Deputy Defense Minister spoke about plans to purchase new weapons

Deputy Defense Minister Alexei Krivoruchko in an interview with the Defense Ministry newspaper "Krasnaya Zvezda" spoke about plans to purchase new weapons.

According to the Deputy Minister, in the outgoing year, plans for the supply and repair of weapons and military equipment have been implemented by 99,8 percent. The Ministry of Defense has accepted about 2700 basic weapons and more than 52,5 thousand units of support equipment.

During the year, 147 units were delivered to the troops aviation equipment, the first reconnaissance and strike complexes with UAVs "Inokhodets" and "Forpost", seven warships and two submarines, over 1500 models of armored vehicles, as well as more than 300 pieces of rocket and artillery weapons and more than 150 models of air defense equipment.

Among the plans of the military department for the next year, Krivoruchko called the expansion of the procurement of fifth-generation Su-57 fighters under the new program of state defense orders for 2024 - 2033.

Already, measures are underway to further increase the purchase of Su-57 aircraft, the results of which will be taken into account in the new state armament program

- reported Krivoruchko.

The program to create a large volume of new Russian armored vehicles, including the Armata tank and vehicles on this platform, new armored personnel carriers and howitzers, will be completed in 2022.

Ensuring completion in 2022 of the creation of a promising tank T-14, infantry fighting vehicles (T-15, B-11, K-17), armored personnel carriers (B-10, K-16), armored recovery vehicle (T-16) (ROC "Armata", "Kurganets -25 "and" Boomerang "), 152-mm self-propelled artillery pieces (ROC" Coalition-SV "), as well as a whole line of advanced combat modules for equipping tracked and wheeled vehicles

- explained the deputy minister.

At the same time, the newest S-500 anti-aircraft missile system will be put into service next year. According to Krivoruchko, the completion of state tests is planned for 2021. The deputy minister did not say anything about the beginning of serial deliveries of air defense systems to the troops, but earlier he said that the Prometheus series would go into production from 2025. At the same time, the Ministry of Defense does not exclude a shift in serial deliveries of the S-500 to an earlier date.

Next year, it is planned to complete tests and put into service the S-500 anti-aircraft missile system and the Voronezh meter-range radar

- he added.

In 2021, the rate of equipping with new types of weapons and those that have undergone repairs with modernization will remain at the same level.

Comments

[Orkraider]

The program to create a large volume of new Russian armored vehicles, including the Armata tank and vehicles on this platform, new armored personnel carriers and howitzers, will be completed in 2022.

A good answer to the questions: - where did Armata disappear?

About the Su-57 is also not bad, they will not stop at the first contract. Interesting information on expanding procurement - from 2024.

It's a pity they didn't comment on Orion. I am really looking forward to news and release plans.

[carstorm 11]

The pacer is Orion. And armata did not disappear anywhere but is being tested

[Orkraider]

Greetings!

The pacer is Orion.

I know, here it is))

I'm waiting for the news about the release plans, about the number.

And armata did not disappear anywhere but is being tested

I agree, but many are discouraged by the fact that they are not in the troops and they write that only for parades and so on ... for them, and there is officialdom: wait, tests are underway.
Yes, slower than we would like. But, on the other hand, the platform will be, and will be, licked and without many imperfections and shortcomings that could be due to haste.


And calendars from the Ministry of Defense are a thing. So many interesting things in them

[Orkraider]

The calendar:

[ccsr]

Quote: Orkraider

I agree, but many are discouraged by the fact that they are not in the troops and they write that only for parades and so on ... for them, and there is officialdom: wait, tests are underway.

The whole trouble is that officers need to be trained for new equipment, which means that you first need to change the course of study in military schools so that when they come to the troops, young lieutenants do not have to be sent to courses again. That is why a quick re-equipment will lead to problems of mastering equipment in the troops - I know this well, because such a problem was also in the Soviet Army.
Therefore, you should not drive horses, and it is better to start training future officers on these tanks, transferring them not to combat units while there are few of them, but only to training units and to battalions to support the educational process in schools. Although, to be honest, I don't know if there are such battalions now. In general, in my opinion, it is best to create one training division for the ground forces, where to train specialists in all VUS, and there to train real contract soldiers for new equipment and retrain those who already have service experience.

[Krasnoyarsk]

Quote: ccsr

The trouble is that officers need to be trained for new equipment,

They took it off the tongue. The new technique comes in quite complicated, so the learning process is quite long. In addition, not a dozen people need to be trained, but thousands. This takes time. What's the use if new equipment arrives at the military unit and stands as a dead weight?

[ccsr]

Quote: Krasnoyarsk

What's the use if new equipment arrives at the military unit and stands as a dead weight?

We faced this problem in the eighties, when the "Taran" complex began to enter the reconnaissance battalions, and not only warrant officers, but also officers did not know how to approach it, because the equipment was much more complicated than "Rama", and the base was different ... Serious study was required on the courses, but then somehow they did not think about it, at least in the GSVG. In general, a sad story when it takes years to master a new technique, and it's good if it is not ditched in the learning process. I hope the current commanders will take into account the mistakes of the past and first teach future officers, and only then they will staff the troops.

[Cyril G ...]

Quote: ccsr

which means that you first need to change the course of study in military schools, so that when they come to the troops, young lieutenants do not have to be sent to courses again.

This should have been done the day before yesterday, otherwise in the fleet (unlike the rest of the campaign), it is generally a complete trash with personnel ...

In general, in my opinion, it is best to create one training division for the ground forces, where to train specialists in all VUS, and there to train real contract soldiers for new equipment and retrain those who already have service experience.

It would be correct. But still, probably two divisions. One in Europe, the second somewhere in Transbaikalia ...

[ccsr]

Quote: Cyril G ...

This should have been done the day before yesterday, otherwise in the fleet (unlike the rest of the campaign), it is generally a complete trash with personnel ...

Unfortunately, this disease was not born now, but thanks to such figures as Serdyukov, it has turned into a problem for all the armed forces. Well, it was impossible to expel academies from capitals and large cities, because by doing so we greatly reduced the level of the teaching staff, and this all negatively affected the training of officers. And this is only a small part of the problems of today's army.

Quote: Cyril G ...

It would be correct. But still, probably two divisions.

I think that our commanders will not agree to one - this is inherent in their psychology, because they believe that the main thing is the combat unit, but those who have served a lot understand that the issue of training and education is much more important for the armed forces, at least from the point in terms of the effective use of new technology.

[Old tanker]

The process of teaching and studying samples of technology in schools has long been established. As well as the process of retraining crews for other or new samples. And we have 1-2 training divisions in each district, and not just one, as you suggest. And this is only for the training of crews of infantry fighting vehicles and tanks. Not to mention other VUS, they have their own tutorials. And they train for specific types of weapons on which the crews will serve in the future. Including the newest ones.

[ccsr]

Quote: Old Tankman

The process of teaching and studying samples of technology in schools has long been established.

Even in the USSR, it was not fully debugged, because when many came to serve, they encountered something that they did not see in their eyes, and sometimes they did not even hear about it. And I know this from my own experience, as well as from the experience of other colleagues.

Quote: Old Tankman

And we have 1-2 training divisions in each district, and not just one, as you suggest.

I wonder if you can name such TRAINING divisions? As far as I know, there are training centers, training regiments, but I haven’t heard anything about divisions. If you do not understand the difference between a training division and a division with a training regiment, then I will note that these are two big differences.

Quote: Old Tankman

Including the newest ones.

Even in Soviet times, I did not hear that the latest technology was sent to training - can you share your memories of where this was?

[Old tanker]

Training centers are training divisions. Including training motorized rifle and tank regiments, as well as support units.
In turn, tell me at least one division of the ground forces in which there is a training regiment. I have never heard of such people in the RF Armed Forces.

[ccsr]

Quote: Old Tankman

Training centers are training divisions.

Who told you this? And in general, you have at least heard something that a division is actually obliged to conduct divisional exercises at least twice a year, and moreover, it has a plan for the combat training of the formation, and for all units. How do you organize all this in the training center, especially since it is different in composition from the division.

Quote: Old Tankman

In turn, tell me at least one division of the ground forces in which there is a training regiment. I have never heard of such people in the RF Armed Forces.

Our history of the armed forces is not limited to one Russian period. During the war there were training divisions, for example, the 48th training rifle division.
In the later Soviet era, training regiments were assigned to divisions for mobility measures, and their commanders knew which unit they would have to operate in. And in the plans for the deployment of divisions, this regiment was taken into account.

[Old tanker]

Kovrov training camp of the Western District. It receives all the new models of tanks adopted at one time into service. I have no doubt that Armata will also be there.

[Orange bigg]

Follow the link below for more details on procurement for the army in 2020. Orion-RU is already in the army.

For the first time, modern complexes with reconnaissance and strike unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) of medium-range "Walker" and "Outpost" began to appear in the Aerospace Forces. In the spring, the Ministry of Defense signed an acceptance certificate for the first Orion long-duration unmanned complex consisting of three vehicles.

https://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/10367405

[Orkraider]

Greetings!

On the adoption of the first complex of three UAVs and two control vehicles in the course. I'm talking about other news, about the contract. In the shops, I saw the quantity not for one complex, but how many were ordered in real life, it is not known ..

According to the transmitted:
I saw No. 1 and No. 3 on flights, No. 2 - no information at all

[Lord of the Sith]

Many thanks for the link!

[antivirus]

again avoided the question of the Avianosses.
Give 10 pieces of 100 tons of VI for 000 years !!!!!!!!!!!!
minuses, then put me, and who will you appoint to pay for exotic?

[Volder]

We did not manage to organize the mass production of tanks and armored vehicles on the Armata platform, as they are already going to complete it. Apparently, the series will be limited to 100 units.

[taiga2018]

The main thing is that in 2024 another "pacifist" who dreams of world peace through unilateral disarmament does not become president ...

[Dym71]

Quote: taiga2018

The main thing is that in 2024 another "pacifist" who dreams of world peace through unilateral disarmament does not become president ...

It is doubtful that our Darkest One will change so dramatically.

[taiga2018]

Quote: Dym71

that our Darkest

Well, first of all, I hope he is following the events in Belarus so closely and will not nominate himself so as not to give the pro-Western opposition an extra trump card ... It is not for nothing that he finally recently signed a law on the immunity of former presidents, is preparing himself a quiet old age ...
And secondly, the "darkest" is already in my opinion and not so "darkest", has aged, softened, liberal where it is necessary to show rigidity. So you need a person "darker".

[Flashpoint]

A successor is needed. :)
And pacifists are different. In the USA, all are pacifists. Only they carefully chose the side.

[Cron]

Quote: taiga2018

Well, first of all, I hope he follows the events in Belarus so closely and will not nominate himself.

What do the events in Belarus have to do with us? Do you think what rolls in the "banana" republics is possible with us? Moreover, there the multi-vector itself shook a chair under him, pushing even his supporters away from him, if you haven't forgotten. For many years flirted with local nationalists, etc.

and will not nominate himself so as not to give the pro-Western opposition an extra trump card

And why should the president of a sovereign country not nominate himself and should be wary of some kind of pro-Western opposition? Well, seriously? And not what? Maybe it's time for Putin to leave, I won't even argue. Well, if at the same time someone comes from the wishes of the "pro-Western opposition", and not the people, then what kind of state is it then?

[Interlocutor]

Why the darkest?

[Dym71]

Quote: Interlocutor

Why the darkest?

Is not shy about his complexes

[Victorio]

Quote: taiga2018

The main thing is that in 2024 the next president did not become "pacifist"dreaming of world peace through unilateral disarmament ...

===
now the local "opposition" will catch up, but they throw minuses

[rocket757]

We are arming ourselves.
I want to, I don't want to, I have to combine guns and oil. Reasonable limits, the main thing is not to violate.

[Thrifty]

The main thing is words and numbers, not deeds! The previous program for rearmament with a roar failed, first of all, in the fleet! Also, the ground forces - in the event of a war, the kids of our oligarchs will sit down for the levers of the T72B3, I hope! Thus, let us get rid of the problem of their lack of patreoism. .. There are a lot of numbers, but in reality, at the exit of the new weapon from the armament, there are only a few copies, the main thing is a deep and not very modernization of Soviet military equipment. ..

[Flashpoint]

Yes. T72B3 is not T90M in any way. Well, at least the modernization is underway. About the fleet - we are waiting for the events of the next year.

[Vitaly161]

do you want to put your kids at the levers of T62? or T72b? it's better T72b3, T90m and T80BVM than what it was, the Russian Federation is imposed with sanctions, that that tree is like garlands, if you screw this on any European country, then in a couple of years there will be a Stone Age, and we are coping like that, the truth is far from good everywhere

[Alexey RA]

Quote: Vitaliy161

do you want to put your kids at the levers of T62? or T72b?

The T-72B is nothing. At the time of the decision on the T-72B3 in some places and the T-55AM served in the first line.

[A_Lex]

The main thing is words and numbers, not deeds!

The main thing for a person who does not know how to think critically, but is accustomed to trust the higher in the hierarchy. Those. for a typical resident of a consumer society. Actually, this type of person is extremely convenient for them, since they can feed him any noodles

[venik]

"...The deputy minister did not say anything about the start of serial deliveries of air defense systems to the troops, but earlier he said that the Prometheus series would go into production from 2025. At the same time, the Ministry of Defense does not exclude a shift in serial deliveries of the S-500 by earlier dates. ..."
=========
Good news! And then somehow they have already begun to get used to the fact that more and more "to the right" the terms are shifted ...

[svp67]

The S-500 is good, it's great, but what are they going to acquire for the military level of air defense?

[antivirus]

will close the sky for 500 km to (from) our borders, combined with the absence of divisional air defense - this is pacifism "we sit on our land, we don't climb over the hill"

[Volder]

Quote: svp67

what are they going to acquire at the military level of air defense?

I think the Vityaz S-350 should be put into production.

[Cyril G ...]

He was launched into the series - only this is the Air Force. Buk-M3, Tor-2M are serially used in the army air defense. At the stage of solving the issue of Derivation and Pine.

[MinskFox]

And what does s300v4 not suit you?

[ccsr]

Quote: ficus2003

The S-500 has never been seen as a complex

And where did you want to see him, if he is still at the plant? And in Soviet times, it was strictly forbidden to introduce new complexes to everyone who had nothing to do with ordering structures, until they were put into service. So even for the sake of secrecy, no one is allowed to approach new developments; at best, several operators will be included in the State Commission, so that there is no unnecessary idle talk until the very last moment. Of course, it is difficult to hide a new development, but this does not mean that military officers have access to it. That is why the S-500 was seen by an extremely narrow circle of officials.

[ficus2003]

Come on, tell me more about the secret secrecy while the A-235 is shown on Russian channels as an element of the S-500.

[ccsr]

Quote: ficus2003

Come on, tell me more about the secret secrecy while the A-235 is shown on Russian channels as an element of the S-500.

Why tell you something if you have already learned everything from a television picture, would-be specialist? Do you even know that there are only two copies of TTZ for such developments, and only a few are fully admitted to them both at the customer and at the developer. However, for you it's still a dark forest, so keep on burning.

[ficus2003]

Quote: ccsr

Why tell you something

Yes, I understood everything, the answer is as usual "you don't understand, it's different!"