St. Andrew's flag was raised at the large landing craft "Petr Morgunov"

Project 11711 large landing ship (BDK) "Pyotr Morgunov" became part of the Naval fleet... The solemn ceremony of raising the Andreevsky flag took place in Baltiysk. This is reported by the Ministry of Defense.

The ceremony was attended by representatives of the command of the Russian Navy, the Baltic Fleet and the Baltic shipyard "Yantar". The first serial project 11711 large landing craft was handed over to the Navy and will go to serve in the Northern Fleet, where the lead ship of the series, the Ivan Gren large landing craft, is already in service.

The completion of the state tests of the BDK was announced in early November 2020. The ship returned to the shipyard, where it passed a control check and training before being transferred to the fleet.

BDK "Peter Morgunov" is the second ship of the project 11711 and the first serial after the lead BDK "Ivan Gren". Laid down in June 2015 and launched on May 25, 2018. The construction of the ship was carried out with delays, since it was necessary to correct the mistakes made in the design of the lead ship.

BDK 11711 is able to accommodate 13 tanks or more than 30 armored personnel carriers and infantry fighting vehicles. The ship also provides for the deployment of a reinforced battalion of the Marine Corps, as well as the temporary basing of various types of ship helicopters. The ship has a cruising range of 4 thousand nautical miles, which allows you to perform tasks in the far sea zone.

At present, shipyard Yantar is building two Project 11711 ships - Vladimir Andreev and Vasily Trushin. Both BDKs are being built according to a modified project and will become part of the Pacific Fleet.

Comments

[Pamir]

Seven feet under the keel, years of trouble-free service.

[Victor_B]

Quote: Pamir

Seven feet under the keel, years of trouble-free service.

I fully support!
This ship replaces the Project 1171 Tapir large landing craft, which will soon fall apart from old age, was designed in the same hull with ramp loading / unloading of troops.
Airborne capacity, either a tank company, or a battalion of marines or motorized riflemen with all the whores and blackjacks.
Disembarkation - either directly on the shore, or "floating".
From here (unlike the Mistrals), it is necessary to go directly into the fire zone of anti-amphibious means ...
With all the possible consequences ...

[Alex777]

designed in the same building

Well, if the difference in VI is considered one and a half times the same body, then yes.

[New Year day]

Quote: Victor_B

designed in the same building with ramp loading / unloading of troops.
Airborne capacity, either a tank company or a battalion of marines

If memory serves, then on Tapirs, the landing twindeck accommodated 300 fighters and 6 tanks. True, the conditions are bad - no ventilation, hot and stuffy in summer, cold in winter.
So there will be more building on Morgunov.

[Trevis]

Good news!)

[seregin-s1]

Hurray comrades, hurray!

[Borz]

The birth of a ship is like the birth of a man, a significant and joyful event! Long years of service to the glory of the Andreevsky flag!

[Dart2027]

Third good news for today.

[Observer2014]

BDK 11711 is able to accommodate 13 tanks or more than 30 armored personnel carriers and infantry fighting vehicles. Also, the ship provides for the deployment of a reinforced Marine Corps battalion, as well as the temporary basing of various types of shipborne helicopters. The ship has a cruising range of 4 thousand nautical miles, which allows it to perform tasks in the far sea zone.

This is. Where? If not a secret. In what distant sea zone will this BDK bring war? 13 tanks or 31 armored personnel carriers? And if it carries the war to the enemy shores, then under the cover of what? We need at least twenty frigates more than once, plus a dozen destroyers. And at once in a maximum of five years. What's the point of this BDK? Land on an uninhabited island? For a beautiful picture? Or this BDK can redraw the balance of power in the Baltic? Or transport cargo to Syria, for example. Well, you can use it as a military dry cargo ship. However, with a smaller tonnage.

[Pytnik]

Svarog in the "vest" cry or buffoon

[Observer2014]

Quote: Pytnik

Svarog in the "vest" cry or buffoon

Show off to yourself one "New" powerful "BDK. Well, such a stronghold in the Baltic will redraw all the strategic plans of the adversaries.

[Kaetani]

Is it so hard to rejoice at the good news. Guano around and so enough. Both real and imagined. So why also shit on flowers

[Observer2014]

Quote: Kaetani

Is it so hard to rejoice at the good news. Guano around and so enough. Both real and imagined. So why also shit on flowers

You can't figure it out on purpose. Well, would it make it easier for you to make such a comment ?: Seven feet under the keel. Long years of trouble-free service !?

[Dart2027]

Quote: Kaetani

Is it so hard to rejoice at the good news.

So it is not good for everyone.

[Pamir]

Yes, but it seems like, "The first serial BDK of project 11711 was transferred to the Navy and will go to serve in the Northern Fleet, where the lead ship of the series, BDK Ivan Gren, is already in service." The third and fourth will go to the Pacific Fleet in the future. across the oceans, we have a lot of our own islands and peninsulas, which can be coveted. There are enough well-wishers. Any ships of this displacement, but on their own closed shipyard, without someone's direction, this is a huge plus. And the Marines also need their ships.

[Observer2014]

Quote: Pamir

Yes, but it seems like, "The first serial BDK of project 11711 was transferred to the Navy and will go to serve in the Northern Fleet, where the lead ship of the series, BDK Ivan Gren, is already in service." The third and fourth will go to the Pacific Fleet in the future. across the oceans, we have a lot of our own islands and peninsulas, which can be coveted. There are enough well-wishers. Any ships of this displacement, but on their own closed shipyard, without someone's direction, this is a huge plus. And the Marines also need their ships.

Now, if you follow the news, then the Marines are precisely for not having their primordially traditional means of delivery. In the proper and quality quantity. It has been ordered to call it Expeditionary Forces.

[Pamir]

Who commanded? Why should we be like NATO standards? What are we monkeys or what? We have never had such goals as there. We would have to close our own, and not seek adventure, where we still give way.

[Observer2014]

Quote: Pamir

Who commanded? Why should we be like NATO standards? What are we monkeys or what? We have never had such goals as there. We would have to close our own, and not seek adventure, where we still give way.

Yes, read it, please. Did I come up with it.

Russian marines are being reformed into expeditionary forces of Russia
October 19 2019

Military Review.

[Pamir]

Yes, I have nothing against you, I didn’t minus by the way, but it doesn’t matter what you call them. The main thing in essence. We have many territories where you don’t even have to go far, but you may need to transfer them.

[g1v2]

The Marines were ordered to be called that not because of a lack of delivery vehicles, but because of a change in the concept of their use. THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT THEY WILL NOW AND WILL DO FIRST - to keep track of the database in forwarding companies and local conflicts.
The fact that out of 21 bdk at the moment only 2 are new, 15 are old Polish, and 4 are ancient Soviet, this is not disputed by anyone. But they still fulfill their tasks. The service life of the Poles is extended by about another 10 years. The old Soviet ones are gradually replaced by 11711. Until the UDKs laid down in the Crimea go into operation, and this will be in 8-9 years, nothing will change. And from wringing hands with howls, this will not change either.
In general, the Marines are also waiting for an update of armored vehicles. In 10-15 years there will be a normal force for colonial and other local conflicts at a distance from their shores.

[Victor_B]

Quote: Pamir

The third and fourth will go to the Pacific Fleet in the future

A battalion of marines with a dowry of a company of tanks ... No transport! At all!
Aha! We will throw blue berets on Grozny with a regiment of the Airborne Forces!

[cmax]

Quote: Victor_B

Quote: Pamir

The third and fourth will go to the Pacific Fleet in the future

A battalion of marines with a dowry of a company of tanks ... No transport! At all!
Aha! We will throw blue berets on Grozny with a regiment of the Airborne Forces!

What did you want to say?

[Alex777]

Well, such a stronghold in the Baltic

I understand. You are a writer, not a reader.
If you had read the article, you would have known that he was leaving for the Federation Council.

[Observer2014]

Quote: Alex777

Well, such a stronghold in the Baltic

I understand. You are a writer, not a reader.
If you had read the article, you would have known that he was leaving for the Federation Council.

But what's the difference. Otherwise, the power of the surface fleet is concentrated there? And not to be confused with the submarine fleet of Russia. This is a completely different story and purpose, which we perfectly understand. And in this interval of the country's economic problems, we perfectly understand its purpose. And the algorithm of application.

[cmax]

Quote: Observer2014

Quote: Alex777

Well, such a stronghold in the Baltic

I understand. You are a writer, not a reader.
If you had read the article, you would have known that he was leaving for the Federation Council.

But what's the difference. Otherwise, the power of the surface fleet is concentrated there? And not to be confused with the submarine fleet of Russia. This is a completely different story and purpose, which we perfectly understand. And in this interval of the country's economic problems, we perfectly understand its purpose. And the algorithm of application.

Okay, you squeal, they wrote correctly above that good news in the surrounding darkness (all kinds of covids, newcomers, NATO are different, and the economy)

[seregin-s1]

In the Northern Fleet.

[Victor_B]

Quote: Observer2014

13 tanks or 31 armored personnel carriers

On 4 "Gren" -a (and this is all that will be), you can immediately load an even tank company plus almost a regiment of motorized riflemen / marines (all equipment will not fit anyway) only with combat vehicles.
Strengths! For ooooooochen limited MDO only. Highly. Fear!
Well, for the day of the Navy, you can do it beautifully!
But there is a need for such ships anyway ...
How can we do without them?
Some muscle. You can also demonstrate.

[Victor_B]

Quote: Victor_B

plus almost a regiment of motorized riflemen / marines

Olepyatka!
Of course, the entire battalion of marines.
For comparison, a tank regiment was placed on "Rogov".

[Observer2014]

Victor_B (Victor Petrovich)

Some muscle. You can also demonstrate.

You can do it in the movies and make a lot of patriotic programs. Anyway, I need a ship for the Marines. Yes, it is needed. Nobody argues. Yes, and did not argue. Here we are talking about something else. Will we continue to give birth to ships in such agony? How are these uncommon BDKs? And for whom the BDK. And for whom is joke. I don't want to upload videos of the American BDK. It will be very contrasting.

[Victor_B]

Quote: Observer2014

I don't want to upload videos of the American BDK. It will be very contrasting.

And there are a couple of dozen of them.

[Grits]

Quote: Victor_B

And there are a couple of dozen of them.

It is completely inappropriate to compare our fleet with mattress mats. It's like chicken versus turkey. Therefore, for contrast, it is better to compare with other fleets - Chinese, Japanese, Indians, all sorts of Europeans. It won't hurt that much.

[A_Lex]

Or to carry goods to Syria, for example.

Yes something like that. To Syria and other similar points. However, if we consider that 2 ships were built and tested in aggregate for 15 years, and the first was repeatedly rebuilt, and the second two is now being built according to a newly modified project, the command at least for a long time did not have a clear understanding of exactly how it was going to use these ships.

[Victor_B]

Quote: A_Lex

Yes something like that.

Well, it's like carrying coal instead of KAMAZ on the BTR-80.
So what?
But on the road it will pass.
Although off-road "specially trained" KAMAZs do not seem to drive better.

[tralflot1832]

In the north, the key points of Spitsbergen, about Bear, about Jan Mayen and Cape North Cape. All the exit through the Danish Strait is open to us. But the Americans know about this, they probably have a plan B. For this, the brigade on the Northern Fleet probably exists. Well, it can still to destroy a couple of tunnels and bridges in Norway, so that life does not seem like honey to norgs. There are people in the general headquarters who know this issue thoroughly. So far, there is enough strength for the deviation of the global headquarters.

[Observer2014]

Quote: A_Lex

Or to carry goods to Syria, for example.

Yes something like that. To Syria and other similar points. However, if we consider that 2 ships were built and tested in aggregate for 15 years, and the first was repeatedly rebuilt, and the second two is now being built according to a newly modified project, the command at least for a long time did not have a clear understanding of exactly how it was going to use these ships.

So maybe instead of not clear what and don't really understand for what purpose it is really a series of twenty units to start building. To establish mass production? Or is it not for us? It is not profitable for us? And it is not necessary? We have our own way of cutting the dough? My opinion is unchanged. Twenty corvettes in five years, plus a dozen destroyers. But that is takoe.We have other tsennosti.I all that ..... I am an opponent of Putin.And how's the "he-he" here issued. "The enemy of the Russian" and "goodbye men" went to a new nickname to change right there. in recent years. Probably so easy. Nick change

[A_Lex]

So maybe instead of not clear what and do not really understand for what purpose it is really a series of twenty units to start building. To establish mass production?

The goals are likely the same as before. 1171 was built in a wide series, including for the supply of the allies. Now there are no ideological allies, but there are private interests in Latin America, Africa and the Middle East, where private military companies are also active. The fleet serves these interests.

Twenty corvettes in five years, plus a dozen destroyers.

In any case, twenty corvettes in 5 years will not work, because 20380 are built for at least 5 years, and they are built by only 2 shipyards with a limited number of slipways. To increase the number of ships, you need to use more shipyards. Nowadays, we won't be able to talk seriously about destroyers. The construction and testing of the head will take at least 10 years.

The immediate real prospect is 20380 as a submarine, 22350 in the role of both an oceanic strike and a BOD, as well as 22800 as a basic element of the mosquito part of the fleet, 12700 as a near minesweeper and 636.3 as an outdated diesel-electric submarine without VNEU, but it can be built relatively quickly. All this has already been worked out and went into series. As in potential, and 885M, subject to the schedule for the commissioning of new boats. It makes no sense to think about everything else in the near future, given how the industry is mastering the production of new projects with difficulty and gnashing.

[Ratmir_Ryazan]

What kind of delusion ?!

The BDK does not have to be used for war, for storming the coast, more often it will be used to supply or transfer forces by sea. As with the same Syria.

He can transport a tank company or a battalion of marines at a time, and there are many such flights.

To supply the same group in Syria, we did not have enough BDK, we had to charter everything we could to provide our group and our ally, Syria, with everything they needed.

Now we have one more large landing craft, and more similar ships are being built according to an improved design.

[Victor_B]

Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan

The BDK does not have to be used for war, for storming the coast, more often it will be used to supply or transfer forces by sea.

We (the USSR) had Ro -ers, now they are in the service of the American Navy.
[media = https: //topwar.ru/18367-sovetskiy-korabl-v-sostave-sil-bystrogo-reagirovaniya-vms-ssha.html]

After the collapse of the Soviet Union, all four Rocker went to Ukraine and were privatized. Not knowing how to dispose of honestly acquired property, their owners sold four huge handsome companies to Global Container Lines and Marianna Shipbuilding Ltd. In 2001-2002, three of them ended up in a scrap yard in India. The remaining "Vladimir Vaslyaev" joined the ranks of the US Navy.

Two or three of these Ro-Ro -ers would completely replace the large landing craft for logistics with Syria.
And cheaper at times!

For comparison: large landing ships of the 775 Ave. (Caesar Kunikov) have a displacement of 4000 tons, the maximum travel of 18 knots, cruising range is 6000 miles per 12 knots. (for the "Captain Smirnov" rocking club, 16 000 miles on 20 knots). Of course, it is incorrect to directly compare the ocean gas jet ship with a tank landing ship - they have completely different designs and tasks. But, I hope, readers have understood my point - a high-speed roller could deliver 20 thousand tons of cargo to anywhere in the world.

[Serg65]

Quote: Victor_B

We (USSR) had rollerskers

And what did you do with them in the USSR?

[tralflot1832]

They stood on the lines of the USA, Japan, Europe, they made money for the USSR!

[Kart]

So how?
Helped?

[tralflot1832]

Ask the crews, probably it helped them a lot! In their youth, they earned themselves for a further comfortable life!

[Serg65]

Quote: tralflot1832

In their youth, they earned themselves for a further comfortable life!

Figo with oil on the collar, they earned it!

[tralflot1832]

I earned 15000 rubles a year in fishermen, chukhariks separately. The question is how they will use this money!

[Serg65]

Quote: tralflot1832

I earned 15000 rubles a year in fishermen

My friend, do not confuse fishermen and unprofitable rollers! All profits were eaten away by high fuel consumption and the Atlantic International Enterprise was a headache, so right after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the residents of Odessa got rid of them first of all!

[tralflot1832]

Yes, there was the topic of the sale of the fleet on metal. The privatization of the fleet for 4 million dollars with the cost of funds 500 million dollars! I don’t want to have fun!

[tralflot1832]

It helped me! I live in Sochi after moving from sunny Murmansk. I fondly remember about Murmansk I lived there for 40 years!

[Serg65]

Quote: tralflot1832

They stood on the lines USA Japan Europe

And who of them is in the USA, who is to Japan and who is to Europe?

Quote: tralflot1832

denyuzhku for the USSR made money!

Did you earn a lot?

[New Year day]

Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan

more often it will be used to supply or transfer forces by sea. As with the same Syria.

It was this experience that showed that this should not be done. The motor resource has been worked out, there is no economy. The transportation of goods was carried out by BTA and dry-cargo vessels. BDK decided to keep

[New Year day]

Quote: Observer2014

Or to carry goods to Syria, for example. Well, you can use it as a military dry cargo ship. However, with a smaller tonnage.

This practice has proven to be harmful. After trips to Syria, the service life of diesel engines is exhausted

[New Year day]

Quote: Observer2014

And if it carries the war to the enemy shores, then under the cover of what?

I don’t know how it is now, but in my years, the BDK was considered a disposable ship during the war - it was assumed that when the landing was made, the ship received
damage precluding its further service. The ship's crew went ashore and joined the landing.

[tol]

Yes, for long-distance transportation (also Syria), the 1609 or 1690 project would be revived, but again they were built in Nikolaev

[Dart2027]

Quote: Observer2014

This is. Where? If not a secret. In what distant sea zone will this BDK bring war?

Depends on the political situation.

[tralflot1832]

Good news. Now let the Marines learn. There is something for modern landings. Seven feet under the keel.

[Xnumx vis]

New large landing ships are needed on the Black Sea! Old large landing craft "Saratov", "Orsk", "Nikolay Filchenkov" ("Alligator" according to NATO classification) are plowing the sea with their last strength.

[tralflot1832]

And when that personified the power of the USSR. I witnessed the exercises when at first they landed on the platform from the SVP and then from them one without reaching the shore unloaded the other one ashore, there are no sandy beaches on Kildin. I can imagine how they will howl if our exercises are held in the west of the Peninsula. Rybachiy. The concept has changed in the area before the landing, there should be only the corpses of the enemy. Now everything is going uphill, the firepower is increasing. But we need to train. Something the Norgs talked about, but I remember they were chasing us on rusty "laibs" (fishermen). And then suddenly Did you tell us what to do?

[Laksamana besar]

Oh how. Congratulations!

[VLADIMIR VLADIVOSTOK]

And what for is he on the Northern Fleet? Are we landing in Norway or are we going to storm England? Complete nonsense! The Pacific Fleet is more needed! There are no roads to Kamchatka! And in the case of an attack on the Kuril Islands, how? This is a strategic betrayal of the Motherland! And Atomic times there in the North is not the way! NATO straits and the North Sea will block and that's it! In WWII, the blockade of the Baltic Fleet taught nothing! And in Kamchatka, for example, access to the open ocean! And help with the deployment of SSBNs!

[tralflot1832]

In the Northern Fleet it is necessary to knock out the eyes of Nato Spitsbergen, northern Norway, about Bear and about Jan Mayen.

[Alexey-74]

Good luck on the sea and ocean.

[Tests]

Ratmir_Ryazan: "To supply the same grouping in Syria, we didn’t have enough BDK, we had to charter everything we could to provide our group and our ally, Syria with everything they needed." .... Dear, Ratmir _Ryazan: "What kind of delusion? ! "
Our brilliant naval commanders for a small sum of money, it seems, crawled on their knees, face downward, to ask the great sea power of Mongolia for help. As a result, at the glorious Black Sea Fleet of the Russian Federation, thanks to Syria, there is a vessel "Kazan-60", built in Austria in 1987. , type М-050С (Austria) type. "Georgy Agafonov". The sworn friends of Turkey in 2015. bought ships for the glorious Black Sea Fleet of the Russian Federation: "Dvinitsa-50", born in 1985, "Vologda-50" of the same year of birth, flying the flag of the Cook Islands. Even the great sailors of the Republic of Vanuatu, the Black Sea Fleet of the Russian Federation in 2015. bought in 1996 a ship of the Tong Xing project, made by crazy hands of Chinese partners, the owners were the descendants of the glorious knights of Malta, our naval commanders called the ship "Kyzyl-60" ... And you are respected about the freight ... Our admirals sawed the loot for years at the beginning ships and ships on pins and needles. And how Syria happened unexpectedly not fortuitously - our glorious admirals sawed the loot on the procurement of ships around the world.

[VLADIMIR VLADIVOSTOK]

What nafig defenses of the Motherland! They will carry military equipment for sale across the cordon! There is nowhere to go in the Far East! Vietnam? China! The equipment must be delivered half the world through Russia to the Pacific Ocean! And so for gentlemen businessmen Algeria is closer! Also to master a new base on the Red Sea! Money and more money! And the Motherland will wait! It is a crime to keep such ships in the west of the country! Do you see the old ships on the west and south! Carry gold without inspection!

[22 dmdc]

Quote: Observer2014

I don't want to upload videos of the American BDK.

mattress toppers have no BDK for a long time.

[Angry]

Hmm ... stupid BDK .... and what we wanted, 3 or 4 times the project was changed and rebuilt accordingly. There is no artillery at all to support the landing ... Also with helicopters on board, and this is several tens of tons of aviation fuel ... and we put it at close range! Under enemy fire! One surviving tank is enough to turn it into a blazing fire. You will not envy the landing at such a "mass grave of the landing." Of course, he is not a BDK, but a peacetime military transport for landing equipment on an unfit coast. So it should be considered as a "military transport". And to build other landing ships, conventionally "assault", lightly armored, with enhanced artillery weapons and long-range ATGMs, at least in pieces. per year, to replace the project 775.