Military Review

"They are trying to question the effectiveness of the S-400": in the foreign press commenting on the animation of the United States with a strike on the air defense system

81

The foreign press is commenting on an American video in which the destruction of a base with Russian S-400 anti-aircraft missile systems (SAM) is shown in animation mode. The video, as Voennoye Obozreniye previously reported, was published by a large American defense company, Lockheed Martin. In the credits to the video, the US company pointed to the process of working on high-precision long-range Precision Strike missiles.


From Lockheed Martin:

PrSM is a new surface-to-surface system that provides enhanced capabilities to attack, neutralize, suppress and destroy targets using missiles from closed firing positions at a distance of over 499 kilometers.

This kind of video and credits were commented on in India and the Middle East. The EAT publication notes that with such animation the United States "is trying to question the effectiveness of the Russian S-400 air defense systems."

In the Indian press:

The US is clearly sending India an additional signal that it is pointless to acquire the S-400 from Russia. The message is as follows: when the S-400s arrive in India, there will already be weapon, which will be capable of destroying Russian air defense systems from the air.

Meanwhile, columnist Mansij Astkhan writes that today, Russian S-400s are the only complexes in the world capable of tracking and destroying stealth aircraft. For the United States, this awareness is a serious blow to self-esteem, which is why animated presentations like this one appear - with strikes on the air defense system and a demonstration that the air defense missile system was overslept:

Photos used:
Lockheed Martin
81 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Victor_B
    Victor_B 20 December 2020 10: 15
    +10
    Why can't the S-400 be destroyed?
    There is nothing indestructible in the world.
    The question is in the likelihood and possibility ... Well, who is it technologically accessible.
    Everything is relative. Patriots in Saudia are not very successful at fighting, and Israel was not very well protected from Saddam's missiles, but the Western media will never scold them.
    As for the S-400, "doubts" about its effectiveness are a rule of good form.
    1. Ilya-spb
      Ilya-spb 20 December 2020 10: 29
      +9
      You can destroy everything. Including humanity.

      The question is different. How many resources will need to be spent on the destruction of the S-400 and how much the costs exceed the cost of the complex.
      And the complex will not stand and wait. The S-400 interacts with other systems, the S-400, can you imagine - it can release missiles and shoot down an enemy plane.
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 20 December 2020 10: 43
        +1
        Strike systems are usually cheaper than those that oppose them.
        Therefore, the statement is often repeated that it is necessary to destroy the CARRIERS, those systems. This is logical, it has long been known.
    2. Lord of the Sith
      Lord of the Sith 20 December 2020 10: 33
      +7
      Do not forget that each S-400 division covers two Pantsir-S-1, four Pantsir-S-1 per regiment.
      1. Alex777
        Alex777 21 December 2020 11: 00
        +4
        There are no Shells in American cartoons. It is not beneficial to them. laughing
        Why do the Americans think that the S-400 won't take PrSM?
        Well, they fly at a speed of 5M, so what? Quite a regular goal.
        There is silence about any PrSM maneuvering in flight.
        And while Lockheed Martin finishes the PrSM (Raytheon could not even show the prototype), we will have the Pantsir-SM for hypersonic targets. hi
        1. Lord of the Sith
          Lord of the Sith 21 December 2020 23: 46
          +1
          You're right hi
          I'll leave you another photo like this. Let others look and think against what the 4th container
          1. Alex777
            Alex777 22 December 2020 00: 07
            +1
            I'll leave you another photo like this. Let others look and think against what the 4th container

            If there is a long-range missile, then it will resolve all issues with PrSM. wink
            1. Lord of the Sith
              Lord of the Sith 22 December 2020 10: 08
              +1
              No, not distant. This is for self-defense, an analogue of Thor or old Shell missiles with a range of 15 km. And this is on every S-400 launcher. Let me remind you that there are two divisions, 16 Launchers in the regiment.
              1. Alex777
                Alex777 22 December 2020 10: 22
                0
                IMHO, this is 9M96. The length of the missiles suggests this. There is no other (9M100). hi
    3. XXXIII
      XXXIII 20 December 2020 10: 34
      +4
      Quote: Victor_B
      Why can't the S-400 be destroyed?

      Because the S-400 is a triumph.)) The S-400 cannot be destroyed so simply with a pipe or a gas cylinder. The air defense system was created on the basis of reflecting the advanced developments of the enemy, and not repelling the copies of small peoples. hi
      1. Victor_B
        Victor_B 20 December 2020 10: 40
        +7
        The S-400 cannot be destroyed so simply with a pipe or a gas cylinder.

        You can easily and simply from a "nomadic" mortar, for example. Or from a .5 rifle to fire and spoil badly. Saboteurs.
        The best air defense is tanks on the enemy airfield.
        1. KCA
          KCA 20 December 2020 11: 16
          +3
          The saboteurs must somehow be delivered to the point of fire, and the "Pantsir" will intercept the mortar mines at once, well, this is if the "Pantsir" is on the DB and with ammunition, and not like the Arabs in Syria and Libya, and the condition to control not arabs too important
        2. poquello
          poquello 20 December 2020 11: 18
          +1
          Quote: Victor_B
          The S-400 cannot be destroyed so simply with a pipe or a gas cylinder.

          You can easily and simply from a "nomadic" mortar, for example. Or from a .5 rifle to fire and spoil badly. Saboteurs.
          The best air defense is tanks on the enemy airfield.

          you can also use a rocket - turn off c400 and destroy it with a rocket)
          1. Snail N9
            Snail N9 20 December 2020 11: 30
            -12%
            Today, Russian S-400s are the only complexes in the world capable of tracking and destroying stealth aircraft.

            Maybe someone can tell you how many "invisibles" shot down the S-400?
            1. XXXIII
              XXXIII 20 December 2020 11: 43
              +5
              Quote: Snail N9
              Maybe someone can tell you how many "invisibles" shot down the S-400?

              There is no data yet, no one wants to check. Even Turkey was not allowed to check the EPR F35, that's not a problem. It is necessary to find a decommissioned or create a layout and smash the F35 trade advertisement to smithereens. laughing
              1. hydrox
                hydrox 20 December 2020 21: 55
                +2
                That's right, there is no need to search for some fush, if they have each found their own broom.
                And if our Containers scan through ALL of Europe together with ALL BV and together with ALL of Asia, and EVERYONE who needs it will receive the coordinates of the location of those Fushek that fall into the field of view of those Containers (and not only Fushek, but also B-52 and other carriers of nuclear weapons), then the population of Russia will be absolutely violet, what will happen next with the detected dangerous objects - who will meet them and what will treat them.
            2. poquello
              poquello 20 December 2020 12: 00
              +2
              Quote: Snail N9
              Maybe someone can tell you how many "invisibles" shot down the S-400?

              eop "invisible" prompt?
              1. Dread
                Dread 20 December 2020 13: 56
                +1
                Quote: Snail N9
                Maybe someone can tell you how many "invisibles" shot down the S-400?

                As soon as possible!
            3. gjkrjdybr50
              gjkrjdybr50 20 December 2020 19: 21
              +3
              So far, not at all, who want to check it yet. Who wants to check - wellcome! But, alas, they are flying around.
        3. XXXIII
          XXXIII 20 December 2020 11: 40
          +2
          Quote: Victor_B
          You can easily and simply from a "nomadic" mortar, for example. Or from a .5 rifle to fire and spoil badly. Saboteurs.
          The best air defense is tanks on the enemy airfield.

          Well, you and the tasks you set Comrade Major. This is an air defense element, the tasks are different. And the tanks are good, but they also need to be covered.
          1. Snail N9
            Snail N9 20 December 2020 12: 30
            -8
            And yet, we have "Nudol" (or whatever, we have "anti-missile-space") "successfully" strikes .... "calculated point" .. wink ..
            1. poquello
              poquello 20 December 2020 12: 57
              +1
              especially for you, we also have target missiles at which they also shoot and hit
            2. gjkrjdybr50
              gjkrjdybr50 20 December 2020 19: 24
              +4
              Yes "Nudol" and do not need skepticism. I am glad that my work is also in the creation of this system and I inform for the especially "advanced": it flies and really amazes.
  2. rocket757
    rocket757 20 December 2020 10: 15
    +3
    So it’s obvious that you don’t try, you don’t know ...
    There was no real, combat use of our new anti-aircraft systems, yes ... well, no one would dare to experience it ON HIMSELF. Yes, and those who wish are substituted, for the sake of the minke, it is not noticeable ...
    So far, some cartoons.
    1. Uncle lee
      Uncle lee 20 December 2020 10: 22
      +6
      Quote: rocket757
      some cartoons.

      They love to shoot fantastic films in Hollywood: from "From a Cannon to the Moon" to the "Apollo" program ...
      And to knock down the S-400 is a pleasure to see!
      1. figwam
        figwam 20 December 2020 10: 35
        +4
        Quote: Uncle Lee
        They love making science fiction films in Hollywood

        A cartoon about how all the enemies of the United States sleep and only the Yankees fly and shoot.
      2. rocket757
        rocket757 20 December 2020 10: 38
        +2
        They know how, are able to dream, fantasies, in a visible row to embody in Hollywood. But the embodied does not coincide with the truth of life, very often.
        Okay, let it remain, studio of dreams, fantasies, dreams!
        It will be boring without them, we are already used to them and perceive the majority accordingly.
      3. Mountain shooter
        Mountain shooter 20 December 2020 10: 44
        +4
        Quote: Uncle Lee
        And to knock down the S-400 is a pleasure to see!

        The main thing is to convince yourself that it is possible, that it is not scary, that it is possible to attack a single S-400, and the GPS will work, and somewhere at a distance the F-35 will patrol without interference ... But this is not a war, cartoon ... This is a simulation of a blow to a single object, like, we bought an S-400, and we, from around the corner! From the territory of a foreign state ... suddenly! The country is a gangster, by God ...
        1. XXXIII
          XXXIII 20 December 2020 11: 53
          +1
          Quote: Mountain Shooter
          But this is not a war, on a cartoon ... This is a simulation of a strike on a single object, like, we bought an S-400, and we, from around the corner!

          So this is exactly what it is shown that they are fighting from around the corner resembles Israeli tactics. But what will happen when they go head-on or the answer flies in, then they immediately begin to say that they have not corrected it. It means to attack f35 imperceptibly, this is correct, but getting a rocket to the airfield before takeoff is wrong.))
      4. sedoj
        sedoj 20 December 2020 14: 29
        0
        Quote: Uncle Lee
        And to knock down the S-400 is a pleasure to see!

        They didn't knock it down - they marked it with paint. Like hit.

        Also to me, paintball players.
    2. cniza
      cniza 20 December 2020 12: 35
      +4
      Quote: rocket757

      So far, some cartoons.


      Or maybe it's for the best. Greetings! hi
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 20 December 2020 13: 46
        +1
        Welcome soldier
        Obviously, when, forcibly, serious weapons are used, everyone will very quickly become ... not very good, to put it mildly.
        Therefore, long live cartoons !!!
        1. cniza
          cniza 20 December 2020 18: 18
          +2
          Such competitions are better than actual practice ...
          1. rocket757
            rocket757 20 December 2020 18: 24
            +1
            Stretch with cartoons, that's okay.
            If we move on to the real embodiment of the idea ... then the next step to the edge will be taken.
            1. cniza
              cniza 20 December 2020 18: 40
              +2
              I don't want this at all and I think no one wants to fight, but there are politicians who are itching in one place ...
              1. rocket757
                rocket757 20 December 2020 20: 28
                +1
                Politicians, for the most part, are talkers.
                They no longer go anywhere without a guarantee ... although they still manage to get into the most, most.
  3. Tusv
    Tusv 20 December 2020 10: 23
    +1
    As I understand it, Lockheed is trying to reproduce Iskander, which can really soak any complex outside the system.
  4. TatarinSSSR
    TatarinSSSR 20 December 2020 10: 26
    -8
    Recently they moved 2 such rocket launchers closer to the Crimea, such as a training exercise. We shot out conditionally and ran back. However, with all my love for the Motherland, I would not be surprised that something like that in the video is possible. The S-400 has never shown itself ANYWHERE in combat. There is only data from exercises and advertising reports. Of course, many in the West respect the Russian S-400 complex, but this is not enough. If the same American Patriot or the Israeli Dome is at the very least poorly but has already shown themselves in combat, then our S-300 and S-400 systems have not shown anything yet. And what is the old Soviet air defense system and the same Pantsiri and S-300 against modern strike weapons - we all saw in Syria and Karabakh. As if it did not work out with the S-400 - that God forbid it will be destroyed like that, and then we will make excuses again - but there was no calculation, but there it was without a BC, or it was an old modification ... and etc.
    1. Vladimir_2U
      Vladimir_2U 20 December 2020 10: 45
      +3
      Quote: TatarinSSSR
      And what is the old Soviet air defense system and the same Pantsiri and S-300 against modern strike weapons - we all saw in Syria and Karabakh

      There are a lot of complaints both to the organization of air defense and to training with discipline, both to the Syrians and to the Armenians.
      1. TatarinSSSR
        TatarinSSSR 20 December 2020 12: 04
        -5
        Why don't you have any claims to the Arab crews of the Abrams, which were burning from the RPG? All of you at once hayal tanks. Or double standards? So don't sell weapons to poor countries or teach them how to use them. And so it turns out - they sold for a profit, and that's it, and then something is wrong, it is not.
        1. poquello
          poquello 20 December 2020 12: 35
          +3
          Quote: TatarinSSSR
          Or double standards?

          and what should be?))))))))))) Will we talk about Khmeinim or will you immediately go into the bright distance?
          1. TatarinSSSR
            TatarinSSSR 20 December 2020 13: 11
            -3
            And what about Khmeimim? Handicraft plywood drones - problem for military object air defense? And here they and the rocket in the article? The bright distance is not for people like you, you are right.
            1. poquello
              poquello 20 December 2020 13: 28
              +2
              Quote: TatarinSSSR
              And what about Khmeimim? Craft plywood drones -

              more than a hundred and hail, and nothing
              and what
              Quote: TatarinSSSR
              we saw in Syria and Karabakh
              ?
              placing previously explored air defense points in case of inability to use these air defense
              1. TatarinSSSR
                TatarinSSSR 20 December 2020 14: 32
                -1
                For your information, not far off, Khmeimim suffered from shelling, the Su-24M was seriously damaged. So everything is as smooth and rosy as you think.
                1. poquello
                  poquello 20 December 2020 14: 52
                  +1
                  Quote: TatarinSSSR
                  For your information, not far off, Khmeimim suffered from shelling, the Su-24M was seriously damaged. So everything is as smooth and rosy as you think.

                  yes I know, I know, two times three times, one whole novel I wrote)
                2. Evil Booth
                  Evil Booth 23 December 2020 11: 40
                  -2
                  the main thing to believe (s) laughing
        2. Vladimir_2U
          Vladimir_2U 20 December 2020 13: 57
          +1
          Quote: TatarinSSSR
          Why don't you have any claims to the Arab crews of the Abrams, which burned from RPGs?
          Maybe because I don't care about the Abrams?
          Quote: TatarinSSSR
          So don't sell weapons to poor countries
          You quieter, quieter! Do not disrupt my gesheft, I just have a couple of Abrams unnecessary to gather dust! )))
          1. TatarinSSSR
            TatarinSSSR 20 December 2020 14: 34
            -2
            That is, you yourself have now recognized that you are one of those who do not care about facts and opinions, you have one, your own and correct, urarash - we have all the best, the most, that has no analogue in the world! Yes, there is something to be proud of.
            1. Vladimir_2U
              Vladimir_2U 20 December 2020 14: 36
              +3
              Buy a tail fire extinguisher for yourself, otherwise it burns out of the blue.
              1. TatarinSSSR
                TatarinSSSR 20 December 2020 21: 39
                -2
                I can do without advice. Especially yours.
    2. Nikita, f
      Nikita, f 20 December 2020 10: 45
      +5
      It's not about weapons, but who is its owner, Russia has not yet lost a single air defense complex, not in Syria, not in a ship, for some reason only very, very poor countries lose air defense that cannot organize this air defense, Russia has a multi-level air defense, all they cover each other, in such poor countries as Syria, the Arabs do not have the necessary air defense density, and besides, they do not have a fantan, for s300 and s200 in Syria, Israeli aircraft operate mainly from the territory of Israel itself, the missiles are minimal and apparently neither Syria nor Nagorno-Karabakh did not have enough radars to track them in good time, the Russian military base is also covered by short-range air defense systems that are sharpened for dating missiles, the same torus, works on targets with EPR 0.05, calmly shot down swarms of miniature drones , in which the EPR is minimal, with the s-400 hitting a drone weighing 3 kg money down the drain, but if such a drone does not bring down nothing good, Syria has only 300 ammunition for the same s300, so they save them, and shooting down flying stealth aircraft or the same f16 over the territory of Israel is a little aggressive and probably difficult because of the police in Israel
    3. Nikita, f
      Nikita, f 20 December 2020 10: 49
      +4
      The Patriots are imprisoned for missile defense, it is difficult for them to work on drones weighing under 5 kg with a miniature EPR, so it is not surprising that the Saudis have gouged the plant, the plant should have been more likely to protect the short-range air defense system around the perimeter in tandem with the electronic combat systems, the Patriots were there as Iranian scads, there was little sense from them.
      1. Evil Booth
        Evil Booth 20 December 2020 12: 37
        -1
        NATO has no air defense from the word at all and never will. srk of the neighbor? they are not! so a couple of pieces from the 70s. the Patriot is not a station wagon.
        1. poquello
          poquello 20 December 2020 13: 01
          0
          Quote: Evil Booth
          NATO has no air defense from the word at all and never will.

          ett will find the US money - they will have Jewish air defense, some kind of but still working
          1. Evil Booth
            Evil Booth 22 December 2020 14: 13
            0
            40 air defense systems, and in particular 25 and something a dozen patriots missed ALL Houthi 25 arquets. Kivsilev showed this with positions and line-up. with this patriot and other .. Arabs' air defense is more powerful than the European one) in Spain there are patriots as we have in half-cubes) there is no NATO air defense, it is all together weaker than the Syrian even in numbers. and a couple of squares are more interesting than 1 hawk single-channel nemoblino and so on. and s200 is more interesting than nothing)) you more specifically state what they will find there probably will buy a pro in kiata and anti-aircraft missile systems in rf?
            1. poquello
              poquello 22 December 2020 19: 47
              0
              Quote: Evil Booth
              be specific about what they will find there

              sling to Davidov
              The Sling of David provides security for the second, middle echelon. It intercepts cruise missiles, medium-range ballistic missiles and NUR. The system hits targets within a radius of 70 to 300 kilometers.
              (from here)
              1. Evil Booth
                Evil Booth 23 December 2020 11: 39
                0
                So what? Why is a sling better than a Patriot? but she doesn't know how to do HBO. All unas have NVO and they have nothing. out with the Houthis tell about the air defense, they bomb the cop as they want.
      2. Evil Booth
        Evil Booth 23 December 2020 11: 41
        0
        lol Warhead pershing has lower ESR than drone. such a s300v 35 years ago on the machine led in interference from 100+ km. less ptmuchto bch a cone falling from above, a sharp cone of correct shape, and by virtue of its shape, just any signal scatters any side in all directions without reflection ... a cone)))
    4. Fungus
      Fungus 20 December 2020 10: 52
      +1
      The best air defense system in the world at the moment is Pantsir. He has dozens of Turkish, American and Israeli UAVs, various missiles and kamikaze drones on his account. And this despite the fact that the Arabs are so-so fighters. And their operators are three orders of magnitude worse than ours.
      1. Nikita, f
        Nikita, f 20 December 2020 10: 55
        +3
        Not beeches are still pizzhe, they have a longer range and a radar is more powerful than beech m3.
        1. Vladimir_2U
          Vladimir_2U 20 December 2020 14: 37
          -1
          Do not swear, here they are banned at once
    5. Tusv
      Tusv 20 December 2020 10: 57
      +1
      Quote: TatarinSSSR
      The S-400 has never shown itself ANYWHERE in combat.

      Did not launch standard missiles at the enemy. It's true. But the integrated S-400 still successfully participates in hostilities. If roughly, then DCT, S-400 target designation, Pantsir launchers. well, electronic warfare. All these chips are included in the integrated S-400
    6. Cottodraton
      Cottodraton 20 December 2020 11: 55
      +2
      I still see chewing of the manuals on your part, so what? What did you see there in Karabakh and Syria? They showed you what they wanted ... you yourself did not see anything
      1. TatarinSSSR
        TatarinSSSR 20 December 2020 12: 06
        +1
        And you were there, on the front line and in the command centers and saw everything personally? Change the methodology.
    7. Dread
      Dread 21 December 2020 01: 07
      0
      Quote: TatarinSSSR
      The S-400 has never shown itself ANYWHERE in combat. There is only data from exercises and advertising reports. Of course, many in the West respect the Russian S-400 complex, but this is not enough. If the same American Patriot or the Israeli Dome are at the very least poorly but have already shown themselves in combat, then our S-300, S-400 systems have not shown anything yet.

      There is no need to repeat a lie, as some of the "Gurus" here are not Russians. Complexes S-400 are tested at test sites upon delivery to the Customer and are actually tested for hitting real targets. You also write here about "Pantsir-C1", "Pantsir-S2" has been adopted by Russia - this is the second big difference, which can be clearly seen from the antenna system of the detection radar. You also do not take into account - "Carapace" has passed 2 upgrades and the shortcomings have been eliminated. In Syria, "Pantsir-C2" (Syria) was struck when it was off and the crew smoked on the sidelines. In Karabakh "Pantsiri-S1" were not used. SAM "Osa" is not "Pantsir".
  5. Ros 56
    Ros 56 20 December 2020 10: 27
    +1
    Let them convince themselves, why argue with them, the more unexpected it will be to get in the horn. bully
    1. TatarinSSSR
      TatarinSSSR 20 December 2020 12: 00
      -2
      A patriot is when there are pluses with a bang and squeals, do you earn a rating? There are facts - the destruction of Russian-made air defense systems. In Libya, Syria, Karabakh. All the rest is idle chatter. And the fact is that the S-400 did not appear in combat, which means there is nothing to talk about its effectiveness. So pour your fairy tales into each other's ears, and poke your friend as many plus signs as you like. And tell about the cool air defense to Israel.
      1. Evil Booth
        Evil Booth 20 December 2020 12: 40
        +1
        wassat a couple of confirmed shells and half a thousand wassat The c300 was destroyed just like I did with a pencil on the monitor .. there is sheer nonsense in the form of a large black spot. The coolness of Israel's air defense is well known; they almost never bombed the Arab troops. the opposite is easy. a few cartoons on the discovery and that's it. if the moment 25 flew over telavivo then what? sure sure.
      2. Fungus
        Fungus 20 December 2020 13: 31
        +1
        American, Turkish and Israeli attack UAVs were not used against Israel's air defense. Missiles and kamikaze drones were not used. Against Carapace, this was all used in real combat conditions. And he knocked it down. Despite his losses. Is there still such an air defense system in the world? No.
      3. Ros 56
        Ros 56 20 December 2020 15: 50
        -1
        Continue whining, at the same time collect your belongings and scratch them in the wilds of the Amazon.
        1. TatarinSSSR
          TatarinSSSR 20 December 2020 21: 00
          -3
          Continue to rejoice at the nonsense from TV and other media, it's useless to argue with you. Zombified everything is not how much.
  6. AB
    AB 20 December 2020 10: 43
    0
    Eeeee, why the heck did they put the radar station on a tall ramp in the multitask or they are not aware of the presence of a mobile tower in the kit? The propaganda experts blinded the cartoon.
    1. Tusv
      Tusv 20 December 2020 11: 44
      +2
      Quote: AB (Alexey)
      Eeeee, why the heck did they put the radar station on a tall ramp in the multitask or they are not aware of the presence of a mobile tower in the kit? The propaganda experts blinded the cartoon.

      This is not a ramp, but an antenna mast. It is called Unzha. It has two purposes - the main thing is to see beyond the horizon. Auxiliary - so that HARMs can be shot at him, and at the radar operators
      1. AB
        AB 21 December 2020 11: 48
        0
        actually i mean it
  7. basal
    basal 20 December 2020 11: 11
    +2
    The video looked. So-so. Any toy manufacturer will do better, more creative. Where are the sun-like Jedi, bloody Mordor scraps ... It's a shame, Lockheed - no success.
    And on the case. Another rocket with a GPS navigator, nothing new. Well, F35, looking for an air defense system and instead of striking a blow, calling a satellite to the base is just silly. Apparently the Americans have become very bad. The video is not made for BLM and other BDSM, but for those who have a brain.
  8. Al Asad
    Al Asad 20 December 2020 11: 31
    +1
    They showed in the cartoon the impact of a non-existent rocket.
    This is an application of course!
    Reinforced concrete argument in favor of the insolvency of the Russian air defense S-400 laughing
    1. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh 20 December 2020 14: 00
      -1
      She has not yet entered service. It's right.
      But there were already several tests:

      This is not a cartoon, but a real photo.
      Lockheed Martin's PrSM missile was tested for a third time at White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico, on April 30, 2020
  9. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 20 December 2020 11: 39
    +1
    more than 499 kilometers.
    As advertising in a retail network - not 500, but 499. Excerpt from Indian media
    a weapon will appear that will be able to destroy Russian air defense systems from the air
    only confirms the weathering of their policy when purchasing weapons from Russia.
  10. cniza
    cniza 20 December 2020 12: 34
    +1
    For the United States, the realization of this is a serious blow to pride, and therefore there are animation presentations like this one - with strikes on the air defense system and a demonstration that the air defense missile system was "overslept":


    Let them rage on their health and hide their "invisibles" ...
  11. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 20 December 2020 13: 13
    +2
    more than 499 kilometers away
    Are you in the scope of the agreement? "I will hesitate" and will not sign. angry
  12. The comment was deleted.
  13. Gregory Charnota
    Gregory Charnota 20 December 2020 15: 17
    +1
    yes it is now they with VV have taken the fashion of cartoons to show how rockets are roaring around the clock
    and so on