Syrian missile boat Tir II (Zolfaghar)

27
Recently, photos of Syrian low-displacement missile boats have appeared on the Internet. Missile boats are armed with two anti-ship missiles "Noor". A total of six years, the Syrian naval forces have adopted the 6 small RK, which are among the most modern and combat-ready surface ships of the Syrian Navy.

Syrian missile boat Tir II (Zolfaghar)


Small RK Tir II, as well as other main weapons, are supplied to Syria from Iran. These ships were developed on the basis of the Iranian design of the boat “IPS 18”, most likely, “IMIG” - the Iranian branch of the state organization of the military industry. Anti-ship missile "Noor" is also a rocket, created in Iranian enterprises.



The ships of the project "IPS 18", and before that the "IPS 16" torpedo boats, are based on boats that were delivered to Iran and built in the DPRK. Iran has improved the boats and today produces several options for the needs of their own and the Syrian Navy. The Noor anti-ship missile is also a North Korean development of the C-802 project. Iran produces these missiles under license.

The Syrian Navy is developing in the direction of coastal and coastal defense, and procurement and deployment of anti-ship missiles are associated with this. Since 2006, Syria began to improve the capabilities of the naval forces, because most fleet - both armament and equipment of ships and boats are morally obsolete.

Since 2009, Syria has been purchasing coastal complexes with Bastion / Yakhont anti-ship missiles from the Russian Federation, which is in line with the policy of the naval forces. As noted, Syria does not seek to increase its upcoming potential, but systematically improves the capabilities of its coastal defense. According to the command of the Syrian Navy, this is done in order to counter the growing naval power of Israel. In addition, Syria is purchasing new radars that are installed on torpedo boats of Tir II class.



Very little is known about the characteristics: a small RK with a displacement of 29 tons, the length of the hull is 21 meters, the speed is about 52 nodes.
The torpedo boat IPS-18 differs from the IPS-16 in its elongated nose section, the presence of a removable 12.7mm machine gun in the nose section.



The ships have several names - “Zolfaqar”, “Tir” or “IPS-18”. All ships are created with low radar visibility. Exhaust pipes of engines are located on the waterline. Crew - three people. Construction only torpedo boats currently completed in favor of boats with rocket weapons.



Information sources:
http://www.iranmilitaryforum.net/naval-forces/12-zolfaqhar-speedboats/
http://www.iranmilitaryforum.net/naval-forces/iranian-navy/25/
http://www.harpoondatabases.com/encyclopedia/Entry2614.aspx
http://articles.janes.com/articles/Janes-Sentinel-Security-Assessment-Eastern-Mediterranean/Navy-Syria.html
27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +17
    20 August 2012 09: 04
    This is called cheap and cheerful!
    If they notice and wipe off the powder, it’s not a pity, but if you are lucky and have time to reach the line and shoot, then they can send a large hog to the bottom. The construction of such a mosquito fleet is absolutely justified and competent step of the Syrian leadership.
    1. +4
      20 August 2012 12: 02
      Sakhalininsk,
      Somewhere, an American general already drowned the entire American fleet in the Persian Gulf, using a mosquito fleet with torpedo and missile weapons.
      Judging by the results, few survived on either side, but the AUG is even more expensive than hundreds of missile boats.
      Of course, these were simulated teachings.
    2. borisst64
      +5
      20 August 2012 12: 05
      The crew of three people! I would call it not a boat, but a rocket motor boat.
      1. Protey
        0
        20 August 2012 21: 52
        Of course, it’s not suitable for the sea-okiyana, but just for the actions in the bay. Indeed - cheap and cheerful, the destroyer will send to the bottom! And if they flock in a flock, then maybe more.
    3. Mikula
      0
      20 August 2012 20: 56
      Sakhalin - This is called cheap and cheerful!

      Here was an article recently: Brimstone missile against Iranian speedboats. The Brimstone radar seeker allows the missile to be fired and forgotten. Laser seeker is more accurate (up to a meter or two from the aiming point). There is a special device for hanging three Brimstone missiles (instead of one large missile) under the planes of jet fighters.

      Well, why are these boats needed - if one f-16 can sink a dozen of them.
      1. +1
        20 August 2012 21: 27
        Doubt tormented me ... about even one ... below 3 km ... MANPADS ... and above ... there is no fall ...
    4. 0
      21 August 2012 14: 08
      It's like a Molotov cocktail against German tigers, cheap and original)))
  2. damba
    0
    20 August 2012 09: 07
    I think in the future if the Bashar regime wins, it will be vital for Syria to create a strong fleet with a mosquito (torpedo boats, missile) and corvettes (12 pieces) and frigates (8-12 pieces) and submarines (6-8 pieces)
    1. +4
      20 August 2012 09: 13
      Quote: damba
      corvettes (12 pieces) and frigates (8-12 pieces) and submarines (6-8 pieces)


      Bolivar will not take out. Syria will not be able to maintain such a fleet; a modern fleet is a very expensive affair.
      1. Vito
        +4
        20 August 2012 09: 39
        Sakhalinets (2),Greetings. drinks
        Regrettably all this, but I completely agree with you!
        The Syrian economy of such a number of modern, high-tech ships (capable of performing almost any task), of course, will not master, but there is one effective solution in my opinion!
        Respected damba (1) proposed to strengthen the Syrian fleet with 6-8th submarines and I completely agree with you here, dear colleague (as we said earlier, an ASYMMETRIC RESPONSE)! Well, at the expense of surface ships of the first and second rank, then at least for a pair, a triple to have.
        To all this, modern aviation would not interfere!
        1. +1
          20 August 2012 10: 01
          Vito I welcome you drinks
          I will nevertheless remain unconvinced and disagree with your arguments about the number of submarines and ships of rank 1-2 for the Syrian Navy. Unfortunately, rank 1-2 ships, as well as submarines of the "Varshavyanka" class (taken stupidly as an example, since smaller boats have dubious combat effectiveness) are very expensive. For Syria, it is much more important to ensure the safety of its skies, and to spend the billions of dollars necessary for the construction and manning of the voiced fleet into air defense and air forces, and entrust coastal missile systems and small missile ships to protect the coast. This is the most efficient and cost effective way.
          1. Vito
            +1
            20 August 2012 10: 31
            I don’t dare to impose my opinion on anyone Buddy! If we talk about the current moment, then of course, here I agree with you!
            I just think that three or four frigates or corvettes is a necessary minimum for a country with a sea border. The fleet must be harmoniously developed and the heads of the "friends of Syria" cannot be cooled by boats alone! Diesel-electric submarines (Varshavyanka or Skorpen, of course, something more modern) is also an expensive pleasure, but they are an effective deterrent, in the amount of 2 or 3 it will not be bad for this country!
            Well, update the Air Force, so it is mandatory. Without modern aviation, the outcome of the conflict will be clear!
          2. +1
            20 August 2012 12: 19
            I agree, since there is no serious need for a strong ocean fleet.
            It makes sense to create a powerful mosquito coastal fleet, no less impressive air defense, saturated with modern complexes of all classes.
            It is good to develop a group of ground anti-ship systems.
            Purchase passive electronic intelligence systems and jammers.
        2. +1
          20 August 2012 12: 05
          Vito,
          The Persian Gulf is not very deep, and can be seen quite well on the subject of submarines, the old submarines that Syria has are not a fact that they will be able to inflict at least some sort of damage.
          According to the memoirs of the Wehrmacht officers during the great Patriotic war of 1941-1945.
          It follows approximately the following: that in the presence of high endurance of the soldiers of the Soviet Army, good tanks such as KV, t-34 (which were a surprise to the Germans).
          The Soviet troops lacked tactical literacy, the interaction of the combat arms, and lack of supplies, which entailed heavy losses of equipment due to the lack of supplies and tactical miscalculations of commanders (due to lack of experience) at the early stage of the war.

          1. Vito
            +1
            20 August 2012 18: 13
            carbofo (1). Good evening.
            Maybe I'm confusing something, but SYRIA is not one of the countries that overlook the Persian Gulf! SYRIA - the Mediterranean state and the depths of its border waters completely allow boats to feel at ease there, and I doubt that SYRIA has an underwater fleet.
            1. 0
              20 August 2012 18: 45
              Vito,
              Do not confuse this, I was mistaken, geography is my weak point :(.
              http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%92%D0%BE%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%BE-%D0%BC%D0%BE%D
              1%80%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%8B_%D0%A1%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%B8%D
              0% B8
              there are definitely no boats anymore. wrote off the last in the 2008 campaign.
              1. Vito
                +1
                20 August 2012 18: 54
                carbofo (1), Well then for a beer and you? drinks
    2. 0
      20 August 2012 10: 31
      Quote: damba
      Syria will be vital to create a strong fleet with a mosquito (torpedo boats, missile) and corvettes (12 pieces) and frigates (8-12 pieces) and submarines (6-8 pieces)


      Is there enough money?
  3. Gazprom
    +2
    20 August 2012 09: 50
    Here is a simple example, so that NATO does not benefit, it is necessary to invest in modern weapons, and most importantly, in the morale of the army.
  4. Yoke
    +4
    20 August 2012 10: 19
    the site had an article about the US AUG headquarters exercise. there the situation of "taking control" of the Strait of Hormuz was modeled. Left to defend themselves one not stupid uncle. So, having extremely limited forces, using missile boats, he managed to drive off the group))) to which the amers said "ayay" that the uncle was not playing by the rules))) they played without him and still "took control" of the strait )
    1. 0
      20 August 2012 10: 32
      Link to the studio - please!
      1. pavelk
        0
        21 August 2012 20: 07
        for the beginning

        There is no Russian translation of Sorry. Use Google to translate if necessary.

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennium_Challenge_2002

        http://www.military.com/opinion/0,15202,95496,00.html
      2. pavelk
        +1
        21 August 2012 22: 09
        Here in more detail - with comments.
        December 2002

        http://www.exile.ru/articles/detail.php?ARTICLE_ID=6779&IBLOCK_ID=35
    2. +4
      20 August 2012 10: 38
      I read about these teachings for a long time. That uncle was then removed away by the brave amer. Admirals.)
      1. Yoke
        +1
        20 August 2012 10: 40
        http://topwar.ru/15137-posledniy-boy-generala-raypera.html чуток обшибся)
    3. Vito
      0
      20 August 2012 10: 46
      Yoke Good day to you.
      I read this article and if I understood everything correctly in it, then the enemy was allowed to create a good shock fist next to the aircraft carrier group and deliver the first strike on the AUG!
      I doubt that with the escalation of this conflict, enemy boats and ships will be allowed to do this! Recall at least the example of Libya. The Libyan Navy missile boat tried to approach the U.S. Navy’s firing range, but was discovered and sunk by an American cruiser using guidance aircraft! And this was an attempt of only one boat, and if there are more, they will not be allowed to leave their own waters and will be destroyed immediately!
      1. Yoke
        +1
        20 August 2012 10: 58
        Vito, Hello!
        Well, for that, the exercises were carried out) We lost the arrogance of some hot heads. A frightening crow, as they say ... Ours now also do not enter the city in columns, if you know what I mean.
        1. Vito
          +2
          20 August 2012 11: 10
          It was a creepy and bloody lesson!
          I even want to believe that he will forever remain in the memory of our commanders!
          Maykop brigade is eternal memory!
      2. -1
        20 August 2012 13: 16
        Vito,
        When there is no choice, all methods are not bad.
      3. pavelk
        0
        21 August 2012 19: 55
        Vito: Recall at least the example of Libya. Libyan Navy missile boat tried to approach US Navy firing range

        Would there be a boy ??

        They will tell you a lot of things to demoralize. ALL (known) Gaddafi ships were destroyed at the berths on the 2-3rd day of shelling.
    4. pavelk
      0
      21 August 2012 19: 58
      In the teachings mentioned by the USA, they used a lot of fake goals and the right time of the day drove off the AUG.

      Navy decided that the Arabs did not finish the right institutions and replayed on this basis))
  5. gorkoxnumx
    +1
    20 August 2012 15: 16
    The Americans will shed a lot of blood; it’s not for them to bribe Iraqi generals. The Iranian government will do everything in order to withstand the upcoming war, this war will become domestic for them.
  6. grizzlir
    +1
    20 August 2012 15: 20
    The machine gun on the bow of the boat looks very much like a classic of the DShKM genre. Most likely a Chinese clone.
    1. Imp
      Imp
      0
      21 August 2012 09: 54
      More precisely, this is an Iranian clone, they have been releasing them for many years.
    2. Captain Vrungel
      0
      21 August 2012 12: 05
      This machine gun is for crew complacency. What kind of effective shooting can be discussed if it is installed on the most vibrating part of the hull of a high-speed vessel. At the shooter’s vibration and speed, tears will flow in a stream, and more will think how not to fly overboard during maneuvers.
  7. 0
    20 August 2012 22: 28
    Well done Syria! They would only have to overcome the pro-NATO - pro-NATO "opposition". angry
  8. Imp
    Imp
    +2
    21 August 2012 09: 56
    Zolfaqar is the common name for the entire line of these boats.
    IPS-18 is the name of the torpedo boat version.
    Tir is the name that boats in the West have been given.
  9. 0
    27 November 2013 18: 07
    Are these boats and warheads still alive? Against the NATO except that landing ships have time to pull.