ECHR ruled on Ukraine's complaint about Crimea

Now in Strasbourg the sessions of the European Court of Human Rights are being held on the claim “Ukraine v. Russia”. The ECHR ruled on Ukraine's complaint about Crimea.

This is stated in the message of the press service of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation.

The court found some of Kiev's accusations against Russia unproven. In particular, Ukraine announced the killings of civilians in Crimea by the "occupiers", threats to representatives of foreign media, discrimination against ethnic Ukrainians, and the persecution of persons with pro-Ukrainian views. All these speculations were rejected by the court.

Therefore, the ECHR called Ukraine's claim "partially admissible" and said it would continue to consider it.

The Minister of Justice of Ukraine Denis Malyuska wrote on his Facebook page that the court's decision is "a legal blow to the mythology of the Russian Federation in its hybrid war", calling it "an intermediate victory of Ukraine" over Russia.

He stated that in stories There was no referendum or peaceful expression of the will of its citizens in Crimea, but there was only "armed aggression of the Russian Federation" and "gross violations of human rights. The minister said that the Russian military took control of the peninsula not from the moment of the referendum, but much earlier, back in February 2014.

Russia supports the myth of the peaceful and legitimate annexation of Crimea, intended for internal use, and is trying to promote it in the international arena.

- the Ukrainian official wrote on the social network.

Comments

[Sergey39]

For Ukraine, it is in the order of things to call defeat an "intermediate victory". The power of the outskirts is based on total lies.

[Thrall]

The Minister of Justice of Ukraine Denis Malyuska wrote on his Facebook page

Do Ukrainian ministers exist anywhere besides Facebook?

[Temples]

Quote: Sergey39

The power of the outskirts is based on total lies.

Only there?

[Vladimir Mashkov]

In fact, the ECHR has not yet made a final decision, its session continues.

But his intermediate solutions are correct:
The court found some of Kiev's accusations against Russia unproven. In particular, Ukraine announced the killings of civilians in Crimea by the "occupiers", threats to representatives of foreign media, discrimination against ethnic Ukrainians, and the persecution of persons with pro-Ukrainian views. All these speculations were rejected by the court.

That is why you are especially ridiculous ... throws on Facebook of the Minister of Justice of Ukraine Malyuska that the court's decision is “a legal blow to the mythology of the Russian Federation in its hybrid war” and “an intermediate victory of Ukraine” over Russia.

[gurzuf]

For example - in America.

[major147]

Quote: Thrall

Do Ukrainian ministers exist anywhere besides Facebook?

Near the cash register, where salary is issued

[tihonmarine]

Quote: Sergey39

The power of the outskirts is based on total lies.

Lies and outskirts are inseparable.

[Labrador]

calling it "Ukraine's intermediate victory" over Russia.

So to speak, we got into trouble

[marchcat]

Minister of Justice of Ukraine Denis Malyuska even understands the meaning of what he has read ??? What a “legal blow to the mythology of the Russian Federation in its hybrid war” if most of the claims were rejected. I was glad early ...

[tikhonov66]

"...
He stated that in the history of Crimea there was no referendum and peaceful expression of the will of its citizens
..."
- LIE, the usual blatant LIE.
There were SEVERAL referendums in the "history of Crimea"
- and in ANY OF THEM "citizens of Crimea" - did not recognize themselves as citizens of Ukraine.
But "Ukrainian officials" do not care!
- they are their own "people"
8-)))
The first referendum on the territory of Crimea (the first referendum in the history of the USSR) took place on January 20, 1991. The decision to hold it was made on November 12, 1990 at an extraordinary session of the Crimean Regional Council of People's Deputies. The question was put to the vote: "Are you for the re-establishment of the Crimean Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic as a subject of the USSR and a participant in the Union Treaty?" 1,777,841 million Crimeans had the right to vote. The referendum was attended by 1,441 million people (81,3%), including residents of Sevastopol. 1,343,855 million people (93,26%) answered positively. The majority of Crimean Tatars boycotted the vote. However, on February 12, the Supreme Soviet of the Ukrainian SSR adopted a law on the restoration of the Crimean ASSR as part of the Ukrainian SSR ..
...
- i.e. Ukrainian officials ON the peaceful expression of the will of the citizens of Krvma - DO NOT DONATE !!!
they, like in Kiiv - "know better" ... 8 - ((
...
On May 5, 1992, at the session of the Crimean parliament, an act on the state independence of the Republic of Crimea was adopted, which was to enter into force after it was confirmed by the all-Crimean referendum scheduled for August 2. Its participants had to answer two questions: "Are you for an independent Crimea in an alliance with other states?" and "Do you confirm the act of state independence of the Republic of Crimea?" On May 13, the Supreme Council of Ukraine recognized the decisions of the Crimean parliament on the proclamation of an act on state independence and the conduct of a referendum as contrary to the constitution of Ukraine and suspended their effect.

... - i.e. Ukrainian officials - FULLY REFUSED THE PEOPLE OF CRIMEA in the right to peaceful expression of their will, they, like in Kyiv - "know better" ... 8 - ((

In March 1995, by a decision of the Verkhovna Rada and the President of Ukraine, the constitution of the Republic of Crimea was abolished, and the presidency was abolished. On April 25, the Supreme Council of Crimea decided to hold a general Crimean referendum on June 25. Crimeans were asked to answer the following questions: "1. Do you approve the constitution of the Republic of Crimea, unilaterally repealed by the Supreme Council of Ukraine on March 17, 1995? 2. Do you support the Law of Ukraine" On the Autonomous Republic of Crimea "of March 17, 1995?" However, on May 31, the Crimean parliament overturned its decision on the referendum, agreeing with the proposal of the Supreme Council of Ukraine to adopt the constitution of the autonomous republic based on the law of Ukraine "On the division of powers between Ukraine and Crimea."

... - i.e. Ukrainian officials - again DEFEATED THE PEOPLE OF CRIMEA in the right to a peaceful expression of their will they, like in Kyiv - "know better" ... 8 - ((

On February 22, 2006, the Crimean Supreme Council again (after 1998) attempted to hold a republican referendum on the status of the Russian language on March 26. The initiative belonged to the Party of Regions of Viktor Yanukovych. The Ukrainian Central Election Commission has banned precinct election commissions in Crimea from voting on this issue.

... - i.e. Ukrainian officials - again DEFEATED THE PEOPLE OF CRIMEA in the right to a peaceful expression of their will they, like in Kyiv - "know better" ... 8 - ((

On December 16, 2006, in an unofficial popular referendum, Crimeans voted against the political course of Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko to join NATO. The Crimean authorities refused to provide premises for voting, and the organizers - the All-Crimean People's Assembly - held a referendum in the streets. 98,7% of the nearly 900 thousand citizens who took part in the voting voted against Ukraine's membership in the North Atlantic Alliance. This referendum had no legal force.

- So FALSE, FALSE and again a big Ukrainian LIE ...
8 - ((

[Crowe]

The court dismissed all these speculations.

Here's what they wanted, to win all the lawsuits against Russia in the courts ... Not all the cat (Ukraine) is Shrovetide.

[210ox]

You haven't won at Sportloto yet.

[ccsr]

the Ukrainian official wrote on the social network.

Again, we will discuss the words of another Ukrainian clown - how long?

[tihonmarine]

Quote: ccsr

Again, we will discuss the words of another Ukrainian clown - how long?

They have everyone who receives at least a small briefcase is obliged to publicly state - "Crimea is the outskirts." If this condition is not met, the portfolio goes to another.
Here is even their biggest boss, not of Ukrainian blood, but oppression there, because he has a portfolio maybe more than others.

[Cron]

In particular, Ukraine announced the killings of civilians in Crimea by the "occupiers", threats to representatives of foreign media, discrimination against ethnic Ukrainians, and the persecution of persons with pro-Ukrainian views.

All this is in full on the territory of Ukraine itself, but who cares if it is not Russia?

He stated that in the history of Crimea there was no referendum and the peaceful expression of the will of its citizens, but only “the armed aggression of the Russian Federation” and “gross violations of human rights.

Why shouldn't Ukraine gather a delegation, also take the president with him with full immunity, take European deputies with it and not go to Crimea and prove that people on this territory support them? It would be a hard blow to the Kremlin, or are they afraid of it:

[tihonmarine]

Quote: Cron

It would be a hard blow to the Kremlin, or are they afraid of it:

More precisely, a complete failure for Kiev.

[nnm]

A good Ukrainian mine with a bad game - their main "Wishlist" such as murders, the court rejected the prosecution. As well as refused to consider the issue of annexation. What is left of the complaint in general is a huge question. The court dismissed all "acute" questions.

[Puppeteer 111]

The press service of the Ministry of Justice said that the following complaints about the following administrative practices of the Russian Federation in Crimea were admissible:
- enforced disappearances and lack of effective investigations;
- cruel treatment;
- illegal detention;
- the spread of Russian legislation in Crimea, because of which, since February 27, 2104, the courts operating in Crimea cannot be considered legal;
- Coercion to Russian citizenship;
- illegal searches in private homes;
- persecution and intimidation of religious leaders who do not belong to the ROC;
- termination of the activities of Ukrainian media;
- prohibition of public gatherings, intimidation and arbitrary detention of organizers of demonstrations;
- expropriation of property from civilians and private enterprises without compensation;
- the prohibition of the Ukrainian language in schools and the persecution of Ukrainian-speaking students;
- restriction of movement between Crimea and mainland Ukraine;
- persecution of the Crimean Tatars.
At the same time, complaints about the administrative practice of murders, detention of foreign journalists, seizure of property of the Ukrainian military were rejected, the court's release says.
The release also says that the court has declared itself incompetent to assess whether the "annexation of Crimea (occupation, - ed.)" Under Russian law was legal from the point of view of international law.
The case is based on two complaints of Ukraine from 2014 and 2015, which in 2018 were combined into one case - Ukraine v. Russia (on Crimea) No. 20958/14.
The ECHR noted that two more cases of Ukraine against the Russian Federation are currently in court. Also, more than 7000 individual complaints were filed about events in Crimea, Donbass and the Sea of ​​Azov.

[bad]

The Minister of Justice of Ukraine Denis Malyuska wrote

This Malyuska (what a funny surname) would be better off modestly keeping silent

[major147]

Quote: malo

The Minister of Justice of Ukraine Denis Malyuska wrote

This Malyuska (what a funny surname) would be better off modestly keeping silent

Apparently, God endowed him with the mind according to the name.
"The minister said that the Russian military took control of the peninsula not since the referendum, but much earlier, back in February 2014."
He should read history and find out when the Russian troops "took control of the peninsula", but apparently not destiny ...

[morpogr]

As if it did not return like a boomerang after all the blockades and terrorist attacks.

[tihonmarine]

Quote: morpogr

As if it did not return like a boomerang after all the blockades and terrorist attacks.

Crimea and Bandera are not compatible, Crimea was, is and will be Russia.

[svp67]

And yet I would very much like to know what the ECHR decided to put aside for consideration?

[Avior]

the Ukrainian media write that the court allegedly confirmed that Russian control over the peninsula was established no later than February 27, and that from that date all decisions of the Crimean courts are not legal.
did not confirm the point about executions and executions.

[svp67]

Quote: Avior

the court allegedly confirmed that Russian control over the peninsula was established no later than February 27

Well, so-so a reason for parsing ...

Quote: Avior

that from this date all decisions of the Crimean courts are not legal.

But this is just speculation until the court makes a decision

[Avior]

Let's see how it ends in the end.

[Tagan]

Quote: ccsr

the Ukrainian official wrote on the social network.

Again, we will discuss the words of another Ukrainian clown - how long?

While the Ukraine project exists. But it's time to cover it up.

[Zaurbek]

What are we doing at the ECHR? And why do we need this court?

[XXXIII]

Quote: Zaurbek

What are we doing at the ECHR? And why do we need this court?

Our idlers are sitting there, although now this decision of the court, in general, does not apply to the internal affairs of Russia as per the new constitution.))
Constitution of the Russian Federation Article 79 <*>

The Russian Federation may participate in interstate associations and transfer to them part of its powers in accordance with international treaties of the Russian Federation, if this does not entail restrictions on the rights and freedoms of man and citizen and does not contradict the foundations of the constitutional system of the Russian Federation. Decisions of interstate bodies adopted on the basis of the provisions of international treaties of the Russian Federation in their interpretation, contrary to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, are not subject to execution in the Russian Federation.

[Ros 56]

Why are you so worried, have you forgotten about the changes in the Constitution?

[Zaurbek]

I don’t ... then another $ 50 billion will be awarded and will be fished around the world

[Ros 56]

I’m wondering what kind of minuses he threw us on the sly, you can see here on the site of these idiots with pots on their heads.

[Mavrikiy]

unproven. In particular, Ukraine announced the murders of civilians in Crimea by the "occupiers", threats to representatives of foreign media, discrimination against ethnic Ukrainians,

And for slander, they have no article? For 10 years, so as not to be familiar.

[Kerensky]

And for slander, they have no article? For 10 years, so as not to be familiar.

There is a system of advance payments. Pay and slander how long your wallet lasts. Moreover, the court's decision will not even be shown to the plaintiff, the plaintiff's lawyer can get acquainted with it for a separate deny ...

[Keyser soze]

On such a claim, the ECHR will not find anything, because the Ukrainians wrote nonsense. Yes, in general, no court is competent in these matters - someone took and added something. Well, it happens all the time. If someone took a territory with his population and can detain it and turn away from the international community, then everything will be fine with him. If you took with someone else's (mentally or nationally) population, then you will receive partisans and bombs. Thousand-year banal.

[yuriy55]

Therefore, the ECHR named the claim of Ukraine "Partially acceptable" and stated that he would continue to consider it.

Partially Acceptable - Half Pregnant.
You can call this step of the ECHR a partial blow to Kiev "in the gut", or you can call it a partial kick in the ass.

[cniza]

Russia supports the myth of the peaceful and legitimate annexation of Crimea, intended for internal use, and is trying to promote it in the international arena.

It's in your head myths roam ...

[major147]

Quote: cniza

Russia supports the myth of the peaceful and legitimate annexation of Crimea, intended for internal use, and is trying to promote it in the international arena.

It's in your head myths roam ...

Somehow, during his "reign", the always drunk Giblets accidentally sober up and admitted that Crimea had left Ukraine itself. But that was just a glimpse of consciousness.

[cniza]

Yes, there was such a thing and even showed how he was chased in the Crimea and how he ran away ...

[A.K.]

Crimea is Russia and that's it. In my opinion, everyone already agrees with this. It's just too early to talk about it from the partners.

[Sayan]

Does this dunce know anything about the history of Crimea? - made with a finger, standing, born, with a long neck on fine carvings and a pan on the part of the body in which he eats?

[Alexga]

It may be better for the Russian Federation to spit on the threshold of the Council of Europe, forget what the ECHR is, and calmly develop along its own path, guided by its state interests. True, then you need to nationalize the most important sectors of your economy.

[tihonmarine]

Quote: AlexGa

It may be better for the Russian Federation to spit on the threshold of the Council of Europe, to forget what the ECHR is

Yes, there is no such threshold and the ECHP, it's just fictions of the stoned West.

[tihonmarine]

He stated that in the history of Crimea there was no referendum and the peaceful expression of the will of its citizens, but only “the armed aggression of the Russian Federation” and “gross violations of human rights.

Let him ask any resident of Crimea about this, and they will answer him, and about aggression, and about the desire to remain a part of Ukraine, and the "train of friendship", and all the more about violations of human rights. All sane people see how human rights are respected by Ukraine in Donbas. "Whose cow would moan, but 404, it would be better to be silent !.

[Kuzmitsky]

For Donbass in Ukraine, human rights are not provided for. Ukrainian officials have been open about this. that if they return Donetsk and Lugansk, they will deprive local residents of electoral and other rights for a long time. They say that their thinking is "poisoned by Moscow propaganda" and they need to be re-educated. Modern Ukraine and human rights are incompatible concepts.

[tihonmarine]

Quote: Kuzmitsky

For Donbass in Ukraine, human rights are not provided for.

Ukraine and human rights, this is just an anecdote of the "Armenian radio" (it was like that in the USSR).

[Ros 56]

The court needs to communicate with the residents of Crimea on this topic, and not with stupid Natsiks. Actually, according to our Constitution, this court can be sent, far, far, well, you all know where.

[Gunner]

Keep your mouth shut, or Russia will achieve your recognition of the referendum after Kiev's complete and unconditional surrender.

[rruvim]

Anecdote:
A family with a son comes to kindergarten.
Educator: I see that this is your son, but whether he is yours, GORONO decides.
Family: We have all the documents! And DNA evidence!
Educator: I see that you didn't beat him, but GORONO decides!
Son: Dad, Mom! They went to the x-r, maybe I will be brought up at home ...