British press: Putin's peace plans in the Middle East are a "trap" for the United States

Putin has a super plan for the Middle East region. It is difficult to say which one, but it can be assumed that he wants to achieve the withdrawal of Iran from Syria in exchange for the return of the Golan Heights occupied by Israel several decades ago to the Syrians.

Such a plan for the Russian president was invented by journalist Roger Boyes from Great Britain and described in an article published in The Times.

At the same time, the British press believes that these and other peace plans of Putin in the Middle East are a "trap" for the United States. After all, his main goal, according to Boyes, is to increase Russia's influence in the region, while the United States pays little attention to it, focusing on other external and internal problems.

Caring for the interests of the Syrian president, the Briton suggests, has nothing to do with the fact that the top leadership of the USSR, and then Russia, had close friendly relations with the Assad family. It is much more important that the Russian Federation now has the Khmeimim air base in the Eastern Mediterranean, which, after expanding its territory and strengthening the runway, will be able to receive even strategic bombers.

Naturally, in order to feel calm and confident in the Middle East, the Kremlin is interested in establishing sustainable peace in Syria and the entire Middle East region. At the same time, Britain doubts the peacekeeping plans of the Russian president.

At the same time, the main thing should be noted: Russia is consistently trying to make this region, one of the most “explosive” regions of the Earth, safe for the lives of people, which is part of the circle of Russian interests. And the speculations of the Western media about this are secondary.

Comments

[Alien From]

Very often and a lot these guys think for us, probably love very much)

[Vend]

Quote: Alien From

Very often and a lot these guys think for us, probably love very much)

Here I agree with this journalist, this is really a trap and not only for the United States. The main task of the President of Russia is a peaceful Middle East, but this does not fit into the aggressive and predatory policy of the United States and Co.

[Uncle lee]

The Kremlin is interested in establishing sustainable peace in Syria and the entire Middle East region

The Yankees do not like the "Peace in the whole world" smilombrit! since the days of the USSR!

[Temples]

Quote: Wend

The main task of the President of Russia is a peaceful Middle East

The main task of the President of Russia is a high standard of living of Russian citizens and order in his own country.

Everything else is necessary only to complete the main task.
And if they interfere, then preemptively destroy any threat.

Let the world provide for themselves. If they need it.

Apparently, for example, the Afghans are satisfied with an eternal war.

[Vend]

Quote: Temples

Quote: Wend

The main task of the President of Russia is a peaceful Middle East

And if they interfere, then preemptively destroy any threat.
Let the world provide for themselves. If they need it.
Apparently, for example, the Afghans are satisfied with an eternal war.

And here you are wrong, instability in the Middle East leads to the emergence of terrorism and a threat to Russia. Who told you that the Afghans are comfortable with the war? When the Taliban came to power, the flow of Afghan heroin to the United States immediately dried up. The Taliban broke the legs of the peasants for growing the opium poppy. And then the world witnessed a provocation with the alleged participation of the Taliban and the subsequent introduction of American troops into Afghanistan. Apparently for the preservation and protection of Afghan heroin and opium fields.

[Berber]

These "comrades" are constantly "gesheft" from instabilities. And then Russia, well, just a bone in the throat.

[Egoza]

Quote: Alien From

Very often and a lot these guys think for us, probably love very much)

Well, they are used to asking themselves and answering themselves.
"Do you have a plan, Mr. Fix? Yes, I have a plan!" And now we will ask the GDP in the same way and answer instead of it.

[Captain Pushkin]

The plan is basically good. There are only two BUTs.
1. Israel will not voluntarily return the Golan Heights.
2. Iran will not leave Syria voluntarily.

[prior]

Putin "wants to get Iran out of Syria"

Why is he doing this?
Putin just wants to include Iran and Syria in the Eurasian Economic Community
(EurAsEc).
Iranian tomatoes are in no way inferior to Turkish ones.

[Svarog]

Putin has a super plan for the Middle East region. It's hard to say which one

There was no need to continue.

[Destiny]

Yes, in his cunning plans, everyone is already confused ...

[Alien From]

So in fact the KGB)))

[mitroha]

Quote: Svarog

There was no need to continue.

Don't give a shit you can't

[mitroha]

Sorry, I mean you and your sycophants

[mitroha]

That is, you have 7 accounts

[rocket757]

British press: Putin's peace plans in the Middle East are a "trap" for the United States

Poor, poor minke whales! Again and again he climbs into the trap! Ha, ha ....

[cniza]

Good time!

Everyone is trying to turn it upside down, let them study their deeds ...

[rocket757]

Welcome
So they correct the history, clumsy, because they need to tell others a lot, to do as they need.
Nothing new.

[cniza]

You can rewrite everything on paper, but in people's memory it is not possible ...

[rocket757]

Memory is such a thing ... just trying to push aside, then sho people remember and most importantly, strive to interrupt the reception of the loyalty of generations ... teak rockers breed and all the same stuff.

[Azimuth]

Iran is a separate story and it is unlikely that we or anyone else can decide whether to leave for it or not to leave Syria, letting a decade of Iranian efforts to create a Shiite belt pass by. To solve such a problem, it will be necessary to essentially destroy modern Iran, but the United States and Israel are engaged in this, relying on the Arabs, but not us, we have no benefits in the fall of Persia.

[Vitaly gusin]

Quote: Azimuth

Iran is a separate story and decide for him to leave or not leave Syria,

Let YOU and I consider the current situation in Syria.
They are located in Syria.
Assad with his army, the rebel army against Assad, Russia, Iran, Turkey, Kurds, USA, bandits of different tribes and names.
I can dwell on the role of each, but Russia plays the main role and invests a lot of resources in this, and it is clear that Putin wants to stay one on one with Assad.
And therefore, the first one to be removed is Iran. it is both a thorn and a key to solving other problems.
You will ask why?
1 Their goals and objectives are different.
2 Russia has full-time videoconferencing. Special Forces. patrol services.
3 Iran uses the IRGC, staffed by mobs from different countries.
4 Israel does not allow Iran to gain a foothold and this helps Putin, so in the last year we have not seen any harsh statements about Israel, but on the contrary, the strengthening of contacts at the level of the Defense Ministry and the Foreign Ministry.
5 The economic and material situation under the sanctions and the crown, makes Iran look for ways to get out of an extremely difficult situation. And the provision of financial and other support to Iran by Russia in joint actions with Israel may lead to the withdrawal of Iran from Syria, which will dramatically change the situation.
After Iran leaves, it will be easier to talk to Erdogan.
But it is clear that this will not lead to Israel's withdrawal from the Golan.
In quieter years, Primakov, Turkey and France tried to do this, but the senior Assad's appetites were inflated.

[Ros 56]

And what a dog business with this shaved? We would sit on our island and not shine.

[cniza]

At the same time, Britain doubts the peacekeeping plans of the Russian president.

And you look at our history and what the Anglo-Saxons have done and continue to create ...

[rocket757]

And he is such a zhentelman ... he shook off any adhering material and went further, over the heads, over the corpses, not doubting at all that he was right.

[cniza]

Yeah, and they have no problems with appetite ...

[A. Privalov]

... Roger Boyes, who previously attributed his "gangster" qualities to our president, now attributes to him a super plan for the Middle East. He is sure that "Putin is not abandoned by the thought: if Iran is persuaded to leave Syria, in exchange for this Israel will give Syria the Golan Heights."

The plan is worthy of the Nobel Prize!

[APASUS]

Quote: A. Privalov

The plan is worthy of the Nobel Prize!

Share your opinion on this question. Will Israel give up Syrian lands in exchange for the weakening of Iran in Syria?

[A. Privalov]

Quote: APASUS

Share your opinion on this question. Will Israel give up Syrian lands in exchange for the weakening of Iran in Syria?

In my opinion, it will not.
The Golan Heights is a territory of strategic importance taken from the enemy who used it for aggression. Taken in battle, at the cost of considerable losses.

[Vitaly gusin]

Quote: A. Privalov

In my opinion, it will not.

I apologize
I will try to explain in more detail.
In 2025, Israel unilaterally withdrew from Gaza.
At the request of the MB, houses and the most fertile lands were left so that they could live there and continue to farm.
ALL this was destroyed and the territory is used only for launching rockets towards Israel.
2002 Lebanese War
Stopped by Resolution 1701 (2006) adopted by the Security Council
I will give you a few of the main points.
2.Calls upon the Government of Lebanon and UNIFIL, as provided in paragraph 11, after cessation of hostilities to jointly deploy its forces to all southern regions of the country and calls on the Government of Israel to withdraw its military forces from southern Lebanon in parallel with the beginning of this deployment;
Israel withdrew all its troops from southern Lebanon, and the Lebanese government, under pressure from HIZBALA, failed to comply.
- taking security measures to prevent the resumption of hostilities, including the creation between the Blue Line and the Litani River, an area free of any armed personnel, manpower and equipment other than those of the Lebanese Government and UNIFIL deployed in the area, as provided for in paragraph 11;
That would be clear to you.

In the shaded area Hizbalah should not be located, but she is in violation of resolution 1701
HAVE YOU HEARD THAT WOULD EXPECT REPENTANCE?
Right, no.
That's why Israel flies there.
And in conclusion.
All territories that Israel leaves are turning into a staging area for an attack

[A. Privalov]

Please correct the dates: the 2005 disengagement and the 2006 Lebanon war.

[Vitaly gusin]

Quote: A. Privalov

Please correct the dates: the 2005 disengagement and the 2006 Lebanon war.

Thank you!
Or keyboard or fingers, but something is crooked

[APASUS]

Quote: A. Privalov

In my opinion, it will not.
The Golan Heights is a territory of strategic importance taken from the enemy who used it for aggression. Taken in battle, at the cost of considerable losses.

Having calculated all the pros and cons, this option still seems possible to me, although what is in the heads of politicians is not clear

[A. Privalov]

Quote: APASUS

this option still seems possible to me.

Such, this is what that will give, or not will give?

[APASUS]

Quote: A. Privalov

Such, this is what that will give, or will not give?

Option with the exchange of territory for the withdrawal of Iranian troops

[A. Privalov]

Quote: APASUS

Option with the exchange of territory for the withdrawal of Iranian troops

The Golan was taken from the Syrians back in 1967, 50 years ago and has not been returned since then, despite political pressure, sanctions and force. Even 5 - 6 years ago, there was no Iran even close there. For Israel, nothing has changed. So, the reason is not at all in Iran and their fosterlings.
If, I really doubt it, but still, if the question of returning the Golan to Syria is ever raised, it will be decided exclusively between Syria and Israel. Any interests and aspirations of third countries will not be taken into account.

[APASUS]

Quote: A. Privalov

if the question of returning the Golan to Syria is ever raised, it will be decided exclusively between Syria and Israel. Any interests and aspirations of third countries will not be taken into account.

I doubt we need the Golan. Russia in this matter is more a guarantor than a purchaser

[A. Privalov]

Quote: APASUS

I doubt we need the Golan. Russia in this matter is more a guarantor than a purchaser

You definitely don't need to!
This is what follows from my first post: Roger Boyes, along with his fantasies, goes in small steps and disappears beyond the horizon.

[u-345]

Why listen to them at all, these Brit?
Said and said. Who are they anyway.

[Alexander F.]

The antipode of morality, a weapon of mass destruction of the "progressive" west.

Simple, they are also normal people, are so surprisingly naive when they approach the perception of world political events with their own evaluative standards. This is especially true when they try to comprehend the actions of the "progressive" united West.
For at least thousands of years, people have been "bred" by "partners" according to the same scenario.
Just turn on your brain.
The greatest achievement of the "progressive" West is the ability to use the antipode of moral values ​​as profit.
Let's remember the Crusades and how it was declared. Some "noble" knights tried to bring "true faith" to barbarians and Muslims.
Ага.
They knew for sure that the Muslims would never accept this, and that means they would resist. And everything was built on this.
On the denial and rejection of other people's values, you can build an excuse for robbery, which would be intended both for internal consumption and for everyone around.
That is, with the help of a simple scheme, any robbery can be presented as a value!
But there is nothing eternal in the world. And as soon as the "topic" with "true" faith was exhausted, they promptly came up with another trap, and called it democracy.
Well, when democracy also exhausted itself, another topic was also promptly thought up, and they called it tolerance.
And everything is so simple, but far from harmless.
Everyone understands perfectly well that most people will never accept ldbt and any other such abomination. Consequently, this will create an opportunity to use a formal pretext for the "progressive" West to attack any country and in any form convenient for them.
And then it becomes, well, very sad.
So, by and large, we and our state, represented by the authorities, are offered.
The authorities, either have to accept this new Western "value", and thus, through LDBT and similar abomination, simply reduce the birth rate, which will ultimately lead to the extinction of the population.
Or give up this abomination. And then it becomes the enemy of the entire "progressive" West, and this, in turn, unties their hands to conduct any aggressive actions against our state, and hence us.
And now in the common language, what is offered to us.
Either you stop multiplying and slowly die out as a people, or we will destroy you by all means available to us.
And we need it?