Military Review

The dates for the transfer of the lead Yasenya-M to the fleet have been postponed

49
The dates for the transfer of the lead Yasenya-M to the fleet have been postponed

Transfer time the fleet the head "Ash-M" was moved again. The multipurpose nuclear submarine "Kazan" of project 885M will be handed over to the customer in May-June this year.


It is reported TASS with reference to a source in the DIC.

According to the source, before the transfer, it is planned to make another checkout to the sea, after which all units and mechanisms will be revised. Then the submarine will be included in the Russian Navy. At the same time, he specified that the Kazan nuclear submarine had completed the program of launches of the Kalibr and Onyx cruise missiles, and no other launches were planned.

The transfer of "Kazan" to the fleet is expected in May-June this year

- said the source.

Earlier, a number of sources in the Ministry of Defense and in the OPK reported that the Kazan submarine had passed all the necessary tests and would be handed over to the fleet in the first quarter of this year, and the head of the USC, Alexei Rakhmanov, promised to hand over the submarine to the customer at the end of February.

Initially, the submarine was supposed to join the Navy by the end of 2019, but many problems and shortcomings were revealed during the tests, after which the Kazan was sent to Sevmash for revision. After eliminating the shortcomings, the submarine continued to undergo protracted tests, which ended only at the end of December 2020.

The Kazan nuclear submarine, the first multipurpose nuclear submarine of the improved project 885M (Yasen-M), was launched on March 31, 2017. Compared with the project "885" Ash ", the new submarine received many improvements and new systems that were not used on submarines earlier. Submarines of the" Yasen-M "project have a displacement of 13800 tons, immersion depth - 520 meters, crew - 64 people, autonomy - 100 days, submerged speed - 31 knots In service are mines, torpedoes 533 mm, cruise missiles "Caliber" and "Onyx", possibly - "hypersonic" Zircon ", since the nuclear submarine" Severodvinsk "of the" Ash "project is involved in the test program of this hypersonic missile ".
49 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Victor_B
    Victor_B 3 March 2021 06: 48
    -8
    The dates for the transfer of the lead "Ash-M" to the fleet have been postponed again.
    The key word is HEADShip!

    How many years have Gerald Ford mattresses been finished?
    1. Mordvin 3
      Mordvin 3 3 March 2021 07: 03
      +8
      Quote: Victor_B
      HEAD

      Wow, I read it - the cephalopod.
      The dates for the transfer of the lead Yasenya-M to the fleet have been postponed

      Never was this, and here again.
      1. Victor_B
        Victor_B 3 March 2021 07: 04
        +4
        HEAD
        Blyin!
        Olepyatka!
        1. Artyom Karagodin
          Artyom Karagodin 3 March 2021 09: 26
          +2
          But funny! So it was not in vain that they were confused))))
      2. Serg65
        Serg65 3 March 2021 08: 56
        +1
        Quote: Mordvin 3
        Never was this, and here again.

        Oh, in vain the Union was destroyed! According to Soviet laws, this Kazan would have been in the ranks for a long time and do not care what it doesn’t work there, it doesn’t shoot there ... we will endure hardships and hardships !!!! soldier
        1. Artyom Karagodin
          Artyom Karagodin 3 March 2021 09: 25
          -1
          Quote: Serg65
          According to Soviet laws, this Kazan would have been in the ranks long ago and don't care what it doesn’t work there, why doesn’t shoot there

          I think the USSR would have smelled of organizational conclusions, or even direct landings in this case. At least it could smell.
          Quote: Serg65
          Oh, in vain the Union was destroyed!

          Only Bykov and Chubais (collective) argue with this.
          1. Bashkirkhan
            Bashkirkhan 3 March 2021 10: 21
            +12
            Quote: Artyom Karagodin
            I think the USSR would have smelled of organizational conclusions, or even direct landings in this case. At least it could smell.

            In the USSR, the "Udaloy" bpk was handed over without air defense systems. Those were the times! A ship with "temporary" radars and no air defense systems at all! And in combat service in the Mediterranean. This is about whining about the long surrender of "Kazan". The commies didn’t bother about fine-tuning the ships at all, there was a tradition to push the unavailable ship to the navy for the next party meeting.
            1. Alexey RA
              Alexey RA 3 March 2021 17: 03
              +3
              Quote: Bashkirkhan
              In the USSR, the "Udaloy" bpk was handed over without air defense systems. Those were the times!

              You can also recall the lead SSBN pr. 941, which was handed over to the Navy a year before its SLBMs were adopted. smile
              And how merrily they passed the Leningrad LD under Joseph Vissarionovich ...
              The ship went to GOSy in the fall of 1936:
              ... it turned out that in full speed mode, the stern went under the water below the deck level (with a differential at the stern up to 1,5 m), and the nose bulged dangerously, which created an emergency and did not allow the weapons systems to operate effectively. In the middle stroke mode, the leader did not obey the steering wheel well, and at low moves he did not obey at all.
              After the installation of artillery of the main caliber, control firing was carried out on one side. Tests showed that the hull turned out to be too weak, and so much so that it was impossible to operate all the artillery at the same time. Dangerous stresses that occurred in the area where the forecastle and the hull docked created a risk of the ship breaking in half if these stresses dynamically increased, caused, for example, by a mine detonation, a shell hit, or even a strong storm. The need for reinforcement of the corps was revealed. In addition, the stability of the ship was only slightly higher than critical, and the buoyancy margin was so small that any damage to the underwater part could lead to disaster.
              © P.I. Kachur. Leaders like "Leningrad"
              So what? But nothing: on December 5, 1936, the ship was accepted by the fleet - and immediately sent back to the plant, where it stood at the outfitting wall until July 1938.
          2. Serg65
            Serg65 3 March 2021 12: 35
            +7
            Quote: Artyom Karagodin
            I think the USSR would have smelled of organizational conclusions, or even direct landings in this case

            Come on? There was a smell of bonuses, and the commanders of unfinished ships were receiving organizational conclusions! A vivid example for you BOD 1155 .... for the absence of air defense systems on the first three ships, who was put?
          3. Grits
            Grits 3 March 2021 13: 45
            +6
            Quote: Artyom Karagodin
            I think the USSR would have smelled of organizational conclusions, or even direct landings in this case. At least it could smell.

            Do not tell me ... I am sure that ships with imperfections were sent to the Navy in the USSR. I myself was a witness to this. While repairing one of the BDRM ships in the 90s (which, we note, went on a combat watch many times), we could not tune the electrical part of one very serious system in any way. We are faced with the fact that it is absolutely impossible to do this. After a long search, they still found the reason. It was banal and related to the structural part of the ship. Rather, not finished work on the elimination of hull work. As a result, the ship, when launching missiles in a full salvo, could simply go into the ground or not stay in the firing corridor with all the consequences. It's good that he didn't have to fight ...
            1. Artyom Karagodin
              Artyom Karagodin 3 March 2021 18: 12
              +2
              Thank you and everyone else who objected for the clarifications. I didn't know these things. This means that the current "effective" teachers did have very good teachers.
      3. Artyom Karagodin
        Artyom Karagodin 3 March 2021 09: 23
        +5
        Quote: Mordvin 3
        Never was this, and here again.

        Yes, this phrase of the late Viktor Stepanovich is no less brilliant than his more famous "they wanted the best, it turned out, as always."

        But seriously, two thoughts arise about this. One is about the terrible mess in shipbuilding, the other is about the fact that, perhaps, it is not bad that the fleet rests and does not want to take the unfinished submarine into operation. Look, "Gorshkov" was tortured for so long. But all the experts unanimously say that it is not in vain.

        But it's still a shame that we do it this way!
        1. Serg65
          Serg65 3 March 2021 12: 40
          +7
          Quote: Artyom Karagodin
          terrible mess in shipbuilding,

          My dear Artem, in order to build the same Gorshkov, you need to have at least another 300 subcontractor plants and shipbuilders in this long chain are the last!
          1. Petrol cutter
            Petrol cutter 3 March 2021 20: 31
            +3
            "My dear Artem, in order to build the same Gorshkov, you need to have at least another 300 factories of subcontractors and shipbuilders in this long chain are the last!"
            Perhaps I will join this common opinion. hi
    2. Stirbjorn
      Stirbjorn 3 March 2021 07: 48
      +7
      Quote: Victor_B
      How many years have Gerald Ford mattresses been finished?

      So in the middle of 2017 we finished
    3. orionvitt
      orionvitt 3 March 2021 12: 29
      +1
      Quote: Victor_B
      How many years have Gerald Ford mattresses been finished?

      But he has long been listed in the fleet. They have a different system. They lower the ship, introduce it into the fleet, everything is done, you can report and receive bonuses. And then they already begin to test and finish, officially it is already considered a combat unit. In Russia, the military will never accept a ship with problems and has not passed the test.
  2. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 3 March 2021 06: 50
    +3
    The transfer of "Kazan" to the fleet is expected in May-June this year
    It's a pity, of course, but June is also not far away ... Since 2019 it has been dragging on, so what to do. request To plan? And the subcontractors are capitalists, they have "money in the morning - chairs in the evening"
    1. WHAT IS
      WHAT IS 3 March 2021 07: 09
      +19
      Better to finish it calmly, not to send it raw to the seas.
      1. Gardamir
        Gardamir 3 March 2021 07: 20
        -7
        Better to finalize quietly
        Maybe just learn to plan better? ..
        1. Sidor Amenpodestovich
          Sidor Amenpodestovich 3 March 2021 08: 03
          -2
          Quote: Gardamir
          Maybe just learn to plan better? ..

          And who are the judges? .. Do not understand who is from the mountain.
        2. Serg65
          Serg65 3 March 2021 09: 00
          +3
          Quote: Gardamir
          Maybe just learn to plan better? ..

          Can you plan your brains out?
        3. Piramidon
          Piramidon 3 March 2021 10: 03
          +2
          Quote: Gardamir
          Maybe just learn to plan better? ..

          And not tryndet about the timing in advance.
        4. Kalmar
          Kalmar 3 March 2021 10: 31
          +4
          Quote: Gardamir
          Maybe just learn to plan better? ..

          Our shipbuilding has a funny tradition of avoiding serial production by all means. Ideally, there should be no two identical ships. Each project is constantly being redone and modified, hence the new technical and other risks. Now "Kazan" will finish, and immediately new Wishlist will appear, which will try to squeeze into the next submarines.
          How to plan something in such conditions - I can hardly imagine)
          1. Petrol cutter
            Petrol cutter 3 March 2021 20: 44
            +2
            "Our shipbuilding has a funny tradition - to avoid serial production by all means. Ideally, so that there are no two identical ships. Each project is constantly being reworked and modified, hence - new technical and other risks. Now" Kazan "will be finished, and immediately new wishes will appear, who will try to squeeze into the next submarines.
            How to plan something in such conditions - I can hardly imagine "
            Let me kiss you, my dear man!
            A similar picture is on the surface ships.
            True, this is not so much a problem of the shipbuilding industry as such, but of the customer. Who doesn't know what he wants.
            Although, I will not lie. Our ... workers from the supply of the plant are also very good at sabotaging work. Otherwise, sorry, I can't name it.
            And after all, what is typical for them does not happen for this.
            And I am "loved" every day in all the cracks ... request
          2. Alexey RA
            Alexey RA 4 March 2021 11: 10
            +1
            Quote: Kalmar
            Our shipbuilding has a funny tradition of avoiding serial production at all costs. Ideally, there should be no two identical ships.

            There is also a second long-standing tradition - to redo the project already during construction. Melnikov's "Potemkin" describes well the torment of the designer and the plant because of this "improvement".
            1. Kalmar
              Kalmar 4 March 2021 11: 13
              0
              Quote: Alexey RA
              There is also a second long-standing tradition - to redo the project already during construction.

              Therefore, it is extremely important to increase the rate of production. When a ship takes 7-8 years to build, the customer always comes up with something. You can't give him (the customer) so much time to think)
              1. ramzay21
                ramzay21 8 March 2021 03: 59
                0
                Americans have a good rule of thumb. The customer cannot make changes to the ship from the start of construction. It would be nice to accept it for us too.
      2. Alien From
        Alien From 3 March 2021 15: 47
        +1
        Few people know how hard this project is born.
    2. Serg65
      Serg65 3 March 2021 09: 00
      +5
      Quote: Mavrikiy
      And the subcontractors are capitalists, they have "money in the morning - chairs in the evening"

      And the Soviet subcontractors ... when do they have chairs?
      Nothing has changed in the Navy over the past 60 years! Only the fleet stopped accepting unfinished ships ...
  3. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 3 March 2021 06: 52
    +3
    Delayed the transfer ... Well, there is not long to wait. Apparently, a great degree of novelty. And this is always fraught with unforeseen delays ... The main thing is to walk well. And she shot accurately ...
  4. Ros 56
    Ros 56 3 March 2021 07: 26
    +5
    This is not a time to rush. Burned on this more than once.
    1. Kalmar
      Kalmar 3 March 2021 10: 38
      +2
      Quote: Ros 56
      This is not a time to rush

      Reasonable haste, alas, is still needed. According to GPV-2020, it was expected that the fleet by now will have 7 such submarines, in fact there is conditionally one (the actual combat capability of Severodvinsk is estimated ambiguously). At the same time, sworn friends are already completing the construction of the "Virginias" for the second decade.

      Of course, this does not mean that it is necessary to hand over the boats to the fleet without regard to quality and comments, but it is no longer possible to get carried away with shifting the deadlines to the right.
      1. Petrol cutter
        Petrol cutter 3 March 2021 21: 08
        0
        "Of course, this does not mean that you need to hand over the boats to the fleet without regard to quality and comments, but it is no longer possible to get carried away with shifting the deadlines to the right."
        It is possible / impossible, it is determined by the quality control department of the plant / military representatives.
        As soon as ordered, the military.
        And I think it's better to take a long time than to sink the steamer and kill people.
        We also had a case - the OTK accepted everything cheerfully.
        Then a new military representative arrived (a small one). And how he crawled into all the holes, how he crawled into all the cracks! Mom dear! ..
        Yes, the ship is easier to rebuild!
        This turn was ...
  5. Hermit21
    Hermit21 3 March 2021 07: 29
    0
    Yes you got sick
    1. Serg65
      Serg65 3 March 2021 09: 02
      +3
      Quote: Hermit21
      Yes you got sick

      Wash yourself!
  6. Stirbjorn
    Stirbjorn 3 March 2021 07: 51
    +2
    I remember another such project, with a degree of novelty, etc.
    B-585 "Saint Petersburg", still in trial operation since 2010 ... and no rush
    1. Serg65
      Serg65 3 March 2021 09: 06
      +5
      Quote: Stirbjorn
      I remember another such project, with a degree of novelty

      Think better of K-19 as a vivid example of the work of the state admissions committee and the acceptance of a ship for the Great October Revolution!
      1. Stirbjorn
        Stirbjorn 3 March 2021 09: 41
        +1
        Quote: Serg65
        Quote: Stirbjorn
        I remember another such project, with a degree of novelty

        Think better of K-19 as a vivid example of the work of the state admissions committee and the acceptance of a ship for the Great October Revolution!

        A holiday is not a holiday, but the dates must be real, as well as the responsibility for their failure. And for such talkers, nothing works, how much money and time do not give them!
        1. Serg65
          Serg65 3 March 2021 12: 30
          +4
          Quote: Stirbjorn
          deadlines must be realistic

          There simply cannot be any real terms with the COMBAT equipment!
        2. Klonser
          Klonser 3 March 2021 19: 20
          +1
          At one time, I immediately said that not earlier than May. Firstly, the crew is on vacation until April, and secondly, ice in the White Sea until May. When our "responsible" comrades declare that the delivery in the 1st quarter we just want to attract them for the dissemination of inaccurate information. Either they are d ... s, or inadequate people. After all, now you can chat whatever you want for it, nothing will happen.
  7. rocket757
    rocket757 3 March 2021 07: 54
    +2
    The main thing is that it would work well, reliably ... you can wait a bit.
  8. bars1
    bars1 3 March 2021 11: 06
    0
    ,, This music will be eternal ... "
  9. musorg
    musorg 3 March 2021 12: 01
    0
    Or more precisely, next year!
  10. stels_07
    stels_07 3 March 2021 12: 35
    +1
    To the parade in St. Petersburg and will hand over
    1. kit88
      kit88 3 March 2021 12: 54
      +8
      Are there many nuclear-powered ships in St. Petersburg at the parade?
      1. stels_07
        stels_07 3 March 2021 14: 16
        +1
        By the Day of the Navy they will hand over, at least some reason for pride
  11. Wolf
    Wolf 3 March 2021 13: 14
    0
    Everything is NORMAL. THE PLAN SHOULD EXIST, AND THE TIME SHOULD BE AIM! Sailors should not accept an unfinished submarine. Failure to meet the deadlines LESSON and science where everyone was WRONG and why, on such cases everything learns. There is no reason for punishment and excitement, a new type of nuclear submarine, and the culture of production rises, it is bad if the manufacturer and designer did not teach anything about the postponement of the deadline.
  12. Tests
    Tests 3 March 2021 19: 48
    0
    February 05, 2021 at "V.O." in the "News" section, they quoted the words of the head of the USC, Alexei Rakhmanov, from an interview with Interfax: "The Kazan nuclear submarine is at the stage of finishing and revision of mechanisms. Judge for yourself: the boat has been on 2,5 navigation trials, and we are already approaching the first service the interval when the repair of the mechanical part is usually carried out. Today we do not see questions that would require some more lengthy tests. We are preparing to finish our part by the end of February "Mr. Rakhmanov, as usual, whistled and did not blush ... Today, TASS source in the defense industry complex and the deadline for the order "in May-June of this year" ... In the comments today, many forecasts have already been written about the delivery time of the nuclear submarine. They can accept it for Victory Day, for the Day of the Northern Fleet, and for June 12 ... Well, we buy popcorn and sit comfortably in the armchairs. When will the fleet take the boat ??? Which of the commentators of the "Military Review" will be the best predictor? ... Sad ...
  13. Bez 310
    Bez 310 4 March 2021 13: 19
    0
    This is the result of all the promises and reports -
    as it has long been in Russia, nothing on time
    was not done.
    And no one is responsible, just like that
    happened...