Military Review

Zelensky signed a decree on "de-occupation of Crimea" and urged Crimeans to "return home"

187

Today the President of Ukraine signed a decree on measures for the "de-occupation and reintegration of Crimea." This was reported by the press service of the office of the head of the Ukrainian state.


Based on the decree signed by Volodymyr Zelensky, the so-called "Crimean Platform" is being created. If we speak without those florid terms used by Kiev, the "Crimean Platform" is another anti-Russian gathering with a frank admixture of Russophobia, which will be financed with the aim of replicating disinformation about Crimea and life on the peninsula. The platform has already included Ukrainian and other "experts", many of whom have previously said that the bridge across the Kerch Strait will not last even a year, as "it will be demolished by ice drift." Today, these same “experts” will be setting the agenda for new discussions that would be more suitable for stories mental illness.

According to the Ukrainian president, he signed the decree on "the day of resistance to the occupation of Crimea and Sevastopol."

Zelensky's decree says that he instructs "to implement measures to support the Crimean Tatar language and Crimean Tatar culture to protect the rights of residents of the occupied peninsula." Even in this, the absurdity of Zelensky's decree can be traced. Indeed, in Ukraine itself, there was no and no support for the Crimean Tatar language and Crimean Tatar culture. Moreover, on the basis of Zelensky's decree, it turns out that for Kiev, only Crimean Tatars live in Crimea. Zelensky is not going to "support" the Ukrainians, Russians, Armenians, Greeks and other nationalities inhabiting Crimea.

Zelensky, signing the decree, made another hypocritical statement, noting that he "sincerely believes that the day will come" when he will be able to cancel the decree, because Crimea will return to Ukraine. Here Zelensky should be reminded that his term in the presidency of Ukraine cannot be infinite ...

Zelensky:

Dear Crimea! All Ukraine is waiting for you. It's time to go home.

In Crimea, they managed to react, noting that they returned home in March 2014.

Several comments from Crimean users:

I propose to create a "Kiev platform". We will consider the option of returning home to Kiev.

Zelenskiy went wild in his desire to please the CIA and his radicals. Minus 50 percent support for a year and a half. You have to be able to do that! Do not worry, the IMF will not give money for this anyway.
Photos used:
Office of the President of Ukraine
187 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Hunter 2
    Hunter 2 26 February 2021 13: 38
    +69
    This is no longer a Circus ... It's just a Madhouse! am
    "On the" day of resistance to the occupation of Crimea and Sevastopol "" - who is the resistance? Crimea returned without Blood ... all the "resistance" - was expressed only in the moronic march of Ukrainian flyers and shouts of "America is with us" ... well, even to the Petty disobedience of the Ukrainian marines, who immediately surrendered - after warning shots!
    1. skif8013
      skif8013 26 February 2021 13: 49
      +24
      Well, so that he does not stand out, he also needs to be weird. Otherwise, he looks like a black sheep, but it seems like everything with a white ticket.
      1. Tatyana
        Tatyana 26 February 2021 14: 27
        +20
        Zelensky signed a decree on the "de-occupation of Crimea" and urged Crimeans to "return home"

        The plot for comedies in the madhouse "Quarter-95"!
        Zelensky has surpassed his playing with a cock on the piano! laughing
        1. frruc
          frruc 26 February 2021 17: 54
          +6
          Zelensky's statement smacks of a Bandera scent with the ensuing conclusions.
        2. Baloo
          Baloo 26 February 2021 17: 59
          +6
          Quote: Tatiana
          Zelensky signed a decree on "de-occupation of Crimea" and urged Crimeans to "return home"

          Quote: Tatiana
          Zelensky signed a decree on the "de-occupation of Crimea" and urged Crimeans to "return home"

          The plot for comedies in the madhouse "Quarter-95"!
          Zelensky has surpassed his playing with a cock on the piano! laughing

          Clown is a calling and destiny. Does he understand that at any moment he can become a sacred victim? That will be the reason for the invasion of Donbass. Everyone will scream about the hand of Moscow, only Pan Zyuzya will not see this anymore. fool
          1. Vladimir Mashkov
            Vladimir Mashkov 26 February 2021 19: 41
            +7
            Discussing the plot, they argued with my wife. She says: "Another schizophrenic was found!" I believe that Zelya is not a schizophrenic, he is complete (a word similar to the extreme degree of mental retardation), the main one in a big fool!
            1. Baloo
              Baloo 26 February 2021 20: 27
              +3
              Quote: Vladimir Mashkov
              Discussing the plot, they argued with my wife. She says: "Another schizophrenic was found!" I believe that Zelya is not a schizophrenic, he is complete (a word similar to the extreme degree of mental retardation), the main one in a big fool!

              Not him. Knows what he is doing. Clown. His main promise is to stop the war, he did not fulfill, because he cannot. But they can easily make a sacred sacrifice out of him. There is now the main one who drives intelligence, Avakov and Nalivaychenko, albeit far away. Biden is also a performer in these games. What does the trip of blacks to the capitol mean? Those behind Obama made it clear to Trump and Biden who have trump cards.
              1. Vladimir Mashkov
                Vladimir Mashkov 26 February 2021 20: 39
                +3
                No, Zelya, nevertheless, chief clown in Ukraine. But, of course, there are no "most important" ones in Ukraine. This is not Avakov, not Nalyvaichenko, and not even the American ambassador Christina Queen, who "rules" all the Ukrainian "sixes". The main ones are, of course, Biden, Blinken and the direct curator of Ukraine Vika Nuland.
        3. aleks neym_2
          aleks neym_2 27 February 2021 13: 40
          +3
          ... which he ripped off from some mattress group ... a Jew, if not a lot .. sorry, obma ... and so on, he will not live! How long have you been indignant at the closure of the "Matchmaker" series?
          The money stopped dripping ...
      2. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 26 February 2021 15: 01
        +15
        Quote: skif8013
        Well, so that he does not stand out, he also needs to be weird. Otherwise, he looks like a black sheep, but it seems like everything with a white ticket.

        No, he is in life such that you will take from him. Remember Vysotsky -
        "He sometimes cried and laughed,
        then bristled to tears
        he mocked us
        crazy, what will you take! "
      3. Lionnvrsk
        Lionnvrsk 27 February 2021 10: 20
        +3
        Quote: skif8013
        Well, so that he does not stand out, he also needs to be weird.

        So he is weird. In his speech, he said: "Crimea was the heart of Ukraine. Seven years ago this heart was ripped out of us! ... What does Ukraine need? It's simple! We need to return its heart !!" lol
        And here is how they comment on his speech:
        - Our heart was ripped out! which we planned to sell for organs to foreigners ...
        -PUTIN STEALED YOUR LOVE!
        -Why do Ukraine need us? We have no water, no electricity ... People never understand Ukrainian people, they love Russia, it even got to the point that, oh horror, May 9 marks .... Yes, spit on us already !!!
        “This means that the ex-clown’s heart doesn’t break from the blood of Donbass and the ashes of Odessa, but he cannot eat without Crimea. Let Bandera pray, maybe he’ll feel better,” Aksenov said.
        - Judging by what is happening in Ukraine, it looks like Crimea was a brain !!
        -If Crimea was the heart, then Donbass was the brain, but the organ with which he played the piano remained
        ..... laughing
    2. svp67
      svp67 26 February 2021 13: 51
      +9
      Quote: Hunter 2
      This is no longer a Circus ... It's just a Madhouse!

      No, it's just ...
    3. Insurgent
      Insurgent 26 February 2021 13: 53
      +23
      Quote: Hunter 2
      This is no longer a Circus ... It's just a Madhouse!

      And a long time ago ...
      Since August 24, 1991, the ill-fated day, when the "Nezalezhnosti" suddenly fell on the Outskirts.
      1. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 26 February 2021 15: 04
        +1
        Quote: Insurgent
        Since August 24, 1991, the ill-fated day, when "Square" suddenly fell on the outskirts

        They did not wait, but she came, and they still do not know what to do with her. And so for 30 years. Amen.
        1. Insurgent
          Insurgent 26 February 2021 15: 07
          +10
          Quote: tihonmarine
          They didn't wait, but she came ...

          ... the polar fox.

          1. tihonmarine
            tihonmarine 26 February 2021 15: 12
            +3
            Quote: Insurgent
            ... the polar fox.

            It seems that everything is moving towards this.
            1. Crimean partisan 1974
              Crimean partisan 1974 26 February 2021 17: 21
              +2
              It seems that everything is moving towards this ... yes, nothing is moving anywhere ... the point of no return pr
              oydena
              1. tihonmarine
                tihonmarine 26 February 2021 17: 29
                +4
                Quote: Crimean partisan 1974
                It seems that everything is moving towards this ... yes, nothing is moving anywhere ... the point of no return
                This is the "polar fox", the scribe is called.
                1. Crimean partisan 1974
                  Crimean partisan 1974 26 February 2021 17: 41
                  +3
                  This is the "polar fox", the scribe ..... but rather not a polar fox, but a complete one ..... cesspool ..... I feel a new swearing phrase will soon appear instead of a capacious and meaningful one will be "go wow" .. it seems like the front of the site is clean and everyone will understand where the opponent is sent
        2. frruc
          frruc 26 February 2021 17: 57
          +3
          Degenerate L. Kravchuk says he knows. fool
      2. figwam
        figwam 26 February 2021 15: 34
        +5
        Dear Crimea! All Ukraine is waiting for you. It's time to go home.

        Now he is priceless and the entire outskirts want to join the Crimea in order to return home to Russia.
        1. tihonmarine
          tihonmarine 26 February 2021 17: 46
          +6
          Dear Crimea! All Ukraine is waiting for you. It's time to go home.
          Quote: figvam
          Now he is priceless and the entire outskirts want to join the Crimea in order to return home to Russia.

          They brought the Svidomites Crimea to the baseboard, destroyed everything, and even blocked the water. And now Crimea has been rebuilt, turned into a health resort, the Crimean bridge has been built.
          And now here we are good lads, we will take everything that you have built "tilki,
          turn back to the edge. "There is no longer laughter or moronism, but simply a blatant lie, greed, and not understanding that they are Nazis, they are offering this to people. To what can one sink and fall so low.
    4. halpat
      halpat 26 February 2021 13: 58
      +8
      Quote: Hunter 2
      This is no longer a Circus ... It's just a Madhouse! am
      "On the" day of resistance to the occupation of Crimea and Sevastopol "" - who is the resistance? Crimea returned without Blood ... all the "resistance" - was expressed only in the moronic march of Ukrainian flyers and shouts of "America is with us" ... well, even to the Petty disobedience of the Ukrainian marines, who immediately surrendered - after warning shots!

      There is not a single independent action. Well, except that he took a pen and signed it.
      Ze does not do so many actions on his own now, and they are all simple:
      I ate, went to the toilet, washed, well, maybe I tucked my wife in ... the latter also does not always work ...
      The rest is ordered to him and he performs like a biomechanical doll. They bring the texts, tell it, sign it, determine the dates and so on.
    5. credo
      credo 26 February 2021 14: 47
      +14
      And I liked the idea of ​​the Kiev platform.
      It would be worth publishing such a newspaper in Crimea, with a breakdown into two columns - "What happened in Crimea during the period of being a part of Ukraine" and "What happened in Crimea after returning to Russia."
      Tourists from Ukraine should be given it free of charge upon entry and exit from the territory of Crimea.
      1. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 26 February 2021 15: 15
        -4
        Quote: credo
        Tourists from Ukraine should be given it free of charge upon entry and exit from the territory of Crimea.

        And a free excursion to the Crimea, and then on a trip to Kyev.
        1. credo
          credo 26 February 2021 15: 24
          +2
          Quote: tihonmarine
          Quote: credo
          Tourists from Ukraine should be given it free of charge upon entry and exit from the territory of Crimea.

          And a free excursion to the Crimea, and then on a trip to Kyev.

          Well, no really. All excursions are only for your own personal, no discounts for brotherly feelings.
          By the way, in that project "Kiev Platform" it would also be worthwhile to introduce the heading "What Ukraine got in return after the coup d'etat and the signing of an agreement with the EU," listing how many Soviet construction enterprises were covered with a copper basin, what "successes" took place in all sectors including medicine, education, social security, etc.

          In the end, everyone has long understood that the West will consistently destroy all the achievements of socialism in the former republics of the USSR and the Warsaw Pact countries, so curtsies and exhortations are already meaningless and it is necessary to start acting in other ways in relation to the border countries.
        2. Insurgent
          Insurgent 26 February 2021 15: 32
          +10
          Quote: tihonmarine
          And a free excursion to the Crimea, and then on a trip to Kyev.

          In Donetsk, in 2014, the "visitor" has already been driven:

          And then they were transported back to their motherland.

          How, pokhom, or crawling - this is no longer our concern ...
    6. Insurgent
      Insurgent 26 February 2021 15: 23
      +4
      Quote: Hunter 2
      even to the Petty disobedience of the Ukrainian marines, who immediately surrendered - after warning shots!

      Note - firing blank , and the use of light-noise grenades "for ostrastka".

      But that was spring 2014, and now it is 2021 ...
    7. Terenin
      Terenin 26 February 2021 16: 48
      +7
      Yes, the Crimean land itself feels and knows its Russian sons-soldiers. Because most of their blood is in her.
    8. Installer
      Installer 27 February 2021 09: 47
      +2
      “Dear Crimea! All Ukraine is waiting for you. It's time to go home. "
      BUT WE WILL NOT GIVE WATER !!
  2. rocket757
    rocket757 26 February 2021 13: 39
    +13
    Zelensky signed a decree on "de-occupation of Crimea" and urged Crimeans to "return home"

    wrote, even signed ... then what?
    1. 210ox
      210ox 26 February 2021 13: 52
      +12
      The main thing for a rooster is to crow.
      1. VORON538
        VORON538 26 February 2021 13: 58
        +7
        Exactly so. Nobody in Crimea kept and does not keep those who want to live in Ukraine, those who want to leave, most of them live quietly in the Russian Crimea, there are also those who moved to Crimea from other regions of Russia, and this clown just blurt out a clear phrase for ukronatsik, so that they lag behind him hi
        1. tihonmarine
          tihonmarine 26 February 2021 15: 20
          +2
          Quote: VORON538
          Exactly so. Nobody in Crimea has kept and does not keep those wishing to live in Ukraine

          And not only from Crimea, but also from other countries, who also do not want to, not even from Africa.
      2. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 26 February 2021 14: 57
        +2
        Quote: 210ox
        The main thing for a rooster is to crow.

        Already the voice broke.
        1. Insurgent
          Insurgent 26 February 2021 15: 10
          +2
          Quote: tihonmarine
          Already the voice broke.

          A hoarse scarecrow.
    2. Krasnoyarsk
      Krasnoyarsk 26 February 2021 14: 11
      +3
      Quote: rocket757
      wrote, even signed ... then what?

      What should happen next?
      He wrote, voiced on stage, the audience clapped. All. What should be?
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 26 February 2021 14: 37
        +1
        So then there should be real, purposeful actions, and so, sales skakuasses are no longer very excited and begin to look in the wrong direction.
        Everything has its beginning, but there will be an end, sure.
        1. Krasnoyarsk
          Krasnoyarsk 26 February 2021 14: 56
          +1
          Quote: rocket757
          So there must be real, purposeful actions,

          What do you expect from the clown? All his concern is to make the audience laugh. What can you say? - It turns out. All. Clowns are not meant for certain actions.
          1. rocket757
            rocket757 26 February 2021 15: 04
            +2
            Come on, why carp at him - don't shoot the "pianist", he plays as he can !!! maybe he's like ... a clown and nothing else.
      2. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 26 February 2021 14: 39
        0
        Quote: Krasnoyarsk
        He wrote, voiced on stage, the audience clapped. All. What should be?

        The approval of the Sahid because of the Big River, and the desire for the EU to support.
        There was already one such clown Petya - "I'm Charlie!", Now a new one has announced.
    3. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 26 February 2021 14: 41
      +1
      Quote: rocket757
      wrote, even signed ... then what?

      Well, if he wrote on toilet paper, at least it will go to work.
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 26 February 2021 14: 48
        +1
        And the "partners" haven't delivered the paper yet ... it seems. However, a lot of things were brought up, they are used from old stocks.
        1. tihonmarine
          tihonmarine 26 February 2021 14: 55
          +1
          Quote: rocket757
          And the "partners" haven't delivered the paper yet ... it seems.

          The owner gives them a roll for a week.
    4. Nyrobsky
      Nyrobsky 26 February 2021 16: 12
      +4
      Quote: rocket757
      Zelensky signed a decree on "de-occupation of Crimea" and urged Crimeans to "return home"

      wrote, even signed ... what's next?

      Then he just had to wipe himself with this law. It has no other practical use. yes
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 26 February 2021 20: 44
        +3
        So it is clear that this is a law for the Crimeans pf-e, but how his attempts are perceived under his nose, we will see ... soon, not soon, we can only guess.
        1. Nyrobsky
          Nyrobsky 26 February 2021 20: 50
          +4
          Quote: rocket757
          So it is clear that this is a law for the Crimeans pf-e, but how his attempts are perceived under his nose, we will see ... soon, not soon, we can only guess.

          No matter how many laws this "fan" has now adopted, his rating will remain in the area of ​​the baseboard, since the electorate is disappointed, and the entourage will leave with him, being lustrated by more cunning replacements. But what a scarecrow, from a meager set of candidates in the State Department nomenclature, will replace him is really interesting. winked
          1. rocket757
            rocket757 26 February 2021 21: 20
            +1
            So yes, that something stormy movement is not observed ... everyone is waiting for commands from the new / old owner.
            Although, the "brown plague" creeps on the most quiet one, this is obvious to everyone.
    5. Terenin
      Terenin 26 February 2021 16: 35
      +9
      Quote: rocket757
      Zelensky signed a decree on "de-occupation of Crimea" and urged Crimeans to "return home"

      wrote, even signed ... then what?

      Like what? In the American magazine "Zelensky's homework", in the mark of execution, he wrote - "done" and went to dinner happy. winked
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 26 February 2021 20: 47
        +2
        This is again from the sphere of fortune-telling ... although it is clear, this clown from the minke circus.
        It is not yet clear whether he will read this or empty words and they will cease to be accepted there as real deeds, the question is ???
    6. cniza
      cniza 26 February 2021 16: 35
      +5
      Quote: rocket757
      Zelensky signed a decree on "de-occupation of Crimea" and urged Crimeans to "return home"

      wrote, even signed ... then what?


      He did what he was prescribed, and nothing else bothers him ...
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 26 February 2021 20: 49
        +1
        I don’t know, I don’t know, empty chatter to his owners can get bored, in the end !!! And he, for now, is on their maintenance, and they can request a report on cases / expenses. Then where should he go?
        1. cniza
          cniza 26 February 2021 20: 52
          +3
          Not an enviable fate, he was an artist, but became a hostage ...
          1. rocket757
            rocket757 26 February 2021 20: 55
            +1
            By yourself, all by yourself ...
  3. SaLaR
    SaLaR 26 February 2021 13: 40
    +12
    I command this ..................... belay Fairytale ... wassat
    1. 210ox
      210ox 26 February 2021 13: 51
      +6
      "Day of Resistance to Occupation" ..... What a joke! Well, where are these resistances? There, three-quarters of the "resisting" joyfully crossed themselves and went to serve in the Russian Armed Forces.
      1. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 26 February 2021 14: 35
        +2
        Quote: 210ox
        What a joke! Well, where are these resistances?

        Well, what about where, remember "I am the daughter of an officer", and even two clowns Dzhemilev and Chubarov.
  4. Sergey Obraztsov
    Sergey Obraztsov 26 February 2021 13: 41
    +12
    - Give Crimea back to the Russians!
    - Nope
    Turns to his people:
    - Comrades, excuse me, I did everything I could!
  5. Destiny
    Destiny 26 February 2021 13: 42
    +14
    Dear Crimea! All Ukraine is waiting for you.

    And the orderlies are waiting for you with a shirt whose sleeves are tied at the back.
  6. Lech from Android.
    Lech from Android. 26 February 2021 13: 42
    +9
    The spring aggravation of Ze began ... A grave case in world psychiatry.
  7. bukhach
    bukhach 26 February 2021 13: 43
    +8
    The office writes, and the paper will endure everything. This parrot Kesha never ceases to amaze with his antics.
  8. Incvizitor
    Incvizitor 26 February 2021 13: 46
    +11
    Return to where the water is blocked for you, to where power lines are blown up for you, to where they pray to the fascist Bandera who killed your ancestors, to where people are fighting for dissent, where your native language is banned, where world Western terrorists rule good
  9. Andrea
    Andrea 26 February 2021 13: 48
    +3
    What a Napoleon, such a decree ... it will be too small! laughing
    I would immediately issue a decree on the abolition of the Constitution of Russia and the whole short-lived. Cancel Russia and no problem! laughing
    1. Insurgent
      Insurgent 26 February 2021 14: 17
      +2
      Quote: Andrea
      Cancel Russia and no problem!

      Are trying yes For now, for "internal use" ...

      The deputy of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine from the ruling party "Servant of the People" Nikita Poturayev proposed to rename Russia when communicating between Ukrainians.

      He proposed to rename Russia to "Muscovy". According to him, each country decides for itself how to call its neighboring states.
      1. Crimean partisan 1974
        Crimean partisan 1974 26 February 2021 15: 34
        0
        what should she call neighboring states ......... well, to a certain extent, he is right .... for example, we call the PRC China. but in the world of China .. nevertheless, the Xiaopians are on the drum .. know for yourself they are building their great skies ...... or here Kampuchea is Cambodia ..... or here is Myanmar. I even climbed to see where it is ... but it turns out Burma ... so how nevmerliks ​​the neighboring state will call it does not change anything ... exactly like with the Crimea ... phantom pains when breaking in junkies
        1. cat Rusich
          cat Rusich 26 February 2021 20: 00
          +1
          Quote: Crimean partisan 1974
          .or here on hearing Myanmar. I even climbed to see where it is ... but it turns out Burma ...
          Côte d'Ivoire - Ivory Coast.
          In 1986, the government of Côte d'Ivoire decided - "... the name of the country IS NOT TRANSLATED from French - it is a GEOGRAPHICAL NAME that does not require translation ..." - in short "the same eggs - only in profile"... Or Georgia - it is GEORGIA (US residents really confuse Georgia-Georgia with the US state of Georgia ...). And Ukraine is already calling Hungary - Ugorshchina, and Germany (FRG) - Nemetchina.
          1. Crimean partisan 1974
            Crimean partisan 1974 27 February 2021 11: 04
            -1
            and Germany (FRG) is a non-metchina ..... so I don’t understand what all the fuss is about ... in a madhouse called wnau everything is uncritical ... what a fool to take that
        2. sgapich
          sgapich 26 February 2021 20: 50
          +1
          Quote: Crimean partisan 1974
          ... for example, we call the PRC China. and in the world of China ...

          And the Chinese themselves call their country 中国 (sounds close to Zhongguo, translated - "Middle State") hi
          1. Crimean partisan 1974
            Crimean partisan 1974 27 February 2021 10: 58
            0
            translated - "Middle State") .... well, that's right ... between heaven and earth --- the heavenly. and they don't care who calls them names and how
  10. kit88
    kit88 26 February 2021 13: 49
    +12
    Have the orderlies already been called?
    1. Terenin
      Terenin 26 February 2021 16: 51
      +5
      Quote: kit88
      Have the orderlies already been called?

      He prudently canceled them by his previous decree. yes
  11. leks
    leks 26 February 2021 13: 52
    +3
    I was always surprised by the statements
    "ukro politikanov", guys honestly, what are you all chewing, drinking and smoking?
    1. Terenin
      Terenin 26 February 2021 16: 52
      +6
      Quote: leks
      I was always surprised by the statements
      "ukro politikanov", guys honestly, what are you all chewing, drinking and smoking?

      I, too, at first thought so, An, no, they carry such heresy in a sober state.
  12. Cron
    Cron 26 February 2021 13: 55
    +5
    Zelensky has generally gotten loose, imposes sanctions on his citizens, confiscates property, and all this without trial or investigation. It cleans the entire information space, closes TV channels and more than 400 sites. They even demand to close individual telegram channels. Some are accused of treason for some nonsense.
    Was he offended by someone? Decided to prove that he is not only a clown, but also a clown with dictatorial manners?
    1. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 26 February 2021 14: 31
      0
      Quote: Cron
      Decided to prove that he is not only a clown, but also a clown with dictatorial manners?

      Little Trotsky imagines himself.
    2. Incvizitor
      Incvizitor 26 February 2021 15: 08
      0
      He has his citizens in Israel and on the outskirts of the goyim, and robbing and killing them is not a problem.
  13. Glory to Berkut
    Glory to Berkut 26 February 2021 13: 56
    +8
    Dear Crimea! All Ukraine is waiting for you. It's time to go home.

    Little Johnny, have you skipped lessons again? We returned home 5 years ago
    1. Yuri Tverdokhleb
      Yuri Tverdokhleb 26 February 2021 14: 09
      +3
      The amendment is a little - soon seven years.
      1. Insurgent
        Insurgent 26 February 2021 14: 24
        +2
        Quote: Yuri Tverdokhleb
        The amendment is a little - soon seven years.

        Yes, seven years since Crimea returned to Russia, and only WE will never return home.

        Everyone is leading us, politicians, like the Jews once did, around the bush ...
        1. Yuri Tverdokhleb
          Yuri Tverdokhleb 26 February 2021 14: 28
          0
          And I believe and swear to the health of the late aunt that our Kermans - Valtsman Groisman, Zeltsman, Kapitelman will still bring ... will lead the land to the eternal kingdom of grace.
          1. Insurgent
            Insurgent 26 February 2021 14: 32
            +1
            Quote: Yuri Tverdokhleb
            And I believe and swear to the health of the late aunt that our Kermans - Valtsman Groisman, Zeltsman, Kapitelman will still bring ... will lead the land to the eternal kingdom of grace.

            We do not care about the entire suburbs galloping from Europe. It's only about Donbass.
        2. cat Rusich
          cat Rusich 26 February 2021 20: 08
          0
          Quote: Insurgent

          Yes, seven years since Crimea returned to Russia, and only WE will never return home.

          Everyone is leading us, politicians, like the Jews once did, around the bush ...
          Donbass residents get passports of Russian citizens - Conduct the expression of the will of the CITIZENS of Russia living in Donbass (Novorossia) on the issue return to Home Harbor - there is no hope for "local politicians" - they are satisfied with everything and so ...
  14. Woland
    Woland 26 February 2021 13: 58
    +2
    He's not only on stage. He's like that in life: "Come back, I'll forgive everything!"?
  15. kventinasd
    kventinasd 26 February 2021 14: 02
    +2
    Zelensky signed a decree on "de-occupation of Crimea" and urged Crimeans to "return home"

    Isn't it time to sign a decree on forcing Ukraine to an adequate state, so to speak, by means of coercive measures, otherwise the matter may soon end very badly? Primarily for Donbass. Only the green clown is preparing for the blitzkrieg, at the behest of the puppeteers ..
  16. Cowbra
    Cowbra 26 February 2021 14: 02
    0
    ... and instructed "to build the gallows first, and then the schools" (c) They already said this.
    Interesting garbage, the border with Crimea is not closed - but the "occupied" Crimeans do not run free, to savory kava, a thousand hryvnias a day and two slaves each to Tomosland. And what are they?
    1. Yuri Tverdokhleb
      Yuri Tverdokhleb 26 February 2021 14: 14
      +2
      One hundred pounds I agree with you, but how does the wife, relatives born in Soviet times, having Russian as their native language perceive all this shizu?
  17. From Tomsk
    From Tomsk 26 February 2021 14: 04
    +3
    This is after the water blockade. Joker.
    1. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 26 February 2021 14: 29
      -1
      Quote: From Tomsk
      This is after the water blockade. Joker.

      And they tried to create a blockade with electricity. In what world does he live, or is he constantly under the "high".
  18. ultra
    ultra 26 February 2021 14: 04
    +1
    It looks like he does not get off the "coke"! laughing
  19. Fedor Sokolov
    Fedor Sokolov 26 February 2021 14: 06
    0
    A clown, he is a clown in Africa!
  20. sibiryk
    sibiryk 26 February 2021 14: 12
    +2
    According to the Ukrainian president, he signed the decree on "the day of resistance to the occupation of Crimea and Sevastopol."
    Something early request , April 1 only a little over a month later.
  21. The comment was deleted.
    1. Yuri Tverdokhleb
      Yuri Tverdokhleb 26 February 2021 14: 31
      +3
      To heighten the passion, declare a hunger strike, you see your jar of jam.
    2. Incvizitor
      Incvizitor 26 February 2021 15: 28
      +1
      1 how is this article generally about Iskander? (except that there is one Fashington blunt raving here another)
      2 why is it written about the region of Serbia, when Serbia does not even have them in service?
      3 how can you build some kind of evidential base from the words of the pathetic frick sisyan from FSH?
      4 as a fraction of Serbia can be agitated by the use of Iskander if the Serbian authorities did not comment on a word.

      In general, some kind of nonsense of a mad Soros troll, an imperfect, which only disgraces its Fashington masters.
  22. K-50
    K-50 26 February 2021 14: 20
    +2
    Zelensky signed a decree on "de-occupation of Crimea" and urged Crimeans to "return home"

    On the way, the clown did not understand that this was not a script on stage. lol
  23. tihonmarine
    tihonmarine 26 February 2021 14: 22
    -1
    Dear Crimea! All Ukraine is waiting for you. It's time to go home.
    Turk Ze calls the Crimeans to the concentration camp, "Rus zoldaten, fam will have hot food and bed." Take this clown on a tour, let him see how normal people live, although he does not understand this, just as the boy from the head will not understand the boy from the classical gymnasium.
  24. Wolf
    Wolf 26 February 2021 14: 37
    +3
    So the aggravation of the situation in the LPR and DPR, the arrival of a large group of American soldiers in Greece for a NATO training session from the Baltic to Greece, are strengthening the grouping and actions in Syria and the statements of the dolls in Kiev have they brought or not? The doll in Kiev will be made as the owner orders and will try to make a civil war in the Southwest of the Russian people. In fact, in the southwest the Russian people are dying on both sides. IT HAPPENED EQUALLY IN THE OKTOBAR REVOLUTION UNDER THE PRESENTATION OF IDEOLOGY THE RUSSIAN PEOPLE DIED IN THE CIVIL WAR (RED AND WHITE) But in fact the people were blushing and blushing only in their zombified heads. So today the zombies of the Ruska people who are called Ukrainians and who were formed in the 20th century are fighting against a kindred people under the control of an OLD ENEMY OF THE RUSSIAN PEOPLE, THE OLD ENEMY IS MORE THAN 1.000 YEARS.
    But maybe the time has come:
    [quoteI propose to create a "Kiev platform". We will consider the option of returning home Kiev.] [/ Quote]
    ??
  25. Ros 56
    Ros 56 26 February 2021 14: 40
    +1
    Well, who will listen to this freak?
  26. Ripap
    Ripap 26 February 2021 14: 44
    +2
    Well, since Zelensky himself signed it, there’s nothing you can do, you’ll have to leave. request
  27. askort154
    askort154 26 February 2021 15: 06
    0
    Zelensky:
    Dear Crimea! All Ukraine is waiting for you. It's time to go home

    Variety artist - what text he was given, that he voiced.
    The USA is lucky in the 21st century, the artists are waiting for their scripts.
    "Polit-Hollywood" - gives odds to his forefather.
  28. svp67
    svp67 26 February 2021 15: 13
    0
    Zelensky: "Dear Crimea! All of Ukraine is waiting for you. It's time to return home."

    And at the same time:
  29. Dimide
    Dimide 26 February 2021 15: 18
    -14%
    US Secretary of State Blinken has already said, quote: - "The United States of America declares solidarity with Ukraine in connection with the seventh anniversary of the invasion and seizure of Crimea by Russia - a blatant denial of the modern international order. We affirm the unshakable truth: Crimea is Ukraine.
    The Russian occupation and the increased militarization of the Crimean peninsula have consequences far beyond Ukraine's borders, which threaten global global security.
    We call on Russia to immediately end its occupation of Crimea, release all Ukrainian political prisoners it is unfairly holding, and return full control of the peninsula to Ukraine. We also call on Russia to end its aggression in eastern Ukraine.
    US sanctions against Russia in response to its aggression in eastern Ukraine and the seizure of Crimea remain in place until Russia changes course. The United States does not and will never recognize Russia's declared annexation of Crimea. "
    You can minus
    1. Insurgent
      Insurgent 26 February 2021 15: 58
      +6
      Quote: Dimid
      US Secretary of State Blinken has already stated, quote:

      Quote: Dimid
      You can minus


      For the next cry of the flawed - " America is with us "? WITH PLEASURE yes
      1. Dimide
        Dimide 26 February 2021 16: 12
        -17%
        Actually, this is not only America's position. How many countries have recognized Crimea as Russian?
        Even the closest ally of the Republic of Belarus and that does not recognize Russian jurisdiction, and even about your "flawed" education, called "painted" republics by your accomplices, I am generally silent
        Minus-alaverdy
        1. Insurgent
          Insurgent 26 February 2021 16: 17
          +4
          Quote: Dimid
          Actually, this is not only America's position.


          But also a number of countries controlled by it?
          1. Dimide
            Dimide 26 February 2021 16: 18
            -12%
            China, India, recognized?
            Or Kazakhstan?
            1. Insurgent
              Insurgent 26 February 2021 16: 30
              +8
              Quote: Dimid
              China recognized?


              Legally (at the level of chicanery) not yet, but in fact - a long time ago, when a Chinese company was laying an energy bridge to the Crimea ...

              And, Khokhma, when the "square" education is only alive with the thought that someone else has not recognized something ...
              And when the conjuncture changes, what will you do?

              USSR - The USA was not recognized until 1933, and then "pressed" ...

              Historical chronicle:

              The first country to recognize the USSR was Afghanistan.

              Then, all in the same 1923, Soviet Russia was recognized by such countries as Germany, Mongolia, Iran, Finland, Poland, Turkey.

              Great Britain recognized the Land of the Soviets in 1924
              Then the USSR was recognized by Italy, the government of B. Mussolini, and then - France, all in the same 1924.
              Also in 1924, the USSR was recognized by Norway, Greece, Sweden, Austria, France, Mexico, Albania, Hijaz and China.
              In 1925, the USSR was recognized by Japan.
              And in 1926, the USSR was recognized by three countries - Saudi Arabia, Iceland and Uruguay.

              In what year did the United States recognize the USSR? In 1933, and this event made significant changes in the state of affairs in world politics.
              Also in 1933, the USSR was recognized by Spain, in 1934 - by Hungary, Romania, Czechoslovakia and Bulgaria.

              In 1935, Belgium recognized the USSR, and only in 1940 - Yugoslavia.
              1. Dimide
                Dimide 26 February 2021 16: 58
                -14%
                This is all sophistry.
                The modern Russian Federation is far from the USSR, and the United Russia is far from the CPSU
                1. Insurgent
                  Insurgent 26 February 2021 17: 03
                  +5
                  Quote: Dimid
                  This is all sophistry.


                  No-e-e-t No. ... It's yours - narrow-mindedness yes
                  1. Dimide
                    Dimide 26 February 2021 17: 11
                    -13%
                    Well, when there is nothing to say or something is different from what is indicated in the manuals, you start to be rude. I always knew that regular propagandists have only one gyrus and that is from a cap. Conjecture is not your strong point.
                    1. Volder
                      Volder 28 February 2021 12: 51
                      +2
                      Dimide, Insurgent correctly told you that regardless of the recognition of the USSR by other countries, the state of the USSR existed - both legally and in fact. The Crimea also exists as part of Russia. When the West decides everything for local residents, trying to impose an illegal position on them, it looks immoral and cynical. The population of Crimea and Donbass does not consider Russia an aggressor and occupier.
                      Recognition or non-recognition of certain phenomena occurs based on the political interests of individual states. Since Russia is a significant player in the international arena, there are many who do not recognize the actual strengthening of Russia through the annexation of Crimea. If some countries do not recognize something, it only means that they believe that it is so beneficial for them. International documents are formed by simple voting. Russia has the right not to participate in this booth, but participates when it suits her. So are other countries. The West is well aware that Crimea went to Russia in full compliance with international law, but for political reasons it says the opposite.
                      By the way, the term "occupation" does not imply the holding of a referendum on the norms of international law and the annexation of the territory following the counting of votes. In this case, we are talking about the democratic choice of the Crimean people, which became possible thanks to ... the Ukrainian Maidan authorities, who violated their own Constitution and thus deprived it of legitimacy. A coup d'etat is always unconstitutional, therefore the people of Crimea, frightened by the threats of aggressive nationalists and the oppression of the Russian-speaking by the new authorities, took advantage of this moment, guided by international law of self-determination.
                      1. Dimide
                        Dimide 28 February 2021 13: 05
                        -4
                        The key word here is "taking advantage of the moment", the rest is from the evil one.
                        Other countries do not recognize Russian jurisdiction in Crimea because the established world order was violated. Read Biden's statements, everything is clearly formulated there.
                        The referendum was also held in the LPR, why are they not part of the Russian Federation?
                      2. Volder
                        Volder 28 February 2021 14: 02
                        +2
                        Quote: Dimid
                        The key word here is "seizing the moment", the rest is from the evil one.
                        This is your evaluative bias, not based on anything.
                        The established world order was violated. Read Biden's statements, everything is clearly formulated there.
                        Biden's opinion is not the ultimate truth, since is based not on facts, but on unfounded words and political interests. The interest of the United States is not to recognize the strengthening of Russia through the annexation of Crimea. After all, the United States could not do anything in this situation, its hegemony was shaken. America was humiliated in North Korea, Syria, and Venezulla. But they quickly recognized Kosovo. Double standarts.
                        The referendum was also held in the LPR, why are they not part of the Russian Federation?
                        Aren't you ashamed of pretending to be Dunno on the Moon? The question of joining the Russian Federation was not raised at that referendum. Study the educational program at least on Wikipedia by typing in a search engine: Referendum on self-determination of the Donetsk People's Republic.
                      3. Dimide
                        Dimide 28 February 2021 17: 00
                        -2
                        I don’t take the EU. Do CIS countries, India, China, Brazil, biased countries also use double standards?
                        Is Kosovo really recognized?
                      4. Volder
                        Volder 28 February 2021 19: 16
                        +1
                        All of these countries are too dependent on the United States, so they are afraid of their anger. Russia, of course, is also economically dependent through dollar transactions, but it still retains sovereignty and independence in political decision-making based solely on national interests. The rest are either vassals, or are afraid of a trade war and a democratic coup in their country.
                        Double standards are quite obvious, there are a lot of examples. Ukraine is also a sinner in this: https://news.rambler.ru/politics/42569044-ukrainskiy-sud-priznal-legitimnost-referendumov-v-krymu-i-ldnr/
                        Is Kosovo really recognized?
                        Currently, Kosovo's independence from Serbia is recognized by 98 states out of 193 (51%) UN members, 22 out of 27 (81%) member states of the European Union (EU), 26 out of 30 (87%) NATO member states.
                      5. Dimide
                        Dimide 28 February 2021 20: 14
                        -2
                        China is also a vassal? In my opinion, he conducts a completely independent policy from Washington
                      6. Volder
                        Volder 28 February 2021 20: 50
                        +1
                        Quote: Dimid
                        China is also a vassal? In my opinion, he conducts a completely independent policy from Washington
                        China is pursuing an independent policy from Russia. And Russia is also pursuing an independent policy from China. China is afraid of aggravated relations with the United States, a trade war, therefore, in some cases, it makes concessions to Washington, does not climb on the rampage. Russia does not issue an ultimatum to China or anyone else on the mandatory recognition of Crimea. At the same time, Chinese business was engaged in laying an energy bridge to the Crimea.
                2. ironic
                  ironic 28 February 2021 19: 10
                  0
                  Well, if you so insist on the de jure issue, then according to the laws of Ukraine, the referendum regarding its integrity can only be all-Ukrainian. So if the referendum was held within Ukraine, then its procedurality was violated according to the laws of Ukraine, if not, then the international obligation on the territorial integrity of Ukraine signed by the Russian Federation was violated.
                3. Volder
                  Volder 28 February 2021 19: 33
                  +1
                  Quote: ironic
                  Well, if you so insist on the de jure issue, then according to the laws of Ukraine, the referendum regarding its integrity can only be all-Ukrainian.
                  Before commenting on something, do not be lazy at least to skim through the previous comments on this topic. I will repeat again in more detail:
                  The 4th President Viktor Yanukovych has officially addressed the Russian authorities with a request that they consider the possibility of using Russian troops throughout Ukraine. Why is it important for the ukropatriots? Because if there were no Russian troops on the Crimean peninsula, which ensured the safety of civilians, then the centurions V. Parasyuk, M. Bondar could be sent to Crimea so that they wreak havoc there, establish a Maidan-patriotic order - approximately the same as made in Odessa on May 2, 2014 (they burned people in the House of Trade Unions). "Polite people" were undesirable elements for such a scenario. Therefore, Russia is to blame for everything. Although the main driver of the Crimean spring is the people of Crimea, who boldly expressed their democratic expression of will. Residents of Crimea came to the referendum and made their choice without the help of "Maidan patriotists". They had both moral and international law for this! After all, a coup d'etat took place in Kiev. The referendum in Crimea was not held according to Ukrainian laws due to the fact that the activists of the Maidan created conditions for the Verkhovna Rada for its deputies to usurp power, thereby violating the Constitution. And since the deputies have worn out the Constitution, then it is foolish to expect from the Crimeans later that they will comply with some articles of the Constitution that is no longer working in fact (since they wipe it in the center). Therefore, it makes no sense to consider the events in Crimea from the point of view of the laws of Ukraine, because they did not operate on the entire territory of the state. This point must be understood and taken into account.
                4. Dimide
                  Dimide 28 February 2021 20: 19
                  -3
                  This is all talk in favor of the poor and verbal balancing act
                  Let's end the discussion with this.
                5. Volder
                  Volder 28 February 2021 21: 04
                  +1
                  Quote: Dimid
                  This is all talk in favor of the poor and verbal balancing act
                  All of this is based on recorded facts and official documents. Explore the chronology of the events of winter-spring 2014 at your leisure to have information. And then compare with what is happening in the Donbass. You do not wish the residents of Crimea the same fate as the residents of the LPNR? So the Russians do not want to either.
              2. ironic
                ironic 28 February 2021 21: 16
                -1
                I did not see anything in your posting that would violate my logic. Therefore, your "before", I do not accept. There was no nationwide referendum, which means, according to the law of Ukraine, this is separatism. If the people refused to trust their government, then the introduction of troops at their request is an intervention. Residents of Crimea had the right to an all-Ukrainian referendum, yes, but not to a local Ukrainian one. De jure, it was illegal. Even if we take into account the state revision, then until the new government was sworn in and changes in legislation, as well as changes in the Constitution, were not announced, the existing laws and agreements remain in effect. Therefore, it is illegal to consider the events in Crimea in isolation from Ukrainian sovereignty, according to international law. What kind of referendum can be discussed if, according to your words, it was held outside the Ukrainian sovereignty? Then this is pure annexation, according to the Crimeans, of no man's land, in favor of Russia, but Russia then pledged that Crimea cannot be a no man's land under international law and the coup d'etat in Ukraine did not release it from this obligation, and even vice versa. As for the coup itself, it cannot be viewed in isolation from the unlawful beating to death of the peaceful protest of students that took place before the events, when there were already barricades and shots and the removal of the existing government.
              3. Volder
                Volder 28 February 2021 22: 28
                +2
                Quote: ironic
                There was no nationwide referendum, which means, according to the law of Ukraine, this is separatism.
                You do not understand what I wrote to you? There is no logic in your words. You are referring to Ukrainian laws, but it makes no sense. The laws of international law were in force, not the laws of Ukraine. Is it really so difficult to grasp this elementary fact?
                If the people refused to trust their government, then the introduction of troops at their request is an intervention.
                If a? What do you mean "if" ?? None if not accepted. The ouster of Yanukovych was carried out absolutely illegally, unconstitutionally. According to the constitution, the mechanism for removing the president from power is clearly spelled out; none of the points of this mechanism was implemented. Apparently, you have not read the Constitution of Ukraine. Yanukovych remained the legally elected president even when he found himself in Russia after fleeing. Flight is an interstate visit, which the president has the right to make within the framework of his powers.
                Residents of Crimea had the right to an all-Ukrainian referendum, yes, but not to a local Ukrainian one. De jure, it was illegal.
                Do you understand badly from the fifth time? I can repeat in the sixth: the inhabitants of the peninsula had the right to hold a referendum on international law - because of the illegality of the actions of the new Maidan authorities.
                until a new government is sworn in and changes in legislation are announced, as well as changes to the Constitution, existing laws and agreements remain in effect.
                No, if the current Constitution is violated by the authorities, the current laws and agreements lose their legitimacy. The new Maidan government in Ukraine did not appear in accordance with the law. If the new authorities can violate the Constitution, then the administration of the Republic of Crimea can also automatically. Simple legal logic.
                Therefore, it is illegal to consider the events in Crimea in isolation from Ukrainian sovereignty, according to international law.
                It is legal according to international rules.
                but Russia then pledged, Crimea cannot be a no-man's territory according to international laws and the coup d'etat in Ukraine did not release it from this obligation
                Of course he did. Where do you get your fantasies from? Do you come up with it yourself or do you get it from the media? At the time of the coup, Crimea did not belong to Ukraine, but to the people inhabiting it. The right of the people to self-determination is enshrined in the norms of international law.
                As for the coup itself, it cannot be considered in isolation from the illegal beating to death of the peaceful protest of students that took place before the events, when there were already barricades and shots and the removal of the existing government.
                The guarantors of the agreement, which was concluded by the former President of Ukraine Viktor Yanukovych and the opposition, were the foreign ministers of Germany, France and Poland. However, the next day these guarantees were violated by the opposition, which seized power, in connection with which the Ukrainian leader had to flee, as his life was in danger. Why the danger threatened you, of course, do not know, tk. have not read Article 108 of the Constitution of Ukraine.
              4. ironic
                ironic 28 February 2021 23: 23
                0
                Got it. If you do not see logic in my words, then you do not know what logic is. When it comes to the integrity of the subject of Ukraine, refer to its laws, it is logical, just as it is logical that international laws appeal to the legislation of the subject. International law requires the integrity of the subject to be respected in accordance with its internal law. What else? After all, each country is a different kind of subject.

                Even as accepted, Yanukovych violated the constitution of his own country and was removed as a violator. If he had acted in accordance with the constitution, his removal would have been illegal, but he initiated gross violations of basic human rights and allowed the usurpation of power. This is unconstitutional. For which he paid with the power. It is for you to read the human rights and obligations of the President in the Constitution of Ukraine.

                No, they were not eligible for two reasons. If Crimea was part of Ukraine, then no one canceled the laws of Ukraine, including the fact that Yanukovych was deprived of power. If they conducted a referendum as a territory not under the jurisdiction of Ukraine, then Russia, according to international law, had no right to crush the results of such a referendum, since it pledged to preserve the territorial integrity of Ukraine. And whether Yanukovych is ousted from power, it does not change either this or this situation. Russia was supposed to help restore state order in Ukraine, and not interfere in it territorially.

                Yanukovych violated the constitution, but no one canceled the laws of Ukraine, nor canceled the international agreements signed. International law does not imply the cancellation of international obligations in the event of a change of government, and anyway. Everything that countries have undertaken to do, and their successors are obliged to do. Russia did not demand an all-Ukrainian referendum on the fate of Crimea in the UN, it held a local referendum in the essence of the integrity of another country, and this is a violation of international obligations. The very fact of unilateral rejection of the current agreements is a violation of international obligations. The Maidan government also appeared in disagreement with the law of actions of the Yanukovych government, but no one changed the obligations of Ukraine as a country and Russia as a country in the international arena. There is no such legal logic and it is not recognized by legal norms. Yanukovych violated the law, as a result he was removed not according to the procedure, but he himself opposed the procedure not according to the law. This does not give anyone the right to disband the integrity of the country of Ukraine according to international standards. This is not illegal legal and not logic, but a demonstration of power capabilities contrary to the jurisdiction and logic of international norms. This is called a territorial redistribution at a convenient coincidence.

                If the internal squabbles of a country free its neighbors from maintaining its territorial integrity, then this is aggression according to international standards. The people have the right to self-determination within the framework of the law on the territorial integrity of the country, as a subject and in accordance with the variety of such a subject, and not as the people want. And this is still written in the norms of international law. That the people cannot decide as they please, and this is called separatism in the norms of international law. Yanukovych had to flee because, in violation of the country's constitution, he set in motion special structures to commit a war crime, physically eliminate (not disperse or even suppress) a peaceful, non-violent demonstration of students, in violation of all fundamental constitutional rights and international provisions. Real violence and armed confrontation began the next day. So Having fled, Yanukovych not only abandoned his state and deprived the country of the governmental structure, but also made it impossible to legally remove him from power in accordance with the constitution. If he took it upon himself to beat people to death with iron rods, then he was obliged to stay in the country, bearing responsibility for this, under Article 108 for impeachment, or have eggs to meet death, if he had eggs sent to death of others, and he just fled, so and it's his fault. I know more than you think.
              5. Volder
                Volder 1 March 2021 20: 37
                0
                Quote: ironic
                International law requires the integrity of the subject to be respected in accordance with its domestic law.
                This is in the absence of a coup, i.e. when the domestic laws of the country are in effect.
                Yanukovych violated the constitution of his own country and was removed as a violator.
                And how did he break it? In what part of the law of Ukraine do you see a violation? In fact, the Constitution was violated by the deputies of the Verkhovna Rada, creating conditions for the usurpation of power - this is clearly confirmed.
                Violations of the Constitution:
                - after February 22, 2014, the legally elected President Yanukovych could no longer fulfill his duties, since Kiev was engulfed in mutiny;
                - Immediately after the "revolution of hydration", the Verkhovna Rada unconstitutionally suspended the previous Constitution, trying to return the parliamentary-presidential format of power - also in contradiction with the current Constitution;
                - extraordinary presidential elections were appointed, although from the point of view of the Constitution they cannot be called when there is a valid legally elected president;
                - the presidential elections were illegal, and therefore the results of these elections in the form of Poroshenko are also illegal;
                - You cannot use armed forces (not to be confused with the Ministry of Internal Affairs) against your own citizens (what is happening in the Donbass).
                Conclusion: in Ukraine there was a constitutional lawlessness, not organized by Yanukovych.
                If he had acted in accordance with the constitution, his removal would have been illegal, but he initiated gross violations of basic human rights and allowed the usurpation of power. This is unconstitutional.
                You are delusional. Was it Yanukovych who rode and shot on the Maidan? It was the opposition. The removal of Yanukovych was illegal, since he could only be removed in accordance with Article 108 of the Constitution of Ukraine. Why do you stubbornly refuse to familiarize yourself with the Constitution of your own country? It is shameful not to know her.
                For which he paid with the power.
                For which Yanukovych was dismissed, Muraev chewed on your fingers. Apparently, you were too lazy to watch the video, the link to which I gave.
                If Crimea was part of Ukraine, then no one canceled the laws of Ukraine, including the fact that Yanukovych was deprived of power.
                With the usurpation of power by the Maidan political force, President Yanukovych could no longer fulfill his duties. And all the laws of Ukraine were canceled automatically when the Constitution was violated.
                If they conducted a referendum as a territory not under the jurisdiction of Ukraine, then Russia, according to international law, had no right to accept the results of such a referendum, since it pledged to preserve the territorial integrity of Ukraine.
                Crimea, like the rest of the territory of Ukraine, was not under the jurisdiction of the state of Ukraine, tk. its laws and Constitution did not work. Russia has the right to include in its composition any territory freed from the framework of the internal laws of a foreign state. Russia can terminate any agreements with Ukraine (including on the observance of territorial integrity) unilaterally at any time - it has the right to do so. No one can forcibly force a sovereign state of the Russian Federation to have any agreements with Ukraine.
                Russia was supposed to help restore state order in Ukraine, and not interfere in it territorially.
                I noticed that the first time the words do not reach you. We'll have to repeat again (hopefully the last one): the 4th President Viktor Yanukovych has officially turned to the Russian authorities with a request that they consider the possibility of using Russian troops throughout Ukraine. But all of Ukraine, Russia does not need nafig. State order was restored only in Crimea, but already under the jurisdiction of Russia. After all, the jurisdiction of Ukraine did not exist at that moment.
              6. ironic
                ironic 1 March 2021 21: 13
                0
                According to international law, the territorial integrity of the country has nothing to do with internal transformations, because this is an internal affair of the country.

                Yanukovych violated a number of human and civil rights under the Constitution of Ukraine, without even declaring a state of emergency, including the use of unauthorized special forces for such actions, equipped with unforeseen means and not to restore order, but to inflict targeted serious bodily harm in a number of cases resulting in death ... Then he violated his responsibilities for responsibility for his own actions. All the rest are the consequences of his violations and violations by officials and special forces carrying out his unconstitutional orders, therefore, consideration should be started with these violations, but this is not the main thing. There can be only one conclusion, even though it was through the fault of Yanukovych that the vertical of power in Ukraine was temporarily lost, this does not cancel the territorial integrity of Ukraine and there are no international agreements that would sanction the violation of such integrity without a relevant UN decision, including all permanent members.

                You are delusional, the first shots rang out the next day after the lawlessness, crimes and usurpation of power by Yanukovych.

                I myself know what happened the day before the first opening of fire, and no one can explain anything to me better than myself, because I personally was involved in clarifying and interviewing witnesses, cannot. There were people I know personally.

                The power was usurped by Yanukovych and, without any sanction or the introduction of any special provision in the country, he used force in an unconstitutional manner and not according to the law, but at the level of a pogrom by bandit formations, and hiding their identification.

                There was no such thing, there are no such laws and there are no such international provisions, such decisions are only in the jurisdiction of the UN, with the approval of all permanent members. You are talking illegal nonsense. Not only Russia, but no country has the right to do anything like this without UN sanction with the obligatory consent of all permanent members, what you have just written is called annexation. They cannot force Russia to comply with the signed agreement, but they can and have done so to put such non-compliance outside international laws. In addition, Russia has not officially announced any termination of any agreements, as well as a change in the status of relations with Ukraine.

                At the time of such an appeal, Yanukovych did not possess the fullness of his power and did not have the right to go to Russia alone with such an appeal. He was not authorized in this. But yes, everyone understands that Russia needed to keep its Black Sea Fleet bases and their tactical connection with the base in Tartus. However, by the very fact of the actions taken and the statement about the disappearance of the jurisdiction of Ukraine, the overwhelming majority of developed countries declared to Russia that they de jure consider it illegal and will never accept it as a rule of international law. Therefore, although de facto no one disputes the annexation of Crimea by Russia, de jure it is considered illegal, and the territorial integrity of Ukraine is considered to have never stopped, and Russia's opinion about its termination is not legitimate under international law.
              7. Volder
                Volder 1 March 2021 23: 22
                +1
                Quote: ironic
                According to international law, the territorial integrity of the country has nothing to do with internal transformations, because this is an internal affair of the country.
                Internal transformations can destroy territorial integrity. There are a lot of examples in the world. Just remember the collapse of the USSR. But you are right about one thing: the secession of Crimea and the loss of control over Donbass are an internal problem of Ukraine.
                Yanukovych violated a number of human and civil rights under the Constitution of Ukraine, without even declaring a state of emergency
                Even so, this does not automatically relieve Yanukovych of his duties as president. From your judgments, one might think that Yanukovych himself went to the square and beat everyone with truncheons himself.
                the use of unauthorized special forces for such actions, equipped with unforeseen means and not to restore order, but to inflict targeted serious bodily harm in a number of cases resulting in death.
                Is it proven? There were organized groups on the part of non-peaceful protesting activists who used unauthorized means of attack. For example, V. Parasyuk's combat hundreds. You see violations of Yanukovych, but for some reason you do not notice violations of the opposition. But the opposition was the first to rebel - it all started with it.
                All the rest are the consequences of his violations and violations of the unconstitutional orders of officials and special forces
                All written orders of Yanukovych were constitutional, since he was the legally elected president. But no one chose the opposition that came to power. The elections took place after the "revolution of hydration".
                it was due to the fault of Yanukovych that the vertical of power was temporarily lost in Ukraine
                Not through the fault of Yanukovych, but under Yanukovych. Yanukovych did not cling to power, since this would have led to even greater casualties.
                this does not abolish the territorial integrity of Ukraine and there are no international agreements that would sanction the violation of such integrity without a relevant UN decision adopted, including by all permanent members.
                The UN does not issue permits for holding referenda in a country where the rights of citizens under domestic laws do not apply.
                the first shots were fired the day after the lawlessness, crimes and usurpation of power by Yanukovych.
                What is the usurpation of power by Yanukovych? Are you out of your mind ?? Yanukovych is the legally elected president, he physically could not usurp power, because he was in power.
                Yanukovych and without any sanction and the introduction of any special provision in the country used force in an unconstitutional manner and not according to the law, but at the level of pogroms by bandit formations, and hiding their identification.
                Are you sure that Yanukovych was behind these gangs? Where is the proof? Has Yanukovych Already Confessed? Do you seriously think that it was by order of Yanukovych that people were burned in the House of Trade Unions?
                no country has the right to do anything of the kind without UN sanction with the mandatory consent of all permanent members
                The USA does this all the time. The consent of the UN members and the UN resolution for the United States is not required to carry out military intervention in third world countries, as well as withdraw from international treaties unilaterally. There are a lot of examples.
                what you have now written is called annexation
                Annexation is the forcible annexation of a territory. But there was no violence against civilians (no one died, no one fired at them). Moreover, the Crimean authorities and the Crimean people were the main driving force, having officially turned to Russia for help, and the "polite people" only provided their protection. And the most interesting thing: the inhabitants of Crimea do not believe that they have been annexed or occupied.
                Russia has not officially announced any termination of any agreements, as well as a change in the status of relations with Ukraine.
                And to whom should Russia officially declare? There is a coup d'etat in Ukraine, who to talk to there? With illegal power? And by the way, Russia did not violate the integrity of Ukraine, tk. there was no jurisdiction of Ukraine in Crimea. The territory and its inhabitants were left to their own devices. It was the people of Crimea who decided to join Russia, and not vice versa. Therefore, blame the citizens of Ukraine in Crimea for the violation of territorial integrity, not Russia. The Crimeans took Crimea from Ukraine and handed it over to Russia.
                At the time of such an appeal, Yanukovych did not possess the fullness of his power and did not have the right to go to Russia alone with such an appeal. He was not authorized to do so.
                He was authorized, possessed power and had the right as an acting, legally elected president.
                the overwhelming majority of developed countries have declared to Russia that they de jure consider it illegal and will never accept it as a rule of international law.
                The key word here is "majority". Recognition or non-recognition is determined by a simple vote, and not on the basis of facts, investigations, court decisions.
                Therefore, although de facto no one disputes the annexation of Crimea by Russia, de jure it is considered illegal, and the territorial integrity of Ukraine is considered to have never stopped.
                So what prevents Ukraine from filing an application to the international court on the illegality of the appropriation of Ukrainian territories by Russia? 7 years have already passed, but Ukraine does not dispute Russia's right to Crimea in the courts. Economic sanctions are not helping to change Russia's foreign policy. UN resolutions do not impose a measure of responsibility and punishment. Ukraine is not accepted into NATO. What are the levers? They are not.
              8. ironic
                ironic 2 March 2021 21: 06
                -1
                They can, but this is not the case of Ukraine, it is a specific case.

                No, this does not relieve Yanukovych of his duties as president, but flight to another country and refusal of responsibility is quite comparable to resignation of his own free will.

                Yes it is proven. Yes, it has been proven that the protests became non-peaceful not on this day, but on the next, as well as the use of force by the protesters. And on that day, a secretly recruited gang killed by surrounding completely peaceful and completely unarmed students with braided metal clubs. It was with this that the non-peaceful protest began.

                And unwritten gangster actions do not become from this actions for which they are not responsible.

                It is through the fault of Yanukovych. If you mean that there were still guilty ones, then yes there were, all his team and those who agreed to go to kill the unarmed. To start.

                The UN and only the UN can authorize intervention in a country that is not engaged in hostilities, and with the consent of all permanent members. Ukraine at that time was not engaged in hostilities. Neither Kiev nor Odessa clashes are such under international law.

                The president is not Gd and not an autocratic tsar. His actions must be authorized not only by him, when it comes to decisions within the framework of the fate of the whole Country. And he single-handedly usurped power and performed actions that he did not have the authority to perform alone, even as president.

                Yes, I am sure. And these were all without exception people from the Berkut, but not officially, by order, raised and not sanctioned sent in uniform and with the appropriate equipment. It was an illegally formed band of law enforcers, sent not to drive up an unauthorized, disturbing protest or some kind of riot, but to kill an unarmed and safe, localized student rally on the square.

                The United States first announces its withdrawal from the treaty, and only then withdraws according to the withdrawal rules, for example, from the treaty on medium-range missiles and the United States has a Congress and a High Court, which will protest actions that grossly do not meet international standards and they do it, and even the president will be obliged submit to the Court and obey. There are not a lot of examples, if there were a lot of them, then in modern history there was more than one opportunity to violate the integrity of both the USSR and the Russian Federation, but they did not, but there were moments when they could and would have gotten away with it.

                The Crimean authorities de jure did not have the right to either apply or hold a local referendum, and the Russian Federation pledged to be the guarantor of integrity, therefore, the annexation, and yes, it was violent, and did not become a massacre only because of the complete helplessness of the Ukrainian Army at that time.

                Russia gave international obligations and was obliged to obtain international sanctions for interference. There is no such thing "there was no jurisdiction of Ukraine in Crimea" under international law, in peacetime. She was present until it was announced otherwise, and it was not announced otherwise. No international sanctions have been issued to challenge such jurisdiction either.

                No fiction, did not possess and did not have the right, even being a legitimate president. He could initiate the approval of such an appeal in the Parliament or the Cabinet of Ministers, depending on the particulars of the Ukrainian form of democracy, but otherwise he could not, it is illegal, therefore it is a usurpation of power.

                It is the recognition or not recognition, and this requires a consensus of all the countries of the permanent participants of the UN in addition to the general majority, and the recognition of Russia's actions in Crimea was protested by all the permanent members of the UN. Russia blocked the condemning resolution, but this does not change the fact that in this situation the status of Crimea as a part of the Russian Federation is de jure not recognized, just as the right of the Crimeans to hold a referendum in the same way as it was de jure is not recognized. On the basis of the facts, there is only one indisputable fact, the right of Ukraine to integrity, which has not been canceled by anyone in the form in which it was signed to support the respective countries, is violated both NOT according to international and NOT according to Ukrainian laws, and the internal power problems of Ukraine in a certain period are not an excuse for that. neither according to international standards, nor according to Ukrainian laws.
              9. Volder
                Volder 2 March 2021 23: 21
                0
                Quote: ironic
                They can, but this is not the case of Ukraine, it is a specific case.
                Is Ukraine special? No, honey, the collapse of the USSR was unconstitutional, but everyone accepted it, and in Ukraine a coup d'etat is also unconstitutional, but everyone accepted it. Ukraine was able to secede, and Crimea could too. Likewise, Kosovo was able to secede.
                flight to another country and denial of responsibility are quite comparable to resignation of their own accord.
                No, they are not comparable. Where did you read that? Provide an article of the law. Yanukovych did not resign. Flight is a forced measure for one's own safety due to the uprising in Kiev, which was organized by the radical opposition. When the Verkhovna Rada adopted a resolution on the "self-removal" of the head of state from the exercise of his powers and appointed an early presidential election, this was a direct violation of the Constitution.
                And on that day, a secretly recruited gang killed by surrounding completely peaceful and completely unarmed students with braided metal clubs. It was with this that the non-peaceful protest began.
                This is a reason, not a reason. Is Yanukovych's involvement in this gang proven? Where is the court's conviction? Pre-organized opposition groups were preparing for a non-peaceful protest.
                And unwritten gangster actions do not become from this actions for which they are not responsible.
                Until now, no one is responsible for the burning of people in the House of Trade Unions. The prosecutor's office of Ukraine refuses to investigate and look for those responsible.
                If you mean that there were still guilty ones, then yes there were, all his team and those who agreed to go to kill the unarmed. To start.
                You do not consider the armed opposition to be guilty. Maidan activists can carry out provocations and use force, but defenders of the law cannot respond in kind. First, take care of the evidence of the charges.
                The UN and only the UN can authorize intervention in a country that is not engaged in hostilities, and with the consent of all permanent members.
                Tell it better than the United States, which regularly ignore the UN and international law, invading the territory of foreign states that are not waging a war. When the Maidan happened and its victims appeared, and the opposition usurped power in an unconstitutional way, the UN was inactive at that time, did not take any measures. An invitation to intervene in the internal affairs of a country can come not only from the UN, but also from the official, legally elected authorities of this country. This is provided for by international law. For example, Russia is in Syria at the invitation of the Assad government. Whereas the United States, Turkey, Iran, France invaded Syria without an invitation and bypassing the UN Security Council.
                The president is not Gd and not an autocratic tsar. His actions must be authorized not only by him, when it comes to decisions within the framework of the fate of the whole Country. And he single-handedly usurped power and performed actions that he did not have the authority to perform alone, even as president.
                In fact, there was no usurpation of power by the president. Russia did not send its troops to Kiev at his request. The court verdict in the high treason case dates back to 2019. This means that while there is no court opinion, Yanukovych's actions are legally binding. They had at that time, in 2014. As for the trial of Yanukovych itself, this is generally a comedy: the interested persons who committed the coup d'etat acted as witnesses, and the judges refused to investigate the evidence of Yanukovych's innocence presented by his defense (including the opinions of experts from the United States, Europe and Ukraine).
                Yes, I am sure. And these were all without exception people from the Berkut, but not officially, by order, raised and not sanctioned sent in uniform and with the appropriate equipment. It was an illegally formed band of security officials, sent not to disperse an unauthorized disturbing protest or some kind of mass riots, but to kill an unarmed and safe, localized student rally in the square.
                You are unfounded, there is no evidence of your opinion. Wishful thinking. Not only students were on the square. For some reason, you are not considering the version of a violent provocation by the opposition to make a "sacred sacrifice". And you even ignore the fact of the speech on the platform of the Maidan by "centurion" V. Parasyuk, who called to take the presidential administration by storm, disregarding the agreements on resolving the crisis between the opposition and Yanukovych. The illegal and aggressive actions of the opposition prompted the head of state to flee Kiev. It is impossible to justify the actions of the opposition by any students, downtrodden by someone who knows nothing.
                There are not a lot of examples, if there were a lot of them, then in modern history there was more than one opportunity to violate the integrity of both the USSR and the Russian Federation, but they did not violate
                The territorial integrity of the USSR was violated in an unconstitutional way - in connection with the political crisis within the country. Ukraine, like many other republics, chose to secede. Crimea also wanted to secede, and Donbass (LDNR) to become autonomy.
              10. ironic
                ironic 4 March 2021 12: 28
                0
                Ukraine is completely ordinary. The disintegration of the USSR was determined by all of its subjects, not just one, therefore these are your own fabrications about the unconstitutionality of its disintegration.
                In Ukraine, first of all, the current government behaved unconstitutionally. Kosovo was separated with the mediation of the UN, and Crimea was separated by the Russian Federation alone.

                This is with what it is not yet comparable? The leader flees to another country and refuses responsibility for his actions. This is a resignation. And who gave him the right to remain the current leader, to flee the country and refuses responsibility for his actions? You give me the article of the law according to which he can keep his position in such a position. In the 108th, this is not said. Flight is a forced measure after an attempt to usurp power? And who allowed him to usurp power in the country? The presidency does not grant such rights. This is precisely a direct violation of the Constitution. And the actions of the Rada are the consequences of the unconstitutional actions of Yanukovych, and not vice versa.

                This is both a reason and a reason. Yes, it is proved by interrogations of the captured bandits. You can familiarize yourself with the trial of Yanukovych yourself. On the day of the students' speech, there was no non-peaceful process from the word at all, do not rewrite the misinformation.

                The case of the house of trade unions is one thing, but the alienation of Crimea is another matter.

                There was no armed opposition on the day of the student rally on the square. Do not rewrite misinformation. The evidence of what happened that day is on the face.

                Do not rewrite misinformation again. The beating of a student rally and an attempt to usurp power took place before the active actions of the opposition and became their cause. The coalition is in Syria at the request of the opposition to President Assad, whose number is in a good half of the country, and the Russian Federation at the request of Assad. The veto in the Security Council was imposed by the Russian Federation, and the rest, respectively, were against Russian support for Assad, so your appeal to Syria and the United States is not legitimate, because then the Russian Federation should not be there either. With more than half a million deaths in Syria, the opposition's request for protection is no less legitimate than the request to protect Assad.

                It was. The fact that the Russian Federation did not have time to send troops is not an argument. His actions do not have any effect. The trial on Yanukovych did not begin in 19, do not come up with it. And the Court was tried by the court, but what was happening on the square on the day of the student rally is known first-hand.

                You are slandering. All evidence exists and there is a mass of evidence. I myself personally heard such testimonies from the participants personally, but you were not there. At the meeting of students there were only students and everything else from the personal words of those who were on the square - slander and lies. The students had no strength at all and they came to kill, to kill them. There were no aggressive actions on the day of the student rally. I clarified this question personally from those who were personally present that day in the square, but you were not there. All retaliatory actions of the opposition took place the very next day, and on that day students were beaten to death. And this is how you can justify retaliatory measures and the prevention of the usurpation of power by Yanukovych, and if this is not an excuse for you, then you yourself are a villain and therefore are ready to kill unarmed people, since their murder is not an excuse for you and a sacred sacrifice.

                The territorial integrity of the USSR was violated by the consent of all subjects of the union, which cannot be considered as someone's unilateral actions, therefore it is constitutional and legal. And the disconnection of Crimea took place against the rest of Ukraine, contrary to the collective consent required by law. And in the Donbass, a civil war generally unfolded, so it's never the same thing. And therefore it is considered de jure illegal.
            2. Volder
              Volder 3 March 2021 00: 49
              0
              Quote: ironic
              The Crimean authorities de jure did not have the right to either apply or hold a local referendum, and the Russian Federation pledged to be the guarantor of integrity, therefore, the annexation, and yes, it was violent, and did not become a massacre only because of the complete helplessness of the Ukrainian Army at that time.
              The administration of the Republic of Crimea de jure and de facto had the right to hold a local referendum, because the constitution and laws in Ukraine did not work. The Russian Federation pledged to be the guarantor of integrity, subject to the legally existing government in the country. When there is a coup d'etat in a country, Russia has the right not to fulfill all its obligations automatically. And for this it is not at all necessary to notify the illegitimate authorities of a foreign country. The term "annexation" is inapplicable in view of the absence of violence against civilians in Crimea and in the presence of their voluntary will to join Russia.
              As for the Ukrainian army: it is not a matter of combat effectiveness, but of the ideological attitude of the military. More than 15 thousand Ukrainian soldiers and officers who served in the Armed Forces of Ukraine on the territory of the peninsula wished to continue serving in the Russian army and other power structures of the Russian Federation. About 1,5 thousand soldiers returned to Ukraine from Crimea.
              There is no such thing "there was no jurisdiction of Ukraine in Crimea" under international law, in peacetime. She was present until announced otherwise, and otherwise was not announced.
              And who, in your opinion, should announce this? Illegal authority is never recognized as illegal. Therefore, no one ever expects such announcements. In accordance with international law, in case of violation of the Constitution by the authorities, the state loses jurisdiction on its territory, that is, it leaves the legal field.
              He could initiate the approval of such an appeal in the Parliament or the Cabinet of Ministers, depending on the particulars of the Ukrainian form of democracy, but otherwise he could not, it is illegal, therefore it is a usurpation of power.
              Only the Court has the right to make a charge of usurpation of power. Further, the Verkhovna Rada, on the basis of this decision, should impeach the president and legally remove him from power. This procedure was not followed in 2014. The court delivered the accusation only in 2019. Until that time, until the court delivers a verdict, there is NO usurpation of power. This must be clearly understood. Therefore, the removal of Yanukovych was illegal. You also need to take into account the fact that Yanukovych's written appeal to Russia dates from March 1, 2014. What does this mean? This means that at that moment the coup d'état had already taken place, the president was actually removed from power, and the Verkhovna Rada adopted unconstitutional decisions. However, de jure, Yanukovych continued to be president. Not a single article of the current Constitution prohibited the appeal to other countries with a request to send troops. Article 106 of the Constitution defines the President as the representative of the state in international relations. Therefore, the deputies of the Verkhovna Rada urgently, immediately after the "revolution of hydration" unconstitutionally suspended the current Constitution, trying to return the parliamentary-presidential format of power. Conclusion: the usurpers of power blame Yanukovych for this, shifting the arrows from themselves to him.
              It is the recognition or not recognition, and this requires a consensus of all the countries of the permanent participants of the UN in addition to the general majority, and the recognition of Russia's actions in Crimea was protested by all the permanent members of the UN.
              For many years the USSR was not recognized by various countries, including the United States. But regardless of the recognition of the USSR by other countries, the state of the USSR existed - both legally and in fact. Likewise, Crimea exists as part of Russia. When the West decides everything for local residents, trying to impose an illegal position on them, it looks immoral and cynical. The population of Crimea and Donbass does not consider Russia an aggressor and occupier.
              Recognition or non-recognition of certain phenomena occurs based on the political interests of individual states. Since Russia is a significant player in the international arena, there are many who do not recognize the actual strengthening of Russia through the annexation of Crimea. If some countries do not recognize something, it only means that they believe that it is so beneficial for them. International documents are formed by simple voting. Russia has the right not to participate in this booth, but participates when it suits her. So are other countries. The West is well aware that Crimea went to Russia in full compliance with international law, but for political reasons it says the opposite.
            3. ironic
              ironic 4 March 2021 12: 39
              0
              No, it did not, the invalidity of the laws of Ukraine can only be determined by the UN Security Council. Everything else is lyrics.

              Well, yes, the usurpation of power by Yanukovych was illegal and this was announced by the Rada. It's enough. The rest will be decided by the Court of Yanukovych.

              The trial can go on for a long time, and Yanukovych's illegal actions were rightfully suppressed quickly. Now the Court will determine the measure of his guilt, and Rada is enough to determine the fact itself. Impeachment can only be carried out by a president present in the country who agrees to bear his responsibility, and absent and disagreeing means giving up his duties.

              De facto yes, but de jure no, did not exist. Likewise, Crimea, de facto Russian, and de jure still Ukrainian. All the rest is your personal, biased lyrics.
  30. Volder
    Volder 1 March 2021 21: 52
    0
    Quote: ironic
    International law does not imply the cancellation of international obligations in the event of a change of government
    Clarification: when changing power in a legal way. If there is no state of Ukraine, then international treaties with this state do not apply either.
    Everything that countries have undertaken to do, must be done by their successors.
    The authorities in Ukraine pledged to comply with Ukrainian laws, but failed to fulfill their own obligations. Why, then, should there be any obligations to fulfill the authorities of other countries in relation to Ukraine? This is not logical.
    Russia did not demand an all-Ukrainian referendum on the fate of Crimea in the UN, it held a local referendum in the subject of the integrity of another country, and this is a violation of international obligations.
    What does the UN have to do with it? It is not the UN that decides when the residents of the homeless territory hold the referendum. The referendum was held in full compliance with the norms of international law, in the absence of the laws of Ukraine on the territory.
    The Maidan government appeared also in the inconsistency with the law of actions of the Yanukovych government
    Darling, you forgot the chronology of events. The legality of Yanukovych's actions was not disputed until the Maidan government emerged. But the Maidan government, after coming to power, had to cover its bottom with at least something. Attempts to stupidly translate the arrows can only work for the internal, not very knowledgeable population.
    Yanukovych violated the law, as a result he was removed not according to the procedure
    Open the Constitution of Ukraine and read article 108 - in what cases the president can be removed from office. Any other cases are not a legal basis for the removal of the president. This must be clearly understood. The president can be tried only after he has lost power, which is now being done by the Kiev court. This is instead of looking for performers of dirty work in the Independence Square. In vain Yanukovych did not want to send a military contingent to Kiev to disperse the protesters. Remaining in power, he would initiate an investigation and search for those who were really behind the attempted rebellion. Alas, the rebels were not stopped. This led to a coup.
    This does not give anyone the right to disband the integrity of the country of Ukraine according to international standards.
    Ukraine itself, with its own hand, "disbanded" its own integrity, giving a legal loophole to the residents of Crimea to escape from the madhouse called under-Ukraine.
    If the internal squabbles of a country free its neighbors from maintaining its territorial integrity, then this is aggression according to international standards.
    If we recall the situation with Kosovo, then this is not aggression at all. Secession of Kosovo is recognized by most countries.
    The people have the right to self-determination within the framework of the law on the territorial integrity of the country, as a subject and in accordance with the variety of such a subject, and not as the people want.
    This is only if the country's Constitution is legitimate. When the laws in the country are illegitimate, then any people are left to themselves and can use international law.
    Yanukovych had to flee because, in violation of the country's constitution, he set in motion special structures to commit a war crime, physically eliminate a peaceful, non-violent demonstration of students
    What is a "war crime"? What is "physical elimination"? 1. Detachment "Berkuts" performed their official duty, reacting to provocations. On the square they fired at the "golden eagles", and they were also accused of opposing the protesters. 2. The fact of the commission of a war crime is determined by the court and in no other way. 3. The protesters used force, prohibited methods, means and tools against the security forces, there was no peaceful action. The aggression had to be answered harshly. Therefore, many protesters were injured and mutilated. We would have sat at home better - they would have been more whole. But no ... flooded to arrange a rebellion, helping the new government to arrange a coup. 4. What kind of treason by the president can we talk about when Yanukovych and the opposition leaders, in the presence of the EU delegation, signed an agreement to resolve the crisis? It provided for a return to the 2004 constitution, early presidential elections and an investigation into the events on the Maidan. However, the next day the signed agreement was thwarted by the opposition, and Yanukovych had to flee.
    Having fled, Yanukovych not only abandoned his state and deprived the country of its governmental structure, but also made it impossible for him to be legally removed from power in accordance with the constitution.
    It is good that you have finally admitted a violation of the Constitution. For some reason, you don’t think about the reasons why Yanukovych did this. You are not interested in this. In conditions of rebellion and refusal to suppress it, there is only one way out - to flee. There is no other choice. For the rebels will come to the president and fulfill one of the paragraphs of Article 108 of the Constitution.
    If he took it upon himself to beat people to death with iron rods, he was obliged to stay in the country, bearing responsibility for it
    Yanukovych did not give the order to beat people to death with sticks. The opposition was obliged not to violate the law in terms of holding peaceful rallies.
    under Article 108 for impeachment
    Impeachment can be carried out without the presence of the president. Didn't you know about this?
  31. ironic
    ironic 1 March 2021 22: 38
    -1
    They act according to international laws, and your opinion has already been recognized de jure as illegal.

    Because the government of Yanukovych did not comply with the laws, it is illogical to not comply with international laws.

    Only the UN decides if this is not a zone of military contact. Yanukovych did not declare martial law.

    International law does not recognize the right to a referendum in territories alienated from the country.

    I have not forgotten, I figured them out myself, personally. Contested immediately on the second day after his gangster actions against students.

    In view of his flight, his behavior was seen as a refusal of responsibility while in office, tantamount to resignation. The flight itself is not legal. Now, if he had stayed and declared martial law, he would have had the right to lay claim to the current president for the 108th, and so he refused to perform his duties on the 108th.

    There was no official statement about the dissolution of the integrity. There was no UN decision with the support of all permanent members, which means that such an opinion is de jure illegal, as the countries declared.

    The secession of Kosovo took place with the direct accompaniment of the process at the UN.

    International law does not give such a right to any people.

    A detachment of golden eagles disguised in non-combatant clothing, without an official order, armed with abnormal braided metal truncheons, surrounded and killed people whose hands were generally empty and who did not even resist. The first shot rang out the next day. I personally found out what kind of action it was among its participants and when the resistance began. All the counter-use of force began only the next day, when completely different people arrived at the square. The students could not even show any aggression, because they were not ready at all for confrontation. It is difficult to call it even a demonstration of protest, many came there for a company with friends and danced on the square to the music. Treason is the use of an unauthorized bandit formation from among the security forces and then escape from the country. The agreement was thwarted not the next day, but the next day, when a bloody mess was made of students on the square, bypassing all conceivable norms and laws. It was then that completely different people came to Kiev, then the violence began, then the shots and the escape just began, and what you are talking about is propaganda to justify the use of an abusive gang without official authorization to mutilate and kill completely unarmed and unable to resist people.

    The reasons why the bandit and the murderer of unarmed people Yanukovych acted this way are transparent to me personally. And they would have come and fulfilled and would have done the right thing according to the constitution.

    And you were personally present when what orders he gave? Have you interviewed at least one participant in those events? I am. The opposition had nothing to do with the student rally. But Yanukovych was more like that to beating them, and he knew that he had sent the gang not to disperse them, but to kill them with iron rods.

    Yes, it was possible if he did not kill people, and then would not be washed off like the last cowardly gopnik.
  32. Volder
    Volder 28 February 2021 22: 36
    +1
    To broaden your horizons, I strongly recommend that you familiarize yourself with the research of Christian Markssen - Doctor of Law, an employee of the Institute of Foreign Public Law and International Law named after A. Max Planck in Heidelberg (Germany):
    https://dpp.mpil.de/03_2014/03_2014_201_230.pdf

    Listen to the Ukrainian expert on Ukrainian TV: Muraev told on his fingers how the Maidan began, and why Azarov suspended movement in the EU
  33. Glory to Berkut
    Glory to Berkut 1 March 2021 14: 28
    0
    Yes, we from Crimea wanted to spit on someone else's recognition. I have a counter question: and for 7 years mega-cool states and their rest jackals, why did they break off Crimea and squeeze the Central Europeans back? And the DPR and LPR are still standing. Why is this so? Scary? Even with all the worlds? Here's the whole price of your "non-recognition" - zilch and nonsense. We are in Russia. So rub down with your Biden.
    P.S. And here, even under all the sanctions, no one regrets the decision.
  • Kisa
    Kisa 26 February 2021 20: 22
    0
    Quote: Dimid
    United States of America declares

    Yes, it's a shame to lose a fifth of the territory, but it's not realistic for Crimea to become Ukrainian, you yourself understand that. why not look into reality to voice the price ... like Finland, having lost Karelia, did not break off economic relations with the Russian Federation and where are they now.
    The states are playing against the Russian Federation of China, and this is not always in the interests of Kiev. got to 3 billion Chinese with this Antonov. there are still agricultural products banned ... in the EU the same market is busy .... and with whom then the great agrarian power?
    1. Dimide
      Dimide 26 February 2021 20: 55
      -6
      Am I missing something and there is an international arbitration award?
      Everything there is very muddy with the receipt of this package and there are a lot of questions about the withdrawal of the enterprise from the "red list". Someone high-ranking will sit down, the "K" department of the SBU is digging tightly.
      Negotiations are underway on trade quotas with the EU. Arabs and Southeast Asia willingly take agricultural products, I did not understand where the ban came from
      1. Dimide
        Dimide 26 February 2021 21: 02
        -7
        You are using outdated information.
      2. Kisa
        Kisa 26 February 2021 21: 06
        +1
        one thing is not clear to me - the Kremlin spends a huge budget on Crimea to the detriment of the Far East and other regions, and the residents seem to be happy. but why is the US not being spent on Ukraine? if they managed to split off the Slavic state, they would have made a candy. The IMF is trying to change the situation, but they have already rested against the wall and surrendered ... look at Ukrainian talk shows, but dynamically, but somehow everything
        1. Dimide
          Dimide 26 February 2021 21: 51
          -6
          Let me express my assumption: the authorities do not want to lose the remnants of sovereignty, and not everyone is ready to play by Western rules.
          There are also various certificates for products, other guests, various restrictions, quotas, transparent taxation, fair courts, and, to be honest, our goods will not stand up to competition (except for raw materials and agricultural products). And the people will not understand the closure of all unprofitable enterprises. mostly the owners only took profits without investing in modernization (with rare exceptions)
          Well, let's see, big privatization begins, and what will happen next, God only knows
          1. Kisa
            Kisa 26 February 2021 22: 11
            0
            Do you see Zelya right now? if he is not Kolomoisky, then whose? why does not Biden call, although Volker insists and the new CIA director and former Russian ambassador is aware of the game. 3 channels 400 sites closed yesterday Washington, or really the Nazis are so strong?
            1. Kisa
              Kisa 26 February 2021 22: 35
              +1
              banned me?
              1. Dimide
                Dimide 26 February 2021 22: 54
                -3
                Yes, it seems not, I see messages
            2. Dimide
              Dimide 26 February 2021 22: 53
              -5
              VAZ is now equidistant from everyone and acts as an arbitrator.
              He got rid of Beni's people according to the classics laughing
              The Nazis are not in authority and do not have the former support (see results of elections at all levels)
              Medvedchuk snatched it out for the fact that he was persistently imposed as the only communicator with the Russian Federation, and VAZ believes that issues should be resolved directly
              1. Kisa
                Kisa 26 February 2021 23: 04
                +1
                right now, 7 years have been celebrating on different talk shows - everyone yelling something, I’m proving that it’s worse, it’s gotten worse in different planes from the economy to the army of sovereignty medicine ... to the best - such a nationalism. and there are few Russian-speaking analysts left. a couple of years ago, they are patriotically positive, and now they are already admitting collapse, and they have wiped it out.
                1. Dimide
                  Dimide 26 February 2021 23: 34
                  -3
                  Our politicians, no matter what, have a favorite trick, a motive question. At the everyday level, people (not counting a single stoned one) do not care what language you speak. Everywhere they speak as one is used to. For more or less objective analytics, you can read the site Word and Deed (bilingual ), by the way, they monitor the fulfillment of election promises by politicians.
                  In my subjective opinion, it has not become worse and there are no tendencies for collapse.
                  1. Volder
                    Volder 28 February 2021 13: 41
                    0
                    Quote: Dimid
                    Big privatization begins, and what will happen next, God only knows
                    Further in the regions will be ruled by oligarchs, because the government does not have budget money to plug the holes of impoverished Ukraine.
                    Medvedchuk snatched it out for the fact that he was persistently imposed as the only communicator with the Russian Federation, and VAZ believes that issues should be resolved directly
                    And why did the rest of the faces and TV channels "snatch out"? Harassment is illegal. The Ukrainian authorities are again wiped out by their own laws, as it was in 2014. They are no strangers, a common thing, a national tradition laughing
                    Our politicians, no matter what, have a favorite trick with a big question. In my subjective opinion, it has not become worse and there are no tendencies for collapse.
                    It became worse after the abolition of the law "On the Foundations of State Language Policy No. 5029-VI". Lately, linguistic scandals have become more frequent in Ukraine. Language initiatives recently adopted by the administration of Volodymyr Zelenskiy violate human rights and revive the denunciation system. I'm talking about the discriminatory additions to the law "On ensuring the functioning of the Ukrainian language as the state language." There is a violent Ukrainization of the multinational population, just like the creation of "true Aryans" in Nazi Germany and the oppression of the Jews.
          2. Insurgent
            Insurgent 27 February 2021 09: 25
            0
            Quote: Dimid
            My guess is that the authorities do not want to lose the remnants of sovereignty,


            Actually ... what Yes ... Obnoxiousness it is possible to restore the method of a certain surgery, but the psychological trauma from rape by dirty Yankees - how do they intend to treat?
            Quote: Dimid
            and not everyone is ready to play by Western rules.


            Who are you asked, asked, and will ask about your "readiness"?
            1. Dimide
              Dimide 27 February 2021 12: 50
              -1
              Just not for you to comment on this post of mine.
              The older brother divorced you "for nothing", got you like a cheap "banovaya biksa" and shoved you until better times, periodically getting it out when it comes to Crimea (figuratively, nothing personal)
        2. KVIRTU
          KVIRTU 27 February 2021 15: 49
          0
          "The Kremlin spends a huge budget on Crimea to the detriment of the Far East and other regions, and the residents seem to be happy." Where does it come from, not otherwise from ukrsaytov. Dagestan, Yakutia, Chechnya are leading in terms of funding by a factor of 2. Crimea receives the same funding as Kamchatka, for that matter. And he brings to the budget 5 times more.
          1. Kisa
            Kisa 27 February 2021 17: 35
            0
            Quote: KVIRTU
            Where does it come from, not otherwise from ukrsaytov

            if you are interested in me, I'm talking about the 25th region. and the neighboring Khabar was also buzzing until Degtyarev was sent and given a handout. a third of the population fled all of my classmates left. Muscovites are hated here fiercely if it's a secret for you and I haven't forgotten how 10 years ago the Moscow riot police were sent to Vladik
            1. KVIRTU
              KVIRTU 28 February 2021 10: 08
              +1
              No, it's not a secret. Was in Krasnoyarsk, on a business trip, the same city as Simferopol. So they have one of 40 city council deputies from the United Russia, and in Simfa 38. So people vote. Therefore, all sorts of Rosguards and organize.
  • Fitter65
    Fitter65 26 February 2021 15: 19
    0
    Zelensky: Dear Crimea! All Ukraine is waiting for you. It's time to go home.
    Such a little doll is straight. And I also like this "offer", from chewing all their elbows, I "liked it"
    In the Kherson region bordering Crimea, local authorities “decorated” the streets with anti-Russian posters threatening to burn Moscow if Ukraine does not get back the Crimean peninsula ... “If Putin does not return Crimea, we will burn all of Moscow to ashes. And over the conflagration of Russia - Say "Glory to Ukraine!"
    The incinerators of Moscow are also Nerons of Bandera tailoring to me, they forgot how their owners promised to destroy Moscow, Berlin lost, by the way, with the help of the ancestors of these Lvov-Kherson Nerons-Napoleons of the local spill. laughing laughing
  • NF68
    NF68 26 February 2021 15: 33
    0
    Fools usually get rich with their thoughts. Spring is on its way. So it kicked in.
  • DMB84
    DMB84 26 February 2021 15: 46
    0
    Quote: credo
    By the way, in that project "Kiev Platform" it would also be worthwhile to introduce the heading "What Ukraine got in return after the coup d'etat and the signing of an agreement with the EU," listing how many Soviet construction enterprises were covered with a copper basin, what "successes" took place in all sectors including medicine, education, social security, etc.

    Yeah. And the third column, where to list our enterprises, which during this time have ravaged and destroyed. Achievements, so to speak, under the leadership of the same West. Guys, stop watching TV. There is any about a parallel universe. It’s enviable sometimes, you look how good it is with them, in that Russia. Anything expensive. Ours continue to trample on the ruins of industry no worse than those of the Skakuas. With great enthusiasm. The courts are the same - health care reform, pension reform. pharmaceuticals, electronics, chemical production. Spit everywhere. Outside there is a facade called "factory", inside - a warehouse of Chinese imports. I'm up to 404, in principle, purple. I'm sorry for my home country.
  • what's up
    what's up 26 February 2021 15: 48
    +1
    Aha! SchA, how the Crimean Tatars will rush to Ukraine! They will build mosques there, force Bandera and Zelensky to convert to Islam and circumcise them !!! laughing
  • cheburator
    cheburator 26 February 2021 16: 03
    -1
    The clown is zelik!
    And in the native harbor it is necessary to return the primordially Russian cities - Odessa, Zaporozhye, Donetsk, Lugansk, Kharkov! And Kiev is also Russian!
  • Glory to Berkut
    Glory to Berkut 26 February 2021 16: 19
    0
    Quote: Yuri Tverdokhleb
    The amendment is a little - soon seven years.

    Exactly. Now time flies smile
  • cniza
    cniza 26 February 2021 16: 33
    +1
    I propose to create a "Kiev platform". We will consider the option of returning home Kie


    It's a good idea, you need to start implementing it ...
  • iouris
    iouris 26 February 2021 16: 46
    0
    Is he all at home already? Oh well.
  • vitvit123
    vitvit123 26 February 2021 16: 51
    0
    (censorship) is getting rich with a thought ...
  • Split
    Split 26 February 2021 16: 56
    0
    Aha, and returned! Only the order was issued from a distance, the Russians did not obey and did not listen to any pretenses! Even hendahoh
    So you can even publish in batches wassat
  • Fedorovich
    Fedorovich 26 February 2021 17: 27
    0
    As the Ukrainians themselves say, the fool is getting richer with a thought ...
  • samarin1969
    samarin1969 26 February 2021 17: 36
    0
    Zelensky is pretty pragmatic. He urged to make the "de-occupation" of Crimea "a common task of peace." And at the same time he is stamping "calls" for the work of foreign power structures in Ukraine.
    After such statements, it is time for the leadership of the Russian Federation to take Zelensky out of the "brackets" of official policy and open a list of criminal cases against him. This multinationalist has long been a pathological enemy of the Russian Federation and the Russian people.
  • Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 26 February 2021 17: 41
    +1
    Zelensky signed a decree on "de-occupation of Crimea" and urged Crimeans to "return home"
    Well done. Did he read it? fool
  • Sasha from Uralmash
    Sasha from Uralmash 26 February 2021 19: 08
    +1
    Crimeans have already returned Home! Che he smokes, idiot! It’s the Ukrainians who need to return home! And then in Geyrope children will become rickets! 45 kinds of genders and other nasty things from Ukrainian children!
  • Crimean partisan 1974
    Crimean partisan 1974 26 February 2021 19: 16
    0
    yeah .. the current deokupation is not right for you there, but here .... it seems to be there, but it seems to be not there ... stealth technology. (as Stoyanov correctly noted in "Gorodok") and bio mother,
  • Dzafdet
    Dzafdet 26 February 2021 19: 55
    +1
    First, they put pans on their heads. Then they elected a big Martian president, then they replaced him with a little Martian ... And nothing changed ...
  • Gato
    Gato 26 February 2021 20: 08
    +1
    All these tops are exclusively for internal use, raguli and not so hawali.
  • Bare
    Bare 26 February 2021 20: 11
    +1
    Will judge this little Johnny 100%
  • ruben morelli
    ruben morelli 26 February 2021 20: 30
    +1
    Urgent.! psychiatric hospital for Zelensky.!
  • Prisoner
    Prisoner 26 February 2021 20: 53
    +1
    Get down to business, you idiot. Your holder is bent, and you are doing manilovism. Leave empty chores, work!
  • Keer
    Keer 26 February 2021 23: 37
    +1
    In Moscow there is a Kievskaya metro station, and a train station. e. Verkhniye Kotly station, even Ukrzaliznytsia can call any platform Crimean, or Tatar bazaar.