The Ministry of Justice will not appeal the decision of the ECHR to pay compensation to Navalny

109
The Ministry of Justice will not appeal the decision of the ECHR to pay compensation to Navalny

The Ministry of Justice will not appeal the decision of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) to pay compensation to opposition leader Alexei Navalny for his detention on Bolotnaya Square in 2012. This was reported by the press service of the Ministry of Justice.

The Ministry of Justice explained that the decision made by the ECHR was not appealed due to the refusal of the European Court to consider the applicants' allegations of violation by the Russian authorities of Article 18 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.



In the rest of the judgment, the ECtHR's findings are based on well-established case-law, widely applied in similar cases in various Council of Europe member states.

- said the press service.

In November 2020, the ECHR awarded Russia the payment of 8,5 thousand euros in compensation for moral damage to Navalny for his detention during a protest on Bolotnaya Square in Moscow on May 6, 2012, followed by being left overnight at the police department and an administrative penalty.

Recall that on May 6, 2012 in Moscow, on Bolotnaya Square, a massive opposition rally agreed with the authorities took place, which eventually escalated into clashes with the police. As a result, more than 400 protesters were detained, including Navalny.
109 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    12 February 2021 10: 51
    ... In November 2020, the ECHR awarded Russia 8,5 euros in compensation for moral damage to Navalny for being detained during a protest on Bolotnaya Square in Moscow on May 6, 2012, followed by being left overnight at the police department and receiving administrative punishment.

    We also pay for the subversive activities of Nakhalny. Well, in general, why be surprised that the West is so scared about Russia, since we ourselves allow it?
    1. +16
      12 February 2021 10: 53
      Why do we need this European Court at all? Actually, like membership in PACE and other "sharashki"?
      1. +27
        12 February 2021 10: 55
        I re-read the article three times, but I still did not understand, will we pay this tovarisCh or not?
        1. +3
          12 February 2021 10: 59
          Quote: Scary_L.
          I re-read the article three times, but I still did not understand, will we pay this tovarisCh or not?

          Let this ECHP first pay all the disfigured French and other gay Europeans, and then think about Russia.
          1. +4
            12 February 2021 11: 27
            Quote: tihonmarine
            Let this ECHP first pay all disfigured French and other gay Europeans,

            They think about someone a lot.
            On December 4, the European Court of Human Rights issued a ruling obliging France to pay compensation to Somali pirates who attacked French ships. The court ruled that the pirates' rights were infringed upon as they had to wait 48 hours before being tried.
            1. +1
              12 February 2021 11: 41
              Well, that's the whole story about the "honesty and rightness" of the useless ECHP, which supports pirates and terrorists. And how many they killed they killed the sailors, this ECHP does not see.
              1. 0
                12 February 2021 13: 59
                Quote: tihonmarine
                Well, that's the whole story about the "honesty and rightness" of the useless ECHP, which supports pirates and terrorists. And how many they killed they killed the sailors, this ECHP does not see.

                The Look logically sets out what they are embarrassed to say in the media and on talk shows:
                "Three founders of the" Navalny project "
                Petr Akopov, columnist for RIA Novosti
                February 11 2021
            2. The comment was deleted.
            3. 0
              15 February 2021 13: 28
              Quote: Mordvin 3
              The court ruled that the pirates' rights were infringed upon as they had to wait 48 hours before being tried.

              I hope - that after 48 pirates were hanged? Oh no, they were able to file claims with the ECHR ...
              Sorry,....
          2. +5
            12 February 2021 11: 30
            The ECHR, PACE, EU and other Western "democrats" brazenly always want the same thing: for Russia to bow, repent and pay, pay, repent and bow.

            Only Russia has already adopted a law on the priority of Russian laws over foreign ones. And just now dissatisfaction with the attitude of Europe, the West towards Russia was expressed, doubts were expressed about the advisability of maintaining contacts with such Europe and further stay in the Russophobic PACE boltology club.

            As for the appetites of the "Euro-democrats" and Navalny with the bulk of Navalny about the fat jackpot-fine, they will only have to lick their lips: decisions of the ECHR NOT required For Russia. The Russian Ministry of Justice simply has nothing to talk about with the ECHR.
            1. 0
              12 February 2021 11: 41
              Quote: Vladimir Mashkov
              Only Russia has already adopted a law on the priority of Russian laws over foreign ones.

              MOSCOW, January 23 - RIA Novosti. The legal protection of Russians, including through the ECHR, will not suffer in connection with the decisions to adopt an amendment to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, said the head of the Russian delegation to PACE, Deputy Speaker of the State Duma Pyotr Tolstoy.
            2. +2
              12 February 2021 11: 43
              You are aware that they help many people, not only Russian citizens.
              1. -4
                12 February 2021 11: 47
                And bless! Only this does NOT mean that Russia absolutely needs to rush headlong to perform any decision of the ECHR. In this particular case, Navalny's foreign agent is NOT needed.
                1. -3
                  12 February 2021 12: 15
                  Quote: Vladimir Mashkov
                  In this particular case, Navalny's foreign agent is NOT needed.

                  Wait for the arrest of Russian property?
                  1. +2
                    12 February 2021 16: 25
                    Quote: mordvin xnumx
                    Wait for the arrest of Russian property?

                    Quote: Kronos
                    You are aware that they help many people, not only Russian citizens.
                    The decisions of this alleged court played a significant role in promoting brexit on the island of Her Majesty: a year before the vote, they made more than forty decisions on payment of compensation by the UK government, including compensation for a pedophile, a rapist, a terrorist confirmed by a court ... The money is ridiculous, but the Britov were outraged - what then someone appointed by someone decides to pay from the British budget ...
                    Let the ECHR continue to make decisions on Russian liberals - someone will sue for non-compliance with the Constitution wink
                    1. +1
                      12 February 2021 16: 30
                      Quote: Pete Mitchell
                      Let the ECHR continue to make decisions on Russian liberals - someone will sue for non-compliance with the Constitution

                      The Constitution of Russia is not valid outside its borders.
                  2. 0
                    13 February 2021 14: 12
                    And who will arrest him then? Leshik from the zone?
                    1. 0
                      13 February 2021 14: 17
                      Quote: ZAV69
                      And who will arrest him then? Leshik from the zone?

                      Europeans. There are precedents.
                      1. -2
                        13 February 2021 14: 21
                        Quote: Mordvin 3
                        Europeans. There are precedents.

                        What are the precedents? There must be a specific individual who will sue for arrest. Then it was a firm leg. Who is right now? Leshik? Well, let him try to file from the colony. They will explain to him in the operative part that it is not necessary to do this, if you want to be alive and backward.
              2. +1
                12 February 2021 12: 24
                Quote: Kronos
                You are aware that they help many people, not only Russian citizens.
                We are aware of course! But we are also aware that decisions in relation to the citizens of Russia are made taking into account the global political trend in relation to our country! Therefore, in identical cases in the ECHR, regarding our citizens, they can make diametrically opposite decisions! In short, positive decisions are made mainly in cases where the person who submitted the application is of interest to the EU and the minke whales in order to use it in the future.
                1. -1
                  12 February 2021 12: 26
                  Yeah, for example, this girl https://lenta.ru/news/2021/02/08/elizaria/
                  1. 0
                    13 February 2021 22: 35
                    Quote: Kronos
                    Yeah, for example this girl

                    You understand what I mean! What is the bickering for? I wrote about the topic of the article - about breakup.
            3. +2
              14 February 2021 11: 20
              Quote: Vladimir Mashkov
              Russia has already adopted a law on the priority of Russian laws over foreign

              Apparently you are very far from jurisprudence.
              First, the foreign legislation on the territory of the Russian Federation do not work... Hence and "
              priority of Russian laws over foreign
              "the concept is not realizable, since this requires a hierarchy of laws - one is more important, the other cannot contradict it (for example, the Federal Law and the law of a constituent entity of the Russian Federation). In the case when one law is valid on the territory of the Russian Federation, and the other does not work (foreign), there is no priority.
              Secondly, you are unambiguously confusing the concept "foreign law"and the international obligations of the Russian Federation. By joining the Council of Europe, we assumed international obligations, which, in accordance with part 4 of article 15 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, became our laws:
              Article 15
              4. The generally recognized principles and norms of international law and international treaties of the Russian Federation are an integral part of its legal system. EIf an international treaty of the Russian Federation establishes rules other than those provided by law, then the rules of the international treaty are applied.

              Thirdly, in the event that the Russian Federation believes that the fulfillment of an international obligation undermines the foundations of the constitutional system of the Russian Federation (for example, as was the case with the ECHR decision on terrorists), the Russian Federation should, in the course of communication of the ECHR complaint with the High Contracting Party (Russia), bring its arguments about the inadmissibility of the applicant's complaint to the ECHR. Instead, we get the reputation of an unacceptable country (like, for example, the United States, with which it is useless to sign international agreements, they will cheat anyway).
              In the event that the decision of the ECHR has taken place, and it undermines the foundations of the constitutional system of the Russian Federation, the Constitutional Court must issue an appropriate conclusion. Which, unfortunately, was not done.
              Quote: Vladimir Mashkov
              about the fat jackpot-fine Navalny, then they only have to lick their lips: the decisions of the ECHR are NOT binding on Russia.

              I'm just shocking you now. laughing
              Here is what the Justice Ministry said on the Navalny case:
              "Payment of the compensation awarded by the European Court will be carried out in accordance with the general procedure," the press service said on Thursday in response to a request from Interfax.

              Navalny confirmed the receipt of funds, the payment went through:
              Russian authorities paid over 4 million rubles to Alexei Navalny

              I am also categorically opposed to the State paying money from my taxes to Navalny. However, you in vain mislead members of the forum with your illiteracy in the field of jurisprudence.
              1. 0
                15 February 2021 14: 31
                In the 1977 Constitution of the USSR, there was also an article on the recognition of international law.
                Article 29. ".......... cooperation between states; conscientious fulfillment of obligations arising from universally recognized principles and norms of international law, from the international treaties concluded by the USSR. "
                1. 0
                  15 February 2021 19: 22
                  Tooting! drinks
          3. +1
            12 February 2021 11: 49
            The Ministry of Justice in fact admitted the guilt of the Russian Federation. Another "peremoga", but in fact a broken bottom.
            1. +2
              12 February 2021 16: 27
              Quote: lexus
              The Ministry of Justice in fact admitted the guilt of the Russian Federation. Another "peremoga", but in fact a broken bottom.

              And you show the Ministry of Justice - not the implementation of the Constitution, create a precedent. You see, people will catch up
        2. -7
          12 February 2021 11: 12
          Quote: Scary_L.
          did not understand whether we will pay this tovarisChu or not?

          The Ministry of Justice explained that the decision made by the ECHR not appealed due to the European Court's refusal to consider the applicants' allegations of violation by the Russian authorities of Article 18 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
          On NO and ships NO. Yes
        3. -3
          12 February 2021 11: 24
          The Russian Foreign Ministry proceeds from the readiness to break off relations with the European Union, said the head of the ministry Sergei Lavrov. He said this in an interview on the YouTube channel "Soloviev Live", a fragment of the conversation was published on the Foreign Ministry website.

          We do not want to isolate ourselves from world life, but we must be ready for this. If you want peace, prepare for war, "

          1. The severance of diplomatic relations.
          2. Mobilization.
          3. The war.

          Well, where are the crowds "wanting to repeat"? I ask - START is given.
          1. +1
            12 February 2021 11: 36
            for a long time they got together with courage, wiping spit from their faces ...
            1. -15
              12 February 2021 11: 40
              Quote: Dikson
              for a long time they got together with courage, wiping spit from their faces ...

              Run to sign up as a volunteer! The assault on the Seelow Heights awaits, as well as the Dnieper bridgeheads. If earlier from radiation sickness both sides will not bend.
              1. +3
                12 February 2021 11: 54
                There will be nothing. From START, too, they were preparing to leave, so they were preparing until the opportunity arose not to leave.
                1. -10
                  12 February 2021 12: 01
                  Quote: military_cat
                  There will be nothing. From START, too, they were preparing to leave, so they were preparing until the opportunity arose not to leave.

                  1. The government is rapidly losing support, including in the army. Therefore, the army urgently needs to be put on its ears so that they can start preparing for war or go to fight.
                  2. Martial law will allow you to calmly send to the camps in bulk.
                  3. The imposed and future sanctions are already rapidly finishing off the economy. The war will write off all this, people will work for rations, not money. And it's cheaper.
                  4. Everything is heading towards an embargo on raw materials from Russia and a severe crisis. And people need to explain why. Because the war.
                  5. War, as history shows, is very helpful in multiplying capital for those who need it.

                  Therefore, the war.
                  1. +1
                    12 February 2021 12: 13
                    I understand your logic. Again, a revolutionary situation ..- it remains to slap someone in some Sarajevo - and the fun is guaranteed, right? Embargo .. Sanctions .. Nabiullina won at the behest of the IMF 320 tons of Russian gold to London in a year .. - they say, according to the rules of the IMF, which our Central Bank obeys, the state reserve in gold should not exceed 20% of the total amount .. And gold then we are not in command ..))) So you are in vain waiting for volunteers to storm the Seelow Heights .. No matter how Mamayev Kurgan is surrendered ... Our gentlemen have all business in Europe .., factories, vineyards, palaces and castles .. - they will not fight .. Otherwise, we will burn out with Europe, and the Americans again with a ransom ..
                  2. +1
                    12 February 2021 18: 10
                    Quote: Civil
                    Therefore, the war.

                    Peskov pointed to the media's misinterpretation of Lavrov's words about the rupture of relations between Russia and the EU

                    I don't want to upset you, but the war has already been canceled.
              2. 0
                12 February 2021 12: 24
                The provocateur is the first bullet.
          2. +2
            12 February 2021 11: 58
            Quote: Civil
            - START is given.

            So the Higher Political Hands of Russia decided that now the country is ready for such a step.

            In general, the moment is right: there is a crisis + covid in the world. People without work, there are lockdowns everywhere, borders are closed.
            The redheads stagger. Ia is weakened.
            And the place of Russia in the world has changed. How long can you chew on snot and always be guilty?
      2. 0
        12 February 2021 10: 56
        The legacy of our aspirations in the 90s-00s-10s is to integrate into the structures of the West, to become a part of it, to hang out beautifully in the West, including our oligarchs, officials and, in the long term, the middle class of the country. But times have changed, and membership in "sharashki" remains.
      3. +3
        12 February 2021 11: 15
        Do you want to deprive Tolstoy of his work ?! You can't get him out of there by the ears, 1001 arguments lead to the importance and "inviolability" of our, that is, his participation
      4. 0
        12 February 2021 11: 37
        Quote: Hunter 2
        Why do we need this European Court at all? Actually, like membership in PACE and other "sharashki"?

        Officials need business trips at the expense of the state. Those who did not manage to cling to the troughs more serious and so for happiness.
        1. -5
          12 February 2021 11: 59
          Their troughs are always full, so that you know why you have to look stupid on a regular basis.
          1. -3
            12 February 2021 12: 02
            Quote: lexus
            Their troughs are always full, so that you know why you have to look stupid on a regular basis.

            The more money, the more greedy they become and the more you want freebies. Alas, I had to face such people in my life, and they are relatives.
            1. -3
              12 February 2021 12: 15
              "Greed will ruin the frayer." (C) From a burnout, the belly will either crack itself, or "help".
      5. +7
        12 February 2021 11: 42
        Then, that is the only chance for ordinary people to get justice in court.
        1. -3
          12 February 2021 12: 06
          Considering that no laws have been written for "basmanny justice", and a certain group of people "by prior conspiracy" is absolutely not limited by the enforcement of its decisions.
    2. D16
      -7
      12 February 2021 11: 00
      We also pay for the subversive activities of Nakhalny.

      Nobody pays for anything. The decisions of the ECHR in Russia are no longer a priority.
      1. +5
        12 February 2021 11: 38
        Quote: D16
        Nobody pays for anything.

        And who told you that?


        Newspaper "Kommersant" No. 144 dated 13.08.2020/2/XNUMX, p. XNUMX
        By the end of the summer, the Russian Ministry of Justice ran out of money to pay for the decisions of the ECHR. “Again,” add lawyers interviewed by Kommersant, stressing that this happens every year. In 2020, 280 people are expected to pay, the amount of debt is 270 million rubles, the Ministry of Justice told Kommersant, specifying that payments will be made by the end of December. A source in the department also noted that the debt partly arose due to the coronavirus epidemic and the work of the Ministry of Justice "in a special regime" for several months.
    3. -9
      12 February 2021 11: 14
      Why dispute if now you can simply not pay, the legislation allows.
      1. 0
        14 February 2021 11: 27
        Quote: AlexanderI
        legislation allows

        Well, give this rule of law.
        1. -1
          15 February 2021 09: 03
          Read the adopted amendments to Art. 79 of the Constitution
          And also: the European Court is not the highest authority in relation to the judicial system of a state party to the convention. Therefore, he cannot overturn a decision made by a public authority or a national court, does not give instructions to the legislator, does not exercise abstract control over national legislation or judicial practice, and does not have the right to order the adoption of measures that have legal consequences.
          1. +1
            15 February 2021 12: 50
            You are either a person who is very far from jurisprudence, or you will insist on your erroneous position so that you are not told, no matter what arguments you are given. I think ... second.
            You may disagree with the obligation of the Russian Federation to fulfill international obligations, but the Ministry of Finance has fulfilled these obligations and paid Navalny (the entire amount awarded by the ECHR from your pocket and mine).
            In order not to comply with the decision of the ECHR, this decision must contradict the Constitution of the Russian Federation. And the decision regarding Navalny does not contradict her.
            And this decision (in terms of compensation) was executed by virtue of Part 4 of Art. 15 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation:
            If other rules are established by an international treaty of the Russian Federation than those provided by law, the rules of the international treaty shall apply.

            With respect!
    4. +3
      12 February 2021 11: 22
      They steal from the budget hundreds of times more than this payment. What are your worries about? Or do you not know?
    5. -7
      12 February 2021 11: 47
      The cost price of one cartridge of PM is 45 rubles ... All the same, it's a little expensive for the people to cost Leshenka, but Russia is a generous country!
    6. +1
      12 February 2021 11: 59
      But what about the amendments, they decide everything !?
      1. 0
        14 February 2021 11: 29
        Quote: Revival
        But what about the amendments

        Only the presidential term was reset, our commitments to the Council of Europe were not nullified (there was no such goal).
        1. -1
          15 February 2021 09: 04
          What are you talking about)))
  2. -9
    12 February 2021 10: 55
    Well, the taxpayers are demanding from you. Soon Vlasov's relatives will have to pay.
    1. +3
      12 February 2021 11: 00
      Say thank you if soon the descendants of Aloizyevich will not sue us ... Still, our ancestors drove him to suicide ...
      1. -6
        12 February 2021 11: 03
        Quote: paul3390
        Say thank you if soon the descendants of Aloizyevich will not sue us ... Still, our ancestors drove him to suicide ...

        Yes, they might get there soon.
    2. -4
      12 February 2021 11: 04
      And who is Vlasov in the history of our country? Does he have any kind of influence in our society as a myth? This is a passing figure, forgotten by all and has not left any trace in our history. Liberal figures of the 90s and even then each much brighter and more significant trace in the history of the country left in comparison with the Vlasov pulled out of the dustbin of history, despite their mediocrity.
      1. +3
        12 February 2021 11: 25
        Another curious thing is that Russia persists in PACE (and even silently paid its arrears of contributions there along with fines) and the ECHR, as it regularly makes contributions to the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD). However, she (Russia) does not use either the PACE or the ECHR to protect its citizens in case of troubles they have when they are in the EU countries. But the EU constantly uses these platforms as mechanisms to support dissidents and its agents of influence in Russia. The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), where Russia regularly contributes 4,1% of all investments of other countries, supports Ukraine, Romania, Poland, the Baltic countries and other "sworn friends" of Russia, as well as various organizations within Russia, Belarus, which according to the EU, they are carrying out activities to "democratize processes" within these countries, that is, they are carrying out "subversive" activities. How is this to be understood, in general?
      2. -3
        12 February 2021 11: 45
        Liberal leaders, as they were in the 90s, have remained.
    3. +5
      12 February 2021 11: 24
      Of course from us, not from Rotenberg and Vasilyeva to demand.
  3. 0
    12 February 2021 10: 56
    Well, if our Ministry of Foreign Affairs continues to express deep concern ... then they will sit on our necks (they have already sat down), we need something more serious, and not engage in chatter
    1. -4
      12 February 2021 11: 01
      And what about the Foreign Ministry? We have all the power in full force exclusively engaged in chatting .. And the distribution of empty promises ..
  4. -2
    12 February 2021 10: 58
    In this news, everything is fine .. Now the bad youngsters will rush to the demonstrations .. And then they will write applications to the ECHR "on compensation for moral harm" ... And they will pay from the budget, right? ))) A good addition to the scholarship ..- for a night in the bullpen get 8,5 thousand euros ..)))
    1. -1
      12 February 2021 11: 12
      Quote: Dikson
      Now the young are bad as they rush to the demonstration .. And then write statements to the ECHR "about compensation

      But who prevents our Ministry of Justice from working with fiction and spark? Fines must exceed the amount of compensation. If there is no money, then everything that was awarded by the Eurikas is automatically withdrawn as part of the fine. With Navalny and start (insulting a veteran) - what the hell will he get and even have to ...
      1. -4
        12 February 2021 11: 43
        It's not about the amount of fines, arrests and trials ... The question is how many idiots will fall for such a bait and climb into unauthorized rallies and events .. In fact, this is like an invitation from Europe: - you make a mess there, and we will force your the authorities will pay you for your offenses .. The youngsters are walking around for fun anyway .. - and cho, photos in the social network from paddy wagons and cameras - romance! And now it turns out that you can profit not only with cookies from Nuland, but also with quite real Eureka .. Beauty!
  5. bar
    -6
    12 February 2021 10: 58
    Ministry of Justice will not appeal the decision of the European Court

    It will just put on this solution with the appliance. tongue
    1. +10
      12 February 2021 11: 11
      It won't, because we are members of the Council of Europe and PACE, so we will pay.
      Another question is what we are doing there so far and why we returned to the same PACE useless and openly hostile, it is not clear .. If you defend Russia's position in Europe, this does not happen. Wonderful things are yours, Lord.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. bar
        -3
        12 February 2021 14: 51
        Quote: Destiny
        It won't, because we are members of the Council of Europe and PACE, so we will pay.

        I think it won't be long. Judging by Lavrov's statements, the process of laying has already begun.
        “We proceed from the fact that we are ready. In case we see again (as we have already felt more than once) that sanctions are imposed in some areas that create risks for our economy, including in the most sensitive areas. We do not want to isolate ourselves from world life, but we must be ready for this. If you want peace, prepare for war. "
  6. -2
    12 February 2021 11: 00
    The Ministry of Justice will not appeal the decision of the ECHR to pay compensation to Navalny

    It is not clear, our sho, again in those games, with cheaters, wanted to play?
    Madhouse !!!
  7. 0
    12 February 2021 11: 00
    Well, how much can you cave in to this biased European bureaucracy, which has a clearly Russophobic anti-Russian orientation. Russia cannot be a fully sovereign country as long as we are bound hand and foot by signed documents when joining the Council of Europe, it would be time to leave it and terminate all agreements with the EU, otherwise we will continue to be taught as schoolchildren and financially punished for bad behavior.
    1. -1
      13 February 2021 00: 46
      Quote: Fedor Sokolov
      Well, how much can you cave in to this biased European bureaucracy, which has a clearly Russophobic anti-Russian orientation. Russia cannot be a fully sovereign country as long as we are bound hand and foot by signed documents when joining the Council of Europe, it would be time to leave it and terminate all agreements with the EU, otherwise we will continue to be taught as schoolchildren and financially punished for bad behavior.

      Better yet, build a huge fence around the country and live 1 on 1? Like the DPRK. Brilliant. Russia is a weak country, Russia in terms of its economy is not like the USSR, not even the 2000 model. Russia must join either China or the United States. There is no third.
  8. -6
    12 February 2021 11: 00
    Are the decisions of the ECHR obligatory for us?
    And one more thing: Moscow is ready to break off relations with Brussels, Lavrov said
    1. +4
      12 February 2021 11: 02
      Yes! Because we are members of the Council of Europe, his mother.
      1. -5
        12 February 2021 11: 07
        Council of Europe his mother

        Mother mother mother !! The echo echoed habitually ... laughing
    2. -3
      12 February 2021 11: 06
      It's time to break off relations with the European Union, business is already doing its own business on the quiet.
      1. +2
        12 February 2021 11: 16
        Membership itself is nothing more than colonial dependence, which gives European bureaucrats and courts the right to interfere in Russia's internal affairs.
  9. -11
    12 February 2021 11: 12
    That's right, why does he breed unnecessary bureaucracy. A piece of paper (ECHR decision) under the cloth, put the text on the table and let it lie. Today in Russia the rule of its laws. Another question to those who were previously in power - what was the need at that time to rush stumbling to join various European organizations, but this question is exclusively rhetorical. Today we have what we were striving for. However, mutually beneficial friendship and cooperation with Europe "from Lisbon to Vladivostok" is not and will not be observed.
    1. -2
      12 February 2021 15: 02
      Question: - Why does Lisbon or Berlin (Merkel) need Vladivostok?
      The resource is needed for the prosperity of the EU, there is no one more to plunder, or something like Albright secretly - We are for democracy, but you give it back ?!
      That’s probably the question.
      Everything else is idle chatter for divorce, they love Ekraina, so they do everything so that it is completely covered to the end.
  10. +6
    12 February 2021 11: 14
    Unfortunately, about the ECHR, if it is engaged, we cannot do anything about it. Made a commitment. So we are executing ... but we do not submit an appeal, because this procedure will cost much more than this fine. And according to the basic requirements of Navalny, they were killed. It's unpleasant, of course ... We have to get out of this whole Europe. PACE, OSCE, HRC ... A crowd of jackals ...
    1. +1
      12 February 2021 14: 53
      Again, the question of the end of the 80's, the beginning of the 90's, the whole task was to subjugate the country to itself and to its structures on a colonial basis, well, like it is now in Ukraine.
      The question of the economy is a decisive factor, they need any resources, they want to live as well, but here there is a crisis on both sides. And with Russia, as 90gg does not slip, so they get angry, puff, etc. !
  11. -6
    12 February 2021 11: 14
    And with what fear should we carry out the decisions of the ECHR? Are we members of the Council of Europe? Do we not have the supremacy of national legislation over international?
  12. -7
    12 February 2021 11: 14
    The Ministry of Justice will not appeal the decision of the ECHR to pay compensation to Navalny


    What? To pay this ghoul?
    Get off))
    Let him sit in a jar, eat pasta in sunflower oil, and dream of crabs))
    1. 0
      12 February 2021 14: 55
      They do not accept our appeals from the word in general, they ignore!
      As in interpol, why waste time on this, you can also torpedo them in the ass!
    2. 0
      13 February 2021 16: 45
      Cool, bulk minus, flew like flies))
      Come on, freaks, go crazy)))

      All the same, your Fuhrer will be imprisoned, like Lyuba-Goebbels))
  13. The comment was deleted.
  14. -5
    12 February 2021 11: 31
    And they won't. And all because:"Decisions of interstate bodies adopted on the basis of the provisions of international treaties of the Russian Federation in their interpretation, contrary to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, are not subject to execution in the Russian Federation."
    Well, what about: "Russia is ready to break off relations with Brussels, if there are sanctions on its part that create risks for sensitive areas of the economy," said Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov.- so what about the liberals and other traitors to Russia, - the station, the platform leaves ...
    “We proceed from the fact that we are ready. In case we see again (as we have already felt more than once) that sanctions are being imposed in some areas that create risks for our economy, including in the most sensitive areas. We do not want to isolate ourselves from world life, but we must be ready for this. If you want peace, get ready for war. " said Lavrov
    1. -1
      12 February 2021 12: 12
      Quote: Mykhalych
      contrary to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, are not subject to execution in the Russian Federation. "

      And where are the contradictions of the Constitution of the Russian Federation?
      1. The comment was deleted.
  15. 0
    12 February 2021 11: 32
    Will there be other news today or is it all about Navalny?
  16. -1
    12 February 2021 11: 43
    Ks RF can recognize the ECHR as a fraudulent organization (criminal) and all of its members.
    Add them to the non-entry list, together with members of the EU parliament who threaten Russia.
    As well as members of the Dutch commission to investigate the downed Boeing along with family members up to 3 descendants. Or, when entering the territory of the Russian Federation, in transit, send them to Magadan for an eternal settlement, without the right to correspond.
    1. 0
      12 February 2021 12: 41
      It's time.
      It remains for judges and officials to sell their villas in Spain and Italy. And take the kids from Oxford.
      1. 0
        12 February 2021 14: 45
        I agree, let them sit there. To release these "patriots" on free bread in the EU.
        Let them be dispossessed by Eurice, as before the Hindus, Pakistanis and everyone else!
    2. 0
      17 February 2021 12: 02
      Ks RF can recognize the ECHR as a fraudulent organization (criminal) and all of its members.

      What are you planning to do with him?

      Dmitry Ivanovich Dedov - Doctor of Law. Currently he is acting as a judge of the European Court of Human Rights from the Russian Federation.
  17. -2
    12 February 2021 11: 48
    Execution of the ECtHR decisions in relation to the provocateur Navalny is a shame for Russia !!!

    What other payments to Navalny and for what ?! What nonsense ?!

    This scoundrel is doing everything to arrange a provocation and a clash with the police, to create the necessary picture for the videos of the Western media and Instagram, and at the expense of our taxpayers we also have to pay the scum ?!

    In the Ministry of Justice, who made such a decision to pay Navalny? He committed an administrative violation, and Russia must also pay him, just because all his antics are covered by the CIA through the ECHR ?!

    No decisions of the ECHR or any other court other than Russian ones should have any legal force on the territory of Russia !!!
  18. +6
    12 February 2021 12: 01
    Well, it must be, how many believers in the constitutional amendments: "And now you can not pay!"
  19. +1
    12 February 2021 12: 11
    Against the background of what is happening, is it already obs .. or not yet?
  20. 0
    12 February 2021 12: 14
    Well, "defenders" fly in to explain this shame!
    And how puffed up!
    And the amendments, which were powerful
  21. +2
    12 February 2021 12: 19
    Ha. This article is intended to confuse everything.

    As far as I know, everyone has already paid for a long time, since they carried out detention, arrests, etc. in violation of the law, etc.
    1. -1
      12 February 2021 12: 41
      Why is it being published now, that's the question;)
    2. -1
      12 February 2021 12: 41
      Quote: Max1995
      Everyone has already paid for a long time, since they carried out detention, arrests, etc. in violation of the law, etc.

      He was paid for his arrests at a rally in 2011. For 2012 has not been paid yet.
  22. 0
    12 February 2021 13: 08
    If the ECHR were independent, I would understand this decision. And so, even if Navalny walks down the small square, he will be awarded compensation for moral damage by the ECHR.
  23. -1
    12 February 2021 13: 15
    The Ministry of Justice will not appeal the decision of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) to pay compensation to opposition leader Alexei Navalny

    Will it pay or will it just be wiped off by this decision?
  24. +1
    12 February 2021 14: 38
    Let them not appeal. The main thing is not to think about paying!
  25. 0
    12 February 2021 15: 56
    Quote: Civil
    Quote: Dikson
    for a long time they got together with courage, wiping spit from their faces ...

    Run to sign up as a volunteer! The assault on the Seelow Heights awaits, as well as the Dnieper bridgeheads. If earlier from radiation sickness both sides will not bend.

    Well, you will not die from the radiation, you will be killed by the bear.
  26. +7
    12 February 2021 18: 17
    Well, that's it. Now Lyokha will heal! In the stall they will buy goods ... Common will drive ... he will pay off his lawyers ...
    wassat
  27. 0
    12 February 2021 18: 37
    Well, this is a very impartial and most objective court. After the quasi-poisoning of Navalny, he immediately, after receiving the test results, made a decision obliging the Russian Federation to release him for treatment to Germany. But the cases of some convicts who were beaten up in prison have been waiting for their consideration for years. This court is a bunch of Russophobes, why the fuck is its jurisdiction? The United States does not recognize any international courts, and what made it worse for them?
  28. 0
    12 February 2021 21: 40
    It is written that it will not dispute, but it is not written anywhere that it will not pay.
  29. 0
    13 February 2021 10: 24
    And how does the Ministry of Justice justify its refusal to appeal against the ECtHR decision? From the article I did not understand the reasons for refusal. Or this article is just another fake, or stuffing to assess the public reaction.
  30. 0
    13 February 2021 12: 18
    So what will they pay? Congratulations, you have once again earned the "respect" of the West!