Military Review

USA, Iran and Israel. Is the confrontation resolved?

88

US State Department. Photo Wikimedia Commons


In the Middle East, the confrontation between Iran, Israel and the United States continues. Three countries actively defend their interests, which is why the situation remains difficult. In addition, it is influenced by the change of power in Washington. New President Joe Biden may change the course of the US Middle East policy, which will certainly affect the general situation in the region and relations between the countries.

Exchange of sanctions


For many years, Washington and Tehran have regularly accused each other of various aggressive actions, and also exchanged sanctions. Another exchange of this kind took place in the first half of January. The United States and Iran have added to the lists of organizations and individuals subject to restrictions.

In early January, the Treasury Department and the US State Department imposed new sanctions against 12 Iranian steel companies and one individual. Also under the restrictions were a Chinese metallurgical company cooperating with Iran, and three organizations from China, Germany and the UK controlled by the Iranian side.

A new package of sanctions followed a few days later. This time, the State Department has taken action against several other steel companies in Iran, China and the United Arab Emirates. In addition, Iranian state maritime organizations, aviation and the aerospace industry. They are accused of trading weapons.

USA, Iran and Israel. Is the confrontation resolved?
Iranian President H. Rouhani and the head of the Atomic Energy Organization A. Salehi at the Bushehr nuclear power plant, 2015. Photo Tasnimnews.com

Iran responded with its own sanctions against a number of US leaders. For supporting "terrorist crimes against Iran", the current US President Donald Trump, two heads of the military department, the head of the CIA, etc. were added to the sanctions list.

Nuclear consent


In 2015, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) or "nuclear deal" was adopted - a set of measures to reduce the Iranian nuclear program in exchange for lifting international sanctions. The plan was successfully implemented until the spring of 2018, after which the Trump administration decided to withdraw from the deal, since it was not in US interests. This step sharply worsened relations between the countries and led to a new complication of the situation in the Middle East.

Official Washington intends to seek a settlement of the situation in the Middle East and is already taking active measures. It is curious that a number of important News and statements were made even before the inauguration of the new president. This may indicate the high priority of current processes and the desire of the new presidential administration to quickly achieve a peaceful resolution of contradictions.

A few days before J. Biden's inauguration, Israeli media reported the start of negotiations with the participation of advisers to the new American president and representatives of Iran. The topic of the consultations is the resumption of the "nuclear deal" in one form or another. Subsequently, such news received confirmation in the form of new messages.

On January 19, the day before J. Biden took office as president, future Secretary of State Anthony Blinken spoke about Washington's intention to resume cooperation with Iran on nuclear issues. On the basis of the old JCPOA, it is proposed to create a new similar plan that meets modern requirements. At the same time, it is necessary for Iran to meet halfway.

Iranian response


In 2015, Iran, despite certain claims and remarks, joined the JCPOA. In 2018, the Iranian side made every effort to preserve the "deal", but the US withdrawal forced it to reconsider its plans. The latest news from Washington is again forcing Iran to adjust its policy and make new statements.


Iranian missile systems. In the future, they may receive nuclear weapons, which worries third countries.
Photo Imp-navigator.livejournal.com

So, shortly after the inauguration in Washington, Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif called on the new American president to return to the implementation of the JCPOA, as well as to unconditionally lift all existing sanctions against Tehran. If the American side joins the "deal" again, Iran is ready to cancel all its measures taken since 2018. At the same time, the Iranian Foreign Ministry does not consider it possible to revise the terms of the JCPOA.

Then the topic of lifting the sanctions was raised by Iranian Vice President Eshak Jahangiri. He noted that the country, despite the continuing sanctions, is showing outstanding success in the oil and gas industry. Thus, in December and January, oil exports reached record levels. The desired lifting of sanctions will lead to obvious positive consequences: "winter is over, bright days await the Iranians."

Third party to the conflict


In general, some warming of relations between Iran and the United States is outlined - in any case, they are again ready for negotiations. However, other participants in the Middle East confrontation are dissatisfied with this and are taking the necessary measures. The hypothetical lifting of sanctions on Iran and the resumption of productive international cooperation are causing Israel's concern.

On January 26, Lieutenant General Aviv Kohavi, Chief of the General Staff of the Israel Defense Forces, made a number of important statements. He noted that returning to the 2015 JCPOA or concluding a new agreement of this kind is the wrong step from an operational and strategic point of view. The general fears that Iran may continue to work on nuclear weapons and create them - despite official statements about the absence of such plans or real projects.

The IDF General Staff is already reacting to possible changes in the military-political situation. A. Kohavi ordered to prepare operational plans that complement existing documents and correspond to new risks. Naturally, the decision to use these plans will remain with the country's leadership - but the army will be ready to repel threats or take preventive measures.


Missile launch at a recent exercise. Photo by the IRGC

Information about the development of new IDF plans appeared in the Israeli press a little earlier, in the middle of the month. At the same time, some details were reported. It was alleged that the chief of the General Staff requested the creation of three action plans to disrupt Iran's nuclear program. One of them should involve the use of military force. Other details are not yet available.

Cooperation and confrontation


Thus, the situation in the Middle East remains difficult, although some developments in recent days give cause for optimism. However, the plans of the countries participating in this confrontation contradict each other and can lead to new problems of various kinds.

At the moment, the United States declares its intention to peacefully resolve the situation around the Iranian nuclear program and reduce military and political risks. Iran is generally ready for cooperation, but does not want to make excessive concessions. Perhaps, after appropriate negotiations, the two countries will find a common language and conclude a new deal. However, the current situation worries Israel, which is now developing updated military plans.

At the moment, judging by the statements of the participants in the current confrontation, a peaceful scenario should be expected - not the simplest and fastest, but without an open conflict. However, certain fears remain and, accordingly, the risk of the outbreak of war. Israel speaks directly about the possibility of using military force - if the need arises.

Fragile world


It is obvious that all participants in the ongoing confrontation defend their national interests. In this case, a variety of goals take place. Thus, the United States, judging by the latest statements, wants not only to maintain or increase its influence in the region. J. Biden's administration is also going to show its peacefulness and desire to “correct mistakes” of the previous president.

It follows from this that the American authorities will not solve the urgent problem of Iran by military means. Serious reasons will be needed to involve the army, but they will try to avoid such a situation. However, Israel is already expressing fears and preparing to take measures that, in theory, could disrupt US plans. Time will tell whether it will be possible to preserve the fragile peace, dispense with the direct use of force and not destroy the existing alliances.
Author:
88 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Lech from Android.
    Lech from Android. 30 January 2021 05: 48
    -8
    However, Israel is already expressing fears and preparing to take measures that, in theory, could disrupt US plans.
    Israel has nuclear weapons and is blackmailing its neighbors ... by attacking them from time to time without fear of retribution.
    Slowly, Israel is taking more and more land from the Palestinians for the construction of their settlements ... Israelis do not care about the opinion of the world on this matter.
    So Iran's fears about its security are justified and understandable ... its actions to protect its state from Israel's claims to the destruction and destruction of Iran are also understandable ... and now comrades from Israel minus me. smile
    1. Lipchanin
      Lipchanin 30 January 2021 07: 09
      -1
      Quote: Lech from Android.
      . and now comrades from Israel minus me.

      And they will not rust laughing
      XNUMX/XNUMX laughing
    2. aszzz888
      aszzz888 30 January 2021 09: 33
      -9
      Lech from Android. (Lech from Android)
      Today, 05:48, and now comrades from Israel minus me. smile
      Israelis are already in line! wink But seriously, in Israel now fears are not excluded because of: 1. the change of the Trump and the arrival of Biden; 2. a possible "resumption of a productive international cooperation agreement" between the Merikatos and Iran.
    3. Lannan Shi
      Lannan Shi 30 January 2021 09: 56
      +14
      Quote: Lech from Android.
      So Iran's fears about its security are justified and understandable ..

      Actually no. The regime of radical Islamists, in Iran, is soon half a century old. It won't be difficult to list how many times they were attacked? If chu, I only remember Iraq. Which is very difficult to attribute to a pro-American or pro-Israel party. But "sweet and harmless" Iran ... I managed to register in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Sudan, Bosnia, Yemen. And this is just what is immediately remembered. Where is Bosnia and where is Iran? Isn't it too much for the peaceful and defenseless? Whether you like it or not, Iran is the country of victorious radical fundamentalists. By the way, for the adoption of Christianity in Iran, at least a prison. But if chu, then they can knock down. Quite according to the law. And one more thing by the way. The position that the United States is a big shaitan, and the USSR, and Russia, as his heiress, is a small one, in general, has not been canceled. As well as the obligation to establish the subordination of the entire Islamic world to Iran, enshrined in the Iranian constitution, is also not deleted.
      Tell me, are you a supporter of the world Muslim empire? And necessarily the Shiite sense? Are you impatient to live according to Sharia law? Missing a mosque nearby? And the paternal supervision of the Sharia morality police? Damn, if you look at it like that, the Ayatollah regime is not much better than those we are bombing in Syria. When the ayatollahs came to power, so much blood was shed that the igil banned in the Russian Federation was quietly crying with envy. And the legislation of Iran and those same ... If not a complete copy, then somewhere around that. Is that what makes you so actively drown for Muslim fanatics?
      1. bobwings
        bobwings 30 January 2021 11: 51
        +4
        Well, while Iran's opponents are Jewish Israel, love and support, at least of the participants in these discussions, is fully guaranteed.
      2. Aleksandr21
        Aleksandr21 30 January 2021 17: 39
        0
        Quote: Lannan Shi
        Damn, if you look at it like that, the Ayatollah regime is not much better than those we are bombing in Syria.


        What regime in Iran is a personal matter of the Iranians themselves, if they want to follow the path of democracy, the flag is in their hands, they don't want to, so you need to be friends with those who are. Tell me, does Iran threaten Russia? And the US-NATO? What is the likelihood of a military conflict between Iran - Russia and Russia - NATO? Obviously, Russia has much more chances of a war with the West ... I mean that there is no need to demonize Iran, it is an ancient state with a rich history and culture, but now it has difficult times and relations with its neighbors are far from friendly, but Iran will not start a global war in BV, why would it set fire to its house? But Israel and the United States may well strike Iran in order to curb the growth of this state and prevent it from acquiring nuclear weapons, and there are many reasons ... Iran has gas reserves of 22,4 trillion. cub. m, which is 15% of world reserves, i.e. the direct competitor of the United States for gas supplies to Europe is one, two - Iran is quite close to China and if it concludes an agreement with China for 280-400 billion dollars, then Iran will enter the Belt and One Road project and will be one of the leaders of the BV (well, a conductor of interests China of course), three - Iran does not want to integrate into the American world system (along with Russia, China) and this makes us allies ... etc. Regarding Israel-Iran relations, this is their own business, why should we worry about Israel? Israel itself is quite good at finding "friends", which are only attacks on Syria ... but on the topic of religion, you need to keep an eye on Turkey more, which is very actively promoting pan-Turkism, and this can turn us sideways ...
        1. Lannan Shi
          Lannan Shi 30 January 2021 18: 40
          +6
          Quote: Aleksandr21
          What is the regime in Iran, this is a private affair of the Iranians themselves

          Exactly as long as they enjoy their regime, within their own boundaries. Can you tell me which side did you get into the borders of Iran, say, Lebanon? Where did the Iranians begin to feed the Shiite groups? Or bosnia. Where did Iran teach militants how to slaughter Christians properly? Well, or the same Afghanistan. Where did the Ayatollist fosterlings completely destroy the Soviet in general, and in particular the Russian guys?
          Quote: Aleksandr21
          Tell me Iran threatens Russia

          No. Whilenot. Stupidly nothing.
          Quote: Aleksandr21
          What is the likelihood of a military conflict between Iran - Russia

          Around 99%. It's a question of time. I don’t know how old you are, but I’ll probably live. And with the acquisition of nuclear weapons by Iran, it will be closer to 100.
          Quote: Aleksandr21
          and Russia - NATO?

          Near zero. For NATO is a pragmatist. But a religious fanatic may well zhahnut YABC, spitting on the consequences for himself. Not this way? Oh well. Let's remember the same Afghanistan. Iran is losing the war with Iraq. Uses the tactics of human waves. For weapons and training are problems. But for training Afghan spirits ... And finances are and weapons. Kompren? Fanatics do not care that Hussein can take Tehran and put them on a pole. Allah ordered to kill Russians in Afghanistan, period.
          Quote: Aleksandr21
          yes now he has difficult times and relations with neighbors are far from friendly

          And why would it suddenly? Are these difficult times coming? Can we just stop sending terrorists to these very neighbors? And give up the idea of ​​destroying states and peoples? You see, it will get better.
          And so of course. Here you declare that such a country must be destroyed, and the people, respectively, and this country is trying to resist you. What scoundrels.
          Quote: Aleksandr21
          but Iran will not start a global war in BV, why would it set fire to its house?

          He already suits her. Because, as fanatics. There is no question why here. Here the question is whether Allah pleases or not.
          Quote: Aleksandr21
          Iran does not want to integrate into the American system of the world (along with Russia, China)

          Damn it? Are we not in the American system? Or is China not in it? Was it such a joke of humor now? That we, that China, in it up to the ears. And all the contradictions ... We pretend to be a little more honorable than a carrier of slippers, and the Chinese to take over control of the system itself. And when / if we achieve this, we will get the YABC in the capital. From Iran. Unless, of course, Iran will have the same nuclear weapons by that time. Refresh your memory? Great shaitan, small shaitan. Yeah. And we pretend to become from small shaitans, middle shaitans. How it will improve the attitude of fanatics ... A mystery covered in darkness.
          Quote: Aleksandr21
          Israel itself is quite good at finding "friends", of which there are only attacks on Syria ...

          And why would he suddenly begin to soak Syria, unhappy and offended by everyone? Could it be because Hezbola has dug in there. Do not recall who exactly is organizing the terrorist attacks in Israel and shelling its territory. What disgusting Jews ... They do not allow themselves to be killed quietly and peacefully. To wet them for it, to wet them.
          1. Aleksandr21
            Aleksandr21 30 January 2021 19: 49
            -3
            Quote: Lannan Shi
            Exactly as long as they enjoy their regime, within their own boundaries. Can you tell me which side did you get into the borders of Iran, say, Lebanon? Where did the Iranians begin to feed the Shiite groups? Or bosnia. Where did Iran teach militants how to slaughter Christians properly? Well, or the same Afghanistan. Where did the Ayatollist fosterlings completely destroy the Soviet in general, and in particular the Russian guys?


            Oh, come on, in the Middle East, almost every state has its own terrorist groups fed up that promote their interests: Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, etc. (the list goes on) and Iran does not look so bad against their background. And compared to the United States, which for the sake of their interests (directly / indirectly) shed so much blood in the world ... even more so. Therefore, in this regard, Iran is no worse and no better than the rest. And about Soviet and Russian guys .... let's not, in Chechnya, for example, many BV states distinguished themselves as sponsors, and they also trained militants to "cut correctly" ...

            Quote: Lannan Shi
            Around 99%. It's a question of time. I don’t know how old you are, but I’ll probably live. And with the acquisition of nuclear weapons by Iran, it will be closer to 100.


            Let's look at the fact, and not what hypothetically may be in the future ... for example, in the future, Russia and China may enter into a military conflict, but this does not prevent them from cooperating in all spheres and acting as a united front on many world problems. ... And friendship with Iran is in Russia's interests at the moment.

            Quote: Lannan Shi
            Near zero. For NATO is pragmatists ...


            Nobody knows what will happen tomorrow. At the moment, NATO considers Russia as its enemy, and it always considered and even after the collapse of the USSR, this organization did not cease to exist, on the contrary, it expanded and expanded, including through the territory of the USSR. And NATO is far from a defensive alliance .... Gaddafi will not let you lie.

            Moreover, in our time, 2021-2030, it may be a time of a great war, who knows, now absolutely everyone is preparing for war.

            Quote: Lannan Shi
            a religious fanatic may well zhahnat YABC


            Perhaps, although in history only one country actually used nuclear weapons to strike another state, and these were far from religious fanatics.

            Quote: Lannan Shi
            Damn it? Are we not in the American system? Or is China not in it? Was it such a joke of humor now? That we, that China, in it up to the ears. And all the contradictions ... We pretend to be a little more honorable than a carrier of slippers, and the Chinese to take over control of the system itself.


            We are not under US control, this is the main thing. We have our own independent foreign policy, which often runs counter to US policy. And the policy of China is far from the one that the Americans would like to see .... but the fact that China wants to take over global governance - I agree, everything goes to this.
            1. Lannan Shi
              Lannan Shi 30 January 2021 20: 26
              +7
              Quote: Aleksandr21
              in the Middle East, almost every state

              We are not talking about an abstract BW, but about a specific Iran, which you declared as entitled to its ideology. Again. He is kicked not for ideology, but for trying to impose it on others. This is to the question of "suffering innocently, and unjustly offended." And by the way. Iran's appetites are much more than half of BV. Taken together. If the same Turks at least limited themselves to pan-Turkism, then Iran swung at pan-Islamism. Gentle hint. Volga region, Ural, Siberia. And even damn it, a piece of Moscow.
              Quote: Aleksandr21
              Moreover, in our time, 2021-2030, it may be a time of a great war, who knows, now absolutely everyone is preparing for war.

              Easy. If someone, like the ayatollahs, gets nuclear weapons. The West is pragmatists to the core. And to work instead of a light bulb, glowing from radiation ... Not their lifestyle. And if we ourselves do not screw up, ditching the economy completely, or having played out to a social explosion, there will be no war with the West. But in the case of radicals ... But here nothing depends on us. Nothing at all. Another khomeyanya will decide, and they will be trampled by waves on machine guns. It already happened. In the same Iran. And if you add nuclear weapons to them ... That's when you learn to think by their yardsticks, that, for example, to die, with your whole family, relatives, and a hundred hectares of neighbors, is not a tragedy, but even incredible luck, if for the glory of Allah, of course, then talk about war. Moreover, nuclear.
              Quote: Aleksandr21
              Perhaps, although in history only one country actually used nuclear weapons to strike another state

              Will it be easier for you that Moscow will become not the three hundredth, but the third city destroyed by nuclear weapons? I'm not really. I live not so far from the Moscow Ring Road. And there is no need for "civilized" Iranians, with a million-year-old culture that goes back to the primordial bacteria. In the Iranian-Iraqi war, it was not a wild Iraq that began to destroy cities with civilians, but a completely cultural and historical Iran. And the war itself, by the way, was due to the fact that cultured Iranians unleashed terror in the neighboring country. I saw such cultural ones in the grave.
              Quote: Aleksandr21
              We are not under US control, this is the main thing. We have our own independent foreign policy

              Ugums. Partners are not allowed at the dining table. So you have to buzz, breaking through to the pie. And if tomorrow Biden throws a piece, fatter, our rulers will not have a best friend. yes
              1. Aleksandr21
                Aleksandr21 30 January 2021 21: 17
                -3
                Quote: Lannan Shi

                We are not talking about an abstract BW, but about a specific Iran, which you declared as entitled to its ideology. Again. He is kicked not for ideology, but for trying to impose it on others. This is to the question of "suffering innocently, and unjustly offended." And by the way. Iran's appetites are much more than half of BV. Taken together. If the same Turks at least limited themselves to pan-Turkism, then Iran swung at pan-Islamism. Gentle hint. Volga region, Ural, Siberia. And even damn it, a piece of Moscow.


                I said that the Iranians themselves have the right to decide what kind of regime they will have in the country, we may not like it, but this is their business and their choice. If Iran imposes its ideology on someone, then you can give him a hand. Although in fairness, not only Iran is dealing with the topic of religion in the BV, and Turkey, as rightly noted, and other Middle Eastern countries (may not be on this scale), but the topic of religion and expansion to external territories is visible in many countries ... but this is not cancels the fact that friendship with Iran is in the interests of Russia, and there is no need for us to quarrel with it.

                Quote: Lannan Shi
                Easy. If someone, like the ayatollahs, gets nuclear weapons. The West is pragmatists to the core ...


                Nuclear weapons will go to Iran in any case, sooner or later. Israel (unofficially) has it, Turkey also wants to acquire nuclear weapons ... and there other BV countries will follow the example, since 1 has it, why shouldn't others have it? DPRK, Pakistan - will share the best practices ..... of course, the danger of using nuclear weapons by fanatics is and it is enormous. But Western pragmatists may well apply it, no worse than fanatics .... the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki are a striking historical example, and the only one in history.

                Quote: Lannan Shi
                Will it be easier for you that Moscow will become not the three hundredth, but the third city destroyed by nuclear weapons? I'm not really. I live not so far from the Moscow Ring Road. And there is no need for "civilized" Iranians, with a million-year-old culture that goes back to the primordial bacteria. In the Iranian-Iraqi war, it was not a wild Iraq that began to destroy cities with civilians, but a completely cultural and historical Iran.


                In my opinion, you demonize Iran too much. Moreover, in the Western media, they demonize Russia and China, exposing them as monsters. What is the point of Iran to destroy the world of nuclear weapons? With the same success, fanatics can come to Pakistan and use nuclear weapons in other countries, from this no one is immune. But I don't think that Iran will choose this path for itself .... there is also another side of the coin, if Iran has nuclear weapons, then Israel and the United States will think 10 times whether they should attack Iran ... in any case, Israel and the United States needs to resolve this issue by other methods and try to establish a dialogue with Iran, and not destroy its scientists and second persons of the state.
                1. Lannan Shi
                  Lannan Shi 30 January 2021 22: 27
                  +6
                  Quote: Aleksandr21
                  ... If Iran imposes its ideology on someone, then you can give him a hand.

                  Stop. Here, in fact, they give him a hand. And immediately there are screams, well, for example about evil Israel, and unjustly offended Iran. Meanwhile, even in the first days after the revolution, Iran announced that its goal was the destruction of Israel. So who is the aggressor in this particular case? Iran, which feeds the terrorists hitting Israel and dreams of nuclear weapons as a means to destroy a country that, in principle, did not interfere with his life, or Israel, which does not want to be destroyed? Bolder, little paw, bolder. Declare that Iran, due to its high historical and cultural level, has the right to genocide.
                  Quote: Aleksandr21
                  Nuclear weapons will go to Iran in any case, sooner or later.

                  And I am inclined to believe that if he gets nuclear weapons, then only with delivery on his own. That's purely out of a sense of self-preservation of neighbors. Who must be completely insane to allow this to happen.
                  Quote: Aleksandr21
                  In my opinion, you demonize Iran too much.

                  Is it possible? Remind me of his first performance on the international stage? Capturing diplomats and blackmailing them with their lives. Let me remind you. And even then from Hitler's Germany ... Our diplomats left. Remind the second action? Sending militants to neighboring Iraq. Then still neutral. What is there to demonize then? And the regime isn’t a year old, even in the country the massacre is going on, by the way, quite in the igil style, and already the Alga-Alga. Neighbors nightmare. Trotskyism from Islam. In its purest and uncluttered form. Constitutionally enshrined.
                  Quote: Aleksandr21
                  What is the point of Iran to destroy the world of nuclear weapons

                  What was the point for Iran to provoke a war with Iraq? What is the point of Iran declaring that it will destroy Israel? What was the point for Iran to get involved in a showdown in Sudan? What was the point for Iran to slaughter the Bosnian Serbs?
                  Quote: Aleksandr21
                  With the same success, fanatics can come to Pakistan and use nuclear weapons in other countries, from this no one is immune.

                  So what is next? For example, a tank driver can go crazy. Iiii ?? Is this a reason to recruit crews frankly crazy? Do you understand that having received nuclear weapons, Iran will at least begin to blackmail Israel with them? And the Jews have nowhere to retreat. Or they will give in the teeth, for every sneeze addressed to them, or they will be cut out. And you have a 101% probability of getting a nuclear conflict in BV. Can't wait to grab a couple of YABCh? That's purely for the company. Or, at least, take a walk under the radioactive rain?
                  Quote: Aleksandr21
                  if Iran has nuclear weapons, then Israel and the United States will think 10 times whether they should attack Iran ...

                  Again. The fundamentalists came to power more than 40 years ago. At least in the 90s, both the United States and Israel, Iran could easily handle nuclear weapons. Under certain conditions, even with our help. But they don't need it. All that the insidious West wants from a peaceful and cultured Iran, so only that it leaves its ideology within its own borders. Everything. They don't get more from him. But ... Religious Trotskyism is a terrible thing. With logic and reason, not lying next to.
                  1. Aleksandr21
                    Aleksandr21 31 January 2021 08: 48
                    -3
                    Quote: Lannan Shi

                    Stop. Here, in fact, they give him a hand. And immediately there are screams, for example about evil Israel, and unjustly offended Iran. Meanwhile, even in the first days after the revolution, Iran announced that its goal was the destruction of Israel. So who is the aggressor in this particular case? Iran, which feeds the terrorists hitting Israel and dreams of nuclear weapons as a means to destroy a country that, in principle, did not interfere with his life, or Israel, which does not want to be destroyed? Bolder, little paw, bolder. Declare that Iran, due to its high historical and cultural level, has the right to genocide ...


                    According to your logic, then it is necessary to destroy Iran, does Israel have the right to do so? Once again, read my last proposal more carefully: "In any case, Israel and the United States need to resolve this issue by other methods and try to establish a dialogue with Iran, and not destroy its scientists and second persons of the state." those. a path of dialogue is needed, not a path of intimidation, intimidation and force. Now I only see an attempt at a military solution by the United States and Israel, but this is the path of a dead end. Regarding the destruction of Israel, very few people there said that when ... well, Iran will be destroyed by Israel, then it will be destroyed by the United States and its allies in the BV, and what will Iran gain from this? Not. They are not suicides, the same Kim has acquired nuclear weapons, now he has a club - but the West and its allies (South Korea, Japan, etc.) have more. those. it is now a deterrent weapon.

                    Further, your opinion on Iran's nuclear program will not change reality in any way. Sooner or later Iran will have nuclear weapons, this is a fact and the neighbors will have to come to terms with this, it is necessary to establish interaction and dialogue: 1) Remove sanctions 2) To interest Iran in joint infrastructure and economic projects, i.e. so far, only China is playing in this field, which intends to invest so seriously in the Iranian economy.


                    Quote: Lannan Shi
                    All that the insidious West wants from a peaceful and cultured Iran, so only that it leaves its ideology within its own borders. Everything. They don't get more from him.


                    Does it mean that he wants badly, since he has not yet lifted the sanctions and has not entered the path of dialogue, is the destruction of Iranian scientists, the elimination of Suleimani the right path? And after such steps Iran of course should open its arms :) you yourself are not funny?
                    1. Lannan Shi
                      Lannan Shi 31 January 2021 09: 57
                      +4
                      Quote: Aleksandr21
                      According to your logic, then you need to destroy Iran,

                      Oh how. And according to your logic, probably it was not necessary to destroy Nazi Germany? They were children, and had the right to an original system? It was necessary to come to an agreement with him, if according to your logic: What is the position of Iran, striving to destroy its neighbor, better than the position of Hitler, who tried to destroy us?
                      Quote: Aleksandr21
                      Israel and the United States need to resolve this issue by other methods and try to establish a dialogue with Iran,

                      How interesting? Disband yourself? And we do not accidentally need to dissolve Russia in order to resolve the issue with the Western: "partners" by other methods? You first try on your proposals, then voice them.
                      Quote: Aleksandr21
                      Sooner or later Iran will have nuclear weapons, this is a fact and the neighbors will have to come to terms with it

                      Accept what? That the fanatics will process their nuclear warheads? You know, I would not have resigned, but struck a preemptive blow. And I don’t think that the same Jews are worse than bad. When they need to choose which city will burn under nuclear weapons, Jerusalem or Tehran, their position will be quite predictable. And this is really a fact. And already you will have to accept that the Jews are not sacrificial rams, and would prefer to demolish the fanatics than die themselves. But they don’t want to go to extremes, and you just itching to unleash a nuclear war.
                      Quote: Aleksandr21
                      time has not yet lifted the sanctions and has not entered the path of dialogue

                      And there is a dialogue, as we have with you. Give up trying to destroy your neighbors, and you will be happy. We will not refuse. And remove the sanctions. Otherwise we will arrange this for you oooh ... Iran is not negotiable. Basically. For the basis of any treaties stipulates the right to attack neighbors and destroy them.
                      1. Aleksandr21
                        Aleksandr21 31 January 2021 13: 30
                        -2
                        Quote: Lannan Shi

                        Oh how. And according to your logic, probably it was not necessary to destroy Nazi Germany? They were children, and had the right to an original system? It was necessary to come to an agreement with him, if according to your logic: What is the position of Iran, striving to destroy its neighbor, better than the position of Hitler, who tried to destroy us?


                        What makes you think that Iran will destroy Israel? Once again, in the event of an Iranian attack on Israel, the United States and its allies in the BV will destroy Iran, this is a fact. And it doesn't matter who, and what once said there .... The Iranians are not suicides, and they understand how it will all end. And as regards us and Iran, it’s generally bypassed, Russia and Iran have pretty good relations and we interact on many issues in the BV. Of course, if you live in Israel, then yes Iran is a problem for you .... but the current path of Israel and the United States is not an option.

                        Quote: Lannan Shi

                        How interesting? Disband yourself? And we do not accidentally need to dissolve Russia in order to resolve the issue with the Western: "partners" by other methods? You first try on your proposals, then voice them.


                        Just don't go to extremes. Iran directly dreams of being an outcast, yeah .... maybe it's worth establishing a real dialogue? There was a JCPOA, but the Americans broke their woods and in order to eliminate Suleimani, they had to go along the path of negotiations and joint concessions. And so they reached a dead end .... almost the second person in the state was killed, and now they are outraged, saying that Iran has accelerated its nuclear program, but what did the United States expect? flowers and thanks? Israel is also very good at eliminating the scientific elite of Iran, the pros do not say ... but as a result, only enmity will intensify and the conflict will flare up with renewed vigor ... this is not an option.

                        Quote: Lannan Shi
                        And there is a dialogue, as we have with you. Give up trying to destroy your neighbors, and you will be happy. We will not refuse. And remove the sanctions. Otherwise we will arrange this for you oooh ... Iran is not negotiable. Basically. For the basis of any treaties stipulates the right to attack neighbors and destroy them.


                        Everyone is good here, until I see political will in the US / Israel to really change the situation, and Iran itself will not make concessions first, especially after the events of 2018-2020, when Trump broke so many firewood ... although with the arrival of the administration Biden, there is a chance to restore what was destroyed ... let's see how events unfold. And it's time to finish our dialogue with you, I was interested to hear your opinion, but regarding the situation around Iran, I will remain with my opinion, i.e. mutual destruction is not an option, you need to negotiate and make concessions.
                      2. Lannan Shi
                        Lannan Shi 31 January 2021 15: 12
                        +2
                        Quote: Aleksandr21
                        What makes you think that Iran will destroy Israel?

                        From the statements of the khamenai, their prezik, I don’t remember him, the activities of the parliament. When the entire elite is raving about destruction, this is not enough?
                        Quote: Aleksandr21
                        in the event of an Iranian attack on Israel, the United States and its allies in the BV will destroy Iran

                        Do you understand Russian? I will repeat to you for the third time. Fanatics don't give a damn about that. Remind me how, experiencing a shortage of weapons and trained soldiers, fanatics drove live waves to machine guns, and at the same time fattened the spirits? The country can be destroyed? What bullshit. It is urgent to slaughter the infidels in Afghanistan.
                        Quote: Aleksandr21
                        Iranians are not suicidal

                        Iranians may not, or rather not all. But their leadership - without exception.
                        Quote: Aleksandr21
                        Of course, if you live in Israel

                        I live 5 km from a small concrete road near Moscow, unless, of course, it says something to an Iranian like you.
                        Quote: Aleksandr21
                        banged almost the second person in the state,

                        Laponka. Suleimani led al-Quds. The functions of which, quite officially, include cooperation with Shiite armed groups outside Iran's borders. Translating into Russian, the organization of illegal gangs. Um ... I don't quite understand if the problem is that the coordinator of terrorism was killed, or that such a person is almost the second person in Iran? Can you even realize this ?: The official duty of a high-ranking official of the country is to organize a bandit underground for the neighbors. What did you babble about the high culture of Iran?
                        Quote: Aleksandr21
                        and Iran itself will not make concessions first

                        Well, then, when he comes close to creating nuclear weapons, he will be stupidly bombed into the Stone Age. For nuclear weapons in a country whose "almost second person" quite officially turns neighboring states into a bandit land ... A rabid dog is ignored until it threatens your life. Then they shoot.
                        Everything. This concludes. For you are either unable to understand what religious fanaticism is, when a fanatic is not just himself, but also his country, and the whole world will joyfully destroy, if the country and the world do not fit into his dogma, or you successfully pretend.
  2. Vitaly gusin
    Vitaly gusin 30 January 2021 17: 37
    +7
    Quote: Lech from Android.
    Israel has nuclear weapons and is blackmailing its neighbors ... by attacking them from time to time without fear of retribution.

    But from this place in more detail, please.
    Quote: Lech from Android.
    Slowly, Israel is taking more and more land from the Palestinians for the construction of their settlements ...

    And if your knowledge allows you and explain All of us what lands and from whom were taken away.
    Until I put a minus, tk. I might get an interesting answer.
  3. ironic
    ironic 31 January 2021 22: 10
    +2
    And how many neighbors were they blackmailed about when?

    How can you take land from the Palestinians for Israel if there are no Palestinians other than Jews?

    How much land was taken from the Arabs living beyond the green line from the land they owned according to the documents, and how many such actions were allowed by the Israeli court?

    When and where did Israel set as its goal the destruction of Iran and the destruction of its statehood?

    Why not minus the deliberate nonsense known as low-standard propaganda of hatred of Jews?

    Answers to the studio are welcome
    1. Iris
      Iris 5 February 2021 22: 54
      0
      Why not minus the deliberate nonsense known as low-standard propaganda of hatred of Jews?

      Strictly speaking, there are no such reasons, except perhaps the case when you are going to oppose a Forum participant. The ethics of conducting a dialogue, it seems to me, excludes "minuses". hi
      1. ironic
        ironic 7 February 2021 12: 28
        +1
        Except in the case when the opponent does not argue, but spreads anti-Semitic slogans. What kind of ethics can there be for Judophobia?
        1. Iris
          Iris 7 February 2021 18: 47
          +1
          You're right. In this case, we are not talking about a discussion.
  • Pessimist22
    Pessimist22 30 January 2021 05: 55
    -5
    The battle jackal of the United States still will not stop.
    1. Lech from Android.
      Lech from Android. 30 January 2021 06: 11
      -4
      It is beneficial for the United States to have such a jackal in this region, through it they push their interests in Syria, Iraq, etc.
      1. anjey
        anjey 30 January 2021 07: 03
        +4
        Israel is the unsinkable US aircraft carrier in the Palestinian desert laughing
        1. aszzz888
          aszzz888 30 January 2021 09: 26
          -7

          anjey (Andrey)
          Today, 07: 03
          NEW

          +4
          Israel is the unsinkable US aircraft carrier in the Palestinian desert laughing
          Bye, "unsinkable". Every vessel has its own sailing period. wink It will also end in Israel.
          1. bobwings
            bobwings 30 January 2021 11: 53
            +4
            Are you going to drown?
            Over the past 3000 years, all the "warmers" have long been feeding the fish.
            1. Vitaly gusin
              Vitaly gusin 30 January 2021 17: 40
              +4
              Quote: bobwings
              Over the past 3000 years, all the "warmers" have long been feeding the fish.

              Far enough, there is also closer, only 29 years old.
          2. ironic
            ironic 31 January 2021 22: 13
            0
            But the clickers will definitely not see this, for they will be in the pits in due time and much earlier.
    2. Lipchanin
      Lipchanin 30 January 2021 06: 36
      -9
      Quote: Pessimist22
      The battle jackal of the United States still will not stop.

      Combat highly paid jackal
      1. ironic
        ironic 31 January 2021 22: 16
        0
        Nevysko, last year budget 19 lard, assistance 3.8. The expected budget for the 30th year is 30 lard, the contract for aid ends on the 28th. The Iranian proxy jackal is relatively more expensive.
    3. Lipchanin
      Lipchanin 30 January 2021 06: 38
      -6
      Quote: Pessimist22
      The battle jackal of the United States still will not stop.

      Looks like minus ego offspring
      1. icant007
        icant007 30 January 2021 07: 49
        +1
        Quote: Lipchanin
        Looks like minus ego offspring


        Maybe VO itself is minus)

        Today I suddenly woke up with a plus 50000 rating. He was a captain, became an underground)))

        I jumped like Gagarin through the rank.

        I wrote to them.
        1. Lipchanin
          Lipchanin 30 January 2021 07: 58
          +2
          Quote: icant007
          Maybe VO itself is minus)

          Unlikely
          Today I suddenly woke up with a plus 50000 rating. He was a captain, became an underground)))

          I jumped like Gagarin through the rank.

          It's even weirder on the next branch.
          My answer is on my computer, but it looks like a different one was attached there
          Quote: Lipchanin
          "Coalition-SV" has confirmed the ability to hit the target with several shells simultaneously

          then with knives and butts already ... well, for sure.
          Reply
          Quote

          Lipchanin
          Lipchanin (Sergey)
          8
          Today, 07: 05

          0
          Quote: Aerodrome

          then with knives and butts already ... well, for sure.

          Strange but this is not my comment request
          Quote: Lipchanin
          "Coalition-SV" has confirmed the ability to hit the target with several shells simultaneously

          My comment
          And the firing range is not specified
          1. Maki Avellevich
            Maki Avellevich 30 January 2021 11: 17
            +9
            Quote: Lipchanin
            It's even weirder on the next branch.
            My answer is on my computer, but it looks like a different one was attached there

            the intrigues of world Zionism.
        2. Lech from Android.
          Lech from Android. 30 January 2021 07: 58
          0
          Today I suddenly woke up with a plus 50000 rating. He was a captain, became an underground)))
          It would be necessary to wash the asterisk. hi I put the stars on the shelf already on the third run, shoulder straps like weights to the ground attract. smile
          1. icant007
            icant007 30 January 2021 08: 35
            0
            Quote: Lech from Android.
            It would be necessary to wash the asterisk.


            Oh, already a major, demoted)))
        3. aszzz888
          aszzz888 30 January 2021 09: 22
          +1

          icant007 (Andrey)
          Today, 07: 49
          NEW

          +2
          Quote: Lipchanin
          Looks like minus ego offspring


          Maybe VO itself is minus)

          Today I suddenly woke up with a plus 50000 rating. He was a captain, became an underground)))

          I jumped like Gagarin through the rank.
          End of the month - bonus! Cover the clearing. wink
          I'm kidding drinks , let the "stars" remain.
    4. ironic
      ironic 31 January 2021 22: 12
      0
      Are the fighting jackals of Iranian bearded men in skirts on the borders of Israel appeasing?
  • bald
    bald 30 January 2021 06: 44
    +6
    It is clear that the states and Israel have no faith. And no matter how our relations develop with Iran, that it would not be desirable for Iran to have nuclear weapons, which could lead to a nuclear conflict in the region, they will not stand on ceremony, but this will move on to a global conflict.
    1. Lech from Android.
      Lech from Android. 30 January 2021 08: 00
      -5
      so that Iran has nuclear weapons, which can lead to a nuclear conflict in the region, they will not stand on ceremony,
      Can't ... it's all lies ... Eun threatens to erase the United States and South Korea with his nuclear missile a hundred times, he still erases the dust from his promises.
      The Iranians need a counterbalance against Israel's lawlessness.
      1. aszzz888
        aszzz888 30 January 2021 09: 24
        -2
        Lech from Android. (Lech from Android)
        Today, 08: 00
        NEW

        0
        so that Iran has nuclear weapons, which can lead to a nuclear conflict in the region, they will not stand on ceremony,
        Can't ... it's all lies ... Eun threatens to erase the United States and South Korea with his nuclear missile a hundred times, he still erases the dust from his promises.
        The Iranians need a counterbalance against Israel's lawlessness.
        And this "chaos" I suppose may end soon.
        1. bobwings
          bobwings 30 January 2021 11: 57
          +6
          You even have no idea what Israel is capable of, those "bezperelshchikov" that it will only be touched, will grind into powder.
      2. Kronos
        Kronos 30 January 2021 11: 24
        +4
        North Korea does not dream of conquering neighboring countries by establishing its own system there.
      3. ironic
        ironic 31 January 2021 22: 19
        +1
        Their chaos may end badly. Israel will not agree with Iran's nuclear weapons, even if you imagine that the United States will agree with it.
    2. sniperino
      sniperino 30 January 2021 09: 02
      0
      Quote: bald
      that I would not like Iran to have nuclear weapons, which could lead to a nuclear conflict in the region
      Do you agree that Iran and Israel also (like Russia) have the right not to want this world to exist without their countries? Israel has such a guarantee, certainly not 100%. Why shouldn't Iran have it? Of course, to arm all countries with nuclear weapons is to bring a complete command closer. But some solution must be found.
      1. bald
        bald 30 January 2021 11: 08
        0
        And I think that Iran has a solution for a long time, work has been carried out since the 50s and I navryatli IAEA could see everything - more than 1000 centrifuges, this is something, and for all the troubles for so many years, under the desert, you can build a devil.
        1. sniperino
          sniperino 30 January 2021 11: 23
          -1
          Quote: bald
          And I think Iran has a solution for a long time
          Perhaps, but I reacted to
          I would not like Iran to have nuclear weapons
          Not a fan of Iran, but you can understand them.
          1. bald
            bald 30 January 2021 12: 07
            0
            I agree, many would like to have it, but there are no opportunities.
      2. dauria
        dauria 30 January 2021 11: 11
        +2
        But some solution must be found.


        "Firemen are looking,
        Looking for militia,
        Looking for photographers
        In our capital,
        They are looking for a long time,
        But they cannot find ... "
        There is too much oil in this corner of the planet. Even if by a miracle the Jews and all of Israel were transferred from these places, there would be no peace there. But "democracy" and its defenders, as always, will be a bunch. And someone will still desperately need an atomic bomb "to protect" both democracy and democracy ..
      3. bobwings
        bobwings 30 January 2021 12: 05
        +9
        Because Israel is ruled by normal modern people with rational thinking. And this is in contrast to Iran, where religious fanatics rule, believing in their oneness, supernatural divine providence, for whom the death of a martyr is the highest goal. A country whose crazy leaders are constantly threatening to wipe another country off the face of the earth, for the sake of their irrational goals, should not have the means to do this.
      4. ironic
        ironic 31 January 2021 22: 22
        0
        Because Israel does not want the fundamental destruction of any country, and Iran already legally wants the destruction of Israel.
  • rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 30 January 2021 06: 58
    +5
    some warming in relations between Iran and the United States is outlined ... other participants in the Middle East confrontation are unhappy with this and are taking the necessary measures
    A possible return of the United States to the "nuclear deal" does not mean a warming of relations between the United States and Iran. Relations as were on the brink of a possible war, and remain, especially since Israel has long been pushing the Americans to this. Therefore, the tension in this region gives rise to many analysts to talk about a possible armed conflict.
  • prior
    prior 30 January 2021 08: 11
    -6
    The confrontation between the United States, Israel and Iran will end only after Iran becomes the owner of nuclear weapons. Then the Yankees and Jews will "wash" and shut up.
    1. aszzz888
      aszzz888 30 January 2021 09: 20
      -4

      prior (Vlad)
      Today, 08: 11
      NEW
      -1
      The confrontation between the United States, Israel and Iran will end only after Iran becomes the owner of nuclear weapons. Then the Yankees and Jews will "wash" and shut up.
      Because of that in Israel and fuss. They feel that their UNRESENTED air strikes can end very sadly for them. Yes, and the baida will not lisp with them, like Trump, who has half of his relatives Jews. Ears will press down.
      1. However, dear
        However, dear 30 January 2021 20: 48
        +3
        https://www.timesofisrael.com/biden-harris-and-their-families-are-making-jewish-history-on-inauguration-day/

        I dare to disappoint you: there are all Jews too. laughing The article is in English. Google translator to help.


        ... and an old anecdote comes to mind. Meeting of the General Staff. The speaker gives an example. Here, a small 8 million Israel is successfully confronting many hostile countries with a population of XNUMX billion. Why can't we cope with some America? A question from the audience: "Where can we get so many Jews" ?! lol
    2. Vitaly gusin
      Vitaly gusin 30 January 2021 17: 48
      +2
      Quote: prior
      after Iran becomes the owner of nuclear weapons.

      Netanyahu: Iran will not have an atomic bomb. Point!
      "We care not only about our security and our future, but also the future of the Middle East and the whole world," Netanyahu added.
    3. ironic
      ironic 31 January 2021 22: 23
      0
      Then it will end, because the war will not be long.
  • icant007
    icant007 30 January 2021 08: 45
    -1
    On January 19, the day before J. Biden took office as president, future Secretary of State Anthony Blinken spoke about Washington's intention to resume cooperation with Iran on nuclear issues. On the basis of the old JCPOA, it is proposed to create a new similar plan that meets modern requirements. At the same time, it is necessary for Iran to meet halfway.


    Timeo Danaos et dona ferentes - Fear the Danaans who bring gifts.

    I believe the recent death of a leading Iranian nuclear engineer will complicate the immediate prospects for Iran's nuclear program. Even if there is some kind of agreement.
  • Doccor18
    Doccor18 30 January 2021 08: 55
    +4
    Is the confrontation resolved?

    The confrontation continues ...
    And the stronger Iran is, the tougher the confrontation will be.
    1. Vitaly gusin
      Vitaly gusin 30 January 2021 17: 51
      +2
      Quote: Doccor18
      And the stronger Iran is, the tougher the confrontation will be.

      Strong Iran, nobody cares.
      Rђ RІRѕS, NUCLEAR, This is completely different.
  • aszzz888
    aszzz888 30 January 2021 09: 15
    -9
    Hypothetical lifting of sanctions on Iran and resumption of productive international cooperation become a cause for Israel's concern.
    Twitched in Israel bully Not all cats are Shrovetide! When the owner himself kicks from a bowl of food. bully
    1. Krasnodar
      Krasnodar 30 January 2021 10: 26
      +6
      In the meantime, the Israelis (in 2019) have overtaken Japan in terms of living standards (HDI) lol
      1. voronkov
        voronkov 30 January 2021 13: 52
        -6
        Quote: Krasnodar
        In the meantime, the Israelis (in 2019) have overtaken Japan in terms of living standards (HDI) lol

        Well, go there, that you sat down in Russia and you crap so on the sly? Then you are offended for what they don't like you so much .. hi
        1. Krasnodar
          Krasnodar 30 January 2021 15: 52
          +1
          How do they dislike it? For not the very last and not the most sophisticated, the iPhone is still loved. And by the way, I am very pleased hi
          Glad to see by the way laughing
      2. ANB
        ANB 31 January 2021 02: 02
        +3
        ... living standards (HDI) Japan overtook

        Found someone to compare with.
        Overtake Sechin, then brag :)
        1. Krasnodar
          Krasnodar 31 January 2021 08: 01
          +1
          You can't argue here)).
    2. voronkov
      voronkov 30 January 2021 13: 56
      -1
      Quote: aszzz888
      Twitched in Israel Not all cats are Shrovetide! When the owner himself kicks from a bowl of food.

      Iran is not the same as before .. And it does not give in to provocations, but waits for a blow, preparing its layered air defense ..! He saw how Iraq and Libya were soaked ...
      1. Vitaly gusin
        Vitaly gusin 30 January 2021 17: 57
        +2
        Quote: voronkov
        He saw how Iraq soaked and Libya ...

        In the highlighted word, two letters are NOT ENOUGH.
    3. Danila46
      Danila46 31 January 2021 04: 35
      +2
      are not tired of you waving your misery here ????
    4. ironic
      ironic 31 January 2021 22: 27
      +1
      Where's the food? And Israel has already made it clear to the new US administration that its return to the nuclear deal will only push Israel to independent, uncoordinated decisions.
  • voronkov
    voronkov 30 January 2021 13: 49
    -2
    Again, such articles reveal unreliable and then their negative ? ..I do remember wink ..I am for Iran and peace in the Middle East .. Silenok in Russia is not enough, of course, but we stick to our defense tactics and kill the devils from time to time.
    1. ironic
      ironic 31 January 2021 22: 29
      +1
      It is impossible to be for Iran and the world at the same time today. As long as there are uncles at the helm in skirts with beards, there will be no peace.
  • sniperino
    sniperino 30 January 2021 14: 16
    0
    Quote: bobwings
    Because Israel is ruled by normal modern people with rational thinking.
    Of course, the Sanhedrin was revived, which turned to Trump and Putin with a request to build a Third Temple in Jerusalem on the site of a Muslim shrine - the Al-Aqsa Mosque. It is very rational that the Messiah does not pull with his coming to Earth.

    1. bobwings
      bobwings 30 January 2021 15: 55
      +1
      Where is the nonsense?
      Mullah in the mosque has hung up another noodle on his ears? I advise you to use a fork ...
      1. sniperino
        sniperino 31 January 2021 08: 52
        0
        Quote: bobwings
        Where is the nonsense?
        It is known from the Kabbalists. Are you not waiting for King Moshiach?
        1. ironic
          ironic 31 January 2021 22: 33
          0
          These are just a few extreme branches of the Khabadniki awaiting. The last Loving Rebbe was certainly not a very trivial person, but this is already a clear overkill. Well, when a huge direction leaves the head, and there is no similar one for replacement, confusion and vacillation begin.
    2. Danila46
      Danila46 31 January 2021 04: 40
      +1
      ha ha! what nonsense !?
      for your information: Al-Aktsa was built on the ruins of the second Jewish temple. It was in this place ...
      1. avib
        avib 31 January 2021 11: 23
        +2
        Not entirely true. On the site of the temple, the Muslims built the Omar Mosque (golden dome) so that the Jews could not rebuild a new temple. El Aqsa is located a little to the side - on the temple mountain, but closer to the edge.
    3. ironic
      ironic 31 January 2021 22: 30
      0
      Funny joke ...
  • zenion
    zenion 30 January 2021 21: 45
    -4
    Every country for which the states have an appetite must have a nuclear shield. Then everyone will be calm.
  • high
    high 30 January 2021 22: 03
    +4
    Three countries (USA, Iran, Israel) are actively defending their interests, which is why the situation remains difficult.

    Israel does not defend its interests, it fights for its existence:
    A timer has been set in the center of Tehran, counting down the days until the destruction of Israel.
    There is an inscription on the timer, in Persian, Arabic and English: “This is the number of days remaining until the complete destruction of Israel. ,,
    Iran will not fight Israel from its territory, the forces are too unequal, for this purpose, a Shiite army is being created in Syria, which, together with the terrorists of Hezbollah and Gaza, must destroy Israel
    As long as the power of Iran's religious fanatics exists, war is inevitable with Israel.
    Israel, of course, will not wait for the expiration of the timer in Tehran and will not look back at the United States, for example, the destruction of the nuclear center in Iraq ... The United States was against
  • certero
    certero 31 January 2021 01: 00
    -2
    Quote: Lannan Shi
    Tell me, are you a supporter of the world Muslim empire?

    Absolutely give a damn about their desire for a world empire. Well, in their own country, they can live as they want. For example, I do not understand why Israel can have an atomic bomb, but Iran does not?
    Although, of course, Russia is absolutely not profitable for the appearance of nuclear countries on its border.
    Therefore, the conclusion is such well, they all in FIG need to protect their interests.
    1. ironic
      ironic 31 January 2021 22: 34
      -1
      Does Israel have exactly the atm bomb?
  • high
    high 31 January 2021 09: 32
    +5
    Quote: certero

    For example, I do not understand why Israel can have an atomic bomb, but Iran does not?

    In Iran, power was seized by unpredictable religious, obscurantist fanatics, for whom human means nothing.
    In Iran, it is in the order of things to stone a woman who is not allowed a divorce and she lives with another man, to hang demonstrators against religious fanatics on the streets - these photos shocked many ... over the past half year, 2 Olympic champions have been executed in Iran ...
    If Iran was able to blow up a seven-story building of the Jewish Center in Argentina, where about 100 people were killed and several hundred were injured, then religious fanatics should not be able to drop a nuclear bomb on Israel or any country ..
    The Argentine Prosecutor's Office issued arrest warrants for the Ambassador to Argentina, the former Iranian Defense Minister ...
    However, Israel will not wait for Iran to obtain nuclear weapons and destroy its country ....... therefore Iran will not be able to obtain and use nuclear weapons.
  • Old26
    Old26 31 January 2021 15: 18
    +6
    Quote: Aleksandr21
    What makes you think that Iran will destroy Israel?

    Respected! In one sentence I will join in your sweet conversation. Are you asking the question mentioned in the quote? Well, after all, Iran has recently adopted a law according to which it is accepted that Israel must be destroyed by 2010 EMNIP? A law has been passed in their Parliament. When their supreme leader speaks about it, this does not convince you, they say he has been talking for a long time. When their president speaks, the reaction is the same. But now they have moved from talking to the LAW, how do you now?
  • Old26
    Old26 31 January 2021 15: 24
    0
    Quote: Lech from Android.
    Can't ... it's all lies ... Eun threatens to erase the United States and South Korea with his nuclear missile a hundred times, he still erases the dust from his promises.

    In-in. He only threatens, because he is not a religious fanatic and understands what will happen to him if he hits the same South Korea or Japan. Getting to the United States is like in the Russian expression - "like to Beijing ... in a kneeling position"
  • APASUS
    APASUS 31 January 2021 21: 28
    +1
    In this conflict, the United States is Israel's tool.
    1. sniperino
      sniperino 31 January 2021 22: 40
      0
      Quote: APASUS
      USA is Israel's instrument
      I do not know how the Fed bankers have dual citizenship, but there is no reason to exclude such an option: they can keep for Faberge.
  • Iris
    Iris 6 February 2021 00: 25
    +1
    The good message of the author of the article can be understood. Indeed, in the standard case of a collision of geopolitical interests (well ... for example, like India and Pakistan), a compromise should be sought based on a detailed and detailed analysis of this very collision.
    But in the Israel-Iran confrontation, there is no talk of a standard case. REAL geopolitical interests of Iran do not overlap with those of Israel in principle. These countries do not have a common border, there is no competition in hydrocarbon trade, there are no disputes over any natural resources, such as water scarce in the region, economic models are fundamentally different. Live, as they say, live - make good.
    The problem is that the regime in Iran is insane. The motives of this regime and the logic of its foreign policy decisions have nothing to do with normal ones: they are not based on abstract state interests, or the interests of the economy and society, or even their own enrichment.
    These decisions are based on messianism. Specifically - the destruction of a certain country, the destruction of "apostasy" - other currents in Islam and - in the future - the destruction of the infidels in principle. Therefore, no compromise can be found.
    Unfortunately, the foreign policy "scouring" inherent in democratic systems has led to dangerous consequences: consistently taken decisions to conclude an agreement on the nuclear program, to break it and to restore it, only worsened the situation.
    Unfortunately, there is no doubt that Iran's nuclear weapons are riveted not with the aim of obtaining an instrument of deterring aggression, but with the aim of using it immediately upon receipt - for the stated purpose.
    The Ayatollah regime, therefore, with open eyes, goes straight to the abyss. And the US opinion on this issue will not, I think, be taken into account.