Military Review

New Russian corvette shot down a cruise missile from a cannon

61

The corvette Aldar Tsydenzhapov was created at the Amur shipyard for the Russian military fleet... During the final stage of state tests in the Sea of ​​Japan, he successfully destroyed a moving high-speed target.


This was reported by the press service of the Air Defense Forces for the Pacific Fleet.

A new Russian corvette shot down a cruise missile from a cannon. According to the Pacific Fleet, the P-120 Malakhit anti-ship cruise missile, which was fired from the Iney small rocket ship, was used as an air target moving at high speed. The missile was fired from the 190 mm A-100 universal naval artillery mount.

Before this, the new warship successfully destroyed a floating mine, a coastal target out of sight and a sea shield from an artillery mount. In addition, electronic jamming, the launch of the Uranus ship missile against a sea target and testing of the airborne aviation complex were practiced.

The transfer of the corvette Aldar Tsydenzhapov to the fleet is scheduled for 25 December.

This ship belongs to the project 20380. It is used during hostilities near the coastline, is used to combat the enemy surface fleet and submarines, as well as for fire support during the landing of troops on the coast.
Photos used:
Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
61 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. APASUS
    APASUS 17 December 2020 12: 57
    +2
    A new Russian corvette shot down a cruise missile from a cannon. According to the Pacific Fleet, the P-120 Malakhit anti-ship cruise missile, which was fired from the Iney small rocket ship, was used as an air target moving at high speed. The missile was fired from the 190 mm A-100 universal naval artillery mount.

    I wonder what they shot? What kind of sighting complex is it worth? Is it really the standard cost?
    1. Alex777
      Alex777 17 December 2020 13: 26
      +13
      The standard Puma complex is not bad. hi
      The rocket is large, subsonic. Everything is regular.
      1. loki565
        loki565 17 December 2020 13: 57
        +13
        Does Marshal Shaposhnikov's BOD have the same gun? It was just that when he gave the pirates a nightmare, he fired several shots at the standing boat and missed ... Then he finished off with AK 630
        1. Alex777
          Alex777 17 December 2020 14: 22
          +4
          After the modernization, this gun was installed. And the LMS remained Bagheera ...
      2. Alex777
        Alex777 17 December 2020 14: 25
        +6
        And on Aldar, the Barrier stands. But there is no Puma ... repeat
    2. huntsman650
      huntsman650 18 December 2020 14: 31
      0
      Ship artillery is versatile.
  2. Eldorado
    Eldorado 17 December 2020 13: 01
    +11
    Bravo, Aldar team! good
  3. Max Lebedev
    Max Lebedev 17 December 2020 13: 05
    +21
    shot down a cruise missile

    And all thanks to "Puma" (you can see it in the photo) good
    1. NDR-791
      NDR-791 17 December 2020 13: 20
      +5
      Wow how can it !!!
    2. MURANO
      MURANO 17 December 2020 13: 49
      +7
      There is no Puma on Aldar. The photo shows an early version of 20380)
      1. Max Lebedev
        Max Lebedev 17 December 2020 13: 59
        +19
        Quote: MURANO
        There is no cougar on Aldar

        Exactly. Looked at the photo of the ship - there is no cougar. How then was it guided? A screen?
        1. Alex777
          Alex777 17 December 2020 14: 24
          +3
          I knew that there should be a Barrier, but I couldn't believe my eyes - I climbed into Vicky.
          Vicki said that Puma ...
          So this is the first successful test of the Barrier?
          1. alexmach
            alexmach 17 December 2020 16: 19
            +8
            So this is the first successful test of the Barrier?

            Well, actually the other day the "Thundering" shot back.
            1. Alex777
              Alex777 17 December 2020 16: 32
              +3
              That is, the doubts of your respected colleagues from the series "The barrier has not yet got anywhere .." are going down in history?
              1. alexmach
                alexmach 17 December 2020 17: 37
                +4
                it's hard to say. I definitely got somewhere, but on the whole the information was received with skepticism. They say the target is not serious for the air defense system. For a cannon - very even, but there is still the question of whether it really was, how accurate the news is. "Thundering" for example fired from arithleria not at a rocket but at a parachute target. And the message from the Ministry of Defense did something very strange. Some of the kabuds shot down missile simulators.
                1. Alex777
                  Alex777 17 December 2020 18: 47
                  0
                  That is why I have formulated the question about "Aldar Tsydenzhapov".
                  That the first time the target is hit.
                  With him, after all, everything is clear: the cannon shot down the rocket?
              2. Sanichsan
                Sanichsan 17 December 2020 18: 37
                0
                Quote: Alex777
                That is, the doubts of your respected colleagues from the series "The barrier has not yet got anywhere .." are going down in history?

                yes, they do. but with what noise and hysteria! wassat there was an article there recently laughing
                1. Alex777
                  Alex777 17 December 2020 18: 45
                  +3
                  I have seen these articles.
                  But this is the case when you want to be glad that our esteemed colleagues are wrong. wink
    3. alexmach
      alexmach 17 December 2020 16: 18
      +3
      Yes, only in the photo there is another ship, but on this one, it seems, Puma, as mentioned above, was not.
  4. Volder
    Volder 17 December 2020 13: 21
    +2
    Not a word about the main weapon of the air defense system! :(
  5. rocket757
    rocket757 17 December 2020 13: 27
    +6
    No, that won't work !!!
    And hde MULTIC ???
  6. sledak
    sledak 17 December 2020 13: 36
    +3
    Eh, sorry there is no video. With the completion of the next stage of test-exercises!
  7. A. Privalov
    A. Privalov 17 December 2020 13: 38
    +8
    It is not an easy task to knock down a moving (1100 km / h) target with a shipborne artillery mount!

    Before that, the new warship successfully destroyed a floating mine, a coastal target out of sight, and a sea shield from an artillery mount.

    How a floating mine is being destroyed from an artillery mount - I saw it once on the Baltic Sea.
    How they destroy a coastal target outside the visibility zone - I can quite imagine.
    But what is a "sea shield"?
    1. Sentinel-vs
      Sentinel-vs 17 December 2020 13: 47
      +5
      Imitation of an enemy ship.
      https://topwar.ru/166837-suda-misheni-nezametnye-geroi-uchenij.html
    2. seregin-s1
      seregin-s1 17 December 2020 13: 50
      +6
      The tug is dragging a barge with a stretched net and corner reflectors. Risks by the way. Ships don't always hit)
      1. A. Privalov
        A. Privalov 17 December 2020 15: 05
        0
        Quote: seregin-s1
        The tug is dragging a barge with a stretched net and corner reflectors. Risks by the way. Ships don't always hit)

        But how did you get into the rocket?
        1. alexmach
          alexmach 17 December 2020 16: 22
          +5
          to get where it is necessary and not to get where it is not necessary, these are still 2 different tasks. Anyway for an automatic cannon :)
        2. Zaurbek
          Zaurbek 17 December 2020 19: 12
          -2
          Apparently, an MSA + a projectile with a fuse
          1. huntsman650
            huntsman650 18 December 2020 14: 33
            0
            There are radar fuses and remote mechanical fuses. Tsvm pulls out and the machine sets the response time when firing at the VC.
    3. nobody75
      nobody75 18 December 2020 18: 01
      0
      Sailors from the century before last shoot at such shields
      1. nobody75
        nobody75 18 December 2020 18: 02
        0
        Marine Shields - Mesh


  8. Evil 55
    Evil 55 17 December 2020 14: 25
    -3
    I would like to know who was holding the rocket and at what distance during this heroic action ...
    1. A. Privalov
      A. Privalov 17 December 2020 15: 04
      +2
      Quote: Evil 55
      I would like to know who was holding the rocket and at what distance during this heroic action ...

      Is a target with a length of 8,5 m and a diameter of 0,8 m at a speed of 0,9 M shot down by a 100 mm shell of a ship's cannon? Something is gnawing at me. recourse
      1. K-612-O
        K-612-O 17 December 2020 15: 08
        0
        Why, HE shell with a guided fuse
        1. A. Privalov
          A. Privalov 17 December 2020 15: 14
          +4
          Quote: K-612-O
          HE shell with a guided fuse


          In such a tunic, a piece of iron, but at a speed of 1100 km / h? Fantasy. fellow
          1. sir.jonn
            sir.jonn 17 December 2020 15: 23
            0
            Quote: A. Privalov
            In such a thing, a piece of iron, but at a speed of 1100 km / h? Fantasy

            Yankees are also learning how to shoot down missiles with artillery, so it's quite possible.
            1. alexmach
              alexmach 17 December 2020 16: 23
              -1
              Well, it's worth saying that it was about some kind of super-duper controlled projectile.
              1. Yuri V.A
                Yuri V.A 18 December 2020 02: 13
                +1
                In September 20, the Americans shot down a simulator target of the KR with a land howitzer. This goes without saying for a 21st century ship AU.
                1. alexmach
                  alexmach 18 December 2020 10: 12
                  +1
                  What's the difference with a howitzer or not a howitzer? They used a guided projectile specially designed for this purpose. In fact, this is something close to the same close-range missile defense system, only fired from an artillery barrel.

                  Our ship guns, first of all, do not have such shells in the ammunition load - the most optimistic maximum is programmed detonation at the point of the trajectory, while they shoot in bursts. In general, in my opinion, the analogy is not entirely appropriate. The methods of defeat are different.
                  1. Yuri V.A
                    Yuri V.A 18 December 2020 11: 05
                    -1
                    The difference is significant, a typical land system does not yet have such a rate of fire and, most importantly, a guidance system that provides the required accuracy of defeat, even with a practical blank. the Americans demonstrated not a super-shell, but a combat control system.
                    1. alexmach
                      alexmach 18 December 2020 11: 19
                      +1
                      As far as I understand, the guidance system was in that case. It was reported that the howitzer received target designation from an external system. And I suspect that the aiming itself was definitely not carried out manually. As for me, this is fundamentally no different from the guidance system of the ship's weapon.
                      1. Yuri V.A
                        Yuri V.A 18 December 2020 11: 32
                        +1
                        The system was natural, since it was demonstrated, therefore, for a modern ship weapon, there is nothing extraordinary in the defeat of the target specified in the article.
                      2. Sergey Sfiedu
                        Sergey Sfiedu 18 December 2020 17: 41
                        +1
                        I remember S.G. Gorshkov was very pleased with the effectiveness of firing at air targets with 100mm AK-100 AU using projectiles with radar fuses and gave instructions to place these guns on a new aircraft-carrying cruiser, which later received his name.
        2. K-612-O
          K-612-O 17 December 2020 17: 38
          +2
          Not a piece of iron but a cloud of debris
        3. lucul
          lucul 17 December 2020 19: 25
          0
          In such a tunic, a piece of iron, but at a speed of 1100 km / h? Fantasy.

          If it is by hand, by eye - then yes.
          And if all the calculations are performed by the computer, then it is quite, especially if a projectile with remote detonation is used (such projectiles on the AK-630)
        4. Simargl
          Simargl 17 December 2020 20: 50
          0
          Quote: A. Privalov
          In such a tunic, a piece of iron, but at a speed of 1100 km / h?
          The commander of the warhead was tightly hooked on sporting.
        5. bk0010
          bk0010 17 December 2020 23: 30
          +3
          Quote: A. Privalov
          In such a tunic, a piece of iron, but at a speed of 1100 km / h? Fantasy
          It wasn't hit-to-kill. Remember the air defense of the 2nd world. The principle is the same. Plus, guidance and determination of the range by the radar, and not by the eyes, the calculations are carried out by the BIUS, not by PUAZO, and in the projectile there is a radio caller, and not the setting of the detonation delay.
        6. Note
          Note 18 December 2020 13: 47
          0
          The rate of fire of the gun is approximately two rounds per second. The guidance system tracks the course, the trajectory of the target using the air defense radar. (This is quite simple language) then, when entering the affected area, that is, at the maximum distance of the gun fire, shells are fired with pre-detonation (the detonation distance is about 50 meters to the target, and the spread is about 30 meters more precisely I will not say) and the setting of sheaves of damaging elements on the target's path. In fact, the only difficulty is in setting the time of the projectile detonation.
    2. Alex777
      Alex777 17 December 2020 16: 36
      +4
      Is a target with a length of 8,5 m and a diameter of 0,8 m at a speed of 0,9 M shot down by a 100 mm shell of a ship's cannon? Something is gnawing at me.

      Even the cruiser 68 bis from 152 mm once did this.
      But then the guys had no choice.
      Or they will shoot down, or the cruiser will be written off. Shot down. wink
      1. Sergey Sfiedu
        Sergey Sfiedu 18 December 2020 17: 43
        0
        And detail? I don’t remember such a case.
        1. Alex777
          Alex777 18 December 2020 21: 34
          0
          I read about the cruiser - it was interesting.
          Then, when I wanted to find the article again, I could not. Alas.
          As far as I remember, it was at the Black Sea Fleet.
    3. aszzz888
      aszzz888 18 December 2020 07: 59
      -2

      A. Privalov (Alexander Privalov)
      Yesterday, 15: 04
      NEW

      +3
      Quote: Evil 55
      I would like to know who was holding the rocket and at what distance during this heroic action ...

      Is a target with a length of 8,5 m and a diameter of 0,8 m at a speed of 0,9 M shot down by a 100 mm shell of a ship's cannon? Something is gnawing at me. recourse
      Who would have doubted! laughing Now if иvreyskie morAki on иvreyskoy vessel, then everything would be OK! and so - I DO NOT BELIEVE! laughing laughing
      1. Maki Avellevich
        Maki Avellevich 18 December 2020 10: 19
        +1
        Quote: aszzz888
        Who would have doubted! Now, if the Hebrew seafood on the Hebrew vessel, then everything would be OK! And so - I DO NOT BELIEVE!

        "No matter how much you feed the wolf, he keeps looking at the Jew."
  • igorspb
    igorspb 17 December 2020 15: 40
    +1
    sorry there is no video, otherwise the Timokhins would have already come running ...
  • Old26
    Old26 17 December 2020 16: 03
    +8
    Quote: A. Privalov
    Is a target with a length of 8,5 m and a diameter of 0,8 m at a speed of 0,9 M shot down by a 100 mm shell of a ship's cannon? Something is gnawing at me.

    But it is not written that it was the only shell. The rate of fire for the installation is 80 rounds / min. How many shells and whether there were remote detonations is unknown. so it may be that u amazed
  • Region-25.rus
    Region-25.rus 17 December 2020 18: 29
    +2
    Quote: alexmach
    it's hard to say. I got somewhere for sure, ......

    "They just gave me a cap-three! Looks like they hit somewhere! request "(c)" Features of national fishing "
    ps
    I just remembered it)) without the goal of offending-defaming-shitting, etc. hi
  • Gunther
    Gunther 18 December 2020 02: 54
    +1
    Keep it up! good
    Our answer to cranberries in the last ship mattress series laughing
  • aszzz888
    aszzz888 18 December 2020 08: 04
    +1
    A new Russian corvette shot down a cruise missile from a cannon.
    Something like that! good Well done Russian sailors! good
  • Ros 56
    Ros 56 18 December 2020 08: 57
    0
    This is wow, from a cannon to a rocket. Yes, I won't put it on my head, how is it?
  • Ilya_Nsk
    Ilya_Nsk 18 December 2020 11: 29
    +1
    A 100mm cannon is strength, especially when controlled well. Quite high power of various types of projectiles at a low (relatively) their price, an altitude reach of almost 10 km. The appearance of corrected projectiles in this caliber is likely. If we take into account the factors that can be measured (the state of the atmosphere, the bending and wear of the barrel, etc.), then you can shoot almost without a miss, putting clouds of debris or crumbling reinforcement with concrete-piercing shells in the path of air targets, and at decent distances. Give only a better radar
  • Alexander K_2
    Alexander K_2 19 December 2020 07: 38
    -2
    Have you tried stones from a slingshot? It would be a Divo, all Divas are Divo !!! good