The emergence of a rocket and space propulsion holding in Russia is approaching

104
The emergence of a rocket and space propulsion holding in Russia is approaching

The emergence of a single holding is approaching, which will include enterprises of the rocket and space industry specializing in engine building. Thus, soon the leading enterprises creating rocket engines will become parts of a single structure.

This was stated by Igor Arbuzov, general director of the Energomash research and production association, which is part of the Roscosmos state corporation, in an interview published on the corporation's official website.



He said that there was only one step left before the emergence of a rocket and space engine building holding in Russia. This step should be the transfer of shares of the design bureau of chemical engineering named after A. M. Isaev to the trust management of NPO Energomash, which should take place within the next few months.

Immediately after this happens, all the leading rocket-building enterprises in Russia working on the creation of engines will be united into a single structure.

NPO Energomash will become the parent enterprise of the newly formed holding. This research and production association is considered one of the world's largest enterprises for the production of liquid-propellant engines for launch vehicles for the space industry. At the same time, despite the sanctions, it continues to supply the United States with the RD-180 and RD-181 rocket engines, and this is far from the only area of ​​activity of NPO Energomash.
104 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +16
    31 January 2021 13: 26
    Whose child has come of age? Well, what would take the post of general manager.
    1. +10
      31 January 2021 13: 36
      Everything. We decided to finally bury the industry. The United States and China are two corps ahead, Europe, India, Japan are already comparable to us, South Korea is on the verge of entering an elite club, Turkey is just about, Israel is going its own way as usual.
      The USSR understood that without COMPETITION impossible leadership. For each project there were at least 2-3 performers, each order was pulled out by the teeth. We now have completely monopolies that needlessly hit a finger to get a contract.
      1. -13
        31 January 2021 13: 56
        Well, nonsense)))

        All of the above countries are at least 30 years behind us, have not yet achieved what the Soviet Union achieved by the 80s)))
        What can they boast about?
        1. +5
          31 January 2021 14: 10
          Quote: Lord of the Sith
          reached the Soviet Union by the 80s

          And when will Russia reach what the USSR was in the 80s? When will it catch up in the number of launches? When will there be a space station? When will reusable ships be realized? When will we return to deep space?
          Of course, he is proud of the successes of a country that does not exist. We are Russia, not the USSR. I'm more interested in what will happen in 5 years, and not what it was 30 years ago.

          Statistics for 1988. There are 94 launches, 52 weeks in a year.
        2. -1
          31 January 2021 14: 12
          Some can already boast of reusable carriers with engines of their own design.
          1. -11
            31 January 2021 14: 17
            Yeah, and a huge, expensive pussy, which immediately explodes at the start, and in the development of which billions have been added)))
            Here are their developments))
            And try to argue that this is not so, only with facts and evidence.
            What have they achieved that we did not achieve many years ago?
            1. +3
              31 January 2021 14: 38
              Quote: Lord of the Sith
              Yeah, and a huge, expensive pussy


              Do you have complexes about this? See a psychoanalyst.
              1. -5
                31 January 2021 14: 48
                The chocolate howling eye may have complexes, but not tactical or strategic, but dibilistic)))

                Which is not able to distinguish psychoanalysis from psychiatry and from psychology)))

                In short, Sklifosofsky. You are wrong, and I will communicate with you only exclusively on the topic.

                Anything to say about the space industry of planet Earth? With numbers, analytics sampled by year for the next 40 years?
                Here he gave the task. Forward and with the song)))
                1. +1
                  31 January 2021 14: 50
                  Quote: Lord of the Sith
                  In short, Sklifosofsky. You are wrong, and I will communicate with you only exclusively on the topic.


                  It's good that you took the pills.

                  Quote: Lord of the Sith
                  Anything to say about the space industry of planet Earth?


                  Yes. Everything is in order with her, it is developing at an unprecedented pace.
                  1. -5
                    31 January 2021 15: 28
                    It's good that you took the pills.

                    My topic is not pills, but space.

                    And you slept out of the blue, that a drug addict, and you sit on wheels))

                    What, nothing to say? So why be smart? Of course, I understand that they are teasing you in the fool, and they feed you with pills so that you fly into space like Gagarin, but without a launch vehicle and a spacesuit.

                    Tell me the facts, analysis and statistics for all countries, what you know about space over the past 40 years.
                    Then let's talk.
                2. 0
                  31 January 2021 22: 25
                  one clarification - not about 10 pieces of 100VI each
                  AND ABOUT ADVANCED DEVELOPMENTS IN THE SPACE INDUSTRIES - THEY WERE GROWED IN INCUBATORS FOR 40 YEARS, BEFORE THE COLLAPSE OF THE USSR, FOR TRANSFER TO THE DR.
                  the technical level of janitors and locksmiths-toolmakers and assemblers and teachers and train drivers of locomotives was increased centrally to increase the general level, in the middle of culture, the transfer was interrupted. the castes have withdrawn into themselves. corporations that can do their own thing. what is not, they buy over the hill. and the level of production relations in the country is not growing - they keep their shells on the market, however.
        3. +4
          31 January 2021 15: 31
          "Ivan Vasilievich, sometimes when you speak, I have the impression that you are delusional."
      2. +10
        31 January 2021 14: 02
        It takes brains to build engines. Stupidly changing signs is incomparably easier.
      3. +6
        31 January 2021 14: 03
        The word "optimization" is omitted in the article, after which another achievement of the USSR ceases to function.
      4. -6
        31 January 2021 14: 07
        Who is this who competed in rocket engines in the USSR?))) What are two or three performers?))
        1. +10
          31 January 2021 14: 52
          Who is this who competed in rocket engines in the USSR?))) What are two or three performers?))

          Khimki, Voronezh, Drepropetrovsk.
          Glushko, Gorokhov, Yangel.
      5. +2
        31 January 2021 14: 24
        It looks like it. The industry is buried.
        This is a very wrong decision.
        The example with Roskosmos teaches nothing. They created a monster and thought that the situation could be improved by shifting money from one pocket to another.
        As a result, the residents of Samara found themselves even under their own sanctions, and TsiKh, as it was in flight, is still sitting there.
        In China and the United States, the process is exactly the opposite.
      6. -4
        31 January 2021 14: 26
        Oh) Do you have a head? Or do we think only in slogans?
      7. -5
        31 January 2021 15: 23
        Because before the people could not even buy toilet paper while multiple design bureaus competed for the state. score. Why don't you mention this? Maybe today for Russia the correct and most productive way is to unite, you don't know for sure, but only reproduce your fears
        1. -8
          31 January 2021 15: 40
          The problem is not that a merger of several enterprises is coming (moreover, successful and unprofitable productions will again heap and pull out one heap at the expense of others) into one structure.
          The problem is that this structure is STATE.
          That says it all. This is a sentence. Put it on the shelves, why?
          1. 0
            31 January 2021 19: 50
            Quote: Cosm22
            The problem is that this structure is STATE.
            That says it all. This is a sentence. Put it on the shelves, why?
            This is not a sentence. This is the hope for development. For when the market decides, then often he decides not very well. The privatization of the 90s proved to be ineffective. Therefore, Putin took up nationalization. Explanatory video on the topic:
        2. +2
          31 January 2021 16: 54
          Quote: Cool but not Igor
          Because before the people could not even buy toilet paper while multiple design bureaus competed for the state. score.

          Exactly. Killing KB for toilet paper is the essence of capitalism in today's Russia.
          Someone gets rolls of dollar paper for the implementation of this path. hi
      8. +3
        31 January 2021 15: 34
        And who prevents you from competing within the holding?
        Sincerely
        1. -11
          31 January 2021 15: 53
          Competition within the state structure is completely ruled out.
          Structural subdivisions will bend only the "general line" of the holding and carry out the orders of the "party and government". Under the strictest control and with strict accountability.
          An analogue of BE-4 or Raptor will never appear in such a structure. Or a decent hydrogen generator, until there is permission from above.
          For the factories included in the holding are in fact deprived of their independence. Who will allow you to do something else, not prescribed in the charter, to invent something at your own peril and risk, i.e. squander public funds?
          1. +5
            31 January 2021 16: 01
            You write something like that .... interesting
            Who will allow you to do something else that is not prescribed in the charter

            You open the charter of any modern joint-stock company - and you will be very surprised. There you can also find "the organization of gambling activities" ... So it is difficult to catch a plant in illegal activities. And any modern plant has long been overgrown with a network of small ooos, affiliated with the management.
            An analogue of BE-4 or Raptor will never appear in such a structure. Or a decent hydrogen generator

            Have you heard about the Energia launch vehicle?
            Structural subdivisions will bend only the "general line" of the holding and carry out the orders of the "party and government". Under the strictest control and with strict accountability.

            Do you understand anything in RAS? Nobody will transfer JSC as part of the holding to the budgetary chart of accounts with "strict reporting". All JSC reporting is spelled out in the law.
            Sincerely
            1. -6
              31 January 2021 16: 16
              I see that you have not grasped my train of thought at all. Yes, I put it figuratively. But this is for brevity.
              The main message is that the state structure will never overcome a private trader in a particular area.
              I have already cited an analogy: in 2015, a monster is being created in Russia - Roscosmos. Tasks? Everything! Open Wiki:
              "The main activities of the corporation are: manned astronautics, planetary exploration, the study of the sun, astrophysics and the creation of artificial earth satellites. One of the important directions of the corporation is the development of tourism, both on earth and in space."
              A sort of Shvets, and a reaper, and a gamer on the pipe. Handyman. Putting all the space stuff in his pocket.
              At almost the same time, a diametrically opposite process was launched in the United States. In 2010, Obama signed a program to create commercial manned spacecraft for the ISS, although the COTS program was announced back in 2006. At the same time, Obama, on the recommendations of the Augustine Commission, decides to give the low orbit at the mercy of private companies. This decision changed the algorithm of NASA's work, but it opened up the broadest prospects for private traders. They had an incentive because all the technology they created was now their property.
              It was from that moment on that RK lost to Musk, a little-known private trader already then. Why?
              Because the work of a state-owned company will NEVER be as effective as the work of a startup.
              The state-owned company is fed from the state budget. By and large, she doesn't give a damn about the final result or the specific time frame. This, incidentally, applies not only to Roscosmos, but absolutely to the same extent for NASA. Regardless of the concrete results, these state-owned companies will still receive money. Well, they'll chide a little, scold. Funding will be slightly cut in the worst case scenario. That's all. Sometimes it even turns out to earn extra money on the side, for example, to sell engines or to be engaged in transportation to the ISS, getting lemons of greenery. It is a pity that such a golden time was too short.
              A startup is a different matter. It has only two outcomes: either to take off quickly, become a successful company, or quickly go bankrupt and go bankrupt. The third is not given, he does not feed from the state trough. Every cent for development and production comes from its own pocket. Therefore, the staff is recruited according to a different principle. And technologies are developed only the most modern, giving the maximum return in a short time. And the attitude to work there is different, and the requirements are higher.
              How do you order the Republic of Kazakhstan to compete with the same Mask under the same conditions? If only with SpaceX ...
              There is also Rocket Lab ... Blue Origin ... Orbital ATK ... Virgin Orbit ... But there are also French, Japanese, Chinese private traders ... And everyone is eager for LEO. So it will be necessary to close space in near space only within the country.
              As for deep space, the ROK is simply pointless to compete there with NASA (and with China). It is trite because of the disparate budgets. Now, plus the sanctions are dragging down.
              The picture will be absolutely similar here. Once again: no one will ever allow independent development. Moreover, such developments will only be prosecuted. Such a monster is just an excuse to knock out more money for yourself. People are tormented by endless approvals, permits, regulations, meetings ... Where can you think about engines ... Is it a startup or a simple plant - what's the difference? ..
              1. 0
                31 January 2021 16: 23
                Because the work of a state-owned company will NEVER be as effective as the work of a startup.

                Have you ever studied economics? What is a "startup" and do you know why you need it? Does the word "securitization" mean anything to you? Have you heard about perpetual funds? It is these very funds with their derivatives that do not allow the "startup" to "quickly" go bankrupt ...
                And Volkswagen has never been state-owned?
                You were not told about the Mitsui family at the lectures?
                Sincerely
                1. -4
                  31 January 2021 16: 44
                  Let's not drag out the song about the money of the State Department, NASA, Pentagon and other crap. This is not for me. This is to a different audience.
                  But even if we assume that some NASA there financed the Spaces 100%, what difference does that make?
                  What?
                  The United States has chosen the absolutely correct tactic of downsizing in the space field. Part of the tasks is assigned to NASA, part - to other (including private) companies. No one there drags the entire blanket over, no one knocks all the factories into one heap in the naive hope that this will immediately solve all the problems. Will not decide. It will only make it worse.
                  On the example of the Samarans, this is perfectly visible.
                  It is incomprehensible to the mind - an enterprise, due to which Russia only keeps on the third place in launches, because only the Unions fly, not only US sanctions, but also the sanctions of Roscosmos are spreading rot.
                  The overall result of the policy pursued in the United States and in Russia is known - the lone Musk has long ago laid the mighty state-owned Roscosmos on its shoulder.
                  1. 0
                    31 January 2021 19: 44
                    Find in my comments the words "State Department", "Nasa" ... Did it work?
                    The United States has chosen the absolutely correct tactics of downsizing in the space field.

                    How did you miss Goldman Sachs, a specialist like you ?! You would have developed such a business model for them! As soon as they graduate from school ...
                    Sincerely
                    1. 0
                      31 January 2021 23: 04
                      Quote: nobody75
                      How did you miss a specialist like Goldman Sachs ?!

                      good
                2. 0
                  31 January 2021 22: 34
                  maybe everything is simpler - the "KGB" bent "independent developers" - "under strict control" and not a step to the side. leakage of "stupid ideas not to allow more to the West-East. Let them build hypersound. Military discipline. Not for a leap forward - to preserve their ideas in the country."

                  and Mars is to Efremov and Solaris and SL.
                  the prose of life is to stop dreaming "while space ships are sailing" and build the needs of the future ...
              2. +1
                1 February 2021 10: 26
                Moreover, such developments will only be prosecuted.

                Processes are already underway.
                "Scientists received sentences for transferring Russian technologies to China."

                “The court found that after leaving UEC-Saturn, Vinogradov pledged to create a full precision casting process in the interests of the Chinese institute. At the same time, he knew that the parts of interest to the Chinese side were used in the creation of weapons, military equipment and delivery vehicles for weapons of mass destruction. Subsequently, Vinogradov attracted Krasilnikov, who had recently resigned from the plant, as an accomplice. "
        2. -3
          31 January 2021 16: 10
          Quote: nobody75
          And who prevents you from competing within the holding?


          Why does the holding's management need it?
          1. +1
            31 January 2021 16: 13
            To reduce the cash flow discount when determining the value of assets.
            In the management of the holding "finonsists" sit.
            Sincerely
            1. -1
              31 January 2021 16: 13
              Your answer is a meaningless collection of words.
              1. +2
                31 January 2021 16: 17
                I wrote to you in Russian above! If there is no competition within the holding, its shares are priced at a discount. And shares are the subject of collateral when receiving a loan. No funding - no government order. It's a shame, young man, not to know basic things ...
                Sincerely
                1. -3
                  31 January 2021 16: 18
                  About "there is no state order" you have done funny. Burn some more.
                  1. 0
                    31 January 2021 19: 45
                    Finish school and read about the discounted cash flow method ...
                    Sincerely
                    1. -2
                      31 January 2021 19: 48
                      To do this, you need to graduate from the physics department of Moscow State University, no less.
                      1. +1
                        31 January 2021 19: 50
                        What does this have to do with the way of assessing the business and the value of shares?
                        Sincerely
                      2. -3
                        31 January 2021 19: 51
                        Well, you need it.
                      3. +1
                        31 January 2021 19: 52
                        Didn't you confuse me with anyone? Are you not interested in holdings?
                        Sincerely
        3. -1
          31 January 2021 16: 51
          The fact that one of the engine manufacturers was put in charge of the holding. An independent management structure has not been created. Thus, he will simply stifle all not his own development.
          1. 0
            31 January 2021 19: 45
            For what reason? They are now his ...
            Sincerely
            1. -2
              1 February 2021 03: 24
              Quote: nobody75
              For what reason? They are now his ...
              Sincerely


              Apparently, some at the forum will be better if Russia sprays its not so large budgetary funds into a certain amount of engines that are not needed by anyone, but competing with each other, as it was before. laughing But no, it will not work - the number of promising launch vehicles for the next decade is known and what engines will be on them too.
              1. -2
                1 February 2021 08: 26
                No, they should have been fighting for a shrinking market in a competitive struggle, and not just the state will appoint the winner's fovarite
                1. -1
                  1 February 2021 10: 32
                  Quote: BlackMokona
                  No, they should have been fighting for a shrinking market in a competitive struggle, and not just the state will appoint the winner's fovarite


                  Enough fighting and fighting laughing ... Each company has competencies in certain issues and everyone will do what they do best. This is what they will use. And they are even already using it - NPO Energomash creates RD-171MV and RD-180MV, KBKhA - RD-0124MS, and methane RD-0177, RD-0169, Proton-PM - is switching to serial RD-191 and plans to start production of RD-191M. Everything is in business.
                  1. -2
                    1 February 2021 10: 44
                    Well, now there are no battles and battles, the winner and the losers are appointed in the political games. Whoever licked better than F is the winner.
                    1. -1
                      1 February 2021 12: 15
                      Quote: BlackMokona
                      Now, now there are no fights and battles, the winner and the losers.


                      there are no winners or losers - everyone wins here and that's good. New media coming soon. I understand - it's not profitable for you, but somehow you are. laughing
            2. -1
              1 February 2021 08: 25
              Because there will not be enough orders for all enterprises. The Americans jumped off the ship, and ours cut space spending year after year.
              Also, the Holding is not a single corporation, thus other enterprises are still other enterprises with their own bosses, budget, and so on.
              Only decisions are now made by their competitor when communicating with the outside world
      9. +3
        31 January 2021 15: 54
        Quote: OgnennyiKotik
        In the USSR, they understood that leadership is impossible without COMPETITION.

        What kind of competition was there in the USSR? The scientific base was scattered, each enterprise came up with its own technologies and did the same thing, but with multiple cost overruns.

        You have to compete with world manufacturers and your developments must be immediately extended to all Russian design bureaus and production facilities - that's why they are united into a holding.
        1. -3
          31 January 2021 16: 08
          Quote: Genry
          You have to compete with global manufacturers


          Compete in the global rocket engine market? Does he exist? smile
      10. +3
        31 January 2021 17: 06
        You contradict yourself. In the USSR, all enterprises of one industry were part of one ministry. That did not exclude competition.
        Competition is now provided by foreign enterprises, you actually wrote about this. Only something she does not help yet. Why is competition within the country better than with foreigners? But the fact that the work is constantly underfunded is a real problem. Only frostbitten liberals do not speak about this.
        The devil, as always, is in the details. It all depends on how everything will be arranged within the corporation. The goal of unification is important. If for the consolidation of resources for development and production, then it is beneficial. If for cutting, then vice versa. I personally do not know this, therefore I consider the categorical statements biased.
        After all, the UEC was assembled for the same principle, but they have recently made us more or less happy. Cadres are everything.
      11. +3
        31 January 2021 17: 19
        Quote: OgnennyiKotik
        Everything. We decided to finally bury the industry.


        Meanwhile, NPO Energomash carried out firing tests of the RD-171 MV liquid-propellant rocket engine designed for the Soyuz-5 rocket. The test program was completed in full. The tests were carried out as usual.



        The firing tests of the RD-191 rocket engine developed and manufactured by NPO Energomash for the Russian Angara rocket were also successfully and fully carried out.

        Quote: OgnennyiKotik
        The USA and China are 2 corps ahead


        For engines - no.

        Quote: OgnennyiKotik
        Europe, India, Japan are already comparable to us


        Are they flying in their spaceships to the ISS? laughing

        Quote: OgnennyiKotik
        South Korea on the verge of entering an elite club


        For ten years she created her 66 ts engine for a domestic rocket. It would be better for all these 10 years to continue flying on our RD-191 with 200 ts.

        Quote: OgnennyiKotik
        Turkey is just about


        Nothing at all.

        Quote: OgnennyiKotik
        Israel as usual goes its own way.


        Jews fly very rarely laughing
      12. +1
        1 February 2021 15: 48
        The industry was buried a long time ago, there is only a cut of the dough!
    2. +4
      31 January 2021 13: 54
      Quote: sergo1914
      Whose child has come of age?

      It's time to get the grandchildren to work.
    3. -1
      31 January 2021 14: 38
      These talented children who, thanks to their talent, began to run large offices, are not so successful employees of these offices called eggs
  2. -3
    31 January 2021 13: 29
    And then they privatize, the assets are attractive.
    1. 0
      31 January 2021 15: 36
      Privatizing what? Holding shares or subsidiaries? The daughters have been corporatized for a long time and, apart from the state, nobody needs them, just like the holding's shares.
      Sincerely
  3. 0
    31 January 2021 13: 31
    Only the question is - is it for the good of the case, or was it more convenient to steal? And then the experience of the years of the triumph of feudo-capitalism still leads to some doubts ..
    1. +1
      31 January 2021 19: 59
      In terms of theft, not much will change. The main theft goes along the line of fictitious transactions with "their" firms and banks. Purely theoretically, due to the redistribution of profits between the daughters of the holding, something can be stolen, but in practice ... There are such bison in the counting chamber that they will put "smart beavers"
      Sincerely
  4. +7
    31 January 2021 13: 33
    A single superholding for the development and production of household goods is not expected?
    1. 0
      31 January 2021 20: 01
      Get Gref out of the WTO or buy a time machine and achieve the withdrawal of troops from Eastern Europe as unnecessary and the collapse of the CMEA. In both cases, the holding is formed by itself ...
      Sincerely
    2. 0
      31 January 2021 23: 10
      I would like to clarify - and which ones,
      Quote: evgen1221
      household goods
      ,
      do you, at the present time, miss so badly?
  5. -1
    31 January 2021 13: 39
    There will be no competitors ... This is both good and bad. It is important that there are good engines.
    1. +3
      31 January 2021 14: 05
      There will be competitors in the USA and China, maybe that's good.
  6. -1
    31 January 2021 13: 42
    Holding (from the English holding "holding, possession"), or a group of companies - a structure of commercial organizations, which includes a parent company and a number of smaller subsidiaries that it controls.
    In short, it's a pity, but the labor exchange is waiting for someone ...
    1. +5
      31 January 2021 15: 38
      In short, it's a pity, but who is waiting for the labor exchange

      Why would it suddenly ?!
      Any downsizing of staff leads only to their increase - the old managerial wisdom ...
      Sincerely
  7. 0
    31 January 2021 13: 43
    We urgently need to buy shares trampoline factory .. They will soon be worth their weight in gold ... bully
  8. -4
    31 January 2021 13: 49
    I noticed for a long time: after a news article mentioning Putin, the lion's share of comments on the next one consists of corruption by children, that everything is over, and that they are not doing that, but just to steal.
    This is not always the case, but quite often. It's very funny to watch this.
  9. -2
    31 January 2021 13: 59
    Earlier Enegomash worked on the development of the space of amers, and now the newly attached
  10. -1
    31 January 2021 14: 05
    The distribution of the names of such structures is interesting.
    The USA and England have a "holding"
    Germany has a "concern"
    France has a "partnership".
    Russia liked the Anglo-Saxon version - "holding" more.
    As they say, with whom you lead, from that you will become pregnant. crying
    1. +1
      31 January 2021 14: 11
      Or it's just a slightly different structure with certain differences) the form is chosen not for sound, but according to the principle of operation
    2. +3
      31 January 2021 14: 40
      These are different names for completely different organizational forms.
    3. +3
      31 January 2021 15: 26
      A holding is a corporation that does not have its own production assets, but owns shares in other companies. From English to hold - hold. This has nothing to do with the partnership - all members of a simple partnership are responsible for its activities. You should at least read something from civil law and joint-stock companies ...
      Sincerely
      1. -1
        31 January 2021 15: 40
        Quote: nobody75
        You should at least read something from civil law and joint-stock companies ...

        The Chukchi are not a reader, however. Unless, of course, this is about the catastrophic state of affairs with everything in general in Russia. He reads such things with pleasure and immediately believes everything without hesitation.
        1. +1
          31 January 2021 15: 43
          I agree that such an askort154 from without the help of "majors" will ruin any collective farm ...
          Sincerely
          1. -1
            31 January 2021 16: 04
            nobody75 I agree that such an askort154 from without the help of "majors" will ruin any collective farm ...

            "Sidoru" and you: Young, green. There is no concept of tact. I posed the question of why Russia chose exactly the option - "holding", and not the others listed, without going into their structural scheme of activities. It is necessary to delve into the essence of the text, and not fly by. So, your counterparts: "Chukchi-Mozhor", not from a great mind. Yes hi
            1. +2
              31 January 2021 16: 06
              I raised the question why Russia chose the option - "holding"

              For transfer pricing and consolidated reporting. Will this answer suit you? Briefly and to the point.
              Sincerely
  11. 0
    31 January 2021 14: 22
    And the merger of enterprises is happening here for what? That's right, to optimize later! When will they steal?
    1. +2
      31 January 2021 15: 32
      The merger of enterprises into a holding occurs for the following reasons
      1 Transfer pricing (to optimize VAT and income tax. From this year, income tax is considered the balance sheet method)
      2 The introduction of a unified system of consolidated management reporting (in other words, the great company 1c has finally finished the UX)
      Best regards
  12. +6
    31 January 2021 15: 44
    Everything. We decided to finally bury the industry. The USA and China are 2 corps ahead

    In a hat, the silly couches will be worn out)) They are so detached that in the 60s and 70s they sit according to Soviet technologies))
    In the USSR, they understood that leadership is impossible without COMPETITION.

    Well, of course, within the framework of one holding, competition is impossible? Even some))
    Like spiders in a jar. I personally know that I worked in a well-known holding.

    Europe, India, Japan are already comparable to us, South Korea is on the verge of entering an elite club

    What is this "elite club"? A club for tickling a point?
    Really far, you can't argue.

    We now have completely monopolies that needlessly hit a finger to get a contract.


    Yes, yes, yes, they are completely fuckers, imbeciles and necrocephalics, and do not want to make money, and do not want so much that the whole world is riding on the ISS on our Unions)))
    1. +3
      31 January 2021 17: 33
      Quote: Lord of the Sith
      In a hat, the fools will wear out the sofa))


      Not aware of the disease that 2020 LRE developed by NPO Energomash were used in the global launches of 95:

      RD-107A / 108A - 75 pcs,
      RD-276 - 6 pcs,
      RD-191 - 5 pcs,
      RD-180 - 5 pcs,
      RD-181 - 4 pcs.
      1. +6
        31 January 2021 17: 39
        That's it.
        But you can't explain this to couch online-lytics what a holding is, what are the pros and cons, they won't understand))
        And our cosmonautics is developing, so that they do not bellow there)))
        1. +4
          31 January 2021 17: 45
          Quote: Lord of the Sith
          And our cosmonautics is developing, so that they do not bellow there)))


          This year, the continuation of flight design tests of the "Angara" LV and the development of the RD-171MV engine as part of the "Soyuz-5" LV stage.

          And also launches of new spacecraft.

          1. 0
            31 January 2021 18: 01
            Yes. Start to be! good
      2. -3
        31 January 2021 21: 55
        Quote: slipped
        Not aware of the disease that 2020 LRE developed by NPO Energomash were used in the global launches of 95


        How many engines were used?
        1. 0
          1 February 2021 02: 32
          Quote: Eye of the Crying
          How many engines were used?


          In total, there were 2020 launches in 114. NPO Energomash's engines have successfully operated in 24 starts, which is 21,05% of global starts.
          1. -5
            1 February 2021 02: 35
            It's strange. At first you counted engines in pieces, but now you started counting starts. However, 21.05% is by no means a brilliant result for a leading space power.
            1. 0
              1 February 2021 02: 40
              Quote: Eye of the Crying
              It's strange. At first, you counted engines in pieces, but now you began to count starts.


              If you have to count one by one, you count. laughing I announced the number of starts with our engines.

              Quote: Eye of the Crying
              However, 21.05% is by no means a brilliant result for a leading space power.


              This is a normal result, given that foreign customers did not supply some of the payloads in 2020, postponing the delivery for this year for various reasons.
              1. -2
                1 February 2021 02: 46
                Quote: slipped
                If you have to count one by one, you count.


                You began to count the engines one by one. Then, however, for some reason they stopped.

                Quote: slipped
                Normal result,


                Not for a leader.
                1. 0
                  1 February 2021 02: 49
                  Quote: Eye of the Crying
                  You began to count the engines one by one. Then, however, for some reason they stopped.


                  Does this amount not allow you to eat calmly? lol Raise your head higher in your cap - an article about NPO Energomash, and they produce engines.

                  Quote: Eye of the Crying
                  Not for a leader.


                  We are in no hurry. laughing
                  1. -1
                    1 February 2021 09: 43
                    Quote: slipped
                    Raise your head higher in your cap - an article about NPO Energomash, and they produce engines.


                    Well, that's what the engines would think.
                    1. 0
                      1 February 2021 10: 34
                      Quote: Eye of the Crying
                      Well, that's what the engines would think.


                      Well, I counted. laughing NPO Energomash's production of new products is only increasing, the same Proton-PM is now expanding its capacity and switching to serial production of RD-191 (M).
                      1. -1
                        1 February 2021 10: 35
                        Quote: slipped
                        Well, I counted.


                        The world has not counted.
                      2. 0
                        1 February 2021 10: 41
                        Quote: Eye of the Crying
                        The world has not counted.


                        think so - wikipedia in your hands laughing
  13. -4
    31 January 2021 20: 48
    What starts. Rogozin has no time, he writes poetry, incl. under the film "Zoya" ... ((
  14. 0
    1 February 2021 13: 30
    As soon as a holding appears ... the industry is shut down.
    1. 0
      2 February 2021 11: 45
      Another add-on has appeared that eats up the money of enterprises without giving anything in return. We will now have to reduce the number of workers to feed the new managers. In a ratio of about 10 to 1.