Borey-Bulava: volley left, but hard questions remain

529
Borey-Bulava: volley left, but hard questions remain

A salvo of Borey and a minesweeper thrown to rot. The problem here is that Borey need there was this minesweeper.

12.12.2020 (15:30). Department of Information and Mass Communications (DIMK) of the RF Ministry of Defense:

Pacific nuclear submarine fleet For the first time, Vladimir Monomakh launched four Bulava ballistic missiles from the Sea of ​​Okhotsk. A salvo launch of missiles was carried out from a submerged position from the Sea of ​​Okhotsk at the Chizha training ground in the Arkhangelsk region.



The flight of the Bulava ballistic missiles took place in the normal mode.

According to the confirmed data of objective control, the missile warheads have successfully arrived in a given area of ​​the Chizha battlefield.


"Vladimir Monomakh" goes to shoot "Bulava".



The volley went!

For the first time, the question of prolonged non-firing of Bulava at the Pacific Fleet was raised in the media on October 22, 2018 in the article “What to ask“ Ash ”? Nuclear submarines keep the fleet on a starvation diet ".

Megaproject of the newest stories is the program "Borey" - "Bulava". Many copies have been broken about its expediency.

In fact, we have that six years after the completion of state tests of the lead boat and three years after the redeployment of the first serial ship to the Pacific Fleet, not a single firing of Bulava SLBMs from the Pacific Ocean was carried out either from the Alexander Nevsky or Vladimir Monomakh. ...

The article caused a significant resonance in society and among specialists. And also an extremely painful reaction in the Main Command of the Navy and the Ministry of Defense (DIMK).

The continuation was after the exercise "Thunder-2019", where the "Pacific" shooting "Bulava" announced by the officials of the Ministry of Defense did not take place - "Problematic" Thunder-2019 ". What is “wrong” in the recent exercises of the strategic nuclear forces of the Russian Federation? ".

The main question is different - why was it necessary to "drive" the newest SN RPLs into an unprepared base, moreover, into the zone of overwhelming domination of anti-submarine forces of the "so-called partners", with extremely weak anti-submarine and simply non-combatable anti-mine forces of the Pacific Fleet?

On March 17, 2020 there was a publication in the author's blog "Kamchatka" Borei "are preparing to fire" Bulava ":

Taking into account the "wild" and unacceptable situation of such a long break in the practical missile firing of the SNR submarines of the Navy's combat strength, with a very high probability, it should be assumed that in 2020 at least one missile firing "Bulava" from the Pacific Fleet (on the battlefield of Chizha).

Of course, this is very positive, and it is highly likely that this shooting will be successful (given its importance and the appropriate support from the industry).

According to available information, this time everything went smoothly: both on the Vladimir Monomakh and with the Bulava and their warheads, up to Chizhi. If all this is true, then the crew and developers can and should be congratulated.

However, uncomfortable questions about our NSNF remain. Moreover, they are the main ones.

First. Why do we need naval strategic nuclear forces (NSNF)?


Quoting from a previously published article:

The key factor that makes it necessary to deploy strategic weapons on sea carriers (in the difficult physical and geographical conditions of their use and the significant superiority of the enemy's anti-submarine forces) is it is the vulnerability of the ground-based component of the NSNF to a sudden nuclear (!) "disarming" strike.

That is, even one, but guaranteed not to be tracked by an SNR with SLBMs, excluding the possibility of such a strike, is an extremely important strategic and political factor. And the main thing here is not the "number of warheads" of the NSNF, but its combat stability. That is, figuratively speaking, for the NSNF (as a system) "Bulava" is secondary to the issues of stealth, hydroacoustics, sea underwater weapons etc.

The quantitative basis of our strategic nuclear forces should be precisely the Strategic Missile Forces. And the role of NSNF is a necessary but auxiliary mechanism of strategic deterrence.

Given the enemy's enormous superiority in naval theaters, and his effective anti-submarine forces, the opinion about the need to carry most of the deployed delivery vehicles and warheads into the sea is nothing more than information sabotage (which was very successfully imposed on us in the 90s within the framework of START II Treaty).

At the same time, it is necessary to clearly understand that the formulation of "task No. 1" to our general-purpose naval forces (MSNF) as a cover for the NSNF actually cuts the possibility of conducting successful (active) hostilities (because the entire initiative is given to the enemy).

It is characteristic that the US Navy has received with great satisfaction the deployment in our country since the beginning of the 70s. intercontinental SLBMs, realizing that the offensive activity of the USSR Navy will thereby be largely curtailed in favor of the passive task of "covering NSNF in the bastions."

Second. The number of missiles in a salvo


At first glance, a lot of shooting and a lot of rockets is very good. However, when the issue is considered comprehensively, everything turns out to be more complicated.

The problem is that a submarine ballistic missile (SLBM) is not just an expensive item, but a very expensive item. Specific data on domestic SLBMs were not provided.

However, according to Western counterparts (for example, UGM-133A Trident II), the corresponding price tags are close to the cost of combat aircraft. In other words, a four-missile salvo of new SLBMs is very cool and expensive (a rough analogue, is tantamount: simultaneously smashing four new Su-35s on the ground).

It is necessary not only to realize that resources for the purchase of weapons are limited, but also that they are not taken out of thin air, but redistributed among other defense spending.

For example, parachute targets were used to conduct State tests of the new Pantsir-M air defense missile system. That is, with targets in the fleet, extreme poverty. But at the same time, a "mace-rocket feast" is going on nearby, where money and resources "flow like a river" ...
It must be understood that there was no military or technical sense in this 4-rocket salvo.

Or was it?

Project 955 has already made a four-rocket salvo.

Or did he make it so that

"Had to repeat"?

Here you can recall the film "Military Acceptance" on the Kamchatka "Boreys" (from the video from the missile compartment of "Alexander Nevsky" it is clear that he fired a two-missile salvo from neighboring mines located near the midship of the submarine (accordingly, there is reason to think about shooting a salvo , to put it mildly, were feared).


In the end, it would have been much more reasonable to fire both Pacific Boreis (two missiles each).

In addition, in 2020, the Navy (without carrying out the entire volume of necessary tests) pushed the act on the new AICR "Prince Vladimir" (955A is not "955 with the letter A", but actually a new project) - link... This is where a volley was really needed (and not a single launch of an SLBM, as it was in reality)!

In other words, a single launch of SLBMs was quite enough for two Kamchatka "Boreys" (as was done regularly and in accordance with the documents by the old nuclear submarine cruisers (APCR) of the project 667BDR of the 25th division).

Third. Marine underwater weapons (MPS) and countermeasures


From the article “Where is Admiral Evmenov running?»:

In the fall of 2006, the author of this article had a conversation with the Head of the Department of Anti-Submarine Weapons of the Navy (UPV of the Navy), Rear Admiral G.V. Melentyev. (a very ambiguous and extremely cautious person).

Just before the conversation, Melent'ev received a telegram from VA Osipov, General Director of Gidropribor Concern. with "proposals" for the delivery of the head order of project 955 "Yuri Dolgoruky".

The cautious Melentiev was simply "bubbling" with indignation from these "proposals"! And now "a very good question" - why was Yuri Dolgoruky commissioned by the industry? And even more "good" - and with what "Yuri Dolgoruky" today?

A public answer to this question has recently appeared in the form of photographs of loading the USET-80 torpedo junk onto the newest project 955 APCR in Kamchatka (and a photo of a torpedo deck with ammunition) and comments. (Link).

Today, the "strategist" ammunition includes only one type of naval underwater weapon - the morally and technically obsolete USET-80 torpedoes (even the year of adoption - the 80th, says a lot) ... For today on "Borey" the program is installed only for the use of USET-80 torpedoes).


Loading of the ancient USET-80 torpedoes on the Borey, they are also on its torpedo deck.

Former Deputy Head of the Anti-Submarine Weapons Directorate of the Navy R.A. Gusev wrote:

"Why is USET-80 not MK-48?" Because Zaporozhets is not Chrysler.

That is, we have a wildest situation when an ancient Zaporozhets is located on the newest strategic agro-industrial complex,

the very new modification of "whose brains" were "reproduced on a domestic basis"

from an American torpedo of 1961, the battery of which was made according to an American patent of the 40s, and the chief designer of the engine died back in 1969.

If someone in the Aerospace Forces offered to hang the R-57 guided missiles of the MiG-3 fighter on the Su-21, he would be sent to Kashchenko. And in the valiant Navy, this is the basis of torpedo ammunition.

For the ins and outs of this shameful situation, see."Arctic torpedo scandal" .

One more point should be noted when mentioning the new torpedoes.

The fact that not a single submarine of the Navy received the prize of the Commander-in-Chief for torpedo training with torpedoes "Physicist-1" (despite its formally high characteristics) clearly speaks not even of the difficulties with the development and development of new weapons, but in fact about the inability of the Navy solve this problem.

This issue will be discussed in more detail later in the article devoted to how the Physicist torpedo was created and killed (of course, based on open data).

It is no better with countermeasures (and anti-torpedo protection).

Rear Admiral A. Lutsky, retired, wrote ("Marine collection" No. 7 for 2010):

It is proposed to equip the Yasen and Borey submarines under construction with PTZ systems, the technical specifications for the development of which were drawn up back in the 80s of the last century, the results of studies of the effectiveness of these means against modern torpedoes indicate an extremely low probability of not hitting the evading submarine.

From the article "APKR" Severodvinsk "was commissioned to the Navy with critical deficiencies for combat effectiveness. There is no anti-torpedo protection for submarines ":

The country has invested enormous funds in new submarines. The Borey-Bulava program turned out to be the most expensive in the RF Armed Forces.

There are no technical problems to have effective underwater weapons and countermeasures, and this does not require any prohibitive means. However, these "newest" submarines are simply "naked" in front of the enemy's weapons, while they themselves have a lot of shortcomings and defects in their underwater weapons.

Here it is appropriate to recall that the Knyaz Vladimir APRK of the latest project 955A was commissioned by the Navy industry without any real tests of countermeasures.

The mastering of anti-torpedoes “Lasta” by our submarine has been disrupted. Rear-Admiral Lutsky wrote above about the extremely low efficiency of the "Module-D" complex (declared on the "Boreys", according to the official information of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation on "Army-2015").

Moreover, the under a far-fetched pretext, self-propelled anti-torpedo protection devices were removed from the ammunition load of the naval submarines (including the NSNF).

And here already some good questions arise:

"What is it: stupidity or deliberate sabotage and undermining the combat effectiveness of the Russian Navy and Armed Forces? Moreover, undermining precisely the ability to carry out tasks of nuclear deterrence? Who benefits from this? Why is this done? "

Fourth. Ice shooting


Until now, the Russian and Soviet navies have not fired a single torpedo shot under the ice with the homing system turned on.

The enemy regularly conducts special anti-submarine exercises in the Arctic with massive torpedo firing (up to two dozen torpedoes per submarine), in readiness to arrange massacres and unpunished execution of naval submarines (including NSNF) on orders.

Initiative officers of the Navy raised the issue of conducting such firing many times. That's just one example.


However, this did not arouse interest in the command of the Navy, as a result of which the question was voiced publicly. For example:

"Defense order" 2013 No. 3 "Torpedoes go under the ice", Mikhail Komarov, Doctor of Military Sciences, Professor, Vladimir Polenin, Doctor of Military Sciences, Professor.

November 05.04.2019, XNUMX
"NVO" "ICEX - the Arctic threat to Russia"
"Arctic torpedo scandal" .

Rear Admiral (Ret.) V.Ya. Dudko (interview to FAN agency):

Until now, the shooting necessary for this has not really been carried out, although the Americans do it all the time. But such proposals have been prepared and, if necessary, can be implemented.

However, everything turned out to be much worse. And the "bottom" of the Navy was "pierced". Both in 2019 and in 2020: the Navy was never able to conduct such firing.

"Why shoot if you can lie?"

Including top management.

No. 312/4/4421 of 15.05.2019. The handling of information on the state of the submarine forces of the Navy and the Northern Fleet, received by the Administration of the President of the Russian Federation, has been reviewed by the Main Operations Directorate of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation.

This situation is not true.

I. Dylevsky, Deputy Head of the General Staff School.

Of course, the GOU GSH did not come up with this fig leaf itself (although it participated). Obviously, its basis was

"Gallant report of the Navy",

having nothing to do with reality.

Fifth. Anti-submarine support


The anti-submarine support of the Kamchatka Boreyevs is two ancient IPC project 1124M that have not undergone even minimal modernization. New corvettes to replace them, Project 20380, for modern submarines are "game" (and not "hunters" for them).

Anti-submarine aviation?

New IL-38N with Novella? Without even touching on the fact that Novella as a search and targeting system was outdated back in the 90s (while this is the only really working and relatively modern complex in our country), the fleet received it in a “castrated form”.

Just a question: "Where are the new novel buoys in government procurement?" Antiquity of the RSL-16M type is purchased in commercial quantities and for a very considerable price tag. But their range on modern low-noise submarines is several hundred (!) Meters. This long-known fact was accidentally exposed in the advertising materials of "Radar-MMS".

The problem was solved simply and effectively: instead of modifying the complex ("Kasatka") to meet modern requirements, these numbers were simply removed from the advertisement. At the same time, the situation itself no longer raises questions when an organization ("Radar-MMS"), which has not developed or handed over to the customer a single search and targeting system, is appointed the head of the Naval Aviation for them. As they say, the commander of the Naval Aviation, Mr. Kozhin, who is leaving for a well-deserved rest, has already prepared a good place there.

Individual tests on a topic similar to modern Western aviation search and sighting systems cause us a shock, because very bad conclusions suggest themselves regarding the survival of submarines. Moreover, in the West, all this has long been mastered (since the 90s)

"Routine of combat training."


Our submarine may have at least zero noise, but it will still be detected due to low-frequency acoustic illumination (up to aviation buoys).

There is an opinion that one of the main reasons for the apparent slowdown in the development of effective anti-submarine weapons in our country was that their effectiveness raised very inconvenient questions about the unrestrained infusion of funds (and their development by effective managers) into obsolete (and relatively easily detectable) submarine projects.

It should also be mentioned about the practically destruction of the topic of "non-traditional search means" in our country.

Head of the Department of Advanced Design, Central Research Institute. Krylov Andrey Vasiliev recalled the deputy commander-in-chief of the USSR Navy for shipbuilding and armaments, Admiral Fyodor Novoselov:

“At the meeting, he did not give the floor to the head of the institute, who was eager to talk about experiments to detect the surfaced trace of a submarine using the radar.

Much later, at the end of 1989, I asked him why he dismissed this question.

Fedor Ivanovich replied: "I know about this effect, it is impossible to defend against such detection, so why upset our submariners?"

What do we have in the end?

Borei in the Sea of ​​Okhotsk.

Rear Admiral V. Ya. Dudko (one of the most successful submariners of the USSR Navy, who successfully discovered the Ohio SSBN and disrupted its first deployment in 1982):

From the point of view of the General Staff, it was a protected area, since it seemed that it allowed the deployment of anti-submarine defense forces in the shortest possible time. But, from the point of view of the secrecy of the PKK SN, ... is an open and very favorable area, which allows for long-term and covert tracking of our ships at great distances.

Our command and we, so we were taught and hammered into our heads, believed that the PKK SN is not vulnerable…. A unique tracking experience, completely new ways to check the lack of tracking of our missile carriers, which, unfortunately, no one was interested either because of their employment, or did not believe, or did not want to recognize the low secrecy of the PKK SN in the "protected" areas ...

Sixth. Mine support


At the moment, the Russian Navy includes 11 RPK SN, deployed in the Pacific Fleet and the Northern Fleet.

At the same time, in the combat composition of these fleets a month ago there was no no one modern anti-mine ship (PMK). Moreover, there was not a single modern anti-mine underwater vehicle in the ranks.

In order to report to the President, a new PMK "Yakov Balyaev" of project 12700 was dragged to the Pacific Fleet urgently along the Northern Sea Route.

"They covered their nakedness with a fig leaf."

And the problem is not even that “I. Balyaev "alone. The problem is that the ships of Project 12700 have an absolutely outdated concept (which would have looked good in the 80s of the last century), but today it is

"Ships to the very first bottom mine with a modern fuse"

(on which either the secondary battery itself or its only mine action apparatus will be blown up).

Note. The issues of the critical state of the mine defense of the Navy will be considered in one of the upcoming articles, including because the arguments of the publications of the Military Review (articles "What is wrong with our minesweepers?" и "What's" wrong "with the newest PMK project 12700") were used by a group of "representatives of military science" in a publication in one of the specialized publications, and in a very incorrect form (with a distortion of their meaning). Accordingly, an analysis on this topic is needed both for revealing the existing problems of the PMO and for our "military science".

And that is not all.

One has only to carry out tests similar to the American "shock trials" (where all the ships pass through them), and we will just have a "complete shock".


For they will end with catastrophic results not only for practically all ships of new projects, but also for the "newest PMK" project 12700. And all specialists are well aware of this! And therefore

"In no case should such tests be carried out" - at the parade our "ships" are so beautiful (and "perhaps there will be no war")!

There are technical solutions to these problems. However, the use of them fully (and not a palliative of the type of spiral-cable shock absorbers) does not give the naval

"Ostrich sticking its head in the sand"

from serious problems.

By the way, it is this problem that explains the actual sabotage of the work with "Last". The wildness of the situation is that it can be confidently asserted that "Right now" "Last" (for example, with a non-standard launcher on the superstructure for target designation of the station "Arfa-M") can reliably and confidently use the old "Warsaw" of project 877 (according to the new - open question).

Moreover, the old "Ryazan" of Project 667BDR will most likely be able to do this. But the newest "Borei" and "Ash" for some reason turn out to be unable to do what they are obliged to do well under the project and state contract. And what did the old boats of the second generation of the USSR Navy do normally?

The answer is simple. Then they did not hide from problems, did not "sweep them under the plinth." And let not all, but the majority decided. And now - at the head of the corner
“Parade, PR and hockey”.


Conclusions


The conclusions from all this will be very tough.

The key requirement for NSNF is high combat stability... In the case of the Russian Navy, it is a fiction. Both for technical reasons and, first of all, for organizational reasons.

In fact, we have simply, as they say, scored on the combat stability of the NSNF: torpedoes, countermeasures and new means of searching for submarines, defense of naval bases.

Allegedly, the newest AICRs are accepted by the Navy with ancient and non-working underwater weapons, without protection and with critical design flaws of the ships.

At the same time, a large-scale PR campaign was launched to advertise the allegedly high efficiency of our submarine forces. It is addressed not only to society, but also to the highest political leadership. At the same time, for the submarine (and especially for the Bulava and Borei), the country pours simply colossal funds, which are mastered by effective managers in the industry.

The "role of the fleet" here is "not to interfere with this process"

(thanks for what will be

"Warm and satisfying place"

after the fleet).

With all this, we have extremely acute problems in a number of areas of military development (starting with fifth generation fighters and AWACS in the Air Force, armored vehicles and ammunition in the ground forces and the same minesweepers and targets in the Navy).

The NSNF of the Pacific Fleet, deployed in the zone of dominance of the enemy's anti-submarine forces, in fact, have practically no combat value:

• there is no anti-mine and anti-submarine support;
• there are no new torpedoes (which is - antique "firewood");
• there are no new missiles (anti-ship missiles and anti-ballistic missiles);
• no anti-torpedo protection.

Despite the scandal with the complete absence of under-ice torpedo firing, the Navy showed complete incapacity to move this issue off the ground.

With the unrestrained infusion of funds into the NSNF (and into the “second NSNF” with the Poseidon) and in the show with the Bulava, the Navy resembles a subject in an expensive frock coat, but at the same time in torn trousers and barefoot.

But in the reports of the fleet -

Full hockey.

In this situation, the question arises about the advisability of such generous funding of the NSNF.

Yes, the Strategic Missile Forces have their own difficulties. (The same formulation of the question on the BZHRK is actually a recognition of the problems with the combat stability of mine and mobile soil complexes).

But at least the Strategic Missile Forces are not hiding from problems. And one way or another they strive to solve them (and not hide them, as in the Navy).

This does not in any way negate the need for NSNF in principle. As a means of guaranteed retaliation.

Alas, today it is not absolutely guaranteed.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

529 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -22
    9 January 2021 04: 38
    Borey-Bulava: volley left, but hard questions remain
    for me, as an ordinary layman, the main thing is "the volley is gone!"... And, the dependence of the military-industrial complex, their coordination ... this is the daily service ...
    1. +11
      9 January 2021 05: 02
      Strategic submarines cannot be multipurpose by definition.
      You can't stuff everything into one submarine. Look at partners - Virginia and Los Angeles (Seawulf). Each boat has its own niche (specialization).
      1. +10
        9 January 2021 05: 15
        Ohio - strategists
        Virginia - multipurpose
        1. +44
          9 January 2021 09: 48
          The situation is depressing. We have a fleet not for war. And what about the command staff? Is everything all right there?

          I am far from the naval theme, but I recall the famous Syrian tour of the only Russian aircraft carrier. He came to war with an incomplete air wing and sank two aircraft (his own). It is noteworthy that for some reason this incomplete air wing performed its combat mission for the most part from a ground airfield. Why, one wonders, did they drive Kuzya to distant lands? Show the world Cousin efficiency in all its glory? Well, well, it turned out very well!

          And what is typical, for such demonstrations and the destruction of their planes, the bosses were not only not removed, but also awarded. And Kuzya was greeted as a hero, with an orchestra, from a military campaign. It seems that everything suits everyone. Admirals are comfortable in warm places and are not interested in combat effectiveness. And the rest just throw their hats up!
          1. +36
            9 January 2021 10: 14
            Quote: Stas157
            We have a fleet not for war. And what about the command staff? Is everything all right there?

            Often, the command staff is very comfortable with life, and they do not want to change anything.
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. +2
                  9 January 2021 15: 22
                  Quote: IGOR GORDEEV
                  Alas in this regard we are really lagging behind the so-called. west - there can be any "talking head" come to power, but from this the essence of the system will not change.

                  Are you afraid of changing the system or what? Does the current one suit you? We just need that broom that will take revenge in a new way. Systemically.
                  1. +11
                    9 January 2021 22: 47
                    Quote: Stas157
                    Quote: IGOR GORDEEV
                    Alas in this regard we are really lagging behind the so-called. west - there can be any "talking head" come to power, but from this the essence of the system will not change.

                    Are you afraid of changing the system or what? Does the current one suit you? We just need that broom that will take revenge in a new way. Systemically.

                    Am I afraid to play in a casino with a big bet for me? At least this is unreasonable :) You propose - let's put the only apartment on "zero" - we will lose well, okay, and you can live in the forest. Well, if we win! ..
                    A broom that sweeps systematically and well just like that from a vacuum will not arise - prerequisites are needed for this. But in our world everything is relative - for someone it was normal in the 90s, and for someone it was a solid black stripe.
                    1. -7
                      10 January 2021 10: 54
                      Quote: IGOR GORDEEV
                      You offer - let's put the only apartment on "zero" - we will lose well, okay, and you can live in the forest

                      Communists, that they want to take away your apartment? Are you an oligarch or what ??

                      If you are in a bad situation, where you are treated unfairly, where poor craftsmanship and a large part of your labor is appropriated ... do you really not want to change the disgusting situation?
                      1. +6
                        10 January 2021 15: 56
                        Communists, that they want to take away your apartment? And what has to do with the communists - they have been gone for a long time, that is, all sorts of populists balabolists and imitators of communists who hide behind a red rag to achieve exclusively their goals, namely, the construction of a road to the feeding trough and no matter how beautiful pre-election speeches they did not make your brain - they are on you and your problems deeply shit in politics go first of all for enrichment and it will be so everywhere and always.
                      2. +2
                        12 January 2021 10: 38
                        There is nothing to be done here: the entire senior composition of the fleets began their service and were brought up under the conditions of the highest level of naval theft, in the 90s, when warships WITH WEAPONS were sold abroad on needles - that's when the naval elite was educated in the naval headquarters.
                        And today they steal as they breathe.
                        Therefore, in the fleets (and even more so in the General Staff School, it is necessary to build a brick wall and declare 1937 - otherwise we will remain naked in front of the enemy.
                        "And where did the fleets go?" - "And their enemies drowned - unarmed, innocent and unrequited."
                        And the President will be guilty many times before the naval and before the people for not doing what he is supposed to do as Commander-in-Chief - organizing the combat stability of the fleets as a kind of strategic nuclear forces.
                  2. +4
                    10 January 2021 19: 31
                    Under the Soviet regime, there was such a saying: "Change 3 chairmen on a collective farm in a year and the collective farm will receive a P-C" ... In our country, a sharp change of the upper ranks has never led to good ...
                2. +2
                  9 January 2021 19: 53
                  how could a volley have gone? it sounds like "the sound of a shot of a duck hunter is gone". this is illiterate
                  1. +1
                    10 January 2021 23: 39
                    Che you got to the bottom of the little things? Nothing else to do? Don't be afraid to tell yourself that you made a "shot"?
                3. IC
                  +2
                  10 January 2021 10: 43
                  As for the Armed Forces, the new broom basically introduces a new form of uniform. Shoigu is most effective here. Some ceremonial uniforms, which are worth. And doubly for the Navy. White and black. Everything else is compensated by the annual parade in St. Petersburg for the president.
              2. -8
                9 January 2021 17: 47
                Bro! fellow You are the correct American Maine! fool Bomb zero and his people! laughing
              3. +2
                10 January 2021 20: 22
                And what makes you so annoying about "irreplaceability"? Pay attention to the turnover in / on or do you think that we will not be like that when the "turnover" comes? I assure you - it will be even worse.
          2. +27
            9 January 2021 10: 25
            Quote: Stas157
            Admirals are comfortable in warm places ...

            You understand everything correctly!
            I had to communicate with admirals in the service
            at the level of Deputy Commander of the Fleet and above,
            up to the Civil Code of the Navy inclusive. Only
            casual commander of a submarine division, and that is because
            just got the rank of admiral.
            1. +36
              9 January 2021 10: 32
              Quote: Bez 310
              casual submarine division commander

              Frenzied growth
              The War Council ended. We were allowed to go home to our taiga garrison. Fly on An-12 for about two hours. "Sailors" are flying with us, they have also run out of their Military Council, but they have to fly to Kamchatka, we have a gas station in the garrison.

              Everyone is tired, stoned, waiting for departure under the plane. The crew came and launched us into the cockpit. The commander and I are aviation people, we know how to fly on airplanes, so we took a place in the pressurized cabin near the table.

              All doors were closed, the pre-flight fuss began. And we slowly get bread, bacon, sausage, and vodka. Everything you need to while away two hours of flight. "Bortach" gave us glasses, we had everything else. Go.

              The people around us looked into our mouths with envy, but we are familiar, everyone dies alone. One "caprice", who all the time pretended that he was more than a "capraz", crawled to the table, asked permission to "fall on the tail." We are not greedy, we treated the "sailor".

              While we were drinking and eating, we already arrived. We went to their native land, had to remember that the chief, to organize refueling and sending the board to Kamchatka. Due to the weather, the board did not go to Kamchatka, gave the command to accommodate passengers for the night, and went home.

              In the morning I came to work, Saturday, and began to push this An-12 to Kamchatka. There the weather is not to hell, they resist, fly there for three hours, with spare problems. I somehow persuaded the Kamchadals to take an airplane, now the main task is to collect passengers.

              The head of the command post went to collect the passengers, the commander and I discussed something in his office. Here yesterday's "capraz" breaks into the office, which we treated to during the flight. And not one, but two bottles of vodka breaks in, and shouts that he has decided to "distribute the debts." He did not owe us so much, but we do not kick out.

              Moreover, something in it, or rather on it, has changed since yesterday evening. And the shoulder straps have changed. Yesterday he was in the capraza's uniform, and today - in the admiral's. The commander immediately reacted: "Well, you damn it, you are growing!". Everything is simple, the admiral justified himself, yesterday at the Military Council they presented shoulder straps, did not have time to attach them. In short, yesterday you treated me like a human being, let's wash off the title quickly.

              I referred to the lack of a snack. The admiral, seeing a dozen lingonberries lying lonely on a saucer, said that a wedding could be played with this snack. The admiral was persistent and assertive. In 40 minutes, he poured two bottles of vodka into us with almost no snack, and I took him to the plane.

              A good admiral, no nonsense, "of ours will be."
              1. +17
                9 January 2021 14: 35
                Quote: Bez 310
                A good admiral, no nonsense, "of ours will be."

                Admiral's rank is not a career step. This is "happiness," as one of my former subordinates explained to me. But that's not what I mean.
                1. How was it possible to sit on the Pacific Fleet's Armed Forces and not see who the shoulder straps are being handed over? Well, that NSh or Zam was not on it - in principle, it is clear. But the commander? He slept there, kemaril. Wild you tofyats, however!
                2. The fact that flyers are by nature "barons" I found out when I returned from Luanda. The commander withdrew from the BS. We, sailors, give our cabins to our guests, showing naval hospitality, but the flyers, they are the first to climb into the pressurized cabin, to the "stove closer" - this cannot be taken away from you. True, the compartment in the Il-76MD is sealed, and we had it with us ... So, we ourselves invited two orphans of the majors to our soapbox so that they would not choke on saliva. Until Chkalovsk flew all about them and learned their life. "Our guys". And we've seen a lot.
                Therefore - descend from heaven, climb out of the lockers of your BAO and learn naval hospitality ... And people will be drawn to you! laughing
                1. +8
                  9 January 2021 14: 44
                  Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
                  How could you sit on the Pacific Fleet's Armed Forces and not see who the shoulder straps are handed

                  We have our own aircraft - the Air Force (MA) of the Pacific Fleet, we do not go to the naval ones.
                  Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
                  learn naval hospitality ...

                  I would tell about the "naval" ... But there is no such section here
                  - "About service".
                  1. +1
                    10 January 2021 17: 06
                    Quote: Bez 310
                    Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
                    How could you sit on the Pacific Fleet's Armed Forces and not see who the shoulder straps are handed

                    We have our own aircraft - the Air Force (MA) of the Pacific Fleet, we do not go to the naval ones.
                    Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
                    learn naval hospitality ...

                    I would tell about the "naval" ... But there is no such section here
                    - "About service".

                    And it ought to be! Military explosions, or what?
                    1. +4
                      10 January 2021 18: 14
                      Quote: Doliva63
                      And it ought to be!

                      Yes, I believe that the section "About service" could
                      would and organize this year.
                      I would read it with pleasure, and I myself would
                      could tell something.
                      Yes, and "sofa theorists" would be useful
                      find out how the people served and serve that service.
                      1. +1
                        10 January 2021 18: 25
                        Quote: Bez 310
                        Quote: Doliva63
                        And it ought to be!

                        Yes, I believe that the section "About service" could
                        would and organize this year.
                        I would read it with pleasure, and I myself would
                        could tell something.
                        Yes, and "sofa theorists" would be useful
                        find out how the people served and serve that service.

                        I agree. Someone should write a letter to the owner of the resource. And we will put the signatures. I mean "servicemen".
                      2. +1
                        10 January 2021 18: 33
                        Quote: Doliva63
                        Someone should write a letter to the owner of the resource.

                        And who is this "person close to the emperor"?
                        Let him write to the "emperor", if not difficult.
                        I haven't been here so long ago, I don't know many ...
                      3. +2
                        10 January 2021 18: 44
                        Quote: Bez 310
                        Quote: Doliva63
                        Someone should write a letter to the owner of the resource.

                        And who is this "person close to the emperor"?
                        Let him write to the "emperor", if not difficult.
                        I haven't been here so long ago, I don't know many ...

                        I don’t know those close to me, but a pen-man who knows how to express should write. I only know how to argue and swear request The old-timers, I think, will support.
                      4. +2
                        11 January 2021 13: 40
                        Quote: Doliva63
                        And it ought to be! Military explosions, or what?

                        Quote: Bez 310
                        Yes, I believe that the section "About service" could
                        would and organize this year.

                        So there was a section "Tales", where stories about the service were published, but it was probably removed about five years ago, it seems, when the war began in Donbass.
                      5. +2
                        11 January 2021 16: 29
                        Quote: Bez 310

                        Yes, I believe that the section "About service" could
                        would and organize this year.

                        Open a Bigler branch? wink
                      6. 0
                        11 January 2021 17: 33
                        Quote: Alexey RA
                        Open a Bigler branch?

                        Почему нет?
                        "Bigler" is possible, and "VO" is worse?
                        I've been to the Bigler, the number of tales
                        rolls over, and here from serious articles
                        could have a little rest.
                        I'm a stranger here, I don't know local laws,
                        let the bosses think.
              2. +13
                9 January 2021 14: 38
                Hmmm. The ability to drink vodka by no means speaks of the combat capabilities and qualities of this admiral. After all, a simple shirt-guy at a crucial moment can issue such orders .. I don't want to offend anyone. There are different people. Take, for example, the same K. Voroshilov or. S. Budyonny What people! Eh! And they turned out to be a little unprepared for modern war. Especially Klim.
                1. +4
                  9 January 2021 14: 49
                  Quote: 210ox
                  The ability to drink vodka by no means speaks of the combat capabilities and qualities of this admiral.

                  And I'm not talking about that, but only about adequacy
                  in the current situation.
                2. 0
                  11 January 2021 12: 23
                  And they turned out to be a little unprepared for modern war ...
                  --------
                  This is how the perestroika media presented us. But Goth, for example, had a slightly different opinion. And here the question arises: whose point of view is more informative and close to the truth? In my opinion, the answer is obvious. Well, in fact, you cannot pass off the opinion of the idle media as the truth. It is more useful to read memoirs, or even better diaries, there are almost no lies.
              3. 0
                9 January 2021 20: 29
                Put a plus. It's a pity you can't super. Wangyu year from 84 to 89?
                1. -1
                  9 January 2021 20: 54
                  Quote: dgonni
                  Put a plus.

                  Who?
                  And what kind of years have you been "wanging"?
                  1. +1
                    10 January 2021 04: 39
                    I think it's about the year of issue.
                    1. 0
                      10 January 2021 17: 22
                      Quote: bayard
                      10

                      If you mean Comrade Bez 310, then in the years indicated he was already a colonel, probably laughing
                      1. -1
                        10 January 2021 18: 15
                        Quote: Doliva63
                        colonel was

                        Was not...
                      2. +1
                        10 January 2021 18: 33
                        Regiment navigator?
                      3. 0
                        10 January 2021 18: 33
                        Quote: Bez 310
                        Quote: Doliva63
                        colonel was

                        Was not...

                        But all, probably, not in the 80s release. I myself am 87 years of age, and my classmate graduated from my own school in 84, and managed to get the underground.
          3. BAI
            +1
            9 January 2021 10: 54
            ... We have a fleet not for war.

            Precisely, for the war. Both in peacetime and in wartime, the number of ships and their weapons will remain unchanged. And to maintain the fleet, which is required for the war, in peacetime Russia is beyond its means. Therefore, we have a surplus fleet for peacetime (with a huge financial burden) and insufficient for war.
            It should be taken into account that the Black Sea Fleet and the Baltic Sea Fleet are kept for the sake of traditions. Their combat value is zero. In case of war, they will be destroyed immediately, most likely within 24 hours - locked in inland seas and are in the range of tactical missiles and aircraft.
            1. +15
              9 January 2021 11: 06
              Quote: BAI
              Therefore, we have surplus navy for peacetime

              That is, the fleet in the form that Russia is now even redundant ?? Suddenly! But, the question concerned, first of all, not the quantitative composition, but the quality and combat effectiveness of units (in the literal sense) that we have in service.
            2. +7
              9 January 2021 11: 31
              Quote: BAI
              It should be borne in mind that the Black Sea Fleet and the Baltic Sea Fleet are kept for the sake of traditions. Their combat value is zero.

              But this is a question.
              Yes, in the event of a war with the same Turkey (suppose this), our fleet will sit under the cover of coastal air defense, as well as their fleet, because any ship that comes out from under the "umbrella" will be showered with everything. But how real is such a war? And what is the fleet to do off the coast of Turkey?
              But a war with Ukraine or Georgia is already real and here the fleet can play its role. as it was in 2008. It's another matter that let's say one of the Atlantes has nothing to do there, enough corvettes and frigates.
              1. -3
                9 January 2021 15: 13
                Quote: Dart2027
                It's another matter that let's say one of the Atlantes has nothing to do there, enough corvettes and frigates.

                I agree, but for the sake of the Ukrainians and the Georgians, and even if something happens, the Turks and corvettes with frigates do not need enough MPK MRK
                1. +2
                  9 January 2021 16: 48
                  Quote: vladimir1155
                  but for the sake of ukrov and Georgians

                  The representative function in the SM also needs to be performed, and the demonstration of the flag in the performance of a corvette or frigate is still more solid, so one IRC is still indispensable.
                  1. -3
                    9 January 2021 18: 41
                    inquisitive will do
                    1. +1
                      9 January 2021 18: 43
                      40 years of service. Too much.
                      1. -2
                        9 January 2021 18: 43
                        well, for a flag it will do
                      2. 0
                        9 January 2021 19: 55
                        Already it is not suitable for this. It was planned that there will be 6 frigates 11356, in principle enough, the same number of corvettes and the required minimum.
                      3. -2
                        9 January 2021 21: 03
                        six frigates are missing in the entire navy so far ... unless you count 1155
                      4. +2
                        9 January 2021 21: 10
                        Quote: vladimir1155
                        there are no frigates in the entire navy so far

                        Alas, it is.
              2. +2
                11 January 2021 16: 33
                Quote: Dart2027
                But a war with Ukraine or Georgia is already real and here the fleet can play its role. as it was in 2008.

                Uh-huh ... solemnly report on the battle with the Georgian RCA, which ended in someone's sinking. And then hush up this topic, when later both of these RCA were discovered in Poti during the Lebed raid.
                1. 0
                  11 January 2021 19: 48
                  Quote: Alexey RA
                  when later both of these RCA

                  There were 5 boats in the battle, 2 were sunk, since they were sunk at a distance of several kilometers, it was difficult to accurately identify who exactly.
            3. +17
              9 January 2021 12: 19
              Quote: BAI
              ... We have a fleet not for war.

              Precisely, for the war. Both in peacetime and in wartime, the number of ships and their weapons will remain unchanged. And to maintain the fleet, which is required for the war, in peacetime Russia is beyond its means. Therefore, we have a surplus fleet for peacetime (with a huge financial burden) and insufficient for war.
              It should be taken into account that the Black Sea Fleet and the Baltic Sea Fleet are kept for the sake of traditions. Their combat value is zero. In case of war, they will be destroyed immediately, most likely within 24 hours - locked in inland seas and are in the range of tactical missiles and aircraft.

              For the operation in Syria, the fleet was not needed? A base in the Red Sea, which controls the entire flow of oil from the Persian Gulf to Europe, is also not needed? The Baltic Fleet ensures the safety of the joint venture and St. Petersburg. The Japanese would land a landing on the South Kurils, and there Rhenium from the volcano figachit. Why do we need Rhenium?
              Take it. The state will not become poorer. (C) Ivan Vasilievich changes his profession.
              And we don't need the Northern Sea Route? Arctic natural resources? Countries such as Sweden, Finland, China and others are interested in the Arctic. And what do they have to do with the Arctic.
              We don't need a huge fleet. We need a combat-ready fleet with efficient effective weapons, capable of solving the tasks facing it: protecting our sea borders (the longest in the world), protecting shipping, fishing, mining, preventing enemy fleets from reaching our shores to deliver a nuclear disarming strike, and others. ...
              1. +18
                9 January 2021 14: 30
                We don't need a huge fleet. We need a combat-ready fleet with efficient effective weapons, capable of solving the tasks facing it: protecting our sea borders (the longest in the world), protecting shipping, fishing, mining, preventing enemy fleets from reaching our shores to deliver a nuclear disarming strike, and others. ...


                HERE !. Common sense begins to win ...
                1. +9
                  9 January 2021 14: 52
                  Would add common sense to the USC and the Admiralty.
                  Water wears away the stone.
                  Judging by the photographs of Klimov's appeals to the Moscow Region, he has been fighting Spitz for a long time.
              2. +11
                10 January 2021 06: 02
                Maxim dug a very deep topic - about the combat value of the Navy's NSNF. Especially the fact that the protection of SSBNs in the bastions will draw off most of the forces of the Navy, not leaving them for an active struggle at sea. And in the "bastions" and at the exit from the bases there is simply nothing to ensure the safety of SSBNs and RLARKs. Especially at the Pacific Fleet.
                Therefore, it would be advisable to revise both the plans for the construction of SSBNs (their quantitative composition) and their location.
                It is precisely because of the inability of the Pacific Fleet to ensure the safety of basing, combat deployment and combat use.
                For quite objective reasons that cannot be eliminated in the medium term. And with a view to greater and more complete return on these warships and ease of basing, protection, operation, repair and logistics, when basing them on the Northern Fleet.
                And at the Pacific Fleet leave MAPLs and SSGNs, which, no longer being diverted to defend SSBNs in the "bastion", will be able to significantly strengthen the Fleet's strike forces in DM and OZ. And the now frail and slowly building anti-submarine forces will be able to more fully provide the anti-submarine warfare of the naval base and the economic zone.
                The Borei-Borei-M series of SSBNs can be limited to 8 pennants, and the last two just laid / laid down can be completed in the Borei-K modification by the Zircon and Caliber-M carriers. And to build such "Borey-K" in the amount of 6 - 8 pieces. This will greatly enhance the strike capabilities of the Fleet and will not need to hide them in "bastions", diverting the already few forces. These SSGNs will be able to effectively "keep track of weapons" for the enemy's AUG and KUG and carry out watch in the oceans, keeping the enemy's coastal infrastructure at gunpoint. And they will also very strongly strengthen the future KUG of the domestic Fleet not only with their shock, but also anti-submarine capabilities, strengthening their combat stability from under the water.
                The construction of the Yasenei should be urgently stopped, having completed the already pledged ones, and the funds for the last two (which may not have been pledged yet) should be redirected to the design of MPSS in the dimension 945 of the project, which should be built in a large series in the future.
                And close the OCD for the Husky \ Laika project, which threatens to result in an even more futuristic version of Ash. All funds should be redirected to the design and construction of MAPLs of moderate VI, inexpensive and massive.

                And on the Northern Fleet, SSBNs collected in one fist will be under much better protection. There, surface forces are more powerful, and air cover is easier to organize. Especially when the upgraded Kuznetsov returns to service.
                Kamchatka strategists need to be taken out of the attack and this burden removed from the Pacific Fleet. There is no other reasonable solution and will not be in the next 10 years.

                And further . In 2015, an order was published for the construction and delivery of 200 liquid-propellant missiles to the Fleet for the Dolphins remaining in service. There are not so many left to serve these boats, but new missiles are being supplied ... Therefore, it makes sense to keep these SSBNs in service as long as possible, and after the exhaustion of the resource, transfer them to "duty in the base", if possible, until the resource is exhausted. missiles.
                The treaty with the Americans on the reduction of strategic armaments will sink into oblivion in a few months, and there is no point in limiting oneself in these armaments and writing off new missiles together in submarines. Let them continue their service as launchers for a retaliatory-on-counter or preemptive strike.
                But only a nationally oriented government can redraw plans, returning to common sense and rational spending of the budget. For this, the Country needs a Master.
                The real Master is wise, decisive, strong-willed.
                Not a puppet in the hands of the entourage.
                Not a compromiser, sagging under the pressure of partners.
                For whom the highest priority will be the safety and well-being of the People.
                ... not friends.
                That will not let go of projects and programs of strategic importance ... and astronomical value.
                Which will appoint executors according to ABILITIES, and not according to the patronage and consensus of the "right people".
                Once upon a time, we were lucky with such a Master ...
                1. 0
                  10 January 2021 06: 14
                  Put a fat plus.
            4. 0
              9 January 2021 13: 12
              Then who is the US fighting with their fleet ??
              1. +4
                9 January 2021 18: 57
                Quote: Jager
                Then who is the US fighting with their fleet ??

                The question is, of course, interesting ... (c)
                Look into the history of WWII and today's operations, when the first strike was made by the KRBD from ships and SSGNs, plus carrier aircraft. But there were times when BZ (even during WWII) was unloaded (disposed of) through the barrel! The battleship "New Jersey" (1983 and 1984 in Lebanon) and the LC "Missouri" (1991 in Iraq).
            5. KCA
              -5
              9 January 2021 13: 20
              Well, of course, the opponents have everything in the Baltic and the Black Sea, but we have nothing, fly the planes and the CD, but why do they write like that in boiling water about the appearance of Iskander in Kaliningrad? What else is there? Yes, only those who need to know, the “partners” learned about the first appearance of the Iskander in Kaliningrad from the reports of Russian TV, the aviation of the Southern Federal District is also about nothing? However, it covers both the Caspian and the Black Sea like a bull a sheep, "Daggers" are also about nothing, only the aviation of possible opponents can do something?
              1. -1
                11 January 2021 13: 58
                Quote: KCA
                why are they peeing with boiling water about the appearance of Iskander missiles in Kaliningrad?

                and no one has anything against the development of Iskander and aviation and navy, the question of the effectiveness of specifically surface ships in the conditions of small limited seas stuffed with coastal missiles and coastal aviation, I personally understand that ineffective not only Russian corvettes frigates in the Baltic, but also German and Swedish, so are ineffective. And the Finns are wise, in general they did not bother with them by the way, they have the whole fleet of minesweepers, minelayers, they count on mining and do it right. .... and they (the Finns) have more minesweepers than in the entire Russian Navy with its oceans! here we are truly throwing money on single battleships and Kuzu, when there are no necessary and available means of naval warfare, so was our bulky battleships in Tsushima that exceeded the power of the Japanese large fleet, all died because the Japanese had hundreds of destroyers (destroyers of that time correspond to MRK)
                1. +1
                  11 January 2021 17: 01
                  The Finns are right. From the experience of the wars in the Baltic, mines and aircraft decide everything.
                2. KCA
                  -2
                  13 January 2021 07: 19
                  Mine planners and minesweepers PPC will help the Finnish fleet in attacking Calibers, Onyxes and Zircons, well, they will easily neutralize all the missiles, especially if they are with SBS, one Caliber with a TABC will fucking demolish the whole of Helsinki, and only then a minefield will save Finland from fools, who will sail on motor boats to conquer
                  1. -1
                    13 January 2021 09: 00
                    Quote: KCA
                    Mine planners and minesweepers PPC how to help the Finnish fleet in the attack of Caliber, Onyx and Zircon,

                    to paraphrase .... how will corvettes and frigates help the Russian fleet in attacking NATO missiles?
            6. -1
              9 January 2021 15: 08
              Yes
              Quote: BAI
              The Black Sea Fleet and the Black Sea Fleet are kept for the sake of tradition.
              and now Vladika is also senseless and vulnerable
              and it is expensive, and for the sake of tradition, the aircraft carrier is more expensive than the Alexandrov ensemble, but with near-zero combat usefulness ..... the author writes that the RPKN at the Pacific Fleet are defenseless, this is a clear obvious fact, but it is not so obvious that all the other RPKN are not enough protected, there is not enough IPC to protect them. we need a water area within a radius of 2000-3000 thousand km, so we do not control it on the Northern Fleet, there are a couple of BODs, a couple of frigates and one cruiser, the remnants of Soviet PLO aviation, but we keep dozens of ships in the Baltic and Black Sea, in the Japanese and Caspian ... for the sake of "tradition", but by and large for the sake of stripe positions. Exit from the Japanese sea only through that same Tsushima, which was narrow back in 1905, for La Perouse is already ..... the admirals are consciously and consistently preparing us again Tsushima!
              1. +2
                10 January 2021 04: 20
                Quote: vladimir1155
                Exit from the Japanese sea only through that same Tsushima, which was narrow back in 1905, for La Perouse is still ..... the admirals are consciously and consistently preparing us again Tsushima!

                If you look closely, it turns out that half of the Pacific Fleet are also locked in their seas like the Black Sea Fleet and the Baltic Fleet. At the beginning of any batch, ships from Vladivostok or Fokino will never enter the operational space, but will hang out only in the Sea of ​​Japan. Yapi block all exits from it. These ships do not go through the Tatar Strait (shallow and freezing). So they can be called the Japanese Navy. Only a group from Kamchatka can break out into the ocean. But these are mostly submarines, there are no serious surface ships there.
                1. -1
                  10 January 2021 20: 42
                  Quote: Gritsa
                  that half of the Pacific Fleet are also locked in their seas like the Black Sea Fleet and the Baltic Fleet. At the beginning of any batch, ships from Vladivostok or Fokino will never enter the operational space, but will hang out only in the Sea of ​​Japan.
                  I agree, but unfortunately this is not half, but almost the entire tof, and in Kamchatka, only all three nuclear submarines, a couple of MPKs and one minesweeper ...
              2. -1
                10 January 2021 16: 06
                And SSBNs go out through Tsushima and they don't need to, if something happens, they can launch rockets from the quay wall.
                1. +2
                  10 January 2021 19: 32
                  there are no rpksn in the Japanese sea, thank God, they are in Kamchatka, but if they do not get out, then there is no point in them, why from the quay wall, then we just roll the mobile yars to the quay and fell even from the quay even from the village road, cheap angrily .... the meaning of the RPKS is not to shoot back somehow from the wall, but to come up unexpectedly to the enemy's shore and hit him close until his missile defense system detects
                  1. 0
                    10 January 2021 22: 27
                    "And to come up unexpectedly to the enemy's shore and hit him close until his missile defense missile is not detected" Now, anyway, you have come close to the shores or shot from the wall, the missile defense missile defense group sees all launches online will be detected instantly, and the SM 3 missiles of the latest modification flight range 2500 kilometers - it is necessary to improve the systems for overcoming missile defense on ICBMs, which is what they are doing.
                    1. -2
                      10 January 2021 22: 50
                      Quote: Vadim237
                      it is necessary to improve the systems for overcoming missile defense on ICBMs, which is what they are doing.

                      I agree, but I see the difference between 1000 km and 12000 km, it is more difficult to track, by the way, you can hit a hedgehog with a mace in Japan (if it attacks), from the south, in those countries in other hemispheres (if, of course, they start aggression against the Russian Federation), in the center of the USA and much much farther 12000 km from Russia, in general, the RPKSN is a longer arm than the yars, and there are also calibers and granites on the nuclear submarine ... as far as I know, it is more difficult to detect them than the MBR ... so the nuclear submarine is necessary and their combat stability and not replacement by Yars or shooting from the wall
              3. +1
                11 January 2021 13: 34
                Quote: vladimir1155
                the admirals are consciously and consistently preparing us Tsushima again!

                To think that it is only the admirals who are to blame, in my opinion, is unreasonable, because in any structure of the armed forces there are always examples of bungling. I will tell you a case that I have known well since Soviet times. In the 50s, in the Vadsø region (Norway), the largest NATO electronic intelligence center, or rather the American one, was created, which had some posts on our border. To neutralize these posts and the center itself, a separate mixed artillery battalion with batteries of rocket and barrel artillery was deployed near the border. Its task was to deploy in the tundra near the border during a threatened period and destroy these objects with the beginning of the war. For this, the infrastructure was created, up to the "concrete" leading to the positions, which were also equipped with concrete slabs so that the equipment would not sit down when the thaw sets in. The maintenance of this division, taking into account housing, heating, school and other delivery costs, represented considerable sums, but nevertheless, no one bothered with this, and the officers served as they should. And this went on for decades. My colleague, who began his service there and with whom we communicated with already quite mature officers, could not understand why, to destroy this center, it was impossible to envisage a pair of ground-based cruise missiles (or OTR) with a range of up to 500-1000 km, which would were located in the coastal units of the Northern Fleet, and the maintenance of which would have cost mere pennies, compared to the maintenance of a separate division in the tundra. In the worst case, provide for a bomber strike from nearby airfields, which could deliver a tactical nuclear strike against this center. And that would be the end for this enemy center. This epic ended with the collapse of the Union, and I think that now only the ruins of the buildings of this object adorn the tundra. This is how we drove the country's economy, completely not understanding what this would result in later. The same is now done by the author of the article, who, with his pseudo-concern, is trying to shove through some unthinkable "ideas" on torpedoes and mines, believing that they will help us in a global war.
                It will be a pity if some of the current commanders buy into such incriminating articles, which, in fact, do not represent anything interesting from the point of development of new weapons, but clog the heads of those people who have a poor understanding of modern military affairs with garbage.
                1. 0
                  13 January 2021 22: 49
                  wow, history ((
            7. +3
              9 January 2021 15: 15
              Quote: BAI
              Therefore, we have a surplus fleet for peacetime (with a huge financial burden) and insufficient for war.

              it is abundant on the seas and insufficient on the oceans! no matter whether it is a war or a pre-war peacetime! This is true !
            8. 0
              9 January 2021 17: 53
              Quote: BAI
              Both in peacetime and in wartime, the number of ships and their weapons will remain unchanged.

              You are not right. There are brigades of conservation ships and there are MMF ships that are undergoing re-equipment and become ships of the Vospom. fleet. And trawlers are even becoming BTShch. Well, most likely they will in fact become breakers.
              1. +1
                10 January 2021 20: 45
                Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
                And trawlers are even becoming BTShch. Well, most likely they will become breakthroughs in fact.

                this is outdated, wars are now fleeting, the reserve is partly non-combatable, and minesweepers do not have enough trawl, complex equipment is required to be mounted for a long time ... but to break through minefields at the cost of the death of the crew ...
                1. +2
                  11 January 2021 19: 27
                  Quote: vladimir1155
                  it is outdated, wars are now fleeting, the reserve of the Bosch is partly non-combatant,

                  When, in the eighties, in the Sevastopol Bay I saw a dozen large ships on conservation, but on which there were crews, albeit reduced, even my landlord's hair stood on end from such bungling. What kind of fools should have been those who came up with the idea of ​​storing this metal, instead of giving them away not to be melted down. After all, even then it was clear that they would drown immediately, after the very first strike on the Sevastopol base, but nevertheless they spent people's money on them, and the naval ones pretended that it was necessary for a mob reserve. In general, there are still those miracle workers in the navy, although they love to look into the future, with something that has no place there for a long time. Their fate is apparently such, to hold on to rubbish, from which there is no benefit ...
                  1. 0
                    11 January 2021 20: 27
                    it
                    Quote: ccsr
                    hold on to junk that is useless ..

                    just a way to cut a variety of provisions, and then another repair ... there is already cut by the billions and in favor of admirals, the same cut is the maintenance of running, but incapable of combat ships with morally and physically outdated non-combat-ready weapons, but such are the KUZYA, modern new corvettes and new minesweepers, almost all ships are over 30 years old ... that is, almost the entire fleet = durilka = cardboard box, and so it was in Rus-YAP during WWI and WWII, flag demonstrations, parades and so on. except maybe the nuclear submarine is more or less appropriate for the tasks. This is all caused primarily by the overestimated tonnage of the uniqueness (in the series a pair of three 1144 1164 or one KUZYA ship) and therefore the astronomical cost of the pennant itself and its repair, it is a pity to throw it out, but there is no money to fix ... many small ships can be produced
                    and serial repair and do not mind writing off. BUT there is little fat on the cut too.
                  2. +1
                    12 January 2021 14: 49
                    And how much good was the cropped (to varying degrees) divisions? How long did it take to bring her to a relatively sane state? We will not talk about combat value. especially if there is a relatively adequate enemy ..... IMHO, but all this is an illustration to the theme of "war with a broken back." EMNIP, as it was called. Plenty of decent posts in decent places. For dust-free service .....
                    1. +1
                      12 January 2021 18: 33
                      Quote: frog
                      And how much good was the cropped (to varying degrees) divisions?

                      There was no use - I have no doubt about that. But at least they had the equipment for conservation, which was instantly brought into working condition, it was only necessary to connect the batteries to the transport base.

                      Quote: frog
                      Plenty of decent posts in decent places. For dust-free service ....

                      The salaries of the personnel were very small compared to the costs of maintaining the equipment itself. So it was not the salaries of the military that ruined us, but the fact that annual re-preservation, inspections, consumables, etc. were required.
                      That is why I say that bungling was not only in the navy, but it was too expensive for the country in the navy. For example, reactivated equipment on a wheel base can be transferred to the national economy at least, but a warship cannot be converted into a trawler.
                      1. +1
                        12 January 2021 18: 49
                        There was no use - I have no doubt about that.

                        Consensus. Not bad already wink
                        But at least they had the equipment for conservation, which was instantly brought into working condition, it was only necessary to connect the batteries to the transport base.

                        Let's just say you're in luck .... I've met more. And, alas, quite often.
                        The salaries of the personnel were very small compared to the costs of maintaining the equipment itself.

                        And I'm not talking about that. And about the fact that a considerable number of officers were ....... how would it be softer ... I think you understand)))
                        For example, reactivated equipment on a wheel base can be transferred to the national economy at least, but a warship cannot be converted into a trawler.

                        Yes, there, too, everything was ambiguous, generally speaking. Again, you can also remember aviation ...
                        For natural reasons, everyone milked the cow that was. And besides the fleet, so to speak, there are complaints feel But just like everyone else. Well, and the specifics are the matter ...
                      2. +1
                        12 January 2021 19: 04
                        Quote: frog
                        Consensus. Not bad already

                        What is the consensus - do you think I found out about it now? That we did not see then that the real deployed divisions of the GSVG are a cut higher in combat readiness than those that were in the Union?
                        Quote: frog
                        And about the fact that a considerable number of officers were ....... how would it be softer ... I think you understand)))

                        Is it their fault that the doctrine of "two wars" existed then, and officers were kept under it? It did not depend on them.
                        Quote: frog
                        For natural reasons, everyone milked the cow that was. And besides the fleet, so to speak, there are complaints

                        But the fleet ruined us too much - it was even evident from the prices of their products, I am in the subject on this issue.
                        Of course, after a fight they don't wave their fists, but the fact that our top military men behaved stupidly in the years preceding the collapse is obvious to me.
                      3. +1
                        12 January 2021 19: 19
                        What is the consensus - do you think I found out about it now?

                        No, of course not. But to know is one thing, and to admit is another. But this is not a run over)), just a statement ...
                        And are they to blame that we then had the doctrine of "two wars"

                        Did I blame them for this? It's not they who invented this nonsense. But ..... They were ....
                        But the fleet ruined us too much - it was even evident from the prices of their products, I am in the subject on this issue.

                        "Expenses for the Soviet Navy in 1989 were:
                        12,08 billion rubles (with a total military budget of 77,294 billion rubles) "
                        It is clear that there are far from all the numbers (as is often the case with statistics)), but ......
                      4. +1
                        12 January 2021 19: 36
                        Quote: frog
                        "Expenses for the Soviet Navy in 1989 were:
                        12,08 billion rubles (with a total military budget of 77,294 billion rubles) "

                        I don't know who and how counted it, and whether the author of the calculations can be trusted, but the official figure was less:
                        military spending of the USSR was relatively modest: in 1968 - 16,7 billion rubles (2,6% of the GNP of the 1980 level), 1975-1976 - 17,4 billion (2,8%), 1980-1984 - 17,1 , 2,7 billion (1987%), 20,2 - 3,2 billion (1%). [3], [5, p. XNUMX].

                        https://topwar.ru/110014-voennye-rashody-zagubili-sssr.html
                        Although, of course, official expenditures did not reflect all defense expenditures, so naturally the expenditures were higher. Once I heard another figure, which in my opinion is more realistic - about 50 billion rubles. by the time of the collapse of the USSR.
                      5. 0
                        12 January 2021 20: 12
                        Well, I already said that the Union's defense spending is a delicate matter)))
                        But in this case, we are talking about the fact that the cost of a rather big navy is about (highly conditional) 16%. It is clear that you can argue about anything here, but .....
                      6. 0
                        13 January 2021 12: 02
                        Quote: frog
                        But in this case, we are talking about the fact that the cost of a rather big navy is about (strongly conditional) 16%.

                        This figure is incorrect, if only because the fleet used a lot of weapons and equipment, the development of which went along the lines of other general customers. For example, everything that went through the 12th GU MO, or even through a number of departments of the Ministry of Defense. Even our space technology was cheaper than the same missile cruisers, aircraft carriers and nuclear submarines. And I'm not even talking about the content.
                      7. 0
                        14 January 2021 16: 21
                        And there are (I'm talking about officialdom))) correct numbers? Taking into account how exactly the prices were set and how did the financing of both the country and the defense industry take place?
                        And are you sure that only the expenses for the "wet" ones were hidden in other columns? And, say, the "falcons" of various epistemology were extremely honest and open?
                        It is obvious that steamship business is not cheap. As well as the obvious cheapness of the army in general, and ours - even more so. In the same way, a certain oddity is obvious)))) The Navy .... That does not mean that he is not needed. In the same way as the strangeness of the tank zoo raises questions, but does not mean that tanks are not needed. And so - for all components ...
                      8. 0
                        14 January 2021 16: 38
                        Quote: frog
                        And there are (I'm talking about officialdom))) correct numbers?

                        No, not everything is indicated there either. But the figure you quoted of 16% is roughly twice as wrong.
                      9. 0
                        14 January 2021 16: 41
                        And here the competition of measuring instruments already begins. I don’t participate in these, alas ...
                        Do you want to believe that the damned fleet was eating the beggars of the Armed Forces? Yes, for the sake of the creator, who will forbid you? The topic is very popular, since the days of the damned emperors and other henchmen ... True, then it turns out that not everything is exactly the same with the numbers, but that is ..... And if it were not spent on the fleet, we would oh, how they took off ...
                        Good luck in the new year and health!
                      10. -1
                        14 January 2021 19: 29
                        Quote: frog
                        Do you want to believe that the damned fleet was eating the beggars of the Armed Forces?

                        I am aware of how the budget of the Armed Forces was divided according to the types and types of troops in general terms, so I think I was not mistaken. It cannot be said that he ate everyone, but he was a leader in this matter. So about 30% was spent on it - I remember that.

                        Quote: frog
                        Good luck in the new year and health!

                        Same to you.
                      11. +1
                        15 January 2021 20: 45
                        Quote: ccsr
                        I am aware of how the budget of the Armed Forces was divided according to the types and types of troops in general terms, so I think I was not mistaken. It cannot be said that he ate everyone, but he was a leader in this matter. So about 30% was spent on it - I remember that.

                        YOUR drinking companions warrant officers lied to YOU
            9. +2
              9 January 2021 18: 30
              Quote: BAI
              It should be borne in mind that the Black Sea Fleet and the Baltic Sea Fleet are kept for the sake of traditions. Their combat value is zero.

              Oh how! And in the General Staff they don't even know !!! laughing
              Quote: BAI
              In case of war, they will be destroyed immediately,

              Well, damn it, "Nelsons" and more! It's already scary to stay on the site ... There are strategists around with incredibly categorical judgments .. and three classes of education at the Central School of Education.
              Yeah ... It's power! intellect and rushing ... already capitulate to such relics of hotts !!!
              AHA.
              Quote: BAI
              locked in inland seas and within range of tactical missiles and aircraft.
              And what words WAY knows ... and where did he get it !?
              Oh yes, I forgot, damn it, - eat STRATEGIUS! As he said - so it will be !!! Because no one can touch the aviation, not to mention the carriers of the anti-ship missile system ... But how, otherwise nizzyayaya !!! It has been said - all will be drowned - period! STRATEGIUS .. eat! laughing
          4. +8
            9 January 2021 13: 35
            Judging by the combat readiness and state of our fleet, not everything is in order with the command staff. The fish goes out from the head. Admirals look like businessmen in uniform.
          5. +6
            9 January 2021 14: 11
            Quote: Stas157
            We have a fleet not for war. And what about the command staff? Is everything all right there?

            The courtiers ... Well, where are we F.F. Ushakov to take something ??? All the proteges around ... hairy-handed. Something is not visible from the deck and from the navigating bridge ...
            The Amam were lucky: they had Rikover. And here, after Gorshkov and Chernavin ... at least roll a ball ...
            Sadly, however.
            1. +2
              9 January 2021 18: 18
              Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
              Sadly, however.

              I don’t know about the army, but in the Ministry of Internal Affairs the situation is the same, protege in the degree of loyalty to the authorities, and not in professionalism. Alas, it's the same everywhere.
              1. +4
                9 January 2021 23: 02
                Quote: Ingvar 72
                Alas, it's the same everywhere.

                "Capitalism with its birthmarks", as the founders taught us at one time ... And the guarantor sings about social lifts ...
                It's time to end the one-party system of power in our country! Painfully, the fans of the "lawyer's son" sharpen their teeth on them. The hour is not equal to death in the upcoming elections ... bully
                1. +1
                  12 January 2021 14: 52
                  Painfully, the fans of the "lawyer's son" sharpen their teeth on them. The hour is not equal to death in the upcoming elections ...

                  After so many years of training? I doubt it very much .... If one of "these" will find it suitable material. But then only the signboard will change wink
              2. 0
                10 January 2021 10: 16
                Quote: Ingvar 72
                protege by the degree of loyalty to the authorities, and not by professionalism. Alas, it's the same everywhere.

                Quite right! This is called the SYSTEM, which must be demolished, otherwise Russia may not stay!
                1. -1
                  11 January 2021 14: 03
                  RI already collapsed in 1917 for this very reason
          6. -1
            9 January 2021 23: 39
            Quote: Stas157
            The situation is depressing.

            From the article I understood one thing - "Vsepropalo" .... So what? So there is still a landing, which walks on the ground and waves its arms and legs ... Nobody has canceled it yet.
            1. +2
              10 January 2021 10: 19
              Quote: Zoldat_A
              From the article I realized one thing - "Vsepropalo" .... So what?
              Of course not! Everything is in plain sight, you just need to apply the will and desire to fix this mess and take away budget funds in your pockets, and at the same time sweep out stupid and incompetent bureaucrats of all ranks from the decision-making places!
          7. +3
            10 January 2021 03: 59
            Quote: Stas157
            It seems that everything suits everyone. Admirals are comfortable in warm places and are not interested in combat effectiveness.

            And as correctly noted in the article, retiring generals and admirals in massive numbers in a very suspicious way find themselves in warm chairs in the leadership of the defense complex. It makes sense to think about it. Maybe it's time for the FSB to get down to business and follow this funny chain of transformations?
            1. +2
              12 January 2021 14: 53
              Maybe it's time for the FSB to get down to business and follow this funny chain of transformations?

              And these are already busy "with their own business." They are not interested in "other people's affairs".
          8. +1
            10 January 2021 18: 17
            Quote: Stas157
            And what about the command staff? Is everything all right there?

            Why do you think the Ministry of Emergency Situations has been appointed as the Minister of Defense? Because all the generals did not find no one(!!!) an intelligent general.
            That's the whole answer request
            1. +1
              10 January 2021 19: 16
              Quote: psiho117
              Why do you think the Ministry of Emergency Situations has been appointed as the Minister of Defense? Because for all the generals there was not a single (!!!) sensible general

              He was appointed out of personal loyalty, and not because there were no smart generals. Although this experience of leadership had large structures and solved operational tasks within the Ministry of Emergency Situations, unlike Ivanov or Serdyukov, and did not climb much with the reforms in the army. That is why I made a mistake, I realized what was happening, and now I seem to be on the spot. Although this appointment was not a failure, and this is already encouraging ...
              1. 0
                11 January 2021 00: 40
                Quote: ccsr
                Serdyukov

                Do not remember Satan by night ...
      2. +8
        9 January 2021 14: 05
        Quote: Military Commissar77
        Strategic submarines cannot be multipurpose by definition.

        Nobody "appointed" them multipurpose, although after the launch of the entire BC, they may well upset the NK and even the enemy's PLA.
        But the speech in the article is completely different. The point is that modern (non-traditional) methods of detecting underwater NOISE objects disrupt the issue of secrecy of our APRK SN even in the so-called. "bastions". And after the attack of the strategist with the help of TO, he is not able to evade it and destroy / withdraw the SNTO. Which is guaranteed to lead to the death of the ship and the crew. There are problems, and the leadership is like ostriches. That's the problem. And not in who cannot be who!
    2. +16
      9 January 2021 06: 48
      for me, as an ordinary man in the street, the main thing is "the volley is gone!"
      You know, when I served as a company commander, I constantly drove on tactics. We were indignant like what for goat accordion? He replied simply: "Do you think that you are a white bone? Goonies! Our business is to send a signal to launch missiles. And then we are ordinary infantry." So I think from the moment of the beginning of combat use any boats are considered decommissioned. A volley fired? Mission accomplished. Nobody will worry about whether the boat will later reach the base (most likely there will be nowhere to return).
      1. -12
        9 January 2021 07: 27
        Already that huge anti-submarine superiority that the opponents created against our nuclear fleet cost them dearly and will continue to do so. And the fact that "Bulava" flies to the right place should restrain them even more. hi
        1. +1
          9 January 2021 07: 49
          There is another question. The only full-fledged volley in history was fired in 1989. (SSBN K-407 project 667BDRM) and then only from the second time. The first failed, the rocket blazed. Let's estimate: a multi-headed rocket 6-10, each head 100-150 Kt., Rockets 16. Total we have from 9,6 Mt to 24 Mt. The goals are minimum 96, maximum 160. This is a DAMAGE !!!! Huge! And only from one boat. At the same time, I believe that a certain minimum is laid down in combat use, which the boat simply must release before being destroyed by the enemy. During the missile salvo, the boat is deaf and blind. Why would she need torpedoes? I don't understand this. Can the specialists explain?
          1. +30
            9 January 2021 08: 12
            Quote: NDR-791
            During the missile salvo, the boat is deaf and blind. Why would she need torpedoes?


            You still have to live to see the volley
            1. +5
              9 January 2021 08: 17
              This is understandable. But after all, SSBNs are not intended for torpedo combat in principle, not sharpened, so to speak. He obviously loses to the hunter boat. Here stealth is the first thing. Or there should be protection from the outside. If they find it before a volley, they will not let you shoot.
              1. +15
                9 January 2021 10: 02
                According to the mind, at least one multipurpose nuclear submarine should cover the launch of SSBNs. But we have with them a disaster from the word in general ...
              2. 0
                9 January 2021 13: 21
                And what prevents the strategist from installing effective means of counteraction and self-defense (detection, destruction)? Just the same, it should be equipped with EVERYTHING.
                The situation is reminiscent of the fate of Yamato, when the battleship had excellent main battery guns, capable of drowning anyone. And the anti-aircraft cover was clearly insufficient. Or the same "Tirpitz" or "October Revolution", which was covered by the entire air defense system of Leningrad. The result is known.
                1. +5
                  9 January 2021 14: 27
                  And what prevents the strategist from installing effective means of counteraction and self-defense (detection, destruction)? Just the same, it should be equipped with EVERYTHING.


                  That's right, it is, and often SSBNs are unmasking the forces that are supposed to protect it.
                2. +2
                  15 January 2021 20: 41
                  Quote: Jager
                  And what prevents the strategist from installing effective means of counteraction and self-defense (detection, destruction)?

                  eggs
                  the dancer
                  or rather VIP-functionaries of our maritime defense industry
                  across which our raftsmen are afraid to squeak
          2. +5
            9 January 2021 19: 58
            Quote: NDR-791
            During the missile salvo, the boat is deaf and blind. Why would she need torpedoes?
            About the "blind-deaf-dumb".
            Yes, it seems, as it were, - "no ...." We were hanging under the paravan, now there are buoys and others ... GPBA again, conformal and nasal antennas, GAS mine detection ... Everyone is sitting on BG-1, recorders write ... Of course there is flare, as without it ... but not at all frequencies ... and without the "whistle" ...

            About torpedoes. GAS mine detecting sees an attacking torpedo. Your task is to have time to enter the "omega", shoot the anti-torpedo (Last), put up a barrage and release the self-propelled jamming, leading away the TO, launched at you. They used to shoot at the bearing for detection. THAT from the dezh TA ... Then it turned out that not everything is so simple ... "upright walkers" became out of fashion, from the word "in general".
            So everything is complicated, but you can ... if you are careful. bully
            In general, we were always taught: if you shoot, consider that you are found and do not wait for the yell of the hydroacoustics: "Torpedo, bearing ... XXX !!!" immediately start the evasive maneuver ... with all the bells and whistles ...
            Something like this. But that was long ago and not true ...
            Yeah, vooottt .... already.
            AHA.
        2. +4
          9 January 2021 10: 05
          Quote: bessmertniy
          Already that huge anti-submarine advantage, which the opponents created against our atomic fleet, cost them dearly and will continue to do so.

          There it is, Mikhalych! It turns out that the main task of our NSNF is to force the enemy to create an anti-submarine attachment? Cunningly invented, you can't say anything!)))
      2. +4
        9 January 2021 09: 18
        I support. What submarines, what strategic aviation in the event of combat use in the future - like a spent cartridge case
        1. +13
          9 January 2021 13: 26
          And if you can eject from an airplane, then you cannot escape from a submarine.
          I believe that airborne troops with their jumps are a kindergarten compared to the crews of the nuclear submarine. Where for weeks people carry out tasks at a depth of one to two hundred meters, in a steel coffin filled with tons of explosives, hydrogen, nuclear fuel and nuclear missiles on board. And in the event of an emergency, and since the beginning of the war, it is so in general, they are guaranteed suicide bombers without the slightest chance to escape.
          1. 0
            9 January 2021 14: 26
            I believe that the airborne troops with their jumps


            What is it about jumping? It's cool - jumping.
            It's scary to jump from Ilah in the sense that there are constant convergence, if you do not fly into someone's lines, they will fly into you. But even then this is not even close every time, many in general, for the entire time, never encounter this themselves.

            Actually, it's cool to jump. You just need to know how to hit the ground correctly, roll sideways, and that's it.

            But divers, yes ...
            1. END
              +2
              10 January 2021 05: 50
              Long ago canceled in peacetime release in 4 streams.
              Side. Under the USSR, they often dropped at 4.
              Technician just now, a couple of times attended
              1. 0
                10 January 2021 11: 47
                At three, they also canceled like. But there are still convergences.
                1. END
                  +2
                  10 January 2021 12: 04
                  ))) My Xena classmate served. He was a master of sports in gymnastics, so they took him there.
                  I got into the film "Zone of Special Attention" ... Just before entering the DRA, the order of the DMB ...
                  One more ... This is a workout in wearing a state uniform. There was a whole wardrobe. But older, he studied together with Shamanov, but the platoons are different.

            2. 0
              11 January 2021 00: 58
              Quote: timokhin-aa
              What is it about jumping? It's cool - jumping.
              It's scary to jump from Ilah in the sense that there are constant convergence, if you do not fly into someone's lines, they will fly into you. But even then this is not even close every time, many in general, for the entire time, never encounter this themselves.

              Actually, it's cool to jump. You just need to know how to hit the ground correctly, roll sideways, and that's it.

              good drinks Ours, dear.
              But divers, yes ...
              Scary. We won't fall further than the earth. And these ... In my military registration and enlistment office, the uterus dropped when in the enlistment commission some cavtorang in a black naval uniform said that I was just going to the Pacific submarine fleet for my health. A school friend served there ... for 8 months they sailed somewhere in the Indian Ocean, during this time he saw the sun twice - he was sitting somewhere in the engine room. It was lucky that the Pacific Fleet did not grow together somehow ... Military commissariat affairs - the jungle is dark. Even 30 years ago .... And with a parachute, Alexander, you have forgotten to add "the lines to pull up". And then a little breeze - and drag over all the bumps. You can't collect bones ...
      3. +5
        9 January 2021 14: 29
        So I think from the moment of the beginning of combat use any boats are considered decommissioned. A volley fired? Mission accomplished.


        This is ours, and the United States is planning to reload mines at sea from tenders and shoot again, before bringing the enemy into a state of a charred desert. And they have everything for this, including special tender ships.
        So, as usual, it's not that simple.
        1. 0
          10 January 2021 01: 09
          I always wondered why it was impossible to shoot right from the tender. (Why did they abandon the idea of ​​arsenal ships.)
    3. +3
      9 January 2021 22: 25
      If this is true, then in a real war there will be no "Volley gone".
      And there will be just an eerie silence and dead cities.
      We have.
      And it will be because the Americans are well aware of the real state of our fleet. They are studying it.
      1. 0
        10 January 2021 16: 12
        And they have the same thing, since SSBNs are part of the nuclear triad - who knows, maybe in the future, space will appear both in our country and in the United States.
      2. -3
        11 January 2021 01: 04
        Quote: Bogatyrev
        If this is true, then in a real war there will be no "Volley gone".
        It will be simple eerie silence and dead cities.

        And that's all. Because our Strategic Missile Forces also did not pass by on the sly. Any real global war is mutual destruction. And neither us, nor America, nothing at all. Megatons will do their wrong ...
    4. 0
      10 January 2021 10: 14
      Quote: Terenin
      And, the dependence of the military-industrial complex, their coordination ...

      Duc if this is not the case, then the volley goes in the wrong place, colleague! And with this we have huge problems, while cutting is in the first place, and not the country's combat capability! Thanks to the author, I read this material with great interest. As one of the high-ranking security officials, now a retired person with whom I have the honor to know, said, "we organize a showy show in the style of" we are all the best ", our bureaucrats in any industry can better than in any other country in the world and if you close your eyes to this, trouble is inevitable! "
  2. +15
    9 January 2021 05: 17
    Cool author walked on the topic what.
    It is difficult for an outsider to evaluate the article ... Knowledge of all aspects of naval affairs is required ... Only specialists can understand all the nuances of NSNF.
    1. -9
      9 January 2021 06: 08
      Can pull up later, to me, "nerd" can not make out anything request launch was? was!
      The Russians have one feature - not to develop their victory, but even to be ashamed of it. (Prishtitna, Georgia, LDNR ...) And, they need to be consolidated.
      1. +12
        9 January 2021 10: 09
        Quote: Terenin
        launch was? was!
        The Russians have one feature - not to develop their victory, but even to be ashamed of them.

        You just have to throw your hats up! Have you read the article? Can you argue somehow intelligibly?
        1. +5
          9 January 2021 13: 37
          And he does not need to argue with reason. He knows everything like that.
          I've seen enough military acceptance. At least I revised the Impact Force for comparison.
        2. -5
          9 January 2021 15: 40
          Everything is relative. Remind the audience when the Americans, British, Chinese, French did something like this? Our respected truth-teller and truth-lover (the author of the article), with great fertility in critical articles and loud denunciation of the listing of well-known shortcomings in the native Navy, is young that he offers to fix them.
          With a comparable military budget of the Russian Federation and Britain, we have our own SLBMs, they have American ones; deck-mounted MiG-29K, they have American F-35; and who will be escorted by "Liza"; and whose patrol P-8 and AWACS. And this "Mistress of the Seas" will stop making her own tanks, but can we afford it? And maybe in Britain comparable to ours air defense forces equipment? Is there something like Iskander there? So don't teach me how to live, better help me financially! (Slogan, not a request)
          1. +6
            9 January 2021 16: 21
            Quote: Scharnhorst
            With a comparable military budget of the Russian Federation and Britain

            Honduras has an even smaller budget, compare it! What does Britain and its budget have to do with it? Are you going to fight with Britain or what? Britain may not have a military budget at all; it does not have such threats as Russia.

            The military budget should be drawn up focusing not on Britain, but on the entire set of military threats and their personal economic opportunities.
          2. 0
            9 January 2021 17: 54
            Quote: Scharnhorst
            Everything is relative. Remind the audience when the Americans, British, Chinese, French did something like this? Our respected truth-teller and truth-lover (the author of the article), with great fertility in critical articles and loud denunciation of the listing of well-known shortcomings in the native Navy, is young that he offers to fix them.
            With a comparable military budget of the Russian Federation and Britain, we have our own SLBMs, they have American ones; deck-mounted MiG-29K, they have American F-35; and who will be escorted by "Liza"; and whose patrol P-8 and AWACS. And this "Mistress of the Seas" will stop making her own tanks, but can we afford it? And maybe in Britain comparable to ours air defense forces equipment? Is there something like Iskander there? So don't teach me how to live, better help me financially! (Slogan, not a request)



            What is the use of this all of you listed, if everything you listed is incapable of fighting?
            And if it is combat-ready - then at the level of the late 70s?

            SLBMs of their own, yes ...
            Have you ever seen the production rate?

            Or do you think. that all our new SSBNs are 100% loaded in all 16 mines?
            I assure you, but it is not.
            The rate of production of missiles is much lower than the rate of production of boats.
            In proportions.
            For the production of the same fiberglass in the Russian Federation is much less than is required at least for the production of the Bulava, at least in the required quantity, by about 4-5 times.
            Purchased in China. What dalut. The scrap rate is very high in this area.
            it took almost 8 years to start production at home.
            And such nuances - the sea.
            there are 600 suppliers of nomenclature for Votkinsk.
            So it seems that there is something of its own, but it is as if it is so little that it makes sense in its own?
            What's the use of SSBNs, if its ammunition load for the first 3-4 years is 4-6 missiles?

            What's the use of our deck-mounted MiG-29Ks - if they don't fly?
            British pilots fly even on American ones, but they fly 200 hours.
            They use weapons.
            They take off and land.
            To the deck.
            In the sea.
            They become aces and ready for war.
            And our pilots of carrier-based aircraft and carrier-based aircraft?

            What you have listed. it's like an old big suitcase without a handle.
            We don't take it anywhere, we store it in a storage room for money, because there is not enough space. but we do not allow to throw it out.

            And when you realize that Britain is part of the NATO bloc.
            They will fight together against us. and not separately.
            They don't have Iskander yet, and they didn't really need them.
            They had ATACMS.
            And now they will buy Prisms.
            And they will have a complete analogue of Iskander.
            and not only for them, but for the entire NATO bloc.

            And since they have several hundred MLRS launchers in NATO in Europe in the ranks and HIMARS buy a few hundred more, then our Iskander to Prism will be in a ratio of 1 to 100 ...
            Not in our favor ...

            Boast there. where appropriate ...

            And learn to think with your head in a complex way ...
            1. -1
              10 January 2021 16: 20
              They will fight together against us. and not separately. They will not fight against us at all - NATO has one principle in life, one for all and each for himself.
              "And since they have several hundred MLRS launchers in NATO in Europe in the ranks" This is actually an MLRS as well as HIMARS, but ATAKMS - OTRK you do not confuse the first with the second.
              1. +1
                12 January 2021 19: 58
                Quote: Vadim237
                This is generally an MLRS as well as HIMARS, but ATAKMS - OTRK You do not confuse the first with the second.

                Vadim.
                You should learn what ATKMS is and what MLRS and Himars are. And how they are interconnected ...
            2. -1
              12 January 2021 20: 30
              No need to shout in vain. The rate of production of rockets is higher than that of carriers.
          3. +1
            15 January 2021 20: 36
            Quote: Scharnhorst
            Young offers to fix them.

            Have you been to the optometrist for a long time? go
            for one and to the surgeon, - to shorten, so that they would not inadvertently bite
      2. +5
        9 January 2021 13: 39
        Quote: Terenin
        Can pull up later, me, "nerd" can not make out anything request was the start? Was!
        The article says that in wartime there would be no launch: we have nothing to cover for the SSBN so that it could shoot back before drowning. They will not even be allowed to take him out of the base: mines will not be allowed. And more than a hundred of our warheads will burn from two enemy warheads.
      3. +2
        9 January 2021 22: 24
        Quote: Terenin
        Can pull up later, to me, "nerd" can not make out anything request launch was? was!
        The Russians have one feature - not to develop their victory, but even to be ashamed of it. (Prishtitna, Georgia, LDNR ...) And, they need to be consolidated.

        Well, I apologized Yes
  3. -5
    9 January 2021 06: 10
    Like after lines like this:
    The NSNF of the Pacific Fleet, deployed in the zone of dominance of the enemy's anti-submarine forces, in fact, have practically no combat value:

    Not to mention the yachts of "our" Russian oligarchs. Are they probably more important to the country? belay
    Heavy thoughts. And the light at the end of the tunnel turned out to be the lights of an oncoming train ...
    1. +6
      9 January 2021 12: 24
      It only remains to hope that in addition to Klimov and Timokhin, there are other caring specialists who are caring for the state and its defenses.
    2. KCA
      +1
      9 January 2021 13: 43
      Perhaps the oligarchs in the United States are building aircraft carriers and nuclear submarines? Or maybe in England? Although in England, apparently, our oligarchs are building squalid nuclear submarines and a stupid aircraft carrier, the aircraft carrier, it seems, is also in France
      1. +2
        9 January 2021 13: 59
        Quote: KCA
        Perhaps the oligarchs in the United States are building aircraft carriers and nuclear submarines?

        Probably in the United States, the oligarchs pay taxes that allow them to build aircraft carriers and nuclear submarines. And in our country they only promised to increase the tax by 2%. But:

        In the United States, taxes are taken as follows:

        But in Russia? Some people cannot explain where they got 2 rubles from ...
        1. KCA
          +4
          9 January 2021 14: 11
          These are taxes on personal income, but how much do businessmen pay taxes, social services and other things for each employee in our country and in the USA? And how hard are they paid? In Russia, tax evasion can be thunderous, but it is unlikely that a person would rather give the money and will not go to court, or they simply take away the business and force them to pay an indemnity, the example of Abramovich is indicative, paid and free, and in the USA tax evasion is a serious crime, Al Capone could not close for organizing an organized criminal group and numerous murders, racketeering, etc., closed for tax crimes
          1. -6
            9 January 2021 14: 30
            Quote: KCA
            how much businessmen pay taxes,

            nowhere in the world does big business pay a cent of taxes, because the income of the Federal Reserve System, banks and dividends on shares are not taxed ... and small and medium-sized entrepreneurs pay ... and even more so the working people
            1. KCA
              0
              9 January 2021 15: 46
              Trump is not a very small entrepreneur, but, most likely, after the transfer of powers of the president, he will be attracted for non-payment of taxes not according to the dezzki, well, so as not to sniff
              1. -3
                9 January 2021 18: 37
                compared to the Fed owners, the shadow masters of the world, Trump is just a small entrepreneur
                1. KCA
                  -1
                  9 January 2021 18: 59
                  Well, I am a complete pragmatist and cynic, and although I even admit all sorts of conspiracy theories, I don’t believe in the complete domination of the FRS over the world, unlike the fakes with the Skripals and Navalny, it’s very easy to bang any person, and no one will know where his grave is
        2. 0
          9 January 2021 18: 14
          In the United States, the salary is calculated per year, not per month (for example, 120K per year is not bad, but for example 50K per year is very so-so), and taxes in different states may differ.
          Correct the training manual.
    3. +28
      9 January 2021 13: 56
      Quote: ROSS 42
      Heavy thoughts. And the light at the end of the tunnel turned out to be the lights of an oncoming train ...

      Do not be sad, it will be even worse.
  4. -12
    9 January 2021 06: 23
    No. Whatever the author says (in this I am a complete layman), at all times all the best weapons are for the enemy. And what about us? Lazy housing and communal services, full optimization. We respect the enemy.
  5. +6
    9 January 2021 06: 40
    The volley went off perfectly good Regarding obsolete torpedoes, but if this is the loading on the photo that the Author brought, then zvizdets, even on diesel pr 636 there are torpedoes Physicist, according to the photo they were loaded on the Black Sea Varshavyanka
  6. -1
    9 January 2021 06: 56
    But this is interesting. The author writes that pr 955 A does not have anti-torpedoes, physicist or physicist 2 torpedoes even exist? In general, according to the idea, everyone should have worked on the series of pr 955
    1. +1
      9 January 2021 12: 25
      You have not read carefully. The author writes that there is USET-80 - an analogue of American torpedoes of the 60s.
    2. +2
      15 January 2021 20: 33
      Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
      on series pr 955

      there were no physicists
      Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
      pr 955 A does not have anti-torpedoes, toreads of a physicist or a physicist 2 even exist?

      Physics-2 NO (in nature)
      Physics? They are banned for mate here.
  7. -6
    9 January 2021 06: 58
    Quote: ROSS 42
    Like after lines like this:
    The NSNF of the Pacific Fleet, deployed in the zone of dominance of the enemy's anti-submarine forces, in fact, have practically no combat value:

    Not to mention the yachts of "our" Russian oligarchs. Are they probably more important to the country? belay
    Heavy thoughts. And the light at the end of the tunnel turned out to be the lights of an oncoming train ...

    Are you replacing Svarog by chance?)))
    1. +3
      9 January 2021 12: 27
      Svarog is irreplaceable. He has already been demoted from generals to privates twice, but he does not give up.
  8. -22
    9 January 2021 07: 20
    This hysterical woman got it already. When she already realizes that it is impossible to assess the combat readiness of the fleet and the army from the photo, because journalists are allowed to shoot only what they are allowed to. This can be both information and disinformation. That there is a certain threshold of secrecy, the author also does not in the course, and one gets the impression that he never served, and he was fake and did not climb out of his offices, and saw the submarines only from photo reports. In his sick opinion, the commander of the Navy must personally report to him about all firing and combat launches. let him explain how the Americans will mine the areas of the Pacific Fleet's combat patrol in the Sea of ​​Okhotsk?
    1. +6
      9 January 2021 07: 32
      Quote: Xscorpion
      This hysterical woman got it already. When she already realizes that it is impossible to assess the combat readiness of the fleet and the army from the photo, because journalists are allowed to shoot only what they are allowed to. This can be both information and disinformation. That there is a certain threshold of secrecy, the author also does not in the course, and one gets the impression that he never served, and he was fake and did not climb out of his offices, and saw the submarines only from photo reports. In his sick opinion, the commander of the Navy must personally report to him about all firing and combat launches. let him explain how the Americans will mine the areas of the Pacific Fleet's combat patrol in the Sea of ​​Okhotsk?

      The person is worried. And writes his thoughts. I am also fond of, and what I know is suggestive. Smart people always analyze information.
    2. +9
      9 January 2021 08: 13
      Pull up the geography to "satisfactory" in a part of the Kuril archipelago, and then ask questions about mining "regions".
      The "partners" are officially and openly notified about the launches "in order to avoid ..." (like the Yankees of us).
    3. +1
      9 January 2021 12: 29
      Quote: Xscorpion
      This hysterical woman got it already. When she already realizes that it is impossible to assess the combat readiness of the fleet and the army from the photo, because journalists are allowed to shoot only what they are allowed to. This can be both information and disinformation. That there is a certain threshold of secrecy, the author also does not in the course, and one gets the impression that he never served, and he was fake and did not climb out of his offices, and saw the submarines only from photo reports. In his sick opinion, the commander of the Navy must personally report to him about all firing and combat launches. let him explain how the Americans will mine the areas of the Pacific Fleet's combat patrol in the Sea of ​​Okhotsk?

      The author is a professional and knows the situation from the inside. In addition, he has insider information from former colleagues about the current state of the fleet, USC and the combat capabilities of the fleet.
      1. -1
        9 January 2021 13: 07
        Quote: Bearded
        In addition, he has insider information from former colleagues about the current state of the fleet, USC and the combat capabilities of the fleet.

        Do not tell the people - what a normal officer will start leaking information to Klimov, knowing that he will then be calculated and sent to cut down the forest for divulging a secret. All that the author operates with is a collection of information from open sources, and the fact that he is a lobbyist for certain industrial structures is obvious to me. So one must be very careful in his assessments, because they can carry hidden propaganda of a new division of the military budget in the interests of those structures that support such authors financially in order to obtain profitable orders for themselves. But whether these orders are profitable for our country is a very interesting question for us. So you shouldn't fall for the bait of such "seekers of truth", but rather focus on our capabilities and how we imagine a future war, based on the existing weapons.
        1. +3
          9 January 2021 13: 40
          Your conspiracy theory is worthy of separate consideration. Is there anything to object to the essence of the article?
          1. -2
            9 January 2021 13: 43
            Quote: Bearded
            Your conspiracy theory is worthy of separate consideration. But on the merits of the article there is something to object

            This is not a theory, this is a practice known back in the Soviet military-industrial complex. Let me remind you simple-minded that the Buran was sold to Ustinov not by the military, but by the industry - such were the things even at that time.
            On the merits of the article, I gave a comment below - you can read it if you wish.
            1. +1
              9 January 2021 13: 52
              With Buran, a good cut came out. But he was a response to diving into the atmosphere of shuttles over Moscow. And then Bullseye came. And with SDI, our intelligence and scientists gave a great blunder.
              1. +4
                9 January 2021 18: 02
                Quote: Bearded
                And with SDI, our intelligence and scientists gave a great blunder.

                This is not at all the case, because the intelligence did not give any swing, and the specialists from the General Staff knew very well that this system was unviable and too costly. The main thing for industry and science was to get money to implement our "response" to the Americans, which they successfully did, despite the protests of the competent military.
                1. +1
                  15 January 2021 20: 21
                  Quote: ccsr
                  intelligence did not give any swing, and specialists from the General Staff already knew very well

                  warrant officers from hRU-hRU-hRU-mmm under a cucumber poured lol
            2. 0
              15 January 2021 20: 23
              Quote: ccsr
              I remind you simple-minded that "Buran" was sold to Ustinov not by the military, but by industry

              YOU are not in the subject
              ABSOLUTELY
              Quote: ccsr
              Essentially

              YOU HAVE BEEN
              once again
        2. 0
          15 January 2021 20: 25
          Quote: ccsr
          the fact that he is a lobbyist for certain industrial structures is obvious to me

          so sing birdie, don't be ashamed
          ZHDEMS
          or pick up your tongue (otherwise you will bite inadvertently)
    4. +14
      9 January 2021 14: 23
      The author served first in the submarine, then in the PAD department, after being transferred to the reserve, he developed an MPS, in the "Region", he still continues to work in the defense industry, the last closed task is the summer of 2020.
      The author is more than in the subject on the issues described.

      What armored car are you driving from now?
    5. 0
      15 January 2021 20: 30
      Quote: Xscorpion
      This hysterical woman got it already.

      bunny, hysterical (from a torn template and a burning fillet) you fought here lol
      Quote: Xscorpion
      And let him explain how the Americans will mine the areas of the Pacific Fleet's combat patrol in the Sea of ​​Okhotsk?

      to whom? YOU? and the meaning of "throwing beads"?
      experts and those who already know everything with their heads (or guess)
  9. -1
    9 January 2021 07: 24
    Strange feeling from the article. The fact that there are problems, then where they are not. Only those who do nothing are not mistaken. Excessive detailing, conclusions about the unreadiness of our submarine fleet for a meeting with the enemy, somewhat resembles a report (to whom?) About the state of affairs, covered with a veil of objectivity.
    1. 0
      9 January 2021 12: 31
      Quote: oracul
      Strange feeling from the article. The fact that there are problems, then where they are not. Only those who do nothing are not mistaken. Excessive detailing, conclusions about the unreadiness of our submarine fleet for a meeting with the enemy, somewhat resembles a report (to whom?) About the state of affairs, covered with a veil of objectivity.

      It is unlikely that reports to the enemy are written in an online magazine. In addition, in the photographs attached to the article, there is a report to the Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation Shoigu.
  10. +5
    9 January 2021 07: 28
    This is an adequate analysis. Not something that came out a couple of days ago
  11. +7
    9 January 2021 07: 39
    At the same time, it is necessary to clearly understand that the formulation of "task No. 1" to our general-purpose naval forces (MSNF) as a cover for the NSNF actually cuts the possibility of conducting successful (active) hostilities (because the entire initiative is given to the enemy).

    Going over, Maxim! What kind of active actions can the Russian fleet conduct against the United States? Send a couple of submarines to Hawaii to be drowned there in no time? Let's say frankly that in the foreseeable future, the fleet simply will not be able to afford "active offensive operations." No money for this. And it won't. What's the point? In the days of the USSR, they were going to sink military convoys in the Atlantic, but in the current situation, they will not be especially. I'm not saying that the idea itself looked chimerical even then ...
    1. +1
      9 January 2021 10: 38
      Doesn't go through. War is possible not only with the United States.
      Our fleet is constrained by the protection of our NSNF and we are not able to build and allocate ships for the OpEsk in case of a war with Turkey or Japan.
    2. +2
      9 January 2021 12: 11
      The author did not write about this, if I understand correctly. Because protection can and should be
      active.

      Otherwise, there is a threat (or maybe it already is) that our NSNF will simply be squeezed at their own bases.
      1. +1
        9 January 2021 17: 43
        Quote: Comrade Y

        Otherwise, there is a threat (or maybe it already is) that our NSNF will simply be squeezed at their own bases.

        This scenario is more than real. In the event of its implementation, our strategists can shoot right from the place of registration. Like any compromise, this option has its pros and cons. In any case, everything will depend on the current operational situation.
    3. +1
      15 January 2021 20: 18
      Quote: Sahalinets
      What kind of active actions can the Russian fleet conduct against the United States? Send a couple of submarines to Hawaii to be drowned there in no time? Let's say frankly that in the foreseeable future, the fleet simply will not be able to afford "active offensive operations."

      maybe and should
  12. +3
    9 January 2021 07: 44
    Actual topic of BMTO. A little messy (emotionally), but to the point.
    1. +2
      9 January 2021 12: 43
      Not a bit messy. The author has published several dozen articles on VO about the combat effectiveness of our fleet, constantly writes appeals to the Defense Ministry and the Minister of Defense, has his own concept of the development of the fleet.
      1. -2
        9 January 2021 16: 02
        I also liked the article. Confused - yes! Ease of criticism, its superficial analysis, categorical and categorical conclusions do not allow probing the proposed development concept, or maybe it does not exist at all!
        1. -1
          9 January 2021 16: 30
          In order to understand the author's vision of this question, you need to read the entire cycle of his articles. You can't fit in one article. There's materials for a whole book.
        2. +1
          15 January 2021 20: 17
          Quote: Scharnhorst
          The ease of criticism, its superficial analysis, categorical and categorical conclusions do not allow probing the proposed development concept, or maybe it does not exist at all!

          lightness is YOUR - waving your tongue
    2. +22
      9 January 2021 14: 36
      A good analytical article, this will not be shown on "Zvezda", nizzyayayaya unbend the buckle.
      1. +7
        9 January 2021 21: 01
        Quote: Malyuta
        Good analytical article,

        Mina is a pro. And no one can take this away from him. But he is no psychologist. Therefore, his articles plunge into the quiet horror of the layman, cut off from the naval reality. This is true.
        I have spoken about this more than once. One cannot go too far without giving up hope for a way out of the "theme" crisis. If Klimov showed the issue of development from bad to better, but with problems that are being solved, but slowly, not as efficiently as we would like ... Then the impression from them would not be destructive, but "critically-positive." And so ... - Chief, everything is gone !! (from)
        What does not suit me in her.
        There is a reliable infa that Boriki and Yasnye are rearming to Physics. But Mina mentions this in passing. There is a USET-80/1 project, where the GOS and accumulators are changed, other mathematics of the RFS - other performance characteristics of the product are obtained. But this is silent.
        Then, if you think that they do not want to hear you in the high naval offices, and you sincerely believe that thereby harming the country's defense and the combat capability of the naval forces, write to the KGB !!! Let there "look under the microscope" at those who are engaged in "sabotage". Everything is so simple. I agree, this is "not chivalrous", but "if the case demands, then it must be done"!
        Then, there is such a thing as the Military Technical / Industrial Commission under the first persons. You can knock there ... (No. )
        But the trouble is that "upstairs" there are undercover fights between bulldogs and wolfhounds, and they simply do not see small mongrels there ... There are heavyweights, and each with its "team of undercover masters" ...
        So, not everything is as simple as it might seem after reading the article, even if it is correct.
        I still consider Maksim Aleksandrovich a pro and a courageous person. Timokhin's namesake has a wish - all the same, take into account my wishes in terms of style and method of presenting information to the public. And then after such articles I want to follow the example of AI Marinesko: batten down the upper conning tower and “digest” what was said for three days until the awl ends.
        Something like this, however. Yeah
        1. +2
          10 January 2021 01: 49
          Dear Alexander ! The comment and wishes are just super! It's a pity that sometimes I don't drink drinks You +++++ hi
          1. +4
            10 January 2021 15: 44
            Quote: VadimLives
            It's a pity that sometimes I don't drink

            Vadim hi
            It's good if by conviction ...
            It's bad if for health ...
            Therefore, I wish you good health in the new year and good luck in all your endeavors. Yes
            1. +2
              10 January 2021 17: 04
              Thank God by conviction ... Thank you for your congratulations and Alexander health and all the best !!! hi Yes
        2. -4
          10 January 2021 12: 49
          Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
          But the trouble is that "upstairs" there are undercover fights between bulldogs and wolfhounds, and they simply do not see small mongrels there ... There are heavyweights, and each with its "team of undercover masters" ...

          Yes, it was in Soviet times, and only Gorshkov's quirks because of his involvement in the Politburo gave the fleet unthinkable funds for its development. This was due to the fact that he promised to catch up with the Americans, and we would become a world ocean power. The groundmen, of course, laughed at these crazy ideas, but the then order forbade shoving against the elders from the Politburo, which is why even then smart people understood that the Strategic Missile Forces were enough for us to put the whole world into dust.
          The result of all this orgy, including the construction of Buran, aircraft carriers, BRZD, etc. led to dire consequences for the country's economy, and then something happened that even the Americans did not expect from us. Here is such a sad story, and people like Klimov dream that we will again step on the same rake ...
          1. 0
            15 January 2021 20: 04
            Quote: ccsr
            in Soviet times, it was, and only Gorshkov's quirks because of his entry into the Politburo gave the fleet unthinkable means for its development. This was due to the fact that he promised to catch up with the Americans

            YOU'RE LYING
        3. 0
          15 January 2021 20: 16
          Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
          There is a reliable infa that Boriki and Yasnye are rearming to Physics.

          885 had them initially
          955 - if the process has begun, then quite recently (after the SPORK in the media)
          Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
          There is a USET-80/1 project, where the GOS and accumulators are changed, another mathematics of the RFS - other performance characteristics of the product are obtained. But this is silent.

          this is "Kant", which is often written in "English transcription" (THERE IS FOR WHAT) - I will not cite it, because there is a moderator girl who reacts "very emotionally" to "boatswain's expressions"
          TTX "Kant" - sucks
          FULL
          the ROC itself is a SCAM: NOT a SINGLE test with a combat battery, the SRS was specially placed "on the sidelines", etc.
          Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
          there is such a thing as the Military Technical / Industrial Commission under the top officials. You can knock there.

          read my article on "Severodvinsk"
          CAREFULLY and with SURNAMES
  13. +2
    9 January 2021 07: 48
    We need a Stalinist purge in the navy. Admirals in the service not of Russia, but of the campaign of another country ...
  14. 0
    9 January 2021 07: 52
    The author's polemical fervor is understandable and, apparently, justified. There are dozens of modern minesweepers in each of the fleets, and each boat must have modern torpedoes. However, for our country, taking into account economic constraints and the foreign policy situation, the first place should be the maintenance of strategic forces in the minimum required composition. The main task is deterrence by creating threats that are unacceptable to the potential enemy.
    1. +3
      9 January 2021 12: 44
      The author writes that the fulfillment of the Main Task is under threat.
    2. +2
      9 January 2021 12: 59
      Quote: S. Viktorovich
      However, for our country, just taking into account the economic constraints and the foreign policy situation, the first place should be the maintenance of strategic forces in the minimum required composition. The main task is deterrence by creating threats that are unacceptable to the potential enemy.

      Yes, it is precisely from such positions that we must approach the assessment of our security, and not from those that we concede in something non-strategic. Otherwise, we will go to peace again - we have already gone through this.
    3. +1
      15 January 2021 20: 03
      Quote: S. Viktorovich
      The main task is deterrence by creating threats that are unacceptable to the potential enemy.

      AGAIN-
      KEY REQUIREMENT FOR MSYAS - BATTLE RESISTANCE
      the meaning of the NSNF is precisely this, and if there is no BU, then ...
  15. -19
    9 January 2021 07: 58
    I see the year on VO began with numerous "all-inclusive" articles. Everything is wrong and everything is wrong. I wonder if this coincidence or preparation for elections 21.
    1. bar
      -13
      9 January 2021 09: 39
      Quote: Bulgarian
      I see the year on VO began with numerous "all-inclusive" articles.

      The sect of all-propals on VO has been living and flourishing since ancient times, and has never gone anywhere. And topics for pessimists are always there - from polymers to aircraft carriers and minesweepers. Our Navy is generally a heavenly place for the development of a depressive, thanks to the naval leadership for this.
      1. +2
        9 January 2021 18: 36
        Quote: bar
        Quote: Bulgarian
        I see the year on VO began with numerous "all-inclusive" articles.

        The sect of all-propals on VO has been living and flourishing since ancient times, and has never gone anywhere. And topics for pessimists are always there - from polymers to aircraft carriers and minesweepers. Our Navy is generally a heavenly place for the development of a depressive, thanks to the naval leadership for this.


        Just earlier, in 2013-2017, the category "urya-urya" was literally a dozen business women.
        Of these, Meehan made up half :))))

        And any article was a discussion. and not throwing hats.

        The last 3 years, on the site there is just some kind of dominance of "urya-urya" and normal people are really tired of it ....
        And this is "Urya-urya" - just like the manuals.
        Absolutely the same words.
        They will run up as if on command - they will pull on.
        Questions are not answered.
        The Order of the "Stoop" will be organized at the forum.
        Each other plus signs will be instructed in the marshals in a couple of months will get out.
        Lyapota ...

        Tired of just looking at it ...
        When you have real life around you and you visit factories, see people, hire people with a "past", hear what they say ... On the one hand.
        And people with "Carbonic power" in their heads, with Nazism, with anti-Semitism with racism in their heads on the other hand ...
        To be honest, I myself am a fan of "healthy nationalism". But he must be his own! Reasonable! And he should be directed towards his own when choosing "his or someone else's. All other things being equal" ...
        And it is simply offensive to treat people from Israel - simply because they are from Israel - this is shameful!
        just as there are people from Bulgaria on the forum - they also get it!

        Where does this Great Russian chauvinism come from? On condition. that in my 50 years in my everyday life I have never seen him !!!! And on the site it just blooms and smells. Apparently supported by the administration in fact!

        But they are not insulted for that. what is bad for them, but for that. that we have bad things and this is their fault ... "If there is no water in the house, then the Jews have drunk" - this is their principle!

        So I have been reading this site since 2013, and for me the "hurray-urya" and Nazism are already clearly formed - one and the same!
        1. bar
          +3
          9 January 2021 18: 45
          Quote: SovAr238A
          the site is just some kind of dominance of "urya-urya" and normal people are really tired of it ....

          You will laugh, but there are people who are really tired of the constant depression and whining. This also happens.

          Quote: SovAr238A
          for me, "urya-urya" and Nazism are already clearly formed - the same thing!

          So they sailed, already accused of Nazism. You at least read what this word means before throwing poop. You, as a representative of God's chosen people, are ashamed not to know this.
          1. +1
            9 January 2021 18: 49
            Quote: bar
            You, as a representative of God's chosen people, are ashamed not to know this.


            Here again ...

            If I disagree with you, am I a Jew?
            did you register me as a Jew?
            What for?
            Explain your thoughts to me!
            Pliz!

            Me.
            Samara man is 50 years old.
            Half-breed, half Bashkir by mother, half Russian by father ...

            Why and why did you write. that I am a Jew!
            What prompted you to do this?
            Voice the course of your miracle of thought to me!
            1. bar
              -4
              9 January 2021 18: 52
              Quote: SovAr238A
              If I disagree with you, am I a Jew?
              did you register me as a Jew?

              Well, if I disagree with you, you signed me up as a Nazi, and why can't I? laughing

              By the way, you are a very bright representative of the all-propals. This is quite revealing laughing
              1. +4
                9 January 2021 19: 17
                Quote: bar
                Quote: SovAr238A
                If I disagree with you, am I a Jew?
                did you register me as a Jew?

                Well, if I disagree with you, you signed me up as a Nazi, and why can't I? laughing

                By the way, you are a very bright representative of the all-propals. This is quite revealing laughing

                And the entry into Jews - from people like you?
                you are not the first or the last ...
                For your manuals, this is probably indicative!
                And the attitude towards all foreigners on this site is brightly Nazi.
                So I'm sorry - but I deserve it!

                I am not all felons.
                I do not fail to see those who shrug for no reason.

                I've never said anything bad about something that really works well.

                Not a bad word was said from me about the Iskander, the URTTKh, or the aircraft of the Su family, or about some types of troops and many other topics ...
                But I will speak badly about what is really bad.
                About the fact that there is no precision engineering.
                About the fact that there is no material science.
                About the fact that there are no optics.
                About the fact that the military-industrial complex is now in that form - it's all under execution ...
                These are the realities of life, I work with it and see it.

                So why should I be silent about this?
                1. bar
                  -4
                  9 January 2021 19: 19
                  Ostap suffered (s) laughing
                  I'll leave just in case, until I hurt hi
        2. +2
          10 January 2021 00: 18
          Quote: SovAr238A
          So I have been reading this site since 2013, and for me the "hurray-urya" and Nazism are already clearly formed - one and the same!

          It happens that somewhere he himself is "galloping across Europe" due to lack of time, with "smart conclusions", but, as a rule, forum users will slow down like "fish on ice," nothing is scary, the forum is the forum. I am grateful for this drinks
    2. 0
      9 January 2021 16: 05
      I noticed the same, especially against the background of Ukrainian "breakthroughs" and peremogs in all branches of military affairs! laughing
  16. +10
    9 January 2021 08: 09
    The NSNF of the Pacific Fleet, deployed in the zone of dominance of the enemy's anti-submarine forces, in fact, have practically no combat value:

    • there is no anti-mine and anti-submarine support;
    • there are no new torpedoes (which is - antique "firewood");
    • there are no new missiles (anti-ship missiles and anti-ballistic missiles);
    • no anti-torpedo protection.


    It would be worth adding that on top of all the problems, Petropavlovsk is covered by exactly 1 (one !!!) squadron of MiG-31
    1. +7
      9 January 2021 08: 40
      Taki covers the North-East direction. In theory, according to the situation, some SAPs will be transferred both to Elizovo and Magadan.
      In Primorye, the a / base did evolve into a two-regimental a / division (although the number of boards did not increase, but a stripe post appeared).
      1. -2
        9 January 2021 09: 52
        Quote: WFP
        In Primorye, the a / base did evolve into a two-regimental a / division (although the number of boards did not increase, but a stripe post appeared).

        Exactly? Then 22 IAP and 530 IAPs? Central Corner and Chuguevka? So there the decision was to send the MiG to Chuguevka, and the Central Corner will be on the Sukhikh.
        And I don’t know how many old pictures are on Google now ...
        In the 17th year in Uglovoy there were 23 Sukhiz + 6 in the slop and 24 MiG + 10 in the slop.
        1. +3
          9 January 2021 10: 09
          Exactly. Although the 31st are still buzzing towards Ussuriysk, and crackers overhead no, no, but they are spinning towards Amur ...
          When the iron goes to Chuguevka - xs.
          1. -2
            9 January 2021 10: 12
            I saw a picture of Chuguevka about a year ago - a squadron of Su-27 and a squadron of MiG-31 were sitting. I don't know the date ...
            1. +1
              9 January 2021 10: 23
              Two + two. “I think so” (c) It’s bad that the popular omen about “if they fly, the weather is good” is relevant.
              1. +1
                9 January 2021 10: 26
                But fig knows him. I noticed that the dump, for example, the MiG-31 in Monchegorsk, was plundered, and 150 pieces were modernized according to rumors
                1. +3
                  9 January 2021 10: 36
                  laughing two APs, two AEs each. “Definitely” (son of a lawyer). But if you "estimate" the materiel of the "earth", then "if faq" 3-4 SAP can be comfortably "relocated" from the Continent.
                  1. +2
                    9 January 2021 11: 04
                    Well, you know, in Primorye and near Murmansk, it is necessary to deploy a minimum of IAP, moreover, on the Su-35 or Su-30SMD, and in Kamchatka, the squadron must be deployed back to the IAP with two squadrons on the MiG-31 and one on the Su-30SM / SMD. And we gave censored stuntmen 8 Su-35s. There are no words.
                    If Kubinka urgently needed new horses instead of the driven ones, well, they would have ordered the most simplified and cheaper Su-30M2 for them.
                    1. +2
                      9 January 2021 11: 32
                      I believe that the GOU sees the "build-up" of the group in a special period.
                      Kamchatka - yes, at least 1 SAP (1 ae sous / moment not "dagger") and a run through airfields (from Anadyr to Vladik) with a touch of the entire VKS grouping (VVO and TsVO) - all the more useful than the Syrian madhouse.
                      1. 0
                        9 January 2021 12: 28
                        They need commandant's offices everywhere throughout the Far East, at least on the basis of simultaneously refueling and servicing a link of fighters
                      2. +3
                        9 January 2021 12: 45
                        Nuuuu ... the number of aeroporiums (including non-Red Army ones) within the number of fingers on the hands. Co-location is not a question ...
                        It's just that for such a Work, hopeless stars and Heroes (materiel reward a la "combat" bonus) will not be given.
                        DV TVD, subjectively, is secondary (there are few of us here and far from the shirnarmass).
                      3. -1
                        9 January 2021 12: 48
                        it is yes. Alas. Then a rhetorical question, is it meaningful for us to keep the Navy in the Far East that is not inferior to either the Japanese, or the Koreans, or the South? You cannot be equally strong everywhere.
                      4. +4
                        9 January 2021 13: 14
                        "We are from simple dogs, not from purebred!" laughing
                        Subjectively:
                        - the presence of military ships in the Sea of ​​Japan and the northern part of TO during the period of growing threat will allow to pull off part of the forces of the "partners"
                        - in the Far East there are still our island territories.
                        Taking into account the fact that Bulava from Murmansk to San Francisco “cut” for a third of the time longer than from PK, I do not see the expediency of finding an SSBN in Kamchatka.
                      5. +1
                        9 January 2021 13: 21
                        Quote: WFP
                        Taking into account the fact that Bulava from Murmansk to San Francisco “cut” for a third of the time longer than from PK, I do not see the expediency of finding an SSBN in Kamchatka.

                        The presence of SSBNs in Petropalovsk personally for me has long been a big question. IMHO it was not necessary to send 955 projects from the word there at all. Would write off BDR sooner or later and that's the end of it. nakraynyak from the North to transfer a pair of 667BDRM temporarily to serve.
                      6. +4
                        9 January 2021 13: 46
                        I agree. Taking into account the likelihood of arming the steamers with a potential Caliber-M (if the cook is not lying to us, then the kerosene stove will last for 4,5 thousand km) and the dead INF Treaty - P-K may well become a home for surface steamers. Big and small.
                        In Vladik - the fleet of the Sea of ​​Japan (MPK, PMK base, diesel and MRK with bervoyski and marines).
                        But, the guys in AVO know better in terms of salary.
                      7. +2
                        9 January 2021 13: 58
                        But.....
                        On the Far East VLadivostok as the main naval base in the theater of operations, well, the edge is inconvenient. Which directly hinted to us in ancient times that the main fleets (Pacific Fleet and Northern Fleet) should not be made equally powerful ...
                      8. 0
                        9 January 2021 15: 55
                        Vladik was born as a sea base earlier than Ermak ... Oddly enough, but from Vladivostok it is more convenient to quickly "work" in the territory of its neighbors by sea, covering the Far East from the southeast and east (with an emphasis on Sakhalin, because the north "partners" have nothing to catch ).
                      9. +1
                        9 January 2021 17: 52
                        As advanced, yes - good ...
                      10. +3
                        9 January 2021 14: 43
                        Quote: WFP
                        It takes a mace from Murmansk to San Francisco to "cut" a third of the time longer than from P-K,

                        Then in general it is possible to replace all rpksn with yars? Is it really incomprehensible that the Maces are not intended to be sawed from the base, it must suddenly jump out of the water under the Yankee's nose, 300 miles from California ..... this is what scares the Yankees.
                      11. +5
                        9 January 2021 21: 27
                        Quote: vladimir1155
                        she must suddenly jump out of the water under the nose of the Yankees, 300 miles from California ..... that's what scares the Yankees.

                        Well, 300 will not be enough, that way for 1000 miles - that's it! And they won't even have time to get scared!
                        And what breaks the template for lovers of crap is the quiet solitary disappearance of APRK SN from the BP area ...
                        It's time to forget the nonsense about the MPLA convoy. The tactics have long been completely different ...
                        And here's how the Bay of St. Lawrence is doing ... I haven't heard for a long time ... Maybe the ROPs have gone for a walk to other lands?
                        Oh, tofyats! You don’t appreciate free access to clean water !!!
                      12. -3
                        9 January 2021 22: 46
                        Quote: BoA KAA

                        It's time to forget the nonsense about the MPLA convoy. The tactics have long been completely different ...
                        !


                        Well, if multipurpose nuclear submarines through the efforts of the command of the fleet ended completely from the word, then now we will, like an ostrich, stick our heads in the sand and howl that we will go the other way and that our tactics are now different? And then the acoustician of Devstvenitsa says in an interview that the pump junk on the stupid Russians on Monomakh?

                        Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
                        to throw a landing party on Hokkaido for the sake of spite ...

                        Uh, what will we plant?
                      13. +3
                        9 January 2021 22: 55
                        Quote: Cyril G ...
                        We will go the other way and that our tactics are different now?

                        Yes, it changed after our missile launchers became quieter than the multipurpose ones, which were used to determine the area where the BS was carried by the "cow". Now multipurpose overlaps the direction, following the moving point, rather than jostling around the ROP.
                        Quote: Cyril G ...
                        what will we plant?

                        Two on the Bay are kind of sculpted. Two are boiled in Yantar. Therefore - "the hour is uneven, they can steal our Green" (c)
                        Moscow, it was also not built right away ...
                        AHA.
                        PS And "all at once" - even good restaurants do not serve, unless, of course, you order "yesterday's cold cabbage soup"! laughing
                      14. 0
                        9 January 2021 23: 01
                        Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
                        Two on the Bay are kind of sculpted.


                        Forget about these. Some kind of madhouse was it really impossible to build a series of Grenovs, at least for the Baltic and the World Cup. And then I watch the "parade of samples" only blooms and smells!
                      15. +1
                        15 January 2021 19: 58
                        Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
                        Yes, it changed after our missile launchers became quieter than the multipurpose ones, which were used to determine the area where the BS was carried by the "cow". Now multipurpose overlaps the direction, following the moving point, rather than jostling around the ROP.

                        everything is much more complicated
                        for reference - PTU-5 worked out
                        incl. and 170 after his watch, - with real contacts
                      16. +2
                        9 January 2021 21: 17
                        Quote: Cyril G ...
                        meaning we keep the Navy in the Far East

                        Probably, in order to provide 25 DSPLs and send troops to Hokkaido for an ostracis ... bully
                2. 0
                  9 January 2021 15: 20
                  and rumored to have modernized 150

                  According to strong rumors .....
                  1. -1
                    9 January 2021 22: 47
                    Then there are 120 pieces based on well-known contracts ...
                    1. 0
                      10 January 2021 11: 33
                      Let's just say, it's very difficult to say what exactly is there - modernization or .... restoration to the possibility of exploitation ... I have already encountered this several times .... Again, since there is no more rumble, the work is over. Obviously, under the herringbone ....
      2. +2
        9 January 2021 15: 17
        although the number of boards did not increase, but the stripe position appeared.

        It's a tradition ...
    2. +4
      9 January 2021 12: 45
      Naval aviation is in a state of flux.
      1. +5
        9 January 2021 12: 51
        And this is also true ..... The fleet command wanted to spit on their aviation.
    3. -1
      9 January 2021 14: 39
      Quote: Cyril G ...
      Petropavlovsk is covered by exactly 1 (one !!!) squadron of MiG-31

      and this is clearly not enough, I will say in a manly way without lisping, it is necessary to transfer the entire Pacific Fleet to Petropavlovsk and the high-flying unit of aviation. The well-known thesis of Kutuzov "let's save the army, save Russia", "the army is more important than Moscow" or Vladivostok. If the enemy knows that he will receive a guaranteed nuclear response for aggression, then we will save Vladivostok, and if Vladik is guarded by ships, they will be drowned ... And the Baltic Fleet must be transferred to Severomorsk and most of the Black Sea Fleet, the corvettes must be taken from the Caspian.
      1. +3
        9 January 2021 18: 17
        Quote: vladimir1155
        And the Baltic Fleet must be transferred to Severomorsk and most of the Black Sea Fleet, the corvettes must be taken from the Caspian Sea.

        It is more expedient to reduce the BF to a flotilla, and transfer the posts to the Northern Fleet, as well as some materiel. Because with modern coastal anti-ship systems and existing aerospace forces, the cities of Kaliningrad and St. Petersburg are much better protected than the BF ship assets can do.
        1. -2
          10 January 2021 19: 37
          Quote: ccsr
          Because with modern coastal anti-ship systems and existing aerospace forces, the cities of Kaliningrad and St. Petersburg are much better protected than the BF ship assets can do.

          absolutely right! this is obvious for a shallow and narrow body of water
          1. -2
            10 January 2021 19: 44
            Quote: vladimir1155
            this is obvious for a shallow and narrow body of water

            The same applies to the Black Sea Fleet, although there are more depths of the Black Sea. But the coastal infrastructure of the fleet is so developed that it makes no sense to keep a large number of surface ships. And in general, the Black Sea Fleet, in my opinion, should simply be turned into one large training base and trained there specialists for all fleets, and not imitate "violent" combat training in a closed water area. There will be much more benefit from this for the country, and it will also save other fleets from the tasks of maintaining various schools, schools, studies and courses.
            1. -1
              10 January 2021 20: 22
              Quote: ccsr
              The same applies to the Black Sea Fleet, although there are more depths of the Black Sea. But the coastal infrastructure of the fleet is so developed that it makes no sense to keep a large number of surface ships.

              quite rightly., in addition to diesel-electric submarines, you can only have MRK and MPK minesweepers, landing ships, coastal aircraft. And large NKs are not needed there at all, we can only leave Pytlivy and Tatarstan with Dagestan, instead of a cruiser and three frigates with corvettes, the SF will be doubled, and if 4 more corvettes from the Baltic will pull up ... even Kuzya will be able to move away from the coast under their protection and finally begin to control the Barents
            2. 0
              15 January 2021 19: 50
              Quote: ccsr
              And in general, the Black Sea Fleet, in my opinion, should simply be turned into one large training base and trained there specialists for all fleets

              fool
              YOUR ACHINEA says that YOU never did real combat training
      2. +3
        9 January 2021 21: 32
        Quote: vladimir1155
        Quote: Cyril G ...
        Petropavlovsk is covered by exactly 1 (one !!!) squadron of MiG-31

        and this is clearly not enough, I will say in a manly way without lisping, it is necessary to transfer the entire Pacific Fleet to Petropavlovsk and the high-flying unit of aviation. The well-known thesis of Kutuzov "let's save the army, save Russia", "the army is more important than Moscow" or Vladivostok. If the enemy knows that he will receive a guaranteed nuclear response for aggression, then we will save Vladivostok, and if Vladik is guarded by ships, they will be drowned ... And the Baltic Fleet must be transferred to Severomorsk and most of the Black Sea Fleet, the corvettes must be taken from the Caspian.

        You see, you have not heard anything about the system of basing the forces of the fleet, the dispersal of forces along the IN, if you want to collect all the eggs in one basket ...
        maybe you were kidding? If - "no", then it's time to see a doctor.
        AHA.
        1. -4
          10 January 2021 19: 49
          Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
          want to collect all your eggs in one basket ...

          childish babble, if only a potential enemy has only two missiles ... then yeah, ....... and if he has hundreds of them, then such a dispersal is an empty useless sound, there will be enough missiles for everyone, no matter how much you run up
        2. +2
          15 January 2021 19: 48
          Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
          want to collect all your eggs in one basket ...

          and no need to collect
          it would be better instead of Rybachiy 955 they would send to Gremikha ... if not for the troubles of BulaFa
          1. +1
            15 January 2021 20: 49
            Quote: Fizik M
            it would be better instead of Rybachy 955 they would send to Gremikha

            Then it would be necessary to close the firm "25 diPL" ... In the north, at least something of the old is still moving, and the Kamchedals with their Squids are breathing in incense. Therefore, as they say - to support the pants.
            1. +2
              15 January 2021 21: 03
              Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
              Then it would be necessary to close the firm "25 diPL".

              it makes sense
              a strike fleet should be based in Kamchatka
              this is our ONLY normal exit to the ocean
              1. +1
                15 January 2021 21: 09
                Quote: Fizik M
                this is our ONLY normal exit to the ocean
                Perhaps that's the way it is. However, ensuring the deployment of forces is also not weak. And secondly, how can you solve the problem of low-frequency illumination? Only by physically destroying the media? So until the war ...
                And two eternal Russian questions rise to the full extent of our foolishness: Who is to blame? and - What to do?
      3. 0
        10 January 2021 00: 48
        Quote: vladimir1155
        Quote: Cyril G ...
        Petropavlovsk is covered by exactly 1 (one !!!) squadron of MiG-31

        and this is clearly not enough, I will say in a manly way without lisping, it is necessary to transfer the entire Pacific Fleet to Petropavlovsk and the high-flying unit of aviation. The well-known thesis of Kutuzov "let's save the army, save Russia", "the army is more important than Moscow" or Vladivostok. If the enemy knows that he will receive a guaranteed nuclear response for aggression, then we will save Vladivostok, and if Vladik is guarded by ships, they will be drowned ... And the Baltic Fleet must be transferred to Severomorsk and most of the Black Sea Fleet, the corvettes must be taken from the Caspian.

        Would you say yes to NATO, otherwise they form their own units, including the fleet, spend money, but it turns out that you can just remove them?
        PS Sometimes units of the fleet and army are needed in a certain place only in order to pin down part of the enemy's forces in this place. There will be no fleet in the Baltic, which means that the enemy will have several dozen more ships in the North
        1. -2
          10 January 2021 20: 09
          Quote: Xscorpion
          Sometimes units of the fleet and army are needed in a certain place only in order to pin down part of the enemy's forces in this place.

          aha, and how will they shackle the enemy if they are destroyed by the enemy's coastal assets 7.5 minutes after leaving the base? expensive pleasure for shackling a pair of launchers of coastal complexes to contain an entire fleet (exposing all SSBNs) and sacrifice it and the entire crew for the sake of "shackling" ... of course, there are situations when you have to sacrifice someone or something for the sake of victory, for example, the heroic deed of Alexander Matrosov, ... but initially it is criminal to plan such methods of war! you can't get enough of any corvettes ... ...
          Norway started developing anti-ship missiles back in the mid 60s of the last century and reached considerable heights. As a matter of fact, this country is one of the world's leading developers of small-sized anti-ship complexes. NSM (Naval strike missile) - a missile weighing 407 kg, including the mass of a penetrating high-explosive warhead of 125 kg. Its firing range is up to 185 km, its speed is 0,95 M, and the missile's seeker (GOS) is infrared. Autonomous target selection is provided, carried out by comparing the target image from the seeker sensor with the templates of typical target images stored in memory.

          The rocket turned out to be very successful. Now it is in service with a number of countries, including Norway itself and the United States. It can be used both from board surface ships and from coastal launchers. There is also its aviation version. Warsaw purchased 50 of these missiles. Launchers, control radars are joint Polish-Norwegian developments.

          When firing from a point of permanent deployment - the village of Semirovice near the city of Gdynia - objects of the main naval base of the Baltic Fleet (Baltiysk), as well as other targets on the territory of the Kaliningrad region of Russia, up to the Zelenograd-Kaliningrad-Bagrationovsk line can be hit. The NSM flight time to Baltiysk will be about 7,5 minutes.

          On January 1, 2015, the Naval Missile Unit, consisting of two divisions, was formed as part of the Polish Navy. This has become, perhaps, the most significant event in the history of the Polish Navy over the past two decades.

          Does this pose a threat to the Russian Baltic Fleet? Certainly. The Poles believe that this military formation will be able to block the deployment of naval forces from Baltiysk. In general, the coastal missile forces are intended for this.
  17. -31
    9 January 2021 08: 11
    Another whining of the "all-ravenous" ...
    1. +18
      9 January 2021 08: 25
      To characterize the author of the article in this way, it is necessary to analyze all his theses step by step and refute them with your arguments.

      But you are obviously too lazy. In that case, this remark of yours, Sergey Samkov, is just how to spoil the air.
      1. +14
        9 January 2021 09: 37
        Do you think he mastered at least one paragraph? The main thing was hanging a label on the person and went on.
      2. -7
        9 January 2021 09: 56
        Quote: Alexander1971
        To characterize the author of the article in this way, it is necessary to analyze all his theses step by step and refute them with your arguments.

        Aleksandr 1971 - when the author of the article, not understanding radar and the physics of interception, shows his complete illiteracy in intercepting an air target by the "Thundering" at a distance of 9 km, and at the same time blaming the developers of Zaslon, this speaks volumes about these authors: Klimov and Timokhin, it would be better not to touch these topics - the profane in this ...
        1. +7
          9 January 2021 10: 11
          Can you give more details?
        2. +6
          9 January 2021 10: 16
          Quote: Dread
          while blaming the developers of the Barrier,

          Is there radio correction there at the Zaslon? And it is not worth 6.3 billion rubles?
          1. -5
            9 January 2021 12: 28
            Quote: Cyril G ...
            Quote: Dread

            Alexander 1971 - when the author of the article, not understanding radar and the physics of interception, shows his complete illiteracy in intercepting an air target by the "Thundering" at a distance of 9 km, while blaming the developers of Zaslon, then this says a lot about these authors: Klimov and Timokhin, it would be better not to touch these topics - the profane in this ...

            Is there radio correction there at the Zaslon? And it is not worth 6.3 billion rubles?
            Is there radio correction there at the Zaslon? And it is not worth 6.3 billion rubles?

            Kirill G ... P should not be confused with hot and soft. The conversation was about something else:
            Quote: Maxim Klimov Leaky umbrella of the fleet. Technical analysis of the "Thundering" firing

            Second, assuming the worst conditions - the radar height of 20 m and the target flight height in these tests, 70 m, we get the radio horizon according to the RM-15 in these tests 48 km (in reality - more). We take the declared 0,95 for the STC, we get 44,5 km, on which the IBMK simply had to detect and conduct the RM-15 with an EPR of 1,3 m2 (while according to the TTZ it is obvious that this figure is much higher). This value is close to the far border of the 9M96 missile defense zone.
            Let's take the reaction time of the air defense missile system for 10 seconds (for a ship in combat readiness No. 1 there are a lot), then the missile defense system will be launched at a distance of 40 km to the target. Let's say the average speed of convergence between RM and SAM is 1 km / s, then the target will be hit in 40 s at a distance of about 26 km.
            In fact, we have a target defeat at 9 km! Forgive me, but even the Sosny missile defense system works at such ranges (an order of magnitude cheaper than the gold 9M96)!
            What (and who - their creators) really worked at "5+" on these firing - SAMs 9M96.

            And where does the Barrier. SAM 9M96 probably hung in the air? Or Captain Klimov miscalculated?
            1. +4
              9 January 2021 12: 45
              Quote: Dread
              do not confuse soft with hot. The conversation was about something else:


              I do not confuse if that, but put the question on the merits.
        3. +1
          15 January 2021 19: 46
          Quote: Dread
          the author of the article, not versed in radar and the physics of interception, shows his complete illiteracy in intercepting an air target by the "Thundering" at a distance of 9 km,

          Monsieur Dred, YOU wrote in complete illiteracy - with your ACHINEA
          Quote: Dread
          while blaming the developers of Zaslon,

          YOU are on fire, urgently save your "fillet" with a fire extinguisher! lol
      3. +7
        9 January 2021 10: 08
        Quote: Alexander1971
        But you are obviously too lazy. In that case, this remark of yours, Sergey Samkov, is just how to spoil the air.

        this is a troll Yes
        1. +8
          9 January 2021 10: 55
          I looked at the profile of this Sergey Samkov. He has only 6 comments on this site, 3-4 lines each with the same content - to fart in passing at any author of the article. This is of course a fat troll.
          1. +4
            9 January 2021 12: 48
            Well, Sergei Samkov does not write to the Minister of Defense for sure. Intellect does not allow.
  18. -9
    9 January 2021 08: 30
    Nothing new! The guano was not delivered, the shovels were not given!
  19. +5
    9 January 2021 09: 20
    "... tough questions remain ..."
    Will we wait for answers to these questions?
    Something I doubt ...
    Will there be a naval parade in 2021?
    1. +8
      9 January 2021 10: 19
      And the parades at the bases are a tradition and not bad ..... But the GVMP is utter nonsense. There is at least some sense in holding it only on round dates such as the three hundredth anniversary of the Navy.
    2. +3
      9 January 2021 12: 50
      The best parades are detachments of ships opposite the enemy's naval bases, not the formation of warships in a line on the Neva River. And most importantly: Peter's boat was the first to launch.
  20. +4
    9 January 2021 09: 32
    Money is everything!
    "federal budget in the amount of 11121358590,0 thousand rubles (paragraph as amended, entered into force on June 7, 2011"
    "2021 - revenues: 18,8 trillion rubles, expenses: 21,52 trillion rubles"
    And now what Putin says: (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJo1YvNI6EQ&ab_channe)
    They steal!
    1. +7
      9 January 2021 10: 07
      Quote: steel maker
      And now what Putin says: (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJo1YvNI6EQ&ab_channe)
      They steal!

      But he didn't know ...
      1. +1
        9 January 2021 15: 22
        Duc it the boyars, they are so ... evil ... do not report .......
  21. -3
    9 January 2021 09: 32
    How to evaluate what is written ???
    Hope that we, the author of something does not know ??? But our management knows and takes the necessary measures !!!
    To hope that the enemy does not know something and will not be able to use what he knows ... somehow it is not necessary.
    Probably not a catastrophe AT ALL, a bias, a serious flaw ... to compensate, which is very difficult to fix, for objective and not very reasons.
    1. +3
      9 January 2021 09: 57
      Quote: rocket757
      But our management knows and takes the necessary measures !!!

      Well, yes, yes ...
      1. -1
        9 January 2021 10: 03
        The upper paths .... we do not know. Most likely we will feel it later.
        1. +9
          9 January 2021 10: 06
          Quote: rocket757
          The upper paths .... we do not know. Most likely we will feel it later.

          Colleague, all their paths lead to their stolen riches, and here they are shift workers.
          1. +2
            9 January 2021 10: 15
            Compradors, there are such ... the question is WHAT WE DO to change the situation for the better.
            1. +9
              9 January 2021 10: 16
              Quote: rocket757
              WHAT WE DO to change the situation for the better.

              We gnaw each other on VO wassat
              1. +1
                9 January 2021 10: 20
                Whistle - steam. There is a lot of noise, ZERO useful action!
                1. +7
                  9 January 2021 10: 23
                  Quote: rocket757
                  Whistle - steam. There is a lot of noise, ZERO useful action!

                  I agree, I was joking so gloomily, because here many have confused the virtual with real life. And in real life, each of us does what he can, someone more, someone less ...
                  1. -1
                    9 January 2021 10: 28
                    We work - we exist!
                    Few people can "boast" that they exist without working!
                    Even pensioners do not sit idle, with rare exceptions.
                    And if we work, everything goes into one "piggy bank", in the end.
          2. 0
            9 January 2021 10: 23
            Quote: Stroporez
            all their paths lie


            These paths were closed. From the word in general. But some of the middle-higher ones are still experiencing illusions
            1. +6
              9 January 2021 10: 27
              Quote: Cyril G ...
              These paths were closed. From the word in general. But some of the middle-higher ones are still experiencing illusions

              They have two or three passports, and if anything, they do plastic surgery, in general they are evacuated to children, women, palaces and warm seas.
              1. +6
                9 January 2021 11: 35
                Quote: Stroporez
                They have two or three passports, and if anything, they do plastic surgery, in general they are evacuated to children, women, palaces and warm seas.


                The London court made a precedent decision in the case of Berezovsky versus Abramovich - all "Young Money", that is, the money whose owners cannot prove their "honest" origin in court - are earned by criminal means this time. Secondly, the West needs a lot of money.
                1. -1
                  9 January 2021 13: 32
                  Quote: Cyril G ...
                  all "Young money", that is, money whose owners cannot prove their "honest" origin in court - are earned by criminal means

                  Some people still think of the theory of class struggle.
                  1. -1
                    9 January 2021 22: 50
                    This is an eternal question. He was and he is. Will it? It will be long. I hope not forever.
                    1. +3
                      9 January 2021 22: 58
                      Quote: Cyril G ...
                      This is an eternal question. He was and he is.

                      What kind of eternal is there. Communist ideology tried to fit the whole history under its theory. In fact, although the notorious class struggle exists, its influence is far from being as significant as it was taught in Soviet schools. Specifically, in this case, we are talking about the fact that our oligarchs and the oligarchs of our partners are not at all brothers-comrades, but quite the opposite, and everyone does not care about any classes.
                  2. +3
                    9 January 2021 23: 19
                    Quote: Dart2027
                    Some people still think of the theory of class struggle.

                    Listen, the class struggle has nothing to do with the opposition to theft and embezzlement.
                    Why on earth do you raise thieves into a class? What do you think is the difference between a thief who stole your wallet from a thief who stole your pension or even an entire country?
                    1. +1
                      9 January 2021 23: 25
                      Quote: Stroporez
                      Listen, the class struggle has nothing to do with the opposition to theft and embezzlement.

                      Quote: Stroporez
                      Colleague, all their paths lead to their stolen riches, and here they are shift workers.
                      And there they are eager to accept them into their ranks.
                      Quote: Cyril G ...
                      The London court made a precedent decision in the case of Berezovsky versus Abramovich - all the "Young Money", that is, the money whose owners cannot prove their "honest" origin in court - are earned by criminal means this time.
                      1. +2
                        9 January 2021 23: 36
                        Quote: Dart2027
                        And there they are eager to accept them into their ranks.

                        The odious will not be accepted, but now you can get a romka with Deripaska only with an ice ax. By the way, the Congress quite seriously raised the issue of returning a trillion of stolen money to the people of the Russian Federation, in the presence of a post-thief government.
                      2. +3
                        10 January 2021 06: 55
                        Quote: Stroporez
                        The odious will not be accepted, but now you can get a romka with Deripaska only with an ice ax.

                        Abramovich thought so too.
                        Quote: Stroporez
                        By the way, the Congress quite seriously raised the issue of returning a trillion of stolen money to the people of the Russian Federation, in the presence of a post-thief government.

                        And then there is Santa Claus.
                2. +3
                  9 January 2021 14: 08
                  It's just that money, even of a very rich person, is pf-e ..... but ASSETS, production and other resources, this is a DELICIOUS, for the sake of which the STATE can attend specifically.
          3. 0
            9 January 2021 15: 23
            and here they are shift workers.

            In the galleys?
            1. +2
              9 January 2021 23: 26
              Quote: frog
              In the galleys?

              Nah, now they are bunker and they have suits from bryony and watches at the cost of the annual budget of the regional center, and galley slaves are inhabitants who can be beaten with sticks and licked.
              1. +1
                10 January 2021 11: 35
                Why are you so, colleague? The inhabitants got drunk vodyary - and ffse. And they are constantly thinking about their homeland and, in general, in thoughts ...
  22. +12
    9 January 2021 09: 50
    Sometimes you ask yourself a question: is it generally possible to get out of this swamp? The admirals cheerfully report, trembling for their seats, the industry led by "effective managers" is driving blatant hack, wanting to cut a bigger dough for another wretched product "unparalleled in the world", urya patriots cheerfully croak, inspired by colorful pictures from the TV. In short, congratulations on your urgent ass dive.
    PS Isn't it time to wake up?
    1. -1
      9 January 2021 11: 13
      And what will change with criticism when the ships that Klimov needs go into the fleet? How will you check that? Again refer to the "authoritative" opinion of the major from the fleet?
      I understand all the feelings and worries of the "patriotic" critics of the existing order of affairs. They are just afraid. They are afraid that they themselves will have to fight.
      I want to calm you down. Everyone will have to fight all the same: both critics and hurray-patriots. Nobody can sit out. Modern technology is so complicated that neither we nor anyone else will be able to produce it like cakes. It takes years to build. Why would anyone think that the enemy's industry will be able to do this faster, or ours will suddenly start working faster?
      So there will be minesweepers or not, there will be a torpedo or not. All this at the first stage of the war, so that the country would have time to mobilize the reserve. By the time the mobilization ends, everything that is now swimming, walking and rolling will have already been destroyed. And this is if you fight with conventional forces. other means of warfare, it may not come to mobilization.
      Opinions about critics are as follows: they want the Russian Federation to have a strong fleet, army, aviation and so on, so that those who are "lucky" are in the ranks at that time would enter and win the war. The critics themselves do not see themselves in the role of combat units, but they definitely see themselves in the role of forum analysts with a can of beer and chips.
      In the article, I liked the author's references to his own authoritative opinion. And especially cool was the statement from patriotic officers with highlighted paragraphs, which was written by the author himself and not even signed by him. Most likely it wasn't even sent out.
      Propaganda is propaganda.
      1. +5
        9 January 2021 12: 31
        Mobilization work begins long before the start of post-fire events and ends for two reasons:
        And we....
        B) Us ....
        Peacetime army readiness - to create conditions for "A".
      2. 0
        9 January 2021 14: 16
        Quote: mark2
        All this at the first stage of the war, so that the country would have time to mobilize the reserve. By the time the mobilization ends, everything that is now swimming, walking and rolling will have already been destroyed.

        strange statement ... did you think well? and how will you arm the mobilized population with crossbows with hoes scythe? ..... you want peace, prepare for war, that is, prepare nuclear submarine missiles and ensure their combat stability. For example, NATO wants to bomb Severomorsk or Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky .... and there are C 400, Torah, Buki, Pantsiri. Interceptor planes take off, BU 200 PLO destroy enemy submarines. PLO ships and minesweepers ply the water area under the cover of coastal aviation and at the behest of underwater tracking systems ... and then the enemy will not bomb these bases! and all this is real by the forces of the AVAILABLE already in the presence of the fleet, if you do, and not cut Then the enemy will not be able to attack because he will receive such a response that he will not be well
      3. +5
        9 January 2021 14: 43
        It seems to me that it is the officers who are not of the highest ranks, but who served in the ship's personnel and who directly worked with weapons and equipment - they most clearly understand what is needed in the navy.
        1. -2
          9 January 2021 18: 18
          And when there is a Big Purge, it is from their composition that the cadres will be taken. But the Navy itself, most likely, will not master this, this is the level of the VGK.
        2. +1
          9 January 2021 18: 29
          Quote: mik193
          It seems to me that it is the officers who are not of the highest ranks, but who served in the ship's personnel and who directly worked with weapons and equipment - they most clearly understand what is needed in the navy.

          In this case, it is best to listen to the words of the great naval commander:
          The breadth of the horizon is determined by the height of the beholder's eye. Admiral S.O. MAKAROV.

          So think about where the "eye" of the author of the article was, and what he could see from there in order to understand what tasks are facing the MODERN fleet, and not the one on which he served.
          Any current senior officer of the GOU GSH understands the tasks of the modern fleet much better, and unlike the author of the article, he is unlikely to go to teach the current naval commanders what weapons they need for nuclear submarines, because he thinks in completely different categories. And the fleet, including the submarine, unfortunately, has too big problems to make it the main type of our military power. This is the main thing when assigning certain tasks to our nuclear submarines, and not that someone wants to better arm our submarine missile carriers. From this, they will proceed when adopting the next weapons program, and not from the wishes of such figures as the author of the article or his admirer Timokhin.
          1. -1
            9 January 2021 20: 16
            From this and will proceed when adopting the next weapons program


            You write as if you understand something in this.
            1. END
              -2
              10 January 2021 06: 04
              Yes, he is an expert in everything. From aircraft carrier coordinates to economy.
              This is even worse than Andryusha the operator.
              They read all sorts of nonsense on the net, then they drag it here ... but VUSovka has not been "voiced" in two years. )))
              1. +1
                10 January 2021 12: 14
                Quote: FIN
                and VUSovka his so for two years and did not "sound". )))

                Has the Ukrainian "specialist" appeared again? Not tired of changing nicknames, "teacher"?
                1. END
                  -3
                  10 January 2021 12: 20
                  And I? There is Guk Kirill, who knocks on me to admins. They ban me, and I write again.)))

                  And what about VUSovka? Ensign? )))
                  1. 0
                    10 January 2021 13: 42
                    Quote: FIN
                    And I? There is Guk Kirill, who knocks on me to admins. They ban me, and I write again.)))

                    So maybe you are an agent of the SBU and are working here to identify persons prone to treason, judging by the active change of nicknames?
                    Quote: FIN
                    And what about VUSovka?

                    You haven't heard of this. And it is hardly interesting for your office, because I have long been retired.
                    1. END
                      -2
                      10 January 2021 14: 09
                      Why should I hear? There is a list on the net.
                      As they say, "The drain is counted."
                      Do you remember what nickname I gave you? Who is on duty? )))
                      1. +1
                        10 January 2021 14: 33
                        Quote: FIN
                        Do you remember what nickname I gave you?

                        No, I don’t remember under what nicknames you performed here, Semyonov. But you burn further, apparently teaching does not bring any money at all, since I started working for the SBU. You can keep asking stupid questions, since you get paid extra for it.
            2. -1
              10 January 2021 12: 10
              Quote: timokhin-aa
              You write as if you understand something in this.

              Unlike you, I understand this, because I was closely involved in my section of the weapons program. And you can continue to puff out your cheeks, just keep in mind, professionals will immediately understand you and laugh at your fantasies - you cannot get basic training on the Internet, and you cannot do without practice, and this is a fact.
              1. END
                -2
                10 January 2021 12: 23
                Yes, they figured it out for a long time ... either he was at the Western Group of Forces, then at the embassy, ​​then he receives intelligence reports on aircraft carriers with coordinates ...
                Messages to read, straight mnogostanochnik.
                1. +1
                  10 January 2021 13: 49
                  Quote: FIN
                  ... then he is in ZGV,

                  Almost five years - this was the only time when I moved from a higher structure to a lower one.
                  Quote: FIN
                  then at the embassy,

                  Don’t whistle, SBU agent, I didn’t write this, so I won’t use drugs, don’t attribute to me what I didn’t tell you.
                  Quote: FIN
                  then reconnaissance on aircraft carriers receives coordinates.

                  There were no aircraft carriers in the Baltic Sea at that time, so no la-la. And those who entered the North Sea were definitely reported. You have a rich imagination, apparently against the background of independence - do you by any chance work as Gritsenko's assistants?
                  Quote: FIN
                  Messages to read, straight mnogostanochnik.

                  More literate people like you, that's for sure ...
                  1. 0
                    15 January 2021 19: 14
                    Quote: ccsr
                    Almost five years - this was the only time when I moved from a higher structure to a lower one.

                    from the food warehouse down the hill to the dining room? lol
                    Quote: ccsr
                    And those who entered the North Sea were definitely reported.

                    warrant officers with pYvYO and Khry
                    FOR CUCUMBER
                    "in secret" lol
              2. 0
                15 January 2021 19: 17
                Quote: ccsr
                closely engaged in his section of the weapons program

                stew?
                footcloths?
                Quote: ccsr
                professionals will immediately understand you

                warrant officer (xRu-xRU-xRU), with his nonsense and nonsense - he took off his pants lol
                hRU-hRU-hRU-MMMM laughing
          2. +1
            10 January 2021 10: 59
            The General Staff officer may understand global tasks better, but he really thinks in other categories. In fact, he does not know the real effectiveness of the complex or system. What was given out on paper is guided by that. This can only be known by a person who directly works with technology.
            It is not necessary to make the navy the main type of military power. It is necessary that he clearly perform a certain range of tasks, and for this we need normal equipment and weapons.
            1. END
              -1
              10 January 2021 11: 07
              How did he get into the General Staff? Where did you serve? By pull?
              I did not rise above the headquarters of the fleet, but this does not interfere (creaking with brains) to advise people involved in the Be-12 and Il-38 simulators. I still remember something.
              As BEZ-310 wrote about such. A lieutenant colonel with third class.
            2. 0
              10 January 2021 12: 25
              Quote: mik193
              The General Staff officer may have a better understanding of global tasks, but he really thinks in other categories.

              Naturally, he must first of all take into account all the factors and advantages of different weapons systems in order to achieve the maximum probability of destroying the enemy with the first strike - this is the situation in our confrontation with the United States.
              Quote: mik193
              In fact, he does not know the real effectiveness of the complex or system.

              You argue like all ordinary people, and I will not even analyze in detail the merits of certain strategic nuclear forces systems that are known in the General Staff. The only thing that you need to at least understand is that the Strategic Missile Forces are the only type of armed forces of the triad whose control system is not intercepted by the Americans and is not subject to the actions of their electronic warfare means. And the Americans cannot understand the state of our Strategic Missile Forces duty forces, and in how many minutes the missiles will fly from the mines, due to the lack of indirect signs to determine this. Only because of this, all dancing around the fleet must be stopped - we just need to competently approach the systematic assessment of our strategic nuclear forces, and choose what will cost us cheaper. By the way, the author of the article correctly evaluates the fleet as an auxiliary structure for the Strategic Missile Forces, i.e. he understands everything perfectly, but he will eat up a bald spot about torpedoes.
              1. 0
                15 January 2021 19: 09
                Quote: ccsr
                I will not even go into detail about the merits of these or those strategic nuclear forces that are known in the General Staff.

                sort it out wassat
                neighing
                I promise not to kick with my feet
          3. 0
            15 January 2021 19: 36
            Quote: ccsr
            So think about where the "eye" of the author of the article was, and what he could see from there

            FACE ABOUT TABLE:

            Quote: ccsr
            Any current senior officer of the GOU GSh understands the tasks of the modern fleet much better.

            are you talking about the one who LIED in the AP that we have YAKOBY "held" ice shooting?
            ensign, and I will grieve you - they know me at GOU GS
            thank you for something - on the "green theme" (more precisely - "sand")
            1. -1
              15 January 2021 20: 09
              Quote: Fizik M
              FACE ABOUT TABLE:

              Some naval officers are just like clowns, they could not figure out even a simple answer to Klimov's personal initiative, but they mark everything as a "strategist" with their quirks.
              Firstly, such answers, if they are really interesting and relevant, are not written in open form, but sent in stamped form.
              Secondly, the word "reviewed" (the first paragraph) does not at all reflect that any actions will be taken on them - this is a typical turnover for unsubscribing for various annoying applicants.
              The second paragraph is just an excuse in the form of a set of words from which nothing follows, but warms the souls of the applicants.
              The third paragraph is praise for the commander of the formation, and Klimov does not dance here, from the word at all.
              The fourth point is an excellent example for those who understand the essence of such formal replies - they do not even insist on the obligatory sending of the applicant to the academy, but only consider it "appropriate to CONSIDER Klimov's candidacy." Based on this, it becomes clear that the Chief of the Main Directorate of the General Staff of the Navy refuses to participate in the fate of Klimov, leaving everything to the discretion of the local commander, including sending him to study. And this best of all suggests that the chief of the OU Klimov and his ideas are not at all interested, otherwise he would have been called officially to the OU General Staff of the Navy.
              The fifth point best of all suggests that in order not to store garbage in the General Staff of the Navy, in order not to store garbage, they simply threw it into 24 institutes, where these papers will be registered, and then at the end of the year they will be sewn up or simply destroyed according to the results of the work of the annual inspection commission office work.
              That's all there is to know about this answer.
              But since there are often such unique people in the fleet that they can make an elephant out of a fly, I am not surprised why another verbiage decided to wave this meaningless scribble.
              Burn on the "expert" of the fleet, and remember that about people like you there has long been a saying - "a hare is not a sailor, there will be no chattering ...".
              In general, the ears are flared, and they are not dusty on the parquet, you are too funny with your letter, which once again showed how those who know how to understand them correctly laugh at you.
              1. 0
                15 January 2021 20: 56
                Quote: ccsr
                Some naval officers are just like clowns, they could not figure out even a simple answer to Klimov's personal initiative,

                clown here you are, "cork" ensign from hRU-hRU-hRU-MMMM
                Quote: ccsr
                Firstly, such answers, if they are really interesting and relevant, are not written in open form, but sent in stamped form.

                bunny, you are just too stupid and did not see anything real
                firstly, everything is clear from the numbers to the competent reader
                secondly, the stamped answers were also
                Quote: ccsr
                The fifth point best of all suggests that in order not to store garbage in the General Staff of the Navy, in order not to store garbage, they simply threw it into the 24th Institute

                he says you're just a stupid ensign who has no idea what the Central Research Institute of OSIS is
                1. -1
                  15 January 2021 21: 11
                  Quote: Fizik M
                  firstly, everything is clear from the numbers to the competent reader

                  Relax, verbiage, numbers are assigned to all correspondence. And the answer is not to the applicant himself, to his boss, which already says everything.
                  Quote: Fizik M
                  secondly, the stamped answers were also

                  Well, why did not the author enter the academy and was not invited to serve at the educational institution?
                  Quote: Fizik M
                  having no idea what the Central Research Institute of OSIS is

                  It was just a specific Central Research Institute, there were such in every type and type of troops, so blow off your cheeks, verbiage:
                  The main customer of the Institute's products is the Main Headquarters of the Navy, to the head of which the Institute is directly subordinate.

                  Moreover, in 2009, his status was also downgraded, having been removed from the central subordination:
                  In 2009, the Institute became part of the Military Educational and Scientific Center of the Russian Navy “Naval Academy named after Admiral of the Fleet of the Soviet Union NG Kuznetsov ".

                  When will you finish demonstrating your incompetence, "marine painter" on general issues?
                  1. -1
                    15 January 2021 21: 29
                    Quote: ccsr
                    numbers are assigned to all correspondence

                    lol
                    prapor, you are so STUPID that you didn't even understand what it was about laughing
                    Quote: ccsr
                    and why the author did not enter the academy and was not invited to serve at the educational institution?

                    and who are you that I would answer such questions? another "daughter of Lieutenant Schmidt"?
                    Quote: ccsr
                    Moreover, in 2009 his status was also downgraded, being removed from the central subordination

                    wassat
                    warrant officer, he was NEVER centrally subordinate and was not

                    PS Ensign, I have one question - have you ever flown on Mars (yet)? lol
                    1. -1
                      15 January 2021 21: 41
                      Quote: Fizik M
                      warrant officer, he was NEVER centrally subordinate and was not

                      What a misery, you don't even know what kind of office it was:
                      Thus, since 1961, the range of tasks assigned to the institute has been constantly expanding. Since 1969, the institute has become the leading institute in the Navy in the field of substantiating the development directions and programs of the fleet's armament, automating the control of its forces, modeling and developing special software for automated control systems. At the suggestion of the Commander-in-Chief of the Navy, the institute was transferred to the first category of research institutions of the Ministry of Defense, designing especially complex products, and since 1988 it has become the central one - 24 TsNII MO. To train scientific personnel and improve their qualifications, in 1971, a specialized council for the defense of candidate dissertations was created at the institute, and since 1976 - and doctoral dissertations. To date, more than 200 candidate and 25 doctoral dissertations have been defended in the dissertation council of the institute.

                      http://militaryarticle.ru/voennaya-mysl/2005-vm/9599-jetapy-razvitija-24-cnii-mo-rf-i-ego-rol-v
                      All the CENTRAL institutes of the Ministry of Defense were of central subordination, and here you once again demonstrated your illiteracy.
                      1. -1
                        15 January 2021 21: 52
                        Quote: ccsr
                        once again demonstrated illiteracy.

                        warrant officer, on subordination I will clarify (and write here)
                        but you didn’t answer about Mars (as well as "sEkrEtnh ensigns" who whisper in your ear the coordinates of amerovskih SSBNs lol
      4. +1
        10 January 2021 01: 28
        Yeah, in your opinion this is awful:
        "The opinions about the critics are as follows: they want the Russian Federation to have a strong fleet, army, aviation and so on, so that those who are" lucky "are in the ranks at this time would enter and win the war."
        "So there will be minesweepers or not, whether there will be a torpedo or not. All this is at the first stage of the war, so that the country has time to mobilize the reserve. By the time the mobilization is over, everything that is now floating, walking and rolling will have already been destroyed." ...

        Of course, it is imperative, put them and millions of mobilized ...
        You can't break the tradition ...
        Only titanic victims, right !?
        That is, it is disgusting and bad to want to win the war, having prepared in advance and not dreaming of winning, by all means reaching the "Reichstag" as the last of every thousand !!! ??
        You are absolutely chtoli! ??
        1. 0
          10 January 2021 12: 43
          This is a psychological deformation - to cover the enemy in the port of loading with missiles is haram, you need to let him submerge, cross the ocean, turn around in a theater of operations, invade, and then you can die under the tracks, in a trench at an unnamed height. Nuili send their children there, under the caterpillars, age itself does not allow.

          Continental power. But as? Do not give up the same land and continentality.
      5. +1
        15 January 2021 19: 41
        Quote: mark2
        And what will change with criticism when the ships that Klimov needs go into the fleet? How will you check that? Again refer to the "authoritative" opinion of the major from the fleet?

        bunny, I was not ashamed for any of my PM or TK for tests
        for these were REAL HONEST tests
        Quote: mark2
        I want to calm you down. Everyone will have to fight all the same: both critics and hurray-patriots. Nobody can sit out. Modern technology is so complicated that neither we nor anyone else will be able to produce it like cakes. It takes years to build. Why would anyone think that the enemy's industry will be able to do this faster, or ours will suddenly start working faster?
        So there will be minesweepers or not, there will be a torpedo or not. All this at the first stage of the war, so that the country would have time to mobilize the reserve. By the time the mobilization ends, everything that is now swimming, walking and rolling will have already been destroyed. And this is if you fight with conventional forces. other means of warfare, it may not come to mobilization.
        Opinions about critics are as follows: they want the Russian Federation to have a strong fleet, army, aviation and so on, so that those who are "lucky" are in the ranks at that time would enter and win the war. The critics themselves do not see themselves in the role of combat units, but they definitely see themselves in the role of forum analysts with a can of beer and chips.

        and I think that YOU are just nonsense
        with a can of beer and chips on a squeezed couch
    2. -4
      9 January 2021 11: 41
      Do you have complete information, or so, for the catchphrase, like one woman said?
  23. +20
    9 January 2021 10: 18
    Much later, at the end of 1989, I asked him why he dismissed this question.

    Fyodor Ivanovich replied: "I know about this effect, it is impossible to protect oneself from such detection, so why upset our submariners?"

    So it is now - why tell the sailors that they will be "merged" during the fighting?
    1. -1
      9 January 2021 12: 53
      They will simply be the first to merge, and we are always after them.
  24. +12
    9 January 2021 10: 30
    The article is an undeniable, undeniable, fat plus !!! Klimov has already become one of my favorite and adequate authors, who writes on the problem, because he REALLY understands it. It's not convenient to write from the phone, I'll try briefly. Gentlemen of the forum, in order for the SSBN to REALLY pose a threat to the enemy during the conflict, he must be on alert, at least undetected. To do this, he must be taken to the patrol area. For this, it is necessary to provide a set of actions that are capable of providing SSBNs with the ability to complete the task at the time of the reaction of the leadership in a conflict. To do this, you need to clear the patrol area from enemy hunter boats, close the patrol area from anti-aircraft defense aircraft. The Soviet Union realized this, and therefore began to revive the aircraft carrier component of the Navy in the form of at least some aircraft carrying ships. Ibotolku from the strategist, if, upon leaving the base, he will be guided by 2-3 submarines of enemy boats throughout the entire period and when the hatch of the mine is opened, he will automatically receive his torpedo. This is the problem, that we CANNOT ENSURE THE SECURITY OF THE HIDDEN AREA OF THE DEPLOYMENT OF OUR SSBNs! We cannot not only do this, but even the SSBNs themselves cannot provide anti-submarine weapons. Those. in the event of a war, the naval component is practically deleted from the strategic nuclear forces. Knowing where the boats are, you can easily neutralize them. That is why the author is sounding the alarm, because he knows about the problem, and the officials from the Navy, who also know about it, say that the problem "does not correspond to reality." Therefore, the media sell pictures of peaceful launches, and the reality is terrifying - we are defenseless in the seas and oceans. We are not able to ensure not only the secrecy of the SSBN, but we are even able to defend ...
    Maxim Klimov - good hi
  25. -2
    9 January 2021 11: 14
    posing a question on BZHRK

    You shouldn't do BZHRK. In view of their low combat resistance to sabotage on the railway, additional time for folding the contact network, braking the throughput of Russian Railways, the previously known coordinates of the location of the railways, poor protection from a shock wave, the ability of a potential enemy to cover the entire network of Russian Railways with unacceptable excess pressure of hydrocarbons.
    1. 0
      9 January 2021 11: 39
      And the striped ones are of a different opinion.
  26. 0
    9 January 2021 11: 28
    The article makes a strange impression. On the one hand, criticism of existing realities. And there is no clear unambiguous conclusion.
    Meanwhile, the history of the Russian Empire and the USSR teaches us that the ocean-going fleet is not only not useful, but also harmful. Actually Russia once, in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, built a large ocean-going fleet. How it turned out is known. It is also known how the beginning of the implementation of the shipbuilding program to recreate a large fleet turned out for Russia. Shell and cartridge famine in the First World War.
    The leadership of the USSR in the 30s also followed the lead of the maritime lobby, starting the construction of a large fleet, but thought better of it in time, curtailing the construction of large ships in 1939. In the Second World War, the USSR did not have new battleships, but there were tanks, guns with shells for them and with small arms were all right. And the fleet was subordinate to the land command.
    Why not take this path now?
    1. +7
      9 January 2021 12: 24
      And who is talking about the "big ocean fleet"? This article is about a purely defensive potential. And that even within the framework of the existing passive doctrine, we do not have enough strength either in quantitative or qualitative terms.
      1. -1
        9 January 2021 14: 06
        Quote: Comrade Y
        who is talking about the "big ocean fleet"? This article is about a purely defensive potential.

        exactly! here I am against a large ocean-going fleet, but SSBNs require MANDATORY comprehensive support of combat stability ... by the way, troops often pass through my village, I think that moving Iskanders, from 400 and so on with one driver and under the protection of one VAI vehicle, often even without technical closure = crime
    2. +3
      9 January 2021 13: 34
      Quote: Igor Tikhomirov
      Actually Russia once, in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, built a large ocean-going fleet. How it turned out is known.

      The fact that our partners really wanted to destroy it.
      Quote: Igor Tikhomirov
      It is also known how the beginning of the implementation of the shipbuilding program to recreate a large fleet turned out for Russia. Shell and cartridge famine in the First World War.

      This famine was due to the fact that no one thought that the war would last more than a few months.
      Quote: Igor Tikhomirov
      but changed his mind in time, curtailing the construction of large ships in 1939

      Because I couldn't build them, physically.
    3. +3
      9 January 2021 14: 19
      Meanwhile, the history of the Russian Empire and the USSR teaches us


      The history of the USSR teaches us that all nuclear deterrence from 1960 to 1973 for about years hung on the Navy.
      And that's just one example.
      History teaches us that at the Bear Spear 2014 exercise, where the Americans were practicing a sudden disarming nuclear strike on the Russian Federation, they were not allowed to dry two SSBNs that were not fired by accident (of all available).
      History also teaches us that among us there are unteachable characters, alas ...
      1. +3
        9 January 2021 18: 37
        Quote: timokhin-aa
        The history of the USSR teaches us that all nuclear deterrence from 1960 to 1973 for about years hung on the Navy.

        Our Civil Cavalry Army was a decisive striking force, so should we again start designing titanium horseshoes? Yes, there was a time when we did not have enough missiles to destroy the entire territory of the United States, now they are enough. Why then expand the fleet, which is already the most costly in our triad and, moreover, the most vulnerable, and even poorly managed due to the enemy's electronic warfare?
        Quote: timokhin-aa
        History teaches us that at the Bear Spear 2014 exercise, where the Americans were practicing a sudden disarming nuclear strike on the Russian Federation, they were not allowed to dry two SSBNs that were not fired by accident (of all available).

        Stop fantasizing, because the "surprise strike" is a figment of your imagination, indicating that you have no idea what scenario the Americans will use in a future war. By the way, your mythical "surprise strike" against which objects of the Russian Federation will you be directed?
        Quote: timokhin-aa
        History also teaches us that among us there are unteachable characters, alas ...

        And there are dreamers on military topics, and they bring even more harm to our people, because with their amateurish reasoning they powder the brains of an inexperienced public.
        1. 0
          9 January 2021 20: 14
          Stop fantasizing, because the "surprise strike" is a figment of your imagination, indicating that you have no idea what scenario the Americans will use in a future war.


          This is one of the options that they are working on and for which they are preparing their IUDs.

          By the way, your mythical "surprise strike" against which objects of the Russian Federation will you be directed


          Write to the Pentagon, ensign.
          1. -2
            10 January 2021 12: 05
            Quote: timokhin-aa
            This is one of the options that they are working on and for which they are preparing their IUDs.

            Enough with the verbiage "writer", it is better to describe specifically how you imagine it. Then people will understand that you are up to the "ensign", as to the moon on foot ...
            1. 0
              15 January 2021 19: 02
              Quote: ccsr
              better describe specifically how you imagine it

              Prapor, do you really think that Timokhin or I will paint on an open source how best to beat us? (beyond what the enemy already knows)
        2. 0
          15 January 2021 19: 06
          Quote: ccsr
          enemy electronic warfare means

          YOU are a warrant officer about this only can smack nonsense
          Quote: ccsr
          because the "sudden blow" is a figment of your imagination,

          well, you were the ensign
          because all the COMBAT UNITS in the USSR worked out the way out of it
          with very strict regulations
          and you at this time, apparently, turned the tushnya in the warehouse lol
      2. +19
        9 January 2021 23: 20
        Quote: timokhin-aa
        there are unteachable characters among us, alas

        This is yes. Someone even paraphrased the well-known expression: "Russia has one problem - fools are dear to it"
  27. -3
    9 January 2021 11: 38
    What's the point in discussing such things here on VO. This should be discussed at the headquarters of the Navy, in special publications, in the Ministry of Defense and in the government, finally. You can, if you wish, reach the president, and here we will not do anything except exchange of views without full information.
    1. 0
      9 January 2021 18: 46
      Quote: Ros 56
      What's the point in discussing such things here on VO. This should be discussed at the headquarters of the Navy, in special publications, in the Ministry of Defense and in the government, finally. You can, if you wish, reach the president, and here we will not do anything except exchange of views without full information.

      Some leaders are pleased to feel that they are much smarter than all the active military, and that someone is supposedly starting to listen to their words. How good that the author of the article only wrote a report to the minister, and in Soviet times he would have concocted a scribble in the Central Committee, and then wrote another letter to the congress, where he would have outlined his "ideas." From those who write here, no one can imagine what kind of punishment it was in Soviet times for officers of the Ministry of Defense to respond to letters from such advanced citizens - it was something that shook many heads of even the main directorates. I'm not talking about all the offended and other inadequate authors, but the letters to the congress were written by just crazy people, and they had to be answered in the Central Committee. Hardly anyone knows what it is, but I was familiar with it ...
      1. 0
        15 January 2021 18: 59
        Quote: ccsr
        Some politicians are pleased to feel that they are much smarter than all the active military, and that someone is supposedly starting to listen to their words. It's so good that the author of the article only wrote a report to the minister, and in Soviet times he would have concocted a scribble in the Central Committee, and then wrote another letter to the congress, where he would set out his "ideas"

        ensign, do not read - do not torture your scanty little mind
        command the cooks - this is your "level" wassat
  28. +7
    9 January 2021 12: 54
    Author:
    Maxim Klimov
    The quantitative basis of our strategic nuclear forces should be precisely the Strategic Missile Forces. And the role of NSNF is a necessary but auxiliary mechanism of strategic deterrence.

    This conclusion of the author of the article is the most valuable in his work, and I completely agree with this conclusion. We can add to this that the same applies to our third component - strategic aviation, which is essentially auxiliary in relation to our Strategic Missile Forces.
    All the rest of the author's theoretical research, including ten-year-old references to some admirals, and I am in doubt, but let the naval ones intelligibly discuss this themselves here, whether the absence of new torpedoes or mines is so tragic for us.
    To the author, since he never served in the structures of general customers, I recommend to remember that 3-5 years for the fleet is nothing at all, because even in the simpler military R&D of the Soviet period, a period of 4 years was considered quite acceptable. This is the starting point when you criticize the current timing of developments.
    1. +15
      9 January 2021 23: 12
      Quote: ccsr
      This conclusion of the author of the article is the most valuable in his work, and I completely agree with this conclusion.

      Yes, this is also suggested by logic: we have the largest territory, which means that strategic nuclear forces should be distributed over it. The Yankees are in charge of the ocean - therefore, the base of the strategic nuclear forces is placed on boats.
    2. 0
      15 January 2021 18: 56
      Quote: ccsr
      All the rest of the author's theoretical research, including ten-year-old references to some admirals, and I am in doubt, but let the naval ones intelligibly discuss this themselves here, whether the absence of new torpedoes or mines is so tragic for us.

      warrant officer, YOUR "doubts" of the level "just steal a box of stew or take a UAZ car" lol
      Quote: ccsr
      To the author, since he never served in the structures of general customers

      where I served - I'm not going to report to "cork" ensigns
      Quote: ccsr
      I recommend to remember

      ensign, "recommend" you to the cook in the dining room - this is your "level" wassat
      Quote: ccsr
      even in the simpler military R&D of the Soviet period, a period of 4 years was considered quite acceptable

      Well, ensign, you took off your PANTS with this ACHINEA lol
  29. -1
    9 January 2021 12: 55
    Klimov, didn’t you suffer on all the resources that Bulava is not allowed from the Pacific Fleet (or is it your alter ego, Timoshkin)? At the same time, meaningfully hinting that they can never?
    Launched from the Pacific Fleet Bulava, I still don't like it. And expensive and not as you wanted.
    Now you don't like the Boreyev basing at the Pacific Fleet. Where to move them until the issue with the PLO is resolved?
    1. -3
      9 January 2021 13: 32
      PFF)). Klimov wrote on VO and other resources of the article that Bulava can only fly from west to east, but cannot fly from east to west.
      1. +6
        9 January 2021 14: 34
        This was not the case. The question was raised exclusively in the plane of why there is no firing from the Kamchatka SSBNs.
      2. 0
        9 January 2021 18: 18
        I didn’t write, I just joked that once.
      3. 0
        15 January 2021 15: 04
        Quote: From Tomsk
        Klimov wrote on VO and other resources of the article that Bulava can only fly from west to east, but cannot fly from east to west.

        fool
        Monsieur, YOU on this one Nonsense at least one link to lead?
    2. -1
      9 January 2021 14: 02
      Quote: demiurg
      Where to move them until the issue with the PLO is resolved?

      it is clear that on the Northern Fleet ... but I believe that they do not need to be moved, they need to be given PLO strength and they are only not where they are needed ... are smeared over the warm seas
    3. 0
      9 January 2021 14: 20
      No, citizen is cheap, it wasn't him. These were your voices in your head.
    4. -4
      9 January 2021 15: 13
      Very comfortable position of the author. If there are jingoistic patriots for whom everything that has been done is wonderful, and what has not been done is not necessary. That is to say, all the scatters. For these, if something is not done, they shout "guard, everything is lost, we can do nothing, just ... if all the polymers." And when we do something, they convince others that we did the wrong thing.
      1. 0
        15 January 2021 16: 29
        Quote: Ivan_Ivanov
        If there are jingoistic patriots for whom everything that has been done is wonderful, and what has not been done is not necessary. That is, all the scattered

        hike YOU have the whole world in black and white pixels wassat
        I sympathize
        lol
    5. 0
      15 January 2021 16: 27
      Quote: demiurg
      At the same time, meaningfully hinting that they can never?

      monsieur, you are raving
      Written by mina030 (mina030)
      2020-03-17 17:23:00
      https://topwar.ru/178779-borej-bulava-zalp-ushel-no-tjazhelye-voprosy-ostalis.html
      Taking into account the "wild" and unacceptable situation of such a long break in the practical missile firing of missile submarines of the strategic forces of the Navy's combat staff, it is very likely that it will be completed in 2020. At least one Bulava rocket fire from the Pacific Fleet (against the Chizha battlefield).
      This is certainly very positive, and it is highly likely that this shooting will be successful (given its importance and the appropriate support from the industry).

      Quote: demiurg
      Launched from the Pacific Fleet Bulava, I still don't like it. And expensive and not as you wanted.

      no need to misinterpret my words
  30. 0
    9 January 2021 13: 14
    The sailors have no questions. And it shouldn't be. All hands on deck!
  31. +1
    9 January 2021 13: 45
    I have a question about the repeatedly shown picture with low-frequency illumination: active headphones have been around for many years, what is the problem to make a means for suppressing low-frequency illumination on the same principles?
    1. +1
      9 January 2021 18: 20
      The whole boat resonates. In a very low range. What you write is active noise cancellation, it is.
    2. 0
      15 January 2021 16: 31
      Quote: bk0010
      I have a question about the repeatedly shown picture with low-frequency illumination: active headphones have been around for many years, what is the problem to make a means for suppressing low-frequency illumination on the same principles?

      fully - physically impossible
      defective - read gov purchases
      but I will refrain from commenting on them
  32. +1
    9 January 2021 13: 59
    I support the respected Maksim Klimov, I will add, the development of new torpedoes, mine action vehicles, and minesweepers, by the way, is not so expensive compared to the UDC, Kuzey and even a frigate, and it is very necessary, which is obvious .... the question is why it has not been done? here you can cut a little or is it a direct betrayal in the General Staff of the Navy? The transfer of all 1st and 2nd rank ships to Kamchatka and the Northern Fleet is not too high in terms of expenditures, then at least they covered the water area by means of 1155 1164 11356 20380, etc. I consider ignoring the security of nuclear submarines and their bases not a mistake, but a serious crime ...
    1. +2
      9 January 2021 16: 34
      From me "+"! And consider my signature in your comment! hi
    2. +1
      10 January 2021 01: 23
      Can't you admit that on the eve of a special period the Pacific Fleet's steamers will not be deployed “for support” (as well as the steamers of the “partners”)?
      BMTO deployments pl (that RPKSN, that mts) Yes, you need to "reach" the level of "feasible" from the level of "military ingenuity".
      1. -1
        10 January 2021 19: 46
        perhaps there are plans for deployment ... but how long does it take to transfer large ships from the Black Sea Fleet and Baltic Fleet to the Northern Fleet? and if this is done in a threatened period past the sworn enemies of all NATO countries through narrow straits! By the way, even on the way to Tsushima, the fleet skirted England far for fear of provocation ... if there are such plans, then this is a filkin letter to protect the bureaucratic s ..... in stripes. The army and navy should be in places where they are needed and or where they can move without control from third countries, for example, if you equip the BF and the Northern Fleet and Kfl with ships of the third rank, then they can move through the GDP.
        1. 0
          11 January 2021 01: 10
          The steamers of the Black Sea Fleet and the Baltic Fleet are needed in their places. We are talking about the deployment of funds in the theater of operations (within the association).
  33. -6
    9 January 2021 14: 25
    I absolutely do not understand all these torpedoes, so I cannot comment. But what I absolutely agree with is that ground-based missiles should form the basis of our nuclear missile forces. Submarines were once needed to send a missile to the enemy. Now boats can shoot straight from the pier.
    1. +6
      9 January 2021 22: 28
      Quote: certero
      Submarines were once needed to send a missile to the enemy.

      Pancake! It is difficult to talk to the deaf and not very thinking ...
      Ground forces (silos, PGRK) are visible, their place is known, and it is possible to inflict "counterforce RNU" on them. But the APRK SN, in order to destroy it, must still be found in the vast expanses of the World Ocean. The firing bearing of the Strategic Missile Forces products is known (sector!), Where all means of early warning and missile defense systems look. But from where the SSBN will deliver its blow - it needs to be very tense to cover all sectors ... It is very difficult to reflect a dagger strike in the belly due to the lack of swing and the small distance (time) of the blade following to the solar plexus ... launching SLBMs from 1000 km ... and even on flat ballistics ... It's not 30 minutes for you to collect when launching from near Kozelsk ...
      Therefore, dear, boats are still needed today so that obscene thoughts about impunity for "disarming strikes" on our country do not fly into the attic of the inhabitants of the Pale House ...
      Quote: certero
      Now boats can shoot straight from the pier.

      They can, but we do not need one more battery melt silo. We need a "situation of uncertainty" with an unpredictable outcome at time "H" on day "D". And so far no one can cope with this task better than the untracked APRK SN ...
      1. -2
        10 January 2021 00: 37
        How many boats do we have constantly at sea on alert? How many of them are not tracked by the enemy in real time? Now answer these questions and you will understand that nuclear cruisers are just a relic of the time when missiles did not reach America.
        And if, for example, the SNV-3 agreement is covered with a furry animal, then it generally becomes simple. It is possible to place atomic weapons in inland waters where it will not be so easy to track them. and instead of nuclear missile carriers it is better to build multipurpose nuclear submarines, which our fleet lacks so much and surface ships.
        1. END
          +2
          10 January 2021 10: 37
          )))
          Not at all. They stand in the bays.
          We tried to place it in Okhotsk too .... They found it out and watched the entire BS.

          K-171 Project 667 B 1985 (July-October). Performed BS in the Hawaiian Islands. Multipurpose PLA pr.671 provided it. Revealed tracking throughout the BS. It didn't work out. After that, the region of the Sea of ​​Okhotsk was "cut" for the BS (this was after the K-219 Britanov accident). 1987-88 (from December 14 to March 3) BS in the region of the Sea of ​​Okhotsk. 8.01.88/142/49.20 check of the absence of tracking of the Tu-153.40 in the Sea of ​​Okhotsk - positive (1.02.1988. 142) .... After confirming the tracking of it, measures to take off. It does not work .... 50.30 check of the absence of tracking of Tu-153.15 in the Sea of ​​Okhotsk - positive (17.02.1988 142). It is taken out into the oceanic zone, but already there on 50.00/156.50/XNUMX the check of the absence of tracking during the return of the Tu-XNUMX is positive (XNUMX XNUMX).

          K-446 Project 667 AU BS December 22, 1986 - March 2, 1987 Kuriles. Checking the absence of tracking of the Il-38 on 26.12.86 (46.50 153.25) -positive.

          K-252 Project 667 AU 19 August 1984 Kuril Islands. Checking the absence of tracking Tu-142 (47.10 153.00) -positive.

          K-451 Project 667 AU March 7, 1984 Kuril Islands. Checking the absence of tracking Be-12 (49.03 156.25) - positive.

          K-451 Project 667 AU September 17, 1984 Kuril Islands. Checking the absence of tracking Be-12 (50.20 156.55) - positive.
          1. 0
            10 January 2021 15: 41
            Quote: FIN
            Detected at the exit and followed the entire BS.

            Colleague, is it okay that you write about the second generation of PLA, which were detected even by a stationary SOSUS for hundreds of miles !?
            But the amy patted the passage 955 to Vilyuchinsk and did not track it, as before. Why? Yes, because its noise level on the MX is 5 times (!) Lower than that of the 971 project (by the way, it is also not a frail car). Of course there are problems, but not as fatal as you wrote to us from your official archive.
            Yours faithfully, hi
            1. END
              -1
              11 January 2021 08: 58
              My comment was deleted. About a Japanese boat in Avacha, Tankovid's unsuccessful exit and his removal from office. I put everything there. Where and how.
              And why did you decide that I put ALL the information I have in my tracking post?
              During a volley in Okhotsk in December, an IPL was detected. I followed the launch. Found already THERE. Obviously, the tail went from Vilyuchinsk behind the SSBN.
              Tankovid's transition from the Northern Fleet was not hidden. Think for yourself how to COVERLY overcome the Bering Strait? Previously, such transfers were announced from the United States. As well as shooting, as well as control checks (it seems up to 5 times a year). Like the Russian Federation, the United States controls.
              But with the nailing of SALT, RIAC, Open Sky, it is not clear how the notification goes ...
              Do Boreas go only to MX? Did the US Navy stay at the 80s level?
              The problems are not fatal. But the Boreys have been in Vilyuchinsk without getting out since 2015.
              I posted about the notification time limit 7-10 minutes earlier.
              They are kept in the database for this very reason.
              We discussed 971 a long time ago at Balancer. Not interesting already. Everyone understands everything.
              1. END
                +1
                11 January 2021 09: 58
                I forgot.
                I dragged everything here.
                With regard to the topic of discussion - "Clean exit and Dirty boat". 2 parts
                https://valcat-8.livejournal.com/38342.html
                https://valcat-8.livejournal.com/38645.html
                150 articles with comments. Reading is tortured.
              2. 0
                15 January 2021 18: 47
                Quote: FIN
                We discussed 971 a long time ago at Balancer. Not interesting already. Everyone understands everything.

                Ilyusha Kurganov as a "source" is not even bad manners, but just a PUMP
                "purely for reference" - "Ritsa-2000" did not go beyond the limit of pieces of paper
            2. The comment was deleted.
            3. 0
              15 January 2021 16: 36
              Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
              But the amy patted the passage 955 to Vilyuchinsk and did not track it, as before

              lol
              it's not even funny (because the transition was OFFICIALLY unhidden)
              but just a childish LIE Monsieur Tankovid
              Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
              why? Yes, because its noise level on the MX is 5 times (!) Lower than that of the 971 project (by the way, it is also not a frail car). Of course there are problems

              still would
              the enemy turns on the "bulbs" of the low-frequency illumination, after his 955 like a fly on the glass with all its low noise
            4. +1
              15 January 2021 18: 48
              Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
              about the second generation of PLA, which was detected even by a stationary SOSUS for hundreds of miles !?

              MUCH more
              especially at the Pacific Fleet

              But the transition 955 to Vilyuchinsk the amy slammed

              these are Tankovid's fables
      2. +1
        10 January 2021 13: 09
        Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
        Ground forces (silos, PGRK) are visible, their place is known, and it is possible to inflict "counterforce RNU" on them.

        Well, no need to fantasize if you are not aware of the flight time to our mine installations. Because they will be able to inflict "counterforce RNA" only through empty mines, and this was never included in their plans and will never enter until they have a TECHNICAL ability to covertly give a command to those means of destruction, the flight time of which will be less than five minutes.
        So far, the Americans do not see this in the foreseeable future, so there is no need to drive a wave, naval commanders ...
        Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
        But where the SSBN will inflict its blow - it is necessary to strain very hard to cover all sectors ...

        This is the ONLY reason why the submarine fleet will develop. But here, too, you are not pointing out that the control system of these forces is not reliable in terms of secrecy and unmasking signs, not to mention that it is vulnerable to the enemy's electronic warfare.
        That is why, given the cost of a kiloton, the fleet is the most expensive and unreliable type of weapons, and therefore either it will be gradually reduced, or the problem will be solved to eliminate these shortcomings. If you know how to get rid of the "birthmarks" of the fleet, then tell us in a popular form, because as far as I know, neither you nor Klimov bother with this, and are ready to present everything as a problem of some private naval weapons.
        1. +1
          10 January 2021 15: 57
          Yes, the submarine fleet should develop and the author is right, speaking about the problems of its development, incl. in terms of the characteristics of the forces ensuring the deployment and duty of SSBNs I agree with "ccsr" that in fact one of the main problems of the fleet is an archaic communication and control system.
        2. +2
          11 January 2021 21: 54
          Quote: ccsr
          flight time to our mine installations. Because they will be able to inflict "counterforce RNU" only on empty mines,
          This is if the Minutemans, and if the Trident with water slots? or with an Ax (AGM-158E?) from the water area of ​​the NSR in the summer? What kind of flight time is an important question, but there is a problem of TIMELY detection of the launch of invisible KRLLs in the positional area, OS and other infrastructure ... Isn't that why we were so puzzled by the continuous radar field in the North?
          Quote: ccsr
          until they have a TECHNICAL ability to covertly issue a command to those means of destruction, the flight time of which will be less than five minutes.
          These issues are systematically worked out in the course of ALL KSHT / KSHU of the strategic command of the US Armed Forces. And in the first echelon they have SSBN / SSGN. And now the Virgins have joined them. Commands via KA-repeaters and even cannot be tracked: continuous "white noise" ...
          Quote: ccsr
          the control system of these forces is not reliable in terms of secrecy and unmasking signs, not to mention the fact that it is vulnerable to the enemy's electronic warfare systems.
          All our forces (RPK SN) are included in a single BU system. The signal for use is received through the spacecraft, being at depth, through the towed "gut". The first sign that it is time to "change for the first time" is the transfer to continuous communication ... With the receipt of the signal, everything is automatic, right up to the removal of the code-locks ... When I served everything was a little more "human". Now almost everything is reduced to pressing the "Button".
          Quote: ccsr
          the navy is the most costly and unreliable type of weapons, and therefore either it will be gradually reduced, or the problem of eliminating these shortcomings will be solved.
          Yes, the navy is an expensive weapon. Reliable when used skillfully. Reduce? No, they will rather lead to reasonable sufficiency. There are problems and they are being solved. Not as fast as we would like, but they are resolved. There are many reasons. Science, technology, professionals ... everywhere there is something to work on.
          Quote: ccsr
          If you know how to get rid of the "birthmarks" of the fleet, then tell us in a popular form
          These are not birthmarks, but rather "white spots". We have many smart people, not very active, strong-willed, decisive, not afraid to go to the end. Podvizhnikov died, with proletarian determination. Everyone has something to lose ...
          Quote: S. Viktorovich
          one of the main problems of the fleet is the archaic communication and control system.
          She is improving. The main direction is through space. It is difficult to suppress, it is guaranteed to bring EPR to the entire water area.
          In general, the conversation is beyond what is permissible. It's worth thinking about.
          Yours faithfully, hi
          1. -2
            12 January 2021 12: 26
            Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
            This is if the Minutemans, and if the Trident with water slots?

            From what water area - explain to begin with.
            Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
            or with an Ax (AGM-158E?) from the water area of ​​the Northern Sea Route in the summer?

            What other subsonic "Ax" is in general a yesterday's day for our air defense, because they learned how to deal with them at the end of the existence of the USSR.
            Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
            What is the flight time is an important question, but there is a problem of TIMELY detection of the launch of invisible KRLLs in the positional area,

            And what will all the other US strategic nuclear forces do at this time - wait for the results of this launch, or should they also begin to prepare in order to simultaneously strike the first strike? Have you even thought about it? Yes, and the flight of cruise missiles itself will not last ten minutes, so that the MASSIVE launch of them will be immediately opened, at least for the operation of the radar:
            A cruise missile continuously measures the altitude of the terrain under its flight path using a radar altimeter and compares the results of these measurements with the readings of a barometric altimeter.

            https://topwar.ru/17195-metody-navigacii-krylatyh-raket.html
            The operation algorithm and frequencies of such altimeters have long been known, and therefore they can be automatically recorded even by small air defense posts.
            1. 0
              15 January 2021 16: 57
              Quote: ccsr
              What other subsonic "Ax" is in general a yesterday's day for our air defense, because they learned how to deal with them at the end of the existence of the USSR.

              warrant officer, YOUR sidekicks (warrant officers) from PYVYo hammered to tell YOU about the PROBABILITIES and the expectation of this "learned"
          2. -2
            12 January 2021 12: 54
            Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
            These issues are systematically worked out in the course of ALL KSHT / KSHU of the strategic command of the US Armed Forces. And in the first echelon they have SSBN / SSGN.

            Yes, they know as well as we do that the actions of their SSBNs are being monitored and those that appear too close to our shores can be destroyed even before the attack starts and the Americans will not even know the reason. We will also keep our SSBNs in the first echelon in relation to American territory, but this does not mean that they will be entrusted with the main task of destroying the United States - our Strategic Missile Forces will be the main element in this process. Although I do not deny that it is precisely the close location of our SSBNs that will make the Americans even more feel like our "iron hand" is squeezing their causal place.
            Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
            All our forces (RPK SN) are included in a single BU system. The signal for use is received through the spacecraft, being at depth, through the towed "gut".

            So this is the most vulnerable link for controlling our submarine forces - firstly, all our satellites are controlled by the Americans, and in a threatened period they will simply suppress them with their own electronic warfare forces or shoot them down (they are doing this kind of work). Secondly, your "gut" itself unmasks the nuclear submarine, and this is also a weak link in the control system. So there will be only one hope for HF radio communication or at VLF stations that they will conduct a short two-way session in order to receive a combat order and confirm with a receipt of its acceptance. And then launch and die with honor, because the enemy will almost immediately determine the coordinates of the ascent and destroy the submarine.
            Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
            Yes, the navy is an expensive weapon. Reliable when used skillfully. Reduce? No, they will rather lead to reasonable sufficiency.

            You and I can only guess about this, but keep in mind that our doctrine with the Strategic Missile Forces was determined by the best minds of the Soviet Union, from academicians to the highest military ranks, who already looked a hundred years ahead. We have no alternative for the Strategic Missile Forces - this is what we must proceed from. And even sixty years after that, we still haven't come up with anything better.
            Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
            The main direction is through space. It is difficult to suppress, it is guaranteed to bring EPR to the entire water area.

            I wonder who told you this? Already in the eighties we did not tie our strategic nuclear forces to space, even from the point of view of delivering commands, and we always knew that space systems would be put out of action during a threatened period. Around that time, work began on the Soviet GLONASS, but they were abandoned because they realized that all this was expensive and unreliable for the army. And only after the collapse of the USSR, these works continued, because it was required by the national economy in the first place. So I don’t share your optimism about space - I have known this topic well since the seventies, and I have a different opinion about its sustainability.
            1. +1
              15 January 2021 16: 55
              Quote: ccsr
              the actions of their SSBNs are being monitored, and those that appear too close to our shores can be destroyed even before the start of the attack and the Americans will not even know the reason.

              fool
              ensign, have a snack! lol
              Quote: ccsr
              all our satellites are controlled by the Americans, and during a threatened period they will simply suppress them with their own electronic warfare forces or shoot them down (they are doing such work).

              fool
              Quote: ccsr
              your "gut" itself unmasks the nuclear submarine,

              wassat
              in short - this is nonsense of an illiterate ensign
              Quote: ccsr
              Already in the eighties we did not tie our strategic nuclear forces to space, even from the point of view of delivering commands, and we always knew

              well, yes, YOU and YOUR sidekick prapory "always knew" lol
              especially after the "fire water"
        3. 0
          15 January 2021 16: 49
          Quote: ccsr
          Well, no need to fantasize if you are not aware of the flight time to our mine installations. Because they will be able to inflict "counterforce RNU" only on empty mines,

          warrant officer, do not talk nonsense hurts her lol
          but go on, "convulsions of strategic thought" wassat from the ensign - warehouse manager, this fellow weekend ahead, make people laugh lol
          Quote: ccsr
          This is the ONLY reason why the submarine fleet will develop

          wassat
          what, however, creative spasms are in the body part on which some warrant officers wear a cap lol
          Quote: ccsr
          Klimov, don't bother too much

          ensign, you'd better bother with stew and footcloths - this is your "level" lol
          how to spank nonsense on issues on which you don’t understand lol
  34. +1
    9 January 2021 14: 30
    And here already some good questions arise:
    "What is it: stupidity or deliberate sabotage and undermining the combat effectiveness of the Russian Navy and Armed Forces? Moreover, undermining precisely the ability to carry out tasks of nuclear deterrence? Who benefits from this? Why is this done? "


    Such a dilemma can arise only when analyzing the short-term stage of the situation. But as the data accumulates, which add up to a clear trend, the reason for doubt disappears. The longer the situation lasts and the more facts that are interpreted as "systemic stupidity" accumulate, the more reason to confidently assert that this is sabotage.

    Because at such a level of hierarchy such a phenomenon as "systemic stupidity" is impossible. People who often over the heads of others, having outstripped or neutralized competitors, sat in high offices, are not at all stupid. Apparatus intrigues and political undercover struggle require quick, flexible, high-quality thinking, for which the ability to clearly understand the real picture and set priorities is vital. Therefore, by definition, there can be no fools at the top. In the absence of a system for the transfer of power by inheritance, there may be scoundrels at the top, but fools are not.

    Therefore, the answer to the question is simple: the leadership is the enemies of the country. Moreover, the enemies are not the state, but the country, because the state is only a special superstructure over the society of the country, which is a mechanism, and in the form in which it is now set up, this mechanism is pursuing a hostile policy towards the country. Those. the country is always one, but at the same time it can have different forms of government in different historical periods, such as: RI, USSR, RF.

    But the state as a computer only clearly implements the program laid down in it, the initiator of the development of which is the leadership. Hence the systematic negative results, which should not be surprised. After all, if you take projects for the fleet, then you will not find a single new project, the functionality of which fully meets the current requirements. And this is 20 years later. Only a naive person can believe that all this is the result of some ridiculous, monstrous accident that has been going on for decades.

    What is the point of fulfilling an order to undermine the combat capability of the fleet? It's very simple. The fleet is both a complex and self-sufficient tool for projecting power outward. In fact, the fleet is an instrument with which military control over the planet is exercised. If there is no efficient fleet, there is no possibility for control. There is no possibility for control, which means that such a country cannot compete with another country that has set itself the goal of having a monopoly on control. Who currently has such a monopoly? USA. In fact, they needed the destruction of the USSR only in order to eliminate a competitor who was preventing them control the entire planet... Accordingly, the main goal of the Russian shipbuilding program is to eliminate the technical ability for the Russian fleet to throw a real challenge to the US fleet. And, what is noteworthy, over the course of 30 years, the combat capability of the fleet has been steadily declining and continues to decline, because old ships are decommissioned, and their place is taken either by ships that are not functioning properly, or generally functioning, but whose functions are partially or completely irrelevant to modern requirements, and then these ships are not competitive. Simply put, the place of old ships is taken by incapacitated ships. Therefore, the solution to all the oddities, absurdities and incomprehensibility is simple - the leadership works in the interests of the United States.
    1. -3
      9 January 2021 15: 16
      Quote: A_Lex
      Simply put, the place of old ships is taken by incapacitated ships

      The most curious thing is that a similar process is going on in the USA! request
      1. +2
        9 January 2021 15: 22
        a similar process is underway in the USA


        Lying.
        1. 0
          9 January 2021 15: 28
          Quote: A_Lex
          Lying.

          you are badly educated and poorly educated ... request
          I give examples:
          1) Zamwolt was created instead of EM type Arlie Berg;
          2) LCS launched instead of Perry-class frigates request
          1. +2
            9 January 2021 15: 42
            I give examples:


            The examples are incorrect, since these are separate experimental projects that do not affect the overall combat effectiveness of the fleet as a whole. The Arlie Burke series of destroyers is under construction and continues to be built. Zamvolt was originally planned in the amount of 32 pieces. Subsequently, the series was reduced to 3.
            You give deliberately incorrect examples, knowing full well that they are incorrect. Therefore, you are deliberately manipulating and doing so in the interests of the United States. Those. to put it simply, you are doing the usual propaganda. For this reason, further communication with you is impractical.

            you are badly educated and poorly educated ...


            Lying.
            1. 0
              14 January 2021 19: 33
              Quote: A_Lex
              You give deliberately incorrect examples, knowing full well that they are incorrect.

              this is in your understanding so, no more request the rest of the saliva is ridiculous and self-fucking ... bully

              Quote: A_Lex
              Amvolt was originally planned in the amount of 32 pieces. Subsequently, the series was reduced to 3.

              why was it cut? bully
              Quote: A_Lex
              and doing it in the interests of the United States. Those. to put it simply, you are doing the usual propaganda. For this reason, further communication with you is impractical.

              fi, you are not just badly brought up, but also from informers ... bully
        2. -1
          9 January 2021 22: 55
          In fact, your opponent is right.
          1. +3
            10 January 2021 01: 30
            In fact, your opponent is right.


            Of course no. The Russian fleet has lost its combat effectiveness against the background of the late USSR model fleet. And the US Navy has not lost its combat effectiveness. The rest doesn't count.
  35. -2
    9 January 2021 15: 01
    The article is so voluminous that to disassemble it all by theses and chapters is to write an even more voluminous article that no one will read, and spend several times more time on it than the author spent on his own. After all, you will have to operate (unlike the author) not with references to unknown experts, unnamed sources in the navy, not with propaganda clichés, but with real figures with performance characteristics, quantity, economic and industrial potential not only of ours, but also of potential opponents. After all, the author did not even give the main figures, not only of our watercraft and their weapons, but even more so did not provide information about what we will face with a potential enemy. And even more so, he did not bother to link our economic and production capabilities of the country with his Wishlist and compare them with the capabilities of adversaries. They say that if the reader wants to, he himself can rummage on the Internet and find all this information, but he, you see, lack of time, take his word for it.
    1. +4
      9 January 2021 15: 30
      Quote: Ivan_Ivanov
      its whole by theses and chapters

      defeat the author using one thesis as an example, so that readers see you are right, and not a desire to gloss over the problems ... request
      1. -2
        9 January 2021 16: 47
        Third. Marine underwater weapons (MPS) and countermeasures ...
        ... photos of loading torpedo junk USET-80 on the newest APCR project 955 ...
        Today, the "strategist" ammunition includes only one type of naval underwater weapon - the morally and technically obsolete USET-80 torpedoes (even the year they were put into service - the 80th ...

        What are the submarines of our "partners" armed with?
        Los Angeles nuclear submarine ... and Mark 48 ADCAP torpedoes. Torpedoes "Gould Mark 48" ... (Wikipedia)
        Type "Seawolf" ... torpedoes Mk 48 ADCAP (http://zonwar.ru)
        Date of adoption of the Mk 48 torpedo - 1972 (Wikipedia)
        Yes, the Mark 48 ADCAP is an upgrade of this torpedo made in 1988. To what I say in the spirit of the author of the article - how deep is this upgrade? there is every reason to believe from reliable sources from the Pentagon that the modernization was only on paper, but in fact it was cutting the dough.
        And what about the modernization of our torpedoes? Why is the author silent about this ??? Meanwhile:
        USET-80 "Getit" / product 2503 (1988), USET-80K "Ceramics" (1989), USET-80KM (1993), USET-80-500 (1994), UETT (1999 g.), USET-80 OKR 2010
        That is, the author's torpedoes, which were put into service in 1988, are "morally and technically obsolete junk." But compared to WHAT? Compared to American torpedoes in 1972 ??? At the same time, both American and our torpedoes were modernized.
        At the same time, American torpedoes are in service with multipurpose nuclear submarines, designed specifically to combat enemy boats and ships, and ours are on SSBNs.
        .
        The same can be said about the counter-torpedoes, which (in my opinion of an amateur) are NOT present in any fleet of the world. There were none in the USSR either. But their absence is presented by the author as a CATASTROPHE !!!!!!

        Is it enough?

        My conclusion is that the author is a propagandist-all-consuming propagandist.
        1. -2
          9 January 2021 16: 50
          Error instead of: "our torpedoes entered service in 1988"
          .
          Read: "our torpedoes entered service in 1980"
        2. 0
          9 January 2021 18: 24
          You fool, all 48s in the 2000s were upgraded to the level of mod.7, with digital signal processing, and a broadband CCH capable of detecting even low-frequency oscillations, as a result, if against mod6 and below you can create a working GPT, then against seven is NOT IN PRINCIPLE, it is contrary to the laws of nature.
          And if she followed you, then either anti-torpedoes, or you are a dead man, just no options.

          You don't know the subject from the word at all, why talk nonsense?
          1. +1
            9 January 2021 23: 25
            Are you trying to insult me ​​with the intention that I take offense, take a pose and start insulting you in return, or stop objecting? Well, that means I'm right and you have no other arguments and methods.
            .
            Have ALL MK 48 torpedoes been upgraded? (as you claim) Where did you get this information? Straight from the Pentagon?
            We often encountered enemy weapons that were considered invincible. Tiger tanks, U-2 planes and similar wunderwales. Well, and such a deadly torpedo Mk 48 7 modification for the time being. Also, the author did not bother to provide information on our latest modifications of torpedoes, simply calling them junk. "Bias" is too soft a word for this approach. Rather, the term "manipulation of facts" is more appropriate.
            .
            Also, in the previous article "Fundamentals of Shipbuilding Policy: Principles and Their Application" the author convinces the reader that it is necessary to build ships with proven, efficient systems that are already being mass-produced. That's exactly what they do with Boreas. They install waste systems that are NOT FACT, which is worse than American ones. So it is not known who will emerge victorious in a hypothetical collision. But the author still convinces that without counter-torpedoes (which no one has and never had) nowhere, and the submarines are not combat-ready.
            So what happens? Do we need to stop production and acceptance of SSBNs into the fleet until hypothetical counter-torpedoes are ready? Why, in the case of corvettes, the author proposes to equip ships with waste, serial samples, albeit outdated (not fact, and inferior (not fact) to the enemy in terms of performance characteristics, and SSBN proposes to equip non-existent systems, and if there are none, then everything is lost? combat duty is impossible?
            1. -1
              10 January 2021 00: 28
              Have ALL MK 48 torpedoes been upgraded? (as you claim) Where did you get this information? Straight from the Pentagon?


              All. Let's just say, from the Pentagon in the rehash of a couple of residents, a dozen signalmen and then a couple of officers.
              And if it's no joke, then these things are not secret in the West.

              So what happens? Do we need to stop production and acceptance of SSBNs into the fleet until hypothetical counter-torpedoes are ready?


              They were ready back in 1998.

              On this my bead gun overheats, you are free.
              1. -1
                10 January 2021 11: 15
                Another low, pathetic, unworthy attempt to insult your opponent on your part, which once again prove that you have no arguments and that I am right.

                I am very glad that you are NOT an active officer in our army.
                1. 0
                  15 January 2021 18: 31
                  Quote: Ivan_Ivanov
                  Another low, pathetic, unworthy attempt to insult your opponent on your part, which once again prove that you have no arguments and that I am right.
                  I am very glad that you are NOT an active officer in our army.

                  with this "flow" ... wassat - to "ducks"
              2. +1
                15 January 2021 18: 11
                Quote: timokhin-aa
                They were ready back in 1998.

                were not ready
                but the first option was just then
                on targets such as MK48 were quite functional
            2. +1
              15 January 2021 18: 29
              Quote: Ivan_Ivanov
              Have ALL MK 48 torpedoes been upgraded?

              in BC - all
              Quote: Ivan_Ivanov
              Where did you get this information? Straight from the Pentagon?

              contract published
              and taking into account the fact that they loaded the first "7" on the submarine back in 2006 ...
              Quote: Ivan_Ivanov
              We often encountered enemy weapons that were considered invincible. Tiger tanks, U-2 planes and similar wunderwales.

              with this "argumentation" wassat if you please, to the murzilka lol
              Quote: Ivan_Ivanov
              SSBNs until hypothetical counter-torpedoes are ready?

              nifiga se "hypothetical" belay
              they were OBLIGED to be at 955 according to State contracts and customer requirements!
              angry
          2. -1
            10 January 2021 07: 31
            Our torpedo Fizik-2 (Case) should be at least at the level of MK-48 mod.7?
            1. +1
              15 January 2021 18: 08
              Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
              Our torpedo Fizik-2 (Case) should be at least at the level of MK-48 mod.7?

              Fizika-2 - NO, this is a "paper torpedo" from the past
              Case - WILL be deliberately worse than MK-48 mod.7 (2006) - for purely organizational reasons
        3. +1
          14 January 2021 19: 36
          Quote: Ivan_Ivanov
          Is it enough?

          yes, you accuse the author of doing yourself ... request Below Timokhin answered request
        4. 0
          15 January 2021 18: 41
          Quote: Ivan_Ivanov
          Date of adoption of the Mk 48 torpedo - 1972 (Wikipedia)

          fool
          Do not hurt bullshit, it hurts!
          the fact that in BC - mod7 - 2006 (at the same time, at least 5 software options for it were changed, and for each of them, the US Navy fired more shots than ALL firing statistics by Physicists)
          Quote: Ivan_Ivanov
          And what about the modernization of our torpedoes? Why is the author silent about this ??? Meanwhile:
          USET-80 "Getit" / product 2503 (1988), USET-80K "Ceramics" (1989), USET-80KM (1993), USET-80-500 (1994), UETT (1999 g.),

          the author wrote about this a long time ago - there is still the same "Ceramics" which was "fought with MK46 1961)
          and all this is the intake of TNK "Dastan" (Kyrgyzstan)

          Quote: Ivan_Ivanov
          USET-80 OKR 2010

          wassat
          just ask what "Kant" is belay
          Quote: Ivan_Ivanov
          There were none in the USSR either. But their absence is presented by the author as a CATASTROPHE !!!!!!

          for us - YES
          and the enemy has an EFFECTIVE SPD PTZ
          Quote: Ivan_Ivanov
          My conclusion is that the author is a propagandist-all-consuming propagandist.

          YOU have no "conclusions", but only an illiterate nonsense
    2. 0
      15 January 2021 17: 00
      Quote: Ivan_Ivanov
      After all, you will have to operate (unlike the author) not with references to unknown experts, unnamed sources in the fleet, not propaganda cliches, but real figures with performance characteristics, the number

      there is a priest
      Quote: Ivan_Ivanov
      economic and industrial potential not only of ours, but also of potential opponents

      and there is a complete ass
      Quote: Ivan_Ivanov
      and he, you see, lack of time

      I really have no time for beads
  36. +2
    9 January 2021 15: 14
    A sad picture, it looks like serious organizational conclusions on the Navy are needed request
    1. -1
      9 January 2021 16: 55
      will be detected by low-frequency acoustic illumination (up to aviation buoys).

      Aviation can and will get to the place of SSBN duty (if it is not knocked down), but after spending 3 hours, and it is necessary to drop several buoys in the area of ​​the submarine's supposed duty, deploy their antennas, get the coordinates of the SSBN, fly to the target point, drop a deep torpedo , and all this takes time. And it is not a fact that there is no active antiphase suppression of low-frequency acoustic illumination on modern SSBNs. SSBNs at low speed at a depth of more than 300 m are not visible under water by satellite means.
      It is much easier and faster to detect BZHRK satellites using side-scan AFAR and optical telescopes by obtaining a multispectral image of railways in real time and analyzing it with artificial intelligence.
      it is impossible to defend against such detection

      You can defend yourself - by stopping the course to the smallest. After reducing the underwater speed to the smallest wake, there will be no wake. Then, from the side-looking radar of Poseidon aircraft and satellites, only the breaking trail will be visible. The place where the surfaced wake fell off is where the submarine stalled underwater. The remaining surfaced wake trail from the underwater course at high speed will gradually blur and will no longer be visible against the background of the noise of the sea, in the same way as the contrail of an aircraft disappears.
      1. 0
        9 January 2021 21: 05
        Both the BZHRK and the submarine wake can be found in some conditions, in some not. Those. these are not arguments for the choice of priority funding for certain developments. More robust analysis is required.
  37. -3
    9 January 2021 16: 55
    Klimov writes a provocateur. Why is he allowed to do this
    1. 0
      9 January 2021 18: 24
      Because all this is true in the first place, and because we have freedom of speech in the second place.
    2. 0
      15 January 2021 17: 04
      Quote: nikolai.shupenin
      Klimov writes a provocateur. Why is he allowed to do this

      1. judging by YOUR post, YOU are the provocateur
      2. a couple of months ago they tried to fabricate a case against me, I had already been to "meat grinders", so I managed to "turn the chessboard 180"
  38. 0
    9 January 2021 17: 06
    It would be possible to be lousy, like "The fleet is too expensive, but the naval uniform is painfully beautiful wassat

    But in reality, the quantitative factor (i.e. in the Russian Federation there are 140 million inhabitants, that is, minds, and NATO + Yankees + unfriendly to us - about 1 billion). from this number they choose, train and give a job in the design bureau ten times more than in the Russian Federation. About the technological level and finance, what can you compare? So who can develop new torpedoes? In the past decades, too, we have always caught up with the development of adversaries. For torpedo weapons for sure. He himself studied at the PF "torpedo faculty" Korabelki - LKI.
    1. +1
      9 January 2021 17: 19
      Young friend, you are wrong. In the 70s, algorithms for targeting torpedoes, etc. were calculated on the PF. quite intellectual things that still make sense. I remember coursework with Associate Professor Kanishchev.
  39. +3
    9 January 2021 19: 01
    The article, in my provincial opinion, is too multifaceted.
    "it is clear that he carried out a two-missile salvo from neighboring mines located near the sub's midship (accordingly, there is reason to think about the fact that they were afraid to fire a salvo, to put it mildly)."
    How would it be logical. Why not?..
    "Given the enemy's enormous superiority in naval theaters, and his effective anti-submarine forces, the opinion about the need to carry most of the deployed delivery vehicles and warheads into the sea is nothing more than an information sabotage (which was very successfully imposed on us."
    The opponents had and still have a huge superiority all the way. If only due to the fact that there are many of them. And the Russian Federation, unfortunately, is one.

    "At the same time, the country is pouring enormous funds into the submarine (and especially on the Bulava and Borei), which are mastered by effective managers in the industry."
    Pro managers. This is bad.
    Pro-melting is more good than bad.
    Boatmen are very brave musicians. They (the falcons) are not sorry for anything. Considering that there are by no means millions of them. And these are highly trained people in their area of ​​the national economy.
    "Allegedly, the newest APCRs are accepted by the Navy with ancient and non-working underwater weapons, without protection and with critical design flaws of the ships."
    Well, I would not argue so categorically however.
    Not a single warship, especially of this level, goes to sea with inoperative weapons, without protection and with critical design flaws ... Bo this is crew suicide (and crew training is expensive / long and tedious) plus the self-drowning of the steamer (and this is arch expensive pleasure).
    1. +1
      15 January 2021 17: 05
      Quote: Petrol cutter
      Not a single warship, especially of this level, goes to sea with inoperative weapons, without protection and with critical design flaws ..

      THIS IS EXACTLY SO
      Quote: Petrol cutter
      Bo is crew suicide (and crew training is expensive / long and tedious)
      plus the self-drowning of the steamer (and this is an extremely expensive pleasure).

      THIS IS EXACTLY SO
  40. +2
    9 January 2021 19: 18
    Well, yes ... one cap-three retired is smarter than everyone ... well, it happens
    1. 0
      15 January 2021 17: 07
      Quote: Andrey VOV
      Well, yes ... one cap-three retired is smarter than everyone ... well, it happens

      is
      but in this case the question is not who is smarter, but who did not break down and did not turn on the reverse gear
  41. 0
    9 January 2021 19: 54
    From the entire cycle of articles, I realized that in the event of a war, we pissed away the sea a little less than completely. At the same time, it is no secret to anyone that the fleet is financed on a leftover basis. Hence the question: maybe, in the event of a future war, the ships won't be needed by anyone, and, from the point of view of the military-political leadership, everything is going as it should?
    1. +3
      9 January 2021 20: 04
      We have all possible opponents except for Ukraine overseas
      1. 0
        9 January 2021 21: 24
        Fact of the day, however. So what about strategy?
        1. +18
          9 January 2021 23: 01
          Quote: Hwostatij
          So what about strategy?

          The military-political leadership is not going to fight. The strategy is to protect the pipe and gas carriers - whatever they get arrested. And of course the parades.
      2. 0
        10 January 2021 16: 04
        Quote: timokhin-aa
        We have all possible opponents except for Ukraine overseas

        Lies - we have a land border with China, and the European NATO countries, where the US troops are based, generally have a common border with us. So the opponents are not as far away as someone wants to promote the idea of ​​creating a powerful surface fleet.
        1. -1
          11 January 2021 01: 20
          Ensign, Mongolia is not our enemy, by any chance? You have already decided.

          For your information:
          USA
          Shaving
          Japan,
          Turkey

          They have no common border with us. War with China is politically impossible so far.

          Do you want to fantasize about the invasion from Poland and the Baltics? But there it will be necessary to first resolve the issue of communications in the Baltic.
          Well, Norway, but it's not serious.
          1. -2
            11 January 2021 09: 15
            No one will sail in the Baltic there, just in the morning the tanks will arrive in Riga, Tallinn and Vilna.
            1. +1
              11 January 2021 10: 48
              And if they are not parties to the conflict? Will they come too?
              1. -1
                11 January 2021 15: 40
                And Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxembourg were participants in the Franco-German conflict in the First and Second World Wars?
                1. +1
                  11 January 2021 17: 54
                  Remind me how the policy "let's dramatically increase the number of countries we are at war with" ended for Germany both times?
          2. -2
            11 January 2021 12: 47
            Quote: timokhin-aa
            Ensign, Mongolia is not our enemy, by any chance?

            It seems that they have not moved away from the holidays, although you often carry nonsense even without holiday libations. Did they teach you in Ukraine to cover up your illiteracy with scoffing?
            Quote: timokhin-aa
            A war with China is politically impossible so far.

            "Bye" is what time period, educate "strategist".
            After all, the fleet will be built for more than one decade, I would like to hear your "smart forecast".

            Quote: timokhin-aa
            Do you want to fantasize about the invasion from Poland and the Baltics?

            From there, strikes can be delivered on our missiles if the Americans seriously take up the deployment of missile defense systems in Europe, as they did in Poland and Romania.
            Quote: timokhin-aa
            But there it will be necessary to first resolve the issue of communications in the Baltic.

            You are living the day before yesterday - why don't the Americans care about communications in the Baltic when they deliver a preemptive strike, if they decide to do so.
            1. +1
              11 January 2021 17: 53
              Something came to my mind - why should I stoop to read what you write?

              Let us from now on, except in cases when I want to quarrel, I will ignore you as if you do not exist at all.

              I'm tired of you, ensign.
              1. -2
                11 January 2021 19: 13
                Quote: timokhin-aa
                I'm tired of you, ensign.

                Merged, verbiage, however, another was not expected, because you cannot correctly answer a single question, So you are filled with a nightingale, but in fact a pissed-off dummy ...
                1. 0
                  15 January 2021 17: 10
                  Quote: ccsr
                  Merged, verbiage,

                  monsieur warrant officer - YOU merged
                  with its enchanting delirium and nonsense lol
                  starting with "tracked US Navy SSBNs" wassat
            2. 0
              15 January 2021 17: 12
              Quote: ccsr
              nafig to the Americans communications in the Baltic when delivering a preemptive strike, if they decide to do so.

              fool
              hmm ... cause-and-effect relationships for the ensign of the TsTSSR are unknown
    2. 0
      15 January 2021 17: 08
      Quote: Hwostatij
      it's no secret that the fleet is financed on a leftover basis.

      nothing like this
      Borey-Bulava is the most expensive military program of the Russian Federation
      1. -1
        16 January 2021 17: 58
        Surface fleet was meant, of course
  42. +2
    9 January 2021 19: 59
    “This does not in any way negate the need for NSNF in principle. As a means of a guaranteed retaliatory strike.

    Alas, today it is not absolutely guaranteed. "
    No hit is absolutely guaranteed.
    Neither reciprocal nor welcoming ... That is the strategy of containment.
    Each of the opponents stupidly does not know how events will actually unfold.
    And if you don't know what to do, DO NOT DO ANYTHING !!
    And don't touch anything with your hands!
    1. 0
      15 January 2021 17: 13
      Quote: Petrol cutter
      No hit is absolutely guaranteed.
      Neither reciprocal nor welcoming ... That is the strategy of containment.

      NONSENSE
  43. +3
    9 January 2021 20: 05
    It must be understood that there was no military or technical sense in this 4-rocket salvo.

    The author goes overboard and strongly. I don't know what about the technical meaning, but politically, it was definitely impossible to limit the launch of one rocket. The Americans wrote for a reason: "This is how Armageddon will look like!"

    I agree with many of the author's statements about the sad level of our Navy, but the author clearly and strongly distorts the blanket in his favor. There is no reason to consider the naval submarine and the Navy as a whole the main and primary goals of emergency investment. The fate of Russia has never been decided at sea.

    The situation as a whole is really extremely dangerous, but investing the last funds in the fleet will become a big stupidity .. Our fate will indeed be decided by missiles and warheads, but not by waterfowl .. It is obvious that we have already lost dominance in the sea, and this is the situation for the next decades at best.
    1. -1
      15 January 2021 17: 16
      Quote: Saxahorse
      but the author clearly and strongly distorts pulling out the blanket in his favor

      YOU blah blah blah or can you argue in detail?
      Quote: Saxahorse
      There is no reason to consider the sea submarine and the Navy as a whole as the main and primary goals of emergency investment.

      these are YOUR personal fantasies
      funds are sufficient - within the limits allocated by the Navy
      the question of what they are spent on
      1. 0
        15 January 2021 22: 07
        Quote: Fizik M
        funds are sufficient - within the limits allocated by the Navy

        Funds are, in principle, above the roof, it is enough to remember all kinds of reserve funds. They do not know how to invest them wisely, so they lie until they are depreciated.

        But it's about something else. Correctly pointing out the extremely dangerous, almost pre-war situation (or maybe not almost), the author sets the priorities incorrectly. The only chance to keep the enemy from war is of course nuclear missiles. But the bet on the Premier League is clearly wrong. To ensure their stability, an entire fleet must be built urgently. Otherwise, these are just targets standing on the base. But a serious fleet almost from scratch is decades, but they are no longer these decades. We need other solutions and urgently.
        1. -1
          15 January 2021 23: 33
          Quote: Saxahorse
          The only chance to keep the enemy from war is of course nuclear missiles.

          no
          Quote: Saxahorse
          But a serious fleet almost from scratch is decades, but they are no longer these decades.


          we will be beaten where we are weak
          and at a level known to be below the nuclear threshold
          1. -1
            16 January 2021 22: 19
            Yes.

            The nuclear threshold just determines the moment when they begin to beat us. As soon as the States consider their losses acceptable, they will give an informal "Ok" to raise rates.

            By all indications, this moment has already been overcome. START-3 rules out the complete destruction of the States and guarantees the destruction of the Russian Federation. The losses will be huge, but the coronavirus has clearly shown that the US elite does not care about the losses of millions of Americans. The tale of "unacceptable losses" is dead.

            PS minus is not mine, but I also think that you are wrong.
  44. 0
    9 January 2021 21: 13
    I liked the article, but the claim to all-propriety is completely unnecessary. If only because the author does not know the true characteristics of the incoming weapons. Which can be upgraded without publicity. In addition, there is the practice of the RF Ministry of Defense to present some characteristics, and then it turns out that everything is different. For example, the same Caliber was presented as a 300 km weapon. By the way, I remember how there was an article and a noise about why there are ships with such weapons in the Caspian Sea)))
    You also need to understand that it may be trivial to lack money. Therefore, they choose the most priority things. SSBNs usually go to the database under cover, and when he went out into the open, then looking for him is just troublesome. The adversary will not shower the entire ocean with buoys. And he needs torpedoes for self-defense. If there is a problem with them, then they just haven't reached it yet. Will reach.
    1. END
      0
      12 January 2021 17: 37
      SSBNs usually go to the database under cover, and when he went out into the open, then looking for him is just troublesome. The foe will not shower the entire ocean with buoys.
      The cover is the reason for unmasking))) Approximately from the 70s.
      They don't go where they want. Imagine a field with a groove, bushes, a ravine on it .... A sniper will remove you from running directly. Crawl using bushes and grooves.
      Currents, bottom profile, depths, drops - all this has been studied to the holes for 70 years.
      Also a magnetometer. maps for location correction. Subv. lighthouses (with RTGs), shipping routes, fishing areas ... SOSUS and other things. And where they can, they are waiting there.
      There was such a feint with the ears - K-524 ... I slipped through. We didn’t try again, they closed the "hole in the fence"
      1. -2
        14 January 2021 22: 18
        I agree, but at the Pacific Fleet it is easier to go to the operas. spaciousness. Again, you can "shoot" in Canada without breaking through to the Atlantic. In general, a base in Nicaragua or Cuba is needed!)))
        1. -1
          15 January 2021 17: 23
          Quote: Saboteur
          at the Pacific Fleet it is easier to go to the operas. spaciousness

          Yeah
          "by the throat" they immediately take
          Quote: Saboteur
          In general, a base in Nicaragua or Cuba is needed!)))

          fool
    2. -1
      15 January 2021 17: 21
      Quote: Saboteur
      If only because the author does not know the true characteristics of the incoming weapons

      are known
      Quote: Saboteur
      That can be upgraded without publicity

      purely for reference - the real work on the "Case" (in the form in which it will go to the Navy) began only after the author's statement to the Main Aircraft Production Association in the fall of 2015.
      Quote: Saboteur
      You also need to understand that it may be trivial to lack money. Therefore, they choose the most priority things.

      uh-huh - wishlist "reputable businessmen" like "golden tower"
      Quote: Saboteur
      SSBNs usually go to the database under cover

      WHAT "COVER"?
      ancient minesweepers? and the same ancient IPC?
      a pair of corvettes without PLUR? or non-combatant anti-submarine aircraft of the Navy?
  45. -1
    9 January 2021 22: 12
    “What to ask“ Ash ”?

    "A-ah! In the autumn of the fields
    The tired Northwind is torn!
    (c) Natalya Markova
  46. +2
    9 January 2021 23: 06
    with all due respect to the author and the questions raised in the article, there is one remark! I’m reading this on VO for the fifth time, probably. with the same quotes, the same conclusions. it is necessary to diversify somehow. otherwise it is already flood and spam.
    you are skillful authors. play out a battle at the same Pacific Fleet between ours and the Japanese. it will be more interesting to read, and people will be imbued with it. and pour from empty to empty? well, so-so occupation.
    1. 0
      15 January 2021 17: 29
      Quote: DrVintorez
      I read on VO for the fifth time probably. with the same quotes, the same conclusions. it is necessary to diversify somehow. otherwise it is already flood and spam.

      if necessary, we will write for the tenth time, because the topic is hot and worth it
      to "diversify", there are serious limitations, I would not say too much and not run into
      Quote: DrVintorez
      play out a battle at the same Pacific Fleet between ours and the Japanese. it will be more interesting to read, and people will be imbued with

      1.in the plan is
      2.people have already been imbued with - almost 100 thousand reads - because the TOPIC is REALLY IMPORTANT
      Quote: DrVintorez
      and pour from empty to empty?

      nifiga itself "empty" - FULL UNSECURITY OF BATTLE STABILITY MSYAS
  47. +2
    9 January 2021 23: 31
    1. Thanks to the author for the article. It is sad to see how the topical issues of the development of the Russian Navy are not being resolved (despite the fact that there are not so many technical problems, mostly organizational).
    2. In general, the state of our Navy and the tendencies of its development lead to memories of the conservatory (in which something needs to be corrected) and the plumbing from an old joke (... the system needs to be changed).
  48. -2
    10 January 2021 00: 13
    Quote: Usher
    Quote: Xscorpion
    This hysterical woman got it already. When she already realizes that it is impossible to assess the combat readiness of the fleet and the army from the photo, because journalists are allowed to shoot only what they are allowed to. This can be both information and disinformation. That there is a certain threshold of secrecy, the author also does not in the course, and one gets the impression that he never served, and he was fake and did not climb out of his offices, and saw the submarines only from photo reports. In his sick opinion, the commander of the Navy must personally report to him about all firing and combat launches. let him explain how the Americans will mine the areas of the Pacific Fleet's combat patrol in the Sea of ​​Okhotsk?

    The person is worried. And writes his thoughts. I am also fond of, and what I know is suggestive. Smart people always analyze information.

    Smart people have the brains to understand that the photo is only what a potential enemy should know.
    1. +2
      10 January 2021 00: 32
      You are simply not in the subject, as we are with the secrecy of things.
    2. 0
      15 January 2021 17: 30
      Quote: Xscorpion
      Smart people have the brains to understand that the photo is only what a potential enemy should know.

      relax - you definitely do not belong to smart lol
      otherwise I wouldn't write my nonsense
  49. -1
    10 January 2021 00: 15
    Quote: Bearded
    Quote: Xscorpion
    This hysterical woman got it already. When she already realizes that it is impossible to assess the combat readiness of the fleet and the army from the photo, because journalists are allowed to shoot only what they are allowed to. This can be both information and disinformation. That there is a certain threshold of secrecy, the author also does not in the course, and one gets the impression that he never served, and he was fake and did not climb out of his offices, and saw the submarines only from photo reports. In his sick opinion, the commander of the Navy must personally report to him about all firing and combat launches. let him explain how the Americans will mine the areas of the Pacific Fleet's combat patrol in the Sea of ​​Okhotsk?

    The author is a professional and knows the situation from the inside. In addition, he has insider information from former colleagues about the current state of the fleet, USC and the combat capabilities of the fleet.

    The author was dismissed in disgrace by a drop, there is a cap-three left. And his insiders are the same drinking companions.
    1. +2
      10 January 2021 00: 32
      Stop talking nonsense.
    2. -3
      10 January 2021 13: 23
      Quote: Xscorpion
      The author was dismissed in disgrace by a drop, there is a cap-three left. And his insiders are the same drinking companions.

      I wonder how reliable your information is, because I have long suspected that he is one of the "offended" at best, and at worst - "sick care". But the word "in shame" put me on my guard, as did the fact that he had been promoted in reserve under such an article. Tell me in more detail (if you know) the story of this "theorist of building a fleet", because the performance is starting to be interesting.
      1. 0
        15 January 2021 17: 35
        Quote: ccsr
        the story of this "naval theorist" because the show starts to get interesting.

        warrant officer, and you see not by the stew and footcloths
        but by closets and sewers
    3. 0
      15 January 2021 17: 33
      Quote: Xscorpion
      Author dismissed in disgrace by a drop, in stock a cap-three

      Monsieur FAVORITE, but will not YOU deign to somehow "confirm" your nonsense documents?
      all the more so below YOU vividly showed interest in my service, actually having signed that you know nothing
  50. -2
    10 January 2021 00: 24
    Quote: timokhin-aa
    The author served first in the submarine, then in the PAD department, after being transferred to the reserve, he developed an MPS, in the "Region", he still continues to work in the defense industry, the last closed task is the summer of 2020.
    The author is more than in the subject on the issues described.

    What armored car are you driving from now?

    If you come to me, then I don't see anything in the author that fits the definition of a submarine officer. And I see a staff hysteria. And I also know that this author, by some miracle, is now working for a certain defense industry company, and advertises his goods, and And yet surprisingly by chance, it was at his enterprise that there were cases of arrests of American spies who transmitted data on torpedoes, including Physics, for which the author was so drowning, to their owners. There were arrests and arrests, but apparently not That's what I want to say. Let him write more.
    1. +2
      10 January 2021 00: 31
      If you come to me, then I do not see anything in the author that fits the definition of a submarine officer.


      A well-known man, and what boats he served on is also known.

      And the staff hysterical I see


      Yes, a good fellow can be seen on the snot. And that the staff are not the crew already? The smartest people in the sun. But the author is not a staff member.

      And I also know that this author, by some miracle, is now working for a certain defense industry company, and advertises his goods, and, accordingly, wraps around others


      Did the voices in your head sing to you?

      This is what I want to say.


      I can imagine how you break your head in spring and autumn. Horror...
      1. -2
        10 January 2021 01: 09
        ... A well-known man, and what boats he served on is also known.

        Well, tell me where he served and in what years, or is it more secret than whining about the operating nuclear submarines and their features?
        1. 0
          15 January 2021 17: 42
          Quote: Xscorpion
          Well, tell me where he served and in what years, or is it more secret than whining about the operating nuclear submarines and their features?

          To whom?
          a deliberate BREAK (in YOUR face) that JAKOB "knows everything about me" wassat
    2. 0
      15 January 2021 17: 40
      Quote: Xscorpion
      If you come to me, then I see nothing in the author

      and what can "see" a deceitful TRAP in YOUR face?
      Quote: Xscorpion
      this author, by some miracle, is now working for a certain defense industry company, and advertises his goods, and, accordingly, wraps around others

      bunny, be weasel - explain this your WAVING IN LANGUAGE with specifics and facts
      or "bring the materiel to the original" (otherwise you will inadvertently bite your tongue)
      Quote: Xscorpion
      And still surprisingly by chance, it was at his enterprise that there were cases of detention of American spies who transmitted data on torpedoes, including Physics

      looking forward to the details angry
      I promise I DO NOT HIT WITH YOUR FEET AND DO NOT LAUGH LOUDLY
  51. -1
    10 January 2021 00: 33
    Quote: oracul
    Strange feeling from the article. The fact that there are problems, then where they are not. Only those who do nothing are not mistaken. Excessive detailing, conclusions about the unreadiness of our submarine fleet for a meeting with the enemy, somewhat resembles a report (to whom?) About the state of affairs, covered with a veil of objectivity.

    That’s right. This author’s articles resemble a full-fledged report to his management.
    1. 0
      15 January 2021 17: 43
      Quote: Xscorpion
      That’s right. This author’s articles resemble a full-fledged report to his management.

      bunny, "level" wassat your "conclusions" - children's ducks swimming in your sofa
  52. -1
    10 January 2021 00: 53
    Quote: Dread
    Quote: Alexander1971
    To characterize the author of the article in this way, it is necessary to analyze all his theses step by step and refute them with your arguments.

    Aleksandr 1971 - when the author of the article, not understanding radar and the physics of interception, shows his complete illiteracy in intercepting an air target by the "Thundering" at a distance of 9 km, and at the same time blaming the developers of Zaslon, this speaks volumes about these authors: Klimov and Timokhin, it would be better not to touch these topics - the profane in this ...

    I agree completely, I myself have a connection to air defense, and these claims of theirs would be ridiculous even for second-year cadets at an air defense school. It’s better to let him climb further under the water and lick his torpedoes, at least he saw them in a picture.
    1. 0
      15 January 2021 17: 45
      Quote: Xscorpion
      I agree completely, I myself am related to air defense

      Taking into account that, Dread in his posts simply wrote TECHNICAL BS, YOU, monsieur, if you had something to do with something, it was pYwO-oooo lol
      Eat
  53. -1
    10 January 2021 00: 58
    Space is the key to everything.
    And not a night flight to Venus, but the placement of tracking, guidance and weapons systems there. Apparently, the Americans are moving in this direction, stirring up something with their space plane.
    And here we can neither lose nor lag behind, but it is advisable to discard all the drooling about the “non-militarization of space”, as well as about the “non-proliferation of nuclear weapons” and win!
    At hyper speeds, almost vertically downwards, any cast iron head of sufficient mass will tear apart any aircraft carrier, destroyer or cruiser. With any of its electronic warfare, lasers and railguns.
  54. -2
    10 January 2021 01: 03
    Quote: timokhin-aa
    If you come to me, then I do not see anything in the author that fits the definition of a submarine officer.


    A well-known man, and what boats he served on is also known.

    And the staff hysterical I see


    Yes, a good fellow can be seen on the snot. And that the staff are not the crew already? The smartest people in the sun. But the author is not a staff member.

    And I also know that this author, by some miracle, is now working for a certain defense industry company, and advertises his goods, and, accordingly, wraps around others


    Did the voices in your head sing to you?

    This is what I want to say.


    I can imagine how you break your head in spring and autumn. Horror...

    I simply served where needed. This method of writing an article is in fact identical to a report. Everything is as if in fact and all the weak points. Previously, they threw bookmarks, now it’s enough to write an article. The methods have changed, the form of the report has not changed. But I will surprise you again, As long as such articles are available, that means it’s necessary. That’s why I noted, let him write more.
    1. 0
      10 January 2021 17: 52
      Klimov together with Timokhin, if they wanted, they would have leaked all the available information and would have lived a quiet, calm, well-fed life, and there would have been no noise, no articles and their discussion.
      True, I don’t know who needs this generally publicly available information - anyone with even a little brain understands everything.
      But for some reason they write numerous reports to all authorities, pointing out shortcomings and showing how to get out of the current situation, and continue this thankless task - after all, if their devastating articles are published, it is with great difficulty.
      But some, as always - who is talking about what, and they are about the author’s person - is he “offended” or “pushy”. In general, instead of reasoned criticism, they throw poop.
    2. +1
      15 January 2021 17: 46
      Quote: Xscorpion
      I just served where needed.

      Yes, YOU already wrote everything:
      pYvO-oooo lol
    3. +3
      17 January 2021 17: 21
      Evgeniy (Xscorpion), it’s a little late here, of course, but in your opinion, “I just served where I needed to”
      “Tell me, where do you NOT need to serve? What is the key to exclusivity? Who do you consider consumable (NOT necessary) material?
      What do you want to express by this? Your exclusivity in the branch of the Russian Armed Forces? Your personal importance in the development of the Navy's air defense? Please, then unsubscribe without minus tracks, I did not minus. I am neutral.
      So the question simply arises, where, what is your personal importance in the defense stability of the naval fleet, what is the exclusivity of “service where needed,” and an explanation of where “service is NOT needed”? At the same time, indicate who, where, or which types of the RF Armed Forces are unnecessary (a whim).
      Nothing personal, I emphasize, I am neutral.
  55. The comment was deleted.
  56. 0
    10 January 2021 02: 12
    In the navy there are only “enemies of the people” all around. TABURETKIN reduced the number of army generals, but it turns out he didn’t have time to get to the naval admirals. It turns out that there are fewer warships in service than there are combat admirals. I’ve already seen this somewhere, it’s called the Ukrainian Navy.
  57. The comment was deleted.
  58. +2
    10 January 2021 03: 28
    Chastity.
  59. The comment was deleted.
  60. END
    0
    10 January 2021 06: 29
    Quote: timokhin-aa
    The whole boat resonates. In a very low range

    To use this effect you need two objects.
    So far, it is assumed that the development of such a “process” is the appearance of Japanese submarines in the Avacha Gulf in December 2019 and 2020.
    Compare her work there and Vasya Tankovid’s exit to an unsuccessful BS. After which he was gently removed from his post.
    And after the Vasins’ inversion - “Therefore, even crossing the Bering Strait, where the US coast is visible to the naked eye, we remained undetected and passed by the American continent quietly and calmly”... the people at headquarters were twirling their fingers at their temples.
    The problem is clear - they can’t do anything - there is no technical ability to prevent this.
    1. 0
      15 January 2021 17: 48
      Quote: FIN
      So far, it is assumed that the development of such a “process” is the appearance of Japanese submarines in the Avacha Gulf in December 2019 and 2020.

      Were they really there at that time? wink
  61. END
    +1
    10 January 2021 06: 37
    Quote: Svetlana
    The remaining surfaced wake from the underwater passage at high speed will gradually blur and cease to be visible against the background of the noise of the sea, in the same way as the contrail of an airplane disappears.

    Visible for several hours after surfacing. In a submerged position it is constantly visible. At least it’s worth it, at least it’s going.)))
    1. -1
      10 January 2021 10: 59
      Quote: FIN
      Visible for several hours after surfacing. In a submerged position it is constantly visible. At least it’s worth it, at least it’s going.)))

      A wake can appear when parking in shallow areas of the water area and there are strong currents at the stopping place. Similar traces - breakers - appear, for example, in a fast stream above the location of an underwater rock. In order not to leave such a mark, you need to choose deeper places to stop underwater and with weak underwater currents.
      Another type of trace - a horizontal water donut torus (arising during rapid immersion) can be annihilated by a specially created counter torus - a donut with the opposite direction of rotation of the water in it.
      1. END
        0
        10 January 2021 11: 09
        So be it. I won't argue.
      2. END
        0
        11 January 2021 08: 33
        I’ve written a hundred times on this topic.))) Everything is online.
        "Standing waves. Who are they?" - Semenov.

    2. -2
      10 January 2021 16: 10
      Quote: FIN
      Visible for several hours after surfacing.

      Even in stormy weather or when the ocean is very rough? Oh well..
      1. END
        0
        11 January 2021 08: 27
        Please...do not write to me.
        I don’t want to waste time; I have formed my opinion about your competence.
        YOU ARE NOT INTERESTED. No offense, take it as a fact.
  62. -1
    10 January 2021 07: 36
    The same formulation of the question regarding the BZHRK is actually a recognition of the problems with the combat stability of mine and mobile soil complexes


    well, perhaps for those who see problems everywhere, even if these same problems do not exist. And then from this very special vision an information “footcloth” is born, as long as an Indian sari and equally colorful with pictures and graphs that adjust everything to the result desired by the author.

    But everything is fine with us: missiles take off and new ships enter service with the Navy.
    1. 0
      10 January 2021 12: 47
      Don't forget to put your cap up.
    2. 0
      15 January 2021 17: 50
      Quote: lopvlad
      But everything is fine with us: missiles take off and new ships enter service with the Navy.

      don’t torment yourself with “unpleasant letters”, smoke bamboo, watch “military acceptance” and “carbon dioxide”
  63. The comment was deleted.
  64. -1
    10 January 2021 09: 02
    Well, everything is always bad with Klimov! And he doesn’t understand the topic at all! He had at least heard about practical products. Which ones are used for educational purposes? And then he made “Yaroslavna’s cry” here!
    1. 0
      10 January 2021 12: 47
      But you understand the topic!
    2. 0
      15 January 2021 17: 52
      Quote: Paphnutius the Unforgettable
      Well, everything is always bad with Klimov! And he doesn’t understand the topic at all!

      some at all rotten YOU have manuals lol
      Quote: Paphnutius the Unforgettable
      He's at least heard of practical products

      actually I shot them angry
  65. +3
    10 January 2021 11: 33
    In 91 we destroyed our USSR. Voucher privatization began in 92. In April 93, in a referendum, the majority supported Yeltsin, i.e. course for the rapid construction of capitalism. In October 93, the Armed Forces were shot. In 96, after the collapse of the army, the military-industrial complex and industry in general, during the war in Chechnya, we again elected Yeltsin!
    And why is some admiral, the head of a design bureau or a military-industrial complex plant worse than some Deripaska?!! Am I off topic?!! No, citizens, I’m just on topic, and you are aliens who don’t know how we built capitalism in the country. It's very good that the salvo went away! It could have been much worse! It’s very good that they adopted a constitution with the supremacy of our laws, but resetting the deadlines is bullshit. The Russian Federation is just beginning to turn sideways towards the West. Those. After what we did, everything is more or less okay in our army and military-industrial complex. Somewhere better, and somewhere as expected...
    1. 0
      11 January 2021 08: 21
      +100000 everything is correct..
  66. The comment was deleted.
  67. -2
    10 January 2021 15: 39
    “ships to the very first bottom mine with a modern fuse” Well, yes - unless another ship catches this mine first with its belly and then everyone will already know that the ship was blown up by mine 12700, in which case it will go to sea using all search engines and with why is the concept of this minesweeper outdated and it has more than one underwater vehicle for searching and clearing mines? And so these are solid theories of probability and the same thing of pulling an owl onto a globe. Anti-aircraft submarines, neither in the Arctic Ocean nor in the Pacific, will enter our air defense zone - so the only threat remains enemy multi-purpose nuclear submarines, but again, everyone will know about the first attack on our SSBNs, and this is in fact the outbreak of a nuclear war. No one will undertake any attacks today, tomorrow, or even in the most distant future - there are no suicides.
    1. END
      0
      11 January 2021 08: 25
      You got excited about the "belly". Even the Captor is, by their standards, an outdated weapon.
      Normally, both Orion and RS-135 are included in the zone. And not only nuclear submarines, but also Japanese submarines.
      In a combat situation, it is unknown what will happen. Many people write forecasts, but no one can say for sure.
      The probability theory is ONE...The calculations and calculation methods are different.
      If necessary, they will do anything. The American Navy is active, arrogant and likes to take things to the weak.
    2. 0
      15 January 2021 17: 54
      Quote: Vadim237
      in this case, it will go to sea using all search tools and why is the concept of this minesweeper outdated

      Have you ever tried sitting down at a computer SOBIER? lol
      try it - maybe you will succeed
  68. +2
    10 January 2021 18: 25

    The problem is that a submarine ballistic missile (SLBM) is not just an expensive item, but a very expensive item. Specific data on domestic SLBMs were not provided.

    How about demonstrating to the “partners” that after a salvo all the missiles reach their target? The task of these missiles is not to literally hit targets, but to restrain “partners” from taking rash steps.
  69. -1
    11 January 2021 08: 19
    the author is either an alarmist or a provocateur..
    What does “very expensive” rockets mean?
    Do we buy them in America?
    The more expensive it is, the more money the designers and workers of these projects will receive.
    And if you don’t pay anything at all, then nothing will happen at all.
    1. -1
      15 January 2021 17: 56
      Quote: Volga073
      The more expensive it is, the more money the designers and workers of these projects will receive.

      It would be MUCH better for the defense capabilities of countries if designers and workers on the subject of missile defense systems, missile guided missiles V-V, anti-ship missiles and missile defense received them
  70. +1
    11 January 2021 09: 11
    If someone in the Aerospace Forces had proposed attaching R-57 guided missiles of the MiG-3 fighter to the Su-21, he would have been sent to Kashchenko.


    So this is the essence, if the role of the Air Force and Ground Forces is clear to everyone, and the problems there are somehow solved, not all, and not always in the desired time frame, but at least there is an understanding of what is needed, and some movement in in this direction, then the Navy is a structure for acquiring funds and occupying positions, it has not fought in war since 1945, how it fought before 1945 is a separate topic, but in fact, all the fleets of the world, except the American one, how it came to taking a risk the battleship, having taken it out of the base, made wet pants (well, even the Japanese, whose Yamato went into battle not at Gaudalcanal, when the outcome of the war was decided, but when it could have simply been blown up at the quay wall).

    Nobody knows why this fleet is needed, what tasks it should solve, what means it should have to solve these problems.
    1. +1
      11 January 2021 17: 56
      Nobody knows why this fleet is needed, what tasks it should solve, what means it should have to solve these problems


      Why don't you start speaking for yourself?
  71. -1
    11 January 2021 09: 17
    According to available information, this time everything went smoothly: on the Vladimir Monomakh and with the Bulava, and with their warheads, right up to Chizhi.

    There is an assumption that not everything went as expected, but not right away - apparently the shooting should have taken place not on the 12th, but on the 10th during strategic nuclear forces training...
    1. END
      0
      11 January 2021 13: 32
      My comment.
      “Nevsky” was planned, but they didn’t take the risk with the new commander.
      Therefore the delay.
  72. +1
    11 January 2021 13: 16
    One (let’s say) friend of mine in Soviet times served as a conscript at the airfield where strategic aviation was based. So, both their political instructor and their immediate commanders themselves knew very well and explained to the conscripts that in the event of war (and then only one war was possible - nuclear), all of them would be guaranteed to be destroyed by the first nuclear strike. Everyone knew this very well. ALL.
    And in the event of the launch of ballistic missiles and/or a massive launch of tamahawks, their main and only task is to ensure the takeoff of as many aircraft as possible - long-range bombers with nuclear weapons, before their airfield is covered by enemy warheads. After the cover, everyone at the airfield is guaranteed to die, as well as the vast majority of residents of nearby cities.
    .
    What is it for me?
    The author of the article laments that our SSBNs have weak defensive weapons. But it’s okay that in such combat operations, in such a war, when our strategists at sea on combat duty are under attack, the strategists at the wall will also be under attack from the enemy’s strategic nuclear forces, and they will certainly be guaranteed to be destroyed along with their crews, bases and nearby cities ? But boats on combat duty have the opportunity to survive. And defensive weapons, torpedoes, anti-torpedoes are far from the most important thing. The main thing is secrecy. If secrecy is not ensured, then no torpedoes or anti-torpedoes will help, because They will be attacked by several “hunters”, both underwater and airborne. The only thing that can cover our strategists in the database is a security submarine. But again, it’s not a fact that they can. Once again, the MAIN THING is STEALTH in order to have time to strike with your “main caliber”. Boats from the pier can, should and will definitely deliver such a blow. Now they will be 100% guaranteed to be destroyed along with the entire crew. But no one is shedding tears about this. As they say, that's how it works. But submarines at sea with a small, tiny degree of probability can survive. But this is not their main task. The main task is to have time to release the ammunition, or at least part of it. And they will have time to do this. As a matter of fact, that is why a salvo launch of 4 missiles was carried out. So that no one has unnecessary illusions.
    But the author knows everything better than the leadership of the General Staff, the Navy and the country. You see, he is not satisfied with such a salvo. Give him another volley.
    .
    I also smiled at the passage that the command of the fleet unit is silent and does not want to tell the sailors that they are defenseless and if something happens they will be destroyed along with the boat. What sweet stupidity... Yes, everyone who serves in the strategic nuclear forces understands that if an SSBN becomes a target for enemy torpedoes, they will be destroyed first, be it a simple sailor on a submarine, its commander, or the admiral himself, who is at the fleet base, as well as the personnel serving the base, who don’t even go to sea. Just as strategic aviation pilots, airfield security, mobile systems maintenance understand this... The main thing is to have time to deliver a retaliatory/counter-counter strike. But we will have time to do this. Whether it’s a boat at sea on combat duty, or standing with ammunition at the pier.
    1. END
      0
      11 January 2021 13: 28
      Unfortunately, “security” submarines are themselves a revealing factor.
      “This is the main thing, but even more important is to slip out of the base unnoticed, because based on practice, if you get hooked right away, they won’t come off later.

      The output of the SSBN (the fact itself) could have been known based on the order of the Pacific Fleet Command, the training plan and the order of the Command Committee of the 2nd FL submarine, preparation activities, in particular the loading of missiles at the Far Pier.
      The boat's passage and loading were recorded by spacecraft. Crew training, manning, orders and, of course, information in the families of submariners. An order from the division commander for support and a support plan, this is the Kamchatka RPLS flotilla. Deployment of a minesweeper, TFR, icebreaker, measures to inspect the hull (311 detachment PPDO). Inspection of the area upon request - border guards, helicopter and plane from 317 OSAP (Mi-14, Be-12).

      That is, directly or indirectly the information was available to hundreds of people.

      I won’t find out where the leak was, but the very fact of the SSBN entering combat service was no secret to the enemy.

      Well, then it’s simpler - communication negotiations during the departure of the boat, increased work of support equipment, a mark from the boat, which was moving to the trim place on the surface (most often to Saranaya Bay)."
      With modern anti-aircraft defense and reconnaissance means, it is impossible to covertly withdraw. Well, no way. At least shoot me)))
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +1
        11 January 2021 14: 09
        Naturally, the fact that the boat left the base cannot be hidden. But further... Perhaps there are options...
        Maybe a security boat can protect for a while.
        Maybe they will be able to secretly leave their territorial waters.
        Maybe we can break away long enough to launch more missiles.
        Maybe our boat will receive the order to launch before the enemy orders it to be destroyed.
        Maybe the security boat will destroy the enemy...
        Maybe they will hesitate, maybe we will work extremely quickly...

        There are always options.
        But that's not what I was even talking about. 1. The strategist’s defensive weapons are a secondary issue. During a war, when they try to destroy him, no defensive weapons will help him. He will be hunted by several opponents at once, both under water and from the air. Only stealth and luck can allow him to fire more missiles. Moreover (if secrecy is not ensured) trying to overwhelm the opponents (and there will be many of them), and then proceed to the main task (launching missiles) is not an option. Also, when performing the main task, the strategist remains defenseless, because During preparation and the launch itself, the use of other weapons is impossible neither for us nor for anyone. Therefore, the author’s tears about our lack of anti-torpedoes (which no one else has) and our (ALLEGEDLY) bad torpedoes are distortion and propaganda. It’s like being indignant that a regiment of anti-missile defense missiles does not travel near Poplar and Yarsy.
        2. I also laughed at the story that management was hiding the dangers of serving on SSBNs from their subordinates.

        Telling tales, inventing nonsense, twisting facts, as is done in this article... this is what enemy information saboteurs do.
        1. END
          0
          11 January 2021 16: 46
          I tried...for 10 years...it didn’t work. Type in the search. Alexander Semenov "Mutabor"...
          Bullshit, fraud and lies.
          There is no point in writing here if comments are deleted.
          1. 0
            12 January 2021 18: 53
            Quote: FIN
            There is no point in writing here if comments are deleted.

            Niki, why are you changing the “truth teller”? 7 So that you can then disavow what was written, “I’m not me and the horse is not mine...”
    2. +2
      11 January 2021 17: 58
      But boats on combat duty have the opportunity to survive. And defensive weapons, torpedoes, anti-torpedoes are far from the most important thing. The main thing is secrecy. If secrecy is not ensured, then no torpedoes or anti-torpedoes will help, because They will be attacked by several “hunters”, both underwater and airborne.


      This is absolutely not the case.
    3. +1
      12 January 2021 18: 50
      Quote: Ivan_Ivanov
      Everyone knew this very well. ALL.

      And not only at the airfield they knew about this, but also all competent military men understood what awaited them, even if it was not the strategic structure of the armed forces.
      I completely agree with your conclusions about the article. Give free rein to people like Klimov and Timokhin, so they will intelligently justify that naval officers should be given daggers made of Damascus steel so that they can better fight off pirates in the Gulf of Aden or the Red Sea in case of boarding.
      You read such visionaries and understand why none of the senior military takes them seriously with their “ideas” - they touch on painfully petty topics....
    4. +1
      15 January 2021 17: 59
      Quote: Ivan_Ivanov
      The main task is to have time to release the ammunition, or at least part of it. And they will have time to do this.

      Why did YOU decide this?
      In fact, there is NO COMBAT STABILITY
  73. The comment was deleted.
  74. -1
    12 January 2021 02: 52
    And what is actually wrong?
    We’ve been living under capitalism for 30 years, where the main thing is MONEY AND MORE...
    In the Pentagon, the military career of senior ranks is a springboard for the position of vice president of one or another military-industrial complex company on discharge...
    If the author thinks that in the bourgeois Russian Federation it is different, let him take off his rose-colored glasses and look at the biographies of the first deputies in the military-industrial complex of the Russian Federation, in the seats of State Duma deputies, etc.
    Accordingly, in order to get a satisfying position at the DMB, the generals lobby in every possible way for what the future employer imposes, it’s good if it’s just old stuff, and not a real defect... And those who are smarter don’t even take bribes, then they’ll fight back everything... And for the capitalist, the main thing is to minimize costs, which are 90% R&D, technical equipment and trained personnel, which there is simply nowhere to get...
    Nothing personal, just business, they are not traitors or saboteurs, the bourgeoisie have no homeland...
    Glory to CAPITALISM! Hooray!
    R.S. And don’t let anyone be confused by the names of military-industrial complex companies with the prefix “state”, the salary and bonus money of the TOP of these companies is higher than that of pure bourgeois...
  75. 0
    12 January 2021 19: 07
    Complete crap!!! A set of sentences and phrases. constipation of thoughts, diarrhea of ​​words.
    1. +1
      15 January 2021 17: 59
      Quote: serezhasoldatow
      Complete crap!!! A set of sentences and phrases. constipation of thoughts, diarrhea of ​​words.

      diarrhea is YOURS here
  76. 0
    12 January 2021 21: 28
    I suspected that everything in the Navy was bad, but I couldn’t imagine that it was bad to such an extent!
  77. 0
    12 January 2021 21: 32
    It's time to use execution for sabotage and sabotage.
  78. +1
    15 January 2021 13: 10
    The worst thing is that all the problems described in the article are carefully washed away everywhere. Articles and comments are deleted. What if there is war tomorrow? And she's already on the threshold...
  79. 0
    16 January 2021 02: 05
    You raise interesting questions. Currently, the criteria for choosing a weapon system are not formalized, nor is the decision-making procedure itself. In theory, the Deputy Customer must guard at least, if not the state, then at least his own interests as an operator. In practice, it can be very different due to subjective and objective reasons. The situation is complicated by the fact that previously competing developers have been united into Rostec (this has its own benefits), but it also limits the possibilities of competition and washing dirty linen in public. After all, no one has canceled the possibility of involving the FAS when challenging government contracts and involving third-party expert organizations to develop an objective solution. It is also clear that if you go down the path of “conflict” - the courts, the involvement of a third-party expert organization to challenge certain decisions - not only may they find options not to give orders to others, but also the corresponding manager within the integrated structure may even lose his job, and who needs it?
    In the military prosecutor's office there are no specialists at the level of the development enterprise or the main institute, and in legal terms they are not always so strong.
    Who remains - perhaps only the VP and the Military-Industrial Complex Commission, the Council of General Designers.
  80. 0
    16 January 2021 20: 26
    Quote: Zoldat_A
    Any real global war is mutual destruction

    By the way, this is not true.
    Here somewhere there were calculations of the real destructive capacity of modern nuclear arsenals - they are quite modest and there is no talk of any mutual destruction.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"