An-12 military transport aircraft makes a hard landing on Iturup island

103
An-12 military transport aircraft makes a hard landing on Iturup island

An An-12 military transport aircraft of the Ministry of Defense was damaged while landing on Iturup Island. This was reported by the press service of the Eastern Military District.

The aircraft crew made a hard landing at the Burevestnik airfield on Iturup Island in bad weather conditions with a strong intermittent wind with a storm. During landing, the plane was damaged, it caught on the parapet, after which the left and nose landing gear was torn out from it.



On February 3 at 35 hours 12 minutes (Moscow time), when landing after a planned flight in difficult weather conditions at the Burevestnik airfield (Iturup Island), the An-XNUMX military transport aircraft had a mean nose and left landing gear

- said in a BBO report.


According to the military, there were no casualties on board, the crew and passengers were not injured. The plane flew from Khabarovsk. How many people were on board the plane is not reported.

A special commission of the Eastern Military District is working at the scene to establish all the circumstances of the incident.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    103 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +32
      9 February 2021 14: 20
      This is a soft fit. Congratulations to the crew and passengers. And the plane
      1. +22
        9 February 2021 14: 26
        Already what day is sweeping ... Master-flyers - class!
        1. +8
          9 February 2021 14: 40
          Quote from Uncle Lee
          Already what day is sweeping ... Master-flyers - class!

          Didn't they "decompose" in such weather? Generally lucky. Heavy weather there at this time of the year.
          The problem of flying over the sea. The weather is changing very quickly, and there is no alternate airfield in the vicinity.
          1. +4
            9 February 2021 16: 45
            No, there is Iturup airport there, which is capable of receiving An-12. And the weather in winter there, yes, heavy. I remember once, when our Il-18 from Vladivostok landed in Yuzhny, they did not see the ground behind a snowstorm until the landing, it was pouring thick snow, and we only felt it when the wheels hit the concrete. They clapped, of course, to the commander.

            And these guys also had, it seems, a difficult night landing on instruments in a blizzard on Petrel and did not notice that reptile parapet on the run.

            By the way, a historical place: in the Kasatka Bay, on the shore of which the Petrel is located, a squadron was going to smash Pearl Harbor, and the planes flew to the aircraft carriers from Etorofu (as the Petrel was then called). And then our Tu-22M3 stood there, which took about an hour to reach Tokyo.
            1. +1
              9 February 2021 17: 21
              Quote: Vladimir Mashkov
              And these guys also seemed to have a hard night landing on instruments in a blizzard on the Burevestnik and did not notice that reptile parapet on the run.


              3.35 Moscow time.
              1. -2
                9 February 2021 17: 50
                You're right, wrong about the night. The video is confusing. But you've probably never been to the Far Eastern snowstorms and blizzards, which are not much different from twilight ...
                1. 0
                  9 February 2021 17: 52
                  I agree, but I think anywhere "the storm covers the sky with darkness")
                  1. -2
                    9 February 2021 18: 31
                    Not sure. I have never seen such powerful snowstorms for 10 days in a row, storms with visibility of 5 meters and storms that I got in the Far East. And after them there are snowdrifts of 2-3 meters. These still exist only in the North.
            2. +4
              9 February 2021 23: 53
              It happens that everyone is well alive; I'm sorry about the plane ...
              Petrel was the home of the Air Defense Air Defense Regiment on the MiG-23: there are fogs and harsh weather for six months. The people who flew there were rigidly trained on the SMU and could not boast about the work of the RZP - they started landing to the end - strip under you
            3. +1
              10 February 2021 02: 48
              then our Tu-22M3 stood there ...

              You either confuse something or fantasize No.
              Tu-22M3 have never been based at this airfield.
              In the Far East, there were two MRA regiments in Mongokhto and Vozdvizhenka.
              1. -2
                10 February 2021 10: 50
                I am not fantasizing, but I may be confusing. When in the mid-80s, standing at Petrel, we were unloading something, then I heard about the Tu-22 from a fellow countryman who took the cargo (I handed it over) on a nondescript but famous pier, from which a barge with the famous four. Probably, either he wrote it up, or I didn't understand it. hi
                1. +2
                  10 February 2021 11: 55
                  A regiment of MiG-90 was stationed in Burevestnik until the beginning of the 23s. But due to local peculiarities, the operation of fighters was not very easy. It was completely impossible to base heavy Tu-22M3s with the existing airfield infrastructure, and given the location of the airfield, it was absolutely pointless.
      2. +8
        9 February 2021 14: 27
        It's too early to congratulate the plane. They are age-related and such emergencies can easily lead to write-off. If there the set and the power elements burst, bent = it is probably the end or sawing, or driving to the school as a teaching aid for cadets + disassembly for parts.
        1. +9
          9 February 2021 14: 58
          Yes, it seems not so scary ...
          1. +2
            9 February 2021 18: 03
            Quote: uav80
            Yes, it seems not so scary ...

            This is in the presence of a repair base.
            1. +4
              9 February 2021 19: 21
              Quote: Seeker
              This is if there is a repair base

              I remember that the TU-154, which in the taiga landed on an abandoned airfield with passengers and rolled out of the runway, was repaired there in the taiga. True, they wrote off later, but he took off himself.
        2. +1
          9 February 2021 17: 59
          Absolutely not problematic. They will change the landing gear, inspect the power elements. And go ahead! good
        3. +5
          9 February 2021 19: 36
          They were left with a gulkin's nose. And there is no replacement and is not expected in the near future. Previously, the An-12 aviation regiment was based at Stupino (they went there to the shooting range). There were also IL-20s there.
          1. +3
            9 February 2021 19: 44
            There were also IL-20s.

            Probably, nevertheless, IL-28
            1. +4
              9 February 2021 22: 05
              Remains of 436 air defense otap. It is the IL-20. Some. I remembered that there were still a few An-26. In addition to the An-12. Back in 1999 we flew sometimes. A couple of times we hit it on such a day - they were happy for the flyers. Now there is the Krutyshki small aircraft airfield. what

              1. +3
                9 February 2021 22: 23
                I confused it with Ilyushin's first jet aircraft - an experimental four-engine Il-22 produced in 1947
      3. +7
        9 February 2021 14: 31
        Alas ... these are vehicles heavier than air. It happens. The crew was lucky anyway! Respect.
      4. -2
        9 February 2021 16: 10
        Quote: iouris
        This is a soft fit. Congratulations to the crew and passengers. And the plane

        I join. But where were the meteorologists looking?
    2. +10
      9 February 2021 14: 21
      Summer is great there. I was in Goryachi Klyuchi. But from the end of October, sadness begins ...
      In February, I have never been to the island, it seems quite tough ...
      It is good that everyone remained alive and well.
    3. +2
      9 February 2021 14: 21
      And where is there an alternate airfield for such a "force majeure"?
      1. +3
        9 February 2021 14: 47
        Quote: grandfather_Kostya
        And where is there an alternate airfield for such a "force majeure"?

        Judging by the maps, there is a service in Kunashir. There are Japanese abandoned buildings, the state is clearly close to a primer or dusty concrete, in the summer you can see them. Well, in the winter - only Kunashir as a reserve.
        1. +13
          9 February 2021 15: 36
          So this one sat in Burevestnik, and 40 km away from the Yasny airport. Or I'm not looking there.
          Just in case, there are of course more options ... 250 km ...winked
          But here you need to think three times before deciding to sit there ...
          1. -1
            9 February 2021 17: 35
            Quote: kit88
            So this one sat in Burevestnik, and 40 km away from the Yasny airport. Or I'm not looking there.
            Just in case, there are of course more options ... 250 km ...winked
            But here you need to think three times before deciding to sit there ...

            Yes, according to Iturup, either Yasny or Petrel.
            On Kunashir, Yuzhno-Kurilsk Airport is far away, 190 km.
            On the northern tip of Urup, the remains of the Japanese takeoff - it is also Kastrikum, is 250 km away. It seems that it is not served and there is no permanent population in Urupa.
            1. +2
              9 February 2021 19: 26
              Quote: Flashpoint
              On Kunashir, Yuzhno-Kurilsk Airport is far away, 190 km.

              Is 190 km too far for an airplane? 20 minutes in the summer. On the other hand, the commander made the decision to land, and we do not know all the details. As the saying goes, if everyone is alive and well and gone on their own feet, then the landing is considered successful. The crew is great.
              1. -1
                9 February 2021 22: 19
                Quote: orionvitt
                Quote: Flashpoint
                On Kunashir, Yuzhno-Kurilsk Airport is far away, 190 km.

                Is 190 km too far for an airplane? 20 minutes in the summer. On the other hand, the commander made the decision to land, and we do not know all the details. As the saying goes, if everyone is alive and well and gone on their own feet, then the landing is considered successful. The crew is great.

                So after all, the conditions for landing are still important. Is the strip ready or not. Weather. Aircraft condition. 20 minutes is an eternity at times.
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. +6
      9 February 2021 14: 22
      The main thing is that people are alive and well! The board, I hope, will be repaired and will still fly! And the weather, of course, is awful! Did you go below the minimum or already without options?
      1. +7
        9 February 2021 14: 50
        Unfortunately, they will not be repaired. - once the rack vomited. for sure, the fuselage deformation and the crew will be disassembled not in his favor. Landing below the minimum and not leaving for a spare
        1. -6
          9 February 2021 17: 01
          You are VERY strict: landing in BURAN AT NIGHT IS COMPLETED. But no luck on the run: we ran into the parapet.
          1. +4
            9 February 2021 17: 27
            Excuse me, but I don't understand you. In your opinion, landing a plane is a lottery or is it a matter of chance?
            1. -5
              9 February 2021 17: 55
              Counter question: have you ever had a chance to sit down on instruments in a blizzard in the Far East? Do you know how many planes crashed in Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk when attempting to land?
              Yes, I was wrong about the night: Moscow time.
              1. +5
                9 February 2021 18: 41
                They come in for landing by instruments. and the direct landing of Soviet and Russian transport aircraft is carried out only visually - you see the strip and landmarks at the height of decision-making, you sit down. If you do not see, you leave for a second or alternate airfield
                1. -6
                  9 February 2021 19: 05
                  Are you a pilot, pilot? Explain the case in which I was a witness and participant. Flight Vladivostok-Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk. Night. Heavy snow. The Il-18 plane descends in it for half an hour. No visibility, solid snow. The earth is visible only when the wheels hit the concrete. What saw the pilot?
                  1. +7
                    9 February 2021 20: 39
                    Well, he could see the haze from the JVI or the approach lights. If the approach was on the course-glide path system, then 20-30 meters of visibility will be enough, if you do not dive. If the approach is by drives, then, of course, special attention is paid to RV. There was no director system on the An-12? In any case, we will wait for official information: maybe the reserve closed at 0/0 with the same prospect, but there was at least something here.
                  2. -1
                    10 February 2021 02: 51
                    Lane approach lights and lane lights
                    1. +1
                      10 February 2021 06: 39
                      To be honest, I didn't quite understand your comment: is there something wrong with the approach lights? In my time there were constant and pulsed radiation along the line of the continuation of the axis of the strip. White. They stood between the end and the near drive.
                      1. 0
                        10 February 2021 07: 22
                        Yes, you wrote everything correctly. I did not go into details and options for light signal systems
                        1. +1
                          10 February 2021 11: 03
                          Clear. Happy last holiday, by the way! Someone gave you a minus ... why?
                        2. +1
                          11 February 2021 08: 28
                          Thank you and everyone involved. Clear sky.
              2. +2
                9 February 2021 18: 54
                I was lucky in the Far East - I was not offended by the weather; in other places I had to ...
        2. +1
          9 February 2021 18: 50
          There would be a desire. In Mali, they put a bow strut so that they led the power elements.
          What have you done? Fucked off ALL pressurized cabin, a new one was closed and after 4 months the plane was lifted into the air.
          1. +3
            9 February 2021 19: 04
            It looks like a fairy tale. but how were the cable wiring and electrical cables connected?
            1. +4
              9 February 2021 21: 24
              Quote: fleks
              It looks like a fairy tale. but how were the cable wiring and electrical cables connected?

              At the entrance to the pressurized cabin there are plug connectors for el. wiring and docking points in the control system.
            2. +2
              10 February 2021 15: 58
              Here he is, already flying winked
        3. +6
          9 February 2021 21: 20
          Quote: fleks
          Landing below the minimum and not leaving for a spare

          Not the fact that the weather conditions were better on the reserve.
          1. -1
            10 February 2021 02: 58
            I agree, not a fact. but still questions about the decision to take off. did they take the weather? and so on and so on
    6. -10
      9 February 2021 14: 23
      Now the search will begin for the one to blame for the damage ... and the fact that people are safe, even in passing, will not remember.
    7. 0
      9 February 2021 14: 23
      It will be repaired by the spring.
    8. +2
      9 February 2021 14: 26
      According to the military, there were no casualties on board, the crew and passengers were not injured.
      Good news!
    9. +3
      9 February 2021 14: 27
      Quote: grandfather_Kostya
      And where is there an alternate airfield for such a "force majeure"?

      Yuk, it seems only. But even there the weather is so-so ...
      Far away from Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk
    10. +1
      9 February 2021 14: 29
      Well what can I say. Judging by the video, the conditions are still the same. Everyone is alive and well - that's good ...
    11. -3
      9 February 2021 14: 35
      Judging by the video meteorological situation was absent during landing! belay
      1. +5
        9 February 2021 14: 44
        A strange statement. She, the meteorological situation, as you put it, is always present. Perhaps the meteorological conditions were below the values ​​of the meteorological minimum of the commander.
        1. 0
          9 February 2021 15: 25
          The plane is damaged, but not broken, and most importantly, people are safe. So you can joke without malice on the topic. And yet, in nature, there are angles not only 90 degrees.
    12. +3
      9 February 2021 14: 38
      "The guard is tired." Machines are half a century old. The weather has nothing to do with it, it seems to me. People are alive - the most important thing.
      1. +1
        9 February 2021 15: 12
        I wanted to write the same thing. How long can you fly on such ancient rubbish !? But apparently the management does not care ...
        1. -1
          9 February 2021 18: 52
          Suggest a replacement winked
        2. -2
          9 February 2021 22: 48
          Quote: Magic Archer
          How long can you fly on such ancient rubbish !? But apparently the management does not care ...

          The same type "Hercules" among the Yankes are even older and fly. And in such weather and the newest can crash.
          1. +2
            10 February 2021 02: 55
            The same type "Hercules" among the Yankes are even older and fly. And in such weather and the newest can crash.

            Here you are mistaken. Almost all of our An-12's peers in the US Air Force have been written off. Nowadays, there are mostly fairly fresh C-130Ns and the newest "Super Hercules" - C-130Js.
            1. +3
              11 February 2021 09: 43
              Dear Toucan, at least you understand what I mean hi others stupidly put a minus or are nonsense like offer a replacement or about Hercules. And sometimes I think that the site has become dull to the point. I just want to leave
              1. 0
                11 February 2021 14: 50
                I have been a reader of the site for a long time, but I registered for VO this year because I was tired of reading nonsense in the comments. If all adequate visitors leave, who will remain?
    13. +9
      9 February 2021 14: 40
      Another old man flew off ... But there is still no replacement My dad in 59 began to fly this type. I wish the crew to get out of stress faster and survive the debriefing.
    14. +1
      9 February 2021 14: 48
      Everybody is alive? Already good. And they will make new iron.
      1. +3
        9 February 2021 18: 53
        What do you offer for replacement winked
        1. -1
          9 February 2021 18: 58
          You will be using the 76s until you create your own version of the new C-130.
    15. +1
      9 February 2021 14: 52
      For one broken two unbeaten give.
      It's about the crew. Such people are gold.
      Like the guys that Tu in the cornfield
      like a baby in a stroller, put.
      1. +2
        9 February 2021 19: 48
        Like the guys that Tu in the cornfield
        like a baby in a stroller, put.

        It was not "Tu", it was A321. There are few boards of their own production now.
        1. +2
          9 February 2021 22: 50
          Thanks. I wrote it and noticed it later.
          But (as an excuse) Tu the same golden guys were planted in Izhma.
          Completely de-energized aircraft, no flap controls,
          at a landing speed of 400 km / h! To an abandoned airfield
          with 81 passengers, with a roll out into the forest - and not one
          victim!
          1. +1
            10 February 2021 00: 01
            I will say a seditious thing: but as for planting a large carcass in Izhma, or for planting A321 in a corn field - in the general assessment of these events there is more politics than a real assessment of what happened. Everyone is alive and thank God
          2. +1
            10 February 2021 07: 56
            The PIC's qualifications made it possible to do this. Unfortunately, this qualification was not enough at Sheremetyevo in May 2019 when landing the SSJ-100 in manual mode. Aeroflot saves on pilot training, the main thing is profit.
            1. 0
              14 February 2021 08: 51
              You're not right. In SHRM, the reason for the catastrophe is not the qualifications of the pilot, and who came from silt 76. - this is not a boy from school. And the fact that the plane was damaged by lightning and was actually not controllable
              1. 0
                14 February 2021 10: 17
                Check the internet for the preliminary report report_ra-89098_pr. The plane was controlled. Admitting 3 goats is a qualification. It was the RRJ pilot who did not train for manual landing, the IL-76 had nothing to do with it.
                1. 0
                  14 February 2021 19: 43
                  I saw this report ... but you cannot blame the person for the fact that he could not determine the required handle stroke in the parking lot - for this, training is needed, and as you yourself confirm, he did not have it for organizational reasons. That is why the leveling speed was under 300. I cannot understand
                  1. 0
                    14 February 2021 22: 19
                    this also requires training

                    That's what we're talking about, Aeroflot's management saves on training.
    16. +3
      9 February 2021 14: 54
      The main thing is that everyone is safe!)
    17. -9
      9 February 2021 14: 55
      The analogs of the Project 12322 Zubr landing craft on air cushion with domestic gas turbine engines would seriously strengthen the TF in the Kuril Islands region. And in peacetime, they can be used to transport goods instead of transport aircraft, for quick communication with the mainland, with Sakhalin. As a power plant for hovercraft, it is worth considering a small-sized nuclear reactor.
      1. +3
        9 February 2021 15: 13
        The idea is interesting, but ships / boats on an air cushion do not really like storms and large ocean waves, and their seaworthy capabilities end before the capabilities of transport aviation.
        1. +5
          9 February 2021 16: 11
          everything is much worse, SVPs are VERY afraid of ice, all ice very quickly disable the skirt. That is, when there is pure water, it is normal, when clean, even ice with snow is also normal, but as soon as they mix and / or when there are hummocks, then the skirt cuts off, tears or grinds off in the blink of an eye. And it is problematic to replace it, especially on bison and other large SVPs.
          1. -1
            9 February 2021 16: 59
            Quote: ProkletyiPirat
            SVPs are VERY afraid of ice,

            And how ships are afraid of ice - ask the Titanic .. An ordinary displacement ship cannot climb onto the shore or on an ice floe - but an SVP can.
        2. -2
          9 February 2021 16: 20
          Quote: swnvaleria
          their seaworthiness runs out earlier than that of transport aircraft.
          In bad weather, the capabilities of transport aircraft are also limited. The main power bearing part of the ship's hull, which ensures the strength and unsinkability of the ship, is a rectangular pontoon. In a severe storm, you can simply turn off the inflation of the hovercraft skirt and go into a drift. Another option is to get out of the storm zone at 45 knots.
          There are convenient bays on the Iturup Island, where the Bison can take refuge in a storm, for example, the Lion's Mouth Bay, the Dobroe Beginning Bay on the western side of Iturup; Kasatka Bay on the east side. The picture shows ships from Admiral Nagumo's formation in Kasatka Iturup Bay before sailing to Pearl Harbor.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. +2
        9 February 2021 15: 18
        How much will that Bison take? And what will be the cost of transportation?
        Consider building infrastructure. In addition, this is the transfer of supply functions from the military aviation to the navy. Such issues are in the competence of the Minister of Defense and the Supreme.
        1. 0
          9 February 2021 16: 24
          Quote: Canecat
          How much will that Bison take? And what will be the cost of transportation?

          The amphibious capacity of the ship is three main battle tanks with a total mass of up to 150 tons, or ten armored personnel carriers weighing up to 131 tons and 140 paratroopers, or eight infantry fighting vehicles weighing up to 115 tons. Instead of military equipment, the Zubr can accommodate another 366 paratroopers. The cost of transportation will be lower than the cost of transportation by military transport aircraft.
          Quote: Canecat
          Consider building infrastructure
          The infrastructure on the Kuril Islands is already being built.
      4. +4
        9 February 2021 15: 56
        Quote: Svetlana
        As a power plant for hovercraft, it is worth considering a small-sized nuclear reactor.

        Blimey..... good
        1. +1
          9 February 2021 17: 54
          That's it.


          Yes, we are not bastard ...
          And you thought ?! am
      5. -1
        9 February 2021 23: 11
        To begin with, it would be necessary to put the "beach" for the DKVP in order to be in order.
        And to practice "on cats" (otherwise the crowd of Robinsons and Fridays on Putyatin and Popov is an opportunity, where on foot along the Stark Strait stretches to the fires of civilization).
        Fast steamships lose to BTA in the main thing - the efficiency of cargo transportation.
    18. Hog
      +3
      9 February 2021 15: 13
      The main thing is that everyone is safe.
      PS: The weather all over Russia was good.
    19. +5
      9 February 2021 15: 25
      The plane is iron. The main thing is that people were not hurt.
    20. +3
      9 February 2021 15: 30
      There are always very difficult weather conditions. If not a storm, then the fog is constant. It is no coincidence that a new airfield was built there in another place on which the drying facilities are now based.
      1. +2
        10 February 2021 02: 58
        On a permanent basis, "dryers" are not based there. No. Used as an alternate airfield.
    21. +3
      9 February 2021 15: 44
      Everything is safe, that's good.
    22. +4
      9 February 2021 15: 54
      Well, it happens, let all those flying on it light candles to God for their health. It could have been much more tragic. And the plane will be written off, he has to go.
    23. +2
      9 February 2021 16: 53
      The main thing is that everyone is alive!
    24. -4
      9 February 2021 18: 31
      Strong pepelats! The crew with a normal pilot always has a lot of chances +
      P.S. Weak pilots did not fly on them when allied!
      Wheeled landing at minus 3 engines. But there is concrete and excellent weather conditions.
      They drank only three days after that.
      1. +3
        9 February 2021 18: 59
        You tell fairy tales - the AN1 engine does not fly. but is rapidly decreasing. he is not predictable even on two
    25. +3
      9 February 2021 18: 56
      Quote: fleks
      They come in for landing by instruments. and the direct landing of Soviet and Russian transport aircraft is carried out only visually - you see the strip and landmarks at the height of decision-making, you sit down. If you do not see, you leave for a second or alternate airfield
    26. 0
      9 February 2021 19: 43
      In the mid-80s, in the same place, the An-22 crashed a couple of minutes after takeoff. 10 days looking around the clock. No sleep and no rest. And they found it from a helicopter, when the weather allowed, two kilometers from the living area. (((26 souls. Not a single whole body ... Arms, legs, torsos. Reason: supposedly the commander took off himself, and the second on takeoff for some reason I was not in a chair. And the commander did not hold. Not a pilot, therefore I am not discussing. As reported in the order, so I am voicing. The weather was terrible. Two An left normally. This was the third. Eternal memory to all. Seryozha and Natasha Deyneko. And the current one. the crew - respect. The airfield is difficult in terms of the weather. Civilians fly on embryers from Yasnoye. There is usually weather.
    27. +1
      9 February 2021 20: 31
      [quote = Flashpoint] [quote = kit88]
      On the northern tip of Urup, the remains of the Japanese takeoff - it is also Kastrikum, is 250 km away. It seems that it is not served and there is no permanent population in Urupa. [/ Quote]

      There is no permanent population, but gold mining and a processing plant are developing in the southern part of the island. They work on a rotational basis. It seems like the runway is being restored.
    28. +1
      10 February 2021 07: 43
      A good airfield, from the end 32 to the Quiet 200 meters, from the end 14 to Okhotsk 10 km. I was there at the time when the regiment was being cut, it was a sad sight, the town was empty, the windows were boarded up, only the turntables of the border guards remained. On the bank of the Tikhoi, there is a heap of remains from MIG 23, keels, engines, parts of fuselages. In general, the collapse is complete. And the weather there is "fabulous" fogs even hang an ax.
      1. +1
        10 February 2021 20: 37
        Quote: Golddigger 96
        On the bank of the Tikhiy heap of remains from MIG 23, keels, engines, parts of fuselages.

        The military does not clean up after themselves. Landfills are set up. Many interesting objects come across them, for example, high pressure diesel injectors, etc. Someday stalkers will poke around with interest in such zones and, based on their findings, build hypotheses and draw conclusions about our civilization.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"