Military Review

The Ministry of Defense announced plans for the receipt of armored vehicles in the troops

57
The Ministry of Defense announced plans for the receipt of armored vehicles in the troops

Over the course of 2021, the Russian army will receive more than 800 units of new and modernized armored vehicles. This was reported by the press service of the military department.


Planned for transmission Tanks, infantry fighting vehicles and armored personnel carriers, which have proven themselves in various climatic zones. In total, the defense industry plans to transfer over 800 units of new and modernized models to the military.

By the end of this year, more than 800 units of armored vehicles are scheduled to enter the formations and military units of the ground forces of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation

- said in a statement.

According to the military department, more than 90 T-72B3 and T-72B3M tanks, about 80 T-80BVM tanks, and a batch of T-90M tanks (without specifying the quantity) are planned to be delivered to the troops. It is noted that part of the T-90M will be delivered to the Kazan Higher Tank Command School.

In addition, more than 120 BMP-3s, over 280 BMP-2 units with the Berezhok combat module, as well as about 300 armored personnel carriers BTR-82A and BTR-82AM will be delivered to units and formations.

Nothing has been reported about the supply of the latest armored vehicles on the Armata, Boomerang and Kurganets combat platforms; earlier the Defense Ministry explained that this equipment will be serially sent to the troops from 2022.
57 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Constanty
    Constanty 22 February 2021 15: 53
    -1
    Having looked at the photo, I noticed that, when the tank is being transported on a railway platform, it is fastened “by the barrel”, does this sometimes lead to an overload of the stabilizer?
    1. mark1
      mark1 22 February 2021 16: 05
      +2
      But he's turned off.
      1. Constanty
        Constanty 22 February 2021 16: 15
        -1
        Thanks for the clarification. It's just that the barrel is long, so long and the lever, and the G-forces are quite high, so it seemed to me not a good solution.
        1. mark1
          mark1 22 February 2021 16: 23
          +1
          I am glad that I could help (though I have never been a tanker but I know Irtysh 1A43 and Ob 1A33 not by hearsay). The barrel in the transport position is placed on a stopper, of course all drives are turned off.
          1. flanker7
            flanker7 22 February 2021 17: 06
            +12
            I would like to clarify. This method of fastening is used to prevent the turret of the tank from turning during transportation by rail. They always do that. If the trunk goes beyond the rail gauge during transportation, the consequences will be catastrophic.
            1. Bad_gr
              Bad_gr 22 February 2021 18: 12
              +1
              Quote: flanker7
              This method of fastening is used to prevent the turret of the tank from turning during transportation by rail. They always do that.

              Previously, it was a rule that when transporting a tank along the railway, a towing cable was made around the barrel, and the ends of the cable clung to tank hooks.
              1. hirurg
                hirurg 22 February 2021 22: 30
                0
                The Ministry of Defense reported .... and then it started.
    2. svp67
      svp67 22 February 2021 16: 23
      -1
      Quote: Constanty
      does it sometimes overload the stabilizer?

      How? There, in general, the mechanical stopper of the weapon in the stowed position is installed, but this is such a strong and heavy piece of iron, does it in any way affect its overload?
      1. Constanty
        Constanty 22 February 2021 16: 26
        0
        In fact - just enlarging the photo, I noticed that there is a support for the trunk - with one leg, but it is.
        To blame
        1. svp67
          svp67 22 February 2021 16: 42
          0
          Quote: Constanty
          In fact - just enlarging the photo, I noticed that there is a support for the trunk - with one leg, but it is.
          To blame

          I don’t know what you saw there, but a mechanical stop is installed in the tank against arbitrary vibrations during movement, in this photo it is red

          1. Constanty
            Constanty 22 February 2021 16: 56
            -2
            Other photographs clearly show that there is no external support, but interestingly, the cables supporting the "direction" are more likely to be attached to the tank's hull, rather than to the platform.

            1. svp67
              svp67 22 February 2021 16: 59
              +3
              Quote: Constanty
              but, interestingly, the cables supporting the "direction" are rather attached to the hull of the tank rather than to the platform.

              They fix the turret of the tank from turning during movement and here it doesn't matter what they are attached to, the main thing is reliability.
              Unfortunately, there were cases when the crews of the tanks did not stop the turrets badly and during the movement they turned, the barrel of the gun went beyond the dimensions and ... there were also victims. That is why they are forced to fasten the towers with wire so that they can not turn, it is easier for railroad workers to control
    3. Ros 56
      Ros 56 22 February 2021 18: 02
      0
      In general, it is not attached to the barrel, but simply the barrel is not allowed to dangle, roughly speaking.
      1. Old tanker
        Old tanker 22 February 2021 19: 01
        +1
        The turret is placed on a manual turret stop to the left of the gunner's seat. For insurance, so that the stopper does not go away from vibration, it is duplicated by a loop of the towing cable around the trunk deployed to the stern.
        The stabilizer of the tank armament is not only turned off, but the "mass" is also turned off. The tank is de-energized.
  2. tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 22 February 2021 15: 56
    0
    800! Yes, with the MTLb (against which I have nothing). England, one battalion of Challengers and one battalion of light tanks throughout England. Under the USSR, thousands were operated on both sides. Someone is blown away and this is clearly not us. Work and only work. This year West will back down, it's better to be friends with us than to crap.
    1. Lara Croft
      Lara Croft 22 February 2021 17: 36
      -2
      Quote: tralflot1832
      800! Yes, with MTLb (against which I have nothing).

      MTLB was produced in Kharkov, so that they can be delivered to the RF Armed Forces in a modernized form ....
      England one battalion of Challengers and one battalion of light tanks for the whole of England.

      What are you speaking about? In the British Army 384 Challenger 2 tanks (its modernized version "Black Night" is on its way), light tanks "Scorpion" were withdrawn from the British army after the end of the Cold War.
      Under the USSR, thousands were operated on from both sides.

      Modern tanks in the USSR Armed Forces were only in the formations of the first and partly the second echelon + two Moscow court divisions ...
      Work and work only.

      You are right, but the article was about bringing all T-72s to the level of T-72B3 ...
      Removed from storage T-80 ... and sent to the troops ...
      I think 800 armored combat vehicles and tanks sent to the troops is a good figure for the RF Armed Forces in the current economy ...
      1. tralflot1832
        tralflot1832 22 February 2021 18: 18
        -1
        I'm talking about that in the plan of small britain. One regiment of Challengers and one regiment of light tanks or heavy infantry fighting vehicles. For the whole continental England. Tank building in England is over! There will be no war with the use of tanks; in their opinion.
        1. figwam
          figwam 22 February 2021 18: 43
          +2
          Quote: tralflot1832
          There will be no war against tanks; in their opinion.

          And the Americans and Germans are preparing and putting KAZ on their tanks, but we still have time.
          1. tralflot1832
            tralflot1832 22 February 2021 19: 08
            +3
            And the Jewish one. Forget who burned them in the furnaces.
        2. Lara Croft
          Lara Croft 22 February 2021 19: 48
          -1
          Quote: tralflot1832
          I'm talking about that in the plan of small britain. One regiment of Challengers and one regiment of light tanks or heavy infantry fighting vehicles. For the whole continental England.

          Well, why should they keep more on Albion? And in the years of the KhV, the 1st AK with three BTC (260-300 Challenger tanks each) was in the FRG making up the British Rhine Army (Belefeld), on the islands there was only one MTD + 15 MPBr. armed with light tanks ...
          Now there is no, the Department of Internal Affairs and the USSR, respectively, they need more compact aircraft, by the way, there are more tanks in the British TB than in ours, and in the MB there are tank units and motorized infantry on the BMP ... (mixed composition) ...
          We still do not have heavy infantry fighting vehicles (in service), and light tanks are created only for the Airborne Forces (?!) ....
          Tank building in England is over!

          Well, while the British Army is armed with tanks, infantry fighting vehicles and armored personnel carriers of domestic development ... and components for sights for tanks, the British do not buy from the French ... unlike us ...
          There will be no war against tanks; in their opinion.

          Here you need academic knowledge, which I do not have, but it seems that the tank is still the main striking force of the ground forces on the battlefield, capable of operating, incl. in the context of the use by the Parties of weapons of mass destruction and means of fire ... and I do not see a replacement for it yet ...
          1. tralflot1832
            tralflot1832 22 February 2021 20: 14
            -1
            A tank with air cover is a terrible force. When I served, the offensive took place behind a barrage of fire; you would not wish for the enemy. Now they decided to save money, work on the centers of resistance. The Azerbaijanis checked it out and very successfully. Unfortunately, lives were given on both sides. But the attackers and the defenders' losses are equal. Progress, be it wrong.
          2. standan
            standan 22 February 2021 23: 35
            -1
            There is one small nuance, the number of tanks of the Armed Forces of England is 227, the number of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation is 22710, and so garbage in general
            1. Lara Croft
              Lara Croft 23 February 2021 12: 44
              -2
              Quote: standan
              There is one small nuance, the number of tanks of the British Armed Forces is 227

              According to WIKI - 386 FV4034 Challenger II (1/3 in storage) ....
              I found a relatively recent article (08.2020) about the British armored forces:
              When the project Challenger 2 LEP In the beginning, the army wanted up to 227 tanks to equip three regiments of the Tour 56 plus a batch for tank schools in Great Britain and Canada.

              https://topwar.ru/174519-britanskij-bronirovannyj-kulak.html
              As can be understood from article 227 MBT, about which you write, these are machines that are expected for delivery, and not those that are in service with the current TB (in England they are called regiments) ...
              And the British don't need any more, the strike forces of the Ground Forces and the Air Force of the USSR no longer hang over Europe, ... and the Russian Federation itself as part of the Armed Forces - 2 TD (one in the Urals), 2 TBR, 1 TP ... agree why Should Britain be on the islands again keep 1500 tanks? And the defense echelon from the Russian Federation went far to the East ...
              the number is the same for the RF Armed Forces - 22710

              Not at all. But almost guessed right.
              For 2019 - 21 932 MBT.
              Source: https://yakapitalist.ru/finansy/skolko-v-rossii-tankov/
              According to forecasts for 2024-2026. they should remain - 7700 – 13000 (see Table 2)
              Source: https://yakapitalist.ru/finansy/skolko-v-rossii-tankov/
              Now the quality:
              About cars T-72, T-80 and T-90, which form the basis of the armament of the Russian army, the official website of the Ministry of Defense reports. True, the quantitative parameters of each model, of course, are not mentioned. According to independent sources, there are no more than 14 thousand of them. There is no data here about outdated, but still having combat capabilities. T-55, T-62 and T-64... They are kept in reserve, but there are a lot of them - about 8 thousand. (about 2,8 thousand of them T-55, up to 2,3 thousand - T-64, 1,6 thousand - T-62).
              Source: https://yakapitalist.ru/finansy/skolko-v-rossii-tankov/
              So, at the moment, the Russian Federation has more than 14 thousand: T-72 (not all are subject to modernization to the level - T-72B3), T-80 and T-90 of all modifications, different years of production and most of which are in storage (in different degree of suitability for use) ...
              So if we discard all modifications of the T-72 and T-80 that are not subject to modernization, we are quite reaching the figure of 13 MBT, although I think their figure will drop to 000 units.
              It should also be noted that, unlike us, Great Britain has one modification of tanks, the troops do not have "modernized" "Chiefs" and "Challengers-1" ....
              1. OgnennyiKotik
                OgnennyiKotik 23 February 2021 12: 53
                -2
                Military Balance data for 2020.
                1. Lara Croft
                  Lara Croft 23 February 2021 13: 01
                  -2
                  Quote: OgnennyiKotik
                  Military Balance data for 2020.

                  You have indicated data on MBT and AFVs, which are in service with line units, excluding those in storage ...
                  I think 2 MBTs in the troops (Land Forces, Airborne Forces and BS of the Navy) are similar to the truth and I think it will subsequently grow due to the modernization of MBTs located on the BCBTs and equipping newly formed formations with them (every year we have a new division in the Armed Forces) ... ...
                  1. OgnennyiKotik
                    OgnennyiKotik 23 February 2021 13: 02
                    -3
                    Quote: Lara Croft
                    excluding stored

                    It says (in store) 10 pieces, this is only in the army.
                    Which confirms your words about about 13 tanks in total. True, the state of storage can be very deplorable.
                    1. Lara Croft
                      Lara Croft 23 February 2021 13: 20
                      -2
                      Quote: OgnennyiKotik
                      It says (in store) 10 200 pieces, this is only in the army

                      I didn’t notice ...
                      Your data is incorrect, as well as partly mine:
                      The infidelity of my source:
                      I read in the periodicals that the T-54/55 had already been disposed of for a long time, but in my sources they are still "in storage" ...
                      Invalidity of your source:
                      According to your information, the T-64 and T-62 no longer exist, but this is not true, the T-64 ceased to be disposed of immediately after 2014 (apparently part of it went to the Donbass), and the T-62 was generally transferred to an active reserve and, according to the exercises at the Far Eastern Military District, were worked out questions about their removal from storage and withdrawal for training ...
                      And the T-62M tanks were reactivated at the Central Research and Development Center (CBRT), the central equipment reserve bases, shortly before the start of the Vostok active phase., after all, for about a month, 16 exercises have been going on under a single plan, related to these strategic exercises, and one of the largest, with 36 thousand participants, was the exercise of the logistics forces, one of the tasks of which was to reactivate and transfer to the formation large volumes of equipment, including these tanks.

                      https://topwar.ru/146975-vostok-2018-i-divannye-vojska.html
                      In addition, part of the T-62M (along with the T-90) were delivered to the SAR ...
                      If, according to my source (article 2019), the Russian Federation has T-72, T-80 and T-90 more than 14 thousand, and according to yours there are 10 of them in SV, then it turns out that either 200 MBTs were disposed of (such a count - in the illiquid?), or hid in the Airborne Forces and the Navy BS ...
              2. standan
                standan 23 February 2021 17: 40
                -1
                Look here https://total-rating.ru/362-kolichestvo-tankov-v-stranah-mira.html
                1. Lara Croft
                  Lara Croft 23 February 2021 20: 07
                  -2
                  Quote: standan
                  Look here https://total-rating.ru/362-kolichestvo-tankov-v-stranah-mira.html

                  Eat ....
                  Article 2014, data (on the number of tanks in Russia) according to the Table in the article from 2008
                  I put on "grandma" she has fresh information ....
                  Even according to VIKI, look, after the collapse of the USSR, the former RSFSR got ~ 24 tanks ...
                  It was in 2008, under the "stooltkin", that the RF Ministry of Defense began to get rid of illiquid assets and "real estate" in the form of military equipment, unable to move ...
                  The mess in the SAR and the former Ukrainian SSR slowed down the process of tank disposal ...
              3. standan
                standan 23 February 2021 19: 57
                -1
                I don't really trust the source you suggested:
                Quote: "The number of tanks in the Russian Federation in the current year, according to Globalfirepower 21,9 thousand, more than in other countries of the world. The Ministry of Defense predicts to bring the share of new equipment to 2027% by 70. Source: https://yakapitalist.ru/finansy/skolko-v-rossii-tankov/ "
                Especially grandma, the author of the article: "Author: Demidova Marina. 30 years of experience in state statistics. Mathematician, economist. Education: Petrozavodsk State University. Source: https://yakapitalist.ru/finansy/skolko-v-rossii-tankov/"
                1. Lara Croft
                  Lara Croft 23 February 2021 20: 16
                  -2
                  Quote: standan
                  I don't really trust the source you suggested:
                  Quote: "The number of tanks in the Russian Federation in the current year, according to Globalfirepower 21,9 thousand, more than in other countries of the world. The Ministry of Defense predicts to bring the share of new equipment to 2027% by 70. Source: https://yakapitalist.ru/finansy/skolko-v-rossii-tankov/ "
                  Especially grandma, the author of the article: "Author: Demidova Marina. 30 years of experience in state statistics. Mathematician, economist. Education: Petrozavodsk State University. Source: https://yakapitalist.ru/finansy/skolko-v-rossii-tankov/"

                  In vain. "grandma" most likely stole "her" data from an earlier source:
                  Formally, as the official website of the Russian Ministry of Defense says, in service with domestic tank forces there are three models of tanks: T-72, T-80 and T-90... They do not include the newest T-14 Armata tank, which has not yet been officially adopted for service, and was recently demonstrated to the general public at the Victory Parade in Moscow. The Ministry of Defense does not provide official data on the number of tanks for each model, but, according to independent sources, the total number of cars of all three models reaches 13-000 pieces.

                  https://topwar.ru/80995-kakie-tanki-stoyat-na-vooruzhenii-rossiyskoy-armii.html
                  Article 2015 (after the SAR and Ukraine) ...
                  The author of the article: Sergey Antonov its source: https://rusplt.ru/sdelano-russkimi/kakie-tanki-stoyat-na-voorujenii-rossiyskoy-armii-18426.html
                  also from 2015 (the same author laughing )
        3. Runway
          Runway 23 February 2021 00: 47
          0
          Could you tell me the number of countries in the NATO bloc? Can you sum up MBT and AFV in those?
          1. Quadro
            Quadro 23 February 2021 02: 43
            -2
            Quote: WFP
            Could you tell me the number of countries in the NATO bloc? Can you sum up MBT and AFV in those?

            If you do not count the sga, then either something like ours, or even less, rather even less, and you also need to understand that some Netherlands with the written off Leo 2a6 (like everything has already been written off) are unlikely to run to help NATO or some kind of Bulgaria (maybe only as an occupying force), Greece too, Italy is also unlikely to be like Spain, the French do not understand at all - then there is no NATO. As a result, the march on minced meat in the candidates of the FRG with 250 combat-ready tanks, the British with 100-120 tanks, the Poles with 430 tanks (of dubious freshness and an unknown percentage of combat readiness), Norway with 50 pieces, the Swedes with 120, and in general, that's all , and maybe the Danes are still with a handful. Not so many, and this is with old type 2a4 and export T-72. The crossed out also have mostly old stuff. What's the use of the number of their troops? Norgs, Swedes and Poles became famous there? Or Spaniards with Italians? Most of them, except that the peasants are fit to drive. And the shapkozakidatstvo has nothing to do with it.
            1. Runway
              Runway 23 February 2021 06: 48
              -2
              The Yankees and Turks were lost. A little higher, the comrade marked the number of almost 23.000 armored hulls in the RF Armed Forces. You can sleep well. laughing
              1. Grits
                Grits 23 February 2021 10: 15
                0
                Well yes. You need to add on the dances that brought their "abrashki" to Europe. And also the Turks, who do not mind moving through the Caucasus with such support.
                1. Quadro
                  Quadro 23 February 2021 17: 10
                  -2
                  Quote: Gritsa
                  Well yes. You need to add on the dances that brought their "abrashki" to Europe. And also the Turks, who do not mind moving through the Caucasus with such support.

                  Have you personally asked the Turks this? In general, it's not a fact that they won't freeze. Erdogash is certainly arrogant, but not stupid like some lovers of the amount of NATO junk.
          2. Lara Croft
            Lara Croft 23 February 2021 12: 55
            -2
            Quote: WFP
            Can you tell me the number of countries in the NATO bloc?

            Don't you read the periodicals? Ashamed citizen, you need to know the enemy by sight ...
            30 pieces...
            The latter, like North Macedonia (formerly Macedonia), entered ...
            Can you sum up MBT and AFV in those?

            Are you kidding me? The number of tanks can be easily found out from the Internet, with an armored vehicle it will be more difficult to add BMPs, armored personnel carriers, BRDMs, armored vehicles, etc.
            1. Runway
              Runway 23 February 2021 13: 19
              0
              Scary to read ... laughing
              Why am I kidding? "Let's hit with a run on ...." (c) - front end bbm have PTSs (not all, but most) in the armament (about transported no, no, as well as about the number of shock flying machines).
      2. Bad_gr
        Bad_gr 22 February 2021 18: 38
        +3
        Quote: Lara Croft
        MTLB was produced in Kharkov, so that they can be delivered to the RF Armed Forces in a modernized form ....

        "..... Currently in Russia a number of MT-LB modifications are produced at the Irkutsk plant of tracked vehicles (" IZGT ") [1], as well as the Ural plant of tracked tractors (" UZGT "), JSC" Muromteplovoz ", Rubtsovsky branch of OJSC NPK "Uralvagonzavod" named after F. E. Dzerzhinsky and at the Ufa plant of geological prospecting equipment (UZGO). Modern modifications MT-LB are produced by the all-terrain plant "Uralspetsmash" (USM). ..... "
        1. Lara Croft
          Lara Croft 22 February 2021 19: 52
          -1
          Quote: Bad_gr
          Quote: Lara Croft
          MTLB was produced in Kharkov, so that they can be delivered to the RF Armed Forces in a modernized form ....

          "..... Currently in Russia a number of MT-LB modifications are produced at the Irkutsk plant of tracked vehicles (" IZGT ") [1], as well as the Ural plant of tracked tractors (" UZGT "), JSC" Muromteplovoz ", Rubtsovsky branch of OJSC NPK "Uralvagonzavod" named after F. E. Dzerzhinsky and at the Ufa plant of geological prospecting equipment (UZGO). Modern modifications MT-LB are produced by the all-terrain plant "Uralspetsmash" (USM). ..... "

          Guilty, I will correct ...
      3. Old tanker
        Old tanker 22 February 2021 19: 12
        0
        Modernization of MT-LB was established long ago at the Murom plant Muromteplovoz. Moreover, they were massively supplied to the troops.
  3. Flooding
    Flooding 22 February 2021 16: 05
    0
    According to the military department, more than 90 T-72B3 and T-72B3M tanks are planned to be delivered to the troops.

    I don’t understand why we should continue to supply according to the previous modernization project.
    It is possible, of course, that it was not delivered according to the old contract.
    But it was possible to hurry up in time, to make adjustments to the contract.
    Targeted deliveries up to complete sets? The only explanation.
    1. carstorm 11
      carstorm 11 22 February 2021 16: 35
      +2
      Park t 72 b needs to be renewed to the end. There is very little left. Even when put into storage, it is better to have a reserve of 72 b3 of more modern machines.
      1. Flooding
        Flooding 22 February 2021 16: 51
        -1
        Quote: carstorm 11
        Park t 72 b needs to be renewed to the end. There is very little left. Even when put into storage, it is better to have a reserve of 72 b3 of more modern machines.

        There is no doubt about it. I just wondered why not everything this year is up to the B3M level.
        Apparently, after all, somewhere undercomplete is B3.
        1. carstorm 11
          carstorm 11 22 February 2021 17: 29
          +1
          Apparently so. Or debts from a previous contract.
  4. rocket757
    rocket757 22 February 2021 16: 07
    0
    Unfortunately, our enemies have the opportunity to clump together ...
    Of course, being able to do it is not the same thing! But you still have to keep in mind all the options.
  5. svp67
    svp67 22 February 2021 16: 56
    -1
    The Russian army will receive more than 2021 units of new and modernized armored vehicles during 800.

    According to the military department, more than 90 T-72B3 and T-72B3M tanks, about 80 T-80BVM tanks, a batch of T-90M tanks (without specifying the quantity) are planned to be delivered to the troops.
    In addition, more than 120 BMP-3s, over 280 BMP-2 units with the Berezhok combat module, as well as about 300 armored personnel carriers BTR-82A and BTR-82AM will be delivered to units and formations.

    800-90-80-120-280-300 = - 60 ... Since it appears everywhere around, I dare to assume that this year the T-90M batch will be a company or battalion set
    1. Lara Croft
      Lara Croft 22 February 2021 17: 41
      -1
      Quote: svp67
      I dare to assume that this year the batch of T-90M will be company officer or battalion set

      Will go to the 1st TA, tremble enemies ... (sarcasm) ...
      1. svp67
        svp67 22 February 2021 17: 52
        -1
        Quote: Lara Croft
        Will go to the 1st TA, tremble enemies ... (sarcasm) ...

        Rather, the "court" divisions ...
        1. Lara Croft
          Lara Croft 23 February 2021 13: 26
          -1
          Quote: svp67
          Quote: Lara Croft
          Will go to the 1st TA, tremble enemies ... (sarcasm) ...

          Rather, the "court" divisions ...

          So they (Taman and Kantemirovsk) are part of the TA ...
      2. Old tanker
        Old tanker 22 February 2021 19: 15
        +1
        Will go to the 1st TA, tremble enemies ...

        At the parades, the foe will intimidate and at the ostentatious biathlon program.
        I hope it doesn't stop there.
      3. Quadro
        Quadro 23 February 2021 02: 51
        -3
        Quote: Lara Croft
        Quote: svp67
        I dare to assume that this year the batch of T-90M will be company officer or battalion set

        Will go to the 1st TA, tremble enemies ... (sarcasm) ...

        Well, where do we have to the German armada of 200 buckets in constant repair or the British indestructible horde of 100 tanks.
  6. t-12
    t-12 22 February 2021 17: 38
    -2
    "Armata", "Boomerang" and "Kurganets" are not reported anything, earlier the Ministry of Defense explained that this equipment will go serially to the troops from 2022.

    Very everything is done slowly. Let me remind you that in 2015 it was planned that 2020 Armata tanks would be built by 2300.
    https://lenta.ru/news/2015/09/15/armata/
    1. Disant
      Disant 22 February 2021 20: 19
      0
      Let me remind you that in 2015 it was planned that by 2020 2300 tanks "Armata".

      A.Naryshkin - How many tanks does the Ministry of Defense want?

      O. Sinenko On the platform "Armata" was approved, among other things, in the armaments program of 2300 units until 2020, but I think that of course, these volumes will be adjusted.

      A.Naryshkin - In which direction - in the smaller?

      O. Sinenko― I think that in periods. Volumes, surely, will remain, but the period, surely,will move closer to 2025
      1. t-12
        t-12 22 February 2021 20: 40
        0
        was approved

        If approved, then it must be executed. Without "but I think" and "probably". No "adjustments" and "shifts".
        1. Disant
          Disant 22 February 2021 21: 08
          0
          The state armaments program is not published - it is a secret document, only the most general provisions on its goals, costs and performance appear in open sources.
          What he needed and how he needed to tell him, he said.
  7. 7,62x54
    7,62x54 22 February 2021 21: 33
    -1
    300+280+120+80+90 =870 шт
    Something for the share of T90 nothing remains.
  8. The comment was deleted.