Military Review

Alexey Navalny faces a real sentence

324

Russian oppositionist and blogger Alexei Navalny faces a real term for evading control of the criminal executive inspection. This was reported on the website of the Federal Penitentiary Service (FSIN).


Navalny may have a suspended sentence replaced with a real one. The UFSIN explained that the oppositionist is evading control of the criminal executive inspection. According to the agency, citing the publication in the Lancet magazine, Navalny was discharged from the Charite clinic on September 20, and on October 12, as German doctors said, he "passed all the consequences of the disease."

Based on the publication, A.A. Navalny was discharged from the Charite clinic on September 20, 2020, and by October 12, he had all the consequences of his illness. Thus, a conditionally convicted person does not fulfill the duties assigned to him by the court and evades the control of the criminal executive inspection

- said the agency.

However, instead of returning to Russia and visiting the Moscow branch of the Federal Penitentiary Service, according to the court's verdict, Navalny continues to stay in Germany and evade control.

It is noted that on December 28, the oppositionist was notified of the need to visit the UFSIN. In case of further disregard of the requirements and "systematic violations", the department, according to the law, has the right to demand from the court that the suspended sentence be replaced with a real one.

Let us remind you that Alexei Navalny has two convictions: in the cases of Kirovles and Yves Rocher. The probationary period in the Yves Rocher case ends on December 30 this year. Earlier, it was suggested that Navalny deliberately stayed in Germany until the end of the suspended sentence, which could, upon his return, turn into "real".
Photos used:
Facebook / Bulk
324 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Ru_Na
    Ru_Na 29 December 2020 09: 27
    +25
    It's high time to send this clown to places not so distant!
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. military_cat
          military_cat 29 December 2020 09: 42
          +1
          Am I understanding correctly that the article in the Lancet is now officially recognized as a reliable source? It says, among other things, that he was poisoned by a newcomer in Russia. Is it like doping, which was denied and then quietly admitted?
          1. FenH
            FenH 29 December 2020 09: 48
            +11
            Quote: military_cat
            Am I understanding correctly that the article in the Lancet is now officially recognized as a reliable source? It says, among other things, that he was poisoned by a newcomer in Russia. Is it like doping, which was denied and then quietly admitted?

            A screenshot from the Lancet with this statement provide?
            1. Avior
              Avior 29 December 2020 10: 21
              +2
              Have you seen a screenshot of the certificate with the statement that he is completely healthy?
              1. FenH
                FenH 29 December 2020 10: 28
                +7
                Quote: Avior
                And you are a screenshot of the help with the statement that he is completely healthy, have you seen?

                and where I stated it? By the way, how did the panties get into the bottle?
                1. Avior
                  Avior 29 December 2020 10: 40
                  -1
                  You ask for a screenshot of some kind of help, so I asked if you had seen other screenshots.
                  1. FenH
                    FenH 29 December 2020 10: 41
                    +3
                    Quote: Avior
                    You ask for a screenshot of some kind of help, so I asked if you had seen other screenshots.

                    Yes I saw

                    https://telegra.ph/Navalnyj-otravlen-ne-Novichkom-Neozhidannye-vyvody-kliniki-SHarite-12-28
                    1. Avior
                      Avior 29 December 2020 11: 31
                      +2
                      The link you specified does not contain a screenshot or at least an excerpt from the screenshot, which would indicate that the bulk was not poisoned by a newbie.
                      There is no such statement from the anonymous author of the article under your link, he has not a statement, but a question.
                      Is Navalny poisoned not by Novice?

                      on the other hand, an anonymous author refers to a serious article in The Lancet, and that one explicitly states

                      laboratory of the German armed forces designated by the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) had identified an organophosphorus nerve agent from the novichok group in blood samples collected immediately after the patient's admission to Charité, 1 a finding that was subsequently confirmed by the OPCW.


                      A laboratory of the German Armed Forces, appointed by the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), has identified an organophosphate nerve agent from the novice group in blood samples collected immediately after the patient's admission to the Charite. , 1 conclusion, which was subsequently confirmed by the OPCW. 2

                      Under link 2, there is just attached a screenshot of the report of the OPCW laboratory, which confirms the fact of chemical poisoning of Navalny, although the word newbie is not used there, since under this name he was not officially included in the lists of the convention
                      5. The results of the analysis of biomedical samples conducted by the OPCW designated
                      laboratories demonstrate that Mr Navalny was exposed to a toxic chemical acting as a
                      cholinesterase inhibitor. The biomarkers of the cholinesterase inhibitor found in
                      Mr Navalny's blood and urine samples have similar structural characteristics to the
                      toxic chemicals belonging to schedules 1.A.14 and 1.A.15, which were added to
                      the Annex on Chemicals to the Convention at the Twenty-Fourth Session of the
                      Conference of the States Parties in November 2019. This cholinesterase inhibitor is
                      not listed in the Annex on Chemicals to the Convention.

                      5. Results of OPCW analysis of biomedical samples.
                      laboratories show that Mr. Navalny was exposed to a toxic chemical that acts as
                      cholinesterase inhibitor. Cholinesterase inhibitor biomarkers found in
                      Mr Navalny's blood and urine samples have similar structural characteristics
                      toxic chemicals belonging to Schedules 1.A.14 and 1.A.15 that have been added to
                      Chemicals Annex to the Convention at the twenty-fourth session
                      Conference of the States Parties November 2019 This cholinesterase inhibitor
                      not listed in the Chemicals Annex to the Convention.
                      (sorry for the machine translation, it was too lazy to type. who really needs it, will look in the original smile )

                      here is this screenshot of the report
                      https://www.opcw.org/sites/default/files/documents/2020/10/s-1906-2020%28e%29.pdf

                      hi
                      1. FenH
                        FenH 29 December 2020 14: 14
                        +2
                        Quote: Avior
                        The link you specified does not contain a screenshot or at least an excerpt from the screenshot, which would indicate that the bulk was not poisoned by a newbie.
                        There is no such statement from the anonymous author of the article under your link, he has not a statement, but a question.
                        Is Navalny poisoned not by Novice?

                        on the other hand, an anonymous author refers to a serious article in The Lancet, and that one explicitly states

                        laboratory of the German armed forces designated by the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) had identified an organophosphorus nerve agent from the novichok group in blood samples collected immediately after the patient's admission to Charité, 1 a finding that was subsequently confirmed by the OPCW.


                        A laboratory of the German Armed Forces, appointed by the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), has identified an organophosphate nerve agent from the novice group in blood samples collected immediately after the patient's admission to the Charite. , 1 conclusion, which was subsequently confirmed by the OPCW. 2

                        Under link 2, there is just attached a screenshot of the OPCW laboratory report, which confirms the fact of chemical poisoning of Navalny, although the word newbie is not used there, since officially under this name it was not included in the lists of the convention
                        5. The results of the analysis of biomedical samples conducted by the OPCW designated
                        laboratories demonstrate that Mr Navalny was exposed to a toxic chemical acting as a
                        cholinesterase inhibitor. The biomarkers of the cholinesterase inhibitor found in
                        Mr Navalny's blood and urine samples have similar structural characteristics to the
                        toxic chemicals belonging to schedules 1.A.14 and 1.A.15, which were added to
                        the Annex on Chemicals to the Convention at the Twenty-Fourth Session of the
                        Conference of the States Parties in November 2019. This cholinesterase inhibitor is
                        not listed in the Annex on Chemicals to the Convention.

                        5. Results of OPCW analysis of biomedical samples.
                        laboratories show that Mr. Navalny was exposed to a toxic chemical that acts as
                        cholinesterase inhibitor. Cholinesterase inhibitor biomarkers found in
                        Mr Navalny's blood and urine samples have similar structural characteristics
                        toxic chemicals belonging to Schedules 1.A.14 and 1.A.15 that have been added to
                        Chemicals Annex to the Convention at the twenty-fourth session
                        Conference of the States Parties November 2019 This cholinesterase inhibitor
                        not listed in the Chemicals Annex to the Convention.
                        (sorry for the machine translation, it was too lazy to type. who really needs it, will look in the original smile )

                        here is this screenshot of the report
                        https://www.opcw.org/sites/default/files/documents/2020/10/s-1906-2020%28e%29.pdf

                        hi

                        Where does it say about Novice? Dichlorvos is included in the same group and is not included in the list of toxic substances, maybe he was poisoned on the plane with Dichlorvos?
                      2. Avior
                        Avior 29 December 2020 14: 56
                        +1
                        The fact of chemical poisoning there is unambiguously confirmed, which means that a criminal case should be instituted, Whatever he was poisoned.
                        Moreover, this substance is on the lists of the organization for the prohibition of chemical weapons.
                        And then send them Navalny's control samples and ask questions, what specific points need to be clarified if they are not clear
                        hi
                      3. FenH
                        FenH 29 December 2020 15: 03
                        0
                        Quote: Avior
                        The fact of chemical poisoning there is unequivocally confirmed, which means that a criminal case should be instituted, Whatever he was poisoned.
                        Moreover, this substance is on the lists of the organization for the prohibition of chemical weapons.
                        And then send them Navalny's control samples and ask questions, what specific points need to be clarified if they are not clear
                        hi

                        Poisoning whom? Let them provide biomaterials to confirm the identity of the poisoned. Why on earth should Russia send them something, they prove the fact of poisoning? Let them bring them to Russia, we will check
                      4. Avior
                        Avior 29 December 2020 15: 51
                        -7
                        Russia is a member of the OPCW, a respected international organization
                        OPCW confirmed the fact of poisoning.
                        If the Russian laboratories could not determine it, judging by their statement, it is necessary to initiate a case - there is a statement by Navalny for this -, conclude an agreement on legal assistance with the OPCW and send them control samples with Navalny's samples.
                        Everything will be according to the law.
                      5. major147
                        major147 29 December 2020 19: 00
                        +6
                        Quote: Avior
                        Everything will be according to the law.

                        According to the law, you need a "piece of paper with a seal" to initiate a criminal case, and not someone's conclusions there. But there are no official documents not from Germany, not from the "respected international organization OPCW".
                      6. Mykhalych
                        Mykhalych 30 December 2020 00: 07
                        +1
                        Quote: major147
                        By law, you need a "piece of paper with a seal" to initiate a criminal case

                        Yes please: The Investigative Committee of Russia has opened a criminal case against blogger Alexei Navalny for large-scale fraud. Navalny is accused of embezzling 356 million rubles, collected as donations for the needs of non-profit organizations. tongue The sanctions under Part 4, Article 159 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation are quite serious, up to 10 years. bully
                      7. Avior
                        Avior 30 December 2020 01: 13
                        -3
                        Code of Criminal Procedure Article 140. Reasons and grounds for initiating a criminal case

                        1. The reasons for initiating a criminal case are:
                        1) statement of the crime;
                        2) appearance with confession;
                        3) a message about a committed or impending crime, received from other sources;
                        4) the decision of the prosecutor to send the relevant materials to the preliminary investigation body to resolve the issue of criminal prosecution ...

                        There is a statement.
                        There is also a message from other sources.
                        There is no case on the application.
                      8. major147
                        major147 30 December 2020 16: 54
                        -1
                        Quote: Avior
                        There is a statement.

                        Where? Whose?
                      9. Avior
                        Avior 30 December 2020 17: 01
                        +1
                        Bulk
                        In any case, he says in the video that he sent a statement
                      10. major147
                        major147 30 December 2020 17: 04
                        -1
                        Quote: Avior
                        Bulk
                        In any case, he says in the video that he sent a statement

                        If sent, then the answer will be in any case. Either business or refusal.
                      11. Avior
                        Avior 30 December 2020 17: 07
                        +1
                        As far as I understand, there has already been a refusal to initiate a pre-investigation check.
                        But according to the statement, I did not hear
                      12. major147
                        major147 30 December 2020 17: 08
                        -1
                        Quote: Avior
                        But according to the statement, I did not hear

                        I'm on the statement. If I'm not mistaken - a month to check.
            2. Avior
              Avior 30 December 2020 01: 15
              -3
              there is an official document. A short report of the OPCW, I gave the link above
              Code of Criminal Procedure Article 140. Reasons and grounds for initiating a criminal case

              1. The reasons for initiating a criminal case are:
              1) statement of the crime;
              2) appearance with confession;
              3) a message about a committed or impending crime received from other sources; ...

              there is a statement, there is a message from other sources
              No business
            3. major147
              major147 30 December 2020 17: 02
              +2
              Quote: Avior
              there is an official document. OPCW Summary Report,

              6. Identified biomarkers are contained in a secret secretariat report.
              Translated into Russian: "We have the evidence, but we will not show it to you!"
            4. Avior
              Avior 30 December 2020 17: 12
              +2
              And they should not get evidence in a criminal case, this is the matter of the investigation
              Please note that to initiate a case, you do not need evidence, but a message.
              In Omsk, there is a control sample of Navalny's samples, you need to withdraw it as expected, within the framework of a criminal case initiated at the request of Navalny, conclude an agreement on legal assistance with the OPCW and send the samples for verification
              The results obtained will legally be included in the investigation.
            5. major147
              major147 30 December 2020 17: 33
              0
              Quote: Avior
              conclude a legal assistance agreement with the OPCW and send samples for verification

              And they will give "the name of the poisoner", as in Syria!
      2. napalm
        napalm 30 December 2020 15: 29
        +2
        Germany refers to the OPCW and the OPCW refers to Germany. Everything is dead end.
      3. major147
        major147 30 December 2020 16: 51
        +1
        Quote: napalm
        Germany refers to the OPCW and the OPCW refers to Germany. Everything is dead end.

        That's what I'm talking about....
  2. Intruder
    Intruder 30 December 2020 01: 07
    -2
    Everything will be according to the law.
    for sure, as soon as he returns to the Russian Federation, the FSIN will immediately put on bracelets in the terminal and in the insulator, and then either poison Lech again with a control injection for a guarantee, or he will be pulled up on a towel, but according to the law ... I just feel sorry for the peasant ... it's not destiny for him, now listen to Russian birches in the suburbs in the morning ...
  3. Avior
    Avior 30 December 2020 01: 17
    -4
    I don't think he'll be back now.
    and still sue money.
  4. FenH
    FenH 30 December 2020 06: 11
    +2
    Quote: Avior
    Russia is a member of the OPCW, a respected international organization
    OPCW confirmed the fact of poisoning.
    If the Russian laboratories could not determine it, judging by their statement, it is necessary to initiate a case - there is a statement by Navalny for this -, conclude an agreement on legal assistance with the OPCW and send them control samples with Navalny's samples.
    Everything will be according to the law.

    Poisoning whom? Santa Claus or someone else? It confirmed the presence of a "novice" type in biomaterials, and whose biomaterials are they? Maybe they were poisoning rats in a fumble? So all that you write is complete nonsense
  5. Avior
    Avior 30 December 2020 08: 49
    -2
    Read the report, everything is written there
    The bypass took samples by ourselves
  6. FenH
    FenH 30 December 2020 08: 52
    0
    Quote: Avior
    Read the report, everything is written there
    The bypass took samples by ourselves

    I congratulate you lying, I passed the blood to the rummage, taken on the day of arrival, then we spent 2 weeks
  7. Avior
    Avior 30 December 2020 15: 52
    -1
    Well, you are healthy and compose
    The OPCW Group made a fence
    Doctors from Sharite - only technical manipulations under the control of the group
    This is understandable - while he is a patient, no one else had the right to do this.
    On 6 September 2020, the TAV team visited the Charité Hospital in Berlin. In the hospital's intensive care unit, the TAV team members confirmed Mr Navalny's identity against a photo-identification document presented to the team by the German authorities. In line with OPCW procedures, blood and urine sampling was conducted by the hospital staff under the direct supervision and continuous visual observation of the team members. The samples were maintained under OPCW chain of custody and transported to the OPCW Laboratory.

    Clearly wives
  8. Okolotochny
    Okolotochny 30 December 2020 12: 49
    -3
    Do you know why Germany does not transfer all materials, including bio of Russia? With a high degree of probability, the "blogger's" bio materials were also selected in Russia. The Germans are simply afraid that they will be caught in fake business.
  9. Deck
    Deck 30 December 2020 21: 26
    -5
    Poisoning whom? Let them provide biomaterials to confirm the identity of the poisoned. Why on earth should Russia send them something, they prove the fact of poisoning? Let them bring them to Russia, we will check


    That you contact the FSIN. They are there under the article from the Lancet to monitor health.
  10. Alexander Lysenko
    Alexander Lysenko 31 December 2020 06: 23
    +1
    Fuck? Yes. Check out the newbie action. A corpse in a few seconds.
  • gsev
    gsev 30 December 2020 01: 50
    +1
    Quote: FenH
    Yes I saw

    https://telegra.ph/Navalnyj-otravlen-ne-Novichkom-Neozhidannye-vyvody-kliniki-SHarite-12-28

    As the chemists explained to me, the Charite Clinic does not have equipment that can be used to find traces of nerve agents used to poison unwanted persons. Such substances are specially designed to be difficult to detect, but this comes at the cost of reducing the toxicity of the poison. However, according to a person's reaction to poisoning, one can conclude with what he was poisoned and how he should be treated. Apparently, Navalny was narrowed to the point of the pupil. This allowed Russian doctors to find a way to save the victim. Apparently, the flight attendant on board the plane realized that their passenger was poisoned with a nerve agent and fearing the start of a terrorist attack with the use of nerve agents, the crew urgently landed the plane. Navalny was brought to the hospital where doctors stupidly and quickly injected him with a horse dose of atropine or something similar. Then everything depended on his body and supportive therapy. In principle, the German doctors from the Charite clinic are guilty of saving Navalny's life by 5 or 10. The devices in Moscow and Novosibirsk clinics have a sensitivity comparable to that of the Charite clinic, so the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation also failed to determine the structure of the poison that entered Navalny. However, in Germany, knowing who Navalny was, apparently transferred his biomaterials (urine, blood and feces) to the laboratory of the German military, who are engaged in combat poisons and who should have equipment that is about 100 times more sensitive, which allows you to control the production technology of such poisons. Then the Germans checked their findings in independent laboratories (CIA ?, MI?) And transferred samples of Navalny's biomaterial to the OPCW. Where did the notification come from? check guys such and such structures, where there are devices capable of controlling the process of creating nerve agents for special forces. Against this background, the statements of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation that the OPCW and Germany did not provide us with the results of the chemical analysis of the biomaterials of the analysis look inappropriate. Russia is supposed to find out who is poisoning its politicians. Silence means that the state recognizes that unknown structures have the right to produce such poisons and poison their citizens with them on its territory, or its inability to resist chemical attacks by terrorists.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. zenion
      zenion 30 December 2020 15: 35
      -1
      Apparently he was used to only one poison. And then he licked, and the poison turned out to be foreign, unfamiliar to his body. But he could not vomit, so as not to give out whose he licked. This is how you have to be an idiot, such as a viper who does not know what dose of poison to administer to a mouse, or a rat. The viper does not do it by trial and error, it is poisonous for sure. And Gusev came up with how they did not know how many kg of poison is needed for the weight of Navalny. And the author made a blot and smeared it all over the Internet.
  • Temples
    Temples 29 December 2020 10: 32
    +2
    A man is molded from a piece of shit.
    And they force the Russian people to talk about it.

    Don't touch shit, it doesn't stink.
    1. private person
      private person 30 December 2020 08: 04
      +5
      And they force the Russian people to talk about it.

      Although I'm not a supporter of Navalny, his investigations are suggestive. And by the way, there is no refutation of his investigations, only accusations of ties with the West. Personally, I do not care where he gets the data from, the main thing is that they are reliable. And judging by the fact that he has not yet been imprisoned for libel, the data are reliable.
      1. zenion
        zenion 30 December 2020 15: 38
        -4
        As I was told by one Grisha, who was being treated for alcoholism in the madhouse, was treated for three months. He never, did not hear or see that the staff of the madhouse argued with the patient. They always agree with him and fully support all his words, but at the same time lead him in the direction necessary for the doctor. Arguing with a fool means that you need to lower yourself to his level.
        1. private person
          private person 30 December 2020 19: 50
          +1
          As one Grisha told me

          Are you that Grisha?
  • Mykhalych
    Mykhalych 29 December 2020 10: 38
    +7
    Quote: Avior
    Have you seen a screenshot of the certificate with the statement that he is completely healthy?

    Earlier, the German clinic Charite admitted that Navalny was discharged on September 20, and by October 12 he had all the consequences of his illness..- this is enough, because they believe- the same what olesha says; By the way, your idol is clamoring for Article 275 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. There are reasons for him to be accused of treason to his country: provocation of sanctions (now for various reasons), damage to the state, actions in the interests of the special services. bully
    1. Avior
      Avior 29 December 2020 11: 38
      -3
      all the consequences have passed, this does not mean that rehabilitation or some other treatment is not required, and on occasion, I think, he will provide such a certificate without any problems.
      there are no healthy people, there are under-examined, as doctors say, yes there is some kind of disease.
      and he is not my idol, he is nobody to me, and his problems do not really bother me.
      in this whole story, I am only interested in those red lines that the authorities have drawn for themselves.
      hi
  • Artunis
    Artunis 29 December 2020 10: 59
    -12%
    He saw the panties and probably even smelled.
    1. gsev
      gsev 30 December 2020 01: 55
      0
      Quote: Artunis
      He saw the panties and probably even smelled.

      When poisoning with nerve gas or another substance, involuntary urination and diarrhea can occur. This is how the body tries to remove the poison.
      1. zenion
        zenion 30 December 2020 15: 42
        -1
        When you took the test with your tongue, you did not accidentally confuse urine with diarrhea. In the same place, everything can mix, only a skilled person with great experience, like yours, can distinguish what is what and who is who? Maybe these were not his cowards, maybe they were others, from a bear?
  • military_cat
    military_cat 29 December 2020 10: 32
    +1
    Quote: FenH
    Quote: military_cat
    It says, among other things, that he was poisoned by a newcomer in Russia.

    A screenshot from the Lancet with this statement provide?

    To take a screenshot of the article text, you need to register on the Lancet website. The word "newbie" is right in the title of the article. One of the factors of recovery after poisoning, the authors of the article named timely medical care in Omsk.
    1. FenH
      FenH 29 December 2020 10: 35
      +2
      Quote: military_cat
      Quote: FenH
      A screenshot from the Lancet with this statement provide?

      To take a screenshot of the article text, you need to register on the Lancet website. The word "newbie" is right in the title of the article. Timely medical assistance in Omsk is named by the authors of the article as one of the factors of recovery after poisoning.

      Despite the loud title of the article, its authors do not claim that Alexei Navalny was poisoned with chemical weapons (CW). They only cite the findings of a laboratory accredited by the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW). However, her report lacks specific biomarkers of poisoning, which is strangely explained by "safety requirements."
      1. military_cat
        military_cat 29 December 2020 10: 39
        0
        If the article is unreliable, why does the FSIN officially refer to it as the basis for its procedural decisions?
        1. FenH
          FenH 29 December 2020 10: 44
          +2
          Quote: military_cat
          If the article is unreliable, why does the FSIN officially refer to it as the basis for its procedural decisions?

          Where is it not reliable? It does not contain your statement
          he was poisoned by a newcomer in Russia
          1. military_cat
            military_cat 29 December 2020 10: 58
            -1
            The article is called "Novichok nerve agent poisoning". Does this title carry valid information? Yes / no.
            1. TAMBU
              TAMBU 29 December 2020 11: 27
              +6
              Does the OPCW report carry true information yes / no?
            2. FenH
              FenH 29 December 2020 14: 17
              0
              Quote: military_cat
              The article is called "Novichok nerve agent poisoning". Does this title carry valid information? Yes / no.

              No, what is a newcomer if he is not on the OPCW list. And on the fence, too, they write a lot, and behind him a shed
            3. military_cat
              military_cat 29 December 2020 14: 24
              +1
              Quote: FenH
              No

              Thank you.

              Hence the logical question - why does our FSIN officially use the Lancet article in its procedural decisions, if inaccurate information in it begins with the title itself?
            4. FenH
              FenH 29 December 2020 14: 28
              0
              Quote: military_cat
              Quote: FenH
              No

              Thank you.

              Hence the logical question - why does our FSIN officially use the Lancet article in its procedural decisions, if inaccurate information in it begins with the title itself?

              You didn't tell me where it says that he was poisoned in Russia?
            5. military_cat
              military_cat 29 December 2020 14: 31
              -1
              Answered.

              Timely medical assistance in Omsk is named by the authors of the article as one of the factors of recovery after poisoning.


              This means that in Omsk he was already poisoned, right? There can be no other interpretations? Or maybe?
            6. FenH
              FenH 29 December 2020 14: 35
              +2
              Quote: military_cat
              Answered.

              Timely medical assistance in Omsk is named by the authors of the article as one of the factors of recovery after poisoning.


              This means that in Omsk he was already poisoned, right? There can be no other interpretations? Or maybe?

              There was no medical aid for poisoning, our doctors announced this, and a sanitary doctor from a German plane indicated symptoms that were not typical for poisoning (pupils), the symptoms appeared already in Germany, what was done with him on the ambulance plane?
            7. military_cat
              military_cat 29 December 2020 14: 39
              0
              Well, that means, again, we come to the conclusion that the article in the Lancet carries false information. So? Is that correct?

              In this case, I once again return to the question - why does our Federal Penitentiary Service officially use an unreliable article from the Lancet in its procedural decisions?
            8. FenH
              FenH 29 December 2020 14: 44
              -2
              Quote: military_cat
              Well, that means, again we come to the conclusion that the article in Lancet carries false information... So? Is that correct?

              In this case, I once again return to the question - why does our FSIN officially use the unreliable article of the Lancet in its procedural decisions?

              Where is it said that he cannot do this? Or the Lancet can be done and the FSIN cannot?
            9. military_cat
              military_cat 29 December 2020 14: 46
              -1
              Quote: FenH
              Where is it said that he cannot do this? Or the Lancet can be done and the FSIN cannot?

              Well, so it would be right away. And then they all rested for some reason.
            10. FenH
              FenH 29 December 2020 14: 47
              -1
              Quote: military_cat
              Quote: FenH
              Where is it said that he cannot do this? Or the Lancet can be done and the FSIN cannot?

              Well, so it would be right away. And then they all rested for some reason.

              I resisted about the poisoning by Russia, I did not ask questions about the FSIN
            11. military_cat
              military_cat 29 December 2020 14: 52
              0
              If the article is unreliable, what difference does it make what is in it?
            12. FenH
              FenH 29 December 2020 14: 56
              -2
              Quote: military_cat
              If the article is unreliable, what's the difference what's in it?

              Much
    2. Rusticolus
      Rusticolus 29 December 2020 19: 28
      0
      And where did you get the idea that the FSIN uses unreliable sources in its decisions? He was obliged to appear, did not appear without a good reason, because no reliable source confirmed his poisoning. Omsk doctors (the only reliable source) assert that there was no poisoning bov. This is enough to admit the fact of malicious evasion from punishment. For me, there was such a delay of 22 days that he was given too much connivance at someone's words. He should have been sent to the bunk a long time ago in strict accordance with the letter of the law.
    3. military_cat
      military_cat 29 December 2020 19: 34
      -1
      Quote: Rusticolus
      And where did you get the idea that the FSIN uses unreliable sources in its decisions?

      Because the FSIN directly referred to the article in the Lancet as the basis for its decision (re-read the text of the news). Nobody, as they say, pulled the tongue.
    4. Rusticolus
      Rusticolus 29 December 2020 19: 43
      -1
      I read it carefully again. There is a link to the dates during which he allegedly underwent treatment from the words of third parties. He did not provide reliable facts that he really underwent treatment there. Consequently, in accordance with the law, this act is qualified as an evasion of execution and entails a criminal penalty. Everything, period. And there is no need to think of anything here.
    5. military_cat
      military_cat 29 December 2020 19: 44
      -2
      Well, you tell the Federal Penitentiary Service, not me, so that they don’t think it out. They also got this bright idea to refer to the Lancet.
    6. Rusticolus
      Rusticolus 29 December 2020 19: 50
      +1
      And they don’t think it out. The fact that there are unconfirmed statements by third parties, if any, may well be reflected in the case file. But this does not mean that someone is going to take them into account when making a decision. In the statement of the Federal Penitentiary Service, I did not see the statement that they made their decision based on these, and only these statements. There is simply no such thing.
    7. military_cat
      military_cat 29 December 2020 19: 55
      -2
      Quote: Rusticolus
      The fact that there are unconfirmed statements by third parties, if any, may well be reflected in the case file.

      Great, then in the case file I would like to say hello to everyone who knows me and order some good and kind song for them.
    8. Rusticolus
      Rusticolus 29 December 2020 20: 10
      -3
      You seem to have absolutely no understanding of legal terms, and absolutely no understanding of jurisprudence. A sort of modern school-sofa expert in everything, who considers himself always right regardless of anything. I will not indicate which community close to the topic of the article possesses these features. This is obvious to all other adequate people.
  • gsev
    gsev 1 January 2021 04: 09
    -1
    Quote: Rusticolus
    for no reliable source has confirmed his poisoning.

    Is it V.V. Putin did not say in an interview that he personally urgently organized the transportation of the poisoned Navalny to Germany for treatment, despite having a written undertaking not to leave the place?
  • Cyril G ...
    Cyril G ... 1 January 2021 22: 45
    +2
    Che is not clear, as soon as they were dragged on a stretcher into a business jet, they immediately sprayed with dust.
  • Cyril G ...
    Cyril G ... 29 December 2020 17: 42
    +1
    Quote: military_cat
    This means that in Omsk he was already poisoned, right?


    No, it only means that drinking everything that burns and chewing with cigarette butts is very unhealthy
  • military_cat
    military_cat 29 December 2020 19: 11
    -2
    By the way, have the doctors already found a stick in Navalny's biomaterials? The last time they had news from them, as far as I remember, they said that the tests showed nothing. Was medicine really powerless in detecting sticks and cigarette butts?
  • Cyril G ...
    Cyril G ... 29 December 2020 20: 16
    0
    They were ashamed of cho. But you can continue to believe in the ravings of the gray mare, that our government over and over again uses the most harmless war agent in the world, Novichek, in an attempt to exterminate either the former spyena, who could have been killed a hundred times in the zone with the good old sharpening, or not much more serious figure opposed to the Fuehrer.
    Well, I cannot forbid you to believe in stupidity.
  • military_cat
    military_cat 29 December 2020 21: 23
    -1
    Quote: Cyril G ...
    They were ashamed of cho.

    And when they then investigated biometrics at the Sklifosovsky Research Institute (https://www.rbc.ru/society/03/09/2020/5f50d6919a79477fdaa7a492), they studied it with a mass spectrometer with a base of 240 substances (and also searched for others "not included in library of equipment "), did not find anything - they were also ashamed to say about the stick and cigarette butts?
  • gsev
    gsev 30 December 2020 02: 10
    +1
    Quote: military_cat
    the last time, as far as I remember, they said that the tests showed nothing.

    Medical equipment should not be able to detect such poisons. Otherwise, the terrorists would have introduced their people to the city hospital and there they opened the production of a poisonous substance, controlling the technical process with such a device and their safety in the production of poison.
  • military_cat
    military_cat 30 December 2020 05: 47
    -1
    Quote: gsev
    Medical equipment should not be able to detect such poisons.
    There was an answer to the remark that Navalny was poisoned by low-quality alcohol.
  • Avior
    Avior 29 December 2020 11: 40
    -1
    links are available in the Lancet, the second link is a short report of the OPCW, it is in the public domain (as opposed to the full one)
  • gsev
    gsev 30 December 2020 02: 05
    +2
    Quote: military_cat
    To take a screenshot of the article text, you need to register on the Lancet website.

    It seems that there is no mention of Navalny's name in the Lancet. The reaction of our Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the FSB allows us to conclude that the people in these structures, involved in the reaction of state bodies to the article in Lancet, are themselves concerned about the poisoning of Navalny and fear a repetition of 1937, where nerve poison will be used instead of "10 years without the right to correspond". Commenting on the article in Lancet, concluding that Lancet writes about Navalny, that Navalny recovered from the poisoning and demanding Navalny's attendance at the FSIN, his representatives actually admitted that Navalny was poisoned in Russia.
  • TAMBU
    TAMBU 29 December 2020 09: 55
    +5
    I don’t know about you, but I personally read experts to understand something correctly. for example here:
    https://telegra.ph/Navalnyj-otravlen-ne-Novichkom-Neozhidannye-vyvody-kliniki-SHarite-12-28
    1. Dodikson
      Dodikson 29 December 2020 10: 26
      -6
      and bots and liberals even in the eyes ... all Baydenovskaya dew.
      1. lis-ik
        lis-ik 29 December 2020 11: 35
        +3
        Quote: Dodikson
        and bots and liberals even in the eyes ... all Baydenovskaya dew.

        Who are the liberals in your opinion. These are the ones who call themselves liberals and sit in the Kremlin? Or those who are not indifferent to what is happening in the Russian Federation and who do not believe the empty statements of the powerful bribe-takers?
        1. Dodikson
          Dodikson 29 December 2020 11: 38
          -3
          those who say that he is worried about Russia, but does not say that he is worried because Russia can break their fucking faces for nothing.
          in other words, pro-Westerners. including those masquerading as patriots, communists, imperials or nationalists.
          they are all ordinary Russophobes.
          1. lis-ik
            lis-ik 29 December 2020 11: 45
            +1
            Quote: Dodikson
            in other words, pro-Westerners. including those masquerading as patriots,

            Don't you find that this definition is very suitable for those who now rule Russia?
            1. Dodikson
              Dodikson 29 December 2020 15: 03
              -4
              I do not find it, but I find that those who are against those who now rule Russia fit under this definition.
        2. Cyril G ...
          Cyril G ... 29 December 2020 13: 26
          -2
          Quote: lis-ik
          Or those who are not indifferent to what is happening in the Russian Federation and who do not believe the empty statements of the powerful bribe-takers?


          The statements of the Man soiled by the most I can’t in cooperation with the ENEMY, who called for more sanctions against his country and did not do anything for Russia at all, look extremely wretched even against the background of the statements of those in power .... Which lied once again.
          1. lis-ik
            lis-ik 29 December 2020 13: 44
            -2
            Quote: Cyril G ...
            Statements of the Man soiled

            Have I even said a word in defense of bulk? On the contrary, I say that they are one field of berries.
        3. Cyril G ...
          Cyril G ... 2 January 2021 15: 55
          +1
          I will remind you just in case, otherwise the interlocutors have a memory like that of golden felling, and the thinking skills are even worse. We are talking about the same teran Vlada Putin who did not hesitate to release hundreds of thousands of shells across Chechnya, and within a dozen years after the end of the second Chechen war, cut out all the Chechen field commanders - who were not killed as soon as they were killed, but only one was poisoned with dust, but unlike the poor one, Khattab quite immediately went straight to the underworld ... Teran is a simple man. quite rightly said - they would like to kill killed ... (S.)
          I personally take this very seriously.

          who does not believe empty statements of power

          Any government is lying. The policy is called ...

          the powerful bribe-takers?
          Do not worry so, having seized it, if suddenly you eat up to the power of Lesch, so that you personally will whine looking at the moon.

          However, this is not the main thing. And most importantly, who benefits from this. The little casket opens up just really if you don't be a fish. GTS Nord Stream-2 vs an attempt to replace Russia as the main gas supplier for your loved ones.
    2. Evil Booth
      Evil Booth 29 December 2020 10: 33
      +6
      cart experts comments ... instead of a court decision or the website of the Ministry of Health ... it remains to believe in a flat earth.
      1. TAMBU
        TAMBU 29 December 2020 11: 25
        +2
        right there ... as soon as there is a court decision or a message from the Ministry of Health ...
    3. military_cat
      military_cat 29 December 2020 10: 42
      -2
      Quote: TAMBU
      I read specialists
      (...)
      anonymous telegram channel "Ruthless PR man"

      Well, you, my friend, got excited.
      1. TAMBU
        TAMBU 29 December 2020 11: 23
        -2
        well, as soon as you find better - let me know ...
    4. Avior
      Avior 29 December 2020 11: 42
      -3
      Are you serious?
      and who is this specialist
      Merciless PR man

      - article author?
      1. TAMBU
        TAMBU 29 December 2020 11: 54
        +2
        firstly, yes, why not. it's not politobzor.net ...
        secondly, who is the author - ask the channel's authors a question ...
        in the third, it says "for example" ... give another example with parsing and evaluating the article ... I'll be happy to read it ...
        1. Avior
          Avior 29 December 2020 12: 05
          +2
          Please.
          https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)32644-1/fulltext
          The Lancet is a weekly peer-reviewed general medical journal. One of the best known, oldest and most respected general medical journals

          this is a famous picture

          now, it turns out, you need to add
          2020 - "Ruthless PR man" from Telegram

          so we will fall to zero: ((((
          hi
          1. TAMBU
            TAMBU 29 December 2020 17: 08
            -1
            I did not know, for example, what Propofol is and that from hyperstimulation of the pancreas with acetylcholine, the levels of all pancreatic enzymes increase ... and how this is related to the Navalny case.

            you will be able to explain the article for non-specialists - we are waiting for your analysis, I am sure it will be interesting.

            PS I figured out you and therefore I repeat once again: with the analysis and evaluation of the article for non-specialists. Once again, or do you understand from the second?
            1. Avior
              Avior 29 December 2020 17: 38
              +1
              I explain for non-specialists - highly specialized issues of the level covered in scientific peer-reviewed journals are not disassembled in telegrams or on VO or even Katya from Facebook.
              They are sorted out in other peer-reviewed journals, whose reputation allows, if not to avoid the fact that you will read a false analysis, then at least to minimize this probability.
              The results of this analysis are already being submitted to the general public for discussion.
              What will "analysis" give you if you are not an expert. You will not be able to tell you whether they write the truth or the lie.
              But if you still want this analysis, I will do it for you.
              Parsing.
              Analyzing the specified article in the anonymous telegram channel, we see that the anime author of which, known to the reader as a Merciless PR man, does not make a statement anywhere in the article that Navalny was not poisoned by a newbie.
              Thus, everything that you read in his article is not proof that Navalny was not hounded, if he himself did not come to this conclusion based on the results of his article.
              1. TAMBU
                TAMBU 29 December 2020 22: 30
                +1
                You will not be able to tell you whether they write the truth or the lie.

                Controversial statement, but let's say ...
                Parsing the specified article in the anonymous telegram channel

                Why should I disassemble this article? I can do that myself. It was about parsing an article in The Lancet ...
                in other peer-reviewed journals, the reputation of which allows, if not to avoid the fact that you will read a false analysis, then at least to minimize this probability

                As I understand it, there are no such publications yet, but if there is, share a link, please ...
              2. Avior
                Avior 29 December 2020 23: 02
                -1
                I understand that there are no such publications yet

                and they should be?
  • Alexander I
    Alexander I 29 December 2020 15: 50
    +1
    TAMBU read the article on your link, quite interesting.
  • Cron
    Cron 29 December 2020 12: 58
    -1
    Quote: military_cat
    Am I understanding correctly that the article in the Lancet is now officially recognized as a reliable source? It says, among other things, that he was poisoned by a newcomer in Russia. Is it like doping, which was denied and then quietly admitted?

    And what about doping there? And what does doping have to do with it? What is the relationship here, I hesitate to ask?
  • zenion
    zenion 30 December 2020 15: 27
    -1
    Why are you so outright. He wears a newbie in the rectum. They scared him and had to wash his panties. Here you are with a scarecrow. He will have to walk in a lunar spacesuit, and this is very expensive. With fear, he betrays so many a newcomer that not a single diaper can withstand, all the time he breaks the dam.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Sidor Amenpodestovich
    Sidor Amenpodestovich 29 December 2020 10: 02
    -2
    Quote: Stas157
    The Russian authorities, stubbornly unwilling to investigate Navalny's poisoning, suddenly remembered justice.

    Weird people. Then they scream that Russia should not submit to the self-made concoctions of the West (the Yukos case, for example).
    They, the same people, begin to demand that Russia, running and jumping, rush, dropping everything in the world, to investigate the departure, proved in laboratory and terribly secret conditions by unknown specialists.
    1. Cron
      Cron 29 December 2020 13: 05
      +2
      investigate the shipment, proven in laboratory and terribly secret conditions by unknown specialists.

      It is as proven as the poisoning of Yushchenko. In which, of course, they tried to blame Russia. They dragged him to the same clinic as Alexis, in the Charite. They found, of course, in the blood what they needed. But as it turned out, if this substance enters the bloodstream, it leaves traces for life. And Yushchenko was refused an offer to be tested in an independent clinic. Well, whoever was already interested in this, the main thing is to bring their candidate to power. And the sheep went to the new Maidan ten years later. So it's useless to find logic in their behavior
  • Fitter65
    Fitter65 29 December 2020 11: 10
    +3
    Quote: Stas157
    The Russian authorities, stubbornly unwilling to investigate Navalny's poisoning, suddenly remembered justice.

    So there is no need to pick up anything from the floor ...
  • nnm
    nnm 29 December 2020 11: 26
    +4
    And on what basis should the investigation be conducted? Do you have a protocol of the interrogation of the victim? Do you have sperm data ?! Toxicological analysis?
    Or do you think the case should be initiated on the basis of newspaper articles and they will be the materials of the criminal case?
  • Guards turn
    Guards turn 29 December 2020 11: 40
    +2
    If Navalny is not willing to return voluntarily, the Russian Federation has the right to submit a request for extradition, there are all the necessary grounds:

    - Russian citizenship;
    - an extradition treaty between Russia and Germany;
    - the presence of a criminal offense in the Russian Federation.
  • APASUS
    APASUS 29 December 2020 11: 51
    +4
    Quote: Stas157
    The Russian authorities, stubbornly unwilling to investigate Navalny's poisoning, suddenly remembered justice.

    It’s bad that people in Syria didn’t know that it is possible to recover from BOV poisoning.
  • tihonmarine
    tihonmarine 29 December 2020 09: 56
    -5
    Quote: Dodikson
    now a bunch of bots and kaklov will run up and start to minus and prove that the anal torch of our freedom and it is necessary for the kingdom

    Already come running, how many minuses you "kakly-navalnyata" poked. Raging, splashing foam, tearing the hair on my head - "radishes" (I can not accompany this with my boatswain's language, they will be banned).
    1. Dodikson
      Dodikson 29 December 2020 10: 14
      -7
      sometimes a minus is a soooooo plus.
      1. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 29 December 2020 12: 57
        -2
        Quote: Dodikson
        sometimes a minus is a soooooo plus.

        I, too, for such minuses, I like how coaxial-navalnyata and all this Russophobic rubbish is enraged.
    2. nnm
      nnm 29 December 2020 11: 29
      -2
      And in my opinion, it's even funny ...
      They cannot even muster the courage to comment on their actions.
      But pride, probably - the whole greasy pug is crawling with pleasure.
      1. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 29 December 2020 13: 03
        -3
        Quote: nnm
        But pride, probably - the whole greasy pug is crawling with pleasure.

        They have no pride, they think so, but narcissism and supposedly significance, among the Ozetians and the last of Trotsky, are over the edge.
        1. Dodikson
          Dodikson 29 December 2020 15: 05
          -3
          Most of the pros and cons are set by the script, and the script cannot write deliberate text. so they crush with estimates without comments.
          1. tihonmarine
            tihonmarine 29 December 2020 15: 30
            -2
            Quote: Dodikson
            Most of the pros and cons are set by the script, and the script cannot write deliberate text. so they crush with estimates without comments.

            Here you are right, a lot goes through scripts, and we can only guess who runs them.
    3. Stirbjorn
      Stirbjorn 29 December 2020 12: 21
      +1
      They will miss out on the slang
      1. The comment was deleted.
  • aleksejkabanets
    aleksejkabanets 29 December 2020 10: 18
    +8
    Quote: Dodikson
    in general, he will return everyone freedom from Russia

    I have not seen such nonsense on the site. Any sane person understands that Navalny's coming to power means blood and wars for the redistribution of property. And ultimately the replacement of some oligarchs with others.

    Quote: Dodikson
    now a bunch of bots and kaklov will run up and start to minus and prove that the anal torch of our freedom and it is necessary for the kingdom

    And I have never seen such nonsense. However, please explain to me why everyone is shouting that Navalny should be imprisoned, and Potanin, for example, should not be touched for oil spills? And such figures are full. There is one unsinkable Chubais worth something. Do not you think that we have some kind of selective attitude to the "landings"?
    1. Dodikson
      Dodikson 29 December 2020 10: 26
      -4
      about Potanin from you first I see that he should not be planted.
      1. aleksejkabanets
        aleksejkabanets 29 December 2020 10: 39
        -1
        Quote: Dodikson
        about Potanin from you first I see that he should not be planted.

        The point is not in specific personalities like Potanin or Chubais, but in the fact that everyone is equal before the law, but some are "much more equal." That's what we are talking about, and you are talking about some kind of "kaklah", with "bulk" as if they only minus you. In addition, with this investigation, which, as you all write, does not need to be carried out, it turns out essentially the same thing that happened with doping in athletes. Only the consequences will be many times more serious. This is no longer Salisbury, in the West they prepared well, they had time. And the state is silent, there are no intelligible comments, there is no reasoned accusation of libel against Navalny (at least). Why?
    2. Stas157
      Stas157 29 December 2020 10: 39
      +15
      Quote: aleksejkabanets
      I have not seen such nonsense on the site. Any sane person understands that Navalny's coming to power means blood and wars for the redistribution of property. And ultimately the replacement of some oligarchs with others.

      hi Colleague, this is useless to explain that Navalny is zero, as a politician, and only his investigations are valuable. They will still consider Navalny the main disaster of Russia (instead of the real culprits), and the communists will be suspected of sympathizing with Navalny and will be called liberals.
      1. aleksejkabanets
        aleksejkabanets 29 December 2020 11: 30
        +1
        hi Hello Stas.
        Quote: Stas157
        Colleague, this is useless to explain that Navalny is zero, as a politician, and only his investigations are valuable ...

        I understand that, I just would like to hear from them at least some intelligible explanation of their position, but I'm afraid they are not capable of anything other than minuses. Some kind of "impotence of logical thinking." Recently, I am inclined to think that this whole story with Navalny is being spun by the authorities themselves and in this vein, in order to justify the coming to power of some "Savior of the Fatherland", such as Pinochet or Musolini. And the main idea will be to unite all together against the external threat (in the form of insidious "amers" and "gayropeans"), for the sake of saving Russia. And a simple worker will march alongside Abramovich forward to the prosperity of our great country.
    3. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 29 December 2020 13: 10
      -3
      Quote: aleksejkabanets
      Navalny's coming to power means blood and wars for the redistribution of property. And ultimately the replacement of some oligarchs with others.

      Ultimately, the collapse of Russia (which is what the West and the United States especially need). For what they are grown in bulk and sables in test tubes. This happened to the outskirts. This is happening in Belarus, in Russia you need to remember this.
      1. aleksejkabanets
        aleksejkabanets 29 December 2020 13: 33
        +1
        Quote: tihonmarine
        in Russia you need to remember this.

        If only about this, it would not be a problem. How do Chubais and Potanin, for example, differ from Navalny, except that they are already at the trough, and Navalny is only squeezing in there? In order to get to the trough, the conditional Chubaso-Potanins had to destroy the USSR, do you think they will not destroy Russia if it is profitable for them?
        1. tihonmarine
          tihonmarine 29 December 2020 13: 50
          0
          Quote: aleksejkabanets
          How do Chubais and Potanin, for example, differ from Navalny, except that they are already at the trough, and Navalny is only squeezing in there?

          The first got drunk and are silent. And they didn't really call people to the barricades.
          And it's not a fact that when Navalny gets drunk, he will close his mouth. Although who will give him in our time to get rich, and especially "black caviar on white bread cannot be smeared on the US grandees."
          1. aleksejkabanets
            aleksejkabanets 29 December 2020 14: 13
            +2
            Quote: tihonmarine
            The first got drunk and are silent. And they didn't really call people to the barricades.

            Have you forgotten the 90s? Maybe remember all the same with what slogans Yeltsin came to power (he was brought), how the White House was shot from tanks? And who got drunk? Have you forgotten the pension reform? Permanent depreciation of the ruble for the sake of "raw materials producers"?
            Quote: tihonmarine
            And it's not a fact that when Navalny gets drunk, he will close his mouth.

            Nobody will ever get drunk. A pig can "get drunk" only when it is already greased with straws. There is and cannot be any difference between the first and the second. Here's what to keep in mind. When Yeltsin talked about "party privileges" was he wrong? And now Navalny is filming his investigations, in many ways he is right. And then and now the government itself "rocks the boat." Here's what to keep in mind. And think about where to go, for whom to go and under what slogans to go, and whether to go at all.
            1. tihonmarine
              tihonmarine 29 December 2020 14: 41
              -1
              Quote: aleksejkabanets
              When Yeltsin talked about "party privileges" was he wrong? And now Navalny is filming his investigations, in many ways he is right.

              Yeltsin is right, but he came to power with his comrades, and they began to eat more than a pig, Navalny is also right, but having come to power (God forbid), he, too, with his comrades will eat no less "Yeltsin & Co". And they all ate and will eat thousands of times more than the Soviet party apparatus.
              1. aleksejkabanets
                aleksejkabanets 29 December 2020 15: 09
                +2
                Quote: tihonmarine
                Yeltsin is right, but he came to power with his comrades, and they began to eat more than a pig, Navalny is also right, but having come to power (God forbid), he, too, with his comrades will eat no less "Yeltsin & Co". And they all ate and will eat thousands of times more than the Soviet party apparatus.

                So I am about the same. But more about the fact that the government itself "rocks the boat," with its exorbitant greed. And I'm afraid that soon we will remember how it was in the 90s. There are already alarm bells. Again, the state has no "money", and I am not even talking about medicine or the cuts in the military budget, for example, they didn’t give me children this month, they said the federal budget didn’t transfer, they will pay it next year, in itself this is not strong for me scary, but the very fact. I remember this already, I remember how it all began. I don't want repetition.
  • Evil Booth
    Evil Booth 29 December 2020 10: 32
    0
    so I already looked at a bunch of links in the current runet, which is swabbed for sshscha, in 1 it says that the bulk of the term was not canceled, but changed the measure ... but in the rest of the type it is unbearable and canceled and therefore the service should have been ..
  • Alexey from Perm
    Alexey from Perm 29 December 2020 13: 44
    +4
    I am not a supporter of Navalny, but in his place I would not return, you know life is dearer than the scribbles of the FSIN
  • Invoce
    Invoce 29 December 2020 09: 32
    -3
    Of course, I'm not an expert on physiognomy, and perhaps they did some photoshop here, but sometimes it seems that Alyosha smokes something ... both according to his ideas and from the photo ...
    1. carstorm 11
      carstorm 11 29 December 2020 09: 36
      +3
      Not) he just has such a face) he is being bullied all the time) BOV does not take him. Even if you smear it on the codpiece))) this is the face of a fighter with a regimen) exhausted by a beginner)
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. carstorm 11
          carstorm 11 29 December 2020 09: 56
          -9
          I agree. In a coffin, the face will obviously not be better. I thought you were much smarter ...
        2. Sidor Amenpodestovich
          Sidor Amenpodestovich 29 December 2020 10: 07
          +3
          Quote: Stas157
          Normal face. Your face would be no better after being poisoned.

          So he always had that expression.
          What happens? Did the poisoning take place even before he became famous? As soon as the authorities noticed him, they immediately got scared and began to poison?
          Well, the man's health! For so many years they have poisoned him, they have poisoned him, but they will not poison him.
      2. Varyag71
        Varyag71 29 December 2020 10: 25
        0
        I will show mine
        1. carstorm 11
          carstorm 11 29 December 2020 10: 26
          +2
          Is this a threat?))) Is everything so bad?)))
    2. Dodikson
      Dodikson 29 December 2020 09: 51
      -8
      You really do not understand that a liberal tolerant of blacks smokes?
      1. Altona
        Altona 29 December 2020 13: 31
        +2
        Quote: Dodikson
        what a black-tolerant liberal smokes

        -------------------------
        1) Promotion of smoking;
        2) Hatred of a certain social group;
        3) Racial intolerance.
        I just parsed out your comment under the current legislation. Nothing personal.
        1. The comment was deleted.
    3. Skarpzd
      Skarpzd 29 December 2020 10: 03
      +14
      but what's the difference that there is a bulk smokes? the question is simple: what did the FSIN officers smoke when the bulk, despite the subscription, was running around the cities and villages ??
    4. Ross xnumx
      Ross xnumx 29 December 2020 11: 41
      +4
      Quote: Invoce
      I'm certainly not an expert on physiognomy, and maybe we did some Photoshop work here

      laughing
      Quote: Stas157
      Normal face. Your face would be no better after being poisoned.

      yes
      Quote: carstorm 11
      No, it's just his face, he is being poisoned all the time. BOV doesn't take him.

      No.
      Three users - three opinions. About persons not disfigured by intellect. Took a portrait row:

      I did not notice any special differences. As for faces in general. Sometimes, I just can't believe:
      when we see the face and the whole head of a barmaid of a modern anti-aircraft school over the old noble clothes, something prevents us from believing in her Latin.

      And more:

      laughing
      1. RUSS
        RUSS 29 December 2020 15: 07
        +3
        Quote: ROSS 42
        I did not notice any special differences. As for faces in general

        Dmitry Kozak was forgotten)
      2. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 29 December 2020 15: 38
        -1
        Quote: ROSS 42
        About persons not disfigured by intellect. Took a portrait row:

        Yes, the intellect is "so rushing."
    5. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 29 December 2020 13: 59
      -4
      Quote: Invoce
      but sometimes it seems that Alyosha smokes something ... both according to his ideas and from the photo ...

      Look at the pupils, two photos

      1. RUSS
        RUSS 29 December 2020 15: 08
        +6
        Quote: tihonmarine
        Quote: Invoce
        but sometimes it seems that Alyosha smokes something ... both according to his ideas and from the photo ...

        Look at the pupils, two photos


        Can you measure his skull? Like in Nazi Germany
        1. tihonmarine
          tihonmarine 29 December 2020 15: 32
          -6
          Quote: RUSS
          Can you measure his skull? Like in Nazi Germany

          Measuring the skull is your prerogative, and the pupils say only one thing ...
          1. RUSS
            RUSS 29 December 2020 15: 52
            +3
            Quote: tihonmarine
            Measure skulls is your prerogative

            I think I already told you what a prerogative is, clarify the meaning of this word.
            Quote: tihonmarine
            and the pupils say only one thing ...

            Are you a doctor or do you know drug addicts?))))
            1. tihonmarine
              tihonmarine 29 December 2020 18: 04
              -1
              Quote: RUSS
              Are you a doctor or do you know drug addicts?

              I am not a doctor, but how many young children have passed away before my eyes, and how many more will go away, precisely because of this foolishness. And by the pupils and by the hands, it is not difficult to determine, not to mention the behavior.
  • tihonmarine
    tihonmarine 29 December 2020 09: 52
    -5
    Quote: Ru_Na
    It's high time to send this clown to places not so distant!

    "A thief should go to jail" - that's not what I said, but I support.
    1. Lannan Shi
      Lannan Shi 29 December 2020 11: 17
      +6
      Quote: tihonmarine
      "A thief should go to jail" - that's not what I said, but I support.

      Ugums. Just any thief. And not according to the principle - this is a thief, he must sit, and this is a sparring partner, he can.
      1. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 29 December 2020 13: 13
        -2
        Quote: Lannan Shi
        Just any thief. And not according to the principle - this is a thief, he must sit,

        I agree. A thief who stole a piece of sausage, or a wallet, can only stuff his face, and a thief who is trying to ruin the state, the "White Swan" and 10 years "on the horns."
        1. Altona
          Altona 29 December 2020 13: 28
          +5
          Quote: tihonmarine
          the thief that the state is trying to destroy

          -------------------------------
          How interesting you build phrases. And most importantly, a phrase can be taken out of one context and inserted into another.
        2. Lannan Shi
          Lannan Shi 29 December 2020 17: 34
          +6
          Quote: tihonmarine
          I agree. A thief who stole a piece of sausage, or a wallet, can only stuff his face, and a thief who is trying to ruin the state, the "White Swan" and 10 years "on the horns."

          Even how? If you please, dear fellow. I don’t remember your calls to put Potanin and Fridman in prison. And the deer did not steal a piece of sausage. And not a couple of very controversial million rubles, like the bulk, which was actually accused of buying cheap and selling at a higher price, for which half of Russia could be jailed. These have stolen tens of billions. Not even rubles, dollars. But you don’t remember them. As well as not hearing screams from you - let's define a shoigu on a white swan. And he was not trying to destroy the country. He was still an active participant in its collapse. When, in August 1991, being the head of the rescue corps, he ordered to issue weapons from the corps arsenal to protect Yeltsin. As well as I do not hear from you calls to replace all the ministers of the interior, since 1995, from the start of the loans-for-shares auctions, and up to the present moment. But they actively contributed to the plunder and in fact the collapse of the country, not imprisoning and not letting offend those who stole hundreds of yards of dollars from a poor country at that time. Just as you don’t shout that FSB and prosecutors should be imprisoned, who did not want to force corrupt police officers to perform their duties. As well as not talking about the need to replace all prime ministers, starting in 1995. Those who did not want to put things in order in this gadyushnik. And don't say something about the fact that the presidents of Russia, starting from that very 1995, who have scored on their duties as a guarantor of compliance with the constitution, the same should be sent to the swan, also like that ... Do not remember.
          Don't you like bulk? Me too. At least send him to the swan, at least to the wall, at least in a loop, at least in the hole. Personally, I won't cry. With just one small clarification. That he should be accompanied by all of the above. In the meantime ... you are drowning for the thieves and traitors of the large, who started to press the thief and the traitor of the petty. And nothing more.
    2. Ross xnumx
      Ross xnumx 29 December 2020 12: 28
      +3
      Quote: tihonmarine
      "A thief should go to jail" - that's not what I said, but I support.

      Why ... Are you in case # 144128? belay
      As for the decision of the court in the Navalny cases, he did not take into account either Zheglov's remark or your opinion:

      In this series of courts, a certain regularity is striking: those who want to enter government bodies, in a strange way, become defendants in criminal cases ... I don't take Navalny. There are such comrades as PN Grudinin, NN Platoshkin ... Does this bother you?
      Nobody opened a case on Navalny's libel against honest and incorruptible officials ... I suspect that the same ECHR could doubt the correctness of the charges, since all the evidence is at hand. And the persons involved in the investigations themselves did not rush to make people laugh. Because, as it is sung in that children's song:

      And further. There one uncle stated bluntly:

      Strange decisions, strange circumstances around the "political corpse ... human insignificance" ... Isn't that so?
      1. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 29 December 2020 13: 30
        -3
        Quote: ROSS 42
        I suspect that the same ECHR could doubt the correctness of the charges, since all the evidence is at hand.

        When Milosovic was arrested, the ECHR closed its eyes, when the Sumerian hordes destroy children and the elderly in the Lao PDR, the ECHR is asleep. What confidence can there be in this feeding organization. So you leave your arguments, for the bulk-soros, they will understand you.
        Navalny exhibits on YouTube, etc. allegedly his investigations, about snickering officials, and even without him, everyone knows about them, as if he discovered America or the North Pole. But he does not expose his investigations, but what the owners slipped him. We already went through this when the Goebbels department slipped it to the citizens of the USSR.
    3. RUSS
      RUSS 29 December 2020 15: 53
      +3
      Quote: tihonmarine
      "A thief should go to jail" - I didn't say that, but I support

      Is there a court decision?
      1. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 29 December 2020 18: 26
        -3
        Quote: RUSS
        Is there a court decision?

        There were cases and court decisions, although he received suspended sentences instead of the term. Cases for 2011, 2012, 2013, and only for 2016. no charge was brought. The last preliminary hearing took place on August 17, 2020, but three days later Navalny fell into a coma, after which he was taken to the German blade.
        There is no smoke without fire.
  • Deniska999
    Deniska999 29 December 2020 10: 39
    +2
    In fact, it's wonderful, now they are released, now they are threatened with a term. It does not pose a real threat, which means that you can simply ignore it, and not go for soap, as everyone does here.
  • vkl.47
    vkl.47 29 December 2020 10: 51
    0
    In all the photos he is always with sunken eyes.
  • lis-ik
    lis-ik 29 December 2020 11: 32
    0
    Quote: Ru_Na
    It's high time to send this clown to places not so distant!

    Then all the accomplices with him. Although it is impossible, they are in power.
  • Incvizitor
    Incvizitor 29 December 2020 13: 32
    +1
    It is necessary to upload a photo of the American embassy in the articles about this frame, so as not to see this face once again.
  • ccsr
    ccsr 29 December 2020 13: 48
    0
    Quote: Ru_Na
    It's high time to send this clown to places not so distant!

    There is no need to make him a martyr by imprisonment, like Khodorkovsky - let him live there happily, and in a year or two everyone will forget about him, even those who sponsor him now. Suffice it to recall our Kasyanov "Misha-two percent", Illarionov and their fate, and they were much higher in status than Navalny, and now they are political freaks. So we must welcome the fact that Navalny ended up in the West - it was a strong move by Putin's analysts, who correctly calculated the consequences of such a step.
    1. RUSS
      RUSS 29 December 2020 15: 54
      +2
      Quote: ccsr
      it was a strong move by Putin's analysts, who correctly calculated the consequences of such a move.

      Multi-way) ?????
  • Taltek
    Taltek 29 December 2020 15: 32
    0
    Well that and mu-k with a soft head.
  • Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 29 December 2020 09: 27
    -2
    Alexey Navalny faces a real sentence
    This is of course good, but everything will work out: blah blah .... It's a pity. request
    1. Insurgent
      Insurgent 29 December 2020 09: 43
      +1
      Alexey Navalny faces a real sentence

      Even if he sits down, in which there are doubts, it will come out in the same way as in his time Khodorkovsky, who was convicted under much more serious articles ...
      1. Igoresha
        Igoresha 29 December 2020 10: 54
        +2
        Even if he sits down
        will not sit down for the same reason that the Kremlin out of fright released him to Germany, spitting on the criminal case for insulting a veteran; ent an article from the category "keep me five" (c) Zadornov, and the tail will come to the point again, fearing the threat of personal sanctions
  • Dimy4
    Dimy4 29 December 2020 09: 29
    +6
    This citizen is more suited to the definition of not an oppositionist, but troublemakers. Simple and in Russian.
    1. Stas157
      Stas157 29 December 2020 09: 57
      +21
      Quote: Dimy4
      This citizen is more suited to the definition of not an oppositionist, but troublemakers.

      Confused senior officials with anti-corruption investigations. And it looks like you too.
      1. Dimy4
        Dimy4 29 December 2020 10: 34
        +5
        Confused senior officials with anti-corruption investigations. And it looks like you too.

        Confusion and confusion have different interpretations, if confusion implies confusion, awkwardness, then the concept of confusion is rebellion, strife, disorder. And this disorder is exactly what Navalny and others like him are trying to organize at the request of their Western curators.
        P.S. The minus is not mine.
      2. The comment was deleted.
  • Alien From
    Alien From 29 December 2020 09: 29
    -2
    Santa Claus will bring him a present in the form of a bottle of perfume laughing
    1. Alien From
      Alien From 29 December 2020 09: 33
      -2
      And one more thing: in the photo, the face glows with intelligence .......
    2. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 29 December 2020 10: 01
      -2
      Quote: Alien From
      Santa Claus will bring him a present in the form of a bottle of perfume

      Gift!
  • Mykhalych
    Mykhalych 29 December 2020 09: 33
    -2
    For Olelesha, zugzwang has come.
  • rocket757
    rocket757 29 December 2020 09: 33
    +5
    Alexey Navalny faces a real sentence

    So he is not in a hurry back ... and bridges are already burning / cutting to the fullest.
    The standard ... will be like others, the same, waiting for the "Abrams" to go to Moscow ... or "Leopards".
    1. novel66
      novel66 29 December 2020 09: 45
      +1
      But what does he live on, I hesitate to ask? Germany is not a cheap country! Vitya hi
      1. carstorm 11
        carstorm 11 29 December 2020 09: 51
        +2
        18 million views of his crazy last video) will not die of hunger)
        1. novel66
          novel66 29 December 2020 09: 52
          -3
          it's a pity! cooler than newbie
        2. rocket757
          rocket757 29 December 2020 09: 57
          -2
          The one who distributes, he will certainly distribute to his kids into little things.
        3. tihonmarine
          tihonmarine 29 December 2020 10: 05
          -6
          Quote: carstorm 11
          18 million views of his crazy last vidpo) will not die of hunger)

          Brothers from overseas, will not let Lotsik interrupt with little blackie and water.
        4. Dodikson
          Dodikson 29 December 2020 10: 23
          -9
          I wonder how many billions of views are needed to buy villas in Spain and France for 3 million green rubles?
        5. Igoresha
          Igoresha 29 December 2020 10: 56
          -2
          18 million views of his crazy last video) will not die of hunger)
          100k subscribers give about $ 30-35 - from the aviation-oriented YouTube logger infa. i.e. 5400 bucks))) oh yes Navalny
      2. rocket757
        rocket757 29 December 2020 09: 56
        +2
        Hello Roman soldier
        He has already stocked up straws / silage .... being a leader of hamsters is a lucrative business, and even being able to distribute donations from sponsors, it's just a dream of anyone like that. It sticks to the handles, sticks, right by itself, by itself.
      3. RUSS
        RUSS 29 December 2020 10: 12
        -3
        Quote: novel xnumx
        But what does he live on, I hesitate to ask? Germany is not a cheap country! Vitya hi

        Watch his video where he names the persons who paid for his treatment and accommodation
    2. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 29 December 2020 10: 03
      -2
      Quote: rocket757
      The standard ... will be like others, the same, waiting for the "Abrams" to go to Moscow ... or "Leopards".

      On the downside, I see not only he is waiting for this.
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 29 December 2020 10: 05
        -3
        This is nothing more ... the hamster sect likes to sleep longer, they will disperse later.
        1. tihonmarine
          tihonmarine 29 December 2020 11: 25
          -5
          Quote: rocket757

          -3
          This is nothing more ... the hamster sect likes to sleep longer, they will disperse later.

          Rather, a sect of adherents of Trotsky and Goebbels, who like the American grandees to receive for Russophobia, but to eat the Russians "yayko, lard, milako"
          1. RUSS
            RUSS 29 December 2020 12: 03
            -1
            Quote: tihonmarine
            who like the American giants to receive for Russophobia

            Students from Moscow State University receive grants, are they also Russophobes?
            1. tihonmarine
              tihonmarine 29 December 2020 13: 17
              -3
              Quote: RUSS
              Students from Moscow State University receive grants, are they also Russophobes?

              All who receive American and Western grants are Russophobes. Why should the country raise specialists who will go to the West? In this I completely agree with I.V. Stalin and those rulers of the USSR who supported this.
              1. RUSS
                RUSS 29 December 2020 14: 39
                0
                Quote: tihonmarine
                ... In this I completely agree with I.V. Stalin and those rulers of the USSR who supported this.

                Under Stalin, there were no intelligent engineers and designers left, for example, the DneproGES was built by the Americans. And not only him.
                On September 7, 1932, 6 American consultants (Frank Feifer, Charles John Thomson, Wilhelm Meffy, Hugh Cooper, Friedrich Winter, Georg Binder), headed by Chief Consultant Cooper and General Electric Engineer Thomson, were “for especially outstanding work at Dneproges” awarded the Orders of the Red Banner of Labor.
                The famous Stalingrad Tractor Plant was built entirely in the USA, where it was dismantled and transported on 100 ships and delivered to the USSR.
                The famous Magnitogorsk is an exact copy of the US Steel Corporation in the city of Gary (Indiana, USA). More than 800 foreign specialists from the USA, Germany, England, Italy and Austria worked on the design and construction under the leadership of the American company Arthur McKee.
                The Americans have prepared construction and technological projects with a full description of equipment, machine tools and mechanisms. Blast furnaces from McKee are still in operation at Magnitka today.

                Etc
                1. Dodikson
                  Dodikson 29 December 2020 15: 09
                  -2
                  oga, and new tanks and jet aircraft, and Russian nuclear weapons, computers and so on, was it all in the USSR under Stalin designed by Americans or non-existent engineers?
                  1. RUSS
                    RUSS 29 December 2020 15: 45
                    -3
                    Quote: Dodikson
                    new tanks

                    Christie M1928 \ M1931, also known as "Model 1940" - American high-speed light cannon tank, developed by John Walter Christie. Design was initiated by Christie in the early 1920s and was originally released in 1928, then modified as the M1931. This tank was purchased by the USSR and produced as BT-2, which later became the basis for the entire series of Soviet BT tanks. In the USSR, the tank was produced under the BT-2 brand, which became the basis for the BT-5 and BT-7 tanks.
                    Quote: Dodikson
                    jet aircraft,

                    In the USSR, in the mid-40s, the aircraft industry did not have its own jet engine. The first Soviet jet aircraft were designed for captured German aircraft engines Junkers YUMO-004 and BMW-003A, which were copied and produced in a limited series in the USSR.
                    Quote: Dodikson
                    Russian nuclear weapons,

                    Julius Rosenberg and his wife Ethel are American communists accused of spying for the Soviet Union (first of all, in transferring American nuclear secrets to the USSR), thanks to them the USSR quickly created its own nuclear weapons.
                    Quote: Dodikson
                    computer

                    In the late 1960s, the Soviet leadership made a fundamental decision: in order to make up the gigantic gap with the United States, Soviet engineers must pirate the IBM-360. Engineers coped with the work and put the American unit at the basis of a whole family of Soviet computers, called ES computers. Moreover, this line has become mandatory for all countries of the Council for Mutual Economic Assistance - from the GDR to Bulgaria.
                    1. Dodikson
                      Dodikson 29 December 2020 19: 23
                      -2
                      Did the Americans do the T-34, KV, IS, La, Mig, Il and others?
                      about nuclear weapons, there was already a lot of material that they did without the Americans, the first captured jet engines were piece, and then other models went that were better and more perfect than the German ones.
                      and from whom our computers were stolen?
                    2. tihonmarine
                      tihonmarine 1 January 2021 08: 21
                      -1
                      Quote: RUSS
                      Julius Rosenberg and his wife Ethel are American communists accused of spying for the Soviet Union (first of all, in transferring American nuclear secrets to the USSR), thanks to them the USSR quickly created its own nuclear weapons.

                      This is already a simple naivety. Poor Rosenbergs fell under the distribution, and the "secrets" went through other channels, for this you need to rummage through the articles that are not available to everyone, well, networks and something can be gleaned from the network, and you can learn a lot of interesting things.
                2. tihonmarine
                  tihonmarine 29 December 2020 15: 10
                  -4
                  Quote: RUSS
                  Under Stalin, there were no intelligent engineers and designers left, for example, the DneproGES was built by the Americans.

                  And many things you did not name, the USA and Germany also did. And what now to bow to their feet? Or give your specialists?
                  The USA and Germany received from the Land of the Soviets in full and even more for these specialists, and the specialists were not offended.
                  So what will the Russian Federation get, having trained specialists for its Russian money, so that they, after unlearning, go abroad to create benefits for those countries that consider Russia an enemy. Or maybe the United States or the West will pay Russia for these specialists? May "FUCKISH" and sanctions against Russia pay.
                  And we do not need to drive us Western political propaganda and agitation, we ourselves figure out where is black and where is white, as well as who is the enemy and who is the friend.
                  1. RUSS
                    RUSS 29 December 2020 15: 47
                    +1
                    Quote: tihonmarine
                    And many things you did not name, the USA and Germany also did. And what now to bow at their feet?

                    No, but at least not to forget about it and how now it is possible, not to remain silent
                    1. tihonmarine
                      tihonmarine 29 December 2020 17: 43
                      +1
                      Quote: RUSS
                      No, but at least not to forget about it and how now it is possible, not to remain silent

                      Yes, no one is silent. Read about aircraft engine factories in the Ulyanovsk region, and American aircraft engines, and about GAZ, and about Christie, and not only American, but also about factories and research centers built by Weimer Germany. I learned a lot of this from publications in the USSR.
                      The good must always be remembered, but we must not forget what price we paid for everything created in the pre-war period.
              2. gsev
                gsev 1 January 2021 04: 41
                +1
                Quote: tihonmarine
                All who receive American and Western grants are Russophobes.

                If in Russia professors and students in the 1990s did not receive grants from Soros, they might not have been able to develop a vaccine against coronavirus and a reliable test for it simultaneously with China, Europe and the United States. Even Israel was unable to create and start producing its own vaccine. And if not for Soros grants, the Gunzburg team might have had to escape from poverty and the lack of opportunities to realize their profession in Israel or the United States. Perhaps without these grants, even Kudrevtsev's colleagues had no one to teach how to properly manipulate cowards.
                1. tihonmarine
                  tihonmarine 1 January 2021 08: 26
                  0
                  Quote: gsev
                  And if not for Soros grants, the Gunzburg team might have had to escape from poverty and the lack of opportunities to realize their profession in Israel or the United States.

                  You are right, but there was a heavy price to pay for the grants. Don't you think that this vaccine created in the states has Russian roots?
  • faiver
    faiver 29 December 2020 09: 37
    0
    You are welcome to visit us in Kolyma, we have been waiting for a long time ... laughing
    1. Skarpzd
      Skarpzd 29 December 2020 10: 04
      0
      Why is this waste in Kolyma?
      1. faiver
        faiver 29 December 2020 10: 09
        0
        Well, not vsezh on germanium katatsa, we now have minus 50, the very thing laughing
        1. Skarpzd
          Skarpzd 29 December 2020 10: 13
          -1
          Well, I'm not really for bulk, I'm worried about the environment))
          and we pressed ice-cream. A couple of days the same fifty dollars was. today it has warmed up to -32. heat, however))
          1. faiver
            faiver 29 December 2020 10: 16
            +1
            ecology will chew it up and spit it out, and in the summer mosquitoes and midges will eat up
            1. Skarpzd
              Skarpzd 29 December 2020 10: 28
              +2
              yeah, how .... his "newbie" did not take it, and you want to rely on a defenseless midge with mosquitoes ???
              1. Dodikson
                Dodikson 29 December 2020 15: 09
                -1
                gnats with mosquitoes if bitten die in a split second.
              2. VORON538
                VORON538 29 December 2020 15: 15
                -2
                Believe me, mosquitoes and other vile and not such an animal in the taiga copes
                Will not even choke !!! hi It cannot be against nature, this is not pseudo-poisoning! hi
          2. Ross xnumx
            Ross xnumx 29 December 2020 12: 46
            -1
            Quote: Skarpzd
            Well, I'm not really for bulk, I'm worried about the environment))
            and we pressed ice-cream. A couple of days the same fifty dollars was. today it has warmed up to -32.

            And who in Kuzbass is especially worried about Navalny? Didn't see a single protester. And, before the New Year, the political tension is weakening.
            I don’t know where there (you) was “fifty kopecks”: maybe in Mariinsk? But our temperature did not drop below forty-two. Here and now:

            A Siberian is not someone who is not afraid of frost, but someone who dresses warmly ...
            drinks
            1. Skarpzd
              Skarpzd 29 December 2020 13: 14
              +3
              yeah. in Mariinsk. well, in the north of Kuzbass. in Itata it seemed like it was 54. As for the supporters of bulk, there is 1 in my team. and after all it is quite a normal man. I'm surprised myself. about warm clothes - people have forgotten how to dress properly.
    2. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 29 December 2020 10: 07
      -4
      Quote: faiver
      You are welcome to visit us in Kolyma, we have been waiting for a long time ...

      Attractive locations for "Lecik & Co."
  • Captain45
    Captain45 29 December 2020 09: 39
    +1
    Navalny may have a suspended sentence replaced with a real one. The UFSIN explained that the oppositionist is evading control of the criminal executive inspection.
    In the late 80s, I had a chance to work for some time in the inspection of correctional labor (as it was called at that time), which monitored those sentenced to correctional labor, conditionally convicted with a deferred execution of the sentence and a probationary period. So the replacement of a suspended sentence for a real term for violations of the rules of serving a conditional sentence or for systematic non-payment of corrective labor was done as helloThree times the convention after 21.00 is not at home, or 2 times I got into the sobering-up center from the street EVERYTHING - I went to the camp, and no one was buzzing about any human rights belay ... First, there were the duties assigned by the court to the convict, which he was OBLIGED to fulfill. And now ... some kind of incomprehensible toothlessness, the clown swagger, and the organs obliged to execute the punishment are zero emotions request am
    1. Avior
      Avior 29 December 2020 09: 49
      +3
      Interestingly, conditionally - the convicts went abroad at that time?
      After all, nobody took the foreign passport from the bulk.
      1. carstorm 11
        carstorm 11 29 December 2020 09: 52
        -2
        He was released as an exception. Otherwise, he would not have crossed the border
        1. Avior
          Avior 29 December 2020 10: 06
          +4
          He did not have any ban on crossing the border and the passport was in his hands.
          1. carstorm 11
            carstorm 11 29 December 2020 10: 30
            -5
            So what?) Having a passport does not mean being able to go through passport control. Debts and a suspended sentence can be received even after receiving it) this organism has both. And if a 3-word term makes it possible through the court to obtain permission to cross the border through a probationary period, then debts are a complete stop. In the database there is - go for a walk or pay right there if you have time)
            1. Avior
              Avior 29 December 2020 10: 45
              +4
              Is he in some kind of database that forbids him to cross the border?
              Can you provide a link to the source of your information?
              Why am I asking- In fact, he himself denies it. As well as what was under the subscription, as some here write.
              1. carstorm 11
                carstorm 11 29 December 2020 11: 26
                +1
                In 18, he was already braked at the airport for debts. Well, if there are debts, then bailiffs probably. If there is a subscription to it, then probably the Ministry of Internal Affairs. Now infa is updated very quickly. When he needed an operation to do it, he was released with a condition if my memory serves me in 17g-8 at someone's request.
                1. Avior
                  Avior 29 December 2020 11: 52
                  +2
                  that is, there is no confirmation, at least in the form of statements by officials that he was in such a base at that time.
                  ok, thanks.
                  hi
                  1. carstorm 11
                    carstorm 11 29 December 2020 12: 05
                    -1
                    You are welcome. Founder of the Anti-Corruption Foundation (FBK), Alexei Navalny, was summoned for questioning by the Investigative Committee (IC) on his own recognizance not to leave the place. This was announced by the politician himself.

                    “The investigator reports that he is applying a preventive measure to me - a recognizance not to leave. Who would doubt that everything was invented so that I could not travel to the regions, supporting "Smart Voting", - Navalny wrote on his Twitter page.
                    Is a personal statement enough for you?)
                    1. Avior
                      Avior 29 December 2020 12: 32
                      -1
                      did the bulk say that he gave a written undertaking not to leave the place?
                      noticed as written - there is no direct statement that
                      took a recognizance not to leave

                      Navalny himself says on this score that he did not give a written undertaking not to leave, since the investigator's demand was illegal, the article did not provide for such a possibility - it does not provide for detention, instead of which they take a subscription.
                      The article also contains nothing on this score.
                      so it was more correct to write - they tried to take it, but it did not work
                      hi
                      1. Ugochaves
                        Ugochaves 29 December 2020 14: 57
                        +1
                        The choice of a preventive measure is the prerogative of the investigator, read the Criminal Procedure Code, and one or another measure is chosen based on the severity of the article
        2. RUSS
          RUSS 29 December 2020 11: 53
          0
          Quote: carstorm 11
          He was released as an exception. Otherwise, he would not have crossed the border

          Delirium
          1. carstorm 11
            carstorm 11 29 December 2020 12: 10
            +1
            Nonsense what? What is the category of citizens who are prohibited from crossing the borders?) You should study the laws of the country in which you live)
            1. RUSS
              RUSS 29 December 2020 12: 13
              0
              Quote: carstorm 11
              Nonsense what? What is the category of citizens who are prohibited from crossing the borders?) You should study the laws of the country in which you live)

              Restrictions on traveling abroad were lifted from Navlny long before his poisoning
              1. carstorm 11
                carstorm 11 29 December 2020 12: 22
                0
                Yes well?))) From the summoned for interrogation to the Investigative Committee (IC) on the "libel case" of the founder of the Anti-Corruption Foundation (FBK) Alexei Navalny, they took a recognizance not to leave. This was announced by the politician himself.

                “The investigator reports that he is applying a preventive measure to me - a recognizance not to leave. Who would doubt that everything was invented so that I could not travel to the regions, supporting Smart Voting, - wrote Navalny on his Twitter page. you somehow follow your leader and do not follow what he says himself)
                On June 15, the Investigative Committee announced the initiation of a criminal libel case against Navalny. The reason for the opening of criminal proceedings was a comment on Twitter, with which the politician provided a campaign video in support of changing the Constitution, where famous people urged to vote for the amendments. Navalny reposted the video on Twitter and called the filming participants "corrupt lackeys", "traitors", "people without conscience" and "shame of the country."
                1. Avior
                  Avior 29 December 2020 12: 39
                  0
                  The investigator says that he is applying a preventive measure to me - a recognizance not to leave.

                  only Navalny himself says that he did not give such a subscription.
                  1. carstorm 11
                    carstorm 11 29 December 2020 12: 43
                    -1
                    But in his twitter he himself writes what he gave) do you think that if you call white black 10 times it will really become that way?))) No one asks his wishes for a subscription)))
                    1. Avior
                      Avior 29 December 2020 12: 45
                      +1
                      Please give me a link to his Twitter, where it is directly written that he gave a recognizance not to leave, and not what the investigator tried to take.
                      Navalny himself repeatedly claimed that he did not give a subscription
                      hi
                      1. carstorm 11
                        carstorm 11 29 December 2020 12: 49
                        -2
                        I don't need to dig into his twitter anymore. Look for yourself if necessary) enough for me that his words were published there by all the media.
                      2. Avior
                        Avior 29 December 2020 13: 17
                        +2
                        I was looking for
                        He didn't post this on his Twitter.
                        But he repeatedly made statements that he did not give such a receipt.
                        For example
                        ..... In a trumped-up case of "insulting a veteran" they tried to take my recognizance not to leave, but the article does not provide for restrictions on freedom. I refused to give a subscription and, as you know, I freely went to Novosibirsk and Tomsk. Nobody limited me "


                        https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.dw.com/ru/navalnyj-nazval-lozhju-slova-putina-o-pomoshhi-v-vyvoze-na-lechenie-v-frg/a-55377233
                        That's why I'm asking, can you confirm your statement with a link to Navalny's Twitter?
                      3. The comment was deleted.
              2. The comment was deleted.
              3. Ugochaves
                Ugochaves 29 December 2020 15: 04
                +1
                Navalny could not give anything lol Investigator MAKES OUT A RULE ON ELECTION MEASURES OF PREVENTION
                1. Avior
                  Avior 29 December 2020 15: 10
                  +2
                  A written undertaking not to leave the place is a written commitment from the accused or suspect.
                  Navalny did not give such an obligation, according to his statement.
            2. RUSS
              RUSS 29 December 2020 12: 48
              0
              Quote: carstorm 11
              Yes well?))) From the summoned for interrogation to the Investigative Committee (IC) on the "libel case" of the founder of the Anti-Corruption Foundation (FBK) Alexei Navalny, they took a recognizance not to leave. This was announced by the politician himself.

              “The investigator reports that he is applying a preventive measure to me - a recognizance not to leave. Who would doubt that everything was invented so that I could not travel to the regions, supporting Smart Voting, - wrote Navalny on his Twitter page. you somehow follow your leader and do not follow what he says himself)
              On June 15, the Investigative Committee announced the initiation of a criminal libel case against Navalny. The reason for the opening of criminal proceedings was a comment on Twitter, with which the politician provided a campaign video in support of changing the Constitution, where famous people urged to vote for the amendments. Navalny reposted the video on Twitter and called the filming participants "corrupt lackeys", "traitors", "people without conscience" and "shame of the country."

              “By the decision of the magistrate of the judicial section 320 of the Yuzhnoye Medvedkovo district of Moscow on August 24, 2020, a criminal case against A.A. Navalny, accused of committing a crime, part 2 of Art. 128.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, suspended due to the illness of the defendant, ”RBC was told in court.
              1. carstorm 11
                carstorm 11 29 December 2020 12: 55
                0
                You should at least teach the materiel before throwing it into the trenches) he was brought to Berlin 22) well, seriously) you can't screw it up like that)
                1. RUSS
                  RUSS 29 December 2020 13: 10
                  +2
                  Quote: carstorm 11
                  You should at least teach the materiel before throwing it into the trenches) he was brought to Berlin 22) well, seriously) you can't screw it up like that)

                  You write everything correctly, But! You, in turn, give the fact to the studio where Navalny was forbidden to cross the border
                  1. carstorm 11
                    carstorm 11 29 December 2020 13: 27
                    -2
                    Drive into the search from Navalny, they took a subscription about a libel case and read.
  • Captain45
    Captain45 29 December 2020 16: 12
    0
    Quote: Avior
    Interestingly, conditionally - the convicts went abroad at that time?

    But what kind of foreign country is a convicted person ?! Not all cities were prescribed a residence permit, but here it is abroad ...
  • Igoresha
    Igoresha 29 December 2020 10: 58
    -1
    And now ... some kind of incomprehensible toothlessness, the clown swagger, and the organs obliged to execute the punishment are zero emotions
    not always, they added to Khodorkovsky for an untidy bedside table. And we all understand that it was not the administration of the colony that threw it on time, but someone higher
    1. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 29 December 2020 11: 47
      -1
      Quote: Igoresha
      And we all understand that it was not the administration of the colony that threw it on time, but someone higher

      Not a "colony", but a Correctional Labor Institution.
  • Yurahip
    Yurahip 29 December 2020 09: 50
    +1
    Does he always have such eyes on the roll, or does the elastic from his panties press hard?
    1. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 29 December 2020 12: 07
      +1
      Quote: Jurachip
      Does he always have such eyes on the roll, or does the elastic from his panties press hard?

      The sea bass, when pulled out, too, has such eyes
      1. Captain45
        Captain45 29 December 2020 16: 39
        0
        Quote: tihonmarine
        The sea bass, when pulled out, too, has such eyes

        What kind of perch? He's frozen pike perch! Silver hake!
        1. tihonmarine
          tihonmarine 29 December 2020 18: 06
          0
          Quote: Captain45
          What kind of perch? He's frozen pike perch! Silver hake!

          Well then, flounder is better.
  • bar
    bar 29 December 2020 09: 51
    -2
    Who will plant him, he's a monument (s)
  • Carib
    Carib 29 December 2020 09: 51
    +2
    That's right, pull, pull constantly.
    What would be afraid. I was afraid to return. I was afraid to remember.
    And not to be published in the Russian Federation, as a convict. At the same time, block the media that want to quote him, remember.
    All those who live far away will not be able to strongly influence internal moods.
    1. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 29 December 2020 10: 09
      -5
      Quote: Carib
      All those who live far away will not be able to strongly influence internal moods.

      But they can bark "from under the fence".
    2. Mordvin 3
      Mordvin 3 29 December 2020 11: 42
      +6
      Quote: Carib
      And do not let it be published in the Russian Federation

      It is published on the Internet.
      1. NI1
        NI1 30 December 2020 06: 25
        0
        It means to prohibit printing on the Internet! Ali ban these Internet altogether! We don't need it for ... oh!))
        1. Mordvin 3
          Mordvin 3 30 December 2020 06: 48
          +1
          Quote: NI1
          ban these Internet! We don't need it for ... oh!))

          Start with yourself. Personally, I need it.
  • Stirbjorn
    Stirbjorn 29 December 2020 09: 53
    +8
    We would like to have been planted long ago. Example, the same Platoshkin. And the fact that Navalny is free means that he is covered at the very top.
    PS Another article dedicated to "useless" and "forgotten by all" Navalny wassat
    1. Mordvin 3
      Mordvin 3 29 December 2020 11: 44
      +4
      Quote: Stirbjorn
      We would like to have been planted long ago. Example, the same Platoshkin.

      Nobody will intercede for Platoshkin abroad.
      1. VORON538
        VORON538 29 December 2020 15: 24
        0
        Apparently because the West does not need oppositionists wishing Russia prosperity! And in the situation with the bulk, he can get away with a lot. Apparently, he is the valve for bleeding off steam. hi
  • bar
    bar 29 December 2020 09: 53
    0
    In case of further disregard of the requirements and "systematic violations", the department, according to the law, has the right to demand from the court that the suspended sentence be replaced with a real one.

    Well, here's the long-awaited reinforced concrete reason to get political asylum in the west.
  • askort154
    askort154 29 December 2020 09: 54
    -2
    In case of further disregard of the requirements and "systematic violations", the department, according to the law, has the right to demand from the court that the suspended sentence be replaced with a real one.

    And the next step is to put him on the international wanted list. Let's see how law-abiding Germany reacts to this. He will have to "escape" to England, or Israel.
    1. Avior
      Avior 29 December 2020 10: 17
      +7
      And let's see, first, whether they will be put on the wanted list and with what wording, and then we will draw conclusions.
    2. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 29 December 2020 12: 10
      0
      Quote: askort154
      He will have to "run" to England, or Israel.

      Israel with Russia will not spoil relations, the rich are fleeing to England, "Only to Mexico, only to Mexico!"
  • parusnik
    parusnik 29 December 2020 09: 56
    +1
    The suspended sentence will turn into a real one. The Germans will not issue it. In the place of Russia, I would not have asked strongly. From a word at all.
    1. gsev
      gsev 30 December 2020 02: 22
      0
      Quote: parusnik
      In the place of Russia, I would not strongly ask

      I will assume that the leadership of the CIA and the US State Department and the SBU of Ukraine, many times more than Putin, wants Navalny to be expelled from Russian politics and leave Russia at least until the end of Putin's presidency.
  • Skarpzd
    Skarpzd 29 December 2020 10: 01
    +13
    sometimes I just talk about our law enforcement system))) and from the state as a whole.
    1 a certain citizen N, under the condition and on recognizance not to leave, hangs out all over our rather big country - as a law enforcement officer.
    2 a certain citizen H either gets sick, or someone, out of the kindness of his soul, is poisoning him with something.
    3 of a certain citizen N, with a not very clear diagnosis, on a personal (he said on TV, no one pulled his tongue) the president's instructions in the name of "higher humanity" are shipped to Germany.
    4 in the non-village of a certain citizen N they are being treated with a progressive enema for something incomprehensible.
    5 in certain circles a scandal is unfolding in order to discredit the chemical warfare agents developed back in the USSR.
    6 The FSIN threatens a terrible punishment to a certain citizen of N, on whom not so long ago the FSIN officers themselves hammered a bolt, and who was taken out of the country with the permission of the President of the country.

    Am I the only one stupid in my head, or are there still people who also do not understand the drama of this series? the second season will be?
    1. parusnik
      parusnik 29 December 2020 10: 11
      +7
      laughing good
      Am I the only one stupid in my head, or are there still people who also do not understand the drama of this series? the second season will be?
      ... You are not alone, I am the same ... laughing
    2. Hagen
      Hagen 29 December 2020 10: 21
      0
      Quote: Skarpzd
      I'm the only one dumb in my head

      You are not stupid, you are just trying to evaluate events from the point of view of rational everyday thinking and views on simple processes. This is normal for an ordinary citizen living in a normal environment. Political processes often go beyond this framework, because there are many more actors with different traditions from ours and the stakes are much higher. Therefore, the actions of those involved in those environments seem incomprehensible and not logical. It's just that everything is somewhat different there.
      1. Skarpzd
        Skarpzd 29 December 2020 10: 37
        +3
        the fact of the matter is that they do not seem. they are not logical. for the stupid, however, thanks)) honestly felt better))
    3. Evil Booth
      Evil Booth 29 December 2020 10: 35
      0
      and weakly google whether the condition imposes restrictions as a half-psi of not leaving? suddenly NO))
      1. Captain45
        Captain45 29 December 2020 16: 24
        0
        Quote: Evil Booth
        and weakly google whether the condition imposes restrictions as a half-psi of not leaving?

        In case of a conditional conviction, the court establishes a number of restrictions for the convicted person, including the following: an obligation not to change his place of residence without notifying the bodies carrying out the execution of the sentence; a ban on visiting places of mass stay of citizens; staying at the place of residence after a certain time, for example, after 21.00 only at home; not to visit the place where alcohol is sold and much, much more, depending on the nature of the crime committed.
    4. Igoresha
      Igoresha 29 December 2020 10: 59
      +1
      the second season will be?
      Putin's electorate grabs
    5. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 29 December 2020 12: 16
      +1
      Quote: Skarpzd
      Am I the only one stupid in my head, or are there still people who also do not understand the drama of this series? the second season will be?

      I won't say about stupidity, but there will be 2 series, and then 3 series. The people are not interested in living without "show and entertainment" series. Better a series about bulk than about the pension system and the minimum wage - the authorities also sit "not sewn with bast."
    6. NI1
      NI1 30 December 2020 06: 31
      0
      Ooooh buddy! There will be many more seasons!
      Even more than our judicial and law enforcement system, they are amazed by the people who call Navalny, Grudinin and others who went in spite of and across, called reptiles, agents of the State Department, troublemakers, etc. This is how it is necessary to love those who rob you, your wife, children, mother-in-law, dear mother, so as not to notice, even see, and humbly, like a slave, to be silent! I’m probably already sure that start beating such people with your shoulders on Saturdays and introduce the right of the first wedding night, they will swallow it all and accept it. Well, how ?! Better to let their own beat and tear than NATO soldiers.)))
      1. Skarpzd
        Skarpzd 30 December 2020 07: 11
        0
        why juggle? Why interfere in one pile of bulk and Grudinin? and this bulk goes across? a swindler on which to put samples nowhere? I am not a supporter of Putin. in my opinion this is the lesser evil. I have already seen such fighters as bulk in my life. at different levels. and long ago I realized that clean things are not done with dirty hands. it is impossible. and personally, no one "robs" me. yes, I pay a bunch of taxes, including latent ones. and who doesn't pay them? only those who steal, or receive denyushku from people interested in something. paid a lot of bulk taxes? on what means does he live (and live well)? in one word - not to teach me honesty swindler.
  • apro
    apro 29 December 2020 10: 02
    0
    Whoever puts him in prison ... he's a monument.
    And for what? There are all their people ... and they perform their functions. To fight inflation. Someone with the rise in gas prices. Someone promises breakthroughs. Someone will take care of grandmothers. the right direction ... and everyone is happy. everyone is in business and with money ...
  • Vladimir Vladimirovich Vorontsov
    Vladimir Vladimirovich Vorontsov 29 December 2020 10: 03
    +1
    ***

    His panties were not returned to him, there is nothing to show up for control ...

    ***
  • Tagan
    Tagan 29 December 2020 10: 03
    -2
    Quote: Stas157
    ... Navalny faces real term for evading control criminal executive inspection.

    The Russian authorities, stubbornly unwilling to investigate Navalny's poisoning, suddenly remembered justice.

    I don’t understand one thing, you, the so-called "oppositionist", are completely calmly and with impunity watering your (?) Country with slops (not the fact that this will endlessly get away with it). At the same time, you nod at lawlessness and lawlessness. But in that case, you with your revolutionary fervor would have died down long ago. Or maybe you are scribbling from jail?
    1. RUSS
      RUSS 29 December 2020 11: 51
      +3
      Quote: Tagan
      I don’t understand one thing, you, the so-called "oppositionist", are completely calmly and with impunity watering your (?) Country with slops (not the fact that this will endlessly get away with it).

      Not a country, but corrupt officials. And he is for sanctions not against Russia, but sanctions against oligarchs
    2. Mordvin 3
      Mordvin 3 29 December 2020 11: 52
      +5
      Quote: Tagan
      I don’t understand one thing, you, the so-called "oppositionist", completely calmly and with impunity water your (?) Country with slops

      In my opinion, he pours slops on specific individuals and organizations.
      Um ... And TNT, owned by Gazprom, does not water the country with such programs as Nasha Rasha?
  • Tagan
    Tagan 29 December 2020 10: 11
    +1
    Quote: military_cat
    Am I understanding correctly that the article in the Lancet is now officially recognized as a reliable source? It says, among other things, that he was poisoned by a newcomer in Russia. Is it like doping, which was denied and then quietly admitted?

    Those. Did you agree that it was originally a 100 percent garbage dump?
  • Andrei Nikolaevich
    Andrei Nikolaevich 29 December 2020 10: 12
    -4
    Lyosha Navalny is good at one thing - he doesn't put a saucepan on his head.
    Now, the forelock, grazing on the site, will run up and start screaming that I am fomenting ethnic strife.
    1. Incvizitor
      Incvizitor 29 December 2020 13: 45
      +2
      He manages the local "chubaty" because without a pot there the top of the local opg soros is also without pans.
  • Hagen
    Hagen 29 December 2020 10: 12
    -3
    Well, at least the FSIN woke up, and that's good! Now, beyond the words - business ... wink
    1. Skarpzd
      Skarpzd 29 December 2020 10: 21
      -1
      Well, the FSIN would have figured out how to get the bulk from the foreign land ... and considering that they calmly closed their eyes to his violations when he was still in the Russian Federation ...
      1. Hagen
        Hagen 29 December 2020 10: 25
        -2
        Quote: Skarpzd
        Well, the FSIN would have figured out how to get bulk goods from foreign countries

        What for? He was at least a little, but dangerous to the authorities here. Otherwise, he will most likely ask for political asylum and will never appear in Russia again. Well, let him hang out over the hill, like a flower in an ice hole. The money will run out and everyone will forget it like a piece of used toilet paper.
        1. Skarpzd
          Skarpzd 29 December 2020 10: 50
          +2
          can't imagine the level of danger of bulk. I try, but I can't.
      2. Cyril G ...
        Cyril G ... 29 December 2020 10: 40
        -1
        What for? He was put in front of the fork of choice. Either return to the Russian Federation, where he will immediately be ordered to fill up by his owners in order to get the continuation of the GAME, or throw so many poop on a quick one in the address of Russia to make the situation of return impossible ... ... You want to live. He knows one hundred percent that Putin has not hounded him and will not be.
      3. Mordvin 3
        Mordvin 3 29 December 2020 11: 54
        +2
        Quote: Skarpzd
        Well, the FSIN would have figured out how to get bulk goods from foreign countries ...

        No problem. Warrant officer Vertuhailo will be sent, and he will deliver.
    2. Revival
      Revival 29 December 2020 10: 48
      0
      Yes, the law should be applied, only on command
  • Tagan
    Tagan 29 December 2020 10: 19
    -2
    Yes, really ... Navalny's gaze somehow looks like a dog peeing "in a big way." And other photos of this character are unlikely to be found. Somehow it is difficult to associate him with a fighter with regards))) but for fighters it is an icon. What attracts them so much? Riddle ...
  • Basarev
    Basarev 29 December 2020 10: 31
    +1
    Of course he won't come back. Who in the police station believes that he will surrender himself? All the more so in an obviously political case. There is nothing criminal in these cases.
  • Skarpzd
    Skarpzd 29 December 2020 10: 34
    -8
    Ltd!!! Finally, witnesses to the holy fight against corruption in bulk pulled up))) iminusit began))) otherwise I really thought it was a sinful thing that they were preparing for NG. dumplings are peeled from the shell)))
    1. Cyril G ...
      Cyril G ... 29 December 2020 13: 20
      0
      Well, you, the followers of the sect have already come running ...
  • Cyril G ...
    Cyril G ... 29 December 2020 10: 36
    -5
    Quote: Stas157
    poisoning


    And what, there is something to investigate, are you serious?
    1. Avior
      Avior 29 December 2020 11: 46
      +4
      There is a conclusion of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, of which Russia is a member, on the confirmation of chemical poisoning in bulk.
      https://www.opcw.org/sites/default/files/documents/2020/10/s-1906-2020%28e%29.pdf
      1. Cyril G ...
        Cyril G ... 29 December 2020 13: 03
        +3
        Yes, I saw him. Hailey like ... Yes, and no matter how many courts will not accept this for consideration, in view of the fundamental disregard of the regulations
        1. Avior
          Avior 29 December 2020 13: 11
          0
          Wait and see
          It is already clear that Navalny will apply to the ECHR in this case, so we'll see if this report will be accepted or not.
          Or did you just mean the Russian courts?
          1. Cyril G ...
            Cyril G ... 29 December 2020 20: 22
            +1
            Not only, and not so much. Lechaim if he is not quite down already realized that on the territory of Russia he will be immediately liquidated already in earnest and without any fools, his eeeh employers have thus received a sacred sacrifice and a GAME. And therefore he will engage in imitation of ebullient activity.
            1. Avior
              Avior 29 December 2020 20: 34
              -1
              It has long been no longer personally necessary to be present in the country for such purposes
              And for filing a claim with the ECHR, even more so
              They write that over the past few years he received a quarter of a million in the claims of the ECHR
              I think this story will further improve his financial situation.
              1. Cyril G ...
                Cyril G ... 30 December 2020 09: 15
                0
                One should be present in the country not for THIS. And according to the won trials, this is nothing more than the level of rumors spread by Lechaim himself.
    2. NI1
      NI1 30 December 2020 06: 34
      -1
      I remember that with the samples of our Olympians, not everything went smoothly either. At first, they denied, cracked that all this was the intrigues of the enemies of the Motherland, and then they quieted down. Then they confessed to the fraud, then washed and paid the fines. Forgotten? ))
      1. Cyril G ...
        Cyril G ... 30 December 2020 09: 19
        0
        Quote: NI1
        Then they confessed to the fraud, then washed and paid the fines. Forgotten? ))

        Why, our sports bureaucrats really want to be accepted, recognized by white people and shaking hands .... Hence all the problems. It's just that "White people" can get into doping, so that it escapes from the ears of some individuals, and to others it is not.
  • opuonmed
    opuonmed 29 December 2020 10: 36
    -1
    Ishe to imprison for treason in such a way that the curators through him wanted to put their people, he and who would work for the interests of other countries!
  • Falx
    Falx 29 December 2020 11: 29
    -1
    Navalny is a shame.

    one consolation, he will never return home, and as an exiled politician no one needs. forget about him ...
  • Tagan
    Tagan 29 December 2020 11: 59
    -1
    Quote: RUSS
    Quote: Tagan
    I don’t understand one thing, you, the so-called "oppositionist", are completely calmly and with impunity watering your (?) Country with slops (not the fact that this will endlessly get away with it).

    Not a country, but corrupt officials. And he is for sanctions not against Russia, but sanctions against oligarchs

    Comments say that the country as well.
  • ender
    ender 29 December 2020 12: 00
    0
    Quote: Insurgent
    Alexey Navalny faces a real sentence

    Even if he sits down, in which there are doubts, it will come out in the same way as in his time Khodorkovsky, who was convicted under much more serious articles ...


    generously pardoned 8 months before the end of the sentence?
  • Tagan
    Tagan 29 December 2020 12: 08
    0
    Quote: mordvin xnumx

    In my opinion, he pours slops on specific individuals and organizations.
    Um ... And TNT, owned by Gazprom, does not water the country with such programs as Nasha Rasha?

    It depends on how you look at it. Moreover, it does water, because it often lies, to put it mildly. I do not understand, if "Nasha Rasha" is watering, then God himself ordered the rest?
  • Voltsky
    Voltsky 29 December 2020 12: 44
    +3
    tin, Ksyusha Sobachk proved in her interviews that she is smarter than Anal Leshka; and with him diseases are still worn :)

    For anal novice poisoning adepts; try to plant cockroaches in a bottle and poison one single cockroach with a "Lyosha" badge with dichlorvos, if you can say it.
  • iouris
    iouris 29 December 2020 12: 48
    -3
    How funny: "there is a REAL term." Threatening (!) This is Through the Looking Glass. He laughs at you.
  • Lord of the Sith
    Lord of the Sith 29 December 2020 13: 16
    -2
    You will put this clown in jail, and the "Western partners" will raise the stench to heaven, and will immediately begin to shit with sanctions.

    Better to sit in Deutschland.
  • Skarpzd
    Skarpzd 29 December 2020 13: 20
    +1
    Quote: Skarpzd
    Ltd!!! Finally, witnesses to the holy fight against corruption in bulk pulled up))) iminusit began))) otherwise I really thought it was a sinful thing that they were preparing for NG. dumplings are peeled from the shell)))

    Well, at least to minus 10, then hold out! are there really so few supporters of bulk? well press a little !!
  • Captan78
    Captan78 29 December 2020 14: 07
    0
    Here he accelerated straight ... Yeah, hair back ...
  • Bshkaus
    Bshkaus 29 December 2020 14: 34
    +1
    Well, hell knows. On the one hand, if he is not in the Russian Federation, then there is nothing to appear and celebrate. He did not sign a recognizance not to leave and on the territory of the Russian Federation he does nothing automatically bad / good))). On the other hand, law is law ...
    The trouble is that at present the Russian Federation does not live according to the law, but according to the concepts, and if we live according to the concepts, then there are no questions or complaints about Navalny (as well as the law).
    As for the Navalny-Putin graters, let's see ... I am subjectively on Navalny's side and I think that Putin has no future in principle, but history will show how it goes ...
    1. iouris
      iouris 29 December 2020 15: 48
      -1
      Quote: Bshkaus
      As for the Navalny-Putin graters, let's see ...

      What does "grater" mean? You formulate your thought: what is it about? I understand that this is difficult for you, but try (for yourself, I don't need it).
      I didn't understand what you are expecting. Is the Maidan in Moscow and the free distribution of cookies and "democracy"?
      On the one hand on the other hand...
      1. Bshkaus
        Bshkaus 29 December 2020 22: 30
        +1
        I didn't understand what you are expecting. Is the Maidan in Moscow and the free distribution of cookies and "democracy"?

        just the Maidan in Russia I want to see in the last place, and I expect a banal change of power. It's hard for me to imagine myself wearing the same underpants for months and years. As for the leadership, it must meet specific challenges facing society and the country. When you build a house, you first need a good excavator to dig a foundation pit, then the foundation must be poured, then the stone-maker must lay out the brick walls and the painter must plaster and paint everything with high quality. So, it is not right when a good stone-maker is entrusted with painting work because he has set the walls well. Putin did an excellent job in the first two terms due to his qualities, then the country faced new challenges and needed a different person.
        As for the "Maidan", it is impossible if there is no weak point. And if the authorities themselves create a weak point, then who is to blame for this, as always - NATO? : /
        1. Cyril G ...
          Cyril G ... 1 January 2021 22: 36
          +1
          Quote: Bshkaus
          It's hard for me to imagine myself wearing the same panties for months and years.

          I don't understand who you are now. About the most democratic monarchies of the Gulf, Or the permanent British queen (By the way, figure out what she really can - very informative), or Merkel, who really ruled longer than Putin? By the way, she is not even elected by popular vote. You probably didn't even vote against Putin. Or the institute of irreplaceable deputy heads of departments in the United States?
    2. kit88
      kit88 29 December 2020 15: 55
      +9
      So he has a probationary period - that means he must be registered from one to 4 times a month.
      Much is not clear here. For example, under what conditions was he released over the hillock for treatment? After all, conditionally convicted not only cannot go abroad, but also you cannot leave the city without permission.
      But like, if you recovered, come check in. And according to Part 1 of Art. 190 PEC sent him a written warning.

      Questions are raised by the validity of replacing the suspended sentence with a real one in this particular case, because this requires that the conditionally convicted:
      systematically violated public order, for which he was brought to administrative responsibility, systematically failed to fulfill the duties assigned to him by the court, or disappeared from control
      Wherein:
      A systematic violation of public order is the commission of a conditionally convicted person within one year of two or more violations of public order, for which he was brought to administrative responsibility. Systematic non-fulfillment of duties is the commission of prohibited or non-fulfillment of the actions prescribed by the conditionally convicted person more than twice within one year, or prolonged (more than 30 days) failure to fulfill the duties imposed on him by the court.
      PEC RF Art. 190
      If they don't show up once, they can't close it.
      1. Avior
        Avior 29 December 2020 16: 29
        +1
        Usually the fact of being abroad is recognized as a good reason for not going somewhere.
        1. The comment was deleted.
    3. Cyril G ...
      Cyril G ... 30 December 2020 10: 23
      0
      Quote: Bshkaus
      I am subjectively on the side of Navalny


      The future projected by the opposition Fuhrer is much sadder ... This one, having grabbed the trough, will eat into three throats ...
  • Icarus
    Icarus 29 December 2020 16: 30
    0
    Quote: Avior
    in this whole story, I am only interested in those red lines that the authorities have drawn for themselves

    Putin said at a press conference: If it was necessary, they would have killed. Therefore, there are no red lines. If state bodies can kill dissidents without trial, then the question arises whether in this case citizens have the right to self-defense or revolt? What can state terrorism lead to? To kill a foreign agent in one's own country is generally a crime against the state, because a dead agent will take with him all the "passwords" and "appearances."
    1. gsev
      gsev 30 December 2020 02: 26
      +1
      Quote: Icarus
      If necessary, they would kill. Therefore, there are no red lines.

      So he was not killed. Putin said that the threat was not from Navalny, but from the special services of foreign powers that seek to use Navalny.
    2. Cyril G ...
      Cyril G ... 30 December 2020 10: 24
      -1
      Quote: Icarus
      If government agencies can kill dissidents without trial


      Let's take an example from the owners of Lechaim. Those are killing everyone right and left by throwing away any laws and even concepts for a long time.
  • Icarus
    Icarus 29 December 2020 16: 50
    0
    Quote: kit88
    If they don't show up once, they can't close it.

    In general, it is not entitled to close, since the European Court of Human Rights ruled on 05.03.2018/XNUMX/XNUMX. in the case "about Yves Rocher" that "punishment is excluded." And the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation did not rule that this decision was unconstitutional or not subject to execution. And, as far as I know, Russia has already paid the blogger a lump sum for this case. Therefore, if Lech comes to the Russian Federation and he is closed under this article, will Russia again pay him "travel allowances"?
    1. Avior
      Avior 29 December 2020 17: 40
      +4
      Everything goes to the fact that they will also pay for this story.
      1. NI1
        NI1 30 December 2020 06: 38
        0
        I think it is heading towards the introduction of the next sanctions. But they will already be much closer and more tangible for the friends of our Pilot. This means that the Russian people will still have to make up their minds and compensate for the loss of the tsar's friend. We have that, let's work hard! Not the first time! If only not like in France, Ukraine, Khabarovsk, Shies ... where else is it different? ))
        1. Alexander Lysenko
          Alexander Lysenko 31 December 2020 06: 29
          +1
          Dolbonaft.
          1. Cyril G ...
            Cyril G ... 1 January 2021 22: 24
            +2
            This is definitely rare!
    2. Cyril G ...
      Cyril G ... 30 December 2020 10: 30
      0
      Quote: Icarus
      The European Court of Human Rights ruled on 05.03.2018/XNUMX/XNUMX. in the case "about Yves Rocher" that "punishment is excluded".

      And this is a to-do list. https://www.znak.com/2020-10-19/kakie_ugolovnoe_dela_i_iski_zhdut_alekseya_navalnogo_v_rossii_spisok
      And by the way, the ECHR, in theory, is not entitled to make any decisions on an explicit criminal offense. However, considering what is screwed up there, I'm not surprised
  • Catholic
    Catholic 30 December 2020 18: 10
    +19
    Alexey Navalny faces a real sentence

    He does not care, he is abroad ... Abroad will not give him away. It was necessary to start criminal cases earlier.
    1. Cyril G ...
      Cyril G ... 1 January 2021 22: 29
      +3
      I think that even if they took him for raping a five-year-old child and cutting his throat, which is basically the most nightmarish thing in the concept of an ordinary person, the West would still bleat about the intrigues of the regime and the prisoner of "conscience." And what can we say about financial scams with which he indulged opposed Fuhrer... Right is such a trifle.
  • Usher
    Usher 5 January 2021 01: 37
    -3
    Russian oppositionist and blogger Alexei Navalny faces a real term for evading control of the criminal executive inspection. This was reported on the website of the Federal Penitentiary Service (FSIN).

    Can someone answer me when he became an oppositionist? HE became a politician or an official? He is nobody, that is, he bred the Americans and our liberals for loot.