Military Review

Iranian press: Armata tank enters the world market

79

The newest Russian-made T-14 Armata tank has been successfully certified and received an export passport. This means that now he can take part in international arms exhibitions, entering the world market.


Iranian news agency Akharin Khabar reports.

Thus, according to the press service of the state corporation Rosoboronexport, the T-14 Armata tank is entering the world market for the first time. At the moment, it is considered the only one in the world a tank third generation.

As noted by the Iranian press, for overseas buyers this is a good news... They have long been interested in the possibility of purchasing the T-14 and other newest examples of Russian armored vehicles. Earlier, the head of the Rosoboronexport company, Alexander Mikheev, said that consultations have been going on for a long time about the probable export supplies of these combat vehicles.

It is quite possible that for the first time foreign military will have the opportunity to buy "Armata" during the IDEX-2021 exhibition, which will be held this year in the United Arab Emirates. Indeed, among the defense enterprises of Russia, whose products will be presented in Abu Dhabi, there will also be the Uralvagonzavod concern, which has developed and produced the T-14.

An official representative of Uralvagonzavod said that an "advertising passport" had already been prepared for the Armata tank, which would allow this product to participate in exhibitions and be sold abroad.

Tank T-14 "Armata" is able to successfully resist the enemy's armored vehicles, support the leading motorized units, as well as destroy the enemy's manpower, including those located inside the fortifications.
Photos used:
GK "Rostec"
79 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. rocket757
    rocket757 8 February 2021 10: 08
    +8
    Boom with realists, we still have to see what, how, where will come out ... or not!
    1. Ross xnumx
      Ross xnumx 8 February 2021 10: 20
      +3
      Quote: rocket757
      Boom with realists, we still have to see

      Why look there?
      Official representative "Uralvagonzavod" сообщилthat an "advertising passport" has already been prepared for the Armata tank, which allows this product participate in exhibitions and be sold abroad.

      Let them look at exhibitions there.
      To be honest, I was constantly bothered by the information on the KAZ "Afghanit". Moreover, different comrades praised their own developments so stubbornly. But after reading:
      "Afganit" has the ability to control a robotic machine gun to destroy incoming ammunition.
      "Afghanit" can destroy shells attacking armored vehicles due to the additional 2x high-speed short-range Doppler radars, manufactured using PFAR technology and working on illumination from a constant source. National Interest having analyzed the statements about the successful tests of "Afghanit" for the destruction in flight of the most advanced American BOPS with uranium cores notes that if this is true, then NATO tanks have become obsolete against the background of the T-14.

      Calmed down. In a word, we will live longer - we will see more.
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 8 February 2021 10: 44
        0
        Export passport, that's okay, BUT, there is still a lot of things in pursuit, on which our traders / manufacturers have stumbled more than once or twice!
        Those. there is a whole range of organizational and technical additions, MANDATORY!
        1. antivirus
          antivirus 8 February 2021 13: 21
          0
          The Persians need to scare the Arabs (agreed two-way with the Russian Federation) - they only need to cross the Tiger and then at one gas station to the ERRiad.
          Soon they will write about Chinese UAVs as well - in defiance of KSA and others
      2. A1845
        A1845 8 February 2021 10: 53
        -1
        Quote: ROSS 42
        notes that if this is true

        I would like to see a reception against uranium scrap flying at supersonic
        They have long been interested in the possibility of purchasing the T-14

        for what purpose and in what quantities? not specified ..
        Tank T-14 "Armata" is able to successfully resist the enemy's armored vehicles, support the leading motorized units, as well as destroy the enemy's manpower, including those located inside the fortifications.
        and this is just a masterpiece of information content, copied from the training manual of the 30s
        1. Ross xnumx
          Ross xnumx 8 February 2021 10: 56
          -9
          Quote: A1845
          I would like to see a reception against uranium scrap flying at supersonic

          so the adversaries analyzed and admitted:
          The National Interest, after analyzing claims of successful tests of the Afghanit in flight to destroy the most advanced American BOPS with uranium cores, notes that if this is true ...

          stop And our people never lie!
        2. Piramidon
          Piramidon 8 February 2021 12: 42
          0
          Quote: A1845

          They have long been interested in the possibility of purchasing the T-14

          for what purpose and in what quantities? not specified.

          Don't run in front of the locomotive. You write that so far only INTERESTED, and immediately want to know the quantity, as if some kind of contracts have already been signed. request
      3. NDR-791
        NDR-791 8 February 2021 10: 59
        +4
        Calmed down. In a word, we will live longer - we will see more.
        But when I read this, they begin to gnaw at me, not just vague doubts, but begin to gnaw straight:"Afghanit" can destroy shells attacking armored vehicles due to the additional 2x high-speed Doppler short-range radars,
        Wow!!! Was it taken and destroyed by radar? And try destroy !!! armor-piercing blank from M829 using a machine gun ??? Oh well. And like the cherry on the cake:National Interest Analyzing Claims of Successful In-flight Destruction Testing of the Afganit the most advanced American BOPS... This is probably the pentagon for us a couple of cars the most modern drove the shells? And the tool with them?
        1. Ross xnumx
          Ross xnumx 8 February 2021 11: 13
          -2
          Quote: NDR-791
          But when I read this, they begin to torment me, not only vague doubts

          Likewise. I'm just torn to pieces: who to believe? You or those "uncles" with diplomas who created this KAZ. wassat Chose "uncles", what remains for me? To our deep regret, there are no videos on the Afghanit's countermeasures against shells with a "cunning, American" core. request
          1. NDR-791
            NDR-791 8 February 2021 11: 19
            +4
            You or those "uncles" with diplomas who created this KAZ.
            So I'm not talking about "smart guys", I'm talking about the National Interest, which even quite accessible information can distort beyond recognition, and even come up with oneself. wassat
            1. antivirus
              antivirus 8 February 2021 13: 24
              -4
              in any case, for any technical tricks-achievements, we will pay in blood.
        2. venik
          venik 8 February 2021 11: 35
          +4
          Quote: NDR-791
          But when I read this, they begin to gnaw at me, not just vague doubts, but start gnawing: "Afghanit" can destroy shells attacking armored vehicles due to the additional 2x high-speed short-range Doppler radars,

          =======
          Artyom! Simply translator it is necessary to tear off the arms, legs and head in addition, if it (the head) he certainly has! What is the truth after such a "translation" you begin to doubt very much (whether the translator has a head)! what
          1. NDR-791
            NDR-791 8 February 2021 11: 43
            +2
            It's just that the translator needs to tear off his arms, legs and head in addition
            The lights in the editorial offices did not go out until morning. A herd of Albanians was polishing the translation of chased phrases from an American magazine wassat wassat wassat
            1. venik
              venik 8 February 2021 11: 45
              +1
              Quote: NDR-791
              The lights in the editorial offices did not go out until morning. A herd of Albanians was polishing the translation of chased phrases from the American magazine wassat wassat

              =======
              good
            2. venik
              venik 8 February 2021 11: 58
              +4
              Quote: NDR-791
              The lights in the editorial offices did not go out until morning. A herd of Albanians was polishing the translation of chased phrases from the American magazine wassat wassat

              =======
              Catch up !:
              Once upon a time I read Alistair McLean's novel "His Majesty's Ship" Ulysses "in Russian translation. The novel is replete with naval terminology, And then I began to" stumble ".... I don't remember all the" pearls ", but one who frankly put I was "stumped" - I remember: "frigate river type"... what For a while - "hovered" until I realized what was meant by "River-class frigates" (during the Second World War the British had a series of frigates named after large rivers ....). He looked at the end of the book: Exactly! My aunt translated ..... So I didn't finish reading it to the end that time. Thank God, then a normal translation came across ...
        3. A1845
          A1845 8 February 2021 12: 30
          +1
          Quote: NDR-791
          Wow!!!

          due to additional 2x high-speed short-range Doppler radars, manufactured using PFAR technology and operating under illumination from a constant source

          good
          and that, the tank is full of space for klystrons and lenses with phase shifters, and replace them if that is not a problem
          there is something to be proud of! soldier
      4. YOUR
        YOUR 8 February 2021 12: 54
        +2
        Get out. Upgrade tanks from storage to your army and forward.
        Newest appliances for sale
        I don’t understand anything at all. What is patriotism?
        1. lis-ik
          lis-ik 8 February 2021 13: 35
          -2
          I don’t understand anything at all. What is patriotism?
          And no one stuttered about patriotism, profit is more accustomed to. Maybe later, according to the leftover principle, the Russian army will drop.
    2. Aleks2048
      Aleks2048 8 February 2021 11: 58
      +6
      Boom with realists, we still have to see what, how, where will come out ... or not!

      laughing
      Let's! Let's see how many T90s are in India and compare with the Russian Federation?
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 8 February 2021 12: 06
        0
        In fact, the basis of the security of our country is by no means tank armada ... although such a component of our armed forces should be developed!
      2. YOUR
        YOUR 8 February 2021 13: 00
        +2
        Only the T-90?
        Su-30 we have 133, only in India 232 and to other countries 245
        Carapace - we have about a hundred, sold 3 times more, etc.
        Its army is supplied on a leftover basis.
        1. rocket757
          rocket757 8 February 2021 13: 59
          +2
          Yes, we have no tanks around every corner and planes like flies, swarms, do not fly ... well, so we have such an enemy who cannot be scared away by such.
          Here is to build several BZHRK, it is more reliable.
          1. YOUR
            YOUR 8 February 2021 14: 03
            +1
            BRZhK withdrawn from service, all work on their construction and development of new ones stopped in 2017. The work will not be resumed.
            1. rocket757
              rocket757 8 February 2021 18: 38
              +1
              Ha, who will forbid us to FANTASY ???
              Then, any, our, new development in a similar topic, causes the Enemy to know, at least ... a lot of things, but desires run into the answer, completely discourages.
              True, this is for the time being, because nothing is eternal !!! Well, it's not worth marking time, never and in anything!
  2. Victor_B
    Victor_B 8 February 2021 10: 08
    0
    The newest Russian-made T-14 Armata tank has been successfully certified and received an export passport. This means that now he can take part in international arms exhibitions, entering the world market.

    Maybe then, finally, OUR troops will begin to arrive in commodity quantities?
    We are tired of waiting ...
    1. seti
      seti 8 February 2021 10: 44
      +1
      Yes, they will acquire it, but in very small quantities. The reasons are just obvious - it is very expensive (the price is about $ 6-7.5 million ... a lot of electronics and foreign ones ... it is technically very complicated ... a new model for us, an X-shaped engine that still needs to be polished to the ideal ... T-72B3M about 18 years old (very successful and not bad) and T-90M (even better) which also need funds. This is what we will actually fight on. Apparently the T-14 is still a pilot (command) vehicle for groups of tanks and motorized riflemen.
      1. SovAr238A
        SovAr238A 8 February 2021 12: 11
        +1
        Quote: seti
        Apparently the T-14 is still a pilot (command) vehicle for groups of tanks and motorized riflemen.


        It makes sense to have a command vehicle in that form. in which its functionality is an order of magnitude higher than other tanks?
        It turns out "one warrior in the field", and the rest are extras.

        it's like the squadron commander on the Su-35, and the squadron itself is on hang-gliders ...

        The system of a military unit must be balanced both in composition and in armaments.

        10 T-14 tanks in one unit will have the same functionality as 50 T-90 tanks ...
        Simply by virtue of a qualitatively different principle of using technology.
      2. molyr
        molyr 8 February 2021 13: 49
        +2
        and where can you read about its cost and about a lot of foreign electronics?
        1. seti
          seti 8 February 2021 14: 01
          +2
          I will give you a link to the channel
          Look at his links for the T-14, he gives a lot of not unfounded information. For the price, device, booking, engine, electronics, KAZ, gun and so on. Provides a lot of classified information and analysis of known information. After all, you are at the computer - it is not so difficult to search for a topic that interests you on your own in Yandex.
          The question that interests you from about 2 minutes with a trifle.
  3. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 8 February 2021 10: 19
    +2
    Alexander Mikheev said that consultations are underway on the probable export supplies of these combat vehicles. has long
    The question immediately arises, was it developed exclusively for export? Can you first meet your needs for at least a third, and only then think about export? Just need not say that to meet your needs you need money, which will be earned by export.
    1. Rubi0
      Rubi0 8 February 2021 10: 40
      -2
      And then I thought dinosaurs as you are believers that the state takes money out of thin air have already died out in 30 years of capitalism, but not all ...
      1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
        Andrei from Chelyabinsk 8 February 2021 10: 58
        +7
        Quote: Rubi0
        And then I thought dinosaurs as you are believers that the state takes money out of thin air have already died out in 30 years of capitalism, but not all ...

        And I thought that people who are not able to understand that the budget of the RF Ministry of Defense is NOT IN ANY KIND connected with export supplies through Rosoboronexport, have long ago realized the full depth of their delusions, but here you go ...
        1. Cananecat
          Cananecat 8 February 2021 11: 18
          +2
          Let's just say, it is not directly connected ... nevertheless, the ROE also pays taxes from which the budget and the military budget are then formed.
          1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
            Andrei from Chelyabinsk 8 February 2021 11: 24
            +7
            Quote: Canecat
            Let's just say, it is not directly connected ... nevertheless, the ROE also pays taxes from which the budget and the military budget are then formed.

            It is over, but the impact on budget revenues of such an export deal is not even minimal, but scanty. And the influence on the budget of the RF Ministry of Defense is absolutely negligible. Actually, exports can grow, and the budget of the Moscow region can fall, there are more theoretical connections than practical ones.
            And I am not at all opposed to the export of Armata, since it’s not easy to buy it yourself - indeed, at least we will support the manufacturer. I am against statements that export contracts allow us to increase the purchase of weapons and military equipment
        2. The comment was deleted.
  4. Cananecat
    Cananecat 8 February 2021 10: 20
    +4
    Many will be interested, but real buyers can be counted on the fingers of one hand.
    I agree that he needs to enter the international market, but let's calculate the optimal number of T-14s for relatively successful actions as part of the unit ...
    1. gloomy
      gloomy 8 February 2021 10: 22
      -7
      Do you know that for sure?
      1. seti
        seti 8 February 2021 10: 37
        +1
        Quote: gloomy
        Do you know that for sure?

        And you yourself think logically. There are countries controlled by the Western Bloc. There are independent countries (only a few). There are partially independent countries maneuvering between different associations. And there are satellites without an independent vote, in short six. The world has long been divided and the strong crushes the weak. Everything is like in the criminal world by concepts. Only someone tries to act on them and someone lays down on them. Naturally, the EU countries and the USA will never buy our developments and will force them not to buy all their satellites. That grenades of the wrong system, then something else that is not right .. As was the case with Turkey and the S-400. Take India for example. The country seems to be independent, but for some reason it is always advised what to take and what not. For example, Rafale (one of the most expensive in the class!) Is possible, but for example the S-400 is not. Or Arab countries ... They are allowed to buy serious things only from one seller and not from any other. Iran seems to be independent, but it cannot buy what it wants yet. Since every fireman is imposed on sanctions and all sorts of restrictions. It is clear that such a purchase requires very serious money. We recall the contract for the Su-35 for Indonesia. They shook hands, but no, they slowed down again .. There are a lot of such examples.
        So if there are buyers, then these are 2-3 countries and probably not soon. All mourners need not worry about critical technologies and that Putin has sold everything again, but at a higher price.
  5. ivselim
    ivselim 8 February 2021 10: 23
    -2
    Traders ...
  6. Vlad5307
    Vlad5307 8 February 2021 10: 23
    +4
    Quote: Victor_B
    The newest Russian-made T-14 Armata tank has been successfully certified and received an export passport. This means that now he can take part in international arms exhibitions, entering the world market.

    Maybe then, finally, OUR troops will begin to arrive in commodity quantities?
    We are tired of waiting ...

    It would be necessary to sell the T-72 on the foreign market, of which we have a lot in service, as well as for the modernization of what is in reserves. Those. to replace the "old" T-72 with Armata. But it seems that the budget will not be able to handle a quick replacement, so they want to earn currency on the Armata first, and then they will lead it wherever it is needed. soldier
    1. Azimuth
      Azimuth 8 February 2021 10: 32
      0
      It is necessary to push, while the factories will earn extra money. Armata is a stage already passed. We need money for new developments. If you want to sell, there must be a better product.
      1. Vlad5307
        Vlad5307 8 February 2021 10: 35
        0
        I agree that it is necessary to promote the sale of the new, but in proportion to the "old" 1: 100, 1:50. Then you don't have to walk with your pants down.
    2. d4rkmesa
      d4rkmesa 8 February 2021 10: 42
      -4
      The T-72B3 is too expensive to export and is considered the same old tank. They tried to sell it somewhere in Asia for a horse price tag, but the Chinese sold their export tank for the same money.
  7. Greyhound famously
    Greyhound famously 8 February 2021 10: 34
    +2
    I wonder what kind of weapon is provided in this export version. If 2A82-1M, then everything is more or less clear. But if the 2A82-1C (with a higher pressure in the chamber and a longer length of the ammunition used), then I would very much like to look at the ammunition, especially since this version of the weapon is not yet in the Russian troops.
    And yes, I would not want to be supplied abroad with equipment superior in parameters to the one that goes into its own army.
  8. tank64rus
    tank64rus 8 February 2021 10: 37
    -2
    And my own army again sideways, like with the T-90 in the 90s. And we will upgrade 72. where the promised 2300 tanks.
    1. hydroy
      hydroy 8 February 2021 10: 48
      0
      Where are the promised 2300? and how many T-90s were riveted for export - thousands, but for the army? - hundreds! Money is tight)
    2. seti
      seti 8 February 2021 10: 57
      +2
      Quote: tank64rus
      And my own army again sideways, like with the T-90 in the 90s. And we will upgrade 72. where the promised 2300 tanks.

      T-72B3M about 18 years old - a tank not particularly inferior to the best Western models of technology. Almost all by parameters. It should be noted that Western countries are also modernizing their armored vehicles and do not produce them from scratch. And the T-90M is even better in terms of security, there is an even more powerful and perfect engine and a gun is even better. And new ammunition can be used. New UO Kalina system, Relikt protection installed. Now it is more practical to massively re-equip troops with tens and hundreds of T-72B3M about 18 years old and T-90M than to produce 10-20 T-14. Since we have mastered these tanks for a long time in production and we have trained crews on them. And so let's chase two hares and be left with nothing. The T-14 is needed, but understanding is also needed that this is a completely new tank and it takes time to be mastered by industry and the rank and file. And a lot of money.
  9. Voltsky
    Voltsky 8 February 2021 10: 51
    +2
    guys for those who are crying about the T-14, you should remember the history of the Su-30; it was the export of these machines that helped the dryers to withstand and develop further, as well as the contract for the T-90 allowed Uralvagonzavod to withstand and develop further.
    If someone did not get the hint: before the foreign contract, these machines as such were not in the troops, including Pantsir-S
    1. Guru
      Guru 8 February 2021 10: 56
      -2
      including Pantsir-S
      Which at one time was developed with the money of the Saudis.
      1. seti
        seti 8 February 2021 11: 18
        -4
        Quote: Guru
        including Pantsir-S
        Which at one time was developed with the money of the Saudis.

        About with the money of the Saudis can be more ? And how many they have too.
        1. Guru
          Guru 8 February 2021 13: 07
          +1
          What about the Saudis' money, can you give more details? And how many they have too.
          Of course, but I must warn you that many sources have cut it, so I cannot find links, there are only indirect ones.
          https://vpk.name/images/i116265.html
          The meaning was this; In the mid-90s, the Saudis could bargain for the price from the Americans (it seems when buying the Patriots, I won't say for sure), which they broke, gave our money. And in the mid-90s, when there were only effective managers around, then the amount of 2-3 million (I won't say for sure, information is closed) dollars was like a breath of air. In the end, the Saudis and the Americans agreed, and they did not buy our shells. According to the link that I gave you will see that the Saudis are testing our shells in 2010, and we ourselves have put them into service in 2012. Here is the story.
          1. Voltsky
            Voltsky 8 February 2021 13: 11
            +3
            The main non-resident sponsor of the Pantsir-S development was O.A.E. as well as South Korea played such a role during the development of the S-350 Vityaz.
            1. seti
              seti 8 February 2021 13: 53
              0
              Quote: Voletsky
              The main non-resident sponsor of the Pantsir-S development was O.A.E. as well as South Korea played such a role during the development of the S-350 Vityaz.

              Absolutely.
          2. Guru
            Guru 8 February 2021 13: 33
            0
            And here's another in the same place:
            the complex could not fire on the move and, according to experts from a special interdepartmental commission and a number of research institutes of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, the Pantsir-S1 air defense missile system cannot fulfill the assigned tasks and fight high-precision weapons at ranges over 12 km. In this connection, in the conditions of a landslide reduction in purchases of military equipment, the Air Defense Forces and the Ground Forces have lost interest in it.
            They returned to the continuation of work on the Pantsir anti-aircraft missile and cannon system only in the second half of the 90s. The UAE showed interest in "Pantsir", which demanded to significantly improve its characteristics, which led to the creation of a practically new system:
            ZRPK type "Pantsir-C1" on the MAN chassis for the UAE
            Source: http://pilot.strizhi.info/
            In May 2000, the Instrument Design Bureau signed a contract with the United Arab Emirates for the supply of 50 Pantsir-C1 complexes.
            24 wheeled chassis
            26 on tracked chassis

            Note in Russia "Pantsir-C1" entered service in 2012.
          3. seti
            seti 8 February 2021 13: 51
            +1
            Complete lies. The SA was never given money to develop the Pantsir-C1. And they do not have these complexes and did not have
            The UAE took part in partial financing in the mid-90s. As a result, the contract amount amounted to $ 800 million (including partial financing of the development). The UAE received the export version from 2009 to 2013.
            So what for only effective managers are around ready to sell for 2-3 million (I will not say for sure, information is closed) dollars no need to lie.
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. The comment was deleted.
  10. Andre___86
    Andre___86 8 February 2021 10: 57
    -4
    Hooray. Sell, divide, sell again, resell. To yourself? Why, there will be no war. We have a vigorous loaf)))
  11. prior
    prior 8 February 2021 10: 58
    -3
    Russia has mastered the production of "gum" that has no analogues in the world.
    Here are several types - "Armata", SU-57, "Leader" ...
    In advertisements on VO and TV, it is chewed and chewed, chewed and chewed, chewed and chewed ...
    But it is still not "on sale".
  12. Konnick
    Konnick 8 February 2021 11: 00
    -6
    Quote: seti
    This is what we will actually fight on. Apparently the T-14 is still a pilot (command) vehicle for groups of tanks and motorized riflemen.


    If you use Armata as a commander, then this will be the primary target for the enemy anti-tank defense. Remember the experience of World War II, when the commander's BT and T-34s with antennas were first knocked out, and when the Americans tried to dilute ordinary Shermans with a long-barreled modification, they also knocked out in the first place. In this case, I do not want to fight on the Armata. And in general I do not want to spend so much money on tanks that have not yet been tested by shelling.
    1. seti
      seti 8 February 2021 11: 32
      +2
      You are something about network-centric war have you heard? I advise you to look for information. Now no one will be using the newest tank alone. It was not created for this. Application - only as part of its tactical link and as a reconnaissance vehicle, target designation and fire adjustment of self-propelled guns, air defense systems and UAVs. For this, there is a circular Doppler radar with medium-range AFAR. Ultraviolet HD cameras are available with 360 ° XNUMX ° coverage and are capable of detecting the operation of engines of equipment with exhaust of ionized gases.
      Of course, this is not a mass tank yet - but over time it will become so.
      1. Konnick
        Konnick 8 February 2021 11: 46
        -1
        If Armata is massive, then we will be left without pants, but we will be ready for network-centric war. And we will have an exhaust ionized gases wassat
      2. Old tanker
        Old tanker 8 February 2021 17: 35
        0
        Something you in your fantasies turned the tank - the main striking force on the battlefield into an ordinary vehicle of forward observers-correctors.
        Believe me, the battle has long been led not from a tank, albeit a super informationally equipped one. A tank is just just a combat unit as part of a tactical group and just one of the elements in the network-centric war you mentioned.
  13. mark_rod
    mark_rod 8 February 2021 11: 03
    -1
    Let's sell the Armata to everyone, and remove the T55 from storage and use it. We have a lot of them. Businessmen from MO xp ..... s
  14. SaLaR
    SaLaR 8 February 2021 11: 18
    -2
    They will buy ... they will definitely buy ... they will buy it very quickly ... the Americans are already rubbing their hands .. they have prepared tools for disassembly .. WAIT hi
  15. Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 8 February 2021 11: 26
    +2
    Going out without entering the home market?
    1. Old tanker
      Old tanker 8 February 2021 17: 39
      +2
      Once upon a time, the T-90 first entered the Indian market, and then only went serially to the home market. If it were not for the Indian contract, it is likely that the T-90 would have remained in single copies in our tank forces. So nothing out of the ordinary here. Again, an additional incentive to develop and reduce the cost of production.
  16. Alien From
    Alien From 8 February 2021 11: 39
    +1
    It's good to start production at least 50/50.
  17. Rostislav
    Rostislav 8 February 2021 12: 00
    0
    Perhaps, first, to start supplying to the troops?
    And that reminds "On you, God, that he himself is not suitable."
  18. Konnick
    Konnick 8 February 2021 12: 03
    -1
    Quote: Rostislav
    Perhaps, first, to start supplying to the troops?
    And that reminds "On you, God, that he himself is not suitable."


    So there are sane people in the MO, unlike VO laughing
  19. Konnick
    Konnick 8 February 2021 12: 23
    +2
    Quote: seti
    Application - only as part of its tactical link and as a reconnaissance vehicle, target designation and fire adjustment of self-propelled guns, air defense systems and UAVs.


    This is what kind of radiation comes from it. Use a vehicle weighing over 50 tons and costing several hundred million rubles as a chassis for target designation systems. The fantasies of using Armata are endless at the level of sofa experts. What words and phrases are immediately visible to the expert wassat
  20. Al_lexx
    Al_lexx 8 February 2021 13: 17
    0
    Good news in my opinion. Export deliveries stimulate production for its own armed forces. Well, what happens in fact, we'll see.
  21. A. Privalov
    A. Privalov 8 February 2021 13: 53
    +1
    The Iranian government, through the Embassy of the Islamic Republic in Moscow, sent a note of protest to the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs in connection with the use of the term Arab Gulf instead of the Persian Gulf in the publication of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on the Twitter microblogging network, RIA Novosti reports.

  22. yehat2
    yehat2 8 February 2021 14: 51
    +1
    I have an essentially simple question - usually a weakened or simplified version is sold abroad.
    Will there be any changes on the Armata? For example, the cannon is simpler or the armor is 2 times thinner, or the crew of the cameras will not get the appearance
    1. Old tanker
      Old tanker 8 February 2021 17: 43
      0
      The composition of the armor will definitely be different. The fire control system and some other systems or units can be changed by the customer according to his requirements. Otherwise, everything will surely remain the same.
  23. sidoroff
    sidoroff 8 February 2021 16: 11
    +1
    and that's fine. now it is necessary to sell ten Armata to Iran for cash. the Ayatollahs will not have any rial left for the nuclear program after that.
  24. Ax Matt
    Ax Matt 8 February 2021 17: 22
    0
    Come on! Olo-lo! All secrets, big and small, are for sale! "... Available ..." ??? fool Eh! Hello! We have nothing else to trade, as soon as those in which we can somehow get ahead !? Blockheads ... They do not have enough news about the "moving" of the shell to mattress toppers and training on our equipment as targets. I have no words!
  25. Dikson
    Dikson 8 February 2021 17: 28
    +2
    Is history repeating itself with the T-90? ...
    1. Sands Careers General
      Sands Careers General 8 February 2021 23: 28
      0
      What story?
  26. Sands Careers General
    Sands Careers General 8 February 2021 23: 26
    0
    And what a good option to sell to all Bedouins, they love advanced equipment for a lot of money))
  27. Magmax
    Magmax 9 February 2021 23: 11
    +1
    Probably the best tank in the world.
  28. nekromonger
    nekromonger 10 February 2021 14: 45
    0
    And what about the engine then? Is there a 1500hp engine?