Turkish press: "There was no shortage of water in Crimea, and then Russian migrants began to come - the situation worsened"

76

The Turkish edition of the Daily Sabah published an article by Aishe Betul Bal, which tells about the situation with the water in Crimea. The Turkish observer immediately indicates her position, calling Crimea a peninsula "occupied by Russia since 2014".

The material in the Turkish press is based on alleged conversations with the residents of Crimea. At the same time, Aishe Betul Bal herself writes that she spoke with people on the phone, and does not give specific names. To justify this option of presenting "information", the Turkish journalist claims that she is changing the names and surnames of the interviewees, since "political persecution may begin against them."



Submission of information is specific. For example, a Turkish journalist cites the statement of a certain "Alim Umerov" and writes that "he has to travel to different regions of Crimea in search of clean fresh water, which he collects in bottles and loads into a car."

From the material of the Turkish press:

Back in 2014, when Russia illegally annexed Crimea, Kiev decided to block the 400-kilometer North Crimean Canal (NCC), which connects the Black Sea Peninsula with the mainland. Previously, it supplied about 85% of the water from the Dnieper River. There was no shortage of water then. But now it has become a chronic problem, according to locals who spoke with the Daily Sabah.

The emphasis in the material is on the fact that the aforementioned "Alim Umerov" is an ethnic Crimean Tatar living in Crimea. From a statement attributed by the Turkish press to the interlocutor "hiding from political persecution":

There was no shortage of water in Crimea. Then Russian migrants started arriving, the situation worsened. After 2014, water problems became major.

At the same time, the interlocutor of the Turkish journalist for some reason does not say a word about the fact that there have always been problems with water in Crimea, but they worsened exactly at the very moment when the authorities in Kiev decided to block the North Crimean Canal.

The Turkish journalist, she claims, still asked her interlocutor about his attitude to Ukraine's actions. To this the "correct interlocutor" stated the following:

There was plenty of water in Crimea, but it was Russian migrants who played their negative role.


The thought being promoted is this: “It was the Russians who came to the peninsula who drank all the water of Alim Umerov”. And along the way the thought was promoted: "The blocking of the channel by Ukraine did not play a big role."

The publication in the Turkish press eloquently testifies to the approach that Turkey takes towards Crimea. In such a situation, it would be worthwhile for any major Russian media to interview the residents of Northern Cyprus about how they live after the Turkish occupation of a part of the island ...
76 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +31
    21 February 2021 15: 47
    Well, why do we need to know the "opinion" of the patient with the whole head Aisha Betul Bal? request
    1. +6
      21 February 2021 15: 56
      Rightly so. Let's collect garbage from all over the world that is attributed to us.
      1. +1
        21 February 2021 16: 13
        What is this report from the 6th chamber? How to calculate it back now?
        1. +25
          21 February 2021 18: 21
          In such a situation, any major Russian media would be worth interview the residents of Northern Cyprus about how they live after the Turkish occupation of part of the island ...

          Cost... But this will not happen. Russian soft-hearted authorities will not "in vain" rock the boat of warm friendly relations with the Turks ... And the Turks have never concealed their hostility towards Russia. With such friends and enemies are not necessary.
          1. -4
            21 February 2021 19: 39
            Turkish press: "There was no shortage of water in Crimea, and then Russian migrants began to come - the situation worsened"
            It must be understood that this is precisely the transition of the Ukrainian Crimea to the Russian Federation, minus the fact of the closure of the Crimean Canal by the Ukrainian authorities ..
            The policy of Turkey and the Turkish media is understandable. Namely.

            Even when Poroshenko was the president of Ukraine, Kiev promised Erdogan for Turkish military assistance to the Bandera junta in their "liberation" of Crimea and the suppression of the LPR and DPR from the Russians to transfer Crimea itself and the entire Kherson region under the external control of Turkey itself, populating them with Turkomans from Turkey.
    2. +12
      21 February 2021 16: 04
      Quote: Hunter 2
      Well, why do we need to know the "opinion" of the patient with the whole head Aisha Betul Bal?

      Babenka forgot that the fate of the Crimea was decided during the Russian-Turkish war of 1768-1774. The Russian army under the command of Vasily Dolgorukov invaded the peninsula. The troops of Khan Selim III were defeated, Bakhchisarai was destroyed, the peninsula was devastated. Khan Selim III fled to Istanbul. Since then, Crimea was, is and will always be Russian.
      1. +10
        21 February 2021 16: 27
        This publication is just of the order when it can be called slander and the author is subject to a sanctioning ban on travel to Russia, as well as a ban on posting information from the publication it represents in the Russian media.
        It is unclear why our Ministry of Foreign Affairs does not apply such a punishment to foreign slanderers who fan ethnic strife.
      2. +9
        21 February 2021 17: 02
        I don’t understand at all - from what kind of rework the Tatars are considered to be the type of indigenous people there ?? The Tmutarakan Russian principality in those parts was 200 years before them! I am already silent about the Greeks ..
      3. +4
        21 February 2021 22: 50
        Quote: tihonmarine
        Quote: Hunter 2
        Well, why do we need to know the "opinion" of the patient with the whole head Aisha Betul Bal?

        Babenka forgot that the fate of the Crimea was decided during the Russian-Turkish war of 1768-1774. The Russian army under the command of Vasily Dolgorukov invaded the peninsula. The troops of Khan Selim III were defeated, Bakhchisarai was destroyed, the peninsula was devastated. Khan Selim III fled to Istanbul. Since then, Crimea was, is and will always be Russian.

        Only the Russian army did not invade, but expelled!
        Not Russian, but Russian (at that time, since the troops were Russian).
        Crimea became Russian in 2014.
        Why are you afraid to call a spade a spade ???
      4. 0
        22 February 2021 08: 58
        Quote: tihonmarine
        Quote: Hunter 2
        Well, why do we need to know the "opinion" of the patient with the whole head Aisha Betul Bal?

        Babenka forgot that the fate of the Crimea was decided during the Russian-Turkish war of 1768-1774. The Russian army under the command of Vasily Dolgorukov invaded the peninsula. The troops of Khan Selim III were defeated, Bakhchisarai was destroyed, the peninsula was devastated. Khan Selim III fled to Istanbul. Since then, Crimea was, is and will always be Russian.

        This is what she just did not forget and cannot forget.
    3. +11
      21 February 2021 16: 45
      Centuries ago, when the Turks illegally occupied Constantinople, the local population had no problems with water, land and air. .... lol
      1. +2
        21 February 2021 22: 53
        With Armenians, Kurds, Greeks - by the way, no!
        As well as tourist business and tomatoes!
    4. +11
      21 February 2021 17: 07
      If there is no water in the tap,
      So you drank

      In this interpretation, Russian migrants.
      Old as the world.
    5. -1
      21 February 2021 18: 20
      Well, why do we need to know the "opinion" of the patient with the whole head Aisha Betul Bal?

      Ahah. Like a journalist problem? Like Erdogan did not personally declare that he would never recognize Crimea as Russian?
  2. +11
    21 February 2021 15: 48
    Well, well.

    If there is no water in the tap,
    The Kurds drank the water.

    So it seems like it should sound in Turkish?
    Let them deal with their water.
  3. +6
    21 February 2021 15: 48
    More evidence of the "officers' daughters". How cheap it was.
    1. +4
      21 February 2021 16: 16
      New reservoirs and water intakes are launched so that water problems are eliminated.
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. +5
    21 February 2021 15: 50
    Turkish press: "There was no shortage of water in Crimea, and then Russian migrants began to come - the situation worsened"
    [Quote] [/ quote]
    It is clear that the one who pays dances the press ... everywhere it is all there and there is enough fraudulent too.
    1. +8
      21 February 2021 15: 54
      Um, migrants probably meant moneybags with Moscow residence permits, who famously began to live in the first lines in resort Crimean cities laughing A lot of water is needed for personal pools. fellow
      1. +5
        21 February 2021 16: 51
        Nobody else uses as much water as goes down the drain ...
        1. +1
          21 February 2021 18: 16
          The problem of water has always existed, and not only in Crimea, but on the entire Black Sea coast ...
          1. +2
            21 February 2021 18: 54
            I live in MEZHDURECHE, Volga and Akhtuba, rivers are not small !!! From one river to another 20 km !!! Already the third well was drilled, and the debit in the wells is so ... lousy that you have to pervert, evacuate, combine the wells into one water intake system ...
            In short, until I redid all the irrigation for drip irrigation, there was not enough water!
            Those. reasonable, economical balance of income and expense, otherwise nothing.
            1. +2
              21 February 2021 19: 02
              That's right, the solution can be found in any situation ...
              1. +1
                21 February 2021 19: 34
                You can ... put all the taps with water cut-off in the house! One-time costs are not small, but then a solid savings.
                1. +2
                  21 February 2021 20: 59
                  You can cut it off and you can cut it down, the main thing is in the right direction - water is life and all future world confrontations will be for fresh water ...
                  1. +1
                    21 February 2021 21: 22
                    Learn to economize, rationally spend what you have, it is very useful for ... the family budget.
    2. +2
      21 February 2021 18: 16
      Quote: rocket757

      It is clear that the one who pays dances the press ... everywhere it is all there and there is enough fraudulent too.


      The press has long turned into a servant of politics ...
      1. +1
        21 February 2021 18: 56
        Well, one of the oldest professions and very, very much, they have the same features with the other, the oldest!
        1. +1
          21 February 2021 19: 03
          It seems to be finally turning into the oldest ...
          1. +1
            21 February 2021 19: 39
            The competition, after all, is not for seniority ... but for some characteristic feature !!!
            1. +2
              21 February 2021 21: 05
              So I am not for seniority, but for the content of aspirations for non-worship and unwillingness to live by my own mind, think about my children, help the elderly and save the country ...
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. +2
    21 February 2021 15: 51
    Turkish press: "There was no shortage of water in Crimea, and then Russian migrants began to come - the situation worsened"

    an old Black-Hundred ditty in a new way -If there is no water in Crimea, then they have drunk ... ... Russian migrants fool
    It seems that the authorities in Turkey do not see the blockage of the Crimean channel by the authorities of the "Independent" channel. Isn't it time for the Russian Federation to apply economic sanctions to Turkey and Ukraine?
    And it’s at least a good reason to sue the Daily Sabah in a European court. With competent lawyers and the overlap of the CCM can be condemned
    1. +5
      21 February 2021 15: 58
      Yes you sho! Well these are partners! Ugh, that's kind of a good word. But the use of one person against our enemies, caused a negative meaning
  8. +10
    21 February 2021 15: 53
    There was no shortage of water in Crimea. Then Russian migrants started arriving, the situation worsened. After 2014, water problems became major. The aforementioned "Alim Umerov" is an ethnic Crimean Tatar living in Crimea.

    Yes, this is Dzhemilev, his style.
    "Blocking the channel by Ukraine did not play a big role."

    Well, exactly, he is.
    1. +5
      21 February 2021 16: 10
      Quote: Destiny
      Yes, this is Dzhemilev, his style.

      Signed with the name Aishe Bethul.
  9. -4
    21 February 2021 15: 54
    Our "media" write the same nonsense about Turkey?)
    1. +2
      21 February 2021 16: 00
      This is not nonsense! This is a smart policy. Learn ...
      1. +2
        21 February 2021 16: 02
        What to learn? How are the Turkish people incited against Russia or how ghouls hang up signs: "Ramil was able to do it and you can?"
        1. +1
          21 February 2021 21: 28
          Excuse me, but who is Ramil?
          1. +1
            21 February 2021 21: 42
            Shamsutdinov, who, last year, shot a dozen of his colleagues (
      2. +1
        21 February 2021 16: 03
        Photos from Crimea) Crimean Tatars are turned against "Russian migrants"
        1. +3
          21 February 2021 16: 08
          It's not how many fools are, but how the FSB deals with them))))
  10. 0
    21 February 2021 15: 55
    Well yes. First, "talking on the phone," then left-handed names and surnames, like so that the bloody gebnya would not send to Siberia to drink ... Cheap for cheap, in short ... negative
  11. +1
    21 February 2021 15: 56
    Is it not that the chief executive officer of the journalist did not find a fee for the article? I suppose they were begging everyone at the train stations.)))
    1. -2
      21 February 2021 18: 26
      glavukrokrymtatarin money zhurnalyuge not the fee for the article found?

      And who found the money for Erdogan, who personally stated that he would never recognize Crimea as Russian?
      1. 0
        21 February 2021 19: 30
        And this is already mainstream and a big politician. Yes, and the Turks do not hunt too much with amers. And then they will ask to leave Lebanon and Syria.
  12. +2
    21 February 2021 15: 57
    Well everything, now it's clear, damn maskals again laughing Turks need to be advised how to make a foil hat ...
  13. +4
    21 February 2021 15: 59
    Well, act like a mirror! Or are you afraid of new friends? So they always have a knife in their bosom prepared for us. What they (unlike us) do not hesitate to admit. And then all blah blah blah ...
  14. +4
    21 February 2021 16: 03
    Over the past six months, there have been several materials about the catastrophic state of affairs with fresh water in many Turkish regions, so that they would be better off dealing with their own problems. Everything dries up there no less than in Crimea.
    1. +1
      21 February 2021 17: 18
      Quote: Drugov
      Everything dries up there no less than in Crimea.

      There, in the Crimea, snow has piled up .... the loss for plants will be replenished, and for the future there will be a supply in storage facilities. But how in Turkey - the question is still the same.
  15. -1
    21 February 2021 16: 06
    This madam walks through the forest
  16. +1
    21 February 2021 16: 14
    Clear. The migrants dumped all the water.
  17. 0
    21 February 2021 16: 18
    Erdogan on the carpet! Let her bring her journalists "with reduced social responsibility" to their senses. laughing
    1. +1
      21 February 2021 16: 26
      They have it strictly feel
  18. +10
    21 February 2021 16: 29
    I don’t know about the Russian migrants, but in my homeland in the steppe Crimea, fresh water began to be scarce because of the agrarians, who, until the 14th year, were irrigating with Dnieper water, and from 14 they began to beat wells and irrigate from them. In the 16th (then I left) I remember that we used the tap water as technical, it was not realistic to drink, it was salty. For drinking and cooking, they bought imported goods in stores, 2 rubles. per liter like so. Now there is an asshole, water is given for 2 hours, in a village with a population of 2000 people, the pressure in the pipes drops that the water runs out of the tap in a small stream. And this is in the summer where the thermometer often goes over 40 degrees. It's easier now, it's snowing.
    1. -1
      22 February 2021 11: 16
      and in my homeland in the steppe Crimea ........ where exactly in the steppe Crimea do you live ...
  19. +2
    21 February 2021 16: 45
    The point is, comrades, that the situation with water (as well as with electricity) is very strange.
    By the nature of my activity, I am not connected with these spheres of the national economy.
    But, there is a situation "on the ground" when the management reports (everything is solid ok and very good). In fact, a complete "bag".
    It is bad that the president does not manually control the island. Bo sorrows and problems, which for six years have not been resolved in any way except this is complete.
    As life shows, without a personal appeal to the president, nothing is decided from the word at all.
    1. -4
      21 February 2021 17: 48
      They are shy, themselves, they can donate a dog there or arrange it to the hospital in manual mode, but otherwise, I can’t find a decent word. feel Our ancestors were wise when they uttered about the boots of a pastry maker and pies of a shoemaker, and then finally a professional intriguer, well, that's what he could, Krymnash and a mustache, write letters in small handwriting ... winked
      1. +2
        21 February 2021 18: 06
        So telephony has already been invented.
        It is absolutely not the president's job (to a certain extent) to run on calls and plug holes with his booty.
        Here is what people who do not know how to steer are put on the ground. This is the problem.
  20. 0
    21 February 2021 17: 24
    laughing The referendum in Ukraine was held on the basis of an article of the Constitution of the Soviet Union regarding the fact that any republic that is part of the Soviet Union has a reason to secede from the USSR on the basis of (sorry for the tautology) referendum. There is such a provision in the Constitution of the USSR on the right to withdraw, but Ukraine has not exercised this right. First, Ukraine declared independence. And only a few months later, Ukraine held a referendum. But not about withdrawal! The right to withdraw Ukraine could only be exercised if the question was asked: "Do you want to leave the Soviet Union", which, in fact, was not done. The referendum was not about that. Resolution of the Crimean Parliament of March 6, 2014

    And one more point for those who are not satisfied with the previous three. There was a resolution of the Crimean parliament in the following connection:

    - in order to protect the inalienable rights and freedoms of citizens, including the right to life, freedom of thought and speech, the right to speak their native language;
    - in order to protect against nationalist groups that tried to penetrate from the mainland of Ukraine;
    - on the basis of the Constitution of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea, namely, in accordance with paragraph 7 of the first part of Article 18 (participation in issues concerning the Autonomous Republic of Crimea) and paragraph 3 of the second part of Article 26 (making a decision to hold a republican (local) referendum).

    By the way, on the basis of the article of the Constitution of Ukraine (Article 138), the Autonomous Republic of Crimea also had the right to a local referendum. But it was the local who was appointed.

    Someone will ask:

    “But what about the supremacy of the Constitution of Ukraine over the Constitution of an autonomous republic?”

    Asks and gets screwed up. Because, even in the 1998 Constitution of the peninsula, which was completely chopped off in rights by Kiev, it is said that if the decisions of the Crimean parliament do not comply with the Ukrainian Constitution, only the President of Ukraine can suspend their effect with a simultaneous appeal to the Constitutional Court of Ukraine regarding their constitutionality. But here the whole nuance is that the only legitimate president of Ukraine was Yanukovych, who did not dispute anything. So, formally, the actions of the Parliament of Crimea do not fall under the violation of the basic law of Ukraine. The powers of the President of Ukraine are terminated early in the event of:

    1) resignation;

    2) the inability to exercise their powers for health reasons;

    3) post removal in impeachment order;

    Xnumx) death.

    Resignation is possible only if the president personally announces this in the Verkhovna Rada. Does anyone remember Yanukovych's statement? Consequently, the renunciation made should be, in accordance with the current Constitution of Ukraine, qualified not as impeachment, but as a coup d'etat.
  21. -6
    21 February 2021 17: 25
    are you afraid that the Turks will take the Crimea? Do not be afraid.
    1. +1
      21 February 2021 20: 55
      Let them be afraid. And who will take away the bald devil Crimea. They will try to open the selection once! Crimea - Russia, and this is not a "tseJavropa" zhovto-blakitnaya.
  22. HAM
    +3
    21 February 2021 17: 33
    Well, what else can an inhabitant of someone's harem, standing in line, write, and to please her master?
  23. +2
    21 February 2021 17: 42
    Quote: iouris
    are you afraid that the Turks will take the Crimea? Do not be afraid.

    Try laughing
  24. +1
    21 February 2021 18: 05
    Quote: iouris
    are you afraid that the Turks will take the Crimea? Do not be afraid.

    This will be their last attempt, if they dare to decide at all))) the Turks are more likely to have something restless.
    1. +1
      21 February 2021 18: 09
      They will not agree to this, only ambition and no more ...
  25. -1
    21 February 2021 18: 05
    Author, well, go to Cyprus .... and write a series of articles .. Are the Turks friends? They consider Crimea not Russian or Ukrainian, but theirs.
    1. 0
      22 February 2021 07: 04
      But you never know who is there and what "counts" ...
  26. 0
    21 February 2021 18: 07
    In such a situation, it would be worthwhile for any major Russian media to interview the residents of Northern Cyprus about how they live after the Turkish occupation of a part of the island ...


    Good and correct thought ...
    1. +1
      21 February 2021 21: 06
      It is a pity that only a thought will remain. The "executors of our destinies" are sick of chronic diplomacy and are unlikely to give the go-ahead to the media specialists for such an article.
  27. +3
    21 February 2021 18: 10
    Patience. The lights were installed, the bridge is standing, roads, hospitals, kindergartens, etc. build. Watermakers will be supplied - there will be water in abundance ... The rest is theft, nepotism and a mess - as elsewhere in Russia. Whoever doesn't like it - they can blame it back on Ukraine, Russia, and so because of the Crimea, dofiga endures what.
  28. -1
    21 February 2021 18: 16
    But what about our "friend and partner" Erdogan Pasha? Russian and Turk are friends forever? Downed bomber in exchange for tomatoes?
  29. +3
    21 February 2021 18: 24
    and why reprint all the "dirt" from all the garbage dumps in the world.?
  30. 0
    21 February 2021 19: 08
    Quote: cniza
    They will not agree to this, only ambition and no more ...

    In the days of Ukraine, the Turks "spud" the Crimea. Support for Tatars, construction of mosques, etc. The authorities turned a blind eye to this, since they were interested in weakening the mood of the Russian-speaking Crimeans. Now, with the return of Crimea, it became much more difficult for the Turks to act. And I want and inject.
  31. +1
    21 February 2021 21: 45
    "Russian migrants" is good smile It is beautiful... laughing It turns out that if I move from Yekaterinburg, say, to Tver, to my friends, I will become a "Russian migrant"? laughing
    In general, I do not understand why broadcast nonsense. And if you are broadcasting, then only with an official mention, they say, "the delirium of a seriously ill mental individual. Not news."
  32. 0
    22 February 2021 06: 29
    In such a situation, it would be worthwhile for any major Russian media to interview the residents of Northern Cyprus about how they live after the Turkish occupation of a part of the island ...
    The answer would be quite. good