Military Review

Robotic complex "Impact" taught autonomous movement on the battlefield

64
Robotic complex "Impact" taught autonomous movement on the battlefield

The Udar robotic complex being developed in Russia was able to autonomously move on the battlefield, as well as interact with drones. Bekkhan Ozdoev, the industrial director of the weapons complex of the State Corporation Rostec, spoke about this.


The Udar complex was developed by the Kovrov All-Russian Research Institute "Signal" based on the BMP-3. Presented for the first time back in 2015, the complex was able to move around the battlefield autonomously, without operator commands, interact with drones, including a tethered type powered by the complex itself, as well as the ability to work in conjunction with light-type robotic systems. Previously, only remote control was reported.

When developing the "Impact", the specialists of the enterprise tested the possibility of the robot's movement in an autonomous mode. For this, the complex includes a motion planning subsystem based on sensors and meters. Based on the data received, the robot's movement route is formed, while taking into account the terrain and the parameters of the combat mission can be calculated

- leads TASS words of Ozdoev.

It is specified that when creating the Udar complex, the Signal specialists applied the principle of equipping the BMP-3 infantry fighting vehicle with a set of special equipment, which turns it into a robotic complex.

The robotization of the fighting compartments is carried out on the same principle - at the moment, six different fighting compartments are robotized, which were installed on the vehicle.

- specified in Rostec.

Earlier, VNII Signal explained that they did not create a robot from scratch, but developed a unified control system, which, after all the necessary work and tests, in the future can be installed on other standard models of military equipment in service with the Russian army.
64 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
  2. Ross xnumx
    Ross xnumx 11 February 2021 07: 45
    +10
    Perfectly! The most important thing is that when performing a combat mission, the robotic complex in autonomous mode does not confuse the shores.
  3. rocket757
    rocket757 11 February 2021 07: 52
    0
    The "Udar" complex was developed by the Kovrov All-Russian Research Institute "Signal" on the basis of the BMP-3.

    And how long can it be on the battlefield, when in the hands of the infantry / enemy there is a mass of means of destruction of such equipment ???
    It is, of course, without a crew, but for no reason / uselessly losing military equipment is not comme il faut ...
    Those. the demon of the correct tactics of use is in no way possible.
    1. Flooding
      Flooding 11 February 2021 08: 31
      +3
      Obviously, vehicles of this class will be carried out on chassis of different levels of protection and cross-country ability. In this case, they probably used the volume of the troop compartment for additional. equipment, which at the initial stage simplified and made the sample cheaper.
    2. qQQQ
      qQQQ 11 February 2021 08: 52
      +2
      Quote: rocket757
      Those. the demon of the correct tactics of use is in no way possible.

      You just opened America. And what can you use without the right tactics? Now this complex is becoming similar to a robotic platform, and if only telecontrol, then this is just a cart that does not fundamentally differ from the German times of the Second World War.
      1. Flooding
        Flooding 11 February 2021 09: 32
        0
        Quote: qqqq
        And what can be used without the right tactics?

        A missile with a nuclear warhead.
        1. Dodikson
          Dodikson 11 February 2021 10: 04
          -3
          and what will she do to the states if she hit the Malvinas Islands?
          1. Flooding
            Flooding 11 February 2021 10: 35
            -1
            difficult to judge. I have never been there or there. remind me, what does the state have to do with it?
            1. Dodikson
              Dodikson 11 February 2021 10: 37
              0
              and despite the fact that this is our most likely enemy. and if nuclear weapons are used, then it is most likely unnatural for them.
              and I cited the Malvinas as an example because even nuclear weapons must be used with the correct tactics, otherwise there will be no sense even from nuclear weapons.
              1. Flooding
                Flooding 11 February 2021 12: 23
                -1
                The topic was not nuclear weapons, the topic was the tactics of using weapons in general as such.
                1. Dodikson
                  Dodikson 11 February 2021 12: 54
                  0
                  the theme was that you answered the question "What can be used without correct tactics?"
                  replied "A missile with a nuclear warhead."
                  which is wrong, because even a missile with a nuclear warhead must be used with the right tactics
                  1. Flooding
                    Flooding 11 February 2021 12: 58
                    0
                    Nuclear weapons are a strategic weapon.
                    It is not tactical.
                    Unless we are talking about especially small charges.
                    Good luck to you.
                    1. Dodikson
                      Dodikson 11 February 2021 15: 47
                      0
                      Well then, try to decipher the abbreviation TNW, and try to tell the military that nuclear artillery ammunition is a strategic weapon.
                      and that missiles to Iskander (and there are also nuclear warheads), as well as anti-ship missiles and missiles with special warheads, are also strategic weapons.
                      laugh together.
                      By the way, it was not about that. but the fact that even strategic weapons are used according to the correct tactics, such as covering the ICBM warheads of industrial areas, accumulations of fuel factories, ports and positioning areas of the enemy's ICBM basing if he has not yet released them (or could have released them if the strike was retaliatory).
                      in general, you need to bomb even with vigorous rockets with your head, and not melt sand in the deserts of Nevada and Arizona
                      1. Flooding
                        Flooding 11 February 2021 17: 43
                        -2
                        You chatter the topic.
                        Why should I google something about tiao if I wrote above about tactical nuclear weapons? If you like to gossip about anything, then this is not for me.
                        And a link, please, throw off the information on nuclear warheads to the Iskander. So, for decency.
                        Although you don't need to have seven spans in your forehead to understand what I wrote about
                        Quote: Flood
                        A missile with a nuclear warhead.
                      2. Dodikson
                        Dodikson 11 February 2021 17: 48
                        0
                        darkness ....
                        and what did you write about tactical nuclear weapons?
                        remind me plz blunt quote of your comment.
                        otherwise I just read something
                        "Nuclear weapons are a strategic weapon.
                        It is not tactical.
                        Unless we are talking about especially small charges. "

                        for reference - especially small charges are less than 1kt.
                      3. Flooding
                        Flooding 11 February 2021 18: 09
                        -1
                        Quote: Dodikson
                        darkness ....
                        and what did you write about tactical nuclear weapons?

                        Have you already found the link to the Iskander nuclear stuffing?
                        Not? Seek and do not bother me in vain.
                      4. Flooding
                        Flooding 11 February 2021 18: 13
                        -2
                        Quote: Dodikson
                        for reference - especially small charges are less than 1kt.

                        Where did you read this? Please provide confirmation of your words.
                        Otherwise it is of no interest.
                      5. Dodikson
                        Dodikson 12 February 2021 09: 09
                        0
                        yes for you materiel is generally not of interest.
                        I didn't throw off the links, it's not even stupid because of laziness, because everything is found from the first request (for example
                        https://lenta.ru/news/2020/01/25/iskander/ ) , хотя о чем говорить с человеком который не знает что у противокорабельного Гранита была БЧ в 500кт , а потому что смысла нет что то приводить и доказывать . не в коня корм.
                        for people like you, if you don't like the opponent's arguments, then links are not links, articles are not articles, "tests are not tests".
                        communication is stopped because there is no reason and no one.
                        better approach any member of the forum and ask - and anti-ship missiles or missiles with special warheads is a strategic weapon?
                      6. Flooding
                        Flooding 12 February 2021 11: 39
                        0
                        Quote: Dodikson
                        communication is stopped because there is no reason and no one.

                        You will learn how to behave to begin with.
                        While you showed yourself a boor.
                        And there can be only one communication with boors - in boorish language.
                      7. Dodikson
                        Dodikson 12 February 2021 14: 23
                        -1
                        yes, you can answer in boorish.
                        but in the language of the subject, alas, there is no materiel (((
                      8. Flooding
                        Flooding 12 February 2021 14: 38
                        -1
                        Quote: Dodikson
                        yes, you can answer in boorish.
                        but in the language of the subject, alas, there is no materiel (((

                        If you do not know the basic basics of behavior, then what can you know about the materiel?
                      9. Dodikson
                        Dodikson 12 February 2021 14: 50
                        -1
                        as the dispute showed, much more than you.
                        Besides, make no mistake, you also don't know a damn about decent behavior.
                        re-read your posts and try to find there at least some signs of politeness and deference.
                        a polite person would simply admit that they say yes, he didn’t put it that way, and nothing would happen, but you understand that you are wrong, but you still try to make someone else wrong.
                        in fact, you are the same boor as I am, just pretend to be decent, but you are neither decent nor educated / literate in the area you are discussing.
                        and you understand this and it gnaws at you, which is why you are still here.
                      10. Flooding
                        Flooding 12 February 2021 15: 20
                        -2
                        Quote: Dodikson
                        in fact, you are the same boor as I am, just pretend to be decent

                        This in itself is worth a lot. Restrain yourself when you want something completely different.
                        Quote: Dodikson
                        You are neither decent

                        Try to convict me of dishonesty. Don't make empty sounds.
                        Quote: Dodikson
                        nor educated / literate in the field you are discussing.

                        I am discussing the topic that interests me. Not the one I'm professional at. And this is normal for a forum with a fairly wide range of issues raised. Or is it a surprise to you?
                        Quote: Dodikson
                        You understand this and it gnaws at you, which is why you are still here.

                        I have never avoided communication on questions of interest to me.
                        And boorish swoops don't scare me away, rather the opposite.
                        And you see, in addition to everything else, and a psychologist? Or just an overconfident person?
                        So I will remind you
                        Quote: Dodikson
                        communication is stopped because there is nothing and no one

                        So why are you still here? What's eating you?
                      11. Dodikson
                        Dodikson 12 February 2021 15: 22
                        -1
                        I'm just laughing here. In fact, I'm a troll.
                        and by the way, yes, I'm a psychologist by education.
                        I am looking for such lulz like you to get away with.
                      12. Flooding
                        Flooding 12 February 2021 15: 49
                        -1
                        Quote: Dodikson
                        I'm just laughing here. In fact, I'm a troll.
                        and by the way, yes, I'm a psychologist by education.
                        I am looking for such lulz like you to get away with.

                        I summarize:
                        a psychologist by training, imagining himself a specialist in weapons.
                        a boor and a troll by vocation, finding amusement for himself in the search and correspondence with some "lulz".
                        there is something to think about.
                      13. Dodikson
                        Dodikson 12 February 2021 16: 02
                        0
                        Think better over the knowledge of materiel, so as not to disgrace yourself and then even a "psychologist by training, imagining himself to be a specialist in weapons, will not laugh at you."
                        a boor and a troll by vocation, finding pleasure for himself in the search and correspondence with some "lulz". "
                      14. Flooding
                        Flooding 12 February 2021 16: 21
                        -1
                        Quote: Dodikson
                        think better about the knowledge of the materiel, so as not to disgrace and then they will not laugh at you

                        it was a pity to spend money on such obvious things. but oh well, I'll spend it. I hate the boons who have learned to use Google, but not intellect.
                        Iskander is the only link to lenta.ru, and which you have designated as the first one that comes across contains information about the possibility of using nuclear warheads. we have indirect unconfirmed information without specifics.
                        My note on charges of especially low power did not suit you as a description of tiao, since according to your words, especially low power is less than 1 kt. Despite my request, you have not confirmed your opinion. Well, I did not shmogla so I didn’t. this is your style.
                        but on the second day of our friendly dive, you finally learned about the missile defense systems equipped with a special warhead. what is interesting is information about the power of such is only for old Granites and only on Wikipedia.
                        so interesting, you ask?
                        Yes, because the nuclear equipment of the warhead of operational-tactical, anti-ship and other missiles is a secret behind seven seals. no doubt such weapons are possessed by the world's leading armies, but they are even less known to the general public than the data on ICBMs. because the power of strategic yao is a guarantee and a guarantee of deterrence. while tiao is in many ways a dark horse, darker than all other types of weapons, with the possible exception of bacteriological.
                        therefore, any mention of Yao means, first of all, and in the second place also precisely its strategic component.
                        I am glad that thanks to our correspondence you got acquainted with some of the nuances of the question. but do not pass this acquaintance with Google for acquaintance with materiel.
                        I'll end where I started. I hate boasting. well, and if a boast and a boor in one person ...
                      15. Dodikson
                        Dodikson 12 February 2021 16: 41
                        0
                        darkness .... ignoramuses all continue to be clever and try to pretend to be smart.
                        they do not understand how stupid and pitiful they look from the outside.
                        they write such pearls
                        Nuclear weapons are a strategic weapon.
                        It is not tactical.
                        Unless we're talking about especially small charges.


                        and then they try to wriggle like a professional on the client.
                        lol, given that ignoramuses are predictable like amoeba, I sense that now one ignoramus will prove that especially small is not ultra small, and in general now there is a particularly secret division of nuclear charges at power where there are not small and ultra small, but there are small, especially small, and only then ultra-small.

                        How is their power measured?

                        The power of a nuclear and thermonuclear charge is measured in TNT equivalent - the amount of TNT that must be detonated to obtain a similar result. It is measured in kilotons (kt) and megatons (Mt). The power of ultra-small nuclear weapons is less than 1 kt, while super powerful bombs give over 1 Mt.

                        https://futurist.ru/articles/1162

                        The power of the explosion of a nuclear weapon is usually measured in units of TNT. The TNT equivalent is the mass of TNT that would provide an explosion equivalent in power to the explosion of a given nuclear weapon. It is usually measured in kilotons (kT) or megatons (MgT). The TNT equivalent is conditional, since the distribution of the energy of a nuclear explosion over various damaging factors depends significantly on the type of ammunition and, in any case, is very different from a chemical explosion. Modern nuclear weapons have TNT equivalent from several tens of tons to several tens of million tons of TNT.
                        Depending on the power, nuclear ammunition is usually divided into 5 calibers: ultra-small (less than 1kT), small (from 1 to 10 kT), medium (from 10 to 100 kT), large (from 100 kT to 1 MgT), extra-large (over 1 MgT)

                        https://studopedia.ru/21_48219_moshchnost-yadernih-boepripasov.html
                        The power of nuclear ammunition is determined by their weight or size, such as the power, for example, of conventional ammunition, and the amount of energy released in a nuclear explosion. This energy is usually compared with the explosion energy of the corresponding amount of TNT. Example: when fission of the nuclei of atoms located in 1 kg. Uranium-235, the same amount of energy is released as in the explosion of a TNT charge weighing 20 tons. In this regard, the power of nuclear weapons is expressed in TNT equivalent. In terms of power, nuclear ammunition is conventionally divided into five calibers:
                        - ultra-low power up to 1 thousand tons (kt);
                        -small from 1 to 10 thousand tons;
                        -average from 10 to 100 thousand tons;
                        -large from 100 to 1 million tons (mgt);
                        -super-large over 1 mgt

                        https://infopedia.su/16xa77c.html


                        About anti-ship missiles, anti-aircraft missiles with special warheads and an Iskander even look too lazy.
                        but I'm glad that the ignorant learned that there are such missiles.

                        then he learns about the fact that nuclear weapons are different, for example hydrogen and actually nuclear (uranium) that there are not only explosive nuclear weapons but also neutron weapons.
                        oh how many interesting things the ignoramus can learn, but they won't. the fact that they won't
                      16. Flooding
                        Flooding 12 February 2021 17: 01
                        -1
                        It flatters you. Why mark with a quote and a font that I wrote literally exactly before your splash of bile?
                        For you, the problem will remain regardless of the degree of my rightness or wrongness. You are behaving unworthily, but at the same time you puff out your cheeks and take mentoring positions. Why did you study to be a psychologist? Down the drain.
                      17. Dodikson
                        Dodikson 12 February 2021 17: 10
                        0
                        lol, the character, instead of admitting that he was inaccurately expressed, began to carry crap in the style of bullshitting "I fso know that you are all stupid", and he again has others to blame.
                        But I'm glad that he stopped arguing that he and the materiel are incompatible things.
                      18. Flooding
                        Flooding 12 February 2021 17: 17
                        -1
                        Are you so dull that an essentially simple thing does not reach you?
                        I do not admit that I am wrong in front of the boor, this is nonsense.
                        Ham does not understand any concessions.
                        Quote: Dodikson
                        began to carry crap in the style of bullshitting "I know you all are stupid", and he again has others to blame.

                        I do not pretend to be omniscient in the slightest degree.
                        Take a closer look at your behavior.
                        Quote: Dodikson
                        But I'm glad that he stopped arguing that he and the materiel are incompatible things.

                        This is the magic word "materiel". You have already crawled it to the holes. Change it to the word "Google". So it will be more truthful.
                      19. Dodikson
                        Dodikson 12 February 2021 17: 32
                        0
                        darkness .... professional on client part two ...
                        Monsieur, at first no one was rude to you, you were asked a simple question, and you are the place to admit that you were inaccurately expressed and began to bullshit.
                        to bull, all people turn on the boor mode.
                        because there is nothing to communicate with {cut out by censorship} (I wrote about it cut out by censorship that I can't cover it with obscene expressions).
                        {cut out by censorship} nothing can be explained, it does not understand the meaning of what is written, and the letters are too difficult for them.
                        therefore I forget to communicate with you because it is not interesting.
                        at first it was at least funny, but now I can feel someone's bulging eyes even through the Internet.
                        by the end
                        1) even nuclear missiles must be used correctly
                        2) ultra-small atomic charges are 1kt and below.
                        3) nuclear charges even of high power are placed not only on strategic weapons
                        do not give thanks.
                      20. Flooding
                        Flooding 12 February 2021 17: 41
                        -2
                        Quote: Dodikson
                        darkness .... professional on the client part two.

                        Add something more weighty to your childish babbling. It is no longer possible to read the same thing. Are you keen on corrupt women? Can I help you financially? Or do you need the help of a colleague on the shop floor?
                        Quote: Dodikson
                        Monsieur, at first no one was rude to you

                        It was like that, I admit.
                        Quote: Dodikson
                        You were asked a simple question

                        Wrong. You were carried by a favorable breeze into completely different matter
                        Quote: Dodikson
                        and what will she do to the states if she hit the Malvinas Islands?

                        Be precise and you will be rewarded. You demand accuracy from others, but not from yourself.
                        Quote: Dodikson
                        to bull, all people turn on the boor mode.

                        Here you go. And what would you like to do with such a citizen? Do not turn into the same insolent hysterics.
                        And after that you want me to admit that I am wrong?
                        You are an insolent, boor and boast. That individually you can endure, but in one person - thank you.
                  2. Flooding
                    Flooding 12 February 2021 17: 22
                    0
                    Quote: Dodikson
                    lol, the character, instead of admitting that he was inaccurately expressed, began to carry crap in the style of bullshitting "I fso know that you are all stupid", and he again has others to blame.
                    But I'm glad that he stopped arguing that he and the materiel are incompatible things.

                    Do you not notice the illogicalism in this short commentary of yours?
                    "Inaccurately expressed" means knowledge of the subject, but imprecise formulation.
                    While ignorance of the materiel means not mastering the subject in principle. In this case, you cannot express yourself inaccurately, you can express yourself incorrectly and incorrectly.
                  3. Dodikson
                    Dodikson 12 February 2021 17: 35
                    0
                    Logically you probably had a count.
                    to write "inaccurately expressed" does not mean that it was really imprecise
                    besides, one can express inaccurately even without owning the object.
                    for example, not knowing how the cabinet furniture is tripled, you can blurt out "I'll lie down at the door."
                    or not groping in construction equipment blurt out "let's dig a pit with this truck crane."
                    from this series of comments "for the use of a nuclear missile, the correct tactics are not needed"
                  4. Flooding
                    Flooding 12 February 2021 17: 43
                    -1
                    Quote: Dodikson
                    to write "inaccurately expressed" does not mean that it was really imprecise
                    besides, one can express inaccurately even without owning the object.
                    for example, not knowing how the cabinet furniture is tripled, you can blurt out "I'll lie down at the door."

                    Launched case. An imprecise expression presupposes an imprecise formulation of a correct thought. Goodbye, let's keep a safe distance.
  • qQQQ
    qQQQ 11 February 2021 16: 04
    +1
    Quote: Flood
    A missile with a nuclear warhead.

    Yes, it is first of all necessary to use tactically competently.
    1. Flooding
      Flooding 11 February 2021 17: 45
      -2
      Quote: qqqq
      Yes, it is first of all necessary to use tactically competently.

      What does it mean? Disguise correctly on the ground? Cover the enemy with crossfire? Do you understand the difference between tactics and strategy?
      1. qQQQ
        qQQQ 12 February 2021 09: 06
        +1
        Quote: Flood
        What does this mean?

        This means correctly determining the time, place and method of delivery.
        1. Flooding
          Flooding 12 February 2021 11: 53
          -2
          Quote: qqqq
          This means correctly determining the time, place and method of delivery.

          The defense doctrine clearly stipulates the use of nuclear weapons only in the form of a retaliatory strike.
          The very specificity of the exchange of nuclear strikes requires the fastest possible response.
          For predetermined goals. Everything. No tactics. It's a matter of survival or retribution.
          1. qQQQ
            qQQQ 12 February 2021 14: 12
            +1
            Quote: Flood
            The defense doctrine clearly stipulates the use of nuclear weapons only in the form of a retaliatory strike.
            The very specificity of the exchange of nuclear strikes requires the fastest possible response.
            For predetermined goals. Everything. No tactics. It's a matter of survival or retribution.

            All this is true, only with regards to the first strike. But if the question is about the exchange of limited strikes and (or) the transition to the phase of a protracted war, then it is here that tactical nuclear weapons come to light together with the tactics of their use.
            1. Flooding
              Flooding 12 February 2021 14: 37
              -1
              Quote: qqqq
              All this is true, only with regards to the first strike. But if the question is about the exchange of limited strikes and (or) the transition to the phase of a protracted war, then it is here that tactical nuclear weapons come to light together with the tactics of their use.

              When I mentioned missiles with nuclear warheads, I had tactical yao in the last place. But with this caveat, I agree with you.
  • Al_lexx
    Al_lexx 11 February 2021 08: 01
    0
    Screw a couple of pieces to the "Armata", as a kind of BMPT, so that, in addition to a remote operator, receive a control center from the tank commander and vice versa, if the operator of this pepelatsa saw something on the battlefield. IMHO it will be normal. And with a boomerang it could not look bad. In the city, to support the infantry, it can also come in handy.
    It’s clear that with the advent of such a technique on the battlefield, we need a reliable and simple system for identifying friend / foe.
    1. Dart2027
      Dart2027 11 February 2021 08: 14
      0
      Quote: Al_lexx
      It’s clear that with the advent of such a technique on the battlefield, we need a reliable and simple system for identifying friend / foe.

      Most likely, it will work in autonomous mode where there are no own, and where there is a risk of friendly fire under the control of the operator.
      1. mark1
        mark1 11 February 2021 08: 29
        0
        Yeah - they'll drop it by parachute into the very middle of the enemy army, and then the drum-cam program will say in such a circle and go to shoot the enemy.)))
        1. Dart2027
          Dart2027 11 February 2021 08: 38
          -2
          Quote: mark1
          Yeah - they will drop by parachute into the very middle of the enemy army

          That is, you can't say anything smart?
          The task of such machines is to go ahead of manpower and guided armored vehicles, opening up the enemy's defenses and taking a blow on themselves, like in a UAV.
          1. mark1
            mark1 11 February 2021 08: 44
            +7
            There are so many of us, smart people, gathered here (who seem to have nothing to do) that we want to dilute the intense brainstorming with some kind of funny nonsense
      2. Ros 56
        Ros 56 11 February 2021 08: 58
        +2
        And few people were put out of friendly fire directly from their own, without the use of any robots?
        1. Dart2027
          Dart2027 11 February 2021 10: 24
          -2
          Quote: Ros 56
          from their own, without the use of any robots

          This, of course, happens, but a person is still more reliable.
          1. military_cat
            military_cat 11 February 2021 11: 25
            +3
            On the contrary, there is nothing more unreliable than the human factor. The person is simply more familiar (and can also be punished, which calms the sense of justice).
            1. Dart2027
              Dart2027 11 February 2021 13: 05
              -1
              Quote: military_cat
              On the contrary, there is nothing more unreliable than the human factor.

              This machine is designed to work in the field, where both tanks and infantrymen may find themselves. How to equip each soldier with a friend or foe system? The question is, and a mistake is expensive. There was talk that all the troops on the battlefield should be united into a single network, so that everyone will know exactly where the others are, then of course the conversation will be different. But it seems that this has not been done yet, so for now the operator will be more reliable ..
              1. Al_lexx
                Al_lexx 11 February 2021 13: 40
                +2
                Quote: Dart2027
                How to equip each soldier with a friend or foe system?

                How does the system of remote reading money from your credit card or smartphone work?
                So here, only the distance is greater. Technically, this is absolutely solvable.
                There was talk that all the troops on the battlefield should be united into a single network, so that everyone will know exactly where the others are, then of course the conversation will be different. But it seems that this has not yet been done ...

                Everything has been done for a long time. It is just that the introduction and saturation of the troops does not occur immediately and suddenly.
                1. Dart2027
                  Dart2027 11 February 2021 14: 57
                  -1
                  Quote: Al_lexx
                  How does the system of remote reading money from your credit card or smartphone work?

                  I am not an expert, but if this system is still not debugged, then there are difficulties.
                  Quote: Al_lexx
                  Everything has been done for a long time. It is just that the introduction and saturation of the troops does not occur immediately and suddenly.

                  May be. If so, then it will be easier.
                  1. Al_lexx
                    Al_lexx 12 February 2021 00: 11
                    0
                    General ...
                    ..pardon))
                    Are you clean and worn out, or essentially what to say?
                    1. Dart2027
                      Dart2027 12 February 2021 07: 06
                      -1
                      Quote: Al_lexx
                      Are you clean and worn out, or essentially what to say?

                      And you?
    2. qQQQ
      qQQQ 11 February 2021 08: 53
      0
      Quote: Al_lexx
      It’s clear that with the advent of such a technique on the battlefield, we need a reliable and simple system for identifying friend / foe.

      Most likely, the operator will give permission to open fire.
      1. Al_lexx
        Al_lexx 11 February 2021 13: 43
        0
        Quote: qqqq
        Most likely, the operator will give permission to open fire.

        Most likely according to the situation. In certain situations, the operator's reaction speed is clearly not enough. I mean situations where there are no civilians, who do not have a system of identification of theirs / foes. In any case, the real experience of using such a technique has not yet been accumulated. And without any doubt, in the process of its accumulation, the cases may be different.
        1. qQQQ
          qQQQ 11 February 2021 16: 11
          0
          Quote: Al_lexx
          Most likely according to the situation.

          I disagree, it's not even a matter of civilians, there is always a probability and it is quite high that the system of one's own / another's for any reason will not be functional either for humans or for a robot and give the AI ​​the right to kill, this is a very high risk that with the same probability will bring down both friends and foes. It's not worth it, operator, with a well-built interface, everything will do everything quickly and reliably.
          1. Al_lexx
            Al_lexx 12 February 2021 13: 23
            0
            Quote: qqqq
            I do not agree ...

            Dear cuckoo.)) You just don't understand how it works. And then I can't do anything about it. Don't settle for health. In any case, everything (absolutely everything) that one person has done can be broken by another person. And to discuss it, just shake the air in vain. However, three-quarters of these shakers spend their time here.
            1. qQQQ
              qQQQ 12 February 2021 14: 13
              0
              Quote: Al_lexx
              important cuckoo.)) You just don't understand how it works.

              But where do we go to high matters. Essentially have something to say?
              1. Al_lexx
                Al_lexx 12 February 2021 18: 04
                0
                Quote: qqqq
                But where do we go to high matters.

                Expected.
  • Ros 56
    Ros 56 11 February 2021 08: 55
    -1
    These devices are certainly good, but what happens, for example, if the program crashes? But won't this iron kaput begin to chop everyone to the right and to the left, both ours and others? fellow
    1. Runway
      Runway 11 February 2021 09: 50
      -2
      The statement said that the tractor can now paddle on the ground without a remote control by a person.
      There is no question of using weapons independently.
    2. FrankyStein
      FrankyStein 11 February 2021 11: 43
      0
      You can set the area of ​​work, no further than it, and no manpower can enter. It was cool to minimize such things in size, attach a thermal imager, a machine gun, put them on their feet so that they could run fast and climb everywhere, rivet in thousands and to the front line.
  • Tektor
    Tektor 11 February 2021 10: 51
    0
    This already looks like the technique of a new war. Respect to the developers!