"They are trying to question the effectiveness of the S-400": in the foreign press commenting on the animation of the United States with a strike on the air defense system

The foreign press is commenting on an American video in which the destruction of a base with Russian S-400 anti-aircraft missile systems (SAM) is shown in animation mode. The video, as Voennoye Obozreniye previously reported, was published by a large American defense company, Lockheed Martin. In the credits to the video, the US company pointed to the process of working on high-precision long-range Precision Strike missiles.

From Lockheed Martin:

PrSM is a new surface-to-surface system that provides enhanced capabilities to attack, neutralize, suppress and destroy targets using missiles from closed firing positions at a distance of over 499 kilometers.

This kind of video and credits were commented on in India and the Middle East. The EAT publication notes that with such animation the United States "is trying to question the effectiveness of the Russian S-400 air defense systems."

In the Indian press:

The US is clearly sending India an additional signal that it is pointless to acquire the S-400 from Russia. The message is as follows: when the S-400s arrive in India, there will already be weapon, which will be capable of destroying Russian air defense systems from the air.

Meanwhile, columnist Mansij Astkhan writes that today, Russian S-400s are the only complexes in the world capable of tracking and destroying stealth aircraft. For the United States, this awareness is a serious blow to self-esteem, which is why animated presentations like this one appear - with strikes on the air defense system and a demonstration that the air defense missile system was overslept:

Comments

[Victor_B]

Why can't the S-400 be destroyed?
There is nothing indestructible in the world.
The question is in the likelihood and possibility ... Well, who is it technologically accessible.
Everything is relative. Patriots in Saudia are not very successful at fighting, and Israel was not very well protected from Saddam's missiles, but the Western media will never scold them.
As for the S-400, "doubts" about its effectiveness are a rule of good form.

[Ilya-spb]

You can destroy everything. Including humanity.

The question is different. How many resources will need to be spent on the destruction of the S-400 and how much the costs exceed the cost of the complex.
And the complex will not stand and wait. The S-400 interacts with other systems, the S-400, can you imagine - it can release missiles and shoot down an enemy plane.

[rocket757]

Strike systems are usually cheaper than those that oppose them.
Therefore, the statement is often repeated that it is necessary to destroy the CARRIERS, those systems. This is logical, it has long been known.

[Lord of the Sith]

Do not forget that each S-400 division covers two Pantsir-S-1, four Pantsir-S-1 per regiment.

[Alex777]

There are no Shells in American cartoons. It is not beneficial to them.
Why do the Americans think that the S-400 won't take PrSM?
Well, they fly at a speed of 5M, so what? Quite a regular goal.
There is silence about any PrSM maneuvering in flight.
And while Lockheed Martin finishes the PrSM (Raytheon could not even show the prototype), we will have the Pantsir-SM for hypersonic targets.

[Lord of the Sith]

You're right
I'll leave you another photo like this. Let others look and think against what the 4th container

[Alex777]

I'll leave you another photo like this. Let others look and think against what the 4th container

If there is a long-range missile, then it will resolve all issues with PrSM.

[Lord of the Sith]

No, not distant. This is for self-defense, an analogue of Thor or old Shell missiles with a range of 15 km. And this is on every S-400 launcher. Let me remind you that there are two divisions, 16 Launchers in the regiment.

[Alex777]

IMHO, this is 9M96. The length of the missiles suggests this. There is no other (9M100).

[XXXIII]

Quote: Victor_B

Why can't the S-400 be destroyed?

Because the S-400 is a triumph.)) The S-400 cannot be destroyed so simply with a pipe or a gas cylinder. The air defense system was created on the basis of reflecting the advanced developments of the enemy, and not repelling the copies of small peoples.

[Victor_B]

The S-400 cannot be destroyed so simply with a pipe or a gas cylinder.

You can easily and simply from a "nomadic" mortar, for example. Or from a .5 rifle to fire and spoil badly. Saboteurs.
The best air defense is tanks on the enemy airfield.

[KCA]

The saboteurs must somehow be delivered to the point of fire, and the "Pantsir" will intercept the mortar mines at once, well, this is if the "Pantsir" is on the DB and with ammunition, and not like the Arabs in Syria and Libya, and the condition to control not arabs too important

[poquello]

Quote: Victor_B

The S-400 cannot be destroyed so simply with a pipe or a gas cylinder.

You can easily and simply from a "nomadic" mortar, for example. Or from a .5 rifle to fire and spoil badly. Saboteurs.
The best air defense is tanks on the enemy airfield.

you can also use a rocket - turn off c400 and destroy it with a rocket)

[Snail N9]

Today, Russian S-400s are the only complexes in the world capable of tracking and destroying stealth aircraft.

Maybe someone can tell you how many "invisibles" shot down the S-400?

[XXXIII]

Quote: Snail N9

Maybe someone can tell you how many "invisibles" shot down the S-400?

There is no data yet, no one wants to check. Even Turkey was not allowed to check the EPR F35, that's not a problem. It is necessary to find a decommissioned or create a layout and smash the F35 trade advertisement to smithereens.

[hydrox]

That's right, there is no need to search for some fush, if they have each found their own broom.
And if our Containers scan through ALL of Europe together with ALL BV and together with ALL of Asia, and EVERYONE who needs it will receive the coordinates of the location of those Fushek that fall into the field of view of those Containers (and not only Fushek, but also B-52 and other carriers of nuclear weapons), then the population of Russia will be absolutely violet, what will happen next with the detected dangerous objects - who will meet them and what will treat them.

[poquello]

Quote: Snail N9

Maybe someone can tell you how many "invisibles" shot down the S-400?

eop "invisible" prompt?

[Dread]

Quote: Snail N9

Maybe someone can tell you how many "invisibles" shot down the S-400?

As soon as possible!

[gjkrjdybr50]

So far, not at all, who want to check it yet. Who wants to check - wellcome! But, alas, they are flying around.

[XXXIII]

Quote: Victor_B

You can easily and simply from a "nomadic" mortar, for example. Or from a .5 rifle to fire and spoil badly. Saboteurs.
The best air defense is tanks on the enemy airfield.

Well, you and the tasks you set Comrade Major. This is an air defense element, the tasks are different. And the tanks are good, but they also need to be covered.

[Snail N9]

And yet, we have "Nudol" (or whatever, we have "anti-missile-space") "successfully" strikes .... "calculated point" .. ..

[poquello]

especially for you, we also have target missiles at which they also shoot and hit

[gjkrjdybr50]

Yes "Nudol" and do not need skepticism. I am glad that my work is also in the creation of this system and I inform for the especially "advanced": it flies and really amazes.

[rocket757]

So it’s obvious that you don’t try, you don’t know ...
There was no real, combat use of our new anti-aircraft systems, yes ... well, no one would dare to experience it ON HIMSELF. Yes, and those who wish are substituted, for the sake of the minke, it is not noticeable ...
So far, some cartoons.

[Uncle lee]

Quote: rocket757

some cartoons.

They love to shoot fantastic films in Hollywood: from "From a Cannon to the Moon" to the "Apollo" program ...
And to knock down the S-400 is a pleasure to see!

[figwam]

Quote from Uncle Lee

They love making science fiction films in Hollywood

A cartoon about how all the enemies of the United States sleep and only the Yankees fly and shoot.

[rocket757]

They know how, are able to dream, fantasies, in a visible row to embody in Hollywood. But the embodied does not coincide with the truth of life, very often.
Okay, let it remain, studio of dreams, fantasies, dreams!
It will be boring without them, we are already used to them and perceive the majority accordingly.

[Mountain shooter]

Quote from Uncle Lee

And to knock down the S-400 is a pleasure to see!

The main thing is to convince yourself that it is possible, that it is not scary, that it is possible to attack a single S-400, and the GPS will work, and somewhere at a distance the F-35 will patrol without interference ... But this is not a war, cartoon ... This is a simulation of a blow to a single object, like, we bought an S-400, and we, from around the corner! From the territory of a foreign state ... suddenly! The country is a gangster, by God ...

[XXXIII]

Quote: Mountain Shooter

But this is not a war, on a cartoon ... This is a simulation of a strike on a single object, like, we bought an S-400, and we, from around the corner!

So this is exactly what it is shown that they are fighting from around the corner resembles Israeli tactics. But what will happen when they go head-on or the answer flies in, then they immediately begin to say that they have not corrected it. It means to attack f35 imperceptibly, this is correct, but getting a rocket to the airfield before takeoff is wrong.))

[sedoj]

Quote from Uncle Lee

And to knock down the S-400 is a pleasure to see!

They didn't knock it down - they marked it with paint. Like hit.

Also to me, paintball players.

[cniza]

Quote: rocket757

So far, some cartoons.

Or maybe it's for the best. Greetings!

[rocket757]

Welcome
Obviously, when, forcibly, serious weapons are used, everyone will very quickly become ... not very good, to put it mildly.
Therefore, long live cartoons !!!

[cniza]

Such competitions are better than actual practice ...

[rocket757]

Stretch with cartoons, that's okay.
If we move on to the real embodiment of the idea ... then the next step to the edge will be taken.

[cniza]

I don't want this at all and I think no one wants to fight, but there are politicians who are itching in one place ...

[rocket757]

Politicians, for the most part, are talkers.
They no longer go anywhere without a guarantee ... although they still manage to get into the most, most.

[Tusv]

As I understand it, Lockheed is trying to reproduce Iskander, which can really soak any complex outside the system.

[TatarinSSSR]

Recently they moved 2 such rocket launchers closer to the Crimea, such as a training exercise. We shot out conditionally and ran back. However, with all my love for the Motherland, I would not be surprised that something like that in the video is possible. The S-400 has never shown itself ANYWHERE in combat. There is only data from exercises and advertising reports. Of course, many in the West respect the Russian S-400 complex, but this is not enough. If the same American Patriot or the Israeli Dome is at the very least poorly but has already shown themselves in combat, then our S-300 and S-400 systems have not shown anything yet. And what is the old Soviet air defense system and the same Pantsiri and S-300 against modern strike weapons - we all saw in Syria and Karabakh. As if it did not work out with the S-400 - that God forbid it will be destroyed like that, and then we will make excuses again - but there was no calculation, but there it was without a BC, or it was an old modification ... and etc.

[Vladimir_2U]

Quote: TatarinSSSR

And what is the old Soviet air defense system and the same Pantsiri and S-300 against modern strike weapons - we all saw in Syria and Karabakh

There are a lot of complaints both to the organization of air defense and to training with discipline, both to the Syrians and to the Armenians.

[TatarinSSSR]

Why don't you have any claims to the Arab crews of the Abrams, which were burning from the RPG? All of you at once hayal tanks. Or double standards? So don't sell weapons to poor countries or teach them how to use them. And so it turns out - they sold for a profit, and that's it, and then something is wrong, it is not.

[poquello]

Quote: TatarinSSSR

Or double standards?

and what should be?))))))))))) Will we talk about Khmeinim or will you immediately go into the bright distance?

[TatarinSSSR]

And what about Khmeimim? Handicraft plywood drones - problem for military object air defense? And here they and the rocket in the article? The bright distance is not for people like you, you are right.

[poquello]

Quote: TatarinSSSR

And what about Khmeimim? Craft plywood drones -

more than a hundred and hail, and nothing
and what

Quote: TatarinSSSR

we saw in Syria and Karabakh

?
placing previously explored air defense points in case of inability to use these air defense

[TatarinSSSR]

For your information, not far off, Khmeimim suffered from shelling, the Su-24M was seriously damaged. So everything is as smooth and rosy as you think.

[poquello]

Quote: TatarinSSSR

For your information, not far off, Khmeimim suffered from shelling, the Su-24M was seriously damaged. So everything is as smooth and rosy as you think.

yes I know, I know, two times three times, one whole novel I wrote)

[Evil Booth]

the main thing to believe (s)

[Vladimir_2U]

Quote: TatarinSSSR

Why don't you have any claims to the Arab crews of the Abrams, which burned from RPGs?

Maybe because I don't care about the Abrams?

Quote: TatarinSSSR

So don't sell weapons to poor countries

You quieter, quieter! Do not disrupt my gesheft, I just have a couple of Abrams unnecessary to gather dust! )))

[TatarinSSSR]

That is, you yourself have now recognized that you are one of those who do not care about facts and opinions, you have one, your own and correct, urarash - we have all the best, the most, that has no analogue in the world! Yes, there is something to be proud of.

[Vladimir_2U]

Buy a tail fire extinguisher for yourself, otherwise it burns out of the blue.

[TatarinSSSR]

I can do without advice. Especially yours.

[Nikita, f]

It's not about weapons, but who is its owner, Russia has not yet lost a single air defense complex, not in Syria, not in a ship, for some reason only very, very poor countries lose air defense that cannot organize this air defense, Russia has a multi-level air defense, all they cover each other, in such poor countries as Syria, the Arabs do not have the necessary air defense density, and besides, they do not have a fantan, for s300 and s200 in Syria, Israeli aircraft operate mainly from the territory of Israel itself, the missiles are minimal and apparently neither Syria nor Nagorno-Karabakh did not have enough radars to track them in good time, the Russian military base is also covered by short-range air defense systems that are sharpened for dating missiles, the same torus, works on targets with EPR 0.05, calmly shot down swarms of miniature drones , in which the EPR is minimal, with the s-400 hitting a drone weighing 3 kg money down the drain, but if such a drone does not bring down nothing good, Syria has only 300 ammunition for the same s300, so they save them, and shooting down flying stealth aircraft or the same f16 over the territory of Israel is a little aggressive and probably difficult because of the police in Israel

[Nikita, f]

The Patriots are imprisoned for missile defense, it is difficult for them to work on drones weighing under 5 kg with a miniature EPR, so it is not surprising that the Saudis have gouged the plant, the plant should have been more likely to protect the short-range air defense system around the perimeter in tandem with the electronic combat systems, the Patriots were there as Iranian scads, there was little sense from them.

[Evil Booth]

NATO has no air defense from the word at all and never will. srk of the neighbor? they are not! so a couple of pieces from the 70s. the Patriot is not a station wagon.

[poquello]

Quote: Evil Booth

NATO has no air defense from the word at all and never will.

ett will find the US money - they will have Jewish air defense, some kind of but still working

[Evil Booth]

40 air defense systems, and in particular 25 and something a dozen patriots missed ALL Houthi 25 arquets. Kivsilev showed this with positions and line-up. with this patriot and other .. Arabs' air defense is more powerful than the European one) in Spain there are patriots as we have in half-cubes) there is no NATO air defense, it is all together weaker than the Syrian even in numbers. and a couple of squares are more interesting than 1 hawk single-channel nemoblino and so on. and s200 is more interesting than nothing)) you more specifically state what they will find there probably will buy a pro in kiata and anti-aircraft missile systems in rf?

[poquello]

Quote: Evil Booth

be specific about what they will find there

sling to Davidov

The Sling of David provides security for the second, middle echelon. It intercepts cruise missiles, medium-range ballistic missiles and NUR. The system hits targets within a radius of 70 to 300 kilometers.

(from here)

[Evil Booth]

So what? Why is a sling better than a Patriot? but she doesn't know how to do HBO. All unas have NVO and they have nothing. out with the Houthis tell about the air defense, they bomb the cop as they want.

[Evil Booth]

Warhead pershing has lower ESR than drone. such a s300v 35 years ago on the machine led in interference from 100+ km. less ptmuchto bch a cone falling from above, a sharp cone of correct shape, and by virtue of its shape, just any signal scatters any side in all directions without reflection ... a cone)))

[Fungus]

The best air defense system in the world at the moment is Pantsir. He has dozens of Turkish, American and Israeli UAVs, various missiles and kamikaze drones on his account. And this despite the fact that the Arabs are so-so fighters. And their operators are three orders of magnitude worse than ours.

[Nikita, f]

Not beeches are still pizzhe, they have a longer range and a radar is more powerful than beech m3.

[Vladimir_2U]

Do not swear, here they are banned at once

[Tusv]

Quote: TatarinSSSR

The S-400 has never shown itself ANYWHERE in combat.

Did not launch standard missiles at the enemy. It's true. But the integrated S-400 still successfully participates in hostilities. If roughly, then DCT, S-400 target designation, Pantsir launchers. well, electronic warfare. All these chips are included in the integrated S-400

[Cottodraton]

I still see chewing of the manuals on your part, so what? What did you see there in Karabakh and Syria? They showed you what they wanted ... you yourself did not see anything

[TatarinSSSR]

And you were there, on the front line and in the command centers and saw everything personally? Change the methodology.

[Dread]

Quote: TatarinSSSR

The S-400 has never shown itself ANYWHERE in combat. There is only data from exercises and advertising reports. Of course, many in the West respect the Russian S-400 complex, but this is not enough. If the same American Patriot or the Israeli Dome are at the very least poorly but have already shown themselves in combat, then our S-300, S-400 systems have not shown anything yet.

There is no need to repeat a lie, as some of the "Gurus" here are not Russians. Complexes S-400 are tested at test sites upon delivery to the Customer and are actually tested for hitting real targets. You also write here about "Pantsir-C1", "Pantsir-S2" has been adopted by Russia - this is the second big difference, which can be clearly seen from the antenna system of the detection radar. You also do not take into account - "Carapace" has passed 2 upgrades and the shortcomings have been eliminated. In Syria, "Pantsir-C2" (Syria) was struck when it was off and the crew smoked on the sidelines. In Karabakh "Pantsiri-S1" were not used. SAM "Osa" is not "Pantsir".

[Ros 56]

Let them convince themselves, why argue with them, the more unexpected it will be to get in the horn.

[TatarinSSSR]

A patriot is when there are pluses with a bang and squeals, do you earn a rating? There are facts - the destruction of Russian-made air defense systems. In Libya, Syria, Karabakh. All the rest is idle chatter. And the fact is that the S-400 did not appear in combat, which means there is nothing to talk about its effectiveness. So pour your fairy tales into each other's ears, and poke your friend as many plus signs as you like. And tell about the cool air defense to Israel.

[Evil Booth]

a couple of confirmed shells and half a thousand The c300 was destroyed just like I did with a pencil on the monitor .. there is sheer nonsense in the form of a large black spot. The coolness of Israel's air defense is well known; they almost never bombed the Arab troops. the opposite is easy. a few cartoons on the discovery and that's it. if the moment 25 flew over telavivo then what? sure sure.

[Fungus]

American, Turkish and Israeli attack UAVs were not used against Israel's air defense. Missiles and kamikaze drones were not used. Against Carapace, this was all used in real combat conditions. And he knocked it down. Despite his losses. Is there still such an air defense system in the world? No.

[Ros 56]

Continue whining, at the same time collect your belongings and scratch them in the wilds of the Amazon.

[TatarinSSSR]

Continue to rejoice at the nonsense from TV and other media, it's useless to argue with you. Zombified everything is not how much.

[AB]

Eeeee, why the heck did they put the radar station on a tall ramp in the multitask or they are not aware of the presence of a mobile tower in the kit? The propaganda experts blinded the cartoon.

[Tusv]

Quote: AB (Alexey)

Eeeee, why the heck did they put the radar station on a tall ramp in the multitask or they are not aware of the presence of a mobile tower in the kit? The propaganda experts blinded the cartoon.

This is not a ramp, but an antenna mast. It is called Unzha. It has two purposes - the main thing is to see beyond the horizon. Auxiliary - so that HARMs can be shot at him, and at the radar operators

[AB]

actually i mean it

[basal]

The video looked. So-so. Any toy manufacturer will do better, more creative. Where are the sun-like Jedi, bloody Mordor scraps ... It's a shame, Lockheed - no success.
And on the case. Another rocket with a GPS navigator, nothing new. Well, F35, looking for an air defense system and instead of striking a blow, calling a satellite to the base is just silly. Apparently the Americans have become very bad. The video is not made for BLM and other BDSM, but for those who have a brain.

[Al Asad]

They showed in the cartoon the impact of a non-existent rocket.
This is an application of course!
Reinforced concrete argument in favor of the insolvency of the Russian air defense S-400

[voyaka uh]

She has not yet entered service. It's right.
But there were already several tests:

This is not a cartoon, but a real photo.
Lockheed Martin's PrSM missile was tested for a third time at White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico, on April 30, 2020

[rotmistr60]

more than 499 kilometers.

As advertising in a retail network - not 500, but 499. Excerpt from Indian media

a weapon will appear that will be able to destroy Russian air defense systems from the air

only confirms the weathering of their policy when purchasing weapons from Russia.

[cniza]

For the United States, the realization of this is a serious blow to pride, and therefore there are animation presentations like this one - with strikes on the air defense system and a demonstration that the air defense missile system was "overslept":

Let them rage on their health and hide their "invisibles" ...

[Mavrikiy]

more than 499 kilometers away

Are you in the scope of the agreement? "I will hesitate" and will not sign.

[Gregory Charnota]

yes it is now they with VV have taken the fashion of cartoons to show how rockets are roaring around the clock
and so on