Day of Long-Range Aviation of the Russian Federation: Retrofitted strategic bomber Tu-95MS carried out a joint flight with the UAV

Today Russia celebrates the Day of the Far aviation Videoconferencing of Russia. Long-range aviation is one of the most important elements of both the country's Aerospace Forces itself and all structures of national security. At the same time, an important factor in ensuring this kind of security is the development of long-range aviation.

Today it became known that one of the stages in the development of the DA of the Russian Aerospace Forces has become a kind of integration in the performance of a test flight mission by the Tu-95MS strategic bomber and drone.

Information Service TASS reports that such tests were carried out for the retrofitted Tu-95.

Experts suggest that we can talk about joint tests of the "strategist" with the heavy attack UAV "Okhotnik". Officially, this information has not yet been confirmed, but the interlocutor of the news agency "did not rule out such tests in the future."

During these tests, the interaction of the Tu-95MS with combat drone. Tu-95MS was actually used as an operational center for controlling the actions of an unmanned aerial vehicle.

It is noted that for carrying out this kind of tests, the strategic missile carrier Tu-95MS was additionally equipped with special equipment, which made it possible to communicate with the drone through a secure data transmission channel from one side to another.
Such interaction of the "strategic missile carrier - UAV" level in the future can become a big step forward, including important for the implementation of aerial reconnaissance. A drone moving at high speed can also act as a kind of decoy target for enemy air defense systems.

Previously, the Okhotnik drone was tested with the fifth generation Su-57 fighter. The joint trials were found to be successful.

For your information:

Long-Range Aviation Day in Russia was introduced into the festive military calendar in 1999. Then it took place by order of the Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Air Force, Anatoly Kornukov. Long-range aviation acts as a strategic reserve of the Supreme High Command of the Russian Federation.

Comments

[Victor_B]

RF Long-Range Aviation Day

So that the number of takeoffs equals the number of soft landings!
Flyers - Happy Holidays!

[Tatyana]

Long-distance flyers and all those involved with a professional holiday!
All health, happiness, success and all kinds of well-being!

Anthem of Long-Range Aviation

[Vladimir_2U]

YES of the Russian Aerospace Forces became a kind of integration when performing a test flight mission with a Tu-95MS strategic bomber and a drone.

Well, Russia is not eating cabbage soup either!
Happy YES Day to Russia involved!

[Doccor18]

Today marks the 106th anniversary of the founding of Long-Range Aviation, which originates from the Ilya Muromets squadron of aircrafts - the world's first heavy bombers formation. Happy Holidays to all those involved! And a peaceful sky!

[Lipchanin]

Quote: Doccor18

which originates from the Ilya Muromets air squadron

In 2010, I saw this plane at the Aviation Museum in Monino.
In our times, it looked like something frivolous. But at that time it probably looked very menacing)

[Bersaglieri]

At that time (1914), however, the heaviest and largest multi-engine aircraft in the world was.

[rotmistr60]

Happy holiday and success in fulfilling a noble goal - to defend the Motherland!

[serg.shishkov2015]

Happy Holidays! More flights, wages, and be sure that the number of take-offs equals the number of landings! You are our pride! You are our glory! Hurrah! Hurrah! Hurrah!

[Nikon O'Conor]

Happy Holidays! More new wings in the new year!

[Lipchanin]

Happy Holidays guys !!
Your job is difficult, but very necessary

[Crowe]

Happy Holidays, men!

Turbines launched
And you are ready for takeoff.
Commander orders
Understandable and harsh.

Instrument check,
Composition check,
In flight you get
Glory to yourself.

Long Range Aviation Day
Solemnly welcome!
And with joy of pilots
Congratulations today!

[Crowe]

And a muzhik gift, but of course!

[mark2]

Day of Long-Range Aviation of the Russian Federation: Retrofitted strategic bomber Tu-95MS carried out a joint flight with the UAV

What, and no one will drag out the mantra about old stuff in flight?

[Lipchanin]

Quote: mark2

What, and no one will drag out the mantra about old stuff in flight?

Still time

[Pete mitchell]

All involved in the holiday!
So that the number of take-offs equals the number of landings

[ancient]

Quote: Pete Mitchell

So that the number of take-offs equals the number of landings

All Dalniks and all .. who are with us, Happy Long-Range Aviation Day!
All of all and the most ... I can not

[Jacket in stock]

And explain to me, small gram, what is the catch of these joint flights of a drone and an airplane.
All right, an additional operator would sit on the plane, and even a single-seat fighter is clinging to a pair.
What for ?
Or is it because there are no long-distance communication systems and the plane is needed only to keep the drone always in the radio visibility zone?

[Reviews]

Quote: Jacket in stock

And explain to me, small gram, what is the catch of these joint flights of a drone and an airplane.

As an option - additional reconnaissance of the target. Or as a carrier of an anti-radar missile. Well, in general it is now kind of "fashionable".
And with control via satellites, everything is really bad with us.
Another question is whether the "Hunter" has enough range to interact with the "strategist".

[ancient]

Quote: Avis

As an option - additional exploration of the target

What is the purpose? ... AUG in the vastness of the ocean or stationary targets on another continent?

[Reviews]

Quote: ancient

Quote: Avis

As an option - additional exploration of the target

What is the purpose? ... AUG in the vastness of the ocean or stationary targets on another continent?

Over the past 50 years, have Tu-95s carried out many sorties "to another continent"? About "AUG in the Ocean" the same thing: they don't need to be reconnoitred, or what?

[ancient]

Quote: Avis

Over the past 50 years, have Tu-95s carried out many sorties "to another continent"?

If you don't know ... then they fly regularly

Quote: Avis

About "AUG in the Ocean" the same thing: they don't need to be reconnoitred, or what?

It is imperative to "open", but for this you need to have a UAV of the Global Hawk type ... and then "start up" in .. "wet reasoning"

[Reviews]

Quote: ancient

Quote: Avis

Over the past 50 years, have Tu-95s carried out many sorties "to another continent"?

If you don't know ... then they fly regularly

Well, get in the know - where. No, it doesn't count along Alaska, it's closer there than to Great Britain.

[SovAr238A]

Quote: Avis

Well, get in the know - where. No, it doesn't count along Alaska, it's closer there than to Great Britain.

If along Alaska.
They fly along Chukotka ...
And since Alaska is close, they report that they are flying to the shores of the United States ...

It seems that on the one hand, they don't lie. but the real USA is still 5000 miles away ...

[Reviews]

What are we talking about. And further than Syria, they did not fly to combat. Also not a different continent per se.

[Jacket in stock]

Interestingly, cons instead of answering how to understand?
for the question we condemn, because it turns out that we do not know either, but this is insulting?

[ancient]

Quote: Jacket in stock

Interestingly, cons instead of answering how to understand?

Because ... "not patriotic" think ...... but they know .... "what kind of OCD2 is still possible ...." to master "money

[ancient]

Quote: Jacket in stock

And explain to me, small gram, what is the catch of these joint flights of a drone and an airplane.

Well ... they took ... and ... all ... "news"
Naturally, the "pair" between the strategist and the UAV is ..... no words ... What is the strategist's radius and at what distance are his targets located?
Or do we already have UAVs that fly at strategic range?
Most likely, the "control and communication" equipment is so .. "bulky" in size that it did not fit anywhere except in the Tu-2MS

[Aag]

Quote: ancient

Quote: Jacket in stock

And explain to me, small gram, what is the catch of these joint flights of a drone and an airplane.

Well ... they took ... and ... all ... "news"
Naturally, the "pair" between the strategist and the UAV is ..... no words ... What is the strategist's radius and at what distance are his targets located?
Or do we already have UAVs that fly at strategic range?
Most likely, the "control and communication" equipment is so .. "bulky" in size that it did not fit anywhere except in the Tu-2MS

Everyone involved in YES health, professionalism, luck and well-being!
With regards to the news ... No, the fact that today is YES Day is not news. I'm talking about it:
"... This information has not yet been officially confirmed, but the source of the news agency" did not rule out this kind of testing in the future "..." Stunned ... "interlocutor"!
As for your joke (in which there is some joke), yes, perhaps, they try the "Bear" as a laboratory, a platform ... This time.
Two, - a hint was sounded in the comments, - the satellite control of the UAV is not sufficiently stable, reliable, operational (this is not a statement, but only my speculations).
Three. The range of the UAV. Refueling in the air, perhaps, will rarely be justified, it is possible (although the adversaries are working on this). Let the specialists decide whether this option is necessary for our strike UAV, based on the range of tasks assigned to them.
And, I think, there is no need to rigidly tie the strikers to the Carcass. I will try to argue ... I hope that ground mobility is incorporated into the design of the strike UAVs, i.e. it allows you to HIDDENLY (in a hangar) quickly disassemble, pack in shipping containers, transport, assemble , lift into the air from the runway from which the Tu-95 cannot take off ...
That is, the plot is as follows: the 95th is in his den, at the point of permanent deployment (there are not so many of them left), and the UAVs are relocated at the right time (covertly or demonstratively, depending on the task) to the planned theater of operations. not about tasks in the strategic nuclear forces, about tasks along the perimeter of our borders. (although, why not to Cuba, Venezuela, oh!) Agree, everything is not calmer there ... the Caucasus region, the South-Western borders, the Baltic states ... there, perhaps, even without leaving the territory of the Russian Federation in / sl-mi MO (pilots, operators of Tu-95), it will be possible to effectively "teleport" the strike potential.
The second promising topic for the strategic-UAV ligament is the tasks of the MA.PLA (anti-submarine aviation).

So far, of course, there is nothing to discuss, but it is interesting to hear from experts about possible prospects.

[ancient]

Quote: AAG

About your joke (in which there is some joke)

It's just that in my life so many "I saw 2 cases when the aircraft was made and centered and balanced, and then the most" funny "begins .. when MRP, AV, and NK'shniki present their products ....... begins ... .. so after all it doesn’t fit at all, .... and we can’t be less ... and so is the smallest option ... well, etc.
Everything else ... it's without me ... my heart can't stand .

[tralflot1832]

Happy holiday to all long-range aviation pilots, flying and flying. Health to all and peaceful skies! Since we don't know what kind of UAV, can we muddy a protective order, like on American AUG?

[K-36]

Quote: tralflot1832

tralflot1832 (Andrey S.)


Happy holiday to all long-range aviation pilots, flying and flying. Health to all and peaceful skies! Since we do not know what kind of UAV, can we muddy a protective order, like on American AUG?

I join in congratulating all those involved in YES. And the topic you touched upon in the commentary (a protection order from "Hunters" for the Tu-95 MS) is quite suitable for itself! And if (for now!) The "Hunters" cannot accompany the Tu-95 along the entire route of their flight (in terms of fuel limiting the flight range), then the second tempting topic is already within the reach of the "Hunters". I mean the topic of creating a "Hunter" - a border guard. That is, to put the same interface equipment on naval aircraft, and fly out to intercept - escort NATO reconnaissance aircraft over the Black, Baltic and Barents Seas. First, under the control of the "lead" aircraft with a pilot, and then in general alone (that is, under the control of the coastal command post). Distances are small (neutral waters along our borders). I can imagine what a howl will rise in the camp of "tolerant" democracy!

[Reviews]

Quote: K-36

if (for now!) "Hunters" cannot accompany the Tu-95 along the entire route of their flight (in terms of fuel, which limits the flight range)

[K-36]

Avis (Sergey).
The people involved called your posted photos "Vakhmistrov's Circus" behind their backs. However, it was this "Circus" that managed to bomb the Chernovodsk bridge across the Danube at the very beginning of the Great Patriotic War. Some details here:
https://www.drive2.ru/b/2769601/
Best regards,

[Reviews]

Quote: K-36

Avis (Sergey).
it was this "Circus" that managed to bomb the Chernovodsky bridge across the Danube at the very beginning of the Great Patriotic War.

When "Zveno-SPB" appeared (exactly it is in the lower picture), it was no longer considered a circus. And they bombed not only this bridge.

The use of the existing machines was continued. On August 17, 6 I-16s successfully bombed the floating dock in Constanta. At the end of the month, dive bombers were used to destroy the crossings across the Dnieper. The importance of the assignment lay in the strategic importance of these crossings and in the possibility of a significant containment of the German offensive. On August 28, two TB-3s took off from the Yevpatoria airfield and headed for the Zaporozhye region. At dawn, thirty kilometers from the city, the I-16 was uncoupled. The raid was sudden and accurate, all four left without loss. On September 8, Zveno-SPB, in cooperation with Yak-1 escort fighters, destroyed the ferry near Berislav. One Yak-1 and one I-16 did not return. The next day, after a successful bombing, four I-16s shot down 2 Bf.109 in aerial combat.

Subsequent military operations of the "suspension" took place in the conditions of an ever worsening combat situation for the Soviet side. At the end of September, German troops began advancing in the northern part of Crimea. All available air forces were used to contain the enemy, even those means that were intended for delivering high-precision strikes behind enemy lines. TB-3s were now often used only to lift heavily loaded I-16 bombs - fighters themselves with two 250 kg bombs could not take off. In these difficult combat conditions, combat losses also increased. On October 1, 1941, the commander of a squadron of outboard aircraft Arseny Shubikov died in an air battle. Further use of the outboard I-16 is becoming sporadic and combat reports are becoming less common. It is only known for certain that the I-16 outboard fighters were also used in 1942. In total, several more than 30 sorties were made, which, in terms of their high efficiency, became one of the most successful military actions of Soviet aviation.

[serg.shishkov2015]

And one of the pilots who participated in the tests of this * Circus * was Valery Pavlovich Chkalov! * Link-SPB * sample 1941 - TB-3-M-34 and 2 I-16 Type 10 with two FAB-250 each! Destruction of the Chernovodsky (according to other sources, Chernavodsky) bridge!

[tralflot1832]

Have they already come and say that this cannot be?

[ancient]

Quote: K-36

And the topic you touched upon in the commentary (a protection order from "Hunters" for the Tu-95 MS) is quite suitable for itself!

I categorically , but the topic of "a pair of strategists and a UAV" .. is not comprehensible to the simple mind.

Quote: K-36

The topic is already within the reach of "Hunters".

While the "Hunter" flies in a circle and into the zone ...... everything else is ..... dreams, dreams and dreams

[Bez 310]

"... interaction of the" strategic missile carrier - UAV "level
in the future can be a big step forward ... "
It is impossible to read such news without a feeling of deep disgust.
Well, they would write normally - Tu-95 was used as an aircraft
- a repeater, it would be understandable, but they have a "step forward". Raving ...
Now commentators will connect and figure out how the UAV will help
"stride" to perform tasks as intended. Vaughn, already about AUG
started inventing something ...

[K-36]

Bez310 (Bez310)

Quote: Bez 310

Now commentators will connect and figure out how the UAV will help
"stride" to perform tasks as intended.

If anything, my "minus" in the assessment of your comment is not. (And the very "minus" of your post I consider absurd.)
But tell me, will you reject the idea of ​​a "Hunter" -the border guard in a green cap on the move? And, if yes, why? Thank you in advance.

[Bez 310]

Quote: K-36

the idea of ​​the "Hunter" -the border guard in a green cap

"Hunter" in its current form will not be received
in the troops, this is not even a prototype, but for now
technology development platform.
When at least a prototype appears, then
decide where to use it. But I will say now -
for border affairs, what is now called UAV
"Hunter" cannot be used, it is very expensive.
And what you call "intercept-escort"
no one needs it, these are not only simple "show-offs", but also
general imitation of media activities
and incompetent ordinary people.
And about the "cons" I'm not worried, they are put by those who do not have
arguments, and who cannot express their thoughts in words.

[K-36]

Bez310 (Bez310)

Quote: Bez 310

for border affairs
"Hunter", use must not, is very expensive.

And here I have a number of counterarguments for you:
1. Expensive.
If we consider the idea as a whole, we will see that it is not so expensive. First, there is no need to train a pilot in a school for 5 years (and this is already a lot of money). Secondly, in today's aviation, there are not enough pilots (Shoigu won, to increase prestige, ordered girls to recruit ). Thirdly, raising the "Hunters" to escort NATO's "Poseidons" will save the resource of active combat interceptors (and this is also money). Fourthly, it will be possible to slightly tweak the "Instructions for air defense crews on duty" (in the sense of reducing the "twitch for every sneeze" in coastal waters).
2. Psychology. Here's a huge bonus. For the reaction of any Dons in Poseidons will be completely different. When a piece of iron-robot hangs on your tail, then who knows what flight program was put into it?!?
For example, if not a Su-24, but an aerial robot-border guard called Hunter, flew over the notorious "Donald Cook", the news feed would have completely different colors.
Something like that.

[Bez 310]

Quote: K-36

I have a number of counterarguments for you

You did not understand the main thing in my message - not
we need the escorts of any "Poseidns", this
the same usual imitation of activity, and nothing
more.
Interceptions are needed in cases of violation of the state border,
and not the fact that every intruder will be shot down.
But that's not even the point, the point is that the UAV class
We don't have a "hunter", and it won't be soon, if at all
it will come to deliveries to the troops. In general, do not
strain and come up with something about "Hunter", his
simply no.
And you came up with a great idea about the girls ...

[K-36]

Bez 310

Quote: Bez 310

the fact is that the UAV class
We don't have a "hunter", and it won't be soon, if at all
it will come to deliveries to the troops. In general, do not
strain and come up with something about "Hunter", his
simply no.

Thanks for the answer. I hope you understand. Your grounded practical realism is quite adequate. However, the "Hunter" is slowly gaining its flight hours. And the topic is not covered. And the 21st century is already in the yard, like everything is in the vein.
By the way, tat nadys Gen. Designer Yak-130 and Orion Dolzhenkov N.N. expressed that it is time (would) to introduce drones into the staff of air regiments. So here I was two years ago here (on VO) voiced this idea. For example, why not send a "spark", but "Outpost R" for weather reconnaissance (before the start of flights)? All videos "Outpost" will throw off in the pre-flight training class in color. What are the problems?
But conservatism in Russia is such a hard-alloy argument that "... not every bird can reach the middle of the Dnieper"
Then, with SW.

[ancient]

Quote: K-36

For example, why not send a "spark", but "Outpost R" for weather reconnaissance (before the start of flights)

It will not work ... since it will be necessary to go to the piloting zones (determine the nature of cloudiness,. Nature, tendency, wind "to break through the NG, VG clouds, visibility, conditions (bumpiness), etc. and there are at least 3-4 such zones.
To "go" to the nearest polygon there is practically the same thing .. "to define".
In the aerodrome area, check the operability of all RTS systems (drive, ARP, RSBN, course-glide paths) and with both courses ... if there is both a Cathet and SP-50 at the aerodrome, then you will need to enter with both systems.
So if you "send" the Outpost to the RP, then just ... by the end of the starting time it will sit down

[K-36]

ancient, devil, incredibly glad to see!
And since the idea of ​​the UAV in the staff of the air regiments "hooked", that is, what to discuss.
1. For my beloved horse Tu-22 M3 (and other Tu-shek), I probably agree that the "Outpost" will not pull. But for hawks, attack aircraft and Su-24 is quite. If time is so pressing, then you need TWO "Outposts". And release them 3 hours before the start of flights. The one that checks the distant flight zones flies out first. Who are neighbors - second. And this second one immediately checks the entire RTS clip (drive, RSBN ... and further down the list), and then goes to its zones.
From my airfield "Outpost" worked on Darts. So he gave out an online picture for the panel of judges (and did not bring with him a flash drive with the footage of the Video, or, God forbid, and save the film). So Makar, having sent everything to the screens in the control room, they can return on foot, and the first combat flights will already be raised.
Now on the Polygon. Send a pair of Orlan-10 to the staff of the polygon team. Fortunately, they have already been tested in all poses (and even in the DB near the Mediterranean Sea). And they riveted enough of them, and Kolomna is stamping operators on the stream. And when the regiment is working on the Polygon, hang "Orlan" a little to the side at H = 1,5 km and cut it into a narrow rectangle of the echelon, let it write out its eights there. With its 12 hours of "hovering", it covers one and a half times any flight shift. And the video picture (as well as "Outpost") is sent online to the KDP. The squadron commander and the Kompolka can see the successes and failures of their pupils in a comfortable chair, drinking tea in a bite with chocolate
And if the "Orlan" is still taught to draw a line of combat contact on the screen and send it to the pilots in the air, assigning targets for destruction, then we are entering the 21st century without too much fanfare.
Once again sincerely

[ancient]

Quote: K-36

The squadron commander and the Kompolka can see the successes and failures of their pupils in a comfortable chair, drinking tea in a bite with chocolate

And what ... quite a sensible idea and takes place ... only the place of loitering needs to be very clearly defined in accordance with the anti-aircraft traffic regulations, otherwise "they will suspend it at 1500 meters ... and then either from a complex type of maneuver, or from pitching, and from above they will dive ...
Glad to see you in vigorous health

[ancient]

Quote: K-36

But tell me, will you reject the idea of ​​a "Hunter" -the border guard in a green cap on the move? And, if yes, why? Thank you in advance.

Victor, and I will also connect to your conversation ...dear Bez 310 in his koment right in absolutely everything.
Well, as a "border guard" ... you can try ... but then what kind of "locator" should be put on it, so that he could detect at least something and someone .... and identification? And the "communication" equipment? And maneuverability?
And the pilot on the fighter has a double task - and "accompany the intruder", and even at the same time the UAV .. to control .. that would be somewhere ..... "did not fly" ... like Vasily Tsimbal

[K-36]

ancient

Quote: ancient

Well, as a "border guard" ... you can try ... but then what kind of "locator" should be put on it, so that he could detect at least something and someone .... and identification? And the "communication" equipment? And maneuverability?
And the pilot on the fighter has a double task - and "accompany the intruder", and even at the same time the UAV .. to control .. that would be somewhere ..... "did not fly" ... like Vasily Tsimbal

Defending my idea of ​​an aerial robot in a green cap. Like a gritsa, I "gave birth" to her, and I should protect
1. Dimensions (well, that is, for installing a locator and other necessary equipment).
The caustic and meticulous guys from the Global Adventure quickly figured out that "the Hunter has dimensions that are almost the same as the Su-34 ... And if you also take into account that the UAV does not have a cockpit at all (with all its catapults, thrusters, RUSs, pedals and a dashboard), then the place for the locator is above the roof. And if we add here the uselessness of any oxygen equipment, an anti-overload automatic pressure device, all kinds of flashlight emergency release squibs, etc., etc., then it becomes clear that there are considerable reserves.
2. Control equipment for the "Hunter".
There is and is already being rolled in. Confirmed by the officialdom on joint flights with the Su-57 and Tu-95 MS as presented by TASS.
3. Secure communication equipment.
There is. And it is already in full use, for example, on the Su-35. That it is used in "Hunter" - see the same TASS calculations.

In short, everything is almost ready. And how to put on a green cap (that is, the commissioning plan) let the people in large stripes decide. And we only give a little hint from below.
You can drive from the border not only the Dons in the Poseidons, but also various inflated boats (such as the Donald Cook). And if something happens, it’s a piece of iron. You can still rivet. But the major who hit the water of the Black Sea is still looking for. And there is no way to return it for the family.
Something like that.
And no matter how things turn out, I am always sincere

[ancient]

Quote: K-36

And no matter how things turn out, I am always sincere

Almost ... persuaded ..let it be.....

[Ros 56]

Air Truckers - Happy Holidays!

[Alexander Vorontsov]

All involved in the holiday!

[tralflot1832]

As a child, I was lucky, I saw how in the sky over Severomosk 3 TU 95 shmal'n into the depths of the Kola Peninsula with something from under the wings. There was one plane and suddenly a small one with wings flew in front of it.

[novel66]

X-22, probably, but it leaves immediately after the release upwards, rode it, up and down

[tralflot1832]

Years navrno 72 73. We loved to pick mushrooms at night in the summer, went with a fan downward, stuff 4. And you just can't miss this in the sky, the "little boy" is noisy though.

[novel66]

no, not x-22, another ... forgot the number

[ancient]

Quote: novel xnumx

no, not x-22, another ... forgot the number

A type ... There were the X-20 and X-22, then the X-55 and X-101 family .... no more.
With "wings" there were also KSR-2 and KSR-10.

[ancient]

Quote: tralflot1832

Years navrno 72 73. We loved to pick mushrooms at night in the summer, went with a fan down, 4 pieces.

Maybe they just shot the PPI .. they greeted the "Severomors". (A common practice ... I was constantly shooting "signals" and "torches")

Quote: tralflot1832

And you will not miss such a thing in the sky, the "boy" is noisy however

In addition to the roar of the Tu-95 propellers, you could not hear anything

[tralflot1832]

How not to hear, I heard: Hey kid, in which direction is America, I screwed right? Don't show off your hand!

[ancient]

Quote: tralflot1832

Hey kid, which way is America, am I right? Don't show off your hand!

This is just an anecdote from the life of the SA and YES, when the commander says to the navigator: "..you don't be smart, but show in which direction to turn."

[ancient]

Quote: tralflot1832

As a child, I was lucky, I saw 3 TU 95 in the sky over Severomosk

Come on ... over the airfield and ... "shmalnul" .... "something" ... and even from under ... the wings (one wing on the plane ... one) and also with wings

[NN52]

Happy Holidays !!!

[novel66]

thanks, Dimka !!

[MP]

I congratulate all long-distance workers on the holiday!

[aszzz888]

Those who have flown and are now flying "around the corner" - Happy Holidays! The third pile you know for whom. In with. Khorol is a whole alley of monuments that have not returned from "around the corner". Crews of 8, 12 people. Who had time to tap SOS, who did not ... Somewhere in the depths of the Oceans They are. Everlasting memory!!!

[anjey]

Immediately I remembered the drill song from 1989, 1st regiment YES. In the village of Chagan, the song is vigorous. Good, I really had to march under it a little out of place

[iouris]

Choir of Marshals?

[anjey]

Let the marshals, if only not ... gays, as in the West

[Dmitry Vladimirovich]

A drone moving at high speed can also act as a kind of decoy target for enemy air defense systems.

What nonsense nonsense!
At what stage, if their flight ranges are significantly different?
What are you talking about journalists?

[Sasha from Uralmash]

Clear skies for you Patzans!