Military Review

In the Indian press: The Chinese army will have a great opportunity to cut off India's access to the northeast in case of war

15

PLA fighters



The Indian edition of DNA published an article, which, to put it mildly, criticizes the policy of official Beijing and announces the threats emanating from China. The author of the material is the columnist Manish Shukla. And the article begins with the commentator reporting on "the brutal Chinese occupation of Tibet, which has continued for decades."

The material claims that the PRC authorities intend to build "an insurmountable security barrier between occupied Tibet and the outside world."

From the article:

China has adopted a strategy of establishing border villages.

These villages, according to the Indian observer, "the Chinese authorities will use to change the demography of the region." It is argued that the percentage of peoples who have traditionally inhabited Tibet will fall, while the percentage of Han people will rise.

For your reference: Han people are the largest ethnic group not only in China, but throughout the entire planet Earth. In the PRC, Han people are more than 90% of the total population.

From the material:

If China strengthens its influence in the region, it will allow Chinese troops access to the Siliguri corridor known as the Chicken Neck. If Chinese forces can influence Chicken Neck, it will be an excellent opportunity for the PRC army to completely cut off India's access to the northeast in the event of war or territorial disputes.

The author writes that this allows the PLA to form a strategic advantage over the Indian armed forces in the region.

Also, the Indian press writes that all this is a deliberate policy of the CCP (Communist Party of China) to "continue the occupation of Tibet."

In general, India is jealous of the development of Chinese infrastructure in the west of the PRC. Railways are being built there, motor roads are being built, electricity is being supplied even to the most remote areas, and comfortable housing is being built. India cannot afford anything of the kind in its border regions in the east of the country. In this regard, China's activities are presented as "occupation activities" and, in addition, as a threat to Indian security.
Photos used:
Ministry of Defense of China
15 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 21 January 2021 06: 47
    -1
    the ability for the PRC army to completely block India's access to the northeast in the event of war or territorial disputes
    And what did you want with territorial problems with China, so that they perceive it as an everyday reality? Naturally, the PRC will use every opportunity to confront India in the event of a possible armed conflict. Therefore, the Indian side can only state the facts.
  2. nnm
    nnm 21 January 2021 06: 59
    +2
    The construction of outposts and outposts in the border areas with the subsequent development of these territories is an old practice.
    Railways are being built there, motor roads are being built, electricity is being supplied even to the most remote areas, and comfortable housing is being built. India cannot afford anything of the kind in its border regions in the east of the country.

    - But this statement is doubtful. India has a sufficient economy to respond in kind. But for some reason he does not. A similar situation is in our Far East, where skyscrapers, infrastructure, etc. are growing before our eyes on the border with China. And we are not going further than talking about the need to develop the Far East.
    But China must be given its due - it is acting thoughtfully, persistently and with a strategic aim.
    1. Doccor18
      Doccor18 21 January 2021 09: 15
      0
      Quote: nnm
      The construction of outposts and outposts in the border areas with the subsequent development of these territories is an old practice.
      Railways are being built there, motor roads are being built, electricity is being supplied even to the most remote areas, and comfortable housing is being built. India cannot afford anything of the kind in its border regions in the east of the country.

      - But this statement is doubtful. India has a sufficient economy to respond in kind. But for some reason he does not. A similar situation is in our Far East, where skyscrapers, infrastructure, etc. are growing before our eyes on the border with China. And we are not going further than talking about the need to develop the Far East.
      But China must be given its due - it is acting thoughtfully, persistently and with a strategic aim.

      I absolutely agree.
      It is worth looking at Blagoveshchensk and Heihe ...
    2. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh 21 January 2021 11: 43
      +4
      Several multi-lane stations have been connected to the borders of Russia in the Far East.
      high quality highway. They run into the river. There is no bridge, no road
      from the Russian side. Take a look at Google maps.
      These are military preparations. It's the same on the Indian side.
  3. Runway
    Runway 21 January 2021 08: 01
    0
    The Hindu writes nonsense. Beijing in the border areas inhabited by ethnic minorities (in comparison with the Han people, naturally) creates buffer zones with acceptable living conditions specifically for local peoples / nationalities. The administration and the security forces are Han.
    Aboriginal people living in the immediate vicinity of the border are voluntarily and compulsorily recruited to work at border agencies and state security agencies (including in the adjacent territory).
    No one will settle in the "gloomy territories" (he has cultivated a word of 4 letters in Zh ...) by the Hans.
    1. Sergej1972
      Sergej1972 21 January 2021 10: 02
      0
      Representatives of these peoples are also widely represented in local governing structures in national regions (autonomous regions (this is the highest degree of autonomy), autonomous regions, autonomous counties, national volosts) of the PRC. National autonomies of different levels occupy almost half of the country's territory, but the population density in them, with the exception of some southern ones, is several times less than the average Chinese. And in most of these autonomies, the "titular" ethnic groups are in the minority, and the majority are Han. Moreover, in most cases, this alignment was original, from the very creation of these autonomies. But in the Tibet Autonomous Region, the situation is not typical. There, Han people are in a clear minority, although their percentage has increased dramatically over the past 60 years. It is interesting that in the PRC there are often such cases when an autonomous district of one nationality is included in an autonomous region of another nationality. And in this district there may be national volosts and villages of other peoples.)
      1. Runway
        Runway 21 January 2021 10: 30
        0
        I focused on the border areas (including disputable ones). An example of XUAR and its Kazakh JSC. Power and administrative components - yellow 100%. Buffer zone (within the border regiment-battalion, which are 100% yellow) - Aborigines.
        Local administrations and officials of departments in contact with ethnic groups are representatives of such.
        An expected option for Tibet with ensuing prospects (sad) for the Hindus.
    2. onstar9
      onstar9 23 January 2021 03: 24
      0
      Quote: WFP
      The Hindu writes nonsense. Beijing in the border areas inhabited by ethnic minorities (in comparison with the Han people, naturally) creates buffer zones with acceptable living conditions specifically for local peoples / nationalities. The administration and the security forces are Han.
      Aboriginal people living in the immediate vicinity of the border are voluntarily and compulsorily recruited to work at border agencies and state security agencies (including in the adjacent territory).
      No one will settle in the "gloomy territories" (he has cultivated a word of 4 letters in Zh ...) by the Hans.

      Yes, it is unlikely that they will not be "populated" by the Hans ... Why, I wonder, will not? Will the locals be "appreciated"? You think the "Chinese comrades" are too soft ... for them to trust anyone. Especially at the border. The Han people will settle Tibet, and the Uyghur region, and all the borders with India ... And I would do this if I wanted to reliably solve the problem of territories and borders ... I think the XinZipins are not such fools as not to understand this. .. By the way, the USSR has always done this as well ...
  4. Doccor18
    Doccor18 21 January 2021 09: 12
    0
    In general, India is jealous of the development of Chinese infrastructure in the west of the PRC.

    How are things in China? Yes, everything is fine, only the Indians are worried ...
    ... Chinese infrastructure in the west of the PRC. Railways are being laid there, motor roads are being built, electricity is being supplied even to the most remote areas, comfortable housing is being built ...

    And what prevents India from doing the same?
    India cannot afford anything of the kind in its border regions in the east of the country.

    And the "diamond Rafali" can afford ...
    They are worried about Tibet. First, put things in order in your house, then look in another ...
  5. Lord of the Sith
    Lord of the Sith 21 January 2021 12: 29
    0
    Hindus are probably not aware of the Qing Empire, which included Tibet. The Chinese have simply regained their territory.

    As we are Crimea. yes

    And they scream about "acupatsey". It would be better to deal with Pakistan. One people, the British, leaving, planted a bomb, dividing India.
    1. Sergej1972
      Sergej1972 21 January 2021 12: 31
      0
      They do not feel like they are one people. And India and Pakistan themselves are multinational.
      1. Lord of the Sith
        Lord of the Sith 21 January 2021 12: 32
        0
        Here. And the Han (Chinese) feel.
        1. Sergej1972
          Sergej1972 21 January 2021 14: 54
          0
          Han people, yes. And some of the Tibetans and Uighurs of the PRC do not identify themselves with the PRC and are prone to separatism. Although most of these peoples are loyal to the authorities.
          1. Lord of the Sith
            Lord of the Sith 21 January 2021 15: 28
            0
            Well, these are their internal problems, which they can quite solve.
  6. Petro_tut
    Petro_tut 21 January 2021 13: 23
    -1
    Oh, the question of Tibet has risen again, you see, the Americans will soon connect