Chinese Navy underwater drone allegedly caught by Indonesian fisherman

55

An unusual item was caught in the territorial waters of Indonesia on December 20. An Indonesian fisherman's catch was allegedly an underwater drone of the Chinese People's Liberation Army.

Judging by the photographs, the find strongly resembles the Sea Wing unmanned underwater vehicle belonging to the Chinese military.



Detection drone became known thanks to the publication of the Indonesian edition of detikNews. It says that the drone, which has something like a sensor array on its nose, reaches a length of just over two meters, not counting the long antenna (about 93 cm) or a sensor coming from the back. The drone has a torpedo-shaped body with a pair of wings (50 cm each) mounted in the center and a vertical tail.


The drone was caught near the Selayar Islands in the South Sulawesi province. This zone is located at a considerable distance from the territorial waters of the PRC. It is located between the Sunda and Lombok Straits, which connect the Indian Ocean with the South China Sea.


The fact that Chinese submarines are present here drones may indicate that the PRC is engaged in the study of underwater terrain outside its territorial waters. If the drones belong to the PLA, this could mean that China is exploring routes from the South China Sea to the Indian Ocean for its warships and submarines.

Such glider-type drones are often used for hydrographic surveys and help in the creation of underwater maps. As the PLA Navy works to project its power further and further from the PRC coastline, China needs modern and detailed nautical charts both for its daily tasks and in the event of possible hostilities.

True, China has not officially recognized the loss of a marine drone off the coast of Indonesia
  • https://twitter.com/Jatosint
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

55 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    30 December 2020 11: 31
    The question arises - where is his mover and how he turns to the right - to the left
    A water cannon?
    1. +5
      30 December 2020 11: 39
      Quote: Avior
      A water cannon?

      No, if you look closely, you can see the horizontal rudder, which is located behind and below the body of the "drone".
      I'm interested in something else, but was there a "BUYER" FOR THIS "GOLDEN FISH"? If yes, then their capture by fishermen may become industrial basis. laughing
      1. +10
        30 December 2020 11: 46
        Well, here's the question. This CWing is massive, and it is made scientifically. And they offer for export.


        1. 0
          30 December 2020 13: 07
          Well, even in the photo they are a little different ... There is also more interesting that he carries in his memory blocks.
    2. +12
      30 December 2020 11: 40
      Well, it's on the fick, such a "catch". And if it were shandarahnulo?
      1. +1
        30 December 2020 11: 54
        Quote: marchcat
        Well, it's on the fick, such a "catch". And if it were shandarahnulo?

        This is just a flaw of the creators of the drone. No one is insured against loss, therefore, a special charge must be provided so that it just shoots when it gets into someone else's curious little hands.
        1. +5
          30 December 2020 13: 34
          so that it just shoots when it hits strangers


          This is prohibited by international treaties. No autopsy self-destructors.
          1. +1
            30 December 2020 13: 47
            Quote: Podvodnik
            This is prohibited by international treaties. No autopsy self-destructors.

            But how to deal with those whose hands the device should not fall?
            1. +1
              30 December 2020 22: 56
              But how to deal with those whose hands the device should not fall?


              Self-flooding after battery exhaustion. Otherwise, a lawsuit in court for damage to curious fishermen.
              1. +1
                31 December 2020 09: 41
                Quote: Podvodnik
                Self-flooding after battery exhaustion. Otherwise, a lawsuit in court for damage to curious fishermen.

                Who will be sued? laughing
          2. +4
            30 December 2020 14: 01
            Something in connection with the history of our losharik, I strongly doubt that some elves have no self-explosives.
            1. +2
              30 December 2020 14: 03
              Quote: evgen1221
              Something in connection with the history of our losharik, I strongly doubt that some elves have no self-explosives.

              Right. Serious people choose serious, proven solutions. And this drone was not taken very seriously.
            2. +1
              30 December 2020 23: 09
              Something in connection with the history of our losharik


              Sorry, not in the know about the losharik story. You want to say that the "enemies" mined some object almost in line of sight from our coast and the apparatus was blown up during its examination? This threatens with reciprocal surprises for the "partners". This is why no one ever does that. And for these cases, the corresponding international agreements are signed. Imagine a situation when fishermen caught something with a bottom trawl, lifted it, and on board this thing jerked and killed someone. An international scandal with all the ensuing consequences and claims.
              1. +1
                30 December 2020 23: 53
                What a scandal, everything is solved quietly by phone or, in extreme cases, by the departure of the director of the CIA or SVR at the place of emergency.
        2. +1
          30 December 2020 13: 59
          a special charge must be provided

          Also provided for by German designers. "On the Bull Field ..." well, you will find further ...
          1. 0
            30 December 2020 14: 05
            Quote: Kerensky
            "On the Bull Field ..." well, you will find further ...

            What exactly to look for, do not understand?
            1. +2
              31 December 2020 03: 12
              Hydrostatic device. This is a hatch with a tube in the center. Triggers to detonate when removed from water.
      2. +5
        30 December 2020 12: 18
        Quote: marchcat
        Well, it's on the fick, such a "catch". And if it were shandarahnulo?

        ========
        drinks The first thing I did was also think about what expression the fisherman had when the net with so and so"catch" (great looking like a small torpedo), pulled out .....
        1. +2
          30 December 2020 13: 49
          Quote: venik
          The first thing I thought was what expression the fisherman had when he pulled out a net with such and such a "catch" (which looks like a small-sized torpedo) ...

          I remember Pikul's "Three ages of Okini-san" laughing:
          On September 6, Kokovtsev spent the night on the "Rurik", summoned to Revel on business: on Dago, naive fishermen began to pick up "iron barrels with horns" thrown by the surf, which they did not understand (mines!). Waking up, Vladimir Vasilyevich immediately remembered these “horns” - detonators.
          - Galvanic impact type! He said to Kolchak over tea in the Rurik's wardroom. - God forbid, if the Estonians decide to bite these horns with an ax, wanting to see what is inside, if the kerosene needed in the household will flow?
      3. 0
        31 December 2020 20: 53
        The fact of the presence of Chinese underwater drones here may indicate that the PRC is studying the underwater relief outside its territorial waters.

        And is it so?
        It may well speak about the fact of low-quality production and curved design.
        The currents swept away the broken apparatus ...

        Remember: an ax floats down the river from the city of Kukuev ... Why do we need it, a rusty piece of iron!

        PS: maybe they are exploring! In each of us, a New Year's conspiracy theorist is sitting at the table wink

        Happy Holiday! Hooray! Hooray! Hooray!
    3. +2
      30 December 2020 11: 43
      Avior, the mover is probably inside, and probably it's still a water cannon!
      1. +3
        30 December 2020 12: 30
        Quote: Thrifty
        Avior, the mover is probably inside, and probably it's still a water cannon!

        =======
        Already wrote - there is NO engine! This is an underwater glider. More information about the Sea Wing family was on the same site: https://topwar.ru/151264-avtonomnye-morskie-sistemy-na-strazhe-interesov-kitaja.html
    4. +2
      30 December 2020 11: 53
      Quote: Avior
      where is his mover and how does he turn right - left
      A water cannon?

      He mainly uses the force of the current
      The marine glider Petrel II features a hybrid propulsion system that allows you to plan along a saw-tooth path using underwater currents, or to perform horizontal movement using an electric jet engine.
      According to the company, the Sea Wing family currently includes the youngest model Sea Wing 300 weighing 60 kg, length 1,9 meters, working depth 300 meters and radius 1000 km. Moving at planning speeds up to an 1 node, the Sea Wing 300 glider can operate independently for up to 40 days.
      Sea Wing 1000-I and Sea Wing 1000-II weighing 65 kg and 70 kg, length 2,1 m and 2,3 m, respectively, are able to reach operational depth 1000 meters at the same speeds, although the latter model is designed to perform advanced tasks and therefore has the maximum declared range sailing 1500 km and can operate continuously up to 60 days.
    5. +6
      30 December 2020 12: 14
      Quote: Avior
      The question arises - where is his mover and how he turns to the right - to the left
      A water cannon?

      =======
      No. This is an underwater glider - an apparatus that is set in motion by changing the buoyancy. So, with negative buoyancy, when submerging, it moves in an aquatic environment like a glider in the atmosphere. And when surfacing, the "wings" change the angle of attack and the result is a "reverse glider". This bullshit moves on sawtooth trajectory.
      Sorry! I explained how I managed ... request
      1. +1
        30 December 2020 13: 44
        The wings of these gliders are motionless. There, synchronously with the change in buoyancy, the change in trim is worked out. When surfacing, the feed becomes heavier, and when diving, the bow part. This provides the possibility of undulating (up - down) forward movement with a horizontal speed of about 0,27 m / s.
        1. +2
          30 December 2020 18: 37
          Most likely, there the load moves forward and backward, changes the center of gravity and with it, trim
          1. +1
            30 December 2020 18: 52
            Most likely a long weighty rod of the type of an armature of a linear electric motor. wink
            1. +1
              30 December 2020 19: 28
              Perhaps, on the contrary, the stator, it is much more compact in length and the center of gravity is easier to shift, and the heavy anchor is not needed.
              The magnets are on the base, and he drives past them.
              The stator magnetic system is heavy, copper and iron are solid, if necessary, it can be additionally weighted.
              But maybe a classic ordinary screw-nut with a low-sided engine.
              An interesting solution with a glider.
              On the other hand, after all, it must change the buoyancy, so a simple shift of the load will not work, there must be some kind of capacity, or vice versa, something airy.
              And then it makes no sense to put two different devices, if you can change the trim and buoyancy with one trim
              1. +1
                30 December 2020 19: 57
                Interesting. smile
                All this has to do with the almost unrecognized science of bionics. By the way, your assumption about a screw with a nut for moving ballast could be quite logically combined with the contraction of the glider's "swim bladder" when moving the load towards the bow and, accordingly, its expansion when the weight moves back to the stern, thus combining the two the main functions of the propeller (change of trim and buoyancy), so to speak, in one "bottle", naturally synchronizing them by means of elementary mechanics. smile It is only necessary to create a low-noise mechanical scheme of this bionic miracle to ensure its own safety.
                1. +1
                  30 December 2020 20: 09
                  The siphon can be compressed in the same way with a linear motor, there will be even less noise. I would put it in front, when the load moves forward, the buoyancy decreases at the same time, the siphon is compressed and a trim on the nose is formed. Perhaps that is why the wings are shifted backward - to the front of the air siphon, which shifts the center of gravity back.
                  If we move the load backward, the volume of the siphon increases and the buoyancy increases, at the same time we get a trim on the stern — the glider moves to a shallower depth, while moving forward.
                  1. +1
                    30 December 2020 20: 20
                    This is exactly what I meant, but without the bellows, but with the cylinder and the piston. Only now, will the linear-electric motor and, as a consequence, the gearless drive provide the required compression force? A small change in volume is not enough.
        2. +2
          30 December 2020 21: 56
          Quote: Herrr
          The wings of these gliders are motionless. There, synchronously with the change in buoyancy, the change in trim is worked out. When surfacing, the feed becomes heavier, and when diving, the bow part.

          =========
          Damn the sea! I didn't even think about such a possibility !!! Bravo! good drinks
          1. +2
            30 December 2020 22: 17
            Fill the main ballast tanks! We go at periscope depth. laughing
            Happy you! drinks
      2. +1
        30 December 2020 18: 35
        Understood thanks
    6. -4
      30 December 2020 17: 56
      Quote: Avior
      The question arises - where is his mover and how he turns to the right - to the left
      A water cannon?

      This is a glider. The future of the Navy and the storm of the oceans. I don’t want to print a whole article. You can find it yourself if you want. hi
  2. +2
    30 December 2020 11: 38
    I have another question .. how far is China's ambition spread?
    1. +3
      30 December 2020 12: 55
      Quote: Titus_2
      I have another question .. how far is China's ambition spread?

      Before Australia
  3. +1
    30 December 2020 11: 38
    You had to buy it out quickly from a fisherman, see its filling. ..
  4. +1
    30 December 2020 11: 40
    Not the first time they lose ... by accident or on purpose? )
  5. 0
    30 December 2020 11: 41
    Actually, the wings are not in the very center of the hull, but are shifted towards the rear of the hull ..
    1. +1
      30 December 2020 18: 39
      It is logical to place the wings in the center of mass, but it is not necessarily in the middle
      Surely batteries are heavier than hardware
  6. +2
    30 December 2020 11: 41
    Quote: Titus_2
    I have another question .. how far is China's ambition spread?

    Very far away ... They have ambitions on a global scale and for a very long time. According to Asian canons, they act quietly and efficiently and buy anything and everything.
  7. 0
    30 December 2020 11: 50
    A question for connoisseurs.
    If a drone is a remotely controlled device, then is it correct to call an underwater unmanned vehicle a drone, unless, of course, it is controlled by wire?
    1. +1
      30 December 2020 18: 42
      Can theoretically be controlled by ultrasound
      You cannot convey a picture like that, and control commands are easy, especially since there will not be very many commands
      Again, ultrasound can track its position according to the principle of secondary radar and
      1. 0
        31 December 2020 06: 43
        Quote: Avior
        You cannot convey a picture like that, and control commands are easy, especially since there will not be very many commands

        In this case, is it possible to call corrected artillery shells drones?
        1. +2
          31 December 2020 10: 10
          Drone is the colloquial name for a UAV.
          The UAV can be controlled remotely, it can be automatically, or it can be a combination of these methods.
          And as for the projectile, I'm not sure that the term aircraft can be applied to it at all.
          1. +1
            31 December 2020 11: 17
            Quote: Avior
            Drone is the colloquial name for a UAV.

            So it is incorrect to call a drone any other unmanned vehicle other than an aircraft.
            1. +2
              31 December 2020 13: 06
              Is that an underwater drone smile
  8. -2
    30 December 2020 11: 51
    A flaw: it is necessary to equip drones with subversive charges to protect themselves from such would-be fishermen.
    1. +1
      30 December 2020 12: 13
      And what will give the charge? Structural deformation and debris, often objectively with preserved aggregate integrity for later analysis. This is not a torpedo, the warhead torpedo has a big one. Design a drone with a multi-charge plug? And what should then be the principle of self-liquidation?
      Again, the class of work with such a drone will be completely different ...
      1. -1
        30 December 2020 13: 46
        Quote: Flashpoint
        And what will give the charge? Structural deformation and debris, often objectively with preserved aggregate integrity for later analysis. This is not a torpedo, the warhead torpedo has a big one. Design a drone with a multi-charge plug? And what should then be the principle of self-liquidation?
        Again, the class of work with such a drone will be completely different ...

        At the very least, he will tear his hands off. This is also a good thing. They won't climb next time.
  9. +1
    30 December 2020 11: 53
    China has not officially admitted the loss of a marine drone off the coast of Indonesia

    Who thinks them there in China? For a long time, the account is no longer in thousands or tens of thousands
  10. +1
    30 December 2020 12: 16
    The era of drones wandering "by themselves" is not soon, but everything is heading for that.
  11. +1
    30 December 2020 12: 37
    Let him announce a tender for the purchase of this device, there will be buyers and the person will earn a lot.
  12. +1
    30 December 2020 13: 24
    [quote = syndicalist] [quote] China has not officially acknowledged the loss of a marine drone off the coast of Indonesia [/ quote]
    Who thinks them there in China? For a long time, the account is no longer in the thousands and not in tens of thousands [/ Quote]
    The world makes 96 million cars a year.
    Of these, China is more than 30 million and they drive
    all over the ball. And now along the bottom
    seas and oceans millions of drones will drive.
    Grandfather told me - Soviet tanks in the 45th
    in China - the column goes with a minimum interval,
    there is a cloud of dust behind each car. Soldier on armor
    dropped an aluminum mug - Chinese head over heels
    rolls right next to the tracks and triumphantly
    raises a crumpled mug. The next day he already
    sells on the market in perfect shape, covered with enamel,
    and on it the chicken is drawn as if it were alive and
    will run away now.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"