Huh?
                  1. EvilLion
                    EvilLion 11 March 2021 13: 51
                    -6
                    And you can also compare the length of the Moscow Ring Road and the color of a sunflower.


                    No need to play around, people reproduce everywhere in the same way. But for some reason it turns out that the more benefits people have, the more something prevents them from multiplying.

                    So we have already broken through the bottom.


                    Find out where children come from. Spoiler, from mothers. And there are very few mothers.

                    This is exactly what the 90s generation tells you. Yeah. I am. Have a family. But I will not give birth any more. Thanks to our government in general and Putin


                    And, in my opinion, you were brought into being on Putin's maternity capital.

                    There are already more than 1000 billionaires in China.
                    1. Lannan Shi
                      Lannan Shi 11 March 2021 14: 25
                      +6
                      Quote: EvilLion
                      people reproduce in the same way everywhere.

                      Fuck ... Is your illiteracy everything? People even eat and go to the toilet differently in different countries. If I can quite get away from everyone, with a plate to chew on, because they got it, and I want silence, then let's say in a Korean, just at the thought of eating alone, depression begins. If I, get up from the table, since they begin to discuss the color, um ... The result of the morning trip to the toilet ... And it's good if I just leave, and not snitch, along the way, between my ears, then the same Korean will also be interested in smell with consistency. And he will give advice on how to improve that very smell. And this is food and toilet, basic for everyone, and not much more complicated reproduction. And if you think that some lumuba is from a Nigerian village, it is the same as some Vanya from a crop failure, only a couple of years unwashed, and therefore black ...
                      Quote: EvilLion
                      And there are very few mothers

                      No no no. I understand. Knowledge is not fashionable these days. Now it is fashionable to prove oneself with slogans and chants. But everything should have a limit, perhaps? In 2015, the size of the age group from 20 to 40 (those who give birth in general) was 45 million people. In 2020 - 41 million. The fall is less than 10 percent. In 2015, 1944 thousand children were born, in the past - 1434. The fall is more than 25% 10% less than those able to give birth, but the remaining 15% ... The economy in its purest form. Yeah.
                      Quote: EvilLion
                      There are already more than 1000 billionaires in China.

                      Are you broadcasting from an alternate universe? I don’t know about you, but in our China there are 799.
                      In general ... Sorry generously, I will not answer further. For when a person is not even able to find out the number of billionaires by country .... What can we discuss with you? I am afraid that you will find your own alternative vision for the multiplication table. yes
                  2. matross
                    matross 11 March 2021 19: 00
                    -5
                    Quote: Lannan Shi
                    There is someone to give birth, there is no desire. This is exactly what the 90s generation tells you. Yeah. I am. Have a family. But I will not give birth any more. Thanks to our government in general, and Putin and Mishustin in particular.

                    Earlier, madam, you made it clear that you are long gone from childbearing age. You are confused in the testimony.
                    1. Lannan Shi
                      Lannan Shi 11 March 2021 19: 16
                      +4
                      Quote: matRoss
                      Earlier, madam, you made it clear that you are long gone from childbearing age. You are confused in the testimony.

                      Laponka. Sorry generously. But you are commonplace liar... Of course, you can now file a complaint for an insult, but ... If you have at least something from a man, besides an entry in your passport, would you be so kind as to provide my post with such hints. And so, yes. This is not an insult, but a simple statement of fact.yes
                      1. matross
                        matross 12 March 2021 11: 57
                        -1
                        Quote: Lannan Shi
                        you are a banal liar

                        I was wrong. I apologize for that. You are 32 years old.
                      2. Lannan Shi
                        Lannan Shi 12 March 2021 16: 35
                        +2
                        Quote: matRoss
                        I was wrong.

                        Em. I take my words back. I am forced to admit that my statement about you does not correspond to the truth. I apologize for the harshness of judgment.
                2. alexey alexeyev_2
                  alexey alexeyev_2 13 March 2021 14: 15
                  -3
                  Sponsored personally at your expense? Potanin lost almost a billion in weight for a shit near Norilsk. Did this affect your budget, are you our diamond sponsor?
              2. V1er
                V1er 12 March 2021 07: 11
                +7
                Quote: EvilLion
                And if in the 90s there were no children, then where can a large number of people aged 20-30 come from now?

                So the problem is that people 20-30 years old do not want to start families. It is expensive. And to start, so that then society will spread rot for the poor, cheap clothes, lack of basic things and healthy food, self-development (circles, sports circles). What for?
  2. Clear
    Clear 11 March 2021 10: 18
    +16
    Yes, on the face of this Rachel Markle, you can see that she is a bitch, and uses the henpecked Garrick, in her mercantile interests.
    Although winked from a political point of view, we need to support this bitch Megan in rocking questions about the centuries-old slave-owning essence of the Anglo-Saxons. About their terrible oppression of blacks in their colonies around the world, as well as in England and the United States now.
    Let the different queens jump out of anger, the silly Hillary Clintons and other obscurantism mercilessly breaking, both earlier and now, the vulnerable souls of gentle blacks ...
    Steal the loot! Freedom for blacks!
    Something like this! crying
    1. WHAT IS
      WHAT IS 11 March 2021 10: 38
      +11
      Quote: Clear
      Freedom for blacks!

      They have gone completely crazy with this tolerance there.
    2. Skay
      Skay 11 March 2021 11: 06
      +3
      It is believed that Markle is a sent Cossack with the aim of undermining the British monarchy in favor of American gentlemen. hi
      1. for
        for 12 March 2021 23: 02
        0
        Quote: Skay
        It is believed that Markle is a sent Cossack

        She is Trump's illegitimate daughter.
    3. neri73-r
      neri73-r 11 March 2021 12: 20
      +4
      There, the whole royal family, from Lisa's grandmother to her granddaughter and daughter-in-law, are gone! These are eternal and irreconcilable enemies of ours, and the worse they have, the easier it will be for us.
    4. Pete mitchell
      Pete mitchell 11 March 2021 12: 44
      +3
      organizations as members of the royal family. And Harry was stripped of his military ranks and titles.
      I remember with what delight the young Britons told me about the princes' service - lead by example.. what a bummer, the kid fell into something muddy in front of the whole world.
      Madam, madam love you cannot support this rubbish - it will remain in memory as a character who has harmed the traditional foundations, for very mercantile purposes. And there will be only
      Quote: Clear
      ... Steal the loot!
      and on all sorts of blacks, like everyone else, she will use it as
      Quote: Clear
      henpecked Garrick, in his mercantile interests ...
      1. Clear
        Clear 11 March 2021 19: 02
        +5
        Quote: Pete Mitchell
        Madam, madam you can't support this stuff -

        Well, as you say, dear Michelle love You are closer to them there, and you know better wink
    5. mole
      mole 14 March 2021 21: 06
      +1
      Quote: Clear
      Yes, on the face of this Rachel Markle, you can see that she is a bitch, and uses the henpecked Garrick, in her mercantile interests.

      You are absolutely right, the prince was studied up and down, Markle came up
      ideally. British crown tears hair.
      I disagree on the second part of the comment. Let them figure out their own serpentarium. For us, the oil in the fire, and gather the fruits.
  3. Vladimir_2U
    Vladimir_2U 11 March 2021 10: 41
    +2
    Quote: Captive
    Dry out a whole machine gun during shooting practice

    What a damage to the defense of Britashka! laughing
    Be sure to place the article in the VO, aircraft carriers tanks and the wife of the prince of blood! Without it! lol
    1. EvilLion
      EvilLion 11 March 2021 13: 12
      -2
      I'm afraid that the state of emergency is much more than a tank driven into a swamp. A tank is just money, and small arms are a crime.
  4. Tank jacket
    Tank jacket 11 March 2021 11: 18
    -3
    All this PR and a wave in the media is aimed at getting us this prick in the capacity of the Emperor of Russia. Either Zhorik Hohenzollern is being promoted, then the red-haired Harry. These pryntsy-clowns, just like in the "Elusive Avengers" Crown of the Russian Empire. "But the media stubbornly sniff them ... negative
    1. Insurgent
      Insurgent 11 March 2021 13: 11
      +2
      Quote: Tank jacket
      All this PR and a wave in the media is aimed at getting us this prick in the capacity of the Emperor of Russia.

      Nope ... So that a give out, you need to smoke, and something very big yes
      1. Tank jacket
        Tank jacket 11 March 2021 18: 40
        -4
        Essentially have something to say? Is the firm related to the Romanovs? Do you think the company has plans to put its offspring at the head of Russia? Is there too much PR of the Anglo-Saxon firm in the media?
  5. seti
    seti 11 March 2021 11: 54
    -2
    Now let's compare this custom article with this one: http://agitpro.su/udar-po-monarxii-stavit-pod-vopros-budushhee-vsej-britanii/
  6. Vasilenko Vladimir
    Vasilenko Vladimir 11 March 2021 12: 16
    +6
    Quote: Captive
    Well, the princes went.

    you might think they were of better quality before
  7. Roman070280
    Roman070280 11 March 2021 12: 22
    +9
    Well, the princes went.


    And I like the princess !!
    I hope Harry won't be offended by me ..))



  8. iouris
    iouris 11 March 2021 13: 52
    +1
    Quote: Captive
    could and fill up like mother

    Not. Now she will "fill up" them all. So the card lay down. Black starts and ... checkmate to the white queen.
    Big riches are at stake. "Eh, crown of the British empire ... Elizabeth, you were wrong."
  9. sabakina
    sabakina 11 March 2021 14: 44
    +2
    Quote: Captive
    Well, the princes went.
    Alas! Gone are the days when real princes looked for a real princess on the side, and found her in their home ...
  10. Alexey RA
    Alexey RA 11 March 2021 14: 56
    +6
    Quote: Captive
    Well, the princes went. Dry out a whole machine gun on shooting practice!

    I should have awarded him an honorary weapon ... for two weeks that way. smile
  • rocket757
    rocket757 11 March 2021 10: 06
    +9
    That's really ... substance, here WHY?
    1. Bashkirkhan
      Bashkirkhan 11 March 2021 10: 15
      +6
      Popcorn disappears. XXI century ... titles, counts, princes ... Crunch of Westminster rolls.
    2. Egoza
      Egoza 11 March 2021 10: 18
      +6
      Quote: rocket757
      That's really ... substance, here WHY?

      well, can bring to notice, "opinions" from different countries. Moreover, SAMA ZAKHAROVA was noted.
      And about the "little wife" I will say: "Circassian saddle does not suit a cow"
      It is possible that the US intelligence services, having slipped this little lady to the near prince, hoped in the future to completely seize Great Britain in their hands. But it didn't work out
      1. knn54
        knn54 11 March 2021 10: 29
        +2
        Elena, I will add - "Nemaє girshe, yak from Ivan Pan, and from Maryka goodness."
        Indeed, an attack on the monarchy.
        Globalists "beat" on all fronts.
      2. Free wind
        Free wind 11 March 2021 14: 47
        +1
        And what kind of creature is Zakharova herself?
    3. Alien From
      Alien From 11 March 2021 10: 31
      +6
      So I also did not understand why we need this swamp?
      1. sabakina
        sabakina 11 March 2021 14: 59
        0
        Quote: Alien From
        So I also did not understand why we need this swamp?

        Well, how to say it is clear ... They warn, however ...
        [media = https: //youtu.be/dsXbMsrwjEQ]
  • Foul skeptic
    Foul skeptic 11 March 2021 10: 10
    +9
    Voennoye Obozreniye became Speed-Info.
    1. Ilya-spb
      Ilya-spb 11 March 2021 10: 14
      +7
      Not. In AIDS, info of naked women was shown.
      1. Insurgent
        Insurgent 11 March 2021 12: 42
        +2
        Quote: Nefarious skeptic
        Voennoye Obozreniye became Speed-Info.



        Quote: Ilya-spb
        Not. In AIDS, info of naked women was shown.

        You left the discussion early yes Such women (photos) appeared in the comments
      2. iouris
        iouris 11 March 2021 14: 10
        0
        It would be better to show lard and vodka.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Alexga
    Alexga 11 March 2021 10: 22
    +5
    For the Military Review, there is probably no news, except about
    about the murky affairs in the royal family about the Windsor family.
  • Free wind
    Free wind 11 March 2021 10: 24
    +7
    Honestly, I don’t know what it’s here for. But if this is for the VO, then one could write that Prince Harry is a participant in the hostilities in Afghanistan. The first business trip was a machine gunner, a co-pilot of a helicopter. I stayed there for about a year. Would you like to have a clumsy partner as your partner? And what kind of panties wears. I'm violet.
  • Alexander X
    Alexander X 11 March 2021 10: 31
    0
    What are the moral u.r.o.dys. And this is the "color of the English nation"!
    1. Skay
      Skay 11 March 2021 11: 10
      +2
      And this is the "color of the English nation"!

      "- And these people forbid me to pick my nose with my finger ?!" (c)
  • prior
    prior 11 March 2021 10: 33
    0
    A family of clowns in royal robes. lol
  • alekc75
    alekc75 11 March 2021 10: 33
    +6
    and why is all this here ???? is that the tabloid press? who said what. what they wrote and what photos were. what for?????
  • Glory1974
    Glory1974 11 March 2021 10: 39
    0
    And where is the information that Prince Harry converted to Orthodoxy? And that he secretly met with representatives of the House of Romanov and was viewed as a contender for the throne in Russia? In general, a very muddy story, the special services of several states are definitely involved there, but what we see is only the tip of the iceberg.
  • Oleg Aviator
    Oleg Aviator 11 March 2021 10: 41
    +2
    Noble ones) ... Their whole life is continuous scandals.
  • Bolt cutter
    Bolt cutter 11 March 2021 10: 45
    +3
    In May 2018, the wedding of the grandson of British Queen Elizabeth II Harry and Rachel Markle, better known under the pseudonym Megan, took place.
    How did this event affect the population of the long-eared owl in the central Volga region? wassat Is there really no more news for the Military Review? request
  • Walking
    Walking 11 March 2021 10: 56
    +4
    The author, accusing Diana, that you forgot to mention that her well-mannered boring husband was the first to cheat on her with his longtime mistress Camila Parker and began to meet with her constantly and the royal family was the first to spread rot on the princess, after which Diana began to behave accordingly towards herself. So you need to write objectively.
    This article is not for VO.
  • VLR
    11 March 2021 11: 02
    +14
    Dear readers, I would like to clarify the situation with this article:
    Strange as it may seem to someone, it’s about politics, and even about big politics. We are not talking about pop stars, but about family members, whose fortune is estimated at 80 billion pounds sterling. The head of which has powers significantly exceeding those of the Iranian ayatollahs. The king (or queen) “cannot be wrong” (the official wording) is the supreme commander in chief, the head of intelligence and counterintelligence. Until 2011, Elizabeth II had the right to dissolve parliament at any moment. And all the laws of Great Britain still come into force only after the approval of the good-natured "grandmother Lisa". Few people know this, but in the 80s, Elizabeth II took and forbade Mi-6 to supply information to Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. At the same time, by her personal order, she sent troops into the unrest-ridden mining regions.
    In addition, Elizabeth II is officially the head of the other 16 states. In 1975, the British Governor-General of Australia, John Kerr, on the orders of Elizabeth, fired the Prime Minister of this country and dissolved Parliament - this is about the decorativeness of royal power in Great Britain.
    And the population of the countries of the British Commonwealth at the moment is 2 billion people (one third of the world's population).
    And therefore, all these scandals go far beyond family relationships and have great political significance.
    This is the first.
    Secondly, I would like to ask moralists, is it permissible from their point of view to write articles about Platon Zubov, Princess Dolgorukova-Yuryevskaya, Louise de Lavalier, Madame de Montespan, the "blue" Duke of Buckingham and other characters in world history? And how worse (or better) are their members of the current British royal family?
    1. Galleon
      Galleon 11 March 2021 11: 49
      +5
      And I liked the article. Thank you, Valery.
      Those fragmentary information that previously came from sources that did not inspire confidence are systematized here, fully disclosed and simply described in an interesting way. And the theme is really such that you cannot dismiss it.
    2. Insurgent
      Insurgent 11 March 2021 11: 50
      +5
      Quote: VlR
      Dear readers, I would like to clarify the situation with this article:
      Strange as it may seem to someone, it’s about politics, and even about big politics.

      That is, even with such a small amount of critical remarks in the comments, do you still understand that the material is somewhat "out of line" for publication on VO?
      Moreover, in this format, with the details of the life of the "royal persons", almost with the intimate nuances of the "gossip" - "where, what and how they itch"...

      Does the VO reader need such materials in such a detailed form? request That is the question yes

      But on the other hand, since you (your article-opinion) have been published here, it means that the one who "lights the stars", this topic is "to taste" ... But there is no dispute about tastes. Especially with those with whom the dispute will be more expensive.
      1. Simargl
        Simargl 11 March 2021 15: 05
        +3
        Quote: Insurgent
        Does the VO reader need such materials in such a detailed form?
        For example, I liked it. And just the same by the unfolding of the format.
        Or do you want everything to be "done" with a short note that looks more like a set of headlines, like a jaundiced press? So this is enough for VO.
    3. Sergej1972
      Sergej1972 11 March 2021 12: 09
      +5
      Of these two billion, half is in India, a republic that has its own head of state - the President (although the Prime Minister has real power). India does not regard the British queen as head of state. And the queen has no, even formal, powers in India. For India, the British queen is just a symbolic head of the Commonwealth. The Commonwealth includes several more republics. As for the governors general of Canada, Australia, New Zealand, they have long been appointed from among the locals, and their candidacies are actually selected by the prime ministers and the ruling parliamentary majority, taking into account the opinion of the largest opposition party.
      1. 2 Level Advisor
        2 Level Advisor 11 March 2021 20: 45
        +2
        Sergey, I'll just say that India has not been included in the 16 countries of the Commonwealth for a long time - you are mistaken, and do not know the question .. Like all those who think that the Queen of England is a symbolic position, just try to inquire about the legal one! list of her powers and capabilities - not a single president dreamed of ..
        1. Sergej1972
          Sergej1972 11 March 2021 21: 01
          +1
          She is not one of those Commonwealth states that recognize the British Queen as their head of state. But India is also a member of the Commonwealth. For Canadians, Australians, the British Queen is the Queen of Canada, Queen of Australia. Etc. At the same time, the parliament and government of Great Britain in those monarchies of the Commonwealth, which recognize Elizabeth as their head of state, have no influence. By the way, the Commonwealth, as an exception, includes one republic, which has never been a British colony. It is the former Portuguese colony of Mozambique.
          1. Sergej1972
            Sergej1972 11 March 2021 21: 28
            +2
            Some members of the Commonwealth were once dependent not on Great Britain directly, but on its dominions - Australia, South Africa.
          2. Sergej1972
            Sergej1972 11 March 2021 21: 30
            +1
            By the way, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nigeria, South Africa are also republics, they are not among the kingdoms of the Commonwealth, but at the same time they are its members.
        2. Sergej1972
          Sergej1972 11 March 2021 21: 18
          +1
          Have you heard about such a thing as countersignature? Most of the Queen's acts without the signature of the prime minister and / or one of their ministers are invalid. On the other hand, it does not bear political responsibility for the signed acts. By the way, the current queen has never vetoed any law, like all her predecessors in the 19th and 20th centuries.
          1. VLR
            13 March 2021 08: 43
            +2
            Of course, why would Elizabeth II veto laws that she had previously approved? All bills are delivered to the Chancery of the Palace, studied there (not necessarily by the queen, there are other people) and returned with amendments. The same Margaret Thatcher complained in her memoirs that Elizabeth constantly pressed on her and almost thrashed her. And the big question is, who was the "Iron Lady" at that time, and who was the "plasticine". In addition, Britain has a House of Lords completely controlled by the monarchs, which can wrap up any objectionable law. So the "smerds" from the House of Commons know their place and dare not break the rules of the game.
            As for India, Elizabeth is not the head of this state. And he is the head of Canada, Australia and 14 other states. They are not part of Britain, but they do recognize Elizabeth's authority. If tomorrow grandmother Lisa is dethroned from the English throne, she will remain the head of 16 formally independent states and calmly move to Ottawa or Canberra.
    4. 72jora72
      72jora72 11 March 2021 12: 09
      +1
      And all the laws of Great Britain still come into force only after the approval of the good-natured "grandmother Lisa"
      And the "grandmother" is also a racist, which, in principle, is not surprising, like her great-power ancestors ...
    5. Krasnoyarsk
      Krasnoyarsk 11 March 2021 12: 15
      +3
      Quote: VlR
      Dear readers, I would like to clarify the situation with this article:

      You see what the matter ... By nature, I hate gossip and never listened to them. But, realizing the importance of the internal squabbles of members of the British royal family for international politics, I read the article. And what did I see there? Nothing. The usual gossip, though probably true. It would be much more interesting if the article was focused on politics. How can our Foreign Ministry take advantage of the current situation? Who will play the first violin after Baba Lisa leaves? Will her role be pulled by sick Charles? And what are the other two sons of Baba Lisa? How will it be reflected in the future on the royal family, I mean politics, the behavior of grandmother's grandchildren? Well, etc.
  • tank64rus
    tank64rus 11 March 2021 11: 03
    +4
    The usual majors, but with titles and from the royal family. We have worse.
  • 72jora72
    72jora72 11 March 2021 11: 15
    0
    that she does not know what is shown on the coat of arms of Great Britain
    To be honest, I also don't remember what they have painted on their coat of arms ...
    1. VLR
      11 March 2021 11: 34
      +2
      Quote: 72jora72
      that she does not know what is shown on the coat of arms of Great Britain
      To be honest, I also don't remember what they have painted on their coat of arms ...

      Quote:
      The lion and the unicorn
      Were fighting for the crown
      The lion beat the unicorn
      All around the town.

      Translation by S. Marshak:
      "He led a mortal battle with Leo Unicorn for the crown
      The Lion drove the Unicorn along the city roads ... "




      But you are probably not claiming the title of British Duke, are you?
    2. Free wind
      Free wind 11 March 2021 11: 39
      +3
      Seals, roses, thistles, unicorns, in short, a lot of incomprehensible things
    3. Keyser soze
      Keyser soze 11 March 2021 11: 57
      +8
      To be honest, I also don't remember what they have painted on their coat of arms ...


      Yes English lions, Scottish unicorns, a ton of tinkers, plus Dieu et mon droit (Lord and my right), Henry V, 15th century.
  • certero
    certero 11 March 2021 11: 34
    -5
    Nice interesting article
  • APASUS
    APASUS 11 March 2021 11: 57
    +8
    I don’t understand why VO turns into hotties and Sun yellow pages?
  • A. Privalov
    A. Privalov 11 March 2021 12: 10
    +3
    Jaundice got here too. Now VO can be safely attributed to the sites that are not abhorrent of rumors, sensations, scandals and gossip about the life of famous people. Bad sign, I dare say.
    Please accept my deepest condolences. hi
    1. Insurgent
      Insurgent 11 March 2021 12: 32
      +6
      Quote: A. Privalov
      Jaundice got here too. Now VO can be safely attributed to the sites that are not abhorrent of rumors, sensations, scandals and gossip about the life of famous people. Bad sign, I dare say.


      The rarest, almost unprecedented history case when I completely agree with the assessment A.Privalov.

      Quote: A. Privalov
      Please accept my deepest condolences.


      What really is there recourse Died so died crying
      1. A. Privalov
        A. Privalov 11 March 2021 15: 44
        +1
        Quote: Insurgent
        The rarest, almost unprecedented case in history

        Well, if you do not approach the situation with excessive categoricality, then there could well be a common denominator on a number of issues of mutual interest. hi
        1. Insurgent
          Insurgent 11 March 2021 16: 32
          +3
          Quote: A. Privalov
          Well, if you do not approach the situation with excessive categoricality, then there could well be a common denominator on a number of issues of mutual interest.

          Boom to bear in mind yes hi
    2. VLR
      11 March 2021 13: 58
      0
      Well, accept then one more "rumor" (which, in fact, is "not very" rumor).
      Now "good people" outside the UK are deciding what to do after the death of "Baba Lisa". To bring down boring and boring Charles with the name of the "holy great martyrs" Diana and Megan? To give the throne to the pliable and inexperienced William, who, by the way, is not eager to reign? Or leave Charles on a short leash?
      This, in your opinion, has nothing to do with VO?
      1. A. Privalov
        A. Privalov 11 March 2021 15: 37
        +6
        Quote: VlR
        This, in your opinion, has nothing to do with VO?

        So.
        I don't even understand your personal agitation about this. hi

        Let's leave the worries of arranging the proper protocol for the transfer of succession to the British throne and the royal prerogatives attached to it to the subjects of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

        Elizaveta Albertovna has many years!
        1. VLR
          11 March 2021 15: 56
          +3
          Well, we probably care who becomes the king of one of the most Russophobic states in the world. By the way, taking into account the statement of M. Zakharova, who spoke very harshly about the royal family, we can conclude that Putin is "betting" on William and does not believe that Charles will be allowed to ascend the throne. Charles is treated badly in the UK, much worse than William. The British royal family is now in a state of shock, and this shock is not explained by Meghan's silly interview, but by anxiety about the fate of the dynasty. Already the British know well how easy it is, having the necessary resources, to process the townsfolk and make them walk with pots on their heads. There won't be a revolution, of course, but
          the authority of the monarchy is based on one person - Elizabeth, and there may be a crisis in the transition of power.
          1. A. Privalov
            A. Privalov 11 March 2021 17: 17
            +2
            Quote: VlR
            one of the most Russophobic states

            So Russia is not from the Anglophile powers, as I understand it. So in this we can observe quite reliable parity. But showing such an unhealthy interest in the smell from the underwear on the island, you can completely unexpectedly sit in a puddle. And then there is nothing to be surprised at that the "worried West" sees the "hand of Moscow" everywhere.
            For the statements of Madame Zakharova are the very interference in internal affairs, which the Russian Federation itself does not like very much. So, I repeat, leave the British calmly, without good advice from the VO, to solve their problems in the monarchical dynasties. hi
            1. VLR
              11 March 2021 17: 34
              -1
              Well, so Zakharova says practically the same thing as Psaki! That is, "right." Did we come to a consensus behind the back of the "British left"? smile
  • Roman070280
    Roman070280 11 March 2021 12: 18
    +5
    Yes, such a normal princess .. why all the carp ..

    1. Simargl
      Simargl 11 March 2021 15: 09
      +3
      Quote: Roman070280
      what is everyone picking on
      Where's Woodman?
  • Stirbjorn
    Stirbjorn 11 March 2021 12: 19
    -1
    Some kind of frank order against Harry and Megan. The author works for the Anglo-Saxons ?! wassat
  • Petrik66
    Petrik66 11 March 2021 12: 58
    +5
    Well, we also had children: Vasya Stalin, Svetlana Aliluyeva, Khrushchevs (both sons), Galina Brezhneva, Yuri Brezhnev - both alcoholics, Igor Andropov,
    1. Simargl
      Simargl 11 March 2021 15: 13
      0
      Quote: Petrik66
      Well, we also had kids too
      And what were the prospects for influencing politics among the "kids"?
      Harry is third in line. And taking into account the state of the first and the reluctance of the second - a little the first.
      Long summers for the queen?
      1. Bolt cutter
        Bolt cutter 11 March 2021 16: 22
        +4
        Harry is third in line
        Actually his number is six laughing ... After William are his three (it is possible that he will do more) children in order of seniority.
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Succession_to_the_British_throne#:~:text=Queen%20Elizabeth%20II%20is%20the,Prince%20of%20Wales's%20elder%20son.
  • Iris
    Iris 11 March 2021 13: 11
    +3
    An absolutely shameful article. Russian Military Patriotic Forum Discusses British Royal Family Underwear! Have sunk.
    The site has quite different flaws, but the low-profile gossip has so far been out of the orbit of its interests.
    1. VLR
      11 March 2021 13: 23
      +1
      Is it okay that this "airing of the clothes" of Meghan and Harry after the death of Elizabeth II could have very far-reaching consequences and could change the history of Great Britain and the whole world?
      By the way, are you aware that at the court of Catherine II and a number of French Louis (and not only) the information from the bedroom was considered the most valuable and the envoys of foreign powers were ready to pay any money to find out at least something? And nobody wrinkled their nose, you know. And, you can believe, politicians of the highest rank are now not up to disgust. These issues are being actively discussed both in the Kremlin and in the White House, in Berlin and Paris (etc.), pushing into the background many more important (from your point of view) problems.
      1. 2 Level Advisor
        2 Level Advisor 11 March 2021 20: 48
        +1
        Valery, thanks for the article, just many people underestimate the influence of the Anglo-Saxon monarchy on the world ..
      2. Iris
        Iris 12 March 2021 20: 43
        +1
        Unfortunately, I cannot agree with you.
        Of course, it is wrong to consider the powers of the British monarch exclusively ceremonial - the monarch really participates in determining the country's foreign policy. It should be borne in mind, first, the function of these powers: in modern Britain it is a rudiment of the system of balancing the power of the Elected and the power of the Inherited. Accordingly, the will of the monarch in Britain is only one of the forces that determine this course, and not the main one.
        And secondly, the limits of these powers - a perfect example is the story of Edward VIII, who, with his pro-Nazi views and "harassing" bride, opposed the government and was forced to resign.
        In this regard, the relationship of Megan, the wife of the third in line contender for the throne, with the royal family is of more interest to fans of scandalous chronicle than to political analysts.

        PS The story with the ban on the provision of intelligence information to Thatcher seems to me incredible: Britain's actions in the Gulf War were determined by its status as a member of the Coalition. But, although the de jure monarch is the commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces, strategic decisions are made by the country's political leadership. With such a legal basis, such an initiative in the context of a military campaign can be regarded as a threat to the country's security .. In any case, I did not find any mention of this episode in Western sources.
        Regards, Iris.
  • mojohed2012
    mojohed2012 11 March 2021 13: 48
    +3
    An American in the royal family is like a woman on a ship or a woman on a cart ... If she climbed in, she shit.
    1. Petrik66
      Petrik66 11 March 2021 15: 19
      +1
      whether it is - German women !!!!! Ours were lucky, so lucky.
      1. mojohed2012
        mojohed2012 11 March 2021 15: 29
        0
        And the Germans - Everything! There is no longer that country and that dynasty.
        The article deals specifically with England and their royal dynasty. Why should we talk about the dead. hi
  • Old26
    Old26 11 March 2021 16: 33
    +6
    Valery! Thanks for the interesting article showing the underside of the royal family. Usually the materials are either very scattered, or as in relation to this interview in our media. Megan and Harry in these stories look offended, they, the unfortunates, were treated all this time.
    The only way this article should have been posted, it seems to me, was not in the OPINIONS section, but in the HISTORY section

    Quote: VlR
    In addition, Elizabeth II is officially the head of the other 16 states. In 1975

    Yes, they often forget about it, or many simply do not know. My classmate received Canadian citizenship in 2000 and when he was in Russia at a funeral he mentioned this with the words: "I swore an oath to the Queen." For some it was a revelation
  • Soldatov V.
    Soldatov V. 11 March 2021 17: 20
    0
    For ten years I have been reading IN that the author is not a professional. Thank you!
    Great Britain is a deeply medieval state, and that says it all.
  • Ryaruav
    Ryaruav 11 March 2021 19: 14
    +2
    Yeah niggers British princess is something
  • mark2
    mark2 11 March 2021 20: 37
    +1
    Will Meghan be the next Princess Diana?
    And what do we care? Yes, do not care how they spat in the days of prehistoric materialism .. With saliva!
  • Aag
    Aag 12 March 2021 06: 23
    +2
    ... Is this "Military Review"? ... recourse
  • VLR
    12 March 2021 10: 52
    +1
    I came across two interesting pictures about the interview with Megan and Harry.
    This one is signed:
    The only woman in the world who turned a prince into a frog



    And here - everything is in Russian:
  • Basarev
    Basarev 15 March 2021 12: 08
    +2
    All because because the royal family forgot about discipline. Everyone has duties, everyone must fulfill unquestioningly. And observe the highest morality. In monarchies, the royal family is the face of the country. This means that there are no personal attachments, there is only duty. And duty orders not to fornicate, to abide by protocol and, at a click, to forget everyone he loved. There are rules commanding not to let anyone in the family, especially the wrong color or rank. The rules were broken, which is the cause of the current mess.
  • Consul
    Consul 16 March 2021 14: 56
    +15
    At 21, Harry showed up for a costume party in the Wehrmacht Afrika Korps uniform.

    However, genes yes
    I remember there is a photograph from the 30s, in which the royal family is captured with a Nazi salute.
  • Consul
    Consul 16 March 2021 14: 58
    +16
    Megan literally declared war on the royal family and forced her husband to participate in it.

    One gets the impression that she is haunted by the "glory" of Princess Diana.
  • Consul
    Consul 16 March 2021 15: 04
    +15
    Harry also said that as if the reason for his family's move to Los Angeles was the fear that Megan would repeat the story of his mother, Princess Diana.

    It can be screwed up ... But I'm pretty sure Megan won't die a natural death.