Shoigu named the weapon that will become the basis of the Russian defense complex

117

Defense Minister of the Russian Federation Sergei Shoigu called weapon, which will become the basis of the Russian defense complex. He said that the main non-nuclear deterrent will be precision-guided systems and hypersonic weapons, including
The Vanguard.

According to the newspaper "News", Sergei Shoigu said this during an operational mobilization meeting of the highest command echelon of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation.



The potential of non-nuclear deterrent forces, primarily of precision weapons, is being strengthened. They will be based on hypersonic systems of various bases.

- said the head of the Russian defense department.

The Minister also noted the constant growth of the professionalism of Russian military personnel. They are constantly introducing the latest technologies, as well as applying the most modern strategy and combat tactics. In particular, many of the latest methods of conducting military operations were first used by the Russian Armed Forces in Syria.

Shoigu said that the Russian military is constantly faced with complex tasks that require commanders to "deeply own the situation" and realize their capabilities.

For the first time, the Russian Armed Forces demonstrated their hypersonic weapons in 2018. These include the "Dagger", "Avangard" and "Zircon" systems.
117 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +56
    9 February 2021 13: 39
    Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu named the weapon that will become the basis of the Russian defense complex ..

    The basis of the Russian defense complex was, is and will be - the Russian soldier ...
    1. +7
      9 February 2021 13: 42
      You are absolutely right! soldier hi
    2. -35
      9 February 2021 14: 09
      Quote: Doccor18
      The basis of the Russian defense complex was, is and will be - the Russian soldier ...

      As well as a Russian riot policeman and a Russian national guard.
      1. +36
        9 February 2021 14: 14
        Quote: Civil
        Quote: Doccor18
        The basis of the Russian defense complex was, is and will be - the Russian soldier ...

        As well as a Russian riot policeman and a Russian national guard.

        OMON and Rosgvardeytsy fought and are fighting against bandit formations, and they also die for their homeland.
        1. -52
          9 February 2021 14: 16
          Quote: Doccor18
          OMON and Rosgvardeytsy fought and are fighting against bandit formations, and they also die for their homeland.

          I absolutely agree that these gangs do not see the shores at all, they go to rallies unauthorized. It is necessary to attract the army, crush these crowds of drug addicts, drunks and agents of the State Department with tanks.
          1. +20
            9 February 2021 14: 30
            Quote: Civil
            We need to attract an army, crush these crowds of drug addicts, drunks with tanks

            Begin with yourself.
            Drink less.
            1. +14
              9 February 2021 14: 40
              Begin with yourself.
              Drink less
              this one does not thump, he works out his leash.
              1. -21
                9 February 2021 15: 16
                Quote: stalki
                this one does not thump, he works out his leash.

                But in fact there is something to object? laughing
                It is a pity that the Red Army does not protect the people. The Red Army will no longer return.
                1. +3
                  9 February 2021 15: 20
                  But in fact there is something to object?
                  It is a pity that the Red Army does not protect the people.
                  And why should you object, you have not a single argument that is sound, not talking to you.
                2. +12
                  9 February 2021 21: 15
                  It's a pity there is no Stalin for people like you!
          2. +1
            9 February 2021 23: 52
            Quote: Civil
            We need to attract the army, crush these crowds of drug addicts with tanks,

            What arrived? wink Well, nothing will hurt for prevention. Although, in this case, it seems that it is already difficult to beat off something. Yes
          3. 0
            10 February 2021 11: 50
            If Putin's men hadn't been scribbling and followed the path of creating popular squads, the 40-50-year-old men themselves would have swept the protesters off the ground, without any Rosgvardia or OMON, and with great pleasure. And by no means in terms of helping zaputintsy, but For the Motherland, and for science to network hamsters. True, at the same time, for the Zaputins there is a great risk of releasing the gin of the Real popular protest from the bottle, therefore they crush the hamsters exclusively with "modest", but so that it does not hurt very much, and so as not to destroy this quasi-opposition, and then nod at a foreign foe for extinction country will become impossible.
            1. 0
              10 February 2021 12: 56
              Quote: andrew42
              If Putin's men hadn't been scribbling and followed the path of creating popular squads, the 40-50-year-old men themselves would have swept the protesters off the ground, without any Rosgvardia or OMON, and with great pleasure. And by no means in terms of helping the Zaputins, but For the Motherland


              And they cannot sweep for the Motherland without the permission of Putin? Here you are, for example - why don't they throw snowstorms?
              1. +3
                10 February 2021 13: 09
                You have a question for the sake of a question. - No, they cannot. - They'll put you in jail. It is just such outgoing Blizzards who will be imprisoned in full, and they will be released, except for the most odious ones, just to pull up the leash. There is no desire to comment on the rest of your provocation.
                1. -1
                  10 February 2021 13: 11
                  Clear. You agree to beat bulk only on condition of impunity. So you love your homeland.

                  Quote: andrew42
                  but they will let go


                  While they are being planted, they will be piled up.
            2. +2
              10 February 2021 14: 00
              There is such a definition - "the state monopoly on violence." If we share this monopoly, then very soon the state will be left with horns and legs.
          4. -6
            10 February 2021 12: 54
            Quote: Civil
            I absolutely agree that these gangs do not see the shores at all, they go to rallies unauthorized.


            And soon these scum will go out into the courtyards. With flashlights. OMON and Rosgvardia will have to die because of this!
          5. 0
            11 February 2021 12: 11
            Vadik, who are you offended ?????? wassat
        2. +8
          9 February 2021 14: 17
          His homeland is not Russia hi
          1. -9
            9 February 2021 15: 12
            Quote: VORON538
            His homeland is not Russia

            Judging by the abundance of spelling errors, this is how it is
        3. +5
          9 February 2021 15: 55
          Quote: Doccor18
          OMON and Rosguards

          OMON is now subordinate to the National Guard.
          1. -1
            9 February 2021 16: 03
            This is yes. Just replied appropriately to the previous commentator
            As well as a Russian riot policeman and a Russian national guard.
          2. -6
            9 February 2021 18: 20
            explain? riot police are police, and the so-called putguard is centuries, before it was all the Ministry of Internal Affairs, as now I don’t know complete nonsense in the heads of not particularly literate rulers of modern Russia
            1. -1
              9 February 2021 18: 58
              For not knowing, minus you dear. Understand report immediately
      2. +3
        9 February 2021 14: 16
        As well as a Russian riot policeman and a Russian national guard.


        By the way, these will have more work ..
        1. -1
          10 February 2021 08: 02
          As long as "these" only beat the people with clubs, no more of their merits are visible.
      3. -4
        9 February 2021 14: 22
        Quote: Civil
        As well as a Russian riot policeman and a Russian national guard.

        The irony is excellent.
        But still, let's separate the flies from the cutlets. Your irony, equalizing the soldiers with the riot police and the national guard casts a shadow on the soldiers. With all due respect, this sounds insulting to the army.
        1. -27
          9 February 2021 14: 31
          Quote: Odyssey
          The irony is excellent.
          But still, let's separate the flies from the cutlets. Your irony, equalizing the soldiers with the riot police and the national guard casts a shadow on the soldiers. With all due respect, this sounds insulting to the army.

          No way! Both of them have the main task of defending the Motherland and the Russian people. Sharing these concepts.
          1. +9
            9 February 2021 18: 59
            Quote: Civil
            No way! Both of them have the main task of defending the Motherland and the Russian people. Sharing these concepts.

            Stop. Did the Bolsheviks separate the Russian army from the gendarmes? Separated. The people hung up the gendarmes, the soldiers and sailors were the backbone and foundation of the socialist revolution.
            Even the officers of the imperial army themselves were challenged to a duel for one comparison with the gendarmes.
            And this is in the Republic of Ingushetia whose political regime is simply ideal compared to the current one. Not because RI was good, but because the current regime is disgusting and simply disastrous for Russia. All the more, it is necessary to make a difference.
            1. +4
              10 February 2021 12: 01
              With all due respect, I dare to note that without the functionality of the "gendarme" there was, no, and will not exist a single state entity. The question is, what is the ideological basis for the actions of the "gendarmerie". However, guided by the tales of the "democrats", you can always change your "gendarmes" for strangers, only then you don't have to squeak oh wey, we fell into a subhuman. The state may not have an army (if there are no real external threats), but the political police and "gendarmerie" should be as an obligatory instrument for protecting the state ideology. But what kind of Ideology is a different conversation. At the same time, at all times, the "gendarmes" are forced to "keep and not let go", that is, to correct the mistakes of the ideological blunders of the authorities in the fire regime. Thankless job. But you can't do without her. That one. Whoever calls for the abolition of the "gendarme" functionality is a voluntary or involuntary demolition of the state, regardless of the political system and the level of "happiness" of citizens.
              1. +5
                10 February 2021 19: 15
                Quote: andrew42
                With all due respect, I dare to note that without the functionality of the "gendarme" there was, no, and will not exist a single state entity. The question is, what is the ideological basis of the actions of the "gendarmerie"

                Almost true. True, the "gendarmerie" in its modern form appeared nevertheless during the transition to capitalism and under capitalism itself. That is, in the absolutist states and further on an increasing basis. Before that, it actually did not exist. What kind of gendarmerie was, say, in medieval France or in the Roman Republic? There were such organs, but in their infancy.
                Under socialism, the "gendarmerie" is also needed, but only for the transitional period and its functionality and importance sharply decreases. Compare the USSR with its militiaman with a sandwich in a holster, where there were no riot police with his truncheons, and nowadays with countless guards and law enforcers with the main function of protecting the property and power of our "privatizers" ...
                Quote: andrew42
                That one. who calls for the abolition of the "gendarme" functionality, is a voluntary or involuntary demolition of the state, regardless of the political system and the level of "happiness" of citizens

                I in no way call for the abolition of the gendarme function, I say that it is necessary to distinguish between a soldier and a national guard in modern society .. In response to the posts of the Civilian who confuses them.
                This difference was clearly carried out by the Bolsheviks in Ingushetia, although the political system of Ingushetia was much more in line with Russia's interests than the current regime of the Abramovichs and Putin's. That is, there were much more excuses for the gendarmes protecting the empire and the property of the Romanovs than for the national guard in the Russian Federation. And still no one pitied them and hung them up, and no one confused them with soldiers (children of the people), whose main function was to protect the people.
                True, our "market democrats Yeltsin-Putin" want to make the army a class appendage of their power. This is what the idea of ​​a contract army is aimed at - serving the employer, not the people. But so far, thank God, the army's "genotype" has not been changed.
                1. 0
                  11 February 2021 15: 16
                  Odysseus, so I completely agree with you - in particular, about serving the interests of the oligarchy by the current law enforcement agencies. What are the ideological postulates of the ruling elite - such will be served by the "gendarmerie", the same will be the selection into its ranks. I wrote about the function as such, and you wrote about the specific incarnations of this functionality in various social formations. And yet, since we are talking about the "gendarmerie" function, the policeman with a sandwich in a holster is not from there, since the main thing here is playing the role of the political police. The same is with riot police: when recidivists are neutralized, there is no "gendarmerie". But when OMON is forced to bludgeon someone on the streets, this is working off the mistakes and shortcomings of the Political Police, which in turn depends on the scale of the discrepancy between the narrowly selfish interests of the ruling elite in relation to the aspirations of large masses of the population. In the case of the bulk, this is a unique case when the real external enemies of the country (namely the country, not the state) are trying to ride the dull discontent of citizens, moreover, in their own selfish interests and, ultimately, against the interests of these very citizens. This is the place for the Political Police.
        2. -2
          9 February 2021 14: 32
          Quote: Odyssey
          Your irony, equalizing the soldiers with the riot police and the national guard casts a shadow on the soldiers.

          Now, if I ask you what the Rosguards didn’t please you, you’ll shove me that same stale video with a woman again.
          If they are such ghouls, in your opinion, where is the video recording of the rest of the chaos?
          1. +8
            9 February 2021 14: 47
            Quote: Sidor Amenpodestovich
            You again shove me that same stale video with a woman.

            And the gayropeans beat everyone in a row, and everything is silently all democratic.
            1. +8
              9 February 2021 15: 21
              So one shot came out and the discussion of the article was reduced to a discussion of his "irony". request
              Returning to the article: I strongly doubt the non-nuclear Vanguard.
              There are not many of them, dear ones, and when a ballistic missile is launched, an early warning system will work.
              Vaughn even warned of the exercises in Germany, the US officials were scared when there was a volley at the Pacific Fleet.
              And in a combat situation, even more overlaps will arise. hi
              1. +5
                9 February 2021 18: 46
                Quote: Alex777
                Returning to the article: I strongly doubt the non-nuclear Vanguard

                This is just a mistake in the article. Vanguard nuclear warhead under an ICBM.
          2. -14
            9 February 2021 15: 18
            Quote: Sidor Amenpodestovich
            Now, if I ask you what the Rosguards didn’t please you, you’ll shove me that same stale video with a woman again.
            If they are such ghouls, in your opinion, where is the video recording of the rest of the chaos?

            And where is even a word against the OMON and the National Guard? Let them kick the women as much as they please. This is their right, this is their country.
            1. -7
              9 February 2021 15: 25
              Quote: Civil
              Let them kick the women as much as they please.

              So how much did they kick them? Name the number. Well, or at least a number.
              1. -10
                9 February 2021 15: 57
                Quote: Sidor Amenpodestovich
                So how much did they kick them? Name the number. Well, or at least a number.

                This is what ordinary people think about their "leader"
                Filmed in bulk
                [media = https: //vk.com/video193829021_456241307]
          3. +1
            10 February 2021 10: 03
            Quote: Sydor Amenpospestovich
            Quote: Odyssey
            Your irony, equalizing the soldiers with the riot police and the national guard casts a shadow on the soldiers.

            Now, if I ask you what the Rosguards didn’t please you, you’ll shove me that same stale video with a woman again.
            If they are such ghouls, in your opinion, where is the video recording of the rest of the chaos?

            In the Rosguards they take do not understand who. Recently, two gavrik in Dagestan shot a man in the police department on the basis of personal hostility
        3. 0
          9 February 2021 14: 51
          with what joy it casts a shadow? these are also soldiers and officers of the country. and they serve her no less. where did you get the idea that it offends us?) rather the opposite.
        4. +12
          9 February 2021 16: 25
          My comrade, a fellow, died in Dagestan 4 years ago, caught two bullets of militants, at whom he threw a shadow ??? fool
      4. +6
        9 February 2021 14: 29
        Quote: Civil
        Quote: Doccor18
        The basis of the Russian defense complex was, is and will be - the Russian soldier ...

        As well as a Russian riot policeman and a Russian national guard.

        A Russian soldier got up across your throat!
      5. -11
        9 February 2021 15: 10
        Quote: Civil
        As well as a Russian riot policeman and a Russian national guard.

        Exclusively against bulk and the like
        1. +1
          10 February 2021 10: 06
          Quote: Lipchanin
          Quote: Civil
          As well as a Russian riot policeman and a Russian national guard.

          Exclusively against bulk and the like

          For some reason, you think that everyone should have the same opinion.
      6. -3
        9 February 2021 18: 09
        and this is necessary. so that people like you do not argue too much
    3. +10
      9 February 2021 14: 30
      The most powerful weapon in Shoigu is the generals women! He hangs shoulder straps for them to the left and to the right ...
      1. -6
        9 February 2021 14: 40
        you vna Mars, they are generals, and in Russia, they are the uniform of state advisers, so do not bear fakes! hi
        1. -9
          9 February 2021 15: 15
          Quote: VORON538
          and in Russia this is the uniform of state advisers,

          "And we Tatars do not care that six rubles, that two trayak" laughing
          The difference has been explained more than once. Everything is like a wall of peas
      2. -6
        9 February 2021 14: 52
        they are not generals but state advisers !!! Enough mixing it up.
        1. +2
          10 February 2021 12: 14
          You are mistaken in ardor, and very significantly. State advisers are a direct analogue of the ranks of generals in semi-military structures and civil administration. And by the way, among themselves, in their midst these positions were called and are called "generals" since 1993, and are also perceived by representatives of related "offices". I believe that you simply did not touch this section of the Russian state. State an advisor is a general's position, if you put it in quotes, then only 1 stroke out of 4 :)) Plus, we have many power structures of the "2nd plan" (not the Armed Forces, and not the FSB / FSO / SVR) were periodically translated to the "army" ranks, then again back to the administrative-civil. The representatives of such structures themselves did not feel any fundamental difference, except for the salary scale and +/- some kind of benefits.
          1. 0
            10 February 2021 12: 17
            Exactly. As well as employees of customs, prosecutors. Also advisers. The only difference is that this analogue, as you say, even receives a salary from another budget and not MO. General is a military rank. State Councilor no. And this is not an analogue, sorry.
            1. +1
              10 February 2021 12: 27
              Just a direct analogue. And this is bad. There should not be so many "generals" ranks in law enforcement agencies. I'm talking about that. About those who do not "drive shelves." And then the cheeks are puffed out.
              1. 0
                10 February 2021 12: 35
                Yes, not an analogue, they understand already. They are not MILITARY !!! AND THE PUBLIC OFFICERS! And this institute has been working in Russia since the time of Peter the Great.
                1. +1
                  10 February 2021 13: 16
                  And then I am not aware of the Table of Ranks. I repeat once again that "adviser" positions are perceived as generals in all branches of the modern Russian state. This is Status! And the real "voivodeship" has nothing to do with it. I am leaning towards the fact that it would be easier to transfer all these "advisers" to army ranks, so that it would not be convenient to call them "generals" who have 200-300 "cops" or 100 customs officers under their command. At least one step lower. I say this as a former Inspector of the 1st rank, then the captain, then the major, then the Counselor of the 3rd rank. I will note that this has nothing to do with positions.
                  1. -2
                    10 February 2021 13: 23
                    So. Stop. Do not confuse positions and titles. They are not the same thing. As for the transfer, on the contrary, these positions were taken away from the military in favor of civil servants so that the military would not be engaged in tasks that were not necessary for them.
                    1. -1
                      10 February 2021 13: 39
                      I just noticed that "Positions" is a separate conversation. Read carefully, pzhsta. As well as official salaries. It was only about titles, and about what is de facto considered in the "power environment". This is a given. But this is nonsense when the ceiling rank of the regiment commander (wow farm) is de facto equal to the ceiling rank, say, of the head of customs (God forbid, 150-200 people, 70% mamzeli on paper).
                      1. 0
                        10 February 2021 14: 07
                        About salaries, too, I will clarify for everyone - MO does not pay them a salary. All civil servants receive it from the federal budget. The table of ranks in various structures, especially for those who have never liked the field. But otherwise it will not work anyway. But as I was convinced from my own experience, everything is not so simple.
                      2. -1
                        11 February 2021 00: 17
                        But in the Armed Forces, for example, the commander of a motorized rifle division and the commander of a division of the Strategic Missile Forces, an air division, is subject to an unequal number of servicemen. This is not a reason to make the commanders of the Strategic Missile Forces divisions and aviation majors or lieutenant colonels. How many people are there in a tank battalion, a motorized rifle battalion, an artillery battalion? The difference is significant, but the bearers of the same ranks are in command.
                      3. -1
                        17 February 2021 22: 40
                        In the army and navy, let the Ministry of Defense decide about the rank. The FSB and the SVR are also their business. I was referring to other law enforcement agencies that do not "fight", and in which there are a lot of "like generals".
      3. +1
        9 February 2021 19: 01
        Not understanding what you are talking about, do not talk nonsense
      4. Cat
        0
        10 February 2021 08: 42
        So rejoice laughing If a country appoints women generals, then it is clearly not going to fight.
    4. +7
      9 February 2021 15: 11
      and also Russian women, who are ready to stand in the rear for 3 shifts behind the machine
    5. 0
      9 February 2021 18: 05
      again passed AB - "10 pieces of 100 VI is not our everything."
      Argentina v Jamaica: 5-0
    6. +2
      10 February 2021 13: 08
      Quote: Doccor18
      The basis of the Russian defense complex was, is and will be - the Russian soldier ...

      Something a lot of pathos, don't you think?
      I cannot say that you are wrong. Right. From fortitude, courage, resourcefulness, etc. Much depends on what the Russian soldier was always famous for. But, alas, in our time on the personal qualities of a soldier you cannot go far. The weapon is needed. A lot of. Miscellaneous. Modern and not very modern. And also the ability to own it.
      And it is also necessary that someone and somewhere made this weapon. Factories also need competent personnel, from management to workers.
      And it is also necessary for this weapon to be developed somewhere. Research institutes are needed, scientists ... But they don't appear out of nowhere.
      And ideology is needed, because it's hard to fight for no reason ...
      Incl. Whatever one may say, one soldier is not enough ... Rear is needed (in the comprehensive concept of this word). And the rear is strong. ...
  2. -9
    9 February 2021 13: 41
    Why do they have such sad faces then? They probably know something)
    1. +3
      9 February 2021 13: 46
      They are not sad - they are tired. And Shoigu was also cold - he took the pose of a Moulin cadet.
      1. -5
        9 February 2021 14: 51
        The photo was put up for a note - lol ... The expression on the face of the GRF allows us to conclude that he heard some kind of "game" and now should "jerk".
        The retinue is clearly straining ... the burden of the "happy people" and the "Aip-colonels" is this ... Everyone is ... fit! wink
        1. +1
          9 February 2021 16: 58
          The facial expression of the GRF allows us to conclude

          Not with Shoigu you can’t understand, he has a poker face.
          Yes, and an ordinary leader, believe me, develops the habit of quietly hearing nonsense, 10 times a day you listen, you will calmly perceive. And all the time it is more expensive to be nervous and yell at subordinates. 10 years ago, I realized that if you want to "bring" to someone, arrange debriefing, but on the go it is useless to do it.
    2. +5
      9 February 2021 13: 50
      Quote: JD1979
      Why do they have such sad faces then? They probably know something)

      Read comments on VO. Where they have already been branded a hundred times that they do not know how to do anything, they do everything wrong, they just cut the budget and eat up the Soviet legacy.
      1. +3
        9 February 2021 14: 13
        Well, everyone has known for a long time that the most professionals (for some reason they are not needed by anyone) in absolutely all industries (such generalists from an engineer to an agronomist and a teacher, a military man and a physician in one person) sit at home on a comfortable sofa and whine at various forums, in including on VO, that there is no money, no work, retirement is far away! lol
        1. -2
          9 February 2021 14: 17
          It's all the fault of the anti-people regime! If they were given a salary, like some Miller, then they would have worked like Elon Musk.
          1. +3
            9 February 2021 14: 18
            Key words- "would give"
            And make money ??? request
            1. +3
              9 February 2021 14: 25
              That well ... Not for that the berry grew! Real Geniuses in universities attend lectures a day after a week, and at work they spend all their imaginations on dreams of Friday night. Strength remains only to cover what the world stands on, this country and this power.
              1. -1
                9 February 2021 18: 06
                so the light is worth? or hanging out in the hole? ............................................. ................
                1. -7
                  9 February 2021 18: 35
                  Quote: antivirus
                  so the light is worth?

                  It has been worth a thousand years. And whoever doesn't like it - welcome from here. Nobody holds. And with such impossible talents, anywhere you can earn money for food. Right?
                  1. +2
                    10 February 2021 10: 13
                    Quote: Sydor Amenpospestovich
                    Quote: antivirus
                    so the light is worth?

                    It has been worth a thousand years. And whoever doesn't like it - welcome from here. Nobody holds. And with such impossible talents, anywhere you can earn money for food. Right?

                    Over the past year, the population of Russia has decreased by half a million like. This is only the dead. Nobody knows how much they left. Everyone who is able to leave. So look do not rush.
                    1. -4
                      13 February 2021 13: 33
                      Quote: Pilat2009
                      Over the past year, the population of Russia has decreased by half a million like. This is only the dead. Nobody knows how much they left. Everyone who is able to leave. So look do not rush.

                      And how many were born and came to take into account, we only count the negative balance, because it is so spectacular?
                      And just don't talk about guest workers. As if they are entirely from Central Asia or Ukraine.
                      1. 0
                        15 February 2021 09: 15
                        Quote: Sydor Amenpospestovich
                        Quote: Pilat2009
                        Over the past year, the population of Russia has decreased by half a million like. This is only the dead. Nobody knows how much they left. Everyone who is able to leave. So look do not rush.

                        And how many were born and came to take into account, we only count the negative balance, because it is so spectacular?
                        And just don't talk about guest workers. As if they are entirely from Central Asia or Ukraine.

                        Where did they come from? I'm telling you about off population decline. If the population has decreased, then the birth rate and arrival does not cover the decline
        2. -6
          9 February 2021 15: 20
          Quote: VORON538
          Well, everyone has known for a long time that the most professionals (for some reason they are not needed by anyone) in absolutely all industries (such generalists from an engineer to an agronomist and a teacher, a military man and a doctor in one person) sit at home on a comfortable sofa.

          1. for
            +1
            9 February 2021 16: 03
            "Patriot" VAS does not confuse the flag and stars. "For the sake of the word ........"
            1. -7
              9 February 2021 17: 14
              Why should they embarrass me?
          2. 0
            9 February 2021 18: 07
            I hardly sit on the old sofa in front of the TV. - all on a chair at the computer. on the couch the cat is lying around. sofa troops they are so fluffy and hairy ...
      2. +1
        9 February 2021 14: 18
        You can't get them through this ..
      3. -4
        9 February 2021 15: 17
        Quote: Sidor Amenpodestovich
        that they do not know how to do anything, they do everything wrong, they just cut the budget and eat up the Soviet legacy.

        In short, grab your bags, the station is leaving
    3. -5
      9 February 2021 15: 24
      Quote: JD1979
      Why do they have such sad faces then?

      So they are not on "Humorin"
      And there is a serious conversation
  3. +5
    9 February 2021 13: 41
    It still seems to me that the staff members do not believe in Russian weapons. Themselves are accustomed to deceiving everyone on performance characteristics, and do not believe ... So, it periodically slips. However, they are in no hurry to check laughing
    1. for
      -1
      9 February 2021 16: 05
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      It still seems to me that the staff members do not believe in Russian weapons.

      What about their concerns?
    2. +1
      9 February 2021 18: 09
      However, they are in no hurry to check

      - there are no delays on a visit to God ...
    3. -2
      9 February 2021 23: 57
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      However, they are in no hurry to check

      Duc, if, according to their own hands, the unacceptable damage starts from 10%, then, of course,
      they are great ... life-giving ... fellow laughing
  4. +4
    9 February 2021 13: 42
    Every deep ruler of a European pedophile-pederast-self-mutilating person should know about the inevitability of punishment on the islands under water or in Antarctica ...
  5. +4
    9 February 2021 13: 42
    The basis of defense is ideological and political unity.
  6. +10
    9 February 2021 13: 44
    He stated that the main non-nuclear the means of deterrence will be high-precision systems and hypersonic weapons, including "Avanhard"

    Something dorgovato will shoot an ICBM with a gliding unit without a nuclear warhead. The target is the maximum size of the building, no missiles can be saved.
    1. +8
      9 February 2021 14: 02
      Quote: bk316
      Something dorgovato will shoot an ICBM with a gliding unit without a nuclear warhead. The target is the maximum size of the building, no missiles can be saved.

      The article is simply incorrectly written. The new one hundred square meters warhead is, of course, nuclear.
    2. -9
      9 February 2021 14: 35
      Quote: bk316
      Something dorgovato will shoot an ICBM with a gliding unit without a nuclear warhead. The target is the maximum size of the building, no missiles can be saved.

      What if this goal is a priority! Like the White House, or the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine ... There are a lot of such small goals on a large scale .. It is subtle here, without a vigorous loaf.
      1. 0
        9 February 2021 16: 53
        Like the White House, or the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine.

        I don’t know how glad I am, but the bunker under the White House may not be pierced without a vigorous loaf ...
        1. -1
          9 February 2021 18: 25
          Quote: bk316
          Like the White House, or the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine.

          I don’t know how glad I am, but the bunker under the White House may not be pierced without a vigorous loaf ...

          About the White House, I'm hypothetically! Of course, for such a goal, a vigorous loaf is needed ... That would not run away ... It's like a flock of cockroaches, so that for sure there are more! Slippery bang! The spray flew! as the saying goes am "use as needed" belay
      2. 0
        9 February 2021 18: 11
        you can talk about a non-nuclear world and the scribe will be with YaB in his teeth - the last gag
  7. +11
    9 February 2021 14: 01
    The article is slovenly framed. The vanguard is a warhead. Placed on the UR-100 from storage. And these are nuclear weapons.
    During the gathering, Shoigu spoke about hypersonic weapons as the basis of non-nuclear deterrence without reference to the Vanguard.
    By the way, the Dagger also makes sense only in the nuclear version, but at least formally it can be non-nuclear.
  8. +6
    9 February 2021 14: 05
    our missile defense is a bureaucratic apparatus. Anyone wrapped up and not allowed to pass.
    And the weapon of attack is the duma. No living creature is able to endure so many laws.
  9. -9
    9 February 2021 14: 12
    I don’t understand why we need non-nuclear when there is nuclear?
    1. +3
      9 February 2021 14: 16
      Quote: Rufat
      I don’t understand why we need non-nuclear when there is nuclear?

      Perhaps you will need to hit on your territory or nearby.
      1. -8
        9 February 2021 14: 41
        Don't give a damn about everyone ...
    2. +1
      9 February 2021 14: 54
      because there are also local conflicts, for example.
    3. -4
      9 February 2021 15: 27
      Quote: Rufat
      I don’t understand why we need non-nuclear when there is nuclear?

      Have you heard the saying about the cannon and the sparrows?
      1. 0
        9 February 2021 18: 12
        what about the fly swatter and the bear? ............................................ ....................................
  10. +5
    9 February 2021 14: 19
    In particular, many of the latest methods of conducting military operations were first used by the Russian Armed Forces in Syria.


    It doesn't sound beautiful and immoral, but Syria has provided us with a good testing ground ...
  11. The comment was deleted.
  12. +2
    9 February 2021 14: 39
    He stated that the main non-nuclear high-precision systems and hypersonic weapons, including
    The Vanguard.

    Is this some other Vanguard? Not the one that VVP told us about?
  13. -1
    9 February 2021 14: 45
    Quote: Civil
    Quote: Doccor18
    OMON and Rosgvardeytsy fought and are fighting against bandit formations, and they also die for their homeland.

    I absolutely agree that these gangs do not see the shores at all, they go to rallies unauthorized. It is necessary to attract the army, crush these crowds of drug addicts, drunks and agents of the State Department with tanks.

    Are you very worried about the bulk? But what about the Nazis and extremists? Their Fuhrer is not even an oppositionist. An agent of influence. And his entourage is no opposition.
  14. +3
    9 February 2021 15: 08
    Oh sure! If not for nuclear weapons, then all enemies could be pelted with bricks. But for some reason they are not afraid of precise weapons, but still nuclear ones.
  15. 0
    9 February 2021 16: 54
    He would rather name what has become, not what will become.
    Tired of this news in the future tense.
    Finally tell me what you did!
    No plans needed, tell us about the results!
    1. -8
      9 February 2021 17: 17
      For the first time, the Russian Armed Forces demonstrated their hypersonic weapons in 2018. These include the "Dagger", "Avangard" and "Zircon" systems.
  16. +2
    9 February 2021 19: 18
    My opinion: the main thing is HUMAN. Without a man, the most modern weapon is unnecessary trash
  17. 0
    9 February 2021 21: 35
    this is of course good, well, you need to go into space and build ships to bomb with asteroids from orbit if you are)
  18. +1
    10 February 2021 05: 42
    I am generally amazed at this fairy tale about Hyper weapons. Well, she flies quickly, so someone will chase her. All the same, she will be met on a collision course of zur with a speed less than hyper and will be shot down not this year so next. Shot down the same American satellite, which flew even at a higher speed than Hyper. At the same time, the missile defense system, which intercepted it, could not even in theory accelerate to the 1st cosmic speed. And this year they are going to shoot them down with a volley of zur, which will go to her in an envelope, in the center of which is our hyper ... And on each Burke there are 50 of them ... And it's useless to maneuver where you can't turn, but you will run into some kind. There is no ultimate weapon and there never will be. There is a sword, a shield will appear ... etc, etc. Germany also had the most advanced weapons, in all areas of military technology ... and Chito ???? And the T-34 won which were produced at least 50000 pieces. If Germany had enough intelligence and they would have released not 6000 Panthers, but two or three times more of them, then as the Queen of England said: "we would probably speak German now." Then, how much do such hyper missiles cost? Like a tank or more expensive? And if they are terribly expensive, then how many thousands can we afford? It is clear that we cannot afford thousands ... It turns out a piece product, but you will not scare anyone with piece goods and will not win. Let's not delude ourselves ... that "from the taiga to the British seas ...." One must always think!
  19. -2
    10 February 2021 08: 20
    Buryat storyteller
  20. 0
    10 February 2021 09: 03
    [quote = Angry] I am generally amazed at this fairy tale about Hyper weapon ..... "You should have been born that way at 25m in Germany just in time 43. You would have given tens of thousands of" Panthers "to the Wehrmacht on the mountain. :) In this case, the advantage is not the amount of weapons, but the timely application of the laws of physics, which was difficult for you to master at school.