Military Review

Russian air defense systems S-300 and attack drones will enter service with the Kyrgyz army

60
Russian air defense systems S-300 and attack drones will enter service with the Kyrgyz army

The Kyrgyz army will soon receive the S-300 anti-aircraft missile systems and Russian-made drones. The corresponding agreement was reached during the visit of the President of the Republic Sadyr Japarov to Russia. This was stated by the press secretary of the head of the Kyrgyz state Galina Baiterek.


The agreements of the parties on the continuation of military-defense cooperation became important. In particular, for the supply in the near future of S-300 anti-aircraft missile systems and attack drones, which will be an important contribution of Russia in ensuring the security of both the Kyrgyz Republic and the external borders of the EAEU and the CSTO

- said in a statement.

The timing and number of air defense systems planned for delivery, as well as the names of drones, are not given.

Recall that Russia and Kyrgyzstan in 2012 entered into an agreement on the supply of weapons from the presence of the Russian army. All deliveries are paid by the Russian side. In addition, the Russian Ministry of Defense and the Kyrgyz military department signed an agreement on training Kyrgyz officers in Russian military institutions. Since 2000, 400 officers and 700 cadets have been trained in military universities, 40 senior officers have taken courses at the Military Academy of the General Staff of the RF Armed Forces.

The Kyrgyz army has already been delivered: two An-26 military transport aircraft, four Mi-24V combat helicopters and six Mi-8MTV and Mi-8MT, two divisions of the modernized S-125 "Pechora-2M" air defense systems, up to fifty modernized BTR-70M, modernized BRDM-2, various vehicles, communications, light and small arms and ammunition.

Last year they discussed the delivery of Buk-M1 anti-aircraft missile systems and Mi-8 helicopters from the presence of the Russian army.
60 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. d1975
    d1975 26 February 2021 15: 20
    -4
    Shoigu gets things done faster than our Foreign Ministry. The main thing is that the horse is fed. hi
    1. mojohed2012
      mojohed2012 26 February 2021 15: 28
      -5
      With such instability of the political situation in Kyrgyzstan and interethnic conflicts, the threat of destabilization and military defeat from militants from the territory of Afghanistan and neighboring countries is growing.
      Misunderstandings about the US base (NATO transit point) also do not add stability.
      It seems that the army of Kyrgyzstan by itself will not be able to reliably protect the territorial integrity and independence of the state, but it is quite enough to hold out until the moment when Moscow decides on military assistance.
      1. Sidor Amenpodestovich
        Sidor Amenpodestovich 26 February 2021 15: 50
        -3
        Let me ask you, what does "mojohed" mean?
        About "mojo" is more or less clear. This, as I understand it, is what Austin Powers lost and regained in the second part of the trilogy of films of his own name. According to Dr. Evil, mojo is libido, attraction, sexual energy.
        But what is "hed"?
        However, if you meant "mojahed", then this word in English transcription is written with "a" - "mojahed".
      2. Tank hard
        Tank hard 26 February 2021 16: 58
        +5
        Quote: mojohed2012
        Misunderstandings about the US base (NATO transit point) also do not add stability.

        What are your misunderstandings? like everything is clear for a long time.
        Since July 2014, the airbase has been closed, the territory and infrastructure have been transferred to the National Guard of Kyrgyzstan
      3. Flooding
        Flooding 26 February 2021 16: 59
        +2
        Quote: mojohed2012
        Misunderstandings with the US base (NATO transit point) also do not add stability

        For a long time there have been no misunderstandings or Americans in Kyrgyzstan.
        If I am not mistaken, since 2014.
    2. Mordvin 3
      Mordvin 3 26 February 2021 15: 44
      +3
      Quote: d1975
      The main thing is that the horse is fed.

      And this is definitely a horse, not a donkey?
    3. credo
      credo 26 February 2021 15: 52
      +8
      Quote: d1975
      Shoigu gets things done faster than our Foreign Ministry. The main thing is that the horse is fed. hi

      If by feed you mean our products, which, moreover, are transferred free of charge, then I don’t understand your joy.
      Today Kyrgyzstan is one of the poorest countries in Central Asia, with a constantly changing power in the process of clan showdowns. Where is the horse feed?

      Of course, they will object to me that it is better if Russia supplies its next beggar woman with its weapons than the US and the EU will do, but is it really better? Not that the current authorities were not taught by the experience of the USSR, when the poor countries of Africa were supplied with weapons for nothing, for the sake of including them in the social camp, and as a result they received a zilch and a hole in the budget for writing off billions of dollars in spending.

      I would like to believe that after all, Russia will get something from this generous gift, but for some reason no one tells us about it. It's a shame, you know.
      1. hirurg
        hirurg 26 February 2021 16: 06
        +3
        Russia has, well, at least cheap labor.
        At the household level, more and more Kyrgyz are already talking about entering the Russian Federation.
        And with the supply of our military equipment, not even the newest even for free, we push the lines of warning about an attack from our borders.
        Or do you prefer, instead of expensive laborers, to have brainwashed terrorists calling in under the guise of guest workers?
        1. Lara Croft
          Lara Croft 26 February 2021 16: 44
          0
          Quote: hirurg
          At the household level, more and more Kyrgyz are already talking about entering the Russian Federation.

          Still they would not say, "skullcaps" will hang on their hands, if only they were taken for maintenance, their local rhetoric do not need them ...
          1. Tank hard
            Tank hard 26 February 2021 17: 05
            +2
            Quote: Lara Croft
            Still they would not say, "skullcaps" will hang on their hands, if only they were taken for maintenance, their local rhetoric do not need them ..

            You, as always, are an expert on the national headdresses of Central Asia. laughing Ak-kalpak is popular among the Kirghiz, not skullcap. Around "experts" laughing
            1. Humpty
              Humpty 26 February 2021 17: 33
              +2
              Quote: Tank Hard
              You, as always, are an expert on the national headdresses of Central Asia.

              Treat the person with great understanding. And then he understood him as much earlier, he ranks Tajiks among the Turks.
              1. Tank hard
                Tank hard 26 February 2021 17: 40
                +1
                hi Salam, Alexander!
                Quote: Humpty
                And then he understood him as much earlier, he ranks the Tajiks among the Turks.

                Whoa! This is a serious moment. recourse
                Quote: Humpty
                Treat the person with great understanding

                All right. drinks
              2. Lara Croft
                Lara Croft 26 February 2021 18: 11
                -2
                Quote: Humpty
                Treat the person with great understanding. And then he understood him as much earlier, he ranks Tajiks among the Turks.

                Yes, you also wrote here that Kazakhstan is 1 years old and there are no former Russian lands in its composition ...
                As for the Tajiks ... I don't remember what I wrote, but maybe I meant this:
                From the end of the 10th century, the political predominance in Central Asia passed to the Turkic-speaking peoples, more and more waves of Turkic, and later Mongolian tribes penetrated into the area of ​​the settled Tajik population. The process of Turkization of Tajiks begins, especially on the plains, to a lesser extent - in the mountains and big cities (Bukhara, Samarkand, Khojent).

                https://yandex.ru/turbo/comunicom.ru/s/interesnoe-pro-tajikistan/311-versiya-istorii-o-vozniknovenii-natsii-kak-tadzhiki
                1. Humpty
                  Humpty 26 February 2021 18: 21
                  +2
                  Quote: Lara Croft
                  Yes, you also wrote here that Kazakhstan is 1 years old and there are no former Russian lands in its composition ...

                  I don’t remember that. Navet! As far as I remember, you argued that the CSTO is mainly composed of Turkic members. This is not literal. But the Armenians are clearly not Turks, that's why I decided that you included the Tajiks among the Turks.
                  The usurpation of Persian-Arab cities by the Turks is a separate big topic.
                  1. Lara Croft
                    Lara Croft 26 February 2021 18: 35
                    0
                    Quote: Humpty
                    I don’t remember that. Navet! As far as I remember, you argued that the CSTO is mainly composed of Turkic members. This is not literal. But the Armenians are clearly not Turks, that's why I decided that you included the Tajiks among the Turks.

                    I remembered to blame. The article was about the conflict in the NKR ... I then wrote that three countries from the CSTO are Turkic peoples and will not fight for the Armenians ..., it was my generalizing mistake, like skullcaps ...
                    The usurpation of Persian-Arab cities by the Turks is a separate big topic.

                    There will be time to read. While looking for an answer, I read a lot of interesting things, this is that rare case when it is useful to scoff ... the main thing is not to be stoned ...
                    Here is a link where Stalin calls Tajiks the only non-Turkic people among the Muslim peoples of the USSR ...
                    https://ucrazy.ru/interesting/1364130982-drevnyaya-istoriya-tadzhikov.html
                    1. Humpty
                      Humpty 26 February 2021 18: 54
                      +1
                      Quote: Lara Croft
                      the main thing is not to be stoned ...

                      Good! By the way, Tajikistan is full of sub-ethnic groups who are more than indigenous there. Since ancient times. But the first who explored this territory were the Russians.
                      I like to dig up some geographical records, you can find many interesting things.
        2. credo
          credo 26 February 2021 17: 27
          +4
          Quote: hirurg
          Russia has, well, at least cheap labor.
          At the household level, more and more Kyrgyz are already talking about entering the Russian Federation.
          And with the supply of our military equipment, not even the newest even for free, we push the lines of warning about an attack from our borders.
          Or do you prefer, instead of expensive laborers, to have brainwashed terrorists calling in under the guise of guest workers?

          Yes, with such reasons, we will go around the world with an outstretched hand.
          Look through history at least 40-50 years ago and then you may understand that the money invested by the USSR in the impoverished outskirts, mainly from the budget of the RSFSR, did not give the result that the Bolsheviks and communists hoped for when starting their project.
          Why step on the same rake again, if in Russia itself, after the collapse of the USSR, all the abominations of capitalism reappeared, including poverty and unemployment, which they wanted to get rid of.
          Before the beggars of the outskirts are attracted to themselves, maybe in Russia itself it is necessary to arrange life for the local population, and not worry in vain about those destitute and powerless in their "independent" countries.
          1. hirurg
            hirurg 26 February 2021 18: 21
            -1
            And who said that you need to invest money like the USSR? And there is no need to lure. But keeping it with you is possible.)
            1. hirurg
              hirurg 26 February 2021 18: 35
              -1
              Here's an example of a real weapons transfer.
              Who will work on it? Who will serve it? Who will receive information primarily from these complexes? But those who have them on the balance sheet will pay.
              Somehow this is how I see it.
              Like a color printer. A penny printer, cartridges are expensive.
      2. d1975
        d1975 26 February 2021 17: 08
        0
        I partially agree with you, but we do not print dollars, and politics should be done. It's still our rear wiper.
        1. Lara Croft
          Lara Croft 26 February 2021 18: 01
          -1
          Quote: d1975
          I partially agree with you, but we do not print dollars, but politics should be done

          What is your RF foreign policy? By definition, it cannot be at the expense of the internal ...
          All the same, this is our rear wiper.

          You were deceived. Or would you name the joint Russian-Kyrgyz economic projects beneficial for the RF?
          1. Humpty
            Humpty 26 February 2021 20: 12
            +2
            Quote: Lara Croft
            You were deceived. Or would you name the joint Russian-Kyrgyz economic projects beneficial for the RF?

            It depends on what to call success and whose success. As an example, the arson of a mine officially owned by a Russian company.
            This led to the personal success of the organizer of the pogrom and arson. He became the head of the region. So they thanked for the careful observance by the Russians of the Kyrgyz racial laws, according to which the workers in the mines must be 80 percent of the local Kyrgyz. And what, for example, twisted the tails of the donkeys all the way, they took to the mine, after 3 months already the head of the section. The remaining 20 percent should be mainly from Kyrgyz other regions.
            Or else "success", at the request of American friends and "public desires," the exploration and production of uranium was legally prohibited.
            And Russia had an interest in this.
            1. Lara Croft
              Lara Croft 26 February 2021 21: 31
              0
              Quote: Humpty
              It depends on what to call success and whose success. As an example, the arson of a mine officially owned by a Russian company.
              This led to the personal success of the organizer of the pogrom and arson. He became the head of the region. So they thanked for the careful observance of the Kyrgyz racial laws by the Russians, according to which the workers in the mines must be 80 percent of local Kyrgyz.

              This is what I meant ...
    4. Svetlana
      Svetlana 26 February 2021 15: 53
      +1
      Do you think that everything was decided without the Foreign Ministry?
      Nope ... In the beginning there was Lavrov, after making decisions and signing contracts, the matter went to the masses, and in particular to Shoigu.
    5. Cananecat
      Cananecat 26 February 2021 17: 26
      0
      The horse is fed, only this horse is fed with rotten oats.
      Strongly surprised by the supply of somewhat outdated weapons ...
  2. askort154
    askort154 26 February 2021 15: 28
    -3
    Everything is logical. The CSTO countries should be protected from the "sultan-erdogans" and the Anglo-Saxon "anaconda loop".
    And the "Chinese tiger" pretends to sleep sleepily on the river bank, waiting for the corpse of the enemy.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. Paranoid50
        Paranoid50 26 February 2021 15: 58
        +3
        Quote: Emil Mamedoff
        what to the Sultan, what to the Chinese tiger

        laughing laughing laughing Oh, it's already here ... What a funny bouncy. fellow wassat
        1. The comment was deleted.
      2. Thrifty
        Thrifty 26 February 2021 16: 55
        +3
        Emil Mamedov - do it better if our С300 is bad for you! Can't you? Then, don't be silly, there are a lot of photos on the Internet with your burnt-out equipment! By the way, what about the crew of our downed helicopter - the killers of the crew, when and how will you punish?
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. Humpty
            Humpty 26 February 2021 18: 04
            +2
            Quote: Emil Mamedoff
            It's just that your elite, having made such an unspecified step at night, tried to "check" Azerbaijan, and what will we do, swallow, or destroy?

            Waiting for an answer? Understand. If there was a violation of the border by the Russian side (this is your version), then none of the adequate ones does this. And I know this not by hearsay.
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. Humpty
                Humpty 26 February 2021 18: 43
                +1
                Quote: Emil Mamedoff
                Although there shouldn't have been any apologies or compensation, it didn't seem enough to you, right?
                Well, no words ..

                Firstly, I do not know whether Azerbaijan (this is for "Dagestan") has made an apology and compensation, and secondly, I repeat, I know not by hearsay about violations of the border by military aircraft, no one sane shoots for any reason.
          2. Thrifty
            Thrifty 26 February 2021 18: 30
            +3
            Emil Mammadov, the killers are still among you, and our business now is to find and destroy them! Blood for blood, death for death! The only way!!!
      3. Tank hard
        Tank hard 26 February 2021 17: 09
        +1
        Quote: Emil Mamedoff
        At the right time, both the Sultan and the Chinese tiger will open these Soviet banks like 2 + 2.

        What, the "great victory" over the superpower - Armenia, turned your head so much? The main thing here is not to lose balance. laughing
        1. Dart2027
          Dart2027 26 February 2021 17: 23
          -1
          Quote: Tank Hard
          What, the "great victory" over the superpower - Armenia, turned your head so much?

          Tellingly, I do not remember a single bad word about our weapons said by the officials of Azerbaijan.
          1. Tank hard
            Tank hard 26 February 2021 17: 30
            +1
            Quote: Dart2027
            Tellingly, I do not remember a single bad word about our weapons said by the officials of Azerbaijan.

            It's not about weapons, it's about dizziness. This happens when you kick a neighbor's boy, and you feel like you have defeated Napoleon's army. wink
            1. Dart2027
              Dart2027 26 February 2021 19: 20
              0
              Quote: Tank Hard
              It's not about weapons, it's about dizziness.

              It is also true, but the leadership of Azerbaijan does not see it.
              1. Tank hard
                Tank hard 26 February 2021 19: 25
                +2
                Quote: Dart2027
                It is also true, but the leadership of Azerbaijan does not see it.

                Isn't the leadership of Azerbaijan in Ankara? Not yet? If you support Azerbaijan so much, I have a simple question. When and who will be responsible for the downed Russian helicopter? And if you do not support him that much, then why do your posts look like support for Azerbaijan? recourse
                1. Dart2027
                  Dart2027 26 February 2021 21: 15
                  0
                  Quote: Tank Hard
                  Isn't the leadership of Azerbaijan in Ankara?

                  I do not know. Maybe.
                  Quote: Tank Hard
                  If you support Azerbaijan so much

                  Is it? I wrote that official Azerbaijan does not criticize Russian-made weapons in any way, in any case I have not come across anything like this.
  3. Graz
    Graz 26 February 2021 15: 28
    +5
    maybe it's better to have air defense systems in reserve than to give away to everyone?
  4. Igar
    Igar 26 February 2021 15: 32
    +2
    But that's why Kyrgyzstan needs the S-300. Who is there to defend against?
    1. antivirus
      antivirus 26 February 2021 15: 37
      0
      from the Australian kangaroo ...
    2. EDWARD
      EDWARD 26 February 2021 16: 42
      +10
      from Chinese loans ..)
    3. Lara Croft
      Lara Croft 26 February 2021 16: 47
      -1
      Quote: IGAR
      But that's why Kyrgyzstan needs the S-300. Who is there to defend against?

      From B-52 taking off from about. Diega Garcia in the Indian Ocean .... (there is such a version) ....
      1. Igar
        Igar 26 February 2021 16: 48
        0
        The B-52 does not need to enter the S-300's range to strike.
        1. Lara Croft
          Lara Croft 26 February 2021 16: 55
          +1
          Quote: IGAR
          The B-52 does not need to enter the S-300's range to strike.

          Then why does the Russian Federation need the S-300 - 400 air defense system at all? Would have cost FOR ....
          1. Igar
            Igar 26 February 2021 17: 00
            0
            Then why does the Russian Federation need the S-300 - 400 air defense system at all? Would have cost FOR ....

            Probably because in addition to the B-52 there are a lot of other aircraft ...
            1. Lara Croft
              Lara Croft 26 February 2021 17: 10
              0
              Quote: IGAR
              Then why does the Russian Federation need the S-300 - 400 air defense system at all? Would have cost FOR ....

              Probably because in addition to the B-52 there are a lot of other aircraft ...

              Those. all other airplanes will be shot down by the ZRK-300, which is not shot down only by B-52?
    4. askort154
      askort154 27 February 2021 06: 29
      0
      But that's why Kyrgyzstan needs the S-300. Who is there to defend against?

      And nothing, that there is a military base of Russia ?! Or do you think that it is enough to protect it only with "Kalash".
  5. 501Legion
    501Legion 26 February 2021 15: 41
    0
    The systems will be integrated into a single system; consider these installations Russia will control and monitor the southern borders of Asia.
    1. rocket757
      rocket757 26 February 2021 15: 54
      0
      A bold guess though, nothing is impossible.
      1. Lara Croft
        Lara Croft 26 February 2021 16: 52
        -2
        Quote: rocket757
        A bold guess though, nothing is impossible.

        In order not to transfer its air defense systems to the IHB in Kant, the Russian Federation donated the air defense system to Kyrgyzstan, now the Kirghiz themselves will cover our VVB, thinking that they are part of the CSTO OPO ...
        two military transport aircraft An-26, four combat helicopters Mi-24V and six Mi-8MTV and Mi-8MT, two divisions of the upgraded S-125 "Pechora-2M" air defense systems, up to fifty modernized BTR-70M, modernized BRDM-2, various vehicles, communications, light and small arms and ammunition.

        All these outdated weapons are transferred from the BHVT / BKHAT of the RF Armed Forces ...
        I was only alarmed by the title of the article, what kind of shock UAVs are transmitted to Kyrgyzstan by the RF?
        1. rocket757
          rocket757 26 February 2021 21: 00
          0
          The Kyrgyz are normal soldiers, if the training is appropriate. Boom ... think that this event was done in a smart way.
          At the expense of drones, it is not clear, although we have reconnaissance equipment ...
          1. Lara Croft
            Lara Croft 26 February 2021 21: 27
            -1
            Quote: rocket757
            The Kyrgyz are normal soldiers, if the training is appropriate.

            You are trolling again. Where did I write that the Kyrgyz are bad soldiers?
            Boom ... think that this event was done in a smart way.

            you are "good", in mind or not, decide in the RF Ministry of Defense ....
            At the expense of drones, it is not clear, although we have reconnaissance equipment ...

            It seems that he wrote in Russian:
            ..... what are they drone drone transfers Kyrgyzstan to the RF?
            1. rocket757
              rocket757 26 February 2021 21: 40
              +2
              No, I will not write ... you are "kindness and objectivity".
              I don `t need it.
    2. Runway
      Runway 26 February 2021 23: 41
      0
      Southern borders within the extremity of the Chuy valley. The transfer of TV and video equipment and the preparation of the office staff are, in fact, an additional payment for our "points" in Kyrgyzstan.
  6. Azef
    Azef 26 February 2021 17: 01
    -1
    Use the Kirghiz! I hope, like the little Pashinyan, you won't spit vilely in our direction ..
  7. samarin1969
    samarin1969 26 February 2021 17: 13
    +2
    [quoteAll deliveries are paid by the Russian side.] [/ quote]
    The generosity of the "domestic" "strategists" is striking. Give a FREE S-300 to the country that China put on a credit hook ??? ... What is the "+" for Russia ??? Is the S-300 effective against drug trafficking and terror neophytes ??
    ps For a long time, since the "multi-vector" statements of the venerable Nursultan, it is time to equip a technological border with Kazakhstan. Fighting drug trafficking and terrorism in Central Asia is pointless. This is their "philosophy of being".
  8. Humpty
    Humpty 26 February 2021 17: 18
    +1
    Quote: mojohed2012
    Misunderstandings about the US base (NATO transit point) also do not add stability.

    Where is it?
    Quote: mojohed2012
    It seems that the Kyrgyz army alone will not be able to reliably protect the territorial integrity and independence of the state

    To do this, at least you need to know where the border is. And in some places the military did not see her for many years. But a drone without satellite control will not help, the radio horizons are close. Although the drones themselves are very necessary. I saw them in Kyrgyzstan only in private use.
    During search operations, for example, the body of a Russian general was found precisely from a quadric, before that the body of a dead Israeli girl, also from a quadric.
  9. The comment was deleted.
  10. 501Legion
    501Legion 26 February 2021 18: 19
    +1
    Quote: Azef
    Use the Kirghiz! I hope, like the little Pashinyan, you won't spit vilely in our direction ..

    we have a dime a dozen of these litters. if such people get to power, then they are easy
  11. Azimuth
    Azimuth 26 February 2021 20: 46
    +1
    Quote: credo
    Quote: d1975
    Shoigu gets things done faster than our Foreign Ministry. The main thing is that the horse is fed. hi

    If by feed you mean our products, which, moreover, are transferred free of charge, then I don’t understand your joy.
    Today Kyrgyzstan is one of the poorest countries in Central Asia, with a constantly changing power in the process of clan showdowns. Where is the horse feed?

    Of course, they will object to me that it is better if Russia supplies its next beggar woman with its weapons than the US and the EU will do, but is it really better? Not that the current authorities were not taught by the experience of the USSR, when the poor countries of Africa were supplied with weapons for nothing, for the sake of including them in the social camp, and as a result they received a zilch and a hole in the budget for writing off billions of dollars in spending.

    I would like to believe that after all, Russia will get something from this generous gift, but for some reason no one tells us about it. It's a shame, you know.

    In Kyrgyzstan, there is more than one of our strategic objects, the training of air defense officers of Kyrgyzstan is carried out free of charge in our schools, we supplied them with sufficiently modern equipment from our army, supplied them free of charge, without utilizing them, including their facilities on the territory of Kyrgyzstan.
    What are you dissatisfied with? Are you offering us to overstrain and send our regiments there with the S-400?
  12. safar gafarov
    safar gafarov 27 February 2021 08: 26
    -2
    no matter how these Kirghiz drones are applied to the neighbors. they all have graters. they will become wild nomads who arrange another kurultai every 2-3 years to choose a new khan