Azerbaijan filed against Armenia with the European Court of Human Rights

110
Azerbaijan filed against Armenia with the European Court of Human Rights

Azerbaijan has submitted an application against Armenia to the European Court of Human Rights. This was reported by the Azerbaijan State News Agency (AzerTAc).

Baku accused Yerevan of violating the rights and freedoms of Azerbaijani citizens as a result of "Armenia's military aggression." It is emphasized that the statement sent on January 15 to the ECHR was drawn up with the help of international experts and leading lawyers of Azerbaijan.



The document says about the violation of the rights and freedoms of Azerbaijani citizens during the 30-year occupation of Nagorno-Karabakh and seven adjacent regions of Azerbaijan by Armenia, and also provides evidence of this.

The statement raised issues of violation (...) of the rights of citizens to life, respect for private and family life, freedom of religion, property and free movement, as well as the right not to be subjected to torture and ill-treatment

- the agency reports.

Armenia is also accused of shelling the cities and villages of Azerbaijan with cluster and phosphorus shells and ballistic missiles during the last military conflict, which led to the death of 93 people, including 12 children and wounding 423 citizens.

Azerbaijan demands from the European Court of Human Rights "to take the necessary measures to restore the violated rights of citizens."
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    110 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. -14
      16 January 2021 17: 46
      Baku accused Yerevan of violating the rights and freedoms of Azerbaijani citizens as a result "military aggression of Armenia"... It is emphasized that the statement sent on January 15 to the ECHR was drawn up with the help of international experts and leading lawyers of Azerbaijan.

      This is some kind of surrealism! The aggressor country is suing for military aggression!
      1. +2
        16 January 2021 17: 55
        It was decided to finally finish off the Armenians at the ECHR.
        1. +6
          16 January 2021 20: 46
          Quote: marchcat
          It was decided to finally finish off the Armenians at the ECHR.

          No, they consolidate the legal status of the territories through the ECHR court. Well done!
          1. -1
            17 January 2021 00: 00
            war crimes were committed there by the army of azerbaijan, so the big question is which side will be condemned
      2. +29
        16 January 2021 18: 08
        Quote: Usher
        This is some kind of surrealism! The aggressor country is suing for military aggression!

        From the point of view of international law - no, because formally Karabakh was considered the territory of Azerbaijan. Their aggression is like liberation, so the international court will wash its hands
        1. -10
          16 January 2021 18: 53
          Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
          I know more than you. Do you even know history? In short. At the beginning of the 20th century, the Turks and Azerbaijan won over the Karabakh. And the territory of Karabakh was forced to recognize Azeirbajan. It is now clear? You just at least read open sources.

          No, if you dig at the beginning of the conflict, Karabakh is the Armenian territory. Azerbaijan with the help of Turkey at the beginning of the 20th century squeezed Karbakh. And their patrons in the face of England forced everyone to accept this status of the KVO.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
          2. 0
            16 January 2021 20: 04
            Quote: Usher
            No, if you dig at the beginning of the conflict, Karabakh is Armenian territory.

            And if you dig even deeper, then Ukraine has the right to the entire Black Sea, was it in vain that the ancient Ukrainians dug it? ))))))
            1. -10
              16 January 2021 22: 12
              And this is what? Is it difficult to fall asleep without the boyars and Ukraine?
              1. +1
                16 January 2021 22: 54
                Quote: Puppeteer 111
                And this is what?

                To that.
                Quote: Usher
                ..... Azerbaijan with the help of Turkey at the beginning of the 20th century squeezed Karbakh ...

                So clearer?

                Quote: Puppeteer 111
                Is it difficult to fall asleep without the boyars and Ukraine?

                People do not need to be judged by themselves.
            2. -4
              17 January 2021 02: 38
              Quote: aleksejkabanets
              Quote: Usher
              No, if you dig at the beginning of the conflict, Karabakh is Armenian territory.

              And if you dig even deeper, then Ukraine has the right to the entire Black Sea, was it in vain that the ancient Ukrainians dug it? ))))))

              What are you making fun of? Smart or what?
              1. 0
                17 January 2021 08: 58
                Quote: Usher
                What are you making fun of? Smart or what?

                Yes, smart. Do you want to object? And I am mocking, because you wrote nonsense. With such "arguments" Russia can have territorial claims to all its neighbors. Yes, and also, among adults and educated people, it is customary to address each other on "you".
          3. +8
            16 January 2021 20: 19
            Borders are generally recognized at the time of the collapse of the USSR.
            Everything that was before the USSR does not matter, the USSR refused to recognize itself as the legal successor of the Russian Empire.
            1. 0
              16 January 2021 21: 13
              Quote: Avior
              Everything that was before the USSR does not matter, the USSR refused to recognize itself as the legal successor of the Russian Empire.

              It is true that our joint countdown goes from December 30, 1922.
          4. +2
            16 January 2021 20: 26
            Quote: Usher
            No, if you dig at the beginning of the conflict, Karabakh is Armenian territory.

            so you gave yourself away as a burger)))
            1. +1
              16 January 2021 22: 24
              Quote: Yeraz
              Quote: Usher
              No, if you dig at the beginning of the conflict, Karabakh is Armenian territory.

              so you gave yourself away as a burger)))

              He didn’t even hide this fact. Like you, you do not hide the Azerbaijani component in your manifestation.
              1. 0
                16 January 2021 23: 09
                Quote: Observer2014
                He didn’t even hide this fact.

                did not know this fact.
                1. -2
                  16 January 2021 23: 13
                  Quote: Yeraz
                  Quote: Observer2014
                  He didn’t even hide this fact.

                  did not know this fact.

                  Well now, is it okay? wink
                  1. 0
                    16 January 2021 23: 20
                    Quote: Observer2014
                    Well now, is it okay?

                    kaaaneeeshnaaaa wink
                    1. -3
                      16 January 2021 23: 23
                      Quote: Yeraz
                      Quote: Observer2014
                      Well now, is it okay?

                      kaaaneeeshnaaaa wink
                      Glory BoHUUUU wink
          5. +2
            17 January 2021 10: 07
            Quote: Usher
            No, if you dig at the beginning of the conflict, Karabakh is Armenian territory. Azerbaijan with the help of Turkey at the beginning of the 20th century squeezed Karbakh.

            I described the vision of the issue from the point of view of international law. And according to it, Karabakh is Azerbaijani. Whether it's right or not, that's another matter entirely.
          6. 0
            17 January 2021 10: 45
            Armenian lodge. Even the very name of Nagorno-Karabakh which is thousands of years old in the Turkic language. Only in the last 5 years the Armenians wanted to rename it Artsakh. But it didn't work out, the whole world just like Karabakh accepts it.
        2. -1
          16 January 2021 20: 02
          Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
          From the point of view of international law - no

          For some reason I remembered the "Armenian genocide" by Turkey
          1. 0
            16 January 2021 21: 16
            Quote: Lebed
            For some reason I remembered the "Armenian genocide" by Turkey

            Armenians can also apply to the ECHP even today.
            1. 0
              16 January 2021 21: 24
              After all, there must be evidence
              And Armenia has already filed claims with the ECHR against Azerbaijan.
        3. for
          -2
          16 January 2021 21: 25
          Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
          Their aggression is like liberation,

          And what did they not release through the courts?
          1. DDT
            +2
            16 January 2021 22: 53
            Quote: for
            Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
            Their aggression is like liberation,

            And what did they not release through the courts?

            They were also released. And the OSCE Minsk Group was like that, have you heard? But it turned out that the fist is more correct. Moreover, the Armenians themselves screwed up so.
      3. -2
        16 January 2021 18: 52
        Quote: Usher
        This is some kind of surrealism!

        We stock up on popcorn and watch the next episode.
      4. +6
        16 January 2021 19: 04
        why the aggressor? they released their own !!!
      5. +3
        16 January 2021 20: 01
        Quote: Usher
        This is some kind of surrealism! The aggressor country is suing for military aggression!

        It was Armenia that was an "aggressor country", especially since the Azerbaijanis did not touch NKR itself. They liberated their regions, the so-called "NKR security belt", which Armenia just occupied. From a legal point of view, it looks like this.
    2. +3
      16 January 2021 17: 47
      Yes Yes. And they themselves are so saints and innocent. Will this court return life? Why are people tormented by foolishness?
      1. 0
        16 January 2021 18: 00
        No, it will not return, they just somehow leberate themselves for what they have done.
        1. +2
          16 January 2021 21: 03
          Quote: grigorii
          leberate themselves

          What - what will they do with themselves?
          1. 0
            17 January 2021 00: 31
            Quote: Paragraph Epitafievich Y.
            Quote: grigorii
            leberate themselves

            What - what will they do with themselves?

            "Conduct investigative excrement" (c)
            1. +2
              17 January 2021 10: 14
              No, I think, 'leberate' is when the mezzanine adapters are twisted with curbs (see the dictionary of grandfather Shchukar)
              Lewdness, in short.
              1. +1
                17 January 2021 11: 06
                - Jawaharlal Nyuru?
                - No, Nyuru Jawaharlal Chonkin fellow
          2. 0
            17 January 2021 09: 58
            laughing I translate into Russian - they rehabilitate, so understand? laughing Well, a person does not know Russian. fellow
      2. +8
        16 January 2021 20: 00
        He will not return his life, but they will try to hang money. What did they say, 50 lard? Well, they will definitely not be superfluous, and they just want to continue humiliating and finishing off the Armenians and will finish off and humiliate them. For southerners this is normal.
        Independence is endlessly costly for Armenians. If the fellows can stand it, if not, then it is better to join the Russian Federation, so that they do not completely suffocate. But at such a pace it is unlikely. They are surrounded by hostile states and there is no direct border with the Russian Federation, and the Georgians are in neutral. In fact, except for the Russian Federation, no one needed Armenia, even the majority of the Armenians themselves. They made a noise in the networks, humanitarian aid was sent as to poor relatives and that's it, silence.
        1. -2
          16 January 2021 20: 28
          Quote: Ramazan
          For southerners this is normal.

          but okay ?? But there was a parade of prisoners in front of the people in Donetsk.
          1. +2
            16 January 2021 21: 22
            Quote: Yeraz
            But there was a parade of prisoners in front of the people in Donetsk.

            And that Donetsk has already appeared in Armenia, or in Azerbaijan?
            1. -3
              16 January 2021 23: 10
              Quote: tihonmarine
              And that Donetsk has already appeared in Armenia, or in Azerbaijan?

              The man accused the Southerners of such gestures, to which I gave him the example of non-Southerners. Read carefully.
              1. 0
                17 January 2021 10: 44
                Quote: Yeraz
                The man accused the Southerners of such gestures, to which I gave him the example of non-Southerners. Read carefully.

                Leave your examples about Donetsk for yourself. Unpleasant to read.
                1. -1
                  17 January 2021 14: 25
                  Quote: tihonmarine
                  Leave your examples about Donetsk for yourself. Unpleasant to read.

                  I forgot to ask you. About the Southerners you can write garbage, but when the real facts about not the Southerners lead ala leave it to yourself, it's unpleasant to read. Then write the truth, not fairy tales.
          2. 0
            17 January 2021 12: 50
            I'm not talking about the parade now, but about humiliation. Conducting prisoners across Donetsk is not a parade, but showing them what they have done and heard the opinion of ordinary citizens, and not Ukrainian propaganda.
        2. 0
          17 January 2021 09: 57
          Quote: Ramazan
          Georgians in neutral
          Turks were allowed to enter Azerbaijan with weapons, but Armenians with sheep's cheese could not enter the Russian Federation; there were interruptions. What kind of "neutral" is this. Tell me more that they are sovereign.
          1. 0
            17 January 2021 11: 01
            Quote: sniperino
            Turks were allowed to enter Azerbaijan with weapons, but Armenians with sheep's cheese could not enter the Russian Federation; there were interruptions. What kind of "neutral" is this. Tell me more that they are sovereign.


            So the Armenians are not such winged angels that more than one neighbor does not love them. Don't you think this is strange? Absolutely all neighbors do not like them, in Russia they also dislike them, although they are needed as a strategic platform.
            1. +1
              17 January 2021 15: 49
              Quote: Anar
              Absolutely all neighbors do not like them, in Russia they also dislike them, although they are needed as a strategic platform.

              Throw nonsense hateful man. And don't drag Russia into your games. Armenians in Russia are not the worst option.
          2. 0
            17 January 2021 12: 58
            Well, so much the worse for the Armenians, then they are generally surrounded from all sides. Then everything is really bad.
    3. +4
      16 January 2021 17: 55
      It's funny, as long as Pashinyan is in power, it will be so .. Also, Russia will be sued for a large sum, both of them ..)))
    4. -11
      16 January 2021 17: 56
      Baku accused Yerevan of violating the rights and freedoms of Azerbaijani citizens as a result of "Armenia's military aggression." ...


      The document says about the violation of the rights and freedoms of Azerbaijani citizens during the 30-year occupation of Nagorno-Karabakh and seven adjacent regions of Azerbaijan by Armenia

      It smelled like Hitler propaganda, all according to Washington manuals sad fool angry .

      Armenian radio is asked what is the essence of the Karabakh conflict. Armenian radio thought, Odessa replied:
      The Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry has once again sent a note of protest to the Heavenly Chancellery about the fact that God illegally settled Armenians in “primordially Azerbaijani” Armenia, but the Heavenly Chancellery was silent.
    5. +6
      16 January 2021 17: 57
      If it was an occupation, then war crimes are the jurisdiction of another court, but the victims of the educational system in Baku do not know this. Actually, Azeri propaganda got stuck in the 14th century and is sitting there. Obviously "international iksperdy" from Ankara, which leads to the word "demand" .... From the court, even in Somalia, you can probably not demand anything, but only ask. Sultan lawyers damn ...

      1. +2
        16 January 2021 20: 12
        In fact, from the point of view of Azerbaijan, it was a civil war. Is Karabakh Azerbaijani? Then you are at war with your own citizens. And what is the European court in the depths of Asia?
        1. 0
          16 January 2021 20: 29
          Quote: Artavazdych
          In fact, from the point of view of Azerbaijan, it was a civil war.

          Yes, what are you ??? and the Armenian Armed Forces were not there, only Karabakh people)))
          1. 0
            16 January 2021 22: 03
            At the beginning? In 1992?
            And even now. There is no male population born in 2000-2002 in Karabakh. Almost completely
      2. +1
        16 January 2021 20: 43
        You are not right
        They filed names of human rights violations
        Direct jurisdiction of the ECHR.
        1. +1
          16 January 2021 21: 28
          Quote: Avior
          They filed names of human rights violations

          If there are names, then there is one name - Gorbachev.
          1. +2
            16 January 2021 22: 35
            My phone adjusts the text as it sees fit
            Names - exactly on
            smile
        2. +3
          16 January 2021 23: 19
          They filed names of human rights violations
          Direct jurisdiction of the ECHR.


          ECHR in hostilities ..... I do not know .... this is not a court for war crimes. They can open the tribunal again in the Hage and there he chops on checkers.
          1. +2
            16 January 2021 23: 44
            ... According to the Azerbaijani authorities, Armenia has not taken any measures to investigate the fate of 3890 Azerbaijani citizens who went missing as a result of the conflict. "The statement raised issues of violation of the rights of citizens to life, respect for personal and family life, freedom of religion, property and free movement as a result of the almost 30-year occupation by Armenia of the Nagorno-Karabakh region and seven adjacent regions of Azerbaijan, as well as the right not to be subjected to torture and ill-treatment, "the message says.

            The statement also refers to shelling during the autumn aggravation of the conflict of cities and villages of Azerbaijan located far from the combat zone, cluster and phosphorus shells, ballistic missiles. As a result, 93 people died, including 12 children, 423 citizens were wounded, 264 houses were completely destroyed, the statement said.



            Prior to that, Armenia had filed with the ECHR, demanding the return of the group that fought after the armistice agreement, which Armenia considers prisoners and Azerbaijan criminals.
            1. 0
              17 January 2021 10: 40
              Quote: Avior
              Prior to that, Armenia had filed with the ECHR, demanding the return of the group that fought after the armistice agreement, which Armenia considers prisoners and Azerbaijan criminals.

              Among them, we cannot be right, for in any case, by supporting one side, we insult the other.
              1. +2
                17 January 2021 11: 08
                In such matters, when applying to the courts, in my opinion, you need to adhere to the laws. They themselves applied to the court, they participate in the sessions, which means that a priori they recognize the effect of the laws that govern the court.
                Let's see the results.
            2. 0
              17 January 2021 11: 19
              If they fought after the announcement of the agreement on the end of the war, it means that these people are at least criminals who purposefully killed people, or rather terrorists who are guilty of killing at least 3 people. They face sentences ranging from 20 years to life.
          2. 0
            17 January 2021 04: 45
            Quote: Keyser Soze
            again the tribunal in the Hage

            Where? laughing
            1. 0
              17 January 2021 06: 57
              Who is where?)))
              1. +1
                17 January 2021 06: 59
                Quote: Sea breeze
                Who is where?)))

                In the Hage crying
                1. +1
                  17 January 2021 07: 19
                  Now I understand.)))
                2. +2
                  17 January 2021 10: 43
                  Quote: Mordvin 3
                  In the Hage

                  And it will not reach Hagi. Stupid ESP, will pour water in a mortar for 5 years, and then everything will be forgotten. The main thing is to get money from the applicant.
                  1. 0
                    17 January 2021 11: 20
                    The procedure in the ECHR is free for the applicant, moreover, under certain conditions, the court may add money to the applicant-private person for a lawyer, for example, to continue the consideration of the claim.
                    The amounts are small, but significant.
                    http://www.apspb.ru/news.php?news=27022019_66&fbclid=lwAR223Sc2ZCrFk5agzZalSx0qpdWGjoxtJwGRmvDlhzp_fxlxG8pukmEgMZo
                    1. 0
                      17 January 2021 11: 31
                      Quote: Avior
                      The procedure in the ECHR is free for the applicant, moreover, under certain conditions, the court may add money to the applicant-private person for a lawyer, for example, to continue the consideration of the claim.

                      For a private person, but not for the state.
                      1. 0
                        17 January 2021 11: 54
                        And how much should the state pay for a particular case? I believed that the budget of the ECHR is formed from the contributions of the member states and does not depend on a specific case.
                        1. +1
                          17 January 2021 13: 08
                          Quote: Avior
                          And how much should the state pay for a particular case?

                          And who knows, a very murky organization, but we helped individuals. And as for Azerbaijan, they will fly by. They applied to Armenia on October 27, 2020, then they flew by.
    6. +9
      16 January 2021 18: 19
      Quote: Usher
      This is some kind of surrealism! The aggressor country is suing for military aggression!

      Do you know the essence of the question.? The aggressor (in your opinion) LIBERATED his territory, which he lost in the 90s naturally thanks to the actions of the peace-loving Armenians lol hi
      RS: But what the Armenian humanists have been doing there for 25 years, the court will consider. hi
      1. -15
        16 January 2021 18: 50
        Quote: fa2998
        Quote: Usher
        This is some kind of surrealism! The aggressor country is suing for military aggression!

        Do you know the essence of the question.? The aggressor (in your opinion) LIBERATED his territory, which he lost in the 90s naturally thanks to the actions of the peace-loving Armenians lol hi
        RS: But what the Armenian humanists have been doing there for 25 years, the court will consider. hi

        I know more than you. Do you even know history? In short. At the beginning of the 20th century, the Turks and Azerbaijan won over the Karabakh. And the territory of Karabakh forced recognize for Azeirbajan. It is now clear? You just at least read open sources.
        1. +6
          16 January 2021 19: 47
          At the beginning of the 20th century, the Turks and Azerbaijan won over the Karabakh. And the territory of Karabakh was forced to recognize Azeirbadzhan.
          And how did the tsar-father in Petersburg look at it? What were the Turks wringing out in the Caucasus, if it was the territory of the Russian Empire? This is if we are talking about really the beginning of the 20th century.
        2. +4
          16 January 2021 20: 33
          You just at least read open sources

          Well, so familiarize us with these open sources - from whom did this couple wrest Karabakh? Or are you these sources? -
          "And the territory of Karabakh was forced to recognize Azeirbadzhan. It is now clear? "
          Nah, well clear
          of course, once "Is it clear now?" - the main argument ...
          1. -4
            17 January 2021 02: 43
            Quote: VyacheSeymour
            You just at least read open sources

            Well, so familiarize us with these open sources - from whom did this couple wrest Karabakh? Or are you these sources? -
            "And the territory of Karabakh was forced to recognize Azeirbadzhan. It is now clear? "
            Nah, well clear
            of course, once "Is it clear now?" - the main argument ...

            Why are you twisting the words here? If only something to vyakut without argument, like a windbag dog. Specifically, can you tell? No? Then shut up.
          2. -1
            17 January 2021 02: 45
            Quote: VyacheSeymour
            You just at least read open sources

            Well, so familiarize us with these open sources - from whom did this couple wrest Karabakh? Or are you these sources? -
            "And the territory of Karabakh was forced to recognize Azeirbadzhan. It is now clear? "
            Nah, well clear
            of course, once "Is it clear now?" - the main argument ...

            Your argument is even clearer. What did I write in Chinese? Do you know what letters are? That they add up to words that make sense? Do you know? Then stop grimacing here kid.
        3. 0
          17 January 2021 11: 22
          Gurgen, stop carrying heresy ... you could not rewrite history, henceforth you will not be able to ...
      2. 0
        17 January 2021 07: 34
        Quote: fa2998
        But what the Armenian humanists have been doing there for 25 years, the court will consider.

        I know the essence of the question.
    7. +9
      16 January 2021 18: 22
      "The most precious thing in the world is stupidity. Because you have to pay the most for it" - "Meeting point ..."
      Here is Pashinyan's stupidity and greed, first of all - it casts a full spoon. The funny thing is that this is good for everyone except the Armenians and the United States - the whole world is watching what the "support" from the United States is worth and what the banana revolutions from the State Department lead to.
    8. +4
      16 January 2021 18: 23
      And after all, they will win this trial, do not go to Erdogad! They nominally liberated their lands. ...
    9. +7
      16 January 2021 18: 28
      Azeybarjan imitates Ukraine. They appealed to the ECHR with the accusation of Russia on Crimea, modestly keeping silent about the arson of people in Odessa and the bombing of Donetsk. Against this background, our "generosity" is striking. I remember that our investigative bodies organized a "White Book" on all the crimes of the Ukrainian
      authorities in Donbass and Odessa, for presentation to "international" courts. Where are the results? Why silence?
    10. +9
      16 January 2021 18: 29
      Quote: Keyser Soze
      but the victims of the educational system in Baku do not know this. Actually Azeri propaganda got stuck in the 14th century

      It was the Armenians who got stuck in 1915. And the Russian language and culture became undesirable in Armenia, at the same time in Azerbaijan they treat the Russian culture and language very well. There is even an opportunity to get higher education in Russian. And Baku is generally a city of mixed Russian-Azerbaijani culture, in contrast to Armenian chauvinism. And there is no need to distort the Russian language.
    11. -4
      16 January 2021 18: 32
      Azerbaijan filed against Armenia with the European Court of Human Rights


      Stop, Azerbaijan, and so the Armenians have humiliated enough. Good things come in small packages.
    12. +3
      16 January 2021 18: 38
      Azerbaijan demands from the European Court of Human Rights

      Even if the ECHR issues a verdict, and when will it be? will it change something? recourse
      I think nothing ...
      1. +6
        16 January 2021 21: 39
        Quote: Mouse
        will it change something?

        It can change a lot. The Turks do not officially recognize the Armenian genocide, but in practice they often have to make excuses for their actions. Which, of course, introduces certain restrictions on their foreign policy. And here the Armenians will be placed in the position of the guilty and justifying - a completely different disposition!
    13. -1
      16 January 2021 19: 05
      But to us, citizens of the country, bad advice already does not shine on arbitrariness and tyranny of the authorities will complain.
    14. +8
      16 January 2021 19: 26
      Quote: Usher
      And the territory of Karabakh was forced to recognize Azeirbadzhan. It is now clear?

      Listen, fake historian. I have been studying history for as long as I live. And about Great Armenia, which is 100 times more than I know now. BUT I AM TALKING ABOUT THE DISTRICTS OF AZERBAIJAN, which the Armenians captured in 94 and annexed Karabakh.
      Karabakh in the USSR was a national (army) autonomy within Azerbaijan. I think it will be so, but in a compact territory.
      1. 0
        17 January 2021 15: 21
        Quote: fa2998
        Quote: Usher
        And the territory of Karabakh was forced to recognize Azeirbadzhan. It is now clear?

        Listen, fake historian. I have been studying history for as long as I live. And about Great Armenia, which is 100 times more than I know now. BUT I AM TALKING ABOUT THE DISTRICTS OF AZERBAIJAN, which the Armenians captured in 94 and annexed Karabakh.
        Karabakh in the USSR was a national (army) autonomy within Azerbaijan. I think it will be so, but in a compact territory.

        Hear "historian"! Why are you lying here? Before the USSR, Karabakh was not a part of Azerbaijan.
        1. -1
          17 January 2021 18: 09
          Quote: Usher
          Why are you lying here? Before the USSR, Karabakh was not a part of Azerbaijan.

          Did I say that? Can you read Russian? And Azerbaijan was "invented" later, there was the Russian Empire. wassat
    15. +4
      16 January 2021 19: 32
      Quote: Usher
      I know more than you.

      And I was there. "Miril" Soviet citizens of Armenian and Azerbaijani nationality. wink
    16. +3
      16 January 2021 19: 45
      Quote: Keyser Soze
      If it was an occupation, then war crimes are the jurisdiction of another court, but the victims of the educational system in Baku do not know this. Actually, Azeri propaganda got stuck in the 14th century and is sitting there. Obviously "international iksperdy" from Ankara, which leads to the word "demand" .... From the court, even in Somalia, you can probably not demand anything, but only ask. Sultan lawyers damn ...

      What "armenia" laughing How the Russian Empire conquered the vassals of the Erivan and Nakhichevan khanates from the Persian Empire, settling them with Armenians from other territories of Persia and the Ottoman Empire, the Armenians were divided between the states of the Ottoman sultans and the Persian shahs.
    17. -3
      16 January 2021 20: 09
      Quote: marchcat
      It was decided to finally finish off the Armenians at the ECHR.

      But it would be nice ...
    18. +20
      16 January 2021 20: 34
      Baku accused Yerevan of violating the rights and freedoms of Azerbaijani citizens as a result of "Armenia's military aggression"

      But ... wassat Somehow not expected ...
    19. -4
      16 January 2021 21: 03
      They were absolutely fucking. They attacked Armenia and Karabakh, and now they are in the pose of the victims
      1. +5
        16 January 2021 21: 59
        Is there evidence of an attack on Armenia? ... and how did no one notice this? From Karabakh, the Armenians brought the corpses of soldiers to Armenia, the question is, what did they do on the lands of another state?
    20. +2
      16 January 2021 21: 33
      What will this change for Yerevan? And if the Armenians receive a negative answer, it will be a disaster! At least we had to recognize Karabakh ourselves, for a start
    21. +1
      16 January 2021 21: 39
      wondering how you can restore the rights of a corpse?
    22. 0
      16 January 2021 23: 01
      They will restore the rights. Right now. You are tortured to swallow dust.
    23. +4
      16 January 2021 23: 48
      Here is a question for the Armenians: You say everywhere that the Azerbaijani army fought with the so-called "Artsakh" army. Then why were all your dead soldiers citizens of Armenia? Why are you lying so blatantly? Understand Karabakh is the territory of the Republic of Azerbaijan and the world recognizes this fact. And if there are soldiers from Armenia, then we will consider them terrorists and take action!
    24. +2
      17 January 2021 00: 04
      Well done Azerbaijanis!
      The Armenians staged genocide on the territory of Azerbaijan for almost 30 years. We received a full response.
      It is a pity that the Azerbaijani army did not reach Yerevan.
      However, it is even good for Russia that Armenia, as a country, has survived. Let it remain small for itself, and not capable of anything - it will not be convenient for them to lick the US ass now, it will not be convenient for them to jump.
      1. -5
        17 January 2021 02: 46
        Quote: Egor53
        Well done Azerbaijanis!
        The Armenians staged genocide on the territory of Azerbaijan for almost 30 years. We received a full response.
        It is a pity that the Azerbaijani army did not reach Yerevan.
        However, it is even good for Russia that Armenia, as a country, has survived. Let it remain small for itself, and not capable of anything - it will not be convenient for them to lick the US ass now, it will not be convenient for them to jump.

        licking ass just Azerbaijanis with Turks. Whom are you making laugh with your opuses? Turkey is a NATO member and lies under the United States.
        1. 0
          17 January 2021 07: 48
          Quote: Usher
          licking ass

          Why write about it here? This is your confidential right and it was not worth declaring this to the entire site.
    25. -6
      17 January 2021 03: 08
      Azerbaijan is the country sponsor of terrorism! She should be tried in The Hague! And the Aliyev Thieves! Senior Aliyev stole oil from Russia!
      1. +2
        17 January 2021 07: 13
        laughing don't tell me my slippers
    26. The comment was deleted.
    27. The comment was deleted.
    28. The comment was deleted.
    29. The comment was deleted.
    30. The comment was deleted.
    31. The comment was deleted.
    32. The comment was deleted.
    33. The comment was deleted.
    34. The comment was deleted.
    35. The comment was deleted.
    36. 0
      17 January 2021 09: 18
      And then Armenia and Azerbaijan will sue Russia hehe
    37. -2
      17 January 2021 09: 51
      And cutting off the heads of Armenian old people on camera, as well as their executions, is of course consistent respect for human rights!
      1. 0
        17 January 2021 15: 23
        Do not say. Logic and circus!
    38. 0
      17 January 2021 10: 16
      Quote: VLADIMIR VLADIVOSTOK
      Azerbaijan is the country sponsor of terrorism! She should be tried in The Hague! And the Aliyev Thieves! Senior Aliyev stole oil from Russia!

      Armenia is just a sponsor of terrorists. Even though I have not heard about Azerbaijanis terrorists laughing
      1. -1
        18 January 2021 01: 28
        All 90 and early 2000 there were bases for training militants in Ayzerbadzhan! Aizers treated them! The gangs were hiding in their territory! Aizepbajan delivered weapons to the militants! If you don't know, it doesn't mean that it didn't happen!
    39. 0
      18 January 2021 04: 01
      Quote: VLADIMIR VLADIVOSTOK
      All 90 and early 2000 there were bases for training militants in Ayzerbadzhan! Aizers treated them! The gangs were hiding in their territory! Aizepbajan delivered weapons to the militants! If you don't know, it doesn't mean that it didn't happen!

      Azerbaijani President Heydar Aliyev viewed the political problem of Chechnya as an internal affair of Russia, and the issue of the Chechen people as a humanitarian problem. To solve the problems of Chechen refugees in Baku in 1999, the head office of the Chechen envoy to Muslim countries was opened.

      After 1994, there were 4,7 thousand Chechen refugees in Azerbaijan, after 2000 - 10 thousand people. Azerbaijan, despite the presence of its own refugees, could not close the borders for suffering people who were held hostage to big politics. Remind you of 1977 where the Armenians staged a terrorist act in Moscow? 17:31. Izmailovskaya station - 7 people killed, 18:05. In the trading floor of grocery store No. 15 on Dzerzhinsky Street (now Bolshaya Lubyanka), not far from the buildings of the KGB of the USSR in the Bauman region, a second explosion is heard. Only a few people were wounded by shrapnel. There were no serious injuries. Another 5 minutes later, at 18:10, an urn exploded near grocery store No. 5 on October 25 (now Nikolskaya) Street, opposite the Historical and Archival Institute. As the experts will later tell, the massive cast-iron urn saved the people passing by: it did not shatter into fragments, and all the energy of the explosion went up.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"