American Admiral: Moving on to building a future navy to contain and defeat our rivals

50
American Admiral: Moving on to building a future navy to contain and defeat our rivals

In the United States, the naval forces, the Marine Corps and the Coast Guard have issued a new document regarding the strategy of these security forces. The document, in particular, reports on how the Navy, the ILC and the coast guard units plan to conduct operations on the high seas and coastal areas.

It was noted that these power structures are planning to "more persistently respond to the increased level of aggression from China and Russia."



The document says that at the moment the United States and its allies are facing new types of threats: these are not full-scale wars, but conflicts with the use of hybrid aggression. It is in this vein that virtually any actions of China and Russia at sea have been viewed for some time in the United States of America.

The new strategy has a florid title: "Advantage at sea: the dominance of integrated, domain-wide naval power." The strategy considers options for the interaction of the above-mentioned power structures, where the Marine Corps will "pay more attention to the use of unmanned vehicles, as well as naval platforms without the participation of large amphibious landing ships."

The materials of the strategy say that the new approach will "redistribute the emphasis in terms of control over the sea."

From the US strategy document:

Significant technological developments and aggressive military modernization by our rivals undermine our military advantage.

At the same time, China and Russia were named as the main rivals.

Admiral Michael Gilday:

Due to the actions of rivals, the United States can no longer assume unhindered access to any point of the world's oceans. We must demonstrate determination to contain our rivals and, if necessary, defeat them on the high seas and coastal areas. To do this, we move on to building the naval forces of the future.

As you can see, the new American strategy clearly defines those with whom the United States is ready to fight.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    50 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +8
      18 December 2020 06: 48
      As you can see, the new American strategy clearly defines those with whom the United States is ready to fight.
      Ready ?! Quite a bold statement.
      1. +2
        18 December 2020 07: 10
        We must demonstrate determination to contain our rivals and, if necessary, defeat them on the high seas and coastal areas
        For this one sentence, the admiral should be injected with haloperidol and given time to rest
      2. +3
        18 December 2020 07: 11
        "Moving on to building the Navy of the future to contain and defeat our rivals." and, after a pause, added - Somali pirates! laughing
        1. +3
          18 December 2020 07: 14
          Quote: Finches
          and, after a pause, added - Somali pirates!

          If necessary, of course, otherwise you never know! The admiral will be more diplomatic than the author of the article. ))
      3. -2
        18 December 2020 07: 34
        Well, prove the opposite.
        1. +3
          18 December 2020 08: 24
          Want a one-time trip on the Styx River? I take it not expensive! wassat
        2. 0
          18 December 2020 09: 26
          Quote: Ryusey
          Well, prove the opposite.

          The nervous rhetoric of the mattress raccoons proves this better than anyone.
    2. Kuz
      +18
      18 December 2020 06: 49
      They expanded, dominated, and suddenly realized that they were behind ... Surprising.
      Or again, all for the sake of a tasty budget?
      1. +2
        18 December 2020 06: 58
        Quote: Kuz
        Or again, all for the sake of a tasty budget?

        Exactly. You will not bark in time, you will be left overboard.
        ... the security forces plan to “respond more aggressively to the increased level of aggression from China and Russia.
      2. +5
        18 December 2020 07: 12
        Quote: Kuz
        Expanded, dominated

        And now the coast guard will fight against the intrigues of Russia and China laughing
      3. 0
        18 December 2020 08: 33
        Quote: Kuz
        They expanded, dominated, and suddenly realized that they were behind ... Surprising.
        Or again, all for the sake of a tasty budget?

        Everything is exactly the opposite. Due to budget cuts, the fleet and the ILC will be built on all kinds of cheap unmanned vehicles instead of large combat units. It was a matter of time, because the Yankees, according to Trump's assurances, should increase the composition of the fleet by two, and without a threefold budget, taking into account the retiring units, they would never do this. So it turns out a maskite fleet of the American type, and this is not a development, but a general degradation.
    3. +7
      18 December 2020 06: 54
      The United States is a country that will always prepare to fight Russia or China, but never will. It's not about war, it's about preparation
      1. +3
        18 December 2020 07: 26
        As we used to say "garbage war, the main thing is maneuvers" laughing
      2. +1
        18 December 2020 08: 23
        the main thing is give money and for more, for more! and we invent a whole bunch of enemies!
    4. +2
      18 December 2020 06: 58
      Yes, let them rivet!
      And more expensive, more expensive!
    5. +4
      18 December 2020 07: 05
      Significant technological developments and aggressive military modernization by our rivals undermine our military advantage.


      I wonder if they were expecting something different? Funny guys.
    6. nnm
      0
      18 December 2020 07: 12
      I didn’t quite understand exactly what activities were proposed for execution, except how to rest with horns in every situation. What will be the future of the Navy and the ILC
      1. 0
        18 December 2020 07: 58
        Quote: nnm
        What will be the future of the Navy and the ILC

        It's all about the money. If there is money, there will be a future.
        1. 0
          18 December 2020 08: 22
          Quote: Egoza
          Quote: nnm
          What will be the future of the Navy and the ILC

          It's all about the money. If there is money, there will be a future.

          Reminded for some reason! smile
          Agniya Barto
          Goby
          There is a goby, swinging,
          Sighs on the move:
          - Oh, the board ends,
          Now I will fall!
    7. 0
      18 December 2020 07: 12
      What about authors dismiss
    8. +1
      18 December 2020 07: 15
      What's new? They recorded Russia as an enemy even under Obama, but in fact they have been destroying us since the time of Tsar Pea, and why did this admiral far fart to us? The main thing is to bring “Nakhimov” to the base in Cuba, and to Venezuela, “Petra,” then let this Gilday, together with the crazy demonokrats, keep on dribbling on the head of Baydan Baydan without stopping.
    9. +2
      18 December 2020 07: 24
      Most of all I am impressed by the phrase that “the United States cannot now freely get into any region of the world!” Nefig stick your pig's snout into the internal affairs of the rest of the world! First, put things in order in your US. ..
    10. 0
      18 December 2020 07: 28
      At the same time, China and Russia were named as the main rivals.
      Basically, nothing new. Let's get more dough for cutting - "The Russians (and now the Chinese) are coming!" bully
    11. -1
      18 December 2020 07: 30
      They have a spy, we have a scout.
      They have a rival, we have a partner.
    12. +1
      18 December 2020 08: 17
      American Admiral: Moving on to building a future navy to contain and defeat our rivals

      "new" plans, new money ... a lot of money !!!
      1. +2
        18 December 2020 08: 46
        They love it when they spend a lot of money, and everyone else pays for it. Greetings! hi
        1. +1
          18 December 2020 08: 55
          Welcome soldier
          They would like, at someone else's expense, BUT, now the stop does not even stimulate their "allies" to pay for striped Wishlist ... there is no gold reserve!
          1. +2
            18 December 2020 08: 58
            Yes, funny times are coming, but the United States will resist to the last ...
            1. +1
              18 December 2020 09: 07
              Quote: cniza
              The United States will push back to the last ...

              They'll probably want to make an Obama-Clinton renaissance ... let's see how it goes.
              1. +2
                18 December 2020 11: 59
                I have the impression that they don't know what to do ...
                1. +1
                  18 December 2020 12: 19
                  Quote: cniza
                  I have the impression that they don't know what to do ...

                  They are not the heroes of the novels who could arrange and pull the war for independence, north against south. These are all politicians - talkers, unfortunately, who have a vigorous club and stuff in their hands!
                  BUT, internal affairs, disassembly, everything must be done according to the mind !!! And who is there a light shining with the mind ???
                  1. +2
                    18 December 2020 12: 32
                    And this tendency is observed in everyone, there are no serious politicians, but they are led from the shadow of a tycoon who does not give a damn about state interests ...
                    1. +1
                      18 December 2020 12: 40
                      I don't give a damn when their business gets twisted, as long as they don't drag it all out ... however, there are not too many willing people who are frostbitten to take part in their business !!! And it is right.
                      1. +1
                        18 December 2020 12: 52
                        But we worry about them Yes :

    13. -3
      18 December 2020 08: 20
      A very specific document, which is typical of the Anglo-Saxons, with their algorithmic thinking. The emphasis is on multi-domain operations and drones, which, in general, are the cutting edge of military science at the moment. The conclusion can be drawn - it is too early to write off amers, although right now there is an opinion that they have critically lost their competence.
    14. 0
      18 December 2020 08: 22
      Russian ships cruise aggressively near their shores and interfere with the peaceful sailing of American ones there! what
    15. -3
      18 December 2020 08: 22
      But under the current state of affairs, can't they nightmarish anyone at sea?
    16. -1
      18 December 2020 08: 24
      How can you not recall the saying "you are a fool, you are rich with a dummy," let him dream.
    17. 0
      18 December 2020 08: 28
      The United States can no longer expect unhindered access to any point in the world's oceans.

      This is a tragedy, a tragedy ...
      Old Man Mahan shuddered ...
    18. 0
      18 December 2020 08: 36
      Due to the actions of rivals, the United States can no longer assume unhindered access to any point of the world's oceans. We must demonstrate determination

      Just say without wowly "We want to take over the whole world." One was already takuoy, a guy from Braunau. And who is to blame for the fact that the United States itself creates these threats? After the collapse of the USSR, the Warsaw Pact was dissolved, and instead of promises not to move to the East, NATO did the opposite, taking hungry and angry jackals into its ranks, and now "the guard is being robbed!"
    19. +1
      18 December 2020 08: 38
      As you can see, the new American strategy clearly defines those with whom the United States is ready to fight.


      So they do not hide, but how they succeed, it depends on us ...
    20. 0
      18 December 2020 08: 49
      "This country will be destroyed by corruption." (from)
    21. +1
      18 December 2020 08: 59
      even printing paper, they do not have enough funds to quickly respond to all calls
    22. 0
      18 December 2020 09: 05
      Holding back and winning certainly sounds tempting and who wouldn't want to. All maritime powers are ultimately willing to win. The Americans decided that
      we move on to building naval forces the future
      Fine, but at least they hinted how and how, and did not muck what was said a hundred times
      "Advantage at sea: the predominance of an integrated domain-wide naval power"
      And what about the inimitable and invincible destroyers Zumwalt, but how to resist in the Arctic with one working icebreaker, and the aircraft carriers, which are a dime a dozen, but against which Russia has weapons and a lot like that ...?
    23. +1
      18 December 2020 09: 27
      Due to the actions of rivals, the United States can no longer assume unhindered access to any point of the world's oceans. We must demonstrate determination to contain our rivals and, if necessary, defeat them on the high seas and coastal areas. To do this, we move on to building the naval forces of the future.

      And how is it that the entire world ocean has become the US's area of ​​responsibility? They themselves have appropriated the sole right, and then they are very surprised if they are sent to hell ................
    24. 0
      18 December 2020 11: 34
      The military budget was approved in the largest quantity in history .. Now you can make loud statements, and shoot high-quality cartoons. And also invite Batman, Spider-Man and other crap from Marvel to the service.
    25. 0
      18 December 2020 11: 48
      It was noted that these power structures are planning to "more persistently respond to the increased level of aggression from China and Russia."

      If all the slaves are on their knees with their muzzles to the floor, and one dares to raise his head, this is an aggressive slave! And his aggressive aggression is completely unbearable - somehow it is translated into Russian.
    26. +2
      18 December 2020 18: 29
      laughing laughing laughing
      [quote on an increased level of aggression from China and Russia. "] [/ quote]
      The general did not suggest where Russia and China increased the level of aggression?
      Maybe he thinks about US ships in the China Sea or the Black Sea? Or do we not know that the Chinese and Ruski ships call near Miami, Los Angeles, New York?
      In the translation of the American politician general, he said:
      Russia and China have decided to GET OUT ONE OF OUR AGGRESSIONS AND WE SHOULD STRENGTHEN THE ATTRACTING COMPONENTS OF OUR FLEET!
      In fact, the general politician is NOTHING YOU CAN CHANGE! If China arrives at the time of the power supply unit, they can be launched 5 times faster than you and 5 times more, and every year this proportion increases in favor of China, the same is with ships.
      If you think about the nuclear component, then Russia is either on an equal footing with you, or a little better!
      It is better to calm VASALOV and Servants with a valerian than chatting! There are not many fools and fools left on this world!
      1. +2
        18 December 2020 19: 11
        When we see a general politician somewhere, it immediately appears that he has chosen the wrong profession. If the enemies are lost and if they affect the military component of the enemy armies, it makes me happy!
        The military should be warriors, no chatter. If you put the chatter in the place of the generals of such an army to nothing, they believe in their chatter that in consequence is deplorable for their army and their people.
    27. +3
      18 December 2020 19: 39
      We urgently need to build new Zumvolts with new railguns!
      Otherwise, Russia will not be scared!
      Super-duper railguns, so that not cheaper than 3 lard apiece, so that each projectile is 100 million.
      Only money has yet to be printed - this is a true Wunderwaffe, otherwise the pace is kind of sluggish ...
      Give 30 trillion candy wrappers a year in turnover!

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"