Military Review

In Israel: New Biden Administration Already Demonstrates Readiness To Return To Nuclear Deal With Iran

82
In Israel: New Biden Administration Already Demonstrates Readiness To Return To Nuclear Deal With Iran

The Israeli edition of The Jerusalem Post has published a publication that concerns the future nuclear deal with Iran. The Israeli author notes that before Joe Biden came to the Oval Office of the White House, Israel is in a better position to prevent the implementation of Iran's nuclear program.


Recall that Donald Trump, who pursued the most pro-Israeli policy in the chair of the US President, previously announced the unilateral withdrawal of the States from the mentioned deal. According to Trump, the deal was not "suitable" because "it did not take into account Iran's capabilities to develop missile weapons." That decision of Trump in Israel was approved. Now they believe that Joe Biden, after the inauguration, may well return the United States to agreements with Iran. In this regard, concerns are expressed.

Israeli edition:

The new Biden administration is already showing a willingness to return to the 2015 nuclear deal with Iran without necessarily responding to all of Israel's objections.

In such a situation, the Israeli press raises the question of how actively the Mossad is ready to act today to stop Iran's nuclear program. It is noted that in Iran itself they are talking about their readiness to sit down again at the negotiating table with the United States after Biden took office.

It was noted that the Israeli special services could try to convince the Biden administration that there is no need to rush to return to the nuclear deal.

From the article:

Will they change their views when they see the full picture of Iranian violations of the nuclear deal since 2018? It's one thing to hear news reports that Iran is enriching uranium to the level of 20%, and another thing is to get the smallest details about how this brings Iran closer to nuclear arms.

These details to Biden, as stated in JP, could have been provided by Mossad.
82 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. bessmertniy
    bessmertniy 8 January 2021 15: 10
    +4
    Perhaps there is no reason for Israel to worry. It is unlikely that under Biden he will suddenly cease to be a strategic partner of the United States. And it is simply inappropriate to advertise Israeli ears to the Americans in negotiations with Iran. hi
    1. APASUS
      APASUS 8 January 2021 16: 10
      +9
      Quote: bessmertniy
      Perhaps there is no reason for Israel to worry. It is unlikely that under Biden he will suddenly cease to be a strategic partner of the United States. And it is simply inappropriate to advertise Israeli ears to the Americans in negotiations with Iran. hi

      Iran's nuclear program is more of a problem for Israel than for the Americans. That is why Israel can easily provide documents in the interpretation that Jews need. Using the Americans as a tool to solve their problems with Iran
      1. oleg-gr
        oleg-gr 8 January 2021 16: 24
        +6
        If Biden wants to go back to a deal with Iran, it just won't work. We'll have to agree to additional conditions. The Persians will not forgive the murder of Soleimani just like that. We'll have to donate someone.
        1. APASUS
          APASUS 8 January 2021 16: 25
          +2
          Quote: oleg-gr
          If Biden wants to go back to a deal with Iran, it just won't work.

          It will work out anyway
          1. Serpet
            Serpet 8 January 2021 17: 03
            +19
            Quote: APASUS
            It will work out anyway

            Yes, and that would be a bargaining chip anyway.
        2. Lionnvrsk
          Lionnvrsk 8 January 2021 18: 20
          +2
          Quote: oleg-gr
          it just won't work.

          It just won't work. Jews will jump out of their pants, but a lot of sticks in the wheels are being pounded, up to a grand provocation by someone else's hands. hi
        3. l7yzo
          l7yzo 8 January 2021 21: 16
          +1
          I sit and read the comments, but who lived in Israel, Syria, Iran and Turkey? So to speak, I want to hear their opinion. We must give the debt to Israel - they successfully oppose in the minority, the much larger majority.
          And what they say to Biden, he will do it. His son is under term. And there will be enough compromising evidence for him to drown him to his ears. They will have the most "not independent" president.
          Although he has already said - that he will be president - "President-elect Harris made her today for the same reasons."
      2. Krasnoyarsk
        Krasnoyarsk 8 January 2021 18: 24
        +3
        Quote: APASUS
        Iran's nuclear program is more of an Israeli problem

        Of course this is Israel's problem. Because "the cat smells whose meat it has eaten"
    2. Airdefense
      Airdefense 8 January 2021 19: 11
      +1
      Israel has always been a strategic partner of the United States, but the US policy towards Israel was different, and the Obama administration in particular was not about Israel.
  2. Shimshon
    Shimshon 8 January 2021 15: 11
    +5
    The feeling that Massad has agents working in the highest echelons of power in Iran.
    1. askort154
      askort154 8 January 2021 16: 10
      +7
      Shimshon ....The feeling that Massad has agents working in the highest echelons of power in Iran.

      And why is Iran better than Russia. wink hi
  3. Klmn
    Klmn 8 January 2021 15: 13
    +2
    I can also provide!
    Right now, everyone provides everything as it suits them ...
  4. Gunther
    Gunther 8 January 2021 15: 23
    +5
    Quote: bessmertniy
    Perhaps Israel does not need to worry ...

    well, hope for Yahweh, but don't make a mistake yourself - you need to put a new son-in-law of the "kushner" type on the daughter of agent Bidon, and everything will work out yes
  5. hydroy
    hydroy 8 January 2021 15: 38
    -3
    Not the same post, but :)
    Turkish media write about the creation of three air bases in Azerbaijan - in Ganja, Lankeran and Gabala.
    1. ultra
      ultra 8 January 2021 16: 49
      +1
      And why so little?
      1. hydroy
        hydroy 8 January 2021 16: 55
        -2
        Normal for Azeria)
      2. hydroy
        hydroy 8 January 2021 16: 55
        -3
        The Viziria does not count on anything else
      3. hydroy
        hydroy 8 January 2021 16: 56
        -3
        While the Western Conference is half-convinced, Viziria hurries to the aid of her Azeria)
  6. hydroy
    hydroy 8 January 2021 15: 41
    -3
    In addition: )
    ❗️ In two days, 12 military transport aircraft of Turkey A400M flew to Azerbaijan.
    1. Deniska999
      Deniska999 8 January 2021 17: 19
      -1
      Turkey is creating air bases in three cities of Azerbaijan - Ganja, Lankaran and Gabala. Turkey's entry into Azerbaijan looks powerful from the point of view of the deployment of air bases for military perspectives: the distance from Lankaran to Tehran is 556 km, and to the Iranian border is about 40 km; from Gabala to the Russian border - 120 km; from Ganja to the Armenian border - about 70 km, to the Georgian - about 60 km.
      1. tralflot1832
        tralflot1832 8 January 2021 17: 44
        +4
        We'll have to target these 3 bases with Iskanders with an unconventional warhead. Didn't Turkey leave NATO?
        1. hydroy
          hydroy 8 January 2021 18: 26
          0
          This is more Iran needs to worry, all these bases are being created against Armenia and Iran! ...
          1. tralflot1832
            tralflot1832 8 January 2021 18: 32
            0
            So just in case it doesn't hurt!
            1. hydroy
              hydroy 8 January 2021 18: 37
              0
              and they also write that 3 transporters landed in 35 days!)
              1. tralflot1832
                tralflot1832 8 January 2021 18: 43
                +8
                Are you paying for the victory in Karabakh? The Sultan will demand something else? For example, to lay down your life on the Iranian Azerbaijani front?
                1. hydroy
                  hydroy 8 January 2021 19: 01
                  -3
                  Yes, I do not care at all, I am a citizen of the Northern Federation
                2. hydroy
                  hydroy 8 January 2021 19: 07
                  -2
                  and generally not Sevanin and not Azeri)
                  1. tralflot1832
                    tralflot1832 8 January 2021 21: 13
                    +1
                    Clearing the alarm, the bases are not true!
  7. garik77
    garik77 8 January 2021 15: 41
    +5
    Democrats have always blogged less about Israel than Republicans. It just so happened historically. No, of course there will be military assistance, but attempts will begin to play a kind of neutrality, and various negotiations with the Palestinian Authority and various groups will begin again, which will greatly irritate the Jews.
  8. Egor53
    Egor53 8 January 2021 15: 46
    -1
    Israel may be spinning in a frying pan, and sooner or later Iran will create nuclear weapons, which will lead to a normalization of the situation in the Middle East.
    1. Tank hard
      Tank hard 8 January 2021 17: 21
      +7
      Quote: Egor53
      and sooner or later Iran will create nuclear weapons, which will lead to the normalization of the situation in the Middle East.

      I do not think that if Iran has nuclear weapons, the situation at the BW will return to normal. For me, it destabilizes even more. However, this is IMHO.
      1. Shimshon
        Shimshon 8 January 2021 17: 32
        +2
        It will certainly appear then, both in Turkey and the Saudis. Which one of them is dearer to your heart?
        1. Tank hard
          Tank hard 8 January 2021 20: 04
          +3
          Quote: Shimshon
          It will certainly appear then, both in Turkey and the Saudis. Which one of them is dearer to your heart?

          Why do you attribute your friends to me? Why is your comment?
          1. Shimshon
            Shimshon 8 January 2021 21: 08
            -1
            My answer was not for you, but Egor53
            1. Tank hard
              Tank hard 8 January 2021 21: 46
              +2
              Quote: Shimshon
              My answer was not for you, but Egor53

              However, it came to me. request
    2. Krasnoyarsk
      Krasnoyarsk 8 January 2021 18: 34
      -1
      Quote: Egor53
      Israel may be spinning in a frying pan, and sooner or later Iran will create nuclear weapons, which will lead to a normalization of the situation in the Middle East.

      Everything is correct. This will force Israel to conduct a dialogue with Iran as an equal partner, and not dictate to it what weapons it has the right to possess and what not. With all the ensuing economic and political consequences.
    3. Airdefense
      Airdefense 8 January 2021 19: 13
      +2
      It is not only Israel that opposes Iran's possession of nuclear weapons, but also other major players in the BB, such as Turkey and Russia.
      1. Petro_tut
        Petro_tut 8 January 2021 21: 10
        0
        Russia is just for this fig, we have no common borders and mutual claims
        1. Airdefense
          Airdefense 8 January 2021 21: 22
          0
          There are no borders, but there is a zone of interests, it is now Iran that needs Russian help in Syria, and how it will behave with nuclear weapons is unknown. In general, we have a "common" Caspian Sea.
    4. bobba94
      bobba94 8 January 2021 20: 53
      +1
      He will create and remember how he was offended by the big Satan and the little Satan. We all know about whom they called and call the great Satan, but we somehow forgot about whom they called, and even now they call the little Satan, but we should not forget ...
      1. bobba94
        bobba94 8 January 2021 21: 05
        +4
        In order not to search, not to google what my comment is about, I will say that at one time Ayatollah Khomeini designated the main enemies of Iran:
        - USA is a greater Satan;
        - USSR - the lesser Satan;
        - Israel is the little Satan.
    5. Petro_tut
      Petro_tut 8 January 2021 21: 15
      +1

      I do not think that if Iran has nuclear weapons, the situation at the BW will return to normal. For me, it destabilizes even more. However, this is IMHO.

      I think that for Iran this is a matter of survival, because the enemy in the person of Turkey has surrounded Iran from all sides, in Iran, almost 30 Lyams of Turks live in the north-west of the country, and if they want to "return" to Turkey, the kneading will not begin for children, but too late figured out where Erdogan was oppressing
      1. Petr Vladimirovich
        Petr Vladimirovich 9 January 2021 21: 38
        0
        Ayatollah, actually, there is one ...)))
  9. Ross xnumx
    Ross xnumx 8 January 2021 15: 59
    -5
    In Israel: Biden's new administration already demonstrates willingness to return to nuclear deal with Iran

    Most likely, the Biden administration thus wants to smooth out tensions with the EU, which does not deny trade relations with Iran. After this concession, tensions will subside in the BV, where Israel will play the main role of the US ally.
  10. rocket757
    rocket757 8 January 2021 16: 03
    0
    Biden's new administration already demonstrates willingness to return to nuclear deal with Iran

    How does it demonstrate?
    However, minke whales will bend their line, there are other methods of influence!
    Carrot and stick, an effective, proven method.
  11. Shahno
    Shahno 8 January 2021 16: 03
    +1
    Quote: ROSS 42
    In Israel: Biden's new administration already demonstrates willingness to return to nuclear deal with Iran

    Most likely, the Biden administration thus wants to smooth out tensions with the EU, which does not deny trade relations with Iran. After this concession, tensions will subside in the BV, where Israel will play the main role of the US ally.

    I don't think Biden is bad at thinking. So the situation in Iran will not change.
  12. Krasnodar
    Krasnodar 8 January 2021 16: 27
    0
    The deal is the lifting of sanctions on the purchase of Iranian oil. This means that oil prices will drop. The question is whether the Americans need it (I am already silent about Russia).
    1. Airdefense
      Airdefense 8 January 2021 19: 14
      +4
      So Iran is exactly selling oil to the same China and is clearly below the market.
      1. Krasnodar
        Krasnodar 8 January 2021 19: 16
        0
        Through a third country and for a third of the cost hi
        1. Airdefense
          Airdefense 8 January 2021 19: 21
          +3
          That is why if the sanctions are lifted from Iran, then oil, subject to the sale of the same volumes, will not fall in price.
          1. Krasnodar
            Krasnodar 8 January 2021 19: 22
            0
            Futures will drop immediately
            Not only China will start buying, moreover, openly
            1. Airdefense
              Airdefense 8 January 2021 19: 36
              +2
              If the volume does not change, what would they fall? If now Iran sells the same oil, but only "illegally" and significantly below the market. Iran produces oil according to open data about 3.6% of world production.
              1. Krasnodar
                Krasnodar 8 January 2021 20: 08
                -1
                That's exactly what will change. Others will buy.
      2. tralflot1832
        tralflot1832 8 January 2021 20: 46
        +1
        At the moment there are 130 "barrels" a day, while earlier there were just over 000 million barrels.
    2. mvg
      mvg 8 January 2021 21: 08
      +1
      How did this prevent the purchase of Iranian oil from the PRC or the DPRK?
  13. Old26
    Old26 8 January 2021 17: 08
    +7
    Quote: Egor53
    Israel may be spinning in a frying pan, and sooner or later Iran will create nuclear weapons, which will lead to a normalization of the situation in the Middle East.

    So is normalization? And against a nuclear Iran, Saudi Arabia wants to become nuclear. In the future, someone else will catch up. The same Turkey, for example. Normalization is good when nuclear weapons will have several countries in this explosive region
    1. Vitaly gusin
      Vitaly gusin 8 January 2021 17: 57
      +3
      Quote: Old26
      Normalization is good when nuclear weapons will have several countries in this explosive region

      Who is talking about normalization?
      Iranian parliamentarians have presented a bill that would oblige the government of the Islamic Republic to destroy the State of Israel in the next 20 years.
      The bill, dubbed "Iran reciprocates," contains 16 clauses detailing how Iran should avenge the assassination of Quds Force Commander General Qassem Soleimani a year ago.
      One of the provisions obliges the government to take steps to "destroy Israel by March 2041."
      What do you think Iran should do to comply with this law?
      And what should Israel do in light of the adoption of this law in Iran?
      1. ccsr
        ccsr 8 January 2021 18: 10
        +5
        Quote: Vitaly Gusin
        Iranian parliamentarians have presented a bill that would oblige the government of the Islamic Republic to destroy the State of Israel in the next 20 years.

        Firstly, the bill has just been presented, and it is not a fact that it will be adopted. And secondly, Israel has the bravest army in the world, and should she be afraid of the Persians - just destroy the myth of the invincible IDF.
        We do not expect this from you, and we are ready to wait for your victory over the extremists in the Middle East. Don't let us down ...
        1. Vitaly gusin
          Vitaly gusin 8 January 2021 18: 34
          0
          Quote: ccsr
          Firstly, the bill has just been presented, and it is not a fact that it will be adopted.

          First, I hope you know how laws are passed that benefit the government.
          Quote: ccsr
          And secondly, Israel has the bravest army in the world, and should she be afraid of the Persians - just destroy the myth of the invincible IDF.

          Secondly, I did not write anything like this, these are your thoughts.
          Quote: ccsr
          We do not expect this from you, and we are ready to wait for your victory over the extremists in the Middle East. Don't let us down ...

          And thirdly, as always we will not let you down, you can be sure.
      2. Petro_tut
        Petro_tut 8 January 2021 21: 07
        +1
        One of the provisions obliges the government to take steps to "destroy Israel by March 2041."
        What do you think Iran should do to comply with this law?

        Still they are unlikely to accept him, there are no suicides in Iran, there are fanatics, there are no suicides
    2. Avior
      Avior 8 January 2021 18: 06
      0
      And with this state of affairs, Ukraine may well be included in this list.
    3. Krasnoyarsk
      Krasnoyarsk 8 January 2021 18: 58
      0
      Quote: Old26

      And against a nuclear Iran, Saudi Arabia wants to become nuclear. In the future, someone else will catch up. The same Turkey, for example.

      And where did you get the confidence that Ca.Ar. and Turkey do not want to have nuclear weapons today? And they will, only after Iran
      1. borberd
        borberd 8 January 2021 20: 43
        +1
        They want to, but they are afraid of sanctions. The Saudis will not even need to strain, they will simply ask Pakistan.
      2. Petro_tut
        Petro_tut 8 January 2021 21: 04
        0
        Turkey does not want to get hold of nuclear weapons today?

        Nuclear weapons in Turkey will be a nightmare for Russia
        1. Vitaly gusin
          Vitaly gusin 8 January 2021 22: 10
          -1
          Quote: Petro_tut
          Nuclear weapons in Turkey will be a nightmare for Russia

          And from Iran, they have not ratified the convention on the Caspian to this day, if under the USSR Iran owned 13,8% of the Caspian, today it claims 20%, this is the economic part, and there is also a religious one, which is no less important for fanatics.
  14. demo
    demo 8 January 2021 17: 40
    +2
    In such a situation, the Israeli press raises the question of how actively the Mossad is ready to act today to stop Iran's nuclear program.
    I do not reject the right of the Mossad to solve the problems of ensuring the security of the Jewish state.
    But I also do not reject the right of the Ministry of Information and National Security of Iran to act extremely harshly and cruelly towards both the Mossad agents and their assistants.
  15. Old26
    Old26 8 January 2021 19: 29
    +7
    Quote: Vitaly Gusin
    Quote: Old26
    Normalization is good when nuclear weapons will have several countries in this explosive region

    Who is talking about normalization?
    Iranian parliamentarians have presented a bill that would oblige the government of the Islamic Republic to destroy the State of Israel in the next 20 years.
    The bill, dubbed "Iran reciprocates," contains 16 clauses detailing how Iran should avenge the assassination of Quds Force Commander General Qassem Soleimani a year ago.
    One of the provisions obliges the government to take steps to "destroy Israel by March 2041."
    What do you think Iran should do to comply with this law?
    And what should Israel do in light of the adoption of this law in Iran?

    Not me. Speaks about "normalization" in the light of Iran acquiring its own nuclear weapons Egor53who wrote:
    Quote: Egor53
    Israel may be spinning in a frying pan, and sooner or later Iran will create nuclear weapons, which will lead to a normalization of the situation in the Middle East.


    For me, the sooner the Iranian nuclear program is brought under hard control, the better. I am not at all tempted to have an unpredictable nuclear power at a distance of 800 km, which is ruled by religious "figures"
    What should Iran do to comply with this suicidal bill for Iran? Of course, create nuclear weapons. After that Iran is unlikely to exist as a single state.
    What should Israel do? In fact, he is being pushed into a preemptive strike against Iran in order to present him as an aggressor. But most likely Iran itself will step on a rake, succumbing to the provocation and start hostilities. Then he will grab it in full.

    Quote: Krasnoyarsk
    Quote: Old26

    And against a nuclear Iran, Saudi Arabia wants to become nuclear. In the future, someone else will catch up. The same Turkey, for example.

    And where did you get the confidence that Ca.Ar. and Turkey do not want to have nuclear weapons today? And they will, only after Iran

    They already want to have it. It's just that Iran already has the infrastructure for creating nuclear weapons, and Turkey and Saudi Arabia will have to create it from scratch. So desire is good, but there is a time factor. Before Iran, these two countries will not receive their nuclear weapons ...
    1. mvg
      mvg 8 January 2021 21: 18
      0
      before Iran

      Are there any guarantees that Pakistan no longer has a C-17 GlobMaster filled with ready-made B-61 and / or W-78 for KSA for an X-hour? National development.
      And Turkey has no agreement with the "fighting hamster"? You can buy a lot at once. The question of money. And they are
      1. The eye of the crying
        The eye of the crying 8 January 2021 23: 28
        0
        Quote: mvg
        Are there any guarantees that Pakistan no longer has a C-17 GlobMaster filled with ready-made B-61 and / or W-78 for KSA for an X-hour?


        Where does Pakistan get the B-61?
  16. Vadim_888
    Vadim_888 8 January 2021 19: 59
    +2
    ... it is another matter to get the smallest details about how this brings Iran closer to nuclear weapons.

    What for?
    There is an old man Colen Paul with his famous test tube - went out, potres, started a war request
  17. Vitaly gusin
    Vitaly gusin 8 January 2021 20: 29
    -3
    Quote: Old26
    What should Iran do to comply with this suicidal bill for Iran? Of course, create nuclear weapons. After that Iran is unlikely to exist as a single state.
    What should Israel do? In fact, he is being pushed into a preemptive strike against Iran in order to present him as an aggressor. But most likely Iran itself will step on a rake, succumbing to the provocation and start hostilities. Then he will grab it in full.

    You not only think deeply, but also read other people's thoughts good
    1. Krasnoyarsk
      Krasnoyarsk 9 January 2021 00: 22
      0
      Strange thoughts are reading "Old26" in your head -
      What should Israel do? In fact, he is being pushed into a preemptive strike against Iran in order to present him as an aggressor. [/ quote]
      Whom does Israel, in the event of its preemptive strike on Iran, want to present as an aggressor? wassat
      Further "Old26" writes - "But most likely Iran itself will step on a rake, succumbing to the provocation and will begin hostilities. Then it will grab it in full."
      I'm wondering who will act as a provocateur?
      Interesting thoughts are in your head. wink
      1. Vitaly gusin
        Vitaly gusin 9 January 2021 08: 29
        0
        [quote = Krasnoyarsk] what should Israel do? In fact, he is being pushed into a preemptive strike against Iran in order to present him as an aggressor. [/ quote] [/ quote]
        Section III. Conditions for the transition of the Russian Federation to the use of nuclear weapons
        19. The conditions governing the possibility of application by the Russian Federation nuclear weapons are:
        d) aggression against the Russian Federation using conventional weapons when the very existence of the state is threatened.
        apply his first, before the start of a nuclear war as such, at the time when the enemy is only trying to secure for himself the opportunity to strike with impunity.
        In fact, with this paragraph, Russia announces its right to PREVENTIVE NUCLEAR KICK.
        The State of Israel has exactly the same right.
        Therefore, it will not wait for Iran to acquire weapons of mass destruction to destroy Israel, according to its leaders.
        Leave the rest to the UN.
        1. Krasnoyarsk
          Krasnoyarsk 9 January 2021 11: 48
          -3
          Quote: Vitaly Gusin

          Therefore, it will not wait for Iran to acquire weapons of mass destruction to destroy Israel, according to its leaders.

          There are too many exaggerations in your statement. There is a very big difference between a promise to marry and a wedding. Even if wedding rings are bought. Pakistan acquired nuclear weapons, but Israel did not strike at it. Just because Pakistan did not threaten Israel? Well, Hitler not only did not promise to attack the USSR, but on the contrary, promised not to attack. And what, it stopped him?
          And if Iran, its new leadership, declares its refusal to "destroy Israel," Israel will not deliver a preemptive strike if Iran is ready to create nuclear weapons?
          But you, by the way, did not answer my 2 questions on the essence of your thoughts.
          1. Vitaly gusin
            Vitaly gusin 9 January 2021 16: 21
            0
            Quote: Krasnoyarsk
            Pakistan acquired nuclear weapons, but Israel did not strike at it. Just because Pakistan did not threaten Israel?

            Not only Pakistan has nuclear weapons, and they have different tasks and objectives from Iran.,
            Quote: Krasnoyarsk
            And if Iran, its new leadership, declares its refusal to "destroy Israel," Israel will not deliver a preemptive strike if Iran is ready to create nuclear weapons?

            New, old, said, smeared ONLY Cessation of nuclear weapons development will allow you to avoid a preemptive strike upon returning production to the initial stage.
            Quote: Krasnoyarsk
            But you, by the way, did not answer my 2 questions on the essence of your thoughts.

            My thoughts in this completely coincide with the decision of YOUR government.
            1. Krasnoyarsk
              Krasnoyarsk 9 January 2021 19: 03
              -4
              Quote: Vitaly Gusin

              Not only Pakistan has nuclear weapons, and they have different tasks and objectives from Iran.,

              How do you know who has what goals? It's empty blah blah blah.
              Iran could have stated that Israel's goal is to hide the true plans. As well as Pakistan and other countries.
              Quote: Vitaly Gusin

              The new, the old, they said, smeared ONLY THE CUTTING OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF NW will allow avoiding a preemptive strike, upon returning the production to the initial stage.

              Well, you have opened up. It was not the threat from Iran that worried Israel. And the fear of parity. Fear of punishment for their crimes in BV.
              Quote: Vitaly Gusin

              My thoughts in this completely coincide with the decision of YOUR government.

              Don't hide behind my government so awkwardly. My government does not prohibit any country in the world from taking care of its security using the methods available to them. YAO means YAO.
              We warn you that in the event of AGGRESSIVE actions against us, we can use nuclear weapons. You are warning that you will strike if Iran wants to strengthen its security by creating nuclear weapons.
              If you do not see the difference between these two approaches, then I cannot help you with anything. Only a doctor with the appropriate specialization remains.
              1. Vitaly gusin
                Vitaly gusin 9 January 2021 19: 32
                +1
                Quote: Krasnoyarsk
                then I can’t help you. Only a doctor with the appropriate specialization remains.

                Monkey, in the Mirror, seeing his image.
                Silently bear a sense of foot:
                “Look,” says: “My dear godfather!
                What kind of mug is there?
                What are her grimaces and jumps!
                I would hang back with anguish,
                Whenever she ever looked like her.
                But, admit, there is
                From my gossips of such krivlyak five or six:
                I can even count them on my fingers. ”-
                “Than to consider the gossips to work,
                Isn't it better to turn on yourself, godfather? ”

                She answered Mishka.
                But Mishenkin's advice just vanished.
                A. I. KRYLOV.
                1. Krasnoyarsk
                  Krasnoyarsk 9 January 2021 19: 54
                  -2
                  Quote: Vitaly Gusin
                  A. I. KRYLOV.

                  I like him too. And you have nothing more to say. And you have to say something. So you grabbed at straws in the person of Ivan Andreevich. tongue
  18. The comment was deleted.
  19. Old26
    Old26 9 January 2021 02: 36
    +3
    [quote = Petro_tut] Russia is just about it for figs, we have no common borders and mutual claims [/ quote]
    And since Russia does not care, she participated in this agreement, from which Trump left. There, by the way, there were 5 nuclear powers plus the FRG. And they came to a common understanding. Are you saying that Russia doesn't care? Russia has no common borders, but I really don't want a country 250 km away from Russia that has not only missile but also nuclear weapons ...
    The fact that there are no mutual claims does not mean at all that the Persians are our ally. We are unfaithful to them, or as they called us at one time - lesser satan

    [quote = Petro_tut] I think that for Iran this is a matter of survival, because the enemy in the person of Turkey has surrounded Iran from all sides, in Iran, almost 30 Lyams of Turks live in the north-west of the country, and if they want to "return" to Turkey, the kneading will not begin children, too late realized where Erdogan was oppressing [/ quote]
    They would not be needed by anyone if they did not take a pose and began to develop their nuclear missile direction. They have a lot of people and there were no cases before that Turkey had any territorial claims against Iran. And when Iran sends its proxies to Syria, in the underbelly of Turkey, of course Turkey will not look at it as something ordinary.

    [quote = borberd] They want, but they are afraid of sanctions. The Saudis will not even need to strain, they will simply ask Pakistan. [/ Quote]
    You won't be able to ask. Pakistan is not suicidal to transfer its nuclear weapons to someone, which is a guarantee, if not peace, then non-aggression from India. They can sell 1-2 bombs illegally and could, but this will no longer suit Saudi Arabia. If Iran possesses nuclear weapons, then the same KSA will want to have its own production of nuclear weapons ...

    [quote = Petro_tut] [quote] Turkey doesn't want to have nuclear weapons today? [/ quote]
    Nuclear weapons in Turkey will be a nightmare for Russia [/ quote]
    And Iran understands this will not be a nightmare for Russia. Well, you have logic. A secular Muslim state and a state living according to exclusively religious laws. Where the president and prime minister are pawns, and the ayatollahs rule over everything.

    [quote = mvg] [quote] before Iran [/ quote]
    Are there any guarantees that Pakistan no longer has a C-17 GlobMaster filled with ready-made B-61 and / or W-78 for KSA for an X-hour? National development.
    And Turkey has no agreement with the "fighting hamster"? You can buy a lot at once. The question of money. And they are [/ quote]
    Are you sure there will be someone in the world who will start selling nuclear weapons? Pakistan was already under sanctions at one time. If he "pushes" his weapon to the side, then all the others and Russia, incl. And China will definitely not sign for him ...

    [quote = Eye of the blatant] [quote = mvg] Is there a guarantee that Pakistan no longer has a C-17 GlobMaster filled with ready-made B-61 and / or W-78 for KSA for an X-hour? [/ quote]

    Where did Pakistan get the B-61? [/ Quote]
    Well, here they believe that the United States will sell the B-61 or W-78 to Pakistan, and that will sell them to the Saud. Both bombs and BG from "minutemans"

    [quote = Krasnoyarsk] Strange thoughts reads "Old26" in your head -
    What should Israel do? In fact, he is being pushed into a preemptive strike against Iran in order to present him as an aggressor. [/ quote]
    Whom does Israel, in the event of its preemptive strike on Iran, want to present as an aggressor? wassat
    Further "Old26" writes - "But most likely Iran itself will step on a rake, succumbing to the provocation and will begin hostilities. Then it will grab it in full."
    I'm wondering who will act as a provocateur?
    Interesting thoughts are in your head. wink[/ Quote]
    Oh, well, about provocations - there is a lot to offer. In particular, the passage of a warship of the same Israel along the edge of a tervod of Iran during a visit to one of the monarchies of the Gulf. If already now the same Iran seizes the ships of such a country as South Korea, then what do you think they will wave a handle to the Israeli? Tensions between Iran and Israel could arise if Iranian units in Syria begin to launch missile attacks on Israel. Not Hezbollah with its tactical or tactical surface-to-surface missiles. but with medium-range missiles. Do you think this will not be a reason for Israel to strike at Iran? And it's not difficult for me to "read" thoughts. The situation itself has only one way out.
  20. pyc.arpeccop tornado 150
    pyc.arpeccop tornado 150 9 January 2021 07: 19
    0
    In Israel: Biden's new administration is already showing willingness to return to a nuclear deal with Iran.

    Now they torture kosher.
  21. orionvitt
    orionvitt 9 January 2021 11: 11
    0
    demonstrates willingness to return to nuclear deal with Iran
    It's too late to drink Borjomi. That's it, Iran is the West about ........ In a word, with its "unprincipled" policy, it did everything to make a new country appear in the nuclear club.
    1. Vitaly gusin
      Vitaly gusin 9 January 2021 18: 18
      0
      Quote: orionvitt
      Late to drink Borjomi.

      This is from the point of view of the therapist, the surgeon looks at it differently.
  22. Petr Vladimirovich
    Petr Vladimirovich 9 January 2021 21: 49
    0
    And in the photo, as always, the Bushehr nuclear power plant. Siemens started to build, Rosatom completed and put it into operation. Our TVELs have worked, we are taking them. And the photo is good, I've seen it thousands of times already ...