They started playing against us on many boards at once

78

The Internet is simply teeming with an abundance of materials about Donbass.

Supporters of "nezalezhnoy" daily report on shelling of positions of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. True, the factual material is not provided. Most often under the pretext of secrecy.



Republicans keep up with their counterparts and also talk about battles, shelling, and casualties. True, unlike the opposing side, the Donetsk residents' messages have a clear texture, indicating the locations of the shelling, the units participating in the shelling, and the names of the commanders.

Both sides are actively promoting the idea of ​​an imminent offensive of the Armed Forces of Ukraine to Donetsk and Lugansk.

However, those who follow what is happening from the outside and consider all the actions and messages of opponents understand that there will be no serious aggravation. Just as there will be no offensive on the dry ground. And not only because Zelenskiy will be afraid of Putin's warning.

Zelensky is a puppet in the hands of Europe and (to a greater extent) the United States. This means that it will not be decided in Kiev at all.

What is happening today on the line of contact is just an imitation of activity for internal consumption. The Armed Forces of Ukraine, which, when listing the units and subdivisions located in the east of Ukraine, looks quite impressive against the background of the Republican corps, is in fact a rather miserable sight.

In subdivisions and units, the shortage of personnel is up to 30% or more. Especially on the line of contact. This is clearly not enough for the offensive. Even with the use of purchased UAVs. Although, according to the statement of Colonel Basurin, the Republicans are ready to meet the Turkish Drones. That is, in the corps there are means for their successful destruction.

Ukraine does not carry out the measures necessary to create a powerful shock fist. There is no remanufacturing of parts. There is no creation of ammunition and fuel depots. No new tank divisions. The artillery is in the same condition as before.

Hence, even if any offensive operation starts in those directions where it is possible (and these directions are known to any commander of republican units), the Armed Forces of Ukraine will come across a well-organized, echeloned defense, which will grind Ukrainian units no worse than millstones of grain.

And who will attack next? Where will Ukrainian commanders get replenishment from? Where is the equipment and weapons that will be transferred to the advancing units in a short time?

Here you don't have to be a strategist at all to understand that the offensive of the Armed Forces of Ukraine will end not with just another cauldron, but with a global drape. At least to the borders of Donetsk and Lugansk regions.

Danger is not where it is expected


The situation in Donbass must be viewed from a slightly different point of view.

Many times analysts have made a completely correct conclusion that the Donbass (especially with the population) is not needed in modern Ukraine. If only because millions of new voters will significantly change the political situation at elections of any level. And there is nothing for Kiev to restore Donbass.

Americans and Europeans? What for?

They are quite satisfied that competitors have been eliminated. That the industry and extractive industries are in decline. That Ukraine is torn apart, therefore, cannot claim membership in NATO.

The West is not satisfied with only one thing - the existence of Russia, which has a good army.

It is precisely from the positions of the EU and the US that the situation must be viewed.

The first question to be answered is why the situation needs to be aggravated?

The answer is obvious. What is needed is not an aggravation in the Donbass, which everyone is tired of and no longer scares anyone. It is necessary to aggravate relations between Ukraine and Russia. Not talking "in general" in TCG, but exacerbation. Better military!

Now the last important question - where is it easy to create such an aggravation? And exactly the place that the Ukrainian military is openly pointing to as a theater of military operations in the near future?

Crimea!

It is there that the next "Ukrainian ships" should be expected. The peninsula today is ideal for provocation.

I'll try to work for the Ukrainian General Staff.

An attack by ground forces is out of the question. The weight classes of the armies are too different.

Aviation?

This is already something from the realm of anecdotes.

Fleet?

Sorry for the rubber boats.

UAV?

Even the Americans are afraid of the electronic warfare of the Russian army.

What is left?

Rocket strike!

For two years the Ukrainians have been shouting about new missiles for the "Vilkha" (Alder) MLRS. Those same corrected missiles with a firing range of up to 200 km. Now imagine testing these missiles, exercising with these missiles, or something similar. And for some reason the rockets are flying towards the Crimea.

What will happen next? Specifically at the time of the shooting.

It is clear that the missiles will be intercepted and destroyed by the Russian missile defense system. But what's next?

The commander must decide to destroy the enemy launchers, since this is a direct attack on Russia. Or not to make such a decision, but to report upstairs and wait for a decision.

In any case, we are a loser.

Let's hit back - we'll give the West a reason to howl about poor Ukraine, which was attacked by this wild bear.

We will not hit - we are battering people who can only frighten with their destroyed Armed Forces. It is clear that in any case there will be no full-scale war, but a serious wave will rise.

Why and why the USA needs it


Yes, exactly what you need. Even necessary at the moment.

Try to understand.

It seems to me that it is necessary to start with the "world master," which the Americans consider themselves to be.

If you look at the speeches of the American president and other officials today, you will notice a significant change in the rhetoric of the Americans towards Russia. Until recently (before the events in Syria), representatives of the American elite always emphasized their military superiority over Russia.

Today they talk about anything other than military superiority. The fact that Trump has declared China the number one enemy is temporary. Simply because for the previous president, the main thing was after all the economy and the stabilization of the United States itself.

For the current president, the security of the US territory again becomes the main one. Only Russia can guarantee serious damage to the United States. Precisely by hitting the territory of the States Moreover, Washington understands that the United States has lagged behind the Russian Federation for a decent amount of time in armaments. And systems that until recently were quite combat-ready are now difficult to use.

By the way, about systems.

Yesterday I watched the message and photos posted on the official website of the Iranian Ministry of Defense. Photos of the base that was hit with a high-precision weapons Americans. The most important facility at the base, the checkpoint, was destroyed. And some wooden trailer is damaged. The rest - garbage and some lumps ... That's the whole result of the use of high-precision, expensive aerial bombs. Why did it happen?

For some reason, this strange blow from the Americans is very strongly associated with the assumption of a provocation by Ukraine in Crimea.

Why not?

The rockets flew. And we get an urgent message about a malfunction of the guidance system. Isn't it the 4 minutes that the American pilots needed to strike after the warning of the Russian representatives?

The USA needs time. Today the task of the Pentagon is about the same as that of the General Staff of the USSR during the "Star Wars". The only difference is that Russia has what it talks about, not bluffs. And this time can be won only by dragging the Russian army into local conflicts, into long-term wars, into the showdown of citizens of neighboring states. Ukraine is suitable for this. Especially in alliance with other "American friends" like Georgia or Moldova.

Why and why the EU needs it


In the EU, everything is simpler and more complicated.

On the one hand, they seem to have given up part of their sovereignty for protection from Russia.

On the other hand, it is already clear today that their defender is cowardly and will run away at the first danger overseas. In the same way, as well as the understanding that fairy tales about our own, European army are just fairy tales. If there is a NATO bloc, they will never create an additional army.

If we add here the need to fulfill all Washington's “wishes” in political terms (and, for some reason, all the demands of the Americans go sideways just for the Europeans), then it turns out - quite sad. On the whole, the European Union is well aware that it must reconcile the incompatible. Walk the razor's edge over the abyss.

Remember what is being actively discussed today in the OSCE and at the EU ministerial summits?

This is a question of the next sanctions on at least three decisions of Russia at once. First, Navalny. Europe on the one hand hears the threat from the United States. On the other hand, Lavrov's statements about the possible reaction of Russia to these sanctions.

Secondly, the response of the Europeans to the failed ultimatum from Josep Borrell. The Russian Foreign Minister skillfully "knocked the sword" out of the hands of the main European diplomat and forced Borrel to abandon pressure on Russia. Which led to a completely different situation on the European continent. Now the trump cards were in the hands of Moscow.

And thirdly, SP-2. On the one hand, the EU (especially Germany) is extremely interested in Nord Stream 2, since this will not only provide huge profits for the new gas hub, but will also fundamentally change the position of Germany itself. Years of confrontation with Poland will come to an end. On the other hand, there is a demand to stop construction.

What we see today resembles a student's copy of La Gioconda. It seems similar, but it does not look like a masterpiece at all. The sanctions that will be announced to our officials today or tomorrow in response to all our "sins" are also a "copy of the Mona Lisa". And Europe understands this.

In fact, the same Josep Borrell outlined a new strategy for EU-Russia relations in his final speech at a meeting of EU foreign ministers in Brussels:

“It is based on three actions.

Counteraction when Russia violates human rights.

Deterrence, when, for example, there is disinformation and cyberattacks.

Engaging in dialogue where we have interests. "

The Europeans have a daunting task.

If we translate what Borel said from diplomatic to philistine, it turns out that the European Union wants to interfere in the internal affairs of the Russian Federation, pursue a policy of active containment of the Kremlin and at the same time cooperate where it is beneficial to Brussels.

This is where the Ukrainian question comes up.

One of the levers of pressure on Moscow can be the possibility of containing the enraged state adjacent to Russia:

"Give for give."

Summer will be very warm. And maybe hot


As you can see, the spring and summer seasons are going to be very interesting.

First of all, because of the actions of Kiev. Pushed to provocation - there will be a lot of blood and the question of

"Ukrainian statehood".

They will keep the zeal of the Ukrainian president - Ukraine will turn into a monster, where everyone will be forgotten

"Achievements of civilization".

Extreme nationalism as an all-Ukrainian idea. Terror towards political opponents. Saber rattling in front of neighboring states and constant threat of attack. Ukrainization in the most brutal way. And so on.

Ukropatriots' dreams come true. Ukraine is indeed becoming the navel of European politics. Well, not really a navel. So, the navel. Considering that the Ukrainians themselves are only pawns in this game. And the destiny of pawns, alas, is to be victims. To die heroically for the glory of the king.

I have described one of the most likely scenarios for the development of events.

Relations between the United States and its allies with Russia and China are at an impasse. The new president returned to

"The traditional values ​​of the Democratic Party."

But the world has changed.

And so much so that much of what Joe Biden is talking about today has ceased to be the key issues of world politics.

There are actually several options.

But the general idea, the general direction of building relations between the West and Russia, the West and China, is already clear.

Well, after a harsh winter, a harsh summer comes.

This is how iron is tempered. Heat and cool in oil. Heated and cooled ...
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

78 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    3 March 2021 04: 29
    Will there be SUMMER? No matter how the "cold summer of 53" comes out ....
    1. dSK
      +4
      3 March 2021 17: 26
      Military means do not remove economic problems. (author)
      In the economic theory of "Kondratyev's long waves" (cycle 40-60 years), which describe major economic crises, it is shown that always those countries that overtake in scientific and technological development begin to wars for the redivision of the world.
    2. +1
      9 March 2021 11: 22
      it seems to me that the author is strongly wrong about the Crimea.
      In Ukraine, there are obvious preparations for a database in the Donbass, a lot of weapons are being purchased for unpunished shooting from a distance. These are sniper rifles, and UAVs, and tactical missiles, and simple artillery is being pulled up.
      And what about the multi-vector impact of the author's rights. Our government is poor in its capabilities and if it is able to adequately handle 1-2 incidents, then if you create a complex game in 15-20 directions at the same time, then it is stupid to have so many adequate experts for an adequate response. And the EU does not even need any real activity, it is enough just to show the fuss and watch how the Russian Federation reacts. If the USSR could react in hundreds of incidents - it had enough people everywhere, then the Russian Federation is in great danger of stumbling.
      It reminded me of the situation before ww2, when the USSR made a number of serious mistakes simply because there was an acute shortage of qualified personnel and there could be no failures in a difficult game.
  2. +27
    3 March 2021 05: 06
    Moreover, Washington understands that in matters of armament, the United States lagged behind the Russian Federation for a decent amount of time.
    Here the author is so downright categorical about this declares that he really snatches pride. It turns out that now we can screw all of their NATU onto threads, or what? And if we can, then why is our elite so afraid to give a real answer at least to their economic sanctions? And another question that is sore on edge - and what for such aggravation is necessary for the elites - that ours, that the Western (although ours have also long ago become Westernized), if the West and without any exacerbations siphons our resources (including intellectual), and ours calmly get their small bribe for this? I, among other things, decided long ago with the answer - all this fuss with the creation of the image of an external enemy - only for the internal consumer is designed. So that you can continue to put people in the stall without hindrance, you need to rally and be patient - the external enemy sharpens a tooth! In general, the article, which at first read as a completely normal attempt at analytics, turned out to be incomprehensible in what.
    1. -8
      3 March 2021 05: 18
      Quote: Dalny V
      And if we can, then why is our elite so afraid to give a real answer at least to their economic sanctions?

      A very correct question! I will add one more from myself. Men are physically stronger than women. Then why don't men give birth to children? Why don't men want to give a real answer to women in this matter? what
      1. +23
        3 March 2021 05: 29
        Superanalogy laughing Men do not give birth to children, because nature has not laid a baby in them (Chaplin's million dollars will soon grow with moss). Therefore, with all their desire, they cannot give an answer. in this matter... It turns out that mother nature has not built in the appropriate organ for our top, too, with the help of which we can give a real answer to economic Western sanctions? That is, there are still not enough testicles?
        1. +1
          3 March 2021 05: 57
          Quote: Far In
          Superanalogy laughing Men do not give birth to children, because nature has not laid a baby in them (Chaplin's million dollars will soon grow with moss). Therefore, with all their desire, they cannot give an answer. in this matter... It turns out that mother nature has not built in the appropriate organ for our top, too, with the help of which we can give a real answer to economic Western sanctions? That is, there are still not enough testicles?

          good drinks
          1. +12
            3 March 2021 06: 50
            Huge
            loudspeaker bells, velvet tape-recorder bass broadcast: "There, behind
            the crest of the hollow, the insidious enemy. Only forward. Only forward. Leverage yourself and
            - forward. At the enemy. Forward ... There, behind the crest of the hollow, the insidious enemy ...
            Leverage yourself and - forward ... "

            The intensity of propaganda is already like in a well-known book ... Well, right, somehow it is necessary to justify the economic situation.
            1. +5
              3 March 2021 12: 07
              A good soothing article in the spirit of the editorials of Pravda on the eve of the Great Patriotic War. Or maybe this is the enemy's misinformation: look, we fuckers have no idea about anything? The latter option is quite possible: those who need it, know and prepare, and the public should portray calmness and ignorance.

              I disagree with some provisions of the article.
              What does it mean "They started to play against us on many boards at once"? Why "started"? I believe that the game went on continuously and without interruption, except that, with the election of Biden-Democrats, it revived.

              I do not share Alexander's serenity about the attack by the Ukrainian Armed Forces. ALL recent facts show that ukrov is in serious preparation for the blitzkrieg. And the command to attack, it seems, has come. Not from, via Zelensky. It is clear from whom there are also preparing for a support operation, cover and stop at the desired them moment.

              The attack will, of course, not be on the Crimea, but on the LPNR in several directions, including amphibious assault in the south. An attempt at a blitzkrieg with an abrupt stop and a terrible howl of the whole West about Russia's aggression and Ukraine's peacefulness. Distracting missile attack on Crimea possible, but unlikely due to the danger explicit wars with Russia.

              And all this must happen precisely because of the SP-2, which should change a lot in geopolitics.

              Why was the decision to attack made? After all, the risk is great. The time has come to use the dying "Moor" for the last time, most likely, with benefit. Either to prolong its existence as a "log in the door" annoying Russia, or to use it as a weighty argument for stopping the same SP-2.

              We are waiting for the second half of April and - yes! - dried earth. Although it is possible that the situation will change and the owners cancel the operation.
              1. The comment was deleted.
            2. 0
              4 March 2021 20: 45
              Every morning at the UN, at the Council of Europe, all the news channels of the Russian Federation.All our politicians and diplomats should start reading with a reminder that the Russian Federation destroyed its chemical weapons back in 2017. And we are waiting for other countries led by the United States to destroy their chemical weapons. And not just about when the next stuffing comes. Then the whole world will remember that Russia does not have CW, but other countries have it that wants to substitute it.
        2. -10
          3 March 2021 09: 08
          Quote: Dalny V
          Men do not give birth to children, because nature did not give birth to them

          Military means do not remove economic problems laughing
          1. +10
            3 March 2021 09: 36
            What a confusing thesis, however. What did you mean? If there are internal economic problems - well, yes, it's awkward to put things in order with an elephant in a china shop. But the States (and not only those), relying on their military superiority, are solving external economic problems for themselves. Even without the help of wars (although with their help too). It is, as it were, a worldwide and many-thousand-year practice.
          2. +3
            3 March 2021 11: 24
            Quote: domokl
            Quote: Dalny V
            Men do not give birth to children, because nature did not give birth to them

            Military means do not remove economic problems laughing

            But this is very controversial.
            This is exactly what Americans have been doing for the past 100 years.
          3. +4
            3 March 2021 14: 29
            Quote: domokl
            Military means do not remove economic problems

            Perhaps I am wrong, but it seems Clausewitz argued that war is a continuation of the economy and a radical solution to its problems.
            1. +3
              3 March 2021 19: 14
              And he also (if his memory serves), said that war decides politics when diplomacy does not make sense. Not literally, but something like that ...
          4. +1
            3 March 2021 16: 41
            Quote: domokl
            Military means do not remove economic problems

            "Little victorious war" postpones the need to solve internal problems (and economic ones too), if it does not turn into "Tsushima", of course.
            1. +1
              3 March 2021 19: 21
              Clarify please?
              Who wanted Tsushima to solve his internal problems?
              If Japan, then she had only one problem, to work off the money invested in it by the West.
              If the Russian Empire, then this is generally fantastic. There (in St. Petersburg), of course, they knew about Japan, "expressed concern," but they were absolutely not ready for war. And such a war could in no way solve the internal revolutionary problems.
              1. +2
                3 March 2021 19: 35
                Quote: Nikon OConor
                If the Russian Empire, then this is generally fantastic. There (in St. Petersburg), of course, they knew about Japan, "expressed concern," but they were absolutely not ready for war. And such a war could in no way solve the internal revolutionary problems.

                It is clear that the Russo-Japanese war had economic reasons (the Bezobrazovskaya clique, etc.). Another question is that at that time Russia did not take it seriously and hoped to quickly "deal with it" in the event of a war, simultaneously dampening discontent at the expense of patriotic feelings. I am not sure that the tsar, with his clique, seriously considered the option that Japan would attack Russia. Of course, no one started a special war, in order to dampen revolutionary sentiments. However, they understood that the "small victorious war", with almost no casualties, would only strengthen the power. And certainly no one expected such an outcome, with Tsushima and the loss of Port Arthur.
      2. +4
        3 March 2021 05: 57
        Quote: domokl
        Quote: Dalny V
        And if we can, then why is our elite so afraid to give a real answer at least to their economic sanctions?

        A very correct question! I will add one more from myself. Men are physically stronger than women. Then why don't men give birth to children? Why don't men want to give a real answer to women in this matter? what

        fool negative stop
      3. +9
        3 March 2021 07: 53
        Quote: domokl
        A very correct question! I will add one more from myself. Men are physically stronger than women. Then why do men not give birth to children? Why don't men want to give a real answer to women in this matter?

        I have read everything on VO. But, this! At least stand, at least fall. This is what kind of brains you need to have to think of this!)) I always suspected that confused people have a special style of thinking))
        1. +9
          3 March 2021 08: 40
          In general, I got the impression that the author sat down at the table, drummed his fingers in thoughtfulness, then, without looking, took out a training manual "agitprop" from the drawer and began to scribble the text.
          On the cover of the training manual, the worn-out inscription "2015" was barely visible ....
          1. +4
            3 March 2021 08: 48
            hi The impressions are the same. I didn't even comment on this.
      4. -6
        3 March 2021 09: 06
        Quote: Far In
        And if we can, then why is our elite so afraid?
        Quote: domokl
        Very correct question!

        The first thing to do is to get rid of the illusion that our "top" is monolithic.

        Those who were appointed by the State Department in the 90s still have power and cannot be ignored. We all remember how not the richest man in Russia, Zhirinovsky, arranged a mini Maidan in Khabarovsk, when his gesheft was taken away from him - a round timber, and what those who trade with Ukraine along with their henchmen in power can arrange ...

        Amendments to the Constitution significantly curtail their ability to organize a coup in Russia and return to the 90s. Elections to the State Duma under the new rules are another blow to their capabilities ... Do you want it fast? And I want to quickly, but do not forget what happens if you very quickly pull lace panties over your head.

        In order to destroy the Stalinist USSR, it took them 40 years - from 1953 to 1993.
        1. +5
          3 March 2021 09: 14
          The first thing to do is get rid of the illusion that our elite is monolithic
          Yes, I learned, I learned that there are two towers: the Medvedev tower and the Putin tower, and Medvedev’s tower Putin’s spread rot for nothing, drove it underground, from where our Red Sun has not been able to get out for a year ... You can be so convincing when free ... laughing
          1. -13
            3 March 2021 09: 23
            Quote: Dalny V
            there are two towers: Medvedev's tower and Putin's tower, and Putin's Medvedev's tower is rotten for nothing

            Yes, there is the pro-Western clan of Medvedev and there is the pro-Russian clan of Putin. Only not spread rot, but subtly outplaying Putin's clan - the Medvedevsky clan. For quite objective reasons - the speed of decision-making by the "Putin" is much higher than that of the "Medvedev", who have to consult with the owner every time.

            I don’t like the bourgeoisie, either Medvedev’s or Putin’s, I am against the exploitation of man-man in any form, but Putin’s make Russia independent and as soon as this is achieved, we can proceed to further reformation of the social system. Not earlier. That is why at this stage I support Putin.
            1. +2
              3 March 2021 12: 58
              Quote: Boris55
              but Putin's make Russia independent, and as soon as this is achieved, we can proceed to further reformation of the social system. Not earlier.

              The same cabbage soup, but pour more. Everything is as usual: no need to swing, you have to be patient, everything will be fine, Putin will take care of everything, but for now let us rally, cross our fingers and, praying, tighten our belts. "Boring, ̶д̶е̶v̶o̶ch̶k̶i̶ Boris" ...
            2. +3
              3 March 2021 14: 20
              Uh-huh, it was 3227 .....
              The samurai has no goal, there is only a path ...
        2. -2
          3 March 2021 16: 50
          Quote: Boris55
          Those who were appointed by the State Department in the 90s still have power and should not be ignored.

          Of course it is impossible, how can you ignore the entire leadership of the country with "Himself" at the head?
          Quote: Boris55
          Amendments to the Constitution significantly curtail their ability to organize a coup in Russia and return to the 90s.

          That is, "zeroing" makes it difficult to return to the 90s? By and large, we have not left since the 90s.
          Quote: Boris55
          Elections to the State Duma under the new rules are another blow to their capabilities ...

          Especially touched.)))) The multi-day voting "on stumps" is, of course, the most powerful blow to the American State Department that I have seen in recent years. )))))
          Quote: Boris55
          And I want to quickly, but do not forget what happens if very quickly, quickly pull the lace panties over my head.

          Share your experience, please. I am not familiar with the sensations of such actions.
      5. +5
        3 March 2021 09: 24
        domokl - Provocations in Crimea? Maybe, but it is much more unpleasant to get provocations in Transnistria - a territory completely isolated from Russia, in the event of a conflict it is impossible to provide air support, or even to support the Kyrgyz Republic with a strike without violating the borders of Ukraine.
        It still seems to me that if they "cling" us, then it is there, and the Donbas and Crimea are a plus to this, so to speak, "number two" are already in the complex.
        1. +1
          6 March 2021 18: 43
          Nazar (Igor), March 3, 2021 09:24 - "... domokl - Provocations in Crimea? Maybe, but it's much more unpleasant to get provocations in Transnistria - a territory completely isolated from Russia, in the event of a conflict, it is impossible to provide air support or even to support the Kyrgyz Republic with a strike without violating the borders of Ukraine ... "

          You are right, Nazar (Igor). Нoh, unfortunately hot (smoldering) spots, where Russia can be STRONG and tough, A LOT.
          We look around the perimeter and where there are already or still OUR(Syria, Armenia, Transnistria, Tajikistan ...). If, what, then there will have to break through!
          And inside the Russian Federation they can strain - we take into account
          - not only liberals,
          -We look at the reports of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the FSB.
          Thinking, let him lead away...for example a trifle - on TV they showed another wedding procession of guests (it seems Moscow), Checkers, blocking the highway and a very childish prank - the flag of Turkey (our big NATO partner) on the hood of a wedding car. And who celebrated - according to the plot, the citizens of the Russian Federation. And why is the flag not its own national or, for example, not the flag of the Russian Federation? belay
          The question remains ... feel
          The USA are successful students of England, they know how to use 100% of the available OPPORTUNITIES, and there will be enough experience to create. am
          And their slaves (we are looking at the former "brothers" in the USSR ...) along the perimeter of the Russian Federation, are already digging the ground with their hoofs ...

          Uncle Sam, he himself will never climb first (It's not royal, it's business to climb the fire for chestnuts yourself bully ) , but will help and manage the process. And in what sequence to use Capabilities will be, this time will tell ...
          But, it is important to remember something else:
          In this regard, Sun Tzu says: "Invincibility is in itself, the possibility of victory lies in the enemy." .....
          In other words, one's own invulnerability depends on oneself, but victory over the enemy depends on him. hi
          Simply put Russia to options (individually and all together) ready ?! OR...
          1. 0
            8 March 2021 04: 41
            boni592807 (Vyacheslav) - To your question: "Is Russia ready for options (individually and all together) ?! OR ..."? so far, a not very optimistic answer can be seen, although it has been recently that the "top" seems to have begun to stir, and this is precisely the case that it is better late than never.
            Quite rightly, you wrote: "... along the perimeter of the Russian Federation, they are already digging the ground with a hoof ..." - only one moment - on the territories of our closest "allies" Armenia and Kazakhstan, Pentagon bio-laboratories have been operating for a long time, I'm not talking about the same laboratories in Georgia and Ukraine - the reaction of the "Kremlin" to this is surprisingly sluggish and indistinct. What, they are waiting again for the "thunder to break out" then and "baptized" will begin?
      6. +4
        3 March 2021 11: 22
        Quote: domokl
        Men are physically stronger than women. Then why don't men give birth to children?

        You do not know much about the anatomy and physiology of the human body.
        In fact, the female body is much physiologically (not physically) stronger than the male. This has been scientifically proven long ago. The survival rate of women is better, women are less susceptible to genetic diseases.
      7. 0
        3 March 2021 13: 40
        Staver may be enough for demagoguery? It is in your article more than in abundance.
      8. +3
        3 March 2021 13: 42
        Quote: domokl
        I will add one more from myself. Men are physically stronger than women. Then why don't men give birth to children?


        Physically, yes, but physiologically we are much weaker than women, therefore nature has determined that they will give birth ... Yes
      9. +1
        3 March 2021 22: 46
        Quote: domokl
        A very correct question! I will add one more from myself. Men are physically stronger than women. Then why don't men give birth to children? Why don't men want to give a real answer to women in this matter? what

        I have long wanted to suggest putting the author's name at the top, next to the title of the article. It will be possible not to waste time reading a couple or two paragraphs of the next portion of dope, very convenient.
      10. +2
        4 March 2021 01: 12
        Quote: domokl
        They started playing against us on many boards at once
        never stopped ... ? !! in fact...
        It's bad that from our side, the last strong grandmaster there was only Joseph Vissarionovich !!!!
        For such games are not for the Karpovs and Kasparovs ... wink
    2. +4
      3 March 2021 12: 24
      What is the author's optimism about the backwardness of the United States in terms of weapons. For me, everything is fine with them. Where are they just critically lagged behind?)))
    3. -2
      3 March 2021 15: 50
      Quote: Dalny V
      but what for such aggravation is necessary for the elites, if the West and without any aggravations is pumping out our resources, and ours are quietly getting their own small bribe for this?
      The correct question! good

      And how did all these stupid elites manage world to arrange wars among themselves during thousands years, when everything was so amicably and simply decided (Vasya-Vasya was rubbed and for a small bribe)? belay Didn't read you, yeah ...

      Explain, finally, to these Western tebils that they have absolutely nothing to worry about, otherwise they, foolishly, trillions spend on maintenance over eight hundred military bases around, mainly, Russia, on the F-35, Zimvolty, nuclear weapons, propaganda, for the bombing and occupation of Iraq, Afgan, Yugoslavia, Libya, etc., but could wow!
      Quote: Dalny V
      - all this fuss with the creation of the image of the external enemy is designed only for the internal consumer. So that you can continue to put people in the stall without hindrance, you need to rally and be patient - the external enemy sharpens a tooth!

      that's right, but all this evil - in the form of Poles, Germans, Turks, Japanese, Angles and Franks and others - dozens of wars, for centuries, persisting on Russia from all sides for land and resources (And lying by millions in Russian soil- a malicious notion of historians and horror stories of the leaders-thieves of Russia, so that "people can be put in a stall without hindrance." Yes fool

      And Russia, in your opinion, with her world reserves of resources, land and water on the Earth suffocating from their lack, "of course", no one "needs" at the peak fool

      when you speak, it feels like you, yes.
    4. +3
      3 March 2021 16: 17
      Quote: Dalny V
      It turns out that now we can screw all of their NATU onto the thread, or what?
      Doesn't come out even once. However, the weapons that have replenished our arsenals, deprives NATU of the illusion of getting rid of Russia without significant damage to itself. This is just the case when the victory will not be the joy of the winner. Our military doctrine does not provide for an attack.
      Quote: Dalny V
      And if we can, then why is our elite so afraid to give a real answer at least to their economic sanctions?

      Are you serious? Should we use missiles for economic sanctions? So, so far, our counter-sanctions, as a result of which the total losses of the EU have long exceeded 100 billion euros and thousands of hard workers have lost their jobs, are not working badly.
      Quote: Dalny V
      The West is pumping out our resources (including intellectual ones) without any exacerbation, while ours calmly receive their small bribe for this?

      It will be fair to say that the West does not pump out, but pays for the purchase of the supplied resources. Our offices are pumped out.
      Quote: Dalny V
      all this fuss with the creation of the image of an external enemy is designed only for the internal consumer. So that you can continue to put people in the stall without hindrance, you need to rally and be patient - the external enemy sharpens a tooth!
      If it does not bother you, then list the "good and bright" that the US and the EU have done for Russia, at least for the last five years, otherwise we are all "zombified" and "promoted" by boxes and are sitting without coupons for the Internet, and therefore alternative we have no sources of information.
    5. 0
      18 March 2021 19: 13
      Oh my God ! To what they have brought Russia. Even with an attack on Crimea (count on Russia), they are already thinking whether to respond or not. Well, this is already a complete "paragraph".
  3. +5
    3 March 2021 06: 13
    What remains? Rocket strike!

    This is the least likely decision of Ukraine (even under pressure from the United States). Aggravation in Donbass is just the most probable and promises the greatest success. The author's insights that the LDNR has a powerful grouping and air defense systems against Bayraktar is not confirmed by anything. The alignment of forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, even with a 30% shortage, still inspires thoughts about preparing for "something." Today, the entire set of forces has been withdrawn from the places of permanent deployment to the field areas of concentration and will not stand like that forever. Preparatory work for mobilizing the population also speaks of building up preparedness. Stocks of MTO in the areas of concentration can be created on the basis of railway stations and routes in a couple of three days. And here the Armed Forces of Ukraine covers at least the consciousness that all actions take place on the territory of Ukraine (where there is no Armed Forces of the Russian Federation and they know it for sure). Crimea is quite another matter. For a missile attack, you need at least a stock of missiles and means of overcoming air defense. In general, the analysis of the situation smacks of such golimous amateurism .... Some statements and no actual sources. There is not even a map of the alignment of forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Reasoning on the water ...
  4. +20
    3 March 2021 06: 16
    When incomes of the population decrease, and prices for everything rise, articles are written on the topic: "Tomorrow is the war."
    1. +14
      3 March 2021 06: 25
      I wang that such articles will double or triple, the year is elective and not just anywhere but in the main support ..
      1. +12
        3 March 2021 06: 40
        That's for sure .. We will hear a lot of "joyful" .. laughing
      2. -14
        3 March 2021 07: 52
        Quote: Pilot
        Wangyu that such articles will double or triple

        Pilotwhat will happen to the ship and the crew if the pilot is thrown overboard?
        Is this what you are hinting at with this picture?
        1. +5
          3 March 2021 13: 03
          Quote: Boris55
          Pilotwhat will happen to the ship and the crew if the pilot is thrown overboard?

          - Who are you? Pilot?
          - No.
          - Maybe the boatswain?
          - No.
          - Who are you?
          - I'm Katsman.
          - All the same, give up the ends!
          - I didn't take them from you. (joke)
          I wonder who is our Pilot, if even Himself - just a rower on the gallery ..?
          1. dSK
            0
            3 March 2021 17: 14
            Quote: Hyperion
            I wonder who is our Pilot

            Kudrin, most likely. He did not create a pillow, but feather bed.
          2. +2
            4 March 2021 23: 08
            We have a Pilot-Katzman
        2. +3
          3 March 2021 14: 23
          A pilot leading a ship to the reefs?
          He is not thrown off the ship so easily.
      3. +10
        3 March 2021 07: 59
        Quote: Pilot
        I wang that such articles will double or triple, the year is elective and not just anywhere but in the main support ..

        So far, it can be stated that Staver ousted Kamenev.
      4. +18
        3 March 2021 10: 15
        Quote: Pilot
        I wang that such articles will double or triple, the year is elective and not just anywhere but in the main support ..

        They will multiply tenfold, so Skabeeva says how we are sick of everyone around us.
  5. +10
    3 March 2021 06: 19
    Officials on both sides benefit from being in the Donbass. They rule money and "produce" reports. And the military has its own rules.
    It is clear that no analytics is capable of revealing the plans of the "headquarters". But the military has its own "laws of war." And the US military is demonstratively increasing its presence in the region. Someday they will carry out a "response for the Crimea": either with a corps of "natives without banners", or - "they will close the sky." The second option is more familiar to them.
    ps On the fields of Syria, the Russian Federation is testing its technical capabilities. Many are waving flags about this. But the enemy is also testing our systems and ... political will. In assessing this will, one can agree with Dalniy: without a "childish" response to the sanctions, Russians will be recorded in "capitulation". soldier
    1. +14
      3 March 2021 07: 16
      No, they would have spent a long time, they have enough strength. Such a sluggish conflict is beneficial to them, when everyone is in limbo without any certainty, then a large field for political games turns out.
  6. +3
    3 March 2021 07: 48
    To the haloperidol to the afftor, and you look, the bloody boys will stop dancing in their eyes. And the rabid, unsubstantiated propaganda, you can still leave it for your kitchen, and not spread it on the network. It's not only Russians who read, heh
    1. +1
      4 March 2021 23: 11
      The author has such a job, what to do
  7. +5
    3 March 2021 07: 50
    Ukraine does not carry out the measures necessary to create a powerful shock fist. There is no remanufacturing of parts. There is no creation of ammunition and fuel depots. There are no new tank units. The artillery is in the same condition as before.
    It means not tomorrow, but the process is going on. We recall the recent events in Karabakh-Artsakh. Previously, they liked to remember the morale of the militia corps, but now, after a series of murders and betrayals, they no longer talk about it.
  8. 0
    3 March 2021 08: 48
    They started playing against us on many boards at once

    Guarantor Mechenny congratulated on the anniversary? Why didn't you throw another medal for that? Along with himself and EBNu (posthumously). For the same merits sad
  9. BAI
    +2
    3 March 2021 09: 47
    1.
    The Armed Forces of Ukraine will come across a well-organized, echeloned defense that will grind Ukrainian units no worse than millstones of grain.

    Something DRG APU pass through this defense like a knife through butter (if they do not blow up on their own mines).
    2. Of all the statements, one can agree with this:
    This means that the decision will not be made in Kiev.

    All that the author has told will not be. There will be an operation carefully prepared by the US and NATO: the Armed Forces of Ukraine will attack and seize a piece of territory. Before the Russian Federation swings into "peace enforcement" or receives a retaliatory blow from the LPNR, NATO "peacekeepers" will be introduced into the occupied territory, for example, Poles and all sorts of tribals (who do not mind if the plan fails), so that the RF Armed Forces will deal not with the Armed Forces, but with NATO troops.
    Whether the Russian Federation will go to a military conflict with NATO over Donbass is a big question.
    There, the account will go for hours and minutes - whoever did not have time, he was late.
    1. -3
      3 March 2021 09: 54
      Quote: BAI
      There will be an operation carefully prepared by the US and NATO: the Armed Forces of Ukraine attack and seize a piece of territory

      The United States and NATO do not need victory, they need a smoldering conflict. The political consequences of such a victory will be very sad, first of all, for the Ukrainian junta itself.
    2. 0
      4 March 2021 10: 45
      Quote: BAI
      Something DRG APU pass through this defense like a knife through butter (if they do not blow up on their own mines).

      An extremely naive idea of ​​the path of penetration of Ukrainian DRGs into the territory of the LPNR. As during the Second World War across the front line. Of course, and so they test the defense from time to time. Mainly for intelligence purposes. But all successful sabotage actions are carried out by groups that are quite legally moving through the "aggressor's" checkpoint. After all, this is a civil war, they are the same Russians as residents of Donetsk or Moscow. They use it. They fight when it suits them. Like their Bandera grandfathers after the war. And so they go quietly to Donetsk and go to the Crimea to rest. We are our own.
  10. +6
    3 March 2021 10: 08
    This is in what types of weapons the United States lagged behind Russia ?? !!!
    1. -1
      3 March 2021 12: 20
      Don't watch cartoons? And they don't even have a Rogozin-style trampoline! The "obsolete" rocket arrived on Mars ...
      1. 0
        4 March 2021 10: 52
        Quote: BIABIA
        Don't watch cartoons? And they don't even have a Rogozin-style trampoline!

        They have trampolines, only Elon Musk has them much more expensive.
        Another freshly fried trampoline from Spase-X.
        https://t.me/rian_ru/78285
      2. 0
        4 March 2021 11: 08
        Quote: BIABIA
        Don't watch cartoons?

        And you probably only watch their cartoons. Oh yes, they have uncensored cartoons for adults in a democracy. Only the moment of roasting Starship was cut from the official video of Spase-X. Why would you?
  11. 0
    3 March 2021 10: 29
    I agree that a multi-faceted strategy of struggle to destroy Russia is being carried out. Ukraine, Georgia, Moldova, Japan and other countries that are territorially offended, as they believe, are part of the strategy. Further: defamation of Russia, restrictions (sanctions), rocking discontent within the country. The war has been going on for a long time. The enemy has already captured Ukraine, Georgia, the Baltic states. It was not possible to seize Belarus from a swoop. Armenia surrendered part of Karabakh because of the provocateur and traitor Pashinyan, but I think the army and people will soon get rid of him. The situation is difficult. Who can be considered as Russia's allies? Iran is motivated; it connects its problems with the destructive policy of the United States. China is a weak hope. Conclusion: we continue to strengthen our two old allies
  12. +2
    3 March 2021 11: 10
    In order to use force, you need to have political will, but it is not there. This Khrushchev could say to the UN, we will bury you! Not taking Tbilisi in 8, not introducing troops into dill at 14, not using 300 in Syria, where the Jews fly and bomb as at a training ground, he shows all the weakness of his rule and only incites the West into even more insolent actions ... I forgot what ended on provocation not to succumb to summer 41 ???
  13. -1
    3 March 2021 12: 24
    For two years the Ukrainians have been shouting about new missiles for the "Vilkha" (Alder) MLRS. Those same corrected missiles with a firing range of up to 200 km.
    It is clear that the missiles will be intercepted and destroyed by the Russian missile defense system.


    It is very interesting, what kind of uber-means of the Russian missile defense system in Crimea is capable of intercepting missiles with an EPR = 0.1m2, a speed of 3.5M and, at the same time, almost vertically diving down from the sky, right into the "dead funnel" of the radar? Has Israel installed an "Iron Dome" in Crimea, bypassing the sanctions?
    1. 0
      3 March 2021 15: 36
      This is not the Ukraine, which could not make a normal mortar and ditch almost all of its highly technological industry?
  14. +5
    3 March 2021 12: 37
    There are several authors on the site, whose names can be found from the first paragraph of the article and who write about "spherical horses in a vacuum".
  15. 0
    3 March 2021 14: 42
    What are we playing?
  16. +4
    3 March 2021 14: 54
    A provocation in Crimea is the most likely scenario. Donbass has long been accustomed to them. This will generate more resonance. X @ hly for the grandmother to work for the public. Where? In the area of ​​the bridge, or the bridge itself. They had been threatening for a long time. It was not in vain that Elusive Joe sent them rubber boats - not to swim in Donbass. Again, they opened the sky for NATO aviation over the Crimea. Coincidence? I don’t think so. The holiday season will be disrupted, for them it is a joy. They do not understand that the Americans also consider them Russians, Slavs, and therefore subject to disposal.
  17. +1
    3 March 2021 15: 26
    Well, so with X 101, trouble can happen, and it flies into the building of the SBU or the Rada or the government of the country 404 ...
  18. -3
    3 March 2021 15: 58
    Our tough couch patriots on the march. The next step is a preemptive strike against an oversized enemy. how much Girkin has already clucked - Vanga is resting. And for five years now, Ukraine will attack the DPR and LPR, and now more abruptly - a missile strike on the Crimea ... Have you fought for a long time? So you need to sign up for Wagner. And still wash your feet somewhere. Is Ukraine falling apart? So it takes a long time to fall apart. We do not observe hunger riots, but the fact that the migrant workers went to Europe, well, that's their business. There are no eggs in power, but how should this be manifested? Our tanks are on Khreshchatyk, so why do we need it, S eu to tear everything apart forever? so many and the United States is just waiting for this. Chatterboxes however.
  19. +3
    3 March 2021 19: 51
    Again, the train with hats was brought up, the abuse is continuous.
  20. 0
    3 March 2021 23: 04
    nothing new to come up with. The tactic of persecuting the beast (barking, hunger, starvation, covering, etc.) does not channel with Russia. It's all the same to stir up a hive or a den for an unlucky hunter
  21. -1
    4 March 2021 08: 02
    Donbass will stand and will remain the WINNER!
    History has already shown these outcomes ...
  22. -1
    4 March 2021 12: 45
    Georgia also thought so, having attacked Ossetia .. they swelled up together with the west .. they were silent for a moment ... and if they start to howl strongly, then slash at those factories that produce these missiles .. warning the workers 4 minutes before the attack. as the United States did in Syria.
  23. 0
    8 March 2021 10: 02
    Obvious nonsense. Time is working for Ukraine, so they don't need anything at all except to wait for a floating corpse.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"