Military Review

"Three and a half years in prison": the court replaced the suspended sentence for Navalny with a real one

586
"Three and a half years in prison": the court replaced the suspended sentence for Navalny with a real one

The Simonovsky court in Moscow replaced Alexey Navalny's suspended sentence in the Yves Rocher case with a real one, sentencing him to 3,5 years in prison.


Alexei Navalny will serve his sentence in a general regime colony, out of the 3,5 years sentenced to prison he will spend 2,8 years, the time spent under house arrest (one day of house arrest for one day of the colony) will count towards serving his sentence.

The court finds the FSIN's representation to be satisfied

- Judge Natalia Repnikova announced the decision.

The consideration of Navalny's case took place in the Moscow City Court, the oppositionist was brought from the Matrosskaya Tishina remand prison, where he was under arrest until February 15. The Federal Penitentiary Service asked to replace the term with a real one, the prosecutor's office supported the request. Navalny himself, speaking in court, demanded immediate release. It is emphasized that earlier he managed to avoid replacing the suspended sentence with a real one three times - in 2015 and 2016, a refusal was issued, and in 2017 the court extended the trial period for another year without replacing it with a real one.

It is noted that the process was attended by representatives of about 20 European countries. The Russian Foreign Ministry called it interference in Russia's internal affairs.

The verdict has not entered into force, Navalny and his defense have 10 days to appeal the court decision, the opposition's lawyers have already announced plans to file a complaint.
586 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. yfast
    yfast 2 February 2021 21: 14
    .
    What an unexpected turn ... Just in time for the next elections will be released.
    1. Finches
      Finches 2 February 2021 21: 19
      +74
      In the most democratic country in the Universe - the United States would have soldered 6 terms of 439 years each and two electric chairs - the whole world would applaud the American judicial system, and, for example, the presidents and prime ministers of some countries, such as Ukraine, Georgia, the non-state of the Baltic states, Poland (from sea to sea) ... kiss the mantle of a judge for such a sentence! But now, on the contrary, a universal howl about the violation of rights will begin! laughing
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. Gene84
          Gene84 2 February 2021 21: 48
          +4
          Here, a graduate student of the Faculty of Mechanics and Mathematics of Moscow State University, Azata Miftakhova, was sentenced to six years in prison for breaking a window in the office of United Russia. And other left-wing activists, Elena Gorban and Andrey Eikin, were suspended for four and two years ...
          1. Finches
            Finches 2 February 2021 21: 54
            +26
            They gave a little, to be honest ... But, after all, you will not provide proofs - otherwise something else will pop up besides the broken window ...
            1. Cheerock
              Cheerock 2 February 2021 22: 13
              +35
              Quote: Finches
              They gave a little, to be honest ... But, after all, you will not provide proofs - otherwise something else will pop up besides the broken window ...

              For example, an attempt to set fire to a room in a residential building. Let him say thanks that he did not fall into the hands of the tenants.
            2. Tatyana
              Tatyana 2 February 2021 22: 14
              +21
              The Simonovsky court in Moscow replaced Alexey Navalny's suspended sentence in the Yves Rocher case with a real one, sentencing him to 3,5 years in prison.
              Taking into account the house arrests for Navalny, this period will be reduced by 1 year.

              Blogger Alexei Navalny's headquarters announced an immediate gathering at Manezhnaya Square in Moscow. It is noteworthy that at the same time appeals appeared on the Web: "Get up Russia", written by users from Ukraine and Azerbaijan.

              As for the officials of foreign countries, at the court session in the Navalny case, foreign ambassadors from 20 countries, who had previously advocated the release of the essentially anti-Russian foreign agent Navalny, were present as listeners.
              Zakharova called this interference of foreign states in the internal affairs of sovereign Russia. And she did the right thing.

              About any alleged "state terrorism" in the Russian Federation, about which Yuri Boldyrev talks in connection with the replacement of the suspended sentence with a real one by Navalny on the video in the commentary of Stroporez, out of the question!
              According to Navlny, article 275 of the RF Criminal Code "High treason" is crying! I hope that the Russian special services regarding Navalny will return to this.

              Zakharova called the presence of foreign ambassadors in court as interference in the affairs of the Russian Federation
              1. Revival
                Revival 2 February 2021 23: 10
                .
                "The audience was attended by foreign ambassadors from 20 countries, who had previously advocated the release of essentially anti-Russian foreign agent Navalny.
                Zakharova called this interference of foreign states in the internal affairs of sovereign Russia. And I did the right thing. "

                Do I understand correctly that they, in your opinion, entered the courtroom illegally !? Maybe through the window? Or they have accomplices from the bailiffs !?
                1. Tatyana
                  Tatyana 2 February 2021 23: 25
                  +24
                  Quote: Revival
                  Do I understand correctly that they, in your opinion, entered the courtroom illegally !? Maybe through the window? Or they have accomplices from the bailiffs !?

                  Zakharova, on the other hand, explained in the video that in international relations such a presence of foreign ambassadors in the courtroom is not accepted, unless a foreign citizen of the country he represents is being tried in the country where the ambassador is received.
                  That foreign ambassadors are present at the court hearings of the host country if a foreign citizen of their country is being tried. So it should be. Otherwise, it is diplomatic nonsense.

                  You obviously did not watch the video with Zakharova at all and rushed ahead of time to speak out against - and you speak too biasedly for Navalny.
                  Aren't you tired of it yourself?
                  1. Revival
                    Revival 2 February 2021 23: 54
                    .
                    "Otherwise, it's diplomatic nonsense."

                    Well, what to say, just that, in my personal opinion, observation, we (they) will swallow this "nonsense" as usual ...
                  2. Revival
                    Revival 3 February 2021 00: 03
                    .
                    Can you manage not to mention bulk when I haven't said a word about him?
                    1. Tatyana
                      Tatyana 3 February 2021 00: 36
                      +10
                      Quote: Revival
                      Can you manage not to mention bulk when I haven't said a word about him?

                      And why are you so indignant that I call things by their proper names and that I can see right through your obtuseness? I have nothing to be ashamed of. I say everything is correct, because the trial is going on over Navalny, and at the same time you distort the content of my post.

                      So in this regard, I do not even intend to master anything. Take it for granted!
                      And my words, when quoting from my posts, I will forgive you to formulate in your comments correctly in the form of quotes - as it should be! And do not pass them off as your thoughts.
                      1. The comment was deleted.
                      2. Civil
                        Civil 3 February 2021 06: 51
                        .
                        1. We disperse there is nothing interesting, everything is under the bunk, priblatnenny on sofas.
                        2. Dull - law enforcement agencies will always help to understand their place in life.
                        3. Those wishing to rebel - can go out on their knees, but a fine for unauthorized public events is inevitable for this.
                        4. For those who suddenly go with petitions - carefully read the article about the events of January 9 (22), 1905 in St. Petersburg.
                      3. Xnumx vis
                        Xnumx vis 3 February 2021 08: 38
                        +5
                        Quote: Civil
                        We disperse there is nothing interesting, everything is under the bins, piled on the sofas.

                        If you have a deadline then climb under the bunk! Personally, I now regret that Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin is not there. (I do not like him!) He would have arranged a demonstrative whipping of your idol, and his henchmen received real sentences. Sometimes cruelty is needed. This is the only way to save the people, the country .. And you sprinkle ashes on your head and lament oh! vey!
                      4. Civil
                        Civil 3 February 2021 08: 42
                        -2
                        Comrade Stalin would send you six oligarchs together with your Provalny in one formation to dig a tunnel to Alaska) to wave a pick lol you are the obverse and reverse of one coin
                      5. nils
                        nils 3 February 2021 09: 01
                        -1
                        Quote: Civil
                        you are the obverse and reverse of one coin

                        A clearly expressed thought and assessment of the current situation. Bravo!
                      6. Xnumx vis
                        Xnumx vis 3 February 2021 11: 33
                        +4
                        Quote: Civil
                        Comrade Stalin would send you six oligarchs together with your Provalny in one formation to dig a tunnel to Alaska) to wave a pick lol you are the obverse and reverse of one coin

                        WE are the oligarchs .. Yes !!? Looks like fans of the oval have a brain problem! As for the coin (obverse and reverse), profile and full face of their idols on the banknotes! you know better! You are paid 33 dollars - the "partners" of silver and their mongrels.
                      7. Civil
                        Civil 3 February 2021 12: 11
                        -5
                        Quote: 30 vis
                        WE are oligarchs ..

                        Six of the oligarchs. As well as Provalny with the flock. lol left and right leg of some leaky underpants laughing
                  3. Maverick1812
                    Maverick1812 4 February 2021 08: 00
                    +2
                    Iosif Vissarionovich would have driven your owners under the bunk long ago. I'm not at all an apologist for Navalny, but there are a lot of questions! Chief - where does the money come from, Zin? (V.S. Vysotsky)
                2. Olgovich
                  Olgovich 3 February 2021 12: 04
                  +6
                  Quote: Civil
                  We disperse there is nothing interesting, everything is under the bins, piled on the sofas.
                  2. Dull - law enforcement agencies will always help to understand their place in life.
                  3. Those wishing to rebel - a fine for unauthorized public events is inevitable for this.


                  Well, you walked around the United States and other France, yes, just, let me remind you: there is not only what you have. but also peaceful unarmed demonstrators are SHOTTED near the Capitol, poisoned with DOGS, gas and water cannons, presidents banyat and critics of Biden are arrested.

                  Dissatisfied with the fact that, finally, the Law worked in relation to the Russian swindler and thief , need higher gallop .

                  And yes, we expect hysterical squeals from them: "America is with US !!" yes
                3. Civil
                  Civil 3 February 2021 12: 12
                  -6
                  Absolutely to the point, plus from me. Only in some countries they drove snickering rich citizens, and in another, poverty of the 3 worlds, even in the scenery of St. Petersburg. good
                4. Olgovich
                  Olgovich 3 February 2021 15: 33
                  +1
                  If you look at the tests, say in Holland, there is mainly Arabic speech.

                  Is it ... snickering? belay

                  Quote: Civil
                  another poverty 3 of the world even in the scenery of St. Petersburg.
                  But already these snickering fat metropolitan cats / hamsters with iPhones for 100 rubles are really difficult to call beggars.
      2. Dmitry V.
        Dmitry V. 3 February 2021 12: 58
        -1
        Quote: Tatiana
        Zakharova explained in the video that in international relations such a presence of foreign ambassadors in the courtroom is not accepted.


        Do you need to explain everything? Isn't it time to move your head?

        Judgment of the ECHR in the Yves Rocher case:
        According to the conclusion, articles 7 and 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights were violated in relation to Alexei and Oleg Navalny. In particular, the court considered that the decisions of the Russian courts were arbitrary and unfounded. The adopted decision "undermined the fairness of criminal proceedings radically," the ECHR believes.
        The ECHR ordered the government of the Russian Federation to pay compensation to Br Navalny in the Yves Rocher case.
        "The court ruled that Russia must pay each applicant 10 euros in non-pecuniary damage. In addition, the Russian Federation must pay Alexey Navalny's legal costs in the amount of 000 thousand euros, as well as 45 euros and 10,971 thousand rubles in compensation for expenses to Oleg Navalny," in the judgment of the ECHR.

        The government of the Russian Federation paid compensation to brunch Navalny, in 2018
        And now he was sentenced to a real term in the same case.
        And the ambassadors in court are WITNESSES IN THE FUTURE COURT AGAINST RF.

        And that such a trial will happen - there is no doubt, since the legal norms were again violated - the judge did not want to go across the opinion of the Kremlin prisoner.
        1. Tatyana
          Tatyana 3 February 2021 15: 43
          -6
          Quote: Dmitry Vladimirovich
          The government of the Russian Federation paid compensation to brunch Navalny, in 2018
          And now he was sentenced to a real term in the same case.
          And the ambassadors in court are WITNESSES IN THE FUTURE COURT AGAINST RF.

          Please give a link to your information about Russia's payments to Navalny in this case on the basis of the ECtHR decision!
          Otherwise, you may end up with exactly the same fake linden as the West did with Navalny's film allegedly about "Putin's Palace."
        2. nov_tech.vrn
          nov_tech.vrn 3 February 2021 20: 55
          -5
          After the latest changes in the Constitution, a bolt will be put on the decisions of the ECHR, earlier, the Yeltsin Constitution, made it possible for anyone to interfere in our affairs, because it recognized the supremacy !!! international courts over our legal proceedings. I don’t know if Leshenka received compensation for those violations that Western fighters for the rights of oppositionists in Russia painted in court, although he remained a criminal, but now he will definitely go to rest on the bunk. I would also give him a jigsaw, to cut the age-old pines.
          1. Dmitry V.
            Dmitry V. 4 February 2021 10: 21
            0
            Quote: nov_tech.vrn
            in our affairs

            Do not mix your affairs and the Kremlin siddler - or are you on his salary?
        3. Tatyana
          Tatyana 3 February 2021 21: 06
          0
          Quote: Dmitry Vladimirovich
          The government of the Russian Federation paid compensation to brunch Navalny, in 2018
          And now he was sentenced to a real term in the same case.
          And the ambassadors in court are WITNESSES IN THE FUTURE COURT AGAINST RF

          As far as I know, the initial verdict in the Yves Rocher case was passed to Navalny back in 2014. Navalny was convicted under parts 2 and 3 of Art. 159.4 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (Fraud in the field of entrepreneurial activity, committed on a large and especially large scale) and part 2 of article 174.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (Legalization (laundering) of funds or other property acquired by a person as a result of a crime). He was assigned 3,5 years CONDITIONALLY and 5 years probation.

          Nowadays, the verdict of Ravelniy dated 2.02.2021 has not yet entered into force, the parties have 10 days to appeal it. Navalny's lawyers have already expressed such an intention.
          At the same time, Navalny's defense is going to inform the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe about the court's decision: in 2017, he stated that Russia had not fully complied with the decision of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR).

          However, the Russian prosecutor, after the Navalny trial, noted that The ECHR did not recognize the verdict as illegal and did not order the Russian authorities to cancel it, calling only for a re-trial of the case.
          The Russian prosecutor also recalled that in 2018, the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation complied with this requirement, but considered the ORIGINAL decision of the court to be LEGAL and JUSTIFIED.
          See in detail - "The indignation of the West and the tears of his wife: Navalny is sent to a colony" - https://www.gazeta.ru/politics/2021/02/02_a_13464908.shtml?utm_source=24smi&utm_medium=referral&utm_term=2599&utm_content=3308996

          This fundamentally contradicts your statement that "the Government of the Russian Federation allegedly paid compensation to the Navalny brigade in 2018."

          Where did you get this information from then? As far as I understand, there will be no links to this information of yours.
          Quote: Dmitry Vladimirovich
          Judgment of the ECHR in the Yves Rocher case:
          According to the conclusion, articles 7 and 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights were violated in relation to Alexei and Oleg Navalny. In particular, the court considered that the decisions of the Russian courts were arbitrary and unfounded. The adopted decision "undermined the fairness of criminal proceedings radically," the ECHR believes.
          The ECHR ordered the government of the Russian Federation to pay compensation to Br Navalny in the Yves Rocher case.
          "The court ruled that Russia must pay each applicant 10 euros in non-pecuniary damage. In addition, the Russian Federation must pay Alexey Navalny's legal costs in the amount of 000 thousand euros, as well as 45 euros and 10,971 thousand rubles in compensation for expenses to Oleg Navalny," in the judgment of the ECHR.
          1. Dmitry V.
            Dmitry V. 4 February 2021 10: 33
            +1
            Quote: Tatiana
            Where did you get this information from then? As far as I understand, there will be no links to this information of yours.


            Well, the seeker will find it, we help the weak:
            All countries, including Russia, have committed themselves to fulfill the will of the ECHR on a voluntary basis. This raises a logical question: what will happen if this is not done? Until recently, the European Court has had only one such precedent: the 2004 judgment in the Hearst v. UK case was not enforced by the British authorities, despite threats and pressure from the European Court. True, in practice, no state has openly declared its refusal to follow the ECtHR verdict. As a rule, attempts to ignore a decision are manifested in the form of a direct or indirect delay in the execution process - there is no time frame for this. As for the possible sanctions, they exist and consist in a monetary fine and reputational losses. But, we repeat, so far, the matter has not reached an explicit and open confrontation between the ECHR and Russia and or another country, except for the case with Great Britain.

            Russia recognizes the ECHR, its jurisdiction and decisions. If the verdict is not in favor of the Russian Federation, then the possible consequences are:

            - payment of monetary compensation to the applicant;
            - the need to make changes, additions to laws and, in general, the need to improve the national legal system;
            -the applicant's right to review the judgment, which became the reason for the appeal to the ECHR
            .

            Do you think that in the case of Yves Rocher the Russian Federation has taken a moratorium on the implementation of the decisions of the ECHR? Both moral and material losses will be too high.
            Looking for a specific payment document? For a certificate, contact the Treasury, in the register of payment documents, such records are kept by Navalny, as a lawyer, it is well known that his application is easy to verify, and since no refutation has been received, it means that he declared the truth - he was paid.
            And there is no point in proving me to you - I didn’t get into search engines for you.
          2. Tatyana
            Tatyana 4 February 2021 12: 37
            0
            Quote: Tatiana
            the Russian prosecutor, after the Navalny trial, noted that The ECHR did not recognize the verdict as illegal and did not order the Russian authorities to cancel it, calling only for a re-trial of the case.

            Those. The ECHR really asked Russia to REVISE the verdict over Navalny - and the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation really revised this verdict and left it in force after its revision, considering the ORIGINAL decision of the court to be LEGAL and JUSTIFIED, i.e. CORRECT.
            PAYMENTS to Navalny on the verdict of the Supreme Court you say ?! If the decision of the Supreme Court while upholding the sentence to Navalny upheld it, and this legally does not imply any payments to Navalny, no glory!
            And the Russian prosecutor on 2.02.2021 also recalled that In 2018, the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation complied with this requirement of the ECHR (which one? See above), however, it considered the ORIGINAL decision of the court to be LEGAL and JUSTIFIED.

            I am more ready to take the word of a professional lawyer of the Russian Federation - the Russian prosecutor-prosecutor at the trial of Navalny, than the false words of a foreign agent Navalny, who has
            only one fake film by Navalny about "Putin's palace", made by order of American special services by foreigners according to Goebbels manuals, what is worth!
            Navalny can write about himself and his activities anything, but it’s worthless!
            A small lie gives rise to great distrust.

            This is how "The allegedly Putin's fairytale palace" actually looks like: the first ILLEGAL tour of the journalist's palace in Gelendzhik. 29.01.2021/XNUMX/XNUMX


            And this is a video of how already OFFICIALLY Russian journalists dealt with a detailed analysis of Navalny's information in his film about the so-called "Putin's palace". See 13:13 min.

            Palace for Putin ". The story of the biggest lie | SK | Exclusive
          3. Dmitry V.
            Dmitry V. 4 February 2021 13: 47
            0
            Quote: Tatiana
            And this is a video of how already OFFICIALLY Russian journalists dealt with a detailed analysis of Navalny's information in his film about the so-called "Putin's palace"

            I saw it.
            Only your conclusions - leave them to the little ones.
            Interested in digging into the details?
            Even in this video, it can be seen that the walls ALREADY had a finish (possibly with glue mats or tiles for glue) and it was removed by the time of shooting (not necessarily this or last year or a couple of years ago - the glue remained), traces of glue rolls remained - the glue is not so easy to remove when dismantling from concrete.
            Other close-ups show that tiles were knocked off the walls (there were traces of grouting for the joints between the tiles (2:32 close-up - there was grout and standard-sized tiles on the wall) - that is, some of the rooms were finished - about 50-60% of the walls covered with remnants of glue surfaces, indicating that once there was a finish, maybe even from the first scandal with this "palace", they can quickly knock down the remnants to bring journalists - it's not particularly interesting for me, when the finish was removed - after the publication or 7 years ago with the first publications about the palace.
            Anyone who understands the technology of interior decoration of premises can see that a rework is underway, that some kind of decoration has already been done (glue mats, this is not a very cheap technology), that the external decoration has not been completed either - for example, semicircular marble vaults of windows are also not completed. The object was not used, it is obvious, I do not argue.
            But the video left more questions - it was necessary to wait a week, and not let the journalists on the spot - any private investor would not mind such an advertisement for the "hotel"
            - why did you have to wait a week?
            - to disperse the indignant citizens of Russia?

            Now the "hotel" is being converted into drywall - a cheap technology. Moreover, it is clear that not so long ago, a rework began. Dates on finishing materials - produced in mid-December 2020 - that is, they were imported at 21 - that's just ...

            Nowhere was it said that the decoration was exactly the same as in the video - but the project existed, was paid for and was converted into a hotel with 16 (!) Rooms?
            - This is an investment nonsense - a hotel with 16 rooms, the project's return on investment - never! For rich people? Those who can afford the prices in such a hotel have their own villas on the Black Sea coast
            That is, there is no one even to attach this crazy project within a reasonable framework, it is initially too costly to become profitable, as they are trying to present here. Another lie that even Arkady Rotenberg does not strongly believe in it, judging by the diagonal of the lie, which, during the interview, now and then testified to his insincerity.

            The theme of the palace in this "investigation" is secondary. But the scheme for withdrawing funds from state-owned companies attracts theft of funds on an especially large scale.
            The issue of financing such construction projects by state companies, joint-stock companies through a fund allegedly engaged in charity is a question requiring confirmation, did not see supporting documents, payment orders, extracts from the register of payments, etc.
            I believe that this requires an investigation and there is no great difficulty for law enforcement agencies, to obtain complete data on this statement is enough to request registers of payments of these companies and joint-stock companies, and from a bank or tax office - it makes no difference.

            But what about the investigation into the poisoning, what about Navalny's unsubstantiated statement - the authorities did not move - and this says a lot about the fact that the revealed scheme of corruption payments is probably not far from the truth.
          4. Tatyana
            Tatyana 4 February 2021 14: 08
            0
            Quote: Dmitry Vladimirovich
            I saw it.
            Only your conclusions - leave them to the little ones.
            Interested in digging into the details?
            Even in this video, it can be seen that the walls ALREADY had a finish (possibly with glue mats or tiles for glue) and it was removed by the time of shooting (not necessarily this or last year or a couple of years ago - the glue remained), traces of glue rolls remained - the glue is not so easy to remove when dismantling from concrete.

            Are you telling me, an engineer who worked at one time in the design and supervision department on the construction of a building ?!
            Tell your unprofessional opinion about the construction of the "Palace to Putin" to those who have never worked at a construction site and do not understand anything about construction!

            Have you ever heard about the dismantling of old finishes during rebuilding and redevelopment inside old buildings that you are surprised at this need in the construction process? Don't write nonsense!
          5. Dmitry V.
            Dmitry V. 4 February 2021 14: 14
            0
            Quote: Tatiana
            employed


            You have already opted for "Tanya / Manya" or Vanya
            Not against transvestites, but men posing as women are not my type.
            At your age, it's time to decide on your gender ...
          6. Tatyana
            Tatyana 4 February 2021 14: 21
            0
            Quote: Tatiana
            engineer who worked

            Quote: Dmitry Vladimirovich
            Quote: Tatiana
            employed
            You have already opted for "Tanya / Manya" or Vanya
            Not against transvestites, but men posing as women are not my type.
            At your age, it's time to decide on your gender ...

            You shouldn't be rude! Nobody here is going to like or dislike you in any way!
          7. Dmitry V.
            Dmitry V. 4 February 2021 14: 52
            0
            Quote: Tatiana
            You shouldn't be rude! Nobody here is going to like or dislike you in any way!


            God forbid, do not take it to heart.
            I myself am not particularly encrypted - just curious what they are trying to achieve by hiding on the floor?
            Popularity? Well, obviously not respect ...
          8. Tatyana
            Tatyana 4 February 2021 15: 18
            0
            Well, I made, perhaps from your point of view, a syntax error like
            Quote: Tatiana
            me, an engineer who worked
            rather than
            Quote: Tatiana
            me, an engineer who worked
            ... And what of it?
            Where did you get such a sexual sexual preoccupation then that you are expressing your protest in polemics to me - your opponent ?!

            Such things in the art of polemics are sophistry and are called - "Argument to the Personality". This is always the most talentless and most vulgar argument in a dispute.
            Sophism is either a logical error in reasoning, or simply a deliberate artificial trick of a polemicist in a dispute against his opponent to prove that he is right.
            You acted ugly.
            In general, rudeness - it is rudeness!
  • -Dmitry-
    -Dmitry- 4 February 2021 12: 43
    +1
    Judgment of the ECHR in the Yves Rocher case:
    According to the conclusion, articles 7 and 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights were violated in relation to Alexei and Oleg Navalny. In particular, the court considered that the decisions of the Russian courts were arbitrary and unfounded. The adopted decision "undermined the fairness of criminal proceedings radically," the ECHR believes.
    The ECHR ordered the government of the Russian Federation to pay compensation to Br Navalny in the Yves Rocher case.
    "The court ruled that Russia must pay each applicant 10 euros in non-pecuniary damage. In addition, the Russian Federation must pay Alexey Navalny's legal costs in the amount of 000 thousand euros, as well as 45 euros and 10,971 thousand rubles in compensation for expenses to Oleg Navalny," in the judgment of the ECHR.


    It's so liberal to take it out of context :)
    PARIS, April 9. / TASS /. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) upheld the claim of blogger Alexei Navalny against Russia, where he challenged the legality of his house arrest pending a court verdict in the case of embezzlement of funds of the Yves Rocher company. This is stated in a statement issued by the court on Tuesday.

    "The court concluded that the applicant's detention under house arrest was ordered unlawfully and the ban on access to communications did not pursue a legitimate aim," the ECtHR verdict says. It also notes that the total period of detention under house arrest exceeded 10 months (from February 28, 2014 to January 5, 2015), when Navalny cut off the tracking bracelet.

    The ECtHR ruled that there had been a violation of Articles 5 (on the right to liberty and security of person), 10 (on the right to freedom of expression) of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), as well as Article 18 (on the limits of use of restrictions on rights) ... In this regard, the court ruled to pay Navalny € 20 thousand for moral damage and € 2,6 thousand as compensation for legal costs within three months after the decision comes into force. At the same time, the initial amount of the requested compensation for non-pecuniary damage was € 100 thousand. The court decision (in accordance with Article 44 of the ECHR) becomes final after three months, if during this time a request is not submitted to transfer the case to the Grand Chamber of the ECHR.


    That is, the ECHR declared illegal only the house arrest, under which Navalny was kept during the trial. The ECHR did not recognize the verdict in the Yves Rocher case as unlawful.

    In their complaints addressed to the ECHR, Navalny indicated, in particular, that they were convicted of actions that were ordinary business activities provided for by the Civil Code, the trial in their case was unfair, the interpretation of the provisions of the criminal law by the courts is arbitrary and unpredictable.

    Meanwhile, the Presidium did not find grounds for canceling the court decisions that took place in this criminal case, indicating that the verdict issued by the court contains a description of a criminal act recognized by the court as proven, indicating the place, time, method of its commission, form of guilt, motives, goals and consequences of the committed guilty of crimes»
    1. Dmitry V.
      Dmitry V. 4 February 2021 13: 54
      0
      Quote: -Dmitry-
      That is, the ECHR declared illegal only the house arrest, under which Navalny was kept during the trial. The ECHR did not recognize the verdict in the Yves Rocher case as unlawful.

      Well, this is your special opinion.
      It is necessary to jail the gentlemen from Gazprom, Transgaz, Transneft, Rosneft - they also criminally pledge 300% or more of the profits and are suitable for criminal activity according to the court ruling by Yves Rocher, I carefully studied the available materials on this case ..
      And the law on capital repairs - according to which monthly payments are made on account of supposedly future major repairs, contradicts the articles of the civil code that only rendered services can be paid for and this is illegal entrepreneurial activity of the state
    2. Nikon OConor
      Nikon OConor 4 February 2021 18: 46
      0
      And the law on capital repairs - according to which monthly payments are made on account of supposedly future major repairs, contradicts the articles of the civil code that only rendered services can be paid for and this is illegal entrepreneurial activity of the state

      You have an interesting point of view. Apparently in construction you are complete 0. Overhaul can last for 3 months and half a year, if "only the services rendered are paid for", what then should builders, contractors, etc. eat all this time?
    3. -Dmitry-
      -Dmitry- 5 February 2021 03: 28
      0
      Quote: Dmitry Vladimirovich
      Quote: -Dmitry-
      That is, the ECHR declared illegal only the house arrest, under which Navalny was kept during the trial. The ECHR did not recognize the verdict in the Yves Rocher case as unlawful.

      Well, this is your special opinion.

      This is not my opinion, but the opinion of the ECHR. If you think that this is not the case, give the decision of the ECHR, which says something completely different. Well, in fact, I can read and interpret court decisions - after all, I have been practicing law for 9 years. Including there was experience with a complaint to the ECHR.

      It is necessary to jail the gentlemen from Gazprom, Transgaz, Transneft, Rosneft - they also criminally pledge 300% or more of the profits and are suitable for criminal activity according to the court ruling by Yves Rocher, I carefully studied the available materials on this case ..
      And the law on capital repairs - according to which monthly payments are made on account of supposedly future major repairs, contradicts the articles of the civil code that only rendered services can be paid for and this is illegal entrepreneurial activity of the state
      And the law on capital repairs - according to which monthly payments are made on account of supposedly future major repairs, contradicts the articles of the civil code that only rendered services can be paid for and this is illegal entrepreneurial activity of the state

      Sophistry and demagoguery.
  • Vladimir Mashkov
    Vladimir Mashkov 3 February 2021 18: 11
    +1
    Not bad, but not enough! It is necessary to bring to mind and call to account for other "deeds"! yes yes yes
  • Nyrobsky
    Nyrobsky 2 February 2021 23: 53
    +25
    Quote: Revival

    Do I understand correctly that they, in your opinion, entered the courtroom illegally !? Maybe through the window? Or they have accomplices from the bailiffs !?
    Nooo, you do not understand correctly.))) They entered the courtroom on completely legal grounds and no one interfered with them. And it is right! The foolishness of the West should be visible and obvious to everyone, since there is no better proof of interference in the internal affairs of other states.
    1. Revival
      Revival 3 February 2021 00: 04
      .
      That is, interference in our internal affairs is legal, or non-obstruction?
      1. Nyrobsky
        Nyrobsky 3 February 2021 00: 28
        +24
        Quote: Revival
        That is, interference in our internal affairs is legal, or non-obstruction?

        Noooo))) Non-obstruction of the presence of diplomats at the trial on legal grounds, in fact, is evidence of the interference of foreign states in the judicial system of Russia, since it was not limited to the mere presence of "delegates", but was associated with the demand expressed by them, in violation of the norms and procedures established by law do not deprive Navalny of his freedom. Having created a precedent with the conclusion of Navalny to a further suspended sentence, in spite of obvious violations, thousands of criminals throughout Russia, who also violated the conditions of serving a suspended sentence, will have a reason to appeal against the court's decisions to replace the suspended sentence with a real release. The West's desire to influence the judicial practice of an independent country because of one blogger with a tarnished reputation is more than obvious, and also stupid.
        1. Revival
          Revival 3 February 2021 01: 08
          .
          It's even cooler here:
          "The non-obstruction of the presence of diplomats at the trial on legal grounds, in fact, is evidence of the interference of foreign states in the judicial system of Russia."

          That is, not even the presence, but "Non-obstruction of the presence of diplomats at the trial on legal grounds" is evidence of the interference of foreign states in the judicial system of Russia. "

          What a twist!
          That is, the actions of the bailiffs on "Non-obstruction of the presence of diplomats at the trial on legal grounds" are evidence of the interference of foreign states in the judicial system of Russia. "
        2. Stas157
          Stas157 3 February 2021 11: 06
          .
          Quote: Revival
          What a twist!
          That is, the actions of the bailiffs on "Non-obstruction of the presence of diplomats at the trial on legal grounds" are evidence of the interference of foreign states in the judicial system of Russia. "

          There is no logic and it never smelled like it. What do you want from confused people! They will soon declare the very fact of foreign embassies on the territory of the Russian Federation a foreign interference!
      2. Miyamoto musasi
        Miyamoto musasi 4 February 2021 07: 16
        +1
        Yeah!!! you couldn't imagine more stupid
      3. Nikon OConor
        Nikon OConor 4 February 2021 18: 51
        +1
        Thanks, I liked it. The most reasoned answer in the thread. I can add that the US judicial system is based on the rule of precedent, and then they would have to let go of some "Butova" if the Russian ambassador was present at the trial, and would have urged the court not to jail her.
        There the scenario is somewhat different, but I highlighted it in QUOTES
    2. sleeve
      sleeve 3 February 2021 06: 20
      +6
      Well, here the level of freedom of the state dances. In a non-free court like ours, according to the letter of the law at an open hearing, it cannot remove those present at all without reason, i.e. obstruction of the conduct of the meeting. In a free country, the judge could forbid being in the courtroom. And spit that immunity. The meeting will be canceled precisely for this reason, and the ambassadors are tugging at their ears. This is the problem. The letter of the law, her mother. The goal was precisely the provocation and was. So they went to work.
  • Revival
    Revival 3 February 2021 00: 55
    .
    That is, legal entry into the courtroom is interference in internal affairs !? Oh how, it's clear
    1. Nyrobsky
      Nyrobsky 3 February 2021 01: 17
      +26
      Quote: Revival
      That is, legal penetration into the courtroom is just interference in internal affairs !? Oh how, it's clear

      They can be present, but they cannot demand - is that even clear to you? I do not remember such massive diplomatic festivals at trials in other states, except for one that took place in Nuremberg on the fact of condemning fascism and fascist criminals, and now the second diplomatic festival, because of Navalny. Then, objectively and justified, then what for? In addition demanding do not judge.
      P / S-I'm ashamed to ask, but this is apparently necessary for further building or stopping the dialogue, who are you by nationality? There are people who can speak Russian, but have forgotten how to think in Russian, since they have been living on the territory of other states for a long time. There is an obvious semantic misunderstanding request
      1. Revival
        Revival 3 February 2021 01: 23
        .
        Well, take the trouble to read the comment to which I replied.
        If you find the word demanded in it, then quote it.
        Either you are not Russian or have long forgotten how to think in Russian, because you have been living on the territory of other states for a long time. Is there an obvious semantic misunderstanding?

        Waiting for a quote from the comment to which I replied ....
      2. AUL
        AUL 3 February 2021 07: 22
        .
        Quote: Nyrobsky
        They can be present, but they cannot demand - is that even clear to you?

        And they, su ... (bad people), demanded?
      3. Nyrobsky
        Nyrobsky 3 February 2021 09: 55
        +7
        Quote: AUL
        Quote: Nyrobsky
        They can be present, but they cannot demand - is that even clear to you?

        And they, su ... (bad people), demanded?

        Ага.
        Swedish Foreign Minister Anne Linde visited Moscow, where she is scheduled to meet with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov. According to her press secretary, at the meeting she plans to demand from the Kremlin the release of Alexei Navalny and the citizens detained by law enforcement agencies during rallies in support of the blogger, Swedish newspaper Aftonbladet reported.
        The topic of the release of the opposition politician at the meeting between Linde and Lavrov will not be the only one, but one of the most important. In addition to the Swedish Foreign Minister, diplomats from various European countries also demand that Alexei Navalny not be jailed.
        https://topwar.ru/179608-diplomaty-iz-stran-evropy-trebujut-ne-sazhat-navalnogo.html
      4. Revival
        Revival 3 February 2021 20: 24
        -1
        Was she present in the courtroom and demanded?
        Or do you collect a puzzle of thousands of dodumok so that an owl can fit on a globe?
        I remind you that we are talking about the presence of ambassadors in the courtroom and their actions.
      5. Nyrobsky
        Nyrobsky 3 February 2021 20: 54
        +4
        Actually, at the moment, you got into my dialogue with my colleague "AUL" where I answered the question posed by IM.
        As for you, your question is a little higher. If you haven't calmed down yet, then I will answer him too ...
        Quote: Revival
        Well, take the trouble to read the comment to which I replied.
        Work hard, this is a comment by a colleague of Tatiana ... The chronology of the dialogue is as follows
        "were present in the hall as listeners foreign ambassadors of 20 countries, who had previously advocated the release of the essentially anti-Russian foreign agent Navalny.
        Zakharova called this interference of foreign states in the internal affairs of sovereign Russia. And did the right thing."

        Your question -
        I understand correctly that do you think they entered the courtroom illegally !? Maybe through the window? Or they have accomplices from the bailiffs !?
        Considering your interest in how they managed to get into the courtroom, I told you that they entered legally and supported Tatyana's position in the sense that Zakharova did the right thing by accusing Western countries of interfering in Russia's internal affairs. This position, which I fully share. Why? -I tried to justify you in my subsequent comments, but judging by the "owl with a globe", absolutely unsuccessful, in this connection, further dialogue with you I consider absolutely meaningless.
      6. Revival
        Revival 3 February 2021 21: 49
        -2
        So they didn't demand anything in the courtroom, it's clear
  • sleeve
    sleeve 3 February 2021 06: 29
    +14
    Exactly . A sense of tact and respect is very important in diplomacy. If the ambassadors on your territory rummage through the criminal courts, deliberately demonstrate for whom they are holding you and they do not care about your opinion in your country, then with respect to the Foreign Ministry, the authorities, in principle, and even more so to the citizens. Who are you, anyway, to take into account your wishes at home?
    It's so cute. And, of course, it's nice to openly cover myself with the extreme form of a response-expulsion. What to do? A generation of boors and colonial masters grew up there.
  • nov_tech.vrn
    nov_tech.vrn 3 February 2021 11: 50
    +11
    There are unspoken rules of behavior for diplomats, and so, they were demonstratively violated, this diplomatic gopota tried to intimidate the judges with its presence, I demonstrate support for the sick Leshenka, but apparently, the judges, on the contrary, took this move as a challenge
    1. The comment was deleted.
  • businessv
    businessv 3 February 2021 19: 08
    -1
    Quote: Revival
    I understand correctly that they, in your opinion, entered the courtroom illegally !? Maybe through the window?

    Why write things, knowing in advance that this is nonsense ?! The trial was open, they had the right to be present, but they had no right to demand translators, interrupt the process with comments, etc. This is the first thing. Second - name at least one trial in our recent history, which was attended by the ambassador of at least one NATO country! It is the presence of this foreign pack that can be classified as pressure on the court.
    1. Revival
      Revival 4 February 2021 00: 13
      -1
      And the very presence, that's what it is, but why were they silent, they would say right away, otherwise they said that they were present and demanded something right there.
      They would immediately say that "round off, think out", and there would be no dispute
      1. businessv
        businessv 4 February 2021 15: 46
        0
        Quote: Revival
        They would immediately say that "round off, think out", and there would be no dispute
        What did you write about? Any post in the VO chat can be described as follows! My post under this article is only one, in which I expressed my opinion regarding the presence of foreign ambassadors and envoys at the trial. And I asked you a question
        name at least one process in our recent history, which was attended by the ambassador of at least one NATO country
        in response to which you wrote and it is not at all clear what!
        1. Revival
          Revival 4 February 2021 17: 08
          -2
          "name at least one trial in our recent history, which was attended by the ambassador of at least one NATO country."

          I don’t follow them, what interest I am, but such information itself didn’t seem to come across
  • -Dmitry-
    -Dmitry- 4 February 2021 12: 35
    +1
    Do I understand correctly that they, in your opinion, entered the courtroom illegally !? Maybe through the window? Or they have accomplices from the bailiffs !?


    Since when has the court on a citizen of the Russian Federation been the subject of attention of representatives of the Foreign Ministry of other countries ??? For example, if representatives of the Foreign Ministries of the Russian Federation, China and Belarus would appear at the trial for the rape of Assange, I can imagine what kind of howl the Western press and our liberals would raise.
  • Sling cutter
    Sling cutter 3 February 2021 00: 16
    +2
    Quote: Tatiana
    According to Navlny, article 275 of the RF Criminal Code "High treason" is crying!

    Can you explain what his treason is.
    And then tell us about civil servants with Maltese passports and orders.
    Shaigu with Medvedev are happy winners of the Maltese awards, why would they?
    1. Finches
      Finches 3 February 2021 00: 50
      +16
      I am still jarred that a man named "Private Airborne Forces" plays for the team of green berets ... Where are you bought and for how much ???
      1. Revival
        Revival 3 February 2021 00: 56
        .
        In the same place where ebn and rooks, he took.
        It seems inexpensive, right?
        1. Finches
          Finches 3 February 2021 00: 59
          +13
          It seems, in this case, not you, so why bother?
          1. Revival
            Revival 3 February 2021 01: 02
            -6
            Got excited))
          2. Finches
            Finches 3 February 2021 01: 04
            +6
            Nothing wrong! It happens! hi
          3. Tatyana
            Tatyana 3 February 2021 01: 59
            +9
            Quote: Revival
            Got excited))

            Quote: Finches
            Nothing wrong! It happens! hi

            It’s because of me that he’s hysterical right now. He pesters everyone himself, and then says that he is sick of our answers! laughing
          4. Revival
            Revival 3 February 2021 20: 26
            -2
            No, only from yours, so I asked and I ask me not to write
        2. Revival
          Revival 4 February 2021 00: 20
          0
          This is intentionally, in order to separate our dialogue from the "Tatyans", I will say frankly, although we are sometimes in "tough, tough" polemics, our dialogue with you is still constructive and sometimes even pleasant.
          And yes, if you are really an officer, then I think that in the heat of the dispute I was not quite right in the heat of focusing on honor and service during the ebn hi
  • Tank hard
    Tank hard 3 February 2021 11: 28
    +5
    Quote: Finches
    I am still jarred that a man named "Private Airborne Forces" plays for the team of green berets ... Where are you bought and for how much ???

    There are different individuals.
    1. VORON538
      VORON538 3 February 2021 15: 22
      0
      So I have been calling him "pontorez" for a long time lol
  • Olgovich
    Olgovich 3 February 2021 12: 10
    +8
    Quote: Finches
    I am still jarred that a man named "Private Airborne Forces" plays for team of green berets... Where do they buy you and for how much ???


    hi
    Wait now horses from this command will still squeal: "America is with us!"
  • The comment was deleted.
    1. Finches
      Finches 3 February 2021 01: 01
      +3
      "Sorrow for the welfare of one's neighbor" - or, more simply, envy is a sin! laughing
  • Tatyana
    Tatyana 3 February 2021 01: 20
    +14
    Quote: Stroporez
    Quote: Tatiana
    According to Navlny, article 275 of the RF Criminal Code "High treason" is crying!
    Can you explain what his treason is.
    You are asking a difficult and big question, but I will try to explain it to you.
    First of all, you start to fight corruption from the wrong end. You need to start with IDEOLOGY! The people will not really understand anything and act correctly for their prosperous future until they understand that in fact there is already informally the STATE ideology in the country in the form of the COLONIAL-PARASITARY paradigm of the American economist Milton Friedman, which is set forth in his book "Capitalism and freedom "on the first 20 pages. And under Navalny it will not change, but will become even worse. Namely.

    Unfortunately, in this matter, Russian education in the country has long been "sour". The bourgeois ideology of the American economist M. Friedman is no longer called "bourgeois", but is called abstractly class ideology simply "market" with elements of the so-called. "Monetarism" (ie, the bourgeois pursuit of financial profits).
    However, it is impossible to equate the concept of real capitalism with all its shortcomings with the doctrinal idea of ​​the American Milton Friedman in the form of a speculative social project, which is being put into practice, to build supposedly perfectly fair capitalism on Earth throughout the world. Due to what?
    Due to the alleged existence in the world of a certain ANARCHISTIC who is absolutely "free" from each and every world market, which is supposedly absolutely "clean" of profanities and dishonesty both from the participants of the capital market, goods (services) and labor, and from pressure on them a nation state. And at the same time, the author assumes that all market participants free from the state are initially at all times equal in their life start and can always become rich, if they just want it. This is pure utopia and bluff!
    Behind this attempt by Milton Friedman to whitewash capitalism lies a very definite goal taken by Washington's apologists. Namely.
    The purpose of this American bluff is to make the sovereign countries "indigenous" for the United States, uncontrollably and duty-free by their governments, mistakenly, free and defenseless from competition, open access for US multinational companies to their domestic markets for the sale of foreign goods and the purchase of "indigenous" wealth by foreigners , enterprises and natural resources.
    At the same time, the reduction of native state property in a maximal way - to "0" - is promoted by the "market people" exclusively as a public good. For the state supposedly does not need to control anything, there is no need to punish anyone, and there is no need to regulate trade and production either. That at the same time all members of society will become such honest and law-abiding entrepreneurs that therefore it will no longer be necessary to protect the population from swindlers, thieves, robbers and murderers. And therefore, the alleged national state, as an anachronism, will disappear by itself as unnecessary, and there is no need to defend it at all. For the distribution of material goods "from above" at the state level is not required, because everything will be regulated by this "ideal" capitalist market. But those who did not fit into the market are already their problems. Let, they say, they survive on their own, as they can. These include in particular all the so-called. "superfluous" people: pensioners, disabled people, children, etc. - all those who "did not fit into the market." But they should be "happy" with their freedom from the centuries-old, fattening abstract-bureaucratic state, which has always been dreamed of by the anarchists for centuries.

    TOTAL. All this ideology of Milton Friedman about the alleged existence of the so-called. "free" and "clean" market is an anarchist propaganda of the American establishment to disintegrate the national security of sovereign states to their complete elimination and subjugation of their resources in favor of US multinational companies. And unfortunately, this ideology has been UNOFFICIALLY adopted by the Russian ruling elite as a STATE ideology. It is implemented in practice by the government of the Russian Federation, the guarantor of the liberal Constitution of the Russian Federation, deputies of the State Duma and the Federation Council. Based on the very Constitution of the Russian Federation, written for Russian liberals in power by specialists from the United States.
    And the HSE is the forge of bourgeois young cadres in this comprador economy and its apologists.
    REFERENCE
    Compradorism (Spanish comprador buyer) is a way of doing business in which profit is derived from activities that undermine its national economy and reduce its ability to grow and ...
    1. Tatyana
      Tatyana 3 February 2021 01: 31
      +13
      Quote: Stroporez
      Can you explain what his treason is.
      Do you understand what ideology is? This is a program of human behavior, which is embedded in a person, like a computer program in an information device. At the same time, a person perceives it as his own, and is ready to fight for it! Ideology for him as a guide to action!
      And the so-called. Friedman's "market" ideology is a program for unlimited consumption. And resources for consumption are limited. Hence the idea of ​​the "golden billion" and population reduction - and all at the expense of the third world, to which the West attributed the USSR, and also includes Russia!
      It was thanks to Soros that all this restructuring in the minds of the people began with the educational reform under Gorbachev in 1986 for teachers and schoolchildren and ended with the counter-revolution and the collapse of the USSR in 1991. This is what ideology means.
      And now this process continues. The ideology promoted in universities is the same! And it will lead precisely to the collapse of the Russian Federation. We will lose the country. Remember: nobody in the West needs Russians, except as "cannon fodder" for the US war with China.
      The US planned to reduce the population of the former Russian Federation to 15 million people.
      So, only naively limited people can live like they do in the West.

      Look here. Now there are protests for Navalny. But the protesters have no political demands for the people other than to end corruption.
      And by the way, Gorbachev and EBN also destroyed the USSR under the flag of fighting corruption.
      In Ukraine, too, every time a coup d'etat was held under the flag of the fight against corruption.
      But the trouble is that M. Fridman's "market" ideology is built precisely on the introduction and encouragement of corruption!
      How can the phenomenon itself, preserving the conditions of its existence, get rid of what lies at its foundation? No way.
      It is necessary to change the ideological basis of society's existence in order to change the society itself.
      As soon as the US State Department takes a corrupt official in another country under observation and promotion, then a corrupt person immediately ends up in Washington, like a fly in a beetle's web. - and through this the West colonizes and controls any country that has fallen into its ideological networks, destroying its national sovereignty and devouring its economy to the end and drinking all the juices from it.
      Therefore, there should be no support for Navalny, Khodorkovsky and other similar pro-Western riffraff. This is not the direction we need.
      It should be remembered that the Russians are not at all indifferent to the economic conditions in which they will go towards their goal of liberating themselves and their country. Therefore, in our economy, we need to preserve what we have left and develop what we have. And not how Tikhanovskaya destroys the economy of Belarus by her calls for protests against Lukashenka. We cannot allow something like this in Russia.
      1. AUL
        AUL 3 February 2021 07: 39
        -1
        Quote: Tatiana
        You are asking a difficult and big question, but I will try to explain it to you.

        Yes, you wrote demagoguery for two posts! But, by the way, treason has a very clear and unambiguous legal definition:
        High treason, that is, espionage committed by a citizen of the Russian Federation, issuance to a foreign state, international or foreign organization or their representatives of information constituting a state secret entrusted to a person or made known to him by service, work, study or in other cases stipulated by the legislation of the Russian Federation, or providing financial, material, technical, consulting or other assistance to a foreign state, international or foreign organization, or their to representatives in activities against the security of the Russian Federation, -
        (in the edition of the Federal Law from 12.11.2012 N 190-FZ)
        Or have appeals to fight corruption become a threat to the security of the Russian Federation?
        1. Achilles
          Achilles 3 February 2021 09: 30
          +8
          Quote: AUL
          Or have appeals to fight corruption become a threat to the security of the Russian Federation?

          Tatyana had in mind that under such slogans (and not only) the overthrow of the government took place, but then no one fought against corruption. Friedman's ideology implies this very corruption.
        2. Stirbjorn
          Stirbjorn 3 February 2021 09: 53
          -2
          Quote: AUL
          Yes, you wrote demagoguery for two posts!

          At the same time, she shoves this into every similar topic for two weeks now. wassat
          Zadolbala with her Friedman!
        3. VORON538
          VORON538 3 February 2021 15: 25
          -4
          And sho is not nravitstsa?
          True, she's so bitter, even though you and your flock don't like it! lol
        4. Stirbjorn
          Stirbjorn 3 February 2021 17: 38
          0
          Quote: VORON538
          And sho is not nravitstsa?
          True, she's so bitter, even though you and your flock don't like it! lol

          I'm sure that on the phrase "colonial-parasitic paradigm", your wadded brain is frozen, if, of course, you have mastered the text before it. hi
    2. KAV
      KAV 3 February 2021 12: 37
      +7
      Quote: AUL
      rendering ... consulting or other assistance to a foreign state, international or foreign organization or their representatives in activities against the security of the Russian Federation
      So, for example, calls for the imposition of sanctions against Russia, participation in the falsification of poisoning in order to discredit the power structures of Russia, persistent attempts to shake the country with rallies of minors, and much more - does this not attract treason? It is not even worth remembering the calls to fight corruption here, because this is just a screen, with a very leaky one.
    3. Revival
      Revival 3 February 2021 20: 29
      0
      Tell me where to see what he "called for the introduction of sanctions against Russia"?
      of Russia
  • Nikon OConor
    Nikon OConor 4 February 2021 19: 11
    0
    Well ... I returned from the army, and my friend has been telling me for 16 years that I am wrong and there is nothing good in Russia, you need to get some dough and blame that the minimum Mexican citizenship costs 200 greens in your suitcase, why I rejoice at every new submarine and aircraft of the RF Armed Forces - "after all, they were created for murder," and this is our world and you need to be a citizen of the world "and not a citizen of one country" belay
    And I'm all so wrong, I answer him: "I, I gave the oath"
    But it turns out it's all ideology soldier
  • Stas157
    Stas157 3 February 2021 11: 09
    -7
    Quote: Stroporez
    Can you explain what is his treason.

    How in what? The king was offended! The palace was shown.
    1. Dodikson
      Dodikson 3 February 2021 14: 06
      -8
      why did he show Biden's Russian palace?
    2. Tatyana
      Tatyana 3 February 2021 14: 08
      +6
      Quote: Stas157
      Quote: Stroporez
      Can you explain what is his treason.
      How in what? The king was offended! The palace was shown.

      The "palace" turned out to be fake! And Navalny's film about the "palace" turned out to be a FOREIGN provocative fake!
      This supposedly "Putin's palace" is already 10 years since the apart-hotel under construction in the future in a historic building being reconstructed inside belongs to Rotenberg, who has its own developing hotel business in the Russian Federation! Inside the building there is still no decoration at all - only gray concrete without floor screed. The facility is planned to be completed only in 5-6 years.
      For this alone - a provocative Western (according to Goebbels) hoax against our country - a provocative lie against Russia and its head of state - you can send Navalny to jail under Article 275 of the RF Criminal Code "High Treason"!

      Yes, we - the former USSR - lost the Cold War to the United States in 1991 and pay tribute to the United States as a country colonized by America.
      Russia is semi-sovereign. The collective West is plundering the wealth of our country. The Yeltsin Constitution of the Russian Federation is colonial, and the American special services wrote it for the Russian Federation in English with automatic translation into Russian.
      Now we are trying to get out of this colonially dependent situation. But the West does not like this very much. The collective West has absolutely aggressive plans with regard to Russia. The US State Department regrets that in 1991 they did not finish off Russia to the end - they did not tear it apart, and Russia is now raising its head against American trans-Atlantic companies.

      Organizers-provocateurs-propagandists on the side of the West (their foreign agents) also work at the demonstrations for Navalny, as in Belarus for Tikhanovskaya. And they work by Goebbel methods!
      They have the same goal - not to improve the life of the people, as such, but under the fig flag of allegedly fighting corruption, preparing for the STATE REVOLUTION in the country in favor of aggravating the external control of Russia, which is now, with the aim of making it easier to capture by an external enemy in the near future!
      This is a WAR of the collective against Russia on the part of the collective West led by the United States! While this war is passive-active - i.e. without its hot phase.

      Do you want to lose this war between the Russian Federation and the West because of 0,001% of the idiots of the population of our country, who are called "useful for the United States" in Washington? I don’t want to lose my country geopolitically, and I don’t advise you to lose it, and your children, if you have them or will appear.
      1. Stas157
        Stas157 3 February 2021 14: 18
        -3
        Quote: Tatiana
        "The palace "turned out to be lime!

        How so ?? Is it not there?

        And I thought my bosom friend helped the king (for billions of government contracts), he declared the house his own. The pier wanted to rebuild a guest house on the lands of the FSB, and so that the guests had a no-fly zone over their heads!)))
        1. Tatyana
          Tatyana 3 February 2021 14: 48
          +4
          Quote: Stas157
          Quote: Tatiana
          The "palace" turned out to be fake!
          How so ?? Is it not there?
          Exactly that NO!
          German journalists conducted their own investigation on this matter and it turned out that absolutely everything in the film "Navalny" about "Putin's palace" from beginning to end was a lie of the American special services!

          The German newspaper Stuttgarter Zeitung revealed similarities about who actually worked on the blogger Alexei Navalny's film about the "palace" allegedly owned by President Vladimir Putin in Gelendzhik. Namely.

          The German film company Blackforest Studios worked on the film by Alexei Navalny about the "palace" of Vladimir Putin. An offer to cooperate with Russian blogger Navalny came to the company's management from the United States. And the film itself was shot by a production company from Los Angeles.

          The German newspaper Stuttgarter Zeitung writes that Navalny, who since September last year was in Germany on treatment for alleged poisoning at the Charite clinic, worked on the film not only in Freiburg, but also in the Kirchzarten commune (Breisgau-Hochschwarzwald district). Blackforest Studios, a professional film and television studio headed by two residents of Freiburg, Nina Gwynne Weiland and Sebastian Weiland, has also been located here since November 2020. Both have worked in the American film industry for many years and have now opened their studio in the Black Forest.

          See in detail - "German media: Navalny's film about the" palace "was made in Germany by order from the USA" - https://vz.ru/news/2021/1/29/1062583.html

          This is how "The allegedly Putin's fairytale palace" actually looks like: first ILLEGAL tour of a journalistthrough the palace in Gelendzhik. 29.01.2021/XNUMX/XNUMX


          And this is already a video of how already OFFICIALLY Russian journalists figured out with a detailed analysis of Navalny's information in his film about the so-called "Putin's palace". See 13:13 min.

          Palace for Putin ". The story of the biggest lie | SK | Exclusive
        2. Stas157
          Stas157 3 February 2021 16: 53
          +3
          Quote: Tatiana
          Exactly what NO!

          But your videos are provided, supposedly exposing, this very palace is present. How so?

          The only difference is that there is no filling inside. Well, Navalny said about this that repairs are underway there now! There is not a single contradiction, except for absurd accusations against Navalny according to a hackneyed manual. They say the agent, the special services, they want to discredit our beloved king and all that kind of thing.
        3. nov_tech.vrn
          nov_tech.vrn 3 February 2021 21: 02
          +3
          Stasik, have you watched at least one of the films, or just footnotes in the training manual?
  • aleksejkabanets
    aleksejkabanets 3 February 2021 20: 52
    -2
    Quote: Tatiana
    The "palace" turned out to be fake! And Navalny's film about the "palace" turned out to be a FOREIGN provocative fake! ......

    The palace, of course, impressed, but I was much more impressed by the ways of obtaining their assets, friends and relatives of the President, as well as the fact that the rest of the family of V.V. Putin was paid by a German banker. Let me remind you that V.V. Putin at that time worked in the presidential administration, this is a bribe. No denials were received from anyone on this matter. I did not see the initiation of a criminal case for libel, which, agree with me, would be logical, after this sensational film. I understand that the arrival of Navalny means neoliberal fascism, but how does this cancel clannishness and incredible corruption in our government?
    1. Tatyana
      Tatyana 3 February 2021 22: 01
      +1
      Quote: aleksejkabanets
      I understand that the arrival of Navalny means neoliberal fascism, but how does this cancel clannishness and incredible corruption in our government?

      Yes, it does not in any way cancel, as long as the bluff ideology of the American economist Milton Friedman with his alleged existence in the world of the so-called. "free" and "clean" market of capital, goods and labor and monetarism (ie unprincipled pursuit of profits for unlimited personal enrichment), for which he received the Nobel Prize!
    2. aleksejkabanets
      aleksejkabanets 3 February 2021 22: 37
      -1
      Quote: Tatiana
      Yes, it does not in any way cancel, as long as the bluff ideology of the American economist Milton Friedman with his alleged existence in the world of the so-called. "free" and "clean" capital markets

      Tatyana, let's start with the fact that ideology is a "superstructure" and economics is a "base". That is, what kind of economy, this will be the dominant ideology. The dominant ideology is formed by the ruling class for the "theoretical substantiation" of its economic interests. Until we have such a dependent semi-feudal peripheral capitalism, we will not see any other state ideology.
    3. Tatyana
      Tatyana 3 February 2021 22: 52
      +2
      Quote: aleksejkabanets
      Quote: Tatiana
      The "palace" turned out to be fake! And Navalny's film about the "palace" turned out to be a FOREIGN provocative fake! ......
      The palace, of course, impressed, but I was much more impressed by the ways of obtaining their assets, by friends and relatives of the President ...

      This is not surprising ... According to Friedman, this is how it should have been.

      Another thing surprises me. Why the hell are the Communists of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation acting as a single bloc with Navalny? Namely, what is surprising is the discrepancy in the positions of the communists regarding their participation in uncoordinated actions organized by Navalny's supporters, which gave rise to a lot of talk about a serious split within the Communist Party of the Russian Federation.
      In general, there has always been a certain split in the form of an intraspecific struggle for power in the Communist Party of the Russian Federation. And it happened not on January 23, but much earlier, when the communist leaders decided to become the beneficiaries of all protests, not paying much attention to their content and the real initiator.
      Party leader Zyuganov welcomed the frank "high gluttony", did not prohibit cooperation with the "Smart Voting" project (Khodorkovsky's projects elections to power of Navalny and Navalnists), approved the building of Moscow coalitions with Navalnists.
      As a result, who today confronted Zyuganov's official critical position on Navalny? These are media promoted on scandals and provocations Rashkin, Kurinny, Bondarenko. Communists, who, in form and content, have long been compared with NON-SYSTEM. In fact, they are just that - communist degenerates.

      In the ranks of the communists now - before the Duma elections - there is a political CHAOS, which repels from the Communist Party and communists, and navalnists! ...

      See in detail - "The Communist Party of the Russian Federation has come to the point of no return. Chaos in the party pushed both the Navalnists and the Communists away" - https://www.gazeta.ru/comments/2021/01/29_a_13459514.shtml?utm_referrer=https%3A%2F% 2Fzen.yandex.com
    4. aleksejkabanets
      aleksejkabanets 3 February 2021 23: 12
      -1
      Quote: Tatiana
      Another thing surprises me. Why the hell are the Communists of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation acting as a single bloc with Navalny? Namely, what is surprising is the discrepancy in the positions of the communists regarding their participation in uncoordinated actions organized by Navalny's supporters, which gave rise to a lot of talk about a serious split within the Communist Party of the Russian Federation.

      The Communist Party of the Russian Federation today is not a homogeneous party, it has its own factions, but on critical issues they are united. And they are not going to unite with Navalny, let alone a united front. The issue here is much more complicated, the state and the media cover everything in such a way as if there are only Putin and Navalny. In fact, there are different people at the rallies, with different ideas (and more without ideas), for people there Navalny is not the main character. In general, with the Communist Party of the Russian Federation and with the "left movement" in general, everything is much more complicated than you wrote, I cannot fit into a comment, and there is little time.
  • Xnumx vis
    Xnumx vis 3 February 2021 13: 41
    -1
    Quote: Stroporez

    Stroporez (Private Airborne)
    Today, 00: 16

    .
    Quote: Tatiana
    According to Navlny, article 275 of the RF Criminal Code "High treason" is crying!

    Can you explain what his treason is.

    Well ! The fighters against the evil lord pulled themselves up. Of those who are for "communism-socialism !!"
    1. aleksejkabanets
      aleksejkabanets 3 February 2021 20: 57
      -1
      Quote: 30 vis
      Can you explain what his treason is.

      Well ! The fighters against the evil lord pulled themselves up. Of those who are for "communism-socialism !!"

      This is how you explain what Navalny's treason is? You have a "rich" set of arguments.
  • frruc
    frruc 3 February 2021 11: 17
    +6
    ... at the court session in the Navalny case, foreign ambassadors from 20 countries, who had previously advocated the release of essentially anti-Russian foreign agent Navalny, were present as listeners ...

    Something suggests that the foreign ambassadors did only a "disservice" to Mr. Navalny, the idea was, to put it mildly, not very successful.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Revival
    Revival 2 February 2021 23: 08
    0
    And what will emerge there?
    Secret, deceased !!!! The witness who identified him.
  • 76rtbr
    76rtbr 3 February 2021 01: 14
    0
    Well, you probably have a healthy forehead and you can put it on the keyboard yourself, you are used to proofs !! Eugene, I don’t recognize you, although I don’t know !!
    1. Finches
      Finches 3 February 2021 19: 57
      0
      Mother is lazy! They wiped me all over here ... It's not even interesting! And about proofs, so hazing in the army has not been canceled ... Let them look for something to convince me of something laughing
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Vend
    Vend 3 February 2021 09: 29
    +4
    Quote: Finches
    They gave a little, to be honest ... But, after all, you will not provide proofs - otherwise something else will pop up besides the broken window ...

    Yes, it's a pity a little, I understand that this is impossible, but it was necessary to add for the diplomats present, one code for each laughing
  • d1975
    d1975 3 February 2021 20: 06
    +1
    You know, my opinion is that they don't tell us, here you can make programs and speak an opinion, it's a pity that there are no those times ((((
  • arhPavel
    arhPavel 2 February 2021 22: 12
    -5
    Anarchist, bomber.
    This is of course still a friend.
    1. Revival
      Revival 2 February 2021 23: 11
      0
      Bomber !?
      Explain, or just blurted out?
  • Cube123
    Cube123 3 February 2021 07: 51
    +9
    Quote: Gene84
    Here Azat Miftakhova, a graduate student of the Faculty of Mechanics and Mathematics of Moscow State University, was sentenced to six years in prison for breaking a window in the office of United Russia.

    https://zen.yandex.ru/media/id/5c948a99a060d700b3d24de9/azat-miftahov-produkt-fabriki-ekstremistovizvrascencev-5caf9d352c72a400b362027a
    "Where do they make you like that?" This cry from the heart comes to mind when you get acquainted with the story of the anarchist Azat Miftakhov, who was detained for making improvised explosive devices and active participation in an extremist organization. But, as it turned out, Azat Miftakhov is not only about bombs. But he also overshadows Alexei Panin himself with his "talents" (in the company of the dog). As it turns out, Miftakhov is a typical product of an assembly line that regularly supplies the Russian opposition with future "Maidan skakatus".
  • The comment was deleted.
  • The comment was deleted.
    1. Finches
      Finches 2 February 2021 21: 34
      +36
      A career officer - and I have something to compare with, he devoted almost 3 decades to the service of the Motherland! And in command positions! This is a good school to understand what happened and what became! And also to understand people - who is xy from xy! I have the honor!
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. The comment was deleted.
                  1. The comment was deleted.
                  2. The comment was deleted.
                  3. The comment was deleted.
            2. Tank hard
              Tank hard 2 February 2021 22: 53
              +1
              Quote: Finches
              For me, the highest measure of social responsibility would be better, but, unfortunately, times are soft as fluff - that’s any disrepute and multiply in the vastness of Russia, plowing tirelessly in the interests of foreigners!

              I read the dialogue, an impromptu was born:

              Lived - there was Volodya, called Svarog.
              (no, not arrogant and arrogant)
              He cursed power, shouted a lot,
              I didn't go to protests myself ...
              He hates foreigners
              Although he was considered a communist.
              Navalny was for the "Sun"!
              But someone forbade the Sun ...
              Volodya with angry words,
              Posted on the glorious internet.
              Didn't sleep, wrote to the site at night,
              Volodya was burning, wasting light.
              He of the Motherland is an ordinary child,
              He will give your life for the truth,
              Has a long personal experience,
              He will ask everyone on the couch!
              laughing
              1. Sling cutter
                Sling cutter 2 February 2021 23: 37
                +13
                Quote: Tank Hard
                Lived - there was Volodya, called

                Well, yes, you reminded me of the classics with your verses, bravo
                laughing
                1. Tank hard
                  Tank hard 2 February 2021 23: 39
                  +2
                  Quote: Stroporez
                  Well, yes, you reminded me of the classics with your verses, Bravo

                  I appreciate your recognition, you could still answer with poetry, well, at least such as in the video. But I understand you, not everyone is given ... repeat laughing
              2. AUL
                AUL 3 February 2021 07: 42
                +1
                Quote: Tank Hard
                I read the dialogue, an impromptu was born:

                Agnia Barto nervously smokes on the sidelines ...
                1. Tank hard
                  Tank hard 3 February 2021 11: 08
                  +1
                  Quote: AUL
                  Agnia Barto nervously smokes on the sidelines.

                  Thank you, Alexander. Your opinion is very important to me. laughing
              3. Nikon OConor
                Nikon OConor 4 February 2021 19: 30
                0
                do not write. It's not yours ..
                1. Tank hard
                  Tank hard 4 February 2021 19: 33
                  +1
                  Quote: Nikon OConor
                  do not write. It's not yours ..

                  I appreciate the opinion of the "expert" laughing
                2. Nikon OConor
                  Nikon OConor 4 February 2021 19: 43
                  0
                  and then !!! laughing I read Pushkin, and Nekrasov, and even Vasilchikov. In general, it is not necessary))
                3. Tank hard
                  Tank hard 4 February 2021 19: 45
                  +1
                  Quote: Nikon OConor
                  I'm Pushkin read, and Nekrasov, and even Vasilchikov.

                  In short, "expert" laughing
                4. Nikon OConor
                  Nikon OConor 4 February 2021 19: 48
                  0
                  You said - not me). Do you know (read) Vasilchikov?
                5. Tank hard
                  Tank hard 4 February 2021 19: 49
                  +1
                  Quote: Nikon OConor
                  You said - not me). Do you know (read) Vasilchikov?

                  Well done! Take a pie from the shelf. laughing
                6. Nikon OConor
                  Nikon OConor 4 February 2021 19: 51
                  0
                  Thank you delicious laughing You have a vocation to cook, why write))
                  Sorry, cheered up)) I hope you too))
                7. Tank hard
                  Tank hard 4 February 2021 19: 54
                  +1
                  Quote: Nikon OConor
                  You have a vocation to cook, why write)

                  I just haven't read the "expert" ... request Impromptu is about 3 minutes, without editing and checking. Well, you as an "expert" know. Truth? wink
                8. Nikon OConor
                  Nikon OConor 4 February 2021 19: 58
                  0
                  Well, then bravo! Poems require editing and time. As an "expert" I tell you this. Indeed, improvisation is a talent.
                  Do not take it close, I'm not out of malice)))
                9. Tank hard
                  Tank hard 4 February 2021 20: 04
                  +1
                  Quote: Nikon OConor
                  Well, then bravo! Poems require editing and time. As an "expert" I tell you this. Indeed, improvisation is a talent.
                  Don't take it close, I'm not out of malice)

                  Well, come on, I am writing a verse here, not quite impromptu, but without editing, raw. Mistakes there, literacy ... And you are an "expert for about 5 minutes, after that, you throw your (not someone else's) verse in response. Let's see. What kind of Sukhov. And yes, I'm not Pushkin, not once." wink
                10. Nikon OConor
                  Nikon OConor 4 February 2021 20: 17
                  +1
                  No, I will not compete with you, I admit that you are right. Let me explain why.
                  I was 16 - 17 years old. 1999-2000 wrote poetry for rap (then we were in this fashionable get-together, my lyrics were read by the best teams in the city of Orenburg "Mad Elefands Crew", the group "Adanay", they organized rap festivals ... in general, were in the works), then the army , there he wrote to his beloved a whole poem on 10 double notebook sheets, in each line. The commanders decided to check that it was so thick that it was sent by mail (maybe I sell the characteristics of "Satan")))) they opened it, read it, then sometimes I wrote poetry on posters by February 23, by the day of the Strategic Missile Forces, by May 9 ...
                  I am already under 40 and inspiration does not visit me, alas.
                  The prose of life took the place of poetry.
                11. Tank hard
                  Tank hard 4 February 2021 20: 20
                  +1
                  Quote: Nikon OConor
                  I am already under 40 and inspiration does not visit me, alas.
                  The prose of life took the place of poetry.

                  Have you read my new verse?
                  what do you think. nonsense?
                  what do you think. Is it easy to write something like this in 10 minutes?
                  No doping?
                  The world is filled with experts ... repeat
                12. Nikon OConor
                  Nikon OConor 4 February 2021 20: 34
                  0
                  I wrote my assessment. What dope can a poet have?
                13. Tank hard
                  Tank hard 4 February 2021 20: 49
                  0
                  Quote: Nikon OConor
                  What kind of doping can a poet have?

                  Someone drinks, and someone else injects. History knows examples. In any case, it is easy to write a verse at will, especially difficult for someone else. It is necessary to suffer. (Such nonsense as about svarog. Does not apply to this). IMHO
              4. Nikon OConor
                Nikon OConor 4 February 2021 20: 37
                +1
                You called me "Expert"
                I agreed with the topic
                But before me you showed
                Your Mind, Pure, Golden ...

                Yours faithfully))
              5. Tank hard
                Tank hard 4 February 2021 20: 45
                +1
                Quote: Nikon OConor
                You called me "Expert"
                I agreed with the topic
                But before me you showed
                Your Mind, Pure, Golden ...

                Yours faithfully))

                It is considered!
                Sincerely. hi
              6. Nikon OConor
                Nikon OConor 4 February 2021 22: 17
                +1
                Well, just like that, you interested me))
                Ode to the scapula))
                Hello unknown enemies,
                That they are waiting at the borders of Russia
                And they shine through the vents,
                Shouting that the Russians are coming!
                Yes Russian I and I go,
                I walk slowly, quietly,
                I'm waiting for your fear
                In the trench, and with my shovel.
                My friend, my glorious shield,
                My retribution and honor
                My sapper shovel
                He accomplishes deeds innumerable.


                Believe me 10 minutes, I can send the file data))
              7. Tank hard
                Tank hard 4 February 2021 23: 05
                0
                Quote: Nikon OConor
                Believe me 10 minutes, I can send the file data))

                I believe. On the road:
                Brownie
                I got a friend
                They say that the brownie.
                He sneaks up quietly
                Watching me in the dark
                He picks up toys
                It rustles in the corners of the night
                He adds water to the mug,
                Keeps both peace and sleep.
                He quietly corrects
                I have a blanket
                He does not hiss and does not bark,
                He does not light a fire.
                He's ... aha! I got it!
                I found out who he is
                I saw who tried
                Tidied up, kept calm.
                It turned out to be mom!
                Mom, my mom!
                Mom was cleaning the house
                While we slept, dad, me.
                While we wandered in dreams
                My mom didn't sleep
                With a bunch of rubbish and dust
                In a moment she straightened out.
                Well, now I'm a brownie
                I will quietly help
                Toys, water,
                I will clean up quickly.
                To keep mommy longer
                I rested and slept
                I will turn into a brownie -
                I'll redo things!
                wink
              8. Nikon OConor
                Nikon OConor 4 February 2021 23: 21
                +1
                I will redo things
                And then I'll fall asleep secretly
                So that mommy is dear
                In the morning she was happy with me.
                To all my toys
                Tanks, books and cars
                As if they went out to a shop window,
                Everything sparkles with purity!
                And then I'll straighten the blanket
                Mom is sleeping, she's not the first time
                Mom is a doctor, saves life,
                Wake up under the moonlight.
                Best regards and good night))
              9. Tank hard
                Tank hard 4 February 2021 23: 22
                0
                Quote: Nikon OConor
                Best regards and good night))

                drinks
  • Tank hard
    Tank hard 4 February 2021 20: 12
    +1
    Quote: Nikon OConor
    Poems require editing and time. I am telling you this as an "expert".

    I have not had dreams for a long time ..
    No nightmares, no grace
    And age is no longer 15
    And it's not even 35.
    I get stuffy at nights
    I sweat at night in my sleep
    I have long been not the same complacent
    A guy who loves everything and everyone.
    Over the years, I became wiser, harder.
    And I love only family and mother
    Some look has become gray-wolf
    And more and more often I want to sleep.
    But I also did not become indifferent
    I don't give a damn about everything and everyone.
    Thank God for this!
    He does not give his soul to trade.

    Here's the "expert".
    Your turn.
    5 minutes to you. wink
    the time of my post is 20: 12.
  • Nikon OConor
    Nikon OConor 4 February 2021 20: 22
    0
    Damn I'm merged !!!! Write !!! This is really yours, and forget about the pies!
    Cool)))
  • Nikon OConor
    Nikon OConor 4 February 2021 20: 40
    0
    Excuse me for 20 minutes.
  • Andrey VOV
    Andrey VOV 2 February 2021 22: 33
    +12
    Dear Svarog, you are a smart verbiage ... for how many years I have been reading your comments and your verbiage is getting better and better
    1. major147
      major147 2 February 2021 22: 53
      +13
      Quote: Andrey VOV
      Svarog, you are a gorgeous verbiage ..

      This very Svarog was caught by me on false propaganda, and when I poked his "muzzle" into his box, he simply merged ...
      1. Tank hard
        Tank hard 2 February 2021 22: 58
        -5
        Quote: major147
        This very Svarog was caught by me on false propaganda, and when I poked his "muzzle" into his box, he simply merged ...

        Today he is famous in this thread, I dedicated a poem to him, read above. laughing
      2. Prjanik
        Prjanik 3 February 2021 14: 13
        +3
        So the favorite topic of these characters is to make a left throw and merge, maybe someone will lead without checking. I think they're just working out here with one of the troll factories.
  • Whiteidol
    Whiteidol 2 February 2021 22: 43
    -1
    What do you mean by "Press Khata"?
  • tihonmarine
    tihonmarine 2 February 2021 21: 46
    +5
    Quote: Finches
    And also to understand people - who is xy from xy! I have the honor!

    I support and approve of your words!
  • The comment was deleted.
    1. Finches
      Finches 2 February 2021 22: 18
      +9
      It's good when there is no honor - and you can joke! But I just don't know how, unfortunately! hi
      1. Revival
        Revival 2 February 2021 23: 23
        0
        You are talking about honor!
        To what extent does the “result” of our recent dispute correspond to the concept of honor and care for the country: “in front of me, Putin fulfilled his promise, but what’s in front of the people is not my concern” !!!

        Yes, "I'm offended for the State" is not yours, you don't have to say, you yourself have a pension, and the rest, well ...
        1. Finches
          Finches 2 February 2021 23: 28
          +11
          Will Navalny add your pension? I'm afraid it will take the last one too ... But you won't understand it anyway! After all, the change of power under capitalism is in no way aimed at improving the life of ordinary citizens, and Uncle Vova, badly brought stability to life - and the incomes of the population grew until all the troubles associated with Crimea - remove this stability now and the country will return to the 90s - do you want it? Evolution is needed today, since a revolution is not possible (this is a change in the political and economic formation) - and a revolt, collapse and loss of independence - yes! Therefore, your "good" (if they are really good) intentions lead to hell, and not to prosperity!
          1. Revival
            Revival 3 February 2021 00: 00
            +1
            The question is put directly! Who has already selected I see a fact!
            I didn't say a word about bulk.
            Do you have a dichotomy with these two?
            What about those who have already selected?
            And, I remembered, respect from the prince ...
            1. Finches
              Finches 3 February 2021 00: 12
              +6
              Who took away from you and what? I do not like Putin - so who is in the way! Vote against and express your opinion within the law - for God's sake! The article is just about Navalny and, accordingly, if you stand up for him, then you are a navalnok and a henchman of the State Department (just kidding here and I beg your pardon)! I respect VVP, you don’t - my respect for him was born because of his actions to the Armed Forces and to me personally. Sometimes he was wrong - Serdyukov, for example, put ... But, nevertheless, for me personally and for the country under his leadership + more than minuses, especially when compared through the prism of the rule of Gorbachev and Yeltsin!
              1. Revival
                Revival 3 February 2021 00: 19
                +1
                Well, yes, I agree, to compare with a full bottom, ebn and humpback, yes, it is strong
              2. Alex777
                Alex777 3 February 2021 09: 52
                +3
                Well, yes, I agree, to compare with a full bottom, ebn and humpback, yes, it is strong

                And with whom should you compare?
                With Zelensky? With Navalny? With Lukashenko?
                Or do you suggest Zyuganov for comparison?
                Maybe Zhirinovsky? Or Yavlinsky?
                Prokhorov or Sobchak? Grudinin?
                We have no other "writers" for you.
        2. Kisa
          Kisa 3 February 2021 00: 42
          -7
          Yes Leshka is muddy no dispute. but what should be the reaction to the Rothenberg Millers ??? I don’t understand everything, but why are you whining here every day that the cellists of the banks do not see all the blood they drank ..
          how is it all in your opinion to convey that it looked patriotic ??? or we deserve it for Zhirik to distribute rubles on the square to slaves
          how does this evolution look like in your opinion ??? until the 34th Immortal in power is it evolution or stability?
          1. Finches
            Finches 3 February 2021 00: 47
            +4
            So tell me - who is stopping you! Convince me that it will be better not in words, but in deeds - the GDP has proved this in practice, and you, not you personally, but opponents and fighters, only know how to verbiage ... Did you explain so clearly? It will be possible for schoolchildren to leave in five years - this is (especially looking at Ukraine) and scary!
          2. ZAV69
            ZAV69 3 February 2021 10: 10
            +2
            Quote: kitty
            until the 34th Immortal in power is it evolution or stability?

            What would be 34, or rather 36, he was in power, it is necessary that he went to the polls at 24 and he was elected. And now it's not even 23. So change the punch card, no one knows what will happen in a year
        3. Cottodraton
          Cottodraton 3 February 2021 06: 44
          +3
          These "comrades" with red rags on the avs have the usual ryazhenka. There, through one, residents of Canada and other USA ... but how this audience "worries" for us, almost tears welling up ...
      2. Nikon OConor
        Nikon OConor 4 February 2021 22: 39
        0
        "in front of me Putin has fulfilled his promises, but what about the people is not my concern" !!!?

        Before criticizing your country and its leadership, you need to learn to write correctly in your Mother tongue.
        1. Revival
          Revival 4 February 2021 22: 45
          0
          Well, thanks, even though a Canadian resident was not recognized for a typo
          1. Nikon OConor
            Nikon OConor 4 February 2021 22: 49
            0
            Yes nz))) Be careful))
  • keeper03
    keeper03 2 February 2021 22: 47
    +2
    9 years on the site, but all the same! request
  • The comment was deleted.
  • the most important
    the most important 2 February 2021 23: 56
    +1
    Quote: Finches
    A career officer - and I have something to compare with, almost 3 decades And in command positions! This is a good school to understand what happened and what happened! And also to understand people - who is xy from xy! I have the honor!

    What a good fellow! Comrade Marshal, compare, if you can, the army of the USSR and modern Russia, the industry of the USSR and modern Russia, agriculture of the USSR and modern Russia, the number of beggars in the USSR and in modern Russia. Anything to be proud of? And having a command position does not always correspond to strategic thinking.
    1. Finches
      Finches 3 February 2021 00: 01
      0
      What do you propose - to destroy the country - as in Ukraine or Georgia, who else is thriving there after the revolting revolutions - Libya, Iraq? Here's an example of strategic thinking - refute!
      1. Alexandes
        Alexandes 3 February 2021 01: 26
        -4
        Quote: Finches
        What do you propose - to destroy the country - as in Ukraine or Georgia, who else is thriving there after the revolting revolutions - Libya, Iraq? Here's an example of strategic thinking - refute!


        Not. Better to wait endlessly and roll up the same ass. Until the tumor becomes inoperable. While Putin-Yeltsin is at the helm (and these are two identical characters), the USSR was rebuilt from the ruins.

        Putin was left with the only way to go uncondemned for his crimes and cowardice - is to grab hold of the chair with all his might and die at the workplace. Which he successfully does.
    2. Cottodraton
      Cottodraton 3 February 2021 06: 46
      -3
      I remember the USSR by standing in lines ...
    3. Ka-52
      Ka-52 3 February 2021 07: 25
      0
      agriculture of the USSR and modern Russia,

      Yes, this is why the USSR bought wheat in Canada for petrodollars, while Russia exports? Perhaps this is why the grocery stores of the USSR demonstrated only the beauty of empty shelves, in contrast to today's abundance?
      industry of the USSR and modern Russia

      in terms of gross indicators - yes, everything is beautiful. Only any economist will tell you how gross income differs from net income. And the USSR was destroyed by just such a discrepancy.
      Well, you measure it with slogans, you have nothing to know
    4. Vlad world
      Vlad world 3 February 2021 09: 22
      +3
      The admirers of Lenin and Trotsky are especially touched by the "excellent" agriculture of the USSR in comparison with today's Russia. You will remember how many million tons of grain the USSR bought. Remember.
      And at the moment, with a minus of 200 million hectares, Russia is selling tens of millions of tons of grain. Probably from the Alpha Centauri supply.
      1. Stas157
        Stas157 3 February 2021 12: 00
        -2
        Quote: Vlad-world
        And at the moment, with a minus of 200 million hectares, Russia is selling tens of millions of tons of grain.

        The arable area in the RF is three times less than in the USSR. Yields (absolute value) are about the same, thanks to modern technology (after all, more than 30 years have sunk). Russia consumes much less and therefore sells the surplus. Moreover, low consumption is not at all a plus for Russia!
        1. Vlad world
          Vlad world 5 February 2021 00: 08
          0
          What arithmetic however. It's amazing. The area has decreased three times with the same productivity (according to you), the population has decreased somewhere in half and the surplus by tens of millions of tons of grain. And different things. We that completely stopped eating !!!. And I wonder how low the consumption of What - fruits, maybe cars and other things.
          But alcohol is exactly the same Significantly less began to consume. Not like in the USSR. The policy of the party and government ceased.
          In 2018, less than in France - and the downward trend has remained.
      2. Revival
        Revival 4 February 2021 22: 48
        0
        And why bread is getting more expensive, probably 90% of the price is a huge salary of workers
  • Revival
    Revival 2 February 2021 23: 57
    +1
    A career officer, there is nothing good by definition, Grachev, your Minister of Defense, was also a career officer, so it is quite understandable
    1. Finches
      Finches 3 February 2021 00: 06
      .
      Grachev, no matter how he was, as they say, a normal person will not get out of a serviceable plane, but the commander of the Airborne Forces regiment in Afghanistan and he carried his cross to the end - yes, he lay down under the drunk, caved in under the politicians ... But do not judge and do not judge you will! For 4 years of the ministry - he passed away at 64 ... He did a lot of business, but in order to figure it out to the end, you need to visit his skin!
      1. Revival
        Revival 3 February 2021 00: 11
        0
        And, I thought that for you, "yes, I went to bed under the drunk" is not shameful, now everything is in its place ... and honor is also somewhere in itself
        1. Finches
          Finches 3 February 2021 00: 23
          -5
          Actually, I had more in mind that do not judge and you will not be judged - but where does my honor or someone else's? Moreover, Grachev has not been on Earth for 8 years ... And I will also "tell you one thing, just do not be offended" - I treat those who are career officers from the school barracks a little differently than an ordinary person - for example Shoigu a stranger to me, he is not a regular, but Gerasimov is a highly respected general ... This is an inner respect! I can’t explain it - but the regular officers will understand - this is a caste!
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. Revival
                Revival 3 February 2021 00: 49
                +1
                Okay, I'll work hard.
                You don't care who you serve.
                You also defend the rookie, they say, "well, I caved in the drunk", what a trifle is it? But for you, and I understand why !, it cost thousands of lives of those very boys whom you Allegedly tried to save (?!).
                You don't care how the country lives if you personally feel good.
                You are "not offended for the state" if you personally feel good.
                It's not an honor for me
              2. Finches
                Finches 3 February 2021 01: 07
                +1
                I remember the text of the Oath and there, you know, the names of whom to serve are not indicated ... But you probably know better ...
              3. The comment was deleted.
              4. The comment was deleted.
              5. The comment was deleted.
  • AUL
    AUL 3 February 2021 07: 49
    -1
    Quote: Finches
    He has done a lot of business, but in order to figure it out to the end, you need to visit his skin!
    And ride in his Mercedes ...
  • The comment was deleted.
    1. Revival
      Revival 3 February 2021 09: 47
      +1
      Hi all the officers?
      This was not at all
      Can you read?
      1. Ka-52
        Ka-52 3 February 2021 09: 50
        +5
        A career officer, is not something good by definition

        then decipher your opinion. There is a category and there is a definition that you give to this category. Name a way of reading that can be understood differently.
        1. Revival
          Revival 3 February 2021 10: 14
          +3
          The conversation was with Zyablintsev about his position, which seems to me to be wrong.
          He "argued" his position, including the fact that a career officer, as if by definition, means that everything I do, I say, etc. is correct.
          It was precisely to this cover-up argument that I replied that a career officer is not a panacea and synonym for universal "sinlessness" and integrity, but it is necessary to judge by the deeds of each individual person.
          To catch all this, of course, you need to see the whole correspondence, especially since our dispute is already systematically flowing in the comments to any article on VO.
          In general, this is not even about his honor as a soldier, but about the fact that in a dispute on other topics he presents it as an argument-shield, which in itself is incorrect and forces this substituted argument to "attack", otherwise this aspect, in principle, would not be would be affected by me
          1. Ka-52
            Ka-52 3 February 2021 10: 20
            +3
            It was to this cover-up argument that I replied that a career officer is not a panacea and a blueprint for universal "sinlessness" and integrity, but it is necessary to judge by the deeds of each individual person

            if the phrase sounded as it is now, then I would not have any questions.
            1. Revival
              Revival 3 February 2021 14: 39
              +1
              I understand, I agree
              hi
    2. Stas157
      Stas157 3 February 2021 12: 06
      -1
      Quote: Ka-52
      what do you know about the officers?

      The army should serve the people, not serve the impudent elite. Do I understand correctly or do you have a different opinion on this matter? That was the whole dispute.
      1. Ka-52
        Ka-52 3 February 2021 12: 15
        +2
        That was the whole argument.

        what was the dispute written specifically in my question. Take the trouble to read it carefully.
        The army should serve the people, not serve the insolent elite

        Well, tell me how the army serves the top. It is desirable with arguments - sobs of hamsters about pink elephants do not interest me
        1. Stas157
          Stas157 3 February 2021 12: 41
          -1
          Quote: Ka-52
          well tell us how the army serves the top

          Is it possible without "well ka"?

          The most notorious case is the shooting of the White House (parliament) in the center of Moscow. The drunkard was then supported by many highly placed officers. And now they support his protégé - the support of the oligarchs.
          1. Ka-52
            Ka-52 3 February 2021 12: 59
            0
            The most notorious case - the shooting of the White House (parliament) in the center of Moscow

            the army carried out the order of the Supreme Commander. At that time, the so-called. the drunk was the legitimate president of the Russian Federation, not the "top". And at the same time, at the time of the events at the White House, he was also a very popular president (by the way, about the drunk).
            And now they support his protégé - the support of the oligarchs.

            Putin is supported for returning the army to its legal position. Of course, for sorosity like you, you want the army to be the same as in the days of the State Department's sycophant Gorbachev, but no, fuck you.
            1. Stas157
              Stas157 3 February 2021 14: 07
              +1
              Quote: Ka-52
              the army carried out the order of the Supreme Commander. At that time, the so-called. drunk was legitimate president RF

              Criminal order. Your EBN used the army not for external threats, but for the execution of parliament and people's representatives in the center of the capital. But it was your "officer's honor" that fully justified it.

              Quote: Ka-52
              Soros like you, I want the army to be the same dyshchenskaya

              And why did you drag it in? Where did I say this? And yes, the confused sorosets seem to be around!))
            2. Ka-52
              Ka-52 4 February 2021 04: 46
              +1
              Criminal order

              from the point of view of whom? Dear Stas, leave your frenzied desire to leave kakakhami for the rally. I don’t need to rub in this nonsense. The army is not a constitutional court for you, which determines the degree of legality of the president's actions; it carries out the order. You, sofa hamsters, who know about the army only from shit films with Petrov, cannot understand this.
              Your EBN used the army

              he is as mine as yours, stupid creature
              And why did you drag it in? Where did I say this? And yes, the confused sorosets seem to be around!))

              well, who are you? You are exactly a magpie, Lekhin hamsters.
              The army must serve the people

              the slogan that all sorts of schemers throw themselves to fool the crowd. As in 1917. And the crowd with a pig's joyful squeal carries it on. What kind of people? In 1917. both on the part of the Reds and on the part of the White Guards were the people. The same. The same Vanya, Styopa and Petit. Urban artisans and peasants. What nation was the army supposed to belong to?
              In 2014. Ukrainian nationalists staged a coup d'etat shouting "Power to the people". But they asked the people's desire? There were 2-3 thousand of them, especially zealous, in Kiev. And in Ukraine lived 40 million. So who should the army be for? For these 2-3 thousand people?
              In January, at least 10 people attended rallies for Navalny. And in the Russian Federation is home to 000 million. For whom should the army be? For the people? And the people are your 140 thousand hamsters or the rest of the citizens of Russia? And what is there in your manuals written about this?
          2. Revival
            Revival 3 February 2021 14: 43
            +3
            Here, for objectivity, it seems to me, (from memory, there was a legal dispute on this topic).
            At that moment, the Supreme Council was more important, ebn just decided everything by force, and not by law. So his actions and those who were in the tank, apparently, were in fact illegal, but ...
  • The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. Finches
          Finches 2 February 2021 23: 09
          +1
          Another Navalnovsky pioneer who did not serve in the Army ... hi You even read the comments, walk around the site - and only then enter the dialogue - that's how you go to protests - if only you pay, but the idea, knowledge, life experience, principles in the end ... - I haven't heard! laughing
  • Revival
    Revival 2 February 2021 23: 14
    +3
    So, do not strain with him, I also corresponded, I wasted an hour, and when the pressure came, he finally wrote openly that he considers Putin to be a good leader, the pension reform is a forgivable justified prank and he is by default for Putin, since he has a pension from him. , and the rest themselves, media
    1. Finches
      Finches 2 February 2021 23: 22
      -2
      Sergey, I think you are talking about me - you didn't have to spend an hour on me - you could have been silently starting from 2014, registering on the site, looking at the comments to understand that I have always supported the GDP ... - poor fellow! I apologize for the wasted time - your supporters are more on "Rain", "Echo of Moscow" or the Ukrainian "Peacemaker"! laughing
      1. Revival
        Revival 2 February 2021 23: 51
        0
        Yeah, you write about the principles in the comment above, but as we found out, you cannot distinguish the principle from the completely different, since, as you said, respecting Putin is a principle !! Oh how
        1. Finches
          Finches 2 February 2021 23: 55
          0
          Why not? I have served with the Supreme Commander since 2000 - and I know what happened then and what happened afterwards - I even measure the correctness of his decisions and our national dignity with the lives of a soldier, and what about you - tiles and bricks?
          1. Revival
            Revival 3 February 2021 00: 07
            0
            You and ebn served as well ...
            1. Finches
              Finches 3 February 2021 00: 15
              -2
              He served in exactly the same way - he tried to serve well, but it is not for me to judge how it came out ... You have correctly noticed that!
              1. Revival
                Revival 3 February 2021 00: 21
                0
                Yes, I'm not talking about how it came out, but about the fact that "I served in the same way."
                All clear..
                1. Finches
                  Finches 3 February 2021 00: 30
                  +1
                  But how else - to me that Yeltsin or Putin ... but the boys come from their mothers alive and well, my task is not only to teach them military science, but most importantly, to return the living and healthy mothers back! And if I do not serve well, because of my negligence and carelessness it will not work out ... That's why I tried! ...
                2. Revival
                  Revival 3 February 2021 00: 46
                  0
                  Enough to hide behind the "boys", the last time they dismantled ...
                  Served, would have served at least someone with "boys" and without
                3. Finches
                  Finches 3 February 2021 01: 27
                  +4
                  In the sense of hiding behind ... However, at least I have someone who will go to reconnaissance with me - but you, apparently, do not ... If only Lech, but he is a piss without Western curators, maybe Kasparov, but he is not in Russia, Khodorkovsky, it is unlikely, you are not the right figure for him, Nevzorov, you don’t have enough money, Sobchak, here you have to be at least an anilingus virtuoso ... But I have someone to go with - if your tribe selling Russia wants to American money to stir up a civil war - you will all get it! But that won't happen either! Because the cat cried for you, who has already sold Russia and even fewer men are standing - I’m raising a storm on the street, it’s not on the Internet to shake balls! However, in the dissatisfied, mostly gays ... Or people of non-traditional (for a Russian man) Anglo-Saxon orientation! laughing
                4. The comment was deleted.
  • sniperino
    sniperino 2 February 2021 23: 28
    +13
    Quote: Svarog
    You are probably also an officer?
    Without "more", Vladimir. You have been wiping the keys here for so many years and have not understood that the officer cannot but see in N and his shoble the enemies of his homeland, whose service he gives most of his life. Even if he has very little interest in politics.
  • Bolt cutter
    Bolt cutter 2 February 2021 21: 37
    .
    The head of all the protests will already have a rooster for amusement - here's the bastard
    Limonov performed and did not bathe wassat .
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Adimius38
    Adimius38 2 February 2021 21: 57
    .
    Funny funny laughing And whose palace is it? laughing
    1. Finches
      Finches 2 February 2021 22: 20
      -4
      Even if Putin's - what's the problem then? Is it kind of like capitalism in the yard? And under capitalism it is not forbidden to have Dvors!
      1. Ivan Kolodin
        Ivan Kolodin 2 February 2021 22: 54
        +5
        Especially if in the civil service, your knowledge about the honor of an officer with this approach becomes more and more clear ... Under capitalism, palaces are not prohibited, of course, but they are not built on federal land and not on state funds ...
        1. Finches
          Finches 2 February 2021 23: 01
          -2
          Have you already canceled the presumption of innocence? Tomorrow I'll shoot a movie that your wife (if any) is cheating on you - without proof, at the expense of virtual graphics - will you kick her out of the house right away or turn on your mind?
      2. The comment was deleted.
        1. Finches
          Finches 2 February 2021 23: 14
          -1
          I, unlike you, do not care about his palaces ... I served the Motherland and now I am in the reserve of the Fatherland! But, if it doesn't reach you, I’ll say more simply - because of the bricks and tiles in the toilet, I will not change the Supreme to the State Department mongrel! I, tea, are not Ukrainian - I have enough satin panties for my eyes, you need lace thongs, but I will manage somehow! laughing
          1. Sling cutter
            Sling cutter 2 February 2021 23: 22
            +12
            Quote: Finches
            I, tea, are not Ukrainian - I have enough satin panties for my eyes, you need lace thongs, but I will manage somehow!

            And there, give me a fur coat, we need to attach the kids, and so on little things for a little grub, to improve housing conditions again. Eh disingenuous you gazpadin colonel, eh being disingenuous wink
            1. Finches
              Finches 2 February 2021 23: 32
              -3
              And I already have everything I need - I have a pension, plus I work ... It's not enough, it's always so little, but I won't destroy and sell my homeland because of my selfishness!
              1. Sling cutter
                Sling cutter 3 February 2021 00: 08
                +13
                Quote: Finches
                Little, it is always so little, but I will not destroy and sell my homeland because of my selfishness!

                Everyone hides behind the concept of Motherland, but not everyone can explain what this concept is for them.
                For the Wrotenbergs and Volodin, Putin = homeland, but for me this is something different, but that is not Putin, for sure.
                and of the colonels, Shendakov is much closer to me in spirit, he fought four wars with a sapper, and this, colleague, wow, but bam and a sentence to him ...
                1. Finches
                  Finches 3 February 2021 00: 18
                  -3
                  So that's good! I won't say anything for Vrotenberg - I don't know him, I have already said for VVP, I won't say anything for Shendakov either - I don't know him either, I didn't serve! Perhaps a decent officer ... so everything is fine here! You have your own opinion, I have mine!
                2. sniperino
                  sniperino 3 February 2021 08: 28
                  +1
                  Quote: Stroporez
                  homeland, but for me it's something else
                  Removing unnecessary signs, we can carry out the ascent from the abstract to the concrete:
                  home for me is something

                  homeland for me is different
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. Ka-52
            Ka-52 3 February 2021 07: 57
            +5
            I served the Motherland and now I am in the reserve of the Fatherland!

            Do not like on this site "Voennoye Obozreniye", military personnel, paradoxically laughing With their concept of duty and military honor. Therefore, couch hamsters, which have a bitten apple replaced morality and dignity, will bypass you so zealously. And you will not prove anything. I have tried with the same result.
      3. Revival
        Revival 2 February 2021 23: 26
        +12
        Well, in general, even under capitalism you can have palaces if you can explain the income on which it is built
    2. syndicalist
      syndicalist 2 February 2021 22: 27
      +8
      Rottenberg says, like my
      1. Finches
        Finches 2 February 2021 22: 36
        -3
        Start to really figure out whose it is - so there maybe a virtual room of dirt belongs to Khodorkovsky! Because capitalism! He bought shares in the hotel through dummies - and now he uses photos of his square meters for Navalny's cinema ... laughing
        1. syndicalist
          syndicalist 2 February 2021 22: 42
          +2
          Quote: Finches
          so there maybe the virtual mud room belongs to Khodorkovsky! Because capitalism!

          This is strong! Surely Navalny bought a couple of rooms there.
          1. sniperino
            sniperino 3 February 2021 07: 52
            0
            Quote: syndicalist
            a couple of rooms were bought from Navalny
            The minimum is a rug in the hallway, the maximum is a bed in the servant's room.
    3. Ivan Kolodin
      Ivan Kolodin 2 February 2021 22: 51
      +16
      Officially, it belongs to Arkady Rotenberg .... Well, you remember the words President, he clearly said neither I nor my relatives have palaces))))
      1. Finches
        Finches 2 February 2021 23: 02
        .
        Most likely you are a very naive and simple person - but this is not a drawback! This is even a positive quality! Only you will be used by bad people ...
  • The comment was deleted.
    1. Tank jacket
      Tank jacket 2 February 2021 22: 12
      +11
      The war, Professor, is fought on all priorities of generic controls. The information war and the oval-related attack are also war, so your comment indicates interest. You cannot be called stupid ..
      A joke for you, Professor: "... and where, let me ask you, I can get my share"
      1. Professor
        Professor 2 February 2021 22: 22
        -8
        Quote: Tank jacket
        The professor's war is waged on all priorities of generalized controls. The information war and the oval-related attack are also war, so your comment indicates interest. You cannot be called stupid ..
        Anecdote for you Professor: "... and where, let me ask you, I can get my share"

        Translation of a proverb from ancient Hebrew: "Things noticeable from there are not noticeable here." And to me that Navalny, that Stepanov or Ilyin, but so rude to sew the case ...

        It is necessary, first to pay compensation, thereby recognizing the verdict as invalid, and then, according to the same verdict, demand from the citizen sent abroad in a coma to come to a different term. Kavka could not have come up with such a thing. hi
        1. Tank jacket
          Tank jacket 2 February 2021 22: 30
          0
          "but it's so rude to sew a thing ..."
          You are disrespectful about the legal system of the Russian Federation. Reminds of interference in the internal affairs of Russia.
          How are the orthodox protests the other day? Roughly overclocked? hi
        2. major147
          major147 2 February 2021 23: 06
          +3
          Quote: Professor
          to demand that a citizen sent abroad in a coma come to a different date.

          Do you have any proof of your words? If not, then you have to answer ...
          As far as it is known from the media, no one bothered him about his marks until he was discharged from the hospital.
          1. 2 Level Advisor
            2 Level Advisor 3 February 2021 09: 00
            -7
            but about the fact that the entire movement in the Yves Rocher case for which the RF has already paid compensation to Navalny and which, accordingly, was recognized as unreasonable, incl. and the RF itself, how would you comment?
            1. major147
              major147 3 February 2021 11: 11
              +2
              Quote: 2 level advisor
              but about the fact that the entire movement in the Yves Rocher case for which the RF has already paid compensation to Navalny and which, accordingly, was recognized as unreasonable, incl. and the RF itself, how would you comment?

              If you answer me, then I am not aware of payments to Navalny, I was not interested. I asked a specific question about grades and just wanted an answer. And I have a counter question not on the topic of grades.
            2. major147
              major147 3 February 2021 11: 22
              +4
              Quote: Level 2 Advisor
              which was accordingly recognized as unfounded, incl. and the RF itself, how would you comment?

              I looked. I will not comment, because not a lawyer, but a candidate of legal sciences Alexander Zorin.
              “The final part of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in the Yves Rocher case does not contain the recognition of Alexei Navalny as not guilty, and also does not oblige the Russian authorities to remove criminal punishment from him. In the final part of the judgment, the court did not find Navalny not guilty and did not oblige the Russian authorities to remove criminal punishment from him. "It also does not contain requirements to transfer the Navalny brothers' case for a new consideration," Zorin notes. RF, the Presidium of the Supreme Court of Russia considered the objections of the ECHR, which were fully set out on 39 pages of the court ruling of the Presidium of the Supreme Court of April 25, 2018.
              The Navalny brothers, committing deliberately illegal financial transactions in order to give a legitimate appearance to the possession, use and disposal of the stolen funds, could not fail to foresee criminal liability under Articles 159.4, 174.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Thus, the reasons for the submitted objections to the ECHR are removed. After this clarification, the RF Armed Forces cannot have any questions from the European Court. This means that the Federal Penitentiary Service's demand to replace Navalny's term in the Yves Rocher case with a real one is absolutely legal both under Russian law and under international standards. "
            3. major147
              major147 3 February 2021 11: 38
              +4
              Quote: Level 2 Advisor
              Quote: Level 2 Advisor

              “The thing is that when assessing the arguments about violation of Article 18 of the Convention, the court assesses not only legal arguments, but also assesses the general context of the case and the applicant's lifestyle, taking into account his social and political role in society, and the validity of applying various criminal offenses against him. enforcement measures "
              That is, declare yourself an "opposition politician" and go to steal, but when they are imprisoned for stealing, shout that they are "pressed" for politics. And the objectivity of the European courts can be judged at least in the case of Gazprom versus Naftogaz.
              1. 2 Level Advisor
                2 Level Advisor 3 February 2021 13: 36
                -1
                I xs Sergey, what did they think about when they decided, but the decision recognized by the Russian Federation is there .. this is a fact .. well, the ECHR will now release an explanation of what they meant that he is innocent and will have to release Oval or not recognize the ECHR in violation of an international treaty .. not the best choice .. I do not defend him, on the contrary, I am amazed that he is the only person in the Russian Federation who received 2 conditions .. all this is strange ..
                1. major147
                  major147 3 February 2021 14: 48
                  +1
                  Quote: Level 2 Advisor
                  or not to recognize the ECHR

                  As far as I know, the ECHR cannot correct the angle. country legislation. They make sure the procedures are correct. Those. if it is a criminal offense in the Russian Federation, but in Sweden, for example, not, the ECHR cannot influence this. At the expense of the twice conditional, apparently our leadership did not want to exacerbate relations with the West. But when the West "lost its shores", Navalny was staged a demonstrative flogging in the presence of Western diplomats. This is how I see the situation.
        3. APASUS
          APASUS 3 February 2021 09: 20
          +7
          Quote: Professor
          then, according to the same verdict, demanding from a citizen sent in a coma abroad to come will be marked differently.

          The question is not related to Navalny, just purely theoretically, do you believe that you can recover from poisoning with a chemical warfare agent?
          1. Professor
            Professor 3 February 2021 14: 00
            +1
            Quote: APASUS
            Quote: Professor
            then, according to the same verdict, demanding from a citizen sent in a coma abroad to come will be marked differently.

            The question is not related to Navalny, just purely theoretically, do you believe that you can recover from poisoning with a chemical warfare agent?

            It all depends on the dose. Otherwise, toxicologists would not exist in nature.
            1. Cube123
              Cube123 3 February 2021 14: 59
              +3
              Quote: Professor
              It all depends on the dose. Otherwise, toxicologists would not exist in nature.

              All of Navalny's analyzes taken before he was sent to Germany are stored in Russia. It is easy to confirm them by genetic analysis. Therefore, they ask for an official opinion from Germany so that they can be compared and stamped. It seems that for this reason no one in the West is in a hurry to give an official conclusion about his "poisoning". And there are no facts, no poisoning.
              1. Professor
                Professor 3 February 2021 17: 52
                -1
                Quote: Cube123
                Quote: Professor
                It all depends on the dose. Otherwise, toxicologists would not exist in nature.

                All of Navalny's analyzes taken before he was sent to Germany are stored in Russia. It is easy to confirm them by genetic analysis. Therefore, they ask for an official opinion from Germany so that they can be compared and stamped. It seems that for this reason no one in the West is in a hurry to give an official conclusion about his "poisoning". And there are no facts, no poisoning.

                Well yes. The patient is in a coma, but there are no facts. There is an official statement by international experts, but no facts. With this attitude, the barrel with the "Novice" will not be a "fact". And what would seem to be easier? Open a criminal case at the request of the victim, interrogate "tourists" accidentally traveling with the victim throughout the country and business. But ...
                1. Cube123
                  Cube123 3 February 2021 18: 19
                  0
                  Quote: Professor
                  And what would seem to be easier? Open a criminal case at the request of the victim,

                  Is there a victim's statement? There is an official conclusion of Russian doctors that no toxic substances were found in Navalny's analyzes. Therefore, without an official response from Germany about the fact of poisoning, there are no grounds for initiating a case. What to search? After all, Germany did not provide any official conclusions laughing "It's hard to find a black cat in a dark room, especially if she's not there." Verbal "Official statements of international experts" is not a basis - give the document signed by a specific authoritative person wink Let him answer with his name and reputation.
                  1. Professor
                    Professor 3 February 2021 21: 55
                    -1
                    Quote: Cube123
                    Is there a victim's statement?

                    Of course there is. Only the UK does not see the corpus delicti and refuses to conduct an investigation. Investigative Committee of the victim declares "prove". Legal nonsense !!!

                    Quote: Cube123
                    There is an official conclusion of Russian doctors that no toxic substances were found in Navalny's analyzes.

                    Toxicologists from the hinterland who pumped him out with antidotes? Or those who washed his coward twice? By the way, where is the victim's clothes? He also wrote a statement on this matter. Why did they not initiate a case on the theft of personal property of a citizen of the Russian Federation?
                    Toxicologists from the hinterland who pumped him out with antidotes? Or those who washed his coward twice? By the way, where is the victim's clothes? He also wrote a statement on this matter. Why did they not initiate a case on the theft of personal property of a citizen of the Russian Federation (Criminal Code of the Russian Federation Article 158. Theft)?

                    Quote: Cube123
                    Therefore, without an official response from Germany about the fact of poisoning, there are no grounds for initiating a case. What to search?

                    Since when is the answer or not the answer of another state the reason for the refusal to investigate a crime against a citizen of the Russian Federation committed on the territory of the Russian Federation?

                    Quote: Cube123
                    After all, Germany did not provide any official conclusions

                    And what? request The crime was committed on the territory of the Russian Federation. "Tourists" interrogated?

                    Quote: Cube123
                    It is hard to look for a black cat in a dark room, especially if it is not there. "Verbal" Official statements of international experts "- this is not the basis - give the document signed by a specific authoritative person Let him answer with his name and reputation.

                    Don't give a damn about experts. They are not interesting to us. A citizen of the Russian Federation fell into a coma on suspicion of premeditated poisoning by a group of persons by prior conspiracy. Who investigated the crime of causing grievous bodily harm (RF Criminal Code Article 111. Intentional infliction of grievous bodily harm, RF Criminal Code Article 105. Attempted murder)? The victim's statement is available.
                  2. Cube123
                    Cube123 4 February 2021 03: 44
                    0
                    Quote: Professor
                    A citizen of the Russian Federation fell into a coma on suspicion of premeditated poisoning by a group of persons by prior conspiracy. Who investigated the crime of causing grievous bodily harm (RF Criminal Code Article 111. Intentional infliction of grievous bodily harm, RF CC Article 105. Attempted murder)? The victim's statement is available.

                    At the time of loading him on the plane, there is no evidence that he was poisoned. The UK has no information about how it could have been pumped up in an airplane or in Germany. The rest is all words, words, words ... And it doesn't matter. He is being tried now for something else. In the meantime, he will sit down and deal with his cowards, and financial fraud, and much more. We are not lawyers, but outside observers. Therefore, we do not know much. And if you look from the outside, Lesha's landing has a huge plus. It is because of him that all this hype is going on at the level of consuls, ambassadors, presidents ... At the moment when the gates of the colony close behind him, he will turn into POLITICAL NOTHING, just as Khodorkovsky turned into such nothing. All investments in Lesha and his team go bankrupt. He ceases to be needed by anyone.
                  3. Professor
                    Professor 4 February 2021 07: 31
                    -1
                    Quote: Cube123
                    At the time of his loading on the plane, there is no evidence that he was poisoned.

                    And now there is no evidence, so there was no investigation and trial. However, the fact of his poisoning was confirmed by the doctors who saved him and the activities they carried out.

                    Quote: Cube123
                    The UK has no information about how it could have been pumped up in an airplane or in Germany. The rest is all words, words, words ...

                    Doctors-toxicologists pumped him out BEFORE the plane. And since no one wants to conduct the investigation despite a number of crimes, EVERYTHING remains words.

                    Quote: Cube123
                    He is being tried now for something else.

                    Not being tried, but condemned. And for what they were sentenced they know all over the world. Yes, and you also know.

                    Quote: Cube123
                    In the meantime, they will sit down and deal with his cowards, and with financial fraud, and with much more.

                    Nobody will understand.

                    Quote: Cube123
                    ... And if you look from the outside, there is a huge plus in Lesha's landing. It is because of him that all this hype is going on at the level of consuls, ambassadors, presidents ... At the moment when the gates of the colony are closed behind him, he will turn into POLITICAL NOTHING, just as Khodorkovsky turned into such nothing. All investments in Lesha and his team go bankrupt. He ceases to be needed by anyone.

                    I just look from the side. A citizen of the Russian Federation was imprisoned for political reasons on a trumped-up case, and no one is even going to investigate the crimes committed against a citizen of the Russian Federation. If you naively believe that this cannot happen to you personally and to your family (after all, you don't get into politics and breathe evenly), then you are deeply mistaken. You are next in line. All the best to you. The topic is closed for me.
                  4. sniperino
                    sniperino 4 February 2021 22: 42
                    +1
                    Quote: Cube123
                    The moment the gates of the colony close behind him, he will turn into POLITICAL NOTHING, just as Khodorkovsky turned into such nothing. All investments in Lesha and his team go bankrupt. He ceases to be needed by anyone.
                    Why then. To the prisoners of the colony, it is as if the circus came to them for a long time.
                2. sniperino
                  sniperino 4 February 2021 22: 05
                  0
                  Quote: Professor
                  A citizen of the Russian Federation fell into a coma on suspicion of premeditated poisoning by a group of persons by prior conspiracy.
                  Whose suspicion? I'll give you free, but useful advice. To play such a fool, it is better to put on an avatar a portrait of young Albert, whom the teachers considered stupid and said that nothing good would ever come of him. You will look more organic and you will be able to powder the brains of one of the young.
                3. Professor
                  Professor 4 February 2021 22: 08
                  0
                  Quote: sniperino
                  Quote: Professor
                  A citizen of the Russian Federation fell into a coma on suspicion of premeditated poisoning by a group of persons by prior conspiracy.
                  Whose suspicion? I'll give you free, but useful advice. To play such a fool, it is better to put on an avatar a portrait of young Albert, whom the teachers considered stupid and said that nothing good would ever come of him. You will look more organic and you will be able to powder the brains of one of the young.

                  Leave the advice to yourself.
                4. sniperino
                  sniperino 4 February 2021 23: 01
                  +1
                  Quote: Professor
                  Leave the advice to yourself.
                  Left. On the question of whose suspicion you don't even answer with a question ... Forgive me if I offended you with anything.
  • major147
    major147 3 February 2021 14: 49
    -1
    Quote: APASUS
    you believe

    I don't believe if it's a matter of faith.
    By the way, my grandfather was gassed in WWII and did not participate in WWII due to his health.
  • gurzuf
    gurzuf 3 February 2021 20: 03
    0
    “It’s necessary, first, to pay compensation, thereby recognizing the verdict as invalid, and then, according to the same verdict, demand that the citizen sent abroad in a coma come to a different term. Obvious delirium of a person in a coma.
  • Keer
    Keer 3 February 2021 00: 32
    -3
    Does it look like the guarantor, having cleared out the internal opposition for 20 years, has cleared a clearing for the State Department officials? He, in whose trenches, comes out? wassat
    1. Finches
      Finches 3 February 2021 01: 12
      +3
      Whom did he clean up ??? Kasparov, Gudkov, Berezovsky, Khodorkovsky, Gusinsky ... - these are not even clowns, but clownwomen! Berezovsky was still so and so, but he could not rise above the level of a blacksmith with women's boots ... And the State Department officials - it sounds, judging by their antics, like the most obedient patients who were fired from a psychiatric hospital! laughing
      1. Keer
        Keer 3 February 2021 01: 31
        -1
        Created a situation where only crafty agents can represent the opposition laughing
      2. Keer
        Keer 3 February 2021 01: 35
        0
        He quarreled with Birch afterwards, the same opposition as Chubais, or Sobchak senior.
      3. Keer
        Keer 3 February 2021 01: 54
        -2
        By the way, Berezovsky in the USSR was a very suitable scientist, DTN, mathematician, and the guarantor from the authorities was written off on his return from the GDR due to his lack of professionalism. So, what about the boots and the level, do not get excited.
        1. mikh-korsakov
          mikh-korsakov 3 February 2021 10: 21
          -1
          Cyril, how do you know that Putin was written off as unusable? I personally know that after the GDR, Putin got a job as vice-rector of Leningrad State University. I personally know, because he rudely kicked me out of his office when I was just. entangled in the maze of the main building I just wanted to ask how to find the archive
          1. Keer
            Keer 3 February 2021 11: 23
            +1
            Formally speaking, they did not write off, but did not offer to work at the PSU.
            1. mikh-korsakov
              mikh-korsakov 3 February 2021 11: 42
              0
              Kirill. In fact, Putin was found by Sobchak or vise versa, he didn't stand with a candle, I don't know. But you are right that since Putin was hired as vice-rector for work with foreigners, this appointment was not without the participation of the competent authorities. But they are not appointed to this position, the position by the way is more responsible than the one that Putin held in the GDR. It's one thing to compile routine boring reports on the moods of directors of factories in the GDR, another thing to work with foreigners in one of the country's largest universities, and everything happens there, for example, Wanzugu, the son of a tribal leader in Niger, bitten off his drinking companion's ear due to drunkenness, and what's wrong with that do you want to do?
              1. Keer
                Keer 3 February 2021 11: 51
                0
                He wanted to continue his operational work abroad, to get a new appointment. But there were no more people willing to support this desire at PSU.
          2. sniperino
            sniperino 4 February 2021 22: 23
            0
            Quote: mikh-korsakov
            After the GDR, Putin got a job as vice-rector of the Leningrad State University. I personally know, because he rudely kicked me out of his office
            Wow! I got it right off the bat. This is school!
    2. APASUS
      APASUS 3 February 2021 13: 19
      -1
      Quote: Keer
      Does it look like the guarantor, having cleared out the internal opposition for 20 years, has cleared a clearing for the State Department officials? He, in whose trenches, comes out?

      Rather, he created this opposition and, to a large extent, controlled it. This is the reason for the incomprehensible success with the Liberal Democratic Party of Russia, three suspended sentences for Navalny and a bunch of seemingly oddities like the lack of jurisdiction of some leaders.
      And the opposition believed in its capabilities
  • Finches
    Finches 2 February 2021 22: 16
    +3
    How can it be without God's chosen wiseacres! They will immediately rush into battle to advocate for their beloved American masters, even if it is just plain sarcasm that needs to be refuted! But if the case concerned some Assange convicted for some unknown reason, then everything would be exactly the opposite ... laughing As the high priest Kaifa taught there, one must look for false witnesses against Christ in order to put Him to death. Of course, two false witnesses were found. They began to talk about what Jesus said: I can destroy the temple of God and create it in three days ... But the real murderer and murderer must be released - it’s unseen, he killed someone ... laughing
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. The comment was deleted.
        2. The comment was deleted.
    2. sniperino
      sniperino 4 February 2021 23: 24
      0
      Quote: Finches
      How can it be without God's chosen wiseacres! They will immediately rush into battle to advocate for their beloved American masters.
      Here the word is more suitable not "owners", but "partners". Which of them is more chosen, let them decide among themselves.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Cheerock
    Cheerock 2 February 2021 22: 26
    +13
    Quote: Professor

    Nobody would interfere in the affairs of two business entities if they regularly pay taxes and have no claims to each other. I.e quite.

    There were claims and a statement to the UK from Yves Rocher and there was damage. Until the company began to poison the whole "civilized world" to such an extent that it decided that it would be easier for it to write off the damage and abandon claims. You like to show only the second half of the case and the decision from the ECHR, which, by the way, is another decision. But the moment that the pinnacle of Navalny's management thought is to stupidly create a "pad" and suck the money without doing anything (with Kirovles - everything is exactly the same), and to wash the grannies through the factory of parents' baskets - you do not bashfully show this. And yes, in the states, this person would definitely sit down.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. Whiteidol
        Whiteidol 2 February 2021 23: 00
        +2
        Who found poison in his blood? Where is the medical conclusion indicating the formula of this poison? Where are the biomaterials with the indicated poison seized from the patient? Why is the patient against the transfer of RF biomaterials? A criminal case is not just opened. Foundations are needed.
      2. Cheerock
        Cheerock 2 February 2021 23: 05
        +9
        Quote: Professor

        Duc had no complaints. You at least read the case. Financial Director of Yves Rocher Vostok Christian Melnik conducted an audit. There was no damage.

        You can repeat at least a hundred times that there was no damage and there was no statement, but there was a statement (I attach) and there was damage. I read the case materials, watched the video of the debate, and read the ECHR decision, in which I also read a fair amount of this text about Navalny's "anti-corruption and political activities" that is completely irrelevant to the case. In the original.
        1. Mordvin 3
          Mordvin 3 2 February 2021 23: 26
          +8
          Quote: CheeRock
          but the statement was (attached)

          The statement is similar to the complaint from the kindergarten of children who have learned to write. First, we concluded an agreement, and then they began to think about the possible damage.
          1. Cheerock
            Cheerock 3 February 2021 00: 55
            +5
            Quote: mordvin xnumx
            Quote: CheeRock
            but the statement was (attached)

            The statement is similar to the complaint from the kindergarten of children who have learned to write. First, we concluded an agreement, and then they began to think about the possible damage.

            Was there a statement? It was. Puberty Youth claims that it was not.
            You are the owner of the company. Your manager enters into an agreement with certain individuals, according to which your company pays for ordinary services twice as high as the market and loses 26 million. The audit began, the scam was revealed, the manager dumped, but the money was stolen from your pocket. How to get them back legally? See the picture above.
            1. Mordvin 3
              Mordvin 3 3 February 2021 01: 12
              -3
              Quote: CheeRock
              The audit began, the scam was opened, the manager dumped

              You need to control your manager, moreover, judging by the statement, he was not alone. By the way, have you found gullible managers who were so harshly deceived? What did they say at the trial? And yet, I remember that in response to similar accusations about the purchase of cabbage, someone just promised to hit someone.
              1. Cheerock
                Cheerock 3 February 2021 01: 23
                +3
                Quote: mordvin xnumx
                You need to control your manager, moreover, judging by the statement, he was not alone. By the way, have you found gullible managers who were so harshly deceived? What did they say at the trial? And yet, I remember that in response to similar accusations about the purchase of cabbage, someone just promised to hit someone.

                This is advice from the field - wash your hands before you start chewing food thoroughly))) Rollback is indestructible and the whole world suffers from this. No, polygraph testing firms are enjoying it.))
                Somehow he was not interested in the fate and personality of the one who pushed the contractor for signature, but how Yves Rocher was forced to give up his claims is very significant. The company has already regretted 100 times that it decided to return its 26 million.
                1. Mordvin 3
                  Mordvin 3 3 February 2021 08: 59
                  -5
                  Quote: CheeRock
                  This is advice from the area - wash your hands before you start chewing food thoroughly)))

                  I can also advise you to think with your head. Tomorrow your boss will look at your salary and say that you are not worthy of it, because you have hooks and no brains, which means that you have inflicted a certain amount of damage on them, by deception. And you will go to the Kolyma, and the neighbor will gossip about how much you piled off to the personnel department.
            2. Avior
              Avior 3 February 2021 03: 15
              0
              it was something like this
              The authorized representative of the Yves Rocher company, Vadim Alekseevich Kodol, in a petition [11] to the investigation in February 2013, noted that when working with the company of the Navalny brothers, the prices in transportation contracts were average market prices or lower (from 4% to 15%) [12]. Yves Rocher spokesman Christian Melnik said that there was no damage or loss of profits in the conclusion of these contracts. [13] The appeal also indicated that the assumption of possible damage arose from the general director of Yves Rocher Vostok, Bruno Leproux, only after interrogating the company's employees in the framework of a criminal case and seizure of documents. Subsequently, Bruno Leproux refused to act as a victim, resigned from the post of general director of LLC Yves Rocher Vostok [14] and went abroad [15] [16]. Later Bruno Leproux became the general director of the Russian firm Il de Bote [17] [18], however, despite the fact that he was a key witness, he was not invited to the court [19] [20].
              1. Cheerock
                Cheerock 3 February 2021 15: 06
                +1
                Quote: Avior
                it was something like this

                It was somehow wrong. With the average market price of transportation from Moscow to Yaroslavl at 13,000-14,000 rubles per flight while working directly with the carrier, Glavpodiska took a little more than 26,000 rubles per flight, welded on "two ends", stupidly transferring orders to the carrier. What is the difference between a roll-back pad and an honest trader and a broker - I don't need to explain. An honest broker takes no more than 2% for such work.
                The fact that Yves Rocher immediately began to pressure and continue to poison them to this day is a separate epic story.
                1. Avior
                  Avior 3 February 2021 15: 16
                  0
                  Yes, they started to press to write a statement
                  And now the central office of Yves Rocher got under the distribution at the same time
            3. for
              for 3 February 2021 04: 22
              0
              Quote: CheeRock
              Your manager concludes a contract with certain individuals,

              And the manager was jailed?
            4. 2 Level Advisor
              2 Level Advisor 3 February 2021 09: 02
              0
              was the decision of the ECHR? it was .. and what are they there and why did they decide - your speculations ..
              1. Cheerock
                Cheerock 3 February 2021 15: 09
                +2
                Quote: 2 level advisor
                was the decision of the ECHR? it was .. and what are they there and why did they decide - your speculations ..

                I repeat - I read the ECtHR decision in full, an interesting document. In short: - Mr. Navalny is a fighter against corruption and a popular politician ... he was tried not by justice, but by the law, therefore - to refuse and pay compensation. good
  • Andrey VOV
    Andrey VOV 2 February 2021 22: 38
    +6
    And you wouldn’t be a professor, your nose in other people's affairs, this is not your homeland, you have chosen yours so follow yours and give advice at home
    1. Professor
      Professor 2 February 2021 22: 44
      -6
      Quote: Andrey VOV
      And you, the professor, would not have pryed your nose into other people's affairs, this is not your homeland, you have chosen yours so watch yours and give advice at home

      You would write "Rodina" with a capital letter, and then you inquired about citizenship, and only after that you climbed with stupid advice. hi
      1. The comment was deleted.
    2. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 2 February 2021 23: 23
      0
      Quote: Andrey VOV
      you wouldn’t be a professor, you wouldn’t pry into other people's affairs,

      Well, it is clear that if the professor defends Navalny, then he was correctly condemned.
  • mikh-korsakov
    mikh-korsakov 2 February 2021 23: 14
    +4
    Dear Oleg. I quote you Nobody would interfere in the affairs of two business entities if they regularly pay taxes and have no claims to each other. Are you serious. But in German, so in German, if it's more convenient for you. Doch, Aber das ist ein Luege. Trotzdem das war Firma Yves Rauchet die gegen Nawalni verklagtet hat
  • Alexander Seklitsky
    Alexander Seklitsky 3 February 2021 07: 27
    +3
    Quote: Professor
    I hasten to upset you, they wouldn't even start

    Yes yes Julian Asange will confirm laughing
  • Nick rex
    Nick rex 2 February 2021 22: 11
    .
    "In the most democratic country", in your words, its presidents have repeatedly appeared before the court for breaking the law, not to mention any petty rag-tag like senators and congressmen.
    But in the luminary, there were no paper clips and signatures, I don't remember such cases.
    1. Finches
      Finches 2 February 2021 22: 21
      +8
      And, God forbid, memory, five presidents were even killed! laughing
      1. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 2 February 2021 23: 30
        +3
        Quote: Finches
        And, God forbid, memory, five presidents were even killed!

        Allegedly by accident.
  • Russobel
    Russobel 2 February 2021 22: 15
    -3
    B-ling, this is the text bro.
    Sincerely ...
  • Bolt cutter
    Bolt cutter 2 February 2021 22: 31
    -2
    The United States imposes personal sanctions on Shnyr, Gepa and Miron for anal intrusion into the beacon of the Russian opposition.
    And the whole third hut is embargoed for the supply of tea and smoke laughing
    1. Lipchanin
      Lipchanin 2 February 2021 23: 40
      -4
      Quote: Bolt Cutter
      And the whole third hut is embargoed for the supply of tea and smoke

      And dates laughing
  • Outsider
    Outsider 2 February 2021 22: 39
    .
    Quote: Finches
    I hope that our convicts will turn out to be more concrete people than the judges and will clean the chimney for this comrade for the sale of the Motherland - in the West after that it will become even more popular, but in Russia, for some time, all protests will be led for amusement. like a rooster - what a mess of the opposition will happen and their young stupid heads will be piled! laughing

    - And what did Navalny sell to the Americans ?! Putin's palace in Gelendzhik for 1 billion US dollars ?! WHAT HAS HE SOLD ??
    1. Finches
      Finches 2 February 2021 22: 46
      +6
      Homeland ... Homeland, he sold! If you don't get it, then there's nothing you can do about it! And our discussion to which you are trying to provoke me is pointless! hi
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. Arpad
        Arpad 3 February 2021 11: 59
        -3
        Quote: Finches
        Homeland ... Homeland, he sold! If you don't get it, then there's nothing you can do about it! And our discussion to which you are trying to provoke me is pointless! hi

        If in your understanding, the investigation of the corruption of officials is treason to the Motherland - apparently with your understanding of the Motherland that something is wrong.
    2. Revival
      Revival 2 February 2021 23: 35
      +5
      This one will not answer you, he is so common phrases
      1. Finches
        Finches 2 February 2021 23: 49
        -6
        And I like how you puff up - tell me honestly, do you want to sell your Motherland? But so far, apparently, no one gives money? laughing
    3. Lipchanin
      Lipchanin 2 February 2021 23: 44
      -1
      Quote: Outsider
      WHAT HAS HE SOLD ??

      MOTHERLAND

      20 foreign diplomats in court in support of the basement don't tell you anything?
      Where else was it?
      Although it was. When Powers was tried
    4. Light
      Light 3 February 2021 01: 16
      +5
      Tin, still worn with this fake German movie laughing
      And Navalny is very good that he was imprisoned, with what fright he has a special attitude. And not for violating the suspended sentence, but for that still fraudulent children substitutes, adults have long been clear with this clown.
  • The comment was deleted.
    1. Finches
      Finches 2 February 2021 22: 54
      -5
      Are you the reincarnation of Freud? My compliments in this case! hi laughing
  • The comment was deleted.
    1. Finches
      Finches 2 February 2021 23: 05
      -1
      hi This is a bonus for Navalny's political career in Europe after his release - he can safely write it even on his resume! laughing
  • cat Rusich
    cat Rusich 2 February 2021 23: 08
    +3
    Quote: Finches
    laughing

    I hope that our convicts will turn out to be more concrete people than the judges and will clean the chimney for this comrade for the sale of the Motherland - in the West after that it will become even more popular, but in Russia, for some time, all protests will be led for amusement. like a rooster - what a mess of the opposition will happen and their young stupid heads will be piled! laughing laughing
    In the case that A. Navalny LOST in the colony ...
    A. Navalny after his release will be able to with full "moral right" lead the GAPARADsomewhere in Europe.
    1. Lipchanin
      Lipchanin 2 February 2021 23: 46
      -6
      Quote: cat Rusich
      will be able with full "moral right" to head GEYPARAD, somewhere in Europe.

      It is possible in Moscow, but only on the Day of the Paratrooper
  • smart ass
    smart ass 2 February 2021 23: 24
    +5
    It turns out that the bulk will have to freeze every weekend for 2.8 years ?!
    1. Sling cutter
      Sling cutter 2 February 2021 23: 54
      +15
      Quote: Clever man
      then what turns out the bulk will have to freeze every weekend for 2.8 years ?!

      The calendar says it might be summer soon.
    2. Light
      Light 3 February 2021 01: 18
      +5
      Well, if absolutely stupid people or loot work out, then let them freeze))
  • SSR
    SSR 2 February 2021 23: 52
    +7
    Quote: Finches
    In the most democratic country in the Universe - the United States, he would have been soldered 6 terms of 439 years each and two electric chairs

    And we have a term like service in the Navy in the USSR.
    I’m not a judge and I don’t want to, but I hope the IT specialist who beat the dpsnik and the hoopoes who beat the guy with the poster will answer in full. As they behaved, they are shocked.
  • Simple
    Simple 3 February 2021 00: 29
    +4
    Quote: Finches
    in the West after that it will become even more popular,


    Before you "clean the chimney" let this "truth-maker" of a real "truth-maker" be injected (as they say - a cesarean bourgeoisie) let him tell about his movements in Germany on the video).
  • TANKISTONE
    TANKISTONE 6 February 2021 23: 03
    0
    Sent to the mail:
  • Svarog
    Svarog 2 February 2021 21: 21
    -7
    Quote: yfast
    What an unexpected turn ... Just in time for the next elections will be released.

    It may not come out .. and if it does ... it’s not a fact that by the next elections ..
  • iouris
    iouris 2 February 2021 21: 21
    +4
    Quote: yfast
    It will be released in time for the next elections.

    If the cards are not swept from the table and the table is not turned over. Some strange poker.
    1. Sling cutter
      Sling cutter 2 February 2021 21: 25
      +15
      Quote: iouris
      If the cards are not swept from the table and the table is not turned over. Some strange poker

      and this is not poker, this is thimbles.
      1. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 2 February 2021 21: 47
        +7
        Quote: Stroporez
        and this is not poker, this is thimbles.

        That's right, in poker, cheaters are hit in the face with candelabra.
        1. Sling cutter
          Sling cutter 2 February 2021 21: 56
          +4
          Quote: tihonmarine
          That's right, in poker, cheaters are hit in the face with candelabra.

          Comrade in this case, the main thimblers begin to defend the deceived and intimidated inhabitants. I laid out the last word there below, listen for fun.
    2. Baloo
      Baloo 2 February 2021 21: 31
      +22
      Quote: iouris
      Quote: yfast
      It will be released in time for the next elections.

      If the cards are not swept from the table and the table is not turned over. Some strange poker.

      And fso? belay And for insulting a veteran, Kirovles and tomographs? And the violation of the regime? And what about the unpaid taxes by this foreign agent? belay
      1. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 2 February 2021 21: 49
        +3
        Quote: Balu
        And for insulting a veteran, Kirovles and tomographs? And the violation of the regime? And what about the unpaid taxes by this foreign agent?

        Responsibility according to the criminal code.
      2. syndicalist
        syndicalist 2 February 2021 22: 29
        .
        Quote: Balu
        And for insulting a veteran, Kirovles and tomographs?

        Another tunnel towards Japan and an attempt to poison the leader
      3. Volga073
        Volga073 2 February 2021 22: 32
        +2
        Just in America there will be re-elections))
  • Thrifty
    Thrifty 2 February 2021 21: 27
    +7
    On the other hand, in a few years there will be a bestseller from Navalka on sale, a book with the telling title "Alyosha - the name and the woman" !!! wassat
    1. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 2 February 2021 21: 50
      +11
      Quote: Thrifty
      On the other hand, in a few years there will be a bestseller from Navalka on sale, a book with the telling title "Alyosha - the name and the woman's"

      And the memoir "How I Survived After the Moonshine Novice."
  • Gene84
    Gene84 2 February 2021 21: 38
    +10
    Navalny to the real term, Colonel Shendakov today to two and a half years of probation ... Repression, however.
    1. Finches
      Finches 2 February 2021 21: 57
      -4
      How scary to live ... laughing
      1. Volga073
        Volga073 2 February 2021 22: 32
        +5
        And you live merrily))
        1. Finches
          Finches 2 February 2021 22: 57
          +1
          Firstly you, and then all your further wishes! On "you" with your wife, you can talk if you have one ...
    2. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 2 February 2021 23: 37
      +8
      Quote: Gene84
      Navalny to the real time,

      So he already had two suspended sentences, not a single Russian received such "favor" from the state. But he did not understand this, let him knock on the pipes with Sobol.
      1. 2 Level Advisor
        2 Level Advisor 3 February 2021 09: 06
        +1
        So the question arises, why is he so good? if 100% of the Kremlin's people are released within six months, the last doubts will disappear.
        1. tihonmarine
          tihonmarine 3 February 2021 10: 25
          +3
          Quote: Level 2 Advisor
          if within six months they release - 100% of the people of the Kremlin, the last doubts will disappear.

          We'll see in six months. Of course, it would be better if he rewound the weight of the term on a bunk.
  • Bomb
    Bomb 2 February 2021 22: 01
    .
    A brave man. And the nuts will tighten more and more. What is good, it is necessary that the patriots of the fortress state drank national pride in full.
    1. PN
      PN 2 February 2021 22: 41
      -3
      Well, you can't call him a coward, but he clearly lacks intelligence.
      1. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 2 February 2021 23: 39
        +3
        Quote: PN
        Well, you can't call him a coward, but he clearly lacks intelligence.

        But you can't call it a hero either.
    2. Incvizitor
      Incvizitor 2 February 2021 23: 04
      +2
      I didn’t want to finish the Germans killed "by Putin's order" by their Fshat masters.
    3. Light
      Light 3 February 2021 01: 26
      +3
      Brave was surrounded by German and British special services, but at the trial he shook and went into hysterics))) What are you a patriot, Banderstan chtoli?)
      1. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 3 February 2021 10: 27
        0
        Quote: Bright
        What are you patriots, banderstan chtoli?

        And that by the last name it is not clear who he is.
  • Bullba
    Bullba 2 February 2021 22: 12
    -7
    Yeah, only WE will choose, and you continue to suck up.
  • Volga073
    Volga073 2 February 2021 22: 31
    +2
    It won't work with a crime))
    Only instead of Biden!
  • mikh-korsakov
    mikh-korsakov 2 February 2021 22: 41
    +7
    Yu Will it come out? This is unlikely. There are two more criminal cases hanging there - about defamation of a veteran and about the embezzlement of FBK funds. We started with the lowest cost, because there are violations of the regime - either they are, or they are not. As for the rest, they will be dealt with slowly, for the bird is in a cage.
    1. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 2 February 2021 23: 43
      +4
      Quote: mikh-korsakov
      As for the rest, they will be dealt with slowly, for the bird is in a cage.

      Like a crucian carp on a hook, now it will not break. And the oil is already boiling in the pan.
  • onstar9
    onstar9 3 February 2021 04: 28
    -4
    Quote: yfast
    What an unexpected turn ... Just in time for the next elections will be released.

    Well, Putin with this verdict proved that this Palace is his own ...
  • w70
    w70 3 February 2021 07: 09
    -4
    Lancelot lost to the Dragon
  • mark1
    mark1 3 February 2021 07: 20
    +4
    Let's hope that this is the beginning of a long journey - there are many sins (up to treason)
  • Vend
    Vend 3 February 2021 09: 28
    +1
    Quote: yfast
    What an unexpected turn ... Just in time for the next elections will be released.

    Even if it does, read the law of the Russian Federation, persons with a criminal record do not have the right to stand for election) So the road to the trough is closed for Navalny. And no matter what the European Court says there, they live in Russia according to Russian laws.)
    1. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 3 February 2021 10: 30
      +2
      Quote: Wend
      And no matter what the European Court says there, they live in Russia according to Russian laws.

      Yes, in Europe, too, do not adore "inmates", so they are trying to prevent him from prison.
  • frruc
    frruc 3 February 2021 11: 10
    +4
    At least by the tenth election, he none and his name is in any way. Do not sharpen your attention on this.
  • Virus-free crown
    Virus-free crown 2 February 2021 21: 14
    .
    Yes ... the brutal rape of the judicial system did happen ... amen
    1. Vasilenko Vladimir
      Vasilenko Vladimir 2 February 2021 21: 18
      +13
      Quote: Corona without virus
      ah ... the brutal rape of the judicial system did happen ... amen

      and what was it about?
      1. Antidote
        Antidote 2 February 2021 21: 22
        .
        The fact that in this case he was already tried, and paid in total 80k euros in compensation. But, apparently, they thought that two times is not enough.
        1. Vasilenko Vladimir
          Vasilenko Vladimir 2 February 2021 21: 23
          +2
          Quote: Antidote
          The fact that in this case he was already tried

          can you voice the verdict?
          1. Avior
            Avior 2 February 2021 22: 09
            .
            The court considered the verdict unfair and noted the arbitrariness of the interpretation of Russian laws by the Russian courts .... Russia must pay compensation of 10 euros to Alexei and Oleg Navalny. She is also obliged to compensate them for legal costs - 000 euros to Alexei Navalny and 45 euros and 000 rubles. - Oleg. This decision was made by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) on the appeal against the verdict in the Yves Rocher case. The court concluded that the sentence was arbitrary and unfounded. The applicants 'claims were satisfied in part .... The ECtHR found that the applicants' rights to a fair trial (Article 10 of the Convention on the Protection of Human Rights) and punishment solely on the basis of law were violated (Article 971). The criminal charges in this case (the notorious article 460, which provides for liability for crimes in the field of business activities) were "widely and unpredictably interpreted," the court said.


            this is the verdict that interests you, you can see in detail, as well as the case materials.

            https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22documentcollectionid2%22:[%22GRANDCHAMBER%22,%22CHAMBER%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-177665%22]}


            there is another verdict in the same case
            PARIS, April 9. / TASS /. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) satisfied the claim of blogger Alexei Navalny against Russia, with which he challenged the legality of being held under house arrest pending a court verdict in the case of embezzlement of Yves Rocher funds. This is stated in a statement issued by the court on Tuesday.

            "The court concluded that the applicant's detention under house arrest was ordered unlawfully and the ban on access to communications did not pursue a legitimate aim," the ECtHR verdict says. It also notes that the total period of detention under house arrest exceeded 10 months (from February 28, 2014 to January 5, 2015), when Navalny cut off the tracking bracelet.

            The ECtHR ruled that there had been a violation of Articles 5 (on the right to liberty and security of person), 10 (on the right to freedom of expression) of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), as well as Article 18 (on the limits of use of restrictions on rights) ... In this regard, the court ruled to pay Navalny € 20 for non-pecuniary damage and € 2,6 as compensation for legal costs within three months after the decision comes into force.

            All the money that was awarded as compensation has already been paid from the Russian treasury.
            Nobody has been brought to justice for the waste of state money on an especially large scale.
            1. Vasilenko Vladimir
              Vasilenko Vladimir 2 February 2021 22: 51
              +2
              Quote: Avior
              this is the verdict that interests you, you can see in detail, as well as the case materials.

              to me the opinion of the ECHR to one place, however, according to today's laws and the judge is the same
              1. Avior
                Avior 2 February 2021 23: 04
                -5
                yeah. 100000 euros have already been paid, you say, up to one place.
                Your one hundred thousand euros.
                And with the cancellation of the verdict, they decided to pokhimichit - to pretend that they had examined again and the same was taken out.
                In reality, it will be another hundred thousand. and if they really put them in, then more.
                1. The comment was deleted.
                  1. Avior
                    Avior 2 February 2021 23: 16
                    -2
                    it is clear, you have run out of arguments, the minuses have gone. Oh well
              2. Mordvin 3
                Mordvin 3 2 February 2021 23: 38
                +3
                Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                according to today's laws and the judge is the same

                Since when, I wonder?
                1. Mordvin 3
                  Mordvin 3 3 February 2021 00: 16
                  0
                  Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                  The ECHR to one place, however, according to today's laws and the judge is the same

                  By the end of the summer, the Russian Ministry of Justice ran out of money to pay for the decisions of the ECHR. “Again,” add lawyers interviewed by Kommersant, stressing that this happens every year. In 2020, 280 people are expected to pay, the amount of debt is 270 million rubles, the Ministry of Justice told Kommersant, specifying that payments will be made by the end of December.

                  https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4451183
                2. Vasilenko Vladimir
                  Vasilenko Vladimir 3 February 2021 08: 33
                  0
                  Quote: Mordvin 3
                  Since when, I wonder?

                  since the last referendum
                  1. Mordvin 3
                    Mordvin 3 3 February 2021 09: 23
                    -1
                    Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                    since the last referendum

                    As we paid, we will pay as long as the contract is in force. Otherwise, wait for the seizure of Russia's assets abroad.
              3. Revival
                Revival 2 February 2021 23: 41
                +6
                In my personal opinion, it is shameful to pay at the request of the ECtH, well, if it is an independent country of course
                1. Avior
                  Avior 2 February 2021 23: 57
                  +4
                  They joined the ECHR voluntarily, and no one keeps them by force - you can leave at any time.
                  hi
                  1. Revival
                    Revival 3 February 2021 00: 08
                    +1
                    So something doesn’t come out, well at least this is not hypocrisy ...
                    1. Avior
                      Avior 3 February 2021 03: 25
                      -1
                      so there is such an old bearded anecdote that you need to either take off the cross, or put on panties.
              4. ZAV69
                ZAV69 3 February 2021 10: 36
                +2
                Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                to me the opinion of the ECHR to one place, however, according to today's laws and the judge is the same

                Well, if you read the above-written quotation, you can see that the decision of the ECHR does not at all overturn the decision on IV ROCHER, there is only compensation for the fact that he was "wrong" under house arrest.
          2. nov_tech.vrn
            nov_tech.vrn 2 February 2021 22: 29
            +10
            For Alexei Navalny, the Yves-Rocher Vostok case is not the first sentence. In 2013, Aleksey was already convicted in the Kirovles case. Then he and the ex-head of the Vyatka Forestry Company Pyotr Ofitserov were found guilty of embezzling the property of the Kirovles company. Navalny was sentenced to 5 years of suspended imprisonment, Officers - to 4 years of suspended imprisonment.
            Case 2 - Alexei and Oleg Navalny, charged under part 4 of Article 159 (fraud committed by an organized group or on an especially large scale) and paragraph "a" of Part 2 of Article 174 (legalization (laundering) of money or other property acquired by other persons by criminal by a group of persons by prior agreement) of the Criminal Code of Russia. Oleg - 3,5 years in a colony, Aleksey - and 3,5 probation, plus a fine.
            Two suspended sentences in a row, someone, well, very strongly supported Lesha.
            1. Avior
              Avior 2 February 2021 23: 09
              -3
              in the Kirovles case, 80 thousand euros of compensation have already been paid, the verdict in the ECHR was declared illegal. But compensation was paid, and the verdict was also allegedly reviewed again. Navalny filed a second lawsuit, the case is pending. The amount will be at least not less.
              1. Mountain shooter
                Mountain shooter 3 February 2021 00: 11
                -6
                Quote: Avior
                in the Kirovles case, 80 thousand euros of compensation have already been paid, the verdict in the ECHR was declared illegal. But compensation was paid, and the verdict was also allegedly reviewed again. Navalny filed a second lawsuit, the case is pending. The amount will be at least not less.

                So far, only Aleksey's words about the payment of compensation to him by the decision of the ECHR have been found. The court awarded, yes, but did he receive this compensation? A liar. Most likely, he puffed out his cheeks again.
                1. Avior
                  Avior 3 February 2021 03: 45
                  +6
                  this?


                  This is the verdict of the ECHR
                  https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-161060%22]}
                  But this is the decision of the RF Armed Forces on the execution of the ECtHR decision to overturn the sentence to Navalny
                  Submitted by the Chairman of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation
                  Lebedeva V.M. the question of resuming criminal proceedings was raised.
                  case in connection with the finding by the European Court of violations of the provisions
                  11
                  Conventions admitted in the consideration of a criminal case against
                  Navalny and Ofitserova in the court of the Russian Federation.
                  The Presidium of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation finds
                  presentation to be satisfied.
                  The European Court of Justice in its judgment of 23 February 2016 (entered into force
                  July 4, 2016) in the case "Navalny and Ofitserov v. Russia" admitted that
                  when considering the criminal case against Navalny and Ofitserov, had
                  a violation of Article 1 § 6 of the Convention took place.
                  The violation of the provisions of the Convention found by the European Court in
                  consideration by the court of the Russian Federation of a criminal case is
                  accordance with sub. "B" clause 2 of part 4 of article 413 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation as a basis for renewal
                  proceedings in this case due to new circumstances.
                  According to part 5 of article 415 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, the Presidium of the Supreme Court of the Russian
                  Federation, based on the results of consideration of the submission, cancels or changes
                  court decisions in a criminal case in accordance with the order
                  European Court of Justice.
                  In criminal proceedings in this criminal case, according to
                  In the Court's opinion, the applicants' rights to a fair
                  legal proceedings, which constitutes a violation of article 1, paragraph 6
                  Convention.
                  Whereas the Court has found a violation of Article 1 § 6
                  Conventions, verdict and appeal ruling in relation to Navalny and
                  Ofitserov are subject to cancellation with the transfer of the criminal case to a new judicial
                  proceedings.
                  Preventive measure against Navalny and Officer Presidium
                  finds it possible not to elect.

                  http://www.supcourt.ru/stor_pdf.php?id=1491258
                  That is, formally, the decision of the ECHR is fully implemented - the sentence on Kirovles Navalny was canceled as illegal.
                  Only then the old sentence was primitively rewritten word for word and formalized as a new sentence. Appeal of the new judgment pending before the ECHR. The result of the examination is obvious.
                  Only bulk money seems to be awarded more now. So they will pay and pass sentences, knowing that they will be canceled and will have to pay compensation again. But the money is from the state, and not their own, and the bulk will remain on trial until the trial and the case in the ECHR passes.
                  1. Mountain shooter
                    Mountain shooter 3 February 2021 07: 59
                    -4
                    Quote: Avior
                    Only bulk money seems to be awarded more now. So they will pay and pass sentences, knowing that they will be canceled and will have to pay compensation again.

                    I guess he won't get anything else. The attitude towards the decisions of external courts has changed. I am expecting a number of cases for the Initial - especially on taxes ... And like the icing on the cake - a case of treason ...
                    1. Avior
                      Avior 3 February 2021 09: 05
                      +1
                      Wait and see.
                      So far, this trend has not been observed, as well as attempts to leave the ECHR, there is not even a conversation on this topic.
                      1. Mountain shooter
                        Mountain shooter 3 February 2021 09: 10
                        -1
                        Quote: Avior
                        So far, this trend has not been observed, as well as attempts to leave the ECHR, there is not even a conversation on this topic

                        You don't have to leave ... you don't have to fulfill ... We consider some decisions to be correct, and some - politically motivated and not subject to execution.
          3. tihonmarine
            tihonmarine 3 February 2021 10: 31
            -2
            Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
            can you voice the verdict?

            Yes, he only shines with his tongue, also probably from that company No. 5.
      2. The comment was deleted.
        1. Vasilenko Vladimir
          Vasilenko Vladimir 2 February 2021 21: 47
          +2
          Quote: Stroporez
          Do you think Colonel Shendakov is a thief too?

          are you from Odessa ?!
          you were asked a SPECIFIC question on a SPECIFIC criminal case, what are you getting out of? "
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. Vasilenko Vladimir
              Vasilenko Vladimir 2 February 2021 22: 12
              0
              Quote: Stroporez
              As far as I remember, you are not from Russia at all

              you don't remember well
              Quote: Stroporez
              Nobody asked me questions

              you are stuck in the dialogue therefore either answer the questions posed above, or untie
              Quote: Stroporez
              and if you're interested, listen, the man was very courageous and said the main thing

              purely sporting interest, he would have held on to the same courageous position if they propped up from the back, if he knew that he would sit on COMMON grounds

              well, and most importantly, he is not interesting to me if he does not rush into power then his figs take it
              and so let him first announce what income he lives on, and after that he will talk about corruption
      3. Paranoid50
        Paranoid50 2 February 2021 21: 54
        -7
        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
        what was it about?

        Do not pay attention - I habitually threw a muddy nickname. yes
        1. Sling cutter
          Sling cutter 2 February 2021 23: 49
          +10
          Quote: Paranoid50
          Do not pay attention - the muddy nickname habitually threw

          Well, among the murky nicknames you would be a member of the jury and your "golden" branch is out of competition wink laughing
      4. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 2 February 2021 23: 46
        -4
        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
        and what was it about?

        Two terms are conditional, the third is real. And if a woman stole a stick of sausage to hungry children, she will receive 3 years. This is rape.
      5. Light
        Light 3 February 2021 01: 31
        +1
        He's on a hike about something about his about women))
    2. d1975
      d1975 2 February 2021 21: 18
      0
      I do not quite understand your answer, let's make it easier. So you are for Navalny or his policies? Or is it still not? Blurred as you have. hi
      1. abrakadabre
        abrakadabre 2 February 2021 21: 35
        +3
        So you are for Navalny or his policies?
        You are not phrasing the question correctly. There is no policy here. Pure criminality. This means that you need to formulate a question to your opponent about: Are you for the rule of law or not? In that spirit.
        1. tihonmarine
          tihonmarine 2 February 2021 23: 48
          +2
          Quote: abrakadabre
          You are not phrasing the question correctly. There is no policy here. Pure criminality.

          And the criminal must sit on a bunk.
          1. abrakadabre
            abrakadabre 3 February 2021 12: 49
            0
            And the criminal must sit on a bunk.
            Exactly
    3. Sidor Amenpodestovich
      Sidor Amenpodestovich 2 February 2021 21: 28
      +17
      Quote: Corona without virus
      Yes ... the brutal rape of the judicial system did happen ... amen

      The Federal Penitentiary Service told the whole December that if Navalny did not return before December 29, he would be detained.
      What prevented him from returning not on January 17, but on December 17? And that's it! No delays!
      So it was necessary that he returned after 29.12.20/XNUMX/XNUMX. So it was a deliberate provocation.
      His masters win in any case.
      If he had not been jailed, he would have started yelling that the authorities were scared, since the people and the whole free world in general are with him.
      He was imprisoned, and now the foreign countries, which were not going to help, will yell, until, release, sanctions.
      He himself, of course, no one asked about anything, since the problems of the negro sheriffs do not care.
      It's funny, of course. Either he is some kind of leader, and on the other hand, a small change for exchange.
      1. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 2 February 2021 23: 53
        -1
        Quote: Sidor Amenpodestovich
        Either he is some kind of leader, and on the other hand, a small change for exchange.

        A pyatak that has fallen into the genital gap is hard to get, but it is not a pity to throw it.
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 2 February 2021 21: 53
      +6
      Quote: Corona without virus
      Yes ... the brutal rape of the judicial system did happen ... amen

      Well, for articles like those of Navalny, someone else would be jailed for 15 years, and then asking for 3,5 years. The term is for children, like for stopping a pair of shoes in the store, and perfume for my beloved.
      1. Arpad
        Arpad 3 February 2021 12: 43
        -1
        Quote: tihonmarine
        Quote: Corona without virus
        Yes ... the brutal rape of the judicial system did happen ... amen

        Well, for articles like those of Navalny, someone else would be jailed for 15 years, and then asking for 3,5 years. The term is for children, like for stopping a pair of shoes in the store, and perfume for my beloved.

        Strange people, the dude was condemned and everyone understands why - all this top is interested in this Kirov forest or some other garbage, as if FSN does not know where he was and why.
        They were imprisoned for the fact that he affected their interests to continue to steal with impunity. In you here you revel in righteous anger - a traitor, you are traitors, you allow the authorities to do whatever they want with a citizen, turning the court into a punishing sword of oligarchs and their companions - everything is bought .only all your sensitive comments and sighs will not count for you when you find yourself in the same situation and start looking for the truth and hoping for a fair trial.
        As the saying goes, for whom the bell rings, he does not ring for Navalny, he rings for you.
        1. tihonmarine
          tihonmarine 3 February 2021 12: 50
          -2
          Quote: Arpad
          As the saying goes, for whom the bell rings, he does not ring for Navalny, he rings for you.

          Go ahead and sing to the barricades, for the bright future of Navalny and his American owners. Although you can only scratch your tongue, but send children to the barricades. It is disgusting to read you.
    6. syndicalist
      syndicalist 2 February 2021 22: 34
      -2
      The first judge jumped off with a chance for amnesty. But they always find someone who is ready to subscribe to all serious
    7. Bomb
      Bomb 2 February 2021 22: 43
      -5
      Yes, now that the agents of the State Department do not interfere with the next month, the salary of 2700 bucks will be
  • Nikolay Ivanov_5
    Nikolay Ivanov_5 2 February 2021 21: 14
    +30
    IT'S VERY Pity that he was not tried for treason, and for only 3,5 years was given.
    1. Kisa
      Kisa 2 February 2021 21: 29
      0
      a year later, they will add 5 for treason retroactively, and that is too resonant. Vova will not allow the second Hodor. yes Lech knew where he was returning. I admit that we will see new stories about the judo cellists right now ...
      1. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 2 February 2021 23: 58
        0
        Quote: kitty
        in a year they will add 5 for cheating retroactively, otherwise it is too resonant

        And two for violation of the regime.
  • Petrik66
    Petrik66 2 February 2021 21: 14
    +23
    Flour serves the villain. all mercenaries - science. Finally, the authorities stopped bowing to their "partners". Respect to the Judge.
    1. abrakadabre
      abrakadabre 2 February 2021 21: 38
      +5
      Finally, the authorities stopped bowing to their "partners".
      The power would cease to bend if for millions of thefts they would solder him not 3.5 years old, as for stealing a chocolate bar, but 12-15 years old
      1. Light
        Light 3 February 2021 01: 35
        0
        It's not evening yet, you can always add yes
        1. abrakadabre
          abrakadabre 3 February 2021 12: 51
          -1
          It's not evening yet, you can always add yes
          Your prayers ...
          I am for it. And I'm not alone.
      2. ZAV69
        ZAV69 3 February 2021 10: 43
        0
        Quote: abrakadabre
        The power would cease to bend if for millions of thefts they would solder him not 3.5 years old, as for stealing a chocolate bar, but 12-15 years old

        Well, this deflection when still was. Yesterday they just converted his virtual jail into a real one. And now, when he is on the bunk, no one will protect him like that, because he is useless on the bunk, the Investigative Committee will complete the case of embezzlement in the FBK and he will receive his 12 planners together with accomplices.
        1. abrakadabre
          abrakadabre 3 February 2021 12: 53
          -1
          I would like to believe that it will be so. Although it was necessary to do THIS from the very beginning
    2. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 3 February 2021 12: 53
      0
      Quote: Petrik66
      Finally, the authorities stopped bowing to their "partners". Respect to the Judge.

      Wow, how many "American bulkheads" are on the site, judging by your disadvantages. It means that we are on the right path if they do not love us.
  • tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 2 February 2021 21: 15
    +12
    And I already thought that he had his own Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. And how it happened, he will get medical treatment at the "villa", otherwise it looks very bad. As a terrible hangover, I had to change my image, let go of my beard so that they would not accept Navalny.
    1. d1975
      d1975 2 February 2021 21: 22
      +13
      Let our partners think that Russia still has a law! Why is he better than other people. I'm not gloating, well, on business to him! So much dirt from him, but 0 sense. Like a politician 0, a mulcher! hi
      1. Hagen
        Hagen 2 February 2021 21: 30
        +10
        Quote: d1975
        Like a politician 0, a mulcher!

        He is a thief !!
        1. three
          three 2 February 2021 23: 06
          0
          ... "He's a thief! - It's not funny, aunt. - Not funny." ... (c)
      2. Sling cutter
        Sling cutter 2 February 2021 21: 37
        +10
        Quote: d1975
        Well, on business to him! So much dirt from him

        Can you list all this evil in at least two sentences?
        1. d1975
          d1975 3 February 2021 20: 11
          +1
          Is it okay to ask your country for sanctions? Is it okay to pull children into their cartoons? What did he offer for the country? What ? A fucking whistleblower, that's who he is! What does this mutota feel for people that, forgive me, see this? Evidence 0. Did he think all his life that Joe would be elusive?
  • Flooding
    Flooding 2 February 2021 21: 16
    +10
    It will be interesting to observe the activities of the fighters against corruption in the absence of the beacon of the Russian opposition.
    The godfather will come out, and the children have already matured.
    1. tralflot1832
      tralflot1832 2 February 2021 21: 22
      +2
      I would have stopped and lived fantastically on the Cote d'Azur at the expense of navalnyat. All itching to joke around. Wait a minute, they will give out a "pencil" in places not so distant to draw the spring. You look and your cheeks will turn pink.
      1. Petrik66
        Petrik66 3 February 2021 13: 02
        0
        so the villains do not give the boy a rest, even now he would buy himself a suit with ebb and in Yalta, but ..... the bourgeois are forced to work.
    2. minomoto
      minomoto 2 February 2021 22: 13
      +1
      Navalny is actually just a talking head who voices videos and waves his hands in front of the camera. The main problem is the roof of the bulk and the FBK, which is 100% in the government and is just waiting for a chance to crawl under the Western corporations, the interests of the Russian Federation are not particularly interested in them.
    3. Kunica
      Kunica 2 February 2021 22: 16
      +3
      Well, you just have to watch)) And let someone fight corruption? Are you satisfied with everything?
      1. Flooding
        Flooding 2 February 2021 22: 32
        0
        Quote: Marten
        Well, you just have to watch)) And let someone fight corruption? Are you satisfied with everything?

        Strongly dissatisfied. But with this gop-company I'm definitely not on the way.
        Corruption can only be fought with clean hands.
    4. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 3 February 2021 00: 03
      -2
      Quote: Flood
      The godfather will come out, and the children have already matured.

      And dad will be forgotten.
  • Vasilenko Vladimir
    Vasilenko Vladimir 2 February 2021 21: 17
    +15
    good news, but it is not clear why he has not yet been imprisoned, any other citizen would have changed parole for a couple of violations of parole for a real term
    1. Simon schempp
      Simon schempp 2 February 2021 21: 35
      -5
      any other citizen for a couple of violations of parole would change for a real term

      NOT ANYONE!
      Especially close ones are not even strained by the convention.
      1. mark2
        mark2 2 February 2021 21: 53
        +2
        Especially close ones are not even strained by the convention.

        What do you think? Did you think you live in a fairy tale about Zolugka? Or do you think that people who come up with laws will not make an effort to ensure that these laws are not applicable to them? You are naive "Chukchi youth". Apart from money, this is the third most important bonus in power. The first bonus is power and influence itself, the second is money and the third is a minimum of responsibility for sins. So it was, so it is and so it will be. Costs of Democracy and More.
        But I must say that any oppositionist, having come to power, will act the same way.
        Even Schwartz wrote about it. To kill a dragon, you have to become a dragon yourself. And what difference does it make to us? Reds come - rob, white come - rob.
  • Thrifty
    Thrifty 2 February 2021 21: 17
    +9
    Let him take the Swedish diploma with him - it will be more fun on quiche. ... lol and in general, all European defenders to the bulk in one team - under one shkonka !!! wassat
    1. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 3 February 2021 00: 06
      -2
      Quote: Thrifty
      Let him take the Swedish diploma with him - it will be more fun on quiche.

      Lyubka Sable will sit through the wall.
  • maxxavto
    maxxavto 2 February 2021 21: 17
    +5
    hurray, hurray, hurray-ah-ah-ah !!!
    1. Simon schempp
      Simon schempp 2 February 2021 21: 36
      .
      Hooray.
      At last.
      Yachts and palaces in one piece. Mercedes and Bentleys intact. Children, wives and mistresses in Miami and the Cote d'Azur can sleep peacefully.
      Russia is getting up from its knees. good
      1. Paranoid50
        Paranoid50 2 February 2021 21: 56
        0
        Quote: Simon Schempp
        At last.

        Oh, the runners are down. fellow
      2. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 3 February 2021 00: 08
        0
        Quote: Simon Schempp
        Children, wives and mistresses in Miami and the Cote d'Azur can sleep peacefully.

        And my daughter is studying at Stanford, but Leshik is a walker.
      3. sleeve
        sleeve 4 February 2021 04: 58
        +1
        Are you a sectarian, my friend? "Yacht yard"?
    2. Incvizitor
      Incvizitor 2 February 2021 23: 08
      -4
      Hurray when for treason for life and it is better to introduce the death penalty and this is all garbage.
  • Emil mamedoff
    Emil mamedoff 2 February 2021 21: 18
    0
    Nifikha herself is 3 years old.
    Such a talent and skill will be lost on the zone.
    1. Vasilenko Vladimir
      Vasilenko Vladimir 2 February 2021 21: 21
      +6
      Quote: Emil Mamedoff
      Such a talent and skill will be lost on the zone.

      don't worry, it won't work there either
      1. Thrifty
        Thrifty 2 February 2021 21: 30
        0
        Vasilchenko Vladimir - he will work there - a live alarm clock in the morning, crowing time for the "authorities" .... wassat
        1. Vasilenko Vladimir
          Vasilenko Vladimir 2 February 2021 21: 32
          +1
          Quote: Thrifty
          in the morning, crowing time for the "authorities" ....

          dust particles will be blown off him there and certainly will not be allowed to be lowered in order to avoid yelling, although the latter could and could have been done, it is unlikely that he would have started yelling about it himself
          1. Incvizitor
            Incvizitor 3 February 2021 18: 10
            0
            He looks like it is always lowered so that nothing will change.
        2. Simon schempp
          Simon schempp 2 February 2021 21: 52
          .
          he will be there - a live alarm clock in the morning, crowing time for the "authorities"

          Thrifty probably with experience in this matter. smile
          1. Stas157
            Stas157 3 February 2021 12: 21
            +1
            Quote: Simon Schempp
            Thrifty probably with experience in this matter.

            Definitely.
          2. martin-159
            martin-159 3 February 2021 15: 46
            +1
            Describes competently.
    2. tralflot1832
      tralflot1832 2 February 2021 21: 45
      -1
      You would entrust him with pomegranates (fruit from a tree) to trade in Russia on the market. No offense, Azerbaijanis do not only trade.
    3. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 3 February 2021 00: 11
      -1
      Quote: Emil Mamedoff
      Such a talent and skill will be lost on the zone.

      With such talents, and such "warmth" from behind the hillock, you look in a year and you will become "looking around the zone".
  • xomaNN
    xomaNN 2 February 2021 21: 19
    +12
    Good news! And then there were fears that at the top of Russia someone could flinch from the "scarecrows" of the West. And so the bulk, you see, at least a couple of years (if it comes out on parole as a good girl) will sew mittens. Useful thing! love
  • iouris
    iouris 2 February 2021 21: 20
    +4
    "Do you think they gave me fifteen days? They gave us fifteen days."
  • cokol-xnumx
    cokol-xnumx 2 February 2021 21: 20
    +13
    A THIEF SHOULD SIT IN JAIL!! there is still on the way to insult a veteran, money laundering and treason.
    1. Simon schempp
      Simon schempp 2 February 2021 21: 37
      .
      A THIEF SHOULD SIT IN JAIL!!

      1. Kunica
        Kunica 2 February 2021 22: 08
        -2
        A cool squad would turn out good But you need to plant them one by one. And most importantly with confiscation yes
  • loki565
    loki565 2 February 2021 21: 20
    +13
    It's funny, he kept referring to the decision of the ECHR court, but what does the Russian Federation have to do with it?))) I would have sat in Germany if so the ECHR worships)))
    1. tralflot1832
      tralflot1832 2 February 2021 21: 46
      +7
      The ECHR is now on the sidelines! That in vain the amendments to the Constitution were adopted.
      1. loki565
        loki565 2 February 2021 21: 50
        +10
        This is correct, absurd when the court of a foreign country dictates its own terms. Let the ECHR first condemn the United States, let's see how they will be answered there))) BUT THIS IS DIFFERENT)))
      2. Avior
        Avior 2 February 2021 22: 12
        -7
        According to the judgment of the ECHR, 100 thousand euros have already been paid from the treasury to Navalny in this case.
        and, apparently, this is not the last payment.
        And you say - sideways ...
        1. sleeve
          sleeve 4 February 2021 05: 02
          +1
          But now they would not be paid ... And this was one of the factors that detaches our judicial system from the "international" one. The first factor is the principled description of the justice system.
  • faterdom
    faterdom 2 February 2021 21: 20
    +3
    "Sed Lex - stupid Lex!"
  • Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 2 February 2021 21: 21
    +16
    Expected! Didn't doubt it. Well, now, thoughtfully and slowly - an investigation into the following cases ... Failure to pay taxes in especially large ones, and then treason ... 8 years of strict minimum. Lesha will be hiccuped with poisoning ... will not have time to spend 30 pieces of silver.
    The appeal ... Well, let them serve.
    1. Vasilenko Vladimir
      Vasilenko Vladimir 2 February 2021 21: 24
      +4
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Non-payment of taxes in especially large

      the surest and easiest way, and most importantly, it is carried out once
  • Vladyka Ecumenical
    Vladyka Ecumenical 2 February 2021 21: 22
    +7
    It will not be enough
    1. aleks neym_2
      aleks neym_2 2 February 2021 21: 31
      +1
      I support, and whoever put a minus - let him sit with him ...
  • Prisoner
    Prisoner 2 February 2021 21: 24
    +17
    3,5 years, of course, is worse than 10 years, but better than conditional. winked
  • Tank jacket
    Tank jacket 2 February 2021 21: 25
    +1
    And then ... "He had a year, three for the escape, five for the kindergarten. Go, go, Vasya" (c) bully
    Prophetic words ... He ran, used children at unauthorized rallies.
    Now he will have a rattle on a quiche- Vasily Alibabaevich wassat
  • Falx
    Falx 2 February 2021 21: 25
    +4
    Justice in action!
  • maxxavto
    maxxavto 2 February 2021 21: 25
    +6
    the most important thing is that he will not be able to be elected anywhere now !!!
    1. Vasilenko Vladimir
      Vasilenko Vladimir 2 February 2021 21: 30
      -2
      Quote: maxxavto
      he cannot now be elected anywhere !!!

      will be able either upon departure or after 10 years if he is sitting for a serious crime, this is in the Duma, for the presidency, about the same if nothing has been changed
      1. Hunter 2
        Hunter 2 2 February 2021 21: 33
        +10
        FZ)
        5.2. A citizen of the Russian Federation does not have the right to be elected President of the Russian Federation:
        1) convicted to imprisonment for a grave and (or) especially grave crime and having an unexpunged and outstanding conviction for the specified crime on the day of voting;
        1.1) sentenced to imprisonment for a serious crime, the criminal record of which is withdrawn or canceled, - until the expiration of 10 years from the date of withdrawal or cancellation of the criminal record;
        (Clauses. 1.1 is introduced by Federal law from 21.02.2014 N 19-ФЗ)
        1.2) convicted to imprisonment for a particularly serious crime, the criminal record of which has been withdrawn or extinguished - until the expiration of 15 years from the date of withdrawal or cancellation of the criminal record;
        (Clauses. 1.2 is introduced by Federal law from 21.02.2014 N 19-ФЗ)
        2) convicted of an extremist crime stipulated by the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and having an unexpunged and outstanding conviction for the crime on the day of voting, if this citizen of the Russian Federation is not affected by subparagraphs 1.1 and 1.2 of this paragraph;
        (in the edition of the Federal Law from 21.02.2014 N 19-FZ)
        (see the text in the previous wording)
        Can't do it anymore! yes
        1. Hunter 2
          Hunter 2 2 February 2021 21: 44
          +5
          the legislator establishes restrictions for election to the State Duma in relation to: - persons sentenced to imprisonment for committing a grave and (or) especially grave crime and having an unexpunged and outstanding conviction for such a crime on election day; - persons convicted of committing an extremist crime under the Criminal Code and having an unexpunged and outstanding conviction for such a crime on election day. The Criminal Code considers acts under Art. 214 (vandalism); Art. 243 (destruction or damage to historical and cultural monuments); Art. 244 (desecration of the bodies of the dead and the places of their burial); Art. 280 (public appeals to carry out extremist activities); Art. 282 (incitement to hatred or enmity, as well as humiliation of human dignity), etc.; - persons subject to administrative punishment for committing an offense under Article 20.3 of the Administrative Code, i.e. for propaganda and public display of Nazi paraphernalia or symbols, or paraphernalia or symbols similar to Nazi paraphernalia or symbols to the point of confusion, if the vote in the elections takes place before the end of the period during which the person is considered to be punished; - persons in respect of whom, by a court decision that has entered into force, it has been established that no more than four years before voting day the fact of violation of the restrictions provided for by the Law on Basic Guarantees (clause 1 of article 56, subsection "g", clause 7 and subsection "g") Clause 8, Article 76). This, in particular, is the presence in election programs, other campaign materials, speeches of candidates and their proxies, representatives and proxies of electoral associations, citizens at public events, in the media, calls to commit extremist actions. In accordance with Art. 1 of the Federal Law of 25.07.2002 N 114-FZ "On Countering Extremist Activities" (as amended on 29.04.2008), such actions include a whole range of acts aimed at violating the foundations of the life of Russian society and the constitutional rights of citizens: forcible change of the foundations of constitutional building and violation of the integrity of the Russian Federation; undermining the security of the Russian Federation; carrying out terrorist activities or publicly justifying terrorism; incitement to racial, national or religious hatred, as well as social hatred associated with violence or calls for violence; humiliation of national dignity; carrying out mass riots, hooligan actions and acts of vandalism based on ideological, political, racial, national or religious hatred or enmity, as well as based on hatred or enmity against any social group; other violent acts;
          That's it, the elections are closed for him! What pleases me personally!
        2. kit88
          kit88 2 February 2021 22: 04
          +12
          Quote: Hunter 2
          A citizen of the Russian Federation does not have the right to be elected President of the Russian Federation:
          1) sentenced to imprisonment for committing a grave and (or) especially grave crime ...

          Alexey, with all due respect, everything you have written can be rolled up and sent to the Basket.
          Let me explain. Your entire text concerns those convicted under the Grave and Especially Grave Articles.
          At Navalny:
          - parts 2 and 3 of article 159.4 - invalidated - (up to 3 years - article of small gravity)
          - part 2 of article 174.1 (up to 2 years - article of small severity)
          Navalny was NOT convicted on a grave and especially grave article.
          PS / But the trouble is the beginning! Everything suggests that he will have everything. Both heavy and especially heavy.
          laughing
          1. Hunter 2
            Hunter 2 2 February 2021 22: 21
            +5
            Actually, I understand perfectly well that before the change in the conditions for serving the sentence, Navalny was convicted. I, like the rest of the country, did not understand how it is generally possible to receive so many suspended sentences ... and even serve a sentence in this way. Being behind bars - the next conditional does not threaten him for sure ... and as I understand it, there are more than enough cases. wink
            1. kit88
              kit88 2 February 2021 22: 33
              +13
              Wai, Alexey, we get your paper back from the Basket.
              The patient still has his first conviction!
              And there - what a beauty - Part 4 of Art. 160 (up to 10 years - Heavy!) Yes, he is also an organizer under Part 3 of Art. 33.
              Then exactly, you are right, the client has arrived.
        3. tihonmarine
          tihonmarine 3 February 2021 00: 17
          0