Military Review

"The first to receive hypersonic missiles": The USA launched the 21st Virginia-class multipurpose nuclear submarine

86
"The first to receive hypersonic missiles": The USA launched the 21st Virginia-class multipurpose nuclear submarine

The United States launched a new Virginia-class multipurpose nuclear submarine Montana. The ceremony took place on March 4 at the Huntington Ingalls Industries shipyard in Newport News.


According to the shipyard's plans, further equipping of the submarine will take place at the outfitting berth. Transfer to the US Navy is scheduled for late 2021 after a test cycle. At the moment, Montana, which was laid in 2015, is 92% complete.

The submarine will become the 21st Virginia-class submarine and the third in a series of ten Block IV submarines of the fourth generation, differing from Block III in reduced radar signature and increased service cycles.

Previously in the command of the American fleet announced that Virginia-class nuclear submarines will be the first in the US Navy to receive hypersonic missiles.

The Virginia-type submarine has a length of 114,2 m (377 ft), a width of 10,4 m (34 ft) and a displacement of 7835 tons. The speed is more than 25 knots in the underwater position, the immersion depth is more than 240 m. The submarine is equipped with a reactor, which does not require refueling during the entire period of operation. The crew is 134 people. The armament of the submarine includes Tomahawk cruise missiles, four 533-mm torpedo tubes with torpedoes Mk48 ADCAP Mod.6, sea mines and unmanned underwater vehicles.

According to the Pentagon's plans, over the next 20 years, the American fleet will receive 30 Virginia-class submarines, which will replace the Los Angeles-class nuclear submarines built from 1976 to 1996 as part of the fleet.
Photos used:
https://twitter.com/WarshipCam
86 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 5 March 2021 09: 34
    -4
    What what and the conveyor for the production of nuclear submarines and Arlie Berkov they have set up. Probably the most profitable business in the development of the budget. The best technologies and the best specialists. But the penguins are ahead.
    1. NDR-791
      NDR-791 5 March 2021 09: 36
      +16
      am am For 20 years 30 boats. And this is only one type ... There is nothing more to say am
      1. Narak-zempo
        Narak-zempo 5 March 2021 09: 38
        -17%
        The national debt will overstrain.
        1. Civil
          Civil 5 March 2021 09: 42
          +1
          Quote: Narak-zempo
          The national debt will overstrain.

          They have money and they rivet ...
          1. umah
            umah 5 March 2021 10: 33
            +3
            differing from Block III in reduced radar signature
            That is, if it takes off, it will be more difficult to detect. In general, the submarine appreciates acoustic invisibility.
            1. vadim dok
              vadim dok 5 March 2021 15: 42
              0
              Difficulties in translation and qualifications of the translator.
        2. NDR-791
          NDR-791 5 March 2021 09: 43
          +8
          The national debt will overstrain.
          Yes, they don’t care ... Bidon needed it, he immediately printed 1,9 billion. Business! While the world and WE are buying bucks, they will build what they want and how much they want. And we will pay for it.
          1. Flooding
            Flooding 5 March 2021 10: 38
            +5
            Quote: NDR-791
            Bidon needed, he immediately printed 1,9 billion. Business!

            Actually, not billions.
            Add three zeros.
            1,9 trillion dollars
            1. NDR-791
              NDR-791 5 March 2021 10: 41
              0
              Quote: Flood
              Add three zeros.

              For me, this and that is the usual fantasy.laughing In short, what he wants to distribute like "for poverty". These trilards will settle in certain pockets. And how much is added on the debt counter, this does not bother them, they will forgive everyone for what they owe
          2. Narak-zempo
            Narak-zempo 5 March 2021 10: 48
            -2
            Quote: NDR-791
            While the world and WE are buying bucks, they will build what they want and how much they want. And we will pay for it

        3. Aleksandr21
          Aleksandr21 5 March 2021 09: 45
          +10
          Quote: Narak-zempo
          The national debt will overstrain.


          Unfortunately, they will not overstrain, the national debt is mostly internal, they lend to themselves ... and there is no problem to print new dollars. Now, if the BRICS countries really began to abandon the calculation in dollars (in fact and not in words), then yes, the dollar would come to an end ... but for now, alas, trade is also conducted in dollars, and settlements in nat. currencies occupy a small percentage.
          1. Narak-zempo
            Narak-zempo 5 March 2021 10: 44
            -2
            Quote: Aleksandr21
            Quote: Narak-zempo
            The national debt will overstrain.


            Unfortunately, they will not overstrain, the national debt is mostly internal, they lend to themselves ... and there is no problem to print new dollars. Now, if the BRICS countries really began to abandon the calculation in dollars (in fact and not in words), then yes, the dollar would come to an end ... but for now, alas, trade is also conducted in dollars, and settlements in nat. currencies occupy a small percentage.

            Read / listen to Mikhail Khazin regarding the dollar's prospects.
          2. Your stranger
            Your stranger 5 March 2021 10: 50
            -2

            A characteristic feature of the modern Chinese economy is its dependence on the external market. In terms of export volume, the PRC ranks 1st in the world. Exports provide 80% of the state's foreign exchange earnings


            The main trading partners of China are the developed capitalist countries, primarily Japan, the United States, Western European states, which account for 55% of foreign trade turnover.


            In 2012, China's total imports and exports amounted to US $ 3 trillion 866,76 billion

            From these trillions came to Russia
            with Russia Edit
            In 2015, trade between China and Russia decreased by 28,6% to $ 68,06 billion. [55] In early 2016, trade between China and Russia decreased by 8,9%. [56]

            That's when the Russian Federation buys in China and sells to China for the amounts and the range that trade with NATO countries and their allies gives it,
            Then you can dream of giving up the dollar,
            In the meantime, we have this
            The share of Russia in China's foreign trade is more modest, but also significant - 2,3% of China's trade in 2012
            1. Narak-zempo
              Narak-zempo 6 March 2021 20: 30
              0
              https://deita.ru/article/490967
        4. Mikle2000
          Mikle2000 5 March 2021 10: 07
          0
          They have a national debt in dollars, not in rubles, euros or yuan. There are no technical problems to maintain it.
        5. ironic
          ironic 6 March 2021 01: 11
          0
          You service a mortgage on much worse terms, so what?
          1. Narak-zempo
            Narak-zempo 6 March 2021 09: 06
            0
            Quote: ironic
            You service a mortgage on much worse terms, so what?

            Fuckers take a mortgage.
            1. ironic
              ironic 9 March 2021 14: 42
              -1
              Papa is a new Russian ..., ugh, sorry, old Jew ... Yapatstal. lol
      2. Flooding
        Flooding 5 March 2021 09: 45
        +5
        Quote: NDR-791
        And that's just one type ..

        but with serious differences
        Block V is much more toothy than its predecessors.
      3. Sling cutter
        Sling cutter 5 March 2021 09: 45
        +11
        Quote: NDR-791
        For 20 years 30 boats. And this is only one type ... There is nothing more to say

        If the USSR were alive, it could rivet more.
        1. Pilat2009
          Pilat2009 5 March 2021 09: 56
          +3
          Quote: Stroporez
          Quote: NDR-791
          For 20 years 30 boats. And this is only one type ... There is nothing more to say

          If the USSR were alive, it could rivet more.

          To be able and to rivet different concepts. Moreover, the USSR never did such a series. The terribly motley composition of the pl was
          1. Sling cutter
            Sling cutter 5 March 2021 10: 01
            +11
            Quote: Pilat2009
            the USSR never did such a series of it. The terribly motley composition of the pl was

            I agree, but they could and did such masterpieces as the "Golden Fish", and this is the latest technology at that time.
            1. Your stranger
              Your stranger 5 March 2021 11: 10
              +4
              Newest for the USSR or the USA?
          2. Nemchinov Vl
            Nemchinov Vl 5 March 2021 12: 55
            0
            Quote: Pilat2009
            all the more so the USSR never made such a series. The terribly motley composition of the pl was
            come on ? !! count the number of 671s, in all its incarnations, up to RTMK ?!
            1. Pilat2009
              Pilat2009 6 March 2021 07: 42
              -1
              Quote: Vl Nemchinov
              671

              Well, yes, I counted 15. 0.5 from 30 American pieces. Did you want to say that 15 = 30?
              1. Nemchinov Vl
                Nemchinov Vl 6 March 2021 15: 14
                -1
                Quote: Pilat2009
                Well, yes, I counted 15. 0.5 from 30 American pieces. Did you want to say that 15 = 30?
                I shouldn't have skipped school ... (!).
                15, - this is only YORSHEY (pr. 671) - https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B5_%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%BA%D0%B8_%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82%D0%B0_671_%C2%AB%D0%81%D1%80%D1%88%C2%BB
                then another 8 units. SOMGA (Project 671 RT) - https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B5_%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%BA%D0%B8_%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82%D0%B0_671%D0%A0%D0%A2_%C2%AB%D0%A1%D1%91%D0%BC%D0%B3%D0%B0%C2%BB
                and then 13 units. PIKE (Project 671 RTM (K) ..) ... - https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B5_%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%BA%D0%B8_%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82%D0%B0_671%D0%A0%D0%A2%D0%9C(%D0%9A)_%C2%AB%D0%A9%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B0%C2%BB
                for I told you about, -
                Quote: Vl Nemchinov
                count the number of 671s, in all its incarnations, up to RTMK ?!
                ... wink yes
                It only one of the most successful projects, not counting the rest of the "motley composition", thanks to which, the total number of nuclear submarines, was approximately "parity", if not more than that of a potential enemy ... (!).... But perhaps the most massive was the 671st ... (!). .. hi
        2. Mikle2000
          Mikle2000 5 March 2021 10: 25
          +1
          So he died because he tried to rivet at the same pace.
      4. Sidor Amenpodestovich
        Sidor Amenpodestovich 5 March 2021 09: 46
        -2
        Quote: NDR-791
        Nothing more to say

        Well, why is there nothing?
        1. We would be so.
        2. One can only envy.
        3. If not for yachts with palaces.
        4. But in the USSR ...

        Top four most overused mantras.
        And the point is not even whether they are true or not, but the fact that they are extremely hackneyed and just as meaningless as halva.
        1. NDR-791
          NDR-791 5 March 2021 09: 52
          -1
          Quote: Sidor Amenpodestovich
          Top four most overused mantras.

          So I say that there is nothing to say. And if there is something, then the uncle admin will be banned am
        2. Sling cutter
          Sling cutter 5 March 2021 10: 04
          +15
          Quote: Sidor Amenpodestovich
          as meaningless as halva.

          Halva is not meaningless, halva is sweet and tasty, excellent with tea.
          I think that we are forgetting the factor of China, which may very well reach the same indicators, if it has not yet emerged.
          1. Sidor Amenpodestovich
            Sidor Amenpodestovich 5 March 2021 10: 09
            0
            Quote: Stroporez
            I think that we are forgetting the factor of China, which may very well reach the same indicators, if it has not yet emerged.

            China has big problems with military technology. He can rivet, but with what characteristics?
            1. Sling cutter
              Sling cutter 5 March 2021 10: 18
              +9
              Quote: Sidor Amenpodestovich
              China has big problems with military technology.

              Not a fact. According to leaked facts, China has already mastered many of the latest technologies, because they already have hypersound.
              The second point, who can guarantee that after the collapse of the USSR, Soviet military technologies - development were not given away - sold to China?
              Shl. The other day I went to test a new Chinese jeep and I can say that in terms of equipment and characteristics it surpasses many well-known brands, but even 20 years ago there was practically no car industry in China. hi .
              1. Sidor Amenpodestovich
                Sidor Amenpodestovich 5 March 2021 10: 53
                +3
                Please name at least one sample of Chinese weapons that can be called advanced with full confidence.
                J-20 forward? What exactly?
                Hypersonic glider? Why is the speed only ten swings, and the range is only 2500 km?
                UAV? And what is outstanding about them?
                Roy UAV? So this is not even a prototype yet, but R&D, rather, not even R&D. It is not necessary to offer the video, it is watched to the holes, since there is only one. Again, why alone, if, according to some commentators, the Chinese have advanced very seriously in this regard?
                1. voyaka uh
                  voyaka uh 5 March 2021 12: 43
                  0
                  "Hypersonic glider? Why is the speed only ten swings, and the range is only 2500 km?" ///
                  ----
                  Because he is the equivalent of the Dagger, not the Vanguard.
                  The missile is a medium-range ballistic missile. Speed ​​10 MAX.
                  Americans are completing tests of their glider, air
                  start with the same characteristics as Chinese.

                  The Chinese produce modern and fairly high-quality weapons.
                  Moreover, in large quantities, and not at the level of prototypes or single
                  copies.
                  Do not entertain yourself with illusions about their remaining.
                  These illusions will cost dearly in war.
                  1. Sidor Amenpodestovich
                    Sidor Amenpodestovich 5 March 2021 13: 25
                    -3
                    Quote: voyaka uh
                    Because he is the equivalent of the Dagger, not the Vanguard.

                    Is this the equivalent of a Dagger?

                    The Chinese produce modern and fairly high-quality weapons.
                    Moreover, in large quantities, and not at the level of prototypes or single
                    copies.

                    Do we have Vanguards at the level of prototypes or single samples? Or Daggers? I do not understand what you call single copies? Zircons?
                    Why is J-20 only 22 pieces? Chinese industry is failing? Or don't they need it anymore, again? Or are there no engines and no one knows when they will be?
                    Where is the Chinese hypersonic anti-ship missile system? Why do they equip their destroyers with missiles with a range of only 180 km?
                    Do not entertain yourself with illusions about their remaining.

                    So this is not an illusion, but a reality.
                    Tell me a sample of advanced Chinese weapons, the characteristics of which are comparable to those of Russia.
                    1. voyaka uh
                      voyaka uh 5 March 2021 14: 10
                      +5
                      "Do we have Vanguards at the level of prototypes or individual samples? Or Daggers?" ///
                      ----
                      Vanguards - 4 pieces.
                      Daggers - about 20 pieces.
                      Su-57 - 1 piece.

                      I do not know if the Chinese samples are better, but the fact that there are more of them is for sure.
                      1. Sidor Amenpodestovich
                        Sidor Amenpodestovich 5 March 2021 14: 44
                        -4
                        Quote: voyaka uh
                        Vanguards - 4 pieces.
                        Daggers - about 20 pieces.
                        Su-57 - 1 piece.

                        That is, do you equate the number of Vanguards on duty at the UR-100N-UTTKh with those produced? You can't help but understand that this is a palliative, and in fact, the main bearer of the Vanguards will be Sarmat.
                        The contract for 76 Su-57 units has been concluded and there is no reason to assume that it will not be fulfilled. Moreover, Product-30 is on its way, which even the Americans have no equivalent for, and there is nothing to say about the Chinese.
                        But you did not answer the question: why were only 20 J-22s produced? It turns out that 20 Daggers are single samples, and 22 Chinese fifth-generation fighters are a series?
                        Yes, and tell me a sample of advanced Chinese weapons. A swarm of drones does not count, as there is only one video, and it looks suspiciously like an episode of the movie "Angel Fall".
                      2. ironic
                        ironic 6 March 2021 01: 21
                        0
                        Which is unlikely to pull three pieces and it is not known what year. In the meantime, there are clear plans for only 12 missiles from Ukrainian ZIPs. The dagger is an aerobalistic derivative of the Iskander, and the J-20 is a 5th generation fighter. So 20 daggers are like 10 Iskander ground launchers. Those. almost nothing. And 22 J-20 is a modern iskadril.
                    2. Sidor Amenpodestovich
                      Sidor Amenpodestovich 5 March 2021 16: 26
                      -3
                      I asked you questions. Will the answers be or will the drain be counted?
                      First Stroporez went into the bushes, now you? Not solid.
                    3. voyaka uh
                      voyaka uh 5 March 2021 18: 33
                      0
                      Don't worry like that. I walk, have fun, turn off my smartphone sometimes. smile

                      In China, two J-20 squadrons, 12 aircraft each, have been formed.
                      And now the third is being formed.
                      Release: 1 plane per month, approx. This is much less than
                      F-35 (16 per month), but not bad either.

                      Ordinary drones - scouts and drummers, like the famous Turkish ones,
                      China produces serially and in large quantities.
                      A swarm is a new and promising business.
                      No one has yet applied or introduced into the troops.
                    4. Sidor Amenpodestovich
                      Sidor Amenpodestovich 5 March 2021 18: 41
                      -1
                      According to Wikipedia, the J-20 entered service in early 2017.
                      If you believe your words that the Chinese produce one J-20 per month, now J-20 should be fifty units.
                      Three squadrons are 36 aircraft.
                      Has the pandemic affected?
                    5. voyaka uh
                      voyaka uh 5 March 2021 18: 46
                      0
                      The release of the latest products is gradually increasing.
                      The rate of one J-20 per month has been reached recently.
                      So it is with the Su-57. In the beginning, 2020 aircraft was produced in 1.
                      But three more are in the assembly process. The rate of 1 per month will also be reached
                      after few years. good

                      The Chinese are farther - worse:
                      ... alleged that CAC set up a fourth J-20 production line in 2019,
                      each line able to produce one fighter per month.

                      Have you read it? The FOURTH assembly line J-20 was assembled.
                      EACH will produce 1 aircraft per month.
                      Four squadrons a year.
                      Chinese are going to release more J-20s than America has
                      F-22. This is their goal.
                    6. Sidor Amenpodestovich
                      Sidor Amenpodestovich 5 March 2021 19: 08
                      0
                      That is, from 2019, the Chinese can produce four J-20s a month? This is 48 aircraft a year. This means that in two years - the 19th and 20th - they had to produce 96 aircraft. Even if we exclude 2019, they should have enough equipment for four squadrons, plus to what was already there, a total of six. But they, as you write, form only the third.
                    7. voyaka uh
                      voyaka uh 5 March 2021 19: 26
                      +1
                      You are in vain trying to catch me on the numbers. smile
                      No matter how much China has in the ranks of aircraft today
                      J-20: 36 or 48 is a lot.
                      But that's not the point.
                      You, as it seemed to me, cannot understand psychologically that
                      MONSTRE has grown near the eastern borders of Russia in 30 years.
                      China. Economic superpower and military superpower.
                      For which Russia is not an elder brother and teacher, but a source of raw materials.
                      Having so far several technologies from the legacy of the USSR,
                      which must be redeemed, stolen or somehow lured out.
                      Which is being done successfully.
                    8. Sidor Amenpodestovich
                      Sidor Amenpodestovich 5 March 2021 20: 05
                      +1
                      The Chinese technological monster did not grow, it was created by the countries of the West. They have made China a worldwide factory. But this factory needs a market.
                      Where will China do with all its consumer goods if America and the EU refuse to buy it? And where will America and the EU get the consumer goods they need so much?
                      China is no less dependent on the west than the west is on China. In biology, this is called mutualism, a type of symbiosis.
                      Russia is an outsider. But not in the meaning of "something last", but in the meaning of "aside." Russia depends on the countries of the West and China to a much lesser extent than China and the countries of the West depend on each other. This is Russia's advantage.
                    9. ironic
                      ironic 6 March 2021 01: 25
                      0
                      It is an advantage to be lagging, because those who are not integrated into this symbiosis today are at the margins of development. The RF possesses enormous resources and is theoretically self-sufficient, but only theoretically. In practice, such self-sufficiency will sooner or later lead to the effect of the USSR-2, and more quickly and more inevitably.
  • Mikle2000
    Mikle2000 5 March 2021 10: 04
    +6
    In fairness, they simultaneously release no more than two types of boats, and not the whole zoo that Russia has.
    1. Doccor18
      Doccor18 5 March 2021 10: 15
      +5
      Quote: Mikle2000
      In fairness, they simultaneously release no more than two types of boats, and not the whole zoo that Russia has.

      And they did not have restructuring, and privatization, and the 90s, when scientific and technical associations switched to the production of washing machines and pans ...
      1. mojohed2012
        mojohed2012 5 March 2021 10: 55
        -1
        The main question is: When?
        When will the United States have at least one type of hypersonic missile, albeit with a speed of up to Mach 1, which will have a stable control channel along the entire route?
        1. Ugochaves
          Ugochaves 5 March 2021 11: 51
          -1
          I will support, when, when .... But what will local liberal fans of the United States say to these Wishlist? After all, they screech so loudly when our Ministry of Defense announces its plans, moreover, according to the samples that are at one stage or another of tests or state acceptance? Or # is it different ...? bully
      2. 3danimal
        3danimal 6 March 2021 22: 08
        0
        This is not an excuse.
        The zoo with the equipment was even BEFORE the perestroika.
        3 MBT, 2 new attack helicopters, etc.
    2. 3danimal
      3danimal 6 March 2021 22: 12
      0
      Quite right. And this with more than ten times the budget.
      It is worth thinking.
  • lucul
    lucul 5 March 2021 11: 32
    -1
    For 20 years 30 boats. And this is only one type ... There is nothing more to say

    It is not entirely clear that this is
    immersion depth - more than 240 m.

    More is how much? 242m, 245m, 250m?
    Let me remind you that our submarines have a diving depth of over 500m.
  • Nemchinov Vl
    Nemchinov Vl 5 March 2021 12: 45
    +1
    Quote: NDR-791
    For 20 years 30 boats. And this is only one type ... There is nothing more to say
    I agree.... until it succeeds "inject to them" Rahman and USC .... we can't catch up with them !!! recourse winked
  • Machito
    Machito 5 March 2021 13: 16
    0
    Quote: NDR-791
    am am For 20 years 30 boats. And this is only one type ... There is nothing more to say am

    Yes, they just do not know the measures.
  • Romario_Argo
    Romario_Argo 5 March 2021 15: 31
    -4
    Virginias have a diving depth of 240 meters and our Shchuk, Anteev, Yasenei have 500-600 meters
    and in general, optical location from orbit calmly takes depths of 270 meters
    Virginia is the wasted money on a monohull super-little submersible - wind (!) repeat
  • mvg
    mvg 6 March 2021 00: 11
    -1
    And that's just one type ...

    In fairness, what else has been built since 97? Experimental SeaWolfe?
  • 3danimal
    3danimal 6 March 2021 22: 06
    0
    It's good when you have enough money and production capacity.
  • Cowbra
    Cowbra 5 March 2021 09: 43
    -7
    As soon as - right away! Truth one stops. No, not that there are no such missiles. These are little things. There are no shells for the Zamvolts either - but they were armed! It's easy with a chainsaw!
    The problem is that they did not even begin to design, and therefore there are such light, almost imperceptible fears that a hypersonic rocket, when it is finished 50 years later at a sawmill, may not fit into this boat stupidly ...
  • Crimean partisan 1974
    Crimean partisan 1974 5 March 2021 09: 49
    -1
    hypersonic missile ... won. the sumvolt has already received a railgun and has remained with the old pukals, now they want to stick a laser on it ... and here ... they will get it. maybe, but not soon
    god like a joke
    after the crash of the airliner, two survivors climb out of the bushes .. one to the other, shaking himself off, says
    --- soooo, they blatantly lied to us about parachutes ... let's see how with the bus
    1. Pilat2009
      Pilat2009 5 March 2021 09: 58
      +6
      Quote: Crimean partisan 1974
      hypersonic missile ... won. the sumvolt has already received a railgun and has remained with the old pukals, now they want to stick a laser on it ... and here ... they will get it. maybe, but not soon
      god like a joke
      after the crash of the airliner, two survivors climb out of the bushes .. one to the other, shaking himself off, says
      --- soooo, they blatantly lied to us about parachutes ... let's see how with the bus

      Get Away From Zumwalt, This Is A Technology Prototype
      1. Crimean partisan 1974
        Crimean partisan 1974 5 March 2021 10: 15
        -3
        Leave aside Zumwalt, this is a prototype for working out technologies ... for me personally, it’s like a violet where they put their honestly and unbearably printed tanga ... the main thing with weapons in the new realities does not go ... the Syrian shelling clearly showed what the axes are worth .... and yet another is not foreseen on the horizon
        1. 2 Level Advisor
          2 Level Advisor 5 March 2021 10: 36
          +3
          Syrian shelling showed only that there was a weapon against the previously unmistakable strategy - "urge everyone with axes" .. Calibers would fly - in the same way it would knock down air defense - cruise missiles are no longer a panacea - they are becoming obsolete .. These shellings did not show anything else. ..
          1. Crimean partisan 1974
            Crimean partisan 1974 5 March 2021 10: 46
            -6
            the Calibers would fly -... the Calibers have several modifications, one of them in the final section is boosted up to 4M, .. that is a little more than a km per second, so if we take into account the radio horizon of 30-40 km, then to repel an attack there will be 20-40 seconds ... add to this the total speed of convergence of missiles and missile launchers ... it turns out that it is not possible to intercept it, unlike a subsonic ax ... and there is nothing else yet
            1. 2 Level Advisor
              2 Level Advisor 5 March 2021 11: 02
              +2
              Vladimir, I am also a patriot, but let's not invent non-existent advantages of Caliber .. Caliber is a good cruise missile, like Ax, and even better than them - our air defense .. but about cruise missiles! rockets with a speed of 4M flying at an ultra-low trajectory of 30-40 km, personally I have not heard and I have no idea why they need it, they are already below the radio horizon, but if this is so, in any case, it is not Caliber, but just another rocket ..
              1. Crimean partisan 1974
                Crimean partisan 1974 5 March 2021 11: 11
                -4
                but if this is so, in any case, this is not a Caliber, but just another rocket ... Kohl .. it's not about patriotism or urakolok .. everything is real ... if there is interest then read about the modifications of the Caliber, this information is a dime a dozen. .. and about the shelling of Busurman in Syria from the Caspian Sea, everything will fall into place
                1. ironic
                  ironic 6 March 2021 02: 57
                  +1
                  Yes, yes, really Calibers with 4M, only they do not fly, but dig underground with hyper-earth speed. G-d, do you have any idea the size of this turbocharger of yours, which can have enough fuel at the end to accelerate to 4M from subsonic speed?
                  1. Crimean partisan 1974
                    Crimean partisan 1974 6 March 2021 09: 13
                    0
                    Yes, yes, really Calibers with 4M, only they do not fly, ... KR 3M54E of the Club M complex .. increase your horizons before throwing on the fan
                    1. ironic
                      ironic 9 March 2021 14: 41
                      0
                      Why are you asking me to do what you did not do yourself? Do you at least read first about what you write about. And not only do they not fly, but also do not fly. In general, they began to develop another version of the strategic range. And what kind of yarn over the fan? You have already overlaid it like this, sho the whole topic in small specks.
            2. ironic
              ironic 6 March 2021 02: 54
              +1
              And it turns first into Dagger, then into Zircon, then into Vanguard and that's it ... Strait of Mexico.
          2. ironic
            ironic 6 March 2021 02: 52
            +1
            And it is not clear whether the air defense was knocked down or not, but the hangars were burnt, it was very clear.
        2. ironic
          ironic 6 March 2021 02: 51
          +2
          The only thing that Zumvolt is not good at with weapons is with cannon shells, everything else is fine. And that there are axes in Syria, and they saw where the planes were in the hangars there the axes and stood up, and the stories about how they were lost; in pystyna, the condition of the hangars was not affected. And it became clear that Burke alone could disable the airfield for several days, provided that the rest of the infrastructure is working and there is someone to repair the airfield.
          1. Crimean partisan 1974
            Crimean partisan 1974 6 March 2021 09: 22
            +1
            The only thing that Zumvolt is not good at with weapons is with cannon shells, ... then if everything is so good, then why did the striped ones give him the nickname King of Pierce ... and the striped admirals themselves do not share your enthusiasm, constantly changing his tactical expediency dropping it down to the level of the coaster
            1. ironic
              ironic 9 March 2021 14: 35
              0
              These are the Georgian names Onisami give on the VO forum. And then it turns out that so far the Russian Federation does not have a single surface ship, even with quarter-barge capabilities. What will we call the Russian fleet then? For this on the forum do not accidentally give a penalty?
  • Ruslan Sulima
    Ruslan Sulima 5 March 2021 09: 49
    +1
    differing from Block III in reduced radar signature

    Damn, it would be better if they thought about hydroacoustic visibility, even I understand that, although I haven’t sat at the GAS console for almost 30 years)
    1. Crimean partisan 1974
      Crimean partisan 1974 5 March 2021 10: 30
      0
      if they would think about hydroacoustic visibility, ... well, how would the damping system of vibrating devices be improved in comparison with angelechs. nevertheless, the problem of pumping the seawater to cool the secondary circuit of the jar has not been solved. therefore, the difference in noise is not particularly visible in comparison with angeles at 3-5 knots
  • mark1
    mark1 5 March 2021 09: 52
    +1
    The speed is over 25 knots underwater, the diving depth is over 240 m.
    and you won’t find fault, it’s true - the speed is 34 knots, the depth is 500m
  • Alien From
    Alien From 5 March 2021 10: 01
    0
    That's what, and they can make boats, and quickly and well. We would be so.
  • Mikle2000
    Mikle2000 5 March 2021 10: 06
    +2
    It would be strange to brandish new types of weapons (existing or drawn) and assume that an economically stronger and more technologically advanced enemy will sit on their butt.
  • Doccor18
    Doccor18 5 March 2021 10: 11
    +1
    The submarine will be the 21st Virginia class submarine ...

    You can endlessly praise the quality, but the quantity has not lost its significance.
    But Virginia (as a project) is even younger than Ash ...
  • betta
    betta 5 March 2021 10: 12
    -1
    "Crew - 134 people."
    In my opinion, our crew is less. Too many people for 8000 volume?
    1. Crimean partisan 1974
      Crimean partisan 1974 5 March 2021 11: 04
      -3
      "Crew - 134 people." In my opinion ... ... yes, everything is simple ... quotas for blacks and genders. it does not matter whether it is specialists or not. the main thing is that there were. yes, plus each psychologist. without a psychologist, no matter how, so a cadlo of "passengers"
    2. Doccor18
      Doccor18 5 March 2021 11: 07
      +4
      Quote: betta
      "Crew - 134 people."
      In my opinion, our crew is less. Too many people for 8000 volume?

      There are only 60 people on the modernized Yasen. will be...
    3. VLADIMIR VLADIVOSTOK
      VLADIMIR VLADIVOSTOK 6 March 2021 03: 39
      -1
      And they have everything on a manual drive! And a crowd of blacks shoves a torpedo from their shoulders into the apparatus!
  • aszzz888
    aszzz888 5 March 2021 11: 25
    0
    immersion depth - more than 240 m.
    something rather weak with depth, almost under the periscope. This can also be detected visually. bully And at the same time with DP 65 pour a couple of styling on the body.
    1. ironic
      ironic 6 March 2021 03: 01
      +2
      At least start reading Klimov, pearl generator.