Norwegian officer called Norway the site of a likely "military clash" between the US and Russia

A material was released in the Norwegian media, which talks about the likely consequences of an increase in the American military presence in this Scandinavian country. Lt. Col. Turmud Heyer, who is a lecturer at the Norwegian Armed Forces Academy, shares his views on this matter.

According to Lieutenant Colonel Heyer, it is Norway with such a development of events that as a result can become the site of a direct armed clash between the United States of America and Russia. Heyer notes that due to the growing tensions over the development of the Arctic, Norway may eventually turn into a real battlefield between the superpowers.

A teacher at the Norwegian military academy emphasizes that Norway, being a NATO country bordering on Russia, has recently been increasingly involved in the confrontation between Washington and Moscow. Because of this, the degree of risk for Oslo itself grows.

Heyer:

It is also necessary to understand that it is Norway of all NATO countries that is closest to the large Russian nuclear arsenal in the north.

According to the Norwegian officer and teacher, today Russia and the United States have embarked on a new Cold War against each other. And if Norway does not take a more pragmatic position, then for Oslo, as Heyer notes, this could lead to extremely negative consequences.

Comments

[Putnik119]

And the Rwandan sergeant called Rwanda the site of a likely collision between Russia and the United States.

[Finches]

Three Baltic dwarfs, Poland, Ukraine, Georgia ... now Norway - they will probably have to draw lots to see who will become the first radioactive ash!

[Lipchanin]

Quote: Finches

Three Baltic dwarfs, Poland, Ukraine, Georgia ... now Norway

And everyone between the lines, "Give me money, we are protecting you all from the Russians"

[zadorin1974]

Kind Sergei. You confuse rats (the first six listed are incomplete) with financially independent Scandinavians. No Scandinavian country has money problems. The Norwegians are worried that when the Arctic shelf is divided, the allies will leave them less. So they are trying to get more out of our pie (naive At the same time, everyone, they pretty decently flew to the producers of seafood and timber processing. That's from here and timid attempts to settle the situation, something like this, when the bottom can not, and the top is not at all possible))))))

[Lipchanin]

Quote: zadorin1974

Kind Sergey.

Good Alex

No Scandinavian country has money problems.

Actually, I had money in the military budget.
It always seems to the warriors that they are not given enough money
As for the rest, I completely agree with myself.

[zadorin1974]

Yes, in general, even the warriors with a budget are doing well. For the Scandinavians, everything is a little simpler and at the same time everything is more complicated. There, basically, historical grievances intersect with economic pragmatism. As a result, we get a political vinaigrette at the end)))).

[Lipchanin]

Quote: zadorin1974

Yes, in general, the warriors with a budget are doing well.

There is never a lot of money)

As a result, we get a political vinaigrette at the output)))).

Like everyone else in here

[boris epstein]

And what historical grievances can Norway have against the USSR and Russia? Norway itself appeared on the maps of the world in the 60s of the 19th century. It did not fight against the Russian Empire or the USSR. But she flew in from Nazi Germany and smashed the German troops in Norway with the Red Army. And after the 2nd World USSR, and then Russia did not show aggression towards Norway. Spitsbergen was used together. Arctic? So the territory of the Russian Federation in the North does not go beyond the borders of the former USSR. And the Northern Fleet was created not against Norway, but against the NATO fleet. Conclusion, do not be bullied, but you won’t be beat back. And economic issues can always be resolved at the negotiating table, if one of the parties does not go too far with the wishlist.

[seregatara1969]

What you had to drink or eat to guess about it. Mattress stripes do not fight on their territory. And they do not regret a European trifle

[NDR-791]

Norway, as a NATO country bordering on Russia, has recently been increasingly involved in the confrontation between Washington and Moscow. Because of this, the degree of risk for Oslo itself grows.
How did the guys want? And eat a fish and not run into a bolt? Nah, that doesn't happen. Get in natu, paddle trouble with a shovel

[IL-18]

I don’t know about Poland and Norway, but in the former Soviet republics it’s enough to work in enclaves with national zombified populations such as Galicia or Mingrelia. Although, my experience with the Balts is surprisingly positive, and zapadentsamt, by the way. Maybe headquarters right away? Washington, London, Bonn, Brussels, etc. It will be good for the health of the same Norwegians, fears will cease to haunt.

[Private-K]

Quote: Finches

Three Baltic dwarfs, Poland, Ukraine, Georgia ... now Norway

Poland is not a dwarf at all, but the owner of the most efficient (and rather large) land army in NATO (after the USA, of course). And they have been pumping up the Polish Armed Forces for a long time, purposefully and thoroughly - a lot of financial assistance and favorable treatment. Although, this does not at all guarantee that the Polish Poles will want to wage an offensive war with the Russian Federation - despite the serious psychological pumping from the authorities.

[Lipchanin]

Quote: Putnik119

A Rwandan sergeant called Rwanda the site of a likely clash between Russia and the United States

But he was not heard

[Profiler]

Quote: Putnik119

And the Rwandan sergeant called Rwanda the site of a likely collision between Russia and the United States.

In Rwanda, of course, it is warmer than in Norway, but the snag is that Africa is far away, and Norway, as a powerful base and a likely bridgehead for the United States and NATO in general, is nearby.

Of course, the Norwegian somewhat exaggerates the threat to Norway from our side, giving it the place of a "battlefield" between us and the United States, but who knows what the irresponsible policy of the Scandinavian country can lead to?

[Ka-52]

And if Norway does not take a more pragmatic position, then for Oslo, as Heyer notes, this could lead to extremely negative consequences.

Join NATO (why is it a country for which the threat of external invasion is minimal), then allow the US Armed Forces into its territory, and then suddenly worry that the country may turn into a rock melted by a nuclear fire. Is it like "first we do, and then we think"? For some reason I thought that it was only our, national trait

[Vladimir_2U]

Quote: Ka-52

as Heyer notes, it can lead to extremely negative consequences.

It is a pity that it was not the aforementioned Heyer who made the decision to join Norway or not.

[Sidor Amenpodestovich]

Quote: Vladimir_2U

It is a pity that it was not the aforementioned Heyer who made the decision to join Norway or not.

Most likely, this decision was made in the United States, and Norway was simply presented with a fact.
- You are joining NATO.
- Are we joining NATO?
- Yes, you are joining NATO. Sign here ... And here will be our military base.
- Your military base?
- Yes. And sign here too.

[Herman 4223]

This is hardly a national trait. The country first fell into the occupation of Germany, then they were replaced by the Anglo-American troops. There can be no national authority in an occupied territory. The power there is initially a puppet, and acts in the interests of the occupiers.

[Uncle lee]

Choi, this NATO member knows and is afraid ...

[bad]

Quote from Uncle Lee

Choi, this NATO member knows and is afraid.

Yes, just "The Navel of the Earth" depicts

[Dodikson]

Well, if the Norwegians themselves wanted to become a battlefield, then what right do we have to forbid them to do so?
Well, they want, so they will.

[Lipchanin]

Quote: Dodikson

Well, they want, so they will.

In fact, no one will ask them

[rocket757]

Norwegian officer called Norway the site of a likely "military clash" between the US and Russia

And no-Che so that we have NOTHING AT ALL there and NEVER, it was not necessary ... and even now, nothing more!
"bamboo" needs to be smoked less, maybe then the toaddlers won't visit!

[Sentinel-vs]

We only need PEACE !!!
... preferably all!

[Lipchanin]

Quote: rocket757

"bamboo" needs to be smoked less, maybe then the toaddlers won't visit!

And the easiest way is to remove the amers' bases and then it will definitely not torment nightmares at night

[rocket757]

Quote: Lipchanin

And the easiest way is to remove the amers' bases and then it will definitely not torment nightmares at night

No, no, "big brother" will be offended, but it is fraught!

[Lipchanin]

Quote: rocket757

No, no, "big brother" will be offended, but it is fraught!

Then let them not whine and then do not complain about fate

[Egoza]

Quote: rocket757

"bamboo" you need to smoke less, maybe then they will not visit the latrine

Yes, he did not smoke! I drank a little and then sang ...
"Pour! Let's drink, by God, more.
Betsy, we grog a glass
The last one on the road.
A slacker who doesn't drink with us.
Pour full glasses!
Who's lying that we, brother, are drunk?
We are only a little merry.
Well, who is lying so shamelessly "?
What? Are the Scots singing? Well then, let's sing about the threat from the Russians ...

[rocket757]

There already dopevatsya is not particularly required and so there are enough psychos.

[rotmistr60]

Norway, as a NATO country bordering on Russia, has recently been increasingly involved in the confrontation between Washington and Moscow

The question immediately arises - who is to blame for this? The teacher's offer to take Norway to a more pragmatic position in relation to Russia and involvement in NATO is reasonable. But the situation does not depend on teachers, but on politicians. Recently, there has been a tendency for small countries to shout loudly what they will get from Russia in the first place. It's one thing when it sounds with the aim of establishing normal relations with Russia (which is extremely rare), and another for the purpose of receiving money from the United States and deploying its troops on its territory (Poland, the Baltic states and fussy Ukraine).

[Pessimist22]

So it seems that the spies have identified where the first blow will be made, for Courland, or has the General Staff changed plans?

[From Tomsk]

This teacher of the Norwegian Armed Forces Academy, Lieutenant Colonel Turmud Heyer, was thinking about how to transfer data on the deployment of American strategic bombers B-1B Lancer at the Erland base and decided to publish his opinion as an analytical review.
And voila! The information went as intended))))

[Moonsund]

And you live by the rules of normal good neighborliness, behave appropriately, and do not drag a mountain of tanks and missiles to the Russian borders. And continue to eat your stinking herring in lye, pump the remaining oil and play hockey. You don't care.

[zwlad]

What sick fantasies this colonel has.

[Radius]

Why shouldn't any dwarf sergeants advise their governments not to place Americans on their territory? In order to avoid, so to speak ...

[Pavel73]

This is the voice of reason. Alas, he will not be heard. Few people realize that the US and its NATO are not defending Europe. For everything is exactly the opposite - Europe is a human shield for the United States.

[Ros 56]

How impatient they all can be to attract the attention of the striped ones, what is this, what is the chew-blakit utyrk and others. And they will not take it into their heads that only coals may remain from their houses and their relatives. Impenetrable dumb.

[prior]

"Norwegian officer called Norway the site of a likely "military clash" between the US and Russia"

Well, how else to raise the importance of unnecessary Norway in the holes of the whole world.
I fell under the Germans myself, and I don't remember anymore that someone wanted to conquer Norway.

[voyaka uh]

Norway will have 50 F-35 fighters in a few years.
To counter them, Russia needs to have at least the Su-57 squadron in the north.

[Fitter65]

Quote: voyaka uh

Norway will have 50 F-35 fighters in a few years.
To counter them, Russia needs to have at least the Su-57 squadron in the north.

Well, there will be that, about the same conversations were when Norway began to arm with F-16s. Moreover, in this region we have normal specialists who do not fly themselves and do not give others ...

[Sands Careers General]

Quote: voyaka uh

Norway will have 50 F-35 fighters in a few years.
To counter them, Russia needs to have at least the Su-57 squadron in the north.

The balance of power is interesting, i.e. squadron of Su-57, 12 vehicles, worth 50 fu-35?
Even without taking into account the amount of equipment in the border area with Norway?

[voyaka uh]

I have named a rough minimum for primary containment.
Norwegians, of course, will never throw all their air forces into battle
Simultaneously.

[Fitter65]

According to Lieutenant Colonel Heyer, it is Norway with such a development of events that as a result can become the site of a direct armed clash between the United States of America and Russia.

This is arrogance. In fact, Poland was the first to stake out its territory as a theater of operations for the United States and the Russian Federation.

[Sands Careers General]

One gets the feeling that the norgi themselves want it. Wars on their own territory. After all, for so long they had nothing.

[Ax Matt]

Stuff themselves with cheap glasses. PR. It's time to understand: there will be no clash between "America and Russia" somewhere ... on a third territory. And then they took the fashion to vying with each other to offer themselves as a sacred cow: no, this will start a war here, we will not ... (like, give money, weapons for free and strengthen). If a mess begins, then everything will be tough and immediately. No one will wait and smear snot on someone's fjords or alps ...

[boris epstein]

"And if Norway doesn't take a more pragmatic stance,"
There is only one option - exit from NATO.

[Reserve buildbat]

The subfloor is right. It is not profitable for Norgs to bark at Russia. In case of a mess, they will be slammed without looking. So they should listen to the words of this underground. The point in the statement is that the mattress pushes the Norgs into a conflict with Russia, in which no matter who wins, the Norgam is a northern animal.