Military Review

Terms of admission to the troops of the strategic complex "Sarmat"

57
Terms of admission to the troops of the strategic complex "Sarmat"

It became known when it is planned to put into service the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation a new-generation strategic missile system "Sarmat". The commander of the Strategic Missile Forces, General Sergei Karakaev, reports on the timing.


In an interview with a departmental publication "A red star"Sergei Karakaev said that one of the regiments of the Uzhur formation will receive the first Sarmat missile system. This event is planned to take place in 2022.

It should be noted that earlier (for example, in 2018), materials appeared in some publications that the promising missile system of the Russian Armed Forces will be put into service in 2021. However, those publications do not find their confirmation.

According to the commander of the Strategic Missile Forces, expressed for the aforementioned newspaper, the industrial cluster continues to "set readiness for state flight tests" of the Sarmat missile complex. At the same time, in the named Uzhur formation (Krasnoyarsk Territory), activities have already been launched to prepare for the rearmament of the first missile regiment on the "Sarmatians".

The missile (liquid-propellant ICBM) of the RS-28 "Sarmat" complex can be equipped with hypersonic missile units. At the same time, the missile is capable of carrying out an attack along trajectories that actually remain outside the coverage area of ​​existing missile defense systems. This may well be regarded as Russia's response to Russia’s deployment by the United States of its missile defense system and to its unilateral withdrawal from a number of key international security treaties.
57 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Pessimist22
    Pessimist22 16 December 2020 06: 33
    +3
    Well, well, I did not know what hypersonic gliders are installed on the Sarmat.
    1. Alex777
      Alex777 16 December 2020 08: 49
      +7
      The closer the date of delivery to the Sarmat DB, the more negotiable the USA.
      Even with BLM, LGBT, MeToo and Biden, they still want to live.
      1. bayard
        bayard 16 December 2020 16: 57
        +2
        Quote: Alex777
        The closer the date of delivery to the Sarmat DB, the more negotiable the USA.

        And how is it closer?
        And how much?
        The title reads: "The terms of admission to the troops have been named ..."
        And?
        Deadline ... shifted to the right - "they plan what will happen in 2022".
        And where does such confidence come from?
        After all, the rocket has never taken off (except for the throw ones, which do not count), even its first stage has never worked properly in a real launch ... especially since there is no question of hitting targets at the range.
        There is simply no rocket.
        No, as a finished product, not as a weapon ... There is a project.
        Difficult, unusual for the performer, never tested in practice. The risk of failure is pretty high. At least the risk of unsuccessful first launches. So it was during the tests of the R-36 and its modifications, and this is at the Yuzhnoye Design Bureau, which specialized in heavy liquid (and solid-fuel too) missiles. And why are the journalists, and the officials giving them interviews, decided that it would be different with "Sarmat"?
        Without mistakes ?
        No bad starts?
        Without working on the identified errors, correcting them and ... new starts that will reveal a certain number of new errors and shortcomings ...
        Where did these officials and journalists get such hats?
        With the timing of ... the adoption of ... a COMPLEX weapon that does not exist in nature ?!
        To the next appearance of Solntseliky in the "people"?
        What is "US negotiability"? belay
        After Biden's victory was announced?
        After another promise to put something there ... in a corner or for armament ...?
        They were really afraid of the real "Voevoda".
        And the Stiletto.
        And "Well done".
        Because they WERE.
        And while they were gone request - they were not.
        No one is afraid of a non-existent threat.
        And this threat is still LONGER.
        For a very long time, no one will be afraid.
        "Yarsa" - will be afraid.
        Old "Topol" and "Topol-M" - will be afraid.
        And the mythical "Sarmat" about ten heads will be scared only when (!) When it passes the ENTIRE COMPLEX of fire tests and tests with launches with the defeat of all designated targets.
        And now WHEN this whole test cycle will be successfully passed and completed, when the new product proves its usefulness and readiness to enter service with the Strategic Missile Forces, only when ... when the first samples of this product enter the missile regiments and take up combat duty ...
        Only then can you be afraid of them.
        Is it really scary?
        In any case, it will make you take this fact seriously.
        Will make the opposing party negotiable?
        Question.
        They are capable of speaking.
        Negotiating is also a great deal.
        Keeping this word is absolutely not.
        Observe the concluded agreements - only as long as they are beneficial to them.
        And by 2022 "Sarmat" is unlikely to be put into service.
        They just won't have time.
        For quite objective reasons.
  2. Yura
    Yura 16 December 2020 06: 33
    +20
    For the United States and the Voevoda, it is too tough, while Sarmat will be out of competition for a long time.
  3. Finches
    Finches 16 December 2020 06: 35
    +17
    Against the background of "preview of the end of civilization"As an American journalist called the simultaneous launch of 4 Bulava missiles from a submerged position from the Vladimir Monomakh nuclear submarine, this is news, like another nail in the coffin for the US plans to play the role of the world decision maker! Yes, and to other countries with an "active life position" a hint to inflate their cheeks less - otherwise the parade in Sevastopol, the parade on Red Square, return the Pytalovsky district, the Kuril Islands - ours ... laughing Go sleep it off and think about your behavior before it's too late, if you have something to think about, of course ...!
    1. Sidor Amenpodestovich
      Sidor Amenpodestovich 16 December 2020 06: 50
      +15
      Against the backdrop of "a preview of the end of civilization," as the American journalist called the simultaneous launch of 4 Bulava missiles from a submerged position from the Vladimir Monomakh nuclear submarine, this is news, like another nail in the coffin for the US plans to play the role of a world decider!

      I see! I see the future!
      Now for the hundred thousand and five hundredth time they will write to you that the United States is not afraid of Russia, since there is money, children, villas, and in Russia there is a bourgeois system, and that's all. Truly I say, it will be so! (srkzm, esicho)
      1. Finches
        Finches 16 December 2020 06: 58
        +4
        Yes! Most likely, comments of this kind are possible! On VO there are many participants living under the slogan - "Chef, everything is lost, everything is lost! The plaster is removed, the client is leaving ..." laughing
        1. ccsr
          ccsr 16 December 2020 12: 55
          +7
          Quote: Finches
          Yes! Most likely, comments of this kind are possible!

          By the way, an interesting paradox is always observed as soon as something significant happens in our country. Musk screwed up again recently, but the West is portraying it as a planned success. We successfully launched Angara-5, and all our comedians who talk about Rogozin's trampoline, how they got water in their mouths, do not even want to compare these two events in order to compare the success of launches of different countries.
          That is why all the supporters are so diligently silent - this is a natural event.
          1. bayard
            bayard 16 December 2020 17: 44
            -1
            "Angara" flew - well, now there is something to bring out military satellites and replace the "Protons". But what to be proud of based on this news?
            About the mythical "adoption" of non-existent weapons?
            "Sarmat" has never flown yet.
            Not once at all.
            The test launch cycle has not yet begun. How it will take place, whether there will be unsuccessful launches, what flaws these launches will reveal and how long it will take to correct them is completely unknown.
            But into service - in 2021.
            Sorry, about 2021 "they swore by their mother" 2 - 3 months ago, now the new life-affirming dates are 2022.
            Why is this?
            To dilute the current negative with the "coming" positive?
            But this optimism is not confirmed by anything.
            So they reported about the "launch of the MS-21 into serial production" from next year ...
            What is it like ?
            What if ALL suppliers of imported components refused to supply us?
            What are you going to complete?
            Or did you dig it up to start?
            How long will it last?
            Will it be a series for sure?
            And what kind of certification are we talking about if ... your components are not ready yet, but there will be no imported ones?
            What components to certify?
            With imported ones?
            And then with yours again?
            But serial production is "ready" to start!
            And so in everything.
            And "Angara" is good.
            This means that the Russian space will not end with the last "Proton".
            1. ccsr
              ccsr 16 December 2020 18: 02
              +1
              Quote: bayard
              To dilute the current negative with the "coming" positive?

              It is not at all necessary to consider only in this way. I think that our people should know about the successes in our rocket industry, and remember that there are only a few countries in the world who can do it.
              Quote: bayard
              Sorry, about 2021 "they swore by their mother" 2 - 3 months ago, now the new life-affirming dates are 2022.

              Even if it is shifted by a year, the resource of those missiles on duty will not be exhausted anyway. What are you afraid of then?
              Quote: bayard
              But serial production is "ready" to start!
              And so in everything.

              And what is wrong with this if the tooling has already been prepared and are waiting for the transfer of design and technological documentation?
              Quote: bayard
              And "Angara" is good.

              So I'm talking about the same thing - this adds to our optimism that not everything Rogozin ditched.
              1. bayard
                bayard 16 December 2020 19: 01
                +1
                Quote: ccsr
                this adds to our optimism that not everything Rogozin ditched.

                Who is against optimism? “Angara” gives such reasons, despite the pearls from Rogozin.
                I'm talking about the unprofessionalism and hype of journalists and some government officials. officials, and specifically - about the hats with the "Sarmat", which has never flown. And if a bad start happens? If one of the stages does not work properly? It seems like an ordinary case on tests, but the terms of "adoption" have already been announced.
                And with statements about the "serial production" of MS-21 from next year ... In what shape? What components? If you refused to import, but you don't have your own? Such a chatter of journalists discredits the industry, the state, and the people involved in this business necessary for the state.
                Quote: ccsr
                Even if it is shifted by a year, the resource of those missiles on duty will not be exhausted anyway. What are you afraid of then?

                What kind of fear are we talking about? The number of missiles in service is limited by treaties, as well as the number of warheads on them, and new ones will replace the old ones, not a plus to them. Unless, of course, the last treaty on the limitation of strategic arms does not cease to exist in the coming months.
                It is about the stupidity of journalists, editors, their printers and the self-promotion of some officials.
                1. ccsr
                  ccsr 16 December 2020 19: 06
                  +1
                  Quote: bayard
                  I'm talking about the unprofessionalism and hype of journalists and some government officials. officials, and specifically - about the hats with the "Sarmat", which has never flown before.

                  Don't feed them with bread, just give them a sensation, so never mind what they write. It is enough that even here at VO some "specialists" are talking such nonsense that at least stand still or fall.
                  Quote: bayard
                  as well as the number of warheads on them and new ones will replace the old ones, and not a plus to them.

                  I just meant it - the replacement will begin a year or two later, why then are we afraid of a shift in terms? It's unpleasant that the deadline will be disrupted, but this is not fatal for us - you must agree with this.
                2. bk0010
                  bk0010 16 December 2020 21: 58
                  0
                  Quote: bayard
                  Unless, of course, the last treaty on the limitation of strategic arms does not cease to exist in the coming months
                  In February 2021.
                  1. bayard
                    bayard 16 December 2020 22: 20
                    +1
                    The INF Treaty was canceled right away, but so far nothing has been deployed. A new race to expand the ICBM fleet is still unlikely, but China is ready to make its own adjustments.
      2. krops777
        krops777 16 December 2020 09: 36
        +1
        Now, for the hundred thousand and five hundredth time, they will write to you that the United States is not afraid of Russia, since there is money, children, villas, and in Russia there is a bourgeois system, and that's all.


        Okay, these are from the Svarog group and other redskins, people with an "active" attitude from the herd of A fu Navalny graze here, so neither Sarmat nor the RF Armed Forces need them for friendship with the United States.
      3. tralflot1832
        tralflot1832 16 December 2020 10: 13
        -5
        They used diapers from Satan, but from Sarmat they will have "duffle"!
    2. Vladimir61
      Vladimir61 16 December 2020 06: 53
      +7
      Quote: Finches
      Go sleep it off and think about your behavior before it's too late, if you have something to think about, of course ...!
      In style, the dollar has made one state the most armed superpower, and the Russian "Sarmat" will make them equal ...
      1. ccsr
        ccsr 16 December 2020 19: 08
        +1
        Quote: Vladimir61
        In style, the dollar has made one state the most armed superpower, and the Russian "Sarmat" will make them equal ...

        As one old impotent man from Odessa said - "Even if you tie a dollar to a member, it still won't stand ..."
  4. soul
    soul 16 December 2020 06: 48
    +23
    We are waiting for flight tests. Good luck to the developers.
  5. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 16 December 2020 07: 00
    +6
    The adoption of new weapons and the deployment of strategic missiles on combat duty in Russia infuriates the Americans. I can't answer with anything yet. And the state of rabies pushes on inappropriate actions. Hence, there is a great desire to destroy our country without tangible damage to oneself in the course of command and control operations and calculations on the computer. But it doesn't even come out on the computer.
    1. aszzz888
      aszzz888 16 December 2020 07: 53
      +1

      rotmistr60 (Gennady)
      Today, 07: 00
      NEW
      +4
      The adoption of new weapons and the deployment of strategic missiles on combat duty in Russia infuriates the Americans. I can't answer with anything yet. And the state of rabies pushes on inappropriate actions. Hence, there is a great desire to destroy our country without tangible damage to oneself in the course of command and control operations and calculations on the computer. But it doesn't even come out on the computer.
      Merikatos, and their henchmen, clang their teeth, chase the foam, and at the exit - a subsonic super-duper-trouper rocket "ax" (was not the former President Trump previously broadcast about it?) bully
      1. mark1
        mark1 16 December 2020 08: 04
        0
        "... Let the arsonist hiss and scream the dove fly." (in this case "Sarmat")
    2. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh 16 December 2020 11: 30
      -5
      "The adoption of new weapons and the deployment of strategic missiles on combat duty in Russia infuriates the Americans" ////
      ----
      Yars is more dangerous than Sarmat. Therefore, the Americans are unlikely to be very excited.
      They removed such missiles from combat duty a long time ago.
      How ineffective. Having relied on solid fuel Minutemans.
      Russia similarly created Poplar and then Yars.
      The Yars have a short launch time, a fast takeoff (first stage),
      flat short trajectory across the North Pole.
      There is nothing to intercept them. Neither at the start stage, nor in the middle, nor at the terminal
      stage.
      1. Hagen
        Hagen 16 December 2020 12: 32
        0
        Quote: voyaka uh
        Yars is more dangerous than Sarmat.

        Do you know exactly what you are talking about? It seems to me that a pickup with a dump truck is to compare bad form (not professionally). The categories are different. Don't you think?
        1. aszzz888
          aszzz888 16 December 2020 13: 43
          -1
          Hagen (Hagen)
          Today, 12: 32
          NEW

          +1
          Quote: voyaka uh
          Yars is more dangerous than Sarmat.

          Do you know exactly what you are talking about? It seems to me that a pickup with a dump truck is to compare bad form (not professionally). The categories are different. Don't you think?
          He doesn't think. He works out the training manuals. wink
          1. Hagen
            Hagen 16 December 2020 13: 48
            0
            Quote: aszzz888
            He works out the training manuals.

            I would not use labels for no particular reason ...
      2. bk0010
        bk0010 16 December 2020 22: 06
        0
        Quote: voyaka uh
        How ineffective. Having relied on solid fuel Minutemans.
        The Americans have a lot of money, we don't. I'm not at all sure that 3 Yars (9 warheads) are cheaper than 1 Sarmat (10 heads), and this is without taking into account the power of the warheads (0.2MT versus 0.8MT). Plus, the Vanguard will not fit on Yars, but the missile defense must be pressed with something. After the Minutemen, they made a heavy MX, which they exchanged for our BZHRK, since they could not make mines worthy of them (at first they planned 10 mines for 1 missile with an underground railway between mines, then mines that could withstand a very close nuclear explosion).
        1. voyaka uh
          voyaka uh 16 December 2020 22: 27
          -2
          Liquid rockets are good for space, but not very
          good for war.
          This is the reason, not the price.
          The preparation time for launch should be very short.
          And vulnerability in the first minutes of the flight.
  6. Thrifty
    Thrifty 16 December 2020 07: 15
    -10%
    Why shout about it at every corner? Or, is the secrecy mode only in words? In Soviet times, such information could have been "awarded" with nine grams of lead !!!
    1. Sidor Amenpodestovich
      Sidor Amenpodestovich 16 December 2020 07: 24
      +5
      Stop panic.
      If the commander of the Strategic Missile Forces himself reports this, then everything has been agreed and approved.
  7. U-58
    U-58 16 December 2020 07: 19
    +6
    If the situation with START-3 does not go into a favorable channel, it will be time to think about reviving the orbital modification.
    How the necromancers panicked about the P36 orb!
    How much effort was spent by them to persuade the USSR to eliminate this model!
  8. Ros 56
    Ros 56 16 December 2020 07: 23
    +2
    Apparently they will soon put Sarmat in the army, since Satan is being demonstrated in our region in the park.
  9. Okiy
    Okiy 16 December 2020 07: 39
    0
    More beautiful and fast Sarmatians!
  10. Connor MacLeod
    Connor MacLeod 16 December 2020 07: 52
    0
    Need to faster, faster ...

    Listen, and Sineva will not be able to throw warheads across the South Pole?
    1. mark1
      mark1 16 December 2020 08: 18
      0
      It can, but one and very small.
      1. Connor MacLeod
        Connor MacLeod 16 December 2020 08: 23
        -1
        Nothing but 100% delivery ...
        1. mark1
          mark1 16 December 2020 08: 25
          +1
          Up to 100 kg as a first approximation
          1. Connor MacLeod
            Connor MacLeod 16 December 2020 08: 27
            0
            How did you calculate?
            1. mark1
              mark1 16 December 2020 08: 30
              +1
              I didn’t consider anything, there is just a conversion version of the R-29 - "Calm" I figured out the possibilities without the 3rd stage. Of course, I do not pretend to be true.
              1. Connor MacLeod
                Connor MacLeod 16 December 2020 08: 37
                0
                Well, this is somewhere one combat unit, right? 100 kt?
                1. mark1
                  mark1 16 December 2020 08: 46
                  +1
                  Again, without any claims to the truth - God forbid, by 1-3 kT, because the PN includes thermal protection and a guidance system and something else and it turns out, at best, a nuclear charge equivalent to the Pion projectile
                  1. Connor MacLeod
                    Connor MacLeod 16 December 2020 08: 55
                    -1
                    Shh-c ... recourse Damn, well, Sineva is a hefty rocket, can't it really be able to accelerate one single combat unit to orbital speed?
                    1. mark1
                      mark1 16 December 2020 09: 17
                      +1
                      Well, in principle, if we take the average mass return (about 3%) as a basis, then it turns out 1,2 tons, but in the case of calmness for some reason this does not work (70 kg into a circular orbit with an altitude of 400 km)
                      We need a real specialist.
                  2. Vikxnumx
                    Vikxnumx 16 December 2020 11: 08
                    -2
                    Again, without any claims to the truth - God forbid, by 1-3 kT, because the PN includes thermal protection and a guidance system and something else and it turns out, at best, a nuclear charge equivalent to the Pion projectile

                    100 kg - 100 kTons ...
                    And why are they not considering the launch point of the missiles?
                    Starting from a point below the equator ....
                    And all positions of interceptor missiles fall out.
                    Only the boat needs to cut a new area of ​​the database and tie the starting point ...
                    1. mark1
                      mark1 16 December 2020 11: 37
                      +3
                      Quote: VIK1711
                      100 kg - 100 kTons ...

                      From the beginning I did not take it, but then I delved into the topic and yes you are right, even with some margin
                      Quote: VIK1711
                      Starting from a point below the equator ....

                      And here is the problem, most likely below the equator (and indeed beyond our positional areas) we will not be released. hi
                    2. Boa kaa
                      Boa kaa 16 December 2020 12: 21
                      +2
                      Quote: VIK1711
                      Only the boat needs to cut a new area of ​​the database and tie the starting point ...

                      Cutting a new ROP is a task of the GS with many variables. bully
                      But why "tie" the start point (launch point) is not entirely clear ... request This need disappeared even on the D-9. The machine regularly issued firing data along the entire deployment route, and not only in the ROP. yes
  11. Crash
    Crash 16 December 2020 07: 53
    -4
    Terms of admission to the troops of the strategic complex "Sarmat"

    And when?
    will be put into service in 2021. However, those publications do not find their confirmation.

    So all the same?
    1. Tcheluskin
      Tcheluskin 16 December 2020 08: 45
      +1
      Previously, the first test launch (which has not yet happened, only "extended" throw tests) will definitely not be accepted. And after the 1st launch - maybe in a couple of years, like Yars; maybe like a Mace ...
      1. Crash
        Crash 16 December 2020 10: 31
        -3
        Then I don't understand the title of the article ... Maybe the minusers will explain?
    2. Piramidon
      Piramidon 16 December 2020 11: 31
      0
      Quote: Crasher
      Terms of admission to the troops of the strategic complex "Sarmat"

      And when?
      will be put into service in 2021. However, those publications do not find their confirmation.

      So all the same?

      Read carefully, otherwise you read through two paragraphs to the third, pulled quotes from the context, and then ask questions. It is clearly said that PUBLICATIONS wrote about 2021 (some kind of iksperd),
      earlier (e.g. in 2018) in some editions there were materials that the promising missile system of the Russian Armed Forces will be put into service in 2021. However, those publications do not find their confirmation.

      and the official named 2022
      The commander of the Strategic Missile Forces, General Sergei Karakaev, informs about the timing .... he said that the first Sarmat missile system would be received by one of the regiments of the Uzhur formation. This event is planned to take place in 2022.
  12. tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 16 December 2020 10: 08
    -1
    Sarmat will be a good son of the Voivode. I like what they call us. Voivode-Satan, Sarmat-they have not been named yet! I will tell you Sarmat-Scribe!
  13. Boa kaa
    Boa kaa 16 December 2020 12: 03
    +1
    Quote: voyaka uh
    Yars is more dangerous than Sarmat.

    Oh !? negative
    And what is more dangerous: a sword or a two-handed sword?
    Maybe it's time to look at the problem by the purpose of the weapon? The P-28 will carry up to 16 MiRV-type BBs. This is a draft, not a trotter. And the tasks of the R-28 are probably different and the breeding area of ​​the BB also cannot be compared with the R-26.
    So you need to look at the problem comprehensively, and not just at who is faster.
    And second... Sarmat would not be needed, ours would not sculpt it. Tea in the "Ingenious" headquarters is not sitting dumkopfs, but very advanced chelas in uniform. And they certainly do not eat their bread for nothing, as some think. yes
    But.
  14. Old26
    Old26 16 December 2020 16: 50
    +2
    Quote: Pessimist22
    Well, well, I did not know what hypersonic gliders are installed on the Sarmat.

    "Sarmat" is still very far from being put into service. And so yes. Only DO NOT STUD. and PLAN TO BET

    Quote: Ros 56
    Apparently they will soon put Sarmat in the army, since Satan is being demonstrated in our region in the park.

    In a couple of years for sure. As the commander-in-chief said - in 2022. Most likely, in December 2022, the launch minimum will be put on the OBD

    Quote: Connor MacLeod
    Need to faster, faster ...

    Listen, and Sineva will not be able to throw warheads across the South Pole?

    Maximum will cover South Africa. They won't even reach Antarctica

    Quote: tralflot1832
    Sarmat will be a good son of the Voivode. I like what they call us. Voivode-Satan, Sarmat-they have not been named yet! I will tell you Sarmat-Scribe!

    The West has already named it - SATAN-2. But it will definitely become clear only after it is put into service.
  15. Old26
    Old26 16 December 2020 18: 51
    +2
    Quote: bayard
    And by 2022 "Sarmat" is unlikely to be put into service.
    They just won't have time.
    For quite objective reasons.

    Maybe it will be accepted. As they say "under the herringbone". that is, the numbers December 25-28. In fact, in 2022, but in fact it may be in 2023. I gave you a plus for the post. Everything is correct. So far, everything is virtual - we will be "afraid" only in the opinion of our media. When the equipment appears in service, they will not be afraid either, but they will be afraid and put the PR of this weapon in the category of priority goals - yes, they will
  16. Old26
    Old26 16 December 2020 20: 41
    +5
    Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
    And what is more dangerous: a sword or a two-handed sword?

    The question is philosophical. The main thing for what. How is it there
    "Everyone chooses for himself
    Woman, religion, road
    The devil serves or the prophet
    Everyone chooses by themselves

    Everyone chooses by themselves
    Time for love or prayer
    A sword for a duel, a sword for a battle
    Everyone chooses for himself " laughing

    Quote: BoA KAA
    Maybe it's time to look at the problem by the purpose of the weapon? The P-28 will carry up to 16 MiRV-type BBs. This is a draft, not a trotter. And the tasks of the R-28 are probably different and the breeding area of ​​the BB also cannot be compared with the R-26.

    It is unlikely that we will go to the violation of the agreements that are in force. And according to them, the allowed number of APs on ICBMs is 10, on SLBMs - 14
    Therefore, hardly more than 10 ...
    1. bk0010
      bk0010 16 December 2020 22: 08
      0
      Quote: Old26
      It is unlikely that we will go to the violation of the agreements that are in force.
      "Izya fse" in February. the Americans do not want to prolong START.
  17. Old26
    Old26 16 December 2020 23: 19
    0
    Quote: bk0010
    Quote: Old26
    It is unlikely that we will go to the violation of the agreements that are in force.
    "Izya fse" in February. the Americans do not want to prolong START.

    We are not talking about the START-3 treaty, especially since the number of warheads was spelled out in the "ancient" SALT-2 treaty. It's just that this treaty has laid down a number of provisions and definitions that are being implemented despite the presence and absence of other treaties. This is the backbone of each country's missile program. And violation of it can cause unpredictable consequences, not all of which will benefit Russia.
    This is, so to speak, the political background of the issue. But there is, as it seems to me, a technical one.
    Do not forget that a missile like the Voevoda (R-36M2 / 15A18M) carries 10 warheads. Although purely technically it could carry 14. But the main thing is that the "Voevoda" has a two-story breeding stage. On the lower floor (on the lower frame) there are seats for 5 warheads and 2 seats for heavy decoys. Moreover, constructively fighting in place of false ones is impossible). The position is exactly the same on the upper frame. All this is covered by a rather large head fairing.
    But ... This is where the but begins. SRTs named after Makeyev, head of "Sarmat" has experience in placing and ten small-power warheads on a one-story frame. But the point is. that the blocks are "looking back", and the stage of dilution has a pulling scheme. This is the GRTs branded "mulka". Experience in creating and placing warheads at the stage of breeding in such a quantity that "look ahead" (the SRC has no pushing scheme, unfortunately). So all sorts of thoughts come into my head. And how did they solve this problem. And will they be able to place 10 blocks on such a CP not with a capacity of 200 kt, but with a capacity of at least 800 kt. Well, I think there is no question of placing as many as 16 blocks. As well as placing on the "Sarmat" as many as 10 "Vanguards" (with its overall characteristics laughing)