Military Review

The participation of the Severodvinsk nuclear submarine in the state tests of the Zircon hypersonic missile has been confirmed

39
The participation of the Severodvinsk nuclear submarine in the state tests of the Zircon hypersonic missile has been confirmed

The first launches of the Zircon hypersonic missile from the submarine will be carried out by the Project 885 Severodvinsk multipurpose nuclear submarine (code Ash). It is reported by RIA News with reference to a source in the DIC.


According to the source, the submarine will launch Zircon both on the surface and underwater by the end of the year. A series of Severodvinsk firing will complete state tests of a new hypersonic missile.

(...) Severodvinsk (...) will perform at least one Zircon launch from the surface position and at least one from the underwater one. The state tests of the missile system are to be completed with a series of firings from Severodvinsk, after which a decision will be made on its acceptance into service both as part of surface and as part of submarine carriers.

- said the source.

It is specified that the Zircon launches from a submerged position have already been carried out, but using submersible stands. The launch from the submarine will be carried out for the first time.

In December 2020, the Ministry of Defense announced that state tests of the Zircon hypersonic missile would begin in 2021 immediately after the completion of the flight test stage. A total of 7 Zircon launches will be carried out, two of them will take place during the flight-design test stage, and another 5 - state tests. The frigate "Admiral Gorshkov" and the multipurpose submarine of project 885 (code "Ash") "Severodvinsk" will take part in the tests.

Serial deliveries of Zircon will begin in 2022.
39 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Thrifty
    Thrifty 26 February 2021 11: 26
    +1
    I am sure that Zircon is already being done for the army, and the tests are only for adjusting the characteristics, and improving the systems of the rocket itself! Not starting the mass assembly of the rocket would be an impermissible mistake for the Kremlin and the Ministry of Defense.
    1. Uncle lee
      Uncle lee 26 February 2021 11: 32
      +13
      Serial deliveries of Zircon will begin in 2022.
      This is not a zircon bracelet from Mimino! But the pressure decreases ... what
      1. venik
        venik 26 February 2021 12: 09
        +5
        Quote: Uncle Lee
        This is not a zircon bracelet from Mimino! But the pressure decreases ...

        ======
        It just does not reduce a increases pressure ...... on "sworn friends". bully
        1. Uncle lee
          Uncle lee 26 February 2021 13: 03
          +7
          Quote: venik
          increases the pressure ...... on "sworn friends"

          And it relieves the pressure well .... on us! No.
      2. lucul
        lucul 26 February 2021 13: 05
        -5
        This is not a zircon bracelet from Mimino! But the pressure reduces

        Ah ... ah ... but what about cartoons? )))
        Right there, quite recently, our Israeli "partners" unanimously shouted that all these are cartoons, and bastard Russia is not able to make them)))
        1. Nemchinov Vl
          Nemchinov Vl 26 February 2021 14: 51
          -6
          Quote: lucul
          Ah ... aah ... but what about cartoons?
          ? !! belay well, like a drug addict under "euphoria" from the movie route 60, by golly !!! winked
          first - the missile did not complete the tests and was not accepted for service ..
          second - Nowadays, the whole fleet has TOTAL two (16 cells) frigate, и one Nuclear submarine "Severodvinsk" (885) ..
          Despite this, you are delighted, like a baby, swordfish did not come, and turn the whole world into awe ... ? !! what
          1. codetalker
            codetalker 26 February 2021 14: 58
            +5
            Today there are two frigates and one nuclear submarine, and in 5 years? Some people went ... without considering that we have not lived one day
            1. Nemchinov Vl
              Nemchinov Vl 26 February 2021 22: 04
              -4
              Quote: codetalker
              Today there are two frigates and one nuclear submarine, and in 5 years? Some people went ... without considerationthat we do not live one day
              yeah, - "well, stupid !!!" (how sometimes Zadornov made fun of the Americans) ... yes
              But the trouble (!), current trends in the shipbuilding of the Navy (for not stoned !!!), create not so much optimism as anxiety !!! yes
              Ship arrival rate first rank in the fleet (fr. 22350 - ten or even eleven years! per unit). Speed modernization/refurbishment 1155 - five or six years ? !!.
              While three more will arrive, at the same pace, the Navy will have to write off another 7 units (1155 and 1164) !!! what crying
              And about the fact that in addition to missiles, you also need to be able to WHAT IS TO GIVE CU for long-range missiles ?! winked and here the capabilities of the Navy are growing daily ... or decreasing ... ?! request
              Well, your hopes that in FIVE years everything will be fine with us (!), and for possible enemies, only come into disrepair (!) ... lol
              1. codetalker
                codetalker 27 February 2021 02: 03
                +2
                Do you think you correctly identified the development trends of our Navy?)
                1. Nemchinov Vl
                  Nemchinov Vl 27 February 2021 02: 58
                  -4
                  Quote: codetalker
                  Do you think you correctly identified the development trends of our Navy?)
                  belay just lost "pink glasses"... recourse
                  If you are not lazy, and pick up a sheet of paper... divide equally ...? !! And at least since 2015 (!!), write down names ships "got up" (for reasons of write-off, or wear and tear of the resource, or for other reasons awaiting repair or modernization), in one column (!), in another received new from shipyards to the Navy (plus even those that came out after repairs or modernization) ... optimism disappears ? !! request yes
                  Although I would like the fleet to receive annually 4-5 combat surface ships of the first and second rank ... But alas ... crying does not work... Well, if only at the expense of "Raptors" and "Buyans" ... ? !!.
                  Хотите ? !! spread them out yourself ... only objectively ...
                  "Kuznetsov" .. "Chabanenko" .. "Fervent" .. "Lazarev" .. "Persistent" .. "Kharlamov" .. "Levchenko" .. "Nakhimov" .. "Fearless" .. "Stormy" .. "Okay" .. "Vinogradov" .. and a pair of 956 - "Ushakov" and "Fast" (on the VTG from which if they return (?!), then for sure will remain so "conditionally combat-ready", but not for hiking) ... and even about "Moscow" not everything is clear ?! ...
                  "Peter" and "Varyag" after 2-3 years maximum stand up due to wear ?!
                  does not cause concern .? !!!
                  Three large landing craft - "George the Victorious" .. "Alexander Shabalin" .. "Nikolay Filchenkov" ...
                  received: "Grigorovich" .. "Essen" .. "Makarov" .. "Gorshkov" .. "Kasatonov" .. "Shaposhnikov" ..
                  Two BDK - "Gren" and "Morgunov" ...
                  and it seems everything ... ? !!
                  About the same (if not worse !!) with SSNN and SSGN ... do not be lazy yourself - https://ic.pics.livejournal.com/navy_korabel/63221775/174442/174442_original.jpg

                  Are there any reasons for delight ?!, and what do you think -
                  Quote: codetalker
                  Think you have correctly identified development trends of our Navy?)
                  ?! Well, here I am, I don’t see it yet ...
                  No. especially - the development trends of our Navy ?! winked request
          2. Boa kaa
            Boa kaa 26 February 2021 19: 17
            +1
            Quote: Vl Nemchinov
            second - at the moment, the entire fleet has ONLY two (16 cells) frigates, and one nuclear submarine "Severodvinsk" (885) ..

            Here is somewhat different. It is not the UKSK that needs to be considered, but the OMS equipment (that section of the BIUS that is responsible for the RO): prelaunch preparation, data entry, storage, blocking, etc.
            And it is still only on the Gorshka, on the K-560 so far, apparently, they are only installing ...
    2. Phoenix
      Phoenix 26 February 2021 11: 45
      -1
      Would it be a permissible mistake to start mass production of an unfinished rocket? There is a rough understanding of how much such an engineering wonder of the world can cost per piece?
      1. Thrifty
        Thrifty 26 February 2021 11: 51
        -7
        Phoenix - is it okay that in the USSR, planes, for example, often went to units, without passing the state test program, and not being put into service? This missile is unique in its presence, we do not have a strong fleet, but for our fleet, Zircon is a powerful argument that neutralizes the enemy's superiority in the number of warships. So, you need to start mass-producing it yesterday!
        1. V1er
          V1er 26 February 2021 11: 55
          +8
          Quote: Thrifty
          Phoenix - is it okay that in the USSR, planes, for example, often went to units, without passing the state test program, and not being put into service? This rocket is unique

          Quote: Thrifty
          So, you need to start mass-producing it yesterday!

          Yeah, and will receive hundreds of non-combat-ready missiles that will not complete a combat mission due to design errors that had to be identified during tests. And the money and resources have already been spent.
          1. antivirus
            antivirus 26 February 2021 13: 01
            -4
            but we do not build AA for 100 VI. already harasho.
          2. Reserve buildbat
            Reserve buildbat 26 February 2021 20: 59
            +1
            This is what we see in the mattress. the fu-35 still does not fly properly, it has already been produced in hundreds of pieces, and the question arose about creating something flying, so as not to leave the Air Force without fighters. laughing
        2. Phoenix
          Phoenix 26 February 2021 11: 56
          +8
          If the rocket is not ready to the end, then its production can result in losses in the hundreds of millions. Modern Russia cannot afford to overwhelm any of its military needs with money. The essence of the appearance of zircon is an effective (in monetary value) solution to the problem of the lack of a fleet.
          Well, once they started talking about the power of the argument - this rocket, like the rest, is catastrophically lacking in target designation means. To make hundreds of rockets and "light up" the low-speed IL-20?
        3. venik
          venik 26 February 2021 12: 12
          -3
          Quote: Thrifty
          we do not have a strong fleet

          ======
          belay Oh?
          Quote: Thrifty
          Zircon is a powerful argument

          ======
          good drinks
        4. Dart2027
          Dart2027 26 February 2021 13: 06
          +2
          Quote: Thrifty
          but nothing that in the USSR, planes often, for example, went to units without passing the state test program, and not being put into service

          And what is it good? I'm wondering how many pilots have died because of this practice?
      2. Boa kaa
        Boa kaa 26 February 2021 19: 46
        +1
        Quote: Phoenix
        Would it be a permissible mistake to start mass production of an unfinished rocket?
        Do not confuse the stage of assembling the finished product with the production of components ... There may just not be the software ready at the final site ... It will be finished, the state commissions will be handed over - and we will be happy, and the Yankees have big hemorrhoids!
        Quote: Thrifty
        So, you need to start mass-producing it yesterday!
        What is 100% ready and beyond doubt, then - yes, you can collect. This won't make Lego any worse ...
        Quote: Phoenix
        If the rocket is not ready to the end, then its production can result in losses in the hundreds of millions.
        ... Do you imagine it as a STONE FLOWER - from a single single crystal of malachite? Or is it still a complex engineering product of 1000 components, 98% of which meet all the requirements and are approved in place and function. And 2% are now "finishing off" in order to add to the already ready 98%, to submit to the state.
        Quote: Phoenix
        The essence of the appearance of zircon is an effective (in monetary value) solution to the problem of the lack of a fleet.
        ... The meaning of 3M22 is in the guaranteed destruction of the enemy's NK. The absence of ships can be replaced by aviation, submarines, and a container version on MMF ships (for example, the Kalibr anti-ship missile system). But Zircon, with its performance characteristics, cannot be replaced in this scheme!
        Quote: Phoenix
        this rocket, like the rest, is sorely lacking target designation means. To make hundreds of rockets and "light up" the low-speed IL-20?
        And then the Il-20 fantasy does not work for you? All our over-the-horizon products have long been capable of receiving control commands from spacecraft. And they spend additional search for the target in the OVMC with their own means ...
        Quote: Cowbra
        Nafig we are so lucky to get out the jambs when so many are loaded into the rocket that there is enough for a couple of tank regiments

        this is why state tests are carried out, "so that it would not be excruciatingly painful," as N. Ostrovsky said. If they bring it to mind, they will accept it. And they will continue to finish, polish ... It's like everyone has it: if there is a platform, they will continue to improve.
        IMHO.
    3. Cowbra
      Cowbra 26 February 2021 11: 57
      +15
      Quote: Thrifty
      Not starting the mass assembly of the rocket would be an impermissible mistake for the Kremlin and the Ministry of Defense.

      Can I tell you how the F-35 was assembled without completing not only the state acceptance - they still have not been able to pass the state acceptance, but even the flight tests? Tell you how three Zamwolts scamper across the sea, which they assembled before they tested it, or what happened to the catapults and lifts on the aircraft carrier Ford - did they also disdain to experience it?
      Nafig we are so lucky to get out the jambs when so many are loaded into the rocket that there is enough for a couple of tank regiments
      1. Paranoid50
        Paranoid50 26 February 2021 12: 18
        +2
        Quote: Cowbra
        as the three Zamvolts scamper across the sea,

        These generally hang out at the wall. yes True, just now one was pushed out (but not far away) to work out actions on the BZHK.
        1. antivirus
          antivirus 26 February 2021 13: 03
          0
          but they are not visible just - they are underwater. the Americans are cheating. there are no restrictions on new types of submarines.
      2. Alien From
        Alien From 26 February 2021 12: 40
        +1
        I agree with you! A penny saves the ruble. And it’s better not to even know how much money it costs to develop and test.
      3. 2 Level Advisor
        2 Level Advisor 27 February 2021 18: 01
        +1
        Yes, a bunch of excrement for minke whales, they have ships and money like candy wrappers, let's look at us, we have slightly different problems .. so they even seem to have a gas that makes the enemy want to gomosyatiny tried to create, we also do something like that?
  2. Hunter 2
    Hunter 2 26 February 2021 11: 27
    +5
    Well, Great, we are waiting for the successful completion of the State tests and the adoption of Zircon into service!
  3. certero
    certero 26 February 2021 11: 49
    +4
    Quote: Thrifty
    Not starting the mass assembly of the rocket would be an impermissible mistake for the Kremlin and the Ministry of Defense.

    To start production of a product that has not passed the state test is a mistake. If shortcomings come up, what will you do? The money has already been spent.
  4. rocket757
    rocket757 26 February 2021 12: 05
    -7
    We will protect the borders powerfully, that's good.
    This is how our internal affairs are going, how our people are protected from different things, what is falling on them now ???
    This is not an idle question; little things do not exist today.
    1. Temples
      Temples 26 February 2021 12: 27
      +3
      Quote: rocket757
      We will protect the borders powerfully, that's good.
      This is how our internal affairs are going ...

      Separate flies from cutlets.
      How do engineers and production workers involved in the Zircon program influence internal affairs?
      Stop making Zircon and make pots and smartphones for everyone?

      We went through this exactly thirty years ago.

      Instead of pots and TVs in every house, it turned out to be a jo.pa all over the country and the further collapse of the latter.
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 26 February 2021 12: 49
        -4
        Quote: Temples
        Quote: rocket757
        We will protect the borders powerfully, that's good.
        This is how our internal affairs are going ...

        Separate flies from cutlets.

        Are you serious?
        All those people live on the moon and none of our troubles ARE ABOUT them?
        To clarify, we do not make smartphones and stuff like that is this a problem ??? By the way, there are pots in every store ... to buy what you need, not everyone has the opportunity !!! This is not good!
        Do you think the news from the Celestial Empire that they have NO POVERTY anymore, will delight our people .... I doubt very much.
        1. Jacket in stock
          Jacket in stock 26 February 2021 13: 41
          +4
          Quote: rocket757
          Do you think the news from the Celestial Empire that they have NO POVERTY anymore, will delight our people .... I doubt very much.

          And how do our people care about news from China about their poor?
          Moreover, it is not about the poor, but about the poor. Read on for headings.
          1. rocket757
            rocket757 26 February 2021 13: 48
            0
            Quote: Jacket in stock
            but about the beggars. Read on for headings.

            This is true, not exactly put it.
            Quote: Jacket in stock
            And how do our people care about news from China about their poor?

            But this is unlikely ... people themselves will not read it, so there are enough guardians, educators. Moreover, they will present it as they need ... like they made a mistake. I read it too, but I made a mistake ...
  5. Ros 56
    Ros 56 26 February 2021 12: 26
    0
    And what follows from this?
    1. Azimuth
      Azimuth 26 February 2021 13: 54
      0
      Apparently "Partners" are now worried and are racking their brains on what principle this missile should be limited in the new treaty. Is it speed or power? Don't sunbathe negotiations.
  6. Old26
    Old26 26 February 2021 14: 52
    +6
    Quote: Thrifty
    I am sure that Zircon is already being done for the army, and the tests are only for adjusting the characteristics, and improving the systems of the rocket itself! Not starting the mass assembly of the rocket would be an impermissible mistake for the Kremlin and the Ministry of Defense.

    Masterpiece !!!! To start a series when the rocket has not yet passed the tests, has NEVER been launched from a submarine and at the maximum range - in order to write this, one must be exceptionally gifted. Minus you for BRED

    Quote: Thrifty
    Phoenix - is it okay that in the USSR, planes often, for example, went to units, without passing the state test program, and not being put into service?

    Do not write BREDA !!! NO WEAPON SYSTEM did not go to the troops without passing the state tests. Not accepted for service - yes, this happened, rarely, but nevertheless it happened. But the systems that have not passed serial tests in the troops IT NEVER HAPPENED

    Quote: Thrifty
    This missile is unique in its presence, we do not have a strong fleet, but for our fleet the Zircon is a powerful argument that neutralizes the enemy's superiority in the number of warships. So, you need to start mass-producing it yesterday!

    This rocket NOT YET... It is only being tested and there is absolutely no guarantee that the Zircon missile that will be put into service will be exactly the same as the one being tested now. Therefore, to start mass production of a rocket that has not yet passed the entire test cycle is a CRIME, which should be punished with a maximum period of time. According to your logic, let us also let "Sarmat" into the series after three throw tests ...
  7. Dzafdet
    Dzafdet 26 February 2021 19: 44
    -4
    Will we test it in Ukraine? After all, there are a lot of targets ... Israel is bombing whoever it wants and wherever it wants ...
  8. Dzafdet
    Dzafdet 26 February 2021 19: 46
    -2
    Quote: Old26
    Quote: Thrifty
    I am sure that Zircon is already being done for the army, and the tests are only for adjusting the characteristics, and improving the systems of the rocket itself! Not starting the mass assembly of the rocket would be an impermissible mistake for the Kremlin and the Ministry of Defense.

    Masterpiece !!!! To start a series when the rocket has not yet passed the tests, has NEVER been launched from a submarine and at the maximum range - in order to write this, one must be exceptionally gifted. Minus you for BRED

    Quote: Thrifty
    Phoenix - is it okay that in the USSR, planes often, for example, went to units, without passing the state test program, and not being put into service?

    Do not write BREDA !!! NO WEAPON SYSTEM did not go to the troops without passing the state tests. Not accepted for service - yes, this happened, rarely, but nevertheless it happened. But the systems that have not passed serial tests in the troops IT NEVER HAPPENED

    Quote: Thrifty
    This missile is unique in its presence, we do not have a strong fleet, but for our fleet the Zircon is a powerful argument that neutralizes the enemy's superiority in the number of warships. So, you need to start mass-producing it yesterday!

    This rocket NOT YET... It is only being tested and there is absolutely no guarantee that the Zircon missile that will be put into service will be exactly the same as the one being tested now. Therefore, to start mass production of a rocket that has not yet passed the entire test cycle is a CRIME, which should be punished with a maximum period of time. According to your logic, let us also let "Sarmat" into the series after three throw tests ...



    Alas, alas. MIT often supplied systems that, even supposedly having passed tests, were brought up for years due to combat training launches ... From an interview with the deputy. commander of the Strategic Missile Forces .....
  9. Old26
    Old26 27 February 2021 00: 47
    +2
    Quote: Dzafdet
    Alas, alas. MIT often supplied systems that, even supposedly having passed tests, were brought up for years due to combat training launches ... From an interview with the deputy. commander of the Strategic Missile Forces .....

    You can give examples. eg
    1. What system
    2. When the state was completed and when it was adopted
    As for combat training launches, they have been, are and will always be. In particular, at such launches, issues of extending the service life are resolved. And not only at MIT, but also at products of other design bureaus too
  10. ironic
    ironic 28 February 2021 22: 06
    +1
    Gee ... I want to finally understand what it is and how it flies. No, I do not need military secrets to understand general issues, but I still cannot understand them. They are going to launch it from everywhere, and what kind of animal it is is not yet clear.