Military Review

The international debut of the T-14 "Armata" tank will take place in Abu Dhabi

77
The international debut of the T-14 "Armata" tank will take place in Abu Dhabi

The Russian T-14 Armata tank will be presented abroad for the first time. According to the press service of Uralvagonzavod, the tank will be shown at the IDEX 2021 international arms exhibition in Abu Dhabi.


(...) an international debut will take place tank T-14 is the only one in the world belonging to the third post-war generation. The machine has a high degree of protection, including high-precision weapons, and the presence of special equipment allows it to be integrated into the automatic control system of the tactical link

- said in a statement.

This information was confirmed by Rosoboronexport, which will represent Russian defense products in the UAE. According to the head of the state corporation Alexander Mikheev, the first public presentations of the T-14 "Armata" will be held in Abu Dhabi.

For the first time we will hold public presentations of the T-14 "Armata" tank, a new Russian-made small arms: KORD assault rifles, Lebedev pistol and the latest Kalashnikov AK-19 assault rifle (...)

- said the head of Rosoboronexport.

In addition to "Armata", at IDEX 2021 Russia will present armored personnel carriers and infantry fighting vehicles on the "Boomerang" platform, "Antey-4000" air defense systems, "Viking" air defense systems and "Tor-E2" air defense systems.

As previously reported, in August 2020, the T-14 Armata tank received the necessary documents and permits for supplies abroad. At the same time it was reported that there were already preliminary applications for the tank.
77 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Nasrat
    Nasrat 17 February 2021 14: 36
    .
    I do not believe! Everything was stolen by the Ozero organized crime group ...
    1. Finches
      Finches 17 February 2021 14: 45
      +12
      Now they will run in, do not worry and minus, calling them a fan of Putin and a fan of Rotenberg ... laughing
      As for Abu Dhabi, this is a recognized platform for displaying the latest weapons - both for sale and for a political hint to our Western "partners" that Russian engineering is not standing still, and the industry has mastered the production of the most modern weapons, which have no analogues in the world, so before you run over, you need to think hard ... And then, I remember, as a certain failed Austrian artist, also in all his hearings declared about Russia as a colossus on rotten legs (that's where the liberals got their hands on all our hait) and than then it ended!
      1. Nasrat
        Nasrat 17 February 2021 14: 59
        -8
        Quote: Finches
        that Russian engineering is not standing still, and the industry has mastered the production of the most modern weapons,

        Svarog and company - won't let you lie - everything is stolen and ruined!
        1. Finches
          Finches 17 February 2021 15: 07
          +5
          Svarog, even highlighted in yellow - so that from afar his active civic position could be seen! laughing
        2. loki565
          loki565 17 February 2021 16: 21
          +8
          The larger the series, the cheaper the production, and there may be a new module with a large caliber tested
          1. Old tanker
            Old tanker 17 February 2021 17: 23
            +4
            Why a larger caliber? The original idea was to put a 152mm gun on Armata. But the idea was abandoned for a number of reasons. Although even during the union, this version of the tank based on the T-80 was tested.
          2. Flooding
            Flooding 18 February 2021 14: 36
            0
            Quote: loki565
            The larger the series, the cheaper the production, and there may be a new module with a large caliber tested

            The big question is which is better:
            - transition to large caliber
            - emphasis on the development of bp used caliber
            - implementation of a tool based on different principles of action
            1. loki565
              loki565 18 February 2021 16: 17
              0
              The big question is which is better:
              - transition to large caliber
              - emphasis on the development of bp used caliber
              - implementation of a tool based on different principles of action

              The designers have already said that all that is possible survived from this caliber and smoothbore gun.
              We do not have other principles yet, and even switching to a new caliber will force us to change half of the turret, automatic loader, etc.
              1. Flooding
                Flooding 18 February 2021 16: 25
                0
                Quote: loki565
                we have no other principles yet

                about the electrochemical weapon have been written more than once
                Quote: loki565
                yes, even switching to a new caliber will force you to change half of the tower, automatic loader, etc.

                don't forget to develop new ammunition
                as a result, the costs are very tangible, which leads to a logical question: is it not better to take a step further
                1. loki565
                  loki565 18 February 2021 16: 31
                  0
                  You may be right, although you have already made a 152mm gun and there are some groundwork for it. But I have not yet seen an electrochemical weapon on a tank.

      2. Roman070280
        Roman070280 17 February 2021 15: 04
        +2
        calling names a fan of Putin and a fan of Rotenberg ...

        No ... it's compliments ..))
      3. Adimius38
        Adimius38 17 February 2021 17: 40
        -3
        so you see and you are laughing
      4. nikolas 83
        nikolas 83 17 February 2021 18: 01
        +5
        Why have you been instructed to drawbacks? Someone "burns" from your comments.
        1. kulinar
          kulinar 17 February 2021 20: 18
          +2
          Quote: nikolas 83
          Why have you been instructed to drawbacks? Someone "burns" from your comments.

          We fix it as much as possible. laughing
          Although it may be better to leave it as a quality mark? negative
      5. mvg
        mvg 17 February 2021 18: 04
        -1
        Now they will run

        Zyablitsev, follow the path of the Thrifty ... little, little inadequate dude.
        1. Finches
          Finches 17 February 2021 18: 05
          +1
          That is, in your understanding, only criticism of the current government is an indicator of adequacy? laughing
          1. Bratkov Oleg
            Bratkov Oleg 18 February 2021 01: 43
            0
            Yes, everything, everything, everything is sure to break, or at least bite!
            And, by the way, until 2014, I was also in favor of removing the power in any way. Like, it will give the people a sense of unity, and the new government will be afraid of it, and will do everything possible for the people, and we will live better than anyone else! This is the bright side of the dream, there was also a dark one, like, will the United States miss its? Under the guise of doing nasty things in our revolution ...

            And then Ukraine happened. Pain, chaos, tears, and an eerily prompt return of Crimea to Russia. From that moment on, I understand that we live in capitalism, where the better you work, the better you live, and it turns out that someone works better, and resources are limited ... then not everyone has enough locks. But Putin's gang is the only force that strengthens and defends Russia. I personally like socialism more, only it already existed, and we could not defend it, the Brezhnev gang sold us to the Americans, with giblets, and then Gorbachev and Yeltsin finished off ... And then Putin threw Yeltsin out of the Kremlin with honors, and history went along another way. I'm just wondering, in the early 2000s, Putin said on TV that the Americans were on the moon, and recently Rogozin congratulated on the 50th anniversary of the landing ... Although the USSR participated in the lunar scam, on the side of the United States, but will Russia announce that this is crap, or will they hold on to a joint lie with the Americans to the last?
            At the same time, it is the United States that is trying to break Russia, destroying its allies, and its sales markets ... But the announcement of the lunar scam is an announcement of the advantage of socialism, and that thieves and bandits are still in power in Russia, yes, and all the capitalists are thieves, robbers, and bandits, and Trump, Biden, also thieves and scum ... And to the Russian capitalists of any leaven, whether pro-Putin or anti-Putin, Biden and Trump are much closer than the Russian people ... And in the middle between this love is Navalny. Ksenia, Yavlinsky, Zyuganov ... I remembered that scripts work here, correct and exact words are deleted.
            Something like that.
            1. Finches
              Finches 18 February 2021 09: 05
              0
              In general, they wrote it right! hi
    2. 210ox
      210ox 17 February 2021 14: 50
      +16
      What are we talking about? About a tank or a cooperative ibn oval? Change the template. The topic is not the same.
      1. Destiny
        Destiny 17 February 2021 14: 55
        +20
        Except for them, no one else writes about the oval, but there are characters who will swallow it in any topic by hook or by crook. Fans of him, probably, and others always blame for this. have already got their bulk and coop lake.
    3. tralflot1832
      tralflot1832 17 February 2021 15: 07
      +1
      Good news day! The people here are worried, judging by your minuses.
    4. Evgeny Strygin
      Evgeny Strygin 18 February 2021 21: 17
      +1
      Well, judging by the production plans - someone did steal a thousand tanks. The lake is not a lake, gelendzhik is not gelenzhik. But it's a fact. Of the grandiose plans, only new plans and dumb defenders of the miracle of planners.
      Which, regardless of what is happening, write the same thing. Hm ... the mystery of the century for what!
  2. tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 17 February 2021 14: 38
    +2
    Well, the Arb sheikhs will buy it. Do they like to show off? In desert camouflage, they should be painted! Give the first buyer abroad you look at the expense of the sheikhs and it will be more fun with the Armats in the troops. good
    1. lucul
      lucul 17 February 2021 14: 54
      +2
      Well, the sheikhs of Arb will buy. Do they like to show off? They should be painted in desert camouflage!

      Well, ours can put a flat tower)))
      1. tralflot1832
        tralflot1832 17 February 2021 15: 01
        +2
        I like this styling better, the dune is needed to sit in ambush! hi
      2. yehat2
        yehat2 17 February 2021 15: 47
        -1
        Quote: lucul
        can put a flat tower

        flat tower of the Pskov Kremlin
      3. 210ox
        210ox 17 February 2021 16: 18
        +1
        Something like this seems to want to stir up the Czechs on the basis of T72
        1. loki565
          loki565 17 February 2021 16: 26
          +2
          Something like this seems to want to stir up the Czechs on the basis of T72

          This is the type of BMPT they tried to create
      4. AlexG83
        AlexG83 17 February 2021 16: 56
        +4
        Quote: lucul

        Well, ours can put a flat tower)))

        They cannot, because they are not fools (this is generally about the concept in this picture). On the barrel there is an ejector, 2 useless course machine guns / cannons (which will be controlled by the gunner), in the place where it is better to place the active protection. There is no combat module for the commander at all. Into the furnace such a concept. )))
        1. lucul
          lucul 17 February 2021 16: 59
          +1
          They cannot, because they are not fools (this is generally about the concept in this picture). On the barrel there is an ejector, 2 useless course machine guns (which will be controlled by the gunner), in the place where it is better to place the active protection. There is no combat module for the commander at all. Into the furnace such a concept. )))

          Eh ... eh .... eh .... the tower is not inhabited, the commander's armor and combat module are not needed there, but 2 course machine guns are very even.
          1. AlexG83
            AlexG83 17 February 2021 17: 10
            +1
            Quote: lucul

            Eh ... eh .... eh .... the tower is not inhabited, the commander's armor and combat module are not needed there, but 2 course machine guns are very even.


            I'm talking about this.
            1. lucul
              lucul 17 February 2021 17: 18
              +1
              I'm talking about this.

              The commander is in an armored capsule, in the corps, and this is just a remote observation device.
              So, in Armata, three of us are sitting in a row, in an armored capsule, in a tank hull.
              1. AlexG83
                AlexG83 17 February 2021 17: 33
                +1
                Quote: lucul
                I'm talking about this.

                The commander is in an armored capsule, in the corps, and this is just a remote observation device.
                So, in Armata, three of us are sitting in a row, in an armored capsule, in a tank hull.

                This is no longer "just a remote observation device", since there is a turret, therefore ... it can be called a combat module. At the same time, it can act as a spare sight for the main weapon (but this is my guess). Where the crew is in the T-14 in the course.
          2. Mordvin 3
            Mordvin 3 18 February 2021 11: 23
            -1
            Quote: lucul
            Uh ... uh ... uh ... the tower is not inhabited there, the commander's armor and combat module are not needed there

            And then nafig need an ejector?
        2. yehat2
          yehat2 17 February 2021 17: 20
          -3
          Quote: AlexG83
          There is no combat module for the commander at all

          so there is no commander either - why does he need a module?
          1. AlexG83
            AlexG83 17 February 2021 17: 34
            0
            Quote: yehat2
            Quote: AlexG83
            There is no combat module for the commander at all

            so there is no commander either - why does he need a module?

            Is there no commander in the tank?
            All, I stop, this misunderstanding is beginning to resemble some kind.
        3. zenion
          zenion 17 February 2021 17: 54
          0
          AlexG83 (AlexG83). You reminded Schweik and his story of how they were preparing to stuff one in the face. How best to do, immediately fill his face, or after he drinks and pays. The owner was in for a drink and will pay. So you know what this bastard did? He did not come! Don't worry about it. You have convinced everyone of your righteousness.
        4. mvg
          mvg 17 February 2021 18: 18
          -1
          You are a plus, so as not to put a minus to your opponent
    2. Brturin
      Brturin 17 February 2021 15: 37
      +3
      Quote: tralflot1832
      Well, the sheikhs of Arb will buy. Do they like to show off?

      not without this, and maybe even the states to prick a little - "The Biden administration introduced a temporary ban on the supply of weapons to the UAE and Saudi Arabia (https://topwar.ru/179459-administracija-bajdena-vvela-vremennyj-zapret-na-postavki- oruzhija-oaje-i-saudovskoj-aravii.html) Psaki yesterday - "We made it clear from the very beginning that we are going to recalibrate relations with Saudi Arabia" ... "It has critical needs in the field of self-defense, and we continue to work with her in this area, even though we are clearly signaling areas of disagreement and concern "...
      1. tralflot1832
        tralflot1832 17 February 2021 15: 41
        +2
        This news is 100% in spite of the exceptional, Ours, as they expected, the holy place never happens. And where the Merquitos are taught diplomacy. The impression is that they buy any position.
    3. Old tanker
      Old tanker 17 February 2021 17: 25
      +2
      Maybe. After all, it was only thanks to the Indian contract that the T-90A entered the troops in series.
      1. Grandfather
        Grandfather 17 February 2021 17: 30
        0
        Quote: tralflot1832
        Well, the sheikhs of Arb will buy. They like to show off
        and "Armata" will wake up already in the states ....
  3. businessv
    businessv 17 February 2021 14: 39
    -1
    As previously reported, in August 2020, the T-14 Armata tank received the necessary documents and permits for supplies abroad. At the same time it was reported that there were already preliminary applications for the tank.
    Well, at least we will test our technologies on foreign supplies. Then, you see, our army will tune in to the acquisition. And then there is a product, but its mass production is not.
    1. Doccor18
      Doccor18 17 February 2021 14: 57
      +2
      Quote: businessv
      Then, you see, our army will tune in to the acquisition.

      "Tune in" good
      1. businessv
        businessv 17 February 2021 15: 01
        +3
        Quote: Doccor18
        "Tune in"

        It was with difficulty that I found a word that could gently describe the attitude of army bureaucrats to the new technology. smile
  4. Jacket in stock
    Jacket in stock 17 February 2021 14: 40
    -1
    And somewhere the other day I read that tanks and armored personnel carriers will only be in the form of models. They say there are some problems with delivery. Who knows how it really is?
    1. tralflot1832
      tralflot1832 17 February 2021 14: 53
      +5
      Flight radar to help, we look after Ruslans. Sheikhs love full-size "toys". They love to ride themselves, they have such a mentality.
    2. Insurgent
      Insurgent 17 February 2021 15: 06
      0
      Quote: Jacket in stock
      And somewhere the other day I read that tanks and armored personnel carriers will only be in the form of models. They say there are some problems with delivery. Who knows how it really is?

      in August 2020, the T-14 Armata tank received the necessary documents and permits for deliveries abroad.

      The documentation is ready, which is practically a "visa" and a "foreign passport". And there are no transportation problems for the "Armata", and even more so for the lighter units of the air defense system, this is not the Indian "Arjun".
    3. Alf
      Alf 17 February 2021 19: 12
      +2
      Quote: Jacket in stock
      And somewhere the other day I read that tanks and armored personnel carriers will only be in the form of models. They say there are some problems with delivery. Who knows how it really is?

      Most likely, the problems are not with delivery, but with safety ... Where did the shell appear?
  5. Alien From
    Alien From 17 February 2021 14: 43
    -1
    Yes, let them start serial production at least through export!
    1. alexmach
      alexmach 17 February 2021 14: 52
      +4
      Let there be no serial production through export. we do not live in the 90s.
  6. ximkim
    ximkim 17 February 2021 14: 45
    +2
    With the debut: audience sympathy, first questions, first tasks from potential buyers.
    1. 210ox
      210ox 17 February 2021 14: 51
      +6
      At one time, the T90 was promoted. It helped, because then the topic could be bent.
      1. ximkim
        ximkim 17 February 2021 16: 56
        +1
        Advertising is the engine of trade, plus side views on the tank, which will prompt some omissions.
        1. Mordvin 3
          Mordvin 3 18 February 2021 11: 27
          -1
          Quote: ximkim
          which will prompt some omissions.

          Will the Arabs tell you? Well, yes, something like that you need a leather sofa in the salon, and a minibar.
  7. tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 17 February 2021 14: 49
    +3
    Minus plates with 404, so all the same Armata is not cardboard! And you own your miracle in one copy for parades. So still grief Pakistan signed a contract with us for armaments. Do you manage to repair T 80 ki with them?
    1. Alf
      Alf 17 February 2021 19: 14
      +2
      Quote: tralflot1832
      Minusators with 404,

      Andrey, look, I immediately identified five bloomers!
      1. tralflot1832
        tralflot1832 17 February 2021 19: 37
        -1
        Serving Russia! drinks
        1. Alf
          Alf 17 February 2021 19: 41
          +7
          Quote: tralflot1832
          Serving Russia! drinks

          This is how the dispatched counterintelligence agents are pierced ... laughing drinks
  8. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. The comment was deleted.
    2. Oden280
      Oden280 17 February 2021 15: 16
      +6
      We have 560 of them in the army and the production continues.
    3. Herman 4223
      Herman 4223 17 February 2021 15: 28
      +7
      How is it not? There are hundreds of them.
  9. Dimide
    Dimide 17 February 2021 15: 05
    -3
    The main thing is that the engines are normally "shaken" so that there is no "embarrassment" in the Arabian heat
  10. Alexander Terentyev
    Alexander Terentyev 17 February 2021 15: 59
    +5
    There are also those who relish the stop of this tank on Red Square. They will stare at the tank with bated breath, expecting an accident, smoke, sparks, a track blade. But the robot Fyodor will come out of the hatch, point with his finger at the target, and it will evaporate from the laser beam. The hatch will slam shut and the tank will disappear into the dust of the Arabian desert.
  11. fa2998
    fa2998 17 February 2021 17: 31
    -1
    Quote: 210ox
    What are we talking about? About the tank


    We are talking about an exhibition. We are great! Single items, models, drawings, 3D graphics and so on. I think the main thing is the supply of serial samples of modern weapons to the army. How many T-14s have been delivered? I remember delivered 1 (one) Su-57, with an old engine. And the noise! hi
  12. Adimius38
    Adimius38 17 February 2021 17: 47
    -1
    the main thing is to cut some money and their hi ride on the T-72. When a Russian soldier sees fittings in combat units, then we can talk about export, but now it's very early. And American friends are partners laughing dream of getting the armature, you have already fitted the armor for them, now it remains to take the armature to the American base ... bravo comrades
  13. yehat2
    yehat2 17 February 2021 20: 14
    0
    Quote: AlexG83
    No in the tank

    this nonsense you yourself came up with
    i talked about the tower
  14. zloybond
    zloybond 17 February 2021 20: 15
    +1
    here's how I'll start reading about our Armata - "... the main battle tank ... blah blah blah ..." the main one is when basically all the tanks are like that ... and we have the main one so as not to lie ... 72, 80 , well, what else is there on the bottom of the barrel .... And the armata so far only so ... for the experiment and for the parade. And of course all the best is immediately exported ... As all the best says to children (American) tongue
  15. Dkuznecov
    Dkuznecov 17 February 2021 23: 55
    -2
    It would be better if the author wrote how long it takes
    "anti-material" snipers completely knock out everything
    sensors with this wonder-yudo-wunderwaffen.
    I think two volleys from a trio of snipers.
    And the fact that the merchants are fussing about suggests that
    that the budget money sawed through everything.
    1. Konnick
      Konnick 18 February 2021 09: 29
      0
      Everything that was in the tower was taken out under the 5mm "armor". Even snipers are not needed, a couple of accurate bursts from a machine gun and the end of all birdhouses. Until now, there have been no tests of the Armata for resistance to shelling from small arms, and even more so about shelling from antimaterial sniper rifles. So the myth about cardboard armor may not be a myth. Therefore, our tankers are in no hurry with Armata, only the lobby in the person of UralVagonZavod is trying.
      1. Dikson
        Dikson 18 February 2021 10: 57
        0
        The fact that you did not see the photos from the shelling resistance tests ... does not mean that such tests were not carried out ..
        1. Konnick
          Konnick 18 February 2021 11: 08
          0
          I just know, as well as the green growth of designers from UVZ.
        2. Konnick
          Konnick 18 February 2021 11: 47
          +1
          Optoelectronic devices are the most vulnerable elements of armored vehicles both during combat operations and during direct fire contact with the enemy. At the same time, it is obvious that the most unreliable components of optical and optoelectronic systems are
          these are glass windows of their warheads protruding above the armor protection of the vehicle, while Armata does not have this armor protection either - 5 mm is all protection.
          For trained shooters, the deviation of the dispersion of bullets from the SVD at a distance of 600 meters reaches the following values: the median error in height is 9,4 cm, the median error in the lateral direction (at a crosswind speed of 1,5 m / s) is 8,8 cm.
          Comparison of these figures with the dimensions of the heads of optical and optical-electronic devices of combat vehicles clearly demonstrates the effectiveness of the use of sniper fire against armored vehicles equipped with observation and aiming devices with warheads placed on the armor, and the appearance of powerful sniper rifles guarantees the defeat of tank optics at long distances - about 2000 m.
          I think Armata will be a desirable target for the Houthis if the Saudis acquire this tank.
          1. evgenii67
            evgenii67 18 February 2021 17: 44
            +2
            An interesting question, if the devices and sensors are so vulnerable to a sniper, then what to say about if a land mine flies into the tower?
            1. Konnick
              Konnick 18 February 2021 19: 11
              0
              For this, there is a complex of automatic protection KAZ, but if it is so effective, then why such powerful armor. A land mine, even if it explodes from a KAZ next to a tank, will not seem a little either, it will definitely carry a 5 mm shell ... along with the filling.
              1. evgenii67
                evgenii67 18 February 2021 19: 34
                +2
                Quote: Konnick
                For this, there is a complex of automatic protection KAZ, but if it is so effective, then why such powerful armor. A land mine, even if it explodes from a KAZ next to a tank, will not seem a little either, it will definitely carry a 5 mm shell ... along with the filling.

                I doubt that the KAZ is capable of intercepting a high-explosive projectile with at least a 50% probability.
          2. Dikson
            Dikson 19 February 2021 06: 29
            0
            The uninhabited tower of Armata with its faceted depressions and body kit is, in general, one big bullet trap ... and I can't believe in the wonderful properties of domestic optical devices and television cameras because of the word "absolutely" ..
  16. yfast
    yfast 18 February 2021 10: 47
    -1
    The engine still had to go forward, like a Jew's. This armored capsule is not so safe.