Litmus paper persistence of the Russian Federation

972

The most talked about episode of the events of January 23 is the one where the St. Petersburg policemen were leading the detainee, and one of them kicked the woman who had pounced on them.

The woman was in the hospital just in case, and a policeman visited her with an apology and flowers. (Personally, I am sure that he was sent there by the worn out authorities). She first announced her Orthodox position. But then, perhaps fueled by the professionals of the colored revolutions, she filed a lawsuit against the policeman in the Investigative Committee. (By the way: what I still despise the democrats for is that they, unlike decent people, do not protect women and children, but hide behind them).



If a man had attacked a policeman, the incident would not have attracted any attention. But the woman changed everything.

This suggests that the tolerance that we laugh at, observing it in America and Europe, has already penetrated into our society and is beginning to corrupt us. After all, no one would have allowed the thought of condescension to Tonka the machine-gunner because she is a woman. And not only during the war or immediately after its end, but also much later until the very death of the USSR.

And now we have already come to terms with the innermost value of a democratic regime: in a democracy, everyone is equal, but some are more equal. And the most savvy enough to portray themselves as weak or offended, and the law is no longer written for you: you can already ram the people around or the state structures yourself. Here lies the most serious threat to any state and its citizens, which can lead to their death.

But we - ordinary residents - are interested not only in this fact itself, but also in its upcoming denouement, since the future of our country and ourselves directly depends on it.

There are two possible poles in resolving this conflict:

1. State structures view this case as an attack on a government official: the actions of the police officer are recognized as correct, and the attacker is condemned to the fullest extent of the Law.

2. The state structures convict the police officer who stopped the offender of the wrong gender and condemn him, and the woman is apologized further.

In the first case, the state will demonstrate firmness in upholding law and order and will send a signal to its citizens and the whole world that it will fight for its existence to the end.

In the second case, there will be a signal that circles aiming at another surrender of Russia to the "civilized community" have gained the upper hand in the power structures of the state.

In this case, enemies from all sides will pounce on the country with renewed vigor, who will again be supported by the “fifth column,” counting on the mercy of the western masters for the services rendered.

At the same time, the current "seven-bankers" do not want to remember all the Gusinsky, Smolensk, Berezovsky and others who dreamed of remaining billionaires in the "free world." But this is their problem.

Our trouble is that then it will be much worse for us.

As it was written in the quotation book of the Great Helmsman:

Dig holes, store grain.

In the meantime, we will observe the development of this process.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

972 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -10
    30 January 2021 15: 05
    Auntie, to put it mildly, weird. But even with a foot in this situation, it is not comme il faut to buy goods.
    1. +49
      30 January 2021 15: 14
      Permissible self-defense is also not comme il faut. When the attacker, having received a pumpkin, runs to court, and the victim of the attack is imprisoned. Do not meddle with a representative of the authorities, and you will not be rewarded as you deserve.
      1. -28
        30 January 2021 15: 34
        Quote: Mikhail M
        Permissible self-defense is also not comme il faut. When the attacker, having received a pumpkin, runs to court, and the victim of the attack is imprisoned. Do not meddle with a representative of the authorities, and you will not be rewarded as you deserve.


        Poor policeman, how bravely he defended himself. Barely fought back, sick.
        1. +12
          30 January 2021 16: 34
          Quote: aleksejkabanets
          Poor policeman, how bravely he defended himself. Barely fought back, sick.

          And if this woman specifically wanted to arrange a provocation and was preparing something (acid, for example) to splash in the face of either law enforcement officers or a detainee?
          Somehow suspiciously she glances at her filming before the start of the provocation - I got the impression that it was a homework in which her accomplice participated, which is why everything immediately started spinning.
          1. -15
            30 January 2021 16: 41
            Quote: ccsr
            And if this woman specifically wanted to arrange a provocation ...

            If a grandmother had a male genital organ, she would be a grandfather. She tried to do something to the National Guard?
            Quote: ccsr
            Somehow suspiciously she glances at her filming before the start of the provocation - I got the impression that it was a homework in which her accomplice participated, which is why everything immediately started spinning.

            And the National Guard is not her accomplice by any chance? Because it was his actions that caused such a wide response. Personally, I would not have raised a hand on her, in an extreme case, he could simply push her out of his way, there were three of them.
            1. +28
              30 January 2021 16: 49
              Quote: aleksejkabanets
              If a grandmother had a male genital organ, she would be a grandfather. She tried to do something to the National Guard?

              In fact, inaction in places of mass unrest can result in even greater human casualties, if only not to suppress any opposition to law enforcement agencies. You will find this in any specialized textbook if you wish. Therefore, the guardsman acted on the machine - an obstacle appeared, it must be removed. Whether it was necessary to kick it is a subject of internal investigation, but not public discussion, because you are not personally responsible for the life of this fighter. And he really risks his life - the example of the United States to help you.
              Quote: aleksejkabanets
              in extreme cases, he could simply push her out of his way, there were three of them.

              On the couch it is easy to argue what you would do, but he did not have time to reason. By the way, explain why the woman stood on the sidewalk and then suddenly jumped out onto the road? Do you also make such jumps in everyday life? How often do you perform such a trick?
              1. -4
                30 January 2021 16: 56
                Quote: ccsr
                On the couch it is easy to argue what you would do, but he did not have time to reason.

                At one time, I found an opportunity to think about what can and cannot be done. Otherwise they would have been imprisoned or killed. The policeman violated several articles of the "Police Law".
                http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_110165/b0e7a72817927f6520504c25498b9f687209dfee/
                And the law should be the same for everyone, if you break it, answer according to the law. Or do you disagree?
                1. +10
                  30 January 2021 17: 03
                  Quote: aleksejkabanets
                  The policeman violated several articles of the "Police Law".

                  I would like to know which ones. But besides the laws, there are also instructions according to which they act in real situations. Moreover, there is also a briefing before taking over the duty. And the last thing - a person could have a nervous breakdown, and he needs to be examined if nothing of the kind has been noticed with him before.
                  In general, there is no need to engage in casuistry - the situation was non-standard, the reaction of the snotty Russian Guard was not entirely adequate, and everything else was inflated for the sake of money.
                  For the criterion, let's just compare what would happen to a National Guard in the Netherlands, USA or France in similar situations, and all the pathos of our accusers will disappear.
                  1. -9
                    30 January 2021 17: 13
                    Quote: ccsr
                    The policeman violated several articles of the "Police Law".

                    I would like to know which ones.

                    Article 19. Procedure for the use of physical force, special means and firearms
                    item 1, item 3, item 4. It's minimum.
                    Described, one article, several points.
                    1. +17
                      30 January 2021 20: 34
                      Quote: Mikhail M
                      Do not meddle with a representative of the authorities, and you will not be rewarded as you deserve.

                      Putin's electoral confidant, former coronavirus headquarters spokesman, doctor and TV presenter Alexander Myasnikov, commented on the incident during a rally in St. Petersburg when a policeman kicked a woman in the stomach.
                      “The guy is on duty, there is a" kneading ", they are leading the detainee, then someone rushes under his feet shouting" for what ?! " This is not a Woman for him at this moment, it is an object that prevents the fulfillment of his task. Maybe spray with a can, or maybe stick with an awl! He has a reflex developed over years of training. Women - there, in a peaceful life, here everyone who interferes with the police from the tasks assigned is a potential enemy, "Dr. Myasnikov wrote in his Telegram channel on January 25
                      See in detail - "" Demolished by a boot "turned out to be a provocateur and demands the release of all" political prisoners "- https://aftershock.news/?q=node/942304&full

                      Although Myasnikov's position on this issue is simple and understandable to many, public opinion was still divided. And all would be nothing.
                      Only now the "Orthodox" Margarita Yudina, which she considers herself to be, after a couple of days, this suddenly allegedly changed her attitude to what happened and issued a new concept of forgiveness with the condition to release Navalny and all his gang.
                      1. -8
                        30 January 2021 20: 40
                        Quote: Tatiana
                        Putin's confidant in the elections, former representative of the headquarters for coronavirus, doctor and TV presenter Alexander Myasnikov

                        Do you think his titles justify police breaking the law?
                      2. +24
                        30 January 2021 20: 46
                        Quote: sergo1914
                        Auntie, to put it mildly, weird. But even with a foot in this situation, it is not comme il faut to buy goods.

                        Rita Yudina, 54, knocked down by a police boot, arrived at the rally on January 23 in St. Petersburg. specially from Luga. The media write a lot and different things about her and at the same time pay attention to the fact that not all ends meet in her stories.

                        On the one hand, Yudina claims that she comes from a family of dissidents since 1917.
                        On the other hand, it is known that in 2011-2017 Yudina and her children lived in Germany, there Yudina, according to her, earned by translations. Yudina, according to her, by her great-grandmother-Swiss, has German roots, so she knows German. Has no higher education.
                        Now unemployed Yudina lives on the outskirts of the regional center Luga in a village house with sons of 20 and 25 years old, a 15-year-old daughter, a dog and cats. Yudina's family is registered as socially disadvantaged. Yudina's children are from different fathers, where their fathers are now, they do not know, Yudina also refuses to tell. The eldest sons are chronic diabetics and do not work. The eldest son was previously under investigation in a criminal case. The family's budget, according to Yudina, is 10 thousand rubles a month, they eat mostly potatoes and bread in the family. The situation in the Yudins' house, judging by the photo, is simply miserable. But! At the same time, a teenage daughter has the opportunity to receive distance education at a Dutch college. Yudina says her daughter is taught in Holland for freebut this information needs to be verified.
                        More details: https://eadaily.com/ru/news/2021/01/26/prava-yudinoy-kachayut-boris-vishnevskiy-i-igilovec-iz-novoy-gazety

                        Earlier, when Yudina was still in the hospital, she publicly stated that she had forgiven the policeman, under whose hot hand she accidentally fell during the riots in St. Petersburg, which were staged by the navalnists on January 23. But less than three days later, Yudina announced that she wanted this guardian of order to be in the dock.
                        Boris Vishnevsky, a deputy of the St. Petersburg Legislative Council from Yabloko, helped Yudina in drafting the claim and hiring lawyers. Denis Korotkov, a journalist from Novaya Gazeta, provides support to Yudina in the media. This is the same Korotkov whom the Federal News Agency (RIA FAN) demands to be punished as a war criminal for cooperation with ISIS. (prohibited in Russia).
                        Yudina explained the change in her decision to petition a police officer to the liberal media that she has a personal account of the entire "police repressive system" in Russia.
                        Yudina even delivered a public ultimatum: she will withdraw the lawsuit against the policeman if all political prisoners are released and pardoned in Russia... A political prisoner in the interpretation of the liberals is a broad concept, it includes national separatists, terrorists from organizations banned in Russia, saboteurs from Ukraine and the like.
                        More details: https://eadaily.com/ru/news/2021/01/26/prava-yudinoy-kachayut-boris-vishnevskiy-i-igilovec-iz-novoy-gazety
                      3. -15
                        30 January 2021 20: 55
                        Quote: Tatiana
                        Rita Yudina, 54, knocked down by a police boot ...

                        Everything that you have written has no meaning. One must be held accountable for breaking the law.
                      4. +10
                        30 January 2021 21: 30
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        Everything that you wrote has no meaning.

                        It’s your moaning about an idea colleague that doesn’t matter.
                      5. -12
                        30 January 2021 21: 39
                        Quote: Dart2027
                        It’s your moaning about an idea colleague that doesn’t matter.

                        Do you think that the police should be immune?
                      6. +13
                        30 January 2021 21: 50
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        Do you think the cops

                        have to do their job, and any statutes about warnings and so on are applied when there is an opportunity to act slowly.
                        During street riots, no one ever makes any warnings, unless only about the opening of fire to kill, so your screams about some unrespected law and your police past are nothing more than another "Crimean woman".
                      7. -10
                        30 January 2021 21: 57
                        Quote: Dart2027
                        have to do their job .....

                        And you did not answer the question
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        Do you think that the police should be immune?

                        Or can haste and fuss justify any wrongdoing? Are they imprisoned for exceeding self-defense? Something not particularly understandable, it was time to think or not. First of all, the proportionality of the use of violence is analyzed. Why do you think it should be different in relation to the police?
                      8. +3
                        31 January 2021 06: 28
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        Or can haste and fuss justify any wrongdoing?

                        Quote: Dart2027
                        have to do their job, and any statutes about warnings and so on are applied when there is an opportunity to act slowly.
                        During street riots, no one ever makes any warnings, unless only about opening fire to kill

                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        Are they imprisoned for exceeding self-defense? Something not particularly understandable, it was time to think or not.

                        It also happens, alas, but it has nothing to do with your colleague - for which I fought and ran into it.
                      9. +5
                        31 January 2021 16: 22
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        Or can haste and fuss justify any wrongdoing? Are they imprisoned for exceeding self-defense? Something not particularly understandable, it was time to think or not. First of all, the proportionality of the use of violence is analyzed. Why do you think it should be different in relation to the police?

                        Shota Rustaveli in his poem "The Knight in the Panther's Skin" said well: "Everyone imagines himself a strategist, seeing the battle from the side."
                        Clever on sofas .... 100500, but as a vigilante to attend such mass events or just as an attesting witness, you will, like Diogenes, run around with a lantern during the day, looking for a person.
                      10. 0
                        31 January 2021 06: 46
                        Well, explain what prevented the character from thinking for half a second!
                        Okay, madam provocateur, let's take this and who then kicked her quickly to make a decision?
                        It is necessary to understand what the character did in this situation to undermine the image of the police where there is more than Madama.
                        Let's leave aside legally or not, he kicked and hit well (and hit in many ways)
                        From my experience in the army, I can say that a fighter is flying.
                        I created the picture, the wave has gone and it just won't end. something will be.
                      11. +6
                        31 January 2021 07: 16
                        Quote: saigon
                        Well, explain what prevented the character from thinking for half a second!

                        Here he has nothing to do, except to stop and start thinking "what kind of woman is she" and what to do with her.
                      12. -6
                        31 January 2021 09: 36
                        Think correctly: urine everyone indiscriminately, who turned up under the arm or under the leg. What's this? War with your people?
                      13. +5
                        31 January 2021 11: 04
                        Quote: Fan-Fan
                        Think correctly: urine everyone indiscriminately, who turned up under the arm or under the leg. What's this? War with your people?

                        Those who come out to the rallies of liberals are no longer the people.
                      14. -6
                        31 January 2021 15: 26
                        Quote: Narak-zempo
                        Those who come out to the rallies of liberals are no longer the people.

                        Jokes aside, the situation is actually funny. To put it simply, the liberalist Navalny is gathering rallies against the liberals in power. And these arguments of yours who are the people and who are not, they have nothing to do with reality.
                      15. +5
                        31 January 2021 11: 56
                        Quote: Fan-Fan
                        What's this? War with your people?

                        Not by the people, but by the enemies of the people.
                      16. +2
                        31 January 2021 23: 10
                        If this cop were your father, you would think differently

                        It's a just war
                      17. +8
                        1 February 2021 20: 00
                        Quote: Santa Fe
                        If this cop was your father

                        I would be proud of him.
                        Quote: Santa Fe
                        It's a just war

                        With traitors.
                      18. +4
                        1 February 2021 10: 50
                        Well, hello, she's been going for 20 years
                      19. +5
                        31 January 2021 06: 51
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        Do you think that the police should be immune?
                        Must be. For this there is a department of own security and a court. Neither you, nor AUE, nor the State Department are allowed to this.
                      20. -6
                        31 January 2021 09: 39
                        Your own safety, your own court. This should not be: the court and the law should be the same for all, these are the same elementary truths.
                      21. +9
                        31 January 2021 10: 23
                        Quote: Fan-Fan
                        own court
                        This is your own court, which has already condemned the police in absentia so that they are not ready to decisively suppress your attempts to arrange a Maidan here. It would seem that the incident did not add to the alcoholism of this lady any consequences dangerous to her health, but you, the bailiffs, here raised all this howl in pursuance of the decisions of your court.
                      22. +11
                        31 January 2021 10: 55
                        Quote: Fan-Fan
                        court and law should be one for all, these are the same elementary truths
                        China and North. I do not bring Korea, you can see for yourself.
                      23. +5
                        31 January 2021 11: 57
                        And we have some ridiculous fines and terms.
                      24. +3
                        31 January 2021 23: 04
                        I, as a native of a family of security officials, personally benefit from this position

                        If something doesn't suit you, that's your problem.
                      25. -6
                        31 January 2021 23: 20
                        Quote: Santa Fe
                        I, as a native of a family of security officials, personally benefit from this position

                        Great, it means "What about us?" you won't ask.
                      26. +3
                        1 February 2021 00: 11
                        War is business

                        If the business is organized correctly, then the enemy bears the losses.
                      27. -9
                        1 February 2021 00: 47
                        Quote: Santa Fe
                        War is business

                        If the business is organized correctly, then the enemy bears the losses.

                        Are you going to wage war with your own people?
                      28. The comment was deleted.
                      29. The comment was deleted.
                      30. -7
                        1 February 2021 10: 03
                        Quote: Santa Fe
                        In my understanding, people are those who have achieved something in life. For which power and state

                        People like you - just living in Russia

                        This is me with the understanding that we have two peoples in our country. Only one people will soon begin to rip off the heads of the second "people".
                      31. +5
                        1 February 2021 10: 34
                        They ate little porridge
                        to fight with the professional military
                      32. -7
                        1 February 2021 12: 14
                        Quote: Santa Fe
                        They ate little porridge
                        to fight with the professional military

                        Wait and see. There are examples. However, you yourself will gnaw each other's throats. The same is full of such examples.
                      33. -1
                        4 February 2021 08: 27
                        Dreamed
                      34. -1
                        4 February 2021 08: 27
                        Oh, this is what you and your curators want
                      35. +4
                        1 February 2021 13: 08
                        Quote: Santa Fe
                        In my understanding, people are those who have achieved something in life. For which power and state

                        People like you - just living in Russia

                        I can directly hear Chubais's words that it is enough to leave 10 million for the maintenance of the pipe and another million partaigenosse, which have achieved something in life to manage them. The thought immediately suggests itself, weren't the Bolsheviks right when they hung the same "achieved something" on the lanterns
                      36. 0
                        4 February 2021 08: 31
                        In some ways, the Bolsheviks were right, the then elite spoke French and despised Russia and the common people. We looked like now towards London
                      37. 0
                        4 February 2021 08: 26
                        Not with the people, but not with a large number of provocateurs
                      38. 0
                        4 February 2021 08: 24
                        If auntie came out to play a revolutionary, let her be ready for such an attitude of the security officials. If you are not ready, let the family take care of it, everything is very sad there.
                      39. +1
                        1 February 2021 04: 24
                        And as I understand it, you and then for the "class-estate" approach "in general
                      40. +5
                        30 January 2021 22: 26
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        Quote: Tatiana
                        Rita Yudina, 54, knocked down by a police boot ...

                        Everything that you have written has no meaning. One must be held accountable for breaking the law.

                        It is necessary to answer for violation of the law, but whether or not this violation was decided by the judge. You stated initially that there was a violation.
                        In my subjective opinion, it smells more of a provocation. Recognize the policeman guilty, the rest will lose their "enthusiasm with passion". Eyes will dim. On the other hand, the "rebels" have a positive example, plus a little "propaganda from sent political workers" in the form of banknotes, etc. "prospects" for creating a just society, etc. will lead to the achievement not of legality and law and order, but to chaos and bacchanalia.
                      41. -7
                        30 January 2021 22: 43
                        Quote: Mole
                        It is necessary to answer for violation of the law, but whether or not this violation was decided by the judge.

                        Or the prosecutor's office, in this case.
                        Quote: Mole
                        You stated initially that there was a violation.

                        But he violated the Police Law, it can be seen with the naked eye.
                        Quote: Mole
                        Recognize the policeman guilty, the rest will lose their "enthusiasm with passion".

                        And there is no need for "enthusiasm with passion", it will very quickly lead to blood. Legality is needed.
                        Quote: Mole
                        On the other hand, the "rebels" have a positive example, plus a little "propaganda from sent political workers" in the form of banknotes, etc. "prospects" for creating a just society, etc. will lead to the achievement not of legality and law and order, but to chaos and bacchanalia.

                        With this case, law enforcement officers are obviously losing position. We must somehow get out with the least losses for ourselves. We must act according to the law.
                      42. +3
                        30 January 2021 22: 58
                        1. Violated or not is not up to you to decide.
                        2. Lack of "enthusiasm and passion" leads to a lack of desire to go to work and do your job. Worse there is no worker with a faded look. He's just serving his work hours. And to keep law and order! It's easier not to notice.
                        3. Priorities are still more important !?
                      43. -14
                        31 January 2021 09: 42
                        Worse no no worker with faded eyes
                        Well, we already in our history saw the NKVD-Schnikov with burning eyes in 1937.
                      44. +7
                        31 January 2021 13: 21
                        Quote: Fan-Fan
                        Worse no no worker with faded eyes
                        Well, we already in our history saw the NKVD-Schnikov with burning eyes in 1937.

                        And what were the clerks, at 37, doing wrong? They cleaned out the unfinished counter, incl. entrenched in the NKVD and the Red Army itself. How everything would turn in the Second World War, do not do it IVS and LPB is not known.
                      45. -3
                        31 January 2021 13: 36
                        Quote: Essex62
                        And what were the clerks, at 37, doing wrong? They cleaned out the unfinished counter, incl. entrenched in the NKVD and the Red Army itself. How everything would turn in the Second World War, do not do it IVS and LPB is not known.

                        Apparently the author of the comment meant the actions of Yagoda and Yezhov (their "falcons"). You will not deny that they "overdone" a little?
                      46. +9
                        31 January 2021 14: 44
                        And I meant Yagoda himself and Yezhov. They did not overdo it, they tried to crush the party, and with a departure from the principles of socialism and Bolshevik consciousness. ... For which they themselves turned out to be enemies, like Bonaparte Tukhachevsky and his comrades. But the weeding was done efficiently.
                        A rollback to the NEP, where will you go? To uproot the psychology of the baryzhy, even after the lapse of not small years of the country's life, the authorities still had that job. The roots remained.
                      47. +1
                        4 February 2021 08: 41
                        Yes, these "falcons" overdid it, but also tell them that they remained unpunished, well, Comrade. Beria strongly slowed down the repressive apparatus
                      48. +8
                        31 January 2021 21: 18
                        The present time proves that the country in 1937 did everything correctly, but not completely.
                      49. -6
                        31 January 2021 21: 46
                        entrenched in the NKVD and the Red Army itself.
                        they still gave the German Communists in the Gestapo, yes, the creator of Katyusha and others like him slapped, real heroes
                      50. 0
                        4 February 2021 08: 35
                        The fact that the betrayal of Tukhachevsky and others is proven and not disputed
                      51. -2
                        31 January 2021 16: 37
                        Yes, what are the burning eyes!
                        Banal selfish interests (both employees and informers), as in France in 1793, as throughout medieval Europe during the witch hunt, as during the "witch hunt" throughout the modern world ...
                        There were also enough blockheads, but without the "enthusiasm of the masses" they would not have turned around like that.
                      52. +2
                        31 January 2021 18: 21
                        Quote: kakvastam
                        Yes, what are the burning eyes!
                        Banal selfish interests (both employees and informers), as in France in 1793, as throughout medieval Europe during the witch hunt, as during the "witch hunt" throughout the modern world ...
                        There were also enough blockheads, but without the "enthusiasm of the masses" they would not have turned around like that.

                        You talk about self-interest from the standpoint of the present, in particular, your convenient worldview!
                        Judge by the deeds by the reviews of contemporaries.
                      53. 0
                        4 February 2021 08: 45
                        Common practice after revolutions. And it all ends with the usurper coming to power. As they say, what they fought for and ran into. Napoleon, Stalin and others came and brought order
                      54. +2
                        31 January 2021 18: 13
                        Quote: Fan-Fan
                        Worse no no worker with faded eyes
                        Well, we already in our history saw the NKVD-Schnikov with burning eyes in 1937.

                        Who are "we???
                        Enlighten about a billion ruined souls. Stop thinking stereotypes embedded in you! It's time to grow up!
                      55. -1
                        31 January 2021 23: 17
                        Quote: Mole
                        Stop thinking stereotypes embedded in you!
                        Not every departure of the human head is thought. For the most part, conditioned reflexes. Where do thoughts come from?
                      56. 0
                        4 February 2021 08: 48
                        Yes, it's funny, the women probably gave birth faster than, according to the liberoids, Stalin shot. The population was growing for some reason
                      57. 0
                        4 February 2021 08: 33
                        If you start putting things in order now, it will be much cooler than 37
                      58. +6
                        31 January 2021 12: 39
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        We must act according to the law.

                        And why is not a case brought against Yudina? For assaulting a police officer. Or is the law not written for her?
                      59. -5
                        31 January 2021 13: 38
                        Quote: aleks26
                        And why is not a case brought against Yudina? For assaulting a police officer. Or is the law not written for her?

                        And I wrote above that according to the law, everyone, including Yudina, must answer. But not "with a boot in the stomach", but according to the law.
                      60. -2
                        1 February 2021 13: 13
                        Quote: aleks26
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        We must act according to the law.

                        And why is not a case brought against Yudina? For assaulting a police officer. Or is the law not written for her?

                        Did she touch him with her finger?
                      61. -1
                        3 February 2021 01: 55
                        aleksejkabanets - You are such a supporter of "legality" right? And the thought does not occur to you that this "injured" scourge originally violated the law:
                        1. - she had no right to be there at all, since this whole action is illegal.
                        2. - Jumping at the feet of a police officer, this is a direct violation of the law, that is, obstruction of the performance of official duties by a police officer.
                        In a "civilized" country, this dirty trick would simply be shot on the spot and no BLM would fit in for it. And here you moaned "the woman" hit - it's just that if she did not break the law - no one would have touched her.
                      62. +4
                        1 February 2021 13: 35
                        The policeman is right one hundred percent, the lady after the hospital still has to pay a fine for participating in an unauthorized rally. I don’t want to leave the house one fine day and see burning tires and heaps of "Bulk" And a policeman who will think how to do her job, what if you push someone and you are in court !!!
                      63. +3
                        31 January 2021 00: 11
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        Quote: Tatiana
                        Rita Yudina, 54, knocked down by a police boot ...

                        Everything that you have written has no meaning. One must be held accountable for breaking the law.

                        You have double standards. If you answer, then both and how the court will look at it.

                        At the same time, it will not be superfluous to note that Yudina, who herself suffered from the actions of the security forces, could become detained.
                        She watched the procession from the Admiralteyskaya. That is, she took part in an uncoordinated mass event, which is prohibited during the pandemic. Her appearance in front of the riot police can be regarded both as a violation of traffic rules (Yudina went out into the roadway), and as an obstacle to the performance of a police officer's official duties.
                        But this is, if we ignore emotions and look at what happened in the position of the Administrative Code and the Criminal Code of Russia.

                        The policeman apologized to her in a human way in the hospital. And in principle, the police had every right and could detain her, if she had not screamed so heart-rendingly.
                      64. +3
                        31 January 2021 00: 33
                        Quote: Tatiana
                        She watched the procession from the Admiralteyskaya. That is, she took part in an uncoordinated mass event,

                        How fun is it that watching and taking part is the same thing?
                        Quote: Tatiana
                        But this is, if we ignore emotions and look at what happened in the position of the Administrative Code and the Criminal Code of Russia.

                        Look better from the side of the "Law on Police", Article 19.
                      65. +2
                        31 January 2021 00: 36
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        Quote: Tatiana
                        She watched the procession from the Admiralteyskaya. That is, she took part in an uncoordinated mass event,
                        How fun is it that watching and taking part is the same thing?
                        Not the same thing. And Yudina took part in the unauthorized march, having specially arrived in St. Petersburg from Luga for this.
                        By the way, in her interviews, Yudina also spoke against herself about the article.

                        It is also noteworthy that Yudina changed her decision to forgive the policeman after she was discharged from the hospital and talked at home with lawyers from "Team-29"

                        REFERENCE
                        Team 29 is an informal human rights association of lawyers and journalists, which aims to resist the growing closeness of the state in Russia. Started working in February 2015. Head - lawyer Ivan Pavlov.

                        Through social networks, they announced a fundraiser for Margarita Yudina to pay off the loans she had collected. It was about 166 rubles.
                        According to the deputy of the Okkervil Defense Ministry Kirill Volkov, the required amount was collected in just a day. After that, Volkov and his colleague from the Ligovka-Yamskaya municipal district, Alexander Izotov, repaid Yudina's loans through Gosuslugi.

                        Repayment of the loan in such a situation can be viewed as bribery of Yudina in order to continue the provocation by the lawyers of the nefrmal human rights defenders "Team 29" against the police officer who has apologized and previously forgiven the victim.
                        For details see - https://spb.mk.ru/social/2021/01/27/poluchivshey-udar-ot-omonovca-zhenshhine-pomogli-vyplatit-kredity.html
                      66. +2
                        31 January 2021 00: 53
                        Quote: Tatiana
                        Team 29 is an informal human rights association of lawyers and journalists ....

                        Well, is it important in this context? It is about the lawfulness of the use of violence by the police. Otherwise, yes, I understand that the situation is shaking. I understand that Navalny is not our friend, not a comrade or brother. But the state will cross the "point of no return" by such methods, and then there will be nothing to agree on. Who needs blood?
                      67. -1
                        31 January 2021 01: 06
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        Quote: Tatiana
                        Team 29 is an informal human rights association of lawyers and journalists ....
                        Well, is it important in this context?
                        How important!
                        Don't the lawyers from the NGO "Teams 29" understand that they are exposing the victim herself? They understand. They just don't give a damn about her - they have their own interests!
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        yes, I understand that the situation is shaking. I understand that Navalny is not our friend, not a comrade or brother. But the state will cross the "point of no return" by such methods, and then there will be nothing to agree on. Who needs blood?
                        It's good that it dawned on you that the situation is being purposefully rocked. So don't bother the police to rock it! Otherwise, there will be no one to protect the population, people, including you!
                        Do not spit into the well (at the police), from which you will soon have to drink water!
                        This has already been done in Ukraine. Remember the "Berkutovites!"
                      68. +9
                        31 January 2021 01: 17
                        Quote: Tatiana
                        It's good that it dawned on you that the situation is being purposefully rocked.

                        The only question is who is shaking it more, Navalny with his shares or the authorities with his irrepressible greed, clannishness and theft?
                        Quote: Tatiana
                        So don't bother the police to rock it! Otherwise, there will be no one to protect the population, the people!

                        It is these "employees" that provoke the crowd into violent and aggressive actions. Have you ever wondered where this might lead?
                      69. +2
                        31 January 2021 01: 31
                        It's useless to talk to you! I tell you about Thomas - you tell me about Erema!
                        So do not go to such rallies for Navalny and his group! Who makes you sick in the head? These are not constructive ways to fight corruption!
                        You are starting to fight corruption at the wrong end. You need to start with IDEOLOGY! The people will not really understand anything and act correctly for their prosperous future until they understand that in fact there is already informally the STATE ideology in the country in the form of the COLONIAL-PARASITARY paradigm of the American economist Milton Friedman, which is set out in his book "Capitalism and freedom "on the first 20 pages. And under Navalny it will not change, but will become even worse. Namely.

                        Unfortunately, on this issue, Russian education in the country has long been "sour". The bourgeois ideology of the American economist M. Friedman is no longer called "bourgeois", but is called abstractly class ideology simply "market" with elements of the so-called. "Monetarism" (i.e. bourgeois pursuit of financial profits).
                        But one cannot equate the concept of real capitalism with all its shortcomings with the doctrinaire idea of ​​the American Milton Friedman in the form of some kind of speculative social project, embodied in life, to build a supposedly ideally fair capitalism on Earth around the world. By what means?
                        At the expense supposedly the existence in the world of a certain ANARCHISTIC is absolutely "free" from everyone and every world market, which is supposedly absolutely "clean" from profanities and dishonesty both on the part of the participants of the capital market, goods (services) and labor, and from the pressure on them by the national state. And at the same time, the author assumes that all market participants free from the state are initially at all times equal in their life start to each other and can always become rich if they just want it. This is pure utopia and bluff!
                        Behind this attempt by Milton Friedman to whitewash capitalism lies a very definite goal taken by Washington's apologists. Namely.
                        The purpose of this American bluff is to make the sovereign countries "indigenous" for the United States, uncontrollably and duty-free by their governments, mistakenly, free and defenseless from competition, open access for US multinational companies to their domestic markets for the sale of foreign goods and the purchase of "indigenous" wealth by foreigners , enterprises and natural resources.
                        In this case, reduction of native state property in the maximum - to "0" - is promoted by the "market people" exclusively as a public good. For the state supposedly does not need to control anything, there is no need to punish anyone, and there is no need to regulate trade and production either. That at the same time all members of society will become such honest and law-abiding entrepreneurs that therefore it will no longer be necessary to protect the population from swindlers, thieves, robbers and murderers. And therefore, the alleged national state, as an anachronism, will disappear by itself as unnecessary, and there is no need to defend it at all. For the distribution of material goods "from above" at the state level is not required, because everything will be regulated by this "ideal" capitalist market. But those who did not fit into the market are already their problems. Let, they say, they survive on their own, as they can. These include in particular all the so-called. "superfluous" people: pensioners, disabled people, children, etc. - all those who "did not fit into the market." But they should be "happy" with their freedom from the centuries-old, fattening abstract-bureaucratic state, which has always been dreamed of by the anarchists for centuries.

                        TOTAL. All this Milton Friedman's ideology about the alleged existence of the so-called. "free" and "clean" market is an anarchist propaganda of the American establishment to disintegrate the national security of sovereign states to their complete elimination and subjugation of their resources in favor of US multinational companies. And unfortunately, this ideology has been UNOFICIALLY adopted by the Russian ruling elite as a state ideology. It is implemented in practice by the government of the Russian Federation, the guarantor of the liberal Constitution of the Russian Federation, in the State Duma and the Federation Council. On the basis of the very Constitution of the Russian Federation, written for Russian liberals, the authorities from the side of specialists from the United States.
                        And the HSE is the forge of bourgeois young cadres in this comprador economy and its apologists.
                        REFERENCE
                        Compradorism (Spanish comprador buyer) is a way of doing business in which profit is derived from activities that undermine its national economy and reduce its ability to grow and ...
                      70. -3
                        31 January 2021 06: 31
                        Quote: Tatiana
                        It's useless to talk to you! I tell you about Thomas - you tell me about Erema!

                        He's just one of those who dreams of making a revolution with a civil war and the collapse of the country.
                      71. +17
                        31 January 2021 10: 57
                        Quote: Dart2027
                        He's just one of those who dreams of making a revolution with a civil war and the collapse of the country.

                        There has already been a certain person in history who claimed that Deutschland = Hitler, but my Grandfather proved to him that this was not so.
                      72. -1
                        31 January 2021 11: 59
                        Quote: Stroporez
                        There was already a certain person in history who

                        History is full of all sorts of people who arrange revolutions to the delight of the United States, so your grandfather is no longer interesting.
                      73. +2
                        31 January 2021 23: 27
                        Quote: Dart2027
                        grandfather
                        She doesn't know who else to hide behind: either for the son of a sambist, or for the hero's grandfather.
                      74. 0
                        1 February 2021 20: 01
                        Quote: sniperino
                        Doesn't know who else to hide behind

                        Exactly.
                      75. +2
                        1 February 2021 04: 40
                        And you did not go overboard by chance
                        , about his grandfather, who "is no longer interesting to you" !!!?, @
                      76. +1
                        1 February 2021 20: 03
                        Quote: Revival
                        And you did not go overboard by chance

                        Nope. They simply dragged him here, because nothing else can be said.
                        Quote: sniperino
                        She doesn't know who else to hide behind: either for the son of a sambist, or for the hero's grandfather.
                      77. +2
                        31 January 2021 23: 24
                        Quote: Dart2027
                        one of those who dream of making a revolution with a civil war and the collapse of the country.
                        Or jam with cookies works out.
                      78. +1
                        31 January 2021 13: 29
                        I agree and subscribe to every line you write, Tatyana. If only you could have put 10000 pluses. This is an ideology that we do not have.
                      79. +1
                        1 February 2021 04: 42
                        Bulk banned?
                      80. +4
                        31 January 2021 21: 29
                        How were you minus. They don't want to be conscious and they don't want others to get it. These are Goebbels' students. Mark Twain called the US policy - to rob a neighbor for his own benefit. This is during the US attack on Mexico.
                      81. +1
                        1 February 2021 04: 38
                        So do not scribble, in every article, you need to start with ideology !!!!
                        Let's start with ideology !!!
                        It's so easy for everyone to do it, come on!
                        Or do you propose to whom not to twitch and start simple, with an ideology for the people !?
                      82. +1
                        1 February 2021 11: 28
                        Quote: Revival
                        So do not scribble, in every article, you need to start with ideology !!!!
                        Let's start with ideology !!!
                        It's so easy for everyone to do it, come on!
                        Or do you propose to whom not to twitch and start simple, with an ideology for the people !?

                        Don't shut my mouth, degenerate "communist"!
                        If you yourself do not understand Marxism-Leninism and dialectics, then do not bother others!

                        All of you, now degenerate "communists", are displeased! They turned into a political insignificance! Found an ally - Navalny !!! In common with him, with your red flags and welcoming flags of the LGBT team, you stalk the streets behind Navalny and swing the stupid supposedly proletarian revolution in Russia!
                        You yourself can’t do anything — to assemble your rally separately — so you cling to the provocateurs — foreign agents of Western influence: Navalny, Khodorkovsky ...! Through them you want to get into power in an ugly way! And then the population will need to cleanse such freaks-revisionist-anarchists everywhere with blood from their lives ...
                        SCAMMERS!
                      83. +1
                        1 February 2021 11: 53
                        Quote: Revival
                        ................................

                        Or maybe you are just a Makhnovist? Then take away the RED flag of Victory over the Reichstag from your avatar and don’t powder the brains of people, what are you for Soviet power!
                      84. +3
                        1 February 2021 11: 58
                        What kind of communists are they? Zyu won the election with ebna and backed up. I got cold feet, as if something did not work out.
                      85. +3
                        1 February 2021 12: 33
                        Quote: Tatiana
                        It's useless to talk to you! I tell you about Thomas - you tell me about Erema!
                        So do not go to such rallies for Navalny and his group! Who makes you sick in the head? These are not constructive ways to fight corruption!
                        You are starting to fight corruption at the wrong end. You need to start with IDEOLOGY! The people will not really understand anything and act correctly for their prosperous future until they understand that in fact there is already informally the STATE ideology in the country in the form of the COLONIAL-PARASITARY paradigm of the American economist Milton Friedman, which is set out in his book "Capitalism and freedom "on the first 20 pages. And under Navalny it will not change, but will become even worse. Namely.

                        Unfortunately, on this issue, Russian education in the country has long been "sour". The bourgeois ideology of the American economist M. Friedman is no longer called "bourgeois", but is called abstractly class ideology simply "market" with elements of the so-called. "Monetarism" (i.e. bourgeois pursuit of financial profits).
                        But one cannot equate the concept of real capitalism with all its shortcomings with the doctrinaire idea of ​​the American Milton Friedman in the form of some kind of speculative social project, embodied in life, to build a supposedly ideally fair capitalism on Earth around the world. By what means?
                        At the expense supposedly the existence in the world of a certain ANARCHISTIC is absolutely "free" from everyone and every world market, which is supposedly absolutely "clean" from profanities and dishonesty both on the part of the participants of the capital market, goods (services) and labor, and from the pressure on them by the national state. And at the same time, the author assumes that all market participants free from the state are initially at all times equal in their life start to each other and can always become rich if they just want it. This is pure utopia and bluff!
                        Behind this attempt by Milton Friedman to whitewash capitalism lies a very definite goal taken by Washington's apologists. Namely.
                        The purpose of this American bluff is to make the sovereign countries "indigenous" for the United States, uncontrollably and duty-free by their governments, mistakenly, free and defenseless from competition, open access for US multinational companies to their domestic markets for the sale of foreign goods and the purchase of "indigenous" wealth by foreigners , enterprises and natural resources.
                        In this case, reduction of native state property in the maximum - to "0" - is promoted by the "market people" exclusively as a public good. For the state supposedly does not need to control anything, there is no need to punish anyone, and there is no need to regulate trade and production either. That at the same time all members of society will become such honest and law-abiding entrepreneurs that therefore it will no longer be necessary to protect the population from swindlers, thieves, robbers and murderers. And therefore, the alleged national state, as an anachronism, will disappear by itself as unnecessary, and there is no need to defend it at all. For the distribution of material goods "from above" at the state level is not required, because everything will be regulated by this "ideal" capitalist market. But those who did not fit into the market are already their problems. Let, they say, they survive on their own, as they can. These include in particular all the so-called. "superfluous" people: pensioners, disabled people, children, etc. - all those who "did not fit into the market." But they should be "happy" with their freedom from the centuries-old, fattening abstract-bureaucratic state, which has always been dreamed of by the anarchists for centuries.

                        TOTAL. All this Milton Friedman's ideology about the alleged existence of the so-called. "free" and "clean" market is an anarchist propaganda of the American establishment to disintegrate the national security of sovereign states to their complete elimination and subjugation of their resources in favor of US multinational companies. And unfortunately, this ideology has been UNOFICIALLY adopted by the Russian ruling elite as a state ideology. It is implemented in practice by the government of the Russian Federation, the guarantor of the liberal Constitution of the Russian Federation, in the State Duma and the Federation Council. On the basis of the very Constitution of the Russian Federation, written for Russian liberals, the authorities from the side of specialists from the United States.
                        And the HSE is the forge of bourgeois young cadres in this comprador economy and its apologists.
                        REFERENCE
                        Compradorism (Spanish comprador buyer) is a way of doing business in which profit is derived from activities that undermine its national economy and reduce its ability to grow and ...


                        Welcome
                        hi
                        Great answer!
                        Bravo love
                      86. +1
                        31 January 2021 02: 25
                        It won't get you anywhere. The crowd is provoked not by the actions of the police, but by the customers. And your goal - by any arguments (reference to the female sex, accusations of breaking the law, intimidation of the consequences of police actions, etc.) will force the police to inaction.
                      87. +2
                        31 January 2021 07: 17
                        Quote: clerk
                        The crowd is provoked not by the actions of the police, but by the customers.
                        They did not succeed with teenagers, their aunt is the last hope. And then a lot of money invested for the sake of receiving the "innocent victims of the regime" - down the drain.
                      88. +12
                        31 January 2021 11: 00
                        Quote: sniperino
                        as teenagers, they did not succeed, the aunt is the last hope. And then a lot of money invested for the sake of receiving the "innocent victims of the regime" - down the drain.

                        Are you sure that those same teenagers want to live in such a state called eboputinism?
                      89. +6
                        31 January 2021 11: 24
                        Quote: Stroporez
                        Are you sure that those same teenagers want to live in such a state called eboputinism?
                        You are already building a state within a state for yourself and have invented a name for it, and are you luring teenagers there with false promises? Political pedophiles are in for a happy joy. And adolescents, of course, want everything good and don't want anything bad. Only they haven't figured out where what is.
                      90. +12
                        31 January 2021 12: 05
                        Quote: sniperino
                        You are already building a state within a state for yourself and have invented a name for it, and are you luring teenagers there with false promises?

                        Colleague, I fought for tonsils for my youth and sometimes I don’t want to remember certain episodes, and now I understand one thing that if my children choose another, good life, then I, as a parent and a citizen, will stand up for their choice and be sure to use it in this sense of all their skills, as well as conscience and beliefs.
                      91. +6
                        31 January 2021 12: 42
                        Quote: Stroporez
                        if my children choose a different, good life, then I, as a parent and a citizen, will stand up for their choice
                        Not yours?
                      92. +9
                        31 January 2021 13: 29
                        Quote: sniperino
                        Not yours?

                        Nooooooo, this is not mine, My Kms in SAMBO and quite calmly will be able to cram the police officer into the holes belonging to the same policeman
                      93. +10
                        31 January 2021 14: 59
                        And he will immediately lie face down on the floor, since most often the horses are detained not by ordinary police officers, but by the National Guard officers in uniform. Who also have the appropriate training. And then he will go to places not so distant.
                        And, if he thinks the same way as you ("policemen" "push the employee"), then, I'm afraid, there he belongs.
                        As for your judgments ... as a lawyer, I advise you to choose expressions more carefully so as not to blurt out too much in the heat, judging by the emotions in your comments, you are quite capable of unconsciously doing this in the heat of the discussion.
                        I will not say that I will feel sorry for you, I am a representative of completely opposite views of yours, and, sinful, I cannot be objective here.
                        But I fully admit that you are a good person, a patriot, just letting off steam here, and then it will be a shame to get an article for appeals out of stupidity.
                        Therefore, let's be a little more civilized in the terms set forth publicly, and we will not turn VO into an analogue of Yandex Zen.
                      94. +3
                        31 January 2021 16: 26
                        Quote: Pensive Lawyer
                        And he will immediately lie face down on the floor, since most often the horses are detained not by ordinary police officers, but by the National Guard officers in uniform. Who also have the appropriate training. And then he will go to places not so distant.

                        I wonder if some master is shot at something as especially dangerous, there will also be a wave of screams?
                        I was greatly moved by the story of Alexei Kudin, a professional MMA fighter from Belarus, who stunned several police officers. A professional hand-to-hand fighter fights with the police and he was not shot to ... on the spot and was not even locked up in a pre-trial detention center, but was released on a subscription, spit on which he fled. True, they still caught him, and again at a rally, so it looks like he will get his all the same.
                        https://www.sports.ru/boxing/1093151989-v-moskve-zaderzhali-bezhavshego-iz-belarusi-bojcza-mma-kudina.html
                      95. 0
                        31 January 2021 21: 39
                        About nuts and bolts in the know?
                      96. +2
                        31 January 2021 22: 23
                        Quote: Stroporez
                        the police officer can easily cram the holes belonging to the same policeman
                        Does it even bother you? Or also gets
                      97. 0
                        31 January 2021 14: 11
                        And if you do not agree with the choice of your children and understand that they are being deceived, would you still approve of their choice?
                      98. +1
                        31 January 2021 16: 11
                        Quote: Stroporez
                        Colleague, I fought for tonsils for my youth and sometimes I don’t want to remember certain episodes, and now I understand one thing that if my children choose another, good life, then I, as a parent and a citizen, will stand up for their choice and be sure to use it in this sense of all their skills, as well as conscience and beliefs.

                        That's when your children are trampled from institutes with a wolf ticket, then remember your approval
                      99. -1
                        3 February 2021 11: 09
                        Quote: ZAV69
                        That's when your children are trampled from institutes with a wolf ticket, then remember your approval

                        Did this help Nikolai number two a lot?
                      100. 0
                        3 February 2021 11: 11
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        Quote: ZAV69
                        That's when your children are trampled from institutes with a wolf ticket, then remember your approval

                        Did this help Nikolai number two a lot?

                        Will it help your children in life?
                      101. -2
                        3 February 2021 17: 56
                        Quote: ZAV69
                        Will it help your children in life?

                        It is not clear to me whether you care about my children or propose to expel students with an active life position from the institutes with a wolf ticket? Why not prohibit the use of schoolchildren in the actions of a united Russia? Or is it different?
                      102. -1
                        3 February 2021 22: 33
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        propose to expel students, with an active lifestyle from the institutes with a wolf ticket?

                        Exactly. If their active life position is aimed at destroying the state, then why the heck should the state teach them? Let them stomp into the army or the wipers.
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        Why not prohibit the use of schoolchildren in the actions of a united Russia? Or is it different?

                        Shares of United Russia violate the law of the Russian Federation? Are they not consistent? And what, the kids are being escorted there?
                      103. -1
                        3 February 2021 22: 46
                        Quote: ZAV69
                        Exactly. If their active life position is aimed at destroying the state, then why the heck should the state teach them?

                        You'd better look from this point of view, are students satisfied with such a state? Will they have a lot of jobs after university?
                        Quote: ZAV69
                        Let them stomp into the army or the wipers.

                        In your opinion, will they have a great desire to protect such a state?
                        Quote: ZAV69
                        Shares of United Russia violate the law of the Russian Federation? Are they not consistent? And what, the kids are being escorted there?

                        I don’t want to comment on such nonsense.
                      104. 0
                        4 February 2021 08: 50
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        You'd better look from this point of view, are students satisfied with such a state? Will they have a lot of jobs after university?

                        Who prevents you from organizing into a party and going to the polls?
                        Intelligent students are usually employed in the last courses in their specialty. And if there are no workers, then who prevented them from entering the place where graduates are beginning to be lured even in practice?
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        I don’t want to comment on such nonsense.
                        Drain protected
                      105. 0
                        31 January 2021 12: 00
                        Quote: Stroporez
                        Are you sure that those same teenagers want to live

                        Do you decide for them?
                      106. 0
                        31 January 2021 21: 42
                        It looks like yours are run by some Hitler Youth types
                      107. +2
                        31 January 2021 21: 50
                        Quote: zenion
                        It looks like yours are being ruled

                        That you are self-critical.
                      108. -1
                        31 January 2021 22: 23
                        Now you have already become like two friends from Ilf and Petrov, how they sawed weights out of "gold", so now you push yourself away with words - and who are you ...
                      109. +1
                        1 February 2021 20: 05
                        Quote: zenion
                        Now you have already become like two friends from Ilf and Petrov

                        That is, they agree.
                      110. -2
                        31 January 2021 10: 19
                        Quote: clerk
                        And your goal - by any arguments (reference to the female sex, accusations of breaking the law, intimidation of the consequences of police actions, etc.) will force the police to inaction.

                        My goal, in this case, is to show that the officer who hit the woman violated the "Law on the Police", for which he must answer. Why should I live by the law and the police don't?
                      111. +1
                        31 January 2021 11: 05
                        "Show that a police officer has violated the law" can only be a court or a body with the authority to investigate cases of administrative violations. Personally, you have neither the knowledge, nor the facts, nor the authority to do this. That is, you are a liar and a slanderer, grossly violating the Constitution of Russia in order to discredit and intimidate its employees, in order to complicate the work of the police in the suppression of illegal actions.
                      112. +16
                        31 January 2021 11: 26
                        Quote: clerk
                        Personally, you have neither the knowledge, nor the facts, nor the authority to do this. That is, you are a liar and a slanderer, grossly violating the Constitution of Russia in order to discredit and intimidate its employees, in order to make it difficult for the police to prevent illegal actions.

                        The fact of the violation was recorded on video, just like the fact of apologizing by this bastard in uniform.
                        And if you suddenly thought that this ghoul has no legal and legal assessment now, then believe me that in a very short time he will be condemned by the people themselves.
                        PySy. If something similar happened to my Mom, I would find and punish the villain to the fullest extent of proletarian justice. soldier
                      113. The comment was deleted.
                      114. +3
                        31 January 2021 12: 02
                        Quote: Stroporez
                        If something like this happened to my Mom, I would

                        If you would like to send your mother to such a gathering, then I can sympathize with her.
                      115. +3
                        31 January 2021 21: 48
                        How did the filming end up there, so it was a rigged provocation? Who pushed her that she was promised?
                      116. +1
                        31 January 2021 23: 38
                        Quote: Stroporez
                        I would find and punish the villain to the fullest extent of proletarian justice.
                        One left, or two?
                      117. 0
                        1 February 2021 00: 22
                        The people will not condemn anyone, civilians cannot pose a threat to the state
                        If something like this happened to my Mom, then I would find and punish the villain to the fullest extent of proletarian justice

                        Ko-ko-ko
                      118. +1
                        1 February 2021 04: 50
                        Oh, "petia, petia" well, what are you?
                      119. -3
                        31 January 2021 11: 59
                        Quote: clerk
                        "Show that a police officer has violated the law" can only be a court or a body with the authority to investigate cases of administrative violations.

                        Any person can "show", that is, draw the attention of the relevant authorities. In this case, to understand the essence, this is the prerogative of the supervisory authority, i.e. prosecutors. No "administrative practice" can be applied to a police officer in this case. The employee grossly violated the Federal Law of 07.02.2011 N 3-FZ (as amended on 29.12.2020) "On the Police", in particular Art. 19. The procedure for the use of physical force, special means and firearms. In particular, I violated paragraphs 1, 3 and 4. Here is a link, you can see for yourself: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_110165/b0e7a72817927f6520504c25498b9f687209dfee/
                        Quote: clerk
                        Personally, you have neither knowledge, nor facts, nor authority for this.

                        Who are you to judge my knowledge so indiscriminately? Regarding "neither facts, nor powers", I inform you that there are facts on the video (do you know the concept of video recording?), Regarding powers, are you familiar with such a concept as "Public Defender"? Anyone can be. http://www.jk.ru/blog/173/
                        Quote: clerk
                        That is, you are a liar and a slanderer, grossly violating the Constitution of Russia in order to discredit and intimidate its employees, in order to make it difficult for the police to prevent illegal actions.

                        I usually do not answer people of whom the notorious D.N. Puchkov calls them "stupid young people" (the site does not pass another word), but in your case I will make an exception. Which article (s) of the Constitution have I violated? What grounds do you have for attributing such "goals" to me?
                      120. +1
                        31 January 2021 12: 57
                        1) You did not apply to the prosecutor's office, but anonymously spread lies and slander to the Internet about allegedly violating the law by the police 2) There is no legal assessment on the video. The public defender acts according to the law, and you spread lies and slander anonymously on the Internet. Therefore, you are not a public defender, but a banal liar and slanderer. 3) With your anonymous, deceitful, slanderous accusations against a police officer who honestly fulfilled his duty, you violated paragraph 1 of Art. 23 of the Constitution of Russia, depriving the police of the right to protect his good name. Therefore, you are a liar and a slanderer.
                      121. -3
                        31 January 2021 13: 05
                        Quote: clerk
                        You did not turn to the prosecutor's office, but anonymously spread lies and slander to the Internet about allegedly violating the law by the police

                        So scribble a denunciation on me, who's stopping you. According to my nickname, my name and surname are quite clear. All the data and even the city of residence in my comments can be found. Forward! If you think that I am spreading slander, contact the prosecutor's office.
                        Quote: clerk
                        You violated clause 1 of Art. 23 of the Constitution of Russia, depriving the police of the right to protect his good name. Therefore, you are a liar and a slanderer.

                        Contact the prosecutor's office, who is stopping you? And for me, a being who kicked an old woman with a boot cannot have a good name.
                      122. +1
                        31 January 2021 13: 19
                        1) Yudina's "laurels" do not let you sleep, but should I help you get started? Why should I? "By herself, by herself, by herself ... (c) 2) And you are not only a liar and a slanderer, but also a banal male chauvinist who denies women their rights (including raking in the event of butting with men while performing). a course that women have been serving in the army for 80 years in combat specialties?
                      123. +2
                        31 January 2021 14: 47
                        Quote: clerk
                        And you are not only a liar and a slanderer, but also a banal male chauvinist who denies women their rights (including raking in the event of butting with men during execution). Do you even know that women have been serving in the army for 80 years in combat specialties?

                        Precisely noticed.
                      124. +3
                        31 January 2021 21: 55
                        A man with no name! Suddenly you became a protector of women and stuff. And they wanted to send my mother to the hooves of the Cossack horses.
                      125. +1
                        31 January 2021 22: 07
                        Quote: zenion
                        Suddenly you became a protector of women and stuff.

                        Is it you me or is the site crashing?
                      126. +5
                        31 January 2021 15: 30
                        An elderly woman 54 years old, it seems. Not that old.
                        The officer of the National Guard went too far, yes.
                        But from the point of view of the law, there were no violations.
                        According to clause 1. ....... In the case of the use of physical force, special means or firearms as part of a subdivision (group), this warning is given by one of the police officers included in the subdivision (group).
                        The police naturally warned over loudspeakers of possible arrest and use of force. It's enough.

                        According to clause 3. When using physical force, special means or firearms, a police officer shall act taking into account the created situation, the nature and degree of danger of the actions of persons in respect of whom physical force, special means or firearms are used, the nature and strength of their resistance. At the same time, the police officer must strive to minimize any damage.
                        Situation - riots, isolated clashes with employees. The woman got in the way. To stop is to show weakness, and another person 5 will stand next to the woman. And then you will not pass. Hands are busy. He kicked me away. The fact that the employee did not hit, but shoved it away, indicates that the employee did not even sway, the woman flew off more because the blow was on the move, then the inertia force and the difference in mass were connected. Yes, and from the foot, I think everyone knows how to beat, but here the movement is precisely by pushing (knee to stomach - foot forward).
                        I don't see how the employee could have done otherwise. I think it would be more rude to drag it over the face with the left hand.

                        According to item 4. A police officer is obliged to provide a citizen who has received bodily harm as a result of the use of physical force, special means or firearms, first aid, and also take measures to provide him with medical assistance as soon as possible.
                        What about bodily injury? The video is cut off. Maybe she got up and only after a while went to the hospital. This is just speculation.

                        In fact, the woman tried to prevent the detention. In many European countries, in a similar situation, it would have been treated even worse (in France it could well have caught a rubber bullet, in the United States and a combat one, by the way, too).

                        Nefig to organize spontaneous rallies. If you want a meeting - agree in advance, they will prepare everything for you, organize, and forward, shout to your health. If you want to scream that the police are fascists, get into a fight with riot police, throw dirt at them, throw snowballs at them - well, your choice, no one will agree on this, and the Constitution does not provide for this, just do not be surprised when after that the twisted police act harshly and do not bow down.
                      127. +2
                        31 January 2021 16: 57
                        According to clause 4: "Director of the Janelidze Research Institute Vadim Manukovsky retracted his words about the excellent health of a Petersburg woman who was hit by a policeman and who ended up in the intensive care unit. So he said in an interview with Fontanka.
                        “Invented and quoted. I didn’t say that phrase, ”he said.
                        However, the journalists of Podvyaz, who had previously given this quote, answered him: “We rechecked the number we called in WhatsApp and GetContact - the phone belongs to Manukovsky and he still spoke of“ great health ”. (The whole quote sounded like this: "She has a slight injury, there are no problems at all. She is conscious, she feels great, I would have discharged her at all"). (with)
                      128. +2
                        31 January 2021 22: 00
                        How to write this out if an elderly grandmother was there with one leg and said that it was very hot there and with horns.
                      129. +1
                        31 January 2021 21: 58
                        You have now broken many of the hearts of the bulkheads; moreover, you have twisted their convolutions. Surprisingly, they didn't even put a minus. Apparently from the brain twisted his hands.
                      130. +3
                        31 January 2021 21: 54
                        Oops! You have already made her an old woman. She may be offended by you and say that you persuaded her. She will leave, and you will sit down for malicious provocations against a law enforcement officer. Both on!
                      131. +1
                        31 January 2021 21: 51
                        Is there a provocation against a representative of the law and the country? How much do you think she can take? How much would you give her if she threw herself at your feet and you smashed your forehead on the asphalt?
                      132. for
                        -1
                        31 January 2021 15: 11
                        Quote: clerk
                        That is, you are a liar and a slanderer,

                        So you violated, the court has not yet recognized him as a slanderer.
                      133. 0
                        31 January 2021 16: 53
                        Whom "his" court did not recognize as a slanderer - a computer nickname on this site?
                      134. 0
                        31 January 2021 12: 01
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        My goal, in this case

                        another color revolution.
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        Why should I live by the law and the police don't?

                        They have already explained to you that everything was according to the law.
                      135. -1
                        31 January 2021 22: 02
                        How do they click you? Hopefully not the way I call the dog, but you are artsy and with a number from the future.
                      136. -1
                        31 January 2021 12: 52
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        My goal, in this case, is to show that the employee who hit the woman violated the "Law on the Police", for which he must answer.

                        And do not want to expand the goal - to show that Yudina also violated the law, for what should she be responsible?
                      137. -1
                        31 January 2021 13: 41
                        Quote: aleks26
                        And do not want to expand the goal - to show that Yudina also violated the law, for what should she be responsible?

                        Yes, I have written about this many times, I repeat, they both must answer according to the law.
                      138. +1
                        31 January 2021 21: 46
                        Maybe, admit, who pushed the poor fellow under the feet of the authorities? How much did you personally promise her?
                      139. The comment was deleted.
                      140. +2
                        31 January 2021 21: 35
                        As soon as the masks are removed from their faces, they immediately minus.
                      141. +12
                        31 January 2021 09: 20
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        The only question is who is shaking it more, Navalny with his shares or the authorities with his irrepressible greed, clannishness and theft?

                        Comrade, that's right! Navalny has absolutely nothing to do with it, but the salary of 15 wooden tyrs from Putin's gaspadin and the ruined and plundered economy are the engine of the emerging protest.
                      142. +1
                        31 January 2021 11: 03
                        Quote: Stroporez
                        is the engine of the emerging protest
                        I have to report that you had a miscarriage.
                      143. +12
                        31 January 2021 11: 11
                        Quote: sniperino
                        I have to report that you had a miscarriage.

                        Scar Nicholas under namber two also thought so in 1905.
                      144. -2
                        31 January 2021 12: 03
                        Quote: Stroporez
                        Stsar nicholas under nmber two

                        So how did it end? Perestroika.
                      145. +14
                        31 January 2021 12: 22
                        Quote: Dart2027
                        So how did it end? Perestroika.

                        In his case, everything ended in a basement and a well-deserved execution, and as for the revolution, Duc "the revolution has a beginning ..." of them who survived will envy the dead.
                      146. -2
                        31 January 2021 12: 26
                        Quote: Stroporez
                        In his case, it all ended in a basement and a well-deserved execution.

                        After that, the revolutionaries were shot for twenty years.
                        Quote: Stroporez
                        Duc "the revolution has a beginning ....." in 85-91-93 there was a counter-revolution

                        This is when the communists destroyed the USSR? Somehow it doesn't look like it.
                        Quote: Stroporez
                        and those of them who survive will envy the dead.

                        I really hope that if (God forbid) another revolution occurs, then you will have time to see how all your relatives in this revolution will be killed, before you yourself will be shot when the new government will clean up potential troublemakers.
                      147. 0
                        31 January 2021 22: 10
                        Are you planning to shoot bulk, or strangle?
                      148. +1
                        1 February 2021 20: 06
                        Quote: zenion
                        Are you planning bulk

                        He is just a pawn, but at the moment it will not be possible to reach his owners.
                      149. +3
                        31 January 2021 16: 56
                        Regardless of the personality and merit of Nicholas II, an extrajudicial reprisal against a group of individuals is simply a mass murder.
                        The story is extremely dark, and no one got better from it, except for the British crown, as usual ...

                        But in the current situation, the collapse of power will not lead to the fact that
                        Quote: Stroporez
                        those who survived will envy the dead
                        , but to the fact that the dead will be the envy of those of us who are not lucky enough to bend. Yugoslavia, Libya, Syria and other "lucky ones" are examples of this.
                      150. +1
                        31 January 2021 22: 09
                        Then Navalny needs to let go of his beard. But as one Arab sage says, a beard is not yet a sign of great intelligence.
                      151. 0
                        31 January 2021 22: 07
                        Dreaming is harmless! Lenin was there. Stalin was there. They were all clever and children, they did not shield themselves, nor did they throw women under locomotives.
                      152. 0
                        31 January 2021 11: 12
                        A meeting of adolescents, urban madmen, and petty provocateurs about economic problems? A new word in political analytics.
                      153. +1
                        31 January 2021 22: 06
                        And where did the bulk of the money come from, really from children's breakfasts?
                      154. 0
                        31 January 2021 21: 25
                        And the crowd, that is, the mass, could not provoke? Dumb mass!
                      155. +1
                        1 February 2021 04: 34
                        Don't waste your time, I tried for two days to draw out a direct answer, it's useless, only hysteria and a cry about "reptilians" and "rallying" and modcha wait
                      156. +1
                        31 January 2021 21: 24
                        You will scare everyone so that the fish in the water will start stuttering. The "presidential palace" misses you; working hands are needed there.
                      157. -1
                        31 January 2021 21: 22
                        She hoped that if the Americans did not pay, the Russians would pay.
                      158. +1
                        31 January 2021 06: 50
                        Tatyana has already offered help on many legal websites of Madame, and not stupid lawyers.
                        And the most interesting thing is even those who categorically do not accept Lesha and his followers.
                      159. 0
                        31 January 2021 08: 45
                        Pontius Pilate was about to pardon Jesus, but then Elman Pashayev took the floor. (WITH)
                      160. +2
                        31 January 2021 08: 55
                        Quote: saigon
                        And the most interesting thing is even those who categorically do not accept Lesha and his followers.

                        Though with the devil, but against the authorities. Nothing new.
                      161. +2
                        31 January 2021 10: 23
                        You have strange conclusions, black white and no tones.
                        I personally have Lesha on my side, but there is a layer of people to whom he is directly a ray of light, etc. according to the well-known text.
                        What do you mean by the word or term power?
                        Power itself is an abstraction, the same term as darkness that carries meanings (and meanings are different).
                        Understand that most of the police officers madam just pushed or walked around, maybe madam would have fallen, but again, but madam got a kick.
                        In a word, like that Madame and the footballer found each other and the resonance went and how to get out now is not very clear.
                        And at the expense of the new, you forgive me wrong, the situation is new and very dangerous.
                        Did you even think that the situation is extremely difficult for the leadership of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the football player and others will think about how to follow orders, do not punish the player and we get screams about the death of the law and bloody guardsmen.
                        That is, the split in society will deepen.
                        In such a stalemate before the elections, the leadership was hounded by one, ONE dashing and well-aimed kick at the camera.
                        Well, now think about whether it is important for or against power, or is it secondary.
                      162. 0
                        31 January 2021 11: 07
                        Quote: saigon
                        offered help, and not stupid lawyers
                        Maybe not stupid, they don't give you any guarantees, but they are very greedy. Call them and ask how much they want for their services. Obviously more than you are for similar ones.
                      163. 0
                        31 January 2021 13: 02
                        Everything is simpler - they expect to profit from the money of Yudina's owners if they manage to inflate the scandal and translate it into a legal plane
                      164. +1
                        31 January 2021 22: 12
                        You need to start your defense with an examination in a psychiatric hospital, and then on and on ...
                      165. +1
                        31 January 2021 22: 59
                        Quote: saigon
                        offered help, and not stupid lawyers
                        Funeral home "Nymph" did not offer discounts?
                      166. -1
                        31 January 2021 11: 02
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        Everything that you wrote is irrelevant

                        Has the most direct.
                        From the above, it follows that she is an ideological enemy - in the way of life and, therefore, in the way of thinking.
                        And she - not by law, but by conscience - is entitled to a bullet.
                      167. -1
                        31 January 2021 11: 06
                        Quote: Narak-zempo
                        And she - not by law, but by conscience - is entitled to a bullet.

                        Maybe we will stop living "according to the concepts"? Can you live more correctly according to the law?
                      168. +2
                        31 January 2021 11: 16
                        If you are this type of advocates of legality, why do you declare a police officer a criminal in violation of the Russian Constitution?
                      169. 0
                        31 January 2021 12: 06
                        Quote: clerk
                        If you are this type of advocates of legality, why do you declare a police officer a criminal in violation of the Russian Constitution?

                        Something I do not remember that I would call him a criminal, I wrote only that this two-legged creature that kicks women can not be called not only a "policeman", but also a man. In addition, I wrote that he broke the law. Above I answered you, I will quote.
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        Quote: clerk
                        "Show that a police officer has violated the law" can only be a court or a body with the authority to investigate cases of administrative violations.

                        Any person can "show", that is, draw the attention of the relevant authorities. In this case, to understand the essence, this is the prerogative of the supervisory authority, i.e. prosecutors. No "administrative practice" can be applied to a police officer in this case. The employee grossly violated the Federal Law of 07.02.2011 N 3-FZ (as amended on 29.12.2020) "On the Police", in particular Art. 19. The procedure for the use of physical force, special means and firearms. In particular, I violated paragraphs 1, 3 and 4. Here is a link, you can see for yourself: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_110165/b0e7a72817927f6520504c25498b9f687209dfee/
                        Quote: clerk
                        Personally, you have neither knowledge, nor facts, nor authority for this.

                        Who are you to judge my knowledge so indiscriminately? Regarding "neither facts, nor powers", I inform you that there are facts on the video (do you know the concept of video recording?), Regarding powers, are you familiar with such a concept as "Public Defender"? Anyone can be. http://www.jk.ru/blog/173/
                        Quote: clerk
                        That is, you are a liar and a slanderer, grossly violating the Constitution of Russia in order to discredit and intimidate its employees, in order to make it difficult for the police to prevent illegal actions.

                        I usually do not answer people of whom the notorious D.N. Puchkov calls them "stupid young people" (the site does not pass another word), but in your case I will make an exception. Which article (s) of the Constitution have I violated? What grounds do you have for attributing such "goals" to me?

                        Are you enough?
                      170. +1
                        31 January 2021 12: 41
                        Your lies and fraud? We are in a free country - I have no right to limit your lies.
                      171. 0
                        31 January 2021 12: 44
                        Quote: clerk
                        Your lies and fraud?

                        Refute if you can, of course. In my opinion, I answered you reasonably, but your arguments are not very good.
                      172. -1
                        31 January 2021 13: 05
                        Answered point by point in original post
                      173. -3
                        31 January 2021 13: 15
                        Quote: clerk
                        Answered point by point in original post

                        Does not stand up to criticism, I wrote above.
                      174. +1
                        31 January 2021 13: 25
                        They wrote. It is a pity that they could not argue.
                      175. 0
                        31 January 2021 11: 33
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        Maybe we will stop living "according to the concepts"?

                        One must live according to conscience, according to conscience.
                      176. +2
                        31 January 2021 16: 05
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        Can you live more correctly according to the law?

                        I would agree, but .... Are you ... really stupid or with intent to play with one goal! ???
                        Why should only a policeman live by the law ???
                        And if both - what the hell was she doing at this illegal rally?
                        Hence, initially it is the source and cause of the Consequences!
                        Moreover, with her unlawful actions, she was not only present, but also prevented the LEGAL organizations from fulfilling their obligations to prevent offenses! And if they are wrong in execution, then, as you say, it was necessary to look for video evidence and go to court, And not to cut off to a meeting and shout - WHAT ARE WE FOR? A familiar phrase! Soon, it seems likely to wait from you- LOWER!
                      177. +1
                        31 January 2021 16: 28
                        Quote: Thompson
                        Soon it seems likely to wait from you- UNDERGE !!!

                        ALREADY ONAZHANZHANA !!!
                      178. 0
                        31 January 2021 17: 24
                        "By conscience" and "by concepts" are not exactly the same thing.

                        Although legalism is a serious and incurable disease.
                      179. +1
                        31 January 2021 23: 17
                        Quote: kakvastam
                        "By conscience" and "by concepts" are not exactly the same thing.

                        So I am in favor of conscience.
                        Quote: kakvastam
                        Although legalism is a serious and incurable disease.

                        And what do you actually have against legalism? Fundamentally correct teaching. And the leaders of our country, under whom she achieved the greatest success - Peter I and Stalin - were spontaneous legists, although Peter hardly even heard of such a concept. Stalin may have been aware.
                      180. 0
                        1 February 2021 14: 29
                        Law is an instrument, and by definition, secondary.
                        It is only a way of codifying some social agreements, and it is simply stupid to consider it as an independent value.
                      181. 0
                        1 February 2021 07: 50
                        Quote: kakvastam
                        Although legalism is a serious and incurable disease

                        You seem to be confusing legalism with the Western idea of ​​"rule of law" and "rule of law." But these are two huge differences. Take a look at Wikipedia at least.
                      182. 0
                        1 February 2021 14: 33
                        The legal society is a euphemism for the police state.
                        And I don’t confuse anything, I just don’t like to put the cart in front of society.
                      183. 0
                        31 January 2021 22: 27
                        So you don't know what it means to live by the law.
                      184. +2
                        31 January 2021 11: 46
                        Quote: Narak-zempo
                        And she - not by law, but by conscience - is entitled to a bullet.

                        Public call for murder. What article is due for this?
                      185. 0
                        31 January 2021 12: 19
                        Quote: astepanov
                        Public call for murder. What article is due for this?

                        Minimum extremism. But here it will rather be "And what for me?"
                      186. 0
                        1 February 2021 07: 47
                        Quote: astepanov
                        Public call for murder

                        Have mercy, where did I call? It was only a value judgment, as it is fashionable to express it now.
                      187. +3
                        31 January 2021 23: 04
                        Quote: Narak-zempo
                        ideological enemy
                        This is not an idea, but genetics: "hereditary dissident".
                      188. AUL
                        +3
                        31 January 2021 08: 03
                        Quote: Tatiana
                        On the other hand, it is known that in 2011-2017 Yudina and her children lived in Germany, where Yudina, according to her, earned money through transfers. Yudina, according to her, by her great-grandmother-Swiss, has German roots, so she knows German. Has no higher education ...
                        You delved into the victim's personality in great detail (by the way, you did not find anything illegal). Why don't you do the same work with the policeman who hit her in violation of the police law? The video shows the situation very clearly! wassat
                      189. +1
                        31 January 2021 08: 49
                        The investigation and the court must decide whether it is extremely clear or extremely unclear. And by declaring a police officer a criminal without a court decision, you and your elders are defiantly violating the Russian Constitution.
                      190. 0
                        31 January 2021 11: 21
                        Why do you need the details of a police officer's private life? To intimidate him by threats, bullying and violence against his parents, wife and children?
                      191. AUL
                        +3
                        31 January 2021 14: 01
                        And what was the point of bringing the details of the victim's life? Do they have anything to do with the policeman's act? And how legal is it in terms of disclosing information about a person's private life?
                        To intimidate him by threats, bullying and violence against his parents, wife and children?
                        Eco, my friend, you have a wild imagination! But I didn't suggest that. But since we analyzed one side so carefully, it would be logical to do the same with the other! Or not to do it at all from either side - it would be fair.
                      192. -1
                        31 January 2021 11: 32
                        Quote: Tatiana
                        Quote: sergo1914
                        Auntie, to put it mildly, weird. But even with a foot in this situation, it is not comme il faut to buy goods.

                        Rita Yudina, 54, knocked down by a police boot, arrived at the rally on January 23 in St. Petersburg. specially from Luga. The media write a lot and different things about her and at the same time pay attention to the fact that not all ends meet in her stories.

                        On the one hand, Yudina claims that she comes from a family of dissidents since 1917.
                        On the other hand, it is known that in 2011-2017 Yudina and her children lived in Germany, there Yudina, according to her, earned by translations. Yudina, according to her, by her great-grandmother-Swiss, has German roots, so she knows German. Has no higher education.
                        Now unemployed Yudina lives on the outskirts of the regional center Luga in a village house with sons of 20 and 25 years old, a 15-year-old daughter, a dog and cats. Yudina's family is registered as socially disadvantaged. Yudina's children are from different fathers, where their fathers are now, they do not know, Yudina also refuses to tell. The eldest sons are chronic diabetics and do not work. The eldest son was previously under investigation in a criminal case. The family's budget, according to Yudina, is 10 thousand rubles a month, they eat mostly potatoes and bread in the family. The situation in the Yudins' house, judging by the photo, is simply miserable. But! At the same time, a teenage daughter has the opportunity to receive distance education at a Dutch college. Yudina says her daughter is taught in Holland for freebut this information needs to be verified.
                        More details: https://eadaily.com/ru/news/2021/01/26/prava-yudinoy-kachayut-boris-vishnevskiy-i-igilovec-iz-novoy-gazety

                        Earlier, when Yudina was still in the hospital, she publicly stated that she had forgiven the policeman, under whose hot hand she accidentally fell during the riots in St. Petersburg, which were staged by the navalnists on January 23. But less than three days later, Yudina announced that she wanted this guardian of order to be in the dock.
                        Boris Vishnevsky, a deputy of the St. Petersburg Legislative Council from Yabloko, helped Yudina in drafting the claim and hiring lawyers. Denis Korotkov, a journalist from Novaya Gazeta, provides support to Yudina in the media. This is the same Korotkov whom the Federal News Agency (RIA FAN) demands to be punished as a war criminal for cooperation with ISIS. (prohibited in Russia).
                        Yudina explained the change in her decision to petition a police officer to the liberal media that she has a personal account of the entire "police repressive system" in Russia.
                        Yudina even delivered a public ultimatum: she will withdraw the lawsuit against the policeman if all political prisoners are released and pardoned in Russia... A political prisoner in the interpretation of the liberals is a broad concept, it includes national separatists, terrorists from organizations banned in Russia, saboteurs from Ukraine and the like.
                        More details: https://eadaily.com/ru/news/2021/01/26/prava-yudinoy-kachayut-boris-vishnevskiy-i-igilovec-iz-novoy-gazety

                        Tatyana, again you (with a small one not a typo) advocate violation of the law by law enforcement officers ... but given your recent comments and desires, he needed to open fire to kill ...
                      193. 0
                        1 February 2021 10: 46
                        Damn, well, finally, I've been waiting for the whole life of this lady to dig up and shake out the basket of dirty laundry. So I understand the task was not to dig and no one deliberately delved into it, it just somehow surfaced itself
                      194. +6
                        30 January 2021 20: 50
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        Quote: Tatiana
                        Putin's confidant in the elections, former representative of the headquarters for coronavirus, doctor and TV presenter Alexander Myasnikov

                        Do you think his titles justify police breaking the law?

                        I consider the injured Margarita Yudina a politically anti-Russian and mindless PROVOCATOR!
                      195. The comment was deleted.
                      196. 0
                        30 January 2021 20: 58
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        Quote: Tatiana
                        I consider the injured Margarita Yudina a political, anti-Russian, mindless PROVOCATOR!

                        I don't care who you think she is. The police officer violated the law - he must answer. All point. If she broke the law, let her answer.

                        That's right! In court they will figure out why the hell she did not rush with her questions at the police at the wrong time!
                        By the way, the policeman hit her not in the stomach, but in the leg, pushing her out of his way on the road. But she spanked decently.
                      197. +1
                        31 January 2021 00: 05
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        don't care who you think she is. The police officer violated the law - must answer.
                        Yes, no doubt, but there are nuances
                        Quote: Tatiana
                        The court will figure out why the hell she did not rush with her questions at the police in time.
                        There is such a rule: do not throw the police / special forces / law enforcement on the neck until they are kicked into the reel - they are on adrenaline: they can react very harshly ..
                        I hope the policeman will be acquitted, but the sediment will remain ...
                      198. -2
                        30 January 2021 23: 42
                        She actually broke the law too) and not one. What do you think will have to answer her?)
                      199. +3
                        30 January 2021 23: 44
                        Quote: carstorm 11
                        She actually broke the law too) and not one. What do you think will have to answer her?)

                        Of course, let both of them answer.
                      200. +3
                        31 January 2021 19: 03
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        The police officer violated the law - he must answer. All point.

                        Police Prize Award, Law Change. To wipe the provocateurs into camp dust. And it's time for the state to adopt the experience of El Salvador, otherwise the clever guys are divorced to hell behind other people's backs
                      201. +10
                        30 January 2021 22: 10
                        Quote: Tatiana
                        I consider the injured Margarita Yudina a politically anti-Russian and mindless PROVOCATOR!

                        That's lovely! In this case, I am a provacator, the brave policemen drew up a protocol against me that I entered the store without a mask. Although yesterday I looked, oops, a very nice comrade captain without a muzzle was buying groceries in the store.
                      202. -8
                        30 January 2021 22: 25
                        Quote: Mordvin 3
                        Although yesterday I looked, oops, a very nice comrade captain without a muzzle was buying groceries in the store.

                        That is why it is proposed to issue special passports to those vaccinated against Coronavirus-19 about their vaccination. In principle, the vaccinated no longer need masks. And the military, doctors, teachers are vaccinated in the first place.

                        But in society, the unvaccinated at the same time have corresponding bewildered questions and discontent like yours regarding such a privilege for the vaccinated.

                        So everything is clear with you - you are from the unvaccinated! Yes
                      203. +8
                        30 January 2021 22: 34
                        Quote: Tatiana
                        In principle, the vaccinated no longer need masks.

                        You don't have to lie then.
                      204. -7
                        30 January 2021 22: 36
                        Quote: mordvin xnumx
                        Quote: Tatiana
                        In principle, the vaccinated no longer need masks.
                        You don't have to lie then.

                        Ha! As they say, for what I bought - for what I sell! lol

                        By the way. I didn't put a minus on you - it's not mine! drinks
                      205. +8
                        30 January 2021 22: 42
                        Quote: Tatiana
                        For what I bought - for what I sell!

                        In the last 2 weeks we have some kind of chaos with these masks going on. Yesterday I was standing at a bus stop, policeman what kind of grandmother I dragged into the police station without a mask. It seems that their plan has been increased a couple of times. They run to the shops, catch violators. Then they will receive the prize.
                      206. -6
                        30 January 2021 22: 49
                        We had this in St. Petersburg at first - last spring - it was. A scandal erupted with the detention of one granny in the street, who was forced to go to the pharmacy for medicine and was already walking back. Passers-by filmed the entire detention on video, reported it to the media - and the madness on the part of the police stopped.
                      207. 0
                        31 January 2021 13: 07
                        Quote: Tatiana
                        A scandal erupted with the detention of one granny on the street, who was forced to go to the pharmacy for medicine and was already walking back. Passers-by filmed the entire detention on video, reported it to the media - and the madness on the part of the police stopped.

                        And the number of people infected with covid has increased dramatically. Well, yes, but the mask does not interfere with breathing the air of freedom!
                      208. 0
                        31 January 2021 07: 23
                        Quote: Mordvin 3
                        Yesterday I was standing at a bus stop, policeman what kind of grandmother I dragged into the police station without a mask. It seems that their plan has been increased a couple of times.
                        You yourself are carrying out someone's plan for pouring out information on the police.
                      209. -17
                        30 January 2021 22: 50
                        You stole my childhood in the 90s, Mordvin ...
                        I will steal your calm old age ...
                      210. +9
                        30 January 2021 22: 53
                        Quote: Tank jacket
                        You stole my childhood, Mordvin ...

                        At what kind of drinking?
                      211. -16
                        30 January 2021 22: 55
                        Quote: mordvin xnumx
                        Quote: Tank jacket
                        You stole my childhood, Mordvin ...

                        At what kind of drinking?

                        Your generation pro ... lost the USSR ...
                        I was 1991 years old in 11 ...
                        So don't blame me ...
                      212. +9
                        30 January 2021 23: 11
                        Quote: Tank jacket
                        Your generation lost the USSR ...

                        I think, yes. We didn’t care what was going on the TV behind Swan Lake. Personally, at that time I was soldering a computer Spectrum to Horizon, seeing off my brother to the Urals, I saw a crowd of 15 people with a poster "Down with the Emergency Committee", among whom was my former classmate. Now he works as a watchman for 15 thousand, and you can ask, like: well, Roma, got it?
                      213. -16
                        30 January 2021 23: 15
                        Do not be offended, Mordvin, when your friends from the 90s sit down. This is our revenge for the chaos that you did ...
                        I'm not vindictive, just evil and my memory is good ...
                      214. +16
                        30 January 2021 23: 22
                        Quote: Tank jacket
                        Do not be offended, Mordvin, when your friends from the 90s sit down.

                        Don't be offended, you stupid person, but my friends and I mostly worked at the enterprise. And they paid taxes so that you, a miracle in feathers, would grow up somehow. It can be seen that something happened.
                      215. -18
                        30 January 2021 23: 10
                        Mordvin ... Now you want to steal childhood from my son? We are stupidly tired of you already ...
                      216. +13
                        30 January 2021 23: 16
                        Quote: Tank jacket
                        Now you want to steal childhood from my son?

                        No one will reject childhood, do not worry. And anyway .... Who do you represent me, your mother? A sort of Karabas Barabas, or what?
                      217. -17
                        30 January 2021 23: 21
                        No, you are now pathetic belly ... But the terms will be soldered to you without statute of limitations. For you have done horrible things without a statute of limitations. And the first to sit in Tagil ... for covering up ethnic groupings ...
                      218. +9
                        30 January 2021 23: 25
                        Quote: Tank jacket
                        For you have done horrible things without a statute of limitations.

                        He pointed his finger in the wrong direction.
                      219. -15
                        30 January 2021 23: 30
                        Write in a personal, about your brothers from the 90s if you want indulgence ...
                        Paraparapam shiu ...
                      220. +13
                        30 January 2021 23: 33
                        Quote: Tank jacket
                        if you want indulgence ...

                        Fuck you around the torn corner, where they sell tomatoes. Demand condescension from Chubais with Putin.
                      221. -8
                        30 January 2021 23: 37
                        Accepted...
                      222. +2
                        31 January 2021 12: 08
                        Masks are needed not to infect others, the mask will not protect itself from infection.
                        Let's say the mask reduces the spread of the infection.
                        And a little is not clear about the privileges for the vaccinated, that a 100% guarantee takes place
                        to be ?
                        Personally, I will be bothered by a guy without a mask and a piece of paper in his back pocket about vaccinations. No one puts a stamp on his forehead.
                        So for now, everyone has to wear and wear masks.
                      223. +1
                        31 January 2021 17: 30
                        Not entirely correct.
                        A vaccinated citizen can be the reason for the infection of others if the virus enters the nasopharynx and manages to multiply before they come for him. So it's better to wear masks, and there will be fewer questions.
                      224. -11
                        30 January 2021 23: 44
                        Someone is stopping you from filming it on the phone and submitting an application to the prosecutor's office?) Ask your name and title? What is your civic position for?
                      225. +3
                        30 January 2021 23: 57
                        Quote: carstorm 11
                        Someone is stopping you from filming it on your phone and submitting an application to the prosecutor's office?)

                        I have never been a snitch and I will not. Clear?
                      226. -5
                        31 January 2021 00: 00
                        Ha) well then, do not be surprised that everything around you is violated. You demand something from some while you yourself do not want to do anything. Everything as usual.
                      227. +4
                        31 January 2021 00: 05
                        Quote: carstorm 11
                        You demand something from some while you yourself do not want to do anything. Everything as usual.

                        And not on demand, in good faith? And, well, you huckster, what conscience is, I suppose you have long forgotten. Or cornered.
                      228. -4
                        31 January 2021 00: 08
                        I’m not a huckster, but a hired worker about which I already told you 5 times. The conscience in me is all right. You are a boor, but do you think you have a conscience?) Shapito
                      229. +1
                        31 January 2021 00: 13
                        Quote: carstorm 11
                        The conscience in me is all right

                        Lying, in my opinion. Does your wife work in a paid clinic?
                      230. -5
                        31 January 2021 00: 15
                        in a private clinic. This is true. Her specialization is not practiced in ordinary people.
                      231. +3
                        31 January 2021 00: 19
                        Quote: carstorm 11
                        in a private clinic. This is true.

                        Uh-huh. And my sister, as she ran back in the USSR, gave injections, and now runs. It is not clear why.
                      232. -7
                        31 January 2021 00: 27
                        Everyone chooses who to be. Nobody bothers your sister to study and become the one who does not run. Mine grew up without a father. She has learned and is still studying. He does not travel abroad for seminars and conferences. Respected in her field. After the first marriage, one pulled her son but did not give up.
                      233. +2
                        31 January 2021 09: 53
                        Well, everything is clear with you: you settled down sweetly in this life and wanted to spit on everyone who could not
                        He does not travel abroad for seminars and conferences.
                        Not everyone travels abroad, some need to run around and give injections to non-ambulant patients.
                      234. -8
                        31 January 2021 10: 09
                        awesome) can you hear yourself sometimes? Settled up? Through work they achieved their goal. Through study. And as for the foreign countries, in its area everything is the most advanced there. So they invite me. Those who could not? This is our fault or what? Spit? You know, yes. I have three daughters. I have someone to care about
                      235. -1
                        30 January 2021 23: 29
                        Quote: Tatiana

                        I consider the injured Margarita Yudina a politically anti-Russian and mindless PROVOCATOR!

                        I join, Tatiana!
                      236. +3
                        31 January 2021 09: 59
                        You think so, but we are different: the provocateurs are those who took the people's pensions, those who conduct such a policy that factories, settlements and the population itself disappear. Here's a concrete example:
                        Rosstat data:
                        1. In the RSFSR in 1990 there were 12800 hospitals
                        Now there are 5900 hospitals, 6900 closed, and 2100 hospitals were closed under Yeltsin, 4800 hospitals were closed under Putin
                        2. There were 1990 polyclinics in the RSFSR in 21500
                        Now there are 16500 polyclinics, 5000 were closed, and 200 hospitals were closed under Yeltsin, 4800 polyclinics were closed under Putin
                      237. 0
                        31 January 2021 18: 40
                        Quote: Fan-Fan
                        You think so, but we are different: the provocateurs are those who took the people's pensions, those who conduct such a policy that factories, settlements and the population itself disappear. Here's a concrete example:
                        Rosstat data:
                        1. In the RSFSR in 1990 there were 12800 hospitals
                        Now there are 5900 hospitals, 6900 closed, and 2100 hospitals were closed under Yeltsin, 4800 hospitals were closed under Putin
                        2. There were 1990 polyclinics in the RSFSR in 21500
                        Now there are 16500 polyclinics, 5000 were closed, and 200 hospitals were closed under Yeltsin, 4800 polyclinics were closed under Putin

                        Are you outraged by Putin or admired by Navalny ???
                        The Wood Vendor has no program. Only criticism based on compromising evidence from the intelligence services of other states. Do you think Navalny gets these materials so simply or for "buns" ???? Ideological fighter ??
                      238. +1
                        31 January 2021 12: 01
                        Well, that she is a provocateur to hell with her, but then how to call the chela who, together with her, participated in the creation of the picture?
                        But the chain of actions led to the kick, and these two people are the last links in it. Let's try to understand why the horseradish vegetable was to screw Lesha in the port?
                        It was easier to summon a little later with a summons and arrest them calmly, but someone gave the order to screw them in the port (a very smart and urgently needed action both in time and place).
                        Is it difficult to calculate that Leshkinsky's supporters are a little, how to put it mildly, are easily faithful among the masses and extremely excitable, it was difficult to imagine provocations?
                        And you know, I have suspicions that it was the suspicion that the madam was deliberately brought out to the guy (the overwhelming majority of the employees bypassed, pushed aside, pushed away with their hand, that's what confuses me in the situation).
                      239. -1
                        31 January 2021 02: 16
                        I missed something and there was already a court decision on violation by the police
                        Law?
                      240. -1
                        1 February 2021 08: 56
                        1. State structures view this case as an attack on a government official: the actions of the police officer are recognized as correct, and the attacker is condemned to the fullest extent of the Law.

                        This is the most correct option. For two policemen were leading the detainee who resisted and their hands were busy. They are taught wrestling techniques with both legs and arms and head .. And anyone who tried to interfere with the arrest became an accomplice. And you need to apply special means and techniques to it. And since we have equal men and women, on democratic grounds, then a kick in the stomach of this aunt is fair! It could have been stronger!
                      241. SOF
                        0
                        1 February 2021 09: 19
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        Do you think his titles justify police breaking the law?

                        .... stop pulling the owl on the globe .... not a damn thing this policeman has violated ..... all these postulates from the law on the police, so carefully laid out by you, here and now, relate to ordinary service, in normal conditions and in the absence of a flock, they are inadequate ........ BUT ...... there are other instructions on the subject of riots .... (amendments to the law on police google) ............ no one will be, personally in front of you, when you are in a crowd, bowing in obeisances ..... if your neighbor, in the crowd ..... pshyknul gas from a spray ........... they will sell you too ..... and a neighbor ...... and an overbearing fool, in a skirt ...... although this is already the taste of an employee ......
                      242. +5
                        30 January 2021 21: 35
                        Quote: Tatiana
                        Although Myasnikov's position on this issue is simple and understandable to many, public opinion was still divided. And all would be nothing.

                        do not look or listen to this "doctor"! This is what I tell you as a medic
                      243. +2
                        30 January 2021 21: 47
                        hi
                        Quote: Silvestr
                        do not look or listen to this "doctor"! This is what I tell you as a medic

                        Please tell me, as a medic, can you listen to any of the "teledoctors"? We once laughed great with "doctor" Malakhov. The contingent was very specific (convicts), therefore, with his urinotherapy, he "came in" as well as possible.
                      244. +15
                        30 January 2021 22: 22
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        Please tell me, as a medic, can you listen to any of the "teledoctors"?

                        from the box, no one. Malysheva, gathering audiences, forms a flow of patients to her clinics, in which non-certified specialists work.
                        Myasnikov, I don’t know what kind of head physician he is, but in his wording he expresses this that the question arises - where did he get the diploma?
                        In fact, they are talking the heads of the authorities to shit the brains of the population.
                      245. -17
                        30 January 2021 22: 51
                        You stole my childhood in the 90s, Sylvester ...
                        I will steal your calm old age ...
                      246. -5
                        30 January 2021 23: 48
                        Well, he's kind of a man in the first place. Secondly, a citizen of the Russian Federation. Has his own opinion on this issue. As you are yours. And what kind of doctor he is now does not matter at all)
                      247. for
                        0
                        31 January 2021 15: 57
                        Quote: carstorm 11
                        your opinion

                        Let him speak in the kitchen, during polls or here.
                      248. +10
                        30 January 2021 21: 47
                        Quote: Tatiana
                        with the condition to release Navalny and all his gang.

                        the term Tolerance, in my native virology, implies the absence of an immune response. In sociology, this term is translated as tolerance. But infectious agents multiply without hindrance in a tolerant organism.
                        Rosgvardia, by analogy with the body, has an immune system, and if we tolerate it, what will happen?
                        On the other hand, there is a lack of trust in the government and the political system in society. But in any case, throwing yourself at the police is not correct.
                      249. +1
                        30 January 2021 22: 00
                        Quote: aybolyt678
                        there is a lack of trust in the government and the political system in society. But in any case, throwing yourself at the police is not correct.
                        That's right!

                        However, Navalny and his "navalnyats" together with Khodorkovsky, "Echo of Moscow", "Dozhm", "Yeltsin Center", the US embassy and others just want them to be allowed everything in the country! So that for them in a special way, laxative - i.e. tolerantly tolerant and not subject to jurisdiction - the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation acted!
                        This is exactly what they are trying to achieve with their politically pro-Western extremism at the protests - and not at all peaceful - in the Russian Federation on their part!
                      250. +9
                        31 January 2021 00: 00
                        Quote: Tatiana
                        "Yeltsin Center"

                        Take it easy. As far as I understand, the Presidential Legacy Centers will be installed for everyone. Presidents.
                      251. 0
                        31 January 2021 10: 03
                        What if a police officer breaks the law? Silence and endure? So we get a completely brutal and corrupt state.
                      252. -1
                        31 January 2021 12: 06
                        Quote: Fan-Fan
                        What if a police officer breaks the law?

                        A police officer is detaining him, and some woman is trying to stop him.
                      253. +2
                        31 January 2021 11: 08
                        The immune system is the Ministry of Internal Affairs, and the National Guard is a cancerous tumor - another way to spend money on a tool of oppression and salaries of officials instead of hospitals, schools, pensions, social housing.
                    2. +2
                      31 January 2021 19: 41
                      Quote: aleksejkabanets
                      Article 19. Procedure for the use of physical force, special means and firearms
                      item 1, item 3, item 4. It's minimum.

                      Point 1 immediately flies like plywood over Paris, because clause 2, which excluded it, acted here. Clause 3 is also in the span, since for some reason everyone thinks (they are already excitedly telling) that the blow was in the stomach (what a nightmare, how can a living person and in the stomach be!). In fact (this can be clearly seen in slow motion) the blow was in the upper front part of the thigh.
                      Neither you nor I, no one else can judge the fulfillment of point 4, because the video is cut off. It is not customary for the opposition to film what is in favor of the police.
                      And yes, I wrote enough about the use of weapons, special equipment and physical force (with serious consequences - until the spleen ruptured), so I know the subject firsthand.
                    3. 0
                      3 February 2021 10: 33
                      aleksejkabanets (Alexey)

                      The policeman violated several articles of the "Police Law".
                      Article 19. Procedure for the use of physical force, special means and firearms
                      item 1, item 3, item 4. It's minimum.
                      Described, one article, several points.

                      Or can haste and fuss justify any wrongdoing? Are they imprisoned for exceeding self-defense?


                      Why didn't you cite article 20 as an example? Not mastered? Or is it because it is very uncomfortable?

                      Article 20. Use of physical force

                      1. A police officer has the right personally or as part of a unit (group) to use physical force, including fighting techniques, if non-force methods do not ensure the fulfillment of the duties assigned to the police, in the following cases:
                      1) for the suppression of crimes and administrative offenses; (Madame committed an administrative offense while at an unauthorized rally)
                      3) to overcome opposition to the legal requirements of a police officer.

                      And by the way, read the comments on the article. 20. Clause 5 of the commentary reads: The actions of a police officer do not exceed the limits of necessary defense if, due to the unexpectedness of the encroachment, he could not objectively assess the degree and nature of the danger of the attack.

                      Educate yourself young man !!! laughing
                  2. AUL
                    0
                    31 January 2021 07: 52
                    Quote: ccsr
                    ... But besides the laws, there are also instructions according to which they act in real situations. Moreover, there is also a briefing before taking over the duty.

                    How cute! The instruction, which nobody knows who came up with, is more important than the law! And, even more so, oral instructions before taking over the duty! So don't give a damn about any laws!
                  3. +1
                    1 February 2021 04: 18
                    Oh, a nervous breakdown? Tell me, does he justify the beatings and murders?
                2. +2
                  1 February 2021 08: 40
                  Quote: aleksejkabanets
                  At one time, I found an opportunity to think about what can and cannot be done. Otherwise they would have been imprisoned or killed. The policeman violated several articles of the "Police Law".

                  Yes. You are right dear. Not really) The employee did not violate any article of the Police Law. Because, in accordance with the Police Law, everything looks exactly like this:
                  "...Article 19. Procedure for the use of physical force, special means and firearms, clause 2. A police officer has the right not to warn about his intention to use physical force, special means or firearms if the delay in their use creates an immediate threat to the life and health of a citizen or a police officer or may entail other grave consequences.... "The curtain is respected.
                  1. -4
                    1 February 2021 10: 18
                    Quote: AndreyS
                    ... if the delay in their application creates an immediate threat to the life and health of a citizen or a police officer, or may entail other grave consequences ...

                    Where did you find the "threat to life and health" here? Where did you find "other grave consequences" here? The 2nd paragraph of the 19th article cannot be applied in any way.
                    1. +1
                      1 February 2021 16: 43
                      Quote: aleksejkabanets
                      Quote: AndreyS
                      ... if the delay in their application creates an immediate threat to the life and health of a citizen or a police officer, or may entail other grave consequences ...

                      Where did you find the "threat to life and health" here? Where did you find "other grave consequences" here? The 2nd paragraph of the 19th article cannot be applied in any way.

                      And where did you not find the dear? Have you seen this employee's report of what happened? Are you aware of the crime situation and information known to employees about possible incidents? Are you aware of the instructions received by the employees? Not. It means that you all the more have no right to talk about violations of laws by an employee.
                      1. -3
                        1 February 2021 16: 55
                        Quote: AndreyS
                        This means that you all the more have no right to talk about violations of laws by an employee.

                        That is, according to your logic, if a policeman hits someone with an ax on the camera, I will have to wait for his report?
                      2. +2
                        1 February 2021 20: 10
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        if the policeman hits someone with an ax on the camera, I will have to wait for his report

                        That is, if the same woman attacks a police officer with an ax, he will have to wait until she hits him and only then defend himself?
                      3. +1
                        1 February 2021 20: 50
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        Quote: AndreyS
                        This means that you all the more have no right to talk about violations of laws by an employee.

                        That is, according to your logic, if a policeman hits someone with an ax on the camera, I will have to wait for his report?

                        Exactly! This is what the law you are promoting says. Or does the law only work in one direction?
              2. -4
                30 January 2021 18: 00

                Vasya carry the machine gun, you know that:


                Quote: ccsr
                inaction in places of mass disturbances can result in even greater human casualties, if only not to suppress any opposition to law enforcement agencies.



            2. +3
              31 January 2021 07: 07
              Having come to the street during a non-illegal rally, the grandmother has already committed an offense!
            3. 0
              31 January 2021 21: 45
              And the National Guard is not her accomplice by any chance?
              the conspiracy theory blooms and smells, but at the beginning of the Maidan coup 2.0 it was the same - the Crimean "Berkut" flew into the protesters' camp in the middle of the night and let's beat the "children" with truncheons (40 UAH / stand, which the injured girl blabbed about at the trial) straight on video cameras of the Inter channel.
              After the victory of Maidan2.0, there was a dispersal of especially principled Maidanites who decided to disobey the command to close the shop - at night and "titushki", this time there were no TV cameras, one pitiful shooting from the phone.
              On the topic of the article, one can only say - the Russian gentlemen, high-ranking officers are true to themselves - the Rosguards were handed over with giblets, as many Riga riot policemen were earlier to Lithuania, as militias to Ukraine.
            4. +3
              1 February 2021 16: 02
              The Russian Guard kicked this one .... (I don't even know what to call it) and did the right thing. What this aunt, who stood in the way of the policeman leading the detainee, has no idea in advance. The serviceman has no time to solve these puzzles. Maybe she wanted to present a bouquet, or maybe sprinkle in her face from a spray can ..... THAT "she wanted to ask why she was detained ..." - fairy tales in favor of the poor. The lawyer was found .... I got in the way and got it. I would have picked up an article for her in the Administrative Offenses Code or the Criminal Code, something like an "obstacle to activity." And I agree that the servant was sent to apologize by the worn out bosses. Instead of the National Guard, it was necessary to send an interrogator to his aunt to receive explanations (interrogation). It would be much more helpful.
          2. -8
            30 January 2021 17: 30
            Quote: ccsr
            And if it was a woman

            What if she had a member? Hallucinations are a favorite of the confused.
            1. +5
              30 January 2021 18: 38
              Quote: Svarog
              What if she had a member?

              Is this a sore subject for you?
            2. -9
              30 January 2021 19: 51
              Ashley Bybbbitt was beautiful ...



              1. -4
                30 January 2021 20: 08

                She was shot by a Negro police officer from the SS ...
                1. -5
                  30 January 2021 20: 43
                  Quote: Tank jacket
                  She was shot by a Negro police officer from the SS ...
                  You would not confuse horseradish (plant) with a finger. The Capitol was seized by armed people, there was an absolutely peaceful woman who came out to meet with a question. It could be bypassed. But for all this, she received a powerful low kick from a stacillogromous hulk. Which salary receives from this woman's taxes as well.
                  Further - the author writes that the woman changed her mind, reconciles, and wrote a complaint to the UK. The author needs to read the Criminal Code at his leisure, because harm to health of moderate severity definitely entails the excitation of UD, and reconciliation of the parties under this article is not possible.
                  Police for all defenders - do you want double standards of law enforcement?
                  1. -10
                    30 January 2021 20: 47
                    Gardamir, will you betray a gang of liberals in time, or like everyone else to Mordovia (or to # 13 in Tagil?) ...
                    So on the 13th. Chairs made of birch are planed there of high quality ... At my dacha there are such ...
                    1. +7
                      30 January 2021 23: 37
                      Quote: Tank jacket
                      Chairs made of birch are planed there of high quality ... At my dacha there are such ...

                      Turner, or what?
                      1. -13
                        30 January 2021 23: 40
                        As a check-in, you are first on the list for questioning ... wassat Paraparapam ...
                      2. +8
                        30 January 2021 23: 46
                        Quote: Tank jacket
                        You're first on the interrogation list ...

                        Will there be an interrogation with a lie detector? Or, as usual, with an elephant and a code in the head? No, I won't. Such guests did not bother me, go back.
                      3. -11
                        30 January 2021 23: 46
                        You ought to work as an opera, father. You wouldn't have a price. Didn't he serve Kolchak in his younger years? No? Counterintelligence? Honestly. Well, why were we so immediately embarrassed? Well, into my eyes, into my eyes! In difficult years, did you steal spikelets from collective farm fields? "(C)
                      4. +5
                        30 January 2021 23: 48
                        Quote: Tank jacket
                        In difficult years, did you steal spikelets from collective farm fields? "(C)

                        I had a letter. Honorable!
                      5. -10
                        30 January 2021 23: 51
                        Quote: Mordvin 3
                        collective farm

                        Do you hand over your hucksters' friends from the 90s or not?
                      6. +5
                        31 January 2021 00: 10
                        Quote: Tank jacket
                        Do you hand over your hucksters' friends from the 90s or not?

                        I received so much at the factory in the 90s that I did not care about the huckster. So I don’t rent anyone, go look for clowns under the bushes.
                      7. -9
                        31 January 2021 00: 18
                        Quote: mordvin xnumx
                        Quote: Tank jacket
                        Do you hand over your hucksters' friends from the 90s or not?

                        I received so much at the factory in the 90s that I did not care about the huckster. So I don’t rent anyone, go look for clowns under the bushes.

                        In the testimony you are confused ... To pick up old folders in the Sverdlovsk region? According to Karo? Fartun? For Carp? Herat Ural?
                      8. +3
                        31 January 2021 00: 21
                        Quote: Tank jacket
                        Raise old folders in the Sverdlovsk region? According to Karo? Fartun? For Carp?

                        Lift up Gene-Herat.
                  2. 0
                    30 January 2021 21: 22
                    Ingvar 72. Would she throw herself under the truck? Why the hell did she go out on the road that the arrested person is taking? Isn't it a lot of bullshit to bypass a bad woman, and if she has a knife in her hands and she wanted to kill the prisoner. Did she come out to ask? Please tell me how to get to the library?
                    1. +1
                      30 January 2021 22: 08
                      Quote: zenion
                      Why the hell did she go out on the road that the arrested person is taking?

                      Is there martial law in the city? belay They told the detainee for an administrative violation. If you do not see the difference now, at most you will see it in the fall.
                      Although I hope it will not come to this, and we will see the revolution from above.
                      1. -5
                        30 January 2021 22: 30
                        Didn't she want to stab the arrested person, or free him? This is certainly not a war. This is not a war, a football player runs with the ball to the opponent's goal, and then a fan jumps out in front of him and asks him if you will hit the goal, or you will pass it to someone. What would a player with the ball do to such a fan? Now you can answer, what would the royal cossack do to her if she jumped out in front of his horse? Ah, you know, a peaceful demonstration, priest Gapon, machine guns and checkers. But this is not a war ?!
                      2. -6
                        31 January 2021 06: 34
                        Quote: Ingvar 72
                        They told the detainee for an administrative violation. If you do not see the difference now, at most you will see it in the fall.

                        So what's the difference?
                      3. 0
                        31 January 2021 11: 14
                        In the legal status and lawfulness of the use of force, those arrested are limited in their rights by the decision of the court or the investigator in the framework of the initiated case.
                      4. -1
                        31 January 2021 11: 55
                        Quote: IImonolitII
                        those arrested are restricted in their rights by a court or investigator's decision within the framework of an initiated case

                        That is, until a person is convicted in court, he cannot be detained? Hmm ...
                      5. 0
                        31 January 2021 16: 11
                        At what time the bulkheads flew in and chopped us with checkers into a steak, or maybe into cutlets. And these are all the same who are for democracy, but only them, the rest it does not bite.
                  3. -4
                    30 January 2021 21: 31
                    Quote: Ingvar 72
                    The Capitol was seized by armed people, there was an absolutely peaceful woman who came out to meet with a question.

                    For the umpteenth time, "peaceful demonstrations".
                    1. +2
                      31 January 2021 10: 11
                      According to Article 31 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, citizens of the Russian Federation have the right to assemble peacefully, without weapons, to hold meetings, rallies and demonstrations, processions and pickets ...
                      Then remove this article from the Constitution.
                  4. +2
                    30 January 2021 22: 32
                    Ambal was on duty in the first place and carried out the arrest, secondly. In the United States, such a lady would simply be shot on the spot. Moreover, it is quite obvious that the lady was not alone. With at least one accomplice - the operator. Her actions were prepared and planned in advance. That is, it is a provocation. Banal. Now, attention! Did you think that people went to the unauthorized rally just for a walk? Of course not. They went out to participate in such provocations. And more attention. Do you think that this provocation ends? Of course not. The Ukrainian experience teaches us that then "unknown snipers" appear and then victims. So that this does not happen, the representative of the authorities uses decisive force. And as a representative of the authorities, he has the right to do so.
                  5. -4
                    30 January 2021 23: 51
                    Where does it say that she is not armed?) How can an employee determine this?) X-ray glasses?)
                    1. AUL
                      +6
                      31 January 2021 08: 38
                      And when you go out into the street, where do you write that you are not armed? Oh, don't you write at all? Well, get it in your belly! From a law enforcement officer!
                      1. -7
                        31 January 2021 09: 24
                        she was peacefully gklyaetsya in the leg on the street and not kicked in the stomach?)))
                    2. +1
                      31 January 2021 10: 13
                      Well then, urine everyone in a row, suddenly everyone is armed.
                      1. -3
                        31 January 2021 11: 25
                        So what? The Polivnians are wetting the dead on the street, who is just walking?) I didn't notice. And if you go initially to violate the law, then why be surprised, then so it flew in?) You will not understand that even here on the branch 90 percent of people at least do not condemn the representatives of the law)
          3. -4
            30 January 2021 21: 02
            Have you gone crazy with the author? I have no words - the woman DIDN'T ATTACK the policeman, she didn’t even swing at him - and was kicked in the stomach. The policeman acted like a real man - he went to her and apologized. The work is nervous, which cannot be done in the heat of the moment ... But the author, Mr. Bondarev, compares this woman with Tonka machine gunner! Now this is already completely subject to jurisdiction, since he did it publicly. Mr. Bondarev probably believes that going to meet a servant of the law and shooting thousands of unarmed people are one and the same thing. Let me also remind Mr. Bondarev (quite deliberately I write with a capital letter) that in the traditions of our culture it has always been to treat women, old people and children with indulgence, and this has nothing to do with Western tolerance and in Mr. Bondarev's interpretation. I don't think that Herr Bondarev is so stupid that he doesn't understand this. And if he understands, then his libel is a deliberate and deliberate provocation. On which, alas, many fell for.
            1. -5
              30 January 2021 21: 27
              Or maybe Tonka did not fire in bursts, but at each one separately, then how? How much do you want to translate this matter into the fact that she was already modern Zoya Kosmodemyanskaya? She stood aside, and he chose her and punched her in the stomach and she lost the child, or the mind? What can you say about the act of this woman, she did everything right, or was it a provocation on her part.
              1. +3
                30 January 2021 21: 37
                Quote: zenion
                How much do you want to translate this matter into the fact that she was already the modern Zoya Kosmodemyanskaya? She stood aside, and he chose her and punched her in the stomach and she lost her child, or her mind?
                About Kosmodemyanskaya the conversation was raised by you, not me. And you seem to see only two options - either Kosmodemyanskaya or Tonka the machine gunner. Primitive, my friend. In your opinion, to punch in the stomach without choosing, but only because she turned up under her foot - does this greatly change the matter? You say you haven't lost your child, you haven't blown your brains out, and that's why there is no question? You will tell your wife this when she is sent to the hospital and she asks you to intercede. I do not see you, sir, from now on point-blank: you are not a man, but something amorphous
                1. -3
                  30 January 2021 22: 36
                  It is quite obvious that the lady was not alone, but with an accomplice - the operator. That they were prepared and planned the action in advance. It can be seen that she received a blow not in the stomach, but in the thigh.
            2. 0
              30 January 2021 21: 32
              Quote: astepanov
              Let me also remind Mr. Bondarev (I am quite deliberately writing with a capital letter) that in the traditions of our culture it has always been to treat with indulgence women, old people and children,

              That is, they have an indulgence?
              1. +1
                30 January 2021 21: 56
                Quote: Dart2027
                That is, they have an indulgence?
                If you ask such a question, then it is useless to explain: the problem is that you are from a different culture. But think at least of this: a policeman kicked a woman in the stomach who showed no signs of aggression and did not interfere with him in anything. And how could she interfere with THREE policemen? Aren't you afraid that this means that a representative of the authorities can do whatever he wants with you, wherever and whenever he wants - and he will get nothing for it?
                1. -2
                  30 January 2021 22: 38
                  How is it "no sign"? On the contrary, she literally lashed out at the employee in execution. How to evaluate her actions? Or maybe she was mined? Thousands more reasons. The employee reacted correctly.
                2. -3
                  30 January 2021 23: 54
                  To stab with a knife. Pour acid. Blow up the martyr's belt. Each of the options and many others are not just possible. This happens to police officers from time to time around the world.
                3. -7
                  31 January 2021 06: 37
                  Quote: astepanov
                  If you ask such a question, then it is useless to explain: the problem is that you are from a different culture.

                  That is, there is nothing to answer.
                  Quote: astepanov
                  But think about this: a policeman kicked a woman in the stomach.

                  Which participated in the street riots and herself crawled under the feet of the employees during execution.
                  Quote: astepanov
                  Are you not afraid that this means that a government official can do anything with you, anywhere, anytime - and

                  I have been hearing this whining for years. Here is only the whole historical experience says that just such as this woman and her masters do.
            3. -2
              31 January 2021 17: 34
              You got a little wrong with the numbers. Now everything is not the same, and women clinging explosives to their stomachs and women who kill their husbands, or simply because she offered herself to someone, but he did not want to, also shoot. The timing is not right. The person walking with those who arrested him is the person for whom they are responsible. If someone stabs him with a knife, or kicks him in the balls and he loses the opportunity to have children, who will be responsible for him. They protected him from her. Nefic cross the road in front of the car and in front of the convoy. In the States, if his hands are busy, he would give with all his heart, and she would be thrown away.
          4. +1
            31 January 2021 09: 37
            "And if this woman specifically wanted to arrange a provocation and cook something (acid for example)"
            I did not cook, but I got it professionally from my feet. and some kind of strange "attack", just got in the way of the "defender"
            1. -2
              31 January 2021 12: 07
              Quote: aglet
              I did not cook, but I got it professionally from my feet.

              What I fought for.
          5. 0
            1 February 2021 07: 17
            Lights, camera, let's start!
        2. +6
          30 January 2021 18: 11
          Quote: aleksejkabanets
          Poor policeman, how bravely he defended himself. Barely fought back, sick.

          The usual tactic of "color revolutionaries" is to put women, preferably the elderly, in front of the protesting crowd, and trained fighters dispersed in the crowd. All this has been tested for a long time, I personally know it from the events in Bishkek in 2005 (the "tulip" revolution). Very much approved by the US State Department. wink
          1. +10
            30 January 2021 18: 21
            So they specifically choose either women or children, but I have a question, does this type of aunt have brains? And where were the brains of the mother who flooded with the stroller to the rally?
            If there was a real child in the stroller and not a dummy, then at the place of custody I would take care of depriving such a mother of parental rights, who risks the life of her child. Or was there no child after all?
            1. +7
              30 January 2021 18: 26
              Quote: Alexander Suvorov
              So they specifically choose either women or children, but I have a question, does this type of aunt have brains?

              In Bishkek, these were pre-trained and paid female individuals. First, they swept away the special forces and dispersed the law enforcement officers in the city, then trained and armed militants entered Bishkek, then looters began to rage. This cannot be allowed in Russia. IMHO.
        3. 0
          30 January 2021 21: 32
          alekseykabanets
          ======
          Terribly interesting, but HOW would you "defend" not his place?
          Only, God forbid, do not try to assure me that neither a hand nor a leg was raised "on a woman" !!!
          1. -1
            30 January 2021 21: 40
            Quote: venik
            Terribly interesting, but HOW would you "defend" not in his place?

            No way. He is for the revolution.
        4. -1
          31 January 2021 15: 14
          For some reason, no one is considering the third option, only as the author said ..
          and if the law enforcement officer is punished for an excessive reaction, and the aunt is also brought to justice ...
        5. +1
          31 January 2021 21: 16
          aleksejkabanets. He hit her with the toe of his boot? No, he pushed her away. He was not defending himself, but the detainee. His life should be guarded by those who accompanied him, they are responsible for him. She flew away from the detainee. If he had hit her with the toe of his shoe, she would have doubled over, and would have straightened her in the morgue.
      2. -6
        30 January 2021 17: 29
        Quote: Michael m
        Permissible self-defense is also not comme il faut. When the attacker, having received a pumpkin, runs to court, and the victim of the attack is imprisoned. Do not meddle with a representative of the authorities, and you will not be rewarded as you deserve.

        And where did she climb? She was unarmed and went to the meeting .. for no reason, she got May-geri right in the stomach .. Absolutely, in this situation, a policeman's attack was not appropriate .. He needs to check his head ..
        1. +1
          30 January 2021 18: 40
          Quote: Svarog
          And where did she climb?

          Participate in street riots.
          1. -1
            31 January 2021 15: 21
            Quote: Dart2027
            Quote: Svarog
            And where did she climb?

            Participate in street riots.

            And in this case, with filming on the camera. After all, in the video, she looked back several times at the operator who was behind her and only then moved onto the roadway across the policemen just when the operator took a convenient position for filming.
            Perhaps the renter promised to pay her money for this, because she had a debt in banks in the amount of 165 thousand rubles. She clearly has the motivation to make money.

            At the same time, only one thing is surprising - what bank gave her a loan to an unemployed person with a family income of 10 thousand rubles? Something I do not really believe in such generosity of banks.
            And if the prosecutor's office checks whether she really had such a bank debt, when, where and why did she get it?

            By the way, the prosecutor's office has already taken up the issue of finding out the income of her family.
            1. 0
              31 January 2021 16: 29
              Quote: Tatiana
              And in this case, with filming on the camera. After all, in the video, she looked back several times at the operator who was behind her and only then moved onto the roadway across the policemen just when the operator took a convenient position for filming.

              Absolutely. This is how they act
            2. -1
              31 January 2021 17: 39
              She had a calculation, the Americans will not pay, the Russian government will pay.
      3. +3
        30 January 2021 17: 29
        Sergei Smirnov, editor-in-chief of Mediazona, was detained at the exit from his house in Moscow. The security forces were waiting for him at the entrance ... It's so romantic good
        The police did a good job.
        Thank you for your service to the Fatherland!
        1. +6
          30 January 2021 17: 45
          Quote: Tank jacket
          The police worked competently

          I agree. All the way. There was no knock on the door asking to open it. There were no calls from the editor-in-chief to the curators with a request to send help in the form of all kinds of stringers in thongs. We stood quietly at the entrance, smoked. Like the lads in the 90s ...
          good
          1. -1
            30 January 2021 17: 51
            Clearly, fashionable, youthful ... bully
            The Main Investigation Department of the Investigative Committee of Russia opened a criminal case of large-scale fraud against businessman Alexander Khomenko, calling him a "sponsor" of the Anti-Corruption Fund.

            "According to the available information, Khomenko provided financial support to the Anti-Corruption Foundation (FBK) and is currently hiding in Ukraine. A decision has been issued against him to prosecute three episodes of fraud, and he is put on the wanted list," on the website of the department.
            According to the Investigative Committee, Khomenko and “other persons who acted with him as part of an organized group” entered into the documents knowingly false information about the cost of the work performed and stole more than 30 million rubles from the budget of the Moscow Region. The criminal case was initiated under Part 4 of Art. 159 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (fraud committed by an organized group, on an especially large scale).
        2. +1
          30 January 2021 18: 15
          Quote: Tank jacket
          Sergei Smirnov, editor-in-chief of Mediazona, was detained at the exit from his house in Moscow. The security forces were waiting for him at the entrance ... It's so romantic
          The police did a good job.
          Thank you for your service to the Fatherland!

          Yes, we have already begun work among the contingent (the video does not open here, but you can watch it using the link):
          [media = https: //youtu.be/X2qjLDKtrpk]
          1. -2
            30 January 2021 18: 18
            Hi Tank, hi what pleases, they work pointwise, and not across areas ...
            1. 0
              30 January 2021 18: 21
              Quote: Tank jacket
              Hi Tank, what pleases me, they work pointwise, not across areas ...

              hi Greetings! You need to work as hard as possible if you don't want to lose the country. It is necessary to bring to justice all those who incite minors to participate in the performances.
              1. -3
                30 January 2021 19: 08
                Quote: Tank Hard
                Quote: Tank jacket
                Hi Tank, what pleases me, they work pointwise, not across areas ...

                hi Greetings! You need to work as hard as possible if you don't want to lose the country. It is necessary to bring to justice all those who incite minors to participate in the performances.
                Evil tongues say that parts of the "elite" have been given an ultimatum from the can's team to overthrow the constitutional order on pain of seizing assets abroad ...
                Well, well, this denotation will not go unnoticed wink
                1. -1
                  30 January 2021 21: 10
                  Quote: Tank jacket
                  Evil tongues say that parts of the "elite" have been given an ultimatum from the can's team to overthrow the constitutional order on pain of seizing assets abroad ...
                  Well, well, this denotation will not go unnoticed

                  Well, I don't know that. But if we assume that someone keeps their savings in a Swiss bank, for example, then the bank controllers can set their own conditions, of course. hi
              2. +2
                30 January 2021 20: 58
                Quote: Tank Hard
                You need to work as hard as possible if you don't want to lose the country.

                Let's start shooting right away, shall we?
                People, what happened to you? fool
                When laws in a country work differently for different groups of the population, when an unhealthy skew in living standards is noticeable with an open glance, when incomes of the bulk of the population are falling, but they are growing among the best friends of the guarantor, anger is the norm. And instead of urgently taking steps to change the course towards degradation, the authorities are increasing spending on the Russian Guard, which this year will exceed spending on the Ministry of Defense. A striking indicator of whom the government considers the enemy.
                1. +5
                  30 January 2021 21: 06
                  Quote: Ingvar 72
                  Let's start shooting right away, shall we?
                  People, what happened to you?

                  Well, you know better from the sofa. Well, I saw it directly. Everything is relative. In (in) Ukraine, after the dispersal of the Berkut, many more people suffered (including fatally) if they were simply dispersed in burrows. And you either do not understand (this happens with couch fighters), or a provocateur. request
                  1. +2
                    30 January 2021 22: 14
                    Quote: Tank Hard
                    ... And you either do not understand (this happens with couch fighters), or a provocateur.

                    Yes, I just understand, and what you do not understand? In your opinion, the West and the Benderaites are to blame for the events in Ukraine? No, dear Tank, Yanukovych and our toothless policy towards neighbors are to blame.
                    Protests are symptoms, disease is our power. And she does not want to be treated.
                    1. -4
                      30 January 2021 22: 18
                      Quote: Ingvar 72
                      Yes, I just understand, and what you do not understand? In your opinion, the West and the Benderaites are to blame for the events in Ukraine? No, dear Tank, Yanukovych and our toothless policy towards neighbors are to blame.
                      Protests are symptoms, disease is our power. And she does not want to be treated.

                      Everyone is to blame, including the people. which allowed the situation in the country, which led to a split in the country and a civil war. Yanyk is alive and well, but what about in (in) Ukraine. Have you started to live better? Richer? Less deaths? What is the integrity of the republic?
                      1. +4
                        30 January 2021 22: 30
                        Quote: Tank Hard
                        Everyone is to blame, including the people.

                        The filly people, wherever they send, will go there. But the thirsty horse runs faster to the watering hole. wink wink
                        So the people should not be blamed, neither in Ukraine, nor in our country in the 90s.
                      2. -4
                        30 January 2021 22: 31
                        Quote: Ingvar 72
                        So the people should not be blamed, neither in Ukraine, nor in our 90

                        Well, yes, the Martians are to blame. laughing
                      3. +7
                        30 January 2021 22: 37
                        It is customary for us to attribute the merits of the people to those in power, and blame the people for their mistakes. request
                      4. -1
                        30 January 2021 22: 40
                        Quote: Ingvar 72
                        It is customary for us to attribute the merits of the people to those in power, and blame the people for their jambs

                        Igor. in Odessa who burned people?
                        And who is this, not the people? And what have you achieved? Has it gotten better?
                      5. +1
                        31 January 2021 17: 54
                        Ingvar 72. Only you said that the people are horses, and Hitler called the mass, or meat afterwards. And now suddenly contradict yourself.
                      6. +1
                        31 January 2021 17: 52
                        Ingvar 72. You know little about what happened in Ukraine. But there miraculously turned out to be specialists from the West and the East. Moreover, I lived in an area where there were many Banders who were allowed to go home. Do you think they have changed?
                    2. 0
                      31 January 2021 17: 48
                      Are there specialists who treat diseases? Does your boss treat such diseases, isn't he from the same brigade. After all, they believed before the war the communists, who later became policemen and traitors. And the point is not in the woman, but in those who replace the fight against thieves and bribe-takers, the fight for the chair.
                  2. +3
                    30 January 2021 22: 15
                    Quote: Tank Hard
                    if they were just dispersed in burrows.

                    And what, there are already norms - how many women can be swept with ankle boots in the stomach? And there is a right to beat those who do not take any action at all? Someone can sanely say: what wrong did this woman do against the trinity of mordovots? Looked askance? Not breathing on command? There is a video, she did not do anything.
                    1. -3
                      30 January 2021 22: 20
                      Quote: astepanov
                      And what, there are already norms - how many women can be swept with ankle boots in the stomach? And there is a right to beat those who do not take any action at all? Someone can sanely say: what wrong did this woman do against the trinity of mordovots? Looked askance? Not breathing on command? There is a video, she did not do anything

                      Why would "women" (as you called them here) go to a rally at all?
                      1. +3
                        30 January 2021 22: 45
                        Quote: Tank Hard
                        Why would "women" (as you called them here) go to a rally at all?

                        Is this a good enough reason to go crazy? Is that exactly what the law says?
                      2. -2
                        30 January 2021 22: 51
                        Quote: astepanov
                        Is this a good enough reason to go crazy? Is that exactly what the law says?

                        Silly conversation ... request Why would a woman who has a family and worries go to a rally? In Bishkek in 2005, these were paid provocateurs. This is a proven fact. But as always later. First, the unjust regime was thrown down (and it was there and in truth not quite fair), then nothing got better. dropped the next one, it didn't get better again, then everything again. But it turned out. that women in the ranks of the protesters were paid for provocations. But that later. when the deeds were done. feel
                    2. -2
                      31 January 2021 17: 58
                      A. Stepanov. We saw what they did in the Netherlands with those who didn’t do anything, but just came to report. But there was no permission for a mess. But everything is fine there, because they are in NATO, and Russia is against NATA.
                      1. -1
                        31 January 2021 19: 15
                        Quote: zenion
                        We saw what they did in the Netherlands with those who didn’t do anything, but just came to report.

                        Do you live in the Netherlands? My whole zombie is filled with groans from Kiselev and Solovyov about the poor Niederglands. To listen to them - you can't press people there. But somehow it turns out that since they cannot, then we can. Especially old women if they don't bother anyone. But I live in Russia, I do not care about your Niederglands, I am interested in what is happening with us, not with you, wherever you are.
                2. -3
                  30 January 2021 22: 56
                  Well, you are coca ... not tolerant. Why shoot? Well, maybe with rubber bullets, and then someone can knock out an eye. It is necessary, as in civilized countries - with gas, there, with tears, the crowd to pollinate a little, use water cannons. Precisely, water cannons are very effective in our conditions! And most importantly, no direct contact with law enforcement officers! In such conditions, others who have clinging to "ideological" svobs will immediately lose their desire to fight with someone - their pants will freeze. And most importantly, everything is like abroad, "European"!
                3. +3
                  31 January 2021 00: 36
                  Quote: Ingvar 72
                  imbalance in living standards

                  what competent actions of the Kremlin do you see? now the people are easy on their feet and in prosperous countries. navalnists outplay Vova for me - well, why did they touch him themselves, they substitute - right now, Leshka has risen in status to another level ... so everything is clumsy .. Vofkin's money bag did not add to his popularity today with this castle
                4. 0
                  31 January 2021 12: 34
                  Let's all the same understand Rosgvardia is not a very homogeneous and motley structure and say that it is a sharpener for overclocking all polls is not correct.
                  They took the Vovchiks from the Ministry of Internal Affairs, added them, but why didn't they just add them and got a new guard.
                  The Rosgvardia carries out the protection of objects and issues permits and generally a ready reserve in case of war for the Ministry of Defense.
                  So overclocking people are not the majority there.
                5. 0
                  31 January 2021 17: 44
                  How are you worried. Instead of correcting, you again call for doing the same thing that you did with the USSR, the same ones.
        3. 0
          30 January 2021 20: 46
          Quote: Tank jacket
          The police did a good job.
          Thank you for your service to the Fatherland!

          Was he at the rally? According to him, no, and he has an alibi. But he was detained precisely for his participation in the rally.
          Where did you learn to read and write, not in the Prigogine lyceums? wink
          1. -3
            30 January 2021 20: 56
            It is not important who studied where, but who caught what feel
      4. -2
        30 January 2021 17: 51
        And in what place is there defense, and even admissible? 54 year old woman asked a question and got in the belly. Interestingly, if you are asked to a representative of the authorities, these representatives are dumb, you will also think?
        1. +8
          30 January 2021 18: 10
          ssergey1978 (Sergey)
          And in what place is there defense, and even admissible? 54 year old woman asked a question and got in the belly.
          If on an ordinary day she would have approached a policeman on the street with a question, that would be one thing, but at an illegal rally to go in with the type of "questions" is completely different, and the camera turned out to be very useful here, so this is a rigged provocation in its pure form, like the allegedly all "bloody" ketchup baby.
          1. +4
            30 January 2021 22: 17
            Quote: Alexander Suvorov
            but at an illegal rally to climb with the type of "questions" is completely different

            Where is it spelled out in the legislation? Or is it from the area of ​​thieves' concepts, and not law?
            1. -4
              31 January 2021 06: 40
              Quote: astepanov
              Where is it spelled out in the legislation?

              Obstacle to employee actions during execution.
        2. -2
          31 January 2021 18: 05
          ssergey1978. Did you hear what she asked? You are a little like an old woman who was sent to a gynecologist. He examined her. She got dressed, opened the doors and suddenly turned around - does your mom know what you are doing here? So what did the woman ask? How to get to the library, or you have matches, you have nothing to light a cigarette with, or maybe you decided to kick the arrested person in the balls. As I now hear her say - I can hit him in the balls, and you take it off, then I will show my husband what I will do to him if he goes left and right.
          1. 0
            31 January 2021 20: 53
            Are you sober? The whole world heard what she asked.
    2. +3
      30 January 2021 15: 14
      Quote: sergo1914
      Auntie, to put it mildly, weird. But even with a foot in this situation, it is not comme il faut to buy goods.

      The situation is stupid, but ... in any case - an attack on a police officer must be stopped Harsh! Otherwise ... down with the police, down with the authorities - hello Holiday of Disobedience. Only very quickly, from sorting out relations with representatives of the Power, we will move on to the next stage ... let's start Fun and with Fire, Cut and Shoot Friend - Friend!
      1. -10
        30 January 2021 15: 38
        Quote: Hunter 2
        The situation is stupid, but ... in any case - an attack on a police officer must be stopped Harsh!

        And where, let me be curious, was there an attack on a policeman? She didn't have time to ask him. By law, a police officer must stand trial, at least for abuse of power. No need to forgive the scum, tomorrow he will hit someone's mother, grandmother, child!
        1. +2
          30 January 2021 15: 46
          The policeman carried out the Detention ... and it is unknown who, possibly an armed criminal! This strange aunt (supposedly Orthodox) tried to obstruct the Police work! All point, let Others think and study the laws.
          1. +3
            30 January 2021 15: 49
            Quote: Hunter 2
            This strange aunt (supposedly Orthodox) tried to obstruct the Police work!

            Watch the video. Did she grab his hands? How did that stop him? How and in what way did she "try to obstruct the Work of the Police"? Those who justify the scoundrels are no different from them.
            1. +4
              30 January 2021 16: 36
              Alexey, you are undoubtedly right. Those who justify the scoundrels are no different from them. So don't make excuses, be nice. In principle, the policeman did the right thing. He was escorting the violator, and some exalted accomplice to the crime (riots) rushed to him. In this case, the policeman acted most humanely. According to the mind, they should have tied this "victim" too. Not to mention the fact that this aunt herself is very muddy.
              1. -4
                30 January 2021 16: 52
                Quote: Stroibat stock
                In principle, the policeman did exactly the right thing ...

                The policeman acted against the law.
                Federal Law of 07.02.2011 N 3-FZ (as amended on 29.12.2020) "On the police" read.
                http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_110165/b0e7a72817927f6520504c25498b9f687209dfee/
                You are an intelligent and adequate person, you yourself will see there the articles that he violated, and there not one article was violated.
                1. +4
                  30 January 2021 16: 58
                  Did the "victim" violate anything? laughing
                  It's just that the circus, which we call an "unauthorized rally", is called by the "lights of democracy" mass riots, which are dispersed violently, right up to shooting. So this offender got off really well. Not to mention the fact that she was not even asked if she knew about the responsibility for participating in an "unauthorized rally" and responsibility for obstructing the work of the police.
                  1. -4
                    30 January 2021 17: 01
                    Quote: Stroibat stock
                    Did the "victim" violate anything?

                    If she violated, let her answer according to the law, she knew where she was going, but I will repeat myself BY THE LAW, and not with a boot in the stomach. Everyone should be equal before the law, from Putin to the last bum.
                    1. +6
                      30 January 2021 17: 06
                      Quite right. Let her now answer according to the law. What kind of unauthorized rallies we have there? Even super soft 15 days. Let us subtract from these 15 those two or three days when she was "in a serious condition lay in intensive care", and now she rides a torn goat laughing... And the rest of the day will be marinated in the monkey house. It will be according to the law. And her sons should be happily sent to jail for systematic malicious evasion of military service. And plus to everything, carefully check the sources of the family's income. This is with regard to the legal response.
                      1. -4
                        30 January 2021 17: 09
                        Quote: Stroibat stock
                        It will be according to the law. And her sons should be happily sent to jail for systematic malicious evasion of military service.

                        But who can argue, let him answer, only the children are there for?
                        Quote: Stroibat stock
                        And plus to everything, carefully check the sources of the family's income.

                        And here I am only in favor of constantly checking all civil servants, otherwise it turns out selectively.
                      2. +9
                        30 January 2021 17: 19
                        Children here mean that they are hard-core deviators. This is also a crime if you are not aware. smile And by the way, good. Let the police officer also be punished by the law. According to the law, he did not commit an offense. But okay, let's imagine that his actions were unauthorized. So what? Inflicting light bodily harm, as a maximum. So maybe a penny fine.
                        But, for example, a snotty "blogger" who kicked a car and broke the windshield should sit down for several years not only for participating in the riots, but also for causing grievous bodily harm. The driver lost an eye. Or doesn't that count either? The driver is a bastard, since he serves in the FSB, as far as I remember, and the "Blokher" is an unhappy child who must be understood and forgiven? I am not changing the subject, I am asking about the legal answer. What a violent aunt, what a young idiot, what law enforcement officers.
                      3. -6
                        30 January 2021 17: 26
                        Quote: Stroibat stock
                        Children here mean that they are hard-core deviators.

                        It's not about them, after all, it is in the article, they are to blame, let them answer.
                        Quote: Stroibat stock
                        So maybe a penny fine.

                        Let the court decide. And the "blogger" is the same.
                      4. +2
                        30 January 2021 22: 52
                        Quote: Stroibat stock
                        And her sons should be happily sent to jail for systematic malicious evasion of military service. And plus to everything, carefully check the sources of the family's income. This is with regard to the legal response.

                        Yes, yes, two men with chronic diabetes are maliciously evading service. They also need to be kicked. Better to kill right away - so that there are no questions. And check the family's income: how much money do they manage to survive in the village? It's not the oligarchs and not the deputies to check ...
                      5. -3
                        31 January 2021 06: 42
                        There is only one with chronic diabetes. The one who is 20 years old. And how can diabetes get in the way of working online as a freelancer? Moreover, he has no disability. And about the health of the elder, there is generally silence. So do not pervert other people's words. However, liberastics and oval are distinguished by increased aggressiveness. A sort of fighting hamsters.
                      6. +2
                        31 January 2021 11: 58
                        "It will be according to the law. And her sons should be happily sent to jail for systematic malicious evasion from military service. Plus, carefully check the sources of the family's income."
                        Why complicate things so much? just take it to Siberia, according to the verdict of the troika, or just spank it out of the revolver in the basements of the National Guard. "and his cat and his cattle," and fill the apartment with salt. this will be according to the law laughing
                      7. -4
                        31 January 2021 12: 01
                        Don't confuse legality with idiocy. Although there is an impression that you are not aware of the legality. You just have to ride with screams "Leshahoroshy" laughing
                    2. +12
                      30 January 2021 17: 34
                      aleksejkabanets (Alexey)
                      If she violated, let her answer according to the law, she knew where she was going, but I will repeat myself BY THE LAW, and not with a boot in the stomach.
                      What are you talking about? She was still very lucky with a boot in the stomach, in Germany, France or the Netherlands she would have received a water cannon or something even heavier, and in the "democratic" USA she would have just been shot.
                      Excuse me, where did you serve? Personally, I served in the internal troops and I fully understand this policeman, moreover, I think that he didn’t hit her a lot, I had to add something else so that it would not be easy to climb under the rink. You can just as well throw yourself under a train, which you don't throw yourself. Any obstacle to the work of a police officer must be suppressed, she prevented him, period. And this aunt should sit, and not a policeman, otherwise the whole country will end.
                      1. +1
                        30 January 2021 17: 42
                        Quote: Alexander Suvorov
                        Excuse me, where did you serve?

                        Federal Penitentiary Service.
                        Quote: Alexander Suvorov
                        Personally, I served in the internal troops and I fully understand this policeman

                        And I believe that a two-legged creature that kicked an elderly woman does not have the right not only to wear shoulder straps, but also to be called a man.
                      2. +11
                        30 January 2021 17: 48
                        aleksejkabanets (Alexey)
                        Federal Penitentiary Service.
                        Something your reasoning does not look like a spinner's reasoning, so you are lying most likely like a gray gelding.
                        And I believe that a two-legged creature that kicked an elderly woman does not have the right not only to wear shoulder straps, but also to be called a man.
                        For a "two-legged creature" in the place of this policeman, I would have filed a lawsuit against you, otherwise they are accustomed to tryndet on the internet with impunity. A two-legged creature, it is you and this aunt because of whom they are then the children of the country fall apart.
                      3. -2
                        30 January 2021 18: 23
                        Quote: Alexander Suvorov
                        That your reasoning does not look like a spinner's reasoning

                        You have a poor knowledge of the GUIN, if you think that they only serve as arrows on the towers. Probably no one works "in the zone"?
                        Quote: Alexander Suvorov
                        so you're lying most likely like a gray gelding.

                        Your wretched reasoning is of little interest to me.
                        Quote: Alexander Suvorov
                        For a "two-legged creature" in the place of this policeman, I would have sued you, otherwise you are used to tryndet on the internet with impunity.

                        Any "two-legged creature" that hits a woman, in my opinion, loses the right to be called a man, and even more so a policeman. Let him serve.
                        Quote: Alexander Suvorov
                        A two-legged creature, it is you and this aunt because of whom they are then the children of the country fall apart.

                        Two-legged creatures are you and your kind "gentlemen" who beat women or justify such disgusting acts. And "countries are being destroyed" by those "great and wise" rulers who encourage such lawlessness.
                      4. +14
                        30 January 2021 18: 29
                        aleksejkabanets (Alexey)
                        Any "two-legged creature" that hits a woman, in my opinion, loses the right to be called a man, and even more so a policeman.
                        This is not a woman, this is a provocateur and the policeman did the right thing.
                        And as for women, I can remind you how young girls in Odessa on May 2, 2014, Molotov cocktails were poured into bottles. Do you remember what happened next? And you can't remind a pregnant woman strangled there?
                        Where are you broadcasting from? From 404 or straight from London?
                      5. -3
                        30 January 2021 18: 39
                        Quote: Alexander Suvorov
                        This is not a woman, this is a provocateur and the policeman did the right thing.

                        In this case, a police officer acted as a provocateur. His actions caused a great public outcry. Do you like that in the West it is shown and spoken in their media as in Russia old women are beaten with boots? But he could simply push her aside with his hand if she interfered with him. And I had to do it. If I had done this in my service, I would have been jailed long ago or killed. And about me they would say "it is my own fault" and they would be absolutely right.
                      6. +6
                        30 January 2021 18: 44
                        aleksejkabanets (Alexey)
                        In this case, a police officer acted as a provocateur. His actions caused a great public outcry.
                        The resonance was caused not by his actions, but by the fact that it was staged, prepared in advance and filmed to cause a resonance.
                        Do you like that it is shown in the West and spoken by their media as in Russia old women are beaten with boots?
                        That's exactly what they show in the West, that's why they filmed it. Why don't they show in the West how a US police officer shot a woman point-blank on live television? Not comme il faut?
                        If I had done this in my service, I would have been jailed long ago or killed.
                        Do not star, you did not serve anywhere!
                      7. +2
                        30 January 2021 19: 03
                        Quote: Alexander Suvorov
                        The resonance was caused not by his actions, but by the fact that it was staged, prepared in advance and filmed to cause a resonance.

                        That is, the police officer was "fake"? If all this is staged? To plant the villain provocateur!
                        Quote: Alexander Suvorov
                        Why don't they show in the West how a US police officer shot a woman point-blank on live television?

                        Do you want it like in the West? For example, I don’t want to. And yes, all this is shown in the West and the police are being tried.
                        Quote: Alexander Suvorov
                        Do not star, you did not serve anywhere!

                        And why, let me be curious, did you make such a profound conclusion? Any reasonable arguments? Or is it just that my position does not correspond to your ideas?
                      8. +5
                        30 January 2021 21: 57
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        And why, let me be curious, did you make such a profound conclusion? Any reasonable arguments? Or is it just that my position does not correspond to your ideas?

                        the argument is - what if the blow was not accented? After all, he just kicked, and she herself, by chance or not, put herself under the blow without expecting that the boot was heavy?
                        additional rigidity to the impact could be given by the fact that they were in a fixed group! he might have held his leg somewhere, but he was pulled!
                        and pay attention, she was not shouting a political demand, but interfering with the convoy!
                      9. -7
                        30 January 2021 22: 06
                        Quote: aybolyt678
                        the argument is - what if the blow was not accented? .....

                        Let the prosecutor's office or the court figure it out. And in fact, he violated the Police Law, in particular Article 19, paragraphs 1, 3 and 4.
                        Quote: aybolyt678
                        She was not shouting a political demand, but interfering with the convoy!

                        Yes, what kind of interference could she create three hefty foreheads? She didn't even try to touch them.
                      10. +5
                        30 January 2021 22: 17
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        She didn't even try to touch them.

                        she got in their way, created an obstacle. And I could still hang in my arms ... I’m a hundred-kilogram elk, but I would never have the idea to stand in the way of the police .. Only in case of a direct threat to my loved ones
                      11. -2
                        30 January 2021 22: 34
                        Quote: aybolyt678
                        And she could still hang in her arms ...

                        But it didn't hang, did it? There is a law, its requirements must be fulfilled. Violence must be dosed and its use must comply with the law. Otherwise, we will quickly slide to the line after which there will be no return. Violence breeds violence. They are imprisoned for "plastic cups", for snowballs, probably, the youth will have problems. And the policeman is better? He kicked an elderly woman in public, what kind of example is he setting?
                      12. -2
                        31 January 2021 06: 42
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        But it didn't hang, did it?

                        because she was not given such an opportunity.
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        And the policeman is better? He kicked an elderly woman in public, what example is he setting?

                        How to deal with women / children.
                      13. -4
                        30 January 2021 18: 43
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        And I believe that a two-legged creature

                        The two-legged creature is your dear victim and the rest of them are children / women.
                      14. -5
                        30 January 2021 21: 12
                        In Germany and France, cars and shops are being burned; in the United States, armed men seize the Capitol. Do we have it all? You cannot understand the banal, violence defeats violence. And justifying the bastards who give the order to act tough, you do not want to understand one thing - it will get worse. And ignoring like Khabarovsk will no longer be otmazhivaet.
                      15. +4
                        30 January 2021 21: 33
                        Quote: Ingvar 72
                        You cannot understand the banal, violence defeats violence.

                        Yes, yes, yes ... Tell the Chinese.
                        Quote: Ingvar 72
                        And justifying the bastards giving the order to act tough

                        Not scoundrels, but defenders of the country.
                      16. 0
                        30 January 2021 22: 03
                        Quote: Dart2027
                        ah-yes-yes ... tell the Chinese.

                        In China, your guarantor's friends would have been shot at the stadium long ago.
                      17. -2
                        30 January 2021 23: 04
                        In China, the likes of you are simply rolled out in tanks.
                      18. +2
                        31 January 2021 10: 26
                        Quote: Viktor.N.Aleksandrov.
                        In China, the likes of you are simply rolled out in tanks.

                        In China, they rolled out the tanks of those liberals who are in power today. They rolled out the Chinese counterparts of Yeltsin, Sobchak, the carrier of Sobchak's portfolio and similar characters, so do not blame your sore head on a healthy one.
                      19. +2
                        31 January 2021 21: 26
                        Do not blame your head on a healthy one There they rolled everyone and, first of all, foreign agents similar to the failed one. Figures like Yeltsin and Sobchak are removed there quietly, without unnecessary noise.
                      20. -2
                        31 January 2021 22: 29
                        Quote: Viktor.N.Aleksandrov.
                        Figures like Yeltsin and Sobchak are removed there quietly, without unnecessary noise.

                        And they didn’t remove it from us. And some, we will not point a finger at him, they wore briefcases.
                      21. 0
                        31 January 2021 06: 43
                        Quote: Ingvar 72
                        Friends of your guarantor in China

                        That's just all the moans about friends come from sources that are as objective as Goebbels.
                      22. +2
                        31 January 2021 18: 15
                        What sources should you believe? After all, we now have quite a capitalism and our sources of information are completely under the control of capital. That is, they definitely work in his interests. By the way, Goebbels is a product of capitalism, of which you are a supporter. So as Comrade Stalin said, or maybe not, "both are worse."
                      23. +1
                        31 January 2021 19: 48
                        Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                        What sources should you believe? After all, we now have quite a capitalism and our sources of information are completely under the control of capital.

                        And when there was socialism, they all spoke only the truth. Navalny has no documents, this is a fact.
                      24. 0
                        31 January 2021 19: 51
                        How did you decide that I believe Navalny? For me, he is that Putin is two sides of the same coin.
                      25. +1
                        31 January 2021 21: 52
                        Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                        How did you decide that I believe Navalny?

                        You don't like the actions of the authorities.
                        Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                        that he is that Putin are two sides of the same coin

                        That is, Putin passed everything for the ... th time.
                      26. 0
                        1 February 2021 13: 00
                        So what? Why should I necessarily be a supporter of the bulk? Moreover, he is from your own pack of mean bourgeois jackals. Putin has already passed many times and many things, but some prefer not to notice it so it is more convenient for them.
                      27. -1
                        30 January 2021 21: 41
                        Quote: Ingvar 72
                        You cannot understand the banal, violence defeats violence. And justifying the bastards who give the order to act tough, you do not want to understand one thing - it will get worse.

                        do not get angry! When the rooster bites, these "smart people" will be the first to start shouting: "and what for us?"
                        But it will be too late, after the first blood there will be no mercy. Golden eagles rushed to Russia, but where should our "falcons" run? request
                      28. -1
                        31 January 2021 06: 45
                        Quote: Silvestr
                        Golden eagles rushed to Russia, but where should our "falcons" run?

                        As they say, "the cap is on the thief."
                        You mean from these
                      29. +3
                        30 January 2021 22: 12
                        Quote: Ingvar 72
                        you do not want to understand one thing - it will get worse.

                        dear Igor, if you go with such requirements, then yes, it will be worse. Because it's not normal when people demand the release of a criminal. Navalny's support is a complete collapse of the state. Requirements must be clear - like we demand social justice, or nationalization of the subsoil, or a progressive tax on excess income ....... Tolerance in microbiology means the absence of an immune response, a microorganism in a tolerant organism develops without hindrance. Based on this, there was nothing for my grandmother to do at the illegal rally. Notice the hit was unaccented. That is, additional rigidity to the impact was given by the fact that they walked in an interlocking group. Imagine, you kick a punching bag, and someone pulls your hands towards the punching bag at the moment of impact, the blow will turn out much harder!
                      30. +3
                        30 January 2021 22: 27
                        Quote: aybolyt678
                        Because it's not normal when people demand to release a criminal

                        The law should be the same for everyone. But here some are imprisoned for nothing (Platoshkin, for example, Kvachkov, Khabarov, Bykov, Furgal), others are only transferred to another position.
                        But Navalny, the authorities themselves are making a banner out of him. Which, by the way, I don't like. He does not propose a change of course and structure in the country. The same Western paradigm of degradation.
                      31. 0
                        31 January 2021 18: 19
                        Are you sure they were jailed for nothing? There is a lot of muddy and incomprehensible things. I would not rush to make heroes of these people. They may well turn out to be akin to our power.
                      32. -1
                        31 January 2021 21: 03
                        I'm sure for Kvachkov and Khabarov. I would follow them into the fire. There are other questions, but everyone is speaking correctly.
                      33. +1
                        1 February 2021 01: 04
                        You can say anything you want. With regards to Platoshkin, He is an ordinary demagogue. Just compare what he says with what Lenin said. And it will immediately become clear
                      34. +1
                        31 January 2021 11: 24
                        Quote: Alexander Suvorov
                        Personally, I served in the internal troops and I fully understand this policeman, moreover, I think that he didn't hit her a lot

                        Yes, if sadists like you serve there, then things are bad.
                        Surely no one sees that the booze is taking place in countries that have serious economic problems? Don't we have them? A monstrous rise in prices for essential goods and food, terrible social stratification, failures in medicine and education (to the praises of success), failure with vaccination (how many sang about the world's first vaccine - and still have not vaccinated even one percent of the population), In the international arena, things are far from brilliant - and these problems are solved by tightening the screws: the costs of power structures are growing and growing, education costs are falling ... Navalny and other riffraff are just an excuse, and the reason is uncertainty and fear of the future. In the last "smooth" 2014, there were no protests. So this is not a riot policeman, but the state kicked her in the stomach - and also out of fear and uncertainty. At the same time, lamenting: "It's not us, it's my aunt and foreign enemies are to blame for everything." Yes, the enemies are also to blame - but the authorities have made fertile ground for them.
              2. -6
                30 January 2021 17: 31
                Quote: Stroibat stock
                He was escorting the violator, and some exalted accomplice to the crime (riots) rushed to him

                She did not rush at all .. in the video it is clearly visible .. rushed, just he ..
                1. +13
                  30 January 2021 18: 03
                  Svarog (Vladimir)
                  She did not rush at all .. in the video it is clearly visible .. rushed, just he ..
                  Well, of course, she went out to give flowers to the policeman, and he kicked her in the thigh.
                  I’m wondering how the local alleged "communists" have united under the banner of anal and famously drown for a mess in the country, and I just want to ask - WHOM DO WE WORK FOR?
                  1. -2
                    30 January 2021 18: 09
                    Quote: Alexander Suvorov
                    I’m wondering how the local alleged "communists" have united under the banner of anal and famously drown for a mess in the country, and I just want to ask - WHOM DO WE WORK FOR?

                    For the mess in the country, those who condone theft are drowning, lawlessness, nepotism and other joys of those in power .. In this case, with a woman is lawlessness. And if the communists unite ... even without Navalny ... then your heels to London will sparkle with Navalny wassat ..
                    1. +12
                      30 January 2021 18: 15
                      Svarog
                      Those who condone theft, lawlessness, nepotism and other joys of those in power are drowning for the mess in the country.
                      What are you talking about? In Ukraine, too, they drowned against corruption II ...?! Can you tell us how things are going with corruption? Not?
                      In this case, it is lawlessness with a woman.
                      I agree that she must be imprisoned according to the law, both for the fact that she went to an illegal meeting and for the fact that she participated in an outright provocation.
                      And if the communists unite ... even without Navalny ... then your heels will sparkle to London ...
                      You are communists like a bullet from shit, after you have united with the anal, everything became clear to whose mill you are pouring water, so it’s for you to run to London while the wind is without stones.
                      1. -2
                        30 January 2021 18: 26
                        Quote: Alexander Suvorov
                        What are you talking about? In Ukraine, too, they drowned against corruption II ...?! Can you tell us how things are going with corruption? Not?

                        So you need to endure corruption, lawlessness .. and then it will be like in Ukraine? wassat
                        Mantras with Ukraine got pretty good .. and maybe like in France?
                        I agree that she must be imprisoned according to the law, both for the fact that she went to an illegal meeting and for the fact that she participated in an outright provocation.

                        And that there are legitimate rallies? Well, yes ... in an open field 100 km from Moscow .. Your laws, which corrupt officials print for themselves, will soon not work at all .. because they were created for cattle .. and they themselves put all the laws in place ..
                        after you have teamed up with the anal, everything became clear to whose mill

                        Fear has big eyes .. where did you see the communist union with Navalny?
                      2. +7
                        30 January 2021 18: 35
                        Svarog (Vladimir)
                        So you need to endure corruption, lawlessness .. and then it will be like in Ukraine?
                        Under these mantras about the type of "fight" against corruption, more than one country was ruined and taken over. So by, it’s you youngsters can hang this noodle on the ears.
                        Mantras with Ukraine got pretty good .. and maybe like in France?
                        And what is there in France?
                        And with Ukraine, these are not mantras, this is what they are preparing for us in Russia, only here everything will be much worse and bloodier with us.
                        And that there are legitimate rallies?
                        There are also legal ones. At least when they do not come out specifically to attack the police. And these are not rallies, this is pure provocation.
                        Fear has big eyes .. where did you see the communist union with Navalny?
                        That blinded or did not see the red flags at the "rallies" anal? Or have you been banned from Google?
                      3. The comment was deleted.
                      4. +7
                        30 January 2021 20: 20
                        Quote: Svarog
                        It was you who went blind .. cowardly "patriots" who

                        So far, cowardly revolutionaries are putting women in front of themselves.
                      5. -2
                        30 January 2021 20: 22
                        Quote: Dart2027
                        Quote: Svarog
                        It was you who went blind .. cowardly "patriots" who

                        So far, cowardly revolutionaries are putting women in front of themselves.

                        Tell me a patriot .. we have a war? Why are we less than half a million people? And this is only this year .. do you have any idea .. this is the number of people .. this is a whole big city .. I live in this way .. and hop .. it is empty ..
                      6. +2
                        30 January 2021 20: 33
                        Quote: Svarog
                        Tell me a patriot .. is there a war with us?

                        That is, do not argue with the fact that cowardly revolutionaries put themselves ahead of themselves as women.
                        Quote: Svarog
                        Why are there half a million fewer of us?

                        This question has already been discussed a million times, read "Death of the West".
                      7. 0
                        30 January 2021 21: 58
                        Quote: Dart2027
                        This question has already been discussed a million times, read "Death of the West".

                        why do we need the West? Or are you from the West? You have to think about your country
                      8. -4
                        31 January 2021 06: 46
                        Quote: Silvestr
                        why do we need the West? Or are you from the West?

                        It examines demographic processes in all developed countries. AND
                        Quote: Dart2027
                        do not argue with the fact that cowardly revolutionaries put themselves in front of them.

                        Quote: Tank Hard
                        Why aren't you giving birth, svarog? Why don't your children in the amount of at least 5 people give birth to 5 more? Why don't they support each other in various emergencies, or just conflict situations?

                        Very good words.
                      9. -1
                        31 January 2021 18: 27
                        Quote: Dart2027
                        This question has already been discussed a million times, read "Death of the West".

                        So we are not a spiritless West, we have our own special truly correct path. laughing Why do you have such shitty guards with logic almost without exception?
                      10. +2
                        31 January 2021 19: 43
                        Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                        So we are not a spiritless West, we have our own special truly correct path.

                        That is, in essence, there is nothing to say.
                        Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                        Why do you have such shitty guards with logic almost without exception?

                        Said a man who has no logic at all.
                      11. -1
                        31 January 2021 19: 46
                        This is in the sense for you or what? laughing And what about you, you are a typical standard silly guardian. Boring to yawn. Who has no brain, but there is a training manual. laughing
                      12. +1
                        31 January 2021 21: 53
                        Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                        And what to say about you, you are a typical standard silly guard.

                        That is, I am not fooled by cheap divorces of those who like to rock the boat.
                        Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                        Who has no brain, but there is a training manual.

                        That you are self-critical.
                      13. 0
                        1 February 2021 13: 11
                        You yourself rock this boat. And no bulk nichrome will do more for this than you and others like you did with your attitude to the people.
                      14. 0
                        1 February 2021 19: 59
                        Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                        what did you and others like you do with your attitude to the people

                        Since when did the fifth column become a people?
                      15. +1
                        1 February 2021 21: 04
                        Since 1991. You don't think of the rest as people.
                      16. +2
                        30 January 2021 21: 31
                        Quote: Svarog
                        Tell me a patriot .. is there a war with us? Why are we less than half a million people? And that's just this year.... Do you have any idea .. this is the number of people .. this is a whole big city .. I live in such a place .. and hop .. it is empty

                        Why aren't you giving birth, svarog? Why don't your children in the amount of at least 5 people give birth to 5 more? Why don't they support each other in various emergencies, or just conflict situations? Take the Kyrgyz for example. Their number is growing steadily, despite the difficult economic situation and completely collapsed healthcare, even in comparison with the Russian Federation. They believe in God, visit temples, help each other, create a traditional family and have children. What's wrong with you? Why are you crying here? What for? You will cease to be and others will take your place. You yourself are fighting against your people. I don't know though. what people do you belong to. Maybe not at all to Russian ... feel
                      17. The comment was deleted.
                      18. +1
                        30 January 2021 22: 09
                        Quote: Svarog
                        I have already given birth .. now I need to feed it as it should.

                        So you work, but no. you're crying here. Although I don’t believe about "giving birth" ... request
                        Quote: Svarog
                        So get away together there .. maybe the Russians will start giving birth then ..

                        That is, you hate other nationalities, and this is your call for expulsion from a multinational country. those citizens who are not of a similar nationality to yours? Are you lighting up here? Come on, write more, let everyone read. Yes
                      19. 0
                        30 January 2021 22: 16
                        Quote: Tank Hard
                        So you work, but no. you're crying here. Although I don’t believe about "giving birth" ...

                        So I work .. and I don’t cry .. here you are crying in my opinion .. there is nothing to answer the question .. so sobbing is continuous .. from fear for the king ..

                        Quote: Tank Hard
                        That is, you hate other nationalities, and this is your call for expulsion from a multinational country. those citizens who are not of a similar nationality to yours? Are you lighting up here? Come on, write more, let everyone read.

                        I'm talking to a psychiatrist ..
                      20. +2
                        30 January 2021 22: 23
                        Quote: Svarog
                        This is how I work .. and I don’t cry ..

                        Not. Volodka. crying ... laughing
                      21. -2
                        31 January 2021 18: 30
                        It's funny when the champions of capitalist nationalist patriotism start campaigning for internationalism. laughing
                      22. +1
                        30 January 2021 22: 00
                        Quote: Tank Hard
                        I don't know though. what people do you belong to. Maybe not at all to Russian ..

                        Article 282 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Incitement to hatred or enmity, as well as humiliation of human dignity (current edition)
                        1. Actions aimed at inciting hatred or enmity, as well as humiliating the dignity of a person or a group of persons on the basis of gender, race, nationality, language, origin, attitude to religion, as well as belonging to any social group, committed in public, in including with the use of mass media or information and telecommunication networks, including the Internet, by a person after being brought to administrative responsibility for a similar act within one year
                      23. +1
                        30 January 2021 22: 13
                        Quote: Silvestr
                        Article 282 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Incitement to hatred or enmity, as well as humiliation of human dignity (current edition)
                        1. Actions aimed at inciting hatred or enmity, as well as humiliating the dignity of a person or a group of persons on the basis of gender, race, nationality, language, origin, attitude to religion, as well as belonging to any social group, committed in public, in including with the use of mass media or information and telecommunication networks, including the Internet, by a person after being brought to administrative responsibility for a similar act within one year

                        Truth? Is our jack of all trades already a lawyer? laughing
                        And I thought that the kindling was here: feel

                        Svarog (Vladimir)
                        Today, 21: 57

                        0
                        Quote: Tank Hard
                        Why aren't you giving birth, svarog?

                        I have already given birth ... now I need to feed it somehow ...
                        Take, for example, the Kyrgyz

                        So get away together there .. maybe the Russians will start giving birth thenb.

                        No? wink
                      24. +2
                        30 January 2021 22: 16
                        Quote: Tank Hard
                        Truth? Is our jack of all trades already a lawyer?

                        I guess you have very poor eyesight, you don't read the necessary books. Or maybe you can't assimilate what you read? laughing
                      25. +1
                        30 January 2021 22: 22
                        Quote: Silvestr
                        I guess you have very poor eyesight, you don't read the necessary books. Or maybe you don't absorb what you read

                        Yes passed the commission in November. wink But you better not go to lawyers, amateurs, and so the country is full. laughing
                      26. 0
                        30 January 2021 21: 57
                        Quote: Dart2027
                        So far, cowardly revolutionaries are putting women in front of themselves.

                        the priority of this belongs to Putin since March 4, 2014.
                      27. -2
                        31 January 2021 06: 49
                        Quote: Silvestr
                        priority of this belongs to Putin

                        Who warned that if necessary, the RF Armed Forces would roll out the APU.
                        Or will Av here tell you that that "great army"?
                      28. 0
                        31 January 2021 18: 23
                        Cowardly kakbypatriots write angry comments about this sitting on the couch at home. laughing What did you do to prevent all this from happening?
                      29. +2
                        31 January 2021 19: 45
                        Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                        What did you do to prevent all this from happening?

                        Then you can learn more.
                      30. -1
                        30 January 2021 21: 48
                        Quote: Svarog
                        It is you who have gone blind .. cowardly "patriots" who are ready to endure .. endure and sing the praises of zeroed out .. praising for "stability"

                        Volodya! They are as scared as Putin is. From the pedestal, but with fanfare!
                      31. -1
                        30 January 2021 22: 20
                        Quote: Silvestr
                        Quote: Svarog
                        It is you who have gone blind .. cowardly "patriots" who are ready to endure .. endure and sing the praises of zeroed out .. praising for "stability"

                        Volodya! They are as scared as Putin is. From the pedestal, but with fanfare!

                        Naturally .. then you have to work .. and be responsible for what you have done ..
                      32. 0
                        30 January 2021 21: 47
                        Quote: Alexander Suvorov
                        Under these mantras about the type of "fight" against corruption, more than one country was ruined and taken over.

                        how many did you save? South Korea, for example.
                        Quote: Alexander Suvorov
                        only here everything will be much worse and bloodier.

                        only the power prepares this blood. The brutality and lack of dialogue only hardens people. Do you remember the "Primorsky partisans"?
                        Quote: Alexander Suvorov
                        There are also legal ones.

                        name at least one permitted opposition rally
                      33. 0
                        30 January 2021 21: 43
                        Quote: Svarog
                        where did you see the association of the communists with Navalny?

                        Zyuganov is Putin's assistant on work with the "communists". but in fact, the same as him. The Communist Party of the Russian Federation will soon scatter in different directions
                      34. -1
                        30 January 2021 22: 21
                        Quote: Silvestr
                        Quote: Svarog
                        where did you see the association of the communists with Navalny?

                        Zyuganov is Putin's assistant on work with the "communists". but in fact, the same as him. The Communist Party of the Russian Federation will soon scatter in different directions

                        So it is ... an adapt from one team ..
                  2. -2
                    30 January 2021 18: 28
                    Quote: Alexander Suvorov
                    I’m wondering how the local alleged "communists" have united under the banner of anal and famously drown for a mess in the country, and I just want to ask - WHOM DO WE WORK FOR?

                    Should we support those who steal, hide their income, hit women, etc.? And what does Navalny have to do with it? If the government does not adhere to the principle "all are equal before the law," why should I applaud this?
                    1. +2
                      30 January 2021 22: 01
                      Quote: aleksejkabanets
                      Should we support those who steal, hide their income, hit women, etc.? What does Navalny have to do with it?

                      But didn't this happen before Navalny? Shaft! impunity breeds permissiveness
                  3. +2
                    30 January 2021 18: 44
                    Quote: Alexander Suvorov
                    I’m wondering how the local alleged "communists" have united under the banner of anal and famously drown for a mess in the country, and I just want to ask - WHOM DO WE WORK FOR?

                    Even with the devil, but the main thing is to arrange a revolution.
                    1. -2
                      30 January 2021 19: 10
                      Quote: Dart2027
                      Even with the devil, but the main thing is to arrange a revolution.

                      Oh, how you are afraid of her, it is gratifying to hear. Your government itself provokes people to "illegal" actions. Will you then ask "And what is it for us"?
                      1. +2
                        30 January 2021 20: 22
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        Oh, how you are afraid of her, it is gratifying to hear.

                        No, I believe in our law enforcement agencies.
                        However, you have been crucifying here for a long time that they themselves say "a former employee of the organs and here you are ...", but here you understand the main thing - revolution? Apparently another "Crimean daughter of an officer" was drawn.
                      2. -3
                        30 January 2021 21: 17
                        Quote: Dart2027
                        that they themselves say "a former employee of the organs and here you are ..."

                        And that former employees are not people? That I should be blind? I have no children, what country will we leave them? She already reminds "Snowy Nigeria".
                      3. +4
                        30 January 2021 21: 27
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        I have no children, what country will we leave them?

                        Normal. Unlike your Ukraine.
                      4. -7
                        30 January 2021 21: 31
                        Quote: Dart2027
                        Normal.

                        Do you think that today we have a prosperous country that is not ashamed to leave to children?
                        Quote: Dart2027
                        Unlike your Ukraine.

                        I understand that anyone who disagrees with you is either a Ukrainian, or a Baltic, or an agent of the State Department.
                      5. +2
                        30 January 2021 21: 39
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        Do you think that today we have a prosperous country that is not ashamed to leave to children?

                        Today we have a normal country where you can find both good and bad, but there is more good.
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        I understand that anyone who disagrees with you or

                        Sometimes all at once, which category are you from?
                      6. +3
                        30 January 2021 23: 13
                        anyone who disagrees with you, either a Ukrainian or a Baltic
                        I am a Baltic, and I also disagree with you (paradox belay ) In Russia, an acceptable standard of living. In Western countries, it is higher, but not hundreds of times. In addition, in Norway, for example, your children, because they do not attend school, can be taken away and given to foster families of roosters or refugees. I'm not kidding.
                      7. 0
                        30 January 2021 23: 42
                        Quote: Bolt Cutter
                        An acceptable standard of living in Russia.

                        Have you been to the province for a long time?
                      8. +3
                        30 January 2021 23: 50
                        Have you been to the province for a long time?
                        I haven't. (I need a visa to Russia am ) But I met those who came from this very province and the next year already traveling back with the words "I saved up for the house, now I will live." Excuse me, but how do you imagine the life of a simple worker in Agnlia or Norway?
                      9. -3
                        30 January 2021 23: 56
                        Quote: Bolt Cutter
                        But I met those who came from this very province and the next year already traveling back with the words "I saved up for the house, now I will live."

                        Here, they go to work.
                        Quote: Bolt Cutter
                        Excuse me, but how do you imagine the life of a simple worker in Agnlia or Norway?

                        Yes, I think it will be worse than the Soviet Union worked at enterprises)))))
                      10. +3
                        30 January 2021 23: 59
                        to work and go
                        Coming back on their own is worth noticing. They are not illegal.
                        I think it will be worse than under the USSR
                        I wanted to ask what you (from your point of view) will have for this.
                      11. -2
                        31 January 2021 00: 05
                        Quote: Bolt Cutter
                        I wanted to ask what you (from your point of view) will have for this.

                        Yes, I don’t know, I didn’t think about it, I never tried it on myself, the age is not the same, where to go. I think a skilled worker gets a couple of thousand a month.
                      12. +1
                        31 January 2021 00: 07
                        skilled worker couple
                        After taxes, a couple. Enough for an average life. But not on the Instagram fairy tale.
                      13. -2
                        31 January 2021 00: 16
                        Quote: Bolt Cutter
                        After taxes, a couple. Enough for an average life. But not on the Instagram fairy tale.

                        The worker did not have a fairy tale anywhere. In the USSR I worked as an electronics engineer and did not complain. But those days are over.
                      14. +1
                        31 January 2021 14: 25
                        Have you been to the province for a long time?
                        Remembered smile One opponent told me that the Russian hinterland (in Siberia) confidently beats dirty and crumbling Riga, which fell into decay under the European Union (he was a tourist there) in all respects. So everything in your province is just wonderful Yes !
                        Yes, the cons are not mine.
                      15. -2
                        31 January 2021 14: 27
                        Quote: Bolt Cutter
                        So everything in your province is just wonderful

                        Yes, this "comrade" probably has his own province on TV, and he talks about it.
                      16. +3
                        30 January 2021 23: 08
                        She already reminds "Snowy Nigeria".
                        Do you think that the collapse organized by Navalny's protestants (and those who are behind him send bitcoins) will turn the country into a hybrid of Norway and Canada laughing ... In South Korea, the main component of the "economic miracle" is the fact that part-time there is 40 hours a week.
                      17. -2
                        30 January 2021 23: 38
                        Quote: Bolt Cutter
                        Do you think that the collapse organized by Navalny's protestants (and those who are behind him send bitcoins) will turn the country into a hybrid of Norway and Canada

                        No, I don't. I have never been a supporter of Navalny, you shouldn't have dragged him to me. Besides, I don't need a "hybrid of Norway and Canada". Strictly speaking, in this topic, I wrote about the fact that everyone should be equal before the law, both policemen and protesters. As for "Snowy Nigeria," I wrote because we are slowly rolling there. Navalny won't get anywhere. The cheese in the mousetrap always goes to the second mouse. And who she is, while you can only guess.
                      18. +4
                        30 January 2021 23: 41
                        And who she is, while you can only guess.
                        You can see that this very second animal mouse is cunning and unprincipled. Gladly ready to substitute others for their own benefit. Such is the "psychological portrait" laughing she has
                      19. +2
                        31 January 2021 12: 22
                        second mouse. And who is she, while you can only guess
                        There is a high probability that this is Khodorkovsky, who has connections in the opposition get-together and who gives them money. If he nevertheless becomes president, then Russia is crazy, he will fulfill his promise to surrender nuclear arsenals (then both NATO and China will be able to simply push through любые decisions by force), will merge "unprofitable assets" - subsidized Kamchatka, Altai, the Volga region, any Yes as well as the Caucasus - they not only require subsidies, but also become it trumpet power to wobble. He will leave himself the most profitable piece. This will already be the final and complete end.
                      20. +1
                        31 January 2021 12: 36
                        Quote: Bolt Cutter
                        Chances are high that this is Khodorkovsky ...

                        Great, but here the question is that the company of the "friend of friends" pushed so many smaller bourgeoisies away from the trough that one can only guess. And the worst thing is that they climb into the regions, "push away from the trough" regional bourgeoisie, and this becomes really dangerous. Moscow has fewer allies in the regions.
                      21. +1
                        31 January 2021 12: 43
                        regional bourgeois
                        Yesterday's gopniks and hucksters, who remained with them. Their time has passed, they have no strength - if they can shoot a commoner on the road to order, then this option will not work with serious people. And the bourgeoisie haven’t been taught anything else — they’ve never read anything in their lives except for hundred-ruble detectives. But on the wave of "popular protest", well mixed, to fly in a shining helicopter is yes.
                      22. 0
                        31 January 2021 12: 53
                        Quote: Bolt Cutter
                        Yesterday's gopniks and hucksters,

                        Well, in this regard, they are no different from the central government.
                        Quote: Bolt Cutter
                        Their time has passed, they have no strength - if they can shoot a commoner on the road to order, then with serious people this option will not work.

                        Remember Khabarovsk, look at the fact that in the regions all today's protests do almost without excesses and detentions. There are just a lot of them, bourgeois.
                        Quote: Bolt Cutter
                        But on the wave of "popular protest", well mixed, to fly in a shining helicopter is yes.

                        This will be the calculation, as in Ukraine, they removed Yanukovych with a "golden toilet", the regional oligarch Poroshenko arrived in a "shining helicopter." And all the fault is irrepressible greed, clannishness and stupidity of the ruling clique.
                      23. +2
                        31 January 2021 12: 58
                        Well, in this regard, they are no different from the central government.
                        Eh, no .. For 30 years, those at the top, at least something learned (and initially were not stupid), and the provincial initially were smaller in caliber, and did not climb up, the nivirs ended up in the zone. Shoot is their whole policy.
                      24. -2
                        31 January 2021 13: 11
                        Quote: Bolt Cutter
                        did not climb up-nivirsitety ended on the zone. Shoot is their whole policy.

                        Not no, not everything is so simple. For example, a local latifundist graduated from the university, not one, as far as I know. Quite polished. It's just that in the localities they have become so fused with the authorities, have become related, have common financial interests, that "they cannot be told in a fairy tale or described with a pen." Shooting their policy "so-so", many of them are strong, will not work. Everything is too rotten.
                      25. -1
                        31 January 2021 12: 40
                        Quote: Bolt Cutter
                        If he nevertheless becomes president, then Russia is crazy

                        If he comes, then most likely it is a civil war, then many of us will have to take up arms. But I still think that he will not be able, too smeared and western ears stick out too clearly.
                      26. +2
                        31 January 2021 12: 52
                        most likely this is a civil war
                        If only ... This is an intervention. He will be announced as a democratically elected ruler, they will show peaceful free Russians, they will talk about evil neo-Nazis who are hiding in the forests and partisans (they will be quickly killed - thermal imagers have changed the rules of the game). Here the problem is also that a single resistance movement will not come out - the Muslims will most likely be attracted to him for preferences, and among the Russians there will be confusion - (as now) - who give the emperor, who the general secretary, and who also the Fuhrer. As a result, a failure. This is a very real scenario.
                        Yes, the second mouse will definitely not raise the living standard.
                        too smeared and western ears
                        For some, he is a martyr of the regime and a beacon of freedom, and Western ears are a sign of quality.
                      27. -1
                        31 January 2021 12: 58
                        Quote: Bolt Cutter
                        If only ... This is an intervention .......

                        Have already passed, will have to repeat. But only such a force as the Bolsheviks could unite and win. The people cannot be defeated. Let's see, wait and see, I hope it won't come to that.
                      28. +4
                        31 January 2021 13: 06
                        have to repeat.
                        It will not fail, too many people know that the West is where they rest, receive treatment, buy houses, study those who have money. And they believe that it is good and well fed there. The guerrilla war will not be successful for technical reasons - drones with thermal imagers and supersensitive direction finders will not allow you to hide in the forest. After a couple of defeats, the rest will surrender. And there are more propaganda opportunities than Goebbels.
                      29. -3
                        31 January 2021 13: 14
                        Quote: Bolt Cutter
                        It will not fail, too many people know that the West is where they rest, receive treatment, buy houses, study those who have money.

                        The percentage of such people is too small. But I still hope we can do without it.
                        Quote: Bolt Cutter
                        Guerrilla warfare will not be successful for technical reasons - drones with thermal imagers and supersensitive direction finders will not allow you to hide in the forest.

                        The point is not at all a partisan war, nothing can be solved by one war.
                      30. +2
                        31 January 2021 13: 20
                        The percentage of such people is too small
                        Many have been. Mngie was seen on TV (which is even worse). Everyone knows that those who can move there. That from there they supply expensive quality goods. In a word, a positive image has been developed.
                        one war doesn't solve anything
                        There will be no other options. Democrats will simply shoot rallies, because they will not be democratic.
                      31. -1
                        31 January 2021 14: 49
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        But only such a force as the Bolsheviks could unite and win.

                        So how did they end up?
                      32. -2
                        31 January 2021 14: 56
                        Quote: Dart2027
                        So how did they end up?

                        Victory in the Second World War, a little?
                      33. 0
                        31 January 2021 16: 31
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        Victory in the Second World War

                        Truth? In fact, before the Second World War, most of them stupidly did not live, as they fought among themselves. Well, in a global perspective, the shame of the Belovezhskaya agreements.
                      34. +1
                        31 January 2021 18: 53
                        That's just talking about the fact that they were communists, it's like claiming that the supporters of the absolute monarchy overthrew the royal power in Ingushetia. But this does not bother the demagogues of the guardians. After all - "this is different." laughing
                      35. 0
                        31 January 2021 19: 46
                        Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                        Just talk about the fact that they were communists.

                        It is a fact that they were communists and revolutionaries.
                      36. 0
                        31 January 2021 19: 49
                        No, they weren't. This is your banal lie. And that's a fact. smile
                      37. 0
                        31 January 2021 21: 49
                        Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                        No, they weren't. This is your banal lie

                        Lev Davidovich Trotsky (party pseudonyms: Pero, Antid Oto, L. Sedov, birth name - Leib [1] Davidovich Bronstein [2] [3] [4], October 26 [November 7] 1879, Yanovka, Kherson province, Russian Empire - August 21, 1940, Coyoacan, Mexico) - Russian revolutionary, Soviet statesman and politician, ideologist of Trotskyism - one of the currents of Marxism. First a constitutional monarchist, then an Iskra-ist, Menshevik, creator of the August bloc, Mezhrayonets, and since 1917, a Bolshevik who joined the RSDLP (b)... Twice exiled under the monarchy, deprived of all civil rights in 1905. In 1905 and 1917 - Chairman of the Petrograd Soviet. One of the organizers of the October Revolution of 1917, one of the founders of the Red Army... One of the founders and ideologists of the Comintern, a member of its Executive Committee. In the first Soviet government - People's Commissar for Foreign Affairs, then in 1918-1925 - People's Commissar for Military and Naval Affairs and Chairman of the Revolutionary Military Council of the RSFSR, then the USSR... Since 1923 - the leader of the internal party left opposition ("New Deal"). Member of the Politburo of the Central Committee of the CPSU (b) in 1919-1926. In 1927 he was removed from all posts and sent into exile; in 1929 he was exiled from the USSR. In 1932 he was deprived of Soviet citizenship.
                        Only you are lying here.
                      38. 0
                        1 February 2021 12: 38
                        What does Trotsky have to do with it? Don't you use any substances forbidden there for an hour?
                      39. -1
                        1 February 2021 20: 12
                        Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                        What does Trotsky have to do with it?

                        Despite the fact that
                        Quote: Dart2027
                        before the Second World War, most of them stupidly did not survive, as they fought among themselves

                        In addition to Trotsky, many did not survive.
                        Quote: Dart2027
                        Well, in a global perspective, the shame of the Belovezhskaya agreements.

                        There is nothing to object to this?
                      40. 0
                        1 February 2021 21: 08
                        So did they or not live to see the Belovezhskaya agreements? What do your hallucinations say on this topic? By the way, why are the Belovezhsky agreements so bad? All you have now is the product of these very agreements. If they did not live now in a bloody, totalitarian and poor scoop oppressing our and your freedoms.
                      41. 0
                        2 February 2021 19: 22
                        Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                        So did they or not live to see the Belovezhskaya agreements?

                        Quote: Dart2027
                        In fact, before the Second World War, most of them stupidly did not live, as they fought among themselves. Well, in a global perspective, the shame of the Belovezhskaya agreements.

                        Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                        By the way, why are the Belovezhsky agreements so bad?

                        Are you already confused under what slogans do you speak? They just drowned for the communists.
                      42. 0
                        4 February 2021 21: 11
                        Yeah ... Continuous sadness among the supporters of capitalism. Not only can they not be logical, but also sarcasm. laughing
                      43. 0
                        5 February 2021 18: 38
                        Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                        Yeah ... Solid sadness among the supporters of capitalism

                        That is, they got confused.
                      44. 0
                        9 February 2021 10: 42
                        The fact that you have a mess in your head has long been clear.
                      45. -1
                        9 February 2021 10: 48
                        Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                        The fact that u

                        I have a very clear position in relation to the enemies of the people, I have never hidden. Well, those who like to arrange troubles have to change their shoes on the go.
                      46. 0
                        9 February 2021 11: 45
                        And the fact that you yourself are an enemy of the people does not bother you in any way?
                      47. -2
                        9 February 2021 14: 15
                        Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                        does not bother you in any way

                        Enemies of the people are now lamenting about "police brutality".
                      48. 0
                        9 February 2021 14: 18
                        Why did you decide that if in your case it is not so, you are not an enemy of the people?
                      49. -1
                        9 February 2021 16: 29
                        Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                        you are not an enemy of the people

                        Well, I’m not “jumping” to the delight of our “partners”.
                      50. 0
                        9 February 2021 16: 51
                        This does not make you a friend of the people.
                      51. -2
                        9 February 2021 18: 01
                        Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                        does not make you a friend of the people

                        I am a representative of the people, the very one who, twisting his fingers at his temple, continued to go about his business, with pleasure looking at how a handful of enemies of the people were "brought to their senses" by the police.
                      52. +1
                        31 January 2021 18: 40
                        Of course, you can wait until the country has slipped into the abyss under the leadership of today's people with bright faces in power. But now go to the forest with your false dichotomy. Now, in reality, after the revolution, I would first of all multiply to zero not the oligarchs and other capitalists, but jackals like you who defend all these achievements of 1991.
                    2. +2
                      30 January 2021 19: 15
                      Quote: Dart2027
                      Quote: Alexander Suvorov
                      I’m wondering how the local alleged "communists" have united under the banner of anal and famously drown for a mess in the country, and I just want to ask - WHOM DO WE WORK FOR?

                      Even with the devil, but the main thing is to arrange a revolution.

                      And what do you think is the main thing .. With the devil quietly and silently die out?
                      1. 0
                        30 January 2021 21: 28
                        Quote: Svarog
                        With the devil

                        Tell me who your friend is and I will tell you who you are.
                        Quote: Svarog
                        die out quietly and silently

                        There was no such rate of population growth as in RI before the revolution in the USSR, which means RI was better.
                      2. +1
                        30 January 2021 22: 06
                        Quote: Dart2027
                        There was no such rate of population growth as in RI before the revolution in the USSR, which means RI was better.

                        only the "effective" manager Nicholas II was the same as the "effective" manager Putin. The analogy is quite appropriate, therefore, the ending is quite predictable
                      3. -3
                        31 January 2021 06: 53
                        Quote: Silvestr
                        only the "effective" manager Nicholas II was the same as the "effective" manager Putin

                        That is
                        Quote: Dart2027
                        There was no such rate of population growth as in RI before the revolution in the USSR, which means RI was better.

                        It's true.
                        Quote: Silvestr
                        The analogy is quite appropriate

                        Nicholas II had a problem with the security forces.
                      4. +3
                        30 January 2021 23: 53
                        RI was better
                        Then the best is Bangladesh and Cameroon wassat Burkina Faso and Sudan are good too Yes .
                      5. +1
                        30 January 2021 22: 29
                        Quote: Svarog
                        And what do you think is the main thing .. With the devil quietly and silently die out?

                        so go kids business. not? can't you? laughing
                      6. +1
                        30 January 2021 22: 54
                        Quote: SanichSan
                        so go kids business. not? can't you?

                        Why do you ask? Do you and your wife need help? I have five of mine, and I can help you if you ask.
                      7. -2
                        30 January 2021 22: 57
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        Do you and your wife need help? I have five of mine, and I can help you if you ask.

                        Yes, I’m okay, you’ll help your friend Svorog, because he is dying out wassat
                      8. +1
                        30 January 2021 23: 02
                        Quote: SanichSan
                        Yes, I’m okay, you’ll help your friend Svorog, because he is dying out

                        So he did not write about himself, but that in a year the country had minus almost half a million people. Personally, I don't like this situation.
                      9. +2
                        30 January 2021 23: 17
                        With the devil quietly and silently die out?
                        And Navalny will distribute Viagra and pierce condoms wassat In Finland, social security, prospects, living standards, even Putin stayed abroad, and they have depopulation. But perhaps it affects across a common border wassat No, in Denmark everything is the same. So that's not the point.
                      10. +1
                        31 January 2021 00: 00
                        Quote: Bolt Cutter
                        And Navalny will distribute Viagra and pierce condoms

                        Yes, he never drowned and does not drown Svarog for Navalny.
                      11. -3
                        31 January 2021 06: 54
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        Yes, he never drowned and does not drown Svarog for Navalny.

                        Is it? But I see how you are only doing this.
                    3. +3
                      30 January 2021 22: 04
                      Quote: Dart2027
                      but the main thing is to arrange a revolution.

                      if you know history, then our revolutions occur from above. And now there are 2 revolutionaries in the country: Putin and Navalny, and both from liberals, just of different stripes.
                      1. +3
                        30 January 2021 22: 23
                        Quote: Silvestr
                        Quote: Dart2027
                        but the main thing is to arrange a revolution.

                        if you know history, then our revolutions occur from above. And now there are 2 revolutionaries in the country: Putin and Navalny, and both from liberals, just of different stripes.

                        And in the seventeenth it was about the same .. and then the communists were generally an insignificant party .. their king and betrayed .. and the communists had to rebuild and restore the state.
                      2. +2
                        30 January 2021 23: 20
                        the communists had to rebuild and restore the state.
                        The question is, will the protesters cope with this task? Navalny will go out on subbotniks Yes ?
                      3. -2
                        31 January 2021 06: 55
                        Quote: Silvestr
                        if you know history, then our revolutions occur from above.

                        and sometimes from abroad. But they are their women.
                  4. +2
                    30 January 2021 19: 02
                    Quote: Alexander Suvorov
                    Who do the guys work for ?!


                    At the dear State Department. Who else should we work for? Either him or Putin. Right there without options?
                    1. +3
                      30 January 2021 22: 07
                      Quote: sergo1914
                      At the dear State Department. Who else should we work for? Either him or Putin. Right there without options?

                      Why then did Putin send the negotiator Chubais to this State Department?
              3. 0
                30 January 2021 22: 33
                Quote: Stroibat stock
                So don't make excuses, be kind. In principle, the policeman did the right thing. He was escorting the offender, and some exalted accomplice to the crime (riots) rushed to him.

                Firstly, not "he", but they - there were three policemen. So this is a typical group attack. Secondly, she rushed to them, and not to them - and then she raked. What if she wanted help?
                Thirdly, how could an aunt of pre-retirement age prevent this trinity?
                Fourth, who told you that she was a riot participant? She carried some posters, attacked the cops, erected barricades, threw stones and sprayed with pepper gas? Not? So you accuse her without proof.
          2. +1
            30 January 2021 15: 59
            The police escorted the detainee, the woman came out to the meeting, obstructing the movement, in the most democratic country they could open fire, well, they just pushed.
            1. -4
              30 January 2021 16: 07
              Quote: figvam
              The police escorted the detainee, the woman went to the meeting, obstructing the movement

              Don't lie, she didn't interfere with the movement. Video above. They could disperse. Justifying bastard is no different from him. What danger did this elderly woman pose to three hefty foreheads?
              Quote: figvam
              it's good that they just pushed.

              You would be so "pushed" more often that your brains would be cleared.
              1. -3
                30 January 2021 16: 12
                If the elderly let her grandchildren knit socks, EPST!
                1. -7
                  30 January 2021 16: 24
                  Quote: Captive
                  If the elderly let her grandchildren knit socks, EPST!

                  And how did she deserve such an attitude towards herself? Can't women have an active citizenship? In your opinion, was this "use of force" proportional to her?
                  1. +3
                    30 January 2021 16: 36
                    Quite. If we proceed from the examples of "beacons" of democracy. There she would either have been shot for opposing the work of the cops or shot down with a water jet. And what is most interesting, in the spirit of "democratic traditions".
                    1. -7
                      30 January 2021 17: 06
                      Quote: Captive
                      Quite. If we proceed from the examples of "beacons" of democracy.

                      You somehow selectively cite your "beacons of democracy" as an example, it would be better if you cited their successes in the economy as an example. The policeman broke the law, period. I must answer by law.
                      Federal Law of 07.02.2011 N 3-FZ (as amended on 29.12.2020) "On the Police"
                      http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_110165/b0e7a72817927f6520504c25498b9f687209dfee/
                      1. -4
                        30 January 2021 17: 40
                        winked And yours, that "one hundred" exchanged replied? Just don't say that you are a Russian. laughing Donkey's ears give out.
                      2. 0
                        30 January 2021 19: 17
                        Quote: Captive
                        Donkey's ears give out.

                        Donkey give out comments.
                      3. -2
                        30 January 2021 19: 28
                        laughing Self-criticism? Surprised, but support.
                      4. +3
                        30 January 2021 19: 30
                        Quote: Captive
                        Self-criticism? Surprised, but support.

                        Not. Constructive criticism.
                      5. +4
                        30 January 2021 19: 18
                        Quote: Captive
                        winked And yours, that "one hundred" exchanged replied? Just don't say that you are a Russian. laughing Donkey's ears give out.

                        The Russians, they are either silent, or spit in the direction of the authorities .. But those who live in the West .. praise Putin very much .. it is strange .. there are many "comrades" from the European Union .. who are for "stability" in Russia .. you probably one of them ..
                      6. -1
                        30 January 2021 20: 00
                        hi
                        Quote: Svarog
                        there are many "comrades" from the European Union .. who are for "stability" in Russia ..

                        By the way, yes. It’s strange that the more patriotic the character is, the further from Russia he lives. They probably yearn for their native aspen and birch trees))))))
                      7. +1
                        30 January 2021 20: 07
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        They probably yearn for their native aspen and birch trees))))))

                        Or the children of our "patriots" will learn about the difficulties of a foreign land .. while their parents here are mastering suitcases ..
                      8. +1
                        30 January 2021 23: 24
                        there are many "comrades" from the European Union.
                        From the outside you can see details that you either don't see or underestimate. I repeat once again, the standard of living here, although higher than in Russia, but not hundreds of times, and a dropout system administrator will not own a house with a swimming pool and a luxury car. Here for everyone according to work Yes .
                      9. -2
                        31 January 2021 13: 35
                        there are many "comrades" from the European Union
                        I really am not from the European Union (UK withdrew good ) but I can say that
                        1. There is an opportunity to compare the situation objectively
                        2. Information is presented in a slightly different way.
                        Thus, from behind the hillock, you can see a completely different perspective.
                      10. -1
                        31 January 2021 18: 57
                        Yours are especially long. laughing
                2. -1
                  30 January 2021 18: 48
                  Quote: Captive
                  If the elderly let her grandchildren knit socks, EPST!

                  That's it. Because of such elderly skakuas (maydanutyh) - the country in the 90s lost 40 million Russian-like people killed. So shta ...
                  PySy she did not die from a police bullet, like a veteran of the US Air Force Ashley Babbitt, and about her (Ashley Babbitt) something liberals do not remember ... Why? wassat
                  1. +4
                    30 January 2021 19: 20
                    Quote: Tank jacket

                    That's it. Because of such elderly skakuas (maydanutyh) - the country in the 90s lost 40 million Russian-like people killed. So shta.

                    Because of them, he still loses .. so what? he is his successor if what ..
                    PySy she did not die from a police bullet, like a veteran of the US Air Force Ashley Babbitt, and about her (Ashley Babbitt) something liberals do not remember ... Why? wassat

                    Because we do not want Russia to become a fascist state ... what is the United States ... and the United States is the worst example ... but for some reason you compare with them and focus on them ..
                    1. +1
                      30 January 2021 19: 26
                      Where is the condemnation of death by a bullet from a fascist-SS policeman of a bloody red-haired woman veteran Ashley Babbitt ???
                      Ashley Elizabeth Babbitt (English Ashli ​​Elizabeth Babbitt; October 10, 1985 [5], Lakeside, San Diego, California [6] [7] - January 6, 2021, Washington) - a veteran of the US Air Force, a participant in a number of armed conflicts on territories of other states [8].

                      Ashley Babbitt
                      English Ashli ​​babbitt
                      Date of birth
                      October 10, 1985 [1]
                      Place of Birth
                      Lakeside [d], San Diego, California, USA
                      Date of death
                      January 6, 2021 [2] (age 35)
                      A place of death
                      Washington, USA [4]
                      Affiliation
                      USA
                      Type of army
                      United States Air Force (April 2004 - April 2008; was in reserve from October 2008 to July 2010)
                      United States Air Force National Guard (July 2010 - July 2016)
                      Years of Service
                      2004-2016
                      Rank
                      Senior Private Aviation [3]
                      Часть
                      Dyce Air Force Base, Texas (2004-2008)
                      Andrews Air Force Base, Maryland (2010-2016)
                      Battles / wars
                      War in Afghanistan (2005)
                      Iraq war (2006)
                      UAE (2012, 2014)
                      -----------------------

                      Bah, so she supported Trump ...
                      This is the reason for the oblivion of her murder ...
                      wassat
                      Ie, a black drug addict is buried in a golden coffin and BLM is born, and the white girl was killed and nothing?
                      1. -2
                        30 January 2021 20: 10
                        Quote: Tank jacket
                        Ie, a black drug addict is buried in a golden coffin and BLM is born, and the white girl was killed and nothing?

                        Tell me a patriot .. we have a war? Why are we less than half a million people? And this is only this year .. do you have any idea .. this is the number of people .. this is a whole big city .. I live in this way .. and hop .. it is empty ..
                      2. 0
                        30 January 2021 20: 11
                        Why was Ashley Babbitt killed? And that your city is empty? I'm going to buy a couple of apartments and cottages in your city ... I will lease ... wassat
                      3. -3
                        30 January 2021 20: 31
                        In a personal, write the names and we will accept you last
                      4. +1
                        30 January 2021 23: 03
                        Yes, there is a war against the Russians. One of the methods to reduce the birth rate. And in the USSR there was nothing to produce poverty and only in Russia.
                        In the "fraternal" republics, this was the only way they multiplied and were encouraged.
                        There has been propaganda for more than a dozen years through films, cartoons, and so on - no need to breed, no need to breed poverty. Stop this propaganda, turn it the other way, by Your example, for example.
                        And then they arise - but they themselves do nothing and only demand.
                        By the way, at 90, the decrease was more significant, but keep quiet about it, but here you see, you catch your eye.
                      5. +1
                        1 February 2021 10: 57
                        Wow - and 30 years have not passed since Svarog drew attention to the extinction of the population of Russia.
                      6. -1
                        30 January 2021 20: 24
                        Quote: Tank jacket
                        Ie, a black drug addict is buried in a golden coffin and BLM is born, and the white girl was killed and nothing?

                        Why do you remember her? Do you want us to have the same? Is that why you excuse the police officer who hit the woman?
                      7. 0
                        30 January 2021 20: 27
                        I just put all the "dissenting" in pencil. Where do you live? Who at your place goes to unauthorized rallies? Write in a personal ...
                      8. 0
                        30 January 2021 20: 32
                        Quote: Tank jacket
                        I just put all those who disagree on a pencil. Where do you live? Who goes to unauthorized rallies in your country? Write in a personal ...

                        We did not have a rally, the people went out to rummage around to see if the rally would take place or not. About 70 people walked and that's probably it. We have a small town. And what I will not write)))))
                      9. -1
                        30 January 2021 20: 35
                        Well, well done ... We already know and remember you all ... We just have a sense of humor too ...
                      10. +1
                        30 January 2021 20: 41
                        Quote: Tank jacket
                        So we all know and remember you ...

                        And we know and remember you))))
                      11. +1
                        30 January 2021 20: 43
                        Will you betray in time? Or how is everyone?
                      12. 0
                        30 January 2021 20: 51
                        Quote: Tank jacket
                        Will you betray in time? Or how is everyone?

                        Betrayal and lies are your part, "respected" liberals. Your leader, who has repeatedly spoken of himself as a liberal, lies and does not blush. And he has already betrayed the people.
                      13. -4
                        30 January 2021 20: 53
                        So, like everyone else ...
                      14. +2
                        30 January 2021 21: 07
                        Quote: Tank jacket
                        So, like everyone else ...

                        For what purpose are you provoking? Are you trying to spin me again to block me? D.N. Puchkov is an apt expression, "a young stupid person" (on the site it cannot be read verbatim) do not be like that.
                      15. -5
                        30 January 2021 21: 09
                        "Just like everyone, like everyone, like everyone,
                        I walk on the ground, I walk.
                        And fate has like everyone else, like everyone else,
                        I ask you happiness.
                        Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes,
                        Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes,
                        Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes,
                        I ask for happiness. "(C)
                      16. 0
                        31 January 2021 13: 39
                        I take all the "dissenting" on a pencil
                        Mark Sakharogorny made it easy for you to the limit - look through the list of Navalny's "friends" and everything is in full view and does not hide. A lot of interesting fruits in his gang by the way.
                  2. +3
                    30 January 2021 22: 12
                    Quote: Tank jacket
                    Because of such elderly skakuas (maydanutyh) - the country in the 90s lost 40 million Russian-like people killed.

                    Old men, did they fire tanks at the White House?
                    Did you sign papers in Belovezhia? So that you live like a Russian pensioner
                    1. -4
                      30 January 2021 22: 18
                      The current retirees rode in 1991 and stole my childhood. How old were retirees in 1991?
                      PySy question is the same ... your mother is Jewish Sylvester?
                      1. +4
                        31 January 2021 02: 03
                        Opening a scared mouth to someone else's mother is a clear sign of moral deformity, final and irrevocable mental degradation. It's time to change a jacket for a diaper or "tie".
                      2. -4
                        31 January 2021 06: 57
                        Quote: lexus
                        Opening a scared mouth to someone else's mother is a clear sign of moral deformity, final and irrevocable mental degradation.

                        Tell about this to those who start yelling that they say "if your mother ..." etc.
                3. +4
                  30 January 2021 22: 09
                  Quote: Captive
                  If the elderly let her grandchildren knit socks, EPST!

                  how old is your mother? If your statement reflects your position in life, then you are a bad son. A decent person should be ashamed
                  1. -1
                    30 January 2021 22: 49
                    Quote: Silvestr
                    A decent person should be ashamed

                    And where did you see a decent one?
              2. -1
                30 January 2021 16: 30
                Quote: aleksejkabanets
                Don't lie, she didn't interfere with the movement.

                Watch the video again! The riot police with the detainee began to bypass this woman to the right, this can be seen along the Bodiur line.
                Quote: aleksejkabanets
                They could disperse.

                But a woman, a participant in an illegal rally, did not want them to pass by and went to the line of the convoy with a moronic question.
                It is necessary to take into account the situation, there was an illegal meeting, a mutiny, an attack on the police. And then, because of such provocations, the Maidan begins, people die and scum come to power.
                1. +1
                  30 January 2021 16: 32
                  Quote: figvam
                  But the woman did not want them to pass by and went to the line of the convoy.

                  You are the one to blame? Tried to ask "Where are you taking him?"

                  Quote: aleksejkabanets
                  In your opinion, was this "use of force" proportional to her?

                  Can you answer?
                  1. +2
                    30 January 2021 16: 50
                    Quote: aleksejkabanets
                    You are the one to blame? Tried to ask "Where are you taking him?"

                    She went to the wrong address, this is not a reference.
                    She could stand still and ask her question without interfering with the movement, but rush to the meeting with the convoy when the detention work is underway, when everyone is inflated, people's nerves are at their limit, this is stupid.
                    Quote: aleksejkabanets
                    Can you answer?

                    Force is used at an illegal rally by both sides, only one is used to incite, and the other is used to calm down, both sides are bending over and this happens in all countries.
              3. +2
                30 January 2021 16: 54
                I fully agree with the author that this case will become an indicator of the adequacy and capacity of the authorities.

                Case extremely simple... Law enforcers escorted the person, hands were busy. The crowd roared behind. A woman rushed at one of them, screaming. What she wanted to do was not clear. Maybe she wanted to grab her face, maybe cut with a knife. The policeman did not have time to stop and politely ask what the woman wanted or to fight back with his hand. It worked the way it was taught and trained: neutralized attacker foot. The blow was strong and the woman fell. An ambulance was called for her, taken to the hospital and treated, almost immediately and discharged after a couple of days. Incidentally, the incident was planned: a woman specially filmed.

                So what is next wrong the leadership of the law enforcement officer behaved: instead of issuing an attack on an employee in the line of duty, it took pity on the woman and decided to end the case peacefully: both the colonel and the policeman apologized to the woman per hit... And Margarita Yudina accepted flowers and an apology.

                What happened next is unknown, but only Margarita annulled the peace and applied to the UK.

                It is not hard to guess that lawyers for the opposition (of the "fifth column"?) Promised it both support for the "case" and significant financial benefits. Perhaps they immediately paid a tidy sum.

                Which exit? To issue an attack by Margarita Yudina on an employee in the line of duty. And NEVER forgive scoundrels provocateurs!
                1. -3
                  30 January 2021 17: 20
                  Quote: Vladimir Mashkov
                  The case is extremely simple.

                  I absolutely agree with you. The police officer violated the Federal Law of 07.02.2011 N 3-FZ (as amended on 29.12.2020) "On the Police"
                  Article 19. Procedure for the use of physical force, special means and firearms
                  Has violated points 1, 3, 4. Minimum. I must answer by law.
                  Quote: Vladimir Mashkov
                  And NEVER forgive scoundrels provocateurs!

                  And here I agree, the policeman acted here as a scoundrel-provocateur.
                2. +2
                  30 January 2021 17: 26
                  Quote: Vladimir Mashkov
                  What happened next is unknown, but only Margarita annulled the peace and applied to the UK.

                  Then they will force the riot policemen to kneel down and ask for forgiveness, and the scoundrels-provocateurs will applaud.
                  1. -5
                    30 January 2021 17: 38
                    Quote: figvam
                    Then they will force the riot policemen to kneel down and ask for forgiveness, and the scoundrels-provocateurs will applaud.

                    Am I agitating for this? I'm just saying that the villain who put on shoulder straps disgraced the police by kicking the WOMAN and he must answer according to the law. It is criminal to bring anyone to their knees. And the OMON's service is not easy, they don't just disperse demonstrations.
                    1. +9
                      30 January 2021 17: 54
                      aleksejkabanets (Alexey)
                      Am I agitating for this? I'm just talking about the fact that the villain who put on shoulder straps disgraced the police by hitting a WOMAN
                      The police don't care about gender if the offender is female or gay so now, can you break the law? If "WOMAN" tomorrow takes up arms and goes to kill, so now to justify her?
                      Don't you think that you are acting like a clown here trying to protect an essentially criminal? All who went to this type of rally are potential criminals and this murky aunt as well. And if tomorrow someone comes out to an unauthorized rally, then they must be beaten mercilessly and not only with their feet, so that the rest of the degenerates are not accustomed to it.
                      1. -3
                        30 January 2021 18: 33
                        Quote: Alexander Suvorov
                        The policeman doesn't care about gender ...

                        Federal Law of 07.02.2011 N 3-FZ (as amended on 29.12.2020) "On the Police"
                        Article 19. Procedure for the use of physical force, special means and firearms
                        Give a link to the law? There is a law, it must be observed, especially for a police officer. I broke the law - answer. What's wrong? Let everyone answer before the law. Or should only the protesters be held accountable before the law?
                      2. +6
                        30 January 2021 18: 39
                        aleksejkabanets (Alexey)
                        Federal Law of 07.02.2011 N 3-FZ (as amended on 29.12.2020) "On the Police"
                        Article 19. Procedure for the use of physical force, special means and firearms
                        And what did he violate? Specifically, not the article number? Don't need this water here.
                        The use of force by these policemen is completely legal, but the actions of this aunt must be examined under a microscope, as well as yours. Who do we work for, I ask again?
                      3. -2
                        30 January 2021 18: 41
                        Quote: Alexander Suvorov
                        And what did he violate? Specifically, not the article number? Don't need this water here.
                        The use of force by these police officers is perfectly legal

                        Not legal. He violated at least articles 1, 3, and 4.
                      4. -1
                        30 January 2021 23: 43
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        He violated at least articles 1, 3, and 4.

                        on the basis of paragraph 2 of the same article, he did not violate anything, but acted in accordance with the law. Do not mislead people.
                      5. -1
                        30 January 2021 23: 51
                        Quote: SanichSan
                        on the basis of paragraph 2 of the same article, he did not violate anything, but acted in accordance with the law. Do not mislead people.

                        "2. A police officer has the right not to warn about his intention to use physical force, special means or firearms if delay in their use creates an immediate threat to the life and health of a citizen or a police officer or may entail other grave consequences."
                        How are you going to apply it in this case? What threat to life and health are we talking about?
                        And what do we do with 3 and 4?
                      6. -5
                        31 January 2021 06: 58
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        How are you going to apply it in this case? What threat to life and health are we talking about?

                        What if she has a grenade in her pocket?
                      7. -1
                        30 January 2021 22: 55
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        Article 19. Procedure for the use of physical force, special means and firearms

                        and you're lying again!
                        Article 21. Use of special means, paragraphs 6 and 8.
                        the employee acted within the law. request
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        Give a link to the law?

                        come on! just not the law, and not the article you were told to refer to according to the manual Yes
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        I broke the law - answer. What's wrong?

                        not so that some are trying to turn the law inside out. request
                      8. 0
                        30 January 2021 23: 11
                        Quote: SanichSan
                        come on! just not the law, and not the article you were told to refer to according to the manual

                        http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_110165/b0e7a72817927f6520504c25498b9f687209dfee/
                        Federal Law of 07.02.2011 N 3-FZ (as amended on 29.12.2020) "On the Police"
                        Article 19. Procedure for the use of physical force, special means and firearms
                        item 1, item 3, item 4. It's minimum. If there are no arguments about the training manual start to shout?
                        Quote: SanichSan
                        not so that some are trying to turn the law inside out.

                        So do not twist it. Everyone should be equal before the law, from Putin to the last bum.
                      9. 0
                        30 January 2021 23: 18
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_110165/b0e7a72817927f6520504c25498b9f687209dfee/
                        Federal Law of 07.02.2011 N 3-FZ (as amended on 29.12.2020) "On the Police"
                        Article 19. Procedure for the use of physical force, special means and firearms
                        item 1, item 3, item 4. It's minimum. If there are no arguments about the training manual start to shout?

                        http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_110165/880aec2f65c55dcd3345ef17fd4f1dc462bb75ce/
                        Federal Law of 07.02.2011 N 3-FZ (as amended on 29.12.2020) "On the Police"
                        Article 21. Use of special means
                        1. A police officer has the right personally or as part of a unit (group) to use special means in the following cases:
                        ...
                        6) for delivery to the police, escort and protection of detained persons, persons in custody, persons sentenced to imprisonment, persons subjected to administrative punishment in the form of administrative arrest, as well as in order to suppress an attempt to escape, in the event of a person resisting an employee the police, causing harm to others or yourself;
                        ...
                        8) to suppress mass riots and other illegal actions that disrupt the movement of transport, the work of communications and organizations;

                        I see that further article 19 in your training manual could not go request
                      10. -1
                        30 January 2021 23: 26
                        Quote: SanichSan
                        I see that further article 19 in your training manual could not go

                        I see that you are a "so-so" lawyer.
                        Quote: SanichSan
                        Article 21. Use of special means

                        On what basis do you mold special tools here? Since when did the leg become a special device? In addition, if you have read this article, then the use of any of the special means is stipulated there, such as: "1) special sticks - in the cases provided for in paragraphs 1 - 5, 7, 8 and 11 of part 1 of this article;". And nothing else. And in this case, only the 19th article applies.
                      11. 0
                        30 January 2021 23: 35
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        And in this case, only the 19th article applies.

                        e.g. point 2 wink
                        or does it not apply? only 3 and 4? belay
                      12. -1
                        30 January 2021 23: 40
                        Quote: SanichSan
                        e.g. point 2

                        "2. A police officer has the right not to warn about his intention to use physical force, special means or firearms if delay in their use creates an immediate threat to the life and health of a citizen or a police officer or may entail other grave consequences." Well, how do you apply it? I'm just asking out of curiosity.
                      13. +3
                        31 January 2021 00: 01
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        Well, how do you apply it? I'm just asking out of curiosity.

                        obvious how wink in accordance with this paragraph, the employee was not obliged to warn the provocateur who threw himself at the feet of something, and in accordance with article 20, paragraph 2, as well as the same paragraph 3 of article 19, he had the right to prescribe her from her feet. everything is within the law request

                        now you.
                        "4. A police officer is obliged to provide a citizen who has received bodily harm as a result of the use of physical force, special means or firearms, first aid, and also take measures to provide him with medical assistance as soon as possible." will you continue to insist that this clause applies to riots?
                      14. 0
                        31 January 2021 00: 28
                        Quote: SanichSan
                        obviously how ...

                        This is where you found it?
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        if the delay in their application creates an immediate threat to the life and health of a citizen or a police officer, or may entail other grave consequences

                        Nowhere.

                        Quote: SanichSan
                        as well as the same paragraph 3 of Article 19, he had the right to prescribe her

                        "the nature and degree of danger of actions of persons against whom physical force is used,"
                        "the nature and strength of their resistance" What was the danger there? What was the resistance?
                        Quote: SanichSan
                        "4. A police officer is obliged to provide a citizen who has received bodily harm as a result of the use of physical force, special means or firearms, first aid, and also take measures to provide him with medical assistance as soon as possible." will you continue to insist that this clause applies to riots?

                        Have you seen the clause "Except for riots" somewhere in the law? No, haven't you? And I didn't see. Let me remind you that the protester was dragged by three officers. One was obliged to help. "Do not wash the black dog white", do not try. The police officer violated the law and must be held accountable for his actions and inaction.
                      15. +1
                        31 January 2021 00: 43
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        "the nature and strength of their resistance" What was the danger there? What was the resistance?

                        rushed to cut a group of police officers escorting the detainee. have you watched the video? that is exactly what she did. The policeman held the detainee with his hands and kicked her away. I live in a not very prosperous area and I know very well how to kick. something in the video I did not see how the employee kicks the unfortunate old woman wassat
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        You saw somewhere in the law a clause "Except riots"? Didn't you see?

                        I saw clause 9 of article 19 and clause 2 of article 20. Didn't you see them?
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        One was obliged to help. "Do not wash the black dog white", do not try.
                        oh, how! that is, no longer "beating an innocent old woman", but "did not help"? wassat well, yes. can endure a reprimand ... but the old woman can solder 10 wink if to the fullest extent soldier
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        "Do not wash the black dog white", do not try.
                        but you smear white with mud with fanaticism wassat
                      16. -3
                        31 January 2021 01: 12
                        Quote: SanichSan
                        rushed to cut a group of police officers escorting the detainee. have you watched the video?

                        Rushed? How are sailors on the embrasure? Don't write nonsense.
                        Quote: SanichSan
                        and kicked her away.

                        So, lightly, with a boot in the belly, that the woman got to the hospital.
                        Quote: SanichSan
                        I saw paragraph 9 of Article 19

                        "9. As part of a unit (group), a police officer uses physical force, special means and firearms in accordance with federal law, guided by orders and orders of the head of this unit (group)." Where does federal law allow women to be kicked? Or do you think this leadership ordered him to kick the woman with his foot?
                        Quote: SanichSan
                        and paragraph 2 of article 20. you did not see them?

                        "2) for the delivery of persons who have committed crimes and administrative offenses to the office premises of the territorial body or police unit, the premises of the municipal body, or other office premises, and the detention of these persons;" How did a punch to a woman's stomach help to get her somewhere? There was no talk about hospitals. You yourself read what you refer to?
                        Quote: SanichSan
                        oh, how! that is, no longer "beating an innocent old woman", but "did not help"?

                        Failure to provide assistance is the same crime.
                        Quote: SanichSan
                        but the old woman can also solder 10 wink if to the fullest extent

                        What are the grounds? She did not participate in the action at all, she was on the sidewalk.
                      17. -3
                        31 January 2021 11: 38
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        Rushed? How are sailors on the embrasure? Don't write nonsense.

                        it is a statement of fact. Watch a video.
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        So, lightly, with a boot in the belly, that the woman got to the hospital.
                        I didn't get it, but they took it and now they are making a "victim of the regime" from this provocateur, but it turns out bad lol
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        "9. As part of a unit (group), a police officer uses physical force, special means and firearms in accordance with federal law, guided by orders and orders of the head of this unit (group)." Where does federal law allow women to be kicked? Or do you think this leadership ordered him to kick the woman with his foot?

                        it's time to end this nonsense. bully
                        As it was correctly noted, I am not a lawyer and, as an ordinary person, I had questions why paragraphs 4 and 7 of Article 19 never(!!!) were not used during police actions at mass actions? is the law always broken? belay Did the law write inadequately, assuming that the riot policeman, after he ordered another pratestun on the head with a truncheon, should give up everything, start providing the prostun with medical assistance and, on the basis of clause 7, fence off the scene and keep it intact? belay
                        but no, the law was written by sane people and in paragraph 9 they prescribed that acting in a group the police officer follows the orders of the group commander and therefore is not obliged to comply with points 4 and 7 relating to the individual actions of the employee.
                        on the basis of paragraph 3 of article 19, the employee was not obliged to explain something to the provocateur rushed across the movement of the convoy (this can be clearly seen in the video). on the basis of article 20, paragraph 2, the employee kicked (the fact that the employee's hands were busy is also visible on the video) the provocateur who prevented the escort of the detainee. on the basis of paragraph 9 of article 19, the officer was obliged to escort the detainee, and not to provide medical assistance to the right-handed woman, whom he had just kicked off naked. all actions of the employee were carried out within the framework of the law, so that even "not helping" he will not be able to incriminate ... bully
                        as a result, the law was written by adequate people, the police officer acted within the law and in accordance with the prevailing circumstances. thus it is logically established that inadequate are those who are trying to distort the letter of the law and distort the very picture of the incident, despite the fact that everything is on the video request
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        What are the grounds? She did not participate in the action at all, she was on the sidewalk.

                        here is a good example good while she was on the sidewalk, no one touched her. they kicked her when she jumped out onto the roadway across the movement of the convoy. you again tried to lie Yes not for the first time. a distorted interpretation of legislation, ignoring the key points of the articles, is essentially a lie. considering how unfamiliar you are with the law governing police actions - the story of involvement with the law enforcement agency is again a lie. you were quite definitely qualified as the "officer's daughter" wink you did not succeed in sculpting an innocent victim out of a provocateur. into law you cannot request do what you can do wink did you write about 5 children there? here! help your friend Svarog with demographics, but he suffers. there may be a problem, he may not have a wife, but try it anyway! what if it happens wink
                      18. -5
                        31 January 2021 07: 00
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        On what basis are you making special tools here? Since when did the leg become a special device?

                        That is, the policeman is to blame for pushing her away with his foot instead of hitting her on the head with a stick. With this it may and should agree, no need to be almond.
                      19. 0
                        1 February 2021 07: 17
                        It seems that you have not read this Law yourself. And if they did, they didn’t understand nicherta.
                      20. -2
                        1 February 2021 10: 21
                        Quote: Radius
                        It seems that you have not read this Law yourself. And if they did, they didn’t understand nicherta.

                        What did you understand from this law? Or so, just to "blurt out"?
                      21. 0
                        2 February 2021 10: 03
                        Not only did I understand this Law, but I also studied it with comments and article-by-article material. And applied it. So - by. I will not explain anything else.
                      22. +4
                        31 January 2021 13: 27
                        Quote: Alexander Suvorov
                        The cop doesn't care about gender if the offender is female or gay so now

                        The policeman - I don't know, the policemen don't really care. People's memory since WW2.
                      23. -1
                        31 January 2021 14: 50
                        Quote: Stas157
                        The policeman - I don't know, the policemen don't really care.

                        That is, there is nothing to argue?
                    2. +1
                      30 January 2021 18: 21
                      Quote: aleksejkabanets
                      Am I agitating for this?

                      It all starts with this.
                      Quote: aleksejkabanets
                      kicking the WOMAN and he must answer according to the law.

                      It would be nice that the WOMAN did not participate in illegal mass rallies, for which she must answer the same by law.
                      1. -1
                        30 January 2021 18: 50
                        Quote: figvam
                        It would be nice that the WOMAN did not participate in illegal mass rallies, for which she must answer the same by law.

                        I do not think this law is fair, but it exists. And therefore, yes, a woman must answer the same according to the law.
                    3. -2
                      30 January 2021 18: 46
                      Quote: aleksejkabanets
                      Am I agitating for this?

                      For this, for this.
                      Quote: aleksejkabanets
                      disgraced the police by kicking a WOMAN and

                      And what? From the fact that she is a woman, she ceased to be a participant in street riots?
                      1. -1
                        30 January 2021 20: 07
                        Quote: Dart2027
                        For this, for this.

                        You have a disorder with cause-and-effect relationships.
                        Quote: Dart2027
                        And what? From the fact that she is a woman, she ceased to be a participant in street riots?

                        No, just another villain in uniform has appeared, I wonder why you drown for him. Will you do the same with your wife or your mother?
                      2. 0
                        30 January 2021 20: 18
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        You have a disorder with cause-and-effect relationships.

                        That you are self-critical.
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        I wonder why you drown for him. You and your wife or mother will do the same.

                        Already been
                        My mother was all right with her head and she would not have flooded there under any circumstances.
                        Another favorite song, even boring. Let's remember how many people died as a result of revolutions, at the beginning of the last century, and now? Do you want to bury your daughter or just know that she disappeared into an unknown place, so that even burying in a human way will not work?
                3. +5
                  30 January 2021 17: 41
                  Quote: Vladimir Mashkov


                  Which exit? To issue an attack by Margarita Yudina on an employee in the line of duty. And NEVER forgive scoundrels provocateurs!

                  If this is done, then, I am sure, the "victim" will withdraw her statement. Moreover, he will also apologize to the National Guard.
                4. +9
                  30 January 2021 17: 47
                  you can treat in different ways - to kick a woman or everybody lying down, everyone has their own criteria and principles ... but this is the first time when the guardsman apologized - it means too resonant. telephones and the Internet, too, must be banned. may slide towards the Belarusian scenario, but we are unlikely to hold a meeting with flowers. violence will meet violence. Incidentally, today Rotenberg announced that his palace turned out to be. How sickening it becomes so little we know about the cellist friends and you are campaigning that we deserve it
                  1. +2
                    30 January 2021 21: 24
                    Quote: kitty
                    Incidentally, today Rotenberg announced that his palace turned out to be. How sickening it becomes so little we know about friends

                    Yes, but before that the other day they published documents, contracts, and everywhere the FSO and the presidential administration are shining.
              4. 0
                30 January 2021 17: 32
                Everything started with such elderly women in Ukraine
              5. +2
                30 January 2021 17: 36
                aleksejkabanets (Alexey)
                Justifying bastard is no different from him.
                In this case, do-nok, this is definitely not a policeman, don't you know?
              6. -2
                30 January 2021 22: 38
                Quote: aleksejkabanets
                Don't lie, she didn't interfere with the movement.

                no, you are not lying. Yes videos are easy to find. she jumped from the sidewalk directly to the employees, for which she got off her feet. if everything was as peaceful as you describe, then the employee would not reach her with his foot.
                Let me remind you that when the officer kicked her, he was holding and leading the detainee.
                Quote: aleksejkabanets
                Justifying bastard is no different from him.

                You just like that on the fly admit that the same provocateur as the "victim"? boldly! laughing
                Quote: aleksejkabanets
                What danger did this elderly woman pose to three hefty foreheads?

                prevented the detention.

                PS
                prior to this post, the question of how justified your position was was controversial. on the one hand, the employee may have really exceeded his authority ... but after watching the video and after you switched to outright lies, I have no doubts about your affiliation hi
                1. 0
                  30 January 2021 22: 59
                  Quote: SanichSan
                  videos are easy to find. she jumped off the sidewalk right at the employees

                  I posted the video above, look.
                  Quote: SanichSan
                  Let me remind you that when the officer kicked her, he was holding and leading the detainee.

                  Let me remind you that there is such a "Law on the Police" a police officer must comply with it. Everything else is "lyrics".
                  1. -1
                    30 January 2021 23: 05
                    Quote: aleksejkabanets
                    I posted the video above, look.

                    I watched the video. if you do not see there obstruction of detention and outright provocation, then you are apparently blind. request
                    Quote: aleksejkabanets
                    Let me remind you that there is such a "Law on the Police" a police officer must comply with it. Everything else is "lyrics".

                    absolutely true, but the law consists not only of 19 articles, but also of 21 articles. Didn't they write about it in the manual? belay
                    1. 0
                      30 January 2021 23: 18
                      Quote: SanichSan
                      absolutely true, but the law consists not only of 19 articles, but also 21 articles

                      21st article on special tools, since when did the leg become a special tool? And since when has the 21st article canceled the 19th? Article 21 is generally inapplicable in this case.
                      1. 0
                        30 January 2021 23: 25
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        And since when has the 21st article canceled the 19th?

                        oops! does it mean that Article 19 cancels Article 21? belay I already understood that you do not know the law, in the manual you only have about 19 article for which you cling and try to hang noodles here about the fact that when suppressing protests and checking documents, the same regulations are the same. tell me, are you not one of those gifted ones who talks about freedom of assembly because there is an article about it in the constitution?
                      2. -1
                        30 January 2021 23: 30
                        Quote: SanichSan
                        oops! does it mean that Article 19 cancels Article 21?

                        Are you healthy?
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        Quote: SanichSan
                        I see that further article 19 in your training manual could not go

                        I see that you are a "so-so" lawyer.
                        Quote: SanichSan
                        Article 21. Use of special means

                        On what basis do you mold special tools here? Since when did the leg become a special device? In addition, if you have read this article, then the use of any of the special means is stipulated there, such as: "1) special sticks - in the cases provided for in paragraphs 1 - 5, 7, 8 and 11 of part 1 of this article;". And nothing else. And in this case, only the 19th article applies.

                        I don't want to repeat myself.
                      3. -2
                        31 January 2021 07: 01
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        I don't want to repeat myself.

                        Is it difficult to argue about the laws with those who really know them?
          3. +8
            30 January 2021 16: 30
            There was no attack on a policeman in this situation! In 2009 04.08. witnessed the detention of a friend of a guest worker by drug control (I swear I did not know what he was selling) while trying to help a guest worker (I see that four are breaking and twisting the poor fellow) one of the operas jerked in my direction but stopped when he saw 130 kg of weight in front of him in a 2-meter performance and ready for action, the senior in hysterics yelled behind me "drug control", "drug control", this stopped me, in this case it was enough to remove the old woman with his hand, for the most stubborn I explain, with a wrist and
            subsequent control of the detainee if everything is done correctly according to the technique, the efforts of one adult are enough, moreover, your one hand can be free. Here two are leading one ram and holding with both hands. And I also treat Navalny as a Trojan horse and I have no sympathy, I just like it to be honest.
            1. -1
              30 January 2021 17: 23
              Quote: Dmitry Potapov
              a wrist and
              subsequent control of the detainee if everything is done correctly according to the technique, the efforts of one adult are enough, moreover, your one hand can be free.

              Here, everything is exactly so, I also do not understand why they were dragging him together.
              Quote: Dmitry Potapov
              I treat Navalny as a Trojan horse and have no sympathy, I just like it to be fair.

              good It couldn't be better. I'm tired of this selectivity.
              1. -3
                31 January 2021 00: 56
                Quote: aleksejkabanets
                Here, everything is exactly so, I also do not understand why they were dragging him together.

                You were not there, otherwise they would have asked you - "Can we lead him together?" You would not allow, you would lead one, and the second, being free, would enter into a discussion with your aunt, explaining to her on what basis they detained the citizen.
            2. +5
              30 January 2021 17: 54
              Quote: Dmitry Potapov
              I swear I didn't know what was trading)

              And who will believe you after your words -
              Quote: Dmitry Potapov
              (I see that four are breaking and twisting the poor fellow)

              Straight four "broke hands"
              Damn defenders. If a drunken boor insults a woman, no one will intercede, and as soon as law enforcement officers "knit" the criminal, from where you just appear.
              1. +5
                30 January 2021 19: 29
                Firstly, I didn’t poke you! Secondly, your "believe" or not "believe", I do not care (I am not used to entering into a deal with my conscience, plus three months passed from the first purchase to the detention and all this time he was "herded" waiting for a large batch); The guest worker has excellent physical characteristics (on the surveillance cameras you can see if he hadn't been in slippers, he would have definitely "dumped".
                1. 0
                  31 January 2021 00: 51
                  Quote: Dmitry Potapov
                  Firstly, I didn’t poke you!

                  Sorry, it escaped. hi
              2. +6
                30 January 2021 19: 34
                About drunk (and not drunk too) boor, I always intercede. And again, Navalny is nothing to me and no one. The outrageous rudeness of FSO, PPP, FMS is very familiar to me.
          4. -2
            30 January 2021 16: 44
            Quote: Hunter 2
            Police Officer Conducted Detention


            Not detention. Detention, or rather like this: DETENTION. Then it was possible to release the magazine from the machine into it. Why waste time on trifles?
          5. +5
            30 January 2021 16: 59
            ... The Police Officer conducted the Detention.

            I wonder if you have such reverence for this police procedure that you write its name with a capital letter?))
          6. +4
            30 January 2021 17: 36
            Kapets. Patriots justify the illegal actions of the policeman, citing the example of the West so hated by them. This is a jump over the head !! Well, and some kind of inadequate anger towards those who think wrong, slightly frightens. In 1917, too, they say, it was so. They killed the people, uzhos. And from the video. The policemen carried out an ADMINISTRATIVE arrest. NOT ARREST. Administrative, for administrative offense. NOT CRIMINAL. And there was no need to kick a chicken in the stomach. And it's good that she didn't crack her bad head against the bardyur. It would be a sacred sacrifice. Therefore, the commanders of these boys would do well to insert a big stick in order to explain to them how not to succumb to provocations. And then next time start chopping people out of machines. That's when the kapets of Russia.
            1. -4
              30 January 2021 18: 50
              Quote: Nikza
              Kapets. Patriots justify the illegal actions of the policeman, citing the example of the West so hated by them.

              Well, if you want you can recall the east, how do they do with such women in China?
            2. -3
              30 January 2021 23: 09
              Quote: Nikza
              Kapets. Patriots justify the illegal actions of the policeman, citing the example of the West so hated by them.

              the joke is that the actions of the police officer are legal wink within the framework of the arrest, the use of force to prevent the arrest is entirely within the law.
              but what to call those who accuse the policeman of doing his job?
              1. -5
                31 January 2021 07: 02
                Quote: SanichSan
                but what to call those who accuse the policeman of doing his job?

                Public Enemies.
          7. +3
            30 January 2021 17: 41
            Yes, and there and then shooting with a cairo. The set-up is obvious. But the policeman's reaction is off scale.
            1. +2
              30 January 2021 21: 31
              Quote: 210ox
              The set-up is obvious.

              There is a full video, they just shoot the kipish. request There are plenty of such vidos in the internet, both from the windows and from the street. By the way, there is a video on the internet where a man's hand was broken, although he and his wife just stood aside on the sidewalk. Broke during transportation to the bus. The man refused to write, although he is now in the hospital. Strange, in such cases the sledak himself has to gallop to the hospital.
              1. 0
                31 January 2021 00: 59
                Quote: Ingvar 72
                with in the hospital. Strange, in such cases the sledak himself has to gallop to the hospital.

                Only for stab wounds and firearms.
          8. +2
            30 January 2021 21: 15
            Quote: Hunter 2
            Police Officer Conducted Detention

            I would say this - the police escorted the detainee, and the citizen tried to interfere with the actions of the police. That is, her initial actions provoked a response. If the police were delayed for a few minutes, to explain to the citizen her illegal actions, it is not known how it would all end. I would go scouting with this guy. hi
    3. +2
      30 January 2021 15: 24
      Quote: sergo1914
      somehow not comme il faut.

      according to the official version, he didn’t see who was attacking (because "gas was flooded")
      1. +4
        30 January 2021 15: 54
        Have you ever seen a video with an attack?
      2. +5
        30 January 2021 21: 32
        Quote: A1845
        according to the official version, he didn’t see who was attacking (because "gas was flooded")

        According to the official version, his visor was flooded! wink
    4. -4
      30 January 2021 16: 10
      winked Let it not go anywhere. It would be better to educate her son of a bum.
      1. +1
        30 January 2021 16: 26
        Quote: Captive
        It would be better to educate her son of a bum.

        Can you tell us more about her son?
        1. -1
          30 January 2021 16: 33
          winked You can, but look for yourself.
          1. -6
            30 January 2021 16: 35
            Quote: Captive
            You can, but look for yourself.

            I did not mention it, you mentioned it, therefore the link is from you. I have no idea how her son did not please you.
            1. -5
              30 January 2021 16: 39
              Aroused interest? Here is the Internet in your hands, the lackeys have no orderlies.
        2. +13
          30 January 2021 16: 40
          she has two sons, 20 and 25 years old. They did not serve in the army, they do not work anywhere. And the "unfortunate" lives with these two oglo-eaters and her daughter for 15 years "at 10 thousand rubles a month." I immediately believe and cry. laughing Have you tried to work?
          1. 0
            30 January 2021 17: 34
            Quote: Stroibat stock
            she has two sons, 20 and 25 years old. They did not serve in the army, they do not work anywhere.

            Correctly. For this to wet my feet in the stomach .. could not bring up .. bad mother .. all bad mothers .. feet in the stomach .. wassat
    5. -3
      30 January 2021 17: 19
      Putin in Davos explained once again that "the liberal model has outlived its usefulness" (c).
      Liberators, change your shoes ... You are not the first time. And we will watch and giggle, looking at this sight laughing
      PySy "In time to betray it, do not betray it, it is to foresee ..."
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
    6. 0
      30 January 2021 17: 33
      Quote: sergo1914
      Auntie, to put it mildly, weird. But even with a foot in this situation, it is not comme il faut to buy goods.

      But you can firmly say: "Yes, I did not touch her with a finger." I'm on the policeman's side, if what ...
    7. -6
      30 January 2021 19: 38
      Quote: sergo1914
      Auntie, to put it mildly, weird. But even with a foot in this situation, it is not comme il faut to buy goods.

      With veteran US Air Force Ashley Babbitt, it also worked out nekomilfo. Ashley, judging by the footage of the video of her murder, did not threaten anyone, but she was shot by a policeman ... request
    8. +3
      30 January 2021 21: 19
      You're right! In such cases, kicking is not good. Butt is another matter. According to the military and the law. You cannot raise your foot on civilians, Nicholas II understood this, so he used machine guns.
      1. +5
        30 January 2021 22: 34
        Quote: zenion
        Nicholas II understood this, so he used machine guns.

        I would have understood, I would have stayed alive with my family ..
        1. 0
          30 January 2021 23: 09
          So they ditched their Nikolasha, or what? If he were a real tsar, and not a fake one, he would have dispersed this shobla back in 1916, and in February he would have finished off the rest. And now they would drink Bavarian and play partisan. Or they would have created, like Jaroslav Hasek: "The party of moderate progress within the framework of legality." He is in this party, the program was on the door of the pub on beautiful framed paper - every woman has a man, every man has free beer. For this program, the innkeeper gave Hasek free beer for six months. For the people hustled there from morning until closing time. The police came to take pivts out of this pub, so that he could close and go to sleep. The women of half of Prague knew where to look for their husbands. I must say thank you to VKPb for being able to bring Russia together.
    9. 0
      30 January 2021 22: 21
      His hands were busy
    10. 0
      31 January 2021 10: 55
      Quote: sergo1914
      Auntie, to put it mildly, weird.

      From open sources, summarizing:
      Auntie, this honored dissident is not in the first generation.
      Itself from Luga of the Leningrad region.
      The farm has three sons, 15, 20 and 25 years old. There are no questions on the junior yet. The elders are nowhere working marginal individuals. Itself also does not work. All four of them live on some kind of benefits.
      I came to St. Petersburg to purposefully shake the boat. Well, she got what she deserved.
    11. 0
      31 January 2021 17: 39
      When you lead a detainee, your hands are full!
  2. 0
    30 January 2021 15: 11
    Absolutely right - I climbed where they don't ask, so be ready to receive it in full, but the fact that you are a woman is your problem
    1. +7
      30 January 2021 15: 16
      Quote: Dart2027
      Absolutely right - climbed where they don't ask

      If you came out to protest, you must forget about gender, age, race and confessional affiliation. Everyone should get their own, according to the law that exists in the country.
    2. +13
      30 January 2021 15: 37
      Quote: Dart2027
      Absolutely right - I climbed where they don't ask, so be ready to receive it in full, but the fact that you are a woman is your problem

      Right! "you are a woman" in this case = "they are children". And how interesting! First she forgave him, and then ran to court. Did your aunt get paid in the evening? Or reminded that she was paid BEFORE and should have worked out!
  3. +9
    30 January 2021 15: 12
    In this case, enemies from all sides will pounce on the country with renewed vigor, who will again be supported by the “fifth column,” counting on the mercy of the western masters for the services rendered.

    If you do not stop these "democratic inclinations, then you can soon see the police and National Guards kneeling in front of the" bulk ".
    1. +8
      30 January 2021 15: 18
      According to the Ministry of Internal Affairs, tomorrow in the capital they plan to close the central metro stations because of the next march of diapers.
      1. +15
        30 January 2021 15: 26
        Quote: Pilot
        According to the Ministry of Internal Affairs, tomorrow in the capital they plan to close the central metro stations because of the next march of diapers.

        Out of place, but I will say "I like the Chinese, how they put things in order."
        1. +20
          30 January 2021 15: 28
          And I like that they put things in order not only below.
          1. +16
            30 January 2021 15: 35
            And I like that they put things in order not only below.

            China has carried out the death sentence for the former chairman of state-owned asset management company China Huarong for bribery, embezzlement and polygamy, PRC Central Television reported.
            https://www.interfax.ru/world/748478
            hi
            1. +12
              30 January 2021 15: 42
              hi In the right way, what about us? For the best friend, Arkady Rotenberg harnessed himself, declaring that the palace was his. We thought for a long time, however, it is unlikely that now who will believe, but what to do now with the felling of the relic forest and other illegal pranks on the peninsula, we will punish each other ??? And those of. persons who have resolved the outrages on the peninsula are punishable ???
              1. +1
                30 January 2021 15: 46
                In the right way, what about us?
                The Western world will not understand you ... human rights defenders and freedom fighters will go on a mental attack on you.
                1. +8
                  30 January 2021 16: 03
                  Quote: Lech from Android.
                  In the right way, what about us?
                  The Western world will not understand you ... human rights defenders and freedom fighters will go on a mental attack on you.

                  You are confusing me with someone, I am more satisfied with the Iron Curtain. Let's go there scratching and whining behind the fence.
                  1. -3
                    30 January 2021 16: 08
                    You are confusing me with someone, I am more satisfied with the Iron Curtain.
                    Well what are you ... smile in the old guard I'm one hundred percent sure.
                    There are few of them left ... sadness.
                    1. +6
                      30 January 2021 17: 11
                      Quote: Lech from Android.
                      You are confusing me with someone, I am more satisfied with the Iron Curtain.
                      Well what are you ... smile in the old guard I'm one hundred percent sure.
                      There are few of them left ... sadness.

                      Yes, it’s not a matter of quantity, the moment is not yet ripe for the erection of a new fence. wink Without him, we will completely disappear, they have already taken out everything, both of them, will hand over everyone with giblets for the mercy of the hegemon, they will definitely not repent and uncover. No.
            2. +8
              30 January 2021 16: 46
              Leaving aside the meanings, I appeal to those who go to protest actions.
              Old people, women and children, do not crawl under the feet of the riot police performing their direct duties!
              Here's a video. I watched it many times. Just now, the riot police ripped the boy out of the clasp of human hands, taking in the face and nervous system such a surge of hatred from those who clasped these hands, receiving such a terrible throwing blow through screams, screams, curses and accusations, humiliating and incinerating their human essence, that their professional training was only enough to automatically move the legs and still panting, lead the boy to the paddy wagon. And now a woman rushes to these fighters who have not come to their senses, in whom everything is trembling inside, the action of which one of the fighters on reflexes, which went haywire because of the just held confrontation with the crowd, one of these fighters took as a continuation this confrontation. He did not even have time to discern who was rushing at him - a man with a knife, an asterisk, a stone or a firearm, a teenager or a woman - he fought off the attack on reflexes, because he did not have time to get out of the situation of hostile confrontation with his nerves, he was still in it ! He took the attack as a danger! Only after that he realizes what happened.
              Realizing this, dear fellow citizens who do not have special training, just do not go to the riot police, take care of yourself!
              Remember, kicking can be fatal!
              Do not put law enforcement officers and yourself in a dangerous situation for each of the participants!
              This, of course, if you have not outlined a plan for yourself to become a sacred victim.
              1. 0
                30 January 2021 18: 50
                I have watched it many times. Just recently, the riot police ripped the boy out of the clasp of human hands, taking such an outburst of hatred from those who clasped these hands into his face and nervous system, receiving such a terrible throwing blow through screams, screams, curses and accusations, humiliating and incinerating their human essence, that their professional training was only enough to automatically move the legs and still panting, lead the boy to the paddy wagon.

                Oh God, don't go on. Even at the monitor, I felt a chilling cold creeping through. Just think what charge of hatred was concentrated on the unfortunate. Burning ganglia and paralyzing the will.
                Worse only is a plastic cup whistling more piercingly than Scythian arrows and louder than a diving "thing" when it sweeps overhead. What moral suffering he can inflict !!!
                But even then they did not flinch. Titans !!!
              2. 0
                31 January 2021 16: 08
                depressant. And he kicked her in the balls. She didn't even have time to draw the revolver. It is not clear why eggs are being sewn to anyone. Why was she given a revolver, but the brains for the revolver were not given ?!
          2. -1
            30 January 2021 17: 17
            Quote: Pilot
            And I like that they put things in order not only below.

            Whose school!
          3. +11
            30 January 2021 17: 36
            Quote: Pilot
            And I like that they put things in order not only below.

            They just clean the top .. and regularly and with brilliant green ..
        2. +6
          30 January 2021 15: 44
          Quote: tihonmarine
          Out of place, but I will say "I like the Chinese, how they put things in order."

          One should not be equal to the Chinese in this case, they dispersed their liberals in Tianmen Square, but in our country they are in power. In the 90s, they won.
          1. +3
            30 January 2021 17: 19
            Quote: aleksejkabanets
            Do not be equal to the Chinese in this case, they dispersed their liberals in Tianmen Square

            There was something recollecting, near the "White House" and near the Ostankino TV station. They won. Sorry..
      2. +8
        30 January 2021 15: 43
        Quote: Pilot
        According to the Ministry of Internal Affairs, tomorrow in the capital they plan to close the central metro stations because of the next march of diapers.

        And here, remember the recommendations of J. Kedmi, how the professional police works:
        1.Unroll weak streams while they are still moving towards the collection point
        2. If a crowd has already gathered, then the most provocateurs will be at the forefront - let them inside your chain, cut them off from steel ones and immediately knit and send them to jail. The rest, who were left without this "wedge", will be confused. Well, and so on .... that's when the government will not show itself weak .. Very competently described, sorry now I will not find a link to put.
        1. +1
          30 January 2021 17: 24
          Quote: Egoza
          And here, remember the recommendations of J. Kedmi, how the professional police works:

          Yes, these techniques are known and have been in effect since 1905, although priest Gapon managed to escape.
  4. +4
    30 January 2021 15: 14
    2. The state structures convict the police officer who stopped the offender of the wrong gender and condemn him, and the woman is apologized further.

    And then there will be "Zvryache Beat Children", "cut off ears" of the opposition, unknown sniper, victims, after whom streets, cities and spaceships will be named, etc. Those who disagree will be burned, in the name of freedom and democracy, of course.
    So the first option
  5. +4
    30 January 2021 15: 15
    If a man had attacked a policeman, the incident would not have attracted any attention. But the woman changed everything.

    Is this where she attacked him?
    1. +4
      30 January 2021 15: 22
      It was a "mental attack". Which is much worse ... lol
      1. +1
        30 January 2021 15: 28
        Quote: Snail N9
        It was a "mental attack". Which is much worse ... lol

        What did you see funny here? fool do you represent the work of the police ??? I doubt it very much. The Police Officer is conducting the Detention, and no one needs to interfere!
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +9
        30 January 2021 15: 30
        Quote: Snail N9
        It was a "mental attack". Which is much worse ...

        We have a familiar grandmother, a nurse, for no reason at all, she caught up with a completely stranger and hit him on the head with a hatchet. She spent 4 years in a psychiatric hospital, now everyone bypasses her. She must have mental protection. what
      3. The comment was deleted.
        1. +11
          30 January 2021 15: 56
          - If our valiant guards are capable of crushing internal enemies like that, then imagine what they will do with external ones!
          “They won't do anything, my lord. They just scatter.
          - Why is this?
          - Because our guardsmen are used to fighting only with unarmed peasants.
          (A. Dumas "Three Musketeers")
          1. +3
            30 January 2021 21: 31
            Quote: paul3390
            - If our valiant guards are capable of crushing internal enemies like that, then imagine what they will do with external ones!
            “They won't do anything, my lord. They just scatter.
            - Why is this?
            - Because our guardsmen are used to fighting only with unarmed peasants.
            (A. Dumas "Three Musketeers")

            hi good
            1. 0
              3 February 2021 11: 38
              Svarog and Paul, as I understand you are awesomely cool soldiers .... on what fronts were wounded .... on the Kolchakovskys ??? laughing
          2. -3
            30 January 2021 21: 44
            Quote: paul3390
            A. Dumas "Three Musketeers"

            Do not remember where exactly this is said by Dumas? I've tried to find it, but for some reason all the links found lead to the sites of various enemies of the people and provocateurs.
            1. 0
              30 January 2021 21: 53
              Lenin, Stalin, Marx and many Bolsheviks also did not say many of the phrases that are attributed to them. But you, liberals and Putinists - it never bothers you, does it? You operate them without a twinge of conscience ..
              1. -3
                31 January 2021 06: 26
                Quote: paul3390
                Lenin, Stalin, Marx and many Bolsheviks also did not say many of the phrases that are attributed to them.

                That is, this is a lie and you know very well about it?
                1. 0
                  31 January 2021 09: 38
                  And so what? Putin's promises, for example, not to raise the retirement age, were just as outright lies, like all the others, and you, too, are well aware of this. For some reason, it doesn't bother you?
                  As for the phrase - did it really become worse from the fact that it was a fake? Once again - you are constantly misinterpreting the phrases of the communists and nothing, everyone is kind of happy.
                  1. -2
                    31 January 2021 12: 10
                    Quote: paul3390
                    And so what?

                    That you are a liar.
                    Quote: paul3390
                    Putin promises not to raise the retirement age

                    Given the demographic pit of the 90s, nothing strange, I personally thought about this for a long time.
                    Quote: paul3390
                    Once again - you constantly misinterpret the phrases of the Communists and

                    So where did I get them wrong?
  6. -13
    30 January 2021 15: 19
    The most talked about episode of the events of January 23 is the one where the St. Petersburg policemen were leading the detainee, and one of them kicked the woman who had pounced on them.

    Well, who would have thought? Slepakov felt on his own skin what freedom and democracy mean in the liberals' understanding. Do you dare you understand and pay attention to other
  7. -1
    30 January 2021 15: 20
    In the meantime, we will observe the development of this process.

    So then there is nothing to discuss ... but it still strains, what decision will the authorities take ???
    1. -6
      30 January 2021 15: 54
      Let's see Victor. This is the litmus test.
      Regarding the apology, if I kicked in the heat of the moment, why not apologize and I should get a reprimand.
      And if consciously assessing the situation, then gratitude.

      And what actually happened, so I am not like the sofa experts who can see everything in the world from their sofa.
      1. +1
        30 January 2021 18: 17
        Vladimir soldier
        At the expense of the servicemen ... the performance of official duties, no more, no less.
        "the victim" ... could just throw herself under the tram with a yell ... any. An adult, capable person, she deliberately violated the law !!!
        Cure, as expected and solder PENALTY, also as expected.
        Diluted bodyagu ??? But many, serious people WARNING what needs to be done BY THE LAW, and not as someone out there got mad!
  8. +20
    30 January 2021 15: 20
    "filed a lawsuit against a policeman in the Investigative Committee" The claim is filed in court, in the Investigative Committee - a statement. Author, write ischo)))
  9. +8
    30 January 2021 15: 25
    Obstruction of justice - like there is such an article? Well, the question is settled. The cop can be reprimanded for exceeding, if any, official powers, but only if it is an attack during execution, then there is no excess.
    PiSi: the very statement of the question is wrong. ONE way is possible - according to the law. Stop living by concepts. Is there an article? All, no questions asked. Is there an instruction for the cop? find out if there was an excess. Apply. Dot
  10. The comment was deleted.
    1. -1
      30 January 2021 15: 36
      Quote: Alex 2020
      In the Western countries loved by liberals and shit-crates, they would have been fucked up so that they (L and D) would have regretted that they were born at all. There the police / gendarmerie in one place turned them all along with their demands. Evidence? Internet to help you! Look how they deal with such.

      Oh, you, there can be no such thing. And if it happens, they bring flowers, candy, wine and Chihuahuas to the hospital
      1. -4
        30 January 2021 16: 27
        Oh, you, there can be no such thing. And if it happens, they bring flowers, candy, wine and Chihuahuas to the hospital

        Water.
        And the fact that she could not resist on her feet, so it is necessary to smoke less. laughing

        But in general, as always, the extreme will be those in uniform. Carrying chestnuts out of the fire.
        1. -4
          30 January 2021 16: 38
          Quote: Arzt
          But in general, as always, the extreme will be those in uniform. Carrying chestnuts out of the fire.

          The couple plans to take action against the police, but a Dutch prosecutor's office spokesman said there were "several announcements" during the protests asking people to leave in accordance with state of emergency rules.

          Good luck
      2. 0
        30 January 2021 18: 21
        Quote: Cron
        Oh, you, there can be no such thing. And if it happens, they bring flowers, candy, wine and Chihuahuas to the hospital

        HA, I remembered the movie "Wasabi" !!! There, too, a commissioner with flowers, came to the hospital! HA, HA!
    2. +5
      30 January 2021 15: 47
      Quote: Alexey 2020
      In the Western countries loved by liberals and shit-crates, they would have been fucked up so that they (L and D) would have regretted that they were born at all. There the police / gendarmerie in one place turned them all along with their demands. Evidence? Internet to help you! Look how they deal with such.

      We're watching.
      According to the police, about 22 thousand people came to the rally. Many brought with them weapons, notably pistols, rifles and shotguns. The action was under enhanced security measures, but it passed peacefully: the police reported only one arrest, writes The Washington Post.

      This is a rally in defense of the right to bear arms, if anything. Yeah, they've gotten rid of it.
    3. +5
      30 January 2021 16: 33
      In the Western countries loved by liberals and crap

      Chapter 1. Fundamentals of the constitutional system
      Article 1

      1. The Russian Federation - Russia is a democratic federal state with a republican form of government.

      I’m not looking for a video with one high official. says that Russia is doomed to liberalism.
  11. +3
    30 January 2021 15: 41
    The author of the article would have worked great in the SS Sonderkommando, would have destroyed all kinds of communists, democrats, and other opponents of the Fuhrer. Why dare she tell a true Aryan "what are you doing." This is, of course, an attack. To her concentration camp!
    The passage about "contempt for the democrats" is also touching, especially when you consider that the Russian Federation, according to the Constitution, is a democratic state.
    P / S. In fact, the picture is sad. The more such non-people creeps out into the light of day and publish their "articles", the more people support Navalny.
    But his program ideas are really even worse for Russia than the current government, for all its lead abomination.
    1. -7
      30 January 2021 16: 12
      Quote: Odyssey
      The author of the article would have worked great in the SS Sonderkommando, would have destroyed all kinds of communists, democrats, and other opponents of the Fuhrer. Why dare she tell a true Aryan "what are you doing." This is, of course, an attack. To her concentration camp!
      The passage about "contempt for the democrats" is also touching, especially when you consider that the Russian Federation, according to the Constitution, is a democratic state.
      P / S. In fact, the picture is sad. The more such non-people creeps out into the light of day and publish their "articles", the more people support Navalny.
      But his program ideas are really even worse for Russia than the current government, for all its lead abomination.

      Only now you don't need to breed Yaroslavna's cry here. The author wrote everything correctly. Why was it necessary to block the path of the law enforcement officers who were leading the detainee? Maybe he attacked someone there and dangerous?
      Just like you, and would work for these very fascists, suppressing the alternative opinion.
      All the opposition was just running around with this woman, not noticing other incidents at all, not the attack on the police, not even the beating of that guy with the poster. They were only interested in the incident with the woman. Where is democracy, freedom of speech and other terrible words?
      On one broadcast, ECHO was only asked about this woman, urging to publish the initials of this riot policeman. For what? For this herd to carry out reprisals over him?
      Ignoring privacy laws, ignoring arguments of opponents about other incidents, etc. They are not interested at all. It is only interesting what is beneficial to them. And you are still talking about the SS Sonderkommando, destroying communists, democrats, and other opponents of the Fuhrer? This is what the people should support?
      The fact that you scream and stink the loudest does not make you all a people.
      1. +6
        30 January 2021 16: 40
        Quote: Cron
        Just like you, and would work for these very fascists, suppressing the alternative opinion.

        So the grandmother suppressed the alternative opinion. A boot in the belly.
        Quote: Cron
        Where is democracy, freedom of speech and other terrible words?

        That's it, democracy ended long ago and slowly. They will take up the Internet, it will be quite fun. But all the same, we must fulfill the plan, look for the scoundrels who hang around the shops without masks.
        1. -3
          30 January 2021 17: 18
          Quote: Mordvin 3
          So the grandmother suppressed the alternative opinion. A boot in the belly.

          What was the alternative opinion? In order to jump out onto the road, stand in the way of the riot police and ask why they detained him? That is, she did not even know why he was detained? And they had to stop and report? Who is she anyway? Well, they lead a person by the hand, they don't beat him, they don't injure him, what was all this about then? She hoped to free him or what? Well, I would shout from the side, they say, release the villains of an innocent person. What was the problem, so it was impossible to express an alternative opinion?
          And you yourself, too, do not be shy, if you see some bully, or the killer is being detained, come, stand in the way and ask why he was detained? Maybe you can catch a bullet in the forehead. Serve the opposition well, they will make you a victim of the regime.
          That's it, democracy ended long ago and slowly. They will take up the Internet, it will be quite fun.

          It is high time to take on certain moments, but neither as in the cradle of democracy, so definitely not worth doing.
          But all the same, you have to fulfill the plan, look for the villains who hang around the shops without masks.

          They had already found many, the naive believed that it was possible to beat the police and riot police with impunity. Others just think they've hidden
          1. +1
            30 January 2021 18: 17
            Quote: Cron
            naive people believed that it was possible to beat the police and riot police with impunity.

            Wow, has grandma already hit the OPON? Come on, I wonder what else she did.
            1. -3
              30 January 2021 18: 23
              Wow, has grandma already hit the OPON? Come on, I wonder what else she did.

              And where does the grandmother have to do with it? Where did I write that she beat them? Are you acting out of yourself on purpose? Why bother looking for her? She was taken to the hospital
              I wrote about other characters
              1. 0
                30 January 2021 18: 34
                Quote: Cron
                And where does the grandmother have to do with it? Where did I write that she beat them?

                Quote: Cron
                naive people believed that it was possible to beat the police and riot police with impunity.

                Of course, you have so in total. Smeared a little.
                1. -2
                  30 January 2021 20: 58
                  Quote: Mordvin 3
                  Of course, you have so in total. Smeared a little.

                  No, you smeared it as you wanted in your feeble mind
                  1. -1
                    30 January 2021 21: 54
                    Quote: Cron
                    No, you smeared it as you wanted in your feeble mind

                    Oh who I see! Our genius is unfinished.
          2. 0
            30 January 2021 21: 02
            so fighters for the law exist from taxes of the most ordinary people and grandmothers including. Do they have to report for what we feed them, I think, more than they are obliged. the whole problem is that a fan of waving his legs to begin with, could verbally to admonish the aunt, before using force, push back with his shoulder, but just step aside a little. If in the place of his aunt a healthy uncle of athletic build, nothing of this would have happened, it was checked. The young karateka, in this case, would be extremely polite and correct.
    2. -3
      30 January 2021 16: 36
      Quote: Odyssey
      But his program ideas are really even worse for Russia than the current government, for all its lead abomination.


      Perhaps I will subscribe to every word.
      1. 0
        30 January 2021 17: 10
        Quote: sergo1914
        Perhaps I will subscribe to every word.

        Objective support ideas Navalny in Russia: 8-10%. And those appeared because of the 30-year propaganda of the market economy and the confidence of some young people that the wrong capitalism was built in Russia.
        They, of course, also deserve full respect and have the right to be represented in parliament, but they do not pose a threat to the authorities. It is all the more offensive to see how the authorities themselves, by their insane decisions, make Navalny the number 1 politician in Russia and the only alternative to Putin.
        But to fight Navalny, she just needed do nothing ... Do not persecute him (and if they didn’t persecute them, heal him in Russia and investigate), do not persecute his people, give him the opportunity to be elected (as the once popular Yavlinsky with similar ideas was given the opportunity).
        And at such a pace, everything will come to the fact that in a year or another Putin will be forced to transfer power to his "successor." He will begin a new stage of liberalization and will triumphantly release Navalny, sharing power with his people.
        1. +3
          30 January 2021 19: 53
          Quote: Odyssey
          the authorities themselves, by their crazy decisions, make Navalny the number 1 politician in Russia and the only alternative to Putin.

          do not throw beads ... It will come to them later. The whole point
      2. +6
        30 January 2021 21: 39
        Semin has a good opinion
    3. +8
      30 January 2021 16: 47
      But his program ideas are really even worse for Russia than the current government, for all its lead abomination.
      ... Almost 30 years the same choice, of two evils to choose the lesser. smile Currently, the circle has narrowed to the limit.
      1. +10
        30 January 2021 19: 50
        Quote: parusnik
        Currently, the circle has narrowed to the limit.

        just 2 people, Putin and Navalny, behind whose backs the stupid government, on the one hand, and money, on the other, want to blow up the country. Both of them work to destroy the country, one has already proven this in 20 years, the second promises
    4. -10
      30 January 2021 16: 58
      Well, well.
      By the way, your son could have been in that policeman's place.
      1. +4
        30 January 2021 17: 12
        Quote: Narak-zempo
        Well, well.
        By the way, your son could have been in that policeman's place.


        Could not. My such foolishness does not suffer.
      2. +5
        30 January 2021 19: 47
        Quote: Narak-zempo
        in place of that policeman your son could be.

        and in the place of the protester, too, someone's son. The law should work, not a dull brainless force.
        If someone wants to repeat "Bloody Sunday", then he must remember the end of it.
        By the way, the police themselves noted the extraordinary bitterness of the protesters .. As M. Zhvanetsky said? -The strength of the Russian government is in the drunkenness of the Russian people. But when he stops drinking, then the end of power
        1. -3
          30 January 2021 20: 26
          Quote: Silvestr
          If someone wants to repeat "Bloody Sunday", then he must remember the end of it.

          Restructuring.
          1. +4
            30 January 2021 21: 33
            Quote: Dart2027
            Restructuring.

            then "Shootout"
            1. -4
              30 January 2021 21: 44
              Quote: Silvestr
              then "Shootout"

              And this is the construction of the country.
      3. +2
        30 January 2021 21: 40
        Quote: Narak-zempo
        By the way, your son could have been in that policeman's place.

        And in the place of this woman is your mother. Have you ever wondered?
        1. -1
          30 January 2021 21: 43
          Quote: Ingvar 72
          And in the place of this woman is your mother. Have you ever wondered?

          Can not.
          She is for Putin.
          1. +3
            30 January 2021 22: 01
            Those. can she ask the riot police questions? belay
            1. -1
              30 January 2021 22: 02
              Quote: Ingvar 72
              Those. can she ask the riot police questions? belay

              She will not do this. She doesn't need it.
              She knows guys are doing the right thing.
    5. +7
      30 January 2021 17: 26
      The author of the article would have worked superbly in the SS Sonderkommando ...


      Suitable for a concentration camp overseer. This type of people, with a similar worldview, are always the most zealous performers of the Sturmbannführer's commandments. He will break his skulls with a butt and then, happy, will return to his family for dinner.
    6. +5
      30 January 2021 17: 38
      Quote: Odyssey
      The author of the article would have worked great in the SS Sonderkommando, would have destroyed all kinds of communists, democrats, and other opponents of the Fuhrer.

      Odysseus, you wrote it very well. I also have this feeling after reading this article. But the Ssovites fought against a foreign people, and these against their own. Therefore, I would compare them with the fascist beast of the Francoists described in Hemengway's novel For Whom the Bell Tolls. As well as those commentators who here praise an elderly woman who kicked in the stomach. I can’t imagine that a Soviet Omnivist would be so cruel against his citizens. The topic is of course disgusting, it's a pity that they are discussing it here
      1. +2
        30 January 2021 21: 35
        Quote: Stirbjorn
        But the Ssovites fought against a foreign people,

        So they're Gauleiters ... that's obvious.
      2. +6
        30 January 2021 22: 30
        Quote: Stirbjorn
        But the Ssovites fought against a foreign people, and these against their own.

        And against his own. First, they dealt with all the political opponents of the Fuhrer - the communists (main enemies), social democrats, then they scared the bourgeois democrats (liberals) to death with terror. Then the "defective nations"
        Quote: Stirbjorn
        I can't imagine that a Soviet Omnivist would be so fierce against his citizens

        In the USSR, it did not exist at all. It appeared at the end of 88 at the second stage of perestroika (transition to the market). In the USSR, this was seen only in films about the Pinochet regime or apartheid. And they didn’t believe it, they said communist propaganda.
        Quote: Stirbjorn
        The topic is of course disgusting, it's a pity that they are discussing it here

        Morally disgusting. And it is sad that the "defenders" of the OMON soldier do not even seem to know such a concept.
        But even worse in the political. Such misanthropic articles are simply pushed into the ranks of Navalny. Thus, the defenders of our kleptocratic dictatorship only make it worse. Which they themselves do not understand, of course.
        It would seem, well, good. A useful fool is useful because he is a fool.
        However, from my point of view, Navalny's ideas are even worse than Putin's mafia. We are faced with a choice between bad and even worse, and they do everything to make the worst win.
        1. +7
          30 January 2021 23: 42
          Quote: Odyssey
          However, from my point of view, Navalny's ideas are even worse than Putin's mafia. We are faced with a choice between bad and even worse, and they do everything to make the worst win.

          This is you to the point. I have exactly the same thoughts. Moreover, there is a struggle between feelings and reason. Reason says that all this nix with Navalny can end very badly .. for ordinary citizens .. nevertheless, Biden and the democrats won and now Putin will be flattened as an adult .. and it may end with a stoned Gauleiter in power in Russia. On the other hand, there is a feeling that these "managers" have done so much for themselves that let them take off their heads ... but they will remove them, and then a new Gauleiter will establish a fascist regime in Russia.
          Really a choice between bad and completely bad.
        2. -4
          31 January 2021 07: 04
          Quote: Odyssey
          Morally disgusting.

          If you are talking about a woman, then yes.
          Quote: Odyssey
          With such misanthropic articles

          Not misanthropic, but a normal analysis of liberal / communist cries about a poor woman as well.
        3. -1
          31 January 2021 10: 43
          What are Navalny's ideas?
    7. -9
      30 January 2021 17: 42
      Quote: Odyssey
      The author of the article would have worked great in the SS Sonderkommando, would have destroyed all kinds of communists, democrats, and other opponents of the Fuhrer.

      Everything was confused in the democrat's head. Plus memory loss. Out of shock, he even put the communists next to the democrats. Although since 1991, in their classification, the communists are “red-brown”. And this is understandable: the American and European masters have long been trying to put the Soviet Union on a par with Nazi Germany, and to equate the Soviet people with the Nazis.
      This means: the article put pressure on the sore spot of the Russian liberals - the dream of using "onizhedey" and "onizhezhins" as a battering ram for the next destruction of the Russian state, in order to then reload the same children and women into the meat grinder of the civil war as in 1917, or in the bloody 90 - in the hope that the owners will give them revenge on the wrong people who do not appreciate their divine essence. As Akhedzhakova called at one time: "... to finish crushing the reptile."
      Although everyone who objectively studies history knows that Nazism in Germany was specially cultivated by Western democracies in order to destroy the USSR with his hands together with all Slavs, Jews, Gypsies and other "inferior peoples".
      Therefore, I believe that the author of this post would have served with zeal in the Sonderkommando.
      1. -7
        30 January 2021 18: 59
        Quote: kosopuz
        Therefore, I believe that the author of this post would have served with zeal in the Sonderkommando.

        Like in Ukraine.
      2. +7
        30 January 2021 19: 41
        Quote: kosopuz
        Nazism in Germany was specially cultivated by Western democracies in order to destroy the USSR with its hands, along with all Slavs, Jews, Gypsies and other "inferior peoples".

        you studied history in which vocational school?
        1. 0
          30 January 2021 21: 57
          Quote: Silvestr
          Quote: kosopuz
          Nazism in Germany was specially cultivated by Western democracies in order to destroy the USSR with its hands, along with all Slavs, Jews, Gypsies and other "inferior peoples".

          you studied history in which vocational school?


          What vocational school? Graduation is in Durka today! In vocational school, adequate students studied, in comparison with this utyrk.
          1. +4
            30 January 2021 22: 18
            Quote: sergo1914
            What vocational school? Graduation is in Durka today! In vocational school, adequate students studied, in comparison with this utyrk.

            judging by the statement, the gentleman generally has a white ticket
            1. +4
              31 January 2021 02: 17
              Dear Sylvester hi,
              it seems that the remaining psychiatric hospitals were redesigned as hospitals, and "these" were dismissed to their homes without drug provision.
        2. -2
          31 January 2021 11: 23
          Quote: Silvestr
          you studied history in which vocational school?

          I studied history in a Soviet school, a higher military school and a Soviet academy. Are you familiar with history? - I do not know. Then read something about the Munich Agreement.
          Therefore, I continue to insist: the article clearly shows that the bad guys who dream (which, perhaps, they are afraid to admit even to themselves) as a barrel of jam and a barrel of cookies to be able to serve in the Sonderkommando, will fiercely defend precisely the second option.
          By the way: the article itself has become a litmus test showing who is rooting for the Russian people, and who is ready to plunge it into bloody showdowns again in order to get some kind of gesheft on this.
      3. 0
        30 January 2021 22: 00
        Quote: kosopuz
        Quote: Odyssey
        The author of the article would have worked great in the SS Sonderkommando, would have destroyed all kinds of communists, democrats, and other opponents of the Fuhrer.

        Everything was confused in the democrat's head. Plus memory loss. Out of shock, he even put the communists next to the democrats. Although since 1991, in their classification, the communists are “red-brown”. And this is understandable: the American and European masters have long been trying to put the Soviet Union on a par with Nazi Germany, and to equate the Soviet people with the Nazis.
        This means: the article put pressure on the sore spot of the Russian liberals - the dream of using "onizhedey" and "onizhezhins" as a battering ram for the next destruction of the Russian state, in order to then reload the same children and women into the meat grinder of the civil war as in 1917, or in the bloody 90 - in the hope that the owners will give them revenge on the wrong people who do not appreciate their divine essence. As Akhedzhakova called at one time: "... to finish crushing the reptile."
        Although everyone who objectively studies history knows that Nazism in Germany was specially cultivated by Western democracies in order to destroy the USSR with his hands together with all Slavs, Jews, Gypsies and other "inferior peoples".
        Therefore, I believe that the author of this post would have served with zeal in the Sonderkommando.


        Listen, bro, is this how you get to think with your sciatic nerve? Nobody else can do that. Well, it is clear that you were conceived under killer drugs and vodka. But it still took years of training?
      4. +3
        30 January 2021 22: 51
        Quote: kosopuz
        Everything was confused in the democrat's head. Plus memory loss. Out of shock, he even put the communists next to the democrats.

        No, citizen. It's all mixed up in your head. Let's briefly
        Communism ideology. Democracy is a type of political regime. Immeasurable concepts, such as boots and cucumbers. The ideology of the Communists necessarily presupposes democracy as a form of gender system. communists are democrats ... But there are other forms of democracy, the main of which is bourgeois (and the bourgeois are trying to present it as democracy in general). They also presuppose democracy as a form of gender. The Nazis (and this is one of the forms of bourgeois dictatorship) were enemies of both. Communists were exterminated, bourgeois democrats were frightened with terror and imprisoned. Therefore, citing the example of the Nazis among the enemies of the Reich, they are separated by commas.
        The author's logic is completely identical to the logic of the Gestapo - a woman dared to ask a question to the policeman leading the enemy of the Fuhrer (and by the way the protesters are in favor of bourgeois democracy against the dictatorship), she attacked! Immediately jail her. I don't care about the laws, I don't care about the video. The interests of the oligarchic dictatorship are sacred!
        Quote: kosopuz
        Therefore, I believe that the author of this post would have served with zeal in the Sonderkommando.

        That is, this is the author of this post, that is, I propose to consider the issue as an attack, justify cruelty, violation of the law, and am also going to jail an innocent person?
        Just wonderful laughing
        Good is evil, black is white.
        1. +5
          30 January 2021 23: 45
          Quote: Odyssey

          No, citizen. It's all confused in your head.

          Odysseus, sergo1914 the answer, apparently, gave the kosopuz hi
        2. -5
          31 January 2021 07: 06
          Quote: Odyssey
          Communism ideology. Democracy is a type of political regime.

          Democracy is not an ideology, and communism is not a political regime? Hmm ...
    8. -4
      30 January 2021 18: 55
      Quote: Odyssey
      The author of the article would work superbly in the SS Sonderkommando, would destroy all sorts of communists, democrats, and other opponents of the Fuhrer

      Remind me of how the USSR did with the workers in Novocherkassk?
      Quote: Odyssey
      In fact, the picture is sad. The more such non-people creeps out into the light of day and publish their "articles" the more people support Navalny.

      Only in your dreams. And such articles are needed.


      1. -1
        30 January 2021 19: 39
        Quote: Dart2027
        Remind me of how the USSR did with the workers in Novocherkassk?

        to remind you how you finished the USSR, the state of workers and peasants? How many workers came out to defend him? Everything comes back
        1. -5
          30 January 2021 20: 27
          Quote: Silvestr
          remind how the USSR ended, the state of workers and peasants

          That's it.
      2. +3
        30 January 2021 23: 00
        Quote: Dart2027
        Remind me of how the USSR did with the workers in Novocherkassk?

        They did bad things. Of course, then there were no riot police, no modern police with their clubs, water cannons and other delights of capitalism. And the management never faced anything like this and was confused. However, this is not an excuse even once. Criminally acted.
        And this became an important factor in the removal of Khrushchev (which I welcome), but also an important factor in bourgeois propaganda.
        An argument that has nothing to cover ..
        Quote: Dart2027
        Only in your dreams. And such articles are needed.

        This is not in my dreams, I am not a supporter of either Putin or Navalny. But the fact that this is a blatant act even by the standards of the Russian police and hits the regime, even its representatives understood, hence the flowers and apologies.
        The cannibalistic logic of the author of the article (and yours) only plays into the hands of Navalny.
        1. -4
          31 January 2021 07: 08
          Quote: Odyssey
          They did bad things. Of course, then there was no riot police, no modern police with their clubs, water cannons and other delights of capitalism.

          That would have stopped the riots without shooting and corpses.
          That is, now the government is much more humane.
          Quote: Odyssey
          But the fact that this is a flagrant act

          exclusively by the standards of those who dream of repeating the Ukrainian scenario.
          Quote: Odyssey
          The cannibalistic logic of the author of the article (and yours) to Navalny

          Yes, yes, yes ... We have already passed this.
  12. -3
    30 January 2021 15: 50
    Tolerance has certainly penetrated into society, but thank God it has not taken root.
    And whether it takes root or not depends not on the GDP but on each of us.
    Well, in this case, everything is generally clear. IN DEFINING GUILT, THE LAW DOES NOT MAKE A GENDER DIFFERENCE. All point.
  13. +5
    30 January 2021 15: 51
    this is news - Rotenberg decided to "surrender" -My palace wassat
    https://lenta.ru/news/2021/01/30/dvorets/

    Order of the Savior laughing
    1. +5
      30 January 2021 16: 04
      Yes, hell knows - we can and Rotenberg .. For from the very beginning I was confused by the issue of security, if this is Putin's residence. There are mountains around, overgrown with forest, there to keep the perimeter - you just get bored. How many people and technology are needed! Otherwise, I climbed onto the nearest hill - and you want to wait there with a mortar, you want with a stinger .. IMHO - so the places of stay of specially protected persons are not built ..
      Yes, and the temple there is some kind of strange, the architecture is more oriental, Armenian or Syrian .. In Russia - so Orthodox churches are usually not built .. And he is somehow healthy for a mansion - well, what the hell is Putin in the country with so many priests? And one would be enough. The amount of his sins still cannot be washed away ...
      Again - is there an amphitheater in feijoa ?? In general, it is a strange object of course ..
      1. +6
        30 January 2021 16: 12
        There is a sea of ​​thorns, not even a kilometer away. There are never too many pops hi , what if the second coming ...
      2. +5
        30 January 2021 17: 52
        And where to shoot this stinger?
        Flights are prohibited there, if anything
        And those mountains and the forest that are around are also forbidden to enter.
        1. +7
          30 January 2021 19: 14
          What - and Putin is also prohibited ?? belay
          Uh-huh - I can see it, this is a sabotage group crawling, and suddenly a sign with a ban .. The elder spits in his hearts and says - that's it, guys, let's go, they don't allow it any further ... wassat
          1. +8
            30 January 2021 19: 25
            The ban is set so that anyone noticed is automatically illegal.
    2. +7
      30 January 2021 16: 08
      Quote: Konnick
      Order of the Savior

      It is funny here that when Navalny's people, hooting, were commenting on the "revelation of the palace in the form of an apartment hotel": they were discussing on whom they might "hang the palace", and just named the name of Rottenberg. With a refrain, this would be the most ridiculous decision.
      And of course, Putin, and it is he who is accepted smile
    3. +6
      30 January 2021 21: 38
      Quote: Konnick
      this is news - Rotenberg decided to "surrender" -My palace wassat
      https://lenta.ru/news/2021/01/30/dvorets/

      Order of the Savior laughing

      Surprising ... how they endured for a whole month ... how they did not immediately stand up for a friend and did not take the blame ... although everyone already understands ... that Putin is that Rotenberg ... it is the same ...
      1. +3
        30 January 2021 22: 04
        "I am you, you are me ... and the hut is not mine" drinks
  14. +1
    30 January 2021 15: 53
    It should be borne in mind that the policeman is far from Uncle Styopa. And his equipment was completely different. What kind of tolerance are we talking about? Many young people, having seen enough fights without rules, roam like a Pug on an Elephant. There is no tolerance in relation to each other. But I am surprised by the opinion of the audience. "Hit him in the face." "I should have poured water over this pack." And then the answer is, "It's you, scumbag, you need to pour water in the cold." Everything is according to the scenario of our society.
    1. +8
      30 January 2021 16: 15
      It should be noted that the policeman is far from Uncle Styopa, and his equipment was completely different

      When I was young, the whole district knew that our district police officer had a glass in his holster. And - what? Did it somehow prevent him from performing his duties? Yes, not a fig! For the people’s militia - the people in general still respected. Understanding its functions. She had no need for a weapon. And the Soviet militia did not hide their snouts under masks, did not hide information about themselves. What for? The same district police officer lived two floors above me.

      Noneshnie same policemen - yes in Syria the special forces and that in my opinion is poorer packed !! You walk around the city as if you were in a combat zone. Spacesuits, armored cars, submachine guns .. Vigorous - who are you going to fight with? With us or what? So we have no weapons, what are you afraid of? Moreover, plus the anonymity of Stirlitz, now even their faces say it will not be possible to take a picture. Some kind of Taunton-macoutes .. And all this - like to protect us ?? From whom? From the landing from Jupiter? Some kind of darkness .. And if you sneeze nearby, they immediately drag you to court, well, you must — you sneeze a representative of the authorities. Straight to the Motherland he encroached on .. Ugh ... The policemen are, rightly they barked at them ...
      1. +9
        30 January 2021 16: 38
        Quote: paul3390
        And the Soviet militia did not hide their snouts under masks, they did not hide information about themselves. What for? The same district police officer lived two floors above me.

        Well, you have compared. The USSR is another country, another system.
        The power (for all its shortcomings) did not rob its own people and, accordingly, did not need structures protecting the loot and fighting with its own people.
        There was no OMON at all (this is the brainchild of late perestroika), the police had completely different tasks and personnel.
        1. -5
          30 January 2021 17: 52
          Quote: Odyssey
          Well, you have compared. The USSR is another country, another system.

          And it became another country as a result of the victory of democracy in 1991.
          Destroyed the country in the struggle for justice against privileges and a totalitarian system, in which no one would dare to go to an unauthorized rally
          1. +3
            30 January 2021 23: 54
            Quote: kosopuz
            And it became another country as a result of the victory of democracy in 1991.

            Have you, excuse me, ever read Soviet laws? Article 2 of the Constitution - "the power belongs to the people." Let me remind you that democracy is the rule of the people.
            Preamble to the Constitution - "a socialist society is a society of true democracy"
            What kind of "victory of democracy" in 1991 are you talking about?
            Quote: kosopuz
            Destroyed the country in the struggle for justice against privileges and a totalitarian system, in which no one would dare to go to an unauthorized rally

            The country was destroyed not as a result of a mythical "struggle", but as a result of the systematic implementation of the policy of perestroika by the relatives of the Central Committee of the CPSU. That is, the destruction of the country is a consequence of the degeneration of the party and the desire of its top leaders for the transition to capitalism and the privatization of power and property.
            It is this power of traitors such as Count Yeltsin and his successor, Count Putin, which we now have.
            And it is this power that you defend.
            1. -5
              31 January 2021 12: 35
              Quote: Odyssey
              the destruction of the country is a consequence of the degeneration of the party and the desire of its top leaders for the transition to capitalism and the privatization of power and property.

              You wrote it right in this place. They just didn’t dare to reveal: with what tool they destroyed the country. And that instrument was the riots waged by the specialists who directed the blind fury of the crowd. And the crowd was not besieged, because the law enforcement agencies and the army were discredited and demoralized as a result of the mass of large and small provocations in Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, the Baltic states, etc.
              And you do not want to admit that the same process of discrediting and demoralizing law enforcement agencies can be launched in connection with the incident in question. The fact that circles have formed in the state aimed at the next privatization of power is spelled out in the article. And for this they need a crowd as a tool and power structures incapable of performing their functions. With the success of this coup, the people - no doubt - will live even worse. After all, the new elite will need the recognition of the "world community", and it will buy it with concessions. Once again, Russia will cut missiles, ships, planes, factories, factories ... We have already gone through this and it can be repeated only under powerful professional psychological pressure. Which is carried out in all kinds of networks and on all kinds of sites.
              You cannot fail to understand this. However, you stubbornly bend your line. So you get paid. By the way, your constant presence on the site speaks about this. “Everything is not so simple,” one “officer’s daughter” wrote.
      2. -5
        30 January 2021 19: 01
        Quote: paul3390
        For the people’s militia - the people in general still respected. Understanding its functions. She had no need for a weapon.

        That all the police were unarmed ?!
        1. +13
          30 January 2021 19: 17
          Personally, in the first 25 years of my life, I have never seen cops with weapons ... At least in plain sight. I didn’t fumble in my pockets. And when, with the onset of democracy and goodwill, they began to walk with machine guns, I remember at first I was very surprised ..
          1. -4
            30 January 2021 20: 28
            Quote: paul3390
            At least in plain sight. I didn't go into my pockets.

            That's it in appearance. And do not confuse the district and internal troops.
            1. +7
              30 January 2021 20: 51
              And I have never seen the internal troops on the streets at all under Soviet rule .. So I have nothing to confuse. And what about exactly - but what do I care what they have in their pockets, even the Maxim machine gun. The main thing is that people are not frightened by their wildly warlike appearance. Unlike noneshny imperial stormtroopers. Plus, you also don't know who wore what, so there's nothing here ..
              1. -7
                30 January 2021 21: 36
                Quote: paul3390
                And I have never seen internal troops on the streets at all under Soviet rule.

                That is, they were not what?
                Quote: paul3390
                Plus - you also don't know who wore what, so

                The fact that according to the charter they were supposed to have weapons I know.
                1. +7
                  30 January 2021 21: 46
                  Can you read? I only said that I personally - I have never seen them on our streets with weapons under Soviet rule. Unlike nowadays.
        2. +3
          30 January 2021 22: 25
          The first time I saw law enforcement officers with a machine gun was in 1987, at the airport, when I went abroad for the first time. And this would not be our airport.
  15. +5
    30 January 2021 15: 56
    The first thing that just hurts your eyes:
    (By the way: why I still despise democrats, so it is because they, unlike decent people, do not protect women and children, but hide behind them).

    Forgive me for the comment, because I don't know what kind of "democrats" hiding behind women and children you meant. On the territory of the Russian Federation, in my memory, separatist bandits covered themselves with women and children, the last six of whom were destroyed in the Chechen Republic, as was notified on 20.01.2021/XNUMX/XNUMX ...
    As for the police officer and the woman:

    And the video shows that the woman did not throw the bouquet “in the hated face”, but on the contrary, forgave the policeman.
    Now - further:
    There are two possible poles in resolving this conflict: ...
    In the first case, the state will demonstrate firmness in upholding law and order and will send a signal to its citizens and the whole world that it will fight for its existence to the end.
    In the second case, there will be a signal that the circles aimed at another surrender of Russia to the "civilized community" have gained the upper hand in the power structures of the state

    I see only one solution to the problem: the government should not interfere with the exercise of citizens' rights:
    Article 31
    Citizens of the Russian Federation have the right to assemble peacefully, without weapons, to hold meetings, rallies and demonstrations, marches and pickets.

    Administrative violations stipulated:
    1. The legislation on administrative offenses, which should be guided by when considering this category of cases, is the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation (hereinafter referred to as the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation), enacted from July 1, 2002, which defines the conditions and grounds for administrative liability, types administrative punishments, the procedure for proceedings in cases of administrative offenses, including the jurisdiction and jurisdiction of these cases, as well as the laws of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, adopted in accordance with the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation on issues attributed to the competence of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation.

    And the police should treat violators of the Code of Administrative Offenses in the same way, regardless of the time and location of the defendant.
    In addition, I agree with the opinion that citizens should be punished for administrative violations from the age of 14.
    1. +5
      30 January 2021 16: 02
      In addition, I am a supporter of the punishment of officials who prevent citizens from exercising their rights for no reason (outside the legislation of the Russian Federation), at the direction of “above”. Such officials should be immediately removed from office.
      Article 136. Violation of equality of human and civil rights and freedoms
      Discrimination, that is, violation of the rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of a person and a citizen, depending on his gender, race, nationality, language, origin, property and official status, place of residence, attitude to religion, beliefs, membership in public associations or any social groups, committed by a person using his official position -
      shall be punishable by a fine in the amount of one hundred thousand to three hundred thousand rubles, or in the amount of the convict's wages or other income for a period of one year to two years, or by deprivation of the right to occupy certain positions or engage in certain activities for a term of up to five years, or compulsory work for a term up to four hundred eighty hours, either by corrective labor for a term of up to two years, or forced labor for a term of up to five years, or by imprisonment for the same term.
    2. 0
      30 January 2021 17: 55
      Quote: ROSS 42
      Forgive me for the comment, because I don't know what kind of "democrats" hiding behind women and children you meant.

      Those who dragged children and women to an unauthorized rally on January 23 and tried to hide behind them.
      Democrats in Belarus acted the same way - strain your memory.
      1. +5
        30 January 2021 18: 24
        Quote: kosopuz
        Democrats in Belarus acted the same way - strain your memory.

        There is no talk about Belarus at all. As for the resistance of the RF and the litmus test ...
        1. Any unauthorized meeting is a priori an administrative offense.
        2. The administration, which refused the organizers of the rally without any reason, should be removed from the performance of its duties as a result of the same prosecutor's check within 24 hours as sabotaging the Constitution of the Russian Federation and infringing upon the rights of citizens.
        3. Citizens of the Russian Federation who have committed administrative offenses according to the Code of Administrative Offenses are obliged to be brought to administrative responsibility regardless of the time, place and nature of the offense (and not only those whose political views do not fit into the norms of the United Russia party program.
        4. The presence of children and women at rallies cannot be a cover, because the rest of the participants do not receive any preferences from this.
        5. I will not strain my memory, because all the events in Belarus are the business of the Belarusians themselves.
        In Russia, it is time to decide that if the government opposes the laws adopted by it and in force in the country, then it is obliged to resign voluntarily, and not to give illegal orders and orders. It is this leadership style that eliminates anarchy and mess.
  16. -5
    30 January 2021 15: 58
    An attack on a police officer is punishable under Art. 318 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Where is it written that women can be attacked?
    Broke the law, got rebuffed and be punished ...
    Well, and the personalities who provoke children, women, young people to illegal actions are moral "bad people" (censorship), whom I scold.
    And Sisyan was closed correctly.
    I hope that law enforcement agencies will identify the instigators and organizers of the riots and punish this brat with dignity ... IMHO ...
    1. The comment was deleted.
  17. +10
    30 January 2021 15: 59
    What order can there be in a country where
    finance is handled by those who keep their money abroad,
    medicine, those who are treated abroad,
    education for those whose children study abroad,
    the protection of order, those who violate it,
    and laws are invented by those to whom they do not apply.
    1. +9
      30 January 2021 16: 49
      "laws are invented by those to whom they do not apply"

      About this Mikhail Zadornov said a long time ago - "New laws are invented by those who should sit on the old!"
  18. -7
    30 January 2021 16: 02
    How furiously they will bypass everyone who does not want to harness the honor of an Orthodox Protestant aunt winked... Apparently, Sisyan's case lives on among the masses wink
    1. +3
      30 January 2021 16: 57
      Quote: Hwostatij
      Xisian's case lives on among the masses

      Xixiang, Oval, Basement, Anal, Pedal ....
      Tighten up, give out something else, interesting.
      1. -4
        30 January 2021 17: 03
        Sorry if I offended you by using your idol's derogatory nickname hi Just in this way I briefly expressed my attitude towards this character. By the way, I have not heard about the basement and the pedal yet. laughing
        1. +1
          30 January 2021 18: 14
          Quote: Hwostatij
          call me if I offended you by using the derogatory nickname of your idol

          And he is not my idol. Leech on the neck of power. But what is interesting is why the lovers of the current government hate him so much? And some kind of dead excuses, like calling for a duel ...
          1. +5
            30 January 2021 18: 23
            But what is interesting is why the lovers of the current government hate him so much?
            If you mean me, then I am not at all a fan of the current government. But the trouble is that no one from the opposition, systemic or not, has yet proposed anything constructive. Unless, of course, we do not consider their ritual howls "Putin, go away, he stole - give it to others." The example of neighbors, and the experience of the 90s, clearly shows what the following of such ideas leads to.
            1. -2
              30 January 2021 18: 29
              Quote: Hwostatij
              But the trouble is that no one from the opposition, systemic or not, has yet proposed anything constructive.

              How about Grudinin? Ivashov? Yes, even Okhlobystin, his mother in a swing, threatened to whistle the program of the communists and go to the polls.
              1. +3
                30 January 2021 18: 34
                Are you joking right now, as I understand it? However, if you give a couple of adequate theses from their programs, I am ready to reconsider my opinion about the incurable degeneration of our opposition.
                1. -1
                  30 January 2021 18: 42
                  Quote: Hwostatij
                  However, if you give a couple of adequate theses from their programs,

                  Have you read it yourself? Zampolit only EdRo fukal?
                  1. Change of economic strategy. The priority will be the welfare of the broad masses of the people, not a handful of oligarchs, the interests of the common man, and not the greed of "fat cats". This requires a sharp turn from oligarchic capitalism to a welfare state. We will put the wealth of Russia, its natural, industrial and financial resources at the service of the people. We will carry out the nationalization of strategically important and backbone industries, electric power, railways, communication systems, leading banks. The state will regain its monopoly on the production and wholesale of ethyl alcohol. This will give impetus to development and will bring trillions of rubles to the Treasury annually; will allow to form a development budget instead of a budget of impoverishment and degradation.

                  2. Restoration of Russia's economic sovereignty. There are several trillion rubles in the government's money-box. But these colossal funds were transferred to the management of foreign financial organizations. The trillions of rubles that are stored in banks and US debt obligations, we will make investments in production, science and education. The new government will save the Russian economy from total dollar dependence. Will create a financial system in the interests of the state and citizens of the country. We will restrict the access of foreign speculative capital to the Russian market. We will refuse to participate in the WTO, because for 4 years of being in this economic punishment cell, we received more than a trillion rubles of direct losses and 5 trillion - indirect ones.
                  1. +1
                    30 January 2021 18: 52
                    Dear, I talked about adequate theses, and not about slogans like "against everything bad, for everything good." And, if you haven't noticed, I was talking about the theses of the PROGRAMS, and not about populist vyser for high school students.
                    1. 0
                      30 January 2021 19: 06
                      Quote: Hwostatij
                      And, if you didn't notice, I spoke about the theses of the PROGRAMS,

                      In your opinion, the 500 days program, what was it?
                      1. +1
                        30 January 2021 19: 15
                        In your opinion, the 500 days program, what was it?
                        Why is this question? I, like, talked about the adequacy of the theses. It is difficult to talk to a person who cannot hear you.
                      2. -1
                        30 January 2021 19: 18
                        Quote: Hwostatij
                        I, like, talked about the adequacy of the theses

                        And I asked you a simple question. Is 500 days an adequate program?
                      3. +2
                        30 January 2021 19: 25
                        My personal opinion: no. But I am judging the program from a post-knowledge perspective. At that time, she could very well look adequate.
                      4. +1
                        30 January 2021 19: 29
                        Quote: Hwostatij
                        At that time, she could very well look adequate.

                        Yes figs there. I read (they gave it out in the techie, they just put it on all the desks) and was stunned, which dreamer made it up?
                      5. +4
                        30 January 2021 19: 37
                        It fit into the concept of liberal economics. The idea, as I understand it, was this: if you want to be like the West, do it like the West. About the cargo cult, then, probably, did not hear wassat .
                      6. -1
                        30 January 2021 19: 45
                        Quote: Hwostatij
                        ... The idea, as I understand it, was this: if you want to be like the West, do it like the West.

                        The idea was, as in 500 days, completely jump on the capitalist rails. Shock therapy type.
                      7. +1
                        30 January 2021 19: 52
                        The idea was, as in 500 days, completely jump on the capitalist rails. Shock therapy type.
                        I do not argue. So why, in general, did you raise this topic? Started like bae with Anal)
                      8. 0
                        30 January 2021 22: 00
                        Quote: Hwostatij
                        Started like bae with Anal)

                        Well, in, again ... Why are you distorting your last name? That's interesting. Did the Pedal spit on your boot in the subway?
                      9. +3
                        30 January 2021 22: 09
                        As I already told you, this is a way of briefly expressing your opinion about this character. In turn, I will ask the question: 18k comments on this resource in 5 years - is it a job or a calling?
                      10. -1
                        30 January 2021 22: 12
                        Quote: Hwostatij
                        In turn, I will ask the question: 18k comments on this resource in 5 years - is it a job or a calling?

                        There are also 4 articles. It's no fucking thing to do.
                      11. 0
                        30 January 2021 22: 23
                        Yes I saw. I even read one - I liked it). And you yourself, as an uh ... a character treat? Do you share his declared worldview?
                      12. +1
                        30 January 2021 22: 27
                        Quote: Hwostatij
                        Do you share his declared worldview?

                        I've already written a bunch of times that uh ... the character is a leech on the neck of power. He parasitizes on them. And they are on us. So I have nothing to do with him. But I also don’t understand why call names. Kindergarten, or what?
                      13. 0
                        30 January 2021 22: 40
                        Well, information war, you know ... We are pouring cognitive slops on our heads - we answer. And vice versa. If we were not communicating with you on a public resource, perhaps I would have used a different terminology (here I would have been banned for it). And for brevity, we have to distort the names.
                        As for the leech, as you say, I doubt it. Rather, he is a whistle for steam. Maximum, creature of one of the towers.
      2. +4
        30 January 2021 18: 35
        Quote: Mordvin 3
        Xixiang, Oval, Basement, Anal, Pedal ....
        Tighten up, give out something else, interesting.

        There is clearly not enough brains here. This fraternity is trying to present all the dissatisfaction of the Russian population with lawlessness, lawlessness and outright looting of natural resources and finances, critical impoverishment and indignation about the lack of livelihood and the simplest work, the speech of the "fifth column" from the State Department in support of Navalny.
        It does not even occur to them that people are sick of this beggarly, flawed and powerless existence against the background of mind-blowing facts about corruption, embezzlement, violation of all kinds of laws for the sake of bribes ... they stop, and the amount of theft grows ...
        1. +1
          30 January 2021 18: 59
          Amazing. Insert any country into the text (adding local Sisyan) - and you won't be mistaken good
  19. 0
    30 January 2021 16: 05
    It is both funny and disgusting to watch how the enemies of the communists in power and for power demand the same punitive measures against the enemies of the communists who represent the opposition, which were carried out against them by the communists, and which all of them are in power, for power, and depicting the opposition, with their hypocritical "righteous anger" and "philanthropy" are presented for the crimes of the communists.
    1. +1
      30 January 2021 17: 03
      He understood what he said?
      1. +2
        30 January 2021 18: 53
        Quote: Narak-zempo
        He understood what he said?

        Representatives of the authorities and their supporters are trying to apply to the opposition - the actual enemies of the communists and the socialist system - punitive measures envisaged during the Soviet era. This is ridiculous and disgusting because the authorities themselves, the supporters of the authorities and the people who portray the opposition with its hypocritical "righteous anger" and "philanthropy" have nothing to do with communist ideas.
        Probably so? lol
        1. -8
          30 January 2021 18: 54
          Communism and liberation are all inventions of Jews and Freemasons against Russia.
          1. +5
            30 January 2021 19: 33
            Quote: Narak-zempo
            Communism and liberation are all inventions of Jews and Freemasons against Russia.

            It's time for you to go to the psychiatrist
            1. -3
              30 January 2021 20: 08
              Quote: Silvestr
              It's time for you to go to the psychiatrist

              And I was.
              Moreover, unlike those who bring a psychiatrist in order not to serve, I paid the district one to serve. Well, so as not to write too much.
              True, in the regional military registration and enlistment office at the re-commission they still turned up. There was too principled granny.
              1. +2
                30 January 2021 21: 49
                Quote: Narak-zempo
                unlike those who bring a psychiatrist in order not to serve, I paid the district one to serve. Well, so as not to write too much.

                It is clear, and then people like you, colleagues shoot. fool
                Because you don't have to go to the army with a sick head. And the Ministry of Internal Affairs is the same.
                1. +5
                  31 January 2021 02: 24
                  Igor hi,
                  there are now just such and take, not good for anything, stupid, but executive.
              2. 0
                1 February 2021 21: 36
                Quote: Narak-zempo
                Quote: Silvestr
                It's time for you to go to the psychiatrist

                And I was.
                Moreover, unlike those who bring a psychiatrist in order not to serve, I paid the district one to serve. Well, so as not to write too much.
                True, in the regional military registration and enlistment office at the re-commission they still turned up. There was too principled granny.

            2. 0
              30 January 2021 20: 42
              Sylvester, here on the fingers you can count the comments in which I am with you - Solidarity! And this comment is just that rare case. +
  20. +6
    30 January 2021 16: 08
    I personally watched the video twice: the policemen are leading the dude, the woman asks them why he was detained ... I can revise it for the third time - I reviewed it - the question is followed by a kick in the stomach ...

    So ... from the point of view of the Laws of the Russian Federation - the one who kicked is a criminal, and it does not matter whether he is a homeless person or the President - according to the Constitution, in our Russian Federation, everyone is equal ...

    Indeed, as the Author said in his article, this will be a litmus test, do we have laws in Russia or have we slipped back into the dashing 90s, where you could have been killed for nothing
    1. +6
      30 January 2021 17: 05
      Quote: Corona without virus
      policemen are leading a dude, a woman asks them why he was detained ...

      What? Out of interest asked? Or didn’t understand that it was an UNAUTHORIZED rally! And they will detain! Or have everyone seen enough how the police knelt in front of the blacks in the United States? Or how they mocked the riot police in Ukraine? Did you want it too? Yes, pushed hard. Will not bother with stupid questions next time.
      1. -3
        30 January 2021 17: 10
        Quote: Egoza
        Quote: Corona without virus
        policemen are leading a dude, a woman asks them why he was detained ...

        What? Out of interest asked? Or didn’t understand that it was an UNAUTHORIZED rally! And they will detain! Or have everyone seen enough how the police knelt in front of the blacks in the United States? Or how they mocked the riot police in Ukraine? Did you want it too? Yes, pushed hard. Will not bother with stupid questions next time.

        And by the way, the woman herself is aware that she is on "UNAUTHORIZED rally"hit ?! laughing
        Here is the simplest situation - you are walking on your legal day off in your city - and then - bang-bang - you are kicked in the stomach for just one question ?!
        1. -1
          30 January 2021 18: 58
          Quote: Corona without virus
          Here is the simplest situation - you are walking on your legal day off in your city - and then - bang-bang - you are kicked in the stomach for just one question ?!

          Just do not la la.
          This grandmother quite deliberately came to participate in the criminal anti-state action.
        2. -1
          30 January 2021 19: 03
          Quote: Corona without virus
          And by the way, the woman herself is aware that she got to the "UNAUTHORIZED rally" ?!

          In this case, she is mentally disabled.
      2. -1
        30 January 2021 18: 55
        I would have prescribed a club to calm her down.
        1. +1
          30 January 2021 19: 32
          Quote: Narak-zempo
          I would have prescribed a club to calm her down.

          And if your mother is like that, with a club, no way?
          1. -4
            30 January 2021 20: 04
            Quote: Silvestr
            And if your mother is like that, with a club, no way?

            So she and so from me.
            Found, too, than to shame laughing
            1. +1
              30 January 2021 21: 42
              Quote: Narak-zempo
              Quote: Silvestr
              And if your mother is like that, with a club, no way?

              So she and so from me.
              Found, too, than to shame laughing

              Actually, these are the ones that support the beating of women ..
  21. +10
    30 January 2021 16: 14
    (By the way: what I still despise the democrats for is that they, unlike decent people, do not protect women and children, but hide behind them).

    And who is in power? Communists? Mom, she received an increase in her disability pension as much as 86 rubles, a little more than a dollar and a little less than a euro. And she's not alone. They build palaces and those who organize protests, and those who press these protests. The pans are fighting, and the lads are tearing each other's forelocks, for their lords.
    1. +6
      30 January 2021 16: 23
      I was robbed of at least a million, pushing me away from my pension for 5 years
      1. +3
        30 January 2021 16: 43
        But according to the law, according to their law ...
        However, money is needed for construction.
      2. +9
        30 January 2021 17: 01
        I was robbed of at least a million, pushing me away from my pension for 5 years

        I hope - you were understanding about this? You were asked ...
    2. -2
      30 January 2021 17: 58
      Who doesn't let you build a palace? I understand that there is not enough money, like all of us. So remember your youth, where you lost those years, instead of studying. You just had to hurry up in time and choose the right track. But because of our youth we have no mind, and then we begin to cry. And of course we all lack a little luck.
      Take, for example, Chernomyrdin, a boy with a C grade from the village, then he came to our city, worked as a mechanic at ONOS, graduated from the institute and slowly, slowly went up. Created Orenburggazprom and so on. And now what is the point of regretting something that cannot be returned. hi
      1. +5
        30 January 2021 18: 35
        Aaaaa, so it turns out, all the numerous palaces and yachts in the Russian Federation and abroad are yours? .. And people here break spears. hi
        1. 0
          30 January 2021 18: 44
          Alas, but I don't fucking need them. Not my format. The richer the person, the more problems. Here I worked with one, since 97, he was a customer, and I am a contractor. So he has never been on vacation, although he had money, like a makhorka fool, as a result he grunted last year, almost in his office. And was it worth it? There are no pockets in the coffin.
      2. +3
        30 January 2021 22: 23
        Quote: Ros 56
        Who doesn't let you build a palace? I understand that there is not enough money, like all of us.

        My friend built his palace. He began to build back in the 80s, a house of 180 squares, not counting the basement and attic, is still paying off the loan. But the neighbors - a traffic cop and an employee of the UFSM for a couple of years have built their own mansions twice as much and are not blown away.
        1. +1
          31 January 2021 20: 13
          My friend, too, was building a two-storey cottage of 200 meters, there was only one finish left, the children had gotten married by that time, he sat down, thought and said: where will I look for my wife, in the basement or on the third floor? I took it and sold it. And I did not strive for this business, because in principle it would have turned out exactly the same. And who is going to wash these hectares of floors, and wipe the dust, but the housekeepers don't have a penny.
          Well, since the 80s, building a cottage until now, you need to have a special talent. Those who wanted to take out a loan and after 2-3 years gave it back from one salary. We have not forgotten how prices and wages rose, while loans remained the same.
  22. -7
    30 January 2021 16: 18
    During the election period, one must work, and not then try to tear. Have chosen to endure until the next. Those who call out to the cubs to protest them in general to crush them in full!
    1. +2
      30 January 2021 16: 38
      Quote: Captive
      Those who call out to the cubs to protest them in general to crush them in full!

      then start ... with the Kremlin.
      "Walking Together" is a Russian interregional youth organization created by the Administration of the President of Russia, which existed in Russia in 2000-2007, under the leadership of Vasily Yakemenko.
      In 2001, in an interview with Kommersant, Vasily Yakemenko said: “I have long wanted to build an organization, which will be engaged in the education of young people, children of eleven or twelve years old ...And when Putin appeared on the horizon, I thought: it seems it is! And we began to make an organization. We started working since March last year, and registered in June "
      1. -2
        30 January 2021 17: 05
        Quote: Silvestr
        Quote: Captive
        Those who call out to the cubs to protest them in general to crush them in full!

        then start ... with the Kremlin.
        "Walking Together" is a Russian interregional youth organization created by the Administration of the President of Russia, which existed in Russia in 2000-2007, under the leadership of Vasily Yakemenko.
        In 2001, in an interview with Kommersant, Vasily Yakemenko said: “I have long wanted to build an organization, which will be engaged in the education of young people, children of eleven or twelve years old ...And when Putin appeared on the horizon, I thought: it seems it is! And we began to make an organization. We started working since March last year, and registered in June "

        And where did Walking Together engage in anti-state activities? Name one example.
        1. +5
          30 January 2021 19: 08
          Quote: Narak-zempo
          And where did Walking Together engage in anti-state activities?

          1. you obviously have not read the constitution of the Russian Federation.
          Article 31 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation The latest version of Article 31 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation states: Citizens of the Russian Federation have the right to assemble peacefully, without weapons, to hold meetings, rallies and demonstrations, processions and picketing.
          In accordance with the Presidential Decree, the Russian Federation began to operate notification the procedure for exercising the right to hold public events, i.e. they did not require special permission from the authorities.
          2. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 828 the first passport is obtained at the age of 14.
          3. Criminal Code of the Russian Federation Article 20. Age at which criminal responsibility occurs
          "" 1. A person who has reached the age of sixteen by the time the crime is committed is subject to criminal liability.

          Don't you find it strange that at the age of 14 they are handed a passport, from the age of 16 they can be jailed, but at the same time a teenager cannot use his constitutional right?
          With regard to "anti-state" activities, we must look at who understands this and how. So, in January 2002, "Walking Together" held an action to exchange harmful, in their opinion, books by the writers Vladimir Sorokin, Viktor Pelevin, Viktor Erofeev and Karl Marx to return them to "bad" authors. Later, they, for good reason, they burned them. Just like in the 30s in Berlin.
          On September 23, 2005, an unauthorized picket was held near the Latvian embassy under the name "Birch to the Motherland" with a demand to extradite Russian oligarch Boris Berezovsky to Russia.
          So if they started using children, then from all sides.
          1. -3
            30 January 2021 19: 18
            Quote: Silvestr
            With regard to "anti-state" activities, we must look at who understands this and how. So, in January 2002, "Walking Together" held an action to exchange harmful, in their opinion, books by the writers Vladimir Sorokin, Viktor Pelevin, Viktor Erofeev and Karl Marx to return them to "bad" authors. Later, they, for good reason, they burned them. Just like in the 30s in Berlin.
            On September 23, 2005, an unauthorized picket was held near the Latvian embassy under the name "Birch to the Motherland" with a demand to extradite Russian oligarch Boris Berezovsky to Russia.

            And where are the examples of anti-state activity?
            And the books were logically burned, because there is no other way to return "Capital" to the author.
            1. +4
              30 January 2021 19: 30
              Quote: Narak-zempo
              And the books were logically burned

              bottom!

              1. -5
                30 January 2021 20: 52
                Quote: Silvestr
                Quote: Narak-zempo
                And the books were logically burned

                bottom!


                And what?
                The Nazis fought against smoking, for example. This is also a vicious practice, in your opinion?
                1. +2
                  30 January 2021 21: 32
                  Quote: Narak-zempo
                  And what?
                  The Nazis fought smoking, for example

                  and from the lack of smoke, concentration camps were built
                  Quote: Narak-zempo
                  This is also a vicious practice, in your opinion?

                  laughing
      2. -1
        30 January 2021 17: 49
        Don't confuse God's gift with scrambled eggs! The Kremlin is not hiding behind the children, and the Lech bastard and his comrades are going to make donations on the children's blood. Only the National Guard did not succumb to provocations. Well done lads. But this little head must be demolished. Although not a little head (brainless stupid), but wallets. And they will demolish, be sure!
        1. +1
          30 January 2021 19: 15
          Quote: Captive
          The Kremlin is not hiding behind the children, and the Lech bastard and his comrades are going to make donations on the children's blood.

          Your testimony is not even documented by the police.
          Quote: Captive
          But this little head must be demolished. Although not a little head (brainless stupid), but wallets. And they will demolish, be sure!

          I am sure that some of Putin's entourage will finance Navalny and raise the degree of tension. You can hear more details from Karaulov and Shevchenko.
          As for the guards, be sure that after a while they will hide their past in this structure. As Gorbyty used to say, "The process has begun," and those who see protests only in bulk are simply stupid. You need to see a little further than your nose.
          The elite began the fight against Putin's battering ram Navalny in exchange for personal sanctions from the United States, and this elite is financing the process. What can you do for the safety of your money. Explore the history of the Russian revolutions of the last century.
    2. +1
      30 January 2021 16: 44
      Quote: Captive
      During the election period, you have to work, and not then try to tear. Have chosen to endure until the next. Those who call out to protests at all push to the full!

      I would then advise you to start with the Kremlin, which I have highlighted in bold in your post laughing it was they who organized the "walking together" and set them on all those who disagree with the Kremlin's policy bully
      1. -1
        30 January 2021 17: 51
        winked For fools, your post. On VO they are not. There are either enemies or ours. ps Most of our people are resting now, but on Monday they will return. laughing
        1. +2
          30 January 2021 21: 01
          Quote: Captive
          winked For fools, your post. On VO they are not. There are either enemies or ours. ps Most of our people are resting now, but on Monday they will return. laughing

          What is this, I, who "drowns for the observance of the laws" is already an enemy ?! belay recourse
          I survived ... I became an enemy in my native country only because I urge to live by the laws wassat laughing
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
            2. 0
              30 January 2021 21: 47
              Quote: Narak-zempo
              When the enemy drowns for the observance of laws, he does not cease to be an enemy because of this.

              When the revolutionaries also groaned about the brutality of the Belarusian OMON, someone noticed that they are like thieves in law from the TV series "Liquidation" - they violate the laws themselves, but they demand that they be observed.
  23. -2
    30 January 2021 16: 28
    Let's put everything on the shelves. So we have peaceful rallies and assemblies, which are formally allowed to citizens of the Russian Federation by the Russian Federation. In the case of the current rallies, we did not observe piercing-cutting-firearms / shields / Molotov cocktails and any widely disseminated materials on forceful resistance to the authorities among the protesters. We did not observe any definite, collectively supported calls by demonstrators for violence against police officers. That is, from the point of view of reasonable logic (but most likely not some kind of Byzantine constructions of our numerous laws), these were all peaceful actions that were not something flagrant and required the use of brute physical force for dispersal and some kind of detention.
    In fact, we see a picture of the so-called "Disproportionate response", or in other words - "excess of the permissible self-defense" - when we see how a police officer kicks a person who is not capable and does not intend to cause him any harm. In this regard, we come to a completely reasonable dilemma - either our laws are NOT comprehensive and do not apply to police officers (and therefore we live in a society built not on the Law, but on its frankly perverted simulation), or this incident cannot be qualified otherwise as an offense similar exceeding the limits of permissible self-defense, which entailed some kind of damage to some degree of severity.

    Twisting in the style of "today threw a glass tomorrow will throw a stone" is a very shaky soil, which can be turned in two ways - today he kicked a woman in the stomach, tomorrow he will break her neck. In short, society should not treat such things other than judgmental and negative.

    As for "By the way: what I still despise the democrats for is that, unlike decent people, they do not protect women and children, but hide behind them" - I will note that the communist gentlemen often did not disdain during the Civil War to take "hostages" among whom, as a rule, there were both children and women. Later, in the 20s and 30s, both children and relatives-wives were responsible for the crimes of the heads of the family or for simple origins (imprisonment for decades, executions). This practice was very widespread until the 50s. And here we will either go to the "excesses of Lenin-Stalin and Co.", recognizing that since it is impossible to condemn "all communists" for this, then, logically, we cannot lump all democrats and liberals into one fetid heap, or, continuing this line, we will find out that children and women covered up both the defenders of the White House, and the modern Russian elite (the movement "Nashi", "Young Russia" and their use as "solving questions"), and the monarchy of all centuries of its existence. In short, everything. This already leads us to reflect on what, in principle, our history is a big and fetid heap, from the point of view of modern morality and values.
    1. +6
      30 January 2021 17: 04
      Quote: Knell Wardenheart
      women covered themselves as defenders of the white house,

      More detail you can?
      1. -3
        30 January 2021 17: 37
        We look at photographs of the era in available sources, which is more detailed.
        1. +2
          30 January 2021 17: 47
          Quote: Knell Wardenheart
          We look at photographs of the era in available sources, which is more detailed.

          Show it. How did Basayev's nukers put women on the windows, and machine guns between their legs? Same? Do not be shy. At the same time, show who Shoigu gave out machine guns to, not Beitarians, no?
          1. 0
            31 January 2021 12: 10
            You didn't hear my main point and clung to the sides as always. Understand - we have NO and WAS NOT a "good" side which should be adhered to, as soon as you start digging our history, it turns out that everyone used what you are talking about, lied outrageously and used violence and terror towards their opponents. So to single out someone from this heap for some exceptional deeds in the field of immorality is a delusion.
    2. -9
      30 January 2021 17: 06
      And you do not cling to the letter of the law, you take a closer look at the spirit.
      1. -1
        30 January 2021 17: 39
        Well, if we have the president so corrosively clings to the letter of the law (the third term after the LADY, the question of the ownership of the palace, etc.), then kakbe is not comme il faut for us, small and pathetic, to show some kind of excessive understanding and spirituality in perception.
        1. -2
          30 January 2021 18: 31
          Quote: Knell Wardenheart
          Well, if our president clings to the letter of the law so corrosively

          In spirit, he is not a president, but a monarch, an autocrat.
          It was he who adhered to the letter for you sick people.
    3. -3
      30 January 2021 19: 05
      Quote: Knell Wardenheart
      We also did not observe any definite, collectively supported calls by the demonstrators for violence against police officers. That is, from the point of view of reasonable logic (but most likely not some Byzantine constructions of our numerous laws), these were all peaceful actions

      In Moscow, 42 law enforcement officers were injured.
      1. +1
        30 January 2021 21: 55
        Quote: Dart2027
        In Moscow, 42 law enforcement officers were injured.

        Did you scratch your tooth enamel?
        1. -4
          31 January 2021 12: 21
          Quote: Ingvar 72
          Tooth enamel
          Too almond.
          https://iz.ru/1115416/2021-01-23/v-peterburge-uchastnik-nezakonnoi-aktcii-udaril-politceiskogo-v-litco
      2. +2
        31 January 2021 12: 12
        In order to "get injured" in such armor, one must either very cheerfully detain people, so to speak, until the workers dislocate, or get a spear from a ballista into any part of the body. I believe in the first more, for some reason!
        1. -4
          31 January 2021 12: 21
          Quote: Knell Wardenheart
          In order to "get injured" in such armor

          Too almond with them ...
  24. -7
    30 January 2021 16: 31
    Zakhar Prilepin: about Navalny from 45 min
    1. +3
      30 January 2021 17: 21
      Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
      Zakhar Prilepin:

      Prilepin has become a star himself.
      1. +3
        30 January 2021 21: 56
        There is a vidos on YouTube when the Prilepins are asked how they feel about Putin. Burned to the fullest. laughing
  25. +4
    30 January 2021 16: 32
    You can sue for a plastic cup, but for a leg in the stomach out of the blue?) What a sin to hide, thugs everywhere and in law enforcement agencies too
  26. -2
    30 January 2021 16: 33
    Shuvalov's daughter, milpiarder and that looking at all this, people go out
    1. -7
      30 January 2021 17: 00
      Envy is a bad thing! Go dance at the Bolshoi Theater and you will have a billion. I also help our children, so that Shuvalov should give up his beautiful daughter? feel
      1. +5
        30 January 2021 17: 24
        Quote: tralflot1832
        Go dance at the Bolshoi Theater and you will have a billion

        Yes. And if the dancers dig a ditch under the wires, for example, they will have 12 thousand.
  27. +4
    30 January 2021 16: 35
    The author is just a pervert!
    Judge for yourself:
    "There are two possible poles in resolving this conflict:

    1. .....
    2. State structures find guilty the police officer who stopped the offender of the wrong gender and condemn him, and the woman is additionally apologized."
    And its subsequent output:
    "In the second case there will be a signal that the circles aimed at another surrender of Russia to the “civilized community” have gained the upper hand in the power structures of the state».
    Those. The author believes that in such cases

    that he himself and "his state" are civilized! Brain cancer!
    In general, the Author is taking the right path, but forget physics: every action causes opposition and you cannot compress the spring or tighten the nut indefinitely. Those who do not understand do not know the history of their country. And history is not a teacher, it is an overseer and punishes for unlearned lessons.
    While "everything to yours, and to the rest - the law" - nothing good will come of it
    1. -5
      30 January 2021 19: 06
      Quote: Silvestr
      every action evokes opposition

      She had forgotten about it as well.
  28. -3
    30 January 2021 16: 38
    In the same St. Petersburg ...

    There is a proposal to paint the protest commissars with indelible paint, as in Hong Kong, and then slowly pull them out one by one ...
    1. +2
      30 January 2021 21: 59
      Quote: Tank jacket
      In the same St. Petersburg ...

      Sits down a nag, and rightly so.
      In contrast to the riot police, who will be smeared.
      And the laws are generally the same for everyone.
      1. -2
        30 January 2021 22: 04
        Quote: Ingvar 72
        Quote: Tank jacket
        In the same St. Petersburg ...

        Sits down a nag, and rightly so.
        In contrast to the riot police, who will be smeared.
        And the laws are generally the same for everyone.

        There is an assumption that he will sit with us at the 13th in Tagil. Painfully similar to a person in the past in uniform ...
        I mean the fool who hit the cop ...
        1. +2
          30 January 2021 22: 19
          Quote: Tank jacket
          There is an assumption that he will sit with us at the 13th in Tagil.
          No, he's a civilian. From the Arkhangelsk region. By the way, I loaded it beautifully. laughing
          I have relatives in Tagil, and they do not drown for Putin. In Nevyansk, even the traffic cops he knows don't like him.
          1. -4
            30 January 2021 22: 22
            Nope, we are waiting for him on the 13th ... and not only for him wink
            1. +4
              30 January 2021 23: 51
              Quote: Tank jacket
              Nope, we are waiting for him on the 13th ... and not only for him wink

              Today you are waiting ... and tomorrow they may be waiting for you ... Russia is so fickle laughing
              1. -5
                30 January 2021 23: 53
                Quote: Svarog
                Quote: Tank jacket
                Nope, we are waiting for him on the 13th ... and not only for him wink

                Today you are waiting ... and tomorrow they may be waiting for you ... Russia is so fickle laughing

                Was in the 90s ...
                1. +4
                  30 January 2021 23: 55
                  Quote: Tank jacket
                  Quote: Svarog
                  Quote: Tank jacket
                  Nope, we are waiting for him on the 13th ... and not only for him wink

                  Today you are waiting ... and tomorrow they may be waiting for you ... Russia is so fickle laughing

                  Was in the 90s ...

                  The story did not begin with the 90s .. and did not end with them ... I mean that your neighbor does not need to dig a hole .. an ancient Russian proverb ..
                  1. -2
                    31 January 2021 08: 57
                    Quote: Svarog
                    your neighbor doesn't need to dig a hole

                    Isn't that what you are doing?
  29. -3
    30 January 2021 16: 39
    To understand and forgive the St. Petersburg policeman, and in a month, when the hype subsides, to reward! good By the way, tomorrow in Moscow -2. The protesters will at least give money to sugrev.
  30. +3
    30 January 2021 16: 40
    And maybe, as in different Europeans, it’s very hard to stick on the faces, so that once and for a long time they understand that they should do the wrong thing. There, they never bowed to aggressive demonstrators at all - they warned them, they gave time to stop, but if they didn't understand, then you will get what you yourself and scraped together. Everything is in your right. True, along the way, it is generally necessary to deal with the country and not go with the flow.
  31. -2
    30 January 2021 16: 44
    laughing Normal men are resting, taking on the chest! He managed to quit me with alcohol. I decided to disperse, and here now navalchata, but the Banderlog are ruling the ball. laughing Hopefully tomorrow the National Guard will correct the brains of the completely stoned, and Lech will get his 10-15 years, because not fig. laughing
    1. -3
      30 January 2021 17: 56
      I have persuaded, do not thank! Tomorrow I will drink to you and to myself, after the protesters are counted hi good
  32. +5
    30 January 2021 16: 45
    There was a "king" in Romania. His name was Nicolae Ceausescu. He was also a lover of palaces.
    I remember they had some kind of laws in Romania too ...
    History teaches that it does not teach anyone anything.
    1. +2
      30 January 2021 17: 31
      Quote: prior
      He was also a lover of palaces.

      He was not a fan of palaces. This is his wife ... When the Ceausescu couple were executed, Nicola muttered: "Elena, but at least now leave me alone!"
      1. -5
        30 January 2021 19: 08
        Quote: Mordvin 3
        When the Ceausescu couple were executed, Nicola muttered: "Elena, but even now, leave me alone!"

        Will the source be? I remember there was already an analysis and it turned out that someone decided that he had read it on the lips on the record, where the lips themselves are hardly visible.
        1. +2
          30 January 2021 19: 13
          Quote: Dart2027
          Will the source be?

          Will not be. I read this in the late 80s, early 90s, and I wrote this that was deciphered by the lips. Either Man and the Law, or Interpol, I don't remember. But certainly not the Soviet militia. sad
          1. -2
            30 January 2021 20: 31
            Quote: Mordvin 3
            Will not be. I read this in the late 80s, early 90s, and I wrote this that was deciphered by the lips.

            And then I remember explaining that in real life they read lips only when the sign language interpreter speaks.
            1. 0
              30 January 2021 21: 56
              Quote: Dart2027
              in real life, lips are read only when the sign language interpreter speaks.

              The sign language interpreter waves his hands, and it has nothing to do with lip-reading.
              1. -4
                31 January 2021 07: 12
                Quote: Mordvin 3
                The sign language interpreter waves his hands, and
                When they dubbed the announcer on the news, they not only waved their hands, but also showed articulation on the lips.
                1. +1
                  31 January 2021 07: 18
                  Quote: Dart2027
                  When they dubbed the announcer on the news, they not only waved their hands, but also showed articulation on the lips.

                  In my opinion, there is no lip articulation. And about waving his hands ... When Mandela was buried, they invited a sign language interpreter. So he waved his hands so that not a single deaf person understood anything. It turned out to be a swindler.
                  1. -4
                    31 January 2021 08: 57
                    Quote: Mordvin 3
                    In my opinion, there is no lip articulation.

                    That is, you yourself have not seen these news bulletins with sign language translation?
                    1. +1
                      31 January 2021 09: 58
                      Quote: Dart2027
                      That is, you yourself have not seen these news bulletins with sign language translation?

                      What did I not see if on the first channel from the end of the 80s the news with them was driven? Saw. She mutters and repeats with her hands. However, I did not bother. Much more interesting is how money, blind to the touch, distinguishes. I worked with them for several years, but I didn't bother to ask.
                      1. -1
                        31 January 2021 12: 15
                        Quote: Mordvin 3
                        What did I not see if on the first channel from the end of the 80s the news with them was driven? Saw. She mutters and repeats with her hands.

                        She does not mumble, but articulates with exaggerated clarity with her lips. However, this does not change the fact that Ceausescu's so-called phrase is simply invented.
                        Quote: Mordvin 3
                        Much more interesting is how money, blind to the touch, distinguishes.

                        When they are printed, the print thickness changes. By the way, not only the blind can do this, gamblers also often work like this - the appropriate training and tattooing on the card, which an ordinary person will not find for him on pain of death
    2. +2
      30 January 2021 19: 07
      Quote: prior
      There was a "king" in Romania. His name was Nicolae Ceausescu.

      Who was killed as a result of the organized CR.
  33. +3
    30 January 2021 16: 54
    The article is based on vol. that Navalny is a universal evil. But why can't the Kremlin put him in jail? And where does he spend these 30 days? And by the way, they quickly began to persecute Grudinin, put Platoshkin in prison, forced the mayor of Yakutsk to leave his post. But about Navalny, only such hissing articles. Or maybe it is necessary to write about those who steal money during the construction of cosmodromes, who set fire to the aircraft carrier being repaired. Why don't they want to complete the construction of JV - 2? Finally, someone builds palaces, and who can only take it with understanding.
    And yes, defenders of democracy. where you see that a woman attacked a police officer, she just came out to ask. It turned out that now is the age of the Internet and the authorities ordered it. apologize. And don't judge the woman, she happened to be there. that's why they kicked her and she's uncomfortable. She herself is ready to apologize to the policeman, but the fact that the "good" people hurried up and suggested to file a lawsuit. so maybe that's right.
    1. +7
      30 January 2021 17: 20
      And by the way, they quickly began to persecute Grudinin, put Platoshkin in prison, forced the mayor of Yakutsk to leave his post. But about Navalny, only such sizzling articles
      ... They burn out the political space to the limit, again put before a choice .. these are two evils, which one is better to choose. smile
      1. 0
        31 January 2021 19: 05
        I would not say that Grudinin and Platoshkin are good. But apparently there was too much evil in the clearing. The stronger begins to spread rot to the weak. laughing
  34. -14
    30 January 2021 16: 54
    For me so women beat can
    And the cops can и necessary!
    1. +4
      30 January 2021 17: 36
      Only stupid as a felt boot can talk like that, or infantile into a snag.
      1. -5
        30 January 2021 18: 10
        The infantile is afraid to beat.
        Even think about that too.
        1. +1
          30 January 2021 18: 28
          Of course, he cannot think, because in order to think, one must have something to think.
          1. -6
            30 January 2021 18: 40
            Ага.
            Think about Paris.
            There are no other effective ways to resist those in power.
            Whining, "peaceful" bleating, legal nonsense are not real.
            1. +1
              30 January 2021 18: 50
              And what the hell is Paris, I'd rather think about my children and grandchildren. More benefit will be.
              1. -3
                30 January 2021 18: 59
                Yes it is!
                Think about their future, what country will you leave ...
            2. -1
              31 January 2021 20: 51
              Some have already done like in Paris, kicked up, true in Ukrainian. We see the result!
              Even I don't want such horses here in Russia
              1. -4
                1 February 2021 10: 21
                Exactly!
                We see excellent results - tax cuts, abolition of unpopular measures.
                France will cut taxes for households and companies totaling 2021 billion euros by the end of 45, said the country's Minister of Economy and Finance Bruno Le Maire.
                Hunting you to become poorer further is your business, masochism cannot be treated.
                But normal people don't like that.
                1. 0
                  2 February 2021 10: 14
                  And where is the guarantee that it will be like in France and not like in Ukraine?
                  Her, you want to jump - France and Ukraine are waiting for you
                  1. -2
                    2 February 2021 10: 21
                    There are no guarantees and, in principle, there cannot be.
                    Although no, I was mistaken - there is a guarantee that if nothing is changed, it will get worse and worse.
                    1. +1
                      2 February 2021 11: 14
                      I agree with that.
                      But you can change that in different ways. You can break and build, or you can break and sit on the ruins
    2. 0
      31 January 2021 14: 10
      You can beat me like that
      And cops can and should be!
      Apron suit AUE wassat
      1. -3
        1 February 2021 10: 21
        Nope, I'm just not sexist.
        And not a slave.
  35. -3
    30 January 2021 17: 04
    Aren't you all ashamed?
    But I am ashamed of you ...
    1. -1
      31 January 2021 00: 26
      Are you ashamed at least not for everyone? Because opinions were divided quite clearly.
  36. 0
    30 January 2021 17: 22
    Yes, there is no internal process! Author take it easy!
    Minimum 7 years before hard storage. And with that redeemable!
    Do not make people or yourself nervous.
    Everything is stable and controllable.!
  37. +3
    30 January 2021 17: 24
    The position of the slaves is simply amazing. They are kicked and they also justify the kicker.
  38. +3
    30 January 2021 17: 26
    Disproportionate violence is all there is to say about this police officer. If you do not pose any threat, but simply ask what is happening, and in response, you have a boot in the stomach, write articles, do not write, nothing will change, then just disproportionate violence and that's it. The government has broken away from the people and sees the people as a threat to itself. And the boot in the stomach is not all. If they order, they will shoot. In Belarus, even grenades were thrown at people.
    But the local riot police are generally tough, their Russian colleagues will be given a head start in cruelty.
  39. +2
    30 January 2021 17: 34
    Only one question, why the hell did this aunt rush to cut them, for what purpose? All the more so when the heated men dragged the detainee. Probably the guardsman exceeded his powers in the heat of the moment, but frankly, I’ll say from experience, there is nothing more dangerous than a crazy, wild crowd. Then, in spite of everything, two opposing forces appear, ready for anything. Itself once got into such a situation when the crowd of pearls, despite appeals for calmness, crying children, cries of women, trampling down the fallen. A bunch of dumb savages. And it was just people leaving the stadium after the concert of our stars. Well, imagine the tension in the confrontation, especially when the heated crowd is trying to beat or maim people in uniform. The crowd must be ready to catch the same in their address. It is good to reason while sitting on the couch, and when you get there yourself, God forbid, you start to perceive differently.
  40. +2
    30 January 2021 17: 43
    Of course, the policeman could not resist and hurried. It would be right to wait a couple of seconds for my aunt to grab the hand and then act. In our case, the police escort the detainee, and if an obstacle arises, they must remove the obstacle. And that was done. If the state "hand over" the policeman - hello Ukraine. This is how it all began in Ukraine.
  41. +1
    30 January 2021 17: 52
    There can be no lisps on this issue.
    Conclusions must be made on the example of UA.
    If people flooded to some gatherings aimed at overthrowing state power, contrary to the opinion of the majority of fellow citizens, they must at least understand why they will be beaten.
    Secondly, be prepared for their arrest and isolation from the rest.
    T. K. I'm not going to participate in the destroe camp. And he did not give them such powers.
  42. +1
    30 January 2021 18: 10
    The policeman did not violate anything and acted very clearly. I only agree that I overdid it a little. He who did not work with the crowd during the riots condemns.
    1. +1
      30 January 2021 22: 48
      There was no crowd - only a lonely middle-aged aunt.
      1. -1
        31 January 2021 07: 12
        Quote: Eye of the Crying
        There was no crowd

        Really?
      2. +2
        31 January 2021 21: 12
        sadness. one eye and one artificial
  43. 0
    30 January 2021 18: 10
    I think you shouldn't expect morale and determination to act after such a performance from the police and the growing guard, so your stoned ones will jump on them, knowing for sure that later they will apologize to them ... I think so ...
  44. +1
    30 January 2021 19: 51
    But then, perhaps fueled by the professionals of the color revolutions, she filed action against the policeman to the Investigative Committee.

    Everything would be fine, but since when have claims been filed with the Investigative Committee ???
  45. 0
    30 January 2021 20: 17
    kicked lashed out
    Here is scum. On the video, you can see that the woman asks: "What do you want him for?" and gets a hard "swing" in the stomach. If his mom is also, would he be born?
    1. +1
      30 January 2021 22: 19
      Not "mawashi", but "maegiri", these are not particularly taught. He could calmly push back with his shoulder, but it looks like they are being given "wild animals".
    2. -2
      31 January 2021 00: 05
      You should follow the words. First he hit the leg. Secondly, you don't want to be told who she is right now?
    3. -2
      31 January 2021 07: 13
      Quote: Icarus
      Here is scum.

      She's a woman.
  46. -2
    30 January 2021 20: 36
    "Navalny's supporters mocked the death of the legendary Soviet and Russian artist Vasily Lanovoy in social networks. On the day of the death of the actor who raised the generation with his roles, a tub of dirt was literally poured on him in social networks. And all the offensive messages expressing joy about the artist's death belong to users. actively supporting Navalny and unauthorized actions ... "(c) Podn-ki, scum, and Bandera rot, yes, it's all piled up!
    1. +1
      30 January 2021 22: 47
      And where did you get the idea that this is a roll? Many people of different political views work in Lakhta smile
  47. +4
    30 January 2021 22: 15
    Quote: Ros 56
    Who doesn't let you build a palace?

    Not "who", but "what? Conscience.
    I tried to "go into business", but I realized that for success I need to stick my conscience away, otherwise I’ll earn a living without business. Pay attention on the roads who behave impudently - drivers on expensive cars, such as Bavarian ones, these are the "successful" ones who managed to stick their conscience in such a way that they even forgot where the turn signals are.
    1. -5
      31 January 2021 00: 04
      Failed. About conscience is nonsense. You didn't want to create a multi-billion dollar holding, but an ordinary small or medium business. What troubles there can be with a conscience? Collect documents and work. Or were you planning to sell drugs?)))
    2. -3
      31 January 2021 07: 45
      I disagree about the drivers. Just people on good and expensive cars behave adequately.
  48. +1
    30 January 2021 22: 16
    Quote: Captive
    "Navalny's supporters mocked the death of the legendary Soviet and Russian artist Vasily Lanovoy in social networks. On the day of the death of the actor who raised the generation with his roles, a tub of dirt was literally poured on him in social networks. And all the offensive messages expressing joy about the artist's death belong to users. actively supporting Navalny and unauthorized actions ... "(c) Podn-ki, scum, and Bandera rot, yes, it's all piled up!

    Proofs in the studio, provocateur.
  49. +2
    30 January 2021 22: 18
    A case for consideration of the personnel commission on the suitability of a law enforcement officer, or even a court, for abuse of office
  50. +4
    30 January 2021 22: 30
    Quote: Radius
    The policeman did not violate anything and acted very clearly. I only agree that I overdid it a little. He who did not work with the crowd during the riots condemns.

    It looks like you worked, congratulations ((
    1. +2
      30 January 2021 22: 40
      The video does not show a complex and rapidly changing environment.
    2. +1
      1 February 2021 07: 03
      Worked. Congratulations! :)
  51. -1
    31 January 2021 00: 04
    “After all, no one would allow the thought of condescension towards Tonka the Machine Gunner because she is a woman.”
    The author does not seem to be aware that criminal law and criminal procedural law are not exactly the same for men and women. There are also differences in the Police Act (or whatever it is called now) in the use of weapons and special equipment against men and women. Using Tonka the Machine Gunner as an example, I decided that a negative (to put it mildly) attitude towards her would transfer to all women, in any situation?! Didn’t they teach you that you shouldn’t hit women? In my opinion, tolerance (if we consider it as a fashionable Western trend) is exactly what the author calls for. But in Russia there has always been a slightly different attitude towards women, hasn’t it? For example, since childhood I was taught to help take her bag from her, open the door for her, and give way to her seat. I don’t think I was taught anything special! And to this day I don’t give a damn that this is not accepted in the West. I haven’t seen the plot that the author is discussing, but I think that not only a policeman cannot beat or push a woman, any man cannot and should not.
  52. 0
    31 January 2021 07: 44
    Interesting article, especially the comparison of the victim with the Thin Machine Gunner, they can’t come up with anything just to justify it.
    1. 0
      31 January 2021 08: 58
      Quote: adler87
      whatever they can come up with just to justify

      Yes, defenders of women are jumping out of their skin.
  53. The comment was deleted.
  54. +2
    31 January 2021 10: 02
    The state is only worth anything if it knows how to defend itself. IN AND. Lenin always knew what he said and did. And then he simply apologized, wrote an explanation. received a reprimand and signed. The reprimand was withdrawn. All. And with this madam, find out who “advised” her, with whom he is connected and where his connections come from. Look for the main link, otherwise it will be very bad for the whole country. Most likely there will be no country. The 5th column will do anything for its foreign capital. It’s true that they will throw her, but it will be too late.
    1. -2
      5 February 2021 07: 08
      Don’t you think that we have a fifth column in the Duma, in the government? They have real estate and children abroad, many have residence permits or citizenship. So who is our 5th column in fact?
    2. 0
      5 February 2021 21: 29
      The political organization of the ruling class of the country, headed by the government and its bodies, whose task is to protect the existing order and suppress class opponents, as well as the country itself with such a political organization. This is the State! Who? Whom? When? They will throw everyone away and always! The proletariat has nothing but chains!
  55. +1
    31 January 2021 10: 15
    When I go to a rally, especially an unauthorized one, I have to be fully aware that anything can happen there. Look how they disperse rallies in democratic countries. Water cannons, tear gas, rubber bullets. Grandma kicked me, it will be a lesson that you need to take care of yourself and not get under the feet of law enforcement officers.
  56. -1
    31 January 2021 10: 16
    It's kind of confusing. There are no facts, but you need to write?

    “But then, perhaps fueled by the professionals of color revolutions, she filed a lawsuit against the policeman with the Investigative Committee. (By the way: what I also despise the Democrats for is the fact that, unlike decent people, they do not protect women and children, but hide behind them)."

    What if it’s not heated by them? Should we despise Democrats less? And VVP, who is also prominent?
    And to defend - would a man rush to defend and get it in full?
  57. The comment was deleted.
  58. +1
    31 January 2021 11: 19
    I read the comments and am amazed. How the vile Russian Guard brutally beat an innocent woman. Firstly, he is on duty, the situation is tense, and then someone is cutting across the convoy. Lucky it was just a foot. Secondly, the argument is that this is a woman. Open the list of terrorists who took children hostage in Beslan. Isn't the number of women surprising? Do you think a woman can't hit with a knife? Or throw a grenade? In this situation, an apology looks simply surreal. It is clear that in the Russian National Guard there are agents of a “democratic” society. How should an employee feel? What if next time they send you to apologize to the bandits?
    1. +2
      31 January 2021 12: 38
      Don't touch Beslan, please.
      By your logic, WHO and the dispersal of a rally are one and the same.
      All that remains is to call all those dissatisfied terrorists and urge them to “ditch them in the toilet”
      There is no need to stir up emotions.
    2. -2
      31 January 2021 21: 32
      It's not about the Russian Guard himself, but about his superiors. These leaders, instead of protecting their subordinates, first of all care about their own home and their shoulder straps. Why, the media raised such a howl around the lawful actions of their employee! We urgently need to insure ourselves. And it doesn’t matter how it will look in the eyes of subordinates and how it will affect future activities.
  59. +3
    31 January 2021 11: 46
    Rotenberg remembered two weeks later that the hut at sea was his wassat
  60. The comment was deleted.
  61. The comment was deleted.
  62. +2
    31 January 2021 14: 35
    If a man had attacked a policeman, the incident would not have attracted any attention. But the woman changed everything.
    Did the woman attack? I didn't see any signs of an attack... . sad
    1. -2
      31 January 2021 16: 23
      ahhh, we must wait for the attack!!! Brilliant!
      Do not lie! All the signs are there! And the proof has arrived only for her! Those who stood on the sidewalk or to the side, even if they were violators of the law, did not suffer, literally at all!
      By your logic... you must first wait for the barricades, cobblestones, pavement tiles and Molotov cocktails flying at you, file a lawsuit, wait for the decision that there was an attack, and only then make a decision... with your foot, with a baton, with a Taser... or immediately a control in the head.
  63. -3
    31 January 2021 16: 13
    Quote: aleksejkabanets
    bipedal creature that kicks women

    We have equality. By the way, women sought.
    Strange. Question: doesn’t it seem strange to you why, out of all the women present, only she got it??? Maybe the rest were Women, that’s why the boot didn’t come to them? And this one was a hysterical provocateur.
    I'm not defending the policeman. Here he went a little overboard, but rightly so.
  64. The comment was deleted.
  65. +1
    31 January 2021 19: 17
    It would be nice if the state showed resilience and firmness and dealt with thieves and swindlers on a national scale, rather than fighting with crazy women
  66. +1
    31 January 2021 19: 49
    Quote: Thompson
    ahhh, we must wait for the attack!!! Brilliant!
    Do not lie! All the signs are there! And the proof has arrived only for her! Those who stood on the sidewalk or to the side, even if they were violators of the law, did not suffer, literally at all!
    By your logic... you must first wait for the barricades, cobblestones, pavement tiles and Molotov cocktails flying at you, file a lawsuit, wait for the decision that there was an attack, and only then make a decision... with your foot, with a baton, with a Taser... or immediately a control in the head.

    Following your logic, in order not to wait for an attack next time, you need to machine-gun everyone around you? Just in case... . sad
    1. -3
      31 January 2021 21: 08
      You have a sick imagination and you are already biased.
      Didn’t the thought just arise of not getting under the feet of law enforcement officers???
      And if you keep jumping, then the option of using a machine gun is quite possible! Otherwise, you don’t even want to think or understand.
      Apparently, many people here are correct - we need to democratize you, like in your favorite crap-cratic Western countries (it’s scary to talk about mattresses), with rubber bullets, tear guns and fire cannons. Otherwise, you don’t understand the tolerance of our police officers at rallies
  67. +1
    31 January 2021 21: 33
    Quote: Thompson
    You have a sick imagination and you are already biased.
    Didn’t the thought just arise of not getting under the feet of law enforcement officers???
    And if you keep jumping, then the option of using a machine gun is quite possible! Otherwise, you don’t even want to think or understand.
    Apparently, many people here are correct - we need to democratize you, like in your favorite crap-cratic Western countries (it’s scary to talk about mattresses), with rubber bullets, tear guns and fire cannons. Otherwise, you don’t understand the tolerance of our police officers at rallies

    You're funny, and...primitive, that's what they rely on, and that's what makes them stormtroopers. who organize the “Night of Long Knives” if you have heard about it. lol
  68. 0
    31 January 2021 21: 51
    Freedom for the National Guard!
    The aunt is on trial as a provocateur!
  69. The comment was deleted.
  70. +1
    1 February 2021 04: 08
    I. Bondarev, you are led -0, in this topic, this is me gently, if you do not answer who attacked the policeman and who was the policeman in this particular case, then I will be forced to consider you a fake, and therefore, by right, a nonentity
  71. +2
    1 February 2021 04: 13
    Who knows what kind of fake this is?:
    "Author.
    and, Bondarev"
  72. 0
    1 February 2021 07: 05
    Quote: victor50
    [i] There are also differences in the Police Law (or whatever it is called now) in the use of weapons and special equipment against men and women..

    The use of physical force differs markedly from the use of weapons and special equipment. Read the Law.
  73. -2
    1 February 2021 09: 07
    All these young people need to be killed. The milk in their mouths hasn’t dried yet, but give them democracy. Everyone to the army
  74. 0
    1 February 2021 10: 45
    The author is still slightly distorting. Historically in Russia, legislation in relation to women was softer. This is how it was in Tsarist Russia, this is how it is in the Soviet Union, this is how it is now.
  75. -2
    1 February 2021 11: 21
    You need to be more careful with women. They should give birth to more children for the benefit and prosperity of RUSSIA
  76. 0
    1 February 2021 16: 10
    Quote: Tatiana
    Repaying the loan in such a situation can be considered as bribery of Yudina in order to continue the provocation on the part of the lawyers of non-profit human rights activists "Team 29"

    And a year later, screw this citizen for non-payment of taxes. I believe that she will definitely forget to pay income tax on the amount received.
  77. 0
    1 February 2021 20: 45
    If a man had attacked a policeman, the incident would not have attracted any attention. But the woman changed everything.
    And this suggests that tolerance... has already penetrated into our society and is beginning to corrupt us
    The author confused tolerance and sexism here. Sexism is intolerant, therefore the supposed difference in society’s reaction to violence against men and women in such a situation should be attributed to intolerance, which has already penetrated into our society and is beginning to unite us into a single and invincible people.
  78. +1
    2 February 2021 13: 10
    The generals have already merged. On the Maidan, too, no one took responsibility - no one gave the order. And then they brought the golden eagle to its knees for no apparent reason
  79. 0
    3 February 2021 07: 51
    But then, perhaps fueled by the professionals of color revolutions, she filed a lawsuit against the policeman with the Investigative Committee.


    Everything is clear here, the author does not know that it is not claims, but statements that are filed with the Investigative Committee. Claims are filed in court.

    If a man had attacked a policeman, the incident would not have attracted any attention. But the woman changed everything.


    And a woman attacked a policeman?! The author seems to be writing about some other case, because in this case there was no policeman, there was an employee of the Russian Guard and no one attacked him.

    After all, no one would even allow the thought of leniency towards Tonka the Machine Gunner because she is a woman


    The author famously equates a collaborator who shot at least 1500 people on the orders of the occupiers with a woman who just stood in the way of a riot policeman. I shake hands with the author, all according to true liberal traditions.

    As for the case itself, I will say two things - any ordinary citizen in an identical case would definitely be brought to criminal liability. An ordinary citizen would have to either pay off and go to “reconciliation”, or receive a court verdict. Ordinary citizens are brought to criminal liability simply for the fact of causing damage to the attacker, and not to someone who stood in the way. And I am familiar with absolutely specific cases when this happened, and people were prosecuted not for exceeding the limits of necessary defense, but for causing bodily harm of a certain severity. That is, the system did not even recognize that they were defending themselves, but recognized them as attackers.

    The second thing is that with the professional work of the riot police, the woman would simply be tied up and taken away. And there would be no such news.
  80. 0
    3 February 2021 21: 06
    The "litmus test" shows just the opposite - the catastrophic shortsightedness of the country's leadership, their complete loss of a sense of reality and self-preservation.

    Society is sending unambiguous signals - Yes, guys, we are still afraid of a repeat of the disaster of the 90s, but a new generation of 20-40 year olds has already appeared, which is ready to help the country get out of the eternal crisis caused by:
    - lack of normal contact between Government and Society;
    - the political immaturity of the Society (which, successive authoritarian regimes deliberately do not allow you to develop your citizenship and personal responsibility);
    - discrepancy between the quality of Elite and the challenges of today;
    - the inability of the “vertical of power” to effectively govern the country in peacetime “in manual mode” from Moscow, its inability to promote a civilian economy of consumer demand and the domestic market.

    Let our representatives into the Representative/Legislative Branch where they belong. Share responsibility for key decisions with the Company. Filter the stream of idiotic and extremely harmful “legislative initiatives” through the expert filter of professional and social communities (scientists and teachers, doctors and officers, IT workers and peasants,...). And take advantage of the proven mechanisms of European liberal-democratic “checks and balances” to ensure development and self-stabilization...

    But no, litmus paper still turns red, like the blood on the Cossack checkers of 1905, the blood on Novocherkassk Square in 1962, or from the broken noses of today. Thicker or thinner, the result is the same - another round of crisis, another “lost decades” and “lost generations.” Aren't you tired??
  81. +1
    4 February 2021 00: 35
    The tolerance virus begins to work.
    Under no circumstances should a fighter be sent to apologize. In my humble opinion, a man in the street who has long and strongly desired order, it was first necessary to reliably establish a fact and give this fact a legal assessment. There is a video, what are the problems? What is there in the video - a groundless strike on a random similar one or an attempt to prevent a fighter from carrying out a lawful arrest?
    If the Fighter has violated, there is a corresponding legal basis for further actions, which does not include babble and flower broom.

    Comrades, or whatever we call you now, gentlemen, chiefs and commanders. You can’t follow the lead of European desires, they have started to steer you, a priori they make the fighters guilty. Wake up, what are you doing?!
  82. The comment was deleted.
  83. 0
    4 February 2021 04: 17
    Quote: aleksejkabanets
    Quote: Santa Fe
    In my understanding, people are those who have achieved something in life. For which power and state

    People like you - just living in Russia

    This is me with the understanding that we have two peoples in our country. Only one people will soon begin to rip off the heads of the second "people".

    A bunch of marginalized people are not the whole People.
    In any society, there will always be such losers in life, and on the contrary, those who get too greedy to the extreme (selfies at their round dances and in paddy wagons with iPhones, and dressed in far-from-cheap clothes - a bright indicator of them) Parasites, whom you give free rein to get rowdy.
    This contingent has too high an opinion of itself.
    In fact, the Crowd, skillfully led by the most real and inveterate Scoundrels and enemies of the country, and there’s no way to call it.
  84. 0
    4 February 2021 04: 21
    Quote: victor50
    “After all, no one would allow the thought of condescension towards Tonka the Machine Gunner because she is a woman.”
    The author does not seem to be aware that criminal law and criminal procedural law are not exactly the same for men and women. There are also differences in the Police Act (or whatever it is called now) in the use of weapons and special equipment against men and women. Using Tonka the Machine Gunner as an example, I decided that a negative (to put it mildly) attitude towards her would transfer to all women, in any situation?! Didn’t they teach you that you shouldn’t hit women? In my opinion, tolerance (if we consider it as a fashionable Western trend) is exactly what the author calls for. But in Russia there has always been a slightly different attitude towards women, hasn’t it? For example, since childhood I was taught to help take her bag from her, open the door for her, and give way to her seat. I don’t think I was taught anything special! And to this day I don’t give a damn that this is not accepted in the West. I haven’t seen the plot that the author is discussing, but I think that not only a policeman cannot beat or push a woman, any man cannot and should not.

    This cohabitation (unwritten concessions to the female sex) is applicable exclusively in peacetime and in private life.
    In emergency situations like this, only infants are allowed some kind of relaxation, and no more.
    Point!
    And there must be One law.
  85. -2
    5 February 2021 07: 04
    There are pogroms in the USA, but here there is a peaceful demonstration. There is no need to compare different things. Yes, not sanctioned. And who would allow it? The authorities are twisting the Constitution like a footcloth. The people are simply tired of this chaos in everything. Are you saying this was organized by the fifth column? We have a fifth column in the Duma and government. This is their property abroad, the children are already there and have a residence permit.
  86. 0
    5 February 2021 21: 23
    Aunty! Provocateur! Well, it’s not my fault! He came himself!

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"