Bloody Moon John F. Kennedy
John Fitzgerald Kennedy, when he became 35th President of the United States, announced before Congress on May 25, 1961, the ambition of the Americans landing on the moon.
Kennedy was ruined by the moon
It should be noted that in the space race between the USSR and the United States, which unfolded since 1955, the Americans were losing on all priority targets. The Soviet Union was the first to not only launch a spacecraft into space (October 4, 1957), but also the first to launch a spacecraft with a man on board (April 12, 1961).
It was not just a rivalry between two superpowers that took place, it was a competition between two systems: socialism and capitalism. Victory in space became a litmus of technical progress and a triumph of ideology.
America then needed revenge, a success unattainable for the USSR, a victory proving the complete superiority of capitalism and the United States in all spheres of development. For this, the conquest of the moon was chosen as the goal for which the game was worth any candle. In the first five years alone, it was planned to spend $ 9 billion on this idea. By 1973, the total cost of the Apollo program was 25,4 billion (or $ 152 billion in current prices).
In its spectacularity, the event was supposed to surpass everything previously known, turning all the previous successes of the Soviet Union into secondary ones, instantly returning the United States not only to the lost space positions, but also making the United States a triumphant winner in the rivalry between the two systems.
Obviously, the priority in this program was given to a more political factor than a scientific one, and it was also supposed to become a grandiose world show. All this, in the first place, was required for the wounded prestige of the United States.
In the planned landing of people on the moon, the Americans certainly had to get ahead of the Soviet Union, whose success in space exploration continued to rapidly develop.
"We choose to go to the Moon" (we decided to fly to the moon),
Is a speech given by John F. Kennedy to students at Rice University in Houston, one of Kennedy's first Apollo speeches and plans for the first man to land on the moon.
What happened, however, was that the Soviet Union, which had suffered after the hardest war, was ahead of the rich and well-fed United States in rocketry.
In many ways, this was the success of the "Soviet" German rocketry, captured from the "Fau" programs, under the leadership of Helmut Grettrup, Soviet science and our designers such as Sergei Korolev.
Werner von Braun, SS Sturmbannfuehrer, more director than designer, with his team of "captured" Germans in the USA did not achieve what the USSR received. Although it is from him that the Americans will make the image of a space genius who has created an unrivaled rocket to this day. And suddenly died shortly after the end of the announced flights under the Apollo program.
Problems with lunar ambitions became apparent to the Americans shortly after the announcement of these intentions in the US Congress.
The desired was at odds with the reality, the United States continued to yield to the USSR in space achievements. And first of all in manned astronautics, which is critical for the goal of landing people on the moon.
Therefore, on November 16, 1963, in the narrowest circle, a decisive meeting on the problems of the Apollo program was held with the participation of President John F. Kennedy.
Less than a week after this meeting, Kennedy was assassinated.
The most famous are two popular versions of the reasons for this murder.
So on June 4, 1963, Kennedy signed Executive Order 11110, according to which the Federal Government, for the first time since 11110, received the right to print currency without going to the US Federal Reserve. The issue would take place by decision of the President and without the approval of Congress, as required by the US Constitution.
Secondly, Kennedy demanded registration from Jewish organizations as
"Foreign agents"
on the territory of the United States, which would severely limit their ability to influence politics.
But there is also something that remains in the shadows.
Kennedy was ready to cooperate with the USSR in joint space exploration.
So, John F. Kennedy suggested that the Soviet Union jointly carry out work on landing a man on the moon. And this is after the grandiose single-handed ambitions of the United States, which it also announced earlier!
This was told by American historian John Logsdon, a former member of the NASA Advisory Board, founder of the Space Policy Institute at George Washington University.
According to Logsdon, Kennedy repeated his proposal to Khrushchev again in 1963, when Apollo was threatened with cancellation and relations between the USSR and the United States warmed after the Cuban missile crisis.
Confident of success, Khrushchev again refused, as this would have smoothed out the absolute victory of socialism over capitalism. Nikita Sergeevich had no particular doubts that the Soviet Union would be ahead of the United States on the moon.
The United States is hopelessly behind the Soviet Union in manned space exploration. For this reason alone, the American president proposed cooperation that would allow at least the United States to save face at the international level and gain access to Soviet experience and technologies in manned space exploration.
Kennedy's proposal was unprecedented. If, on the contrary, the USSR lagged behind the USA in space, they would not have offered us anything like that.
Khrushchev's refusal left the Americans no choice. The ultimate loss in Space Race would have put the US in an extremely difficult position. It was a matter of "life and death" for capitalism and for the United States itself, which became the world leader and master of the capitalist system.
How often quoted a phrase that is essentially correct:
"There is no such crime that capital will not go for a profit of 300%."
It could be continued like this:
to "any crime" and for the sake of further flourishing parasitism.
Moreover, it is acceptable for capitalist morality in the United States, be it the murder of its own president or a monstrous and blatant falsification.
Could John F. Kennedy agree to the lunar scam, deception of the entire world community, incrimination of which would put the United States on the brink of national disgrace and disaster?
Hardly. Therefore, he offered cooperation.
With this step, Kennedy left no choice to world capitalism, having signed his own death warrant. Including on such an important issue as the absolute victory of the United States in space, as the absolute victory of capitalism over socialism.
Brezhnev was bought by the moon
In October 1964, Nikita Khrushchev also lost his position. His place was taken by Leonid Brezhnev. All further events took place during his reign.
In the United States, preparations for the lunar mission were in full swing, its spectacular part was largely inspired by the 1968 film by Stanley Kubrick (written by Arthur Clarke) "A Space Odyssey of 2001".
Just as it seemed to Arthur Clarke that by the XNUMXst century mankind would have mastered deep space in manned flights, so much in the American program was done "for growth." It was with the confession of Kubrick (after which he died suddenly) in the falsification of the entire US lunar program that the scandal began. Apart from narrow specialists, now the whole world is thinking. And it split into those who believed in the United States and those who began to doubt.
In fact, as a safety net, you could have filmed something in the Hollywood pavilion.
But how it turned out, everything was much more complicated.
NASA came up with their own "space odyssey" from scratch (about many things only by ideas, due to the lack of real experience), focusing on theories, assumptions, preliminary calculations and publicly available scientific information.
However, it is difficult to come up with what you know firsthand. If TASS stated that our cosmonauts feel great after returning from orbit, our American "partners" took this into account.
To illustrate, two photos, immediately giving rise to doubts about the reality of American manned flights. These are fixed facts that you cannot deny.
Having no idea about how they really felt after a long stay in zero gravity, the Americans imagined that returning from orbit should look like Hollywood.
This fact alone is only part of the many blunders and inconsistencies. The assumption immediately suggests itself about the entire American show mission to "conquer" the moon.
After an oxygen environment in a reduced pressure, in which the subjects felt bad even on Earth, leaving the pressure chamber, what can we say about the added weightlessness and tightness of the capsule, while still in spacesuits filled with feces, without toilets for several days.
All the broadcasts "from space" from American astronauts were more reminiscent of old radio shows based on far-fetched science fiction stories than real reports.
It turns out that the Americans engaged in falsification even before the "flights" to the moon, shortly after the assassination of Kennedy. This is all of their "manned" astronautics of that period, including the Skylab tank-dummy.
When the Chief Designer Academician Vasily Pavlovich Mishin, who replaced Sergei Pavlovich Korolev, learned about the launch of Apollo 8 to the Moon, he said,
"It can't be, they are adventurers doing a comedy in space."
It turns out that maybe ...
Later, already in 1970, at MGGS-70 (International Geological and Geophysical Symposium of 1970), the Americans showed a film about their flights to the Moon. At the end of this film there was a five-minute interview with the director of the American lunar program, recorded specifically for MGGS-70, in which he summed up that in the USSR they could not fly along the Kondratyuk route, but in the USA they did.
"Kondratyuk's track" is another theoretical borrowing of an old publication, where a 1st year student, Alexander Stepanovich Shagrey, published his calculation of a flight to the moon under the pseudonym "Yuri Vasilyevich Kondratyuk". At that time, no one knew about the existence of radiation belts (or the Van Allen belt) near the Earth, and, in general, the study of radioactivity was just beginning.
The “Kondratyuk track” is a trajectory with minimal energy consumption, but it passes through the radiation belts in places where the maximum concentration of protons, electrons and other radioactive particles.
The American engineer from NASA John Houbolt took advantage of the ideas of the Kondratyuk Trail. Moreover, it turned out that when traveling along the trajectory officially declared by NASA only one way, the Americans should have received lethal doses of radiation.
This is not counting the fact that their flights began in the years of maximum activity of the Sun, and the starts were often superimposed on the arising magnetic storms.
The scandal that began then at the symposium on the same evening was closed by an order from the Central Committee of the CPSU to the Presidium of the USSR Academy of Sciences, where it was strongly recommended to forget about the Kondratyuk route with radiation belts and
"Don't annoy American friends."
Why?
Maybe because the 35th President of the United States John F. Kennedy suddenly offered the Soviet Union cooperation in manned exploration of the Moon, and their 37th President Richard Nixon, again, suddenly flew in 1972 personally to Moscow, and the United States went to grandiose concessions, and also presented expensive personal gifts to Brezhnev?
All of this strangely coincided with America's great achievements in landing on the moon.
The apotheosis of American friendship with the "defeated" USSR in space was the joint show "Soyuz-Apollo", where, following the logic, only one "Soyuz" actually flew.
You have to understand that, as before, everyone saw only an enchanting American launch with Apollo and the same splashdown with sniper accuracy next to their ships.
By the way, even more risky in terms of overloads, the refusal of the Americans from the "two-dive" scheme of entering the Earth's atmosphere could not give the declared accuracy of the splashdown of the American Apollo. Drop the Apollo capsule from a high-altitude freighter? Yes, you can fit into that "patch". Then it can be explained why the daughter's descent vehicle was not burned at high velocities of entry into the atmosphere.
If dear Leonid Ilyich made a deal with the Americans, this explains a lot in that “detente”. And with what the United States paid off for recognition and silence.
This can also explain how suddenly, as if on assignment or "for the sake of self-interest," in our country there were many supporters of the project of conquering the moon by the United States. Among them is cosmonaut Yevgeny Leonov, a direct participant in the Soyuz-Apollo program.
Our President Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin, when asked about the lunar falsification, answered with humor, as a private person:
“I know this version.
But it seems to me that it is impossible to falsify such an event.
This is the same thing that some claim that on September 11, the Americans themselves blew up these twin towers. They themselves directed the actions of the terrorists.
Complete nonsense! Brad, this is impossible! ... Complete nonsense!
The same applies to the landing on the moon: it is impossible to falsify an event of this magnitude. "
But it seems to me that it is impossible to falsify such an event.
This is the same thing that some claim that on September 11, the Americans themselves blew up these twin towers. They themselves directed the actions of the terrorists.
Complete nonsense! Brad, this is impossible! ... Complete nonsense!
The same applies to the landing on the moon: it is impossible to falsify an event of this magnitude. "
(Forum "Seliger", August 1, 2011).
Towards the Twin Towers. Correlate the mass of the plane and the mass of the steel and concrete building ...
For both towers to fold like houses of cards inside, even an aircraft carrier that crashed from the sky would not have achieved such an effect. Plus, a terrorist passport was found right on the ruins. Unburned? Where can we go without it?
Very muddy thing.
Why then did the third skyscraper fall in the same way at a distance, into which no planes crashed?
And where did all the wreckage from the plane that "rammed" the part of the Pentagon that was empty due to repairs go?
Who, besides the United States, also created and sponsored world terrorism, and then pretended that he was fighting it too? Aren't the Americans themselves?
Whoever laughed at the crystal "honesty" of these same Americans. Take at least the same test tube of "white powder" that Colin Powell was shaking at the UN to find a suitable excuse for the US invasion of Iraq?
As in the case of the flights to the moon, with the twin towers, we were presented with implausible excuses and a combination of facts. For example, that the third skyscraper allegedly fell because gas exploded under it, by coincidence, at the same moment. This, what kind of field exploded there, what could work in full accordance with the technology of industrial detonation?
Is the Moon an American Earth Satellite?
Now the States have begun to claim their special rights to a natural satellite of the Earth called the Moon.
Moreover, they are not even in a hurry to land on it again. And, moreover, their super-reliable rovers seem to have been navigating the vastness of Mars for many years. At the same time, up to the present time on the Moon, the States have not been able to run in any real and even inferior lunar rover.
There is also such a directive as the "US National Space Policy". She is very suitable just for the protection of secrets for all visits by the Americans to the moon. After all, these trips to the moon are indicated by no less than
"Critical Information for American National Interests."
That is, it is the strictest secret.
Only Russia (as the assignee of the USSR) now has the full right to inspect the lunar surface with any detail that is possible.
This is possible now. And it was possible even under Brezhnev - to make an inspection flyby of the moon. Even if in automatic mode, but this does not happen?
Hans Christian Anderson wrote the fairy tale "The New Dress of the King". Just as in that fairy tale, events unfold today: everyone clearly sees that the king is naked. But to say something about it honestly and openly (read: officially) is in no way possible.
In the United States, everything is sewn with "white thread". All of their crafty explanations for flying to the moon. Exactly the same as in stories with the industrial detonation of those fatal twin towers.
No one is going to quarrel with America now. Including our new "elite".
Moreover, for the United States it is still a matter of life and death. Up to the threat of the outbreak of war. If they are caught in a lie, then this is an indelible national shame.
To everyone who piously believes in Hollywood speculation, let me remind you:
“This is one small step for man, but a giant leap for all mankind.”
But the fact is that the United States is not all of humanity. And that, yes, the richest country, but still ahead of the Soviet Union in manned cosmonautics.
Brezhnev's deal with the United States provided temporary benefits. But it gave rise to a fetish of the West, the loss of ideology, as a result of the betrayal of socialism by party renegades and the death of the Soviet Union.
A whole army of adherents of the "lunar witnesses" and dollar trolls, together with demagogues from NASA, get out in explanations and excuses. They, I must say, even go so far as to throw in fakes like that "Gagarin did not fly at all." So it goes to the point that "The Earth is flat" will soon agree ... Their dollar silver coins, of course, will be credited to them.
The inconsistencies about the moon
Until now, NASA has not been able to safely return crews from deep space. This circumstance alone is enough to ruin the reality of the Apollo flights to the moon.
And the falsification of the Apollo program itself is revealed from the very sources of NASA in the following directions:
1. An attempt to develop a heavy lunar launch vehicle over a period of five years resulted in the acknowledgment of the existence of serious vibration problems in the first stage of the rocket, similar to those experienced on Saturn 5. Subsequently, the Ares series missiles had to be abandoned.
2. The F-1 engines of the first stage of "Saturn-5" are not even discussed in the current analytical documents of NASA.
3. An upgraded version of the Saturn 2 second stage J-5 engine has been proposed for the new heavy rocket, but NASA now claims that it really boils down to a new development and work has been put on hold.
4. NASA is still unable to develop a heavy rocket with a payload of 70 tons, let alone repeat the capabilities of Saturn-5.
5. NASA qualifies the takeoff from the lunar surface as an ascent from a "deep gravity well", and plans to land on the moon were delayed so much that they were practically abandoned. This is not surprising, since the Apollo lunar module was clearly unable to take off from the landing platform due to the lack of gas venting channels.
6. The Apollo command module had the property of bistability during landing, that is, there was an equiprobable danger of its overturn and combustion when entering the Earth's atmosphere.
7. NASA still does not have a reliable heat shield for the command module to safely return crews from deep space.
8. The profile of "one-hole" (direct) entry into the Earth's atmosphere, declared in the reports on "Apollo", is practically inapplicable. If implemented when landing at the second space velocity, it can be catastrophic for the lander.
9. If the descent vehicle somehow transferred the entry into the atmosphere, then during the descent the astronauts would be in critical condition due to the serious danger of severe gravitational overloads after a long period of weightlessness and, most likely, after splashdown would be in a serious condition and would not look so cheerful.
10. The lack of key knowledge regarding human exposure to solar and space radiation in outer space makes real protection from radiation very problematic.
Finally, the last and main question:
"Where is the money, Zin?"
How and why did the most important evidence disappear: all the lunar soil disappeared? The originals of all photographic and film materials were also destroyed?
Hack and predictor Aviator
In conclusion, it must be said that if we take a strictly scientific basis, then it will become evident that we know about the manned Apollo flights to the Moon exclusively from NASA. There is not a single independent confirmation of these missions to date.
There weren't even any attempts at inspections, although there are no fundamental technical obstacles to this.
Therefore, the belief in the Apollo flights is entirely based today solely on the belief in the alleged honesty of NASA. But this approach is contrary to scientific principles and cannot be considered objective.
As Alexei Vadimovich Vandam (major general of the Russian army, military intelligence officer and writer) once said:
"Worse than a war with the Anglo-Saxon can only be friendship with him."
It is difficult to say what would have happened if this story had gone differently, had Khrushchev agreed to cooperate in space with Kennedy, would the USSR have won or lost then?
But definitely, the collapse of the Soviet Union largely determined the recognition by the Soviet leadership of the American landing on the moon.
In other words, the American mission "Blood Moon" of criminal capitalism destroyed the country of the USSR. But everything could be different.
The moon would just remain the moon. And I would call to the great deeds of our scientists and our people. Would be our well-deserved victory. And all this was lost so ineptly. No, you have to be honest.
All this was simply sold. Our elites. Buying a lie about the American moon
Information