The modernized frigate "Marshal Shaposhnikov" began testing weapons systems

December 15 2020 48

The former Project 1155 large anti-submarine ship (BOD), after modernization, retrained as frigates "Marshal Shaposhnikov", began the stage of checking weapons systems. This was reported by the press service of "Dalzavod".

According to the report, the frigate went to sea ranges in the Sea of Japan to test missile and artillery weapons systems. During the tests, the ship will conduct rocket firing at a ground target and firing anti-aircraft systems during the development of air defense missions. In addition, tests of electronic warfare systems and communications equipment will be carried out.

The frigate will work out throw tests from missile systems in order to test the strength of the reinforcement of launchers and ensure storage safety weapons aboard

- said in a statement.

Earlier, the Ministry of Defense reported that the frigate of the Pacific Fleet Marshal Shaposhnikov will conduct the final stage of factory sea trials on December 16-17.

(...) at the training grounds, the crew and the commissioning team will check the components and mechanisms of the ship, test weapon systems, including the launchers of the Kalibr-NK missile system, the Uran anti-ship systems and the A-190 and AK artillery mounts -630

- stated in the military.

As previously reported in the press service of the Pacific Fleet, the frigate will return to fleet before the end of this year.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Thrifty

+8

15 December 2020 12: 20

Here, instead of decommissioning, you can also upgrade combat-ready ships until a replacement is built for them!
1. Temples
  
  +4
  
  15 December 2020 12: 22
  
  It is often cheaper and faster to build a new one than to upgrade an old one.
  1. Tiksi-3
    
    +6
    
    15 December 2020 12: 27
    
    It is a pity that there is an ambush with air defense ... very weak, but it turned out quite at the level ...
    1. maxim k.
      
      -3
      
      15 December 2020 13: 07
      
      And if the air defense was also modernized?
      1. alexmach
        
        +4
        
        15 December 2020 14: 06
        
        So they did not modernize.
  2. tihonmarine
    
    +4
    
    15 December 2020 12: 36
    
    Quote: Temples
    It is often cheaper and faster to build a new one than to upgrade an old one.
    
    But these, or others like him, are not yet being built. And "Shaposhnikov" will do Russia a good service for now.
  3. Thrifty
    
    +8
    
    15 December 2020 12: 39
    
    Temples - and here are the Chinese, our destroyers of Project 956, in my opinion, that they have in their fleet, they just modernized it properly, and do not soar, because the ships were initially good, with modernization potential. And we have almost all of these destroyers put on pins and needles. In the fleets, how many of them do we have 2 or 3 units ??? That is the case when a good friend of the best, when it was necessary to upgrade the ship in the ocean zone. ...
    1. donavi49
      
      +9
      
      15 December 2020 13: 00
      
      In fact, this is extremely controversial, rather the additional loading of enterprises. They have an epic pace of national shipbuilding there. Vaughn 2 destroyer 055 has already run off the state and until NG (Chinese) will be accepted.
      
      The first pair of 956s is being upgraded. The GK is changing - for Chinese supersonic missiles, air defense by replacing the beam complex with 2 Shtil-1 TLUs, as well as adding their national short-range air defense system (a la RIM-116), as well as replacing bulky 533mm torpedoes with their MK46 clones.
      
      The second one is already being refined at the plant.
      
      But they are baked in this way not only for 956. Their destroyers of the 90-00s, which competed in efficiency with Iranian destroyers, are also refitted into a completely sane second rank with air defense and anti-ship missiles.
  4. faiver
    
    +2
    
    15 December 2020 12: 39
    
    It is often cheaper and faster to build a new one than to upgrade an old one.
    - as for me, it's all a star, an excuse for killing the fleet ...
Igor Borisov_2

-4

15 December 2020 12: 28

Quote: Temples
It is often cheaper and faster to build a new one than to upgrade an old one.

I fully support - skr "Fearless" has been undergoing repair / modernization since 2014, that is, more than 6 years. And it was built in 4 years ...
1. faiver
  
  +14
  
  15 December 2020 12: 48
  
  It was built in the USSR, and is being modernized in Russia, which is called feel the difference
  1. Uncle lee
    
    +5
    
    15 December 2020 12: 56
    
    Quote: faiver
    Feel the difference
    
    I worked in VP ERA at the Kholmsk Shipyard, every month they released a "capitalist"! Apart from the routine ...
  2. frog
    
    +1
    
    15 December 2020 21: 20
    
    And they would ask how the modernization of those already built in the Union was ...
novel66

-9

15 December 2020 12: 38

the modernized armored personnel carrier was retrained in the BMP ...
Ros 56

+4

15 December 2020 12: 39

The good news has been that every week a new or upgraded ship is being tested. And yesterday the beautiful Angara -5 went, already lovely sight. Slowly and recover from the 90s.
1. sustav75
  
  +1
  
  15 December 2020 16: 33
  
  Thirty years after the collapse of the Soviet Union! And you are all slowly recovering! It seems like they have already been lifted from their knees ?! How our government loves those who are slowly suffering! After the Great Patriotic War, where the whole country was in ruins, they were reborn in five years! Until we strangle Putin's friends, such as Chubais, Sechin, Miller, Gref and others, we will forever be on our knees, or even lower!
  1. vitvit123
    
    +1
    
    15 December 2020 19: 02
    
    The phrase 30 years after the collapse of the union .., indicated in response to the recovery after the 90s, is not correct. After the collapse of the union, we did not recover for at least 10 years, but collapsed at an accelerated pace. Therefore, we are not recovering for 30 years, but as a maximum of 20 years.
2. 2 Level Advisor
  
  +1
  
  15 December 2020 16: 46
  
  to the "Christmas tree" every year there is news with a + sign, the whole year would be like this ..
Berber

-4

15 December 2020 12: 41

Where are our "in Russia, truncated badly"? Where are the "all-fenders"?
1. bondrostov
  
  -1
  
  15 December 2020 12: 57
  
  I would like to ask you your comrades, but how is Admiral Nakhimov how many more modern. Will it last ???
  1. Berber
    
    -3
    
    15 December 2020 13: 00
    
    Come on! And where is the sequel, about the devastation and we will soon end?
    1. bondrostov
      
      -1
      
      15 December 2020 14: 28
      
      The end is not the end, with regards to Nakhimov, there is nothing to say ... they put it in the dock at 14m, but things are still there.
      1. sustav75
        
        -1
        
        15 December 2020 16: 36
        
        The docks are quiet! But in the offices there you can hear sawing! And obviously not firewood :)))
      2. frog
        
        0
        
        15 December 2020 21: 21
        
        Anything better than Kuzya. They also put it in the dock ... first ...
2. Aerodrome
  
  +3
  
  15 December 2020 13: 02
  
  Quote: BerBer
  Where are our "in Russia, truncated badly"? Where are the "all-fenders"?
  
  rejoice at such a "modernization" can only be a madman, no GAS, no air defense missile defense ... nothing normal, only "calibers", not a ship, but a "launcher".
  1. Grits
    
    0
    
    16 December 2020 09: 42
    
    Quote: Aerodrome
    rejoice at such a "modernization" can only be a madman, no GAS, no air defense missile defense ... nothing normal, only "calibers", not a ship, but a "launcher".
    
    Such a "launcher" would look good on the "Akula" SSBN. All the same, idle costs 3 pieces. And there is no need for missile defense or air defense.
Charik

0

15 December 2020 12: 41

I see Uranus PU, and where is his sub-caliber and how many are there?
1. faiver
  
  +1
  
  15 December 2020 12: 52
  
  UKSK caliber stands instead of the second tower
  1. Charik
    
    0
    
    15 December 2020 12: 53
    
    That is, for the remaining one AU, how many pu pieces are 8
    1. faiver
      
      +2
      
      15 December 2020 12: 58
      
      no, two blocks of eight
Pavel57

+2

15 December 2020 12: 55

Quote: Temples
It is often cheaper and faster to build a new one than to upgrade an old one.

Our modernization is expensive, 60% of the construction of a new ship.
BUT, when there are problems with a new gas turbine, there is free capacity and the ship will serve for another 15 years, then such a repair is justified.
1. faiver
  
  -4
  
  15 December 2020 13: 02
  
  Everything is expensive here, because everywhere accountants are at the helm - effective managers ...
  1. d4rkmesa
    
    0
    
    15 December 2020 19: 44
    
    Well xs, read about the same Amur plant ... You can't write off everything to accountants.
Pavel57

+4

15 December 2020 13: 18

Quote: faiver
Everything is expensive here, because everywhere accountants are at the helm - effective managers ...

The USSR did not like modernization. Troublesome and little honor. Therefore, relatively few ships were actually modernized. Although there were interesting and necessary projects.
1. Bersaglieri
  
  0
  
  15 December 2020 14: 18
  
  hmm? Didn't love? And what about the destroyers, IPCs and TFRs, which have been modernized, keeping in the fleet even the junk of the 50s? That in the USSR, that in the USA, they loved modernization very much at that time.
Yuriy71

-1

15 December 2020 13: 26

Yes, it was possible not to write off "half of the fleet" unique units, but to gradually upgrade! But, on the other hand, in our conditions, modernization can be much more expensive than building a new one! And on the third hand, we have new products of worse quality than before !!!
iouris

0

15 December 2020 13: 27

Is a frigate more than a destroyer?
1. faiver
  
  0
  
  15 December 2020 13: 35
  
  Is a frigate more than a destroyer?
  - no, less ...
  1. iouris
    
    0
    
    15 December 2020 13: 43
    
    Is Abramovich's yacht bigger than a destroyer?
    1. faiver
      
      +4
      
      15 December 2020 13: 56
      
      Moreover, it is larger than our Moskva-class missile cruisers ...
      1. iouris
        
        -2
        
        15 December 2020 16: 15
        
        Then it is clear: there was simply not enough for a destroyer ...
        I wonder if the weapons on Abramovich's yacht are more powerful than on this corvette?
    2. Bersaglieri
      
      0
      
      16 December 2020 13: 34
      
      Usmanov has even more :)
2. Bersaglieri
  
  +1
  
  15 December 2020 14: 20
  
  These are zhurnalamery :) Simply in NATO "jargon" BOD pr1155 is Fregat https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Udaloy-class_destroyer
  1. d4rkmesa
    
    +1
    
    15 December 2020 19: 46
    
    "Frigate" - just in the native, intimate. But "Udaloy" is NATO-style.
Cool but not Igor

-2

15 December 2020 13: 35

And the air defense will also be working on old P-15 type termites, like on the Thundering corvette? Strong air defense however ...
Tests

+2

15 December 2020 20: 37

bondrostov (Andrey), dear, WHO and now in Switzerland in the glorious city of Geneva. And TARKR "Admiral Nakhimov" at the outfitting embankment of SEVMASH in the city of Severodvinsk, Arkhangelsk region of the Russian Federation. The ship was taken out of the filling pool on 18.08.2020/2022/XNUMX. The USC planned to send the cruiser to the seas in XNUMX.
Connor MacLeod

0

16 December 2020 08: 12

What's the point in modernizing all this old stuff? It is better to spend this money in order to lay new 22350, load Amber and the Baltic plant ...
Pavel57

0

16 December 2020 13: 01

Quote: Bersaglieri
hmm? Didn't love? And what about the destroyers, IPCs and TFRs, which have been modernized, keeping even the junk of the 50s in the fleet?

Yes, the history of modernization of ships in the Soviet Navy is interesting in its own way.
You can see it on the example of destroyers 56 and 57.
Project 56 is a mass destroyer, quickly outdated in its original version. But only half of the released ships were modernized. Not all ships were fully armed due to funding restrictions. And what is most important - the limitation of the ship's capabilities for modernization was determined by the lack of reserves in displacement, this made it necessary to dismantle almost all outdated weapons and significantly rebuild the ship, and as you know, such work requires large material costs and time.
Project 57 is the first missile ship, due to the rapid obsolescence of the missile system, it was forced to modify the Republic of Kazakhstan in the BOD, which was in the 70s. It turned out long and expensive.

In general, handing over ships that are not fully equipped with weapons is not a rare practice in the navy. There are enough examples.
At the same time, they forget about the shortage.