Completed the creation of a new RCB reconnaissance vehicle

January 29 2021

The RChBZ troops will soon receive a new RKhM-9 radiation, chemical and biological (RCB) reconnaissance vehicle. The creation of the machine was completed by the Tula Plant of the Roskhimzashchita corporation. This was announced by the Deputy Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation Alexei Krivoruchko.

PJSC "Plant" Tula "completed the development work of" Bogomaz ", within the framework of which a promising RCB reconnaissance vehicle RHM-9 with a completely new instrument base was created

- said the deputy minister.

The new RCB reconnaissance vehicle was created on the basis of the KamAZ-63969 Typhoon armored vehicle and is designed to conduct radiation, chemical and biological reconnaissance on the battlefield. At the same time, the design of the vehicle allows data collection without the crew leaving the vehicle. In terms of efficiency, the new vehicle is two times superior to the RCB reconnaissance vehicles of previous generations.

The development of new vehicles PXM-9 based on Typhoon and PXM-8 based on the Tiger armored car was reported in 2017. In 2018, both vehicles were demonstrated during a private display at the Army-2018 International Military-Technical Forum. In 2019, they were shown during the Victory Parade in Tula.

PJSC "Plant Tula" specializes in mobile means of radiation, chemical and biological reconnaissance. It was at this plant that the RKhM-2S was created on the basis of the GT-MU, RKhM-4 and RKhM-6 tracked transporters on the BTR-80 and RKhM-5 chassis based on the BMD-3 for the Airborne Forces.

Photos used:: http://bastion-karpenko.ru

We are

Military Reviewin Yandex News

Military Reviewin Google News

svp67 29 January 2021 15: 56
+16

18

2
This is good, new technique with updated features, it is always GOOD.
1. Zoldat_A 29 January 2021 16: 43
  
  +7
  
  9
  
  2
  
  Quote: svp67
  This is good, new technique with updated features, it is always GOOD.
  
  OK good. But the name, in my opinion, is not very ...
  I myself don’t believe in God, I’m not yet mature enough to believe. But he is used to treating the feelings of believers with respect from childhood. I remember how the father of "bream" threw in, when I tried to play with my grandmother at the age of 9-10 (there was a believer) ... And therefore -
  Do not take the name of the Lord in vain
  I remember. Moreover, the military equipment should be called "Iconographer" ...
  For my taste, an example of a good name is "Sun", for example. Corresponds to 200%. Well, they know better there, NAVIRKH ...
  1. nsm1 29 January 2021 17: 38
    
    +1
    
    3
    
    2
    
    We have a "punisher" too.
    Incidentally - "icon painter" cool, why not ?!
  2. voronkov 29 January 2021 20: 14
    
    +2
    
    3
    
    1
    
    Quote: Zoldat_A
    Quote: svp67
    This is good, new technique with updated features, it is always GOOD.
    
    OK good. But the name, in my opinion, is not very ...
    I myself don’t believe in God, I’m not yet mature enough to believe. But he is used to treating the feelings of believers with respect from childhood. I remember how the father of "bream" threw in, when I tried to play with my grandmother at the age of 9-10 (there was a believer) ... And therefore -
    Do not take the name of the Lord in vain
    I remember. Moreover, the military equipment should be called "Iconographer" ...
    For my taste, an example of a good name is "Sun", for example. Corresponds to 200%. Well, they know better there, NAVIRKH ...
    
    Igor, you are right .. Something jarring in this name .. You can’t call military equipment that way .. Orthodox faith is sacred, on this Russia mother held on and keeps .. Who believes, who does not believe, but this is still the basis of the Russian soul and Russia in in general .. As the saying goes "You can only believe in Russia"
    And so the technique is necessary and I hope it is crammed with everything you need in such situations!
    We have rich experience since the times of the USSR in this regard .. A powerful armored car!
2. antivirus 29 January 2021 17: 10
  
  -5
  
  1
  
  6
  
  if it is not possible to use it on the AB deck, it is a bad car.
  1. seregatara1969 29 January 2021 17: 27
    
    0
    
    1
    
    1
    
    High, will it fit on the railway platform?
    1. antivirus 29 January 2021 18: 13
      
      +1
      
      2
      
      1
      
      and the platform will fit on the railway?
      - otherwise, KB and the customer with an "asterisk" demote
    2. Zoldat_A 29 January 2021 20: 19
      
      0
      
      0
      
      0
      
      Quote: seregatara1969
      High, will it fit on the railway platform?
      
      The loading platform from the rail is about 1700 mm. The permissible height of the contact wire is from 5750 mm to 6600 mm. At least 4 meters remain for the car.
      
      I found the only photo where people are nearby - for scale. It is difficult to judge, but, in my opinion, there is clearly no four meters in it.
Couchexpert 29 January 2021 15: 57
+3

4

1
Quote: article
In terms of efficiency, the new vehicle is two times superior to the RCB reconnaissance vehicles of previous generations.

And how is the efficiency of RCB reconnaissance vehicles measured?
1. molyr 29 January 2021 16: 07
  
  +1
  
  1
  
  0
  
  I think in the speed and accuracy of the data received
  1. Couchexpert 29 January 2021 16: 17
    
    0
    
    1
    
    1
    
    1. Measures background 2 times faster.
    2. Measures the background 2 times more accurately.
    3. Measures background 2 times faster and 2 times more accurate.
    Which one?
    1. Doctor 29 January 2021 17: 11
      
      +2
      
      8
      
      6
      
      Which one?
      
      Bogged down where the BRDM will pass.
      Will not reach the zone, the crew will not be irradiated.
      
      This is the advantage ...
      1. Private-K 30 January 2021 10: 14
        
        -1
        
        0
        
        1
        
        Quote: Arzt
        Which one?
        
        Bogged down where the BRDM will pass.
        Will not reach the zone, the crew will not be irradiated.
        
        In general, it is strange to "spend" very expensive MRAPs on RCB reconnaissance. There are so few of them produced so it is better to use them in the role where they are more needed.
        Although, IMHO, it is likely that such machines are designed to provide government agencies in a special period.
2. vvnab 29 January 2021 16: 07
  
  +1
  
  4
  
  3
  
  The cost of operation, apparently. Now everything is in money ... Capitalismus!
  1. Couchexpert 29 January 2021 16: 22
    
    -2
    
    0
    
    2
    
    I myself can join this answer. Although this is a purely platform issue. You can make an RCB reconnaissance vehicle based on the lunar rover.
3. svp67 29 January 2021 16: 50
  
  +1
  
  1
  
  0
  
  Quote: CouchExpert
  And how is the efficiency of RCB reconnaissance vehicles measured?
  
  The speed of work to detect and indicate infection ...
From Tomsk 29 January 2021 16: 03
0

1

1
oh, I have number 787 on my car too))
1. antivirus 29 January 2021 17: 12
  
  0
  
  2
  
  2
  
  as one pensioner said, already 15 years ago: stopped on the road - I do not need to talk, if you have something to say, then cool numbers are not needed.
vvnab 29 January 2021 16: 06
0

2

2
It's great that 63969 have found a use. I really like the look. The brutality is off scale. )
I thought the platform would remain experimental. There has been no news since 2015.
moreman78 29 January 2021 16: 07
+10

11

1
If created on the basis of KAMAZ-63969 "Typhoon", it means - NON-FLOATING! And what then is its advantage and efficiency in comparison with the RHM-6 (which is based on the BTR-80)?
saygon66 29 January 2021 16: 09
+3

3

0
- Interesting car! The glazing is reminiscent of the South African samples - Ratel 20. And the three driving axles ... have an unusual arrangement.
1. Blackgrifon 29 January 2021 18: 50
  
  0
  
  0
  
  0
  
  The Typhoon program was made - a whole family was offered from 6x6 to 8x8. But then the Ministry of Defense considered the level of protection (14,5 in a circle) excessive and the car was abandoned. As a result, as a one-volume KAMAZ made Typhoonenko.
mark1 29 January 2021 16: 29
+7

8

1
It looks, of course, very fashionable ... But - isn't it too wide variety of platforms we get? Moreover, KAMAZ-63969 is far from the cheapest and can only be used in such a limited capacity ... how much is such an RCB-MRAP necessary?
1. Couchexpert 29 January 2021 16: 35
  
  0
  
  2
  
  2
  
  +1 Ask the right questions.
2. antivirus 29 January 2021 17: 14
  
  -5
  
  1
  
  6
  
  requests for profit of KAMAZ shareholders have been fulfilled ............................................ ...
3. Private-K 30 January 2021 10: 16
  
  -1
  
  0
  
  1
  
  Quote: mark1
  It looks, of course, very fashionable ... But - isn't it too wide variety of platforms we get? Moreover, KAMAZ-63969 is far from the cheapest and can only be used in such a limited capacity ... how much is such an RCB-MRAP necessary?
  
  As I suggested above, this is a machine for providing government agencies. Expensive. Comfortable. Impressive. What they love there.
  1. mark1 30 January 2021 11: 47
    
    0
    
    0
    
    0
    
    Quote: Private-K
    Expensive. Comfortable. Impressive. What they love there.
    
    The government bodies will be pleased.
sergo1914 29 January 2021 17: 44
+1

2

1
The title, of course, ... it looks like Soviet creativity is over. After distribution, I was sent on the topic "Vector". Rare crap. Dead end. But how it sounded ...
nsm1 29 January 2021 17: 45
-2

0

2
Interestingly, there are shields for these huge glasses?
1. Blackgrifon 29 January 2021 18: 51
  
  +1
  
  1
  
  0
  
  No - now they rarely make mine-protected armored vehicles with shields. But the glass holds 14,5 mm.
  1. nsm1 29 January 2021 18: 53
    
    +1
    
    3
    
    2
    
    And after it needs to be changed, transparency is lost ...
    1. Blackgrifon 29 January 2021 19: 07
      
      +1
      
      2
      
      1
      
      Indisputably. But on the other hand, according to the well-known technical characteristics, the car is very good and in its design is very close to the ratel.
2. Nestor Vlakhovski 29 January 2021 22: 47
  
  0
  
  1
  
  1
  
  He doesn't need shields, the car is not for the front line.
  If rare stray bullets with shrapnel "tankanet", okay.
Guru 29 January 2021 19: 54
0

2

2
What kind of "Bogo-MAZ" they did not have enough imagination, Really PIPELATS.
Nikolay Dyaglev 29 January 2021 20: 49
+1

4

3
Intends to produce so many varieties of armored vehicles? To hemorrhoids were those securing? Scorpio, Wolf, Tiger, all kinds of shit, what nonsense
1. Nestor Vlakhovski 29 January 2021 22: 45
  
  +1
  
  5
  
  4
  
  Sawing a budget for endless R&D is much more profitable than creating serial products.
  This will not stop as long as the state spends people's funds in an inappropriate way, shoving godfathers, brothers, matchmakers, classmates and even friends in the section into the pockets.
Vaўkalak 30 January 2021 12: 13
0

0

0
Well, of course it looks very nice.
kytx 31 January 2021 23: 04
0

0

0
I was taught on BRDM2
this one is too big
I wonder how many people there is a crew