For the first time in the history of the Russian Federation, a Russian warship entered Port Sudan, where the MTO point of the Russian Navy will appear

93

The frigate "Admiral Grigorovich" is a Russian warship, which for the first time in stories The Russian Federation entered Port Sudan, where a Russian naval base may soon appear. He arrived in this African country to resupply and rest the team after the international naval exercises AMAN-2021, which took place in the Arabian Sea on February 15-16.

This message was made by the press service of the Black Sea fleetto which this battleship belongs.



The crew of the frigate "Admiral Grigorovich" paid a visit to Port Sudan, where, by agreement between Russia and the Republic of Sudan, a logistical support point for the Russian Navy will be created.

- stated in the information support department of the Black Sea Fleet of the Russian Federation.

In 2020, the Russian Federation and the Republic of Sudan signed an agreement on the creation of a logistics base in Port Sudan for the Russian Navy. The size of the port allows it to simultaneously receive up to four warships. At the same time, the parties agreed that Russian servicemen temporarily in Sudan will have diplomatic immunity.



The emergence of a Russian naval base in this African country will contribute to strengthening security in the region. The new basing point for Russian warships will make it possible to more effectively eliminate the threat of pirate attacks in the busy shipping area, through which about 20 oil tankers pass a year. At the same time, Russia will have the opportunity to monitor traffic in the Red Sea.
93 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +31
    28 February 2021 17: 08
    With an initiative, men! hi
    1. -15
      28 February 2021 17: 50
      Someone in Sudan wanted independence? By the way, the peasants, along with the initiative, are also fighting Yemen. Although the place is just gorgeous!
      1. 0
        28 February 2021 18: 09
        I’m never a specialist at all, but judging by the map in the Red Sea, a dubious place can be "locked" from either side and you will not twitch. If you really Base, then Base, with an air wing, etc. ... and so ... pampering.
        1. -13
          28 February 2021 18: 28
          Well, while we are building another base through social networks, they are processing our youth, which will overthrow the existing regime and destroy our state. Through social networks, our children will be taken out to fight against us.
          1. +1
            3 March 2021 13: 54
            Everything is lost? We all will die?
        2. +10
          28 February 2021 18: 40
          They can lock them up. If only someone on this "base" is going to "go out" somewhere. Perhaps not. It is a peacetime stronghold in a very hot region. He is quite well located in relation to Egypt, with which it looks like some kind of "special relationship" (which the Sudanese owners of the place are counting on), so it will be nice to be supplied under a "special protocol" in the event of a blockade, even with the ostentatious neutrality of Egypt but what if?). And at this miracle point, let's assume a "Tartus" set, maybe even without aviation. DBK, SAM type "Buk" and "Pantsir" multiply the entire Suez Canal by zero. One small base makes the whole region boil (the involvement of Saudi Arabia and Israel (just how at the same time ?!) is inevitable for "pressure" on the base) in the event of "showdown". Of course, I would like to have a more convenient place, something like the one that the USSR had in Ethiopia. But now are not those times and ... not "that" Ethiopia (generally not count on the sea tiyatra). So, based on the possibilities, even with minimal content ... a good thing ... And if it succeeds in concretely strengthening, if there at least a mixed air regiment will be with a helicopter squadron, if the S-300, the "strip" is normal for the Il-476, if the basing of MRK and diesel-electric submarines (at least two units, please) is ensured - to world imperialism in a particular region.
          1. -9
            28 February 2021 18: 42
            Quote: sleeve
            And at this miracle point, let's assume a "Tartus" set, maybe even without aviation. DBK, SAM type "Buk" and "Pantsir" multiply the entire Suez Canal by zero.

            sounds cool ... and multiplies by "zero" quickly ... no need to build illusions.
            1. -12
              28 February 2021 19: 44
              ABOUT ILLUSION: the Foreign Ministry needs a base, the military does not.
              Watered influence. presence, to pump loot to companies.
              in case of war and so on, everyone should run away from the base without telephones and dzhipies to the pampas. wait for the Yars in the Dakota and Brussels. Who will survive in the sands - Winner in a nuclear war.
        3. +3
          28 February 2021 21: 00
          Quote: Aerodrome
          I’m never special, but judging by the map in the Red Sea, a dubious place can be "locked" from any side and you won’t twitch

          The Red Sea is an international artery, it is impossible to lock someone up and not harm everyone else (it's like a six-lane autobahn, everyone will stand)
          Quote: Aerodrome
          if you are Base, then Base, with an air wing, etc. ... well ... pampering.

          This is not a base, but an MTO point. There our ships and crews will simply replenish supplies on campaigns. This is a slightly different purpose, but to build an airfield there and so on, I do not see any reason for refusal at all.
      2. +2
        28 February 2021 18: 30
        We need to return at least partially to Africa, where we have weak positions in terms of military facilities.
        1. +12
          28 February 2021 18: 39
          Well, you go on a ship ...
          Running out of fuel, water, food.
          And not everyone agrees to accept you. (
          And in this case it is good.
          I am only stating a Fact.
          Temee Warship.
          I think this is the first swallow
          1. -6
            28 February 2021 18: 44
            Quote: hirurg
            Well, you go on a ship ...
            We are running out of fuel, water, food.
            And not everyone agrees to accept you. (
            And in this case it is good.

            yes, I agree, if only the Ships went, and not the "admirals" with eight missiles ... they had nothing to do there ... they fired and ... everything ... from the old "Ticonderogs" the US sailor would giggle ... then 122 cells and not 8 ...
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. The comment was deleted.
                2. The comment was deleted.
                3. +1
                  1 March 2021 01: 29
                  Pink ponies see opportunities for soft power.
                  In our time, war, that is, brute force, against nuclear powers is unrealistic.
                  Therefore, it is pointless to fear for our ships. As well as to imagine the collision of even our boat with the Ticonderoga.
                  the Americans can, but will not, just as our cruiser can destroy the same Ticonderoga, but will not, even if the opportunity arises.
                  The consequences are too serious.
                  Therefore, we are glad that we have "staked out" and that no one will climb, because we are a nuclear power.
                  How no one will climb on the United States, even if it once slipped to the level of a regional power.
                  Nuclear deterrence really works.
      3. -3
        28 February 2021 19: 09
        I do not like? Get NATO bases in Romania, Poland, Georgia ... it won't seem like a little!
    2. -3
      28 February 2021 19: 05
      Not that expression! Although, I have no words how to express my admiration ...
    3. +3
      28 February 2021 19: 11
      Great news! good

      However, the return of our ships to the "big sea game" will require the construction of an impressive ocean-going fleet, because the competitors are not weak these days. And there are a little more of them, including by our efforts. what
      I hope that the correct conclusions will be drawn and that the optimal ship designs for these purposes will be selected!
      1. +12
        28 February 2021 22: 14
        Quote: RealPilot
        However, the return of our ships to the "big sea game" will require the construction of an impressive ocean-going fleet, because the competitors are not weak these days. And there are a little more of them, including by our efforts.

        Is there a large ocean-going fleet? Will it? Enough money?
        Berbera Base, Somalia (1964 - 1977): In addition to the infrastructure for naval ships, a unique 05 meter runway 23/4140 was built at Berbera Airport.
        The USSR did its best to support the economy and agriculture of the backward country; taught her the officer corps, supplied equipment and all the necessary goods. In the open press, there are data that the unpaid debt of Somalia to the USSR (and, therefore, Russia) is 44 tons in terms of gold. They were kicked out of the base, the debts were not returned.
        1. +2
          28 February 2021 22: 37
          Quote: Overlock
          They were kicked out of the base, the debts were not returned.

          1. In the 90s, we didn't even need to be kicked out, they themselves abandoned everything and everyone!
          2. To repay debts you need influence, in one area or another (see point 1).
          1. -1
            1 March 2021 10: 35
            In the 90s, there was no need to kick us out, they themselves left everything and everyone!

            What does the 90s have to do with it?

            It all happened suddenly: in 1977, the Ethiopian-Somali war broke out. The Soviet Union was shocked by both "allies", nevertheless, it had to choose whom to support in this feud of two strange peoples. The choice fell on Ethiopia. The Somalis did not tolerate the offense and demanded that the Soviet sailors get out of the base within three days.

            The USSR did not get involved in an endless conflict with the savages - it just dropped everything and left ...
            1. 0
              1 March 2021 12: 54
              In general, I'm talking about friends, claims and debts, and you?
              And with Somalia, everything was decided not in three days! We, with our allies, decided to support Ethiopia, and more than five months passed from the beginning of the conflict to the breakdown of relations (treaty).
  2. +9
    28 February 2021 17: 09
    An airbase would not hurt there either.
    1. -4
      28 February 2021 17: 22
      At whose expense is the banquet?
      1. +20
        28 February 2021 17: 26
        Of course for yours!
        The evil uncle Putin himself stole the keys to your apartment, where the money is, and announced the creation of an MTO base! laughing
        1. -1
          28 February 2021 19: 16
          ... if they (money) were there ... did the 777 go away?
        2. 0
          1 March 2021 01: 37
          Quote: OrangeBigg
          At whose expense is the banquet?

          Quote: El Dorado
          Of course for yours!
          The evil uncle Putin himself stole the keys to your apartment, where the money is, and announced the creation of an MTO base!
          belay
          not so primitive ... through payments "spread among the population", so that did not catch the eye .. what Yes but , -
          Quote: tralflot1832
          There not only tankers can be considered, but also American AUG. The Suez Canal will be under control!
          ... and this is probably a plus.
      2. -2
        28 February 2021 17: 36
        Not at your expense. I am sure about that.
        1. 0
          28 February 2021 17: 42
          Quote: Stepan S
          Not at your expense. I am sure about that.

          Then the base is needed.
      3. +13
        28 February 2021 18: 05
        A strong army is only at its own expense! Not a single "uncle" from abroad will make a truly strong army at his own expense to anyone, and the region is not very simple, and the jump airfield and even more so the air base will not be superfluous there. The Saudis are still "partners"! Yemen nearby, Somalia. If I had my way, I would also place a missile base.
        1. -2
          28 February 2021 18: 49
          Quote: Dmitry Potapov
          jump aerodrome


          The runway is yes, normal is 2488 meters, but the parking lot is scanty - a maximum of 2 planes will fit request
          1. -2
            28 February 2021 19: 10
            Quote: Stas Sv
            the parking lot is scanty - a maximum of 2 planes will climb request

            Well, Khmeimim, too, was once an abandoned airfield ...
            1. -1
              28 February 2021 19: 17
              [img = | Hmeimim] file: /// C: /Users/777/Desktop/1111.jpg [/ img]
              Quote: Lara Croft
              Hamim

              But! It is important that there are two parallel lanes (2500 and 2800 meters), and the parking lot is much larger than in Port Sudan
              1. 0
                28 February 2021 19: 22
                Quote: Stas Sv
                Quote: Lara Croft
                Hamim

                But! It is important that there are two parallel lanes (2500 and 2800 meters), and the parking lot is much larger than in Port Sudan

                Therefore, Khmeimim VVB of the Russian Aerospace Forces, and in Sudan, only the PMTO of the Russian Navy is being built ..., there is enough of an airfield ... when it comes to the construction of a naval base, then we'll talk ...
        2. 0
          28 February 2021 23: 18
          Quote: Dmitry Potapov
          If I had my way, I would also place a missile base.

          Why the hell is your missile base in Sudan if you can destroy any object with missiles without having a missile base outside the Russian Federation?
    2. -5
      28 February 2021 17: 25
      Why an airbase? Suez will be enough to block the coastal complexes)
      1. -7
        28 February 2021 17: 40
        Quote: Clever man
        Why an airbase? Suez will be enough to block the coastal complexes)

        To be.
        1. -1
          28 February 2021 19: 19
          Quote: OrangeBigg
          Quote: Clever man
          Why an airbase? Suez will be enough to block the coastal complexes)

          To be.

          I see you became more accommodating when you found out the source of financing for the construction ...
      2. 0
        28 February 2021 17: 53
        Shoreline from the territory of a neutral state will not be allowed to shoot. And then he drowned whoever was needed - and to the port. And there you are no longer an officer, but a diplomat feel
        At the same time, the parties agreed that Russian servicemen temporarily in Sudan will have diplomatic immunity.
        1. -2
          28 February 2021 18: 16
          At the same time, Russia will have the opportunity to monitor traffic in the Red Sea.
          that is, the satellites do not work ... you need binoculars, a notebook and a pencil. 21st century ... Rogozin, sit and count traffic.
          1. +5
            28 February 2021 18: 39
            Traffic monitoring is a diplomatic term in this case. Read how to "control traffic with the theoretical ability to block it to hell". Just talking in direct language about control - many neighbors will get overwhelmed. Therefore, we "monitor".
            1. +4
              28 February 2021 21: 43
              control traffic with the theoretical possibility of blocking it to hell

              C oh-oh-very theoretical
              1. +12
                28 February 2021 22: 30
                Quote: alexmach
                C oh-oh-very theoretical

                Even theoretically impossible
            2. +12
              28 February 2021 22: 17
              Quote: Pensive Lawyer
              Read how to "control traffic with a theoretical the ability to block it to hell".

              This is just a pearl! Will the overhead burst? Strategist!
              1. -1
                1 March 2021 01: 17
                Well, no one will directly talk about overlap ...
                Pirates found ... dangerous area ... warships are looking for ... not advised to enter ...
                For a few days, calm.
                And even a day in this case will have a serious economic effect.
          2. +1
            28 February 2021 18: 42
            But it's more pleasant to count traffic from an RTO, or TFR than from a satellite))). Or even through a periscope or a DBK radar ...
            1. -1
              28 February 2021 18: 50
              Quote: Pensive Lawyer
              Traffic monitoring is a diplomatic term in this case.

              Quote: sleeve
              But it's more pleasant to count traffic from an RTO, or TFR than from a satellite))). Or even through a periscope or a DBK radar ...

              blessed is he who believes ...
              1. -1
                28 February 2021 19: 22
                blessed is he who believes

                For his is the kingdom of the Lord ...
            2. Aag
              0
              28 February 2021 20: 17
              Quote: sleeve
              But it's more pleasant to count traffic from an RTO, or TFR than from a satellite))). Or even through a periscope or a DBK radar ...

              Perhaps YES! (Not moreman).
              However, due to the abundance of articles on VO with a reasoned statement, IMHO, the fact that the Navy is not fully (to put it mildly) capable of providing its component of deterring an adversary ... This news sounds, you must agree, a dissonance.
              Of course, one cannot see the whole perspective, the operational, tactical situation from the sofas. But the interests of individual interested parties can sometimes be traced. Breaking yourself, maybe not bad! Only why at the expense of the people (we have already written above, -... and at whose expense ?!). A hackneyed theme: our problems, my profits !!!
              IMHO: in the current situation (ash-tree stump, I don't know everything), - the main task of the Fleet, in addition to guarding, all-round, sea borders, trade traffic, is to ensure trouble-free access to the patrol regions, to ensure that very patrolling, our underwater carriers of ICBMs .Do not overload the Strategic Missile Forces with overwhelming tasks! Yes! This is an effective answer. hi
              1. Aag
                +1
                28 February 2021 23: 37
                Quote: AAG
                Quote: sleeve
                But it's more pleasant to count traffic from an RTO, or TFR than from a satellite))). Or even through a periscope or a DBK radar ...

                Perhaps YES! (Not moreman).
                However, due to the abundance of articles on VO with a reasoned statement, IMHO, the fact that the Navy is not fully (to put it mildly) capable of providing its component of deterring an adversary ... This news sounds, you must agree, a dissonance.
                Of course, one cannot see the whole perspective, the operational, tactical situation from the sofas. But the interests of individual interested parties can sometimes be traced. Breaking yourself, maybe not bad! Only why at the expense of the people (we have already written above, -... and at whose expense ?!). A hackneyed theme: our problems, my profits !!!
                IMHO: in the current situation (ash-tree stump, I don't know everything), - the main task of the Fleet, in addition to guarding, all-round, sea borders, trade traffic, is to ensure trouble-free access to the patrol regions, to ensure that very patrolling, our underwater carriers of ICBMs .Do not overload the Strategic Missile Forces with overwhelming tasks! Yes! This is an effective answer. hi

                What did you say wrong?
                I would like to hear the opinion of the minus. (Not for a minus speech, for an opinion, preferably, something reasoned). hi
  3. +2
    28 February 2021 17: 15
    This is rather good / than bad.
    Only judging by the map ...
    Where is the port there? what
    Two bast shoes on the map? ..
    1. -3
      28 February 2021 17: 49
      This is rather good / than bad.
      Only judging by the map ...
      Where is the port there? what
      Two bast shoes on the map? ..

      Be that as it may, but a reinforced set of Bastions will not hurt there - the projection of power, so to speak.
      1. -3
        28 February 2021 17: 54
        There is a suspicion that the drawing of the card is figurative.
        But I would still like to have more accurate positioning.
        In addition to general phrases ...
    2. +5
      28 February 2021 18: 00
      You open Yandex cards
      Search for "Sudan"
      He opens Sudan by placing a marker on their capital Khartoum
      1. -1
        28 February 2021 18: 09
        Thank you.
        I'm an old / lazy schemer.
        The disposition is now clear. And it is clear what to fight for.
        1. +7
          28 February 2021 18: 10
          Got it. I merge.
          1. +1
            28 February 2021 18: 15
            Why so at once? You are badly needed.
            Other than jokes.
      2. 0
        28 February 2021 18: 49
        The island is cool there. Talla talla seems. Little true ...
      3. +1
        28 February 2021 23: 26
        Quote: Raven-95
        You open Yandex cards
        Search for "Sudan"
        He opens Sudan by placing a marker on their capital Khartoum

        There are two Sudans there. We are in the North.

        The one that "ours" has access to the sea, but the southern one does not, but has more oil production points ...
        I still think that we are in Northern Sudan until the South Sudan oil pipeline is built to Kenya, as they build either in the South or in the North, a war starts ...
        In short, it's not profitable for us to build anything major there ...
  4. +12
    28 February 2021 17: 22
    Congratulations!
    Seven feet under the keel wish
    To all those who are on the hike now
    And I raise a full glass
    To drain to the bottom so for you.

    Glorious symbol of the Russian fleet,
    Snow-white St. Andrew's flag.
    He's on the mast like a bird in flight
    The vast expanse overshadows.

    Two crossed oblique ribbons
    On the white cloth lay.
    This is the pride and glory of Russia,
    This is the honor of our Russian land.

    Over Gangut, Chesmoy and Sinop
    Our flag fluttered triumphantly.
    Sevastopol stood fearlessly with him,
    The proud "Varangian" did not let him down.

    He passed all the seas, oceans,
    More than once in world tours
    And carried through distant lands
    Russian dialect and color of Russian eyes.

    But I'm also no less dear
    Soviet flag, where with a scarlet star,
    Hammer and sickle trembling in the wind
    With a strip below blue.

    The banner of the fleet of a great power,
    Our military valor banner.
    And he is covered with unfading glory,
    Like the old St. Andrew’s flag.

    Valery Shtormovoi
    1. +1
      28 February 2021 19: 34
      And let you "storm" in the same spirit - good luck and good mood!
  5. +3
    28 February 2021 17: 24
    There not only tankers can be considered, but also the American AUG. The Suez Canal will be under control! good
  6. +7
    28 February 2021 17: 32
    Good luck, for the glory of Russia!
  7. +3
    28 February 2021 17: 48
    Egypt and Sudan fear that as a result of the Ethiopian hydroelectric power station in the Nile, there may be an acute shortage of water, which will lead to numerous socio-economic and environmental problems.
  8. +7
    28 February 2021 17: 55
    Base, hardly. Rather, all the same, "MTO point of the Russian Navy" ...
    Which of course NEEDED, to replenish stocks and minor repairs of ships serving in the "pirate area" and in transit from the east, Indian to Mediterranean and in the opposite direction ...
    And in order to create a BASE, you need to have a sufficient number of ships and boats that could be kept in that area.
    And in our Fleets - at least ... Barely barely enough to guard the borders and deploy underwater
    strategic cruisers ...

    How many warships (not tugs, rescue ships, tankers, transports and workshops,
    which are also constantly included in the composition and not counting the BDK used to deliver the necessary items to Syria) in our Mediterranean Operational Squadron ??? 2-4, rarely 5-6 ships ...
    Where now to get enough quantity for which to build a BASE in Sudan? Weaken the other fleets?
    The basing point of the brigade of artillery corvettes of project 22160, in the future, perhaps ... For
    anti-piracy targets. But for now, as an addition to the border guards, they are needed in Black.
    In the distant future, if we have an "extra" (not urgently needed in other theaters) brigade of multipurpose nuclear submarines with cruise missiles, then it would be very nice to place it there, to control the Indian Ocean ... But when such an opportunity will be, it is not known , not earlier than 30 years later for sure ...
  9. 0
    28 February 2021 18: 08
    Excellent. Still, the successive steps in the development of Russia as a great state are seen more and more clearly :)
  10. +3
    28 February 2021 18: 17
    Needed, but for this you need more boats. Beautiful and different. (Not yachts, of course, though). In addition, African countries are very unstable, "leaders" are always changing, often military coups.
    It will be bad if in a year or two, through the paid-for puppets, a "civil" war starts and we will either have to wind up from there (image losses) or fight (actually unrealistic + losses). And who can arrange it, alas, there are enough people who want to go across the ocean, and the islanders can help.
    1. +11
      28 February 2021 22: 20
      Quote: TerraSandera
      In addition, African countries are very unstable, "leaders" are always changing, often military coups.
      It will be bad if in a year or two, through the paid-for puppets, a "civil" war begins and we will either have to wind up (image losses) or fight (in fact, unrealistic + losses) from there.

      This was already the case in '77. They abandoned everything!
    2. 0
      1 March 2021 22: 31
      I wonder how it was described in the official media. Russia will have permanent access to the Indian Ocean. And before that they had not permanent? Yes, and that this Indian, there would be to scrape together the possible theater of operations of ships. Some still around Syria are tied to rotation.
  11. 0
    28 February 2021 18: 20
    And how beautiful Sudan is, here you have the pharaohs' camp at your side, and Libya, and full control over the Red Sea and all ships going through the Suez Canal. We need to be friends with Sudan.
    1. -1
      28 February 2021 18: 27
      That, there are many with whom it would be necessary to be in "friends".
      Will there be enough resources ?! Here's the question ...
      1. +4
        28 February 2021 19: 14
        We have enough resources, there would be more honest people who support the state, not their own pockets.
    2. +11
      28 February 2021 22: 24
      Quote: Ros 56
      We need to be friends with Sudan.

      This is where, according to a 2015 African Union report: “People are dismembered, bodies are burned, and the blood is drained from them. The surviving members of the community are then forced to drink this blood, as well as to eat the fried flesh of the corpses of their fellow tribesmen?
      There is a civil war in the country - tribe to tribe, infectious diseases are off scale, there is no water, no food. During the hostilities, the opposing sides massively carry out ethnic cleansing in the best national traditions: men are killed, women and children are sexually abused and sold into slavery.
      I doubt you are a friend to them. You can be a snack, but not a friend
      1. 0
        5 March 2021 12: 56
        Africa, what to take from it.
        These are traditions. Braces, one might say.
    3. 0
      1 March 2021 22: 37
      And how beautiful "full control" sounds. And how will it be complete? 1 frigate only to scare the pirates, and more and will not be allocated. Local powers have more significant leverage for "complete" control. So this is just a "gas station" for peacetime. I do not think that from there, in any mini conflict, they will decide to launch something in third countries (for terrorists, of course)
  12. +1
    28 February 2021 19: 03
    Why not yet built PMTO of the Russian Navy be called a naval base, for a catchphrase, or what ...?
  13. -3
    28 February 2021 19: 23
    We are Russians, God bless us ... God bless ... winked
  14. -2
    28 February 2021 19: 27
    Each time, discussions at V.O. more and more intelligent. It is immediately clear whose "onizhedeti" proudly carry the banner of mmm ... the second freshness of bulk panties ...
    1. 0
      28 February 2021 19: 36
      What kind of life, such are the songs. What do you think ?!
      The time is right now.
  15. 0
    28 February 2021 19: 44
    At the same time, the parties agreed that Russian servicemen temporarily in Sudan would have diplomatic immunity.
    This is a key point.
  16. -3
    28 February 2021 19: 48
    In the joy that which. What have you lost there?
  17. 0
    28 February 2021 20: 08
    Why did the Black Sea Fleet press service make a statement? After all, before the Persian Gulf was the Pacific Fleet's area of ​​responsibility ...
  18. -3
    28 February 2021 20: 30
    Russia spreads its wings ...
  19. -6
    28 February 2021 20: 42
    When, finally, will we put the hospital in Chemulpo again?
  20. +1
    28 February 2021 20: 59
    Again you have the same rake. Please remind me how much money was "poured" into Africa during the Soviet era, weapons, equipment, building materials, foodstuffs were supplied free of charge, non-repayable loans were issued, spent on infrastructure construction, etc. At various times, such points were deployed in Alexandria and Mersa Matruh (Egypt), Dahlak (Ethiopia), Socotra and Aden (Yemen), Luanda (Angola), Conakry (Guinea), Tripoli and Tobruk (Libya), Bizerte and Sfax ( Tunisia) And where is the mustache?
    I remember there was an anecdote from the Armenian Radio: -they say children in Africa do not eat up.
    Or is it possible that they do not finish eating, let them send us to the Union
  21. -3
    28 February 2021 21: 35
    If NATO attacks Iran, then we will swim close by.
    1. +12
      28 February 2021 22: 26
      Quote from DiViZ
      If NATO attacks Iran, then we will swim close by.

      Iran, what kind of relative do you have?
      1. -1
        28 February 2021 22: 58
        The rocket sweeps away everything in the way.
  22. 0
    28 February 2021 22: 26
    On the last evening of winter, I will send a little imagination in flight ... We are building a diesel-electric submarine fleet in the Baltic. You can teleport them to the duty station through the White Sea Canal, the White Sea (we will let "Caliber" along Chizhe there), then all the NSR. Mogo through the Baltic, North Sea, Mediterranean (there "Calibers" can be given to 3 and 4 barmaley and their oil production in Syria, it's not a pity!), By the Red Sea - and here, good luck, the MTO point of the Russian Navy Day 5-7 for restocking and rest of the crew. Then to the exercises in Pakistan or India, to Vietnam (there are more Varshavyankas in the Navy than in the Pacific Fleet) or to China (there are 2 "compatriots" serving there - "Varshavyanka" born on SEVMASH, all "Varshavyanka" in the Navy China - more than that of the Russian Navy) with a call to their ports to replenish supplies ... Yes, you see, in 2-3 years, finally, the container "Caliber" for patrol officers of pr. 22160 will be completed, or they will have a helicopter PLO constantly. And then this miracle of the Engineer's thought runs across the seas not for those functions for which it was conceived. With the opening of the Navy's MTO point in the Red Sea and this, the ships will find work where they should serve, since there are already 3 of them in the Black Sea Fleet, by the end of 2021 they promised to transfer one more to the fleet.
  23. kig
    0
    1 March 2021 01: 34
    The main area of ​​pirate activity has moved to the Gulf of Guinea for six years.
  24. +1
    1 March 2021 11: 14
    Moscow was not built right away ... First rem. fleet base. Then the Jump Air Base, then a key stronghold in the Egypt-Sudan-Seychelles-Madagascar-Africa link.
    1. 0
      1 March 2021 22: 29
      1941 will come suddenly! Again - they will not have time!
  25. 0
    1 March 2021 14: 30
    kig, dear, in the west of Africa our fleet, for today, it seems, nothing shines, neither in Cape Verde, nor in Guinea-Bissau, nor in Angola .. "Transhelf" ineptly profiled. Now the teleportation of Varshavyankas from the Baltic to the Pacific Fleet is a problem, don't you agree?
  26. 0
    1 March 2021 22: 28
    So what? A couple of days ago, a US Navy Landing Ship entered the port of Sudan! Are the Sudanese crap out of this warning yet? USA Will not let Russia build anything there! Russia is swinging too slowly! And the States will use everything - threats, bribery, blackmail ... the Russian base will not be there! Here, you will see!
  27. +1
    2 March 2021 06: 10
    It is high time!!!!