Military Review

Terms of return of two Project 971 nuclear submarines to the Northern Fleet announced

45
Terms of return of two Project 971 nuclear submarines to the Northern Fleet announced

The modernized Project 971 Leopard nuclear submarine, launched at the end of December 2020 in Severodvinsk, will return to the 24th Division of the Northern fleet in the second half of this year.


The submarine has completed the stage of the slipway repair, and is currently completing the modernization already on the water. After the completion of all work, it will go through the cycle of the prescribed tests, and in the second half of 2021 it will return to the Northern Fleet.

On December 25, the nuclear submarine was removed from the boathouse of the Zvezdochka Ship Repair Center (CS). After the completion of work at the pier of the enterprise, it will go out for tests, which can last up to six months, and this is the second half of 2021, after which the submarine will be transferred to the fleet.

- TASS quotes the words of a source in the defense industry complex.

At the moment, the submarine has carried out the replacement of electronic weapons, control systems, communications, navigation, hydroacoustics, and BIUS. The submarine received new weapons (KR "Caliber"), and the acoustic signature was also reduced.

The second submarine of Project 971 (Schuka-B), which will return to the Northern Fleet, will be the Volk multipurpose nuclear submarine, which is also undergoing repairs and modernization at Zvezdochka. The transfer of the submarine is scheduled for 2023.

The Volk nuclear submarine will return to the Navy in 2023, having received, after modernization, new strike capabilities associated with the use of Kalibr-PL cruise missiles

- Said the source agency.

The submarine arrived at the Zvezdochka CSR in August 2014 and has been at the facility since then, awaiting repairs. Plans for the modernization of the Volk nuclear submarine have not been disclosed, but, most likely, work on it will be similar to that carried out on the similar type of nuclear submarine Leopard.

The multipurpose nuclear submarines "Wolf" and "Leopard" are part of the 24th "Animal Division" of the Northern Fleet of the Navy. In addition to them, the division also includes submarines "Tiger", "Vepr", "Panther", "Gepard".
45 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. faiver
    faiver 6 January 2021 12: 59
    +5
    Well, it all goes very slowly ... sad
    1. Aerodrome
      Aerodrome 6 January 2021 13: 20
      0
      Quote: faiver
      Well, it all goes very slowly ... sad


      Airfield (Airfield)
      9
      11 December 2020 12: 20

      -8
      Quote: Whatislove
      A good gift for sailors
      would ... for the remaining 20 days, I'm sure, and half of the promised. just sure.
      promised a lot ... scored with slippers ...
  2. FIR FIR
    FIR FIR 6 January 2021 13: 10
    +9
    20 units were laid, and 14 were completed, of which 2 were given to India. With normal operation and timely modernization, all 14 ships could still be part of the domestic fleet.
    1. Eldorado
      Eldorado 6 January 2021 13: 12
      -1
      India has only one "Pike-B" - "Chakra".
      1. FIR FIR
        FIR FIR 6 January 2021 13: 17
        +7
        Well, "Magadan" will be handed over next year, it will become 2.
    2. Eldorado
      Eldorado 6 January 2021 13: 15
      +9
      The first boats went with the already outdated GAK. This was the reason for the decommissioning and disposal of the first "Schuk-B". A couple more boats were unfinished, their sections and units were used in the construction of the first three "Boreys". One is still unfinished at the ASZ.
      1. FIR FIR
        FIR FIR 6 January 2021 13: 35
        +1

        According to the chief designer of the project Chernyshev (who passed away in July 1997), Bars retains significant modernization opportunities. For example, the backlog that Malachite possesses makes it possible to increase the search potential of a submarine approximately 3 times.

        It was possible to upgrade ships. Writing off, of course, is easier, but with what the fleet will remain. Moreover, project 885 is stalled, and the number of Ash trees will be small.
        1. businessv
          businessv 6 January 2021 14: 03
          +12
          Quote: FIR FIR
          Moreover, project 885 is stalled, and the number of Ash trees will be small.
          It seems to me that the transfer of boats to the fleet is proceeding very slowly, not just slowly! I would like to ask the naval colleagues to clarify what the problem is, and the miners to give their arguments to justify! Play sleepers to a person, and where do you leave comments? In the mind ?!
    3. Ratmir_Ryazan
      Ratmir_Ryazan 6 January 2021 14: 25
      0
      So write it, as if everything depends on only one simple desire to do the nuclear submarine.

      One submarine is a billion dollars in costs !!!

      20 nuclear submarines is $ 20 billion !!!

      And in addition to multipurpose nuclear submarines, we need strategic and surface ships and support ships and money for the maintenance of those ships that are in service !!!

      The USSR leaders brought mediocrity to poverty when toilet paper became in short supply and decay, then all the 90s they wanted to do the same with Russia.

      We have only just started bringing new ships into operation, because only recently the country has got money for this. That is why everything is so slow.

      We must really look at our capabilities, and not whine that there is little of everything and that it would be better if there were more.
      1. Revival
        Revival 6 January 2021 14: 45
        +13
        Then on our "impossibilities".
        And your remark about opportunities would be appropriate under one mandatory condition that everyone, Everyone tightens their belts for the sake of creating opportunities ..
        Otherwise, I’ll lecture you beautifully about the need to tighten belts for the sake of the country, riding a Maybach with billions, and you, of course, understand that the time is now ...
        When a country does not have the opportunity for a cruiser, then in the first place, there should be no opportunity for a yacht!
        1. Rubi0
          Rubi0 6 January 2021 15: 00
          -7
          Why did it happen? If the state cannot build a cruiser and asks state employees to tighten their belts, then why should everyone tighten their belts and not buy yachts, Merciers, etc.? Thank God not communism with equalization at 120 rubles
          1. Revival
            Revival 7 January 2021 01: 07
            +2
            Because either this is the state and the one who dares to talk about the tightened belts first tightened them or it is Licimerie
        2. Ratmir_Ryazan
          Ratmir_Ryazan 6 January 2021 19: 28
          -1
          When a country does not have the opportunity for a cruiser, then in the first place, there should be no opportunity for a yacht!


          Why so?!

          A person who legally bought a yacht and lives in Russia pays a huge amount of money in taxes !!!

          But for some reason it is not enough for you, for some reason you think that it is not you, but that he should pay even more. And from what ?!

          From history it is not clear what the slogans and desires to take away and divide everything lead to ?!

          To the split of the country, society, civil war and millions of victims !!!

          In order for the country to have destroyers and cruisers, it is not necessary to tighten their belts, not to take them away, but rather to give them, to give businesses and people earn money, the opportunity to purchase apartments, cars and yachts and pay taxes, and now they build a fleet with cruisers from taxes.

          In the USSR, there were no privately owned yachts, there were cruisers and a huge fleet, only the poor people sold all this for chewing gum and jeans, thinking that this was happiness.
          1. Rzzz
            Rzzz 6 January 2021 22: 44
            +5
            Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
            A person who legally bought a yacht and lives in Russia pays a huge amount of money in taxes !!!

            Do not pay.
            Because:
            1. Personal sanctions have been announced on him, and the state forgives him taxes (there is such a law)
            2. He brought a certificate that he pays taxes in another country, and we do not take tax from him (and there is such a law).
            3. All his property, including yachts, are registered in some banana republic, he pays there a thousand bucks a year in taxes, and he lays big and fat on other countries.

            There are many more tricks, I cannot tell everything, I am not the most prominent expert in this matter.
            1. Ratmir_Ryazan
              Ratmir_Ryazan 7 January 2021 00: 13
              0
              In addition to income tax, which in order not to pay in Russia one must live in another country for more than 183 days a year, there is also a property tax, there is a tax on business income and a bunch of everything else in the form of fees, duties and excise taxes.
              1. Rzzz
                Rzzz 7 January 2021 01: 41
                +3
                Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
                there is still a tax n

                Well these guys write laws for themselves, do you really think that they won't write "right" ??
            2. Cool but not Igor
              Cool but not Igor 7 January 2021 00: 19
              +1
              I also agree, but these are removable problems and still, not all money flows away from abroad. In any case, no one will return to socialism and will not give their business to the state. own. It's just that over time, all such glaring shortcomings will be eliminated or not, we will find out in the future, for Russia, under the influence of external factors, 20 years of development is not at all a lot. And it is better to have such a variety of goods as now, the opportunity to travel to any country which is used by millions of people, than everyone to walk in gray pants, eating 3 varieties of sausage, but living with the thought that we have a cruiser
          2. Cool but not Igor
            Cool but not Igor 6 January 2021 23: 26
            +2
            Thank you for such a simple idea, but to the point. Here all such ideological communists, but what such management led to, do not draw conclusions. They remember only good things. I understand that, of course, the USSR, with the right leadership, could not collapse (this is not an obligatory scenario) and become a world power. But since everything went this way and did not work out, then why not try another way, because the USSR existed for 70 years, and we have capitalism only 30.
          3. Revival
            Revival 7 January 2021 01: 09
            +2
            "A person who legally bought a yacht and lives in Russia pays a huge amount of money in taxes !!!"

            How did "golovan" "name, sister, name" of this honest hero !?
      2. times
        times 6 January 2021 15: 00
        +24
        Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
        We have only just started putting new ships into operation, because only recently the country has got money for this.

        The country has a lot of money. Enough for dubious projects and investments. And they built little ships because "there will be no war" and "we are now equal partners." Okay, at least wiser. It's a pity that the time has passed.
        1. Ratmir_Ryazan
          Ratmir_Ryazan 6 January 2021 19: 32
          -8
          What projects do you think are dubious?

          Russia has a million-strong army and a multimillion-dollar reserve, and in my opinion, this suggests that the country takes the military threat seriously.
          1. the most important
            the most important 6 January 2021 22: 38
            +3
            Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
            What projects do you think are dubious?

            Nuclear power plant in Turkey being built for our money. And this is $ 20. Never pay off! Writing off to the debtors of the USSR everything and everyone. And this is another 000 billion dollars, and even those who have this money above the roof were forgiven - Iraq !!! What's this? Stupidity? They wrote off Vietnam and Cuba and were left without bases, but on account of the debt they could take a lease for 000 years! And this despite the fact that 000-120 percent of the population of our country is poor or poor, or on the verge of this line. Oh yes, I completely forgot, 500-50 billion dollars was recently given to Egypt for the development of some kind of industrial zone. Will they return? Never! The mentality is not the same
            1. Ratmir_Ryazan
              Ratmir_Ryazan 7 January 2021 00: 27
              -2
              All over the world nuclear power plants are paying off, but in Turkey, why should it suddenly not pay off?

              Iraq was forgiven the debt when most of the country was controlled by ISIS militants, and only 60-80 km were left to Baghdad.

              If you have not forgotten, they helped our country during the Patriotic War, and the same Americans and British.

              The bases in Cuba and Vietnam were closed as unnecessary, and not because the money ran out.
        2. Rzzz
          Rzzz 6 January 2021 22: 56
          +3
          Quote: mal
          The country has a lot of money. Enough for dubious projects and investments.

          Sobyanin's money must be scraped. He pours budget money on some curbs a year, like a submarine stands.
          And then, in general, he planned to build a stadium for surfing the size of 5 football stadiums in the silver forest.
      3. Aleksandr1971
        Aleksandr1971 6 January 2021 15: 41
        +2
        Our capabilities are great and allow for much more than is done now in any area of ​​public administration, in the field of defense, education, health protection, industrial development, transport and agriculture. There is simply not a sufficient level of concentration and suppression of wasteful and corrupt spending of funds. And in order for the funds already allocated to give the desired and even greater effect, you need competent management.
      4. Runway
        Runway 6 January 2021 16: 27
        +1
        This is written by a person born in the first half of the 80s ...
  3. Sevastiec
    Sevastiec 6 January 2021 14: 07
    +4
    7 years for modernization? Hmm ... and nothing to say. "Partners", aircraft carriers build faster.
    1. Ratmir_Ryazan
      Ratmir_Ryazan 6 January 2021 14: 28
      -6
      7 years for modernization? Hmm ... and nothing to say. "Partners", aircraft carriers build faster.


      What are you comparing? Construction of a serial ship with the submarine sent to a sump pending modernization or disposal?

      Or do you think this nuclear submarine has been doing nothing but modernizing every day for 7 years ?!

      Rejoice that this nuclear submarine will soon be returned to service in a modernized form and do not whine.
      1. Revival
        Revival 6 January 2021 14: 40
        +5
        So put it on modernization, and then they didn't do anything with it for years !?
        This is normal of course ..
        1. globus
          globus 6 January 2021 14: 47
          -1
          How do you imagine ship repair?
          1. Rzzz
            Rzzz 6 January 2021 23: 04
            +5
            Quote: globus
            How do you imagine ship repair?

            I cannot imagine him, I see him regularly, on commercial ships. Come on, come on, faster, every day the vessel is idle - about $ 1,5-2 per ton of deadweight. Dock time is precious, pay the crews for overtime. To do as much as possible for the repair so that it does not break down until the next repair, because taking the ship out of work is much more expensive.
            1. Revival
              Revival 7 January 2021 01: 06
              0
              Here, thank you for pinning the demagogue
            2. globus
              globus 8 January 2021 10: 26
              0
              On commercial ships, they probably do. But the repair of nuclear submarines is a completely different scale, completely different approaches and conditions. Despite the fact that the ship did not undergo medium repairs. And then there is modernization, the limits of which the customer (MO) does not always visualize. "We want to bring it closer to the 4th generation according to the characteristics that we can." Plus the supply of equipment with a long manufacturing cycle and testing. And much more. Yes, no matter how much you urge the repairmen, you can't jump over your head. Remember that the boats of this project were built in a block fashion.
              Do not compare your commercial repair, which is like changing the rubber on a car, to repairing a warship of this class.
              1. Rzzz
                Rzzz 8 January 2021 22: 24
                0
                I do not compare. I also focused on the time factor, on reducing downtime.
                It is clear that the military uses, let's say, other methods when calculating money. And they have more money than businessmen, and it’s easier to spend money from others. This is in addition to the larger volumes.
        2. Ratmir_Ryazan
          Ratmir_Ryazan 6 January 2021 19: 21
          +1
          Well, if you sponsored and paid for the modernization of the nuclear submarine, then things would go faster.

          In all countries of the world, ships that have exhausted their resource are sent to the parking lot, awaiting either repair or write-off. And decisions on them are made based on financial capabilities and feasibility.

          The Yasen-M project would advance faster and the modernization of Shchuk-B would not be needed.

          Everything depends on money, the country would have more, there would be more ships and submarines.

          Russia's military budget is only $ 50 billion, while the US has $ 750 billion, and China has $ 250 billion.

          Yes, we are lagging behind them in terms of the number and capacity of ships, because they have more resources - financial in the first place and there is nothing to be surprised at.

          We have to save money and prioritize tasks. In addition to the submarine fleet, we also have surface and ground forces and aviation, and all this requires huge funds.
          1. Revival
            Revival 7 January 2021 01: 02
            +1
            Your remark about sponsorship can and would be appropriate under one obligatory condition that everyone, Everyone tightens their belts to create opportunities ..
            Otherwise, I’ll lecture you beautifully about the need to tighten belts for the sake of the country, riding a Maybach with billions, and you, of course, understand that the time is now ...
            When a country does not have the opportunity for a cruiser, then in the first place, there should be no opportunity for a yacht!
          2. Charik
            Charik 8 January 2021 12: 04
            0
            so khekhe himself explained for dollars-rubles like we do ours for rubles-they are for dollars-more expensive, as it were
      2. Sevastiec
        Sevastiec 7 January 2021 06: 30
        -1
        Okay ok, keep splashing with delight and yelling urrya.
  4. Revival
    Revival 6 January 2021 14: 39
    +1
    So I don't even know whether to argue or not about the postponement of the "right" date?
    Or is it already clear, familiar?
  5. Abrosimov Sergey Olegovich
    Abrosimov Sergey Olegovich 6 January 2021 17: 01
    +4
    Quote: Rubi0
    Why did it happen? If the state cannot build a cruiser and asks state employees to tighten their belts, then why should everyone tighten their belts and not buy yachts, Merciers, etc.? Thank God not communism with equalization at 120 rubles


    Well, if only because the situation of extreme property inequality and in particular the situation when a small stratum of the population has the opportunity to buy yachts, Rolls Royces and Mercians, and the other - essentially the bulk of the population is tightening their belts more and more there is a breeding ground for a social explosion - revolution ...
    Really 1917 taught nothing? Is it really not enough of one minister, whose mistress wore a necklace for the price of two battleships?
  6. paul3390
    paul3390 6 January 2021 17: 19
    +5
    Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
    The USSR leaders brought mediocrity to poverty when toilet paper became in short supply and decay, then all the 90s they wanted to do the same with Russia.

    We have only just started bringing new ships into operation, because only recently the country has got money for this. That is why everything is so slow.

    I did not understand - it means that they brought the USSR to the handle and then ruled in the 90s by the same people? Moreover, they are still in power even now ..

    Did the money just appear now? Or maybe - 20 years of reign should have stolen less? Instead of every Putin billionaire, one could build an aircraft carrier. I'm already silent about the crowds of millionaires ..
    1. Charik
      Charik 8 January 2021 12: 08
      +1
      so any athletes with representatives of the blue screen-shake there the identity is not enough, they also work for the good of the homeland-yes they sit in the state fool-and all at least major FSB-et so as not to bother
  7. Tests
    Tests 6 January 2021 23: 18
    0
    Many times on "VO" discussed the long terms of repair and modernization of ships of the Russian Navy. There are several reasons: firstly, the Navy changes the requirements for the order during the term of the contract (a new high chief came to the post - the repair program was revised), secondly, the financing of repairs is very often not timely, and thirdly, a shipbuilding (ship repair) plant is very often the place of final assembly of products from dozens of counterparty factories (communication is made by a plant in Western Siberia, cables - a plant from Eastern Siberia, an engine - in Rybinsk, a failure in the timing of one device is, very often, a shift to the right of the delivery date of the entire ship), -fourth, banal theft at the stage of device design, manufacturing, testing at the stand, installation on a ship, tests on an almost finished modernized ship ... 14.01.2015/2014/2003 at "VO" there was the material "Horseback through the Arctic", with wonderful photos, like on "Zvezdochka" in September 2008, once the Russian ship "Transshelf", along the NSR pulled the nuclear submarines "Bratsk" and "Samara" from the Pacific Fleet to repair. "Bratsk" began to be repaired in 2023, they even brought it to the dock in 2025, but they say they are stealing in the Russian Federation, they abandoned the repair and modernization of the boat in the East of the country ... Interestingly, in XNUMX and XNUMX, as planned, boats for the fleet will hand over .... About this source in the defense industry TASS told?
  8. zwlad
    zwlad 7 January 2021 12: 18
    -1
    Let's hope that the timing will not go to the right.
  9. Charik
    Charik 8 January 2021 11: 50
    0
    -First, they would have passed the Leopard, and only then they thought that talking about the Wolf is planned for 2023.-well, this is understandable, if only the numbers were not mistaken