Military Review

Unidentified drones strike Turkish control zone in northern Syria

60
Unidentified drones strike Turkish control zone in northern Syria

From Syria, there are reports of the use of several unknown drones armed with explosive devices in the north of the country. According to recent reports, such drones were used to attack targets in the Turkish-controlled zone north of the city of Al-Bab in Aleppo province.


Several explosive devices were dropped from UAVs in the area of ​​Tarhin, which is controlled by the Turkish military and the armed formations of the so-called "Syrian Free Army" controlled by them.

Turkey claims that drone strikes on FSA and Turkish positions in the Tarhin area could have been carried out by armed PKK (Kurdistan Workers' Party) units. PKK detachments are also suspected by Ankara of imposing a battle in the east of Turkey itself - in the Diyarbakir region, where the Turkish gendarmerie suffered losses the day before and where additional security forces were deployed.

Meanwhile, the pro-Turkish armed formations struck another massive attack on the eastern suburbs of Ain Issa. As noted, mortars of various calibers were used, as well as homemade rocket launchers. If you believe the reports of the Kurdish administration, then the Turkish military was also involved in the shelling of the eastern suburbs of Ain Issa.

We remind that observation posts of the Russian military police appeared in Ain Iss (Raqqa province) a few days ago. This deployment took place after representatives of the local (Kurdish) administration addressed the Russian command. After that, the shelling of Ain Issa itself ceased, but the pro-Turkish groups switched to shelling the territories located a few kilometers east of this city.

The situation at this hour remains unsettled in the south of Syrian Idlib. Earlier there, the militants tried to expand their zone of control, inflicting a series of attacks on the positions of the SAA, but received a serious rebuff, including the use of combat aviation.
60 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Vladimir_2U
    Vladimir_2U 11 January 2021 08: 04
    +23
    Wow, so not only the "bearded" can play these games! Who would have thought.
    "... And with what measure you measure, it will be measured to you also ..." One very famous book.
    1. kit88
      kit88 11 January 2021 08: 30
      +15
      This beard is the one who needs a beard.
      1. XXXIII
        XXXIII 11 January 2021 09: 55
        +6
        Bayraktar returns home.
        1. Orange bigg
          Orange bigg 11 January 2021 09: 57
          +8
          Open secret. The Arabs are already openly saying whose drones they were.
          “This evening, a series of powerful explosions occurred in Aleppo province, following a drone attack on oil smuggling sites by Turkish-backed militants. According to new reports from Aleppo governorate, drone strikes were carried out by the Russian Aerospace Forces, which once again attacked oil smuggling facilities in the city of Tarhin. Video footage showing the aftermath of the strikes was posted on social media this evening, showing severe fires at the site where several oil tankers are located, ”Al-Masdar News reported.

          Considering that currently only one type of attack drone is in service with Russia, experts have suggested that the strikes were inflicted by the Orion drone or several combat vehicles of this model at once.

          https://avia.pro/news/amn-rossiyskie-bespilotniki-nanesli-udary-po-tureckim-gruzovikam-v-aleppo
        2. Machito
          Machito 11 January 2021 16: 00
          +3
          As they say, not Bayraktar alone. The Kurds also have homemade products capable of assembling a combat drone from parts.
  2. svp67
    svp67 11 January 2021 08: 11
    +13
    And six months later, from the mouth of Manturov, we learn that the next strike UAV of Russia passed a test in combat in Syria ... wink
    1. Ka-52
      Ka-52 11 January 2021 08: 22
      +22
      yet another attack UAV of Russia passed a test in combat in Syria ... wink

      the sect of Bayraktar fans will now prove to you that the RF Armed Forces do not have shock drones, and the bearded meerkats were simply beaten by a hail
      1. Alexander Galaktionov
        Alexander Galaktionov 11 January 2021 08: 27
        -6
        Percussion let the MO show a video of the use of a strike uav, and all the questions that we do not have drummers will disappear immediately yes
        1. Ka-52
          Ka-52 11 January 2021 08: 34
          +10
          Percussion let the MO show a video of the use of a strike uav, and all the questions that we do not have drummers will disappear immediately

          video is not a fact that will prove to you. Half of the videos (if not more) on YouTube, on which the UAV performed only designator, were identified by the audience as hitting targets with their own drones weapons.
          1. Alexander Galaktionov
            Alexander Galaktionov 11 January 2021 08: 35
            -6
            The approach can be disassembled, the UAV used missiles or not
            1. hydrox
              hydrox 11 January 2021 09: 10
              +8
              But the commentators do not need to know this, otherwise the stench will rise to heaven, you know from whom.
              As long as you can camouflage, you have to do it, but as the debris with the stigma is presented, then you will have to confess - "And what, in fact? We do everything the same way as others. laughing But we want to do better - we have the opportunity and desire for this - do not bother us to polygon lol "
          2. Alexander Galaktionov
            Alexander Galaktionov 11 January 2021 08: 38
            -2
            Let's see the teachings this year
        2. Interlocutor
          Interlocutor 11 January 2021 10: 47
          +7
          Shock let MO show a video of the use of a strike uav

          They won't show you anything. For you do not need to see it. Russians don't like to brag. You can tell what by chance someone saw. The rest is neither. And it is right.
        3. Petro_tut
          Petro_tut 11 January 2021 11: 46
          +3
          Shock let MO show a video of the use of a strike uav,

          Well, MO showed him, as it were, unshaven, - "Look, the bird flies" laughing
          Probably it looked something like this
          https://youtu.be/u6QbSXD5E1A
    2. Revolver
      Revolver 11 January 2021 10: 07
      +6
      Quote: svp67
      And six months later, from the mouth of Manturov, we learn that the next strike UAV of Russia passed a test in combat in Syria ... wink

      Israel in such cases usually states that they do not confirm or deny Israel's involvement in the strikes. Russia should also take this position.
      1. Vasya Zyuzkin
        Vasya Zyuzkin 11 January 2021 13: 21
        0
        All those who have illegally invaded Syria.
  3. Aviator_
    Aviator_ 11 January 2021 08: 15
    +5
    Unidentified drones strike Turkish control zone in northern Syria

    And nothing is known about the effectiveness of these attacks?
    1. Alexander Galaktionov
      Alexander Galaktionov 11 January 2021 08: 20
      0
      In general, we would have already had shock UAVs, with video application
      1. Ka-52
        Ka-52 11 January 2021 08: 31
        +5
        In general, we would have already had shock UAVs, with video application

        and what is impatience connected with?
        1. Alexander Galaktionov
          Alexander Galaktionov 11 January 2021 08: 33
          -11%
          Lagging in shock UAVs, so it circles 12 hours or 24 in the sky, and if any boiling will come to the aid of the detachment
          1. Ka-52
            Ka-52 11 January 2021 08: 40
            +12
            Lagging in shock UAVs, so it circles 12 hours or 24 in the sky, and if any boiling will come to the aid of the detachment

            the target can be hit using other means of destruction: manned aircraft, artillery. Moreover, in some cases, UAVs will not be able to do anything in principle - for example, if the target is area, recessed, multiple, protected by air defense, fortified. UAVs have a lot of problems with the need to be close to the front line (except for heavy UAVs), the requirements for telemetry protection from interception, induced interference, etc. And echeloned air defense is likely to quickly reduce the capabilities of the UAV to a minimum. All this makes the UAV not a universal weapon, but a sector one. Therefore, the development of drones in various designs - all in due time
            1. Alexander Galaktionov
              Alexander Galaktionov 11 January 2021 09: 00
              -8
              The area target of the UAV will give coordinates, it will highlight or destroy a special target if the Close proximity striker is in the presence of which UAV, especially if the enemy has strong air defense, then it is better to sacrifice the UAV than the aircraft
              1. Ka-52
                Ka-52 11 January 2021 09: 08
                +13
                if the Proximity drummer is stuck in which uav

                if in Karabakh the enemy of Azerbaijan was a normal army, it is not a fact that your Bayraktars would take off. The control range of 250 km makes their departure aerodromes vulnerable to many weapons. A pair of OTRKs is enough to, if not completely destroy all aircraft, then damage the runway, warehouses with weapons and fuel
                1. Alexander Galaktionov
                  Alexander Galaktionov 11 January 2021 09: 16
                  -8
                  They had Scuds and Iskandars who were behind Karabakh
                  1. Ka-52
                    Ka-52 11 January 2021 09: 25
                    +8
                    They had Scuds and Iskandars who were behind Karabakh

                    there was no Iskander among the NKR armed formations. The Armenians tried to use Elbrus at the airport in Ganja, but hit the sky with their finger. Only karma has been spoiled
                    1. Alexander Galaktionov
                      Alexander Galaktionov 11 January 2021 09: 27
                      -9
                      And why didn't the Armenians bang Iskander at the airport in Ganja then?
                    2. Alexander Galaktionov
                      Alexander Galaktionov 11 January 2021 09: 28
                      -8
                      Isxanders wrote who is behind Karabakh - Armenians
                    3. Grits
                      Grits 11 January 2021 16: 49
                      0
                      Quote: Ka-52
                      The Armenians tried to use Elbrus at the airport in Ganja, but hit the sky with their finger. Only karma has been spoiled

                      I would not be surprised that the Armenians did not even know where the UAVs were taking off and from where they were controlled. And they hit the airport at random - what if it's all there ...?
                2. Alexander Galaktionov
                  Alexander Galaktionov 11 January 2021 09: 18
                  -7
                  Here again, if, in fact, we have that Azerbaijan won And the fact that they did not prepare, these are already questions for them
                  1. Ka-52
                    Ka-52 11 January 2021 09: 31
                    +7
                    in fact, we have that Azerbaijan won And the fact that they did not prepare, these are already questions for them

                    our dialogue did not have the topic "who and why won in Karabakh". I'm just saying that the role of the UAV in this conflict is overblown. Yes, spectacular. Yes, in a certain situation it is quite acceptable (if the enemy does not control the sky). But wars are not won by Bayraktars))
                    1. Alexander Galaktionov
                      Alexander Galaktionov 11 January 2021 09: 33
                      0
                      UAV wars are not won, I agree to 100 percent, but the situation is another matter
                    2. Grits
                      Grits 11 January 2021 16: 51
                      0
                      Quote: Ka-52
                      But wars are not won by Bayraktars

                      This was the first war to refute your claims. Although, I also agree with him.
                3. Alexander Galaktionov
                  Alexander Galaktionov 11 January 2021 09: 30
                  -1
                  And if the Armed Forces of Ukraine had Laura, Astra, and something else, then I think not everything would be good either, it would be
                4. Dimide
                  Dimide 11 January 2021 13: 32
                  0
                  There was news in the fall that the software was updated and now the controlled flight range is about 500 km
                  1. Ka-52
                    Ka-52 12 January 2021 05: 07
                    +1
                    There was news in the fall that the software was updated and now the controlled flight range is about 500 km

                    and where does the software? The problem is in relaying. For a drone flying at an altitude of 8000m, the radio horizon is slightly more than 300 km. And with a decrease to 200, it decreases by 2 times. Therefore, in order to increase the distance over the horizon, it is necessary to increase the wavelength or use repeaters (repeaters).
                    1. Dimide
                      Dimide 12 January 2021 10: 21
                      0
                      If I remember correctly, it was said that the new software makes it possible to increase the UAV's flight range without placing additional repeaters.
                      1. Ka-52
                        Ka-52 12 January 2021 10: 27
                        +1
                        means switched to a longer wavelength. The longer the wavelength, the more it is reflected from the ionosphere. And, accordingly, it can go very far along the tropospheric waveguide. But the lower the frequency, the less secure the connection. So it's a double edged sword
            2. Alexander Galaktionov
              Alexander Galaktionov 11 January 2021 09: 01
              -1
              Moreover, the Turks used, conditionally 3 Bayraktar, one Anka with RER and one with EW
            3. Intruder
              Intruder 11 January 2021 17: 18
              0
              Moreover, in some cases, UAVs will not be able to do anything in principle - for example, if the target is area, recessed, multiple, protected by air defense, fortified.
              ground-based BPA will approach, and slowly but surely they will disassemble from 30 mm-wok, something like this, remember our Uranium-9 or Marker, in the West they are also tested, by the way, for a long time ...:
              1. Intruder
                Intruder 11 January 2021 17: 24
                0
                and here is a new platform for heavier BM-s:
                1. Intruder
                  Intruder 11 January 2021 17: 30
                  0
                  another interesting video for launchers for loitering ammunition:
    2. NDR-791
      NDR-791 11 January 2021 08: 34
      +3
      And nothing is known about the effectiveness of these attacks?
      At least it's fear. Already forced to take into account this approach. Although ... there are no losses on our side good
  4. prior
    prior 11 January 2021 08: 24
    +6
    "Unidentified drones strike Turkish control zone"

    The Bayraktars went berserk .....
    1. Alexander Galaktionov
      Alexander Galaktionov 11 January 2021 08: 31
      +2
      Will you infuriate Bayratkars by eating EW radiation?)
  5. sleeve
    sleeve 11 January 2021 08: 35
    0
    Scenario 1.
    Two or three more such "terrorist attacks" and the Turks will "untie" their hands regarding the PKK. Who then "threw" the VU not far from anything?
    2 script
    Taki appeared on the knee made by the Kurds themselves (or maybe the "volunteers" volunteered a little). Well then, two or three more times and ... Well, it was already in scenario 1.
  6. Mykhalych
    Mykhalych 11 January 2021 08: 38
    +2
    Oops, but mulberries are more accurate IMHO infa:On the night of January 9-10, unidentified aircraft struck powerful strikes at the oil processing and storage facility in the border region occupied by Turkey. the village of Tarkhin in the Syrian province of Aleppo.As a result of the air raid, powerful fires are recorded, stolen fuel, oil and trucks are burning.
    See: https: //rusvesna.su/news/1610231959
  7. Andrei Nikolaevich
    Andrei Nikolaevich 11 January 2021 08: 55
    +2
    And whose drones are they? How wrong they did ...)
  8. bad
    bad 11 January 2021 08: 59
    +16
    Well, that's the answer flew. While the trial balloon.
  9. cniza
    cniza 11 January 2021 09: 11
    +2
    There will be no peace there for a long time, because many players are interested in the slow-moving conflict ...
  10. Ros 56
    Ros 56 11 January 2021 09: 45
    +3
    Apparently the time has come to get change. After all, there are no actions without consequences. negative bully
  11. APASUS
    APASUS 11 January 2021 10: 23
    +1
    I've always liked this sentence:
    Unidentified drones strike Turkish control zone in northern Syria

    In the modern world, what can you do without being exposed?
  12. Astra wild2
    Astra wild2 11 January 2021 10: 42
    0
    There are two options: 1 the Kurds struck. They have long-standing and constant "sympathies".
    2. Deliberate provocation in order to stir up conflict. Who was behind the provocation is a separate question
  13. realmadmaxx
    realmadmaxx 11 January 2021 16: 40
    +1
    um how I wonder who it could be what
  14. Brturin
    Brturin 11 January 2021 16: 48
    +1
    Quote: Ka-52
    sect of fans of Bayraktars

    “The Turkish drones really managed to disable a significant number of Russian-made systems: in May this year, in just four days, up to nine Shells were destroyed. However, this number is more evidence of the intensity of the collisions than the shortcomings of the air defense system. According to some reports, the number of Bayraktars destroyed in 2020 is 47. Most of the Turkish UAVs were shot down - by "Shells" in the areas of Abu Greir, Sirt and Bani Walid, which the PNU and the media associated with Turkey are reluctant to mention "- the publication" Al-Masdar News ".... about 30 more Bayraktar TB2 UAVs were destroyed in Syria during the active confrontation between the SAA and the Turkish army,
    https://avia.pro/news/rossiyskie-zrpk-pancir-s-sbili-v-livii-47-tureckih-dronov-bayraktar-tb2
    Some have one opinion, others ... only so far they somehow did not fall into the zone of "seriously" built air defense
  15. Angry
    Angry 11 January 2021 17: 26
    0
    Hmm .... The CIA did not refuse the Alcalda project .... Fools! The stick, as you know, has two ends .... They will also have another September 11!
  16. high
    high 11 January 2021 20: 18
    0
    Faezeh Hashemi Rafsanjani, daughter of the late Iranian president, interviewed by Iranian Ensaf News:
    “As a result of our assistance to Bashar al-Assad, at least 500 people were killed as a result of the use of chemical or other weapons. It was a mistake "
  17. Narak-zempo
    Narak-zempo 11 January 2021 20: 43
    +3
    Yes, not everything for the cat is Shrovetide, not everything for the sultan of khachiks "Bayraktaras" to hammer, sometimes the answer arrives.
  18. zenion
    zenion 12 January 2021 17: 30
    0
    It was the Armenian drone pilots who inflicted an invisible blow from behind the boxes. The Turks were lucky that they did not bomb the Bakhchisarai palace of this one. It was an aiming flight, the grip zone in the pincers will expand in all directions. C400 won't help. They do not react to wood.
  19. Intruder
    Intruder 12 January 2021 23: 04
    0
    Several explosive devices were dropped from UAVs in the area of ​​Tarhin, which is controlled by the Turkish military and the armed formations of the so-called "Syrian Free Army" controlled by them.
    By the way, where are the vaunted various types of electronic warfare and URV systems, so successfully introduced into the minds of the townsfolk, who can "land" any drone for * ts kilometers to the target object ??? :) Even the Turks cannot ... :)) )
  20. xomaNN
    xomaNN 12 January 2021 23: 12
    0
    Shaw ... did the Armenians decide to take revenge after Karabakh? wassat