Military Review

Serbian press: US is not strong enough to go against Russia and invade Crimea

98
Serbian press: US is not strong enough to go against Russia and invade Crimea

From time to time, the Western press publishes a number of publications telling how the United States and NATO are preparing for the invasion of Russian Crimea. However, despite the rattling weapons"The US is not strong enough to go against Russia and invade the peninsula," Slobodan Samardzhia writes about this in an article for the Serbian newspaper Politika.


According to the author, the time of the "big wars" has not yet passed, the threat of a military conflict between the United States and Russia has existed and will continue to exist for a long time. This is evidenced by the recent military exercises of NATO, the concentration of US and alliance troops near the Russian borders, and the dangerous rapprochement of the warships of the two countries. However, a US invasion of Crimea is unlikely.

The United States itself is not strong enough to openly oppose Russia, the author claims. Even the US military budget, which is many times higher than the Russian one, does not guarantee a US victory. Washington is well aware that a war far from its own shores is unlikely to end in victory, and the United States cannot fully rely on its European allies.

However, against the backdrop of constant statements about the "Russian threat", American taxpayers can demand from the administration a report on where their money is spent when it is not enough inside the country. One of the responses to this on the part of the new US administration could be an armed adventure, for example, the invasion of Crimea, which would shift the attention of Americans from internal problems to external ones.

The new year 2021 could turn the verbal battles between the United States and Russia into a real clash, especially since Washington does not have the courage to hit China. However, the Russians would not have returned Crimea to themselves in 2014 in order to "sell it for cheap" later. At the moment, the Americans are not strong enough to invade the peninsula, the rest will be shown by time, as the Serbian author writes, adding that Biden still needs to be shown how "tightly he is in the saddle."
98 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Lord of the Sith
    Lord of the Sith 19 January 2021 17: 15
    +7
    From time to time, the Western press publishes a number of publications describing how the United States and NATO are preparing to invade the Russian Crimea.


    Well, invade. If you are completely finished and are not friends with your head.
    1. Lionnvrsk
      Lionnvrsk 19 January 2021 17: 20
      +2
      Biden still needs to be shown how "tight he is in the saddle."

      Yes, this old one has to prove that he is still OGO-GO, he can do a lot of things.
      1. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 19 January 2021 17: 31
        +8
        Biden still needs to be shown how "tight he is in the saddle."

        If you substitute a stepladder to the mare, then maybe he will sit in the saddle (with the help of the guard). And if he sits down, then the mare will be led on a lead, while you need to hold on to the mane, two people are held from the sides, and two keep their legs in stirrups.
        And that's just "quietly, quietly, and only at a step" but no more than half an hour (otherwise it will erase the ass). But a photo can be taken - a can in a hat, two magnums on a belt and "Cossacks" with spurs.
        1. Poetry
          Poetry 19 January 2021 18: 02
          +5
          We need one more person. To wake him up. And then he is constantly cut down. laughing
          1. tihonmarine
            tihonmarine 19 January 2021 18: 26
            +5
            Quote: Poetiszaugla
            We need one more person. To wake him up.

            A bell around your neck, like hanging a cow, will not fall asleep.
            1. uralant
              uralant 20 January 2021 02: 57
              +2
              Quote: tihonmarine
              A bell around your neck, like hanging a cow, will not fall asleep.

              Then it was already botched. Under the crystal ringing of a bell, he will definitely breathe!
            2. sergeymixaandreev
              sergeymixaandreev 5 March 2021 04: 32
              0
              No, you have to put a homosexual in the back, even if in accordance with their lgbt principles he occasionally pushes him, then he will definitely not fall asleep!
      2. Nyrobsky
        Nyrobsky 19 January 2021 21: 25
        +9
        Quote: LIONnvrsk
        Biden still needs to be shown how "tight he is in the saddle."

        Yes, this old one has to prove that he is still OGO-GO, he can do a lot of things.

        If he himself can heap up, then only in his pants, but those who stand behind him (Obamo-Clintonoids), yes, they can. They have a complete nix with their heads along the way.
    2. SRC P-15
      SRC P-15 19 January 2021 17: 21
      +5
      Quote: Lord of the Sith
      Well, invade. If you are completely finished and are not friends with your head.

      They will not go to Crimea. But helping Japan to try to reclaim the Kuril Islands is easy! The United States sleeps and sees its base on these islands.
      1. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 19 January 2021 17: 33
        -1
        Quote: СРЦ П-15
        They will not go to Crimea.

        They are to Crimea, Russia to Alaska.
      2. credo
        credo 19 January 2021 17: 41
        +6
        Quote: SRC P-15
        Quote: Lord of the Sith
        Well, invade. If you are completely finished and are not friends with your head.

        They will not go to Crimea. But helping Japan to try to reclaim the Kuril Islands is easy! The United States sleeps and sees its base on these islands.

        One thing I cannot understand why the author of the article from Serbia raises the question of the possibility of the US invasion of the Russian Crimea, and not of the same Serbia.
        If someone decided that the United States, together with NATO countries, achieved their goal in Serbia, then this view is deceptive, and for a small but victorious war, just such countries as Serbia are suitable, because they can easily be forced to surrender or impose their own living conditions. blocking all paths-roads to the "civilized world".
        So, all these abstruse scribblers - "intellectuals" are either petty instigators or just narrow-minded people who do not understand that the democrats with Biden, if they really need to somehow distract local voters from the past "fair" elections, then certainly not a war with a nuclear power, but a lightning-fast military company with a small state from a different weight category, like the 2020 war between Azerbaijan and Armenia.
        1. Avior
          Avior 20 January 2021 01: 23
          +1
          One of the main priorities of Serbia's foreign policy is joining the European Union. In some EU documents, 2025 appears as the projected date for Serbia and Montenegro to join the European Union.

          The process of Serbia's accession to the European Union began in November 2005, when Serbia was part of the State Union of Serbia and Montenegro. In May 2006, Montenegro held an independence referendum and seceded from the union, while Serbia continued negotiations with the EU on its own. On July 29, 2008 Serbia and the EU signed a Stabilization and Association Agreement [1]. On September 22, 2009, Serbia applied to join the EU [2].

          On March 1, 2012, Serbia received the official status of a candidate for accession [3]. In December 2013, the Council of the European Union approved the decision to start negotiations on Serbia's accession to the EU in January 2014 [4], and the first intergovernmental conference was held on January 21 in Brussels. [5] In December 2009, Serbian citizens with biometric passports were granted the right to travel in the Schengen countries without obtaining a visa [6]. On September 15, 2017, European Commissioner Johannes Hahn estimated that Serbia could obtain membership in the European Union until 2025.

          it is not clear what NATO can still achieve in Serbia?
        2. uralant
          uralant 20 January 2021 04: 57
          +1
          Quote: credo
          Democrats with Biden, if they really need to somehow distract local voters from the past "fair" elections, then certainly not a war with a nuclear power, but a lightning-fast military company with a small state

          And you, since you are positioning yourself as an intellectual, can't you see that the world is practically under the USA. Of the smaller ones, North Korea and Iran remained, and the rest were Russia and China. So who to trample for an excuse. Not too much and trample.
          1. credo
            credo 20 January 2021 13: 18
            +2
            Quote: uralant
            Quote: credo
            Democrats with Biden, if they really need to somehow distract local voters from the past "fair" elections, then certainly not a war with a nuclear power, but a lightning-fast military company with a small state

            And you, since you are positioning yourself as an intellectual, can't you see that the world is practically under the USA. Of the smaller ones, North Korea and Iran remained, and the rest were Russia and China. So who to trample for an excuse. Not too much and trample.

            The United States has Venezuela, Cuba and Nicaragua in its underbelly, the current government in which the United States is very jarring. Everything is close by and there is no need to drive the fleet with the marines to distant lands.
            There are enough states in Africa that do not want to follow the lead of the Anglo-Saxons and are looking for various ways of development without the "democratic buns" of the United States.
            There is no need to talk about Eurasia - here the United States has not only geostrategic opponents in the person of the EU, Russia and China, but also smaller but no less intractable Iran, North Korea, Belarus, Syria, Yemen and others.
            So the United States has a "choice" and has someone to spoil its life.
        3. Andryukha G
          Andryukha G 21 January 2021 12: 54
          0
          I completely agree that the Americans "fought well" with the Germans, this is especially evident in newsreels how Americans and fascist officers treat each other with wine and cigarettes, and in real clashes the Americans showed themselves as worthless warriors, that the war is in Europe and Asia. Therefore, at the present stage, if they start a war somewhere only with a repeatedly weak enemy and more acting by someone else's hands and mercenaries ...
      3. Egoza
        Egoza 19 January 2021 17: 42
        +1
        Quote: СРЦ П-15
        The United States sleeps and sees its base on these islands.

        Let them continue to sleep, lulled by sweet dreams. Where is our Phoenix bird?
      4. Lord of the Sith
        Lord of the Sith 19 January 2021 17: 49
        +1
        Quote: SRC P-15
        Quote: Lord of the Sith
        Well, invade. If you are completely finished and are not friends with your head.

        They will not go to Crimea. But helping Japan to try to reclaim the Kuril Islands is easy! The United States sleeps and sees its base on these islands.


        This is nonsense. This is a casus belli with all that it implies, no matter what territory.
      5. Zoldat_A
        Zoldat_A 19 January 2021 23: 06
        +4
        Quote: SRC P-15
        Quote: Lord of the Sith
        Well, invade. If you are completely finished and are not friends with your head.

        They will not go to Crimea. But helping Japan to try to reclaim the Kuril Islands is easy! The United States sleeps and sees its base on these islands.

        Why should they climb themselves? They have the concept of "unacceptable losses in the event of a retaliatory strike" They remember Vietnam. Why won't they find "cannon fodder"? The same Japanese, the same horses, the same Tribals are digging the ground with their hoofs ... Georgia is also too early to write off the State Department's accounts. Moldova has just reached its potato - why not repeat 2008 in Transnistria? The space for war with someone else's hands for America is an unpaved field, stretching beyond the horizon ...
      6. Oumuamua
        Oumuamua 16 March 2021 20: 43
        0
        Let them poke their attention to the Kuril Islands. The Japanese will get a pug and lose Hokkaido for their insolence, and the Americans will lose Alaska, also during a referendum held under the supervision of Polite people in the uniform of the Russian Armed Forces. That's all. So let them twitch.)
  2. Alien From
    Alien From 19 January 2021 17: 18
    +4
    The Serbs needed something from us, not otherwise .......
  3. Incvizitor
    Incvizitor 19 January 2021 17: 21
    +4
    They have cannon fodder on the outskirts of Russia to haul coal.
  4. Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 19 January 2021 17: 21
    -13%
    Without nuclear weapons ..... all the Americans have. They'll take it.
    1. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 19 January 2021 17: 35
      +2
      Quote: Zaurbek
      Without nuclear weapons ..... all the Americans have. They'll take it.

      Yeah, now God knows what is going on, and even start a war with Russia. It is not known what will happen.
    2. 210ox
      210ox 19 January 2021 17: 35
      +2
      Why would they? Spill the blood of your soldiers? When they can try to do it with someone else's hands. Or wait on the sidelines until a new "tagged 2.0" appears on the horizon
      1. Zaurbek
        Zaurbek 19 January 2021 17: 44
        -3
        Why did Britain and France take Crimea?
        1. 210ox
          210ox 19 January 2021 17: 57
          +2
          Eck where they had enough. And what did the Sarmatians want from the Greek policies in the Crimea? They supported their ally, Turkey, sinking in the Black Sea.
          1. Zaurbek
            Zaurbek 19 January 2021 18: 42
            -3
            And now they will support .... imagine the Crimea -Turkish and what will it mean for the Russian Federation?
      2. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 19 January 2021 18: 28
        +1
        Quote: 210ox
        Why would they? Spill the blood of your soldiers?

        America will not forgive them, they will immediately remember Bidona and Trump and the Republicans, oh, what will begin.
        1. hirurg
          hirurg 20 January 2021 08: 33
          +1
          America will not forgive them ..
          That's right.
          an armed gamble, for example, the invasion of Crimea, which would turn the attention of Americans from internal problems to external ones ...
          Outward, straight to heaven. And those who remain alive will face such internal problems .. God forbid.
    3. Mikhail Alexandrov
      Mikhail Alexandrov 20 January 2021 14: 12
      +1
      Mattress covers, and in Vietnam, had EVERYTHING in stock ...
  5. Doccor18
    Doccor18 19 January 2021 17: 25
    +6
    Serbian press: US is not strong enough to go against Russia and invade Crimea

    The United States is not strong enough to invade the DPRK or Iran, because they know that they will have to fight for REAL. What can we say about the invasion of Russia ...
    1. Paul
      Paul 19 January 2021 17: 39
      0
      Perhaps you are right. But Russia has a lot of territory (Kamchatka, Chukotka), which is virtually defenseless against the real capabilities of the United States. After the capture of these territories, it will be extremely difficult to knock them out of there. But the Kuril Islands are a special case when the interests of the United States and Japan, as well as an artificially formed dispute over these islands, can become a very real example of aggression against us. Only a repetition of the feat of our ancestors, namely heroic defense, can save our reputation, otherwise, after a successful landing on the islands, we are unlikely to be able to knock out the foe from there, and the ships, perhaps, will not be able to approach because of actions unlike the larger united fleet of the United States and Japan ... The one that will not climb to the Crimea because a smart one will not go up a mountain; a smart mountain about ...
      1. Tzar
        Tzar 19 January 2021 17: 52
        +3
        Are you broadcasting from the XII century? laughing
        Quote: Paul
        But Russia has a lot of territory (Kamchatka, Chukotka), which is virtually defenseless against the real capabilities of the United States. After the capture of these territories, it will be extremely difficult to knock them out of there.

        I directly imagined: brave American settlers visit the Kamchatka lands of the Indian continent, quickly build forts, and that's all - the natives with bows and arrows run away beyond the Urals wassat
        1. Paul
          Paul 19 January 2021 18: 01
          0
          My guess is that the US military is serving the military, not the settlers. And they will not capture / destroy deer, but infrastructure
          1. Tzar
            Tzar 20 January 2021 13: 37
            +1
            Well, let the military. It’s ridiculous to assume that they can safely walk on the ground, sit down and hold it. Are we living in the era of great geographical discoveries, where Kamchatka and Chukotka are blank spots on the map?
            1. Paul
              Paul 20 January 2021 17: 43
              +1
              Kamchatka and Chukotka are certainly well-known territories - otherwise I would not write about them. It is very, very strange to imagine the action of the modern US armed forces as a military campaign of the times of the ancient world. In the tactical techniques of modern armies, there are no concepts of entry, sitting and holding. Most likely, the United States will use the weapons it has for its intended purpose, namely, they will block ports with ships, fire missiles at significant objects and accumulations of naval forces and armored vehicles, etc., etc. Perhaps you have other information. I also admit that you possess comprehensive information that allows you to believe that Kamchatka and Chukotka are more protected from US attacks than Crimea.
              1. Tzar
                Tzar 21 January 2021 12: 31
                0
                Quote: Paul
                In the tactical techniques of modern armies, there are no concepts of entry, sitting and holding.

                Well, why, just in the conflicts of strong players on the territory of third countries, this tactic is best suited, for example, Syria: the States have staked out oil fields beyond the Euphrates and it is impossible to squeeze them out of there without going into a direct "hot" phase of the conflict. The Turks also realized their initial mistake in Idlib and are now setting up their camps along the entire front line.
                Quote: Paul
                Most likely, the United States will use the weapons it has for its intended purpose, namely, they will block ports with ships, fire missiles at significant objects and accumulations of naval forces and armored vehicles, etc., etc.

                What you are describing is already a real "hot" war, in which vigorous loaves will be used. Let us leave aside the assumption that "they will shoot yadren-loaf, in Miami, dachas-wives-children-yachts-bills-gold-diamonds" wink
                1. Paul
                  Paul 21 January 2021 15: 11
                  0
                  I agree with you. Only the article was about the possibility of the US "invasion" of Crimea. I think that invasion was understood as part of a "hot" war using conventional weapons. And I oppose you precisely because it is more difficult to take Crimea than Kamchatka and Chukotka. It is more difficult because there are objectively more of our forces.
    2. Zaurbek
      Zaurbek 19 January 2021 17: 46
      -2
      They will be bombed into the Stone Age and killed a couple of million ... if they don't bomb peaceful cities and people.
  6. prior
    prior 19 January 2021 17: 27
    +4
    Explain to me, a dull one, why can't I destroy the capital of the country with the help of nuclear weapons, whose army invaded the territory of my country in order to destroy me and the country ?!
    Do you still need Crimea? Do you still need Kuril Islands?
    Are you tired of your life and the life of your children?
    1. HAM
      HAM 19 January 2021 17: 32
      +1
      They have already been explained about the "decision-making centers", until it comes ... but in vain ...
    2. Zaurbek
      Zaurbek 19 January 2021 17: 47
      -3
      There are different situations ... for example, you have to choose - to lose the uninhabited Kuril Islands or half of the population ...
      1. prior
        prior 19 January 2021 17: 56
        +3
        They traded in Alaska, traded in Brest, traded in Viskuli.
        Bargained with WADA, with the Olympic federations ...
        Bargained a lot?
        1. Zaurbek
          Zaurbek 19 January 2021 18: 44
          0
          You ask those who bargained. They probably got something.
    3. t-12
      t-12 19 January 2021 21: 33
      0
      with the aim of destroying me and the country
      And many were destroyed in the Crimea? Or even not in Crimea?
      1. prior
        prior 20 January 2021 08: 47
        +1
        Are you not enough of the mass graves of Soviet soldiers throughout Europe?
  7. Paragraph Epitafievich Y.
    Paragraph Epitafievich Y. 19 January 2021 17: 30
    +1
    From time to time, the Western press publishes a number of publications telling how the United States and NATO are preparing for the invasion of Russian Crimea.

    I wonder where this Serb found this "series of publications"? Or is the "Western press" meant some Facebook degenerate with his sick fantasies? Why the hell, and for what sake NATO take Crimea by storm? What an idiotic fantasy? Well, okay, the Sumerian patriots scare psychiatrists from time to time with revanchist paroxysms, but damn it, NATO and the United States is that the hell?
  8. janeck
    janeck 19 January 2021 17: 32
    +5
    Why does the planet Earth need peace ?? if Russia is not on it (S) then there will be no peace)
  9. Mouse
    Mouse 19 January 2021 17: 35
    +8
    It's just a shake of air ... can you find it?
  10. S.Freeman
    S.Freeman 19 January 2021 17: 39
    +2
    The degree (political) in Russia is so high that I am sure that the Russians will smash at the enemy with all their guns. And one more thing: "... we cannot be turned off the path, we are on the side ... where to go ...", so they shmalnut, do not even doubt. And the Americans and their sycophants are well aware of this. In the 20th century, such a nuclear dichlorvos was invented that no one would hide. Thanks to our grandfathers!
    1. Masha
      Masha 19 January 2021 17: 59
      +3
      I am sure that the Russians will shoot at the enemy with all their guns

      Russia does not start wars,
      She finishes them
      Having reached the edge in suffering
      And for our own, and for others.
      Longsuffering passes by,
      Believing hopefully in Good,
      And remembering God's will
      To respond to Evil with love.

      My country, pitying the whole world,
      And calling to live in peace,
      One goes against the villains
      Hoping to reason with the fools
      Open your eyes to the blind and the sighted
      And shout to the deaf ...
      Send everyone to hell,
      Yes, to wind up their tails!

      Yes, so that it was discouraging
      We dictate someone's will,
      So that the good name of Russia
      Do not dare to remember in vain!
  11. kursovik
    kursovik 19 January 2021 17: 41
    +1
    The topic of Crimea has long been closed and the Kuril Islands too ... Tired of it already!
  12. Alexga
    Alexga 19 January 2021 17: 41
    +3
    There can be no talk of any kind of invasion of the territory of the Russian Federation. Everyone read the Military Doctrine of the Russian Federation and listened to the speeches of the GDP. Everyone wants to live.
  13. LifeIsGood
    LifeIsGood 19 January 2021 17: 42
    +1
    Hmm ... Serbian "Analytica" clearly has a bad memory ... The United States is afraid to invade Iran and North Korea, but easily into Russia! laughing
  14. yuriy55
    yuriy55 19 January 2021 17: 43
    +1
    Serbian press: US is not strong enough to go against Russia and invade Crimea

    Thank you brothers! Supported Mother Russia ...
    Yes, the Americans enter the Black Sea sideways, knowing about the alignment of forces and the number of coastal missile complexes. Whom do they hope to find there in Crimea? Where are we going to wash and bury them there? belay
    1. Ripap
      Ripap 19 January 2021 18: 34
      -5
      Wow! Will there be enough hats?
      1. The comment was deleted.
  15. cniza
    cniza 19 January 2021 17: 49
    +4
    The new year 2021 could turn the verbal battles between the United States and Russia into a real clash, especially since Washington does not have the courage to hit China.


    They themselves will never climb, but they will try with someone else's hands ...
    1. rocket757
      rocket757 19 January 2021 17: 58
      +3
      The minke whales are vast, but .... where are they so much, with frostbitten brains, to dial ??? The Geyropeans cannot be encouraged to do this, but the Younger Europeans .... such a rabble that you collect them, do not collect them, there will be no sense.
      1. cniza
        cniza 19 January 2021 18: 22
        +4
        There, too, they are not fools and everyone understands this, they will be at pain points - Donbass, Transnistria and will try in the Caucasus ...
        1. rocket757
          rocket757 19 January 2021 18: 36
          +3
          It is clear that they will stir up local conflicts ... fortunately, ours began to stir, more thoughtful actions began to be carried out.
          It is restless, but it doesn’t feel like a serious crisis.
          1. cniza
            cniza 19 January 2021 18: 45
            +4
            Let's hope the United States has enough of its own problems ...
            1. Ripap
              Ripap 19 January 2021 18: 51
              +1
              Don't you know what is the best and favorite way to solve internal problems ASASHAI? That's right, a small (or not so) victorious war.
              1. rocket757
                rocket757 19 January 2021 19: 16
                +3
                Also an option ... that's just WHERE, it will be possible to arrange a "victorious war" ???
                1. cniza
                  cniza 19 January 2021 21: 08
                  +4
                  They have no options for a victorious war, so they rage ...
                  1. rocket757
                    rocket757 19 January 2021 22: 47
                    +3
                    Well, if again some ... Grenada will be found. In other places, they will be able to cram a hedgehog into their pants, sure.
              2. cniza
                cniza 19 January 2021 21: 07
                +3
                So everyone knows it. but it is dangerous to unleash wars now, for them ...
            2. rocket757
              rocket757 19 January 2021 19: 15
              +1
              We guys are not malevolent! But in their specific direction, we can join the chorus, which is chanting "you would have choked, striped !!!"
              1. cniza
                cniza 19 January 2021 21: 06
                +2
                And why not, how much dirt can you pour on us ...
                1. rocket757
                  rocket757 19 January 2021 22: 43
                  +2
                  So it makes no sense to pour something on them .... they themselves do an excellent job with it!
                  It is no longer uncommon when, at a high level of politics, those responsible allow themselves to twirl their fingers at their temples, looking in their direction ... they can show them a finger, in their own manner.
                  Got to the liver, many.
  16. tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 19 January 2021 17: 53
    +1
    It seems that many are asleep and see when we clash with the United States! Do they really think that this will not affect them.
  17. bar
    bar 19 January 2021 17: 54
    +1
    USA is not strong enough to go against Russia and invade the peninsula

    The US is not strong enough to go against Russia even in Syria. It's funny to talk about Crimea, it will be the 3rd World War.
  18. rocket757
    rocket757 19 January 2021 17: 55
    +2
    From time to time the Western press publishes a number of publications telling about how the United States and NATO are preparing for the invasion of Russian Crimea.

    Come on, they want to support the skakuas even so, cheaper. Eka is unseen.
    1. cniza
      cniza 19 January 2021 18: 23
      +3
      Well, to play on the nerves, and to provoke Turkey ...
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 19 January 2021 18: 44
        +2
        Happened and piled up in a crowd !!!
        But, times have changed and the power, which has vigorous arguments, will yapping from afar, shitting on small things ... but they will try to hit the economy! But again, hard times are coming, consider everyone ... will take care, first of all, of themselves !!! And the minke whales collect everyone on the "barricades" but they want to force someone to pay, to pay, but not themselves .... and this, far from everyone is satisfied, now.
        In general, we will see.
        1. cniza
          cniza 19 January 2021 18: 47
          +3
          They need trouble and more noise, they will shit on every corner ...
          1. rocket757
            rocket757 19 January 2021 19: 18
            +2
            In the backyard there will be ... directly, no one dares!
            1. cniza
              cniza 19 January 2021 21: 12
              +2
              Yes, they will run around the bush and look for where to shit ...
              1. rocket757
                rocket757 19 January 2021 22: 53
                +3
                Unfortunately, they have a choice!
                For a long time they have been creating opportunities for themselves, and we cannot effectively influence the situation everywhere.
    2. Vlad Svargin
      Vlad Svargin 19 January 2021 18: 47
      +1
      want to support the skakuas

      They also prepared the Georgian "tie chewer" and how did all this preparation end!
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 19 January 2021 19: 19
        +2
        Good lesson for everyone else !!!
        Those who believed that they could bite a honey copper on the heel and they would get nothing for it.
  19. Petrol cutter
    Petrol cutter 19 January 2021 18: 08
    +4
    What the hell is a NATO invasion of Crimea taking place?
    Are the counter-agents completely mad?
    The only thing I'm sure of today is that there is a real island / fortress.
    In this regard, there is even no reason to worry. And in the depths of the sea there is also a lot of diesel. Like good old times...
  20. Master
    Master 19 January 2021 18: 22
    +2
    Nobody would dare to attack a nuclear power. That's all.
    1. Ripap
      Ripap 19 January 2021 18: 39
      -2
      You missed the word "bye". But how long this "while" will last is a very big and debatable question.
  21. Vlad Svargin
    Vlad Svargin 19 January 2021 18: 41
    +1
    The United States was practically unable to "convince" the North Koreans of its power in 1953, and even more so at the present time. And they also have fresh memories of the defeat from Vietnam, so they only have to "rattle their weapons" to gratify their pride.
  22. APASUS
    APASUS 19 January 2021 21: 52
    +4
    Why would the Americans invade Crimea. The author in the Serbian edition did not think about it? They supply Ukraine with modern types of weapons, at an accelerated pace they teach and train military personnel, build bases on the territory of Ukraine, so that Ukrainians in military uniforms would collect potatoes in the fields ............
  23. Jaromir
    Jaromir 19 January 2021 23: 23
    +11
    USA is not strong enough to go against Russia and invade Crimea

    The United States will not go into a direct military conflict with Russia. Why, when there is a fifth column in the face of pro-Western politicians?
    1. 1921
      1921 20 January 2021 02: 37
      +2
      And they will not climb. They would have all sorts of Grenada, to smash Panamas. A crowd of half the world trampled Iraq on. And a little bit more old, so they only know how to snatch))) You are absolutely right, they are great at muddying the water from the inside in countries, why should they fight ...
  24. Vitaly Pogrebnyak
    Vitaly Pogrebnyak 20 January 2021 00: 29
    -1
    Oh yes, the Serbs are the authorities in such matters, let Guadeloupe and Somalia say their opinion.
  25. The comment was deleted.
  26. Keer
    Keer 20 January 2021 02: 55
    0
    In the picture, apparently, a landing near Odessa, most likely the Lighthouses near Poskot.
  27. The comment was deleted.
  28. zwlad
    zwlad 20 January 2021 09: 17
    +2
    USA is not strong enough to go against Russia and invade Crimea

    Wrong promise.
    The US is not STUPID enough to go against Russia and invade Crimea.
    If anything, they will drive the Gay European meat to the slaughter, while they themselves will sit on the sidelines, heating, as always, their little hands in the war and stuffing their pockets with super profits.
  29. Decimalegio
    Decimalegio 20 January 2021 09: 33
    0
    I would so much like to know what kind of Western publications are they talking about a possible invasion of Russia ???? At the moment, Covid 19 and the economy dominate all publications. I don’t want to destroy someone’s beliefs, but in the West we read more and more about the Chinese danger.
  30. Decimalegio
    Decimalegio 20 January 2021 09: 40
    -1
    Quote: zwlad
    USA is not strong enough to go against Russia and invade Crimea

    Wrong promise.
    The US is not STUPID enough to go against Russia and invade Crimea.
    If anything, they will drive the Gay European meat to the slaughter, while they themselves will sit on the sidelines, heating, as always, their little hands in the war and stuffing their pockets with super profits.

    From what you write, the opposite is true. Maybe you think you can invade the West. Avoid clichés here in Europe, we are not gay or slaves to the United States. I will not list the prevailing Russian clichés, which are, of course, mistaken and offensive.
    1. Dude
      Dude 20 January 2021 10: 47
      0
      Avoid clichés here in Europe, we are not gay or slaves to the United States.
      I agree, gays in Europe are not all, but under the USA all European countries lie very tightly. Do not agree? Give an example of a convincing opposition against the Stars and Stripes hegemon, I have all the attention repeat
      I will not list the prevailing clichés about Russian, which are certainly wrong and offensive.
      Here is the main mistaken cliché about Russians (you obediently repeat it):
      Maybe you think you can invade the West.
      1. Decimalegio
        Decimalegio 21 January 2021 00: 13
        0
        excuse me, I was not going to stereotype 144,5 million Russians, but only you personally as a Type user. However, I agree with you in Russia too, and not only in heterosexuals. However, I do not understand anything, you speak with contempt about Europe, now it is true that most of the territory of Russia is in Asia, but most of the Russian population, apart from geography, is in Europe. I read Tolstoy, Dostoevsky and Chekhov not because I thought they were Asian, Korean or exotic authors, but as representatives of the great European culture. Great Italian architects have created wonderful buildings in Russia, and there are more Russian museums in Italy than in any other part of the world. Of course, there is a difference between a Russian and a Portuguese, and between an Italian and a Swede, but don't think that we are so different. I think that a Chinese or a Thai will see in Russian no difference from a German or two Westerners. Get over it, you are European and Westerner. I forgot that not all European states always follow the United States, for example Switzerland, Andorra, San Marino and Liechtenstein. I hope this is enough as an example. Hello. laughing
  31. Alex Justice
    Alex Justice 20 January 2021 17: 05
    0
    The author does not know that Russia is a nuclear power.
  32. Armen Sologyan
    Armen Sologyan 24 January 2021 10: 38
    0
    Well, are we waiting for the US invasion of Crimea? And what the US wants Russia to return Alaska? The result of any invasion of Russia is the loss of territories by the aggressor. Germany, Finland and Japan are prime examples. And Japan should not have unleashed a war in Mongolia and waged war with the USSR! Everyone will get what they deserve !!!
    1. Decimalegio
      Decimalegio 24 January 2021 22: 26
      0
      take it easy, take it easy, the USA will not invade Crimea
  33. The comment was deleted.
  34. Vdi73
    Vdi73 23 February 2021 01: 56
    0
    You are welcome, this is the third world war, only the states will not be able to serve overseas. We will hit all cities and bases. What is the Crimea and the Turks this applies to. Do you want to die? Die, Russia will provide you with it, you play with fire.