Gender neutral parent. West is feeling a new bottom

250
Gender neutral parent. West is feeling a new bottom
Photo: Gage Skidmore, Wikimedia Commons

Let's do without "father" and "mother"


The initiator of the reduction of the vocabulary of colleagues was made by the Speaker of the House of Representatives Democrat Nancy Pelosi, a famous fighter for gender equality. According to the ideas of the Democratic Party, within the walls of the Congress in the very near future the address "he", "she", "man", "woman", as well as the words "son", "daughter", "aunt", "uncle" should be excluded , "Mother-in-law", "father-in-law", "son-in-law" or "daughter-in-law".

Let's try to trace the paradoxical and provocative logic of the congressmen. Perhaps the most important thing now in the United States is the elimination of inequality in all areas of life. Discrimination on skin color and ethnicity seems to be coped with in words. Today, in the United States, calling an African American a black man is just like death.




The next form of inequality that required an immediate solution was religious differences, as well as the specificity of sexual orientation. Again, more in word and on paper, these problems in American society have been resolved. By analogy with the African American quota, in the very near future filmmakers should be expected to comply with the mandatory quota for the presence of LGBT actors in the frame. New times - new customs.

But progress cannot be stopped. Initially, the quite good ideas of equality and brotherhood have passed the stage of perversion. Something similar happened to the science of eugenics at the beginning of the XNUMXth century, which at first was vulgarized by the forced sterilization of the Americans, and later Hitler was completely disgraced by the Nazi ideology.

Now in the US Congress, the equality of people is brought to an absurd apotheosis - they prohibit the use of "he", "she", "mom" and "dad". Of course, so far only within the walls of the cradle of American democracy, but with further prospects for the spread of innovation throughout the country.

The US Department of State became the first sign in the elimination of the concepts of "mom" and "dad" ten years ago. Then the American diplomats solemnly promised to write in official documents not "father" and "mother", but "parent No. 1" and "parent No. 2". But this attack was more a way to butter up the homosexual community in the United States, many of which managed to build same-sex families and have children. That is, the State Department's "parent number 1" instead of "mom-dad" is not a way to get rid of gender differences, but an attempt not to offend homosexuals.

How much parliamentarians in Washington are concerned with equality between men and women is well illustrated by the case of "Amen and a-women". During the reading of the prayer for the first meeting of the Congress this year, the reader hesitated, recognizing in "Amen" (translation of "Let it be so") a direct reference to the male gender. Realizing that such blatant intolerance towards women could annoy Nancy Pelosi, he read Amen and a-women.

It is not known how the Democrat Pelosi reacted to this incident, but the Republican Guy Reshenthaler wrote an angry one on Twitter:

“The opening prayer for the 117th Congress ended with the words 'Amen and a-women.'

Amen is a Latin word that means "so be it." This word has no gender.

Unfortunately, facts are irrelevant to progressive democrats.

Incredible. "

Conspiracy theory


It is impossible to consider such scandalous proposals from the US legislature in isolation from the purposeful destruction of family values. The most outrageous thing is that the overwhelming majority of Congressmen are well-established family men.

For example, the notorious Pelosi has been married for several decades and has five children. The erasure of the boundaries between man and woman, mother and father, has only one goal - the final destruction of the family as the foundation of society. At the same time, the luxury of having a family is left to the most privileged ruling stratum of the population.


Source: konkurs-kids.ru

When people in power with a blue eye say from the rostrum that from now on it will not be possible to address their relatives "dad" and "mom", but the vile in this case "parent" should be pronounced, then you involuntarily begin to believe in conspiracy theory, in the fact that the planet already overpopulated, and the authorities, as they can, limit the birth rate. Even with such provocative and ridiculous methods. And that, congressmen are getting their way - at the moment, about 40% of children in the United States are born out of wedlock. And for blacks - up to 70%.

What does this mean? A new tribe of Americans is being prepared, who will relatively painlessly accept the rejection of "fathers" and "matter".

The most interesting thing is that conspiracy theorists will legitimately put a logical foundation under such a theory. The world is known to be captured by robotization and artificial intelligence. As a result, workers will no longer be so in demand, which means that we have the right to expect gigantic total unemployment.

It is not for nothing that in many countries (even in Russia) they seriously talk about a guaranteed unconditional income as a salvation in a new automated reality. But why share resources with your own electorate, if you can thin it out completely painlessly.

For many years the powers that be were dependent on the working class - after all, the main generator of the country's notorious GDP. In order to avoid strikes, it was necessary to raise salaries, improve working conditions and take care of family happiness. Because the family is the main supplier of manpower, recruits for the army, and sometimes you can find a couple of new Lomonosovs, Mendeleevs or Landau among the younger generation.

And when working hands and brains are not needed, then the family is not needed. So you can simply thin out your own population to the required minimum. Obviously, the first to come to such an idea in the US Congress. All discussions about the connection between Pelosi's absurdity and a world conspiracy may seem like speculation, but they started it first.

Gender neutral parent


Unfortunately, disastrous global trends are treated by global shocks.

Most often it ends in a civil war or revolution. But in the case of the destruction of the family and the destruction of gender status, there is hope.

In American society, the abolition of "dad" and "mom" as concepts was received coolly. At least in the camp of traditional Republicans, whom, according to Trump, are still in the majority. And this gives hope to curb the spread of gender-neutral trends across North America and beyond.

References to the Bible have become one of the lines of behavior of Pelosi's critics. In the Holy Scripture it is quite definitely written - God created man in his own likeness as a man and a woman. Considering that Congressman Pelosi is quite a God-fearing Catholic, this logical incongruity may have an impact on her.

The Washington Times takes the idea further. If gender neutrality is in vogue, why are there still toilets for “boys” and “girls”? And finally, common changing rooms have not been introduced?

One of the beginners stories with the denial of the family as the foundation of society, it became, oddly enough, the Black Lives Matter movement. The strategy is based on the struggle "for freedom, liberation and justice." It would seem that they are quite sound and positive ideals. But everything is spoiled by the tools proposed by the activists. It turns out that liberal nirvana can be achieved only through the destruction of the nuclear family model imposed by the West.

The main enemy is the father, as the key carrier of aggression and domestic violence. Children raised without a male upbringing seem to Black Lives Matter to be much more tolerant.

The declaration of freedom fighters cannot but be called a call for promiscuity - promiscuous sexual relations. Or another tool in the hands of the rulers of the world, for whom 90% of the population are freeloaders.

Again conspiracy, but without it in the story with the abolition of "mom" and "dad", alas, nothing.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

250 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +57
    16 January 2021 05: 24
    Paradoxically, in the fight against inequality in the United States, the inequality of the poor and the rich will remain ... a person cannot be called a black man, husband, wife, boy, girl, but can be called poor or rich smile .
    A country of boundless stupidity, insanity, impudence, insolence, deceit, hypocrisy, hypocrisy and much more.
    Trump tried to destroy this Tower of Babel, he did not succeed ... for him the Democrats themselves will do it with their stupid laws that contradict human nature by this nature.
    It is impossible to go against its creator without consequences ... many empires and peoples in the history of mankind paid for this with their disappearance ... The United States, with the stubbornness of a maniac, stubbornly goes to its natural death.
    1. -17
      16 January 2021 06: 10
      "You can't go against your creator"
      What kind of creator are we talking about?
      1. 0
        16 January 2021 06: 15
        Quote: Pessimist22
        What kind of creator are we talking about?

        And Muhammad, his prophet ...
        1. -10
          16 January 2021 06: 25
          It is clear, I thought it was about Zeus, the god of thunder and lightning, who is in charge of the whole world.
          1. +1
            16 January 2021 06: 36
            Quote: Pessimist22
            It is clear, I thought it was about Zeus, the god of thunder and lightning, who is in charge of the whole world.

            No, I honor the one-eyed Odin. Yes
            1. 0
              16 January 2021 10: 01
              Quote: Mordvin 3
              No, I honor the one-eyed Odin.

              then it is better to read Roda
              1. -7
                16 January 2021 10: 44
                Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                then it is better to read Roda

                And who is this? I do not know.
                1. +4
                  16 January 2021 17: 55
                  Quote: Mordvin 3
                  Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                  then it is better to read Roda

                  And who is this? I do not know.

                  nothing to be proud of
                  1. -5
                    16 January 2021 17: 59
                    Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                    nothing to be proud of

                    I honor Odin One-eyed.
                2. 0
                  16 January 2021 21: 03
                  Quote: mordvin xnumx
                  Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                  then it is better to read Roda

                  And who is this? I do not know.

                  Without clan and tribe?
              2. 0
                16 January 2021 17: 56
                Why do some people so dislike their own history ?!
                1. -5
                  16 January 2021 18: 01
                  Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                  don't like their own story so much ?!

                  Don't. I thoroughly know the history.
                  1. -1
                    16 January 2021 18: 02
                    Quote: Mordvin 3
                    Don't. I thoroughly know the history.

                    well, judging by the question, not quite
                    1. -5
                      16 January 2021 18: 04
                      Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                      well, judging by the question, not quite

                      What's not quite?
                      1. +1
                        16 January 2021 18: 07
                        it is clear that you are Scandinavian and Russian is not native to you
                      2. -2
                        16 January 2021 18: 11
                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        it is clear that you are Scandinavian and Russian is not native to you

                        Home negative My grandfather was a Mordvin, and I am a purebred Russian.
                      3. -4
                        16 January 2021 18: 53
                        well, if RUSSIAN, then it would not be a sin to know your Gods
                      4. -3
                        18 January 2021 12: 20
                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        well, if RUSSIAN, then it would not be a sin to know your Gods

                        Russians have one God.
                        His son is the head of our Orthodox Church.
                        His name is Jesus Christ.

                        Baptism tomorrow.
                        With which I congratulate all the Orthodox.
                      5. -1
                        18 January 2021 12: 29
                        Quote: Temples
                        Russians have one God.
                        His son is the head of our Orthodox Church.
                        His name is Jesus Christ.

                        that is, everything that Vladimir is not RUSSIAN
                      6. -2
                        18 January 2021 12: 34
                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        that is, everything that Vladimir is not RUSSIAN

                        Didn't manage to formulate the idea in a hurry?

                        Is there documentary evidence of what happened before Vladimir?

                        Fairy tales and fables from the Internet remain fairy tales and fables.

                        All nonsense is being molded against Russian history.
                      7. +1
                        18 January 2021 13: 14
                        Quote: Temples
                        Is there documentary evidence of what happened before Vladimir?

                        That is, there was nothing at all ?!
                        and you know that 99 Orthodox holidays are converted pagan holidays of our ancestors, that trinity is a straight line from paganism
                      8. 0
                        18 January 2021 13: 16
                        Quote: Temples
                        All nonsense is being molded against Russian history.

                        well, yes RODINA, PARENTS are nonsense
                        you even enter a new house using pagan rituals
                      9. +1
                        18 January 2021 16: 56
                        Quote: Temples
                        Russians have one God.
                        His son is the head of our Orthodox Church.
                        His name is Jesus Christ.

                        Yeah, they drove them with a crowd of spears when they baptized. Have you heard anything about Sophia's 12 articles?
                      10. -2
                        16 January 2021 20: 20
                        Quote: mordvin xnumx
                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        it is clear that you are Scandinavian and Russian is not native to you

                        Home negative My grandfather was a Mordvin, and I am a purebred Russian.

                        Native, Parents (dad, mom), Motherland, Human race ...
                        One is alone, And One is a warrior in the field if he is tailored in Russian ...
                      11. -3
                        16 January 2021 20: 24
                        Quote: Tank jacket
                        Native, Parents (dad, ma

                        Plus grandpa-mommy ...
                      12. -5
                        16 January 2021 20: 44
                        Fatherlessness? What is the difference between Motherland and Fatherland?
                      13. -4
                        16 January 2021 20: 53
                        Quote: mordvin xnumx
                        Quote: Tank jacket
                        Native, Parents (dad, ma

                        Plus grandpa-mommy ...

                        Why is the Motherland calling and at the same time the Great Patriotic War? bully
                        Purely by concepts ...
                      14. 0
                        17 January 2021 04: 08
                        Quote: Tank jacket
                        Why is the Motherland calling

              3. 0
                18 January 2021 20: 32
                We must strive for this, and America must set an example by raising children in an incubator, or find strangers and stop demagoguery. Strangers do not care who will bear and "give birth". This is what Gollywood brought the rulers of the United States to.
            2. +1
              18 January 2021 16: 51
              Quote: Mordvin 3
              No, I honor the one-eyed Odin.

              Arguing with the viking rabbi,
              The dispute is deliberately fruitless:
              - God is one. And he is not alone.
              - One is God. And not one ...
              ©
          2. +3
            16 January 2021 10: 17
            Quote: Pessimist22
            I see, I thought it was about Zeus

            Are you talking about Zeus' love passion for Ganymede? feel
          3. 0
            16 January 2021 20: 02
            Quote: Pessimist22
            It is clear, I thought it was about Zeus, the god of thunder and lightning, who is in charge of the whole world.
            First there was Uranus (Sky) + Gaia (Earth) ...
            Then Uranus exiled his children to the bowels of the Earth, then Kronos (Chronos - Time) castrated his father Uranus with a sickle and overthrew him ... And the Golden Age of Kronos's reign began, which, just in case, to avoid Maidan, swallowed his children, but Zesv (Thunder and Lightning) escaped this outcome. When Zeus grew up - started a war with his father Kronos - they shook up the Universe during the war, defeated Zeus and freed his brothers and sisters from the womb of Uranus (probably gutted ...). Zeus - reigned on Olympus ...
        2. The comment was deleted.
          1. 0
            18 January 2021 12: 18
            Quote: Temples
            Gender neutral parent.

            It.
            Just h.m.o.

            Namesake, I don't understand ...
      2. +17
        16 January 2021 06: 51
        What kind of creator are we talking about?
        Call this Nature smile... the instinct of procreation, the instinct of self-preservation, survival skills and much more are inherent in us in our genes ... and in the USA, roughly speaking, an experiment is being conducted to destroy this inherent nature in humans of the survival program. hi
        1. +20
          16 January 2021 09: 58
          an experiment to destroy the survival program by this inherent nature in man.

          There was an experiment - "Mouse Paradise". They gave the mice a room, plenty of food and no enemies. They multiplied and multiplied ... Then they suddenly stopped. They squabbled, got angry, even "homosexuals" - mice appeared. As a result, everyone died. The whole colony as a whole. Not from disease, lack of food or enemies, but from the fact that they stopped multiplying. Absolutely.
          But there was not enough small - a hole in the floor or wall, so that you could escape from paradise into a hungry field. There, after all, mice do not die out.
          1. +6
            16 January 2021 18: 14
            Experiment "Universe-25": how heaven became hell. Yes, very interesting and informative.
          2. 0
            16 January 2021 19: 55
            There was an experiment - "Mouse Paradise".
            Данный эксперимент был опровергнут: http://новости-мира.ru-an.info/%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8/%D1%8D%D0%BA%D1%81%D0%BF%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%82-%D0%B2%D1%81%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F-25-%D0%B1%D1%8B%D0%BB-%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%8A%D1%8F%D1%81%D0%BD%D1%91%D0%BD-%D0%BD%D0%B5%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BD%D0%BE/
          3. 0
            18 January 2021 17: 05
            Quote: dauria
            There was an experiment - "Mouse Paradise". They gave the mice a room, plenty of food and no enemies.

            Yes, so long since the rat-catchers were brought up. Whoever remained alive rats, then only ate their fellows.
        2. +11
          16 January 2021 12: 01
          And what moral and ethical laws can prevent the authorities from changing nature? You do not care that breeding work is carried out for the productivity of livestock. And nobody cares about the natural desires of cows or chickens, and even more their kindred feelings.)) Or is it hard to imagine that the authorities can treat the population in the same way? After all, if there is no God, then everything is allowed ...
          1. +4
            16 January 2021 15: 13
            After all, if there is no God, then everything is allowed ...

            Not all. Ohm's Law works without God. And sticking your finger into the socket with impunity will not work. So it is not "morality" that will get in the way of selection. And at least the fact that incubator chickens die three times more than their own from under the hen. Not to mention the wild quail.
            The Romans were clever. They invented the trireme, phalanx, catapult, trigonometry and other wisdom. And the guys came from the north. Unwashed, even without writing and one leader ... And where is eternal Rome?
            1. +5
              16 January 2021 15: 57
              "Not everything. Ohm's law works even without God. And sticking your finger into an outlet with impunity will not work."
              ... Adam and Eve were also not recommended to try the apple. wink
              It's one thing if you yourself decide to stick your fingers into the socket, and it's another thing if you are put on the electric chair against your will.

              “So it’s not“ morality ”that will interfere with the selection. But at least the fact that hatchery chicks die three times more than their own from under the hen. Not to mention the wild quails.
              The Romans were clever. They invented the trireme, phalanx, catapult, trigonometry and other wisdom. And the guys came from the north. Unwashed, even without writing and one leader ... And where is eternal Rome? "
              Is natural selection our everything? smile
              1. +4
                16 January 2021 16: 24
                Is natural selection our everything?


                That's it, don't laugh. It's just that many for some reason decided that it ends with an individual. No, further selection continues between herds of monkeys, tribes, states ... And the "gene" information is no longer stored in genes, but in the habits of individuals in the herd. And it is loaded into an individual after birth in the process of its growth in the herd. This is how people emerged from the monkeys. Herds with more advanced sound-word communication were preferred.
                (monkeys still have a vocabulary of under a hundred, and neighboring herds have similar words). The herd began to select elements for itself. It drove out completely stupid people, did not accept strangers.
                By and large, natural selection is just an extension of the general laws of biophysics. The trigger effect will not allow two structures using a common resource to develop on equal terms. It will slide towards the domination of one and the half-dead existence of the other (extinction or displacement into another niche) As an example - if you do not force the clergy by the collar, then there will never be two religions in the country. There will be only one, since they all need a common resource - people.
                1. +3
                  16 January 2021 17: 55
                  Well, social Darwinism has many supporters in the modern world. My soul does not accept this theory (I understand that for Darwinists the soul is not an argument). So, according to your logic, the adherents of morality and ethics will die out like mammoths, since these properties make them uncompetitive in the struggle for survival.
                  1. 0
                    16 January 2021 18: 02
                    Quote: RitaNik
                    since these properties make them uncompetitive in the struggle for survival.

                    and why confidence in non-competitiveness ?!
                    just the opposite, in crisis situations, individual farmers going over their heads would rather die out
                  2. +2
                    16 January 2021 18: 20
                    supporters of morality and ethics will die out like mammoths,


                    You are wrong. Morality is absolutely essential in the "construction" of a society. What is conscience? An individual's program of behavior, selected by the evolution of the entire "herd" (not necessarily human). There is an instinct for learning after birth, the standards of behavior in the "pack" are remembered. Then their own behavior is compared with the standard. The mismatch generates a signal of mismatch (pangs of conscience) and forces the individual to correct its behavior. That is why herd animals are easier to train. Have you noticed how dogs are "ashamed"? So morality is a necessary mechanism for managing the elements of society. Without it, the entire structure of interaction will disintegrate, leaving a "colony of flagellated protozoa", losing to a close-knit herd.
                    You have confused the competitiveness of the entire herd with the competitiveness of one element of it. These are two different things. One egoist will perfectly survive in a pack of "moral" ones. But the pack of egoists will lose.
                    1. 0
                      17 January 2021 00: 12
                      This means that you recognize the competitiveness of the "churchmen"? smile
                      1. +3
                        17 January 2021 00: 54
                        competitiveness of "churchmen"


                        Please be clear about your question. Churches (organizations made up of people) compete to attract the population to "their own." faith. Different ways. Up to St. Bartholomew's Night. People themselves are just a shared resource. A baby from Afghanistan adopted by the United States easily becomes a Catholic. In the modern world it is simply more profitable for the state to keep confessions "by the collar" from complete victory alone.
                      2. 0
                        17 January 2021 02: 34

                        We are talking about the coexistence in one society of believers and atheists, provided that the latter are the overwhelming majority.

                        And it may seem to any state at a certain period that it can do without any confessions, as has already happened in the recent history of our country.
                      3. +2
                        17 January 2021 03: 22
                        We are talking about the coexistence in one society of believers and atheists, provided that the latter are the overwhelming majority.


                        It's naive. This has never happened. "Believers" are always the majority. Faith is one of the ways to protect the psyche. It distorts the perception of reality when it is necessary for the brain to continue the functioning of the organism as a whole. At the same time, it is important that the very fact of switching on the protection is not realized.
                        It is akin to closing a person's eyes in a bright flash. The person is blind at this moment, but he retains his sight. Well, or signal limiting diodes at the amplifier input. Although a strong signal is distorted, the output stages will survive for further work when the normal level is restored.
                        The "atheist" either simply did not see the "bright flash", or he has other methods such as the "welding mask" - for example, the same vodka. Personally, I feel sorry for them - these are people with a very high threshold for enabling protection. Before it turns on, they can go crazy.
                        So don't worry, religion won't disappear until another way is invented. A person needs faith. And demand creates supply
                      4. 0
                        17 January 2021 03: 34
                        Quote: dauria
                        "Believers" are always the majority.

                        Hehe ... Minority. negative
                      5. +3
                        17 January 2021 04: 27
                        Hehe ... Minority.


                        I'm not glad that I got involved ... This is an area where psychiatrists should work exclusively. With completely clear brains, putting their need for faith in a corner. Even in a cassock. I have seen people with such crippled fates that they will break without faith. Wouldn't hurt them. And just put the "believer" in quotes. A nun cannot cross the road and believe at the same time. People differ only in the amount of time they remember God's help. Someone just once in a lifetime, and even that is not recognized. Well, if not at all, then you need to see what kind of person he is and how he lived his life, that he has no one to be afraid of.
                        The trouble is different - now they impose "faith" ahead of time, without waiting for a person to need such help. And they turn into drug dealers instead of giving opiates when needed.
                      6. 0
                        17 January 2021 04: 36
                        Quote: dauria
                        to give opiates when needed.

                        Well, you drove the nag ... laughing Somehow I was digging a garden at my uncle's. One pepper comes up to me and says: "Vovan, show me how to plant potatoes, I have never planted anything except grass ..." I gurgled ... laughing
                      7. 0
                        17 January 2021 03: 35
                        But you are an atheist, I suppose.
                      8. 0
                        17 January 2021 03: 39
                        Quote: RitaNik
                        But you are an atheist, I suppose.

                        I am that ... Agnostic .. Yes
                      9. 0
                        18 January 2021 10: 44
                        Forgive me generously, I do not want to involve you in a discussion, just clarification is required on my part.
                        By believers, I meant those who regularly visit the temple and participate in divine services.
                        Such a minority. Muslims may have more.
                      10. 0
                        18 January 2021 17: 07
                        Quote: RitaNik
                        By believers, I meant those who regularly visit the temple and participate in divine services.

                        I don't believe in God, but I'm afraid of him. winked
                      11. 0
                        18 January 2021 17: 37
                        Are you joking?
                        How can you be afraid of someone you don't believe in?
                      12. 0
                        18 January 2021 17: 45
                        Quote: RitaNik
                        Are you joking?
                        How can you be afraid of someone you don't believe in?

                        No kidding. I don’t believe a damn thing, but somehow I dreamed of a witch. I was stiff. Somehow he folded two fingers with a cross and said: ".... (there with obscenities), God help. My cat, after these words, sighed up to the ceiling.
                      13. 0
                        18 January 2021 17: 52
                        Well, you are afraid of witches and other evil spirits, not God. smile In all likelihood, you believe in their existence, since you are so scared.
                      14. 0
                        18 January 2021 18: 05
                        Quote: RitaNik
                        In all likelihood, you believe in their existence, since you are so scared.

                        No, I didn't believe it. But when I dreamed of a witch, I was really paralyzed. I couldn't move at all, just moved my fingers somehow. And the witch looked like my ex-girlfriend. crying
                      15. 0
                        18 January 2021 18: 13
                        Yes, a dream like this ...
                      16. 0
                        18 January 2021 18: 36
                        Quote: RitaNik
                        Yes, a dream like this ...

                        I'm serious. I woke up, my cat was sleeping on me, but I really couldn't move my arms and legs. Well, obscenely turned to the Lord God, then I jumped on the bed about a meter and a half, and my cat jumped up to the ceiling. And he ran away somewhere ... belay
                      17. 0
                        18 January 2021 18: 53
                        Perhaps it was sleep paralysis. But in general, you are a provocateur, Vladimir (sorry for the familiarity), now we will be banned for flooding Yes
                      18. 0
                        18 January 2021 19: 07
                        Quote: RitaNik
                        Perhaps it was sleep paralysis.

                        Is it paralysis at twenty-four? Do not laugh.
                      19. +1
                        18 January 2021 19: 15
                        Yes
                        By the way, Happy Epiphany Eve!
                      20. +1
                        18 January 2021 19: 17
                        Quote: RitaNik
                        By the way, Happy Epiphany Eve!

                        Thank you! love
                2. -1
                  16 January 2021 18: 01
                  Quote: dauria
                  from monkeys and people came out

                  sure ?!
                3. +1
                  16 January 2021 20: 14
                  Quote: dauria
                  This is how people emerged from the monkeys. ...
                  First, "bald monkeys" appeared (they became bald from radiation from UFO engines that visited our planet) ...
                  "Bald monkeys" got cold and they had to invent clothing и fire, eat a lot of meat (learned to hunt) - all the progress of "bald monkeys" is aimed at warming and survival.
                  1. 0
                    18 January 2021 06: 21
                    The "bald monkeys" became cold and they had to invent clothes and fire, eat a lot of meat (they learned to hunt) - all the progress of "bald monkeys" is aimed at warming and survival.

                    everything is just the opposite
            2. -1
              16 January 2021 17: 59
              Quote: dauria
              And the guys came from the north. Unwashed, even without writing and one leader ... And where is eternal Rome?

              Well, for the sake of truth, it's not the "guys from the north" who won, but Rome lost, and this is a significant difference
            3. 0
              18 January 2021 05: 26
              Quote: dauria
              The Romans were clever. They invented the trireme, phalanx, catapult, trigonometry and other wisdom. And the guys came from the north. Unwashed, even without writing and one leader ... And where is eternal Rome?

              the army of Rome was very good, the ruling elite was corrupted and degraded!
          2. -1
            16 January 2021 17: 58
            Quote: RitaNik
            And what moral and ethical laws can prevent the authorities from changing nature? You do not care that breeding work is carried out for the productivity of livestock. And no one cares about the natural desires of cows or chickens, and even more so their kindred feelings.))

            yes, but subject to the appearance of several species of man, one of which will be a breeder
      3. +5
        16 January 2021 06: 52
        Which creator? US Federal Reserve.
      4. +5
        16 January 2021 11: 42
        Quote: Pessimist22
        What kind of creator are we talking about?

        about nature. Yes
      5. +1
        17 January 2021 20: 35
        God, no matter how you call him, you can call him Nature.
      6. 0
        12 February 2021 21: 53
        About the one who created ALL-God!
    2. +13
      16 January 2021 07: 18
      Americans need to go even further, and genetically modify the entire nation, that "at the exit" there was "it" - a two-sex creature, self-fertile, "me and a woman and a man" in one person lol Then a bunch of words like "mom, dad" will disappear, for such a new Yankee will be a mamopap in one essence wassat
      1. dSK
        +9
        16 January 2021 08: 42
        The states will call "SODOM and GOMORA" on their heads. The Lord God is a loving father, but very strict. Adam and Eve, two of his beloved creatures to the whole vast paradise, for one disobedience kicked out of it ... And if we behave badly, it will not seem little to us. The crown is just another flower.
        1. dSK
          +17
          16 January 2021 08: 47
          The Russian "law banning LGBT propaganda", which is practically never applied, needs to be improved! Why only for minors ???
          If we do not want the Lord God to arrange for us, too, "SODOM and GOMORA" - we need a complete BAN, for ALL !!!
        2. +21
          16 January 2021 10: 44
          Quote from dsk
          The states will call "SODOM and GOMORA" on their heads

          This is how the West destroys itself.
      2. +9
        16 January 2021 08: 45
        Quote: Thrifty
        Then a bunch of words like "mom, dad" will disappear

        All the same, the memory that there is a mother (mother), will remain, because the word "motherf * cker"entered spoken English, and most importantly, into Ebonics (P • bonics), And without the word speakers of that language (and there are about 13% of the American population) can not kommunikirovat as equals and without the word nigger. And this, sorry, is racial discrimination and therefore must be condemned and eliminated. And replace this word with "Parent # 1 f * cker"it will not work, because for the majority of Ebonix speakers such a linguistic construct exceeds their intellectual capabilities.
        tongue
        1. +9
          16 January 2021 12: 36
          I you he she! Together - a whole country
          Together - a friendly family! In the word "we" - one hundred thousand "I",
          Big-eyed, mischievous, black, red and flaxen,
          Sad and cheerful - in cities and villages!

          This song is now banned! crying
          1. 0
            16 January 2021 19: 54
            Quote: Uncle Lee
            I you he she! Together - a whole country
            Together - a friendly family! In the word "we" - one hundred thousand "I",
            Big-eyed, mischievous, black, red and flaxen,
            Sad and cheerful - in cities and villages!

            This song is now banned! crying


            Enjoy until you delete
            1. 0
              17 January 2021 04: 13
              Quote: Nagan
              Enjoy until you delete

              Here, damn it, you fool ...
      3. +10
        16 January 2021 13: 50
        It would be better if they did it easier, they themselves would be sterilized and business. And then it’s scary to think about what kind of inequality, women can give birth and there is no homosexual. Forbid giving birth and all things.
        1. +2
          16 January 2021 15: 21
          That's it. But it is likely that this is still not being prepared for the chosen ones. This is for ordinary citizens, or rather citizens "beggars and superfluous." Worldwide. And then you realize that American politicians and tycoons really consider themselves endowed with special rights, a higher caste, whose opinion everyone should be equal to. But this is not so, they are in mind and mind - the usual levels, closer to the average. And their status depends on the notorious luck, the level of cynicism and greed. Therefore, there is no logic in their statements, even from what they advocate, examples:
          Parent 1 and Parent 2 = inequality. Who is the first, who is the second?
          Couple and single person = inequality. Why you are alone? Why a couple? Why not a trio or quartet?
          Homics and lesbians = inequality. Why do some couples have this and even 2, while others do not?
          Chromosomes XY and XX = inequality.
          Blood groups 1,2,3,4 = inequality.
          Dark and brown = inequality.
          Narrow eyes and round = inequality.
          Bald and hairy = inequality ...
          Therefore, they are clearly hypocritical. People are created different so that humanity will survive to this day. And so everyone must be named differently to identify their difference!
      4. AUL
        +3
        16 January 2021 15: 46
        Quote: Thrifty
        Then a bunch of words like "mom, dad" will disappear, for such a new Yankee will be a mamopap in one essence

        And the first word of the child will be "parent # 2" ...
        1. +2
          16 January 2021 19: 14
          Everything will replace the word "log". But the future Americans will have to be planed until the sexual characteristics disappear completely.
      5. +2
        16 January 2021 18: 27
        Correct, but forgot to mention. Half black and half white, exactly in the middle. Necessarily narrow eyes, and in some places there should be red and yellow.
    3. -3
      16 January 2021 13: 57
      They will do it, they will do it, only when they do it. We Lechu with Android and will invite wassat But until that time. Lyokha will be on Android ... Only he knows. What did he come up with with this android
    4. 0
      17 January 2021 01: 32
      They don't know what they are doing!
    5. -1
      17 January 2021 09: 08
      Albert Kinsey came to the conclusion. that in a healthy society the percentage of homosexuals of both sexes should not exceed THREE PERCENT. Otherwise, society is threatened with degeneration.
      In the UK, according to official figures, the percentage of homosexuals is approximately TEN PERCENT.
      As for Trump, the fact that he lost is a boon. For himself.
      In terms of astrological theory, Trump was born in the Year of the Tiger. And the USA is under the sign of the Bull.
      Ox-Tiger is a vector pair, in which the Ox is the master and the Tiger is the servant. In this situation, the rule of the servant in the master country is a struggle against "windmills". That is, no chance.
      Now the Democrats will be responsible for the collapse of the United States.
  2. +26
    16 January 2021 05: 26
    You look at them and think - if only all this did not reach us ...
    God forbid...
    1. +13
      16 January 2021 05: 30
      Quote: Crowe
      You look at them and think - if only it would not reach us ...

      You know, I remember very well how we talked about AIDS.
      "This is all with them and will not reach us"
      God forbid...

      God forbid see this in Russia
      1. +16
        16 January 2021 08: 49
        Wait, Biden will come, and one of his first acts will be to impose sanctions on Russia for the fact that rear-wheel drive is not allowed to go through the parade of pride in Red Square and register same-sex marriages.
        1. +5
          16 January 2021 10: 28
          I will not be surprised at such an act
    2. -12
      16 January 2021 05: 42
      Quote: Crowe
      You look at them and think - if only all this did not reach us ...
      God forbid...

      And when mom and grandmother bring up
      the child ... they are gender neutral ??? the family is still ...
    3. -1
      16 January 2021 06: 42
      The same thought. The reformers take the bad and the bad from the West to make friends with it.
      1. +23
        16 January 2021 10: 48
        Quote: ximkim
        Reformers take bad things from the west to make friends with them

        Rather, the reformers are kept for the Faberge, and they have to promote bad things. Into the furnace of such reformers.
    4. +2
      16 January 2021 10: 23
      Quote: Crowe
      You look at them and think - if only all this did not reach us ...
      God forbid...

      Well, as they say- "A-man and A-wumen" !! laughing
  3. +7
    16 January 2021 05: 27
    West is feeling a new bottom

    Already groped and slowly but surely punches it
    And it will strike ...
    1. +6
      16 January 2021 06: 43
      America and the West will soon end, but Russia is slowly but surely moving forward, the rich get richer, the poor get poorer.
    2. +5
      16 January 2021 08: 51
      We just decided that we had reached the bottom, as we knocked from below.
  4. +11
    16 January 2021 05: 43
    If we put the question in principle, then the abolition of the institution of the family is rather a natural result of the movement of Western civilization as a whole. After all, it is based on the idea of ​​man as an independent individual. The whole edifice of capitalism and liberal democracy is based on this. A person is separated from other people and has the right to property (in its original form, to his own body). It is clear that all collective institutions are gradually being called into question. Only at the beginning it was a departure from the Christian brotherhood of people and a transition to individual salvation, and ultimately came to the "abolition" of the last bastion of the family.
    However, from the point of view of political economy, there are questions here - if robots really reduce dependence on labor (as before it was reduced by the transfer of production to the countries of the 3rd world), then the elimination of people in general and the destruction of the Protestant white majority as the cultural basis of old America will lead to the fall demand. Capitalism is based on the idea of ​​making a profit and unlimited expansion. If there are few people and the old university education is completely eliminated, then how to expand the market? To whom and what to sell?
    And from the point of view of management, of course, the "human dust" from migrants and people without clan and tribe seems to be easier to manage. But if there is no foundation and basis for society, but there are only separate "free" individuals living in the world of globalistic midnight with its Orwell's doublethink like "Freedom of speech is censorship," then can such a society exist at all? Should it not slide into the Hobbesian war of all against all?
    1. +5
      16 January 2021 06: 57
      Quote: Odyssey
      then the elimination of people in general and the destruction of the Protestant white majority as the cultural basis of old America will lead to a drop in demand. Capitalism is based on the idea of ​​making a profit and unlimited expansion. If there are few people and the old university education is finally eliminated, then how to expand the market? To whom and what to sell?

      And who said that capitalism will last forever? Here we go back to the old days of feudalism. When people were not educated and could only consume essential goods. All other luxury goods were consumed by the nobility. In the new world, phones, cars, apartments will become not just a luxury, but inaccessible. And with that comes decline. People will be fed with what they order and do whatever they want with them. People will be turned into meaningless biomass (the process is already underway).
      1. +1
        16 January 2021 13: 20
        . "In the new world, telephones, cars, apartments will become not just luxury, but inaccessible" ///
        ----
        So far, the trend is just the opposite. Mobile phone and internet available
        almost any beggar. It's the same with the car. Clothes are pennies.
        Only the apartments are expensive.
        1. +1
          16 January 2021 20: 22
          Quote: voyaka uh
          .
          ----
          So far, the trend is just the opposite. Mobile phone and internet available
          almost any beggar. ...
          Mobile phone = collar.
          Internet = chain ... Twitter ban = chain shortening sad
          1. -1
            16 January 2021 21: 43
            "Internet = chain .." ////
            ----
            Why are you sitting on this chain? wink
            1. +1
              16 January 2021 22: 00
              Quote: voyaka uh
              "Internet = chain .." ////
              ----
              Why are you sitting on this chain? wink
              Someone has a "chain" attached to a "collar" (smartphone) ...
              dog on a chain
              D. Trump's "chain was shortened" and D. Trump was shackled with chains.
              prisoners in the usa
              And I use the "chain" for the "well of knowledge" and draw knowledge from it
              well of knowledge
              Well of knowledge Yes
              1. 0
                16 January 2021 22: 36
                Illusion. Anyone scouring the internet is sure they've found the right well.
                and this "most correct" knowledge in it. And overwhelmed with importance in this regard.
                You are exactly on the same chain as everyone else, including the Americans.
                1. +1
                  16 January 2021 22: 45
                  Quote: voyaka uh

                  You are exactly on the same chain as everyone else, including the Americans.
                  liberation of workers
                  the forces of the world are invincible
                  our armored train is on the side track
                  Yes
        2. Bow
          +3
          16 January 2021 23: 36
          You have probably not traveled from Israel to more "modern" countries for a long time.
          The same cars are being squeezed out of cities everywhere. The ideal of the "city of the future" for modern mayors is when cars and other city amenities, such as parks or other pleasant spaces, are available to a narrow circle of the elite, and the gray mass obediently moves on public transport from human beings to work and back, without creating any inconvenience to the elite.
          In light of these trends, cars in cities now have a hazy future.
        3. 0
          17 January 2021 04: 16
          Quote: voyaka uh
          Mobile phone and internet available
          almost any beggar.

          You're lying! I know a beggar, he has no telephone!
    2. +2
      16 January 2021 09: 02
      To whom and what to sell?
      Blacks and robots ...
      1. Fat
        0
        16 January 2021 20: 04
        Here's the same. And if the bot is also endowed with equal rights with other "intelligent organisms"? wassat
      2. +1
        16 January 2021 22: 04
        Quote: 72jora72
        To whom and what to sell?
        Blacks and robots ...

        Blacks in the usa live in "communism" - I need a product - I went to the store and took the product "is free".
        blacks rob the store
        bully
    3. +6
      16 January 2021 09: 30
      Odysseus
      Capitalism is based on the idea of ​​making a profit and unlimited expansion. If there are few people and the old university education is completely eliminated, then how to expand the market? To whom and what to sell?

      For globalists, the receipt is no longer so important or not important at all. They have accumulated enormous wealth, and they print as many pieces of paper called "money" as they want.
      The point is that the modern world is not entirely capitalistic.
      Someone aptly called the modern period of history financialism.
      And this is not really capitalism or even not capitalism at all.
      Globalist financialists don't need market expansion.
      Their goal is a digital concentration camp.
      can such a society exist at all? Should it not slide into the Hobbesian war of all against all?

      At the moment, the globalists manage to control their peoples. They are confident that they will control the whole world.
      A terrible threat looms over humanity.
  5. +5
    16 January 2021 05: 47
    "According to the ideas of the Democratic Party, within the walls of the Congress in the very near future the address" he "," she "," man "," woman ", as well as the words" son "," daughter "," aunt "," uncle "," Mother-in-law "," father-in-law "," son-in-law "or" daughter-in-law. " - speak Newspeak, think Newspeak.
    1. +4
      16 January 2021 08: 03
      But what then to call the mother-in-law? And I realized the parent of parent number 1 (or 2). It turns out long.
      1. +4
        16 January 2021 08: 04
        Quote: Dimy4
        But what then to call the mother-in-law?

        This is not for me .. I do not use Newspeak and I don’t know any such overtones.
      2. +2
        16 January 2021 10: 43
        In English
        Mother in law
        mother-in-law smile
  6. +6
    16 January 2021 06: 07
    Oh, damn it burnt ... Why did I read it all?
    1. +3
      16 January 2021 06: 10
      Quote: Mordvin 3
      Haha I read it all

      I sympathize. Himself the same ...
      But you need to know
      1. +6
        16 January 2021 08: 56
        Quote: Lipchanin
        Quote: Mordvin 3
        Haha I read it all

        I sympathize. Himself the same ...
        But you need to know

        You feel good, you sympathize with it from afar, but here it happens. But in which case I have half of the zinc rounds in stock. Even, perhaps, a little more.
        1. +2
          16 January 2021 10: 31
          Quote: Nagan
          But in which case I have half of the zinc rounds in stock.

          Aim harder.
          One shot, one less gender
        2. 0
          22 January 2021 14: 42
          Nagan? - the barrels overheat when used intermittently, so you need a couple of spare ones, and you can't do with zinc alone - so I recommend increasing your stocks !!!
  7. +9
    16 January 2021 06: 24
    West is feeling a new bottom
    The West has already broken through the bottom and picking up speed rushed into the underworld. What can we say about the West if on the website some people stand up for American "democracy", take criticism from the United States with hostility, and at the same time are happy to castigate Russian reality. Still, it was not for nothing that the concept of marriage was enshrined in the Constitution - the union between a man and a woman, which means that dad and mom, and son with daughter, and grandmother and grandfather will remain.
    1. +6
      16 January 2021 06: 47
      The West is testing "one thing", in Russia "another" is being tested ... but both want to get the result (and will get) one - completely controlled herd of "units".
      1. -2
        16 January 2021 07: 08
        What the American enemies of the Communists are doing with the American people is, in part, analogous to what the enemies of the Communists have done on the territory of the USSR with the Soviet people, starting with their Perestroika. Normal people are humiliated, insulted, deprived of their moral and ethical values, discredit the history of their country, and all in order to present non-normal people better than normal people.
        1. 0
          16 January 2021 07: 42
          Quote: tatra
          in part, an analogue of what the enemies of the communists did on the territory of the USSR with the Soviet people

          I wonder if it wasn't a humpbacked communist who staged a firefight?
          Renounce obscurantism, return to Russian Bolshevism!

          According to the article.
          This is a statement of fact. Is it possible to call mom, dad and daughter and son those who happily knock on punitive organs on each other? laughing
          1. -5
            16 January 2021 07: 48
            Well, I wrote about this, including the fact that for not normal people who seized the USSR in their anti-communist Perestroika, to betray their country and people, those who believed them, each other is completely normal. Gorbachev betrayed the communists, who believed him, and entrusted the country and the people, to the enemies of the communists who, thanks to him, captured the USSR, betrayed him, threw him to the supporters of the communists "he is not ours, he is your communist."
            1. +4
              16 January 2021 07: 52
              Quote: tatra
              Gorbachev betrayed the communists who believed him

              What kind of communists are they who can be easily fooled like this?

              The system of educating cadres in the USSR was set at a high level: october, pioneers, Komsomol members — these are the filters through which the future communist passed. I will never believe that the hunchback was in power as if by accident. He was brought there on purpose and was brought in by people with party membership cards.
              1. -3
                16 January 2021 07: 58
                What do you ask questions to which you yourself know the answer? The enemies of the communists on the territory of the USSR have always pretended to be and pretend to be those who are beneficial to you at the moment. And just as some of you in the communist regime pretended to be communists and their supporters for the sake of profit, so all of you together with them, starting from your Perestroika, pretend to be "great philanthropists" in your propaganda against the USSR and the Soviet people.
                1. +2
                  16 January 2021 08: 06
                  Quote: tatra
                  The enemies of the communists on the territory of the USSR have always pretended to be and pretend to be those who are beneficial to you at the moment

                  They did not always succeed in this, but only from the very time when the meetings of the communists began to be held in secret from the people and it began under Khrushchev. This allowed the Trotskyists to tear the party away from the people, and in the party to "clean up the clearing" and bring the hunchback to power.

                  We digress from the topic.
                  1. -4
                    16 January 2021 08: 22
                    Ha, your theme, the enemies of the communists, all 30 years after your capture of Russia is the same "and we have nothing to do with it, it's all the communists are to blame." YOU yourself do not have YOU yourself, and you all have nothing to do with what you did under Soviet power, your anti-Soviet Perestroika, your seizure and dismemberment of the USSR into your anti-Soviet states, what you did with them and their peoples for 30 years after the capture.
                    1. +2
                      16 January 2021 08: 27
                      Quote: tatra
                      "and we have nothing to do with it, it's all the communists are to blame"

                      What, the people are caught again?
                      Even now you do not want to admit your mistake.

                      Constitution (Basic Law) of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (adopted at the extraordinary seventh session of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR of the ninth convocation on October 7, 1977)

                      "Article 6... The leading and guiding force of Soviet society, the core of its political system, state and public organizations is the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. The CPSU exists for the people and serves the people.

                      Armed with Marxist-Leninist teachings, the Communist Party determines the general outlook for the development of society, the line of internal and foreign policy of the USSR, directs the great creative activity of the Soviet people, and gives a systematic, scientifically substantiated character to its struggle for the victory of communism.

                      All party organizations operate within the framework of the USSR Constitution. "

                      There is a popular wisdom: "I took up the tug, do not say that it is not hefty."

                      ps
                      There is not a word about global politics in the 77th Constitution, but in terms of its importance in terms of impact on the state, it is higher than foreign and domestic policy.
                    2. 0
                      16 January 2021 19: 58
                      Quote: tatra
                      "and we have nothing to do with it, it's all the communists are to blame"
                      Exactly. The communists are to blame. Stalin shot them correctly!
              2. +4
                16 January 2021 08: 28
                I have an old, disheveled notebook. 1982-1988 The time when I was a lecturer of the RK KPSS. I went with her to meetings with a lecturer of the Central Committee of the CPSU, to which we were gathered so that he would "give us instructions" and "tell us interesting things" and "what can and cannot be told to the people." And here I have from her a scan of the page about fertility outside wedlock in the USA and in the USSR. This could be said as an example that we still have immorality and irresponsibility! This is the year 1984 ...
              3. +1
                16 January 2021 10: 06
                Quote: Boris55
                What kind of communists are they who can be easily fooled like this?

                what does ideology and deceived people have to do with it ?!
                Or do you think that once you have adopted the ideas of communism, you cannot be deceived?
                1. 0
                  16 January 2021 14: 29
                  Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                  Quote: Boris55
                  What kind of communists are they who can be easily fooled like this?

                  what does ideology and deceived people have to do with it ?!
                  Or do you think that once you have adopted the ideas of communism, you cannot be deceived?

                  Moreover, ideas can and only be accepted in words, but in fact, nurture and implement completely different ideas and wait for an opportunity.
          2. 0
            16 January 2021 07: 58
            Quote: Boris55
            I wonder if it wasn't a humpbacked communist who staged a firefight?

            Opportunism (Latin opportunus - opportunity) is a term used in politics and political science, as well as in economics.

            In modern economic theory, opportunism is understood as "following one's own interests, including by fraudulent means"
        2. -1
          16 January 2021 21: 06
          Quote: tatra
          What the American enemies of the communists are doing to the American people

          And they say that they are "fighting" injustice and racism, and in general they are building Marxism-socialism, all these "black lives are important" ...
          Quote: tatra
          what the enemies of the communists on the territory of the USSR did to the Soviet people, starting with their Perestroika. Normal people are humiliated, insulted, deprived of their moral and ethical values, discredit the history of their country, and all in order to present non-normal people better than normal people.

          Everything is the same that the Bolsheviks did with the Russian Empire, starting with the 1917 revolution. Who, if not they, destroyed temples, priests, faith in God? Everything is the same under good slogans — land to the peasants, factories to the workers. The result is known, the Putilov workers were suppressed in 1919: [media = https: //rg.ru/2019/03/13/rodina-bunt.html]
          The sailors from Krondstadt took part in the suppression of workers' protests. Later, the Bolsheviks suppressed the sailors: [media = https: //histrf.ru/lenta-vremeni/event/view/kronshtadtskii-miatiezh]
          Then they got the peasants and suppressed their uprising:[media = https: //histerl.ru/lectures/20_vek/tambovskoe-vosstanie.htm]
          Why are your Bolsheviks better than the "enemies of the communists"? The same turbidity is happening in the United States and in the world in general. Everything is similar, but the sauces are different. All of you are smeared with one world. Supposedly you wish the world and people well, but you are not interested in whether we need your "good" and "good intentions." presenters know where, but you do not believe in this place. Well, there will be a surprise. wink
      2. 0
        19 January 2021 15: 06
        I have a similar feeling: American "shadows": the Yeltsin-putinoids are the same circus as the Democrats vs the Republicans - only one level higher. One and the same vector of aspirations in relation to the "masses", only the rates are different, and the slogans are mutually denouncing. Socialism is hated equally wildly.
  8. +3
    16 January 2021 06: 34
    Surprisingly, the author, touching on gender issues and conspiracy theories, remained silent about the fact that there were two important news in the US Congress - at the last by-election, the first or first transgender, gay African American and the first open supporter of conspiracy theories appeared in Congress.
    In the state of Georgia, 46-year-old Marjorie Taylor Green, who is called "the first US lawmaker to openly support the QAnon conspiracy theory", confidently won the elections to the House of Representatives.
    QAnon supporters support Donald Trump and believe that he is opposed by a powerful coalition of Satan-worshiping pedophiles from among government officials, businessmen, celebrities and journalists.

    This is the one who, not having time to cross the threshold of Congress, said that she would immediately impeach the newly elected president, just wait until he becomes president.

    smile
    Sarah McBride will become the first transgender woman to serve as a US Senator after her victory in Delaware the day before .... McBride is 30 years old, previously a press secretary for the Human Rights Campaign for the LGBT community, and during the Barack Obama administration practice at the White House.
    She will now become the highest ranking transgender in the country.


    ... 32-year-old New York City Councilor Richie Torres became the first African American gay to be elected to the US Congress.

    Apparently, the innovations described in the article are tied to the last two cases.
    It is useless to offend colleagues in Congress, the leadership decided. And then they will be dragged through the courts smile
  9. +5
    16 January 2021 06: 42
    This is how it turns out, I came to get a job as a loader, and they tell me we can only take rear-wheel drive, our whole team is like that!
    1. 0
      16 January 2021 06: 56
      This is how it turns out, I came to get a job as a loader, and they tell me we can only take rear-wheel drive, our whole team is like that!

      wassat
    2. -3
      16 January 2021 07: 06
      Quote: ASAD
      This is how it turns out, I came to get a job as a loader, and they tell me we can only take rear-wheel drive, our whole team is like that!

      Oh, damn it, they made fun ... drinks laughing
    3. +2
      16 January 2021 09: 07
      but they say we can only take, rear-wheel drive, our whole team is like that!
      Only black gay people with disabilities.
  10. +5
    16 January 2021 06: 49
    Neither aunt, nor a mother ... Not he, not she ... In general - it is, as in the horror film "It". Cool to horror. wassat
    So this is what it turns out to be - the new face of American democracy. laughing
    Come on, Nancy, burn on! We are already hooked on your show !!! laughing laughing laughing
  11. -1
    16 January 2021 06: 54
    If the author constantly promoted family values, the patriarchal way of life and casually mentioned it somewhere in his articles. about genders, it would be possible somehow prokty. But now I see in the spirit of overtone windows, the author allegedly indignantly describes these same genders, even if the people indignantly get used to it
    1. +6
      16 January 2021 07: 14
      Power, in fact, no matter what it is, wants one thing - its full control over society, with a minimum of costs on its part. Equally "combed", faceless, completely controlled in all respects, a herd of "units", divided into classes according to their need for use - this is the ideal society of the future, to which the authorities in all countries strive. It is no coincidence that Mao admired the arrangement of the life of the ant colony and called the arrangement of the anthill an example to follow in the social structure and state organization.
      1. +3
        16 January 2021 20: 34
        Quote: Snail N9

        In the usa shields - transparent - democracy good
        In Belarus shields iron - "iron curtain" - dictatorship sad
  12. +9
    16 January 2021 07: 11
    Crazy old lady continues to anneal to the fullest. She has already been put on absenteeism in the cemetery, but the grandmother does not calm down. By the way, in countries with high tolerance it is no longer customary to say "fat" or "fatty bass". Now there is a tolerant saying "a person with a developed physique". Yes, and chess will be repainted there soon.
    1. +1
      16 January 2021 09: 58
      For some reason, at the words "with a developed physique," it was not fat that introduced himself, but an athlete .. okay still "full" ..
      1. +1
        16 January 2021 10: 43
        This is to make any SSB feel like an athlete. For rolls and cutlets. laughing
  13. +4
    16 January 2021 07: 15
    The brain has shrunk, there is no soul, one humanity is IT, -Nancy Pelosi.
  14. +1
    16 January 2021 07: 21
    The next step for them will apparently be the replacement of the word man-word-combination-born in an unjust family = slave.
  15. +3
    16 January 2021 07: 23
    I don't know about the striped ones, but in Geyrope newcomers from Asia and Africa will soon show them xy from xy by the age of 30-50.
    1. Bow
      +1
      17 January 2021 00: 06
      See how it works today. For example, in France. The teacher's head was cut off by a stranger - and the right to choose how and where to teach their children was taken away from everyone. On such contradictions, the strengthening of control over society and its depersonalization will be promoted. Already, as we can see, it is moving forward.
      It will be difficult for ordinary Europeans, and the elite does not care who they parasitize on. In the conditions of an electronic concentration camp, it will be possible to keep in check any society, even if it consists of the wildest people.
  16. +4
    16 January 2021 07: 23
    The West and the states in particular, in general, loves fascism and regularly slides there.
    1. Cat
      +2
      16 January 2021 09: 05
      Where else can capitalism slide? Everything is according to the classics.
  17. +6
    16 January 2021 07: 30
    If 30 years ago I was told that this is possible, I would answer: only in science fiction, Bradbury, Orwell or Sheckley.
    The world is going to hell.
    1. +2
      16 January 2021 09: 39
      I would answer: only in science fiction, Bradbury, Orwell or Sheckley.


      In Robert Crane's short story "Purple Fields," women needed government permission to have children. And after 40 years - a beggarly unemployment benefit. Particularly talkative ones were awarded a ticket to paradise. So not everything has come true. There is room to "develop"
  18. +3
    16 January 2021 07: 41
    America, as a great power, was created by migrants with puritanical views, and today's elite makes a deal with the majority. Even Poe said, the opinion of the majority is always wrong, because most people are.
  19. +2
    16 January 2021 07: 42
    And what are they doing half-measures? They would sterilize everyone in the United States without exception. You look 20 years later and America is gone. Better yet, let them try to push their heresy in the Middle East, Africa and Asia. There will be a circus. I would have seen how it ended.
  20. +2
    16 January 2021 07: 56
    Capitalism, however ..
  21. +1
    16 January 2021 08: 05
    Bottom? I hesitate! At the bottom from the bottom, wait with holes with spoons knocking, keep the walking mummy! good
  22. +3
    16 January 2021 08: 46
    If only these "neutral bombs" fell on foreign territory. And American demons "self-destruct". And Russia will again be saved by beautiful women.
    The family, at one time, arose when the problem of property and inheritance arose. Now, the circle is closed: no family - no heir.
    I would like to see how the owners of billions of dollars will transfer the "non-blood-earned" place in FORBS to a neutral "mathematical" successor. laughing "Neutral communism" will come.
  23. +2
    16 January 2021 08: 49
    This is being worked out, or rather, a new trend is being groomed like the Hippies of the 50s-60s, as a toolkit for political domination.
  24. +7
    16 January 2021 08: 55
    This is necessary, as our people are worried about family values ​​in America. And once again everyone grabbed shovels to bury her. And that the country is dying out with awesomely correct values ​​is not considered.
  25. +1
    16 January 2021 09: 08
    In fact, all these theories about "freedom, equality, brotherhood" are not new, they have already been repeatedly used here and there in some weak links in the chain of human society, but they burned out like dry firewood in a stove-stove in a severe frost for window. So the old rulers of the United States did not discover America here. Apparently, someone at some American university of the "major league" carefully read the "Manifesto of the Communist Party" of Messrs. F. Engels and K. Marx, got acquainted with the main ideas of other works of Mr. Marx and his followers, then passed these ideas off as his own, and with American impudence proclaimed that this is the future of humanity. Humanity, as always, was not asked whether it wants to sew up or cut off its primary sexual characteristics, determined by nature and the Lord God. But this shows in the best possible way that it was all exactly like this, because serious scientists would first test their theories on laboratory mice or dogs.
  26. +1
    16 January 2021 09: 13
    By the way, the FBI has received tens of thousands of denunciations against the Republicans who took the capitol, if Trump is a man, he should pardon them on January 18, 19 !? Who else will use the United States as an example for us? Is it only as a repressive machine !!!
  27. +5
    16 January 2021 09: 31
    Quote: Crowe
    You look at them and think - if only all this did not reach us ...
    God forbid...

    as he writes in the article ... sometimes among the younger generation you can find a couple of new Lomonosovs, Mendeleevs or Landau ... reading this one must take into account the fact that deceit, insolence, insanity will now be directed at such luminaries as Mendeleev or Landau and propaganda in order to show these great people to the new younger generation in a perverted way, so that the new generation does not follow the path of great discoveries. An example of this is the cycle of feature films "DAU" created by director Ilya Khrazhanovsky. This is a terrible slander and lie not only against the great scientist Landau, but also against the entire state machine and science that supported great discoveries and great scientists.
    And immediately these films, especially "Dow. New Man" and "Dow. Natasha" were enthusiastically received at the Berlin Film Festival. Yes, the Ministry of Culture of Russia banned the demonstration of these films in Russia, explaining this by the propaganda of pornography, although the explicit scenes there about pornography are very doubtful. But the fact that these films are slander and outright lies against great scientists and great science, the Ministry of Culture was afraid to state this or it was forbidden to do it ...
    So this is breaking through to us and our local liberals are very much looking forward to it. After all, there were
    the cries of the liberals when these films of Khrzhanovsky were banned from showing in Russia ...
  28. +2
    16 January 2021 09: 53
    They have their own laws. We also need to create our own. Otherwise, we will scold morality there, and will not notice how all this will appear in our country. After all, gender change is in full swing in our country. Our laws are needed. Well, at least not all of Europe succumbed to this influence. Poland, Hungary and other countries are still resisting.
  29. +4
    16 January 2021 11: 33
    And he cried out strongly, with a loud voice, saying: Babylon, the great harlot, has fallen, fallen, has become the habitation of demons and the shelter of every unclean spirit, the shelter of every unclean and disgusting bird; for she watered all nations with the fierce wine of her fornication, 3 and the kings of the earth committed fornication with her, and the merchants of the earth became rich from her great luxury.

    4And I heard a different voice from heaven, saying: Come out of her, my people, so as not to participate in your sins and to undergo her plagues; 5 For her sins have come to heaven, and God remembered her iniquities.

    6 Give her back as she gave you, and give her back twice according to her deeds; in the bowl in which she prepared the wine for you, cook it in half.

    7How much she was famous and luxuriant, give so much torment and sorrow to her. For she says in her heart: "I am sitting as a queen, I am not a widow and I will not see sorrows!"

    8That one day, executions, death, and weeping, and famine, will come upon her, and will be burned by fire, because the Lord God who judges her is strong.

    9 And the kings of the earth will mourn and lament for her, having fornication and having escaped with her, when they see the smoke from her fire, 10 standing away from her torment fear and saying: Woe, woe to you, great city of Babylon, mighty city! for in one hour your judgment came.

    11And the merchants of the earth will weep and cry for it, because no one is buying their goods, 12goods of gold and silver, and precious stones and pearls, and fine linen and porphyry, and silk and scarlet, and all fragrant wood, and all kinds of ivory and all kinds of products from precious trees, made of copper and iron and marble, cinnamon and incense, and peace and incense, and wine and oil, and flour and wheat, and cattle and sheep, and horses and chariots, and human bodies and souls.

    14And the fruits that were acceptable to your soul were not with you, and all the stout and brilliant departed from you; you will not find it anymore.

    15Traders all this, enriched by her, will become far from the fear of her torment, crying and sobbing 16 and saying: woe, woe to you, a great city, dressed in fine linen and purple and scarlet, adorned with gold and precious stones and pearls, 17ib died in one hour such a wealth! And all the helmsmen, and all the sailing ships, and all the shipbuilders, and all the merchants on the sea were far away 18, seeing the smoke from her fire, they cried out, saying: What city is like a great city!

    19 And they ashied their heads, and cried out, weeping and weeping: woe, woe to you, great city, whose jewels have all been enriched with ships on the sea, for it is empty in one hour!

    20 Rejoice in this, heaven and holy apostles and prophets; for God completed your judgment on him.

    21And one strong Angel took a stone like a large millstone and cast it into the sea, saying: with such an aspiration Babylon, the great city, will be defeated, and it will no longer be.

    22 And the go'los playing the harp, and singing, and playing the flute, and blowing trumpets in you will no longer be heard; there will be no artist in you, no art, and the noise from the millstones will not be heard in you; 23and the light of the lamp will no longer appear in you; and the golos of the bride and groom will no longer be heard in you: for your merchants were nobles of the earth, and all nations were misled by your magic.

    24And in it is found the blood of the prophets and saints and all those who were killed on the earth.
  30. AB
    +1
    16 January 2021 12: 16
    Gender neutral parent. And also the words "son", "daughter"

    Well, right across Pushkin
    "The queen gave birth in the night
    Not a son, not a daughter;
    Not a mouse, not a frog,
    But to an unknown animal. "
    [I]Gender-neutral parent - queen, also the words "son, daughter" are replaced with an unknown animal.[I]
  31. +5
    16 January 2021 13: 02
    Why are the indigenous peoples of the American continent silent? After all, of all these screaming for "freedom" only they, the Indians have the right to speak .. They are all dying on the reservations. At that time, African Americans and Anglo-Saxons are fighting for territory with their LGBTI rights, etc. kneeling in front of each other, etc.
    Why are they silent about them? There are practically no indigenous people left .. That is the question?
  32. +14
    16 January 2021 13: 22
    Perhaps the most important thing now in the United States is the elimination of inequality in all spheres of life.


    This whole policy, which in fact looks kind of stupid, has one clear goal - to make people think in the framework of an abnormal, fictional picture of the world.

    Reality is always unambiguous... "Father", "mother", "black man", "boy", "girl" - these and other terms have an unambiguous characteristic, from which follows a certain style of behavior in society, which is called a social role. Unambiguity is socially convenient, since it allows one to predict in advance what to expect from a particular person with a certain social role. In its turn correct understanding of another person allows you to effectively establish contact with him.

    The new policy suggests introducing ambiguity as a standard... Why is the idea of ​​the immutability of social roles being deliberately destroyed? So, the introduction of the concept of gender is necessary in order to destroy the possibility of presupposing a person's sexual orientation, since in the new paradigm it can not only be different, but a person can constantly change his gender, as a woman puts on a new blouse every day. Today you are queer, tomorrow you are cisgender, and the day after tomorrow someone else. It is the same with the biological sex, the change of which is now put on stream. Today you are a boy, and tomorrow you can easily become a girl. Or you can become both a girl and a boy at the same time. In short, you can be anything and constantly change, which in turn entails an inevitable change in your social behavior, since a new form determines new behavior in the world.

    As a result, a person has the ability to constantly change, like, for example, the liquid metal terminator in the movie Terminator 2. Today it took one form, tomorrow a second, the day after tomorrow a third. A it is impossible to effectively establish stable social contact with a person who is constantly changing.

    What is the new policy for? The new policy is needed to eliminate the possibility of making long-term agreements between people... People, each of whom is constantly in search of himself and only does what changes, are incapable of long-term agreements. The long-term agreement between the subjects is based on the internal immutability of the subjects. In a simplified way, it looks like this: "I know who I am, and I know who she is, therefore I have every reason to expect that the agreement concluded between us will not change in the future, because neither I nor she will change internally."

    The new policy deliberately destroys unambiguity, which means that it eliminates the very possibility of long-term agreements, since it is impossible to count on long-term agreements in conditions when you do not know who you will be in the future, and the one with whom you are now negotiating will turn into someone.

    Why is a new policy needed? The new policy is needed so that people, in principle, lose the opportunity for long-term agreements among themselves. In this way, the elite minimizes the potential for being overthrown someday because people who are incapable of lasting agreements cannot speak with a united front.

    There is a saying - there are fewer bad people, but they are better organized. The new policy pursues a clear goal - to deprive the people of the opportunity to unite, i.e. to the organization... And without unification, without organization, without conditionally saying "there is such a party" in which everyone, pursuing a common goal, works for a common cause, it is impossible to effectively resist another cohesive organization.
    1. +4
      16 January 2021 14: 04
      What a nice and clever comment!
      1. 0
        16 January 2021 21: 58
        Have you read Yuval Harari's Homo Deus?
        There is a continuous evolution of human society. But evolution
        is not necessarily the way up, for the better. These are jerks from one to another
        side. A kind of complication. Self-experiments are not always correct.
        But who does not pass these experiments-jerks-throws, lags behind.
        1. +1
          17 January 2021 00: 42
          There is a continuous evolution of human society. But evolution is not necessarily an upward path for the better. These are jerks in one direction or the other.


          It's not about evolution. A person, as a born researcher who studies natural mechanics, purposefully striving to put them at his service, which, in fact, differs from static animals in his monotonous life cycle, carries out a continuous process of cognition, accumulates knowledge, which in turn leads to a constant revaluation values. The old, less capacious and accurate view of the world is gradually giving way to a new, more complex and objective one. This process is somewhat reminiscent of the development in physics, where the Newtonian concept was replaced by the general theory of relativity, which will inevitably, as new data accumulate, be refined and expanded within the framework of the new theory.

          The problem is that along with the knowledge of the world, methods of manipulation, deception and deception of a person are also being improved, which, for greater persuasiveness, are sometimes disguised as scientific theories, like the same racial theory or the theory of the market economy. The goal in this case is an attempt to instill in a person a wrong idea of ​​both the world and himself, which is an integral part of the world. And the use of a misconception as a direct guide to action creates specific problems for people in the course of putting into practice these supposedly scientifically based theories.
          1. +1
            17 January 2021 01: 05
            ". A person, like a born researcher who studies" ///
            ----
            What kind of person? Aborigines of Australia? Pashtuns of Afghanistan?
            They need only one thing: so that they do not interfere with their life, how they lived
            thousands of years, without studying anything, changing nothing and not wanting to know new things.
            And other people rush forward, not getting out of the laboratories of the universities.
            Genetically, we note that the former are no different from the latter.
            Although these groups have absolutely, diametrically different ideas about the world.
            And the point here is not in the elites, conspiracies and deceptions of the masses, but much, much deeper, alas ...
            There are many social tensions from these differences in the world.
            Which can only be solved by a system of compromises. Also social.
            1. +1
              17 January 2021 01: 21
              What kind of person?


              Every person in one way or another. It's just that not every person in a wrongly organized society has real opportunities for self-realization.

              Although these groups have absolutely, diametrically different ideas about the world.


              Which is natural, since these groups belong to different societies, each of which sets its own system of values ​​and provides one or another opportunity. However, why go far to Australia when there is an example of Russia, where 60 years ago there were much more opportunities for self-realization for everyone than at the present time, when people are mainly busy with the problem of earning money and survival. Everything is the same - different societies, different values, different conditions, different possibilities inevitably influence a person's decision on how to build his life.
        2. 0
          19 January 2021 15: 20
          Evolution should not be confused with degeneration. I suppose you do not wish your people such "evolution". Therefore, there is no need to substitute concepts for others. It's not gonna go.
          1. +2
            19 January 2021 15: 38
            Evolution is change. The changes are not necessarily positive. Genetic self-experimentation. Degeneration may well be an evolutionary option.
    2. -1
      16 January 2021 14: 50
      Quote: A_Lex
      And without unification, without organization, without conditionally speaking "there is such a party" in which everyone, pursuing a common goal, works for a common cause, it is impossible to effectively resist another cohesive organization.

      Well, the majority of Americans with conservative views have united around Trump, and how has this helped them? They will be accused of attempted murder of congressmen and under this sauce they will confiscate weapons from the population.
      1. +6
        16 January 2021 15: 13
        Well, the majority of Americans with conservative views have united around Trump, and how has this helped them? They will be accused of attempted murder of congressmen and under this sauce they will confiscate weapons from the population.


        You need to unite not around the personality, but for the sake of achieving a specific goal. Conservatism is not a goal.

        At the same time, Trump received as many as 2 impeachments for the very attempt to really lead his supporters, thereby violating the established rules of the game in which voters give their votes to a candidate, after which the connection between them is actually broken.

        These rules of the game have a specific purpose - deprive society of the ability to directly change reality... The model of "representative democracy" is perfect for this, in which society votes to a candidate in the hope that he will act in the public interest, and the candidate, by unspoken rules, has no right to act as a leader, organizing and guiding society for real change. Therefore, Trump was slapped with 2 impeachments - for violating the unspoken code of conduct of an American politician, thereby creating a precedent and a dangerous example to follow.

        "The president is charged with incitement to mutiny." Those. to lead people for real action in a "representative democracy" is a rebellion. What does it mean? This means that in fact society in a "representative democracy" has no rights, because it has no right to directly change reality, and all the words about the "right of the people to revolt" are a lie. Real power belongs to the very small elite that exercises it through lobbying. And the construction of "democracy" is needed to powder the brains of the masses and convince them that they have a real impact.
    3. +4
      16 January 2021 15: 57
      Then they will decide that your Name is the oppression of a neighbor with a different name ... And they will introduce numerical designations. Or the barcodes on the forehead ... Everyone will become the same, gray and incapable of grouping by interest. There was a European cartoon (I forgot its name) - in it, the government controlled its citizens with the help of a special additive in shampoo! They all wash their heads. And people were quiet, obedient ...
      So it is - you are all different, not similar, which means that you cannot have common ideals, desires and aspirations!
      1. +4
        16 January 2021 16: 17
        So it is - you are all different, not similar, which means that you cannot have common ideals, desires and aspirations!


        It is simply that the emphasis is deliberately placed on the fact that people differ in external, formal criteria. By clothes, by skin color, by the shape of the eyes, by language, by rituals, by sexual preferences. And the conclusion is drawn, they say, since people are different outwardly, they are different inside. This is deliberate misleading, i.e. a lie, since a person is only a person, while the outer shell is only a tool, an interface that ensures the effective interaction of a person with the world.

        From the point of view of personal aspirations, everyone is just the same, because everyone wants security, respect, communication, trust, self-realization, diversity, comfort, interesting activities, simple and understandable infrastructure, confidence in the future, etc. And the whole difference is that some recognize others as individuals, while others see in people only shells, tools, robots useful for themselves.
        1. 0
          16 January 2021 22: 04
          People differ both externally and internally, as individuals.
          What unites them is the need to "live in a pack" - in a particular society, country.
          To adapt and respect each other within the laws and customs of this country.
          But with the development of society, customs change, and laws also change.
          It's time for conflicts.
          Which is just what America is going through so violently.
  33. +1
    16 January 2021 14: 32
    The storming of the Capitol, a hotbed of hatred and degradation in the world, did not happen in vain, and already without the African-American pogroms .. It is worth thinking for all of us! Already troops have been brought in to guard .. who and what is interesting?
  34. -1
    16 January 2021 15: 04
    And somewhere in the meantime, slavery flourished! Separately, about the current banks - an affinity for the system under tsarism.
  35. +2
    16 January 2021 15: 50
    It is not specified when in the USA they will abandon the Names and introduce the NUMBERS, impaled or burned out on their hands ???
  36. 0
    16 January 2021 16: 05
    Quote: Semenov
    Quote: ximkim
    Reformers take bad things from the west to make friends with them

    Rather, the reformers are kept for the Faberge, and they have to promote bad things. Into the furnace of such reformers.

    Into the furnace, it would be too easy. But for import substitution (chair upholstery) just right ..
  37. -1
    16 January 2021 19: 15
    Quote: evgen1221
    The next step for them will apparently be the replacement of the word man-word-combination-born in an unjust family = slave.


    The word man is ALREADY not tolerant among them.
    Human = man (does not have "gender neutrality").
    Seen by the change to prayer
    "a-man & a-women"

    And if a child identifies himself as a girl or boy, then he grows up in a "wrong" family and must be transferred to another, it is logical that the new "family" should preferably be LGBT in order to negate the previous distortions of upbringing with the deliberately tolerant views of the new "parents" ...

    As for the term, it is unlikely that it will be a "slave" in a "democratic" society, most likely they use a "victim-social invalid" i.e. an inferior citizen who needs treatment and rehabilitation.

    All this is sad.
  38. Fat
    0
    16 January 2021 19: 41
    hi Think ... "Instead of founding fathers" "founding parents" (no gender definition) and "Motherland - parent". Ursula Le Guin once wrote the novel "The Left Hand of Darkness". So, on the planet Zima, all inhabitants were hermaphrodites. Probably it was easier for them. recourse
    However, it would probably be better for Evgeny Fedorov not to hint at T. Robert Malthus in his analysis, since its "trap" does not threaten humanity, the birth rate has already decreased with the growth of well-being. The fluctuation occurs, at best, in the area of ​​simple population reproduction ...
  39. 0
    16 January 2021 20: 02
    for the presence of LGBD actors in the frame
    Are they democrats in LGBD "D"? Actually.
    So you can simply thin out your own population to the required minimum.
    Will be left without consumers. How then to get rich? Khan to capitalism.
  40. 0
    16 January 2021 20: 02
    And, which is typical, there are people who believe in the stated nonsense smile
  41. -1
    16 January 2021 20: 10
    first .. Americans, and later Hitler

    For some reason they are associated with me.
  42. +1
    16 January 2021 20: 46
    Let's do without "father" and "mother"

    Why, why, what will it give in the end ???
    1. +1
      17 January 2021 00: 27
      hi hi hello, Victor! I thought ----- are they now, all the books, songs, films, cartoons, where are these words ---- thrown away now? Or they will replace and redo according to new rules. And all will be removed from the dictionaries? negative Mess, am am
      Quote: rocket757
      Let's do without "father" and "mother"

      Why, why, what will it give in the end ???
      sad crying crying
      1. 0
        17 January 2021 01: 48
        Hi Dmitry soldier
        They care too much about us, they prohibit us all the time ... either alcohol or smoking !!! Banning is easy ... offering a good, tempting, smart alternative is many, many, more difficult !!! Well, you have to think about it ...
        1. +1
          17 January 2021 03: 25
          Is it so much about us? About Americans, it turns out stronger! am so that the amersky mother would not be offended that she is not a dad? What? Does it really shake her, or what? Or dad, what? "Usual, panimash? crying "And what about the children? Will they be called by their names, mom and dad?"
          Well, the books will be withdrawn from sale, the films will be corrected. .... what about books and films at home? For this subject? Who will control the execution? The further, the wilder ... despite the fact that there are real problems request
          1. 0
            17 January 2021 09: 57
            Each "servants of the people" have their own shores, their own jumps ...
            1. 0
              17 January 2021 10: 23
              Quote: rocket757
              Each "servants of the people" have their own shores, their own jumps ...

              Yeah, these hustlers fool will not bring to good, I wonder how residents will react, obediently or vice versa?
  43. 0
    16 January 2021 21: 30
    Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
    well, if RUSSIAN, then it would not be a sin to know your Gods

    Right now, we will agree to Svarog (enemy of the people with VO)
  44. +12
    16 January 2021 21: 33
    in the very near future, the address "he", "she" should be excluded

    what "It" is it going to be addressed? laughing
  45. +1
    16 January 2021 21: 36
    Quote: rocket757
    Let's do without "father" and "mother"

    Why, why, what will it give in the end ???


    It's very simple if you make cookies at home, then it is better to use fresh natural products that will give an individual and unique taste. If this is an international brand selling cookies around the world and with a shelf life of six months they don't need an individual one, they need a standard of standard ingredients around the world.

    If you build a global Western world, then it is desirable that everything would be without individual characteristics in each country. Management from a single center becomes easier everything will consistently succumb to a common statistical model without any surprises.

    The destruction of the family as a social key element of the community is the most important thing, there is no family - there is no national identity.

    The second plus is a litmus test of the state that is not led to depersonalization, does not share democratic tolerant values ​​and automatically become enemies of the rest of the "progressive" society, which will begin to fight this deviation until it is brought back to normal. Of course, you can propaganda some state will be declared an enemy and then reformed. But it is necessary to strain the propaganda machine. And so having instilled these "values" we get a society that, without external control, will fight with other sovereign states.
    1. 0
      17 January 2021 18: 07
      You can collect all theories, fantasies in a heap and proclaim whatever you want.
      But there is such a catch ... for MOST OF THE WORLD, all those troubles of the "progressive west" to the lantern, frankly!
      The rest of the world will live in its own way and twirl a finger at the temple, pointing in the direction of overseas nnn tol \ LE / rastov fool
  46. +16
    16 January 2021 21: 36
    Let's do without "father" and "mother"

    fool fool fool
    I think that in the near future the dictionary of abusive words will be replenished with the following words: American (will be analogous to the name of Dostoevsky's novel), tolerant, gender.
    1. +2
      17 January 2021 10: 54
      tolerant

      A very similar expletive - "tolerast" - has been around for a long time. It is possible to enter into official dictionaries. Yes, and "gender" is beginning to slowly replace the good old "bugger".
  47. +11
    16 January 2021 21: 38
    Let's try to trace the paradoxical and provocative logic of the congressmen.

    laughing I doubt that American congressmen have any logic. laughing
  48. +19
    16 January 2021 21: 43
    Discrimination based on skin color and ethnicity seems to be coped with in words.

    Aha Yes
    If in the beginning dark-skinned people were oppressed, now light-skinned ones. They have coped with discrimination straightforward ... They go from one extreme to the other. But what's interesting is that those who replace one discrimination with another (from discrimination of blacks to discrimination of fair-skinned ones) are themselves white, the same Nancy Pelosi is fair (in terms of skin) ...
  49. +15
    16 January 2021 21: 46
    mandatory quotas for the presence of LGBD actors in the frame

    I read somewhere that they are already beginning to accuse directors of sexism. That is, opponents of sexism in cinema demand that others instead of beautiful and sexy women be filmed. How ...
    1. +2
      17 January 2021 10: 58
      Quote: Jaromir
      mandatory quotas for the presence of LGBD actors in the frame

      I read somewhere that they are already beginning to accuse directors of sexism. That is, opponents of sexism in cinema demand that others instead of beautiful and sexy women be filmed. How ...

      I'm afraid that such films will start to fail en masse at the box office, so this innovation will not take root.
  50. +16
    16 January 2021 21: 50
    from now on it will not be possible to address relatives "dad" and "mom", but you should pronounce the vile "parent" in this case

    Parent is a masculine word, somehow not tolerant ...bully
  51. +12
    16 January 2021 21: 54
    Again conspiracy theories

    Without her, my dear one would be nowhere... And how could we be without her, if the politicians themselves do such things that such actions cannot be explained except by reference to conspiracy theories.
  52. +4
    16 January 2021 22: 38
    Pelosi is rocking out for a reason. Behind her is strength and power. While Trump was there, all these gays became quiet. And now, with the arrival of Biden, a bacchanalia will begin with the imposition of this Satanism on the whole world.
    They all burn in hell.
  53. +1
    17 January 2021 00: 31
    Well... Another revolution is brewing. This time it's American women against men.. Nobody wants to be number 2. Well, good luck to them.
  54. wow
    +2
    17 January 2021 01: 23
    May something grow on Nancy's forehead! And then THIS can be called (in Amerian) - IT....
  55. The comment was deleted.
  56. -4
    17 January 2021 02: 29
    What exactly is the problem? She's gone. This is development, evolution, progress. Or will the opponents of parent No. 1 and parent No. 2, as well as the gender-neutral parent, be against progress, especially technological progress? And everything is connected and interconnected. Without the development of society, a break from ancient values ​​and so on, there will be no other progress and development, no matter what. There will be degradation and stagnation, xenophobia, chauvinism, and other delights of social Darwinism, isolationism, the friend-or-foe system, all the nonsense that has happened throughout the history of mankind and is happening now. Thanks to science and technology, that same progress, many of those who would not survive in a natural environment among the wild, where the fittest survive, where natural selection takes place, the same Darwinism, but natural, now survive. And all these laws of nature are alien to civilization, both developed, and will always be alien, because they will interfere with the foundations of the civilization of the future, its new values, rules and system of survival if it exists at all.

    There is no God, just as there was no evolution according to Darwin. All these are fictions and fairy tales. This means everything is relative, there is no morality, no rules, there is nothing that would interfere with anything, especially artificial things. Nature itself has no good and evil, no conscience and morality, no concepts of good and bad, no concepts of normal and abnormal, natural and unnatural. Man invented all this. This means it is relative and does not have one-sided judgment and truth, immutability. So what's the problem? Today's humanity, if we exaggerate, is cattle, and it is quite possible in the future that it may undergo selection, just like animals, our smaller brothers, whom we use and exploit in every possible way for our own purposes and needs, as well as the creation of new species, types, sexes, etc. and man. Why not? Why cling to something that has long outlived its usefulness and it’s time to shed like old skin and move forward, expanding boundaries and conquering new horizons and stars?

    Robotization, automation, and the widespread introduction of AI into all spheres of life are the future. And huge masses of people simply will not be needed, and if they are needed, then for the exploration of the universe and the colonization of new planets. And even then it won’t take many people. Machines will do everything, as well as reproduce and support human life, regardless of gender, species, and other things. And this will be the paradise that many people dream of, who understand more than the majority and see wider, deeper, but which for today’s humanity still looks like a utopia. Because they haven’t matured yet. Have not yet developed sufficiently. At least at the societal level.

    As for the reproduction of people and their quantity, regarding our current time, those people who are best ready and capable, adapted for this, should be fruitful and multiply, not only physically, but also mentally, morally, financially, materially. And for this they must not only be healthy, but also smart, well-read, have knowledge in many aspects and fields, especially psychology and biology, education and so on. Such people must also be financially prepared with prospects for the future, for their offspring, no matter how they were bred and who their direct or indirect parents themselves are, so that the offspring does not know hunger, need, or anything like that. All others who do not comply are denied the opportunity to reproduce as well as have the right to do so, no matter alone or within the framework of a “family,” no matter how it is called structurally, from the inside. Why create sick people and poverty, especially unnecessary ones? And these are the majority, and this is a much bigger problem. But as I wrote above, thanks to civilization and modern medicine, many who would not survive in nature in the natural environment according to the natural program of natural selection, they are disabled people of any type and degree, premature, sick, weak and others, simply would not survive. But now they survive, and that’s normal. But at the same time, this is a double-edged sword, and here technology, science, new social rules, principles, etc., which today are very outdated and require replacement and development in many directions, should come to the rescue.

    In summary, all this will lead to paradise, to universal equality, humanism and philanthropy, regardless of gender, orientation, sex, conventional nationality, ethnicity and other things. It will lead to cosmopolitanism, in short, the unification of a single family and system, culture, values, language and other things. We are one family, and we have one house. So why all this that has always happened and is happening now, why the patchwork quilt and enmity, my house on the edge, the war with others like us, friend or foe and other nonsense? Why spend huge amounts of money on weapons against each other when the real enemy is external, from outer space? On the other hand, we are our own enemies if we do not change, develop, improve, improve, and not remain unchanged mummies with unchanged, ossified by nature concepts, principles, values, rules, “morals” and everything else that has long been requires development and improvement. March throw forward.

    We need to move, go forward, and not stand still, which is what is happening now, or even degrade, roll back into the past. The past is the past, we must forget it and look only to the future.
    1. +1
      17 January 2021 14: 07
      This is development, evolution, progress. Or will the opponents of parent No. 1 and parent No. 2, as well as the gender-neutral parent, be against progress, especially technological progress? And everything is connected and interconnected.


      Technological development does not require the abolition of precise terminology regarding a person's social roles, such as "father" or "daughter". Over the course of 2 centuries - the 19th and 20th - a scientific and technological revolution took place, which did not require the introduction of “gender-neutral” terms into practice. And now such a need does not exist.

      Without the development of society, a break from ancient values ​​and so on, there will be no other progress and development, no matter what. There will be degradation and stagnation, xenophobia, chauvinism, and other delights of social Darwinism, isolationism, the friend-or-foe system, all the nonsense that has happened throughout the history of mankind and is happening now.


      Social Darwinism, xenophobia, Nazism, chauvinism - all this was invented during the period of establishment of the bourgeois system and is directly related to it, and not to supposedly “ancient values”.

      Thanks to science and technology, that same progress, many of those who would not survive in a natural environment among the wild, where the fittest survive, where natural selection takes place, the same Darwinism, but natural, now survive.


      Man has never lived and does not live in the wild. Man always lives in a society that does nothing but transform wild nature into a suitable habitat for itself. Natural selection has nothing to do with humans, because it is not the strongest who are useful to society, but the competent ones, and the need for competent people in a variety of fields is becoming greater.

      There is no god


      Absence as well as presence cannot be proven, at least at this stage, therefore an unambiguous statement is not possible.

      This means everything is relative, there is no morality, no rules, there is nothing that would interfere with anything, especially artificial things.


      Nonsense. A person lives in society, without society he cannot live a full life, accordingly, morality, rules, and laws are needed for the effective functioning of society as a system, including ensuring the life of each individual person.
      Those cunning and cunning people who say that there are no morals or rules, let them pack up their money, go to a desert island and try to survive there on their own in the natural environment, establishing their own rules where they not only want to, but can, and do not impose their fantasies, divorced from reality, on society. Instilling nonsense about the lack of morals and rules in people who are accustomed to trust is much easier than instilling this in unplowed land, in a wolf or bear encountered in the forest, in pneumonia caused by hypothermia in the absence of access to antibiotics.

      Today's humanity, if we exaggerate, is cattle, and it is quite possible in the future that it may undergo selection, just like animals, our smaller brothers, whom we use and exploit in every possible way for our own purposes and needs, as well as the creation of new species, types, sexes, etc. and man.


      Today's humanity is “cattle” only for those moral monsters who see only themselves as humans, and everyone else as biological robots, which they considered it possible for themselves to use as they please, since they consider people virtually their private property. Since such a view of reality is inadequate, it seems much easier to sort out the excessively proliferating moral monsters and place them beyond those natural boundaries where they should be.

      Robotization, automation, and the widespread introduction of AI into all spheres of life are the future. And huge masses of people simply will not be needed, and if they are needed, then for the exploration of the universe and the colonization of new planets. And even then it won’t take many people. Machines will do everything, as well as reproduce and support human life, regardless of gender, species, and other things. And this will be the paradise that many people dream of, who understand more than the majority and see wider, deeper, but which for today’s humanity still looks like a utopia. Because they haven’t matured yet. Have not yet developed sufficiently. At least at the societal level. In summary, all this will lead to paradise, to universal equality, humanism and philanthropy, regardless of gender, orientation, sex, conventional nationality, ethnicity and other things. It will lead to cosmopolitanism, in short, the unification of a single family and system, culture, values, language and other things.


      No. In the described scheme, all this can lead to ordinary fascism, to racism, to the institutionalization of the division of society into the Eloi, who are considered a born elite, and the Morlocks, who are considered a born cattle. All this can lead to an artificial division of humanity into 2 fundamentally different races. And all in order to build a pleasant and comfortable paradise for a small elite on the bones of many.
      But such a project makes no sense. Singling a few into a separate caste and universally indulging them is pointless. Behind this entire project is only the personal desire of the elite to ensure a pleasant and problem-free life for themselves and nothing more. Apart from pandering to the whims of presumptuous elitists, such a racist project has no constructive purpose. And since the project does not have an adequate goal, it means it will not take place.

      We are one family, and we have one house. So why all this that has always happened and is happening now, why the patchwork quilt and enmity, my house on the edge, the war with others like us, friend or foe and other nonsense?


      Eat well, fascist agitator. On the one hand, at the expense of the majority, build a paradise for the elite and prohibit anyone from reproducing who does not meet high elitist criteria, which, of course, will only be possible for a few, and at the same time, it is hypocritical to talk about how we are supposedly one family and why we have enmity and division into our own, although elitism is a direct division into our own, which it purposefully imposes on the entire society. Your campaigning is primitive and of poor quality.

      We need to move, go forward, and not stand still, which is what is happening now, or even degrade, roll back into the past. The past is the past, we must forget it and look only to the future.


      If the past is forgotten, it will inevitably repeat itself. Those who are now in the USA demolishing monuments to Lincoln and trying to forget the past, tomorrow with their own hands they will again build the same slavery from the past. Everything that is forgotten inevitably comes back. The current degradation is directly related to the attempt to discard and forget the past, recognize it as wrong, worthless and live from scratch in order to again go through the same path as before. But this is stupid. The most valuable thing that humanity has is memory and accumulated experience, no matter what mistakes we had to go through to gain this experience. Any unconsciousness will lead to the need to fill the same bumps again, which is both stupid and pointless.
    2. +1
      17 January 2021 16: 40
      Quote: Ela Myaushkina
      just as there was no evolution according to Darwin. All these are fictions and fairy tales

      You stand up for scientific progress and deny science! What nonsense did I read? You first find out what happened from what, that is, causes and consequences. Fiction and fairy tales are your nonsense, the theory of evolution has long been proven. It just seems like a secret to stupid people.
  57. +1
    17 January 2021 05: 08
    Here are the tolerants wassat
  58. 0
    17 January 2021 09: 33
    Yes, to the star, this America for me is mother, this is mother, father means father and no one. I'm not collecting numbers. Destroying and forgetting your family, hitting a child on the lips when he says the first word - mom, some kind of insanity and self-destruction, this “trend” would not have reached us
  59. Ham
    0
    17 January 2021 09: 39
    Apparently they don't have any other problems...
  60. 0
    17 January 2021 10: 19
    American liberalism is worse than Covid both in content and consequences.
  61. +2
    17 January 2021 10: 46
    In general, it’s interesting.....this topic is being imposed on the “white” part of the population. Why - I don’t know. But migrants and non-migrants - Muslims - don’t care and they continue to multiply, Hindus too, Latinos - Christians too.... they all have strong family and religious traditions... and a low threshold of education and wealth.. And this prevents them from immersing themselves in topic....
    And what will everyone come to? Latinos and blacks will replace whites in the USA, and Arabs and Turks in Europe?
  62. The comment was deleted.
  63. sav
    -1
    17 January 2021 10: 54
    West is feeling a new bottom

    How precisely noticed good
  64. 0
    17 January 2021 13: 59
    It's disgusting to even read!
  65. 0
    17 January 2021 16: 35
    Prayer at the opening of the 117th Congress
    whaaat? What the hell is prayer at the opening of a legislative body? Are you completely crazy?
  66. The comment was deleted.
  67. 0
    18 January 2021 07: 54
    Let's try to trace the paradoxical and provocative logic of the congressmen. Perhaps the most important thing now in the United States is the eradication of inequality in all spheres of life.
    The main thing is nonsense, as long as the plebs don’t think about property rights to the means of production and exploitation of man by man and forget about the appropriation of surplus value by the bourgeoisie. Even without pants, everyone is equal. Everything is the same with us.
  68. 0
    18 January 2021 11: 06
    And I like watching this circus. The main thing is that he doesn’t get to us.
  69. 0
    18 January 2021 19: 56
    It would be easier for degenerates to replace all terms with one single term “creature,” or better yet, simply “It” or “It.” It says - it declares (this is about the pelosikha).
  70. The comment was deleted.
  71. 0
    27 January 2021 06: 23
    parent No. 1 and No. 2 are already inequality
  72. Lew
    0
    2 February 2021 07: 40
    what do you want from senile insanity? In Soviet times, teachers over 60 years old, and then in exceptional cases at 60, were not allowed to teach at school. They understood that insanity was possible... and here, the second person in the state. True, our Matvienko is not much younger.....and also the second person....Oh! so they copy from us!!!)) Exactly!
  73. 0
    4 February 2021 04: 48
    sick of these perverts
    normal people will soon have to hide in basements. Along the way, we also need to legitimize, like Muslims, a morality police that will protect normal sexually oriented people from this vile, perverted infection! GBT into the furnace of scum! am
  74. Lew
    0
    17 February 2021 09: 17
    When digging a well, you never know what kind of geyser you will run into....
  75. 0
    19 February 2021 18: 34
    SolvedFishPlanRIETNI
  76. 0
    19 February 2021 18: 38
    I wonder what the children call Nancy at home - parent 2 or parent 1? There is also discrimination here - parent 2 may be offended, he wants to be first.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"